Summary-Based Compositional Analysis for Soft Contract Verification - Artifact

Design-by-contract is a development best practice that requires the interactions between software components to be governed by precise specifications, called contracts. Contracts often take the form of pre- and post-conditions on function definitions, and are usually translated to (frequently redundant) run-time checks. So-called soft contract verifiers have been proposed to reduce the run-time overhead introduced by such contract checks by verifying parts of the contracts ahead of time, while leaving those that cannot be verified as residual runtime checks. In the state of the art, static analyses based on the Abstracting Abstract Machines (AAM) approach to abstract interpretation have been proposed for implementing such soft verifiers. However, these approaches result in whole-program analyses which are difficult to scale. In this paper, we propose a scalable summary-based compositional analysis for soft contract verification, which summarises both the correct behaviour and erroneous behaviour of all functions in the program using symbolic path conditions. Information from these summaries propagates backwards through the call graph, reducing the amount of redundant analysis states and improving the overall performance of the analysis. This backwards flow enables path constraints associated with erroneous program states to flow to call sites where they can be refuted, whereas in the state of the art they can only be refuted using the information available at the original location of the error. To demonstrate our improvements in both precision and performance compared to the state-of-the-art, we implemented our analysis in a framework called MAF (short for Modular Analysis Framework) — a framework for the analysis of higher-order dynamic programming languages. We conducted an empirical study and found an average performance improvement of 21%, and an average precision improvement of 38.15%