Published June 15, 2022 | Version v1
Poster Open

Designated Communities: Uncertainty and Risk

  • 1. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • 2. hu


This poster explores the tension between the concept of a Designated Community as a foundational element in Trustworthy Digital Repository certification and curators’ uncertainty about how to interpret and apply this concept in practice.


This research was funded in part by the University of Michigan Rackham Graduate School.



Files (259.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
160.0 kB Preview Download
99.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details


  • Abrams, S. (2021). Tacit attitudinal principles for evaluating digital preservation success. Archival Science.
  • Bak, G. (2016). Trusted by Whom? TDRs, Standards Culture and the Nature of Trust. Archival Science, 16(4), 373–402.
  • Bettivia, R. S. (2016). The Power of Imaginary Users: Designated Communities in the OAIS Reference Model. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–9.
  • Boutard, G. (2020). Alter-Value in Data Reuse: Non-Designated Communities and Creative Processes. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 23.
  • Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2012a). Reference Model for and Open Archival Information System (OAIS) (Magenta Book CCSDS 650.0M-2). Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems.
  • Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2012b). Space Data and Information Transfer Systems—Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories (Standard ISO 16363:2012 (CCSDS 652-R-1)). Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems.
  • Giaretta, D. (2011). Advanced Digital Preservation. Springer.
  • Reilly, Jr., B. F., & Waltz, M. E. (2013). Trustworthy Data Repositories: The Value and Benefits of Auditing and Certification. In J. M. Ray (Ed.), Research Data Management: Practical Strategies for Information Professionals (pp. 109126). Purdue University Press.