#	Attribute	Description	Value range
1	Name of the tool	Name of the tool as it is officially given as the title (without vendor name in front of it, if applicable).	free text
2	Provider	The developers of the tool.	free text
3	Access / Link	Link to the tool through which it can be accessed and used.	URL
4	Form	Categorization of the tool. Can belong to several categories by fulfilling specific properties.	[Fully Configurable Tool, Automatic Tools, Improved Survey Tool, Regular List Tool]
5	Publication year	Indication of the year when the tool was published for the first time.	year
6	Development status	Technical state of the tool. Recognizable on the basis of completeness of the questions, version of the source code or also regular updates.	[unfinished, complete, ready and will be updated]
7	Automation level of the evaluation	Indicates how much interaction is required from the user to perform the evaluation.	[completely manual evaluation, manual and automatic evaluation, completely automatic evaluation]
8	Editing time	Time needed to get to the final result of the evaluation.	minutes (time span, if applicable)
9	Number of upper categories	Number of categories or groupings of categories (normally 4 for F-A-I-R).	positive integer
10	Number of questions	Number of questions (also sub-questions or optional questions) needed to make a complete evaluation. For configurable tools, the default template is used.	positive integer
11	Comprehensibility of the evaluation	Certain issues/aspects may have different weights for meeting FAIR principles.	[all answers equally ranked without weighting, weighting but without indication of weights and without explanation, weighting with indication of weights, weighting with indication of weights and explanation for weighting]
12	Generic	Can the tool be applied generically to any data set?	[yes, no] or free text]
13	Subject reference	Specification of the subject area, if the tool is designed for one.	[yes, no] or free text]
14	Explanation of the question	Description of the questions and answers, what they mean, and examples of how this might look implemented in a data set, if applicable.	[no explanation, short explanation, simple explanation, detailed explanation, detailed explanation with examples]
15	Feedback of the results	After the evaluation of the individual or all criteria, is feedback given to the user on what he can do better, possibly with examples?	[no feedback, short feedback, simple feedback, detailed feedback, detailed feedback with examples]
16	Final Report	Specifies how detailed the result of the evaluation is and whether it can be exported.	free text
17	Language	List of languages in which the tool is available	free text enumeration
18	Registration required	Is registration required to use the tool?	[yes, no]
19	Costs in euro	Indication of costs of the tool that may be incurred once or at time intervals.	free text
20	Complies with FAIR principles	Indication of whether criteria comply with FAIR principles, criteria have been incorrectly assigned to F-A-I-R categories, or criteria do not comply with principles (such as Open Data or personal data).	free text
21	Required knowledge and skills	Level of knowledge needed to understand and use the tools. Starting that no previous knowledge is needed, knowledge in RDM (like PID, licenses, documentation details) or in computational science (technical knowledge, like XML or JSON).	free text
22	Comment	Specific comments about the tool 	free text
			free text