See https://w3id.org/ro/crate for further details about RO-Crate.
This specification is Copyright 2017-2020 University of Technology Sydney, The University of Manchester UK and the RO-Crate contributors.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the “License”); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an “AS IS” BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.
Note: The RO-Crate JSON-LD context and JSON-LD examples within this specification are distributed under CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication.
The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
This document specifies a method, known as RO-Crate (Research Object Crate), of aggregating and describing research data with associated metadata. RO-Crates can aggregate and describe any resource including files, URI-addressable resources, or use other addressing schemes to locate digital or physical data. RO-Crates can describe data in aggregate and at the individual resource level, with metadata to aid in discovery, re-use and long term management of data. Metadata includes the ability to describe the context of data and the entities involved in its production, use and reuse. For example: who created it, using which equipment, software and workflows, under what licenses can it be re-used, where was it collected, and/or where is it about.
RO-Crate uses JSON-LD to express this metadata using linked data, describing data resources as well as contextual entities such as people, organizations, software and equipment as a series of linked JSON-LD objects - using common published vocabularies, chiefly schema.org.
The core of RO-Crate is a JSON-LD file, the RO-Crate Metadata File, named ro-crate-metadata.json
. This file contains structured metadata about the dataset as a whole (the Root Data Entity) and, optionally, about some or all of its files. This provides a simple way to, for example, assert the authors (e.g. people, organizations) of the RO-Crate or one its files, or to capture more complex provenance for files, such as how they were created using software and equipment.
While providing the formal specification for RO-Crate, this document also aims to be a practical guide for software authors to create tools for generating and consuming research data packages, with explanation by examples.
RO-Crate: A directory structure that contains a dataset, which is described in an RO-Crate Metadata File.
RO-Crate Root: The top-level directory of the RO-Crate, indicated by the presence of the RO-Crate Metadata File ro-crate-metadata.json
(or ro-crate-metadata.jsonld
for crates that comply with versions before v1.1 of this specification)
RO-Crate Metadata File: A JSON-LD file stored as ro-crate-metadata.json
in the RO-Crate Root. The metadata file describes the RO-Crate with structured data in form of RO-Crate JSON-LD. (In version 1.0 this file was named ro-crate-metadata.jsonld
but has been renamed to improve the usability of crates.)
RO-Crate Website: Human-readable HTML pages which describe the RO-Crate (i.e. the Root Data Entity, its Data Entities and Context Entities), with a home-page at ro-crate-preview.html
(any additional files reside in ro-crate-preview_files/
)
Entity: An identified object, which have a given type and may be described using a set of properties.
Type: A classification of objects or their descriptions. The type (or class) is identified by a URI, mapped to a key by JSON-LD.
Property: A relationship from one entity to another entity, or to a value. The type of relationship is identified by a URI, mapped to a key by JSON-LD.
Data Entity: A JSON-LD representation, in the RO-Crate Metadata File, of a directory, file or other resource contained or described by the RO-Crate.
Root Data Entity: A Data Entity of type Dataset, representing the RO-Crate as a whole.
RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor: A Contextual Entity of type CreativeWork, which describes the RO-Crate Metadata File and links it to the Root Data Entity.
JSON-LD: A JSON-based file format for storing Linked Data. This document assumes JSON-LD 1.0. JSON-LD use a context to map from JSON keys to URIs.
JSON: The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format as defined by RFC 7159; a structured text file format that can be programmatically consumed and generated in a wide range of programming languages. The main JSON structures are objects ({}
) indexed by keys, sequential arrays ([]
) and literal values (""
).
Contextual Entity: A JSON-LD representation of an entity associated with a Data Entity, needed to adequately describe that Data Entity. For example, a Person, Organization (including research projects), item of equipment (IndividualProduct), license or any other thing or event that forms part of the metadata for a Data Entity or supporting information.
Linked Data: A data structure where properties, types and resources are identified with URIs, which if retrieved over the Web, further describe or provide the identified property/type/resource.
URI: A Uniform Resource Identifier as defined in RFC 3986, for example http://example.com/path/file.html
- commonly known as URL. In this document the term URI includes IRI, which also permit international Unicode characters.
URI Path: The relative path element of an URI as defined in RFC3986 section 3.3, e.g. path/file.html
RO-Crate JSON-LD Context: A JSON-LD context that provides Linked Data mapping for RO-Crate metadata to vocabularies like Schema.org.
RO-Crate JSON-LD: JSON-LD structure using the RO-Crate JSON-LD Context and containing RO-Crate metadata, written as if flattened and then compacted according to the rules in JSON-LD 1.0. The RO-Crate JSON-LD for an RO-Crate is stored in the RO-Crate Metadata File.
Throughout this specification, RDF terms (properties, types) are referred to using the keys defined in the RO-Crate JSON-LD Context.
Following Schema.org practice, property
names start with lowercase letters and Type
names start with uppercase letters.
In the RO-Crate Metadata File the RDF terms use their RO-Crate JSON-LD names as defined in the RO-Crate JSON-LD Context, which is available at https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context
The structure an RO-Crate MUST follow is:
<RO-Crate root directory>/
| ro-crate-metadata.json # RO-Crate Metadata File MUST be present
| ro-crate-preview.html # RO-Crate Website homepage MAY be present
| ro-crate-preview_files/ # MAY be present
| | [other RO-Crate Website files]
| [payload files and directories] # 0 or more
The name of the RO-Crate root directory is not defined, but a root directory is identifiable by the presence of the RO-Crate Metadata File, ro-crate-metadata.json
. For instance, if an RO-Crate is archived in a ZIP-file, the ZIP root directory is an RO-Crate root directory if it contains ro-crate-metadata.json
.
Data Entities in the RO-Crate MUST either be payload files/directories present within the RO-Crate root directory or its subdirectories, or be Web-based Data Entities.
ro-crate-metadata.json
)ro-crate-metadata.json
and appear in the RO-Crate Rootro-crate-metadata.jsonld
instead of ro-crate-metadata.json
then processing software should treat this as the RO-Crate Metadata File. If the crate is updated then the file SHOULD be renamed to ro-crate-metadata.json
and the RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor SHOULD be updated to reference it, with an up to date conformsTo property naming an appropriate version of this specification.JSON-LD is a structured form of JSON that can represent a Linked Data graph.
A valid RO-Crate JSON-LD graph MUST describe:
It is RECOMMENDED that any referenced contextual entities are also described in the RO-Crate Metadata File with the same identifier. Similarly it is RECOMMENDED that any contextual entity in the RO-Crate Metadata file is linked to from at least one of the other entities using the same identifier.
The appendix RO-Crate JSON-LD details the general structure of the JSON-LD that is expected in the RO-Crate Metadata File. In short, the rest of this specification describe the different types of entities that can be added as {}
objects to the RO-Crate JSON-LD @graph
array below:
{ "@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
"@graph": [
]
}
ro-crate-preview.html
and ro-crate-preview_files/
)In addition to the machine-oriented RO-Crate Metadata File, the RO-Crate MAY include a human-readable HTML rendering of the same information, known as the RO-Crate Website.
If present in the root directory, ro-crate-preview.html
MUST:
Be a valid HTML 5 document
Be useful to users of the RO-Crate - this will vary by community and intended use, but in general the aim to assist users in reusing data by explaining what it is, how it was created how it can be used and how to cite it. One simple approach to this is to expose all the metadata in the RO-Crate Metadata File.
Contain a copy of the RO-Crate JSON-LD in a script
element of the head
element of the HTML, for example:
<script type="application/ld+json">
{"@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
"@graph": [ ...]
}</script>
ro-crate-preview.html
SHOULD:
RO-Crate JSON-LD Context
to a URI, indicate this (the simplest way is to link the key to its definition).ro-crate-preview-files/
These are the actual files and directories that make up the dataset being described.
The base RO-Crate specification makes no assumptions about the presence of any specific files or folders beyond the reserved RO-Crate files described above. Payload files may appear directly in the RO-Crate Root alongside the RO-Crate Metadata File, and/or appear in sub-directories of the RO-Crate Root. Each file and directory MAY be represented as Data Entities in the RO-Crate Metadata File.
RO-Crates SHOULD be self-describing and self-contained.
A minimal RO-Crate is a directory containing a single RO-Crate Metadata File ro-crate-metadata.json
.
At the basic level, an RO-Crate is a collection of files and resources represented as a Schema.org Dataset, that together form a meaningful unit for the purposes of communication, citation, distribution, preservation, etc. The RO-Crate Metadata File describes the RO-Crate, and MUST be stored in the RO-Crate Root.
While RO-Crate is well catered for describing a Dataset as files and relevant metadata that are contained by the RO-Crate in the sense of living within the same root directory, RO-Crates can also reference external resources which are stored or accessed separately, via absolute URIs. This is particularly recommended where some resources cannot be co-hosted for practical or legal reasons, or if the RO-Crate itself is primarily web-based.
It is important to note that the RO-Crate Metadata File is not an exhaustive manifest or inventory, that is, it does not necessarily list or describe all files in the package. Rather it is focused on providing sufficient amount of metadata to understand and use the content, and is designed to be compatible with existing and future approaches that do have full inventories / manifest and integrity checks, e.g. by using checksums, such as BagIt and Oxford Common File Layout OCFL Objects.
The intention is that RO-Crates can work well with a variety of archive file formats, e.g. tar, zip, etc., and approaches to capturing file manifests and file fixity, such as BagIt, OCFL and git (see also appendix Combining with other packaging schemes). An RO-Crate can also be hosted on the web or mainly refer to web resources, although extra care to ensure persistence and consistency should be taken for archiving such RO-Crates.
RO-Crate aims to capture and describe the Research Object using structured metadata.
The RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor contains the metadata that describes the RO-Crate and its content, in particular:
Dataset
itself, a gathering of dataThis machine-readable metadata can also be represented for human consumption in the RO-Crate Website, linking to data and Web resources.
RO-Crate makes use of the Linked Data principles for its description. In particular:
RO-Crate realizes these principles using a particular set of technologies and best practices:
Schema.org is the base metadata standard for RO-Crate. Schema.org was chosen because it is widely used on the World Wide Web and supported by search engines, on the assumption that discovery is likely to be maximized if search engines index the content.
Note: As far as we know there is no alternative, well-maintained linked-data schema for research data with the coverage needed for this project - i.e. a single standard for expressing all the examples presented in this specification.
RO-Crate relies heavily on Schema.org, using a constrained subset of JSON-LD, and this document gives opinionated recommendations on how to represent the metadata using existing linked data best practices.
Generally, the standard type and property names (terms) from Schema.org should be used. However, RO-Crate uses variant names for some elements, specifically:
File
is mapped to http://schema.org/MediaObject which was chosen as a compromise as it has many of the properties that are needed to describe a generic file. Future versions of Schema.org or a research data extension may re-define File
.Journal
is mapped to http://schema.org/Periodical.Warning: JSON-LD examples given on the Schema.org website may not be in flattened form; any nested entities in RO-Crate JSON-LD SHOULD be described as separate contextual entities in the flat @graph
list.
To simplify processing and avoid confusion with string values, the RO-Crate JSON-LD Context requires URIs and entity references to be given in the form "author": {"@id": "http://example.com/alice"}
, even where Schema.org for some properties otherwise permit shorter forms like "author": "http://example.com/alice"
.
See the appendix RO-Crate JSON-LD for details.
RO-Crate also uses the Portland Common Data Model (PCDM version https://pcdm.org/2016/04/18/models) to describe repositories or collections of digital objects and imports these terms:
RepositoryObject
mapped to http://pcdm.org/models#ObjectRepositoryCollection
mapped to http://pcdm.org/models#CollectionRepositoryFile
mapped to http://pcdm.org/models#FilehasMember
mapped to http://pcdm.org/models#hasMemberhasFile
mapped to http://pcdm.org/models#hasFileNote: The terms RepositoryObject
and RepositoryCollection
are renamed to avoid collision between other vocabularies and the PCDM terms Collection
and Object
. The term RepositoryFile
is renamed to avoid clash with RO-Crate’s File
mapping to http://schema.org/MediaObject.
From Dublin Core Terms RO-Crate use:
conformsTo
mapped to http://purl.org/dc/terms/conformsToThese terms are being proposed by Bioschemas profile ComputationalWorkflow 0.5-DRAFT and FormalParameter 0.1-DRAFT to be integrated into Schema.org:
ComputationalWorkflow
mapped to https://bioschemas.org/ComputationalWorkflowFormalParameter
mapped to https://bioschemas.org/FormalParameterinput
mapped to https://bioschemas.org/ComputationalWorkflow#inputoutput
mapped to https://bioschemas.org/ComputationalWorkflow#outputfunding
mapped to http://schema.org/funding (schemaorg #383)Note: In this specification the proposed Bioschemas terms use the temporary https://bioschemas.org/ namespace; future releases of RO-Crate may reflect mapping to the http://schema.org/ namespace.
RO-Crate is simply a way to make metadata assertions about a set of files and folders that make up a Dataset. These assertions can be made at two levels:
This document has guidelines for ways to represent common requirements for describing data in a research context, e.g.:
However, as RO-Crate uses the Linked Data principles, adopters of RO-Crate are free to supplement RO-Crate using Schema.org metadata and/or assertions using other Linked Data vocabularies.
A future version of this specification aim to cater for variable-level assertions: In some cases, e.g. for tabular data, additional metadata may be provided about the structure and variables within a given file. See the use case Describe a tabular data file directly in RO-Crate metadata for work-in-progress.
RO-Crate JSON-LD SHOULD use the following IDs where possible:
identifier
which is RECOMMENDED to be a https://doi.org/ URI.In the absence of the above, RO-Crates SHOULD contain stable persistent URIs to identify all entities wherever possible.
The Root Data Entity is a Dataset that represent the RO-Crate as a whole; a Research Object that includes the Data Entities and the related Contextual Entities.
As explained in section RO-Crate structure, the RO-Crate description is stored as JSON-LD in the RO-Crate Metadata File ro-crate-metadata.json
in the RO-Crate root directory.
The RO-Crate JSON-LD MUST contain a self-describing RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor with the @id
value ro-crate-metadata.json
(or ro-crate-metadata.jsonld
in legacy crates) and @type
CreativeWork. This descriptor MUST have an about property referencing the Root Data Entity, which SHOULD have an @id
of ./
.
{ "@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"},
"about": {"@id": "./"}
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
...
}
]
}
The conformsTo of the RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor SHOULD be a versioned permalink URI of the RO-Crate specification that the RO-Crate JSON-LD conforms to. The URI SHOULD start with https://w3id.org/ro/crate/
.
Consumers processing the RO-Crate as an JSON-LD graph can thus reliably find the Root Data Entity by following this algorithm:
@graph
arrayconformsTo
property is a URI that starts with https://w3id.org/ro/crate/
about
object keep the @id
URI as variable root@graph
array@id
URI that matches root return itSee also the appendix on finding RO-Crate Root in RDF triple stores.
To ensure a base-line interoperability between RO-Crates, and for an RO-Crate to be considered a Valid RO-Crate, a minimum set of metadata is required for the Root Data Entity. As stated earlier the RO-Crate Metadata File is not an exhaustive manifest or inventory, that is, it does not necessarily list or describe all files in the package. For this reason, there are no minimum metadata requirements in terms of describing Data Entities (files and folders) other than the Root Data Entity. Extensions of RO-Crate dealing with specific types of dataset may put further constraints or requirements of metadata beyond the Root Data Entity (see the appendix Extending RO-Crate).
The RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor MAY contain information such as licensing for the RO-Crate Metadata File so metadata can be licensed separately from Data.
The table below outlines the properties that the Root Data Entity MUST have to be minimally valid and additionally highlights properties required to meet other common use-cases:
The Root Data Entity MUST have the following properties:
@type
: MUST be Dataset@id
: MUST end with /
and SHOULD be the string ./
name
: SHOULD identify the dataset to humans well enough to disambiguate it from other RO-Cratesdescription
: SHOULD further elaborate on the name to provide a summary of the context in which the dataset is important.datePublished
: MUST be a string in ISO 8601 date format and SHOULD be specified to at least the precision of a day, MAY be a timestamp down to the millisecond.license
: SHOULD link to a Contextual Entity in the RO-Crate Metadata File with a name and description. MAY have a URI (eg for Creative Commons or Open Source licenses). MAY, if necessary be a textual description of how the RO-Crate may be used.Note: These requirements are stricter than those published > for Google Dataset Search which > requires a Dataset
to have a name
and description
,
Warning: The properties above are not sufficient to generate a DataCite citation. Advice on integrating with DataCite will be provided in a future version of this specification, or as an implementation guide.
The following RO-Crate Metadata File represents a minimal description of an RO-Crate.
{ "@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"},
"about": {"@id": "./"}
},
{
"@id": "./",
"identifier": "https://doi.org/10.4225/59/59672c09f4a4b",
"@type": "Dataset",
"datePublished": "2017",
"name": "Data files associated with the manuscript:Effects of facilitated family case conferencing for ...",
"description": "Palliative care planning for nursing home residents with advanced dementia ...",
"license": {"@id": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/au/"}
},
{
"@id": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/au/",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"description": "This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Australia License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/au/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.",
"identifier": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/au/",
"name": "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Australia (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 AU)"
}
]
}
The primary purpose for RO-Crate is to gather and describe a set of Data entities in the form of:
The data entities can be further described by referencing contextual entities such as persons, organizations and publications.
Where files and folders are represented as Data Entities in the RO-Crate JSON-LD, these MUST be linked to, either directly or indirectly, from the Root Data Entity using the hasPart property. Directory hierarchies MAY be represented with nested Dataset Data Entities, or the Root Dataset MAY refer to files anywhere in the hierarchy using hasPart.
Data Entities representing files MUST have "File"
as a value for @type
. File
is an RO-Crate alias for http://schema.org/MediaObject. The term File here is liberal, and includes “downloadable” resources where @id
is an absolute URI.
Data Entities representing directories MUST be of "@type": "Dataset"
. The term directory here includes HTTP file listings where @id
is an absolute URI, however “external” directories SHOULD have a programmatic listing of their content (e.g. another RO-Crate).
Data Entities can also be other types, for instance an online database. These SHOULD be of "@type": "CreativeWork"
and typically have a @id
which is an absolute URI.
In all cases, @type
MAY be an array in order to also specify a more specific type, e.g. "@type": ["File", "ComputationalWorkflow"]
Tip: There is no requirement to represent every file and folder in an RO-Crate as Data Entities in the RO-Crate JSON-LD.
<RO-Crate root>/
| ro-crate-metadata.json
| cp7glop.ai
| lots_of_little_files/
| | file1
| | file2
| | ...
| | file54
An example RO-Crate JSON-LD for the above would be as follows:
{ "@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"},
"about": {"@id": "./"}
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": [
"Dataset"
],
"hasPart": [
{
"@id": "cp7glop.ai"
},
{
"@id": "lots_of_little_files/"
}
]
},
{
"@id": "cp7glop.ai",
"@type": "File",
"name": "Diagram showing trend to increase",
"contentSize": "383766",
"description": "Illustrator file for Glop Pot",
"encodingFormat": "application/pdf"
},
{
"@id": "lots_of_little_files/",
"@type": "Dataset",
"name": "Too many files",
"description": "This directory contains many small files, that we're not going to describe in detail."
}
]
}
The above example provides a media type for the file cp7glop.ai
- which is useful as it may not be apparent that the file is readable as a PDF file from the extension alone. To add more detail, encodings SHOULD be linked using a PRONOM identifier to a Contextual Entity of @type
WebSite.
{
"@id": "cp7glop.ai",
"@type": "File",
"name": "Diagram showing trend to increase",
"contentSize": "383766",
"description": "Illustrator file for Glop Pot",
"encodingFormat": ["application/pdf", {"@id": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/PRONOM/fmt/19"}]
},
{
"@id": "https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/PRONOM/fmt/19",
"name": "Acrobat PDF 1.5 - Portable Document Format",
"@type": "WebSite"
}
If there is no PRONOM identifier, then a contextual entity with a URL as an @id
MAY be used:
For example:
{
"@id": "1st-tool.cwl",
"@type": "File",
"name": "First executable tool",
"description": "An example Common Workflow Language File",
"contentSize": "120",
"encodingFormat": ["text/plain", {"@id": "https://www.commonwl.org/v1.0/Workflow.html"}]
},
{
"@id": "https://www.commonwl.org/v1.0/Workflow.html",
"@type": "WebSite",
"name": "Common Workflow Language (CWL) Workflow Description, v1.0.2"
}
If there is no web-accessible description for a file format it SHOULD be described locally in the dataset, for example in a file:
{
"@id": "some-file.some_extension",
"@type": "File",
"name": "Some file",
"description": "A file in a non-standard format",
"contentSize": "120",
"encodingFormat": ["text/plain", {"@id": "some_extension.md"}]
},
{
"@id": "some_extension.md",
"@type": ["File", "CreativeWork"],
"name": "Description of some_extension file format",
"encodingFormat": "text/markdown"
}
The table below outlines the properties that Data Entities, when present, MUST have to be minimally valid.
Note that all @id
identifiers must be valid URI references, care must be taken to express any relative paths using /
separator, correct casing, and escape special characters like space (%20
) and percent (%25
), for instance a File Data Entity from the Windows path Results and Diagrams\almost-50%.png
becomes "@id": "Results%20and%20Diagrams/almost-50%25.png"
in the RO-Crate JSON-LD.
In this document the term URI includes international IRIs; the RO-Crate Metadata File is always UTF-8 and international characters in identifiers SHOULD be written using native UTF-8 characters (IRIs), however traditional URL encoding of Unicode characters with %
MAY appear in @id
strings. Example: "@id": "面试.mp4"
is preferred over the equivalent "@id": "%E9%9D%A2%E8%AF%95.mp4"
A File Data Entity MUST have the following properties:
@type
: MUST be File
, or an array where File
is one of the values.@id
MUST be either a URI Path relative to the RO Crate root, or an absolute URI.A Dataset (directory) Data Entity MUST have the following properties:
@type
MUST be Dataset
or an array where Dataset
is one of the values.@id
MUST be either a URI Path relative to the RO Crate root, or an absolute URI. The id SHOULD end with /
While one use-case of RO-Crates is to describe files contained within the RO-Crate root directory, RO-Crates can also gather resources from the web identified by absolute URIs instead of relative URI paths, i.e. Web-based data entities.
Using Web-based data entities can be important particularly where a file can’t be included in the RO-Crate root because of licensing concerns, large data sizes, privacy, or where it is desirable to link to the latest online version.
Example of an RO-Crate including a File Data Entity external to the RO-Crate root (file entity https://zenodo.org/record/3541888/files/ro-crate-1.0.0.pdf):
{ "@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"},
"about": {"@id": "./"}
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": [
"Dataset"
],
"hasPart": [
{
"@id": "survey-responses-2019.csv"
},
{
"@id": "https://zenodo.org/record/3541888/files/ro-crate-1.0.0.pdf"
},
]
},
{
"@id": "survey-responses-2019.csv",
"@type": "File",
"name": "Survey responses",
"contentSize": "26452",
"encodingFormat": "text/csv"
},
{
"@id": "https://zenodo.org/record/3541888/files/ro-crate-1.0.0.pdf",
"@type": "File",
"name": "RO-Crate specification",
"contentSize": "310691",
"description": "RO-Crate specification",
"encodingFormat": "application/pdf"
}
]
}
Additional care SHOULD be taken to improve persistence and long-term preservation of web resources included in an RO-Crate as they can be more difficult to archive or move along with the RO-Crate root, and may change intentionally or unintentionally leaving the RO-Crate with incomplete or outdated information.
File Data Entries with an @id
URI outside the RO-Crate Root SHOULD at the time of RO-Crate creation be directly downloadable by a simple retrieval (e.g. HTTP GET), permitting redirections and HTTP/HTTPS authentication. For instance, in the example above, https://zenodo.org/record/3541888 and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3541888 cannot be used as @id
above as retrieving these URLs give a HTML landing page rather than the desired PDF as indicated by encodingFormat
.
As files on the web may change, the timestamp property sdDatePublished SHOULD be included to indicate when the absolute URL was accessed, and derived metadata like encodingFormat and contentSize were considered to be representative:
{
"@id": "https://zenodo.org/record/3541888/files/ro-crate-1.0.0.pdf",
"@type": "File",
"name": "RO-Crate specification",
"contentSize": "310691",
"encodingFormat": "application/pdf",
"sdDatePublished": "2020-04-09T13:09:21+01:00Z"
}
File Data Entities may already have a corresponding web presence, for instance a landing page that describes the file, including persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI) resolving to an intermediate HTML page instead of the downloadable file directly.
These can be included for File Data Entities as additional metadata, regardless of whether the File is included in the RO-Crate Root directory or exists on the Web, by using the properties:
{
"@id": "survey-responses-2019.csv",
"@type": "File",
"name": "Survey responses",
"encodingFormat": "text/csv",
"url": "http://example.com/downloads/2019/survey-responses-2019.csv",
"subjectOf": {"@id": "http://example.com/reports/2019/annual-survey.html"}
},
{
"@id": "https://zenodo.org/record/3541888/files/ro-crate-1.0.0.pdf",
"@type": "File",
"name": "RO-Crate specification",
"encodingFormat": "application/pdf",
"identifier": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3541888",
"url": "https://zenodo.org/record/3541888"
}
A Directory File Entry or Dataset identifier expressed as an absolute URL on the web can be harder to download than a File because it consists of multiple resources. It is RECOMMENDED that such directories have a complete listing of their content in hasPart, enabling download traversal.
Alternatively, a common mechanism to provide downloads of a reasonably sized directory is as an archive file in formats such as .zip
or .tar.gz
, described as a DataDownload.
{
"@id": "lots_of_little_files/",
"@type": "Dataset",
"name": "Too many files",
"description": "This directory contains many small files, that we're not going to describe in detail.",
"distribution": {"@id": "http://example.com/downloads/2020/lots_of_little_files.zip"}
},
{
"@id": "http://example.com/downloads/2020/lots_of_little_files.zip",
"@type": "DataDownload",
"encodingFormat": "application/zip",
"contentSize": "82818928"
}
Similarly, the RO-Crate root entity may also provide a distribution URL, in which case the download SHOULD be an archive that contains the RO-Crate Metadata file.
In all cases, consumers should be aware that a DataDownload
is a snapshot that may not reflect the current state of the Dataset
or RO-Crate.
The RO-Crate SHOULD contain additional information about Contextual Entities for the use of both humans (in ro-crate-preview.html
) and machines (in ro-crate-metadata.json
). This also helps to maximize the extent to which an RO-Crate is self-contained and self-describing, in that it reduces the need for the consumer of an RO-Crate to refer to external information which may change or become unavailable over time.
RO-Crate distinguishes between Contextual entities and Data entities.
Data entities primarily exist in their own right as a file or directory (which may be in the RO-Crate Root directory or downloadable by URL).
Contextual entities however primarily exist outside the digital sphere (e.g. People, Places) or are conceptual descriptions that primarily exists as metadata, like GeoCoordinates and ContactPoint.
Some contextual entities can also be considered data entities - for instance the license property refers to a CreativeWork that can reasonably be downloaded, however a license document is not usually considered as part of research outputs and would therefore typically not be included in hasPart on the root data entity.
Likewise, some data entities may also be described as contextual entities, for instance a File
that is also a ScholarlyArticle. In such cases the Contextual Data Entity MUST be described as a single JSON object in the RO-Crate Metadata JSON @graph
and SHOULD list both relevant data and contextual types in a @type
array.
The RO-Crate Metadata JSON @graph
MUST NOT list multiple entities with the same @id
; behaviour of consumers of an RO-Crate encountering multiple entities with the same @id
is undefined.
A challenge can be how to assign identifiers for contextual entities, that is deciding on their @id
value.
RO-Crate recommend that if an existing permalink (e.g. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1825-0097
) or other absolute URI (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josiah_S._Carberry
) is reasonably unique for that entity, that URI should be used as identifier for the contextual entity in preference of an identifier local to the RO-Crate (e.g. #josiah
or #0fa587c6-4580-4ece-a5df-69af3c5590e3
).
Care should be taken to not describe two conceptually different contextual entities with the same identifier - e.g. if https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josiah_S._Carberry
is a Person it should not also be a CreativeWork (although this example is a fictional person!).
Where a related URL exist that may not be unique enough to serve as identifier, it can instead be added to a contextual entity using the property url.
See the appendix on JSON-LD identifiers for details.
A core principle of Linked data is to use URIs to identify important entities such as people. The following is the minimum recommended way of representing a author of a RO-Crate. The author property MAY also be applied to a directory (Dataset), a File or other CreativeWork entities.
{
"@type": "Dataset",
"@id": "./",
"author": {"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8367-6908"}
}
{
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8367-6908",
"@type": "Person",
"affiliation": "University of Technology Sydney",
"name": "J. Xuan"
}
This uses an ORCID to unambiguously identify an author, represented as a Contextual Entity of type Person.
Note the string value for the organizational affiliation. This SHOULD be improved by also providing a Contextual Entity for the organization (see example below).
An Organization SHOULD be the value for the publisher property of a Dataset or ScholarlyArticle or affiliation property of a Person.
{
"@type": "Dataset",
"@id": "./",
"publisher": {"@id": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041"}
}
{
"@id": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041",
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "University of Technology Sydney",
"url": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041"
}
An Organization SHOULD also be used for a Person’s affiliation property.
{
"@type": "Dataset",
"@id": "./",
"publisher": {"@id": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041"},
"author": {"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-944X"}
},
{
"@id": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041",
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "University of Technology Sydney"
},
{
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-944X",
"@type": "Person",
"affiliation": {"@id": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041"},
"email": "peter.sefton@uts.edu.au",
"name": "Peter Sefton"
}
A RO-Crate SHOULD have contact information, using a contextual entity of type ContactPoint. Note that in Schema.org Dataset does not currently have the corresponding contactPoint property, so the contact point would need to be given through a Person or Organization contextual entity which are related to the Dataset via a author or publisher property.
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"author": {"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-5409"}
},
{
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-5409",
"@type": "Person",
"contactPoint": {
"@id": "mailto:tim.luckett@uts.edu.au"
},
"familyName": "Luckett",
"givenName": "Tim",
"identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-5409",
"name": "Tim Luckett"
},
{
"@id": "mailto:tim.luckett@uts.edu.au",
"@type": "ContactPoint",
"contactType": "customer service",
"email": "tim.luckett@uts.edu.au",
"identifier": "tim.luckett@uts.edu.au",
"url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-5409"
}
To associate a publication with a dataset the RO-Crate JSON-LD MUST include a URL (for example a DOI URL) as the @id
of a publication using the citation property.
For example:
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"citation": {"@id": "https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2014.2386282"}
}
The publication SHOULD be described further as an additional contextual entity of type ScholarlyArticle or CreativeWork.
{
"@id": "https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2014.2386282",
"@type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"author": [
{
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8367-6908"
},
{
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0690-4732"
},
{
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-0583"
},
{
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6953-3986"
}
],
"identifier": "https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2014.2386282",
"issn": "2168-2267",
"name": "Topic Model for Graph Mining",
"journal": "IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics",
"datePublished": "2015"
}
citation MAY also be used with other data and contextual entities:
{
"@id": "communities-2018.csv",
"@type": "File",
"name": "Snapshot of RO Community efforts",
"citation": {"@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1313066"},
"encodingFormat": "text/csv"
}
A data entity MAY provide a published DOI identifier that, compared with any related publication in citation, primarily captures that file or dataset:
{
"@id": "figure.png",
"@type": ["File", "ImageObject"],
"name": "XXL-CT-scan of an XXL Tyrannosaurus rex skull",
"identifier": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3479743",
"citation": {"@id": "http://ndt.net/?id=19249"},
"encodingFormat": "image/png"
}
The Root Data Entity SHOULD have a publisher property. This SHOULD be an Organization though it MAY be a Person.
{
"@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1009240",
"@type": "Dataset",
"name": "Sample dataset for RO-Crate v0.2",
"publisher": {
"@id": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041"
},
"temporalCoverage": "2017"
},
{
"@id": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041",
"@type": "Organization",
"identifier": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041",
"name": "University of Technology Sydney"
},
To associate a research project with a Dataset, the RO-Crate JSON-LD SHOULD contain an entity for the project using type Organization, referenced by a funder property. The project Organization
SHOULD in turn reference any external funder, either by using its URL as an @id
or via a Contextual Entity describing the funder.
Tip: To make it very clear where funding is coming from, the Root Data Entity SHOULD also reference funders directly, as well as via a chain of references.
{
"@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1009240",
"@type": "Dataset",
"funder": {
"@id": "https://ror.org/038sjwq14"
},
},
{
"@id": "https://eresearch.uts.edu.au/projects/provisioner",
"@type": "Organization",
"description": "The University of Technology Sydney Provisioner project is ...",
"funder": [
{
"@id": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041"
},
{
"@id": "https://ands.org.au"
}
],
"identifier": "https://eresearch.uts.edu.au/projects/provisioner",
"name": "Provisioner"
},
{
"@id": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041",
"@type": "Organisation",
"identifier": "https://ror.org/03f0f6041",
"name": "University of Technology Sydney"
},
{
"@id": "https://ands.org.au",
"@type": "Organization",
"description": "The core purpose of the Australian National Data Service (ANDS) is ...",
"identifier": "https://ands.org.au",
"name": "Australian National Data Service"
},
If a Data Entity has a license that is different from the license on the Root Data Entity, the entity SHOULD have a license property referencing a Contextual Entity with a type CreativeWork to describe the license. The @id
of the license SHOULD be its URL (e.g. a Creative Commons License URL) and, when possible, a summary of the license included using the description property.
The below Data Entity has a copyrightHolder which is different from its author. There is a reference to an Organization describing the copyright holder and, to give credit, a sameAs relation to a web page. The license property here refers to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ which is expanded in a separate contextual entity.
{
"@id": "SciDataCon Presentations/AAA_Pilot_Project_Abstract.html",
"@type": "File",
"contentSize": "17085",
"copyrightHolder": {
"@id": "https://www.idrc.ca/"
},
"author": {
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-716X"
},
"description": "Abstract for the Pilot Project initial findings",
"encodingFormat": "text/html",
"license": {
"@id": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
},
"sameAs": "https://www.scidatacon.org/2016/sessions/56/paper/265/"
},
{
"@id": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"name": "CC BY 4.0",
"description": "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License"
},
{
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-716X",
"@type": "Person",
"identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-716X",
"name": "Cameron Neylon"
},
{
"@id": "https://www.idrc.ca/",
"@type": "Organization",
"description": "Canadian Frown Corporation and funder of development research",
"identifier": "IDRC",
"name": "International Development Research Center"
}
In some cases the license of the RO-Crate metadata (the JSON-LD statements in the RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor) is different from the license on the Root Data Entity and its content (data entities indicated by hasPart).
For instance, a common pattern for repositories is to license metadata as CC0 Public Domain Dedication, while data is licensed as CC-BY or similar. This pattern allow metadata to be combined freely (e.g. the DataCite knowledge graph), while redistribution of data files would require explicit attribution and statement of their license.
To express the metadata license is different from the Root Data Entity, expand the RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor to include license
:
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"identifier": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"about": {"@id": "./"},
"license": {
"@id": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/"
}
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"license": {
"@id": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
}
}
If no explicit license
is expressed on the RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor, the license
expressed on the Root Data Entity apply also on the RO-Crate metadata.
To specify which equipment was used to create or update a Data Entity, the RO-Crate JSON-LD SHOULD have a Context Entity for each item of equipment which SHOULD be of @type
IndividualProduct. The entity SHOULD have a serial number, manufacturer that identifies it as completely as possible. In this case the equipment is a bespoke machine. The equipment SHOULD be described on a web page, and the address of the description SHOULD be used as its @id
.
{
"@id": "https://confluence.csiro.au/display/ASL/Hovermap",
"@type": "IndividualProduct",
"description": "The CSIRO bentwing is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV, commonly known as a drone) with a LIDAR ... ",
"identifier": "https://confluence.csiro.au/display/ASL/Hovermap",
"name": "Bentwing"
}
Uses CreateAction and UpdateAction type to model the contributions of Context Entities of type Person or Organization in the creation of files.
In this example the CreateAction has a human agent, the object is a Place (a cave) and the Hovermap drone is the instrument used in the file creation event.
{
"@id": "#DataCapture_wcc02",
"@type": "CreateAction",
"agent": {
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-552X"
},
"instrument": {
"@id": "https://confluence.csiro.au/display/ASL/Hovermap"
},
"object": {
"@id": "#victoria_arch"
},
"result": [
{
"@id": "wcc02_arch.laz"
},
{
"@id": "wcc02_arch_traj.txt"
}
]
},
{
"@id": "#victoria_arch",
"@type": "Place",
"address": "Wombeyan Caves, NSW 2580",
"name": "Victoria Arch"
}
To specify which software was used to create or update a file, the software application SHOULD be represented with an entity of type SoftwareApplication, with a version property, e.g. from tool --version
.
For example:
{
"@id": "https://www.imagemagick.org/",
"@type": "SoftwareApplication",
"url": "https://www.imagemagick.org/",
"name": "ImageMagick",
"version": "ImageMagick 6.9.7-4 Q16 x86_64 20170114 http://www.imagemagick.org"
}
The software SHOULD be associated with the File (or other data entities) it created as an instrument of a CreateAction, with the File referenced by a result property. Any input files SHOULD be referenced by the object property.
In the below example, an image with the @id
of pics/2017-06-11%2012.56.14.jpg
was transformed into an new image pics/sepia_fence.jpg
using the ImageMagick software application as “instrument”. Actions MAY have human-readable names, which MAY be machine generated for use at scale.
{
"@id": "#Photo_Capture_1",
"@type": "CreateAction",
"agent": {
"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-944X"
},
"description": "Photo snapped on a photo walk on a misty day",
"endTime": "2017-06-11T12:56:14+10:00",
"instrument": [
{
"@id": "#EPL1"
},
{
"@id": "#Panny20mm"
}
],
"result": {
"@id": "pics/2017-06-11%2012.56.14.jpg"
}
},
{
"@id": "#SepiaConversion_1",
"@type": "CreateAction",
"name": "Convert dog image to sepia",
"description": "convert -sepia-tone 80% test_data/sample/pics/2017-06-11\\ 12.56.14.jpg test_data/sample/pics/sepia_fence.jpg",
"endTime": "2018-09-19T17:01:07+10:00",
"instrument": {
"@id": "https://www.imagemagick.org/"
},
"object": {
"@id": "pics/2017-06-11%2012.56.14.jpg"
},
"result": {
"@id": "pics/sepia_fence.jpg"
}
},
Tip: If representing command lines, double escape \\
so that JSON preserves the \
character.
If multiple SoftwareApplications have been used in composition, such as from a script or workflow, then the CreateAction
’s instrument SHOULD rather reference a SoftwareSourceCode which can be further described as explained in the Workflows and scripts section.
To record an action which changes an entity’s metadata, or changes its state in a publication or other workflow, a CreateAction or UpdateAction SHOULD be associated with a Data Entity or, for the RO-Crate itself, with the root data entity.
A curation Action MUST have at least one object which associates it with either the root data entity Dataset
or one of its components.
An Action which creates new Data entities - for example, the creation of a new metadata file - SHOULD have these as results.
An Action SHOULD have a name and MAY have a description.
An Action SHOULD have an endTime, which MUST be in ISO 8601 date format and SHOULD be specified to at least the precision of a day. An Action MAY have a startTime meeting the same specifications.
An Action SHOULD have a human agent who was responsible for authorizing the action, and MAY have an instrument which associates the action with a particular piece of software (for example, the content management system or data catalogue through which an update was approved) which SHOULD be of @type
SoftwareApplication.
An Action’s status MAY be recorded in an actionStatus property. The status must be one of the values enumerated by ActionStatusType: ActiveActionStatus, CompletedActionStatus, FailedActionStatus or PotentialActionStatus.
An Action which has failed MAY record any error information in an error property.
UpdateAction SHOULD only be used for actions which affect the Dataset as a whole, such as movement through a workflow.
To record curation actions which modify a File within a Dataset - for example, by correcting or enhancing metadata - the old version of the File SHOULD be retained, and a CreateAction added which has the original version as its object and the new version as its result.
{
"@id": "#history-01",
"@type": "CreateAction",
"object": { "@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1009240" },
"name": "RO-Crate created",
"endTime": "2018-08-31",
"agent": { "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5152-5307" },
"instrument": { "@id": "https://stash.research.uts.edu.au" },
"actionStatus": { "@id": "http://schema.org/CompletedActionStatus" }
},
{
"@id": "#history-02",
"@type": "UpdateAction",
"object": { "@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1009240" },
"name": "RO-Crate published",
"endTime": "2018-09-10",
"agent": { "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5152-5307" },
"instrument": { "@id": "https://stash.research.uts.edu.au" },
"actionStatus": {"@id":" http://schema.org/CompletedActionStatus" }
},
{
"@id": "#history-03",
"@type": "CreateAction",
"object": { "@id": "metadata.xml.v0.1" },
"result": { "@id": "metadata.xml" },
"name": "metadata update",
"endTime": "2018-09-12",
"agent": { "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5152-5307" },
"instrument": { "@id": "https://stash.research.uts.edu.au" },
"actionStatus": { "@id": "http://schema.org/CompletedActionStatus" }
},
{
"@id": "#history-04",
"@type": "UpdateAction",
"object": { "@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1009240" },
"name": "RO-Crate published",
"endTime": "2018-09-13",
"agent": { "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5152-5307" },
"instrument": { "@id": "https://stash.research.uts.edu.au" },
"actionStatus": { "@id": "http://schema.org/FailedActionStatus" },
"error": "Record is already published"
},
{
"@id": "https://stash.research.uts.edu.au",
"@type": "IndividualProduct",
"name": "Stash",
"description": "UTS Research Data Catalogue",
"identifier": "https://stash.research.uts.edu.au"
}
To describe an export from a Digital Library or repository system, RO-Crate uses the Portland Common Data Model (PCDM).
A Contextual Entity from a repository, representing an abstract entity such as a person, or a work, or a place SHOULD have a @type
of RepositoryObject, in addition to any other types.
Objects MAY be grouped together in RepositoryCollections with hasMember pointing to the RepositoryObject.
Note: The terms RepositoryObject
and RepositoryCollection
are renamed in RO-Crate to avoid collision between other vocabularies and the PCDM terms Collection
and Object
. The term RepositoryFile
is renamed to avoid clash with RO-Crate’s File
mapping to http://schema.org/MediaObject.
Warning: PCDM specifies that files should have only technical metadata, not descriptive metadata, which is not a restriction in RO-Crate. If the RO-Crate is to be imported into a strict PCDM repository, modeling of object/file relationships will be necessary.
For example, this data is exported from an Omeka repository:
{
"@id": "https://omeka.uws.edu.au/farmstofreeways/api/collections/6",
"@type": "RepositoryCollection",
"title": "Project Materials",
"description": [
"Materials associated with the project, including fliers seeking participants, lists of sources and question outline. "
],
"publisher": {"@id": "University of Western Sydney"},
"rights": "Copyright University of Western Sydney 2015",
"hasMember": [
{
"@id": "https://omeka.uws.edu.au/farmstofreeways/api/items/166"
},
{
"@id": "https://omeka.uws.edu.au/farmstofreeways/api/items/167"
},
{
"@id": "https://omeka.uws.edu.au/farmstofreeways/api/items/168"
},
{
"@id": "https://omeka.uws.edu.au/farmstofreeways/api/items/169"
}
]
},
{
"@id": "https://omeka.uws.edu.au/farmstofreeways/api/items/166",
"@type": "RepositoryObject",
"title": [
"Western Sydney Women's Oral History Project: Flier (illustrated)"
],
"description": [
"Flier (illustrated) seeking participants for the project."
],
"publisher": { "@id": "https://westernsydney.edu.au"},
"rights": "Copyright University of Western Sydney 2015",
"originalFormat": "Paper",
"identifier": "FTF_flier_illust",
"rightsHolder": [
"Western Sydney University"
],
"license": {
"@id": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/"
},
"hasFile": [
{
"@id": "content/166/original_eece70f73bf8979c0bcfb97065948531.pdf"
},
...
]
},
{
"@type": "File",
"@id": "content/166/original_eece70f73bf8979c0bcfb97065948531.pdf"
}
Scientific workflows and scripts that were used (or can be used) to analyze or generate files contained in an RO-Crate MAY be embedded in an RO-Crate. See also the Provenance section on Software Used to Create Files.
Workflows and scripts SHOULD be described using data entities of type SoftwareSourceCode.
The distinction between SoftwareSourceCode and SoftwareApplication for software is fluid, and comes down to availability and understandability. For instance, office spreadsheet applications are generally available and do not need further explanation (SoftwareApplication
); while a Python script that is customized for a particular data analysis might be important to understand deeper and should therefore be included as SoftwareSourceCode
in the RO-Crate dataset.
A script is a Data Entity which MUST have the following properties:
@type
is an array with at least File
and SoftwareSourceCode
as values@id
is a File URI linking to the executable scriptname
: a human-readable name for the script.A workflow is a Data Entity which MUST have the following properties:
@type
is an array with at least File
, SoftwareSourceCode
and ComputationalWorkflow
as values@id
is a File URI linking to the workflow entry-point.name
: a human-readable name for the workflow.Short example describing a script:
{
"@id": "scripts/analyse_csv.py",
"@type": ["File", "SoftwareSourceCode"],
"name": "Analyze CSV files",
"programmingLanguage": {"@id": "https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-380/"},
}
Short example describing a workflow:
{
"@id": "workflow/retropath.knime",
"@type": ["File", "SoftwareSourceCode", "ComputationalWorkflow"],
"author": {"@id": "#thomas"},
"name": "RetroPath Knime workflow",
"description": "Retrosynthesis workflow calculating chemical reactions",
"license": { "@id": "https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0"},
"programmingLanguage": {"@id": "#knime"}
}
There is no strong distinction between a script and a workflow; many computational workflows are written in script-like languages, and many scripts perform a pipeline of steps.
Here are some indicators for when a script should be considered a workflow:
Here are some counter-indicators for when a script might not be a workflow:
Scripts written in a programming language, as well as workflows, generally need a runtime; in RO-Crate the runtime SHOULD be indicated using a liberal interpretation of programmingLanguage.
Note that the language and its runtime MAY differ (e.g. different C++ compilers), but for scripts and workflows, frequently the language and runtime are essentially the same, and thus the programmingLanguage
, implied to be a ComputerLanguage, can also be described as an executable SoftwareApplication:
{
"@id": "scripts/analyse_csv.py",
"@type": ["File", "SoftwareSourceCode"],
"name": "Analyze CSV files",
"programmingLanguage": {"@id": "https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-380/"},
},
{
"@id": "https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-380/",
"@type": ["ComputerLanguage", "SoftwareApplication"],
"name": "Python 3.8.0",
"version": "3.8.0"
}
A contextual entity representing a ComputerLanguage and/or SoftwareApplication MUST have a name, url and version, which should indicate a known version the workflow/script was developed or tested with. alternateName MAY be provided if there is a shorter colloquial name, for instance “R” instead of “The R Project for Statistical Computing”.
It is possible to indicate steps that are executed as part of an ComputationalWorkflow
or Script
, by using hasPart to relate additional SoftwareApplication
or nested SoftwareSourceCode
contextual entities:
{
"@id": "workflow/analyze.cwl",
"@type": ["File", "SoftwareSourceCode", "ComputationalWorkflow"],
"name": "CWL workflow to analyze CSV and make PNG",
"programmingLanguage": {"@id": "https://w3id.org/cwl/v1.1/"},
"hasPart": [
{"@id": "scripts/analyse_csv.py"},
{"@id": "https://www.imagemagick.org/"},
]
}
It can be beneficial to show a diagram or sketch to explain the script/workflow. This may have been generated from a workflow management system, or drawn manually as a diagram. This diagram MAY be included from the SoftwareSourceCode
data entity by using image
, pointing to an ImageObject data entity which is about the SoftwareSourceCode
:
{
"@id": "workflow/workflow.knime",
"@type": ["File", "SoftwareSourceCode", "ComputationalWorkflow"],
"name": "RetroPath2.0 workflow",
"image": {"@id": "workflow/workflow.svg" }
},
{
"@id": "workflow/workflow.svg",
"@type": ["File", "ImageObject"],
"encodingFormat": "image/svg+xml",
"name": "Diagram of RetroPath2.0 workflow",
"about": {"@id": "workflow/workflow.knime"}
}
The image file format SHOULD be indicated with encodingFormat using an IANA registered media type like image/svg+xml
or image/png
. Additionally a reference to a Pronom identifier SHOULD be provided, which MAY be described as an additional contextual entity to give human-readable name to the format:
{
"@id": "workflow/workflow.svg",
"@type": ["File", "ImageObject"],
"encodingFormat": ["image/svg+xml"],
"name": "Diagram of RetroPath2.0 workflow",
"about": {"@id": "workflow/workflow.knime"}
},
A workflow diagram may still be provided even if there is no programmatic SoftwareSourceCode
that can be executed (e.g. because the workflow was done by hand). In this case the sketch itself is a proxy for the workflow and SHOULD have an about
property referring to the RO-Crate dataset as a whole (assuming the RO-Crate represents the outcome of a single workflow), or to other Data Entities otherwise:
{
"@id": "workflow/workflow.svg",
"@type": ["File", "ImageObject"],
"encodingFormat": ["image/svg+xml"],
"name": "Diagram of an ad hoc workflow",
"about": {"@id": "./"}
}
Data entities representing workflows (@type: ComputationalWorkflow
) SHOULD comply with the Bioschemas ComputationalWorkflow profile, where possible.
When complying with this profile, the workflow data entities MUST describe these properties and their related contextual entities: name, programmingLanguage, creator, dateCreated, license, sdPublisher, url, version.
The ComputationalWorkflow profile explains the above and list additional properties that a compliant ComputationalWorkflow data entity SHOULD include: citation, contributor, creativeWorkStatus, description, funding, hasPart, isBasedOn, keywords, maintainer, producer, publisher, runtimePlatform, softwareRequirements, targetProduct
A data entity conforming to the ComputationalWorkflow profile SHOULD declare the versioned profile URI using conformsTo:
{ "@id": "workflow/alignment.knime",
"@type": ["File", "SoftwareSourceCode", "ComputationalWorkflow"],
"conformsTo":
{"@id": "https://bioschemas.org/profiles/ComputationalWorkflow/0.5-DRAFT-2020_07_21/"},
"..": ""
}
The input and output parameters for a workflow or script can be given with input
and output
to FormalParameter contextual entities. Note that this entity usually represent a potential input/output value in a reusable workflow, much like function parameter definitions in general programming.
If complying with the Bioschemas FormalParameter profile, the contextual entities for FormalParameter, referenced by input
or output
, MUST describe: name, additionalType, encodingFormat
The Bioschemas FormalParameter profile explains the above and lists additional properties that can be used, including description, valueRequired, defaultValue and identifier.
A contextual entity conforming to the FormalParameter profile SHOULD declare the versioned profile URI using conformsTo, e.g.:
{
"@id": "#36aadbd4-4a2d-4e33-83b4-0cbf6a6a8c5b",
"@type": "FormalParameter",
"conformsTo":
{"@id": "https://bioschemas.org/profiles/FormalParameter/0.1-DRAFT-2020_07_21/"},
"..": ""
}
Note: input
, output
and FormalParameter
are at time of writing proposed by Bioschemas and not yet integrated in Schema.org
The below is an example of an RO-Crate complying with the Bioschemas ComputationalWorkflow profile 0.5:
{ "@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"},
"about": {"@id": "./"}
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"hasPart": [
{ "@id": "workflow/alignment.knime" }
]
},
{
"@id": "workflow/alignment.knime",
"@type": ["File", "SoftwareSourceCode", "ComputationalWorkflow"],
"conformsTo":
{"@id": "https://bioschemas.org/profiles/ComputationalWorkflow/0.5-DRAFT-2020_07_21/"},
"name": "Sequence alignment workflow",
"programmingLanguage": {"@id": "#knime"},
"creator": {"@id": "#alice"},
"dateCreated": "2020-05-23",
"license": { "@id": "https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0"},
"input": [
{ "@id": "#36aadbd4-4a2d-4e33-83b4-0cbf6a6a8c5b"}
],
"output": [
{ "@id": "#6c703fee-6af7-4fdb-a57d-9e8bc4486044"},
{ "@id": "#2f32b861-e43c-401f-8c42-04fd84273bdf"}
],
"sdPublisher": {"@id": "#workflow-hub"},
"url": "http://example.com/workflows/alignment",
"version": "0.5.0"
},
{
"@id": "#36aadbd4-4a2d-4e33-83b4-0cbf6a6a8c5b",
"@type": "FormalParameter",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://bioschemas.org/profiles/FormalParameter/0.1-DRAFT-2020_07_21/"},
"name": "genome_sequence",
"valueRequired": true,
"additionalType": {"@id": "http://edamontology.org/data_2977"},
"format": {"@id": "http://edamontology.org/format_1929"}
},
{
"@id": "#6c703fee-6af7-4fdb-a57d-9e8bc4486044",
"@type": "FormalParameter",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://bioschemas.org/profiles/FormalParameter/0.1-DRAFT-2020_07_21/"},
"name": "cleaned_sequence",
"additionalType": {"@id": "http://edamontology.org/data_2977"},
"encodingFormat": {"@id": "http://edamontology.org/format_2572"}
},
{
"@id": "#2f32b861-e43c-401f-8c42-04fd84273bdf",
"@type": "FormalParameter",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://bioschemas.org/profiles/FormalParameter/0.1-DRAFT-2020_07_21/"},
"name": "sequence_alignment",
"additionalType": {"@id": "http://edamontology.org/data_1383"},
"encodingFormat": {"@id": "http://edamontology.org/format_1982"}
},
{
"@id": "https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"name": "Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 4.0 International",
"alternateName": "CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0"
},
{
"@id": "#knime",
"@type": "ProgrammingLanguage",
"name": "KNIME Analytics Platform",
"alternateName": "KNIME",
"url": "https://www.knime.com/whats-new-in-knime-41",
"version": "4.1.3"
},
{
"@id": "#alice",
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Alice Brown"
},
{
"@id": "#workflow-hub",
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Example Workflow Hub",
"url":"http://example.com/workflows/"
},
{
"@id": "http://edamontology.org/format_1929",
"@type": "Thing",
"name": "FASTA sequence format"
},
{
"@id": "http://edamontology.org/format_1982",
"@type": "Thing",
"name": "ClustalW alignment format"
},
{
"@id": "http://edamontology.org/format_2572",
"@type": "Thing",
"name": "BAM format"
},
{
"@id": "http://edamontology.org/data_2977",
"@type": "Thing",
"name": "Nucleic acid sequence"
},
{
"@id": "http://edamontology.org/data_1383",
"@type": "Thing",
"name": "Nucleic acid sequence alignment"
}
]
}
rdfs:comment
on ad-hoc terms #164conformsTo
URIs unchanged, will be updated in RO-Crate 1.2)ro-crate-metadata.json
to facilitate use of JSON editors. #82 #84./
#74@type
might be an array #85@base: null
#73relatedLink
property in RepositoryCollection example #91jekyll-rtd-theme
and split into multiple pages #95author
can also be applied to CreativeWork
e086b8b@id
should not include ../
74ef6f1conformsTo
to indicate RO-Crate version@type
array instead of additionalType
affiliation
#identifiers
and _:identifiers
ro-crate-metadata.jsonld
instead of CATALOG.json
(DataCrate) or manifest.jsonld
(RO-Lite)ro-crate-metadata.html
instead of DataCrate’s CATALOG.html
about
the RO-Crate Dataset.When implementing tools to work with RO-Crate it is not necessary to use JSON-LD software libraries, however, programmers should keep in mind the following:
RO-Crate JSON-lD has a flat structure; every entity is a JSON object directly within the @graph
array in the RO-Crate Metadata File. A useful strategy when processing a crate is to build a look-up table and/or function so that entities can be found via their ID, for example provide a method such as getEntity(id)
which returns an entity by its id or a null
value if it’s not there.
Code defensively. Code should not assume that values will always be a String; values for properties may be single scalar values such as strings or integers ("2"
or 2), or references to other entities such as {"@id", "_:1"}
(where the referenced entity may or may not be described in the crate, see the point above about having a getEntity()
method).
Read the whole specification. The RO-Crate specification addresses common use cases individually, introducing aspects of the specification as in a progressive manner. Some key points, such as entities may have more than one value for @type
, may not be apparent from a quick reading.
RO-Crates may co-exist with other packaging schemes, such as BagIt using two general approaches; either (a) adding RO-Crate into a package as part of the payload or (b) wrapping another kind of package. Examples using BagIt follow.
BagIt is described in RFC 8493:
[BagIt is] … a set of hierarchical file layout conventions for storage and transfer of arbitrary digital content. A “bag” has just enough structure to enclose descriptive metadata “tags” and a file “payload” but does not require knowledge of the payload’s internal semantics. This BagIt format is suitable for reliable storage and transfer.
BagIt and RO-Crate have largely separate concerns - RO-Crate is focussed on rich metadata, the semantics of data, while BagIt is about reliable transfer.
RO-Crate can be combined with BagIt simply by placing the RO-Crate files within the BagIt payload (data/
) directory.
<BagIt base directory>/
| bagit.txt # As per BagIt specification
| bag-info.txt # As per BagIt specification
| manifest-<algorithm>.txt # As per BagIt specification
| fetch.txt # Optional, per BagIt Specification
| data/ # Payload: RO-Crate root directory
| ro-crate-metadata.json # RO-Crate Metadata File MUST be present
| ro-crate-preview.html # RO-Crate Website homepage MAY be present
| ro-crate-preview_files/ # MAY be present
| [payload files and directories] # 1 or more SHOULD be present
The Bag declaration bagit.txt
MUST be present, the main role of this file is to mark the folder as a bag according to RFC8493. The file SHOULD have this fixed content in UTF-8:
BagIt-version: 1.0
Tag-File-Character-Encoding: UTF-8
The BagIt base directory containing bagit.txt
can have any name, and can be archived/transferred in any way, e.g. within a ZIP archive, SFTP or even be exposed on the web.
The manifest file contains file checksums; the BagIt specifications recommends SHA-512 as default algorithm, that is manifest-sha512.txt
SHOULD be present.
The BagIt manifest file MUST list the checksum of all payload files in data/
and its subdirectories. Where data/
is also the RO-Crate Root the manifest therefore MUST include ro-crate-metadata.json
:
41846747…ee71 data/ro-crate-metadata.json
e1105ed0…5e13 data/chipseq_20200910.json
37fd3a02…bb95 data/results/pipeline_info/design_reads.csv
Note: The SHA-512 checksums have been shortened in the above example.
Creating the manifest file without using BagIt tools/libraries can be done using the equivalent of:
$ find data -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sha512sum > manifest-sha512.txt
Similarly checking the payload directory:
$ sha512sum --quiet -c manifest-sha512.txt
data/chipseq_20200910.json: FAILED
data/ro-crate-metadata.json: FAILED
sha512sum: WARNING: 2 computed checksums did NOT match
The BagIt manifest complements the RO-Crate structure as it provide a complete listing of all payload files with cryptographically strong checksums, ensuring the crate has been fully archived/transferred, which the weak CRC-32 checksum (TCP/IP, ZIP, gzip) is insufficient to guarantee, particularly for large crates.
To ensure the manifest file itself is complete, it is RECOMMENDED to include its checksum in tagmanifest-sha512.txt
:
b0556450…8802 bag-info.txt
000b27e3…c52e manifest-sha512.txt
The BagIt manifest is intended to detect “bit rot” and accidental damage, it does not provide proof the RO-Crate has not been deliberately tampered with, as a malicious actor can also update the checksums.
Guarding against such scenarious would require additional cryptographic measures, e.g.
gpg --detach-sign --armor --output tagmanifest-sha512.txt.asc tagmanifest-sha512.txt
in combination with a secure PGP key exchange or equivalent trust network.
The arcp specification suggests how BagIt UUID identifiers can be used to calculate the base URI of a bag, see section Establishing a base URI inside a ZIP file. For this purpose it is RECOMMENDED that bag-info.txt
includes a fresh UUID like:
External-Identifier: urn:uuid:24e51ca2-5067-4598-935a-dac4e327d05a
The BagIt fetch file MAY be used to reference files to be downloaded into particular data/
paths to complete the bag. These files may be large, require authentication or otherwise inconvenient to transfer within the BagIt folder.
Example fetch.txt
using Git LFS:
https://media.githubusercontent.com/…/SPT5_INPUT_R1.bigWig 963489 data/results/SPT5_INPUT_R1.bigWig
BagIt tools can help complete the bag and verify the checksum of the downloaded files according to the manifest.
The RO-Crate contained in data/
MAY describe the bag with data entities as if the bag was complete, even if the large file is not (yet) present:
{
"@id": "results/SPT5_INPUT_R1.bigWig",
"@type": "File",
"name": "Normalized SPT5_INPUT_R1 bigWig for genome browsers",
"encodingFormat": {"@id": "http://edamontology.org/format_3006"},
"url": "https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/biocompute-objects/bco-ro-example-chipseq/main/data/results/bwa/mergedLibrary/bigwig/SPT5_INPUT_R1.bigWig"}
}
It is RECOMMENDED that the url
is provided in the data entity and consistent with the line in fetch.txt
in case the RO-Crate is transferred outside its BagIt container.
The fetch.txt
approach can also be useful where other files in the RO-Crate reference a downloadable file by relative paths within data/
, even if this file is not itself described in the RO-Crate metadata.
As an alternative to the above, web-based data entities can be used in the RO-Crate:
{
"@id": "https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/biocompute-objects/bco-ro-example-chipseq/main/data/results/bwa/mergedLibrary/bigwig/SPT5_INPUT_R1.bigWig",
"@type": "File",
"name": "Normalized SPT5_INPUT_R1 bigWig for genome browsers",
"encodingFormat": {"@id": "http://edamontology.org/format_3006"}
}
The above data entity MAY be combined with fetch.txt
in the BagIt base directory:
https://media.githubusercontent.com/…/SPT5_INPUT_R1.bigWig 963489 data/snapshots/SPT5_INPUT_R1.bigWig
In this case the file data/snapshots/SPT5_INPUT_R1.bigWig
may be present, but unknown by RO-Crate; BagIt contains a checksummed snapshot of the web resource. Compared with the first approach, the RO-Crate is here primarily pointing at a web resource which is allowed to change without causing a BagIt checksum error.
Alternatively, an RO-Crate can wrap a BagIt bag, so that the RO-Crate metadata is outside of the bag directory and can be changed without changing the payload’s checksums.
<RO-Crate root directory>/
| ro-crate-metadata.json # RO-Crate Metadata File MUST be present
| ro-crate-preview.html # RO-Crate Website homepage MAY be present
| ro-crate-preview_files/ # MAY be present
| bag1/ # "Wrapped" bag - could have any name
| bagit.txt # As per BagIt specification
| bag-info.txt # As per BagIt specification
| manifest-<algorithm>.txt # As per BagIt specification
| fetch.txt # Optional, per BagIt Specification
| data/
| [payload files and directories] # 1 or more SHOULD be present
| example.txt
A Data Entity describing example.txt
in this scenario would have an @id
of bag1/data/example.txt
:
{
"@id": "bag1/data/example.txt",
"name": "Example file"
}
Root Data Entities MAY include repository-specific identifiers, described using Contextual Entities using a PropertyValue, with a name that identifies the repository and the identifier as a value. The same identifier MAY be used in multiple different repositories and effectively namespaced using the name
of the ProperyValue
.
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"identifier": ["https://doi.org/10.4225/59/59672c09f4a4b", {"@id": "_:localid:my-repo:my-id"}, {"@id": "_:localid:other-repo:https://doi.org/10.4225/59/59672c09f4a4b"}]
}
{
"@id": "_:localid:my-repo:my-id",
"@type": "PropertyValue",
"name": "my-repo",
"value": "my-id"
}
{
"@id": "_:localid:other-repo:https://doi.org/10.4225/59/59672c09f4a4b",
"@type": "PropertyValue",
"name": "other-repo",
"value": "https://doi.org/10.4225/59/59672c09f4a4b"
}
It is not necessary to use JSON-LD tooling to generate or parse the RO-Crate Metadata File, although JSON-LD tools may make it easier to conform to this specification, e.g. handling relative URIs. It is however RECOMMENDED to use JSON tooling to handle JSON syntax and escaping rules.
This appendix shows a brief JSON-LD introduction for complying with the RO-Crate Metadata File requirements.
The example below shows the overall structure of a flattened, compacted RO-Crate Metadata File where @context
refers to the RO-Crate JSON-LD Context, while @graph
is a flat array of the entities that constitute this RO-Crate.
{ "@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"},
"about": {"@id": "./"},
"description": "RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor (this file)"
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"name": "Example RO-Crate",
"description": "The RO-Crate Root Data Entity",
"hasPart": [
{"@id": "data1.txt"},
{"@id": "data2.txt"}
]
},
{
"@id": "data1.txt",
"@type": "File",
"description": "One of hopefully many Data Entities",
"author": {"@id": "#alice"},
"contentLocation": {"@id": "http://sws.geonames.org/8152662/"}
},
{
"@id": "data2.txt",
"@type": "File"
},
{
"@id": "#alice",
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Alice",
"description": "One of hopefully many Contextual Entities"
},
{
"@id": "http://sws.geonames.org/8152662/",
"@type": "Place",
"name": "Catalina Park"
}
]
}
Note: entities above have been shortened for brevity, see the individual sections for data entities and contextual entities.
The order of the @graph
array is not significant. Above we see that the RO-Crate JSON-LD graph contains the RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor, the Root Data Entity, any Data Entities and any Contextual Entities.
Properties of an entity can refer to another URL or entity by using the form {"@id": "uri-reference"}
as in the example above, where the author property in the File entity refer to the Person entity, identified as #alice
.
Identifiers in @id
SHOULD be either a valid absolute URI like http://example.com/, or a URI path relative to the RO-Crate root directory. Although legal in JSON-LD, @id
paths in RO-Crate SHOULD NOT use ../
to climb out of the RO-Crate Root, rather such references SHOULD be translated to absolute URIs. See also section Core Metadata for Data Entities.
Care must be taken to express any relative paths using /
separator and escape special characters like space (%20
). As JSON-LD supports IRIs, international characters in identifiers SHOULD be encoded in UTF-8 rather than %
-escaped.
Because the RO-Crate JSON-LD is flattened, all described entities must be JSON objects as direct children of the @graph
element rather than being nested under another object or array. Properties referencing entities must use a JSON object with @id
as the only key, e.g. "author": {"@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1825-0097"}
If no obvious identifier is available for a contextual entity, an identifier local to the RO-Crate Metadata File can be generated, for instance {"@id": "#alice"}
or {"@id": "#ac0bd781-7d91-4cdf-b2ad-7305921c7650"}
. Although it is RECOMMENDED to use #
-based local identifiers, identifiers in @id
MAY alternatively be a blank node identifier (e.g. _:alice
).
Multiple values and references can be represented using JSON arrays, as exemplified in hasPart
above; however as the RO-Crate JSON-LD
is in compacted form, any single-element arrays like "author": [{"@id": "#alice"}]
SHOULD be unpacked to a single value like "author": {"@id": "#alice"}
.
The main purpose of the @context
is to relate JSON property keys and @type
references to their Linked Data identifiers, which in RO-Crate is based primarily on http://schema.org/ URIs.
In other uses of JSON-LD the context may perform more automatic or detailed mapping, but the RO-Crate JSON-LD context
is deliberately flat, listing every property and type.
To find the full description of a particular property or type, follow its URI from the context. For instance, we can find within the context https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context that author
above is mapped to http://schema.org/author:
"author": "http://schema.org/author",
The RO-Crate JSON-LD Context may either be set by reference to https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context or by value (merging the two documents).
Consider the below (simplified) example of by reference using a versioned permalink:
{ "@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"description": "RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor (this file)",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"},
"about": {"@id": "./"}
}
]
}
The above is equivalent to the following JSON-LD using an embedded context, by adding the subset of corresponding keys from the external @context
:
{ "@context": {
"CreativeWork": "http://schema.org/CreativeWork",
"about": "http://schema.org/about",
"description": "http://schema.org/description",
"conformsTo": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/conformsTo",
"about": "http://schema.org/about"
},
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"description": "RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor (this file)",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"},
"about": {"@id": "./"}
}
]
}
Note that conformsTo
is retained to indicate which version of RO-Crate specification the root data entity conforms to.
While the second form is more verbose, one advantage is that it is “archivable” as it does not require Internet access for retrieving the @context
permalink. Tools consuming or archiving RO-Crate MAY replace by-reference @context
URIs with an embedded context by using version-specific hard-coded contexts. See https://github.com/ResearchObject/ro-crate/releases to download the JSON-LD contexts corresponding to each version of this specification.
To check which RO-Crate version is used (in terms of properties and types expected), clients SHOULD check the property conformsTo
on the RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor rather than the value of @context
.
RO-Crate consumers SHOULD NOT do the opposite substitution from an embedded context, but MAY use the JSON-LD flattening algorithm with compaction to a referenced RO-Crate JSON-LD context (see also notes on handling relative URI references below).
Tip: The JSON-LD flattening & compaction algorithms can be used to rewrite to a different @context
, e.g. to https://schema.org/docs/jsonldcontext.jsonld
or a different version of the RO-Crate JSON-LD Context.
The media type application/ld+json
for ro-crate-metadata.json
will, when following this specification, comply with the flattened/compacted JSON-LD profiles as well as https://w3id.org/ro/crate
, which may be indicated in a HTTP response as:
HEAD http://example.com/ro-123/ro-crate-metadata.json HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/ld+json; profile="http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#flattened http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#compacted https://w3id.org/ro/crate"
Note that most web servers will however serve *.json
as Content-Type: application/json
.
Requesting the RO-Crate metadata file from a browser may also need permission through CORS header Access-Control-Allow-Origin
(however extra care should be taken if the RO-Crates require access control).
To change the configuration of Apache HTTPD 2, add the following to .htaccess
or equivalent config file:
<Files "ro-crate-metadata.json">
ForceType 'application/ld+json;profile="http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#flattened http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#compacted https://w3id.org/ro/crate"'
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin *
Header set Access-Control-Expose-Headers "Content-Length,Content-Range,Content-Type"
</Files>
For NGINX, try:
location ~ ro-crate-metadata.json$ {
types { } default_type 'application/ld+json;profile="http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#flattened http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#compacted https://w3id.org/ro/crate"';
add_header 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' '*';
add_header 'Access-Control-Expose-Headers' 'Content-Length,Content-Range,Content-Type';
}
For Content-Delivery Networks (e.g. GitHub pages) a symbolic link to ro-crate-metadata.jsonld
may help to create an alias that can be served as application/ld+json
:
ln -s ro-crate-metadata.json ro-crate-metadata.jsonld
To extend RO-Crate, implementers SHOULD try to use existing http://schema.org/ properties and classes and MAY use terms from other vocabularies and ontologies when this is not possible.
The terms (properties and types) used SHOULD be added as keys to the @context
in the RO-Crate JSON-LD (if not present). To avoid duplicating the RO-Crate JSON-LD Context the @context: []
array form SHOULD be used as shown below.
URIs in the @context
SHOULD resolve to a useful human readable page. When this is not possible - for example if the URI resolves to an RDF ontology file, a human-readable URI SHOULD be provided using a sameAs description.
For example. The @id
URI http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/interviewee from the BIBO ontology intends to resolve to an ontology file, which is not useful for humans, however the HTML section http://neologism.ecs.soton.ac.uk/bibo.html#interviewee is human-readable. To read more about best practices for content negotiation of vocabularies, we refer the reader to Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies.
{
"@context": [
"https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
{"interviewee": "http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/interviewee"},
],
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/interviewee",
"sameAs": "http://neologism.ecs.soton.ac.uk/bibo.html#interviewee",
"@type": "Thing"
}
]
}
When generating the RO-Crate Website from RO-Crate JSON-LD, the code MUST use a sameAs URI (if present) as a target for an explanatory link for the term instead of the Linked Data URI supplied in the @context
.
Where there is no RDF ontology available, then implementors SHOULD attempt to provide context by creating stable web-accessible URIs to document properties and classes, for example, by linking to a page describing an XML element or an attribute from an XML schema, pending the publication of a formal ontology.
Context terms must ultimately map to HTTP(s) URIs which poses challenges for crate-authors wishing to use their own vocabularies.
RO-Crate provides some strategies to add a new term (a Class or Property) that is not in Schema.org or another published vocabulary, so that there is a stable URI that can be added to the @context.
For projects that have their own web-presence, URLs MAY be defined there and SHOULD resolve to useful content. For example for a project with web page https://criminalcharacters.com/ the property education
could have a URL: https://criminalcharacters.com/vocab#education which resolves to an HTML page that explains the term using HTML anchors:
<div id="education">
<h1>Property: education</h1>
<p>Literacy of prisoner. Prison authorities would record the prisoner’s statement as to whether they could read and write …
</p>
</div>
Tip: Ensure you have a consistent use of http
or https
(preferring https) as well as consistent path /vocab
vs /vocab/
vs /vocab/index.html
(preferring the shortest that is also visible in browser).
For ad hoc terms where the crate author does not have the resources to create and maintain an HTML page, authors may use the RO-Crate public namespace (https://w3id.org/ro/terms/
) to reserve their terms. For example, an ad-hoc URL MAY be used in the form https://w3id.org/ro/terms/criminalcharacters#education
where criminalcharacters
is acting as a namespace for one or more related terms like education
. Ad-hoc namespaces under https://w3id.org/ro/terms/
are available on first-come-first-serve basis; to avoid clashes, namespaces SHOULD be registered by submitting terms and definitions to the RO-Crate terms project.
In both cases, to use an ad-hoc term in an RO-Crate, the URI MUST be included in the local context:
{
"@context": [
"https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
{"education": "https://criminalcharacters.com/vocab#education",
"interests": "https://w3id.org/ro/terms/criminalcharacters#interests"},
],
"@graph": [ ... ]
}
Following the conventions used by Schema.org, ad-hoc terms SHOULD also include definitions in the RO-Crate with at minimum:
@type
of either Class
(contextual entity type) or Property
(attribute of an contextual entity)rdfs:label
with the human readable version of the term, e.g. makesFood
has label makes food
rdf:comment
documenting and clarifying the meaning of the term. For instance the term sentence
in a prisoner vocabulary will have a different explanation than sentence
in a linguistic vocabulary.{
"@id": "https://criminalcharacters.com/vocab#education",
"@type": "rdf:Property",
"rdfs:label": "education",
"rdf:comment": "Literacy of prisoner. ..."
}
Tip: It is not a requirement to use English for the terms, labels or comments.
More information about the relationship of this term to other terms MAY be provided using domainIncludes, rangeIncludes, rdfs:subClassOf following the conventions used in the Schema.org schema.
The RO-Crate Metadata File use relative URI references to identify files and directories contained within the RO-Crate Root and its children. As described in section Describing entities in JSON-LD above, relative URI references are also frequently used for identifying Contextual entities.
When using JSON-LD tooling and RDF libraries to consume or generate RO-Crates, extra care should be taken to ensure these URI references are handled correctly.
For this, a couple of scenarios are sketched below with recommendations for consistent handling:
If performing JSON-LD flattening to generate a valid RO-Crate Metadata File, add @base: null
to the input JSON-LD @context
array to avoid expanding relative URI references. The flattening @context
SHOULD NOT need @base: null
.
Example, this JSON-LD is in compacted form which may be beneficial for processing, but is not yet valid RO-Crate Metadata File as it has not been flattened into a @graph
array.
{
"@context": [
{"@base": null},
"https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context"
],
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"description": "RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor (this file)",
"conformsTo": {"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"},
"about": {
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"name": "Example RO-Crate",
"description": "The RO-Crate Root Data Entity",
"hasPart": [
{ "@id": "data1.txt",
"@type": "File",
"description": "One of hopefully many Data Entities",
},
{ "@id": "subfolder/",
"@type": "Dataset"
}
]
}
}
Performing JSON-LD flattening with:
{ "@context":
"https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context"
}
Results in a valid RO-Crate JSON-LD (actual order in @graph
may differ):
{
"@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"conformsTo": {
"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"
},
"about": {
"@id": "./"
},
"description": "RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor (this file)"
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"description": "The RO-Crate Root Data Entity",
"hasPart": [
{
"@id": "data1.txt"
},
{
"@id": "subfolder/"
}
],
"name": "Example RO-Crate"
},
{
"@id": "data1.txt",
"@type": "File",
"description": "One of hopefully many Data Entities"
},
{
"@id": "subfolder/",
"@type": "Dataset"
}
]
}
Note: The saved RO-Crate JSON-LD SHOULD NOT include {@base: null}
in its @context
.
JSON-LD Expansion can be used to resolve terms from the @context
to absolute URIs, e.g. http://schema.org/description
. This may be needed to parse extended properties or for combinations with other Linked Data.
This algorithm would normally also expand @id
fields based on the current base URI of the RO-Crate Metadata File, but this may be a temporary location like file:///tmp/rocrate54/ro-crate-metadata.json
, meaning @id
: subfolder/
becomes file:///tmp/rocrate54/subfolder/
after JSON-LD expansion.
To avoid absoluting local identifiers, before expanding, augment the JSON-LD @context
to ensure it is an array that includes {"@base": null}
.
For example, expanding this JSON-LD:
{
"@context": [
"https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
{"@base": null}
],
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"conformsTo": {
"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"
},
"about": {
"@id": "./"
},
"description": "RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor (this file)"
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"description": "The RO-Crate Root Data Entity",
"hasPart": [
{
"@id": "data1.txt"
},
{
"@id": "subfolder/"
}
],
"name": "Example RO-Crate"
}
]
}
Results in a expanded form without @context
, using absolute URIs for properties and types, but retains relative URI references for entities within the RO-Crate Root:
[
{
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"@type": [
"http://schema.org/CreativeWork"
],
"http://schema.org/about": [
{
"@id": "./"
}
],
"http://purl.org/dc/terms/conformsTo": [
{
"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"
}
],
"http://schema.org/description": [
{
"@value": "RO-Crate Metadata File Descriptor (this file)"
}
]
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": [
"http://schema.org/Dataset"
],
"http://schema.org/description": [
{
"@value": "The RO-Crate Root Data Entity"
}
],
"http://schema.org/hasPart": [
{
"@id": "data1.txt"
},
{
"@id": "subfolder/"
}
],
"http://schema.org/name": [
{
"@value": "Example RO-Crate"
}
]
}
]
Note: @base: null
will not relativize existing absolute URIs that happen to be contained by the RO-Crate Root (see section Relativizing absolute URIs within RO-Crate Root).
Tip: Most RDF parsers supporting JSON-LD will perform this kind of expansion before generating triples, but not all RDF stores or serializations support relative URI references. Consider using an alternative @base
as detailed in sections below.
When loading RO-Crate JSON-LD as RDF, or combining the crate’s Linked Data into a larger JSON-LD, it is important to ensure correct base URI to resolve URI references that are relative to the RO-Crate Root.
Note: When retrieving an RO-Crate over the web, servers might have performed HTTP redirections so that the base URI is different from what was requested. It is RECOMMENDED to follow section Establishing a Base URI of RFC3986 before resolving relative links from the RO-Crate Metadata File.
For instance, consider this HTTP redirection from a permalink (simplified):
GET https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.0/crate HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Location: https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/1.0/ro-crate-metadata.jsonld
GET https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/1.0/ro-crate-metadata.jsonld HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/ld+json
{
"@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.0/context",
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.jsonld",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"conformsTo": {
"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.0"
},
"about": {
"@id": "./"
},
"license": {
"@id": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/"
}
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"hasPart": [
{
"@id": "index.html"
}
}
]
}
Following redirection we see that:
https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/1.0/ro-crate-metadata.jsonld
index.html
resolves to https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/1.0/index.html
https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.0/index.html
which would not redirect correctlyThis example also use RO-Crate 1.0, where the RO-Crate Metadata File is called ro-crate-metadata.jsonld
instead of ro-crate-metadata.json
. Note that the recommended algorithm to find the Root Data Entity is agnostic to the actual filename.
When parsing RO-Crate JSON-LD as RDF, where the RDF framework performs resolution to absolute URIs, it may be difficult to find the RO-Crate Root in the parsed triples.
The algoritm proposed in section Root Data Entity allows finding the RDF resource describing ro-crate-metadata.json
, independent of its parsed base URI. We can adopt this for RDF triples, thus finding crates conforming to this specification can be queried with SPARQL:
PREFIX dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>
PREFIX schema: <http://schema.org/>
SELECT ?crate ?metadatafile
WHERE {
?crate a schema:Dataset .
?metadatafile schema:about ?crate .
?metadatafile dcterms:conformsTo <https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1> .
}
..or (less efficient) for any RO-Crate version:
PREFIX dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>
PREFIX schema: <http://schema.org/>
SELECT ?crate ?metadatafile ?spec
WHERE {
?crate a schema:Dataset .
?metadatafile schema:about ?crate .
?metadatafile dcterms:conformsTo ?spec .
FILTER STRSTARTS(str(?spec), "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/")
}
When parsing a RO-Crate Metadata File into RDF triples, for instance uploading it to a graph store like Apache Jena’s Fuseki, it is important to ensure consistent base URI:
<file:///tmp/ro-crate-metadata.json>
(file) or <http://localhost:3030/test/ro-crate-metadata.json>
(web upload)ro-crate-metadata.json
may not be recognized as JSON-LD and must be renamed to ro-crate-metadata.jsonld
ro-crate-metadata.json
may not send the JSON-LD Content-TypeTip: If the RDF library can parse the RO-Crate JSON-LD directly by retrieving from a http
/https
URI of the RO-Crate Metadata File it should calculate the correct base URI as detailed in section Establishing absolute URI for RO-Crate Root and you should not need to override the base URI as detailed here.
If a web-based URI for the RO-Crate root is known, then this can be supplied as a base URI. Most RDF tools support a --base
option or similar. If this is not possible, then the @context
of the RO-Crate JSON-LD
can be modified by ensuring the @context
is an array that sets the desired @base
:
{
"@context": [
"https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
{"@base": "http://example.com/crate255/"}
],
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"conformsTo": {
"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"
},
"about": {
"@id": "./"
}
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"name": "Example RO-Crate"
},
{
"@id": "data1.txt",
"@type": "File",
"description": "One of hopefully many Data Entities"
},
{
"@id": "subfolder/",
"@type": "Dataset"
}
]
}
Parsing this will generate triples like below using http://example.com/crate255/
as the RO-Crate Root (shortened):
<http://example.com/crate255/ro-crate-metadata.json>
<http://purl.org/dc/terms/conformsTo>
<https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1> .
<http://example.com/crate255/ro-crate-metadata.json>
<http://schema.org/about>
<http://example.com/crate255/> .
<http://example.com/crate255/>
<http://schema.org/name>
"Example RO-Crate" .
<http://example.com/crate255/>
<http://schema.org/hasPart>
<http://example.com/crate255/data1.txt> .
<http://example.com/crate255/>
<http://schema.org/hasPart>
<http://example.com/crate255/subfolder/> .
<http://example.com/crate255/data1.txt>
<http://schema.org/description>
"One of hopefully many Data Entities" .
Generating a RO-Crate JSON-LD from such triples can be done by first finding the RO-Crate Root and then use it as base URI to relativize absolute URIs within RO-Crate Root.
An RO-Crate may have been packaged as a ZIP file or similar archive. RO-Crates may exist in a temporary file path which should not determine its identifiers.
When parsing such crates it is recommended to use the Archive and Package (arcp) URI scheme to establish a temporary/location-based UUID or hash-based (SHA256) base URI.
For instance, given a randomly generated UUID b7749d0b-0e47-5fc4-999d-f154abe68065
we can use arcp://uuid,b7749d0b-0e47-5fc4-999d-f154abe68065/
as the @base
:
{
"@context": [
"https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1/context",
{"@base": "arcp://uuid,b7749d0b-0e47-5fc4-999d-f154abe68065/"}
],
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"conformsTo": {
"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"
},
"about": {
"@id": "./"
}
},
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"description": "The RO-Crate Root Data Entity",
"hasPart": [
{
"@id": "data1.txt"
},
{
"@id": "subfolder/"
}
],
"name": "Example RO-Crate"
},
{
"@id": "data1.txt",
"@type": "File",
"description": "One of hopefully many Data Entities"
},
{
"@id": "subfolder/",
"@type": "Dataset"
}
]
}
Parsing this as RDF will generate triples including:
<arcp://uuid,b7749d0b-0e47-5fc4-999d-f154abe68065/ro-crate-metadata.json>
<http://schema.org/about>
<arcp://uuid,b7749d0b-0e47-5fc4-999d-f154abe68065/> .
<arcp://uuid,b7749d0b-0e47-5fc4-999d-f154abe68065/>
<http://schema.org/hasPart>
<arcp://uuid,b7749d0b-0e47-5fc4-999d-f154abe68065/data1.txt> .
Here consumers can assume /
is the RO-Crate Root and generating relative URIs can safely be achieved by search-replace as the arcp URI is unique. Saving RO-Crate JSON-LD from the triples can be done by using the arcp URI to relativize absolute URIs within RO-Crate Root.
Tip: Bagit: The arcp specification suggests how BagIt identifiers can be used to calculate the base URI. See also section Combining with other packaging schemes - note that in this approach the RO-Crate Root will be the payload folder /data/
under the calculated arcp base URI.
Some applications may prefer working with absolute URIs, e.g. in a joint graph store or web-based repository, but should relativize URIs within the RO-Crate Root before generating the RO-Crate Metadata File.
Assuming a repository at example.com
has JSON-LD with absolute URIs:
{
"@context": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1",
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "http://example.com/crate415/ro-crate-metadata.json",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"conformsTo": {
"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"
},
"about": {
"@id": "http://example.com/crate415/"
},
},
{
"@id": "http://example.com/crate415/",
"@type": "Dataset",
"description": "The RO-Crate Root Data Entity",
"hasPart": [
{
"@id": "http://example.com/crate415/data1.txt"
},
{
"@id": "http://example.com/crate415/subfolder/"
}
],
"name": "Example RO-Crate"
}
]
}
Then performing JSON-LD flattening with this @context
:
{ "@context": [
{"@base": "http://example.com/crate415/"},
"https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"
]
}
Will output RO-Crate JSON-LD with relative URIs:
{
"@context": [
{
"@base": "http://example.com/crate415/"
},
"https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"
],
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "./",
"@type": "Dataset",
"description": "The RO-Crate Root Data Entity",
"hasPart": [
{
"@id": "data1.txt"
},
{
"@id": "subfolder/"
}
],
"name": "Example RO-Crate"
},
{
"@id": "ro-crate-metadata.json",
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"conformsTo": {
"@id": "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1"
},
"about": {
"@id": "./"
}
}
]
}
Warning: This method would also relativize URIs outside the RO-Crate Root that are on the same host, e.g. http://example.com/crate255/other.txt
would become ../create255/other.txt
- this can particularly be a challenge with local file:///
URIs. `
[BagIt]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BagIt
[BagIt profile]: https://bagit-profiles.github.io/bagit-profiles-specification
[conformsTo]: http://purl.org/dc/terms/conformsTo
[CURIE]: https://www.w3.org/TR/curie/
[DataCite]: https://www.datacite.org/
[DataCite Schema]: https://schema.datacite.org/
[DataCite Schema v4.0]: https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.0/metadata.xsd
[Flattened Document Form]: https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#flattened-document-form
[geonames]: https://www.geonames.org/
[git]: https://git-scm.com/
[hasFile]: https://pcdm.org/2016/04/18/models#hasFile
[hasMember]: https://pcdm.org/2016/04/18/models#hasMember
[isOutputOf]: http://purl.org/cerif/frapo/2017-09-04#d4e526
[JSON]: http://json.org/
[JSON-LD]: https://json-ld.org/
[linked data]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_data
[OCFL]: https://ocfl.io/
[OCFL Object]: https://ocfl.io/1.0/spec/#object-spec
[ORCID]: https://orcid.org
[Pairtree]: https://confluence.ucop.edu/display/Curation/PairTree
[Pairtree specification]: https://confluence.ucop.edu/display/Curation/PairTree?preview=/14254128/16973838/PairtreeSpec.pdf
[Pronom]: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/PRONOM/Default.aspx
[RepositoryCollection]: https://pcdm.org/2016/04/18/models#Collection
[RepositoryObject]: https://pcdm.org/2016/04/18/models#Object
[ResearchObject]: https://www.researchobject.org/
[Schema.org]: http://schema.org
[WorkflowSketch]: http://wf4ever.github.io/ro/2016-01-28/roterms/#Sketch
[semver]: https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html
[Omeka]: https://omeka.org
[Linked Data principles]: https://5stardata.info/en/
[open standards from W3C]: https://www.w3.org/standards/
[GPL 3.0]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0
[HTML 5]: https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/
[W3C RDF 1.1 formats]: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/
[Research Organization Registry URIs]: https://ror.org/
[Google Dataset Search]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/dataset
[JSON-LD 1.0]: https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-json-ld-20140116/
[flattened]: https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#flattened-document-form
[compacted]: https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#compacted-document-form
[FORCE11 Data Citation Principles]: https://doi.org/10.25490/a97f-egyk
[RFC3986 section 3.3]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.3
[JSON-LD context]: https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#the-context
[BagIt UUID identifiers]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-soilandreyes-arcp-03#appendix-A.4
[domainIncludes]: http://schema.org/domainIncludes
[rangeIncludes]: http://schema.org/rangeIncludes
[Schema.org schema]: https://schema.org/version/latest/schemaorg-current-http.jsonld
[rdfs:subClassOf]: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_subclassof
[JSON-LD tooling]: https://json-ld.org/#developers
[JSON-LD flattening]: https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld-api/#flattening-algorithm
[JSON-LD Expansion]: https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld-api/#expansion
[JSON-LD base URI]: https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#base-iri
[JSON-LD expanded form]: https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#expanded-document-form
[RFC3986 base URI]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-5.1
[SPARQL]: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/
[RDF triples]: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/
[Apache Jena]: https://jena.apache.org/
[RDF 1.1 note on IRIs]: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#note-iris
[ARCP]: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-soilandreyes-arcp-03.html
[ARCP BagIt]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-soilandreyes-arcp-03#appendix-A.4
[media type]: https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types
[JSON-LD media type]: https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#application-ld-json
[RFC7231 response]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-3.1.1.5
[BIBO ontology]: http://neologism.ecs.soton.ac.uk/bibo.html
[ro-terms]: https://github.com/ResearchObject/ro-terms
[function parameter definitions]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parameter_(computer_programming)
[Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies]: https://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/
[Action]: http://schema.org/Action
[ActionStatusType]: http://schema.org/ActionStatusType
[ActiveActionStatus]: http://schema.org/ActiveActionStatus
[Class]: http://schema.org/Class
[CompletedActionStatus]: http://schema.org/CompletedActionStatus
[ComputerLanguage]: http://schema.org/ComputerLanguage
[CreateAction]: http://schema.org/CreateAction
[CreativeWork]: http://schema.org/CreativeWork
[DataDownload]: http://schema.org/DataDownload
[DateTime]: https://schema.org/DateTime
[Dataset]: http://schema.org/Dataset
[FailedActionStatus]: http://schema.org/FailedActionStatus
[File]: http://schema.org/MediaObject
[Journal]: http://schema.org/Periodical
[GeoCoordinates]: http://schema.org/GeoCoordinates
[ImageObject]: http://schema.org/ImageObject
[MediaObject]: http://schema.org/MediaObject
[Organization]: http://schema.org/Organization
[Person]: http://schema.org/Person
[PotentialActionStatus]: http://schema.org/PotentialActionStatus
[Place]: http://schema.org/Place
[Product]: http://schema.org/Product
[Property]: http://schema.org/Property
[PropertyValue]: http://schema.org/PropertyValue
[ScholarlyArticle]: http://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle
[SoftwareApplication]: http://schema.org/SoftwareApplication
[SoftwareSourceCode]: http://schema.org/SoftwareSourceCode
[UpdateAction]: http://schema.org/UpdateAction
[WebSite]: http://schema.org/WebSite
[about]: http://schema.org/about
[accountablePerson]: http://schema.org/accountablePerson
[actionStatus]: http://schema.org/actionStatus
[additionalType]: http://schema.org/additionalType
[affiliation]: http://schema.org/affiliation
[agent]: http://schema.org/agent
[alternateName]: http://schema.org/alternateName
[author]: http://schema.org/author
[citation]: http://schema.org/citation
[contact]: http://schema.org/accountablePerson
[contactPoint]: http://schema.org/contactPoint
[contactType]: http://schema.org/contactType
[contentLocation]: http://schema.org/contentLocation
[contentSize]: http://schema.org/contentSize
[contributor]: http://schema.org/contributor
[copyrightHolder]: http://schema.org/copyrightHolder
[creator]: http://schema.org/creator
[dateCreated]: http://schema.org/dateCreated
[datePublished]: http://schema.org/datePublished
[defaultValue]: http://schema.org/defaultValue
[description]: http://schema.org/description
[distribution]: http://schema.org/distribution
[email]: http://schema.org/email
[encodingFormat]: http://schema.org/encodingFormat
[endTime]: http://schema.org/endTime
[error]: http://schema.org/error
[event]: http://schema.org/event
[familyName]: http://schema.org/familyName
[funder]: http://schema.org/funder
[geo]: http://schema.org/geo
[givenName]: http://schema.org/givenName
[hasPart]: http://schema.org/hasPart
[identifier]: http://schema.org/identifier
[IndividualProduct]: http://schema.org/IndividualProduct
[instrument]: http://schema.org/instrument
[keywords]: http://schema.org/keywords
[license]: http://schema.org/license
[memberOf]: http://schema.org/memberOf
[name]: http://schema.org/name
[object]: http://schema.org/object
[phone]: http://schema.org/phone
[programmingLanguage]: http://schema.org/programmingLanguage
[publisher]: http://schema.org/publisher
[relatedItem]: http://schema.org/relatedItem
[result]: http://schema.org/result
[sameAs]: http://schema.org/sameAs
[sdLicense]: http://schema.org/sdLicense
[sdPublisher]: http://schema.org/sdPublisher
[sdDatePublished]: https://schema.org/sdDatePublished
[startTime]: http://schema.org/startTime
[temporalCoverage]: http://schema.org/temporalCoverage
[thumbnail]: http://schema.org/thumbnail
[translationOf]: http://schema.org/translationOf
[translator]: http://schema.org/translator
[url]: http://schema.org/url
[valueRequired]: http://schema.org/valueRequired
[version]: http://schema.org/version
[creativeWorkStatus]: http://schema.org/creativeWorkStatus
[isBasedOn]: http://schema.org/isBasedOn
[maintainer]: http://schema.org/maintainer
[producer]: http://schema.org/producer
[runtimePlatform]: http://schema.org/runtimePlatform
[softwareRequirements]: http://schema.org/softwareRequirements
[targetProduct]: http://schema.org/targetProduct
[conditionsOfAccess]: http://schema.org/conditionsOfAccess
[dateModified]: http://schema.org/dateModified
[image]: http://schema.org/image
[DefinedTerm]: http://schema.org/DefinedTerm
[DefinedTermSet]: http://schema.org/DefinedTermSet
[Grant]: http://schema.org/Grant
[Project]: http://schema.org/Project
[subjectOf]: http://schema.org/subjectOf
[mainEntityOfPage]: http://schema.org/mainEntityOfPage
[WebPage]: https://schema.org/WebPage
[input]: https://bioschemas.org/types/ComputationalWorkflow/0.1-DRAFT-2020_07_21#input
[output]: https://bioschemas.org/types/ComputationalWorkflow/0.1-DRAFT-2020_07_21#output
[FormalParameter]: https://bioschemas.org/types/FormalParameter/0.1-DRAFT-2020_07_21
[ComputationalWorkflow]: https://bioschemas.org/types/ComputationalWorkflow/0.1-DRAFT-2020_07_21
[ComputationalWorkflow profile]: https://bioschemas.org/profiles/ComputationalWorkflow/0.5-DRAFT-2020_07_21
[FormalParameter profile]: https://bioschemas.org/profiles/FormalParameter/0.1-DRAFT-2020_07_21
[RFC 2119]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
[RFC 3986]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986
[RFC 6838]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6838
[RFC 7159]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7159
[RFC 8493]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8493