ID,Database source,Article Title,Author Keywords,Abstract,Action,Method,Discipline,Group,Geo,Author Full Names,Source Title,Language,Document Type,Conference Title,Conference Date,Conference Location,Addresses,Cited Reference Count,"Times Cited, All Databases",Publisher,ISSN,ISBN,Publication Year,Volume,Issue,Start Page,End Page,DOI,UT (Unique WOS ID),Pubmed Id,Date of Export,Action_openpolicies,Action_openmethod,Action_opendata,Action_openaccess,Action_opentools,Action_opensoftware,Action_openeducation,Action_openparticipation,Action_openscience,Action_openevaluation,Method_survey,Method_interview,Method_documentreview,Method_biblio,Method_othermeth,Discipline_agric,Discipline_med,Discipline_engtech,Discipline_nonspecificdisc,Discipline_socscie,Discipline_natscie,Discipline_hum,Group_researcher,Group_unisupportstaff,Group_publisher,Group_policy,Group_business,Group_funder,Group_librarian,Group_practitioner,Group_university,Group_othergroup,Geo_DZA,Geo_nonspecificgeo,Geo_MAR,Geo_EST,Geo_MYS,Geo_SA,Geo_IRL,Geo_ZWE,Geo_LTU,Geo_DEU,Geo_SVK,Geo_GRL,Geo_BGR,Geo_ITA,Geo_SWE,Geo_AUT,Geo_JPN,Geo_GHA,Geo_SAU,Geo_CRI,Geo_SRB,Geo_IND,Geo_PER,Geo_JAM,Geo_COL,Geo_NA,Geo_RUS,Geo_PHL,Geo_TUR,Geo_PRK,Geo_LBY,Geo_BGD,Geo_BWA,Geo_TUN,Geo_ZAR,Geo_KOR,Geo_TWN,Geo_CHN,Geo_ARG,Geo_ISR,Geo_POL,Geo_VNM,Geo_IRN,Geo_AUS,Geo_GRC,Geo_GBR,Geo_HUN,Geo_CHE,Geo_VEN,Geo_IDN,Geo_TZA,Geo_ETH,Geo_NOR,Geo_THA,Geo_FRA,Geo_BEL,Geo_IRQ,Geo_CHL,Geo_NGA,Geo_EU,Geo_PNG,Geo_PAK,Geo_ARE,Geo_SDN,Geo_ZAF,Geo_EGY,Geo_SVN,Geo_NLD,Geo_MEX,Geo_BRA,Geo_LKA,Geo_CZE,Geo_KEN,Geo_CUB,Geo_SGP,Geo_DNK,Geo_CAN,Geo_HKG,Geo_HRV,Geo_ESP,Geo_URY,Geo_AF,Geo_SEN,Geo_ROU,Geo_FIN,Geo_USA,Geo_NZL,Geo_AS,Geo_BOL,Geo_PRT,Geo_UGA,Geo_ARM
5,WOS,Spanish Scholarly Journals in WoS and Scopus: The Impact of Open Access,scholarly journals; Spain; open access; self-archiving; licenses; WoS; Scopus,"The aim of this study was to determine the impact of open access on the publishing policies of Spanish scholarly journals indexed by Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. The study sample was obtained in October 2013. After discarding those that were not published in Spain and those that were inactive, we were left with a total of 406 journals (392 in Scopus and 171 in WoS, with an overlap of 157). Seven key indicators were established: age, subject area, language, publisher, portals, type of access, and copyright. Most of the data were gathered by directly analyzing the websites of the journals. Information from the Dulcinea directory was also used. Most of the journals (63 per cent of the total) were first published after 1980. Universities and commercial publishers were the most significant publishers, accounting for 42 per cent and 31 per cent of all journals, respectively. Social sciences and health sciences were the most significant disciplines, accounting for 33 per cent each. Of the journals, 60 per cent were available free immediately after publication and 76 per cent granted permission for self-archiving a version of the manuscript. By combining the two results, we estimated that 48 per cent of all journals were open access (offering free access and permission for self-archiving).",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['ESP'],"Abadal, Ernest; Melero, Remedios; Rodrigues, Rosangela Schwarz; Navas-Fernandez, Miguel",JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Abadal, Ernest; Navas-Fernandez, Miguel] Univ Barcelona, Fac Lib & Informat Sci, Catalonia, Spain; [Melero, Remedios] Spanish Natl Res Council, Agrochem & Food Technol Inst, Madrid, Spain; [Rodrigues, Rosangela Schwarz] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Grad Program Informat Sci, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil; [Navas-Fernandez, Miguel] Catalonia Govt, Special Libraries, Madrid, Spain",19.0,10.0,UNIV TORONTO PRESS INC,1198-9742,,2015.0,47,1,77.0,96,10.3138/jsp.47.1.04,WOS:000086362200007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
6,WOS,Open access policies in Spanish universities,Open access; universities; Spain; OpenCourseWare; repositories; mandates; scientific journals,"The aim of this paper is to analyze the current state of policies in favour of open access (OA) applied by Spanish universities. Five major mechanisms of intervention for pursuing OA policies were used to analyze and evaluate the situation: infrastructure and services; information and dissemination; economic incentives; institutional coordination; and regulation or obligation. Data collection was based on a questionnaire sent to the vice-rectors for research of all Spanish universities. This information was supplemented by consulting directories of repositories, Spanish scientific journals, and institutional OA policies. The application of OA policies varies greatly. Spanish universities can be classified into five groups according to the number and quality of the actions taken. The first includes 7 universities (9% of the total) that have a comprehensive OA policy. The second includes 12 universities (16%) with a clear policy. The third includes 17 universities (23%) with an ongoing policy. The fourth includes 17 universities (23%) that have taken one or two actions and therefore have an incipient policy. Finally, the fifth group includes 21 universities (28%) that have taken no actions to favour OA.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']","['survey', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['ESP'],"Abadal, Ernest; Olle Castella, Candela; Abad-Garcia, Francisca; Melero, Remedios",REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Abadal, Ernest] Univ Barcelona, Fac Bibliotecon & Documentacio, E-08007 Barcelona, Spain; [Olle Castella, Candela] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Estudis Ciencies Informacio & Comunicacio, Barcelona, Spain; [Abad-Garcia, Francisca] Univ Valencia, Fac Med, E-46003 Valencia, Spain; [Melero, Remedios] CSIC, IATA, Madrid, Spain",18.0,8.0,CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS,0210-0614,,2013.0,36,2,,,10.3989/redc.2013.2.933,WOS:000087254500006,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
7,WOS,Open access monographs published by university presses in Spain,University publishers; University presses; Open access; Monographs; Surveys; Questionnaires; Interviews; Funding; Policies; Spanish Universities Publishers Association; UNE,"The open access model for publishing monographs by the members of the Spanish Universities Publishers Association (UNE) is analyzed. The study focused on production data from 2015-2017, as well as the positioning and arguments of the editors in relation to the open access movement, publication, related policies, and financing modalities. Data was collected by a questionnaire (with a response rate of 58% of the publishers associated with UNE) and includes in-depth interviews with seven of them. The results show that 75% of UNE members publish titles in open access, most consider open access a good way to increase the dissemination of monographs, and that there are no differences in content quality with non-open access works. Publishers do not see that publishing in open access is compatible with the commercial exploitation of printed copies. Publishers consider the most effective financing channels to be institutional payment (i.e., the university), followed by publisher's self-financing, and payment by the author.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'university']",['ESP'],"Abadal, Ernest; Olle, Candela; Redondo, Silvia",PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Abadal, Ernest] Univ Barcelona, Fac Bibliotecon & Documentacio, Melcior Palau 140, Barcelona 08014, Spain; [Olle, Candela] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Estudis Cornunicacio & Informacio, Av Tibidabo 39-43, Barcelona 08035, Spain; [Redondo, Silvia] Fundacio Escoles Garbi, Rambla Catalunya 17,3r 2a, Barcelona 08007, Spain",24.0,5.0,EPI,1386-6710,,2018.0,27,2,300.0,311,10.3145/epi.2018.mar.08,WOS:000088414100022,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
8,WOS,The Impact of Funding Insulin Research on Open Access Publishing: A 20-Years Bibliometric Analysis,Insulin; fund; open access; bibliometry; World Health Organization; diabetes,"Background: The recent report of The World Health Organization on diabetes has stressed on the burden of diabetes on low/middle income countries. Recent studies advocated the importance of funding more research on diabetes and insulin in these countries. Recently, the European Research Council advocated the importance of gold Open Access (OA) publishing, where the funded research should be immediately accessible. In this study, we aim to assess funding for insulin research, where we will compare the OA status between funded and unfunded research. Methods: We used Scopus database to assess insulin research published from January 1st, 1999 to December 31 st, 2018. Our bibliometric analysis consisted of three main sections: analysis of all publications on insulin, analysis of funded insulin publications, and analysis of unfunded insulin publications. Results: We found a total of 388,202 publications, of which only 83,180 (21.4%) were funded. USA produced around 30.1% of the total publications, and the National Institute of Health (NIH) was the major funder with 18.6% of all publications. Of the funded publications, 29,143 (35%) were OA publications, compared to 97,347 (31.9%) of the unfunded publications. We didn't find a significant difference in OA status between funded and unfunded research. Conclusion: In concordance with the European Research Council's decision to support gold OA publishing model, we found that only 35% of the funded and 31.9% of the unfunded insulin research were OA. Although the funded research is increasing in China, most of it is produced in high income countries. This highlights the importance of allocating more funds to low/middle income countries.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Abbasi, Hiba; Abu-Farsakh, Noor; Abuazzam, Farah; Halaseh, Rasha; Alaraj, Othman; Hassan, Eman; Al-Essa, Mohammad; AlRyalat, Saif A.",CURRENT DIABETES REVIEWS,English,Article,,,,"[Abbasi, Hiba; Abu-Farsakh, Noor; Abuazzam, Farah; Halaseh, Rasha; Hassan, Eman] Univ Jordan, Dept Internal Med, Amman 11942, Jordan; [Alaraj, Othman] Univ Jordan, Dept Emergency Med, Amman 11942, Jordan; [Al-Essa, Mohammad] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Amman 11942, Jordan; [AlRyalat, Saif A.] Univ Jordan, Univ Jordan Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Amman 11942, Jordan",22.0,0.0,BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD,1573-3998,,2020.0,16,5,497.0,502,10.2174/1573399815666190712201635,WOS:000088639900012,31538901.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
9,WOS,Citation indicators' comparison of LIS open access and subscription publications based on Scopus,Library and information science; Open access; Article processing charge; Citation indicators; Hybrid journals; Subscription journals,"Purpose There are different opinions about the quality and reputation of publications. Given that one of the ways to analyze the quality of journals and articles is citation indicators, the purpose of this paper is to compare the citation indicators of open access (OA), full subscription and hybrid journals and articles based on the Scopus in the field of library and information science (LIS) for a period of ten years (2004-2013). Design/methodology/approach The research population is all LIS journals and articles in LIS hybrid journals in Scopus. The data related to citation indicators (number of received citations, two years' impact, Citescore [IPP] and H-index) were extracted from Scopus, Journal Metrics and SCImago and analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics with SPSS and Excel. Findings The findings indicate that number of OA journals and articles were less than that of full subscription and hybrid journals. The average rate of all citation indicators in hybrid journals were more than that of OA and full subscription journals. However, in the level of articles, the average number of citations received by OA articles (15.6) was more than that of non-OA articles (2.25). Originality/value Unlike journals, OA seems to be an advantage for articles in LIS. LIS hybrid journals receive more citations than OA and subscription journals. Thus, the authors' approach to publishing in OA, hybrid or subscription journals and the publishers approach to the publication type may also be influenced by the findings of the present study.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Abbasi, Zahra; Shekofteh, Maryam; Shahbodaghi, Azam; Kazemi, Elaheh",GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE MEMORY AND COMMUNICATION,English,Article,,,,"[Abbasi, Zahra; Shekofteh, Maryam; Shahbodaghi, Azam] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Fac Paramed Sci, Dept Med Lib & Informat Sci, Tehran, Iran; [Kazemi, Elaheh] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Fac Paramed Sci, Dept Biostat, Tehran, Iran",35.0,1.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2514-9342,,2019.0,68,4-5,288.0,299,10.1108/GKMC-02-2018-0016,WOS:000089667600003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
12,WOS,Awareness and Use of Open Access Resources in Higher Education and Scholarly Research: Faculties versus Students Perspectives,Higher Education; Open Access (OA); Open Access publication; Open Access Resources (OAR); Scholarly Research,"Purpose- The study aims to identify, and to compare the awareness and attitude of faculties and students towards Open Access Resources. Design/methodology/approach- The study employed a mixed method research approach. A survey has been conducted among purposively selected students (52) and faculties (17) through distributing a structured questionnaire(1-5 point likert scale, and open ended).SPSS v.20 and coding method have been used for analyzing quantitative and qualitative data respectively. Findings-Both faculties and students had positive perceptions towards OARs though faculties were more knowledgeable than students in terms of understanding on major OA concepts. Digital format and free availability were considered as motivational factors for using OARs. Both respondents indicated plagiarism and copyright violation as important vulnerabilities in using OARs. Originality/value-This paper highlights the awareness level of faculties and students towards open access resources in higher education in scholarly research. Apart from purposes, sources, preferable model, and state of publication in open access mode, the study focuses on motivational factor, vulnerabilities, and integration of open access resources in higher education and scholarly research from faculties and students perspectives which demonstrateits originality. Implication- It would generate awareness among the academics, library professionals as well as OA publishers topromote OARs for wider use. © 2020 All Rights Reserved",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['BGD'],"Abdullah- Al- Mahmud, Eamin Ali Akanda A.K.M., Haque M.A., Eamin Ali Akanda A.K.M., Begum D.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2020.0,2020,0,1.0,16,,WOS:000165815400001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
13,WOS,Attitudes Toward Open Science and Public Data Sharing A Survey Among Members of the German Psychological Society,open science; public data sharing; attitudes toward open science: data sharing hopes and data sharing fears,"Central values of science are, among others, transparency, verifiability, replicability, and openness. The currently very prominent Open Science (OS) movement supports these values. Among its most important principles are open methodology (comprehensive and useful documentation of methods and materials used), open access to published research output, and open data (making collected data available for re-analyses). We here present a survey conducted among members of the German Psychological Society (N = 337), in which we applied a mixed-methods approach (quantitative and qualitative data) to assess attitudes toward OS in general and toward data sharing more specifically. Attitudes toward OS were distinguished into positive expectations (hopes) and negative expectations (fears). These were uncorrelated. There were generally more hopes associated with OS and data sharing than fears. Both hopes and fears were highest among early career researchers and lowest among professors. The analysis of the open answers revealed that generally positive attitudes toward data sharing (especially sharing of data related to a published article) are somewhat diminished by cost/benefit considerations. The results are discussed with respect to individual researchers' behavior and with respect to structural changes in the research system.","['openscience', 'openmethod', 'opendata', 'openaccess']",['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['DEU'],"Abele-Brehm, Andrea E.; Gollwitzer, Mario; Steinberg, Ulf; Schoenbrodt, Felix D.",SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Abele-Brehm, Andrea E.] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen, Dept Psychol, Erlangen, Germany; [Gollwitzer, Mario; Schoenbrodt, Felix D.] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Psychol, Munich, Germany; [Steinberg, Ulf] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, Munich, Germany",23.0,3.0,HOGREFE & HUBER PUBLISHERS,1864-9335,,2019.0,50,4,252.0,260,10.1027/1864-9335/a000384,WOS:000165993800005,,2021-01-27,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
22,WOS,Publishing African communication researches in open access outlets: An interrogation of Scopus between 1996-2016,Communication research; Open Access; Publishing; Scopus,"Open Access academic outlets have become meters of scholarship ranking globally, but publishing through these gates remains a problem locally. With a special focus on academic publishing by African mass communicators, this study interrogates the open access. The key objectives of this study include finding out the number of Africa's communication journals indexed in Open access Scopus platform; mine the data in the global repository and answer the question: how open are open access academic outlets. Applying comparative computational datasets and especially, content analysis, preliminary results showed that less than 5% of both indexers contain Mass Communication journals, compared to the sciences, engineering and others. Curiously, publications by Africa and subscriptions by the continent's higher institutions are similarly low. The study concludes that the negatively skewed presence of local journals and articles in global open access databases should worry Africa's higher institutions in the face of global competition for upper ranking. It recommends urgent convening of conferences, seminars and workshops on global open access offerings with a view to increasing awareness and usage among all Universities in the continent. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['university'],['AF'],"Adesina E., Odiboh O., Oyero O., Adeyeye B., Yartey D., Ekanem T.","Proceedings of the 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2018: Innovation Management and Education Excellence through Vision 2020",English,Conference Paper,"31st International Business Information Management Association Conference: Innovation Management and Education Excellence through Vision 2020, IBIMA 2018",25 April 2018 through 26 April 2018,0,,,4.0,"International Business Information Management Association, IBIMA",0,9780999855102,2018.0,0,0,6340.0,6345,,WOS:000175067000003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
31,WOS,Reappropriation of knowledge and decolonization: Open Access as a process of political action of the South,Open Access; coloniality of knowledge; reappropriation SciELO; Redalyc,"This article analyses the idea that the dominant scientific communication model entails a form of coloniality of knowledge as described by a group of Latin American social scientists from the late twentieth century, including A. Escobar, E. Dussel, and S. Castro Gomez. This form of coloniality of knowledge can be subverted by strengthening the practice of knowledge circulation known as Open Access. The paper undertakes an analysis of scientific publication in Latin America and the Caribbean. We conclude from this analysis that scientific production in this area is underrepresented in databases such as Journal Citation Report (JCR) and Scientific Journal Ranking (SJR). Following this analysis we reassess the presence of Latin American social science in other databases such as SciELO and Redalyc. We do so using Agamben's category of dipositif alongside that of coloniality of knowledge. These two theoretical elements contribute to the political meaning of Open Access in Latin America and the Caribbean. Open Access thus constitutes a political move towards decolonization and the reappropriation of knowledge, allowing the return of publicly-funded research.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['socscie'],['researcher'],['SA'],"Aguado-Lopez, Eduardo; Vargas Arbelaez, Esther Juliana",REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE SOCIOLOGIA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Aguado-Lopez, Eduardo] Univ Autonoma Estado Mexico, Fac Ciencias Polit & Sociales, Toluca, Mexico; [Vargas Arbelaez, Esther Juliana] Univ Autonoma Estado Mexico, Toluca, Mexico",21.0,6.0,"UNIV NACL COLOMBIA, DEPT SOCIOLOGIA",0120-159X,,2016.0,39,2,69.0,88,10.15446/rcs.v39n2.58966,WOS:000186395800005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
32,WOS,Altmetrics of the Open Access Institutional Repositories: a webometrics approach,Institutional Repositories; Open Access; Webometrics; Altmetrics; Social tools; Academic networks,"Self-archiving in Institutional Repositories (IRs) is playing a central role in the success of the Open Access initiatives. Deposited documents are more visible and probably they get more downloads and citations, but making them freely available in a local repository is not enough. Social tools, both public and academic targeting, networking or silo oriented, should be taken into account for reaching larger audiences and increase not only the scholarly but also the social impact. The paper explores the presence of IRs contents in 28 social tools (Academia, Bibsonomy, CiteUlike, CrossRef, Datadryad, Facebook, Figshare, Google+, GitHub, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Reddit, RenRen, ResearchGate, Scribd, SlideShare, Tumblr, Twitter, Vimeo, VKontakte, Weibo, Wikipedia All Languages, Wikipedia English, Wikia, Wikimedia, YouTube and Zenodo) using a webometric approach. We collected the link mentions of 2185 IRs in the cited tools during July 2017 from Google selected data centers. The results show that most of the IRs have no strong presence in the most specializes tools and even for the most popular services the figures are not high enough too. A candidate explanation for the low number of altmetric mentions is the lack of strategy in promotion of IRs contents and certain bad practices mostly regarding URL naming.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Aguillo, Isidro F.",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Aguillo, Isidro F.] Cybermetr Lab IPP CSIC, Albasanz 26-28,3E14, Madrid 28037, Spain",30.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,123,3,1181.0,1192,10.1007/s11192-020-03424-6,WOS:000186405700002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
33,WOS,Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories,Repositories; Open access; Webometrics; Indicators; Visibility; Usage; Ranking,"The Ranking Web of World Repositories ( http://repositories.webometrics.info) is introduced. The objective is to promote Open access initiatives (OAI) supporting the use of repositories for scientific evaluation purposes. A set of metrics based on web presence, impact and usage is discussed. The Ranking is built on indicators obtained from web search engines following a model close to the Impact Factor one. The activity accounts for a 50% of the index, including number of pages, pdf files and items in Google Scholar database, while the visibility takes into account the external inlinks received by the repository (the other 50%). The Ranking provides the Top 300 repositories from a total of 592 worldwide, with a strong presence of US, German and British institutional repositories and the leadership of the large subject repositories. Results suggest the need to take into consideration other file formats and the usage information, an option is not feasible today.","['openevaluation', 'opentools']",['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Aguillo, Isidro F.; Ortega, Jose L.; Fernandez, Mario; Utrilla, Ana M.",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article; Proceedings Paper,10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators,"SEP 17-20, 2008","Univ Vienna, Vienna, AUSTRIA","[Aguillo, Isidro F.; Fernandez, Mario; Utrilla, Ana M.] CSIC, CCHS, Cybermetr Lab, Madrid 28037, Spain; [Ortega, Jose L.] CSIC, VICYT, Sci Programming Div, Madrid 28006, Spain",29.0,40.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2010.0,82,3,477.0,486,10.1007/s11192-010-0183-y,WOS:000187508500004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
55,WOS,Motivating participation in open science by examining researcher incentives,0,"Support for open science is growing, but motivating researchers to participate in open science can be challenging. This in-depth qualitative study draws on interviews with researchers and staffat the Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital during the development of its open science policy. Using thematic content analysis, we explore attitudes toward open science, the motivations and disincentives to participate, the role of patients, and attitudes to the eschewal of intellectual property rights. To be successful, an open science policy must clearly lay out expectations, boundaries and mechanisms by which researchers can engage, and must be shaped to explicitly support their values and those of key partners, including patients, research participants and industry collaborators. © Ali-Khan et al.",['openpolicies'],"['interview', 'othermeth']",['med'],"['researcher', 'business', 'othergroup']",['CAN'],"Ali-Khan S.E., Harris L.W., Gold E.R.",eLife,English,Article,0,0,0,,,8.0,eLife Sciences Publications Ltd,2050084X,0,2017.0,6,0,0.0,0,10.7554/eLife.29319,WOS:000211095600001,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
57,WOS,Citation advantage for open access articles in European Radiology,Bibliometrics; Open access publishing; Radiology,"Objective To investigate whether there is a difference in citation rate between open access and subscription access articles in the field of radiology. Methods This study included consecutive original articles published online in European Radiology. Pearson chi(2), Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess for any differences between open access and subscription access articles. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine the association between open access publishing and citation rate, adjusted for continent of origin, subspeciality, study findings in article title, number of authors, number of references, length of the article, and number of days the article has been online. In a secondary analysis, we determined the association between open access and number of downloads and shares. Results A total of 500 original studies, of which 86 (17.2%) were open access and 414 (82.8%) were subscription access articles, were included. Articles from Europe or North America were significantly more frequently published open access (p = 0.024 and p = 0.001), while articles with corresponding authors from Asia were significantly less frequently published open access (p < 0.001). In adjusted linear regression analysis, open access articles were significantly more frequently cited (beta coefficient = 3.588, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.668 to 6.508, p = 0.016), downloaded (beta coefficient = 759.801, 95% CI 630.917 to 888.685, p < 0.001), and shared (beta coefficient = 0.748, 95% CI 0.124 to 1.372, p = 0.019) than subscription access articles (beta coefficient = 3.94, 95% confidence interval 1.44 to 6.44, p = 0.002). Conclusion Open access publishing is independently associated with an increased citation, download, and share rate in the field of radiology.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'othermeth']",['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Alkhawtani, Rayan H. M.; Kwee, Thomas C.; Kwee, Robert M.",EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Alkhawtani, Rayan H. M.; Kwee, Thomas C.] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiol Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Hanzepl 1,POB 30-001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands; [Kwee, Robert M.] Zuyderland Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Heerlen Sittard Geleen, Netherlands",16.0,2.0,SPRINGER,0938-7994,,2020.0,30,1,482.0,486,10.1007/s00330-019-06389-0,WOS:000213334800002,31428826.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
58,WOS,Is open access publishing a case of disruptive innovation?,journal publishing; open access journals; OAJ; disruptive innovation; DI; open access business models; open access in developing countries; open access in the Caribbean,"Open access journal publishing is a recent phenomenon that challenges the established system of print journals and viewed by some researchers as a form of disruptive innovation that has implications for stakeholders in both developed and developing countries. The research approach involved collection of data from the major full-text aggregator databases and other secondary sources, and conduct of a thematic analysis to identify the main issues involved in open access publishing and the question of its disruptive impact on the industry. The main finding was that, while the publishing of open access journals was growing, widespread acceptance by academia was slow. Further, while there were signs of the open access model disrupting the publishing business, it was premature to label it a disruptive innovation.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['SA'],"Allahar, Haven",INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Allahar, Haven] Univ West Indies, Arthur Lok Jack Global Sch Business, Max Richards Dr,Uriah Butler Highway North West, Mt Hope, Trinidad Tobago",54.0,2.0,INDERSCIENCE ENTERPRISES LTD,1740-0589,,2018.0,10,1,35.0,51,10.1504/IJBE.2018.10014432,WOS:000213444200007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
60,WOS,The library and the web: Graduate students’ selection of open access journals for empirical literature searches,Educational trends and issues; Empirical literature; Graduate students; Library instruction; Literature searching; Longitudinal studies; Open access journals,"This study provides a unique, longitudinal perspective on the selection and use of open access journals by graduate students enrolled in a regularly offered educational trends and issues course. Faculty expectations for this course are that students will conduct literature searches and use articles that are empirical studies from peer-reviewed journals, published within the previous ten years. Reference lists of 382 students were collected between 2005 and 2013, and reviewed for inclusion of articles from open access journals. Of 594 unique journal titles, 68 (11.45 percent) were available under various open access conditions. Findings suggest that graduate students are using both library collections and Web crawlers to satisfy literature search assignments when not directed to specific portals. Consequently, librarian knowledge of open access empirical literature may be of much value when providing resource instruction within the current information environment. © Ethan J. Allen and Roberta K. Weber.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['othergroup', 'librarian']",['USA'],"Allen E.J., Weber R.K.",Journal of Web Librarianship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,4.0,Routledge,19322909,0,2014.0,8,3,243.0,262,10.1080/19322909.2014.927745,WOS:000213647300006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
61,WOS,An Exploration of Indexed and Non-Indexed Open Access Journals: Identifying Metadata Coding Variations,best practices for online publishing; discovery; HTML coding practices; Internet searching; empirical research studies; metadata; search engine optimization; non-indexed scholarly journals; open access journals; scholarly communication,"The intent of this investigation was to learn what factors may have contributed to low usage of a small set of reputable open access scholarly journals, as evidenced in graduate student reference lists. Inquiry into differences among open access sources referenced between 2005 and 2014 revealed that non-indexed journals were being used notably fewer times than their commercially indexed counterparts. A comparison of HTML source code between indexed and non-indexed journals illustrated that certain metadata and other coding features may have affected the visibility of non-indexed journal content. The study suggests to librarians the presence of less visible empirical literature on the web and to smaller, independent academic publishers, the need to apply better quality metadata and optimization strategies to their open access journal content.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['USA'],"Allen, Ethan J.; Weber, Roberta K.",JOURNAL OF WEB LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"[Allen, Ethan J.] Florida Atlantic Univ Lib, John D MacArthur Campus Lib, Jupiter, FL 33458 USA; [Weber, Roberta K.] Florida Atlantic Univ, Dept Curriculum Culture & Educ Inquiry, Jupiter, FL USA",28.0,1.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",1932-2909,,2015.0,9,2-3,65.0,84,10.1080/19322909.2015.1020185,WOS:000213902700003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
68,WOS,Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles,altmetrics; diffusion; open access; public use of research; science communication; social media; social network analysis; Twitter,"The growing presence of research shared on social media, coupled with the increase in freely available research, invites us to ask whether scientific articles shared on platforms like Twitter diffuse beyond the academic community. We explore a new method for answering this question by identifying 11 articles from two open access biology journals that were shared on Twitter at least 50 times and by analyzing the follower network of users who tweeted each article. We find that diffusion patterns of scientific articles can take very different forms, even when the number of times they are tweeted is similar. Our small case study suggests that most articles are shared within single-connected communities with limited diffusion to the public. The proposed approach and indicators can serve those interested in the public understanding of science, science communication, or research evaluation to identify when research diffuses beyond insular communities.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Alperin, Juan Pablo; Gomez, Charles J.; Haustein, Stefanie",PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Alperin, Juan Pablo] Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Publishing, Vancouver, BC, Canada; [Alperin, Juan Pablo] Simon Fraser Univ, Scholarly Commun Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada; [Gomez, Charles J.] CUNY Queens Coll, Sociol, Flushing, NY 11367 USA; [Haustein, Stefanie] Univ Ottawa, Sch Informat Studies, Ottawa, ON, Canada",54.0,13.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0963-6625,,2019.0,28,1,2.0,18,10.1177/0963662518761733,WOS:000220287800012,29607775.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
71,WOS,The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: oncology journals,Oncology; cancer; open access (OA); journals; bibliometry,"Background: The field of oncology is among the highest productive fields in medicine, with the highest impact journals. The impact of open access (OA) journals is still understudied in the field of oncology. In this study, we aim to study the open-access status of oncology journals and the impact of the open-access status on journal indices. Methods: We collected data on the included journals from Scopus Source List on 1st of November 2018. We filtered the list for oncology journals for the years from 2011 to 2017. OA journals covered by Scopus are indicated as OA if the journal is listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and/or the Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources (ROAD). Results: There were 318 oncology journals compared to 260 in 2011, an increase by about 24.2%, and the percentage of OA journals has increased from 19.6% to 23.9%. Although non-OA journals have significantly higher scholarly output (P=0.001), percent cited and source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) were higher for OA journals. Conclusions: Publishing in oncology OA journals will yield more impact, in term of citations, and will reach boarder audience.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen; Abu Nassar, Anas; Tamimi, Faris; Al-Fraihat, Esraa; Assaf, Lama; Ghareeb, Ragan; Masoudi, Mahmoud; Al-Essa, Mohammad",JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen] Univ Jordan, Univ Jordan Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Amman 11942, Jordan; [Abu Nassar, Anas; Tamimi, Faris; Al-Essa, Mohammad] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Amman, Jordan; [Al-Fraihat, Esraa] Univ Jordan, Dept Pathol & Microbiol & Forens Med, Amman, Jordan; [Assaf, Lama] Univ Jordan, Univ Jordan Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Amman, Jordan; [Ghareeb, Ragan; Masoudi, Mahmoud] Univ Jordan, Dept Internal Med, Amman, Jordan",23.0,0.0,AME PUBL CO,2078-6891,,2019.0,10,4,777.0,782,10.21037/jgo.2019.02.13,WOS:000221441900008,31392058.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
72,WOS,The Impact of Open-Access Status on Journal Indices: Respiratory and Pulmonology Journals,Bibliometry; journals; open access; pulmonology; respiratory; impact,"Background: Open access (OA) publishing is rapidly emerging in almost all disciplines, with variable intensity and effect on the discipline itself. The move toward OA is also observed in the field of respiratory and pulmonology, where both OA data repositories and OA journals are rapidly emerging. Objective: we aim to study the open-access status of respiratory and pulmonology journals and the impact of the open-access status on journal indices. Methods: We collected journal's data from Scopus Source List on 1st of November 2018. We filtered the list for respiratory and pulmonology journals. Open Access Journals covered by Scopus are recognized as Open Access if the journal is listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and/or the Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources (ROAD). For each journal, we used several metrics to measure its strength, and then we compared these metrics between OA and non-OA journals. Results: There were 125 respiratory and pulmonology journals, a number that has increased by 12.6% since 2011. Moreover, the percentage of OA journals has increased from 21.6% to 26.4% during the same period. Non-OA journals have significantly higher scholarly output (p=0.033), but OA journals have significantly higher percentage of citation (p=0.05). Conclusion: Publishing in OA journals will yield a higher citation percentage compared to non-OA journals. Although this should not be the only reason to publish in an OA journal, it is still an important factor to decide where to publish.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen; Abu Nassar, Anas; Tamimi, Faris; Al-Fraihat, Esraa; Assaf, Lama; Ghareeb, Razan; Masoudi, Mahmoud; Al-Essa, Mohammad",CURRENT RESPIRATORY MEDICINE REVIEWS,English,Article,,,,"[AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen] Univ Jordan, Univ Jordan Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Amman 11942, Jordan; [Abu Nassar, Anas; Tamimi, Faris; Al-Essa, Mohammad] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Amman 11942, Jordan; [Al-Fraihat, Esraa] Univ Jordan, Dept Pathol & Microbiol & Forens Med, Amman 11942, Jordan; [Assaf, Lama] Univ Jordan, Univ Jordan Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Amman 11942, Jordan; [Ghareeb, Razan; Masoudi, Mahmoud] Univ Jordan, Dept Internal Med, Amman 11942, Jordan",16.0,0.0,BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD,1573-398X,,2019.0,15,1,26.0,31,10.2174/1573398X15666190214154531,WOS:000221478900002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
83,WOS,You cannot collect data using your own resources and put It on open access: Perspectives from Africa about public health data-sharing,data-sharing; public health; health and demographic surveillance systems; research involving public health data; research ethics; Africa,"Data-sharing is a desired default in the field of public health and a source of much ethical deliberation. Sharing data potentially contributes the largest, most efficient source of scientific data, but is fraught with contextual challenges which make stakeholders, particularly those in under-resourced contexts hesitant or slow to share. Relatively little empirical research has engaged stakeholders in discussing the issue. This study sought to explore relevant experiences, contextual, and subjective explanations around the topic to provide a rich and detailed presentation of what it means to different stakeholders and contexts to share data and how that can guide practice and ethical guidance. A qualitative design involving interviews was undertaken with professionals working in public health institutions endowed with data (HDSS), ethics committees, and advisory agencies which help shape health research in Africa. A descriptive form of thematic analysis was used to summarize results into six key themes: (1) The role of HDSSs in research using public health data and data-sharing; (2) Ownership and funding are critical factors influencing data-sharing; (3) Other factors discourage data-sharing; (4) Promoting and sustaining data-sharing; (5) Ethical guidance structures; and (6) Establishing effective guidance. The themes reveal factors regarding the willingness or not to share and an intricate ethical system that current discourse could reflect. Many of the concerns resonate with the literature, but a whole other gamut of people and process issues; commitments, investments, careers, and the right ethical guidance are needed to realize a sustainable goal of reaching 'share' as a default.",['opendata'],['interview'],['med'],"['researcher', 'policy', 'othergroup']","['GHA', 'TZA']","Anane-Sarpong, Evelyn; Wangmo, Tenzin; Ward, Claire Leonie; Sankoh, Osman; Tanner, Marcel; Elger, Bernice Simone",DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS,English,Article,,,,"[Anane-Sarpong, Evelyn] Univ Basel, Inst Biomed Eth IBMB, Publ Hlth Eth, Basel, Switzerland; [Anane-Sarpong, Evelyn] Univ Basel, Collaborat Swiss Trop & Publ Hlth Inst, Basel, Switzerland; [Wangmo, Tenzin; Elger, Bernice Simone] IBMB, Basel, Switzerland; [Ward, Claire Leonie] IBMB, Hlth Eth, Basel, Switzerland; [Sankoh, Osman] INDEPTH Network, Accra, Ghana; [Tanner, Marcel] Univ Basel, Epidemiol & Med Parasitol, Basel, Switzerland; [Tanner, Marcel] Univ Basel, Swiss Trop & Publ Hlth Inst, Basel, Switzerland; [Elger, Bernice Simone] Univ Geneva, Ctr Legal Med, Geneva, Switzerland",37.0,2.0,WILEY,1471-8731,,2018.0,18,4,394.0,405,10.1111/dewb.12159,WOS:000225786300015,28745008.0,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
88,WOS,Open access to data: An ideal professed but not practised,Voluntary data-sharing; Mandatory data-disclosure; Open science,"Data-sharing is an essential tool for replication, validation and extension of empirical results. Using a hand-collected data set describing the data-sharing behaviour of 488 randomly selected empirical researchers, we provide evidence that most researchers in economics and management do not share their data voluntarily. We derive testable hypotheses based on the theoretical literature on information-sharing and relate data-sharing to observable characteristics of researchers. We find empirical support for the hypotheses that voluntary data-sharing significantly increases with (a) academic tenure, (b) the quality of researchers, (c) the share of published articles subject to a mandatory data-disclosure policy of journals, and (d) personal attitudes towards open science principles. On the basis of our empirical evidence, we discuss a set of policy recommendations. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",['opendata'],"['othermeth', 'othermeth']",['socscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick; Mueller-Langer, Frank",RESEARCH POLICY,English,Article,,,,"[Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick; Mueller-Langer, Frank] Max Planck Inst Innovat & Competit, Munich, Germany; [Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick] Univ Munich, Dept Econ, D-81377 Munich, Germany; [Mueller-Langer, Frank] Int Max Planck Res Sch Competit & Innovat, Munich, Germany",76.0,24.0,ELSEVIER,0048-7333,,2014.0,43,9,1621.0,1633,10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.008,WOS:000228068100001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
94,WOS,Effects of academic staff competence and Internet services on the use of open access journals in federal universities in North Central Nigeria,Academic staff; Federal universities; Internet services; North Central Nigerian; Staff competence; Use of open access journals,"The study was motivated to assess academic staff competence and Internet services affecting the use of open access journals in federal universities in North Central Nigeria. Survey research design was used for the study. The population of the study comprised of 5,365 lecturers in seven federal universities covering both conventional and specialized universities. Sample sizes of 359 lecturers were randomly selected for the study. A structured questionnaire was designed and used for the study. Out of the 359 copies of the questionnaire administered, 330 copies were returned and used for the study. Collected data were analysed using frequency counts, percentages, mean and standard deviation. Inferential statistical tool such as Pearson Product Moment Correlation was used. Four research questions were answered and two null hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance. The findings of the study revealed that the level of use of open access journals by academic staff was fairly high (weighted mean score = 2.84); the extent of the effect of Internet services by academic staff is fairly adequate. A significant relationship was established between academic staff use of open access journals and each of the following: extent of staff competence (r= .75; df= 329; p < 0.05) and Internet services (r= .99; df= 329; p < 0.05). Based on the findings, it was recommended among others that, there should be constant training and retraining of computer and Internet use to lecturers in the studied universities, Management of universities in the North Central, Nigeria should install and improve their Internet services, procure and provide adequate information and communication technology (ICT) facilities that would serve the university communities effectively. © 2019 Library Philosophy and Practice.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['NGA'],Ango A.A.,Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2019.0,2019,0,0.0,0,,WOS:000230939700006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
98,WOS,Promotional strategies for open access resources discovery and access,Advocacy; Challenges; Discovery; Electronic information resources; Nigeria; Open access; Perception; Promotion; Universities,"The research was designed to determine the promotional strategies adopted by Nigerian university libraries to enhance open access resources discovery and access, as well as their support and perception on use of the resources. Data for the research were collected with a survey questionnaire using 50 university librarians in Nigeria through electronic mail and social media platforms. A follow up interview was used to elicit qualitative data from the university librarian. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were extracted to confirm and consolidate the data as collected. The results were presented as simple percentages, tables and charts. Nigerian universities are supporting the green and gold models of open access initiatives, though emphasis is more on the green model-the institutional repository majority of which were yet to be listed in the OpenDOAR. There was perceived high use of open access resources by faculty members in spite of very few who could not use the resources due to unawareness, lack of skill and institutional reservations on open access resources quality. Promotional strategies adopted include advocacy and infrastructural development with limited user survey initiatives. The ingenuity of the university library is important for Open Access Resources (OAR) promotion. Nigerian universities have made incursions into the support of OAR (www.nusoer.org) especially the green model which discovery and access are promoted through advocacy, infrastructural development and survey initiatives. Librarians and continuing professional development stakeholders could deploy the results to assess their status in OAR support and promotion. © 2018, Chinwe V. Anunobi and Rebecca Ape.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['NGA'],"Anunobi C.V., Ape R.",Webology,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,University of Tehran,1735188X,0,2018.0,15,1,30.0,45,,WOS:000233465100014,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
101,WOS,Open science practices adopted by Latin American & Caribbean open access journals,Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); Latin America and the Caribbean; Open access; Open access journals; Open science,"The objective of this study is to investigate how Open Science (OS) values and practices have influenced open access (OA) journals publishers in Latin American and the Caribbean (LA&C) countries. Our key research question is: to what extent are these practices being adopted by LA&C journals? In order to address this question, we conducted a survey with a sample of LA&C journals listed on the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) database. The results reveal that many journals are somewhat aware of or informed about most of open science practices being discussed, but just some of them have already successfully adopted those practices. © 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing - Connecting the Knowledge Commons: From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure, ELPUB 2018. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['SA'],"Appel A.L., Lujano I., Albagli S.","22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing - Connecting the Knowledge Commons: From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure, ELPUB 2018",English,Conference Paper,"22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing - Connecting the Knowledge Commons: From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure, ELPUB 2018",22 June 2018 through 24 June 2018,0,"[Fattah, Sabina; Rehn, Marius] Norwegian Air Ambulance Fdn, Dept Res & Dev, Drobak, Norway; [Fattah, Sabina; Wisborg, Torben] Univ Tromso, Anaesthesia & Crit Care Res Grp, Fac Hlth Sci, Tromso, Norway; [Agledahl, Kari Milch] Univ Tromso, Dept Clin Med, Tromso, Norway; [Rehn, Marius] Univ Stavanger, Dept Hlth Studies, Stavanger, Norway; [Rehn, Marius] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Emergencies & Crit Care, Dept Anaesthesia, Oslo, Norway; [Wisborg, Torben] Finnmark Hlth Trust, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Hammerfest Hosp, Hammerfest, Norway; [Wisborg, Torben] Oslo Univ Hosp, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Trauma, Oslo, Norway",10.0,2.0,CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS,1935-7893,,2017.0,11,4,403.0,406,10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.29,WOS:000406350300006,27995839.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
104,WOS,The adoption of Article Processing Charges as a business model by Brazilian Open Access journals,Article Processing Charges; Brazil; Open Access; Open Access Journals,"Different funding and business model alternatives for Open Access to scientific publication have been discussed and tried, either by Gold open access journals or by the 'hybrid' ones. A growing number of both types of scholarly journals have adopted a publication fee - more specifically an Article Processing Charge - as their open access business model, a procedure that has been the subject of controversies. The objective of this study is to characterize Brazilian open access journals that adopt article processing charges. The main contribution of this study is to audit and support decision making of editorial policies and business models for open access that are being proposed by and for Brazilian journals. We defined a sample of Brazilian open access journals using article processing charges extracted from the Directory of Open Access Journals database in April 2018 along with their classification in the Scimago Journal Ranking, Journal Citation Reports and Qualis Capes system, considered as an indicator of prestige of academic journals. The study reveals that a small number of Brazilian open access journals are currently applying article processing charges, with practices varying mainly according to fields of study, types of organization and classification according to the Qualis system.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['BRA'],"Appel, Andre Luiz; Albagli, Sarita",TRANSINFORMACAO,English,Article,,,,"[Appel, Andre Luiz] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst Brasileiro Informacao Ciencia & Tecnol, Escola Comunicacao, Programa Posgrad Ciencia Informacao, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; [Albagli, Sarita] Inst Brasileiro Informacao Ciencia & Tecnol, Coordenacao Ensino & Pesquisa, R Lauro Muller 455, BR-22290160 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil",29.0,3.0,PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDADE CATOLICA CAMPINAS,0103-3786,,2019.0,31,,,,10.1590/2318-0889201931e180045,WOS:000238078200004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
110,WOS,"Same question, different world: Replicating an open access research impact study",0,"To examine changes in the open access landscape over time, this study partially replicated Kristin Antelman’s 2004 study of open access citation advantage. Results indicated open access articles still have a citation advantage. For three of the four disciplines examined, the most common sites hosting freely available articles were independent sites, such as academic social networks or article-sharing sites. For the same three disciplines, more than 70 percent of the open access copies were publishers’ PDFs. The major difference from Antelman’s is the increase in the number of freely available articles that appear to be in violation of publisher policies. © 2019, Association of College and Research Libraries. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['natscie', 'hum', 'socscie', 'engtech']",['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Arendt J., Peacemaker B., Miller H.",College and Research Libraries,English,Article,0,0,0,,,5.0,Association of College and Research Libraries,100870,0,2019.0,80,3,303.0,318,10.5860/crl.80.3.303,WOS:000241350600002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
116,WOS,Open access policy implementation: First results compared,0,"Open Access policy implementation is a tough job. Policy pioneers have faced considerable challenges in meeting their own aims and achieving recognized success. Professionals charged with implementing policy typically need several years to accomplish significant progress. This is a study of first results from a small but significant number of cases with an emphasis on variety and on defining a methodological standard. All cases have been reconstructed through documents and interviews. The most salient issues of policy implementation are investigated comparatively, namely (i) the matching infrastructure that a policy requires; (ii) the issue of capturing content and scholarly compliance; (iii) how to provide access to the content and foster usage; (iv) and the benefits offered to authors. As the author is pivotal to any open access solution, this provides a comparative perspective for delineating a policy research agenda. © Chris Armbruster 2011.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']","['interview', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'university', 'funder', 'othergroup']","['GBR', 'AUT', 'USA', 'AUS', 'FRA', 'CHE']",Armbruster C.,Learned Publishing,English,Article,0,0,0,,,6.0,0,9531513,0,2011.0,24,4,311.0,324,10.1087/20110409,WOS:000243028200006,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
117,WOS,"Doctoral students in New Zealand have low awareness of institutional repository existence, but positive attitudes toward open access publication of their work",0,"Objective: To investigate doctoral students' knowledge of and attitudes toward open access models of scholarly communication and institutional repositories, and to examine their willingness to comply with a mandatory institutional repository (IR) submission policy. Design: Mixed method, sequential exploratory design. Setting: A large, multi-campus New Zealand university that mandates IR deposit of doctoral theses. Subjects: Two doctoral students from each of four university colleges were interviewed. All 901 doctoral students were subsequently sent a survey, with 251 responding. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with eight subjects selected by purposive sampling, followed by a survey sent to all doctoral students. The authors used NVivo 8 for analysis of interview data, along with a twophase approach to coding. First, they analyzed transcripts from semi-structured interviews line-by-line to identify themes. In the second phase, authors employed focused coding to analyze the most common themes and to merge or drop peripheral themes. Themes were mapped against Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory and social exchange theory constructs to aid interpretation. The results were used to develop a survey with a fixed set of response choices. Authors then analyzed survey results using Excel and SurveyMonkey, first as a single data set and then by discipline. Main Results: The authors found that general awareness of open access was high (62%), and overall support for open access publication was 86.3%. Awareness of IRs as a general concept was much lower at 48%. Those subject to a mandatory IR deposit policy for doctoral theses overwhelmingly indicated willingness to comply (92.6%), as did those matriculating prior to the policy (83.3%), although only 77.3% of all respondents agreed that deposit should be mandatory. Only 17.6% of respondents had deposited their own work in an IR, while 31.7% reported directly accessing a repository for research. The greatest perceived benefits of IR participation were removal of cost for readers, ease of sharing research, increased exposure and citing of one's work, and professional networking. The greatest perceived risks were plagiarism, loss of ability to publish elsewhere, and less prestige relative to traditional publication. The reason most given for selecting a specific publication outlet was recommendation of a doctoral supervisor. Disciplinary differences in responses were not sizable.For additional interpretation, the authors applied Rogers's diffusion of innovations theory to determine the extent to which IRs are effective innovations. The authors posit that repositories will become a more widely adopted innovations as awareness of IRs in general increases, and through increased awareness that IR content is discoverable through major search engines such as Google Scholar, thus improving usability and increasing dissemination of research. Using the social exchange theory framework, the authors found that respondents' expressed willingness to deposit their work in IRs demonstrated altruistic motives for sharing their research freely with others, appreciation for the reciprocity of gaining access to others' research, and awareness of the potential direct reward of having their work cited more often. Conclusion: Authors identified that lack of awareness, rather than resistance to deposit, as the main barrier to IR depository participation. Major benefits perceived for participating included the public good of knowledge sharing and increased exposure for one's work. Concerns included copyright and plagiarism issues. These findings have implications for communication and marketing campaigns to promote doctoral students' deposit of their work in institutional repositories. While respondents reported low direct use of IRs for conducting research, the vast majority reported using Google Scholar, and so may have unknowingly accessed open access repository content. This finding suggests that attention be given to enhanced metadata for optimizing discoverability of IR content through genera search engines. © 2012 Arndt.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'survey']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['university', 'researcher']",['NZL'],Arndt T.S.,Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,University of Alberta,1715720X,0,2012.0,7,4,119.0,121,10.18438/b8qw4r,WOS:000243687300019,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0
129,WOS,Market power of publishers in setting article processing charges for open access journals,Open access journal; Article processing charge; Market power,"While open access journals provide readers with articles free of charge through the journals' networks, authors are required to pay article processing charges to the publishers. This study simultaneously estimates the article processing charges for 535 open access journals independently launched by publishers along with citation scores and number of articles in a journal to identify the determinants of charges. The results show that open access journal publishers set higher article processing charges for more frequently cited journals with more articles. However, concentration measured by the share squared of the number of articles in an academic field is not shown to influence the charges significantly. Moreover, this study finds that large subscription journal publishers do not generally set higher article processing charges for their open access journals. Instead, they incorporate open access journal publishers that have already accomplished great achievements into their company groups. These findings suggest that large subscription journal publishers may influence the open access journal market through mergers and acquisitions of prominent open access journal publishers in the future, although they do not yet have market power.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Asai, Sumiko",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Asai, Sumiko] Meiji Univ, Sch Polit Sci & Econ, Chiyoda Ku, 1-1 Kanda Surugadai, Tokyo 1018301, Japan",21.0,1.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,123,2,1037.0,1049,10.1007/s11192-020-03402-y,WOS:000247550500001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
130,WOS,The effect of collaboration with large publishers on the internationality and influence of open access journals for research institutions,Open access journal; Citation score; Collaboration; Internationality; Influence,"Many academic societies and universities entrust the publication of their open access journals to large publishers, and this collaboration strengthens the presence of these publishers in the open access journal market. This study empirically examines the effect of collaborating with large publishers on the internationality and influence of research institutions' journals. The study compiles 60 Scopus-indexed open access journals and finds their citation frequency through the SCImago journal rank and source normalized impact per publication. Furthermore, it uses the country distribution of authors and citations to determine the journals' internationality. The results revealed that most journals increased the number of articles written by overseas researchers and their citation scores, which indicates that collaborating with large publishers is an effective method for enhancing the internationality and influence of institutions' official journals in non-English-speaking countries in particular. However, in addition to publishing journals on publishers' websites, research institutions' efforts toward internationality, such as appointing overseas researchers as editors, are essential to accomplish the desired outcome.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'university']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Asai, Sumiko",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Asai, Sumiko] Meiji Univ, Sch Polit Sci & Econ, Chiyoda Ku, 1-1 Kanda Surugadai, Tokyo 1018301, Japan",31.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,124,1,663.0,677,10.1007/s11192-020-03426-4,WOS:000247624500004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
133,WOS,A citation analysis of Iranian journals to open access (OA) articles and journals,Referred journals; Open access (OA) journals; Citation analysis; Bibliometric; Sociometric analysis; Free access; Iran; DOAJ,"This study was survey on citation research of Open Access (OA) journals in English papers of Iranian universities journals during year 2007. The main purposes of this paper were: to examine the state of English papers in Iranian journals in Thomson Scientific Master Journal List (TSMJL); and to analyze their visibility through citations to OA journals in DOAJ database. In fact, the researcher has used of citation analysis technique of bibliometric and large-scale sociometric analyses on about 16,219 citations. The method followed in the first part of this study is obtaining data from e-journal articles which indexed in TSMJL, conducting descriptive analyses, and reporting the findings in tables and figures. In the second part of the study, DOAJ database is used to behaviour cited reference searches and other citation analyses. It found that there are 960 Iranian print-based journals and only 37 Iranian Journals was indexed in TSMJL. Sixteen English Journals in TSMJL of eight Iranian universities. Throughout sixteen journals only one journal didn't publish during 2007 and there were 704 articles all over the fifteen journals. Using large-scale sociometric analyses on about 16,219 citations all over 15 journals, it is notable that number of journals without citation to DOAJ was 3,101 (99.7%) and the number of journals with citation to DOAJ was 9 (0.3%). It shows that there was huge difference between the journals which had citing to DOAJ and without citing to DOAJ.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher', 'publisher', 'university']",['IRN'],"Asemi, Asefeh",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article; Proceedings Paper,10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators,"SEP 17-20, 2008","Univ Vienna, Vienna, AUSTRIA","Univ Isfahan, Fac Educ & Psychol, Dept LIS, Esfahan, Iran",14.0,5.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2010.0,82,3,487.0,494,10.1007/s11192-010-0184-x,WOS:000250460400011,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
135,WOS,The Open-Access Availability of Criminological Research to Practitioners and Policy Makers,Evidence-based policy; translational criminology; open access,"Criminology produces policy-relevant research and criminologists often seek to influence practice, but most criminological research is confined to expensive subscription journals. This disadvantages researchers in the global south, policy makers and practitioners who have the skills to use research findings but do not have journal subscriptions. Open access seeks to increase availability of research, but take-up among criminologists has been low. This study used a sample of 12,541 articles published in criminology journals between 2017 and 2019 to estimate the proportion of articles available via different types of open access. Overall 22% of research was available to non-subscribers, about half that found in other disciplines, even though authors had the right to make articles open without payment in at least 95% of cases. Open access was even less common in many leading journals and among researchers in the United States. Open access has the potential to increase access to research for those outside academia, but few scholars exercise their existing rights to distribute freely the submitted or accepted versions of their articles online. Policies to incentivise authors to make research open access where possible are needed unlock the benefits of greater access to criminological research.",['openaccess'],"['documentreview', 'biblio']",['socscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Ashby, Matthew P. J.",JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE EDUCATION,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Ashby, Matthew P. J.] UCL Jill Dando Inst Secur & Crime Sci, 35 Tavistock Sq, London WC1H 9EZ, England",71.0,1.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",1051-1253,,,,,,,10.1080/10511253.2020.1838588,WOS:000251331600002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
143,WOS,Citation analytics: Data exploration and comparative analyses of CiteScores of Open Access and Subscription-Based publications indexed in Scopus (2014-2016),Citation impact; Open Access; CiteScore; Analytics; Citation analytics; Smart campus; Data mining,"Citation is one of the important metrics that are used in measuring the relevance and the impact of research publications. The potentials of citation analytics may be exploited to understand the gains of publishing scholarly peer-reviewed research outputs in either Open Access (OA) sources or Subscription-Based (SB) sources in the bid to increase citation impact. However, relevant data required for such comparative analysis must be freely accessible for evidence-based findings and conclusions. In this data article, citation scores (CiteScores) of 2542 OA sources and 15,040 SB sources indexed in Scopus from 2014 to 2016 were presented and analyzed based on a set of five inclusion criteria. A robust dataset, which contains the CiteScores of OA and SB publication sources included, is attached as supplementary material to this data article to facilitate further reuse. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions of OA CiteScores and SB CiteScores are presented in tables. Boxplot representations and scatter plots are provided to show the statistical distributions of OA CiteScores and SB CiteScores across the three sub -categories (Book Series, Journal, and Trade Journal). Correlation coefficient and p-value matrices are made available within the data article. In addition, Probability Density Functions (PDFs) and Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs) of OA CiteScores and SB CiteScores are computed and the results are presented using tables and graphs. Furthermore, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison post-hoc tests are conducted to understand the statistical difference (and its significance, if any) in the citation impact of OA publication sources and SB publication source based on CiteScore. In the long run, the data provided in this article will help policy makers and researchers in Higher Education Institutions (HEls) to identify the appropriate publication source type and category for dissemination of scholarly research findings with maximum citation impact. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Atayero, Aderemi A.; Popoola, Segun I.; Egeonu, Jesse; Oludayo, Olumuyiwa",DATA IN BRIEF,English,Article; Data Paper,,,,"[Atayero, Aderemi A.; Popoola, Segun I.] Covenant Univ, Dept Elect & Informat Engn, Ota, Nigeria; [Egeonu, Jesse] Covenant Univ, Dept Econ & Dev Studies, Ota, Nigeria; [Oludayo, Olumuyiwa] Covenant Univ, Dept Business Management, Ota, Nigeria",14.0,10.0,ELSEVIER,2352-3409,,2018.0,19,,198.0,213,10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.005,WOS:000254525400004,29892634.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
144,WOS,Open Data as Open Educational Resources: Towards transversal skills and global citizenship,Open Data; Open Educational Resources; Research based learning; Critical Thinking; Global Citizenship; Higher Education,"Open Data is the name given to datasets which have been generated by international organisations, governments, NGOs and academic researchers, and made freely available online and openly-licensed. These datasets can be used by educators as Open Educational Resources (OER) to support different teaching and learning activities, allowing students to gain experience working with the same raw data researchers and policy-makers generate and use. In this way, educators can facilitate students to understand how information is generated, processed, analysed and interpreted. This paper offers an initial exploration of ways in which the use of Open Data can be key in the development of transversal skills (including digital and data literacies, alongside skills for critical thinking, research, teamwork, and global citizenship), enhancing students' abilities to understand and select information sources, to work with, curate, analyse and interpret data, and to conduct and evaluate research. This paper also presents results of an exploratory survey that can guide further research into Open Data-led learning activities. Our goal is to support educators in empowering students to engage, critically and collaboratively, as 21st century global citizens.","['opendata', 'openeducation']","['survey', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],"['SA', 'NA', 'EU']","Atenas, Javiera; Havemann, Leo; Priego, Ernesto",OPEN PRAXIS,English,Article,,,,"[Atenas, Javiera] UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England; [Havemann, Leo] Univ London, Birkbeck, London WC1E 7HU, England; [Priego, Ernesto] City Univ London, London, England",53.0,17.0,INT COUNCIL OPEN & DISTANCE EDUCATION,2304-070X,,2015.0,7,4,377.0,389,10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.233,WOS:000254920600001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
154,WOS,Perceptions and use of open access journals by Nigerian postgraduate students,Nigeria; Perception; Postgraduate students; Use of Open Access Journals,"This article investigates perceptions and use of Open Access journals (OAJs) by master's degree students in two universities in the southwestern part of Nigeria. A descriptive survey design was used in the study and the study population was comprised of 7,423 master's degree students in the University of Ibadan and 1,867 from Obafemi Awolowo University. A multistage random sampling technique was used to select a sample size of 249 and the data collection instrument was a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using frequency counts, percentages, mean, standard deviation, correlation, and regression analyses. The findings revealed that OAJs were used for learning, dissertation writing, personal research, and development. OAJs were not frequently used because of download delays, unavailability of Internet facilities, and limited access to computers terminals, among other issues. OAJs were found to be of relative advantage, positively perceived, and found to be compatible with existing values and quality assurance in scholarly publications, hence their use for academic activities. The regression analyses showed that there was a significant positive relationship between positive perception, perception of relative advantage, perception of compatibility, perception complexity, and master's degree students' use of OAJs. Negative perception was found to have a significant negative correlation with the use of OAJs. This article recommends that quality assurance of OAJs should be ensured in order to boost users' positive perceptions to increase their patronage and usage of these scholarly outlets for various academic activities, which will in turn encourage research and development across the various institutions of higher learning in Nigeria. © Philips Oluwaseun Ayeni, 2017.",['openaccess'],['survey'],"['natscie', 'socscie', 'hum']",['othergroup'],['NGA'],Ayeni P.O.,Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information,22879099,0,2017.0,5,1,26.0,46,10.1633/JISTaP.2017.5.1.3,WOS:000258356100007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
158,WOS,At the click of a button: Assessing the user experience of open access finding tools,0,"A number of browser extension tools have emerged in the past decade aimed at helping information seekers find open versions of scholarly articles when they hit a paywall, including Open Access Button, Lazy Scholar, Kopernio, and Unpaywall. While librarians have written numerous reviews of these products, no one has yet conducted a usability study on these tools. This article details a usability study involving six undergraduate students and six faculty at a large public research university in the United States. Participants were tasked with installing each of the four tools as well as trying them out on three test articles. Both students and faculty tended to favor simple, clean design elements and straightforward functionality that enabled them to use the tools with limited instruction. Participants familiar with other browser extensions gravitated towards tools like Open Access Button, whereas those less experienced with other extensions preferred tools that load automatically, such as Unpaywall. © 2020 American Library Association. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['USA'],"Azadbakht E., Schultz T.",Information Technology and Libraries,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,American Library Association,7309295,0,2020.0,39,2,0.0,0,10.6017/ITAL.V39I2.12041,WOS:000259656500011,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
167,WOS,A Crisis in Open Access: Should Communication Scholarly Outputs Take 77 Years to Become Open Access?,communication; open access; WSIS; UNESCO; Budapest Open Access Initiative; business model of publishing; Open Access Index (OAI),"This study diachronically investigates the trend of the open access in the Web of Science (WoS) category of communication. To evaluate the trend, data were collected from 184 categories of WoS from 1980 to 2017. A total of 87,997,893 documents were obtained, of which 95,304 (0.10%) were in the category of communication. In average, 4.24% of the documents in all 184 categories were open access. While in communication, it was 3.29%, which ranked communication 116 out of 184. An Open Access Index (OAI) was developed to predict the trend of open access in communication. Based on the OAI, communication needs 77 years to fully reach open access, which undeniably can be considered as crisis in scientific publishing in this field. Given this stunning information, it is the time for a global call for open access by communication scholars across the world. Future research should investigate whether the current business models of publications in communication scholarships are encouraging open access or pose unnecessary restrictions on knowledge development.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Baghestan, Abbas Ghanbari; Khaniki, Hadi; Kalantari, Abdolhosein; Akhtari-Zavare, Mehrnoosh; Farahmand, Elaheh; Tamam, Ezhar; Ebrahim, Nader Ale; Sabani, Havva; Danaee, Mahmoud",SAGE OPEN,English,Article,,,,"[Baghestan, Abbas Ghanbari; Kalantari, Abdolhosein] Univ Tehran, Tehran, Iran; [Baghestan, Abbas Ghanbari] Univ Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Malaysia; [Tamam, Ezhar] Univ Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia; [Khaniki, Hadi] Allameh Tabatabai Univ, Tehran, Iran; [Akhtari-Zavare, Mehrnoosh] Islamic Azad Univ, Tehran Med Sci, Commun Hlth, Tehran, Iran; [Farahmand, Elaheh; Danaee, Mahmoud] Univ Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; [Ebrahim, Nader Ale] Alzahra Univ, Tehran, Iran; [Sabani, Havva] Int Vis Univ, Gostivar, Macedonia",28.0,3.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,2158-2440,,2019.0,9,3,,,10.1177/2158244019871044,WOS:000266296300009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
168,WOS,Opening interlibrary loan to open access,Open access; Interlibrary loan; Interlending; Academic libraries,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine interlibrary loan requests for open access materials submitted during fiscal years 2010 and 2011 and to determine the impact of open access materials upon fill rate for interlibrary borrowing requests. Design/methodology/approach - Borrowing requests for open access materials were quantitatively analyzed and compared to total borrowing requests. Findings - During the period studied, borrowing requests for open access materials increased while overall requests held steady. As the number of requests filled with open access documents continues to rise, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis University Library is. able to provide a service to users and cost savings for the library by utilizing this material. The difficulty users have in navigating the online information environment makes it unlikely that interlibrary lean requests will decrease due to the growing amount of open access material available. Originality/value- The literature discussing the use of open access materials to fulfill ILL requests is limited and largely focuses on educating ILL practitioners about open access ant providing suggested resources for locating open access materials. This research paper studies actual requests for open access materials and their impact on interlibrary loan.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['USA'],"Baich, Tina",INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY,English,Article; Proceedings Paper,12th IFLA Interlending and Document Supply Conference (ILDS),"SEP 19-21, 2011","Chicago, IL","Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Univ Lib, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA",10.0,9.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,0264-1615,,2012.0,40,1,55.0,60,10.1108/02641611211214305,WOS:000266296300010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
177,WOS,"The UK Scholarly Communication Licence: Attempting to Cut through the Gordian Knot of the Complexities of Funder Mandates, Publisher Embargoes and Researcher Caution in Achieving Open Access",copyright; UK-SCL; Scholarly Communication Licence; Scholarly Communications; higher education institutions; open access; licensing,"Whilst take-up of open access (OA) in the UK is growing rapidly due partly to a number of funder mandates, managing the complexities of balancing compliance with these mandates against restrictive publisher policies and ingrained academic priorities, has resulted in UK higher education institutions (HEIs) often struggling with confused researchers, complex workflows, and rising costs. In order to try to address this situation, the UK Scholarly Communication Licence (UK-SCL) was formulated to bypass the root causes of many of these challenges by implementing a licensing mechanism for multiple-mandate compliance in one single policy. This is the first empirical study to focus on the genesis of the UK-SCL and how its implementation has been conceived thus far. A qualitative research method was used, taking the form of 14 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from the initiative across the UK. The results indicate that those working within UK HEIs are concerned with the complexity of the current OA policy landscape and are frustrated with the inertia within the current system, which has resulted in higher costs, further publisher restrictions, and has not addressed the underlying tensions in academic culture. The UK-SCL is seen by its initiators as a way to achieve further transition towards OA and take back some element of control of the content produced at their institutions. The study concludes by modelling the ways in which the UK-SCL is intended to impact relationships between key stakeholders, and discussing possible implementation futures.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'policy']",['GBR'],"Baldwin, Julie; Pinfield, Stephen",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Baldwin, Julie] Univ Nottingham, UoN Lib, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England; [Pinfield, Stephen] Univ Sheffield, Informat Sch, Regent Court, 211 Portobello, Sheffield S1 4DP, S Yorkshire, England",86.0,0.0,MDPI,2304-6775,,2018.0,6,3,,,10.3390/publications6030031,WOS:000272330500001,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
187,WOS,"The presence of High-impact factor Open Access Journals in Science, Technology, Engineering and Medicine (STEM) disciplines",DOAJ; E-journals; Impact analysis; Impact factor; JCR; Open Access,"The present study means to establish to what extent high-quality open access journals are available as an outlet for publication, by examining their distribution in different scientific disciplines, including the distribution of those journals without article processing charges. The study is based on a systematic comparison between the journals included in the DOAJ, and the journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) Science edition 2013, released by Thomson Reuters. The impact factor of Open Access (OA) journals was lower than those of other journals by a small but statistically significant amount. Open access journals are present in the upper quartile (by impact factor) of 85 out of 176 (48.8%) categories examined. There were no OA journals with an Impact Factor in only 16 categories (9%).",['openaccess'],"['documentreview', 'biblio']","['engtech', 'med', 'natscie']",['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Barbaro, Annarita; Zedda, Monica; Gentili, Donatella; Greenblatt, Rafael Leon",JLIS.IT,English,Article,,,,,20.0,2.0,"UNIV STUDI FIRENZE, DIPT STUDI MEDIOEVO & RINASCIMENTO",2038-5366,,2015.0,6,3,57.0,76,10.4403/jlis.it-11257,WOS:000276858000007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
200,WOS,"Perceptions, preferences of scholarly publishing in open access routes A survey of academic librarians in Nigeria",Nigeria; Academic librarians; Tertiary institutions; Institutional repositories; Open access routes; ResearchGate,"Purpose - The purpose of this study is to know the various factors librarians consider while selecting open access (OA) journal for publication, and to know the challenges librarians face with OA journal publishing. Design/methodology/approach - Online questionnaire was designed to collect data using Survey Monkey software from 335 academic librarians in 57 institutions (Universities, Polytechnics and Colleges of Education) in Nigeria. Findings - The findings of the study revealed that majority of the academic librarians are aware of the gold and green publishing routes, while the majority of academic librarians are not aware of the diamond publishing route. The study also revealed that when considering where to publish, reputation and impact factor of journal were rated as very important among the factors that inform their choice of OA. The study further revealed that academic librarians have little or no knowledge about the existence of institutional repositories in their institutions, and only a few actual use institutional repositories and Research Gate to self-archive their publications. The majority of the academic librarians agreed that author fees (Article Processing Charges) and low impact factor of journal are barriers to publishing in OA journals. Training on OA publishing is recommended for librarians to increase their knowledge and confidence to discuss OA with faculty members in future. Practical implications - Knowledge of authors' attitude toward OA publishing models will help OA advocates focus on the factors that are meaningful that are raised in this study. Originality/value - The study is an original research work that investigated academic librarians' perception and engagement with OA publishing as they lead the OA campaign in their institutions.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher']",['NGA'],"Baro, Ebikabowei Emmanuel; Eze, Monica Eberechukwu",INFORMATION AND LEARNING SCIENCES,English,Article,,,,"[Baro, Ebikabowei Emmanuel] Fed Univ, Univ Lib, Otuoke, Nigeria; [Eze, Monica Eberechukwu] Enugu State Coll Educ Tech, Enugu, Nigeria",49.0,3.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2398-5348,,2017.0,118,3-4,152.0,169,10.1108/ILS-03-2017-0015,WOS:000283583600006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
204,WOS,Do open access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and methodological reflections of an application of multiple measures to an analysis by WoS subject areas,Citation analysis; Open access citation advantage; Open access journals; Web of Science; Normalised citation scores; Open access,"This study is one of the first that uses the recently introduced open access (OA) labels in the Web of Science (WoS) metadata to investigate whether OA articles published in Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) listed journals experience a citation advantage in comparison to subscription journal articles, specifically those of which no self-archived versions are available. Bibliometric data on all articles and reviews indexed in WoS, and published from 2013 to 2015, were analysed. In addition to normalised citation score (NCS), we used two additional measures of citation advantage: whether an article was cited at all; and whether an article is among the most frequently cited percentile of articles within its respective subject area (pptopX %). For each WoS subject area, the strength of the relationship between access status (whether an article was published in an OA journal) and each of these three measures was calculated. We found that OA journal articles experience a citation advantage in very few subject areas and, in most of these subject areas, the citation advantage was found on only a single measure of citation advantage, namely whether the article was cited at all. Our results lead us to conclude that access status accounts for little of the variability in the number of citations an article accumulates. The methodology and the calculations that were used in this study are described in detail and we believe that the lessons we learnt, and the recommendations we make, will be of much use to future researchers interested in using the WoS OA labels, and to the field of citation advantage in general.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Basson, Isabel; Blanckenberg, Jaco P.; Prozesky, Heidi",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Basson, Isabel; Blanckenberg, Jaco P.; Prozesky, Heidi] Stellenbosch Univ, DST NRF Ctr Excellence Scientometr & STI Policy, Stellenbosch, South Africa; [Basson, Isabel; Blanckenberg, Jaco P.; Prozesky, Heidi] Stellenbosch Univ, Ctr Res Sci & Technol CREST, Stellenbosch, South Africa",40.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,,,,,,10.1007/s11192-020-03734-9,WOS:000285692100004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
209,WOS,"Austrian scientists on the golden road to open access: Results from the study of open access publishing (SOAP) [Österreichische wissenschaftlerinnen und wissenschaftler und der goldene weg zu open access: Ergebnisse aus der ""study of open access publishing"" (SOAP)]",Austria; Open access; Results; Scientists; SOAP; Study on open access publishing; Survey,"The EU funded Study of Open Access Publishing (SOAP) run from March 2009 to February 2011. More than 53.000 people worldwide participated in this online-survey on the Golden Road to Open Access, among them about 46.000 scholars. The paper will put a spotlight on the input of the 462 Austrian scientists who took part in this survey. It analyses their answers to 9 selected questions out of the survey's original total of 23 questions. A focus is put on significant differences in these answers between scientists from Austria and Germany. The financial supporting structure for Open Access in Austria is quite dissimilar from Germany hence differences should be expected. Even so 89 % of scientists in both countries agree that Open Access is helpful in their own field of research.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['AUT'],Bauer B.,VOEB-Mitteilungen,English; German,Article,0,0,0,,,4.0,0,10222588,0,2011.0,64,44289,413.0,429,,WOS:000286607600006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
211,WOS,Open access at universities in Austria - Survey of the council of Austrian university libaries [Open access An den Österreichischen Universitäten 2012: Umfrage Im Auftrag Des Forums Universitätsbibliotheken Österreichs],Council of austrian university libraries; Open access; Survey; Task force 'open access at universities in austria'; University; University library,"The Task Force on ""Open Access at universities in Austria"" was set up by the Council of Austrian University Libraries in November 2011. The group was charged with the analysis of the current policy framework of Open Access and to identify projects that deal with the ""golden road"" and the ""green road"" to Open Access at universities in Austria. The working group started off by conducting a survey in early 2012 of all Austrian university libraries to gather information on their experiences with the implementation of Open Access.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['AUT'],"Bauer B., Gumpenberger C., Haas I., Katzmayr M., Ramminger E., Reinitzer D.",VOEB-Mitteilungen,English; German,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,0,10222588,0,2012.0,65,2,213.0,217,,WOS:000286824800002,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
214,WOS,Do journals flipping to gold open access show an OA citation or publication advantage?,Open access; Publishing model; Citation analysis; Paired t-test; Effects of OA; OA flipping,"The effects of Open Access (OA) upon journal performance are investigated. The key research question holds: How does the citation impact and publication output of journals switching (flipping) from non-OA to Gold-OA develop after their switch to Gold-OA? A review is given of the literature, with an emphasis on studies dealing with flipping journals. Two study sets with 119 and 100 flipping journals, derived from two different OA data sources (DOAJ and OAD), are compared with two control groups, one based on a standard bibliometric criterion, and a second controlling for a journal's national orientation. Comparing post-switch indicators with pre-switch ones in paired T-tests, evidence was obtained of an OACitationadvantage butnotof an OAPublicationAdvantage. Shifts in the affiliation countries of publishing and citing authors are characterized in terms of countries' income class and geographical world region. Suggestions are made for qualitative follow-up studies to obtain more insight into OA flipping or reverse-flipping.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Bautista-Puig, Nuria; Lopez-Illescas, Carmen; de Moya-Anegon, Felix; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente; Moed, Henk F.",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Bautista-Puig, Nuria] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Res Inst Higher Educ & Sci INAECU, Madrid, Spain; [Lopez-Illescas, Carmen] Univ Complutense Madrid, Informat Sci Fac, Dept Informat & Lib Sci, SCImago Grp, Madrid, Spain; [de Moya-Anegon, Felix] SCImago Grp, Madrid, Spain; [Guerrero-Bote, Vicente] Univ Extremadura, Dept Informat & Commun, SCImago Grp, Badajoz, Spain; [Moed, Henk F.] Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy",32.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,124,3,2551.0,2575,10.1007/s11192-020-03546-x,WOS:000287134000004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
219,WOS,An investigation of graduate student knowledge and usage of open-access journals,graduate students; information literacy; library services; Open access; survey,"ABSTRACT: Graduate students lament the need to achieve the proficiency necessary to competently search multiple databases for their research assignments, regularly eschewing these sources in favor of Google Scholar or some other search engine. The author conducted an anonymous survey investigating graduate student knowledge or awareness of the open-access journal articles that resulted from those types of searches. The intent, in part, was to facilitate the creation or expansion of library services targeting graduate students. Additionally, the survey sought to elicit student interest in open-access publishing. This article discusses the survey outcomes and potential next steps. © 2016, Published with license by Taylor & Francis.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'othergroup']",['USA'],Beard R.M.,Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Routledge,1941126X,0,2016.0,28,1,25.0,32,10.1080/1941126X.2016.1130453,WOS:000289391800003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
232,WOS,"Open science and open access, a scientific practice for sharing knowledge",0,"Digital transformation is changing communication in the academic community, breaking geographic barriers with facilities of communication between collaborators. However, countries and institutions are not in the same context about resources to build an open path for research production. For this reason, Open Access and Science are strategies of relevance that enable collaboration among researchers around the world and institutional areas. We do a systematic review with the aim of exploring the potentials, and limitations of Open Science (OS) and Open Access (OA) to scientific collaboration and production. We did an initial screening of an abstract of 1664 publications in Scopus to select 144 documents related. Finally, a detailed review of the articles presents 17 documents that deal specifically with the functionalities and barriers of OS and OA. The given arguments highlight the efficiency, and abilities to democratize the production of knowledge and to generate ideas and innovative solutions to current problems. Likewise, this article addresses the barriers found in the academic level. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the arguments treated by scientists in the dispute over whether to use it or not. Specifically, our objectives are to: (a) analyze the role of open science and open access in scientific production, (b) identify the barriers that authors experiment when opting for open access and open science. At last, we discuss the potential of OS to overcome the territorial, economic, and infrastructure barriers that certain researchers may experience in their production of scientific research collaboratively and equitably. Copyright © 2019 for this paper by its authors.","['openaccess', 'openscience']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Belli S., Cardenas R., Velez M., Rivera A., Santoro V.",CEUR Workshop Proceedings,English,Conference Paper,"2nd International Conference on Applied Informatics Workshops, ICAIW 2019 - Joint AIESD 2019, WDEA 2019, EduSynergies 2019, IKIT 2019, ISTIHMR 2019, WSSC 2019, VGameEdu 2019",6 November 2019 through 9 November 2019,0,,,1.0,CEUR-WS,16130073,0,2019.0,2486,0,156.0,167,,WOS:000292473000007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
236,WOS,Open access publishing and ethical issues in the moroccan context,Ethic; Morocco; Open access; Open edition; Open science; Predatory journals; Researchers; Scholarly publishing,"This paper treats some ethical issues of open access publishing in the Moroccan academic context through a survey conducted among researchers and decision makers at Abdelmalek Essaâdi University and also among some notorious Moroccan scientific journal publishers. We questioned faculty researchers about their points of view on publishers’ commercial policy that appears to be against ethical and scientific values. We present some arguments against publishers’ market policy such as knowledge is a public good not a commodity and author must not pay to receive information that he provided. Ethic is present during all open access publishing process. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'biblio', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'university', 'publisher']",['MAR'],"Benaissa N., Belouali S.",Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering,English,Conference Paper,"1st International Conference on Smart Information and Communication Technologies, SmartICT 2019",26 September 2019 through 28 September 2019,0,,,0.0,Springer,18761100,9783030531867,2020.0,684 LNEE,0,541.0,547,10.1007/978-3-030-53187-4_59,WOS:000293812700003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
239,WOS,Open data hopes and fears: Determining the barriers of open data,Barriers; Challenges; Data quality; Open data; Publishing data; Transparency; Using data,"In recent years, Open Data has gained considerable attention: a steady growth in the number of openly published datasets - mainly by governments and public administrations - can be observed as the demand for Open Data rises. However, many potential providers are still hesitant to open their datasets and at the same time users often face difficulties when attempting to use this data in practice. This indicates that there are still various barriers present both regarding usage and publishing of Open Data, but studies that systematically collect and assess these barriers regarding their impact are rare. Based on this observation we survey prior literature on barriers, and have developed a questionnaire aimed at both assessing the users and publishers views on obstacles regarding Open Data adoption. Using a sample of over 100 participants from Austria who completed our online survey, we draw conclusions about the relative importance of the barriers reported in the literature. The empirical findings presented in this study shall serve as a solid foundation for future research on the mitigation of Open Data barriers. © 2017 IEEE.",['opendata'],"['survey', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['AUT'],"Beno M., Figl K., Umbrich J., Polleres A.","Proceedings of the 7th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2017",English,Conference Paper,"7th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2017",17 May 2017 through 19 May 2017,0,,,26.0,Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.,0,9781509067190,2017.0,0,0,69.0,81,10.1109/CeDEM.2017.22,WOS:000295906000004,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
265,WOS,$100 Is Not Much To You': Open Science and neglected accessibilities for scientific research in Africa,Open Science; African science; data sharing; research environments; public engagement,"The Open Science (OS) movement promises nothing less than a revolution in the availability of scientific knowledge around the globe. By removing barriers to online data and encouraging publication in Open Access formats and Open Data archives, OS seeks to expand the role, reach and value of research. The promises of OS imply a set of expectations about what different publics hope to gain from research, how accountability and participation can be enhanced, and what makes science public in the first place. This paper presents empirical material from fieldwork undertaken in (bio)chemistry laboratories in Kenya and South Africa to examine the extent to which these ideals can be realized in a sub-Saharan context. To analyse the challenges African researchers face in making use of freely available data, we draw from Amartya Sen's Capabilities Approach. His theorisations of conversion factors' helps to understand how seemingly minor economic and social contingencies can hamper the production and (re-)use of online data. In contrast to initiatives that seek to make more data available, we suggest the need to facilitate a more egalitarian engagement with online data resources.","['openscience', 'openaccess', 'opendata']","['interview', 'othermeth']",['med'],['researcher'],"['ZAF', 'KEN']","Bezuidenhout, Louise; Kelly, Ann H.; Leonelli, Sabina; Rappert, Brian",CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH,English,Article,,,,"[Bezuidenhout, Louise; Leonelli, Sabina; Rappert, Brian] Univ Exeter, Dept Philosophy Sociol & Anthropol, Exeter, Devon, England; [Kelly, Ann H.] Kings Coll London, Dept Global Hlth & Social Med, London, England; [Bezuidenhout, Louise] Univ Witwatersrand, Steve Biko Ctr Bioeth, Johannesburg, South Africa",26.0,12.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",0958-1596,,2017.0,27,1,39.0,49,10.1080/09581596.2016.1252832,WOS:000302851700002,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
267,WOS,Open access legal information sources and their use by students of national law university,Case study; India; Legal information resources; Open access,This article identifies various open access resources that are popular among legal community in India. The findings of the study reveal that majority of respondents are aware of open access resources. The main purpose of using these resources are for case law searching. Majority of the respondents have stated that legal information available in open access resources are not organized properly and was a hindrance in usage.,"['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['survey'],['socscie'],['othergroup'],['IND'],"Bhardwaj R.K., Madhusudhanb M.",Annals of Library and Information Studies,English,Article,0,0,0,,,5.0,0,9725423,0,2014.0,60,4,314.0,319,,WOS:000302929100005,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
268,WOS,Open Research Data Repositories: A Content Analysis to Comprehend Data Equitable Access,Research Data; Content Analysis; Data Repository; Researchers; Open Data,"The present study pertains to content analysis of open Research Data Repositories (RDRs) worldwide to comprehend the growth and development in the area. The study is original because no attempt has been made so far to do a content analysis of these open research data repositories. The study used the content analysis method of open RDRs listed on the registry of research data repositories. The dataset was analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Each unique parameter was given a unique variable for the purpose of analysis. Subsequently, the dataset was analyzed using Microsoft Excel to achieve the objectives of the study. A simple percentage method was followed in analyses and is presented through Tables and Figures. The study found that there are 1997 RDRs are open worldwide, which are indexed in the registry of research data repositories. It was also found that out of these data repositories 1509 (75.6 percent) are 'disciplinary', 'institutional' 398 (19.9 percent) and 'others' 90 (4.5 percent). Majority open RDRs worldwide use the World Data System (WDS) certification followed by Core Trust Seal. The study found total 70 countries in the world have 1997 RDRs and the United States is the leading country with 704 (35.3 percent) open RDRs, followed by Germany 201 (10.1 percent), United Kingdom 183 (9.2 percent), Canada 118 (5.9 percent). Scientific and statistical data formats are available in maximum (1238) open research data repositories, followed by standard office documents (1108), images (1047), plain text (935), raw data (881). It is ascertained that 1049 (52.5) RDRs are not following any metadata standard in open RDRs and 948 (47.5 percent) follow metadata standards. It was ascertained that Dublin Core is being used by (237) data repositories, followed by ISO 19115 (128), Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) (125). It was found that 963 (48.2 percent) data repositories are using unknown and in-house developed software worldwide. Majority of research data repositories contains the material relating to 'Biology' 715 (23.0 percent). Besides this, the study found that open data repositories have been developed in 60 languages worldwide.",['opendata'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Bhardwaj, Raj Kumar",JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRIC RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"[Bhardwaj, Raj Kumar] Univ Delhi, St Stephens Coll, Delhi 110007, India",30.0,0.0,PHCOG NET,2321-6654,,2019.0,8,3,135.0,142,10.5530/jscires.8.3.29,WOS:000303299600006,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
269,WOS,Perception of Library Professionals in Kerala Towards Open Access Publications: A Gender Wise Study,Kerala; Library Professionals; Open Access; Open Access Journals; Repository,"The paper discusses the perception of library professionals in Kerala towards Open Access. It highlights the impact of open access in saving the budget of libraries, faster publication, accessibility of articles, popularity, citation, impact factor. Open access initiative has been widely implemented in academic institutions in different parts of the world. It is also make available to academic community in India through internet by various institutions. The Library professional has significant role in promoting and dissemination of the Open Access Initiatives in Kerala. The study analyses the perception of Library professionals towards Open Access (OA) in Kerala. The result of the survey shows the positive attitude of the library professionals towards the Open Access in the academic environment of Kerala. © 2019 Library Philosophy and Practice.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['IND'],"Bhaskaran P., Koovakkai D.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2019.0,2019,0,0.0,0,,WOS:000305440700001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
270,WOS,Open access repositories in computer science and information technology: An evaluation,Computer science; Evaluation; Information technology; Open Access repositories,"The study reports evaluation of nine Open Access Repositories in the field of Computer Science and IT. The repositories were identified from the OpenDOAR; directory of Open Access repositories (http://www.open doar.org/). Questionnaires were sent via e-mail to repository administrators to ascertain the background, resources, content management policies, preservation policies, rights management, promotion, advertisement, services, feedback and access statistics of the repositories. The findings revealed that most of the repositories are maintained by 1-2 faculty members on a part-time basis. The most popular software platform is Eprints, on account of its excellent support, ease of installation, transparency of interfaces, configurability, OAI compliance and active development. Most of the repositories follow policies for selection of content and submission of documents, have provision for withdrawal of content by the authors and voluntary faculty deposit policies. Although backups are taken for short term preservation of the content, no strategies have been adopted for long term preservation. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright compliance of their articles in most of the repositories. Links are provided from library or departmental websites to most of the repositories for promotion and advertisement. Most of the repositories have provision for feedback from users. A few repositories provide access statistics. The paper provides recommendations for the establishment and management of OA repositories. © 2009 Author.",['openaccess'],"['documentreview', 'survey']",['natscie'],"['publisher', 'othergroup']",['nonspecificgeo'],Bhat M.H.,IFLA Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,,,9.0,0,3400352,0,2009.0,35,3,243.0,257,10.1177/0340035209346210,WOS:000305497100004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
277,WOS,Continued adventures in open access: 2009 perspective,,"Many publishers have actively responded to the open access (OA) movement and have developed a variety of new models and policies as a result. Of those adopting OA models, the majority seek to cover costs through author-side charges in the region of US$ 1,000-3,000. Optional or 'hybrid' OA models are increasingly commonplace, although most are experiencing uptake of below 10%, with some notable exceptions. Early evidence from these initiatives suggests that OA leads to an increase in online usage. Meanwhile numerous fully OA journals have launched, and a few subscription journals have made the transition to full OA. Several case studies indicate that fully OA models reliant upon author-side charges are viable, depending on authors being able and willing to pay publication charges, and other influential factors including rejection rate. Most authors continue to rank other considerations, including speed of publication, quality of peer review, and impact factor, as more important than a journal's OA policies, although funder and university-level mandates seem likely to have an increasing influence on an author's choice of where to publish. This article provides a number of case studies of gold OA journals - both hybrid and fully OA - with a particular focus on the sustainability of these models.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Bird, Claire",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, England",5.0,18.0,ASSOC LEARNED PROFESSIONAL SOC PUBL,0953-1513,,2010.0,23,2,107.0,116,10.1087/20100205,WOS:000306395100003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
282,WOS,A Study of Innovative Features in Scholarly Open Access Journals,Scholarly publishing; open access; Internet; peer review,"Background: The emergence of the Internet has triggered tremendous changes in the publication of scientific peer-reviewed journals. Today, journals are usually available in parallel electronic versions, but the way the peer-review process works, the look of articles and journals, and the rigid and slow publication schedules have remained largely unchanged, at least for the vast majority of subscription-based journals. Those publishing firms and scholarly publishers who have chosen the more radical option of open access (OA), in which the content of journals is freely accessible to anybody with Internet connectivity, have had a much bigger degree of freedom to experiment with innovations. Objective: The objective was to study how open access journals have experimented with innovations concerning ways of organizing the peer review, the format of journals and articles, new interactive and media formats, and novel publishing revenue models. Methods: The features of 24 open access journals were studied. The journals were chosen in a nonrandom manner from the approximately 7000 existing OA journals based on available information about interesting journals and include both representative cases and highly innovative outlier cases. Results: Most early OA journals in the 1990s were founded by individual scholars and used a business model based on voluntary work close in spirit to open-source development of software. In the next wave, many long-established journals, in particular society journals and journals from regions such as Latin America, made their articles OA when they started publishing parallel electronic versions. From about 2002 on, newly founded professional OA publishing firms using article-processing charges to fund their operations have emerged. Over the years, there have been several experiments with new forms of peer review, media enhancements, and the inclusion of structured data sets with articles. In recent years, the growth of OA publishing has also been facilitated by the availability of open-source software for journal publishing. Conclusions: The case studies illustrate how a new technology and a business model enabled by new technology can be harnessed to find new innovative ways for the organization and content of scholarly publishing. Several recent launches of OA journals by major subscription publishers demonstrate that OA is rapidly gaining acceptance as a sustainable alternative to subscription-based scholarly publishing.",['openaccess'],"['documentreview', 'biblio']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Bjoerk, Bo-Christer",JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"Hanken Sch Econ, Helsinki 00101, Finland",42.0,33.0,"JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC",1438-8871,,2011.0,13,4,,,10.2196/jmir.1802,WOS:000307618600004,22173122.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
283,WOS,A comparison of subscription and Open Access journals in construction management and related fields,Business model; Internet; Open access; Scholarly publishing,"The Internet has profoundly changed the technical infrastructure for the publishing of scientific peer reviewed journals. The traditional business model of selling the content to subscribers is increasingly being challenged by Open Access (OA) journals, which are either run at low cost by voluntary academics or which sell dissemination services to authors. In addition authors in many fields are taking advantage of the legal possibilities of uploading free manuscript versions to institutional or subject-based repositories, in order to increase readership and impact. This study looks closer at the current publishing situation in construction management and related fields and compares empirical data about 17 OA journals and 16 traditional subscription journals. Of the articles published in 2011 in the subscription journals only 9 % could be found as OA copies. The overall OA availability (including articles in OA journals) was 14 % for Construction Management and Economics and 29 % for construction IT scholarship. The study also compared the scientific quality of OA journals to subscription journals using a number of citation indexes. Four of the OA journals are approaching the citation levels (using Scopus data) of the average subscription journals. OA journals are outperforming subscription journals by almost a year in speed of publication.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['socscie', 'natscie']",['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],Bjork B.-C.,Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building,English,Article,0,0,0,,,3.0,Australian Institute of Quantity Surveyors,18356354,0,2012.0,12,2,27.0,42,10.5130/ajceb.v12i2.2560,WOS:000307618600006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
284,WOS,"The electronic journal of information technology in construction (ITcon): An open access journal using an un-paid, volunteer-based organization",0,"Introduction This case study is based on the experiences with the Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), founded in 1995. Development This journal is an example of a particular category of open access journals, which use neither author charges nor subscriptions to finance their operations, but rely largely on unpaid voluntary work in the spirit of the open source movement. The journal has, after some initial struggle, survived its first decade and is now established as one of half-a-dozen peer reviewed journals in its field. Operations The journal publishes articles as they become ready, but creates virtual issues through alerting messages to ""subscribers"". It has also started to publish special issues, since this helps in attracting submissions, and also helps in sharing the work-load of review management. From the start the journal adopted a rather traditional layout of the articles. After the first few years the HTML version was dropped and papers are only published in PDF format. Performance The journal has recently been benchmarked against the competing journals in its field. Its acceptance rate of 53% is slightly higher and its average turnaround time of seven months almost a year faster compared to those journals in the sample for which data could be obtained. The server log files for the past three years have also been studied. Conclusions Our overall experience demonstrates that it is possible to publish this type of OA journal, with a yearly publishing volume equal to a quarterly journal and involving the processing of some fifty submissions a year, using a networked volunteer-based organization.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['engtech'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Björk B.-C., Turk Ž.",Information Research,English,Article,0,0,0,,,7.0,0,13681613,0,2006.0,11,3,185.0,203,,WOS:000308082500001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
289,WOS,Journal portals - an important infrastructure for non-commercial scholarly open access publishing,Portal; Open access; SciELO; Scholarly journal,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to look at third party journal portals, which facilitate the low-cost publishing of open access journals. Portals have become very important enablers for converting journals published by scholarly societies and universities to open access, in particular in the social sciences and humanities. Design/methodology/approach - Portals were identified using a combination of methods including a literature search, interviews with experts, a key word web search and by analyzing web addresses and publishers in data from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). Findings - In total, 21 portals fitting our definition were identified. Together these published more than 6,000 journals. They contribute around 10 percent of the journals indexed in the DOAJ, and the content is very highly skewed to certain countries, in particular Latin America and Asia. Originality/value - While there have been earlier case study reports about individual portals, especially SciElo, this is probably the first systematic study of this phenomenon as a whole.",['openaccess'],"['documentreview', 'interview', 'othermeth']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Bjork, Bo-Christer",ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Dept Management & Org, Helsinki, Finland",24.0,5.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1468-4527,,2017.0,41,5,643.0,654,10.1108/OIR-03-2016-0088,WOS:000309164000008,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
290,WOS,"Growth of hybrid open access, 2009-2016",Open access; Scholarly publishing,"Hybrid Open Access is an intermediate form of OA, where authors pay scholarly publishers to make articles freely accessible within journals, in which reading the content otherwise requires a subscription or pay-per-view. Major scholarly publishers have in recent years started providing the hybrid option for the vast majority of their journals. Since the uptake usually has been low per journal and scattered over thousands of journals, it has been very difficult to obtain an overview of how common hybrid articles are. This study, using the results of earlier studies as well as a variety of methods, measures the evolution of hybrid OA over time. The number of journals offering the hybrid option has increased from around 2,000 in 2009 to almost 10,000 in 2016. The number of individual articles has in the same period grown from an estimated 8,000 in 2009 to 45,000 in 2016. The growth in article numbers has clearly increased since 2014, after some major research funders in Europe started to introduce new centralized payment schemes for the article processing charges (APCs).",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Bjork, Bo-Christer",PEERJ,English,Article,,,,"[Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Informat Syst Sci, Helsinki, Finland",17.0,17.0,PEERJ INC,2167-8359,,2017.0,5,,,,10.7717/peerj.3878,WOS:000309701200008,28975059.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
291,WOS,SCHOLARLY JOURNALS IN BUILDING AND CIVIL ENGINEERING - THE BIG PICTURE AND CURRENT IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS,Scholarly publishing; Building and Construction; Internet; Open Access,"The publishing of scholarly peer reviewed journals has in the past 20 years moved from print to primarily digital publishing, but the subscription-based revenue model is still dominant. This means that the additional benefits of open access to all scholarly articles still remains a vision, despite some progress. A selection of 72 leading journals in building & construction was studied, in order to determine the current status in this subfield of engineering. Of the approximately 9,500 articles published yearly in these, only some 5,6 % are in the 11 full OA journals included, and a couple of percentage more are paid OA articles in hybrid journals. In most of the OA journals publishing is free for the authors. In terms of OA maturity, the field lags far behind the situation across all sciences, where at least 15 % of articles are in full OA journals. If OA is to become more important in our field, the growth is likely to come from major publishers starting new journals funded by author payments (APCs) or converting existing hybrid journals once they have reached a critical share of paid OA articles.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['engtech'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Bjork, Bo-Christer",JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION,English,Article,,,,"[Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland",21.0,0.0,INT COUNCIL RESEARCH & INNOVATION BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION,1874-4753,,2018.0,23,,381.0,388,,WOS:000310865400006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
292,WOS,How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited,open access; predatory publishing; citations; impact,"Predatory journals are Open Access journals of highly questionable scientific quality. Such journals pretend to use peer review for quality assurance, and spam academics with requests for submissions, in order to collect author payments. In recent years predatory journals have received a lot of negative media. While much has been said about the harm that such journals cause to academic publishing in general, an overlooked aspect is how much articles in such journals are actually read and in particular cited, that is if they have any significant impact on the research in their fields. Other studies have already demonstrated that only some of the articles in predatory journals contain faulty and directly harmful results, while a lot of the articles present mediocre and poorly reported studies. We studied citation statistics over a five-year period in Google Scholar for 250 random articles published in such journals in 2014 and found an average of 2.6 citations per article, and that 56% of the articles had no citations at all. For comparison, a random sample of articles published in the approximately 25,000 peer reviewed journals included in the Scopus index had an average of 18, 1 citations in the same period with only 9% receiving no citations. We conclude that articles published in predatory journals have little scientific impact.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Bjork, Bo-Christer; Kanto-Karvonen, Sari; Harviainen, J. Tuomas",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, POB 479, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland; [Kanto-Karvonen, Sari; Harviainen, J. Tuomas] Tampere Univ, Dept Informat Studies & Interact Media, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland",47.0,4.0,MDPI,,,2020.0,8,2,,,10.3390/publications8020017,WOS:000311644000005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
293,WOS,A longitudinal study of independent scholar-published open access journals,Open access; Scientific publishing,"Open Access (OA) is nowadays increasingly being used as a business model for the publishing of scholarly peer reviewed journals, both by specialized OA publishing companies and major, predominantly subscription-based publishers. However, in the early days of the web OA journals were mainly founded by independent academics, who were dissatisfied with the predominant print and subscription paradigm and wanted to test the opportunities offered by the new medium. There is still an on-going debate about how OA journals should be operated, and the volunteer model used by many such 'indie' journals has been proposed as a viable alternative to the model adopted by big professional publishers where publishing activities are funded by authors paying expensive article processing charges (APCs). Our longitudinal quantitative study of 250 'indie' OA journals founded prior to 2002, showed that 51% of these journals were still in operation in 2014 and that the median number of articles published per year had risen from 11 to 18 among the survivors. Of these surviving journals, only 8% had started collecting APCs. A more detailed qualitative case study of five such journals provided insights into how such journals have tried to ensure the continuity and longevity of operations.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Bjork, Bo-Christer; Shen, Cenyu; Laakso, Mikael",PEERJ,English,Article,,,,"[Bjork, Bo-Christer; Shen, Cenyu; Laakso, Mikael] Hanken Sch Econ, Dept Management & Org, Informat Syst Sci, Helsinki, Finland",19.0,10.0,PEERJ INC,2167-8359,,2016.0,4,,,,10.7717/peerj.1990,WOS:000312160500001,27190709.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
294,WOS,Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact,impact; open access; peer review; scientific publishing,"Background: In the past few years there has been an ongoing debate as to whether the proliferation of open access (OA) publishing would damage the peer review system and put the quality of scientific journal publishing at risk. Our aim was to inform this debate by comparing the scientific impact of OA journals with subscription journals, controlling for journal age, the country of the publisher, discipline and (for OA publishers) their business model. Methods: The 2-year impact factors (the average number of citations to the articles in a journal) were used as a proxy for scientific impact. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) was used to identify OA journals as well as their business model. Journal age and discipline were obtained from the Ulrich's periodicals directory. Comparisons were performed on the journal level as well as on the article level where the results were weighted by the number of articles published in a journal. A total of 610 OA journals were compared with 7,609 subscription journals using Web of Science citation data while an overlapping set of 1,327 OA journals were compared with 11,124 subscription journals using Scopus data. Results: Overall, average citation rates, both unweighted and weighted for the number of articles per journal, were about 30% higher for subscription journals. However, after controlling for discipline (medicine and health versus other), age of the journal (three time periods) and the location of the publisher (four largest publishing countries versus other countries) the differences largely disappeared in most subcategories except for journals that had been launched prior to 1996. OA journals that fund publishing with article processing charges (APCs) are on average cited more than other OA journals. In medicine and health, OA journals founded in the last 10 years are receiving about as many citations as subscription journals launched during the same period. Conclusions: Our results indicate that OA journals indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus are approaching the same scientific impact and quality as subscription journals, particularly in biomedicine and for journals funded by article processing charges.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Bjork, Bo-Christer; Solomon, David",BMC MEDICINE,English,Article,,,,"[Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland; [Solomon, David] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA",19.0,126.0,BIOMED CENTRAL LTD,1741-7015,,2012.0,10,,,,,WOS:000312164800001,22805105.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
308,WOS,Open access: Perceptions and reactions of academic librarians in Nigerian private universities,0,"Open Access (OA) has been heralded as a key strategy for promoting the electronic dissemination and access to quality scientific knowledge by researchers in developing countries. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the perceptions and reactions of academic librarians in Nigerian private universities to OA publishing as a medium for disseminating quality scientific knowledge and for assessing the contributions of scholars to global knowledge improvements. Ten of the seventeen private universities in Southwestern Nigeria were randomly selected, and 42 academic librarians from the ten universities were surveyed. A questionnaire adapted from Palmer, et al. (2009) was used to collect data. The findings showed that academic librarians in Nigerian private universities have positive perception of OA scholarly publishing. However, their level of involvement in creating awareness and contributing to the development of OA at the time of the study was low. It needs to be improved in view of the potential benefit of OA for promoting the visibility of the research output of researchers in the universities.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['NGA'],"Bolarinwa O., Utulu S.C.A.",African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science,English,Article,0,0,0,,,3.0,0,7954778,0,2011.0,21,2,127.0,137,,WOS:000317808500002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
312,WOS,Open access at universidad nacional de Rosario. Faculty needs and practices [Acceso abierto en la universidad nacional de Rosario necesidades y prácticas de los docentes/investigadores],Argentina; Faculty; Institutional repositories; Open access; Researchers; Universidad nacional de rosario,"This paper presents the results of a survey at the Universidad Nacional de Rosario, in Argentina, to know the opinions about, and use of, Open Access (OA) by professors and researchers at the university, and their needs in relation to the use of the university Institutional Repository (IR). It is based on 783 replies to a survey implemented in 2012. The results of this survey show that 80% of professors and researchers at UNR, in all subject areas, agree with the OA dissemination of outputs in all academic areas. However, only 13% of professors and researchers use the IR for dissemination of its own scholarly output, mainly due to ignorance of its existence. The most frequent uses for dissemination in OA are open access journals, websites of the faculties and research centers or groups, as well as personal websites. What motivates professors and researchers to disseminate their work in the IR, is the use of it by their fellow professors/researchers, students and the general public. Moreover, they value from the IR the advance search facilities tailored to their needs and user profile, and the availability of usage statistics of their work. © Universidad de Buenos Aires.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'university']",['ARG'],"Bongiovani P.C., Guarnieri G., Babini D., Llópez F.A.","Informacion, Cultura y Sociedad",Spanish,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,Universidad de Buenos Aires,15148327,0,2014.0,30,1,13.0,34,,WOS:000317808500008,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
313,WOS,Argentinian researchers' opinions and habits regarding open access publishing. A study based on the SOAP survey data,Open access; survey; researchers; Argentina,"The aim of present work attempts was to discover the opinions and habits of Argentinean researchers regarding open access publishing in four research fields: Medicine, Physics and Astronomy, Agriculture and Biological Sciences and Social Sciences and Humanities. The study is based on the researchers' responses to the SOAP (Study of Open Access Publishing) survey conducted in 2010 and these results are compared with those revealed in the worldwide SOAP study as well as with the findings of a previous study on the publication patterns of Argentina's scientific community. The conclusions and discussion caution that while open access publishing is considered beneficial, that consideration is not sufficient in itself for researchers to change their publication habits.",['openaccess'],['survey'],"['med', 'natscie']",['researcher'],['ARG'],"Bongiovani, Paola; Diana Gomez, Nancy; Miguel, Sandra",REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Bongiovani, Paola] Univ Nacl Rosario, Ctr Int Franco Argentino Ciencias Informac & Sist, RA-2000 Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; [Diana Gomez, Nancy] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Bibliotecon & Documentac, Fac Humanidades Comunicac & Documentac, E-28903 Getafe, Spain; [Miguel, Sandra] Univ Nacl La Plata, Inst Invest Humanidades & Ciencias Sociales, Fac Humanidades & Ciencias Educ, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; [Miguel, Sandra] Univ Nacl La Plata, Dept Bibliotecol, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; [Miguel, Sandra] CSIC, Grp Invest SCImago, Madrid, Spain",19.0,14.0,CONSEJO SUPERIOR INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS-CSIC,0210-0614,,2012.0,35,3,453.0,467,10.3989/redc.2012.3.903,WOS:000317808500009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
314,WOS,Attitudes and perceptions of open access publishing among researchers who evaluate scientific careers in Argentina,Open access; journals; research assessment; researchers; Argentina,"This study analyzes attitudes and perceptions of open access publishing among researchers who evaluate scientific careers in Argentina, focusing on differences in age range, thematic area and institution affiliation. The results indicate that evaluators maintain traditional attitudes and opinions in both the choice of the journal where they themselves publish and the process of evaluating the research output of their peers. The journal peer-review process, publishing prestige, impact factor and presence in international and regional indexes are highly valued. But the open access journal model is not considered as a key factor in either their decisions about their own publications or in their evaluation of other researchers. The positive opinion about publishing in OA increases with the evaluator's age. It is promising that 61% of evaluators have published at least one open access article in the last five years and they give greater importance to this aspect when evaluating their peers.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['ARG'],"Bongiovani, Paola; Miguel, Sandra; Hernandez-Perez, Tony",REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Bongiovani, Paola; Hernandez-Perez, Tony] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Bibliotecon & Documentac, Madrid, Spain; [Bongiovani, Paola] Univ Nacl Rosario, Fac Humanidades & Artes, Rosario, Argentina; [Miguel, Sandra] Univ Nacl La Plata, CONICET, IdIHCS, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina",32.0,3.0,CONSEJO SUPERIOR INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS-CSIC,0210-0614,,2017.0,40,2,,,10.3989/redc.2017.2.1404,WOS:000317808500010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
315,WOS,Bulgarian authors' open access awareness and preferences,European Union; Bulgaria,"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe the findings of a survey of Bulgarian faculty about the extent to which their research is openly available, awareness of the European Union Competitiveness Council open access goal, support for the goal and preferences for achieving it. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a survey of 584 faculty at six universities in Bulgaria using the Qualtrics online survey software. There were 222 effectively surveyed respondents. Findings Bulgarian researchers are aware of arguments in favor of open access and believe that it benefits researchers in their discipline. Only a little more than a third of Bulgarian faculty are familiar with the E.U. goal of open access to all publicly-funded research by 2020. Once the goal is explained, they support it. Authors may not understand the intricacies of green and gold open access, but they are willing to meet the E.U. goal by either publishing in open access journals (the gold method) or depositing articles in open access repositories (the green method). Originality/value To date, there has been no research that seeks to determine the degree to which researchers are aware of the E.U. Competitiveness Council's goal or that seeks to determine faculty preferences for achieving that goal. This paper explores methods available for achieving open access to the results of publicly funded research in Bulgaria.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['BGR'],"Boock, Michael; Todorova, Tania Yordanova; Trencheva, Tereza Stoyanova; Todorova, Radostina",LIBRARY MANAGEMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Boock, Michael] Oregon State Univ, Dept Libraries & Press, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA; [Todorova, Tania Yordanova; Trencheva, Tereza Stoyanova] State Univ Lib Studies & Informat Technol, Dept Lib Management, Sofia, Bulgaria; [Todorova, Radostina] New Bulgarian Univ, Sofia, Bulgaria",26.0,0.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0143-5124,,2020.0,41,2/3,91.0,102,10.1108/LM-08-2019-0059,WOS:000317808500022,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
316,WOS,"Open research data, an archival challenge?",Archival science; Archivist; Open data; Open research data; Open science,"The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive.","['opendata', 'openaccess']",['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher', 'policy']",['SWE'],"Borgerud, Charlotte; Borglund, Erik",ARCHIVAL SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Borgerud, Charlotte] Swedish Assoc Local Author & Reg, S-11882 Stockholm, Sweden; [Borglund, Erik] Mid Sweden Univ, S-85170 Sundsvall, Sweden",45.0,1.0,SPRINGER,1389-0166,,2020.0,20,3,279.0,302,10.1007/s10502-020-09330-3,WOS:000317808500023,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
317,WOS,Predictive validity of editorial decisions at an open access journal: A case study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,Open access; Predictive validity; Public peer review,"In this study we investigate the quality of the selection process of an open access (OA) journal, taking as an example the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). ACP is working with a new system of public peer review. We examined the predictive validity of the ACP peer review system - namely, whether the process selects the best of the manuscripts submitted. We have data for 1111 manuscripts that went through the complete ACP selection process in the years 2001 to 2006. The predictive validity was investigated on the basis of citation counts for the later published manuscripts. The results of the citation analysis confirm the predictive validity of the editorial decisions at ACP: They covary with citation counts for the published manuscripts.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['natscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Bornmann L., Daniel H.-D.","ELPUB 2010 - Publishing in the Networked World: Transforming the Nature of Communication, 14th International Conference on Electronic Publishing",English,Conference Paper,"14th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2010",16 June 2010 through 18 June 2010,Helsinki,,,0.0,0,0,9789522320865,2010.0,0,0,40.0,44,,WOS:000317808500024,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
324,WOS,"Perceptions, preferences of scholarly publishing in Open Access journals A survey of academic librarians in Africa",Africa; Institutional repositories; Academic librarians; Scholarly publishing; Open Access routes; Self-archiving,"Purpose - The purpose of the study is to know the various factors librarians consider while selecting Open Access (OA) journal for publication and to identify the challenges librarians face with OA journal publishing. Design/methodology/approach - Online questionnaire was designed to collect data from 402 academic librarians in 87 universities in Africa using SurveyMonkey software. Findings - The study found that academic librarians are aware of the green and gold routes but not familiar with the diamond route. The study revealed that a large number of the academic librarians have published only one paper in OA journals, followed by those who have not published any paper in OA journals. The study also revealed that reputation of journal and impact factor of journal were seen as very important among the factors that inform them of choosing OA. The majority of the respondents agreed that author fees, and lack of stable internet connectivity are the major barriers to publishing in OA journals. Practical implications - The study recommends that academic libraries in institutions of higher learning in Africa should organize seminars periodically on the need for their librarians to research and publish in OA journals. Social implications - Identifying factors involved in author decisions to publish in OA journals will help illuminate issues that may encourage or discourage author support of OA publishing models. Further understanding of these issues can assist the efforts to improve author perceptions of and confidence in OA publications. Originality/value - It is believed that this study of African librarians publishing in OA journals is the first study in the region.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['AF'],"Bosah, Gabriel; Okeji, Chuma Clement; Baro, Ebikabowei Emmanuel",DIGITAL LIBRARY PERSPECTIVES,English,Article,,,,"[Bosah, Gabriel] Nigerian Inst Oil Palm Res, Benin, Nigeria; [Okeji, Chuma Clement] Chukwuemeka Odumegwe Ojukwu Univ, Igbariam Campus, Igbariam, Nigeria; [Baro, Ebikabowei Emmanuel] Fed Univ Otuoke, Yenagoa, Nigeria",42.0,4.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2059-5816,,2017.0,33,4,378.0,394,10.1108/DLP-03-2017-0011,WOS:000320021200012,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
325,WOS,Open access foreign scientific resources and the SciGuide navigator,electronic publishing; foreign scientific resources; information resources navigator; open access movement,"This paper outlines the reasons that open access resources are required and the developmental patterns of open access models, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of open access information flows; it introduces a navigator that has been created as a tool for the use of open access resources. It also contains an analysis of statistical data about the use of this tool, including the results of surveys and interviews with the experts from one of the top research institutes of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and presents the authors' ideas about the role of libraries in the open access movement. © 2011 Allerton Press, Inc.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['RUS'],"Bosina L.V., Shaburova N.N.",Scientific and Technical Information Processing,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,0,1476882,0,2011.0,38,4,251.0,257,10.3103/S0147688211040022,WOS:000320038200006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
329,WOS,Charting the Open Access scholarly journals landscape in the UAE,Open Access; Scientific publications; Scholarly publishing; DOAJ; ROAD; Ulrichsweb,"The purpose of this study is to chart the scholarly journal landscape in the UAE in order to provide a scientific perspective on research productivity, distribution, and access in the country and lay the foundations for further research in this area. The study aims also to contribute to research endeavoring to paint a global picture of scholarly publishing. We carried out a mapping of scholarly journals published in the UAE compiled from international and local sources. The resulting journal list was studied focusing on the share of OA titles, language of publication, discipline, and type of publisher. Our results show that: (1) 534 journals are published in the UAE and that the share of OA is quite noteworthy with about 64% of all online journals; (2) the APC-based OA model is prevalent with around 75% of OA journals levying a publication fee; (3) UAE journals are predominantly in English while the number of Arabic-language journals is marginal; (4) science, technology and medicine prevail as the most prevalent subject areas of the journals; and (5) commercial publishers control most of the publications especially in the medical field. The study lays a foundation for further studies on scholarly journals in the UAE. The combination of regional indexes and international directories to measure the country's scholarly journal output can also be replicated and built upon for other countries where the major international bibliometric databases do not provide a comprehensive representation of scholarly publishing activities.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['ARE'],"Boufarss, Mohamed",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Boufarss, Mohamed] Tampere Univ, Fac Informat Technol & Commun Sci, Tampere, Finland",81.0,2.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,122,3,1707.0,1725,10.1007/s11192-020-03349-0,WOS:000320501600006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
330,WOS,"Open Sesame? Open access priorities, incentives, and policies among higher education institutions in the United Arab Emirates",Open access; Scholarly publishing; Research universities; Open access policies,"Higher education institutions (HEIs) have an instrumental role in the move towards Open Access (OA) by shaping the national strategies, policies, and agendas. This study sets out to explore the role of HEIs in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) OA uptake and reflect on the ongoing international initiatives pushing for universal OA to research. The study is based on an online survey targeted at UAE higher education institutions research management units. In order to measure the institutional views, only one response was solicited from each institution. A total of 19 valid responses were received, making up 47% of HEIs included in the population of organisations. Our results suggest that there is low commitment to OA among UAE HEIs as attested by the low number of OA policies, scarce OA funding, limited proliferation of institutional repositories, perceived lack of urgency to migrate from current access models, and little consideration of OA for promotion purposes. The study is the first of its kind in the UAE, Arab and Middle Eastern countries, providing rare insight into a growing phenomenon that is global, yet most vocally discussed from a western perspective and context. The study contributes to the debate on the role of HEIs in the transition to OA and in shaping national and regional OA policies, as well as informing international initiatives about the current status of OA in the region.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['ARE'],"Boufarss, Mohamed; Laakso, Mikael",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Boufarss, Mohamed] Tampere Univ, Fac Informat Technol & Commun Sci, Tampere, Finland; [Laakso, Mikael] Hanken Sch Econ, Dept Management & Org, Helsinki, Finland",94.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,124,2,1553.0,1577,10.1007/s11192-020-03529-y,WOS:000320501600007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
331,WOS,"French publishing attitudes in the open access era: The case of mathematics, biology, and computer science",,"This study investigates the extent to which open access (OA) publishing models affect French researchers' attitudes. Research questions were: What place does OA have in attitudes of French researchers in mathematics, biology, and computer science? Are French researchers aware of new publishing models? Do they publish in these new outlets? What funds do they use? What kind of feedback and satisfaction can we observe? We used a quantitative approach to identify structural trends. From April to May 2015, the authors gathered empirical data (interviews, training, and meetings) on researchers' opinions and understanding of OA publishing models to define the variables and build up the questionnaire that was sent out in June 2015. The findings of the survey demonstrated that, when choosing journals to publish their articles, researchers did not rate OA as a criterion but rather impact, prestige, and symbolic recognition. Publishing OA articles is only in its first stages in the publishing practices of researchers. Lack of policy, prescriptions, and lack of rewards explain why OA is not a factor that determines the publishing strategies of French researchers. The researchers who take the risk of OA publishing are biologists, the older and more experienced researchers, and those who are members of editorial teams.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['FRA'],"Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Dillaerts, Hans; Lafouge, Thierry; Bador, Pascal; Sauer-Avargues, Aude",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Lafouge, Thierry; Bador, Pascal] Univ Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, ELICO, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France; [Dillaerts, Hans] Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, LERASS CERIC, Montpellier, France; [Sauer-Avargues, Aude] Univ Fed Toulouse Midi Pyrenees, Toulouse, France",40.0,7.0,WILEY,0953-1513,,2018.0,31,4,345.0,354,10.1002/leap.1169,WOS:000320725900012,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
332,WOS,Document supply and open access: an international survey on grey literature,grey literature; document delivery; archives management; institutional libraries,"Purpose - This article seeks to investigate the impact of the open archive initiative on the document supply of grey literature. Design/methodology/approach - The article is based on a comparative survey of five major institutions: The British Library (UK), CISTI (Canada), INIST-CNRS (France), KISTI (South Korea) and TIB Hannover (Germany). Findings - All major document suppliers are more or less deeply involved in the open archive movement, and this involvement has an obvious impact on the policy of acquisition, archiving and supply of grey literature (dissertations, reports, conferences, etc.). Originality/value - Even if the impact of increased access to digital resources on document supply is relatively well documented, little is known about the specific effect on grey literature, especially in the OA environment. This study provides some evidence concerning this effect.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Schopfel, Joachim",INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY,English,Article; Proceedings Paper,7th International Conference on Grey Literature (GL7),"DEC 05-06, 2005","Nancy, FRANCE","Univ Lille 3, Dept Informat & Commun Sci, Lille, France; CNRS, INIST, E Publishing & Document Supply Dept, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France; Univ Nancy, Nancy, France",37.0,11.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-1615,,2006.0,34,3,96.0,104,10.1108/02641610610686012,WOS:000320742000002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
367,WOS,Drivers of article processing charges in open access,Open access; Article processing charges; Academic publishing; Market power; Market concentration; Reputation,"Large publishing companies have been dominating scientific publishing for long, which leads to high subscription fees and inhibited access to scientific knowledge. At digital era, the opportunity of an unrestricted access appears feasible, because the cost of publishing should be low. It is no longer the readers and libraries to pay subscription fees, but scientific organizations and authors themselves who pay for the cost of having their article published. As the data shows, there is a tremendous variance of article processing charges (APC) across journals, which obviously cannot be explained by the costs. One of the explanatory variables could be reputation, but it only contributes less than 5% to the variance in average APC. This study is meant to shed light on the various determinants of APC. Based on the data from the OpenAPC Initiative, the Directory of Open Access Journals and three different datasets of Web of Science, we employ ANOVAs and multivariate regressions. The results show that market power plays an important role to explain APC, inter alia, through market concentration, market position of individual publishers (publisher size), and the choice of hybrid publishing model.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Budzinski, Oliver; Grebel, Thomas; Wolling, Jens; Zhang, Xijie",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Budzinski, Oliver; Grebel, Thomas; Zhang, Xijie] Technol Univ Ilmenau, Inst Econ, Ilmenau, Germany; [Wolling, Jens] Technol Univ Ilmenau, Inst Media & Commun Sci, Ilmenau, Germany",65.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,124,3,2185.0,2206,10.1007/s11192-020-03578-3,WOS:000330622600015,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
372,WOS,OA in the Library Collection: The Challenges of Identifying and Maintaining Open Access Resources,discovery services; electronic resources; knowledgebases; link resolvers; metadata; Open Access,"While librarians, researchers, and the general public have embraced the concept of Open Access (OA), librarians still have a difficult time managing OA resources. To find out why, Bulock and Hosburgh surveyed librarians about their experiences managing OA resources and the strengths and weaknesses of management systems. At this session, they shared survey results, reflected on OA workflows at their own libraries, and updated audience members on relevant standards and initiatives. Survey respondents reported challenges related to hybrid OA, inaccurate metadata, and inconsistent communication along the serials supply chain. Recommended solutions included the creation of consistent, centralized article-level metadata and the development of OA collection development principles for libraries. ©, Published with license by Taylor & Francis.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['USA'],"Bulock C., Hosburgh N., Mann S.",Serials Librarian,English,Article,0,0,0,,,4.0,Routledge,0361526X,0,2015.0,68,44287,79.0,86,10.1080/0361526X.2015.1023690,WOS:000334005800003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
398,WOS,Patterns of Citations of Open Access and Non-Open Access Conservation Biology Journal Papers and Book Chapters,citation advantage; conservation biology; developing country; HDI; human development index; open access,"Open access (OA) publishing, whereby authors, their institutions, or their granting bodies pay or provide a repository through which peer-reviewed work is available online for free, is championed as a model to increase the number of citations per paper and disseminate results widely, especially to researchers in developing countries. We compared the number of citations of OA and non-OA papers in six journals and four books published since 2000 to test whether OA increases number of citations overall and increases citations made by authors in developing countries. After controlling for type of paper (e. g., review or research paper), length of paper, authors' citation profiles, number of authors per paper, and whether the author or the publisher released the paper in OA, OA had no statistically significant influence on the overall number of citations per journal paper. Journal papers were cited more frequently if the authors had published highly cited papers previously, were members of large teams of authors, or published relatively long papers, but papers were not cited more frequently if they were published in an OA source. Nevertheless, author-archived OA book chapters accrued up to eight times more citations than chapters in the same book that were not available through OA, perhaps because there is no online abstracting service for book chapters. There was also little evidence that journal papers or book chapters published in OA received more citations from authors in developing countries relative to those journal papers or book chapters not published in OA. For scholarly publications in conservation biology, only book chapters had an OA citation advantage, and OA did not increase the number of citations papers or chapters received from authors in developing countries.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['natscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Calver, Michael C.; Bradley, J. Stuart",CONSERVATION BIOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Calver, Michael C.; Bradley, J. Stuart] Murdoch Univ, Sch Biol Sci & Biotechnol, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia",38.0,34.0,WILEY,0888-8892,,2010.0,24,3,872.0,880,10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01509.x,WOS:000339984400010,20455909.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
408,WOS,"Funding Sources for Open Access Article Processing Charges in the Social Sciences, Arts, and Humanities in the United States",open access; article processing charges; APC; funding sources; social sciences; arts; humanities,"Article processing charges (APCs) are one method of many to ensure open access to research literature, but studies that explore the funding sources for such payments, especially as related to open access publications in the arts, humanities, and social sciences, have been limited. This study seeks to understand the range of funding sources that are available and used by faculties in these disciplines to pay for APCs associated with publishing in open access journals, as well as attitudes towards and awareness of available institutional funds that may inflect future engagement with open access publishing. The authors distributed a survey to faculty who had an open access journal article published in 2017 from three doctoral granting, high research activity universities in the United States. Twenty-two scholars participated in the final survey, ten of whom indicated that they paid an APC for their publication. While the results cannot make generalizations about funding sources, they do suggest that both the prevalence of APCs as well as attitudes about open access engagement may be influenced by disciplinary self-identification. This research contributes to discussions around the future of open access funding models as well as to disciplinary outreach regarding APC funding for journal publications.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Cantrell, Melissa H.; Swanson, Juleah A.",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Cantrell, Melissa H.; Swanson, Juleah A.] Univ Colorado, Univ Lib, Boulder, CO 80309 USA",17.0,2.0,MDPI,,,2020.0,8,1,,,10.3390/publications8010012,WOS:000342048100005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
424,WOS,Evaluating and Promoting Open Data Practices in Open Access Journals,open access; open data; data sharing; data citation,"The last decade has seen a dramatic increase in attention from the scholarly communications and research community to open access (OA) and open data practices. These are potentially related because journal publication policies and practices both signal disciplinary norms and provide direct incentives for data sharing and citation. However, there is little research evaluating the data policies of OA journals. In this study we analyse the state of data policies for OA journals by employing random sampling of the Directory of Open Access Journals and Open Journal Systems journal directories and applying a coding framework that integrates both previous studies and emerging taxonomies of data sharing and citation. This study, for the first time, reveals both the low prevalence of data-sharing policies and practices in OA journals, which differs from the previous studies of commercial journals in specific disciplines.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Castro, Eleni; Crosas, Merce; Garnett, Alex; Sheridan, Kasey; Altman, Micah",JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Castro, Eleni] Boston Univ, OpenBU & ETD Program, Boston, MA 02215 USA; [Crosas, Merce] Harvard Univ, IQSS, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA; [Garnett, Alex] Simon Fraser Univ, Res Data Management & Syst, Burnaby, BC, Canada; [Sheridan, Kasey] SunTrust, Res & Acquisit, Richmond, VA USA; [Sheridan, Kasey] MIT, Program Informat Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA; [Altman, Micah] MIT, MIT Lib, Program Informat Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA; [Altman, Micah] Brookings Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA; [Altman, Micah] Harvard Univ, Harvard MIT Data Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA; [Altman, Micah] Henry A Murray Arch, Cambridge, MA USA; [Altman, Micah] Inst Quantitat Social Sci, Cambridge, MA USA",52.0,4.0,UNIV TORONTO PRESS INC,1198-9742,,2017.0,49,1,66.0,88,10.3138/jsp.49.1.66,WOS:000345503000004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
427,WOS,Open access and anti-plagiarism in the institutional repositories and libraries of the Faculties of Education in Spain,Repositories; Open Educational Resources; Plagiarism; Academic Libraries; Pre-service Teacher Education,"Institutional repositories are a strategy to promote scientific production and Open Educational Resources (OER) in universities. They offer a service that facilitates educational innovation, but also generate great concern about the lack of respect for copyright. This study analyses information on the open access and antiplagiarism policy established by 62 repositories from 75 Spanish universities that are already using this service. The stratified sample involves 20 libraries from Faculty of Education in Spain (38.5%). The study used a mixed methodological approach, and three different information collection instruments were used: repository analysis questionnaire, analysis of the libraries' web pages and in-depth interviews with those responsible for these services. The results obtained allow us to know the type of information existing in the repositories, the institutional policy of free access to scientific production, as well as the way in which information is informed, acts and prevents plagiarism in them. The conclusion is that university repositories enjoy a high degree of open access to information, but there is not much information about plagiarism. However, libraries report antiplagiarism tools and offer training initiatives.","['openaccess', 'opentools', 'openpolicies']","['documentreview', 'survey', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'othergroup']",['ESP'],"Cebrian-Robles, Violeta; Raposo-Rivas, Manuela; do Carmo Duarte-Freitas, Maria",REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE TECNOLOGIA EDUCATIVA-RELATEC,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Cebrian-Robles, Violeta; Raposo-Rivas, Manuela] Univ Vigo, Fac Ciencias Educ, Org Escolar & Metodos Invest, Dept Didact, Campus Lagoas S-N, Orense 32004, Spain; [do Carmo Duarte-Freitas, Maria] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Ciencia & Gestao Informacao, Av Prefeito Lothario Meissner,632 Jardim Amer, BR-80210170 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil",53.0,2.0,"UNIV EXTREMADURA, FAC EDUCACION",1695-288X,,2018.0,17,2,41.0,56,10.17398/1695-288X.17.2.41,WOS:000345721600002,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
437,WOS,Open access in developing countries: African open archives,academic publication; Africa; developing countries; Open access; open archives; open repository,"This paper presents the results of a study on the open archives in developing countries. It provides the elements of type, size and contents of open archives. The methodology is based on information collected from open repository websites. The survey is based on an almost exhaustive sample list of developing countries websites retrieved from directories and a list of open repositories. The purpose of this study, carried out from 2011 up to now, is to measure, at a second level, the impact of open access on the Algerian researchers by analyzing their practices related to open access, through the identification of their scientific publications at a second level in the open archives, in which they can deposit. © 2011 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.",['opentools'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']","['ETH', 'GHA', 'SEN', 'KEN', 'ZAF', 'TUN', 'UGA', 'SDN']","Chalabi L., Dahmane M.",Information Services and Use,English,Conference Paper,0,0,0,,,3.0,0,1675265,0,2011.0,31,44289,111.0,119,10.3233/ISU-2012-0640,WOS:000346238100001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0
442,WOS,The transition toward open access: the University of Hong Kong experience,Scholarly communication; Open access publishing; Research assessment; OA policies; Open access (OA); University of Hong Kong,"Purpose - While open access (OA) offers an alternative to the unsustainable pricing of serials and supports a core value of ensuring openness to knowledge, the perceived value of the impact of OA journals is still lacking consensus among stakeholders. This study is based on the analysis of the University of Hong Kong (HKU) research publication data within four broad disciplines - health science, life science, physical science and social science - and the purpose of this paper is to understand the perspectives and preferences of academic researchers around OA. The findings are useful to libraries in shaping their strategies for meeting the rising challenges of scholarly publishing. Design/methodology/approach - Article publication data from HKU have been collected and analyzed with the purpose of exploring general OA trends and understanding authors' incentives for publishing in OA journals. Findings - The explosion in the number of OA journals in recent years has not only impacted on how libraries manage contents and budgets, but also on academic researchers' choice of journals for submitting their articles for publication. This study conducted at the HKU indicated that academic researchers have a gradual tendency to shift toward publishing their work in OA journals, and interestingly, the shifts are to some extent discipline specific. Research limitations/implications - The OA marketplace is currently undergoing a state of flux. The OA model of funding through article publication charges, process of peer review and reputation in the marketplace are under rapid development. Practical implications - As OA journals take up a sizeable market share of the scholarly journal publishing market, libraries need to stay abreast of developments in the OA sector in order to respond to researcher needs. Understanding the thinking behind researcher's decisions in choosing venue for submission of publications helps to advance research support services which the library offers. Social implications - The change in researcher behavior prompted by the gravitation toward sharing of research contents in scholarly communication networks and broader choice of OA journals have resulted in a positive growth of OA articles publishing at the HKU. Originality/value - This study is based on actual HKU publication data in the past ten years, and it is useful for understanding HKU researchers' attitudes toward OA publications and in particular the longitudinal trends in shifting toward OA publishing within the context of the university's open policy and within the global OA landscape.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['med', 'natscie', 'socscie']","['university', 'librarian']",['HKG'],"Chan, Gayle Rosemary; Cheung, Allan Shi-Chung",LIBRARY MANAGEMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Chan, Gayle Rosemary] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Libraries, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China; [Cheung, Allan Shi-Chung] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Chem, Fac Sci, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China",18.0,1.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0143-5124,,2017.0,38,8-9,488.0,496,10.1108/LM-02-2017-0013,WOS:000347363800022,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
447,WOS,Librarians' Contribution to Open Access Journal Publishing in Library and Information Science From the Perspective of Authorship,Open access (OA) journals; Librarian authors; Library and information science (LIS); Type of collaboration,"This study focused on librarian authors of open access articles in the field of library and information science (LIS). Of 19 LIS OA journals and 1819 research articles published between 2008 and 2013, half of the authors (55.6%) worked in libraries and approximately one third were researchers (33.5%). No appreciable changes were observed in the annual distributions of authors' occupations. Regarding the types of collaboration, 53.7% of all articles were coauthored and primarily resulted from collaborations among librarians. The coauthored articles written by librarians and researchers accounted for the second-most prevalent type of collaboration; the highest increase was identified in the annual percentage of articles resulting from collaboration between librarians and researchers. This confirms that librarians engage in increasingly frequent interaction with researchers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Chang, Yu-Wei",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Taipei 10617, Taiwan",68.0,10.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2015.0,41,5,660.0,668,10.1016/j.acalib.2015.06.006,WOS:000347822900008,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
450,WOS,Open access and institutional repositories in Greece: Progress so far,Data storage; Greece; Institutional libraries; Open systems,"Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present the current situation regarding open access and institutional repositories (IRs) in Greece. Design/methodology/approach: This paper reports on the development of IRs in Greece and discusses their content and the various access restrictions that apply to content. A questionnaire survey was used to identify current and future steps regarding open access from the IR managers' and library directors' perspective. Findings: The paper finds that Greek IRs using DSpace and CDS Invenio software have been developed by libraries of academic institutions. The Berlin Declaration on open access has been signed by two academic institutions and one research institution, while another university will bring the matter to the Senate. Metadata harvesting is one point that all respondents agreed on, although it seems that a national harvesting service will not be established in the near future. Furthermore, content availability at the moment seems to be hindered by fear of copyright infringement rather than financial charges, at least for ETDs. Research limitations/implications: Further research should be conducted in order to identify the rate of deposited published peer-reviewed research in IRs. Furthermore, a broader survey could show the thoughts and future plans of the total of Greek IRs, not just those using OAI-PMH or those with mixed content (gray literature and published research). Possible research topics could be the interoperability of IRs in order to build a national harvesting service and the access restrictions that are available for authors in each IR. Originality/value: This paper is addressed to those wishing to be informed of the latest developments regarding IRs and open access in Greece. It also provides a brief insight into the views of leading IR managers and library directors. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.","['openaccess', 'opentools']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'othergroup']",['GRC'],Chantavaridou E.,OCLC Systems and Services,English,Article,0,0,0,,,9.0,0,1065075X,0,2009.0,25,1,47.0,59,10.1108/10650750910931922,WOS:000348747300017,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
471,WOS,The status of open access library and information science journals in SSCI,Open access; Citation analysis; Open access journals,"Purpose - The main purpose of this paper is to measure the status and quality of library and information science (LIS) open-access (OA) journals in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI). Design/methodology/approach - The study selected 86 source journals of LIS in the SSCI as a sample and measured their status of open access. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to analyze 36 OA journals of 86 source journals, especially their production capability, academic influence and network communication ability. Findings - The results indicate that OA journals have become an increasingly important part of LIS journals. Production capability, academic influence and network communication ability are important factors affecting the quality of OA journals. These three evaluation indicators of LIS OA journals are high, but many still have room for improvement. Research limitations/implications - As the paper is limited by collecting data, the indicators of OA journals' quality are not all-around. So, they cannot reflect the quality of LIS OA journals. In the selection of the evaluation method, the evaluation results are limited because only one AHP method is used. Practical implications - The research on evaluation of OA journals can help library and scientific research personnel use OA journals effectively. Identifying key factors on evaluation can help researchers to construct OA journals better. Social implications - The research on OA journals' quality can also promote the study on OA process in academic circles and promote the communication, development and utilization of academic information. Such research can also enrich the theory of OA, and provide some new perspectives for the study of journals' evaluation. Originality/value - This paper measures the quality of LIS OA journals by analyzing production capability, academic influence and network communication ability. Rather than the traditional research methods, the focus of this study is on the value of the Web as a source of impact indices. It contributes to the scholarly impact measurements of OA journals.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['socscie'],"['publisher', 'librarian']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Chen, Ming; Du, Yunfei",ELECTRONIC LIBRARY,English,Article,,,,"[Chen, Ming] Nanjing Univ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China; [Du, Yunfei] Univ North Texas, Denton, TX USA",24.0,9.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-0473,,2016.0,34,5,722.0,739,10.1108/EL-05-2015-0070,WOS:000353742300010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
472,WOS,Open Access in 2013: Reaching the 50% Milestone,Open Access percentage; Open Access survey; Open Access status; Open Access empirical study,"This article reports a 2013 study on the percentage of Open Access (OA) journal articles. Following the 2009 Bjork et al. (2010) model, this study generated 2,655 random sample articles published in 2012 from Scopus. It found that 37.8% of Scopus samples have free full text on the Internet, a significant increase from 20.4% recorded by the Bjork et al. study. Because the vast majority of the 9,900 OA journals listed by DOAJ are not indexed by Scopus, this study projects with caution that human history is reaching a milestone; either the percentage of OA articles published in the previous year is very close to 50% or it has passed that mark.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Chen, Xiaotian",SERIALS REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"Bradley Univ, Cullom Davis Lib, Peoria, IL 61625 USA",20.0,8.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",0098-7913,,2014.0,40,1,21.0,27,10.1080/00987913.2014.895556,WOS:000354219500002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
473,WOS,Measuring the Degrees of Openness of Scholarly Journals with the Open Access Spectrum (OAS) Evaluation Tool,Degrees of Open Access; HowOpenIsIt; OA; Open Access evaluation; Open Access Spectrum Evaluation Tool,"HowOpenIsIt is a guide created by SPARC (Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition), PLOS (Public Library of Science), and OASPA (Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association) to describe an array of policies a journal can have in the continuum between Open and Closed. The OAS Evaluation Tool uses the HowOpenIsIt guide to measure the degree of openness of journals of all kinds with scores between 0 and 100. A total of 1,005 journal samples, both OA and non-OA journals in various languages and from various parts of the world, were evaluated and scored with the OAS Evaluation Tool by a team of information professionals in 2015 based on the policies posted on journals' websites. This article reports the findings of the OAS evaluation.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Chen, Xiaotian; Olijhoek, Tom",SERIALS REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Chen, Xiaotian] Bradley Univ, Lib, 1501 W Bradley Ave, Peoria, IL 61625 USA",13.0,7.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",0098-7913,,2016.0,42,2,108.0,115,10.1080/00987913.2016.1182672,WOS:000354774100008,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
483,WOS,Management and usage of open access scholarly online resources in university libraries in Nigeria Librarians' viewpoints,Databases; Nigeria; Management; Scholarly journals; Internet access; Open access resources,"Purpose - The purpose of this research is to ascertain from academic librarians in Nigeria their knowledge of open access online resources (OASOR), how their libraries manage these resources and how they are used by their readers. This is an alternative source of resource provision which librarians needed to adopt, in view of dwindling budgets. Design/methodology/approach - A survey design was adopted for the study. The study was conducted during an annual general meeting/conference of the Nigerian Library Association in June 2014. Interview and eye witness accounts were also used to complement the questionnaire. Random sampling technique was used to select 312 librarians from the 720 attendees from the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria. Data were analyzed using the weighted mean on a Likert scale. Findings - The result of the finding revealed that some of the academic libraries sampled have access to limited open access (OA) resources from AGORA, HINARI, OARE and EBSCOhost databases. The management procedure adopted included downloading of relevant resources for their readers; providing hard copies of some of the downloads; and giving their readers access to the databases via their University websites. Others include offering consultancy services to academic departments and organizing training seminars to their users for direct access to the databases. The OASOR received adequate utility rate by users. Originality/value - Dwindling economies and coping with current trends of information management in the contemporary world necessitated the use of information communication technology to avail OA resources to anchor education, research and human capital development in Nigeria. This will enable the country attain the Millennium Development Goal.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['NGA'],"Chigbu, Emmanuel Dickson; Njoku, Ezinne O.; Uzoagba, Ngozi",ELECTRONIC LIBRARY,English,Article,,,,"[Chigbu, Emmanuel Dickson; Njoku, Ezinne O.; Uzoagba, Ngozi] Univ Nigeria, Nnamdi Azikiwe Lib, Nsukka, Nigeria",21.0,2.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-0473,,2016.0,34,6,974.0,984,10.1108/EL-08-2015-0140,WOS:000357693000007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
484,WOS,How open is open access research in Library and Information Science?,LIS journals; open access; self-archiving,"The study investigates Library and Information Science (LIS) journals that published research articles between 2003 and 2013, which were about open access (OA) and were indexed in LIS databases. The purpose was to investigate the journals' OA policies, ascertain the degree to which these policies facilitate OA to publications, and investigate whether such texts are also available as OA. The results show that literature growth in the domain has been significant, with a total of 1,402 articles produced during the eleven years under study. The OA policies of the fifty-six journals that published the highest number of articles were analysed. The results show that most articles (404; 41%) were published in hybrid journals, whereas 272 (29.7%) appeared in OA journals. Some 143 (53%) of the articles published in hybrid journals were available as green OA copies. In total, 602 (66%) of all the articles published were available as OA. The results show that the adoption of OA for research articles on that very subject is somewhat higher than in other fields. The study calls on LIS professionals to be conversant with the OA policies of the various journals that may publish their research.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Chilimo, Wanyenda Leonard; Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire",SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Chilimo, Wanyenda Leonard] Tech Univ Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya; [Chilimo, Wanyenda Leonard; Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire] Univ South Africa, Dept Informat Sci, Pretoria, South Africa",20.0,2.0,FORUM PRESS,0256-8861,,2018.0,84,1,11.0,19,10.7553/84-1-1710,WOS:000357753800006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
485,WOS,Adoption of Open Access Publishing by Academic Researchers in Kenya,open access; article processing charge; fraudulent publisher; sub-Saharan Africa; Global South,"This study investigates Kenyan scholars' adoption of open access (OA). The authors used a questionnaire to collect data from academic researchers at selected Kenyan public universities. The findings of this study indicate that while Kenyan researchers have embraced the concept of OA, challenges such as a lack of mechanisms to guide academic researchers on where to publish, a dearth of funding mechanisms to cover article processing charges, and a lack of accreditation mechanisms for regional and national journals are exposing Kenyan academic researchers to unscrupulous journal publishers and predatory publishing outlets. OA advocates in Kenyan universities need to devise innovative ways of raising awareness about OA, and these universities should provide the environment, infrastructure, and capacity building needed to support OA.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['KEN'],"Chilimo, Wanyenda; Adem, Aggrey; Otieno, Ajwang' Nicholas Walter; Maina, Mary",JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Chilimo, Wanyenda] Tech Univ Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya; [Chilimo, Wanyenda] Univ South Africa, Dept Informat Sci, Pretoria, South Africa; [Adem, Aggrey] Tech Univ Mombasa, Dept Math & Phys, Mombasa, Kenya; [Otieno, Ajwang' Nicholas Walter] Pwani Univ, Kilifi, Kenya; [Maina, Mary] Scott Christian Univ, Machakos, Kenya",30.0,2.0,UNIV TORONTO PRESS INC,1198-9742,,2017.0,49,1,103.0,122,10.3138/jsp.49.1.103,WOS:000357898100009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
487,WOS,Open Access initiatives in Zimbabwe: Case of academic libraries,Open access; Library consortia; Access to information; Digital literacy,Globally library consortia activities are gaining momentum and Africa is not an exception. The Information and Communication Technology (ICTs) dispensation has ushered in a transformative era characterised by the open access initiatives (OAI). Technologies development has added a new dimension to how academic libraries manage scholarly content. This article seeks to explore how academic libraries are progressing in their open access initiatives in Zimbabwe. This article also examines the extent to which open access has been adopted in Zimbabwe's higher education institutions (HEIs). The article seeks to find out how academic libraries can benefit from open access initiatives. The article also analyses the roles of stakeholders in strengthening the open access initiatives among academic libraries in Zimbabwe. The paper will suggest strategies to strengthen the open access initiatives in Zimbabwe.,['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['SWE'],"Chisita, Collence T.; Chiparausha, Blessing",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"[Chisita, Collence T.] Univ South Africa, Dept Informat Sci, Coll Human Sci, PO Muckleneuk Campus, Pretoria, South Africa; [Chiparausha, Blessing] BUSE, Bindura, Zimbabwe",44.0,2.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2019.0,45,5,,,10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102047,WOS:000358159700017,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
490,WOS,"Analysis of visits to ScienceCentral, an open access full-text archive of scientific society journal literature",Access to information; Archives; Bibliographic databases; Open access publishing,"ScienceCentral is a free or open access full-text archive of scientific society journal literature hosted by the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies. It was launched in December 2013. We analyzed the number of articles deposited, page views by period, country of visitors, number of visitors, and entry point of visits. Descriptive statistics were presented. We also hypothesized that visitors accessed ScienceCentral mostly through Google and Google Scholar since ScienceCentral allows Googlebot to index it. The number of deposited articles was 19,419 from 124 journals in December 2016. The number of page views per month was 20,228 in December 2016. The top countries of visitors were South Korea (39.9%), the United States (13.26%), India (4.2%), China (3.4%), and Russia (3.2%). The average number of page views per article a month in December 2016 was 1.0. Google and Google Scholar were powerful referral sites to ScienceCentral. Except for direct visits to ScienceCentral, seven out of the top ten access sites to ScienceCentral were Google or Google Scholar sites from a variety of countries. Although the number of visitors and page views has increased continuously, the average number of page views per article a month has not increased.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Cho, Younsang; Huh, Sun",SCIENCE EDITING,English,Article,,,,"[Cho, Younsang] M2Community, Seoul, South Korea; [Huh, Sun] Hallym Univ, Dept Parasitol, Chunchon, South Korea; [Huh, Sun] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Inst Med Educ, Chunchon, South Korea",4.0,2.0,KOREAN COUNCIL SCIENCE EDITORS,2288-7474,,2017.0,4,1,30.0,33,10.6087/kcse.86,WOS:000358736900001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
493,WOS,Managing expectations for open access in Greece: Perceptions from the publishers and academic libraries,Academic libraries management; Greece; Open access; Publishing industry; Scholarly communication,"In Greece, there seems to be a growing level of awareness regarding open access among scholars, faculty staff and information professionals. Indeed, consensus regarding the necessity of open access initiatives in Greece is gradually established. The present of open access in other European settings may however be revealing the expected, though distinct, future of open access in Greece. This work focuses upon some current aspects for open access and attempts to investigate them for the Greek setting. The investigation includes five (5) important aspects of open access, i.e. a) ETDs management from the academic libraries, b) university repositories development, c) regulation of digital and/or printed scientific material quality requirements, d) cooperation and competition between libraries and academic publishers, e) understanding the role of scientific work dissemination in developing future professionals and scholars. The paper initially provides an outline for the Greek publishing industry, focusing on STM publishers and on the way they take advantage of the changes mainly in editorial and marketing terms, in a hybrid technological era. The Greek publishing industry may berepresentative of other national small publishing markets. Further, an empirical research is providing in order to illuminate open access from two different points of view: that of STM publishers and that of academic libraries' directors in Greece. The empirical investigation took place in February and March of 2007 and is based on seventeen experts' perceptions. The methods employed are outlined and include the development of the questionnaire for semi-structured interviews. Finally, the unexpected agreement from both publishers and academic libraries' directors regarding open access development is discussed and some specific for Greece conclusions are drawn.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'publisher']",['GRC'],"Christina B.G., Petros K.A.","Openness in Digital Publishing: Awareness, Discovery and Access - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2007",English,Conference Paper,"11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2007",13 June 2007 through 15 June 2007,Vienna,,,6.0,0,0,9783854372929,2007.0,0,0,229.0,237,,WOS:000359502000010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
494,WOS,Awareness of predatory open-access journals among prospective veterinary and medical authors attending scientific writing workshops,education; journal selection; mentoring; open access; publishing; survey,"Authors face many choices when selecting a journal for publication. Prospective authors, especially trainees, may be unaware of predatory online journals or how to differentiate them from legitimate journals. In this study, we assessed awareness of open-access and predatory journals among prospective authors attending scientific writing workshops; our long-term goal was to inform educational goals for the workshops. We surveyed participants of writing workshops at veterinary and medical schools and an international conference over a 1-year period. The survey included 14 statements for respondents to indicate agreement level on a Likert-like scale and four questions on awareness of resources about predatory journals; respondents also defined predatory journal. A total of 145 participants completed the survey: 106 (73.1%) from veterinary schools and 86 (59.3%) graduate students or residents. Fewer faculty (vs trainees) agreed that open access was an important factor in deciding where to publish; faculty and postdoctoral researchers were more likely to expect to pay more to publish in an open-access journal. Most respondents (120/145, 82.7%) agreed/strongly agreed that the decision to accept a manuscript should not be influenced by publication charges, but 50% (56/112) indicated that they didn't know how publishing costs were supported. Of the 142 respondents who answered, 33 (23.0%) indicated awareness of the term predatory journal; 34 (23.9%) were aware of the Directory of Open Access Journals; 24 (16.9%) were aware of the Science sting article about predatory journals; and 7 (4.8%) were aware of Beall's list. Most (93/144, 64.5%) definitions of predatory journals described poor but not predatory journal practices, and some respondents misunderstood the term completely. Mentors should help novice authors to be aware of predatory journals and to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate open-access journals, thus selecting the best journal for their work.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['agric'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Christopher, Mary M.; Young, Karen M.",FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Christopher, Mary M.] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Pathol Microbiol & Immunol, Davis, CA 95616 USA; [Young, Karen M.] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Vet Med, Dept Pathobiol Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA",13.0,28.0,FRONTIERS MEDIA SA,,,2015.0,2,,,,10.3389/fvets.2015.00022,WOS:000359509100009,26664951.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
497,WOS,We should not light an open access lamp and then hide it under a bushel!,Discovery services; E-Journal supply chain; E-Publishing platforms; Hybrid journals; Interoperability and integration; Metadata standards; Open Access articles; RSS; Web feeds,"The rapid growth of hybrid journals in the last few years has seen an unfortunate side effect: the majority of Open Access (OA) articles published in those journals cannot be recognized as OA beyond the publishers' websites, or by the discovery services used by researchers to access full-text articles. This reality has been demonstrated in the literature and solutions have been proposed. This paper explains the causes behind the problem, examines each of the proposed solutions, discusses the few implementations made with those solutions, and estimates whether the potential benefits merit the efforts required to implement the available solutions. Each of the solutions is analyzed from standardization and pragmatic perspectives. In particular, we critically analyze the solution proposed by NISO (RP-22-2015), and compare it with the solution offered by the JEMO project, which is based on using metadata elements from namespaces and XML schemas already being used by publishers. The contribution presents a number of case studies which show that research published as OA ends up erroneously being labelled as non-OA on the electronic services used by the end-user, when one of the components of the supply and delivery chain for e-journals fails to include OA information in its metadata. Furthermore, the case studies demonstrate that publishers of hybrid journals should not be the only ones being answerable for the problem. In fact, during the study, some publishers were actually not allowed to enable OA identification, at the article level, by key components of the supply chain. In those case studies, we worked with a sample of publishers that implemented the JEMO solution. From those experiences we draw answers to the main question of this presentation: which solution should be used to enable OA discovery from hybrid journals? What becomes apparent is that publishers are prepared and willing to implement any of the available solutions in their publishing workflow. The paper proposes that the simplest option is the best solution to provide standardized means to identify OA at the article level. © 2015 The authors and IOS Press.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Chumbe S., MacLeod R., Kelly B.","New Avenues for Electronic Publishing in the Age of Infinite Collections and Citizen Science: Scale, Openness and Trust - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Elpub 2015",English,Conference Paper,"19th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Elpub 2015",1 September 2015 through 3 September 2015,0,,,1.0,IOS Press BV,0,9781614995616,2015.0,0,0,102.0,112,10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-102,WOS:000360505300014,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
498,WOS,A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Open Access in Scopus,Open access; Bibliometric analysis; Bibliometric study; Scholarly communications; Electronic publishing; Academic publishing; Institutional repository; Self-archiving,"Using bibliometric techniques, this study investigates the characteristics of the literature on open access related research. The bibliometric data collected from Scopus, such as document type, country of publication, language of publication, subject area and the publication year of the open access documents, is used. In addition, the most cited articles, the top journals, the most productive authors and the institutions with the highest number of papers are also identified. The results of the study show that: 1. thirteen document types and 7,721 documents from 1972 to 2012, peer-reviewed journal articles (4,793; 62%) are the most frequently used type and the most popular publication media; 2. the US (2,204; 27%) and the UK (1,172; 14%) with 3,376 (41%) of the articles, are the countries with the greatest contribution, from a total of 128 countries' authors; 3. English (7,316; 94%) dominates the other languages as the most frequently used language; 4. the top 3 subject areas are medicine (2,753; 22%), social science (1,787; 14%), biochemistry and genetics, molecular biology (1,253; 10%); 5. the last 10 years (20032012) account for 6513 (84.3%), as the highest output; 6. the most cited papers, published on Remote Sensing of Environment, are cited 2043 times, written by 13 coauthors in 1998 and supported by NASA in the US; 7. Plos One, with the most total publications on open access, published 554 papers; 8. the top 3 most productive authors are Bjork, B.C., from Finland, with 29 articles on open access, McGrath, M., from the United Kingdom, with 27articles on open access and Harnad, S., from Canada, with 24articles; and 9. the top institution is the University of Toronto (Canada). The future development of open access research will be of increasing importance, with more subject areas, authors, institutions and journals. The OA movement, an innovation in scholarly communication, is growing quickly and will widely influence in different subject areas and changes in related research worldwide.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Chung, Jenny; Tsay, Ming-Yueh",QUALITATIVE & QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN LIBRARIES,English,Article,,,,"[Chung, Jenny; Tsay, Ming-Yueh] Natl Chengchi Univ, Grad Inst Lib Informat & Archival Studies, Taipei 11605, Taiwan",19.0,1.0,INT SOC ART SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-ISAST,2241-1925,,2015.0,,,821.0,841,,WOS:000360553700003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
499,WOS,Assisting users in open data infrastructures: A management perspective,E-Science; FeUSE framework; Information Technology Information Library (ITIL); Open Data; Service desk; User support,"Utilizing user support is an essential activity in e-Science to maintain and strengthen the research activities via an e-Science infrastructure to benefit science as well as our society. User support process is present in almost each and every e-Science infrastructure to support the users. However, there are fewer studies conducted that empirically evaluate the user support process in federated open data e-Science infrastructures and highlight major problems in the user support process. In this paper, a popular climate data e-infrastructure; Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) is chosen as a case-study. This paper expounds a study conducted using interviews with the major stakeholders of ESGF. Based on the analysis of the interviews, a central problem in the current user support practices in ESGF is identified. In this paper, a solution to this central problem is recommended that can not only enhance the user support process in federated e-Science infrastructures like ESGF from the management perspective but also can improve the user experience and usability of federated e-Science and IT infrastructures.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['natscie'],['researcher'],"['DEU', 'USA', 'AUS', 'ESP']","Chunpir H.I., Zaina L.A.M.",Proceedings of the 15th International Conference WWW/Internet 2016,English,Conference Paper,15th International Conference WWW/Internet 2016,28 October 2016 through 30 October 2016,0,,,3.0,IADIS,0,9789898533579,2016.0,0,0,27.0,34,,WOS:000360817500007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
505,WOS,The impact of open access citation and social media on leading top Information Science journals,Open Access; Journals; Information Science; Bibliometrics; Altmetrics,"This study assesses possible advantages of open access can bring to the area of Information Science, using bibliometric citation indicators and Altmetric scores to analyze sixteen hybrid scientific journals, filtered by respective Impact Factors and included in the Journal Citation Reports. Data collection was performed using Web of Science, Google Scholar, Altmetric.com and Mendeley. The verification was performed in two periods in order to examine whether open access exerted influence over time. Results indicate that open access boost the number of citations and mentions in social media for the sample of papers drawn from journals under study. Moreover, this boost is greater when authors upon publishing pay the processing charge to guarantee the immediate open access availability of the paper. In conclusion, while open access can boost the number of citations of a paper, the quality of the paper itself drives most citations.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['natscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Cintra, Paulo Roberto; Furnival, Ariadne Chloe; Milanez, Douglas Henrique",INVESTIGACION BIBLIOTECOLOGICA,English,Article,,,,"[Cintra, Paulo Roberto] Univ Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil; [Furnival, Ariadne Chloe] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, DCI, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil; [Milanez, Douglas Henrique] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, NIT Mat, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil",22.0,8.0,UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO,0187-358X,,2018.0,32,77,117.0,132,10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2018.77.57874,WOS:000361943000001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
514,WOS,Challenges of publishing open access journals,Open access; OA; Scholarly journals; Publishers; Spain; Surveys; Qualitative analysis,"A survey of 1,280 publishers of Spanish scientific journals (43% response rate; n=561) revealed their experiences with open access in scientific production. Quantitative analysis of the data showed that 72% (n=404) of respondents had experience with open access or were engaged in the conversion process. Of these, about 80% valued their experience in positive or very positive terms. Among the most common difficulties associated with the adoption of open access in their journals were the financial constraints and challenges related to organizational structure.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['ESP'],"Claudio-Gonzalez, Melba G.; Villarroya, Anna",PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Claudio-Gonzalez, Melba G.; Villarroya, Anna] Univ Barcelona, Fac Bibliotecon & Documentacio, Barcelona 08034, Spain",18.0,6.0,EPI,1386-6710,,2015.0,24,5,517.0,525,10.3145/epi.2015.sep.02,WOS:000362965200002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
516,WOS,Open access articles receive more citations in hybrid marine ecology journals,citations; open access publishing; scientific communication; scientific publishing; marine ecology,"The accumulation of evidence that open access publishing can increase citation rates highlights one benefit of universal accessibility to scholarly works. However, studies investigating the effect of open access publishing on citations are typically conducted across a wide variety of journals and disciplines, introducing a number of potential issues and limiting their utility for specific disciplines. Here, I used three primary marine ecology journals with an open access option as a microcosm of scientific publishing to determine whether or not open access articles received more citations than non-open access articles during the same time frame, controlling for self-citations, article type, and journal impact factor. I also tested for the effects of time since publication and the number of authors. Citations were positively correlated with time since publication and differed across the three journals. In addition, open access articles received significantly more citations than non-open access articles. Self-citations increased with author number and were affected by a complex interaction between open access, journal, and time since publication. This study demonstrates that open access articles receive more citations in hybrid marine ecology journals, although the causal factors driving this trend are unknown.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['natscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Clements, Jeff C.",FACETS,English,Article,,,,"[Clements, Jeff C.] Univ New Brunswick, Dept Biol Sci, 100 Tucker Pk Rd,POB 5050, St John, NB E2L 4L5, Canada; [Clements, Jeff C.] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Atlantic Vet Coll, Dept Hlth Management, 550 Univ Ave, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada",30.0,9.0,CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING,2371-1671,,2017.0,2,,,,10.1139/facets-2016-0032,WOS:000363208700001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
517,WOS,Predator in the Pool? A Quantitative Evaluation of Non-indexed Open Access Journals in Aquaculture Research,ethics; journal selection; open access; peer review; scientific publishing; science communication,"Predatory open access (OA) journals can be defined as non-indexed journals that exploit the gold OA model for profit, often spamming academics with questionable e-mails promising rapid OA publication for a fee. In aquaculture-a rapidly growing and highly scrutinized field-the issue of such journals remains undocumented. We employed a quantitative approach to determine whether attributes of scientific quality and rigor differed between OA aquaculture journals not indexed in reputable databases and well-established, indexed journals. Using a Google search, we identified several non-indexed OA journals, gathered data on attributes of these journals and articles therein, and compared these data to well-established aquaculture journals indexed in quality-controlled bibliometric databases. We then used these data to determine if non-indexed journals were likely predatory OA journals and if they pose a potential threat to aquaculture research. On average, non-indexed OA journals published significantly fewer papers per year, had cheaper fees, and were more recently established than indexed journals. Articles in non-indexed journals were, on average, shorter, had fewer authors and references, and spent significantly less time in peer review than their indexed counterparts; the proportion of articles employing rigorous statistical analyses was also lower for non-indexed journals. Additionally, articles in non-indexed journals were more likely to be published by scientists from developing nations. Worryingly, non-indexed journals were more likely to be found using a Google search, and their articles superficially resembled those in indexed journals. These results suggest that the non-indexed aquaculture journals identified herein are likely predatory OA journals and pose a threat to aquaculture research and the public education and perception of aquaculture. Several points of reference from this study, in combination, may help scientists and the public more easily identify these possibly predatory journals, as these journals were typically established after 2010, publishing <20 papers per year, had fees <$1,000, and published articles <80 days after submission. Subsequently checking reputable and quality-controlled databases such as the Directory of Open Access Journals, Web of Science, Scopus, and Thompson Reuters can aid in confirming the legitimacy of non-indexed OA journals and can facilitate avoidance of predatory OA aquaculture journals.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['agric'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Clements, Jeff C.; Daigle, Remi M.; Froehlich, Halley E.",FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Clements, Jeff C.] Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Gulf Fisheries Ctr, Aquaculture & Coastal Ecosyst Sect, Moncton, NB, Canada; [Daigle, Remi M.] Laval Univ, Dept Biol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; [Froehlich, Halley E.] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA",63.0,1.0,FRONTIERS MEDIA SA,,,2018.0,5,,,,10.3389/fmars.2018.00106,WOS:000363209300002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
523,WOS,A snapshot of attitudes towards open access monograph publishing in the humanities and social sciences - Part of the OAPEN-UK project,0,"Exploring the possibilities and feasibility of open access monograph publishing in the humanities and social sciences (HSS), OAPEN-UK presents some initial findings from its benchmarking survey with the projects' authors, publishers and members of the steering group. The survey explores their awareness of and attitudes towards open access, their motivations for publishing and priorities in scholarly communication. © Ellen Collins and Caren Milloy.",['openaccess'],['survey'],"['socscie', 'hum']","['publisher', 'researcher']",['GBR'],"Collins E., Milloy C.",Insights: the UKSG Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,,,5.0,United Kingdom Serials Group,20487754,0,2012.0,25,2,192.0,197,10.1629/2048-7754.25.2.192,WOS:000364390400009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
524,WOS,Open access monographs and the role of the library,0,"If open access (OA) books are to succeed, they need to operate in a way that works for academic libraries. Humanities researchers rely upon libraries to help them find and access many of the books they need for their research. Furthermore, many business models require direct input from librarians in the form of funding for first-copy costs or alternative formats. This article uses interviews with librarians and repository managers at four UK universities to consider some key issues for OA monographs from the point of view of librarians, and concludes with a reflection on these findings from the point of view of the University of Huddersfield's Library.",['openaccess'],['interview'],"['socscie', 'hum']",['librarian'],['GBR'],"Collins E., Stone G.",Insights: the UKSG Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,United Kingdom Serials Group,20487754,0,2014.0,27,SUPPL. 1,11.0,16,10.1629/2048-7754.163,WOS:000365051500030,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
542,WOS,Open access publishing in business research: The authors' perspective,Business librarians; Business researchers; Discipline-specific publishing; Open access; Scholarly communication,"Open access (OA) publishing is now accepted as an integral part of the emerging trends within scholarly communication. Business librarians, like their subject specialist colleagues in other disciplines, are increasingly called upon to interpret scholarly communication trends to their faculty. This study surveys 1,293 business faculty from American schools of business accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. Issues explored include business faculty publishing practices within the discipline and how these affect academic advancement, obtaining articles for their own research, electronic publishing, self-archiving, and their perceptions about OA publishing generally. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['socscie'],['librarian'],['USA'],Coonin B.,Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,14.0,0,8963568,0,2011.0,16,3,193.0,212,10.1080/08963568.2011.581606,WOS:000367121900003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
549,WOS,"Knowledge areas, themes and future research on open data: A co-word analysis",Open data; Bibliometric analysis; Co-word analysis; Science map; Knowledge areas; Most-studied themes; Future trends,"This paper aims to contribute to a better understanding of the literature on open data in three ways. The first is to develop a descriptive analysis of journals and authors to identify the knowledge areas in which open data are applied. The second is to analyse the conceptual structure of the field using a bibliometric technique. The co-word analysis enabled us to create a map of the main themes that have been studied, identifying their importance and relevance. These themes were analysed and grouped. The third is to propose future research trends. According to our results, the main knowledge areas are Engineering, Health, Public Administration, Management and Education. The main themes are big data, open-linked data and data reuse. Finally, several research questions are proposed according to knowledge area and theme.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Corrales-Garay, Diego; Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, Marta; Mora-Valentin, Eva-Maria",GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY,English,Article,,,,"[Corrales-Garay, Diego; Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, Marta; Mora-Valentin, Eva-Maria] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Paseo Artilleros S-N, Madrid 28032, Spain",82.0,14.0,ELSEVIER INC,0740-624X,,2019.0,36,1,77.0,87,10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.008,WOS:000368149500012,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
563,WOS,Open and Shut: Open Access in Hybrid Educational Technology Journals 2010-2017,open access; open scholarship; open education; educational technology research; gold open access; publishing,"Little is known about open access publishing in educational technology journals that employ a hybrid model which charges authors only if they wish to publish via gold open access. In this study we sought to address this gap in the scholarly understanding of open access publishing in hybrid journals that publish research into the intersection of education and technology. We analysed three categories of article access types: gold, green, and limited access, and collected data on their prevalence in the seven-year period from 2010-2017 across 29 journals. Data was gathered from Scopus, Unpaywall, Sherpa RoMEO, and via manual searches of the journal websites, resulting in a dataset comprising the metadata of 8,479 articles. Our findings highlight that most research remains locked behind paywalls, that open access publishing through legal means is a minority activity for the scholars involved, and that the complexity and costs of legal open access publishing in these journals may be inhibiting the accessibility of research to readers.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Costello, Eamon; Farrelly, Tom; Murphy, Tony",INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING,English,Article,,,,"[Costello, Eamon] Dublin City Univ, Dublin, Ireland; [Farrelly, Tom] Inst Technol Tralee, Tralee, Ireland; [Murphy, Tony] Dublin Business Sch, Dublin, Ireland",51.0,0.0,ATHABASCA UNIV PRESS,1492-3831,,2020.0,21,1,112.0,133,,WOS:000371930400006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
571,WOS,Open access to research outputs-institutional policies and researchers' views: Results from two complementary surveys,Open access; Repositories; Research outputs; Scholarly communication; Self-archiving,"This paper presents the results of two complementary surveys undertaken in 2008 as part of a wider project investigating the effects and impact of open access to research outputs in the UK. The institutional view, from a survey of academic librarians, is compared to researchers' perceptions and practices. Researchers were largely unaware of their institutions' policies with regard to open access, or whether they had an institutional repository. Reasons for making research outputs available on open access, or not doing so, were sought, and the role of open access material as a research resource investigated. The surveys found that many researchers maintained a suspicion of open access publications, both as authors and as users of scholarly material, together with a degree of ignorance about open access and the role of institutional repositories. This suggests that a degree of culture change may be needed, as institutions develop repositories with a view to future research assessment requirements, and more funders adopt open access mandates for the outputs from research which they fund. © 2010 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['GBR'],Creaser C.,New Review of Academic Librarianship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,32.0,0,13614533,0,2010.0,16,1,4.0,25,10.1080/13614530903162854,WOS:000373135700014,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
572,WOS,Authors' awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories,Attitudes; Behavior; Disciplinary differences; Open access; PEER project; Repositories; Self-archiving,"This article investigates the awareness of scholarly authors toward open access repositories and the factors that motivate their use of these repositories. The article reports on the findings obtained from a mixed methods approach which involved a questionnaire returned by over 3000 respondents, supplemented by four focus groups held across Europe in the summer 2009. The research found that although there was a good understanding and appreciation of the ethos of open access in general, there were clear differences between scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds in their understanding of open access repositories and their motivations for depositing articles within them. This research forms the first part of a longitudinal study that will track the changing behaviors and attitudes of authors toward open access repositories. © 2010 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],"['GBR', 'DEU', 'ITA', 'SWE', 'ESP', 'FRA', 'NLD']","Creaser C., Fry J., Greenwood H., Oppenheim C., Probets S., Spezi V., White S.",New Review of Academic Librarianship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,46.0,0,13614533,0,2010.0,16,SUPPL. 1,145.0,161,10.1080/13614533.2010.518851,WOS:000373177000016,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
577,WOS,Is open access sufficient? A review of the quality of open-access nursing journals,clinical outcome; journal impact factor; mental health nursing; nursing research; open access,"The present study aims to review the quality of open-access nursing journals listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals that published papers in 2013 with a nursing focus, written in English, and were freely accessible. Each journal was reviewed in relation to their publisher, year of commencement, number of papers published in 2013, fee for publication, indexing, impact factor, and evidence of requirements for ethics and disclosure statements. The quality of the journals was assessed by impact factors and the requirements for indexing in PubMed. A total of 552 were published in 2013 in the 19 open-access nursing journals that met the inclusion criteria. No journals had impact factors listed in Web of Knowledge, but three had low Scopus impact factors. Only five journals were indexed with PubMed. The quality of the 19 journals included in the review was evaluated as inferior to most subscription-fee journals. Mental health nursing has some responsibility to the general public, and in particular, consumers of mental health services and their families, for the quality of papers published in open-access journals. The way forward might involve dual-platform publication or a process that enables assessment of how research has improved clinical outcomes.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Crowe, Marie; Carlyle, Dave",INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING,English,Article,,,,"[Crowe, Marie; Carlyle, Dave] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol Med, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand",14.0,10.0,WILEY-BLACKWELL,1445-8330,,2015.0,24,1,59.0,64,10.1111/inm.12098,WOS:000373526200003,25388929.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
586,WOS,"Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and Scholarly Communication: A Study of Conflicting Paradigms",,"The Open Access movement of the past decade, and institutional repositories developed by universities and academic libraries as a part of that movement, have openly challenged the traditional scholarly communication system. This article examines the growth of repositories around the world, and summarizes a growing body of evidence of the response of academics to institutional repositories. It reports the findings of a national survey of academics which highlights the conflict between the principles and rewards of the traditional scholarly communication system, and the benefits of Open Access. The article concludes by suggesting ways in which academic libraries can alleviate the conflict between these two paradigms.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['NZL'],"Cullen, Rowena; Chawner, Brenda",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"[Cullen, Rowena; Chawner, Brenda] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Informat Management, Wellington 6140, New Zealand",36.0,58.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2011.0,37,6,460.0,470,10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002,WOS:000375210200003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0
593,WOS,"A survey of physical sciences, engineering and mathematics faculty regarding author fees in open access journals",0,"Discussions of the potential of open access publishing frequently must contend with the skepticism of research authors regarding the need to pay author fees (also known as publication fees). With that in mind, the authors undertook a survey of faculty, postdocs, and graduate students in physical science, mathematics, and engineering fields at two research universities (Cornell University and Syracuse University) asking for their experience with and opinion of paying author fees for publication of research in open access journals. The results of this survey indicated that most respondents had not decided against publishing in an open access journal due to the author fee requirement. Those who had paid them only requested or received coverage for those fees in grant line-items or from institutional sources in a few cases. Responses seemed to combine cautious optimism about open access journals with intense skepticism about their quality and intense opposition to the idea of having to pay any additional costs from their own pockets. © 2014, Association of College and Research Libraries. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Cusker J., Rauh A.E.",Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,3.0,Association of College and Research Libraries,10921206,0,2014.0,0,78,0.0,0,10.5062/F4VH5KTQ,WOS:000375366100006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
595,WOS,Access to research inputs: open science versus the entrepreneurial university,Open science; Research funding; Industry sponsorship; Research inputs,"The viability of modern open science norms and practices depends on public disclosure of new knowledge, methods, and materials. However, increasing industry funding of research can restrict the dissemination of results and materials. We show, through a survey sample of 837 German scientists in life sciences, natural sciences, engineering, and social sciences, that scientists who receive industry funding are twice as likely to deny requests for research inputs as those who do not. Receiving external funding in general does not affect denying others access. Scientists who receive external funding of any kind are, however, 50 % more likely to be denied access to research materials by others, but this is not affected by being funded specifically by industry.","['openaccess', 'opendata', 'openmethod', 'openevaluation', 'opensoftware']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['DEU'],"Czarnitzki, Dirk; Grimpe, Christoph; Pellens, Maikel",JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER,English,Article,,,,"[Czarnitzki, Dirk; Pellens, Maikel] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; [Grimpe, Christoph] Copenhagen Business Sch, Frederiksberg, Denmark; [Grimpe, Christoph] Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden; [Pellens, Maikel] Ctr European Econ Res ZEW, Dept Ind Econ & Int Management, Mannheim, Germany",25.0,12.0,SPRINGER,0892-9912,,2015.0,40,6,1050.0,1063,10.1007/s10961-015-9392-0,WOS:000375482700004,,2021-01-27,0,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
596,WOS,Open access in South Africa: A case study and reflections,academic publishing; scholarly communication; journals; online presence,"In this paper, we locate open access in the South African higher education research context where it is, distinctively, not shaped by the policy frameworks that are profoundly changing research dissemination behaviour in other parts of the world. We define open access and account for its rise by two quite different routes. We then present a case study of journal publishing at one South African university to identify existing journal publishing practices in terms of open access. This case provides the springboard for considering the implications - both positive and negative - of global open access trends for South African - and other - research and researchers. We argue that academics' engagement with open access and scholarly communication debates is in their interests as global networked researchers whose virtual identities and online scholarship are now a critical aspect of their professional engagement.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['ZAF'],"Czerniewicz, Laura; Goodier, Sarah",SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Czerniewicz, Laura; Goodier, Sarah] Univ Cape Town, Ctr Higher Educ Dev, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa",29.0,5.0,ACAD SCIENCE SOUTH AFRICA A S S AF,0038-2353,,2014.0,110,9-10,97.0,105,10.1590/sajs.2014/20140111,WOS:000375556300003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
601,WOS,Open access institutional repositories in Latin America,Institutional repositories; Latin America; Open access; Scholarly communication,"Objetive. This paper identifies and analyzes institutional repositories (IR) in Latin America. The development of systems by universities and research institutes in Latin America is highlighted in literature as a way to achieve the Open Access goals considering the public funds and also the IR characteristics. Method. In terms of methodology, this paper used five selection methods and five IR analyses dimensions. Results. The related elements brought the selection, mapping and characterization of 84 IR listed in a set of 289 digital repositories. Conclusions. The research data showed that Latin America obtained relevant advances in terms of IR also if compared with United States and some European countries. This research shows that IR are efficient tools to promote the open access.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['SA'],"da Costa, Michelli Pereira; Lima Leite, Fernando Cesar",BIBLIOS-REVISTA DE BIBLIOTECOLOGIA Y CIENCIAS DE LA INFORMACION,English,Article,,,,"[Holzman, Alex] Alex Publishing Solut, 2805 Brown ST, Philadelphia, PA 19130 USA",1.0,1.0,PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD,1680-4333,,2016.0,15,2,177.0,182,10.1057/eps.2015.85,WOS:000454598100002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
612,WOS,"Open access journals - What publishers offer, what researchers want",gold open access; Open access; open access journals; Study of Open Access Publishing,"The SOAP (Study of Open Access Publishing) project has analyzed the current supply and demand situation in the open access journal landscape. Starting from the Directory of Open Access Journals, several sources of data were considered, including journal websites and direct inquiries within the publishing industry to comprehensively map the present supply of online peer-reviewed OA journals. The demand for open access publishing is summarised, as assessed through a large-scale survey of researchers' opinions and attitudes. Some forty thousand answers were collected across disciplines and around the world, reflecting major support for the idea of open access, while highlighting drivers of and barriers to open access publishing. © 2011 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Dallmeier-Tiessen S., Darby R., Goerner B., Hyppoelae J., Igo-Kemenes P., Kahn D., Lambert S., Lengenfelder A., Leonard C., Mele S., Nowicka M., Polydoratou P., Ross D., Ruiz-Perez S., Schimmer R., Swaisland M., Van Der Stelt W.",Information Services and Use,English,Conference Paper,0,0,0,,,7.0,0,1675265,0,2011.0,31,44228,85.0,91,10.3233/ISU-2011-0624,WOS:000378750100004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
613,WOS,"Traditional factors of fit, perceived quality, and speed of publication still outweigh open access in authors' journal selection criteria",0,"Objective: To determine the extent to which the open access (OA) status of a journal influences authors in their journal selection decisions and to analyze the sources of funding for the article-processing charges (APCs) applied in professional OA publishing. Design: Survey questionnaire. Setting: The international open access scholarly publishing sector. Subjects: 1,038 researchers across all academic disciplines who have recently published work in open access journals that charge APCs. Methods: Journals listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals were stratified into seven discipline clusters, and systematic random sampling was used where possible to collect a sample of up to 15 journals per cluster that levy APCs. For each individual journal, the authors of the 15 most recently published articles (working from 2010 backwards) were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire on the factors influencing their choice of journal and the source(s) used to fund processing charges. Additional background information about the authors and journals was also collected and merged with the survey responses. Main Results: The results of the survey identified the fit of the article with the journal's subject area, the perceived quality or impact of the journal, and the speed of the peer-review and publishing process as the dominant factors in the journal selection decision of authors. All three aspects were judged as either ""very important"" or ""important"" by 80% or more of respondents - significantly higher than the corresponding figure of 60% in relation to the open access status of the journal. The analysis also indicated that two key elements appear to influence how APCs are funded: the research discipline and the country of origin of the author. The use of research grants to fund charges is more prevalent in scientific disciplines than in the humanities, whilst researchers based in lower-income countries more frequently identify APCs as a barrier than those in higher-income countries. Grants and institutional funding tend to be the primary sources of funding for journals with higher APCs, whilst personal funding is utilised more often in cases where the fee is less than $500. Conclusion: Despite the increasing focus on the accessibility and visibility of research, academics still appear to place a greater value on 'who' rather than 'how many' readers access their research, and consequently traditional factors still persist as the main determinants in an author's choice of journal. The future success of the APC model, compared with the traditional subscription-based or hybrid models, will ultimately depend on the ability of authors to obtain the necessary funding to pay such charges, combined with the extent to which the quality of services offered by open access publishers is perceived as being commensurate with the associated publishing fees. © 2012 Dalton.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],Dalton M.,Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,University of Alberta,1715720X,0,2012.0,7,4,102.0,104,10.18438/b8hc87,WOS:000378759100011,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
614,WOS,Attitudes of North American Academics toward Open Access Scholarly Journals,,"In this study, the authors examine attitudes of researchers toward open access (OA) scholarly journals. Using two-step cluster analysis to explore survey data from faculty, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers at large North American research institutions, two different cluster types emerge: Those with a positive attitude toward OA and a desire to reach the nonscholarly audience groups who would most benefit from OA (pro-OA), and those with a more negative, skeptical attitude and less interest in reaching nonscholarly readers (non-OA). The article explores these cluster identities in terms of position type, subject discipline, and productivity, as well as implications for policy and practice.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],"['USA', 'CAN']","Dalton, Elizabeth D.; Tenopir, Carol; Bjork, Bo-Christer",PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY,English,Article,,,,"[Dalton, Elizabeth D.] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Dept Commun Studies, Murfreesboro, TN 37130 USA; [Tenopir, Carol] Univ Tennessee, Sch Informat Sci, Knoxville, TN USA; [Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Dept Management & Org, Informat Syst Sci, Helsinki, Finland",67.0,1.0,JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV PRESS,1531-2542,,2020.0,20,1,73.0,100,10.1353/pla.2020.0005,WOS:000379019400007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
615,WOS,Open data in the life sciences: The 'Selfish Scientist Paradox',Life sciences; Open data; Questionnaire,"Full and open access is promoted as the international norm for the exchange of scientific data by numerous scientific and political bodies. In the contemporary digital era, since scientists are both consumers and producers of data, they inevitably play a crucial role in defining the level of data accessibility. Yet, it is individual researchers usually who resist the release of their data. Through a global online questionnaire survey, the perception of 858 life scientists with respect to open data was investigated. Differences in scientists' perceptions were tested per major country, rank position and academic performance in order to identify partial and global preferences. The 'Selfish Scientist Paradox' was identified: although the majority of respondents were in favour of open access to life sciences data, and most acknowledged that data gathered by others is vital to their work, the same group of people were quite reluctant to share their own data; only a third of them were willing to make their data available unconditionally. Scientists with > 10 yr professional experience were twice as likely to oppose open access, while almost half of junior researchers would rather not share their data prior to publishing. Senior scientists argued that although project funding in general was a significant incentive towards making their data available, at the same time certain confidentiality agreements in some projects become a main barrier to data sharing. Country of professional location largely affected most responses, revealing that southern Europeans had a 'conservative' attitude towards open access, being more unwilling to share their data. Analyses based on academic performance (publications and citations) indicated that established individuals were more dependent on data collected by others and more opposed to open access. © The authors 2018.",['opendata'],['survey'],"['natscie', 'engtech', 'med']",['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Damalas D., Kalyvioti G., Sabatella E.C., Stergiou K.I.",Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,Inter-Research,16118014,0,2018.0,18,1,27.0,36,10.3354/esep00182,WOS:000379031100004,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
617,WOS,Some ideas concerning the need for networking of open access repositories of digital university libraries: A case study of the EU visegrád Group,Case study; European union; Linked homepages; Open access repositories; Universities; Visegrad group; Visibility,"For scientific research institutions, as well as for scientists individually, the degree of accessibility of a given institution's and of an individual researcher's scientific achievement is of growing significance in this world of the internet: i.e., it is vitally important to know about and to have easy access to what research is conducted in what fields and with what results in the different institutions. In this study I intend to survey the present situation concerning the homepages of leading universities of the so-called Visegrad Group inside the European Union and the extent to which the present situation serves or fails to serve the cause of the philosophy of open access. My aim is twofold. (1) I will consider whether the scienetific-knowledge repositories built by universities are accessible or not, and/or how easy or difficult it is to access them. Provided that those repositories exist at all, because, in spite of the fact that the Berlin Declaration is generally adopted in principle, the homepages of a good number of the surveyed Visegrad Group universities or libraries do not make their research databases easily accessible or accessible at all, or they can be accessed in the given national language only(2).","['openaccess', 'opentools']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],"['POL', 'CZE', 'HUN', 'SVK']",Dani E.,"5th International Multi-Conference on Complexity, Informatics and Cybernetics, IMCIC 2014 and 5th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, ICSIT 2014 - Proceedings",English,Conference Paper,"5th International Multi-Conference on Complexity, Informatics and Cybernetics, IMCIC 2014 and 5th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, ICSIT 2014",4 March 2014 through 7 March 2014,0,,,0.0,"International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, IIIS",0,9781941763001,2014.0,0,0,26.0,31,,WOS:000379229200005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
635,WOS,Open access initiatives in European universities: analysis of their implementation and the visibility of publications in the YERUN network,Open access; YERUN network; Bibliometric analysis; Document analysis,"In this paper, the authors analyse the open access (OA) output of the universities in YERUN (the Young European Research Universities Network) and their institutional documentation of their own OA situation. The period from 2009 to 2019 was selected for the bibliometric analysis. The full register of publications for the YERUN universities was downloaded from Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection, and a set of bibliometric analyses was performed to provide an evidence-based response to the research questions (example: Do YERUN universities follow publication patterns similar to those of their countries of origin? How does OA affect the impact of scientific publications? What types of OA are used at each institution? Is there a relationship between specialization and OA?). The bibliometric analyses looked at four dimensions: activity and context indicators; collaboration indicators; specialization indicators; OA types and impact indicators. The document analysis included variables related to infrastructure, specific support actions, institutional policies and OA information availability. The paper concludes that the institutional measures and actions fostering OA identified on universities' websites bear a correspondence with the bibliometric data. YERUN institutions have higher rates of OA publications than do their host countries, with a clear preference for the green route. OA publications are systematically more cited than non-OA publications, and green OA has more impact than do other types of OA. Also, no relationship was found between specialization and OA publication rate.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"De Filippo, Daniela; Manana-Rodriguez, Jorge",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[De Filippo, Daniela] Carlos III Univ Madrid, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Madrid 28903, Spain; [De Filippo, Daniela] UAM UC3M, Res Inst Higher Educ & Sci INAECU, Getafe 28903, Spain; [Manana-Rodriguez, Jorge] Carlos III Univ Madrid, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, LEMI Metr Informat Studies Lab, Madrid 28903, Spain",43.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,125,3,2667.0,2694,10.1007/s11192-020-03705-0,WOS:000381871700003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
636,WOS,Characterization of the Iberian publications on open science and analysis of their presence in social media,Open Science; bibliometric indicators; altmetric indicators; Spain; Portugal,"In this paper, the publications on Open Science in SCOPUS, from Spain and Portugal, are analyzed and the impact of that production on social media is studied through bibliometric and altmetric indicators. Between 2000 and 2016, 1273 documents on this subject were detected for both countries, especially concentrated in the last five years. Open Data is one of the more frequent topics, and Computer Science and Social Science are the subjects with a higher production. One third of the publications with DOI have had an impact on social networks, with Twitter being the medium with the highest number of mentions. Although one third of the documents were published in open access, no link was found between this indicator and the presence in social media.","['openaccess', 'opendata']",['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],"['ESP', 'PRT']","De Filippo, Daniela; Silva, Paulo; Borges, Maria Manuel",REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[De Filippo, Daniela] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Inst INAECU, Madrid, Spain; [Silva, Paulo; Borges, Maria Manuel] Univ Coimbra, Fac Letras, Coimbra, Portugal",35.0,3.0,CONSEJO SUPERIOR INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS-CSIC,0210-0614,,2019.0,42,2,,,10.3989/redc.2019.2.1580,WOS:000382179800004,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0
638,WOS,The perception of Brazilians researchers on the deposit of scientific production in open access institutional repositories [La percepción de investigadores brasileños sobre el depósito de la producción científica en repositorios institucionales de acceso abierto],Institutional repositories; Open access; Scholarly communication system,"This work aims to present and discuss results of research about the perception of researchers regarding the deposit of scientific production in open access institutional repositories. The results presented compose results of a larger research whose purpose was to propose guidelines for the deposit of scientific production in open access institutional repositories based on the perception of the different actors that participate in the scholarly communication system. From the methodological point of view, the study has a descriptive purpose and a qualitative methodological approach, since the proposal of the guidelines was based on the perceptions of the actors involved. As a research method, the survey was adopted, which was operationalized with the adoption of the semistructured interview technique. Among the conclusions, the main motivations for depositing scientific production in institutional repositories are diversified according to the areas of knowledge. Among them are the awareness of the benefits of open access, compulsory deposit, institutional incentives and the link to culturally deposit-prone disciplines. © 2019 Escuela Interamericana de Bibliotecologia. All rights reserved.",['opentools'],"['survey', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['BRA'],"De Freitas M.A., Leite F.C.L.",Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia,Spanish,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Escuela Interamericana de Bibliotecologia,1200976,0,2019.0,42,2,159.0,173,10.17533/udea.rib.v42n2a04,WOS:000382584000009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
662,WOS,Social media visibility of open access versus non-open access articles: A case study of life sciences & biomedicine,0,"This study aims to determine whether and to what extent OA status of articles predicts their social media visibility when controlling for a considerable number of important factors. These factors which previous research confirmed their positive associations with altmetric counts are journal impact, individual collaboration, research funding, number of MESH topics, international collaboration, lay summary, and F1000 Score. The data for this study comprises 83,479 articles and reviews in the research area of Life Sciences & Biomedicine from 2012-2016, retrieved from the Medline in November 2018. The results showed that (except for policy documents) the percentage of OA articles mentioned on altmetrics platforms was significantly higher than that of the NOA articles. Furthermore, OA factor is significantly associated with the increasing number of tweets, news posts, Facebook posts and blog posts and decreasing zero counts on each platform. Finally, OA status of articles is likely to increase the number of tweets, Facebooks posts, news posts, and blog posts by 97.6%, 25.2%, 78.2% and 51.4%, respectively.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['natscie', 'engtech', 'med']",['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Dehdarirad T., Didegah F., Didegah A.","17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019 - Proceedings",English,Conference Paper,"17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019",2 September 2019 through 5 September 2019,0,,,0.0,International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics,0,9788833811185,2019.0,1,0,762.0,769,,WOS:000385621300009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
667,WOS,"Open Access E-journals: Past, Present, and Future",Scientific Communication; Scientific Publishing; Electronic Journals; Scientific Journals; Open Access Journals,"This article begins by tracing the origin and development of electronic journals in open access, how they emerged, how they were defined, and what needs to be answered. It explains how the transition from the printed world to the electronic came to be in the design and concept of journals; and notes exactly when the launch of these types of publications occurred. To describe the real situation of the journals it uses data provided by the directory of electronic publications Ulrichs and the directory of journals in open access DOAJ. It calculates the number of journals circulating and offers an editorial profile portrait of the current journals. It discovers the existence of a distinct editorial pattern (language, country of origin, type of editorial) in the open access electronic journals, versus the journals published worldwide and especially in respect to those with greater prestige that are indexed in the Journal Citation Reports. In the open access journals there exists a greater role for non-Anglo countries and languages. Also, it detects an extraordinary fragmentation of the editorials that differ from the multinationals that monopolize the market of scientific communication. It concludes reflecting on the challenges and threats that hover over these types of publications: about how the printed world will fade, how these journals will be financed, how to prevent fraud expansion of pirated journals, and declares the emergence of a new model of scientific communication.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Emilio",RELIEVE-REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION Y EVALUACION EDUCATIVA,English,Article,,,,"[Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Emilio] Univ Granada, Res Methods, E-18071 Granada, Spain",20.0,5.0,ASOC INTERUNIVERSITARIA INVESTIGACION PEDAGOGICA,1134-4032,,2015.0,21,1,,,10.7203/relieve.21.1.5005,WOS:000386019400002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
668,WOS,Scrutinising what Open Access Journals Mean for Global Inequalities,Global publishing; Open access models; Author processing charge; Impact factor; Knowledge production,"In the current article, we tested our hypothesis by which high-impact journals tend to have higher Article Processing Charges (APCs) by comparing journal IF metrics with the OA publishing fees they charge. Our study engaged with both journals in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields and the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) and included Hybrid, Diamond and No OA journals. The overall findings demonstrate a positive relationship between APCs and journals with high IF for two of the subject areas we examined but not for the third, which could be mediated by the characteristics and market environment of the publishers. We also found significant differences between the analysed research fields in terms of APC policies, as well as differences in the relationship between APCs and the IF across periodicals. The study and analysis conducted reinforces our concerns that Hybrid OA models are likely to perpetuate inequalities in knowledge production.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['natscie', 'engtech', 'socscie']",['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Demeter, Marton; Istratii, Ronina",PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY,English,Article,,,,"[Demeter, Marton] Natl Univ Publ Serv, Ludovika Sq 2,Annex Bldg Szarnyepulet,Off 223, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary; [Istratii, Ronina] SOAS Univ London, Flat 5 Aylmer Court,Sheldon Ave, London N2 0BU, England",30.0,1.0,SPRINGER,1053-8801,,2020.0,36,4,505.0,522,10.1007/s12109-020-09771-9,WOS:000386162500006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
680,WOS,Availability of Open Access Books in DOAB: An Analytical Study,Open access; Directory of Open Access Books; DOAB; licenses,"This paper discusses the availability of open access books which are available in the Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB). The relevant data has been collected from the open access directory from http://www.openbooks.org/ on 25 October 2015. Among the 3379 books, 1584 (46.88 %) books are published in English which includes 445 books which have no licenses, 83 books have CC BY; 153 books have CC-BY-NC; 814 books have CC-BY-NC-ND; 36 books have CC-BY-NC-SA; 24 books have CC-BY-ND and 29 books have CC-BY-SA licenses. It is found that 21 books have not mentioned its authors in the directory.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['natscie', 'engtech', 'socscie']",['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Dhanavandan, S.; Tamizhchelvan, M.",DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Dhanavandan, S.; Tamizhchelvan, M.] Deemed Univ, Gandhigram Rural Inst, Dindigul Dt 624302, Tamil Nadu, India",8.0,2.0,DEFENCE SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION DOCUMENTATION CENTRE,0974-0643,,2016.0,36,2,79.0,87,10.14429/djlit.36.2.9440,WOS:000389323800003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
686,WOS,Open data to evaluate academic researchers: An experiment with the Italian Scientific Habilitation,0,"The need for scholarly open data is ever increasing. While there are large repositories of open access articles and free publication indexes, there are still a few examples of free citation networks and their coverage is partial. One of the results is that most of the evaluation processes based on citation counts rely on commercial citation databases. Things are changing under the pressure of the Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC), whose goal is to campaign for scholarly publishers to make their citations as totally open. This paper investigates the growth of open citations with an experiment on the Italian Scientific Habilitation, the National process for University Professor qualification, which instead uses data from commercial indexes. We simulated the procedure by only using open data and explored similarities and differences with the official results. The outcomes of the experiment show that the amount of open citation data currently available is not yet enough for obtaining similar results. © 2019 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019 - Proceedings. All rights reserved.",['opendata'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['natscie'],['othergroup'],['ITA'],"Di Iorio A., Poggi F., Peroni S.","17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019 - Proceedings",English,Conference Paper,"17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019",2 September 2019 through 5 September 2019,0,,,3.0,International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics,0,9788833811185,2019.0,2,0,2133.0,2144,,WOS:000389639100014,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
708,WOS,Reconsidering the gold open access citation advantage postulate in a multidisciplinary context: an analysis of the subject categories in the Web of Science database 2009-2014,Open access; Citation advantage; Gold open access prevalence; Citation impact; Journal visibility,"Since Lawrence in 2001 proposed the open access (OA) citation advantage, the potential benefit of OA in relation to citation impact has been discussed in depth. The methodology to test this postulate ranges from comparing the impact factors of OA journals versus traditional ones, to comparing citations of OA versus non-OA articles published in the same non-OA journals. However, conclusions are not entirely consistent among fields, and two possible explications have been suggested in those fields where a citation advantage has been observed for OA: the early view and the selection bias postulates. In this study, a longitudinal and multidisciplinary analysis of gold OA citation advantage is developed. All research articles in all journals for all subject categories in the multidisciplinary database Web of Science are considered. A total of 1,138,392 articles-60,566 (5.3%) OA articles and 1,077,826 (94.7%) non-OA articles-published in 2009 are analysed. The citation window considered goes from 2009 to 2014, and data are aggregated for the 249 disciplines (subject categories). At journal level, we also study the evolution of journal impact factors for OA and non-OA journals in those disciplines whose OA prevalence is higher (top 36 subject categories). As the main conclusion, there is no generalizable gold OA citation advantage, neither at article nor at journal level.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Dorta-Gonzalez, Pablo; Gonzalez-Betancor, Sara M.; Dorta-Gonzalez, Maria Isabel",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Dorta-Gonzalez, Pablo] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, TiDES Res Inst, Campus Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain; [Gonzalez-Betancor, Sara M.] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Metodos Cuantitat Econ & Gest, Campus Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain; [Dorta-Gonzalez, Maria Isabel] Univ La Laguna, Dept Ingn Informat & Sistemas, Ave Astrofis Francisco Sanchez S-N, San Cristobal la Laguna 38271, Spain",21.0,17.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2017.0,112,2,877.0,901,10.1007/s11192-017-2422-y,WOS:000392187600010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
709,WOS,Prevalence and citation advantage of gold open access in the subject areas of the Scopus database,open access; gold open access; prevalence; citation advantage; journal citation impact; SJR,"The potential benefit of open access (OA) in relation to citation impact has been discussed in the literature in depth. The methodology used to test the OA citation advantage includes comparing OA vs. non-OA journal impact factors and citations of OA vs. non-OA articles published in the same non-OA journals. However, one problem with many studies is that they are small and restricted to one discipline or set of journals-. Moreover, conclusions are not entirely consistent among research areas, and 'early view' and 'selection bias' have been suggested as possible explications. In the present article, an analysis of gold OA from across all areas of research-the 27 subject areas of the Scopus database-is realized. As a novel contribution, this article takes a journal-level approach to assessing the OA citation advantage, whereas many others take a paper-level approach. Data were obtained from Scimago Lab, sorted using Scopus database, and tagged as OA/non-OA using the DOAJ list. Jointly with the OA citation advantage, the OA prevalence as well as the differences between access types (OA vs. non-OA) in production and referencing are tested. A total of 3,737 OA journals (16.8%) and 18,485 non-OA journals (83.2%) published in 2015 are considered. As the main conclusion, there is no generalizable gold OA citation advantage at journal level.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Dorta-Gonzalez, Pablo; Santana-Jimenez, Yolanda",RESEARCH EVALUATION,English,Article,,,,"[Dorta-Gonzalez, Pablo] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, TiDES Res Inst, Campus Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain; [Santana-Jimenez, Yolanda] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Metodos Cuantitat Econ & Gest, Campus Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain",26.0,11.0,OXFORD UNIV PRESS,0958-2029,,2018.0,27,1,1.0,15,10.1093/reseval/rvx035,WOS:000392208800002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
710,WOS,"Open access effect on uncitedness: a large-scale study controlling by discipline, source type and visibility",Uncitedness ratio; Uncited rate; Open access; Differences by field; CiteScore,"There are many factors that affect the probability of being uncited during the first years after publication. In this study, we analyze three of these factors for journals, conference proceedings and book series: the field (in 316 subject categories of the Scopus database), the access modality (open access vs. paywalled), and the visibility of the source (through the percentile of the average impact in the subject category). We quantify the effect of these factors on the probability of being uncited. This probability is measured through the percentage of uncited documents in the serial sources of the Scopus database at about two years after publication. As a main result, we do not find any strong correlation between open access and uncitedness. Within the group of most cited journals (Q1 and top 10%), open access journals generally have somewhat lower uncited rates. However, in the intermediate quartiles (Q2 and Q3) almost no differences are observed, while for Q4 the uncited rate is again somewhat lower in the case of the OA group. This is important because it provides new evidence in the debate about open access citation advantage.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Dorta-Gonzalez, Pablo; Suarez-Vega, Rafael; Isabel Dorta-Gonzalez, Maria",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Dorta-Gonzalez, Pablo; Suarez-Vega, Rafael] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, TiDES Res Inst, Campus Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain; [Isabel Dorta-Gonzalez, Maria] Univ La Laguna, Dept Ingn Informat & Sistemas, Ave Astrofis Francisco Sanchez S-N, San Cristobal la Laguna 38271, Spain",25.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,124,3,2619.0,2644,10.1007/s11192-020-03557-8,WOS:000392208800003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
714,WOS,Open data 5 years on: A case series of 12 freedom of information requests for regulatory data to the European Medicines Agency,Access to documents; Clinical study report; Cochrane collaboration; CSR; EMA; European medicines agency; Evidence synthesis; Freedom of information; Freedom of information act; Publication bias; Regulatory science; Reporting bias; Systematic reviews,"Background: Clinical trial (and other) data from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) offers the best available opportunity to address the extensive reporting bias in pharmaceutical trial literature. Data are requested via freedom of information requests, but 5years on, little is known about how the system is working. Methods: Case series of 12 requests for regulatory data (clinical study reports and other regulatory data) relating to 29 different compounds. We logged start and end dates for correspondence with and data releases from the EMA, the need for additional correspondence and appeal of initial negative decisions, and inspected data releases for redaction. We measured: time from initial request to first substantive response from the EMA, to final decision from the EMA (in case of appeal), to initial receipt of documents, and to completion of request; number of data transmission batches generated; number of pages received for each request; average number of pages per batch over time (for releases in multiple batches); judgment as to whether the request was satisfied. Results: We found great variability in time to receive an initial decision from the EMA (1 to 13weeks). Additional correspondence with the EMA was necessary in 10 of 12 requests. Four of 12 were initially refused but 3 of 4 were allowed on appeal after 3 to 33 additional weeks. One request was denied despite appeal. Time to final decision was 1 to 43weeks. We received data for 11 of 12 requests in 98 batches. While two requests remain outstanding as at June 2015 the remaining nine requests took a median 43weeks to completion (range: 17 to 186weeks). Despite redaction in 10 of 11 releases (mainly of researcher and participant identifying information), 8 requested were wholly satisfied. Conclusions: The EMA is the only regulator in the world that is routinely releasing original clinical trial data, but release can take considerable time to occur and often only after a lengthy correspondence. Given its importance for research and significance for transparency we suggest ways in which the process could be made more efficient. © 2016 Doshi and Jefferson.",['opendata'],['documentreview'],['med'],['othergroup'],['EU'],"Doshi P., Jefferson T.",Trials,English,Article,0,0,0,,,18.0,BioMed Central Ltd.,17456215,0,2016.0,17,1,0.0,0,10.1186/s13063-016-1194-7,WOS:000392884700005,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
716,WOS,"A cross-sectional description of open access publication costs, policies and impact in emergency medicine and critical care journals",Open access; Impact; Emergency medicine; Critical care,"Introduction: Finding journal open access information alongside its global impact requires access to multiple databases. We describe a single, searchable database of all emergency medicine and critical care journals that include their open access policies, publication costs, and impact metrics. Methods: A list of emergency medicine and critical care journals (including citation metrics) was created using Scopus (Citescore) and the Web of Science (Impact Factor). Cost of gold/hybrid open access and article process charges (open access fees) were collected from journal websites. Self-archiving policies were collected from the Sherpa/RoMEO database. Relative cost of access in different regions were calculated using the World Bank Purchasing Power Parity index for authors from the United States, Germany, Turkey, China, Brazil, South Africa and Australia. Results: We identified 78 emergency medicine and 82 critical care journals. Median Citescore for emergency medicine was 0.73 (interquartile range, IQR 0.32-1.27). Median impact factor was 1.68 (IQR 1.00-2.39). Median Citescore for critical care was 0.95 (IQR 0.25-2.06). Median impact factor was 2.18 (IQR 1.73-3.50). Mean article process charge for emergency medicine was $2243.04, SD=$ 1136.16 and for critical care $2201.64, SD=$1174.38. Article process charges were 2.24, 1.75, 2.28 and 1.56 times more expensive for South African, Chinese, Turkish and Brazilian authors respectively than United States authors, but neutral for German and Australian authors (1.02 and 0.81 respectively). The database can be accessed here: http://www. emct.info/publication-search.html. Conclusions: We present a single database that captures emergency medicine and critical care journal impact rankings alongside its respective open access cost and green open access policies.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Dove, Chante; Chan, Teresa M.; Thoma, Brent; Roland, Damian; Bruijns, Stevan R.",AFRICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE,English,Article,,,,"[Dove, Chante] Univ Cape Town, Fac Hlth Sci, Cape Town, South Africa; [Chan, Teresa M.] McMaster Univ, Div Emergency Med, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada; [Thoma, Brent] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Emergency Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; [Roland, Damian] Univ Leicester, Dept Hlth Sci, SAPPHIRE Grp, Leicester, Leics, England; [Roland, Damian] Leicester Hosp, Paediat Emergency Med Leicester Acad PEMLA Grp, Leicester, Leics, England; [Bruijns, Stevan R.] Univ Cape Town, Div Emergency Med, Cape Town, South Africa",14.0,3.0,ELSEVIER,2211-419X,,2019.0,9,3,150.0,155,10.1016/j.afjem.2019.01.015,WOS:000393043100003,31528534.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
724,WOS,Comparing Open Access Search Tools to Improve Interlibrary Loan Fulfillment Efficiency,(3-8) interlibrary loan; open access articles; Google; Google Scholar; JURN; OAIster; Open Access Button; openDOAR,"Open access (OA) search tools can expedite the turnaround of interlibrary loan (ILL) fulfillment by locating openly available articles not found by library harvesting tools. Several search tools are available, but no comparison has been done of their efficacy in the context of ILL. Six OA search tools were evaluated using 153 ILL article requests for quantity of openly available articles found, accuracy of results, and value. Article availability was analyzed by publication year and broad academic discipline. Google and Google Scholar outperformed specialty OA search tools, although they were more prone to error and more likely to locate pre-publications.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Duffin, Kirstin, I",TECHNICAL SERVICES QUARTERLY,English,Article,,,,"[Duffin, Kirstin, I] Eastern Illinois Univ, Lib Serv, Charleston, IL 61920 USA",41.0,0.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",0731-7131,,2020.0,37,4,415.0,431,10.1080/07317131.2020.1810442,WOS:000394441200005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
726,WOS,"Acceptance and Usage of Open Access Scholarly Communication by Postgraduate Students at the Sokoine University of Agriculture and the University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania",,"This study assessed the awareness and usage of Open Access (OA) for scholarly communication by postgraduate students at the Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) and the University of Dar es Salaam (UDSM). A semi-structured self-administered questionnaire survey was undertaken using a convenience sample of 230 postgraduate students of whom 128 (55.6%) participated in the study. The open access concept was familiar to 58.6% of the respondents; however, although 60.9% of them acknowledged having accessed OA content, only 10.9% of them had disseminated research findings through OA. The respondents' perceptions toward OA were generally positive. Low awareness of the OA concept, inadequate online scholarly communication skills, and the slow Internet connectivity were possible factors affecting the exploitation of OA in the study area. The review and formalisation of the existing postgraduate information literacy training modules at the two universities is recommended in order to improve the adoption of OA and exploitation of the online resources in general.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['TZA'],"Dulle, Frankwell W.",AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ARCHIVES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"Sokoine Univ Agr, Morogoro, Tanzania",39.0,3.0,ARCHLIB & INFORMATION SERVICES LTD,0795-4778,,2011.0,21,1,17.0,27,,WOS:000395038600004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
736,WOS,Researcher's Perceptions on Publishing Negative Results and Open Access,negative results; Open Science; science policy; open access; null hypothesis,"Scientific advance is based on reproducibility, corroboration, and availability of research results. However, large numbers of experimental results that contradict previous work do not get published and many research results are not freely available as they are hidden behind paywalls. As part of COST Action DARTER, a network of researchers in the field of RNA therapeutics, we have performed a small survey among our members and their colleagues to assess their opinion on the subject of publishing contradictory or ambiguous results and their attitude to open access (OA) publishing. Our survey indicates that, although researchers highly value publication of negative results, they often do not publish their own, citing lack of time and the perception that those results may not be as highly cited. OA, on the other hand, seems to be widely accepted, but in many cases not actively sought by researchers due to higher costs associated with it.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['researcher'],['EU'],"Echevarria, Lucia; Malerba, Alberto; Arechavala-Gomeza, Virginia",NUCLEIC ACID THERAPEUTICS,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Echevarria, Lucia] Univ Paris Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, END ICAP, Versailles, France; [Echevarria, Lucia] SQY Therapeut, Montigny Le Bretonneux, France; [Malerba, Alberto] Royal Holloway Univ London, Dept Biol Sci, Sch Life Sci & Environm, Egham, Surrey, England; [Arechavala-Gomeza, Virginia] Biocruces Bizkaia Hlth Res Inst, Neuromuscular Disorders, Plaza Cruces S-N, Baracaldo 48903, Bizkaia, Spain; [Arechavala-Gomeza, Virginia] Ikerbasque, Basque Fdn Sci, Bilbao, Spain",8.0,0.0,"MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC",2159-3337,,,,,,,10.1089/nat.2020.0865,WOS:000396354300002,32730128.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
738,WOS,"Open Access Perceptions, Strategies, and Digital Literacies: A Case Study of a Scholarly-Led Journal",open access; open science; open scholarship; journals; policies; publishing strategies; motivation; reputation; ranking; impact factor,"Open access (OA) publications play an important role for academia, policy-makers, and practitioners. Universities and research institutions set up OA policies and provide authors different types of support for engaging in OA activities. This paper presents a case study on OA publishing in a scholarly community, drawing on qualitative and quantitative data gained from workshops and a survey. As the authors are the managing editors of theOA eJournal for eDemocracy and Open Government(JeDEM), the aim was to collect data and insights on the publication choices of authors interested in OA publishing and other crucial factors such as personal attitudes to publishing, institutional context, and digital literacy in order to improve the journal. In the first phase, two workshops with different stakeholders were held at the Conference for e-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM) held in Austria and in South Korea in 2016. In the second phase, an online survey was sent to all the users of the e-journal JeDEM in October 2019. From the workshops, key differences regarding OA perception and strategies between the stakeholder groups were derived. Participants strongly perceived OA publishing as a highly individualist matter embedded within a publishing culture emphasizing reputation and rankings. The survey results, however, showed that institutional support differs considerably for authors. Factors such as visibility, reputation, and impact play the biggest role for the motivation to publish OA. The results from both inquiries provide a better understanding of OA publishing attitudes and the relevant digital literacies but also suggest the need to investigate further the enablers or difficulties of scholarship, particularly in a digital context. They clearly point to the potential of regularly addressing the users of the journal as well as communicating with them the more nuanced aspects of OA publishing, non-traditional metrics, or respective digital literacies, in order to reduce misconceptions about OA and to support critical stances.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'othermeth']",['socscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Edelmann, Noella; Schossboeck, Judith",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Edelmann, Noella; Schossboeck, Judith] Danube Univ Krems, Dept E Governance & Adm, A-3500 Krems, Austria",59.0,0.0,MDPI,,,2020.0,8,3,,,10.3390/publications8030044,WOS:000396464900002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
741,WOS,Open Access and the Economics of Scholarshipin Rhetoric and Composition Studies,0,"Rhetoric and composition, as an academic discipline, argues for a strong link between scholarship and practice. However, restrictive publisher agreements, limited distribution channels, and perceptions about the value of open access among gatekeepers can limit access to scholarship and its potential for application. This study, through analysis of publishing policies and practices for rhetoric and composition journals as well as surveys and interviews with journal editors, examines the current state of open access in the field. Findings reveal the need for more consistent and widespread adoption of more open policies for publishing to extend the impact and value of scholarship in the field. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'interview', 'documentreview']",['hum'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Edwards M., Reyman J.",Rhetoric Review,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Routledge,7350198,0,2018.0,37,2,212.0,225,10.1080/07350198.2018.1424480,WOS:000396548500007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
744,WOS,The economics of open access: On the future of academic publishing,0,"Addressing the recent debate on how the future of academic publishing might look in a purely digital environment, this book analyzes the experiences of researchers with, as well as attitudes towards, 'Open Access' (OA) publishing. Drawing on a unique, in-depth survey with more than 10,000 respondents from 25 countries, Thomas Eger and Marc Scheufen discuss their findings in the light of recent policy attempts which have been trying to foster OA, revealing considerable shortcomings and lack of knowledge on fundamental features of the academic publishing market. © Thomas Eger and Marc Scheufen 2018 All rights reserved.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Eger T., Scheufen M.",The Economics of Open Access: On the Future of Academic Publishing,English,Book,0,0,0,,,3.0,Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.,0,9781785365768; 9781785365751,2018.0,0,0,1.0,156,10.4337/9781785365768,WOS:000396859500006,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
745,WOS,The determinants of open access publishing: survey evidence from countries in the Mediterranean Open Access Network (MedOANet),Academic publishing; Copyright; Law and Economics; MedOANet; Open Access,"We discuss the results of a survey conducted between March 2013 and May 2014 in six Mediterranean countries and covering 2528 researchers from France (380), Italy (596), Spain (1291), Portugal (142), Greece (130) and Turkey (131). We compare the results with those of a survey on Germany, conducted in 2012, with 1913 respondents. We show that there are significant differences between the scientific disciplines with respect to researcher’s awareness of and experience with both open access journals and self-archiving. We conclude by discussing our results in the light of the MedOANet policies which seek to foster open access publishing. © 2016, Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],"['FRA', 'GRC', 'ITA', 'ESP', 'PRT', 'TUR', 'DEU']","Eger T., Scheufen M., Meierrieks D.",Economia e Politica Industriale,English,Article,0,0,0,,,3.0,Springer International Publishing,3912078,0,2016.0,43,4,463.0,489,10.1007/s40812-016-0027-8,WOS:000396859500008,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0
746,WOS,The determinants of open access publishing: survey evidence from Germany,Academic publishing; Open access; Copyright; Law and economics,"We discuss the results of a survey conducted in the fall of 2012 and covering 2151 researchers in Germany. We show that there are significant differences between the scientific disciplines with respect to researchers' awareness of, and experience with, both open access (OA) journals and self-archiving. Our results reveal that the relevance of OA within a discipline may explain why researchers from particular disciplines do (not) publish OA. Furthermore, several aspects like copyright law, age, profession or the inherent reward system of a discipline also play a role. Consequently, the paper emphasizes that a one-size-fits-all approach, as promoted by most recent policy initiatives, is unlikely to provide an effective framework for shaping the future of scholarly publishing.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['DEU'],"Eger, Thomas; Scheufen, Marc; Meierrieks, Daniel",EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS,English,Article,,,,"[Eger, Thomas] Inst Law & Econ, D-20148 Hamburg, Germany; [Scheufen, Marc] Ruhr Univ Bochum, D-44787 Bochum, Germany; [Meierrieks, Daniel] Univ Freiburg, D-79098 Freiburg, Germany",27.0,16.0,SPRINGER,0929-1261,,2015.0,39,3,475.0,503,10.1007/s10657-015-9488-x,WOS:000396995000001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
752,WOS,The Potentials of Open Access Initiative and the Development of Institutional Repositories in Nigeria: Implications for Scholarly Communication,Open access; Institutional repositories; Scholarly communication; Nigeria; Research communication; Collection development,"This study examined the state of open access institutional repositories in Nigeria. Expository review of literature was used to x-ray the state of the art, while descriptive informetrics was used to extract informetric data from two major repository directories (Registry of Open Access Repositories and Directory of Open Access Repositories). Findings revealed that Nigeria has twenty repositories from 14 out of about 153 universities in the country; majority of the repositories (70%) use DSpace as archiving software. The growth of repositories in the country has been slow, and the dominant contents of the repositories are journal articles, theses, and dissertations. While the study exposes the weaknesses of Nigeria universities in exploring the potentials of institutional repositories in wider dissemination their scientific productivity, it challenges government and other stakeholders to develop sustainable framework for development of repositories in the country.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['NGA'],"Ejikeme, Anthonia Nwamaka; Ezema, Ifeanyi Jonas",PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY,English,Article,,,,"[Ejikeme, Anthonia Nwamaka; Ezema, Ifeanyi Jonas] Univ Nigeria, Nnamdi Azikiwe Lib, Nsukka, Nigeria; [Ezema, Ifeanyi Jonas] Univ South Africa, Dept Informat Sci, Pretoria, South Africa",44.0,3.0,SPRINGER,1053-8801,,2019.0,35,1,6.0,21,10.1007/s12109-018-09626-4,WOS:000397930300028,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
754,WOS,Open access repositories of Bangladesh: An analysis of the present status,Bangladesh; institutional repositories; open access; open access repositories,"This study examines the present status of open access repositories in Bangladesh. The main aim of the study is to find out the characteristics of open access repositories, their development scenario and ranking in web repositories as well as to recommend some suggestions for the development of open access repositories in Bangladesh. The methodology includes a quantitative approach. The data were collected from OpenDOAR from 20 to 29 August 2017. The scope of the study is confined to Bangladeshi repositories indexed in the OpenDOAR database. The findings of the study show that the Bangladeshi repositories are embodied in the Ranking of Web Repositories. The study also clearly indicates the very slow progress of open access repositories in Bangladesh. The repositories in Bangladesh listed in OpenDOAR are mostly institutional in nature. The study also reveals that a maximum number of repositories are small in terms of collection. It can be easily summarized that there is a need for public awareness regarding the concept of open access repositories in Bangladesh to support research and development. This paper is the first attempt in Bangladesh to discuss and analyze the overall scenario of open access repositories. It also suggests some recommendations for developing the open access repository system in Bangladesh which will surely add value to the future research of open access in Bangladesh.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['BGD'],"Elahi, Md Hasinul; Mezbah-ul-Islam, Muhammad",IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Elahi, Md Hasinul] East West Univ, Dhaka, Bangladesh; [Mezbah-ul-Islam, Muhammad] Univ Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh",32.0,4.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,0340-0352,,2018.0,44,2,132.0,142,10.1177/0340035218763952,WOS:000398006200007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
755,WOS,Gold Open Access Publishing in Mega-Journals: Developing Countries Pay the Price of Western Premium Academic Output,article processing charge; financial transparency; gold open access; mega-journals; socio-economic status,"Open access publishing (OAP) makes research output freely available, and several national governments have now made OAP mandatory for all publicly funded research. Gold OAP is a common form of OAP where the author pays an article processing charge (APC) to make the article freely available to readers. However, gold OAP is a cause for concern because it drives a redistribution of valuable research money to support open access papers in mega-journals' with more permissive acceptance criteria. We present a data-driven evaluation of the financial ramifications of gold OAP and provide evidence that gold OAP in mega-journals is biased toward Western industrialized countries. From 2011 to 2015, the period of our data collection, countries with developing economies had a disproportionately greater share of articles published in the lower-tier mega-journals and thus paid article APCs that cross-subsidize publications in the top-tier journals of the same publisher. Conversely, scientists from Western developed countries had a disproportionately greater share of articles published in those same top-tier journals. The global inequity of the cross-subsidizing APC model was demonstrated across five different mega-journals, showing that the issue is a common problem. We need to develop stringent and fair criteria that address the global financial implications of OAP, as publication fees should reflect the real cost of publishing and be transparent for authors.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Ellers, Jacintha; Crowther, Thomas W.; Harvey, Jeffrey A.",JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Ellers, Jacintha] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Evolutionary Ecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands; [Harvey, Jeffrey A.] Netherlands Inst Ecol, Wageningen, Netherlands; [Harvey, Jeffrey A.] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands",9.0,5.0,UNIV TORONTO PRESS INC,1198-9742,,2017.0,49,1,89.0,102,10.3138/jsp.49.1.89,WOS:000398300300014,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
761,WOS,Features of top-rated gold open access journals: An analysis of the scopus database,Gold open access ranking;  Open access impact analysis;  SJR;  Open access journals,"Purpose: The goal is to identify the features of top-rated gold open access (OA) journals by testing seven main variables: languages, countries, years of activity and years in the DOAJ repository, publication fee, the field of study, whether the journal has been launched as OA or converted, and the type of publisher. Sample: A sample of 1910 gold OA journals has been obtained by combining Scopus SJR 2012, the DOAJ, and data provided by previous studies (Solomon, 2013). Method: We have divided the SJR index into quartiles for all journals' subject areas. First, we show descriptive statistics by combining quartiles based on their features. Then, after having converted the quartiles into a dummy variable, we test it as a dependent variable in a binary logistic regression. Contribute: This work contributes empirically to better understanding the gold OA efficacy of data analysis, which may be helpful in improving journals' rankings in the areas where this is still a struggle. Findings: Significant results have been found for all variables, except for the types of publishers, and for born or converted journals. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Ennas, Gianfranco;  Di Guardo, Maria Chiara",JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Ennas, Gianfranco;  Di Guardo, Maria Chiara] Univ Cagliari, Dept Econ & Business, I-09123 Cagliari, Italy",30.0,12.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV,1751-1577,,2015.0,9,1,79.0,89,10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.007,WOS:000399500600004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
765,WOS,Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus,Scopus;  Open access journals;  CiteScore;  Journal quality;  Non-open access journals;  SJR,"Purpose - This study aims to provide an extensive overview of OA journals' status and quality in 27 research areas based on all Scopus-indexed journals. It shows the volume of OA journals, proportion of publications in OA journals and the quality of these journals in comparison with subscription-based counterparts. Design/methodology/approach - This research investigated 22,256 active peer-reviewed journals indexed by Scopus in 2015. Data were gathered using the Journal Metrics website. The current research adopted four indicators to compare the quality of OA and non-OA journals indexed in Scopus under each subject area, namely citedness rate, CiteScore, SNIP and SJR. Findings - OA journals comprised approximately 17 per cent out of the total journals indexed by Scopus in 2015. The results revealed an uneven spread of OA journals across disciplines, ranged from 5.5 to 28.7 per cent. Studying the quality of journals as measured by CiteScore, SJR SNIP leads us to the finding that, in all research areas, except for health profession and nursing, non-OA journals attain statistically significant higher average quality than do OA journals. Originality/value - Although OA publishing improves the visibility of scholarly journals, this increase is not always coupled with increase in journals' impact and quality.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Erfanmanesh, Mohammadamin",COLLECTION BUILDING,English,Article,,,,"[Erfanmanesh, Mohammadamin] Univ Isfahan, Dept Knowledge & Informat Sci, Esfahan, Iran",44.0,10.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0160-4953,,2017.0,36,4,155.0,162,10.1108/CB-02-2017-0007,WOS:000399825700012,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
766,WOS,Quantitative portrait of open access mega-journals,Mega-journals;  Open access journals;  Scholarly communication;  Journal studies;  Bibliometrics,"Nowadays, Open Access Mega-Journals (OAMJs) represent a substantial part of the scholarly communication system. The current research is conducted with the aim of providing better insights into the increasingly important OAMJ phenomenon through investigation of eight reputable titles using established bibliometric methods. Results of the study showed that eight studied OAMJs were responsible for 1.87% of the total number of publication indexed in Web of Science during 2012-2016. Despite the decline in publication count of PLOS ONE over the past couple of years, it was the biggest journal in the world till 2017, when Scientific Reports overtook PLOS ONE as the most productive journal. Over 88% of the papers published in eight selected OAMJs were cited at-least once at the point in time of analysis. The highest proportions of cited and un-cited documents were seen in Scientific Reports and SpringerPlus, respectively. With regard to the three indicators, namely share of highly-cited papers, the category normalized citation impact as well as the JIF percentile, IEEE Access had by far the best performance among eight examined OAMJs. Results of the study revealed that Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Multidisciplinary Sciences, Neurosciences, Oncology and Immunology were the most commonly assigned subject categories to OAMJs' content. The National Natural Science Foundation of China was the most important funding agency that supported the publication of around 26000 articles in eight studied OAMJs. Investigation of the geographic distribution of authors showed that the United States and China by far had the highest contribution in the content of eight studied OAMJs. There were, however, notable variations between different OAMJs.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Erfanmanesh, Mohammadamin",MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Erfanmanesh, Mohammadamin] Univ Malaya, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia",20.0,1.0,"UNIV MALAYA, FAC COMPUTER SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECH",1394-6234,,2019.0,24,2,115.0,131,10.22452/mjlis.vol24no2.7,WOS:000399859000002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
767,WOS,Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: A Case of Iran,Predatory journals;  Publishing scam;  Bogus journals,"Scholarly publishing scams and predatory journals are emerging threats to academic integrity. During the last few years, the number of bogus journals has dramatically increased, defraud authors by promising fast review and prompt publishing. The current research investigates the contribution of Iranian researchers in predatory open-access journals in 2014. In this research, a total of 21,817 articles published by 265 journals from Beall's list of predatory standalone journals were investigated. Although Beall's weblog was taken offline on January 15, 2017, data was collected between January and March 2016 when his weblog was accessible. Results of the study revealed that Iranian researchers have contributed to 1449 papers from 265 journals, ranked this country as having the second largest contributor after India. Surprisingly, institutions with the highest share of publication in predatory journals are among the most reputable and well-known universities of the country. Un-vetted papers published in predatory journals can hurt individuals' reputation and be a base for future low-quality research in Iran and other world countries. To avoid being victimized by questionable journals, researchers should be more familiar with scholarly publishing literacy skills to recognize and avoid publishing scams.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Erfanmanesh, Mohammadamin;  Pourhossein, Razieh",PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY,English,Article,,,,"[Erfanmanesh, Mohammadamin] Univ Isfahan, Dept Knowledge & Informat Sci, Esfahan, Iran;  [Pourhossein, Razieh] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Dept Knowledge & Informat Sci, Tehran, Iran",28.0,6.0,SPRINGER,1053-8801,,2017.0,33,4,433.0,444,10.1007/s12109-017-9547-y,WOS:000399871500001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
772,WOS,Neither digital or open. Just researchers: Views on digital/open scholarship practices in an Italian university,0,"How do university researchers consider attributes such as 'digital' and 'open' as regards to their research practices? This article reports a small-scale interview project carried out at the University of Milan, aiming to probe whether and to what extent actual digital research practices are affecting cultures of sharing in different subject areas and are prompting emergent approaches such as open publishing, open data, open education and open boundary between academia and society. Most of the 14 interviewed researchers seem not to see any clear benefit to move to further technological means or new open practices and call for institutional support and rules. However, a few profiles of 'digital, networked and open' researchers stand out and show both a self-legitimating approach to new modes of knowledge production and distribution and a particular sensitiveness towards values and perspectives driven by 'openness' in digital networks.","['openaccess', 'opendata', 'openmethod', 'openeducation']",['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['ITA'],Esposito A.,First Monday,English,Article,0,0,0,,,21.0,First Monday,13960466,0,2013.0,18,1,0.0,0,10.5210/fm.v18i1.3881,WOS:000400688000003,,2021-01-27,0,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
782,WOS,Open for business: Open access journals in commercial databases,Commercial databases;  Journals;  Open Access;  Publishing,"In this investigation the availability of Open Access journals in three commercial databases commonly licensed by libraries, as verified by reference to the Directory of Open Access Journals title list, ranged from 10.91% to 29.18%. A more in-depth analysis of sample Open Access titles available through these databases revealed that the databases varied from 0% to 96.72% in regards to clearly identifying Open Access content and between 83.33% and 96.72% in enabling full access to these sample titles. The inclusion of Open Access content also increased overall title counts in these commercial databases between 6.24% and 10.40%, raising the question of whether some databases include Open Access content to increase title counts and justify higher subscription fees. © 2017 Zebulin Evelhoch, Sean Lind, and Martin Bagaya.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Evelhoch Z., Lind S., Bagaya M.",Serials Librarian,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,Routledge,0361526X,0,2017.0,73,2,107.0,118,10.1080/0361526X.2017.1333072,WOS:000403451700007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
783,WOS,"Local contents and the development of open access institutional repositories in Nigeria University libraries Challenges, strategies and scholarly implications",Local contents; Institutional repositories; Scholarly communication; Nigeria; University libraries; Open access; Nigeria; Collections management; University libraries,"Purpose - This study seeks to examine the management of local content materials for open access institutional repositories in Nigeria. Design/methodology/approach - A survey research design was adopted for this study. A total of 85 librarians from seven government funded universities in South East Nigeria were used for the study. Findings - From the findings 15 local content materials were identified as relevant for publication in institutional repositories. Similarly a major method of acquiring these local contents is by encouraging staff to deposit their publications in the university libraries. It was also found out that providing a subject index to the local contents and their digitization were effective methods of organizing the materials for the institutional repository. The findings also showed that an increase in the visibility of the authors, promotion of university ranking and efficient dissemination of research findings were among the benefits of publishing in institutional repositories. The problems and strategies of publishing in institutional repositories were also identified through the findings. Practical implications - This study will serve as a useful guide for university administrators and librarians who are interested in developing their institutional repositories using local contents available to them. It will also be of great value to project managers who are engaged in the digitization of their local contents. Social implications - Research works generated in Nigeria and other developing countries are poorly disseminated and therefore lack global visibility. The publication of these research findings in institutional repositories of individual universities will not only improve the visibility and utilization of the research but will also increase the global ranking of the universities and researchers who have published the works in the repository. Originality/value - This paper is on the use of local content information resources in building institutional repositories in Nigerian university libraries. These studies will be useful for university libraries, particularly in developing countries, that intend to build their institutional repositories.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['NGA'],"Ezema, Ifeanyi J.",LIBRARY HI TECH,English,Article,,,,"Univ Nigeria, Nnamdi Azikiwe Lib, Nsukka, Nigeria",26.0,15.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0737-8831,,2013.0,31,2,323.0,340,10.1108/07378831311329086,WOS:000404125300002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
784,WOS,Open Access Institutional Repositories in Nigeria Academic Libraries: Advocacy and Issues in Scholarly Communication,institutional repository; open access; academic libraries; library advocacy; scholarly communication; Nigeria,"This study was conducted to examine advocacy issues in open access institutional repositories in Nigeria. A descriptive survey research design was adopted to study 150 librarians from six government-funded academic institutions in South East Nigeria. The article identified 12 local content materials as relevant for publication in institutional repositories. It was found that advocacy is very critical in attracting funds and creation of awareness for institutional repositories in Nigeria. Major advocacy strategies are the use of institutions Websites, face-to-face interaction with target groups, seminars, and workshops. The study identified the National Universities Commission, Federal Ministry of Education, and institutional administration as major targets of the advocacy. Library associations, librarians, and management of the institutions are identified as very important groups to spearhead advocacy programs. The problems associated with institutional repositories advocacy were also identified. This study will serve as a useful guide on advocacy issues for institutional administrators and librarians who are interested in developing their institutional repositories using local content available to them. The originality lies in the ability of the article to survey professional librarians who gave their opinions on the questions raised which were used to generate data that addressed the objectives of the study.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['NGA'],"Ezema, Ifeanyi J.; Okafor, Victoria N.",LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES,English,Article,,,,"[Ezema, Ifeanyi J.] Univ South Africa, Dept Informat Sci, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa; [Ezema, Ifeanyi J.; Okafor, Victoria N.] Univ Nigeria, Nnamdi Azikiwe Lib, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria",40.0,7.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",1464-9055,,2015.0,39,3-4,45.0,58,10.1080/14649055.2016.1176842,WOS:000404291000004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
785,WOS,Open Access Publishing in Africa: Advancing Research Outputs to Global Visibility,Open Access; Institutional Repository; Scholarly Communication; Research Productivity; Research Visibility; Africa,"The purpose of the study was to examine the status of Africa in the open access environment as well as the challenges of providing global visibility to African research outputs. A descriptive bibliometric approach was adopted for the study. Data was extracted from two world repository directories (Registry of Open Access Repositories - ROAR and Directory of Open Access Repositories - DOAR) and Directory of Open Access Journals DOAJ to determine the presence of Africa and size of repositories and records found in the directories. Findings reveal that only 20 African countries have presence in ROAR and DOAJ, but 22 countries have presence in DOAR. South Africa has more repositories in ROAR and DOAR while Egypt has over 70% of African contributions to DOAJ. The subject coverage of the repositories indicates that there are more publications in the sciences than there are in the social sciences and humanities; the preferred languages of publication in the directories are English, German and French. Though there is slow adoption of publishing in open access journals in Africa, there has been an increase in the number of open access journal articles from 2,019 in 2005 to 24,997 in 2014. The paper calls on African governments, researchers and librarians to deploy sustainable mechanisms to increase global visibility of African research findings using open access platforms.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['AF'],"Ezema, Ifeanyi J.; Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire",AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ARCHIVES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Ezema, Ifeanyi J.; Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire] Univ South Africa, Dept Informat Sci, Pretoria, South Africa",53.0,3.0,ARCHLIB & INFORMATION SERVICES LTD,0795-4778,,2017.0,27,2,97.0,115,,WOS:000404291000005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
795,WOS,Open scholarship ranking of Chinese research universities,Open scholarship; University ranking; Open access; Open education; Social scholarship; Digital scholarship,"Universities and the members of their faculties, by means of open access, open education, and social media engagement, contribute to many publicly accessible resources of academic values, i.e., open scholarship. To encourage universities to contribute even more to open scholarship, in a more focused and sustainable way, the methodology of Open Scholarship Ranking (OSR) was constructed after a thorough examination and several adjustments based on the Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions (hereinafter referred to as the Berlin Principles). The OSR has met most of the Berlin Principles, and new adjustments helped to improve its quality. A significant correlation has been observed between the OSR results of Chinese research universities and the results from existing comprehensive university rankings. The OSR provides an evaluation framework for universities' performance in open scholarship, and can be regarded as an acceptable way of ranking universities.",['openevaluation'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['CHN'],"Fan, Wenqiang; Liu, Qinghui",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Fan, Wenqiang; Liu, Qinghui] Beihang Univ, Inst Higher Educ, 37 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China",63.0,1.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2016.0,108,2,673.0,691,10.1007/s11192-016-1983-5,WOS:000404844700013,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
798,WOS,Accessgrey: Securing open access to grey literature for science and society,,"Persistent identifiers such as a DOI1 for a publication and an ORCiD2 for an author/researcher can be approached from both the demand-side as well as supply-side of information. It appears however that the former attracts more attention. Here emphasis lies in the access to and preservation of research output. Yet, it is on the supply-side regarding the acquisition of research output that persistent identifiers may by the same token have influence in identifying and populating prospective data archives and repositories. This study will look at the influence persistent identifiers have in securing the acquisition of grey literature for public access. The goal of this project is twofold. First, to carry out a survey within the grey literature community as to the opinions, uses, and applications of persistent identifiers. And second, to initiate a project geared to populate a new collection housed in the GreyGuide Repository3 by using the DOI as an incentive. Resources in Grey Literature (RGL) is as a generic, multidisciplinary collection that will serve for this purpose. Using GreyNet’s distribution channels and social media, stakeholders in the field of grey literature are invited to enter one or more of their publications in the RGL collection. Each new entry will receive a DOI minted by GreyNet International and further stored and preserved in the DataCite registry4. Also, a system generated citation will be added to each new entry in order to facilitate record use. The types of grey literature documents eligible for entry in the RGL collection are numerous5. Brief guidelines for record entry require that it be self-archived using the existing online-template and that both the metadata record and accompanying full-text document(s) are in English. An additional descriptive field does allow for entry in another language. And, a translation of the document can also be uploaded in the repository. Finally, it is understood that by submitting the metadata record and file(s), they become open access compliant under Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA6. The initial phase of the project commenced in April 2019 and closed in October 2019. Records harvested during this period along with the results of the survey will be analyzed in its second phase. In the final phase, the project’s outcome will be published. Results should indicate whether the AccessGrey Project be extended to other collections in the GreyGuide, and if this project would be of value to other communities of practice in the field of grey literature. © 2020, GreyNet. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Farace D., Frantzen J., Biagioni S., Carlesi C., De Robbio A., Češarek A., de Blaaij C., Ikeda K., Crowe J.",Grey Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,GreyNet,15741796,0,2020.0,16,3,153.0,159,https://doi.org/10.26069/greynet-2020-000.219-gg,WOS:000405275500014,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
803,WOS,A reputation economy: how individual reward considerations trump systemic arguments for open access to data,,"Open access to research data has been described as a driver of innovation and a potential cure for the reproducibility crisis in many academic fields. Against this backdrop, policy makers are increasingly advocating for making research data and supporting material openly available online. Despite its potential to further scientific progress, widespread data sharing in small science is still an ideal practised in moderation. In this article, we explore the question of what drives open access to research data using a survey among 1564 mainly German researchers across all disciplines. We show that, regardless of their disciplinary background, researchers recognize the benefits of open access to research data for both their own research and scientific progress as a whole. Nonetheless, most researchers share their data only selectively. We show that individual reward considerations conflict with widespread data sharing. Based on our results, we present policy implications that are in line with both individual reward considerations and scientific progress.",['opendata'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['DEU'],"Fecher, Benedikt; Friesike, Sascha; Hebing, Marcel; Linek, Stephanie",PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Fecher, Benedikt] German Inst Econ Res DIW Berlin, Dept Res Infrastruct, Berlin, Germany; [Fecher, Benedikt; Friesike, Sascha; Hebing, Marcel] Alexander von Humboldt Inst Internet & Soc, Dept Knowledge Dimens, Berlin, Germany; [Friesike, Sascha] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, KIN Res Grp, Amsterdam, Netherlands; [Hebing, Marcel] German Inst Econ Res DIW Berlin, German Socioecon Panel Study, Berlin, Germany; [Linek, Stephanie] German Natl Lib Econ ZBW, Dept Sci 2 0, Kiel, Germany",58.0,7.0,PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD,2055-1045,,2017.0,3,,,,10.1057/palcomms.2017.51,WOS:000406886800004,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
813,WOS,OScH in the Wild: Dissemination of Open Science Hardware and Implications for HCI,diy; maker movement; open science hardware,"Open Science Hardware (OScH) refers to open-source alternatives for proprietary scientific equipment. While the OScH movement aims to reduce barriers for scientific experimentation both in and beyond professional labs, disseminating OScH for widespread adoption proves to be challenging in practice. To this end, we examined real-world practices related to the dissemination of OScH through a two-part study. First, we developed an open science hardware, a DIY incubator, and disseminated it through the Instructables website and maker workshops. In parallel, we interviewed eight open science hardware practitioners from different parts of the world. Insights from interviews together with our own self-reflections revealed how different OScH dissemination modalities serve unique purposes. Our findings also reveal several challenges for widespread adoption of OScH and the importance of collaborations between OScH developers. We conclude by discussing the opportunities for HCI to lower barriers for customization, support internationalization of OScH, and scaffold proactive distributed collaborations between developers and users. © 2020 ACM.",['opentools'],"['othermeth', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']","['AF', 'SA', 'USA', 'EU', 'AS']","Fernando P., Kuznetsov S.",Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings,English,Conference Paper,"2020 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2020",25 April 2020 through 30 April 2020,0,,,0.0,Association for Computing Machinery,0,9781450367080,2020.0,0,0,0.0,0,10.1145/3313831.3376659,WOS:000407839000004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0
816,WOS,Open Access repositories: a new model of scientific communication,Open Access; Scientific Communication; Visibility; Impact; Repositories; Repository Gredos; Presentations; Training sessions,"Introduction and objective: Technological development facilitates the communication of scientific knowledge, allowing expand distribution channels and significantly reducing transmission costs of the investigation. There are new paradigms of scientific communication such as open access repositories that must be exploited to provide academic and research free content, so that the scientific production is globally accessible to society. The aim of this study is to report the benefits of scientific communication model through open access repositories, using as an example the Revista de la Sociedad Otorrinolaringológica Castilla y León, Cantabria y La Rioja deposited and disseminated through Gredos, the Institutional Repository of the University of Salamanca. Method: We present the fundamentals, the state of the art, trends and benefits of open access, understood as a radical change in the system of scientific communication. They are defined and analyzed repositories, which are the ""green road"" to get open access to knowledge. Results: Open Access Repositories are a new way to spread scientific journals so that papers published in them achieve maximum exposure and visibility, increasing the rate of citation. Discussion: The study focuses on the repositories and on the deposit of scientific articles in repositories, specifically in the case of Gredos institutional repository of the University of Salamanca, to explain the advantages of the dissemination of the contents of the Revista de la Societdad Otorrinolaringológica Castilla y León, Cantabria y La Rioja through the repository Gredos, emphasizing the increased visibility of the scientific content hosted in the repository Gredos.Conclusions: Currently the movement for open access is sufficiently consolidated as evidenced by the data presented in this paper. Repositories are a key element in the development of this movement, offering multiple benefits to authors, institutions and the general public. The Journal of the Sociedad Otorrinolaringológica de Castilla y León, Cantabria and La Rioja diffused through the repository of Gredos will increase the content visibility and the rate of citation, while contributing to the public good.","['opentools', 'openaccess']",['documentreview'],['med'],"['librarian', 'researcher']",['ESP'],"Ferreras-Fernandez, Transito",REVISTA DE LA SOCIEDAD OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA DE CASTILLA Y LEON CANTABRIA Y LA RIOJA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Ferreras-Fernandez, Transito] Univ Salamanca, Serv Bibliotecas, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain",1.0,0.0,SOC CASTILE & LEON CANTABRIA & RIOJA,2341-1503,,2015.0,6,,33.0,65,,WOS:000407885400006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
833,WOS,Implementing open licensing in government open data initiatives: A review of Australian government practice,Copyright; Creative commons; Entrepreneur; Information management; Information policy; Intellectual property; Lawful re-mix; Machine-readable; Open access; Open data; Open format; Open government; Open licence; Pro-active publishing; Public sector information; Value-adding,"As support grows for greater access to information and data held by governments, so does awareness of the need for appropriate policy, technical and legal frameworks to achieve the desired economic and societal outcomes. Since the late 2000s numerous international organizations, inter-governmental bodies and governments have issued open government data policies, which set out key principles underpinning access to, and the release and reuse of data. These policies reiterate the value of government data and establish the default position that it should be openly accessible to the public under transparent and non-discriminatory conditions, which are conducive to innovative reuse of the data. A key principle stated in open government data policies is that legal rights in government information must be exercised in a manner that is consistent with and supports the open accessibility and reusability of the data. In particular, where government information and data is protected by copyright, access should be provided under licensing terms which clearly permit its reuse and dissemination. This principle has been further developed in the policies issued by Australian Governments into a specific requirement that Government agencies are to apply the Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY) as the default licensing position when releasing government information and data. A wide-ranging survey of the practices of Australian Government agencies in managing their information and data, commissioned by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner in 2012, provides valuable insights into progress towards the achievement of open government policy objectives and the adoption of open licensing practices. The survey results indicate that Australian Government agencies are embracing open access and a proactive disclosure culture and that open licensing under Creative Commons licences is increasingly prevalent. However, the finding that ""[t]he default position of open access licensing is not clearly or robustly stated, nor properly reflected in the practice of Government agencies? points to the need to further develop the policy framework and the principles governing information access and reuse, and to provide practical guidance tools on open licensing if the broadest range of government information and data is to be made available for innovative reuse. Categories and Subject Descriptors K.4.1 [Computers and Society]: Public Policy Issues - intellectual proper rights, regulation; K.4.3 [Computers and Society]: Organizational Impacts - computer-supported collaborative work; K.5.0 [Legal Aspects of Computing]: General; K.5.1 [Legal Aspects of Computing]: Hardware/Software protection - copyrights, licensing, proprietary rights; K.5.2 [Legal Aspects of Computing]: Governmental Issues - regulation. General Terms Public Policy, Culture Change, Information Management, Governance, Co-ordination, Implementation, Performance, Measurement, Economics, Licensing, Technology, Standardization, Legal Aspects, Entrepreneurs, Innovation, Open Government. Copyright 2010 ACM.",['opendata'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['policy'],['AUS'],"Fitzgerald A., Hooper N., Cook J.S.","Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, WikiSym + OpenSym 2013",English,Conference Paper,"9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, WikiSym + OpenSym 2013",5 August 2013 through 7 August 2013,Hong Kong,,,6.0,0,0,9781450318525,2013.0,0,0,0.0,0,10.1145/2491055.2491094,WOS:000409827300008,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
848,WOS,Barriers to Open Access uptake for researchers in Africa,African research visibility; Barriers to Open Access; Preservation of indigenous knowledge; Publishing funding mechanisms,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the extent of visibility of researchers in African countries, in the Open Access (OA) arena and aims to identify main causes of reduced uptake in OA in Africa. Design/methodology/approach - Extent of visibility is explored by quantitative analysis of institutional repository and OA journals data sets followed by qualitative analysis of OA foundation documents and literature on OA in Africa published mainly between 2003 and 2013. Findings - Visibility in institutional repositories or OA journals for African researchers remains low. Causes include insufficient educational support for librarians and administrators in required new roles; inability of national, organisational and technological infrastructures to support OA; impracticality of western-based and costly publishing models; and disincentives relating to intellectual property and researcher perceptions. Complex language and literacy issues also inhibit engagement. Recommendations include strong OA advocacy, development of support initiatives, integration of international knowledge for local conditions and vice versa, sensitive preservation of indigenous knowledge and development of mechanisms of funding and research assessment mechanisms, which are economically and technically viable. Originality/value - Earlier attempts were made to raise awareness about the lack of uptake of OA in Africa. This paper shows that the situation has hardly changed and now requires urgent attention. Otherwise OA will not become the default method for distributing new peer-reviewed research in every field and country by 2022 (BOAI, 2012).",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['AF'],"Fox, Moya; Hanlon, Susannah Micaela",ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Fox, Moya] Univ Dundee, Lib & Learning Ctr, Dundee, Scotland; [Hanlon, Susannah Micaela] Northumbria Univ, Dept Math & Informat Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, Tyne & Wear, England",63.0,9.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1468-4527,,2015.0,39,5,698.0,716,10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0147,WOS:000412492800001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
854,WOS,Self-archiving of biomedical papers in open access repositories,Biomedical journals; Open access; Repositories; Self-archiving,"Introduction and development. Open-access literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. Self-archiving or deposit of scholarly outputs in institutional repositories (open-access green route) is increasingly present in the activities of the scientific community. Besides the benefits of open access for visibility and dissemination of science, it is increasingly more often required by funding agencies to deposit papers and any other type of documents in repositories. In the biomedical environment this is even more relevant by the impact scientific literature can have on public health. However, to make self-archiving feasible, authors should be aware of its meaning and the terms in which they are allow to archive their works. In that sense, there are some tools like Sherpa/RoMEO or DULCINEA (both directories of copyright licences of scientific journals at different levels) to find out what rights are retained by authors when they publish a paper and if they allow to implement self-archiving. Pub Med Central and its British and Canadian counterparts are the main thematic repositories for biomedical fields. In our country there is none of similar nature, but most of the universities and CSIC, have already created their own institutional repositories. Conclusion. The increase in visibility of research results and their impact on a greater and earlier citation is one of the most frequently advance of open access, but removal of economic barriers to access to information is also a benefit to break borders between groups.","['openaccess', 'opentools']",['documentreview'],['med'],['othergroup'],['ESP'],"Francisca Abad-Garcia, M.; Melero, Remedios; Abadal, Ernest; Gonzalez-Teruel, Aurora",REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Francisca Abad-Garcia, M.; Gonzalez-Teruel, Aurora] Univ Valencia, Fac Med, Dept Hist Ciencia & Documentac, E-46010 Valencia, Spain; [Melero, Remedios] CSIC, Inst Agroquim & Tecnol Alimentos, E-46010 Valencia, Spain; [Abadal, Ernest] Univ Barcelona, Dept Bibliotecon & Documentac, Barcelona, Spain",49.0,1.0,REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA,0210-0010,,2010.0,50,7,431.0,440,10.33588/rn.5007.2009628,WOS:000413605500006,20387213.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
857,WOS,Attracted to open access journals: A bibliometric author analysis in the field of biology,Developing countries; Publications; Research,"Purpose - Scholars from developing countries have limited access to research publications due to expensive subscription costs. However, the open access movement is challenging the constraint to access. Consequently, researchers in developing countries are often mentioned as major recipients of the benefits when advocating open access (OA). One of the implications of that argument is that authors from developing countries are more likely to perceive open access positively than authors from developed countries. The present study aims to investigate the use of open access by researchers from developing countries and is thus a supplement to the existing author surveys and interviews. Design/methodology/approach - Bibliometric analyses of both publishing behaviour and citing behaviour in relation to OA publishing provides evidence of the impact of open access on developing countries. Findings - The results of the multivariate linear regression show that open access journals are not characterised by a different composition of authors from the traditional toll access journals. Furthermore, the results show that authors from developing countries do not cite open access more than authors from developed countries. Originality/value - The paper argues that authors from developing countries are not attracted to open access more than authors from developed countries. © 2009 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],Frandsen T.F.,Journal of Documentation,English,Article,0,0,0,,,21.0,0,220418,0,2009.0,65,1,58.0,82,10.1108/00220410910926121,WOS:000413615500062,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
858,WOS,The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system: Three science fields,Open access journals; Bibliometrics; Field differences,"The greatest number of open access journals (OAJs) is found in the sciences and their influence is growing. However, there are only a few studies on the acceptance and thereby integration of these OAJs in the scholarly communication system. Even fewer studies provide insight into the differences across disciplines. This study is an analysis of the citing behaviour in journals within three science fields: biology, mathematics, and pharmacy and pharmacology. It is a statistical analysis of OAJs as well as non-OAJs including both the citing and cited side of the journal to journal citations. The multivariate linear regression reveals many similarities in citing behaviour across fields and media. But it also points to great differences in the integration of OAJs. The integration of OAJs in the scholarly communication system varies considerably across fields. The implications for bibliometric research are discussed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Frandsen, Tove Faber",INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT,English,Article,,,,"Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark",36.0,20.0,ELSEVIER SCI LTD,0306-4573,,2009.0,45,1,131.0,141,10.1016/j.ipm.2008.06.001,WOS:000413694400003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
859,WOS,The effects of open access on un-published documents: A case study of economics working papers,Open access advantage;  Working papers;  Economics;  Citation analysis;  Grey literature,"The use of scholarly publications that have not been formally published in e.g. journals is widespread in some fields. In the past they have been disseminated through various channels of informal communication. However, the Internet has enabled dissemination of these un-published and often unrefereed publications to a much wider audience. This is particularly interesting seen in relation to the highly disputed open access advantage as the potential advantage for low visibility publications has not been given much attention in the literature. The present study examines the role of working papers in economics during a 10-year period (1996-2005). It shows that working papers are increasingly becoming visible in the field specific databases. The impact of working papers is relatively low;  however, high impact working paper series have citation rate levels similar to the low impact journals in the field. There is no tendency to an increase in impact during the 10 years which is the case for the high impact journals. Consequently, the result of this study does not provide evidence of an open access advantage for working papers in economics. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Frandsen, Tove Faber",JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark",64.0,13.0,ELSEVIER,1751-1577,,2009.0,3,2,124.0,133,10.1016/j.joi.2008.12.002,WOS:000413737900001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
864,WOS,Few Open Access Journals Are Compliant with Plan S,Plan S;  open access journals;  article processing charges (APC);  technical requirements;  publisher size;  Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ),"Much of the debate on Plan S seems to concentrate on how to make toll-access journals open access, taking for granted that existing open access journals are Plan S-compliant. We suspected this was not so and set out to explore this using Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) metadata. We conclude that a large majority of open access journals are not Plan S-compliant, and that it is small publishers in the humanities and social sciences (HSS) not charging article processing charges (APC) that will face the largest challenge with becoming compliant. Plan S needs to give special considerations to smaller publishers and/or non-APC based journals.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Frantsvag, Jan Erik;  Stromme, Tormod Eismann",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Frantsvag, Jan Erik] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Univ Lib Tromso, NO-9037 Tromso, Norway;  [Stromme, Tormod Eismann] Univ Bergen, Univ Bergen Lib, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway",24.0,5.0,MDPI,2304-6775,,2019.0,7,2,,,10.3390/publications7020026,WOS:000414497000001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
870,WOS,Authors attain comparable or slightly higher rates of citation publishing in an open access journal (CytoJournal) compared to traditional cytopathology journals - A five year (2007-2011) experience,Citations;  impact;  open access;  publication,"Background: The era of Open Access (OA) publication, a platform which serves to better disseminate scientific knowledge, is upon us, as more OA journals are in existence than ever before. The idea that peer-reviewed OA publication leads to higher rates of citation has been put forth and shown to be true in several publications. This is a significant benefit to authors and is in addition to another relatively less obvious but highly critical component of the OA charter, i.e. retention of the copyright by the authors in the public domain. In this study, we analyzed the citation rates of OA and traditional non-OA publications specifically for authors in the field of cytopathology. Design: We compared the citation patterns for authors who had published in both OA and traditional non-OA peer-reviewed, scientific, cytopathology journals. Citations in an OA publication (CytoJournal) were analyzed comparatively with traditional non-OA cytopathology journals (Acta Cytologica, Cancer Cytopathology, Cytopathology, and Diagnostic Cytopathology) using the data from web of science citation analysis site (based on which the impact factors (IF) are calculated). After comparing citations per publication, as well as a time adjusted citation quotient (which takes into account the time since publication), we also analyzed the statistics after excluding the data for meeting abstracts. Results: Total 28 authors published 314 publications as articles and meeting abstracts (25 authors after excluding the abstracts). The rate of citation and time adjusted citation quotient were higher for OA in the group where abstracts were included (P < 0.05 for both). The rates were also slightly higher for OA than non-OA when the meeting abstracts were excluded, but the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.57 and P = 0.45). Conclusion : We observed that for the same author, the publications in the OA journal attained a higher rate of citation than the publications in the traditional non-OA journals in the field of cytopathology over a 5 year period (2007-2011). However, this increase was statistically insignificant if the meeting abstracts were excluded from the analysis. Overall, the rates of citation for OA and non-OA were slightly higher to comparable.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Frisch, Nora K.;  Nathan, Romil;  Ahmed, Yasin K.;  Shidham, Vinod B.",CYTOJOURNAL,English,Article,,,,"[Frisch, Nora K.] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Karmanos Canc Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA;  Old Hutzel Hosp, Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA",323.0,10.0,WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS,0974-5963,,2014.0,11,,,,10.4103/1742-6413.131739,WOS:000416105200004,24987441.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
873,WOS,Open science in e-science: contingency or policy?,Communications;  Research methods,"Purpose - This paper seeks to discuss the question of openness in e-Science. Design/methodology/approach - The study is based on 12 in-depth interviews with principal investigators, project managers and developers involved in UK e-Science projects, together with supporting documentary evidence from project web sites. The approach was to explore the juxtaposition of research governance at the institutional level and local research practices at the project level. Interview questions focused on research inputs, software development processes, access to resources, project documentation, dissemination of outputs and by-products, licensing issues, and institutional contracts. Findings - The findings suggest that, although there is a widely shared ethos of openness in everyday research practice, there are many uncertainties and yet-to-be resolved issues, despite strong policy imperatives towards openly shared resources. Research limitations/implications - The paper concludes by observing a stratification of openness in practice and the need for more nuanced understanding of openness at the level of policy making. This research was based on interviews within a limited number of e-Science/Social Science projects and the intention is to address this in future work by scaling the study up to a survey that will reach the entire UK e-Science/Social Science community. Practical implications - The fundamental challenge in resolving openness in practice and policy, land thereby moving towards a sustainable infrastructure for e-Science, is the coordination and integration of goals across e-Science efforts, rather than one of resolving IPR (Intellectual Property Rights) issues, which has been the central focus of openness debates thus far. Originality/value-The question of openness has previously been posed on the macro-level of research policy, e.g. whether science as a whole can be characterized as open science, or in relation to the dissemination of published outputs, e.g. Open Access. Instead, a fine-grained perspective is taken focusing on individual research projects and the various facets of openness in practice.","['openaccess', 'opendata', 'openmethod', 'openpolicies', 'opensoftware']",['interview'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Fry, Jenny;  Schroeder, Ralph;  den Besten, Matthijs",JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION,English,Article,,,,"[Fry, Jenny] Univ Loughborough, Dept Informat Sci, Loughborough, Leics, England;  [Schroeder, Ralph] Univ Oxford, Oxford Internet Inst, Oxford, England;  [den Besten, Matthijs] Univ Oxford, Oxford e Res Ctr, Oxford, England",38.0,11.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,0022-0418,,2009.0,65,1,6.0,32,10.1108/00220410910926103,WOS:000416692700005,,2021-01-27,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
874,WOS,Towards an Understanding of the Relationship Between Disciplinary Research Cultures and Open Access Repository Behaviors,,"This article explores the cultural characteristics of three open access (OA)-friendly disciplines (physics, economics, and clinical medicine) and the ways in which those characteristics influence perceptions, motivations, and behaviors toward green OA. The empirical data are taken from two online surveys of European authors. Taking a domain analytic approach, the analysis draws on Becher and Trowler's (2001) and Whitley's (2000) theories to gain a deeper understanding of why OA repositories (OAR) play a particularly important role in the chosen disciplines. The surveys provided a unique opportunity to compare perceptions, motivations, and behaviors of researchers at the discipline level with the parent metadiscipline. It should be noted that participants were not drawn from a stratified sample of all the different subdisciplines that constitute each discipline, and therefore the generalizability of the findings to the discipline may be limited. The differential role of informal and formal communication in each of the three disciplines has shaped green OA practices. For physicists and economists, preprints are an essential feature of their respective OAR landscapes, whereas for clinical medics final published articles have a central role. In comparing the disciplines with their parent metadisciplines there were some notable similarities/differences, which have methodological implications for studying research cultures.",['openaccess'],['survey'],"['natscie', 'med', 'socscie']",['researcher'],['EU'],"Fry, Jenny; Spezi, Valerie; Probets, Stephen; Creaser, Claire",JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Fry, Jenny] Univ Loughborough, Sch Arts English & Drama, Epinal Way, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England; [Spezi, Valerie; Creaser, Claire] Univ Loughborough, Ctr Informat Management, Sch Business & Econ, Epinal Way, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England; [Probets, Stephen] Univ Loughborough, Dept Comp Sci, Epinal Way, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England",41.0,10.0,WILEY,2330-1635,,2016.0,67,11,2710.0,2724,10.1002/asi.23621,WOS:000416779300039,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
882,WOS,RoMEO studies 2: how academics want to protect their open-access research papers,scholarly publications;  authors;  self-archiving;  electronic publishing;  copyright;  open archives initiative,"This paper is the second in a series of studies (see E. Gadd, C. Oppenheim and S. Probets. RoMEO studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on author-self-archiving, Journal of Documentation 59(3) (2003) 243-277) emanating from the UK JISC-funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open-archiving). It considers the protection for research papers afforded by UK copyright law, and by e-journal licences. It compares this with the protection required by academic authors for open-access research papers as discovered by the RoMEO academic author survey. The survey used the Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL) as a framework for collecting views from 542 academics as to the permissions, restrictions and conditions they wanted to assert over their works. Responses from self-archivers and non-archivers are compared. The paper concludes that most academic authors are primarily interested in preserving their moral rights, and that the protection offered research papers by copyright law is way in excess of that required by most academics. It also raises concerns about the level of protection enforced by e-journal licence agreements.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Gadd, E;  Oppenheim, C;  Probets, S",JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"Loughborough Univ Technol, Dept Informat Sci, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England",21.0,19.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0165-5515,,2003.0,29,5,333.0,356,10.1177/01655515030295002,WOS:000418097700003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
883,WOS,RoMEO Studies 3: how academics expect to use open-access research papers,,"This paper is the third in a series of studies emanating from the UK JISC-funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open-archiving). It considers previous studies of the usage of electronic journal articles through a literature survey. It then reports on the results of a survey of 542 academic authors as to how they expected to use open-access research papers. This data is compared with results from the second of the RoMEO Studies series as to how academics wished to protect their open-access research papers. The ways in which academics expect to use open-access works (including activities, restrictions and conditions) are described. It concludes that academics-as-users do not expect to perform all the activities with open-access research papers that academics-as-authors would allow. Thus the rights metadata proposed by the RoMEO Project would appear to meet the usage requirements of most academics.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Gadd, E;  Oppenheim, C;  Probets, S",JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"Univ Loughborough, Dept Informat Sci, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England",34.0,15.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0961-0006,,2003.0,35,3,171.0,187,10.1177/0961000603353005,WOS:000418210300010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
884,WOS,UK university policy approaches towards the copyright ownership of scholarly works and the future of open access,Open access; Scholarly communication; Copyright; Licensing; Intellectual property; Self-archiving,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to consider how the open access policy environment has developed since the Rights Metadata for Open Archiving Project's call in 2003 for universities and academics to assert joint copyright ownership of scholarly works and investigate whether UK universities are moving towards a joint copyright ownership. Design/methodology/approach - The paper analyses 81 UK university copyright policies to understand what proportion make a claim over: IP ownership of all outputs; the copyright in scholarly works; re-using scholarly works in specific ways; and approaches to moral rights. Results are cross-tabulated by policy age and mission group. Findings - Universities have not asserted their interest in scholarly works through joint ownership, leaving research funders and publishers to set open access policy. The paper finds an increased proportion of universities assert a generic claim to all IP (87 per cent) relative to earlier studies. In total, 74 per cent of policies relinquished rights in scholarly works in favour of academic staff; 20 per cent of policies share ownership of scholarly works through licensing; 28 per cent of policies assert the right to re-use scholarly works in some way; and 32 per cent of policies seek to protect moral rights. Policies that share ownership of scholarly works are more recent. The UK Scholarly Communication Licence (UK-SCL) should have an impact on this area. The reliance on individual academics to enforce a copyright policy or not to opt-out of the UK-SCL could be problematic. The paper concludes that open access may still be best served by joint ownership of scholarly works. Originality/value - This the first large-scale analysis of UK university policy positions towards scholarly works. The paper discovers for the first time a move towards shared ownership of scholarly works in copyright policies.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['GBR'],"Gadd, Elizabeth",ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Gadd, Elizabeth] Univ Loughborough, Res Off, Loughborough, Leics, England",55.0,5.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2050-3806,,2017.0,69,1,95.0,114,10.1108/AJIM-06-2016-0092,WOS:000418440100007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
885,WOS,What does 'green' open access mean? Tracking twelve years of changes to journal publisher self-archiving policies,Embargo periods;  green open access;  institutional repository;  publisher policies;  self-archiving,"Traces the 12-year self-archiving policy journey of the original 107 publishers listed on the SHERPA/RoMEO Publisher Policy Database in 2004, through to 2015. Maps the RoMEO colour codes ('green', 'blue', 'yellow' and 'white') and related restrictions and conditions over time. Finds that while the volume of publishers allowing some form of self-archiving (pre-print, post-print or both) has increased by 12% over the 12 years, the volume of restrictions around how, where and when self-archiving may take place has increased 119%, 190% and 1000% respectively. A significant positive correlation was found between the increase in self-archiving restrictions and the introduction of Gold paid open access options. Suggests that by conveying only the version of a paper that authors may self-archive, the RoMEO colour codes do not address all the key elements of the Bethesda Definition of Open Access. Compares the number of RoMEO 'green' publishers over time with those meeting the definition for 'redefined green' (allowing embargo-free deposit of the post-print in an institutional repository). Finds that RoMEO 'green' increased by 8% and 'redefined green' decreased by 35% over the 12 years. Concludes that the RoMEO colour codes no longer convey a commitment to green open access as originally intended. Calls for open access advocates, funders, institutions and authors to redefine what 'green' means to better reflect a publisher's commitment to self-archiving.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Gadd, Elizabeth;  Covey, Denise Troll",JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Gadd, Elizabeth] Loughborough Univ, Hazlerigg Bldg, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England;  [Covey, Denise Troll] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA",42.0,10.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0961-0006,,2019.0,51,1,106.0,122,10.1177/0961000616657406,WOS:000418666800004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
886,WOS,The influence of journal publisher characteristics on open access policy trends,Open access; Self-archiving; Publishers; Policies,"Examines SHERPA/RoMEO publisher open access (OA) policy information for 100 publishers over a 13 year period (2004-2016) to consider whether their size, type or country (UK or US) affected the development of their OA policy over time. A publisher's RoMEO colour code, whether they offered a Gold OA option, and the mean number of restrictions as to when, how and where papers may be self-archived, were all mapped. Kruskal-Wallis tests were run to assess whether the differences between their 2004 and 2016 positions were statistically significant. Finds that the growth of Green and Gold OA policy approaches has not been evenly distributed amongst publishers with some significant differences amongst publishers of different size, types and country (UK and US). Large commercial publishers are more likely to be allocated a RoMEO colour code, but at the same time place a high volume of restrictions as to where and how authors might self-archive. Small publishers are less likely to have a RoMEO green colour code, but the volume of restrictions they place on self-archiving are minimal. University presses appear not to be engaging with either OA agenda to any considerable degree. UK and US publishers' OA policies appear to be influenced by the national OA policy environment which, considering the global nature of the scholarly journals market, was more pronounced than might have been anticipated.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],"['GBR', 'USA']","Gadd, Elizabeth; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Gadd, Elizabeth; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire] Loughborough Univ Technol, Loughborough, Leics, England",33.0,4.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2018.0,115,3,1371.0,1393,10.1007/s11192-018-2716-8,WOS:000418772300019,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
887,WOS,The Impact of Open Access on Teaching-How Far Have We Come?,open access; education; teaching support; licensing,"This article seeks to understand how far the United Kingdom higher education (UK HE) sector has progressed towards open access (OA) availability of the scholarly literature it requires to support courses of study. It uses Google Scholar, Unpaywall and Open Access Button to identify OA copies of a random sample of articles copied under the Copyright Licensing Agency (CLA) HE Licence to support teaching. The quantitative data analysis is combined with interviews of, and a workshop with, HE practitioners to investigate four research questions. Firstly, what is the nature of the content being used to support courses of study? Secondly, do UK HE establishments regularly incorporate searches for open access availability into their acquisition processes to support teaching? Thirdly, what proportion of content used under the CLA Licence is also available on open access and appropriately licenced? Finally, what percentage of content used by UK HEIs under the CLA Licence is written by academics and thus has the potential for being made open access had there been support in place to enable this? Key findings include the fact that no interviewees incorporated OA searches into their acquisitions processes. Overall, 38% of articles required to support teaching were available as OA in some form but only 7% had a findable re-use licence; just 3% had licences that specifically permitted inclusion in an 'electronic course-pack'. Eighty-nine percent of journal content was written by academics (34% by UK-based academics). Of these, 58% were written since 2000 and thus could arguably have been made available openly had academics been supported to do so.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'biblio']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'publisher']",['GBR'],"Gadd, Elizabeth; Morrison, Chris; Secker, Jane",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Gadd, Elizabeth] Loughborough Univ, Res Off, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England; [Morrison, Chris] Univ Kent, Informat Serv, Templeman Lib, Canterbury CT2 7NU, Kent, England; [Secker, Jane] City Univ London, LEaD, Northampton Sq, London EC1A 0HB, England",35.0,0.0,MDPI,,,2019.0,7,3,,,10.3390/publications7030056,WOS:000418815400001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
893,WOS,Visibility of academic resources: a critical review of the role of institutional repositories and open access,institutional repositories; open access; visibility,"In the last decade, institutional repositories and open access have generated considerable interest within the academic community. The aim of this article is to analyze diverse concepts and functions assigned to institutional repositories over time, as well as their role in the open access movement, especially with regard to enhancing the visibility of academic materials in general. This paper consists of a critical overview of the literature on institutional repositories, with particular emphasis on repository functionality, and arrives at three definitions of the strategic the functions of repositories as assets for: in-house archiving; motors for re-conceptualizing scholarly publications; and as broader digital infrastructure. These definitions are then employed to analyze the current state of institutional repositories and suggest lines for further research.",['opentools'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Galina Russell, Isabel",INVESTIGACION BIBLIOTECOLOGICA,Spanish,Article,,,,"Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Bibliog, Mexico City, DF, Mexico",43.0,9.0,UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO,0187-358X,,2011.0,25,53,159.0,183,,WOS:000419417400002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
902,WOS,The Open Access Movement and the health sector information professionals from Ciudad de La Habana [El movimiento de acceso abierto y los profesionales de la información del sector de la salud en ciudad de La Habana],Cuba; Information professionals; The open access movement to the information,"The Open Access Movement to the Information looks for scientific literature availability without economic restrictions neither of permits. Libraries and information professionals play a fundamental part in this context, through the design and implementation of strategies that allow a transition of the communication system from the traditional science to a new system, as well as promoting the potentialities that this Movement offers for the access and dissemination of the scientific results. The present work summarizes the results of a cuanti-qualitative study carried out between January and May of the 2009, with the objective of determining the main factors that influence in the participation of the professionals of the information of the Health sector in the Open Access Movement. For this, a printed questionnaire was applied to 40 professionals of the information, distributed in 13 Municipal Centers of Information of Medical Sciences and 12 Libraries of Primary Attention in Health. Also, four focal groups were carried out with a group of these professionals as well as an interview to a professional at provincial level, in charge of the process of informational literacy in the sector of health. It was identified that these professionals are not totally familiarized yet with the principles, strategies and resources developed as part of the Movement and that it is required to continue with the institutional actions to achieve bigger participation and leadership in the transformations of the models of scientific communication.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],"['librarian', 'othergroup']",['CUB'],"García C.P., Tarragó N.S.",ACIMED,English; Spanish,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,0,10249435,0,2010.0,21,4,376.0,402,,WOS:000422820000006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
904,WOS,Geography Journals in Journal Citation Reports: economic profits versus open access,Scientific journals; geography; publisher; impact factor; Open Access; Journal Citation Reports,"Within the field of the scientific publishing sphere and high impact journals, there exist a wide variety of formulas ranging from relevant multinational publishing houses to small scholar public organisms. This paper analyzes the editorial features and pricing policies of geographical journals indexed in Journal Citation Reports, taking into account individual article costs, subscriptions and pay-per-publish fees. It is observed a contrasted duality between commercial publishers -Anglo-American commercial firms, which are hegemonic- and non-profit publishers, which are heterogeneous and represent the minority. Underlying the text is the debate about the necessity of spreading scientific knowledge openly and without restrictions, an issue that has to do with Open Access principles.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['socscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Garcia Martin, Miguel",REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Alexander, Patrick H.] Penn State Univ Press, University Pk, PA 16802 USA",2.0,0.0,UBIQUITY PRESS LTD,2048-7754,,2020.0,33,,,,10.1629/uksg.525,WOS:000209760900006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
920,WOS,Getting cited: Does open access help?,Open access;  Knowledge diffusion;  Scientific publishing;  Citations;  Self-selection,"Cross-sectional studies typically find positive correlations between free availability of scientific articles ('open access') and citations. Using a number of instruments as plausible sources of exogeneous variation, we find no evidence for a causal effect of open access on citations. We provide theory and evidence suggesting that authors of higher quality papers are more likely to choose open access in hybrid journals which offer an open access option. Self-selection mechanisms may thus explain the discrepancy between the positive correlation found in Eysenbach (2006) and other cross-sectional studies and the absence of such correlation in the field experiment of Davis et al. (2008). (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Gaule, Patrick;  Maystre, Nicolas",RESEARCH POLICY,English,Article,,,,"[Gaule, Patrick] MIT, Alfred P Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA;  [Maystre, Nicolas] UNCTAD, Geneva, Switzerland",34.0,46.0,ELSEVIER,0048-7333,,2011.0,40,10,1332.0,1338,10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.025,WOS:000425003600006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
924,WOS,How accessible is open data? Analysis of context-related information and users' comments in open datasets,Accessibility; Open data; Data literacy; Civic engagement; Open data usage; Data and context,"Purpose This paper aims to examine the nature and sufficiency of descriptive information included in open datasets and the nature of comments and questions users write in relation to specific datasets. Open datasets are provided to facilitate civic engagement and government transparency. However, making the data available does not guarantee usage. This paper examined the nature of context-related information provided together with the datasets and identified the challenges users encounter while using the resources. Design/methodology/approach The authors extracted descriptive text provided together with (often at the top of) datasets (N = 216) and the nature of questions and comments users post in relation to the dataset. They then segmented text descriptions and user comments into idea units and applied open-coding with constant comparison method. This allowed them to come up with thematic issues that descriptions focus on and the challenges users encounter. Findings Results of the analysis revealed that context-related descriptions are limited and normative. Users are expected to figure out how to use the data. Analysis of user comments/questions revealed four areas of challenge they encounter: organization and accessibility of the data, clarity and completeness, usefulness and accuracy and language (spelling and grammar). Data providers can do more to address these issues. Research limitations/implications - The purpose of the study is to understand the nature of open data provision and suggest ways of making open data more accessible to non expert users. As such, it is not focused on generalizing about open data provision in various countries as such provision may be different based on jurisdiction. Practical implications - The study provides insight about ways of organizing open dataset that the resource can be accessible by the general public. It also provides suggestions about how open data providers could consider users' perspectives including providing continuous support. Originality/value Research on open data often focuses on technological, policy and political perspectives. Arguably, this is the first study on analysis of context-related information in open-datasets. Datasets do not speak for themselves because they require context for analysis and interpretation. Understanding the nature of context-related information in open dataset is original idea.",['opendata'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],"['CAN', 'GBR', 'USA']","Gebre, Engida H.; Morales, Esteban",INFORMATION AND LEARNING SCIENCES,English,Article,,,,"[Gebre, Engida H.] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Educ, Vancouver, BC, Canada; [Morales, Esteban] Univ British Columbia, Language & Literacy Educ, Vancouver, BC, Canada",54.0,1.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2398-5348,,2020.0,121,1/2,19.0,36,10.1108/ILS-08-2019-0086,WOS:000425210200001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
929,WOS,When Paywall Goes AWOL: The Demand for Open-Access Education Research,econometric analysis;  faculty careers;  faculty development;  research utilization,"As universities cut library funding and forego expensive journal subscriptions, many academic organizations and researchers, including the American Educational Research Association (AERA), are moving toward open-access publications that are freely downloadable by anyone with a working internet connection. However, the impact of paywalls on the consumption of academic articles is unclear. We provide novel evidence on this question by exploiting a natural experiment in which six high-impact, usually gated AERA journals became open access for a 2-month period in 2017. Using monthly download data and an always-open-access journal as a comparison group, we show that making journals open access likely increased article downloads in those journals by 55% to 95% per month. Given a per-article download price of $36, this suggests a relatively elastic response: The average price elasticity of demand for downloads is 1.2, with individual journal elasticities ranging from 0.6 to 2.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Gershenson, Seth;  Polikoff, Morgan S.;  Wang, Rui",EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER,English,Article,,,,"[Gershenson, Seth;  Wang, Rui] Amer Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, 4400 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20016 USA;  [Gershenson, Seth] Inst Lab Econ IZA, Bonn, Germany;  [Polikoff, Morgan S.] Univ Southern Calif, Rossier Sch Educ, 3470 Trousdale Pkwy, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA",11.0,1.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,0013-189X,,2020.0,49,4,254.0,261,10.3102/0013189X20909834,WOS:000425630200015,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
931,WOS,Professional Information Skills and Open Data. Challenges for Citizen Empowerment and Social Change,Professional skills; social change; open data; skills; citizen empowerment; data journalism; digital communication; multimedia; civil society,"The current process of social transformation is driven by the growth of the culture of transparency and accountability, the socio-technological development of the web and the opening of public data. This situation forces the media to rethink their models of social intermediation, converting the growing open data access and user participation into new instruments that facilitate citizen empowerment. Open data can only generate citizen empowerment, facilitate decision-making and democratic action if it can provide value-added information to the citizens. Therefore, the aim of the research is to analyse the competencies necessary to develop information products created with open data. The study used a qualitative methodology based on two instruments: a survey of data journalism experts (university professors of journalism, journalism professional data, and experts in transparency), and an analysis of selected cases of information products created with open data. The results allow the identification of a series of conceptual, procedural and attitudinal skills needed to perform the tasks of collection, processing, analysis and presentation of data, which are necessary for the development of this type of information product, and which should be integrated into the training of future journalists.",['opendata'],"['survey', 'documentreview']",['socscie'],"['othergroup', 'researcher']",['ESP'],"Gertrudis-Casado, Maria-Carmen; Gertrudix-Barrio, Manuel; Alvarez-Garcia, Sergio",COMUNICAR,English,Article,,,,"[Gertrudis-Casado, Maria-Carmen] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Ciberimaginario Grp, Madrid, Spain; [Gertrudix-Barrio, Manuel] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Commun Fac, Digital Commun, Madrid, Spain; [Alvarez-Garcia, Sergio] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Commun Fac, Madrid, Spain",53.0,23.0,GRUPO COMUNICAR,1134-3478,,2016.0,24,47,39.0,47,10.3916/C47-2016-04,WOS:000425943100268,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
934,WOS,Understanding Open Data Policy: Evidence from Bulgaria,Open data in Bulgaria; OGD; data audit; open data policy,"This paper provides an overview of Bulgaria's policy on open data by using the framework of a novel Open Data stage model, showing that the country is still at the first stage of opening data. We also present a detailed overview of the data landscape of the public sector in the country and outline the first milestones and successes in its efforts to publish some of that data for reuse. A complete data audit reveals persistent technological and cultural barriers to publishing public sector information but also outlines the potential of doing so. The paper summarizes the limited knowledge about the actual benefits of open data and proposes moving beyond anecdotal evidence and usage metrics toward a more complete impact evaluation.",['opendata'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['policy'],['BGR'],"Gerunov, Anton",INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION,English,Article,,,,"[Gerunov, Anton] Sofia Univ St Kliment Ohridski, 125 Tsarigradsko Shosse Blvd, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria",11.0,6.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",0190-0692,,2017.0,40,8,649.0,657,10.1080/01900692.2016.1186178,WOS:000426515100001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
936,WOS,Open access in vocational education and training research: results from four structured group discussions,Open Access; Vocational education and training (VET); Academic research communication; Group discussions; Qualitative content analysis; Science communication,"Aim: Open Access fosters the exchange of academic research information by making publications free of charge and, wherever possible, available through open licences and without any technical barriers. Although the Open Access publication model is already well established in the natural sciences, there seems to be more resistance towards Open Access in the social sciences, including the field of vocational education and training research. The research project Open Access in Vocational Education and Training Research aims to uncover the conditions influencing the acceptance, dissemination and use of Open Access in vocational education and training research. The project is grounded in a sociology of knowledge approach and in media theory. It comprises of two parts. First, four structured group discussions are conducted as focus groups and analysed using a qualitative content analysis. This paper focusses on this first part of the research project, the implementation and analysis of the group discussions as well as the results thereof. The second part of the research project will be based on an online questionnaire built upon these results. The questionnaire will be sent out to authors involved in vocational education and training research in the second part of the research project. Findings: The analysis of the group discussions reveals several thematic clusters. According to group discussion participants, the scope of their publications as well as transparent quality assurance procedures in publishing are particularly relevant. The reputation of their chosen publication medium is another central aspect. It also becomes clear that in some cases an information deficit regarding the financing of Open Access publications or accompanying licensing models exists. Finally, participants discuss changing literature research strategies and changes of work and reading practices. The latter being clearly discernible in an increasingly digitalised daily work routine of vocational education and training researchers, while academic research communication is also an important topic discussed.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['socscie'],['researcher'],"['DEU', 'AUT', 'CHE']","Getz, Laura; Langenkamp, Karin; Roedel, Bodo; Taufenbach, Kerstin; Weiland, Meike",EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING,English,Article,,,,"[Getz, Laura; Langenkamp, Karin; Roedel, Bodo; Taufenbach, Kerstin; Weiland, Meike] Fed Inst Vocat Educ & Training BIBB, Robert Schuman Pl 3, D-53175 Bonn, Germany",31.0,0.0,SPRINGER,,,2020.0,12,1,,,10.1186/s40461-020-00101-z,WOS:000426734600116,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
940,WOS,Current status of open access journals published in D8 countries and registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (pre-2000 to 2014),Open access; Journals; Scopus; Thomson Reuters; DOAJ; D-8 countries,"Purpose - The study aims to monitor the status of open access (OA) journals published in Developing 8 (D-8) countries, i.e. Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Nigeria, Pakistan and Turkey. Design/methodology/approach - The authors' web-based data sources for journal-based metrics were the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Thomson Reuters (Journal Citation Reports [JCR], which provided journal impact factors [JIF]) and Scopus (source normalized impact per paper [SNIP] and SCImago journal rank [SJR]). The authors obtained information about journals published before 2000 to 2014. From the JCR, JIF, Rank in Category, Total Journals in Category, Journal Rank in Category, and Quartile in Category were used. Findings - The authors' identified 1,407 OAJ published in D-8 countries. Egypt published the most journals (490) and Bangladesh the fewest (29). Egypt, Iran and Turkey accounted for approximately 73.5 per cent of all journals. At the time of study, 10,162 journals were registered in DOAJ, and 13.8 per cent of them were published in D-8 countries. The mean JIF for all journals from individual countries was highest for Pakistan (0.84), followed by Iran (0.74) and Turkey (0.57). The mean SNIP for all journals from each country was highest for Nigeria (0.57), followed by Egypt (0.57) and Pakistan (0.51). Practical implications - The widespread use of OA publishing models in D-8 countries will boost accessibility of their journals' content and ultimately impact research in D-8 states. Originality/value - Journals published in Egypt, Iran and Turkey account for approximately three-fourths of all OA journals published in D-8 countries. More than one-third (38 per cent) of the journals the authors studied used a Creative Commons (CC) BY license, a hallmark of OA research findings. Most of the journals with a JIF were in the JCR Medical Sciences category (60 per cent). As the number of journals in D-8 countries increases, publishers should attempt to make their journals eligible for indexing in-citation databases. The authors recommend efforts to improve the quality of journals in other subject categories, so that as many as possible become eligible for indexing in JCR.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],"['BGD', 'EGY', 'IRN', 'IDN', 'MYS', 'NGA', 'PAK', 'TUR']","Ghane, Mohammad Reza; Niazmand, Mohammad Reza",ELECTRONIC LIBRARY,English,Article,,,,"[Ghane, Mohammad Reza; Niazmand, Mohammad Reza] Reg Informat Ctr Sci & Technol, Shiraz, Iran",53.0,4.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-0473,,2016.0,34,5,740.0,756,10.1108/EL-06-2015-0107,WOS:000427175300004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
941,WOS,The citation advantage for open access science journals with and without article processing charges,Article processing charges; citation advantage; DOAJ; open access journals; science class; Thomson Reuters,"In this study of access models, we compared citation performance in journals that do and do not levy article processing charges (APCs) as part of their business model. We used a sample of journals from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) science class and its 13 subclasses and recorded four citation metrics: JIF, H-index, citations per publication (CPP) and quartile rank. We examined 1881 science journals indexed in DOAJ. Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports and Web of Science were used to extract JIF, H-index, CPP and quartile category. Overall, the JIF, H-index and CPP indicated that APC and non-APC open access (OA) journals had equal impact. Quartile category ranking indicated a difference in favour of APC journals. In each science subclass, we found significant differences between APC and non-APC journals in all citation metrics except for quartile rank. Discipline-related variations were observed in non-APC journals. Differences in the rank positions of scores in different groups identified citation advantages for non-APC journals in physiology, zoology, microbiology and geology, followed by botany, astronomy and general biology. Impact ranged from moderate to low in physics, chemistry, human anatomy, mathematics, general science and natural history. The results suggest that authors should consider field- and discipline-related differences in the OA citation advantage, especially when they are considering non-APC OA journals categorised in two or more subjects. This may encourage OA publishing at least in the science class.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Ghane, Mohammad Reza; Niazmand, Mohammad Reza; Sabet Sarvestani, Ameneh",JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Ghane, Mohammad Reza; Niazmand, Mohammad Reza] Reg Informat Ctr Sci & Technol, Shiraz, Iran; [Sabet Sarvestani, Ameneh] Islamic World Sci Citat Ctr, Shiraz, Iran",61.0,0.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0165-5515,,2020.0,46,1,118.0,130,10.1177/0165551519837183,WOS:000427177000007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
945,WOS,Open Access and Institutional Repositories — A Developing Country Perspective: A case study of India,developing countries;  India;  institutional repositories;  open access archives;  open access literature;  open publishing;  South Asia,"Open access facilitates the availability and distribution of scholarly communication freely, as a means and effort to solve the problem of inaccessibility, primarily due to financial constraints, particularly in the developing countries. In India there has been a gradual realization of the usefulness of open access among various institutions. Various open access initiatives have been undertaken and are operational. Many are in the developmental stage. Some initiatives have also been taken in the area of metadata harvesting services particularly public funded ones. The future of open access in India is dependent upon a proper policy and developing a proper framework. In the implementation of open access, LIS professionals should play a proactive role in the growth of collections in institutional repositories. The paper provides an overview about the present state of open access initiatives by various institutions of the country. © 2007, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['IND'],"Ghosh S.B., Kumar Das A.",IFLA Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,,,46.0,0,3400352,0,2007.0,33,3,229.0,250,10.1177/0340035207083304,WOS:000427393100025,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
951,WOS,Open data for research and strategic monitoring in the pharmaceutical and biotech industry,Biotech;  Intellectual property;  Open data;  Pharmaceutical;  Research;  Strategic monitoring,"Open data is considered the new oil. As oil can be used to produce fertilisers, pesticides, lubricants, plastics and many other derivatives, so data is considered the commodity to use and re-use to create value. The number of initiatives supporting free access to data has increased in the last years and open data is becoming the norm in the public sector;  the approach empowers stakeholders and nurtures the economy. Even if at early stage, private companies also are adapting to the open data market. A survey was conducted to which thirteen companies of different size (from micro enterprises to world-leading pharmas) in the pharmaceutical and biotech sector and representing four business models archetypes of companies exploiting open data (aggregators, developers, enrichers and enablers) participated. The information collected provides a snapshot of the use of open data by the pharmaceutical and biotech industry in 2015-2016. The companies interviewed use open data to complement proprietary data for research purposes, to implement licensing-in/licensing-out strategies, to map partnerships and connections among players or to identify key expertise and hire staff. Pharmaceutical and biotech companies have made of the protection of knowledge a dogma at the foundation of their business models, but using and contributing to the open data movement may change their approach to intellectual property and innovation. © 2017 The Author(s).",['opendata'],['survey'],['med'],['business'],['nonspecificgeo'],Giovani B.,Data Science Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,"[Kumar, Love] IK Gujral Punjab Tech Univ, Kapurthala 144603, Punjab, India;  [Singh, Amarpal] Beant Coll Engn & Technol, Gurdaspur 143521, Punjab, India;  [Sharma, Vishal] Shaheed Bhagat Singh State Tech Campus, Ferozepur 152004, Punjab, India",17.0,0.0,HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS,2095-2759,,2019.0,12,2,208.0,214,10.1007/s12200-018-0767-3,WOS:000508186400230,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
952,WOS,Tracing open data in emergencies: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic,altmetrics; coronavirus; publication metrics; research waste; SARS-CoV-2; scientometrics,"Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic constitutes an ongoing, burning Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). In 2015, the World Health Organization adopted an open data policy recommendation in such situations. Objectives The present cross-sectional meta-research study aimed to assess the availability of open data and metrics of articles pertaining to the COVID-19 outbreak in five high-impact journals. Methods All articles regarding the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), published in five high-impact journals (Ann Intern Med,BMJ,JAMA,NEJMandLancet) until March 14, 2020 were retrieved. Metadata (namely the type of article, number of authors, number of patients, citations, errata, news and social media mentions) were extracted for each article in each journal in a systematic way. Google Scholar and Scopus were used for citations and author metrics respectively, and Altmetrics and PlumX were used for news and social media mentions retrieval. The degree of adherence to the PHEIC open data call was also evaluated. Results A total of 140 articles were published until March 14, 2020, mostly opinion papers. Sixteen errata followed these publications. The number of authors in each article ranged from 1 to 63, whereas the number of patients with a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection reached 2645. Extensive hyperauthorship was evident among case studies. The impact of these publications reached a total of 4210 cumulative crude citations and 342 790 news and social media mentions. Only one publication (0.7%) provided complete open data, while 32 (22.9%) included patient data. Conclusions Even though a large number of manuscripts was produced since the pandemic, availability of open data remains restricted.","['opendata', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['med'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Gkiouras, Konstantinos; Nigdelis, Meletios P.; Grammatikopoulou, Maria G.; Goulis, Dimitrios G.",EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION,English,Article,,,,"[Gkiouras, Konstantinos] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Med, Lab Clin Pharmacol, Thessaloniki, Greece; [Nigdelis, Meletios P.; Goulis, Dimitrios G.] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 1, Unit Reprod Endocrinol, Sch Med, GR-56429 Thessaloniki, Greece; [Grammatikopoulou, Maria G.] Int Hellen Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Thessaloniki, Greece",66.0,0.0,WILEY,0014-2972,,2020.0,50,9,,,10.1111/eci.13323,WOS:000428363300012,32558931.0,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
961,WOS,Open access indicators and information society: The Latin American case,Communication technologies; Information society; Open systems; South America,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to estimate open access penetration ratios through cross-analysis of existing social context and open access indicators in Latin America. Design/methodology/approach - The following parameters were used to characterize the chosen countries. On one hand, it takes social context indicators like digital opportunity index (DOI), GDP 2007 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (www.oecd.org/home/3305,en_2649_201185_1_1_1_1_1,00.html), scientific output 2005, and investment in science and technology vs GDP 2004. On the other hand, it analyses open access indicators considering the two main open access strategies - the green and gold routes - and the existing legal framework. Findings - This paper discusses the evolution of DOI and compares with open access parameters (numbers of repositories, number of registries in repositories, DOAJ journals and number of creative commons licences) in the context of scientific information in developing countries in Latin America. Research limitations/implications - This paper is not an exhaustive survey and limits the comparison to the Latin American Countries, focalized in Brazil, Chile and Argentina. Originality/value - This paper gives an overview of the situation of three particular countries: Brazil, Chile and Argentina, and explains the position of these countries in the open access movement in Latin America. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']","['biblio', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],"['BRA', 'ARG', 'CHN']","Gómez N., Bustos-Gonzalez A., Santillan-Aldana J., Arias O.",OCLC Systems and Services,English,Article,0,0,0,,,9.0,0,1065075X,0,2009.0,25,2,82.0,92,10.1108/10650750910961884,WOS:000429946800009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
968,WOS,Publication modalities 'article in press' and 'open access' in relation to journal average citation,Early view; In-press articles; Online first; Open access; Citation advantage; CiteScore; Impact factor,"There has been a generalization in the use of two publication practices by scientific journals during the past decade: (1) 'article in press' or early view, which allows access to the accepted paper before its formal publication in an issue; (2) 'open access', which allows readers to obtain it freely and free of charge. This paper studies the influence of both publication modalities on the average impact of the journal and its evolution over time. It tries to identify the separate effect of access on citation into two major parts: early view and selection effect, managing to provide some evidence of the positive effect of both. Scopus is used as the database and CiteScore as the measure of journal impact. The prevalence of both publication modalities is quantified. Differences in the average impact factor of group of journals, according to their publication modalities, are tested. The evolution over time of the citation influence, from 2011 to 2016, is also analysed. Finally, a linear regression to explain the correlation of these publication practices with the CiteScore in 2016, in a ceteris paribus context, is estimated. Our main findings show evidence of a positive correlation between average journal impact and advancing the publication of accepted articles, moreover this correlation increases over time. The open access modality, in a ceteris paribus context, also correlates positively with average journal impact.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Gonzalez-Betancor, Sara M.; Dorta-Gonzalez, Pablo",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Gonzalez-Betancor, Sara M.] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Metodos Cuantitat Econ & Gest, Campus Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain; [Dorta-Gonzalez, Pablo] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, TiDES Res Inst, Campus Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain",36.0,4.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2019.0,120,3,1209.0,1223,10.1007/s11192-019-03156-2,WOS:000430381300016,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
972,WOS,Covid-19: an analysis of open data policies on the pandemic in the Spanish autonomous communities.,open data; institutional information; transparency; open government; coronavirus; covid-19; public administration; regional government; health; public health; institutional communication,"Spain has been one of the most impacted countries due to the global public health crisis generated by the pandemic of Covid-19. In this context, public administration must be transparent and they should release reliable data on how the disease evolver in order to promote accountability and citizens' right to public information. Although political authority was concentrated under the Spanish Government's single chain of command, the regional governments have preserved a notable margin of discretion to implement its decisions. Consequently, this paper analyzes open data initiatives carried out by the 19 Spanish regional governments, which are the basis for transparency. For each of the regions we studied seven variables related to open data's technical features and additional data breakdown. Our results reveal that, although most of the regional governments have offered data on Covid-19, the situation is quite heterogeneous, especially in terms of reusability and breakdown of available data. Those uneven approaches on open data lead to inequality in accessing public information depending on the region where Spanish citizens live.","['opendata', 'openpolicies']","['documentreview', 'othermeth']",['med'],"['researcher', 'policy']",['ESP'],"Gonzalvez-Gallego, Nicolas; Nieto-Torrejon, Laura",RAZON HISTORICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE HISTORIA DE LAS IDEAS,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Gonzalvez-Gallego, Nicolas; Nieto-Torrejon, Laura] Univ Catolica San Antonio Murcia UCAM, Fac Ciencias Jurid & Empresa, Murcia, Spain",37.0,0.0,INST POLITICA SOCIAL,1989-2659,,2020.0,,48,67.0,88,,WOS:000431601400001,,2021-01-27,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
973,WOS,Is Open Data an Enabler for Trust? Exploring the Link and the Mediating Role of Citizen Satisfaction,Open government data; open government; trust; citizen satisfaction,"In recent years, one of the main expectations of officials and politicians is to increase citizens' trust in institutions as a result of openly disclose public data. This paper provides empirical evidence for 18 European countries on the significant and positive direct relationship between open government data and institutional trust, but there still exist areas for development. The mediating role of citizens' satisfaction between open government data and trust is also confirmed. In addition, the moderation effect of social and demographic variables reveals a higher relationship for people highly educated, who are under 65 and access the Internet daily.","['opendata', 'openpolicies']","['survey', 'documentreview', 'othermeth']",['socscie'],"['researcher', 'policy', 'othergroup']","['AUT', 'CHE', 'CZE', 'DEU', 'ESP', 'FIN', 'EST', 'GBR', 'FRA', 'HUN', 'NLD', 'PRT', 'BEL', 'LTU', 'ITA', 'IRL', 'SWE', 'SVN']","Gonzalvez-Gallego, Nicolas; Nieto-Torrejon, Laura; Concepcion Perez-Carceles, Maria",INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION,English,Article,,,,"[Gonzalvez-Gallego, Nicolas; Nieto-Torrejon, Laura; Concepcion Perez-Carceles, Maria] San Antonio Catholic Univ Murcia, Dept Business Adm, Campus Los Jeronimos,Avda Los Jeronimos 147, Murcia, Spain",49.0,1.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",0190-0692,,2020.0,43,14,1218.0,1227,10.1080/01900692.2019.1668412,WOS:000431921000006,,2021-01-27,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0
979,WOS,"Open access publishing model: Preferences, opportunities, and challenges - an opinion survey among teaching staff in higher education Institutions In Tamilnadu",OA publishing model; Open access; Opportunity in OA; Threats in OA,"Background: Open Access, a novel model of publishing is one among the surprises and delights of the digital age. It is a paradigm shift in the academic society which hammered up the traditional publishing and unlatched the doors of knowledge to reader community. One of the main drives of open access is to make academic research more easily available and maximum exploitation of resources. Objectives: This study aims to elucidate how well that teaching community working in higher education institutions in Tamil Nadu, endorses for the open access publishing model. The study elucidates their preferences on open access publishing and their perceptions about the opportunities and threats in open access publishing. Methods: Survey design was used to conduct the study and a structured questionnaire is used to collect data. Convenience sampling method is adopted for the study. Data collected were organized in Excel and analyzed by using SPSS PASW 18. Cronbach's alpha is used to check the internal reliability of the opportunity and threats items. Frequencies and percentages were used to identify the popular publishing model, opportunity and threat. ANOVA and t-test were used to check the statistical relationship between variables. Results: A total of 121 teaching staffs from five higher education institutions in Tamil Nadu were enrolled in the study. Majority of the prefer Open Access publishing model over the other commercial and hybrid publication models. Around 66.1% of teaching staff responded that Open Access is their first choice of publishing. Around 45.5% of teaching staff abide if their subscribed commercial access publisher moves to hybrid access at some point. 51.2% of teaching abide if their subscribed commercial access publisher moves to complete open access at some point. The top most opportunity item as denoted by the teaching staff was New database of information are emerging and in development (71.1%). The top three threat items as denoted by the teaching staff was Open Access is still evolving to become sustainable (66.1%). Opportunity has a significant statistical relationship with No. of OA Journals publications. Conclusion: The study results will help the institutions, higher education system, librarians, information service providers, open access publishers & policy makers and government to intensify their efforts in promoting and nurturing open access publishing model. © 2019 Library Philosophy and Practice.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'publisher', 'librarian', 'policy']",['IND'],"Govindarajan R., Dhanavandan S.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2019.0,2019,0,0.0,0,,WOS:000432813700005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
982,WOS,Mapping the hinterland: Data issues in open science,open science; public engagement; science communication,"Open science is a practice in which the scientific process is shared completely and in real time. It offers the potential to support information flow, collaboration and dialogue among professional and non-professional participants. Using semi-structured interviews and case studies, this research investigated the relationship between open science and public engagement. This article concentrates on three particular areas of concern that emerged: first, how to effectively contextualise and narrate information to render it accessible, as opposed to simply available; second, concerns about data quantity and quality; and third, concerns about the skills required for effective contextualisation, mapping and interpretation of information.","['opendata', 'openmethod']",['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['GBR'],"Grand, Ann; Wilkinson, Clare; Bultitude, Karen; Winfield, Alan F. T.",PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Grand, Ann; Bultitude, Karen; Winfield, Alan F. T.] Univ W England, Sci Commun Unit, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England; [Bultitude, Karen] UCL, Dept Sci & Technol Studies, Res, London WC1E 6BT, England",69.0,6.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0963-6625,,2016.0,25,1,88.0,103,10.1177/0963662514530374,WOS:000433776900004,24769860.0,2021-01-27,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
987,WOS,Considering Non-Open Access Publication Charges in the Total Cost of Publication,scholarly publishing; page charges; colour charges; publishing charges; submission charges,"Recent research has tried to calculate the total cost of publication in the British academic sector, bringing together the costs of journal subscriptions, the article processing charges (APCs) paid to publish open-access content, and the indirect costs of handling open-access mandates. This study adds an estimate for the other publication charges (predominantly page and colour charges) currently paid by research institutions, a significant element which has been neglected by recent studies. When these charges are included in the calculation, the total cost to institutions as of 2013/14 is around 18.5% over and above the cost of journal subscriptions11% from APCs, 5.5% from indirect costs, and 2% from other publication charges. For the British academic sector as a whole, this represents a total cost of publication around 213 pound million against a conservatively estimated journal spend of 180 pound million, with non-APC publication charges representing around 3.6 pound million. A case study is presented to show that these costs may be unexpectedly high for individual institutions, depending on disciplinary focus. The feasibility of collecting this data on a widespread basis is discussed, along with the possibility of using it to inform future subscription negotiations with publishers.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['GBR'],"Gray, Andrew",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Gray, Andrew] British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England",33.0,2.0,MDPI AG,2304-6775,,2015.0,3,4,248.0,262,10.3390/publications3040248,WOS:000434317200005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
988,WOS,"Sorry, we're open: Golden open-access and inequality in non-human biological sciences",Open-access; Impact factor; Article Publishing Costs; Inequality; h-index,"Golden Open-access (GOA) journals make research more accessible and therefore more citable; however, the publication fees associated with GOA journals can be costly and therefore not a viable option for many researchers seeking high-impact publication outlets. In this study, metadata was collected from 174 open-access, non-human biological science journals and analyzed to determine relationships between Article Processing Charges (APC), Impact Factor (IF), Eigen Factor (EF), citability, h-index, journal rank, and potential contributing factors to publishing preference, such as years of available open access, publication frequency, and average review process time. Further, the aforementioned bibliometrics were examined in relation to country of publisher, as well as their national income threshold. The results of this study provide evidence that bibliometric values such as IF, EF, citability, h-index, and journal rank all increase as APC increases, and each of these metrics are higher in publishers from high-income countries in comparison to upper-middle and lower-middle income countries. Implications of these trends are discussed in regards to non-human biological sciences, and potential consequences of inequality within the global scientific community overall.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Gray, Russell J.",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Gray, Russell J.] RJ Gray Ecol, 705 Alligator Ranch Rd, New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168 USA",34.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,124,2,1663.0,1675,10.1007/s11192-020-03540-3,WOS:000434590900007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
991,WOS,A framework for systematic analysis of open access journals and its application in software engineering and information systems,Open access; Predatory publishers; Software engineering; Information systems; Research; Systematic analysis,"This article is a contribution towards an understanding of open access (OA) publishing. It proposes an analysis framework of 18 core attributes, divided into the areas of bibliographic information, activity metrics, economics, accessibility, and predatory issues. The framework has been employed in a systematic analysis of 30 OA journals in software engineering (SE) and information systems (IS), which were selected from among 386 OA journals in Computer Science from the Directory of OA Journals. An analysis was performed on the sample of the journals, to provide an overview of the current situation of OA journals in the fields of SE and IS. The journals were then compared between-group, according to the presence of article processing charges. A within-group analysis was performed on the journals requesting article processing charges from authors, in order to understand what is the value added according to different price ranges. This article offers several contributions. It presents an overview of OA definitions and models. It provides an analysis framework born from the observation of data and the existing literature. It raises the need to study OA in the fields of SE and IS while offering a first analysis. Finally, it provides recommendations to readers of OA journals. This paper highlights several concerns still threatening the adoption of OA publishing in the fields of SE and IS. Among them, it is shown that high article processing charges are not sufficiently justified by the publishers, which often lack transparency and may prevent authors from adopting OA.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['engtech'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Graziotin, Daniel; Wang, Xiaofeng; Abrahamsson, Pekka",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Graziotin, Daniel; Wang, Xiaofeng; Abrahamsson, Pekka] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Comp Sci, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy",73.0,7.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2014.0,101,3,1627.0,1656,10.1007/s11192-014-1278-7,WOS:000434752900014,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
992,WOS,Developing a Freely Accessible/Open Access Resource Management Policy at Duke University Libraries: A Case Study,academic libraries;  collection development;  electronic resources;  resource management,"Freely accessible and open access resources present unique challenges for librarians working with electronic resources. Due to the fact that many of these resources lack high-quality metadata or the technical support provided by traditional publishers, making them discoverable and maintaining access over time can be tricky. Creating a policy allows for a systematic approach to the management of freely accessible/open access (OA) resources, alleviating problems surrounding lack of staff time or expertise. Many of these resources are already important parts of collections and will only continue to grow in importance. Freely accessible/OA resources allow for a more diverse representation of content, both by subject and format type, and allow a wider array of authors to have their work appear in library collections. This case study will provide a review of freely accessible/OA policies in other libraries, describe why these resources are important to add to our collections, discuss challenges libraries face with managing these resources, and explain how Duke University Libraries is addressing some of these challenges through the development of a policy.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['USA'],"Greene, Bethany",SERIALS REVIEW,English,Article;  Proceedings Paper,37th North Carolina (NC) Serials Conference on Blazing a New Path,"APR 06, 2018","Chapel Hill, CA","[Greene, Bethany] Duke Univ Lib, Box 90187,Smith Warehouse,114 S Buchanan Blvd, Durham, NC 27708 USA",1.0,0.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",0098-7913,,2018.0,44,3,182.0,187,10.1080/00987913.2018.1534537,WOS:000434858300001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
994,WOS,The future of open access in Croatia: A survey of academic and research libraries,Academic libraries; Croatia; Digital storage; Open access; Research libraries,"Purpose: The purpose of this research paper is to present Croatian librarians' awareness about the importance of institutional open access (OA) repositories. Design/methodology/approach: The research is based on an online questionnaire sent to all the Croatian research and academic libraries. Online questionnaire was chosen as the most appropriate tool, as the authors wanted it to be anonymous and as quick as possible. Findings: The findings indicate that all the academic librarians in Croatia are aware of the importance of institutional OA repositories. The number of OA repositories in Croatia is rather small, but the librarians are making lots of efforts towards the development of new repositories. Croatian librarians think that the most appropriate software is open-source software; that OA repositories have to be open access initiative protocol for metadata harvesting compliant; that copyright owner's consent for archiving is necessary. The biggest problems are the lack of administration support and the researchers' unawareness of the benefits of OA, especially OA repositories. Practical implications: Based on this research, some steps regarding OA could be done on a national level, e. g. guidelines for establishing OA repositories could be created and the obligation of self-archiving should be regulated. This research could be a valuable tool for developing new OA repositories. Originality/value: The paper contributes to the understanding the OA movement in transitional countries and peripheral scientific communities. The knowledge created in such countries can be beneficial for the global scientific community, and OA repositories are valuable way for promoting that knowledge. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['HRV'],"Grgic I.H., Barbaric A.",Library Review,English,Article,0,0,0,,,5.0,0,242535,0,2011.0,60,2,155.0,160,10.1108/00242531111113096,WOS:000435465000010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
995,WOS,Information literacy and open access in Croatian academic libraries,Academic libraries; Croatia; Library users; Information literacy; Open access; Open access literacy,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present results of a survey of Croatian academic libraries' user education about open access (OA)-related issues. The concept of OA literacy will be explained, and the term will be put in the context of information literacy (IL) and scholarly communication. Design/methodology/approach - An anonymous online questionnaire was sent to all the Croatian academic libraries with the aim to find out if libraries are involved in OA and to learn about plans for user education about the aspect of IL that is important for using OA information. Findings - Almost all the libraries are involved in OA publishing, either through OA repositories or through OA journals. However, 22 per cent of the libraries do not educate their users about OA. Two most important IL skills in the context of OA are finding OA information and understanding OA citation advantage. Academic libraries in Croatia mostly recognize the questionable publishers as a threat for OA. However, 40 per cent of libraries do not plan any form of education about OA literacy. Practical implications - The results of this research can be a basis for creating programmes of user education in academic libraries. Some problems are recognized, some skills are identified and further steps could be undertaken to improve academic library users' OA literacy skills. Originality/value - The research results contribute to understanding the importance of academic libraries in developing OA literacy of their users. The paper gives results of a survey of Croatian academic libraries and some new perspectives for authors, readers and libraries on how to evaluate OA sources using OA literacy skills.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['HRV'],"Grgic, Ivana Hebrang",LIBRARY REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Grgic, Ivana Hebrang] Univ Zagreb, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Informat & Commun Sci, Zagreb, Croatia",38.0,2.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0024-2535,,2016.0,65,4-5,255.0,266,10.1108/LR-01-2016-0009,WOS:000435587100372,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1000,WOS,Landscapes of Research: Perceptions of Open Access (OA) Publishing in the Arts and Humanities,open access academic publishing; humanities; social sciences; institutional repositories; Australia,"It is widely known now that scholarly communication is in crisis, resting on an academic publishing model that is unsustainable. One response to this crisis has been the emergence of Open Access (OA) publishing, bringing scholarly literature out from behind a paywall and making it freely available to anyone online. Many research and academic libraries are facilitating the change to OA by establishing institutional repositories, supporting OA policies, and hosting OA journals. In addition, research funding bodies, such as the Australian Research Council (ARC), are mandating that all published grant research outputs be made available in OA, unless legal and contractual obligations prevent this. Despite these broader changes, not all scholars are aware of the new publishing environment. In particular, the rate of adoption of OA models in the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) has historically been lower than Science, Technology and Medicine (STM) disciplines. Nevertheless, some local and international OA exemplars exist in HSS. At Edith Cowan University in Perth, Western Australia, the faculty-administered environmental humanities journal, Landscapes, was migrated to the institutional open access repository in 2013. Subsequently, researchers in the Faculty of Education and Arts were surveyed regarding their knowledge, understandings, and perceptions of OA publishing. The survey was also designed to elicit the barriers to OA publishing perceived or experienced by HSS researchers. This article will present the findings of our small faculty-based OA survey, with particular attention to HSS academics (and within this subject group, particular attention to the arts and humanities), their perceptions of OA, and the impediments they encounter. We argue that OA publishing will continue to transform scholarship within the arts and humanities, especially through the role of institutional repositories. The library-as-publisher role offers the potential to transform academic and university-specific publishing activities. However, the ongoing training of university researchers and personnel is required to bring into balance their understandings of OA publisher and the demands of the broader Australian and international research environment.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']","['survey', 'othermeth']",['hum'],['researcher'],['AUS'],"Gross, Julia; Ryan, John Charles",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Gross, Julia] Edith Cowan Univ, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia; [Ryan, John Charles] Edith Cowan Univ, 2 Bradford St,Room 17-206, Mt Lawley, WA 6050, Australia",33.0,5.0,MDPI,2304-6775,,2015.0,3,2,65.0,88,10.3390/publications3020065,WOS:000436281800003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1004,WOS,The culture of open data in Latin America and the promotion of transparency and access to information [La cultura de datos abiertos en américa latina y la promoción de la transparencia y acceso a la información],Access to information;  Data culture;  Open data;  Transparency Law,"The culture of open data allows governments to improve transparency processes, and they are also a useful means of communicating about public management and accountability. States have a legal instrument such as the Law on Transparency and Access to Public Information, legislative mechanisms at the governmental level to guarantee access to data. Policies that also contribute to the exercise and development of journalism in each territory. For this reason, this research considers it relevant to present a content analysis, typical of qualitative studies, to the Open Data Catalogs of 19 Latin American countries. The methodology used is qualitative with which the observation and analysis of the Open Data Catalogs is established. The objective is to determine the mechanisms of transparency and access to information implemented the governments and to observe the quality, quantity and associated use of information in the data journalism. It is concluded that the quality, quantity of data and democratic access to information is subject to political will. © 2020, Associacao Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao. All rights reserved.","['opendata', 'openpolicies']","['interview', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'policy']",['SA'],"Guaycha M., Ordóñez K.",RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao,Spanish,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Associacao Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao,16469895,0,2020.0,2020,E35,302.0,313,,WOS:000436281800012,,2021-01-27,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1009,WOS,A lost dimension in the open scholarly world: Authors' experiences and open access publishing,0,"The movement of free accessibility of scholarly literature on the public Web has brought uprising in the intellectual class of the digital world. Though several studies have been carried out to understand the end-users' awareness level and the benefits they avail from this revolution, researchers/authors who play a pivotal role and without whom Open Access (OA) could not have seen the dawn and could not have been successful so far, have remained least studied, if not, unnoticed. Regardless of the use of OA platforms, earlier research has to some extent indicated the experiences, behaviour, and attitudes of authors towards open access. The way they think about OA has been explored by authorities from various dimensions. The current chapter is an attempt to understand their experiences, perceptions, and the opinions they hold about open access publishing. The chapter highlights the growing awareness, views, and perceptions of 336 authors in the field of medicine towards OA publishing. The survey instrument, an online questionnaire covering e-mail invitation to participate, was sent to the authors publishing their works in OA journals. The authors who had made recent submissions in the open access journals were consulted and the journals were selected from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The study explores the attitudes of authors to open publishing models, including OA journals and OA repositories. The research work is not a reflection of all the authors in the field of medicine, and hence, the findings should not be generalized to represent the views of all the authors contributing to open access platforms in the field of medicine. Neither should the findings be generalized to represent the views of all the authors in the open access world. The study can further be extended to divulge the views of authors in the field of medicine on the basis of geographical locations and gender. A follow up study can also be taken to monitor the opinion shifts of the authors in the sub-fields of medicine. © 2015, IGI Global. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Gul S., Shah T.A.","Open Source Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications",English,Book Chapter,0,0,0,,,0.0,IGI Global,0,9781466672314; 1466672307; 9781466672307,2014.0,44288,0,762.0,772,10.4018/978-1-4666-7230-7.ch035,WOS:000436880000002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1010,WOS,Emerging web 2.0 applications in open access scholarly journals in the field of agriculture and food sciences,Agricultural sciences; ATOM; Facebook; Food sciences; Open access; Open access journals; RSS; Scholarly communication; Scholarly journals; Social bookmarking; Twitter; Web 2.0,"Purpose – The study aims to focus on the application of Web 2.0 tools in Agriculture and Food Sciences open access journals. The changing trends in scholarly publishing processes have revolutionised the academic world. The shifting of academic journals to open access mode has been on the rise because of the numerous benefits associated with it. The high level of profitability reaped from open access titles has forced them to experiment with new and innovative technologies, including Web 2.0. The new shift in the form of Web 2.0 has sifted in to the open access journal world. Open access journals in the field of Agriculture and Food Sciences are growing and so are the features and functionalities within them. Because of these new innovative tools there is an urgent need to focus on their adoption. Design/methodology/approach – Directory of Open Access Journals, being one of the growing open access journal directories, was selected for the purpose of data gathering. The journals selected for the study included those titles which were currently active. Findings – The open access journal landscape in the field of Agriculture and Food Sciences is influenced by the Web 2.0 revolution. The degree of experimenting with Web 2.0 in open access journals in Agriculture and Food Sciences is evident and can prove an excellent platform for the dissemination of agricultural information in a more advanced mode. Researchlimitations/implications – The study will be helpful for journal administrators who belong to the field of Agriculture and Food Sciences to know the actual status of Web 2.0 adoption by the journals in their field. The study can also be helpful for journal administrators for the adoption of Web 2.0 tools to achieve a better, more innovative and interactive scholarly platform. It will also enable us to know how the new pioneering technology – Web 2.0 – can help to explore new innovative ways of managing information in the scholarly world in general and the Agriculture and Food Sciences discipline in particular. Originality/value – The study can be extended to harness the effects of Web 2.0 on the research activities of the scholars associated with various disciplines of Agriculture and Food Sciences. How Agricultural scientists make use of Web 2.0 for sharing and exchange of information for their academic development can also be researched. The impact of Web 2.0 tools on the citation counts of open access journals can also be studied. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'biblio']",['agric'],"['researcher', 'publisher']","['BRA', 'USA', 'PAK', 'ROU', 'POL', 'CHL', 'TUR', 'IND', 'JPN', 'GBR', 'COL', 'VEN', 'HRV', 'CZE', 'IRN', 'ESP', 'MEX', 'ARG', 'ITA', 'CAN', 'IDN', 'SRB', 'DEU', 'SVN', 'ZAF', 'FRA', 'FIN', 'CHE', 'BGD', 'EST', 'AUS', 'BEL', 'CRI', 'SVK', 'NGA', 'BGR', 'EGY', 'HUN', 'NZL', 'PRT', 'NOR', 'ARE', 'CHN', 'IRQ', 'ISR', 'KEN', 'LBY', 'LTU', 'MYS', 'PER', 'RUS', 'KOR', 'LKA', 'SWE']","Gul S., Shah T.A., Nisa N.T.",Library Review,English,Article,0,0,0,,,4.0,Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.,242535,0,2014.0,63,0,670.0,683,10.1108/LR-05-2013-0060,WOS:000436880000006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,1,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,0
1011,WOS,Evolving landscape of scholarly journals in open access environment,Open access; Open access journals; Scholarly communication; Open access journals-growth and development; Directory of open access journals; DOAJ,"Purpose Open access journals (OAJs) offer immediate, free and unrestricted online access to the scholarly literature. The purpose of this study is to trace the status and characteristics of OAJs published across the globe. Various trends that have evolved in OAJ market have been studied. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on data collected from one of the largest OA journal directory - Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The data were downloaded on 02 January 2018 and details of OAJs added to DOAJ till 31 December 2018 were harvested, codified and further analyzed in SPSS software. A Microsoft-Excel template application - MAKESENS - developed by Finnish Meteorological Institute (Finland) in 2002, was explored to perform Mann-Kendall Test and Sen's Slope Estimates. Findings A less score of OAJs offer access to their archival content. An increasing trend is witnessed in the OAJ publishing with Elsevier, Sciendo and BioMed Central (BMC) as the top publishers. Majority of publishers are from high-income zone countries, followed by upper-middle and lower-middle zone countries. Majority of OA publishers are from the UK, Indonesia and Brazil. A lesser score of journals offer article processing charges and/or author submission charges. Majority of OAJs from high- and lower-middle-income zone countries levy submission/processing charge to authors compared to OA journals from upper-middle- and lower-income zone countries (p < 0.01). OJS stays a prioritized platform for hosting OA journal content. Portico and CLOCKSS/LOCKSS are mostly used for long-term preservation purposes. Majority of OAJs from high-income zone countries participate in digital arching initiatives compared to ones from other income zones. Majority of the journals adopt a peer review (double-blind peer review, blind peer review, peer review and open peer review) process for validation of their scholarly content. The time lag between submission and publication ranges from one to 53 weeks, with majority of OAJs having a time lag of 11-20 weeks. Creative Commons Licenses are mainly adopted by OAJs. Research limitations/implications - As the study is based on the data offered by DOAJ, any gaps in the DOAJ data will also get reflected in the study. Further, there might be other OAJs also that have yet to show compliance with DOAJ standards and get indexed with it. Originality/value The study tries to showcase the current status and characteristics of OAJs.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['publisher'],"['GBR', 'BRA', 'ESP', 'USA', 'POL', 'IRN', 'IDN', 'COL', 'ITA', 'ROU', 'TUR', 'CHE', 'RUS', 'DEU', 'IND']","Gul, Sumeer; Gupta, Sangita; Shah, Tariq Ahmad; Nisa, Nahida Tun; Manzoor, Shazia; Rasool, Rchana",GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE MEMORY AND COMMUNICATION,English,Article,,,,"[Gul, Sumeer] Univ Kashmir, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Gupta, Sangita] Univ Jammu, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Shah, Tariq Ahmad] Cent Univ Kashmir, Cent Lib, Ganderbal, India; [Nisa, Nahida Tun] Govt Coll Women, Dept Bot, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Manzoor, Shazia] Univ Kashmir, Dept Social Work, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Rasool, Rchana] Govt Degree Coll Tral, Dept Geog, Pulwama, India",61.0,0.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2514-9342,,2019.0,68,6-7,550.0,567,10.1108/GKMC-10-2018-0085,WOS:000437003900001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1012,WOS,Influence of personality traits on open access mode of publishing,Conscientiousness; Agreeableness; Open access publishing; Big five personality traits; Openness to experience; Extraversion; Emotional stability; Author personality traits; Psychoanalytical study,"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the influence of personality traits on perception and acceptance of open access (OA) mode of publishing by the author community of University of Kashmir, India. The study is an attempt to highlight the relationship between personality traits of authors and OA mode of publishing. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the responses of 48 faculty members affiliated with different Departments of Science Discipline of University of Kashmir. Big Five personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness to experience) were tapped through ten-item personality inventory, and information regarding OA was gauged through six self-devised statements. Findings Pearson correlation test confirms statistically significant relation between personality traits and different dimensions of OA mode of publishing. Personality traits are found to have an influence on author's perception of OA mode of publishing. However, the study could not ascertain any relation between the notions of an author about the quality of OA content with any of the personality traits. Emotionally stable authors are found to explicitly submit their work in OA journals without any anxiety or negativity. Agreeable and conscientious authors also prefer to keep their work open to make it helpful to the broader audience and get maximum recognition from peers and citations to their work respectively. However, some authors (agreeable) hesitate in submitting their work in open platforms due to the fear of getting their works easily copied. Originality/value The study is first of its kind highlighting a new dimension in the field of OA and investigates the influence of personality traits on author's attitude towards open mode of publishing.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['IND'],"Gul, Sumeer; Mahajan, Tram; Shah, Tariq Ahmad; Nisa, Nahida Tun; Ahmad, Suhail; Shafiq, Huma; Shueb, Sheikh; Hussain, Aabid",ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Gul, Sumeer] Univ Kashmir, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Mahajan, Tram] SP Coll, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Shah, Tariq Ahmad] Cent Univ Kashmir, Cent Lib, Ganderbal, India; [Nisa, Nahida Tun] Govt Coll Women, Dept Bot, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Ahmad, Suhail] Univ Kashmir, Dept Polit Sci, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Shafiq, Huma] Govt Degree Coll, Magam, India; [Shueb, Sheikh] Govt Degree Coll, Tral, J&K, India; [Hussain, Aabid] Dept Informat, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India",39.0,1.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1468-4527,,2018.0,42,4,535.0,544,10.1108/OIR-11-2016-0335,WOS:000437167100002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1013,WOS,Culture of open access in the University of Kashmir: a researcher's viewpoint,Serials; Publishing; Surveys; Research; India,"Purpose A survey of University of Kashmir scholars was undertaken in 2008 to ascertain their experience, attitudes and perceptions about the open access (OA) movement. The purpose of this paper is to report the survey's findings. Design/methodology/approach - The study was based on data collected from scholars belonging to the Science and Social Science faculties at the University of Kashmir. A pre-defined, closed-ended, 14-item questionnaire was distributed among 84 research scholars. The selection of scholars was based on stratified disproportionate sampling in which the sample size for the departments of both faculties was confined to four scholars, as only four research scholars were enrolled in the Department of Psychology. Findings The majority of the scholars consulted both open access as well as library-subscribed resources. Of OA resource users, four-fifths consulted journals and two-fifths consulted books. Colleagues (57.14 per cent) were the main referral sources of OA awareness with the least intervention from library professionals. Scholars (95.23 per cent) retrieved OA content via search engines. About 21 per cent remarked above 60 per cent relevancy of OA content related to their research need. The majority of scholars considered OA useful to publish their work quickly, boost their productivity as an author and increase citations of their work. One third reported awareness of more than two OA journals. About 30 per cent reported OA journals as a source of publishing their work, whereas just 10 per cent deposited their works in OA repositories. Overall, Science scholars had the edge over their Social Science counterparts in acceptance of open access. Research limitations/implications The research highlights the viewpoints of only 84 scholars out of 326 registered scholars in the fields of Sciences and Social Sciences at the University of Kashmir. Originality/value Research of this kind has not been carried out before at the University of Kashmir. The paper discusses open access awareness among the researchers of the University of Kashmir with recommendations for information professionals and teaching faculty to acquaint researchers with the benefits of open access.",['openaccess'],['survey'],"['natscie', 'socscie']",['researcher'],['IND'],"Gul, Sumeer; Shah, Tariq Ahmad; Baghwan, Tariq Ahmad",ASLIB PROCEEDINGS,English,Article,,,,"[Gul, Sumeer] Univ Kashmir, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Srinagar 190006, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Shah, Tariq Ahmad] Islamic Univ Sci & Technol, Awantipora, India; [Baghwan, Tariq Ahmad] SM Iqbal Coll Educ, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India",23.0,11.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0001-253X,,2010.0,62,2,210.0,222,10.1108/00012531011035008,WOS:000437167100006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1016,WOS,On the impact of Gold Open Access journals,Gold Open Access;  Open Access publishing;  Journal impact factor;  SNIP;  SJR;  Impact analysis;  Impact evolution;  Ulrichsweb;  Directory of Open Access journals (DOAJ);  Journal citation reports (JCR),"Gold Open Access (=Open Access publishing) is for many the preferred route to achieve unrestricted and immediate access to research output. However, true Gold Open Access journals are still outnumbered by traditional journals. Moreover availability of Gold OA journals differs from discipline to discipline and often leaves scientists concerned about the impact of these existent titles. This study identified the current set of Gold Open Access journals featuring a Journal Impact Factor (JIF) by means of Ulrichsweb, Directory of Open Access Journals and Journal Citation Reports (JCR). The results were analyzed regarding disciplines, countries, quartiles of the JIF distribution in JCR and publishers. Furthermore the temporal impact evolution was studied for a Top 50 titles list (according to JIF) by means of Journal Impact Factor, SJR and SNIP in the time interval 2000-2010. The identified top Gold Open Access journals proved to be well-established and their impact is generally increasing for all the analyzed indicators. The majority of JCR-indexed OA journals can be assigned to Life Sciences and Medicine. The success-rate for JCR inclusion differs from country to country and is often inversely proportional to the number of national OA journal titles. Compiling a list of JCR-indexed OA journals is a cumbersome task that can only be achieved with non-Thomson Reuters data sources. A corresponding automated feature to produce current lists on the fly would be desirable in JCR in order to conveniently track the impact evolution of Gold OA journals.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'policy', 'publisher']","['USA', 'BRA', 'GBR', 'ESP', 'IND', 'NLD', 'DEU', 'CAN', 'ROU', 'ITA', 'JPN', 'POL', 'TUR', 'CHL', 'MEX', 'HRV', 'COL', 'IRN', 'SRB', 'CZE', 'CHE', 'KOR', 'ZAF', 'AUT']","Gumpenberger, Christian;  Ovalle-Perandones, Maria-Antonia;  Gorraiz, Juan",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Gumpenberger, Christian;  Gorraiz, Juan] Univ Vienna, Vienna, Austria;  [Ovalle-Perandones, Maria-Antonia] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Madrid, Spain",20.0,22.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2013.0,96,1,221.0,238,10.1007/s11192-012-0902-7,WOS:000437301000005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1017,WOS,The impact factors of open access and subscription journals across fields,Impact factor;  normalized impact factor;  open access journals;  rank normalized impact factor;  subscription journals,"We have compared the 2-year and 5-year impact factors (IFs), normalized impact factors (NIFs) and rank normalized impact factors (RNIFs) of open access (OA) and subscription journals across the 22 major fields delineated in Essential Science Indicators. Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2012 has assigned 2-year IF to 1,073 OA and 7,290 subscription journals and 5-year IF to 811 OA and 6,705 subscription journals. Overall 12.8% of journals listed in JCR are OA, but a higher percentage of journals are OA in 9 fields, including multidisciplinary (31%), agriculture (19.1%) and microbiology (19.1). Overall 2-year IF is higher than 5-year IF in about 31.5% journals in both OA and subscription journals. But among physics journals, two-thirds of OA journals and 58% of subscription journals have a higher 2-year IF. For multidisciplinary journals the mean RNIF is higher for OA journals than subscription journals. Higher proportion of subscription journals had mean RNIF above 0.5: 361 of 1,073 OA journals (33.6%) and 3,857 of 7,280 subscription journals (52.9%) had a 2-year mean RNIF above 0.5 and 277 of 811 OA journals (34.2%) and 3,453 of 6705 (51.5%) subscription journals had a 5-year mean RINF above 0.5. Moving to OA has proven to be advantageous to developing country journals;  it has helped a large number of Latin American and many Indian journals improve their IF.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['agric', 'socscie', 'natscie']","['researcher', 'publisher']","['USA', 'GBR', 'NLD', 'DEU', 'JPN', 'FRA', 'CHE', 'CHN', 'RUS', 'POL', 'ITA', 'AUS', 'BRA', 'CAN', 'IND', 'KOR', 'DNK', 'ESP', 'TUR', 'SGP']","Gunasekaran, Subbiah;  Arunachalam, Subbiah",CURRENT SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Gunasekaran, Subbiah] CSIR Cent Elect Res Inst, Knowledge Resource Ctr, Karaikkudi 623302, Tamil Nadu, India;  [Arunachalam, Subbiah] Ctr Internet & Soc, Bangalore 560071, Karnataka, India",34.0,9.0,INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES,0011-3891,,2014.0,107,3,380.0,388,,WOS:000437491900016,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1018,WOS,Use of open access journals by Indian researchers,Indian researchers;  Impact factor;  open access journals;  research papers;  Science Citation Index Expanded,"Indian researchers have published more than 43,400 papers in over 4,600 journals in 2009 as seen from Science Citation Index (SCI) - Expanded. Of these, over 6,900 (or one in six) papers were published in 445 open access (OA) journals. The proportion of papers published by Indian researchers in OA journals is considerably higher than the world average, which is estimated to be 8.5-10.0%. Although India publishes well over a thousand journals, including about 360 OA journals, SCI Expanded indexed in 2009 only 101 Indian S&T journals including 46 OA journals. It is likely that the percentage of Indian papers in OA journals as seen from SCI will be higher if more Indian journals are indexed in SCI Expanded.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'publisher']","['USA', 'NLD', 'GBR', 'IND', 'DEU', 'CHE', 'JPN', 'SGP', 'ROU', 'KOR', 'POL', 'CAN', 'CHN', 'HUN', 'FRA', 'ITA', 'IRN', 'KEN', 'NGA', 'ISR', 'AUS', 'RUS', 'SRB', 'BRA', 'TUR']","Gunasekaran, Subbiah;  Arunachalam, Subbiah",CURRENT SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Gunasekaran, Subbiah] Cent Electrochem Res Inst, CSIR, Knowledge Resource Ctr, Karaikkudi 630006, Tamil Nadu, India;  [Arunachalam, Subbiah] Ctr Internet & Soc, Bangalore 560071, Karnataka, India",15.0,4.0,INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES,0011-3891,,2011.0,101,10,1287.0,1295,,WOS:000437739200001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1022,WOS,Open Access in China: A Study of Social Science Journals,open access journal; open access article; CSSCI; scholarly journal; search engine,"To learn about the current situation of open access (OA) in Chinese social science journals, 714 journals listed in the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI) in 2012 to 2013 were chosen to investigate, and search engines were used to analyze the OA status of these journals and their articles. The results showed that 13.73 per cent of journals in the CSSCI are OA, their OA format is mostly PDF, and 84.69 per cent of their OA resources are gathered from the publishing years 2004 to 2012. The level of OA journals focusing on different subjects is unbalanced in China. Articles from each journal published in 2007 were selected according to different standards to study the relationship of OA and citation. The results showed that the OA level of highly cited articles is higher than that of low-and non-cited articles. Factors that may restrict OA development in China were analyzed.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['CHN'],"Guo, Fei; Xue, Jing-Yuan; Li, Ruo-Xi",JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Guo, Fei; Xue, Jing-Yuan] Chongqing Univ, Journals Dept, Chongqing, Peoples R China; [Li, Ruo-Xi] Chongqing Normal Univ, Chongqing, Peoples R China",17.0,6.0,UNIV TORONTO PRESS INC,1198-9742,,2014.0,45,4,336.0,352,10.3138/jsp.45.4.02,WOS:000438321200012,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1025,WOS,Visualization for Open Access – A Case Study of Karlstad University and the University of Makerere in Uganda,Enterprise system architecture;  Modelling methods;  Open Access (OA);  Visualization,"Open Access (OA) research provides a platform to world-wide knowledge sharing, but the channels and possibilities are still limited. It is not always clearly defined how the process of publishing should take place. Information systems architectures are intrinsically complex engineering products that can be defined graphically on various levels of abstractions and represented using different aspects of the system. For that reason enterprise architecture is not easy to comprehend for different actors involved. Graphical representations of different business scenarios are critical to understand how different aspects of the system descriptions are analysed in relation to each other and how requirements from different perspectives are perceived as a whole. The goal of this paper is to introduce the modelling method for visualization of the process of publication of BSc thesis into institutional repositories. Universities need to investigate undergraduate students’ publications of their graduate work (BSc thesis) to promote knowledge of university repositories. Two different modelling methods were used to visualize publishing process and two case studies at two different universities were made. The results indicated and motivated that SICM method had more semantic power to visualize business process in a more comprehensive way. © 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'university']",['UGA'],Gustiené P.,Communications in Computer and Information Science,English,Conference Paper,"24th International Conference on Information and Software Technologies, ICIST 2018",4 October 2018 through 6 October 2018,0,,,0.0,Springer Verlag,18650929,9783319999715,2018.0,920,0,187.0,197,10.1007/978-3-319-99972-2_15,WOS:000438387600004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0
1027,WOS,Sustainability of Latin American initiatives that publish open access journals using the XML-JATS standard: the case Redalyc,JATS; Latin America; Marcalyc; Open access; Redalyc; SciELO; Scientific journal; Scientific publication; Sustainability; XML,"Objetive. To carry out the sustainability analysis of the Latin American initiative Redalyc.org, based on two fundamental aspects, the economic and the need for its existence. Method. the measurement of the man-hours required to publish a scientific article is carried out, using Marcalyc. 40 articles published in scientific journals from different areas of knowledge, belonging to Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela, are processed using this tool. Results. it is obtained that the markup takes on average 86.3% (SD = 4.2%) of the total processing time, distributed in almost equal parts between the content of the article (body) (average = 48.3%, SD = 9.5%) and references, notes, acknowledgement, appendix and glossary (back) (mean = 43.2%, SD = 9.3%). Conclusions. The sustainability of Redalyc's publication model is more economically guaranteed for two reasons; 1) the processing time to generate XML-JATS is much shorter than SciELO, and 2) it uses a markup tool (Marcalyc), which can be used directly by the editorial team of a journal, without the need for specialized technical knowledge. This favors the sustainability of the scientific publication model in Latin American open access and returns the control of the publication process to the editors.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'researcher']","['COL', 'BRA', 'MEX', 'VEN']","Guzman-Useche, Eliana; Rodriguez-Contreras, Fernando",BIBLIOS-REVISTA DE BIBLIOTECOLOGIA Y CIENCIAS DE LA INFORMACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Guzman-Useche, Eliana; Rodriguez-Contreras, Fernando] Univ Los Andes, Fac Ingn, Merida, Venezuela",12.0,0.0,"UNIV PITTSBURGH, UNIV LIBRARY SYSTEM",1562-4730,,2019.0,,76,10.0,21,10.5195/biblios.2019.588,WOS:000438416600007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1031,WOS,Main Influencing Factors of Quality Determination of Collaborative Open Data Pages,data quality; information quality; Wikipedia; collaborative open data; metrics; indicators; quality dimensions; qualitative study; quality determination,"Collaborative knowledge bases allow anyone to create and edit information online. One example of a resource with collaborative content is Wikipedia. Despite the fact that this free encyclopedia is one of the most popular sources of information in the world, it is often criticized for the poor quality of its content. Articles in Wikipedia in different languages on the same topic, can be created and edited independently of each other. Some of these language versions can provide very different but valuable information on each topic. Measuring the quality of articles using metrics is intended to make open data pages such as Wikipedia more reliable and trustworthy. A major challenge is that the 'gold standard' in determining the quality of an open data page is unknown. Therefore, we investigated which factors influence the potentials of quality determination of collaborative open data pages and their sources. Our model is based on empirical data derived from the experience of international experts on knowledge management and data quality. It has been developed by using semi-structured interviews and a qualitative content analysis based on Grounded Theory (GT). Important influencing factors are: Better outcomes, Better decision making, Limitations, More efficient workflows for article creation and review, Process efficiency, Quality improvement, Reliable and trustworthy utilization of data.","['opendata', 'openevaluation']",['interview'],['engtech'],['researcher'],"['DEU', 'RUS', 'BEL', 'IDN', 'ITA', 'NLD', 'ISR']","Haerting, Ralf-Christian; Lewoniewski, Wlodzimierz",INFORMATION,English,Article,,,,"[Haerting, Ralf-Christian] Aalen Univ Appl Sci, Dept Business Sci, D-73430 Aalen, Germany; [Lewoniewski, Wlodzimierz] Pozna Univ Econ & Business, Dept Informat Syst, PL-61875 Poznan, Poland",14.0,0.0,MDPI,,,2020.0,11,6,,,10.3390/info11060283,WOS:000438605100005,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1033,WOS,Open data visualizations and analytics as tools for policy-making,Policy informatics; Policy analytics; Open data; Topic modeling; Visual analytics; Usability testing,"Government agencies collect large amounts of structured and unstructured data. Although these data can be used to improve services as well as policy processes, it is not always clear how to analyze the data and how to glean insights for policy making, especially when the data includes large volumes of unstructured text data. This article reports opinions found in We the People petition data using topic modeling and visual analytics. It provides an assessment of the usability of the visual analytics results for policy making based on interviews with data professionals and policy makers. We found that visual analytics have potentially positive impacts on policy making practices. Experts also articulated potential barriers regarding the adoption of visual analytics tools, and made suggestions. Potential barriers included insufficient resources in government agencies and difficulty integrating analytics with current work practices. The main suggestions involved providing training and interpretation guidelines along with the visual analytics tools. Major contributions of this study include: (1) suggesting viable visualization tools for analyzing textual data for policy making, and (2) suggesting how to lower barriers to adoption by increasing usability.","['opendata', 'openpolicies']",['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Hagen, Loni; Keller, Thomas E.; Yerden, Xiaoyi; Luna-Reyes, Luis Felipe",GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY,English,Article,,,,"[Hagen, Loni; Keller, Thomas E.] Univ S Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620 USA; [Yerden, Xiaoyi; Luna-Reyes, Luis Felipe] SUNY Albany, 135 Western Ave, Albany, NY 12222 USA",57.0,3.0,ELSEVIER INC,0740-624X,,2019.0,36,4,,,10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.004,WOS:000438742100001,,2021-01-27,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1034,WOS,The role of the national library as a catalyst for an open access agenda: the experience in Sweden,Open access;  National libraries;  Electronic publishing;  Archives;  Sweden,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the role of national libraries in developing national open access infrastructure and policy on the basis of the experiences of the National Library (NL) of Sweden. Design/methodology/approach - The paper is descriptive based on the knowledge of a key, player in the development of open access in Sweden. The priorities and outcome of the programme are described. Findings - The paper reveals that the NL Sweden since around 1990 has combined the mission of a traditional national library with that of a national, research library authority. It has coordinated its support for development of repositories and open access in the OpenAccess.se programme that ran from 2006 to 2009. The conclusion is that a national library can successfully act as a catalyst for closer cooperation between the main bodies of research and research libraries in advancing an Open Access agenda and developing a digital research information infrastructure. This is because it is usually placed directly under the government and thus closer to national policy making. It is often perceived as unbiased in relation to the different interests of the various parties involved. It is also able to advance development projects into sustainable services. Originality/value - The role of national libraries in relation to open access has not been discussed widely. The experience of the NL Sweden in this respect has a general interest.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher']",['SWE'],"Hagerlid, Jan",INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY,English,Article,,,,"Natl Lib Sweden, Dept Natl Cooperat, Stockholm, Sweden",2.0,6.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,0264-1615,,2011.0,39,2,115.0,118,10.1108/02641611111138923,WOS:000438742100002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1035,WOS,Case studies in open access publishing. Number Five. Taking the plunge: Open access at the Canadian Journal of Sociology,0,"Introduction. Presents a personal account of the transfer to open access of the leading Canadian journal of sociology. Background: The Canadian Journal of Sociology had established a strong position, internationally, among sociology journals. However, subscriptions were falling as readers increasingly accessed the resource through libraries and a transfer of editorship occasioned an opportunity for a radical reassessment. Rationale for open access: Following something of a personal struggle on the part of the Editor, the rationale for open access, that is, increasing the visibility and use of the journal, was accepted. Support from the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council becomes more central to economic viability Conclusion: Converting a scholarly print journal from toll-based to open access cannot be undertaken without serious consideration of all elements of the publishing and editing processes, but the benefits to scholarship are expected to be real. © the authors, 2008.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'othermeth']",['socscie'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['CAN'],Haggerty K.D.,Information Research,English,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,0,13681613,0,2008.0,13,1,0.0,0,,WOS:000438743500002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1041,WOS,High-throughput analysis suggests differences in journal false discovery rate by subject area and impact factor but not open access status,False discovery rate; Replication; Reproducibility; Cancer; Open access; Impact factor,"Background A low replication rate has been reported in some scientific areas motivating the creation of resource intensive collaborations to estimate the replication rate by repeating individual studies. The substantial resources required by these projects limits the number of studies that can be repeated and consequently the generalizability of the findings. We extend the use of a method from Jager and Leek to estimate the false discovery rate for 94 journals over a 5-year period using p values from over 30,000 abstracts enabling the study of how the false discovery rate varies by journal characteristics. Results We find that the empirical false discovery rate is higher for cancer versus general medicine journals (p=9.801E-07, 95% CI: 0.045, 0.097; adjusted mean false discovery rate cancer=0.264 vs. general medicine=0.194). We also find that false discovery rate is negatively associated with log journal impact factor. A two-fold decrease in journal impact factor is associated with an average increase of 0.020 in FDR (p=2.545E-04). Conversely, we find no statistically significant evidence of a higher false discovery rate, on average, for Open Access versus closed access journals (p=0.320, 95% CI -0.015, 0.046, adjusted mean false discovery rate Open Access=0.241 vs. closed access=0.225).Conclusions Our results identify areas of research that may need additional scrutiny and support to facilitate replicable science. Given our publicly available R code and data, others can complete a broad assessment of the empirical false discovery rate across other subject areas and characteristics of published research.","['openmethod', 'openaccess']","['othermeth', 'biblio']",['med'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Hall, L. M.; Hendricks, A. E.",BMC BIOINFORMATICS,English,Article,,,,"[Hall, L. M.; Hendricks, A. E.] Univ Colorado, Math & Stat Sci, Denver, CO 80202 USA; [Hendricks, A. E.] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Biostat & Informat, Aurora, CO 80045 USA",29.0,0.0,BMC,1471-2105,,2020.0,21,1,,,10.1186/s12859-020-03817-7,WOS:000440788500004,33297936.0,2021-01-27,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1047,WOS,Quantum game theory and open access publishing,quantum game theory; open access; physics and society,"The digital revolution of the information age and in particular the sweeping changes of scientific communication brought about by computing and novel communication technology, potentiate global, high grade scientific information for free. The arXiv, for example, is the leading scientific communication platform, mainly for mathematics and physics, where everyone in the world has free access on. While in some scientific disciplines the open access way is successfully realized, other disciplines (e.g. humanities and social sciences) dwell on the traditional path, even though many scientists belonging to these communities approve the open access principle. In this paper we try to explain these different publication patterns by using a game theoretical approach. Based on the assumption, that the main goal of scientists is the maximization of their reputation, we model different possible game settings, namely a zero sum game, the prisoners' dilemma case and a version of the stag hunt game, that show the dilemma of scientists belonging to non-open access communities. From an individual perspective, they have no incentive to deviate from the Nash equilibrium of traditional publishing. By extending the model using the quantum game theory approach it can be shown, that if the strength of entanglement exceeds a certain value, the scientists will overcome the dilemma and terminate to publish only traditionally in all three settings. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Hanauske, Matthias; Bernius, Steffen; Dugall, Berndt",PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"Univ Frankfurt, Inst Informat Syst, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany; Johann Christian Senkenberg Univ Library, D-60325 Frankfurt, Germany",28.0,14.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV,0378-4371,,2007.0,382,2,650.0,664,10.1016/j.physa.2007.04.012,WOS:000441949600003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1049,WOS,"Open Data, Crowdsourcing and Game Mechanics. A case study on civic participation in the digital age",Civic participation; Civic technologies; Crowdsourcing; Game mechanics; Open data,"The aim of this paper is to shed light on the dynamics of civic participation, media agency, and data practices. To do so we analyse an investigative journalism story run by The Guardian that combined open data, crowdsourcing and game mechanics with the purpose of engaging readers. The case study highlights how data can be made accessible to people who usually do not have access; how game mechanics can be deployed in order to foster civic participation by offering users a sense of autonomy, competence and relatedness; and how crowdsourcing can organise a large group of people into achieving a common goal. The combination of these three elements resulted in a case for civic participation in the digital era.","['opendata', 'openmethod']","['interview', 'othermeth']","['engtech', 'socscie']","['practitioner', 'othergroup', 'researcher']",['GBR'],"Handler, Reinhard A.; Conill, Raul Ferrer",COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK-THE JOURNAL OF COLLABORATIVE COMPUTING AND WORK PRACTICES,English,Article,,,,"[Handler, Reinhard A.; Conill, Raul Ferrer] Karlstad Univ, Media & Commun Studies, S-65188 Karlstad, Sweden",76.0,6.0,SPRINGER,0925-9724,,2016.0,25,2-3,153.0,166,10.1007/s10606-016-9250-0,WOS:000442535700001,,2021-01-27,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1052,WOS,Diffusion of treatment research: Does open access matter?,open access; diffusion; dissemination; accessibility; publishing,"Advocates of the Open Access movement claim that removing access barriers will substantially increase the diffusion of academic research. If successful, this movement could play a role in efforts to increase utilization of psychotherapy research by mental health practitioners. In a pair of studies, mental health professionals were given either no citation, a normal citation, a linked citation, or a free access citation and were asked to find and read the cited article. After 1 week, participants read a vignette on the same topic as the article and gave recommendations for an intervention. In both studies, those given the free access citation were more likely to read the article, yet only in one study did free access increase the likelihood of making intervention recommendations consistent with the article. (0 2008 Wiley Periodicals.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'othermeth']","['med', 'socscie']","['practitioner', 'researcher']",['USA'],"Hardisty, David J.; Haaga, David A. F.",JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Hardisty, David J.] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10027 USA; [Haaga, David A. F.] American Univ, Washington, DC 20016 USA",34.0,10.0,WILEY,0021-9762,,2008.0,64,7,821.0,839,10.1002/jclp.20492,WOS:000442670600018,18425790.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1053,WOS,"Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition",open data; reproducibility; open science; meta-science; interrupted time series; journal policy,"Access to data is a critical feature of an efficient, progressive and ultimately self-correcting scientific ecosystem. But the extent to which in-principle benefits of data sharing are realized in practice is unclear. Crucially, it is largely unknown whether published findings can be reproduced by repeating reported analyses upon shared data ('analytic reproducibility'). To investigate this, we conducted an observational evaluation of a mandatory open data policy introduced at the journal Cognition. Interrupted time-series analyses indicated a substantial post-policy increase in data available statements (104/417, 25% pre-policy to 136/ 174, 78% post-policy), although not all data appeared reusable (23/ 104, 22% pre-policy to 85/136, 62%, post-policy). For 35 of the articles determined to have reusable data, we attempted to reproduce 1324 target values. Ultimately, 64 values could not be reproduced within a 10% margin of error. For 22 articles all target values were reproduced, but 11 of these required author assistance. For 13 articles at least one value could not be reproduced despite author assistance. Importantly, there were no clear indications that original conclusions were seriously impacted. Mandatory open data policies can increase the frequency and quality of data sharing. However, suboptimal data curation, unclear analysis specification and reporting errors can impede analytic reproducibility, undermining the utility of data sharing and the credibility of scientific findings.","['opendata', 'openmethod']","['othermeth', 'biblio']",['socscie'],"['researcher', 'publisher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Hardwicke, Tom E.; Mathur, Maya B.; MacDonald, Kyle; Nilsonne, Gustav; Banks, George C.; Kidwell, Mallory C.; Mohr, Alicia Hofelich; Clayton, Elizabeth; Yoon, Erica J.; Tessler, Michael Henry; Lenne, Richie L.; Altman, Sara; Long, Bria; Frank, Michael C.",ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Hardwicke, Tom E.] Stanford Univ, Meta Res Innovat Ctr Stanford METRICS, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA; [Mathur, Maya B.] Stanford Univ, Quantitat Sci Unit, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA; [MacDonald, Kyle; Nilsonne, Gustav; Yoon, Erica J.; Tessler, Michael Henry; Altman, Sara; Long, Bria; Frank, Michael C.] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA; [Mathur, Maya B.] Harvard Univ, Harvard Biostat, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA; [Nilsonne, Gustav] Stockholm Univ, Stress Res Inst, Stockholm, Sweden; [Nilsonne, Gustav] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden; [Banks, George C.] Univ N Carolina, Belk Coll Business, Charlotte, NC USA; [Kidwell, Mallory C.] Univ Utah, Dept Psychol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA; [Mohr, Alicia Hofelich] Univ Minnesota, LATIS, Minneapolis, MN USA; [Clayton, Elizabeth] Univ N Carolina, Org Sci Program, Charlotte, NC USA; [Lenne, Richie L.] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN USA",57.0,29.0,ROYAL SOC,2054-5703,,2018.0,5,8,,,10.1098/rsos.180448,WOS:000442917700012,30225032.0,2021-01-27,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1057,WOS,Factors affecting psychologists' adoption of an open data badge,data sharing; individual motivation; open data badge; psychologist; social psychology; theory of planned behavior,"The purpose of this research is to investigate the individual, normative and resource factors affecting psychologists' adoption of an open data badge. The theory of planned behavior is employed as the theoretical framework to explain how these factors impact behavioral intention to adopt an open data badge. A national survey (n=341) of psychologists found that perceived benefits, norms of data sharing and attitude towards an open data badge had a significant positive relationship with attitude toward the open data badge, whereas perceived risk had a significant negative relationship. Perceived effort had a negative relationship to behavioral intention to adopt the open data badge, but had no relationship to attitude formation surrounding the open data badge adoption. The availability of a data repository and pressure from an open science journal did not have a significant relationship to behavioral intentions to adopt an open data badge. The implications for psychologists from a practical and theoretical perspective, and future directions for improving psychologists' data sharing behaviors are discussed. Copyright © 2017 by Association for Information Science and Technology",['opendata'],['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Harper L.M., Kim Y.",Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,John Wiley and Sons Inc,23739231,0,2017.0,54,1,696.0,698,10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401120,WOS:000443616100007,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1058,WOS,"Attitudinal, normative, and resource factors affecting psychologists' intentions to adopt an open data badge: An empirical analysis",Open data badge; Data sharing; Psychologist; Psychology; Theory of planned behavior,"The purpose of this research is to investigate the attitudinal, normative, and resource factors affecting psychologists' adoption of an open data badge. The theory of planned behavior was employed to demonstrate how these factors influence behavioral intentions to adopt an open data badge. This research used a survey method to examine to what extent those attitudinal, normative, resource factors influence psychologists' behavioral intentions to adopt an open data badge, and therefore engage in data sharing behaviors. A national survey (n= 341) across the field of psychology showed that perceived benefit and perceived risk had significant positive and negative relationships with attitude toward the open data badge respectively. Furthermore, attitude toward open data badge and norm of data sharing had significant positive influences on psychologists' behavioral intentions to adopt the open data badge. Perceived effort had a significant negative relationship with the behavioral intention to adopt the open data badge, but had no effect toward attitudes surrounding the badge. However, this research found that the availability of a data repository and pressure from an open science journal did not have any significant relationship with behavioral intention to adopt the open data badge. The discussion includes implications for psychologists from both practical and theoretical perspectives. Additionally, future directions for gauging psychologists' adoption of the open data badge and increasing data sharing behaviors are discussed.",['opendata'],['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Harper, Lindsey M.; Kim, Youngseek",INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Harper, Lindsey M.] Marshall Univ, Libraries & Online Learning, One John Marshall Dr, Huntington, WV 25755 USA; [Kim, Youngseek] Univ Kentucky, Sch Informat Sci, 331 Little Lib Bldg, Lexington, KY 40506 USA",61.0,5.0,ELSEVIER SCI LTD,0268-4012,,2018.0,41,,23.0,32,10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.03.001,WOS:000443629000001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1060,WOS,Open data policies and satellite Earth observation,Data; Open; Full; Free of charge; Data policy; Earth observation; Space,"From the Heads of State of the G8 nations, the European Union, international organisations, through to national laws and policies, there is a strong momentum for full, free and open access to public sector digital data so that the benefits of public investment in such data can be maximised with as few barriers to use as possible. While open data for society at large is a relatively new phenomenon, the space sector has been accustomed to open data for all of its existence, especially in astronomy and navigation, but also in Earth observation. In the context of the open data debate, the purpose of this paper is to examine 21 policy and legal instruments concerning open data made by a range of organisations that in one way or another relate to Earth observation data and therefore contribute to the critical examination of the effectiveness of the open data movement. Based on these documents, the paper discusses common issues such as changing perspectives on the desirability of open data, commercial use, and licences and exceptions, and concludes that open access to Earth observation data requires more specification in order to clarify the conditions of access and so to realise fully the potential benefits. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",['opendata'],['documentreview'],['natscie'],"['researcher', 'policy']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Harris, Ray; Baumann, Ingo",SPACE POLICY,English,Article,,,,"[Harris, Ray] UCL, Dept Geog, London WC1E 6BT, England; [Baumann, Ingo] BHO Legal, D-50674 Cologne, Germany",26.0,25.0,ELSEVIER SCI LTD,0265-9646,,2015.0,32,,44.0,53,10.1016/j.spacepol.2015.01.001,WOS:000443993100003,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1067,WOS,The role of open access and open educational resources: A distance learning perspective,Digital scholarship; Open access; Open access publishing and licensing; Open and distance learning; Open education; Open educational resources,"The paper explores the role of Open Access (in licensing, publishing and sharing research data) and Open Educational Resources within Distance Education, with a focus on the context of the University of London International Programmes. We report on a case study where data were gathered from librarians and programme directors relating to existing practice around Open Access; the major constraints in using Open Educational Resources and the main resource implications, when adopting Open Educational Resources, were also investigated. Our aim was to (a) raise awareness and understanding of what is possible to achieve in higher education by embracing the Open Access movement (b) identify next steps and actions that could be taken to improve institutional use of Open Access materials, including Open Educational Resources, (c) examine the implications of such actions for Open Distance Learning and generally the higher education sector. Our investigation highlighted some opportunities and the findings resulted into some clear recommendations that emerged both for practitioners and for students in this area. There seems to be a clear synergy between the different but related movements of Open access and OERs as both have to address issues of ease of access, quality and visibility in order to become accepted in higher education. © ACPIL.","['openaccess', 'openeducation']","['survey', 'interview']",['socscie'],"['practitioner', 'researcher', 'unisupportstaff']",['GBR'],"Hatzipanagos S., Gregson J.",Electronic Journal of e-Learning,English,Article,0,0,0,,,12.0,Academic Publishing Ltd,14794403,0,2015.0,13,2,96.0,104,,WOS:000445209200009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1073,WOS,"Exploring Possibilities for Transforming Established Subscription-based Scientific Journals into Open Access Journals Present Situation, Transformation Criteria, and Exemplary Implementation within Trans-O-MIM",Scientific journals; open access; subscription; journal transformation; journal conversion; journal flipping; journal transition,"Background: Based on today's information and communication technologies the open access paradigm has become an important approach for adequately communicating new scientific knowledge. Objectives: Summarizing the present situation for journal transformation. Presenting criteria for adequate transformation as well as a specific approach for it. Describing our exemplary implementation of such a journal transformation. Methods: Studying the respective literature as well as discussing this topic in various discussion groups and meetings (primarily of editors and publishers, but also of authors and readers), with long term experience as editors and/or publishers of scientific publications as prerequisite. Results: There is a clear will, particularly of political and funding organizations, towards open access publishing. In spite of this, there is still a large amount of scientific knowledge, being communicated through subscription based journals. For successfully transforming such journals into open access, sixteen criteria for a goal-oriented, stepwise, sustainable, and fair transformation are suggested. The Tandem Model as transformation approach is introduced. Our exemplary implementation is done in the Trans-O-MIM project. It is exploring strategies, models and evaluation metrics for journal transformation. As instance the journal Methods of Information in Medicine will apply the Tandem Model from 2017 onwards. Conclusions: Within Trans-O-MIM we will reach at least nine of the sixteen criteria for adequate transformation. It was positive to implement Trans-O-MIM as international research project. After first steps for transforming Methods have successfully been made, challenges will remain, among others, in identifying appropriate incentives for open access publishing in order to support its transformation.",['openaccess'],"['documentreview', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['funder', 'publisher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Haux, Reinhold; Kuballa, Stefanie; Schulze, Mareike; Boehm, Claudia; Gefeller, Olaf; Haaf, Jan; Henning, Peter; Mielke, Corinna; Niggemann, Florian; Schuerg, Andrea; Bergemann, Dieter",METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE,English,Article,,,,"[Haux, Reinhold; Kuballa, Stefanie; Schulze, Mareike; Mielke, Corinna] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Peter L Reichertz Inst Med Informat, Braunschweig, Germany; [Haux, Reinhold; Kuballa, Stefanie; Schulze, Mareike; Mielke, Corinna] Hannover Med Sch, Muehlenpfordtstr 23, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany; [Boehm, Claudia; Haaf, Jan; Henning, Peter; Niggemann, Florian; Schuerg, Andrea; Bergemann, Dieter] Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany; [Gefeller, Olaf] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, Erlangen, Germany",31.0,7.0,GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG,0026-1270,,2016.0,55,6,481.0,487,10.3414/ME16-05-0010,WOS:000446100000007,27868132.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1079,WOS,Mandatory Open Access Publishing for Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Ethics and Enthusiasm,Ethics; Open access; ETDs; Institutional repositories; Intellectual property,"This article argues against policies that require students to submit theses and dissertations to electronic institutional repositories. The article counters a variety of arguments often used to justify this practice. In addition, the article reports on the results of an examination of electronic thesis and dissertation policies at more than 150 university libraries and graduate schools, offering a system of criteria and scoring for ranking these policies according to their respect for student copyright and intellectual property. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher']",['USA'],"Hawkins, Ann R.; Kimball, Miles A.; Ives, Maura",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"[Hawkins, Ann R.; Kimball, Miles A.] Texas Tech Univ, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA; [Ives, Maura] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA",24.0,10.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2013.0,39,1,32.0,60,10.1016/j.acalib.2012.12.003,WOS:000446564700012,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1081,WOS,Editors view the continuous publication model as a satisfactory alternative for open access LIS journals,0,"Objective: To understand the prevalence of, motivations for, and satisfaction with using a rolling-volume publishing model, as opposed to publishing discrete issues, across open access academic journals in library and information science. Design: A 12 question survey questionnaire. Setting: English-language, open access library and information science (LIS) journals published in the United States of America. Subjects: A total of 21 open access LIS journals identified via the Directory of Open Access Journals that were actively publishing, and that also met the authors' standard of scholarliness, which they established by identifying a journal's peer-review process or other evidence of rigorous review. Based on responses, 12 journals published using discrete issues, while 9 published as rolling volumes or as rolling volumes with some discrete issues. Methods: In late 2011, the study's authors invited lead editors or primary journal contacts to complete the survey. Survey participants were asked to identify whether their journal published in discrete issues, rolling volumes, or rolling volumes with occasional discrete issues, with the latter two categories combined as one for ease of results analysis. Survey logic split respondents into two groups, either discrete-issue or rolling-volume. Respondents in both categories were posed similar sets of questions, with the key difference being that the questions directed at each category accounted for the publication model the journals themselves identified as using. Editors from both groups were asked about the reasons for using the publication model they identified for their journal: within the survey tool, authors provided 16 potential reasons for using a discrete-issue model, and 13 potential reasons for using a rolling-volume model. Respondents from both groups were asked to mark all reasons that applied for their respective journals. The survey also included questions about whether the journal had ever used the alternate publishing model, the editor's satisfaction with their current model, and the likelihood of the journal switching to the alternate publishing model in the foreseeable future. Main Results: The authors collected complete responses from 21 of the original 29 journals invited to participate in the study, a response rate of 72%. For the 12 journals that identified as using discrete issues, ease of production workflow (91.7%), clear production deadlines (75.0%), and journal publicity and promotion (75.0%) were the three most common reasons for using a discrete-issue model. For the nine journals using rolling volumes, improved production workflow (77.8%), decreased dependence on production deadlines (77.8%), and increased speed of research dissemination (66.7%) were the three most common reasons cited for using a rolling-volume model. Findings show that overall satisfaction with a journal's particular publication model was a common factor regardless of publishing model in use, though only the rolling-volume editors unanimously reported being very satisfied with their model. This high satisfaction rate is reflected in editors' positions that they were very unlikely to switch away from the rolling-volume method. While a majority of editors of discrete-issue journals also reported being very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with their current model, the mixed responses to whether they would contemplate switching to the alternate model suggests that awareness of the benefits of rolling-volume publishing is increasing. Conclusion: Researchers discovered a greater incidence of rolling-volume model journals with open access LIS journals than anticipated, suggesting that this is an area where additional research is necessary. The relative newness of the rolling-volume model may be a contributing factor to the high satisfaction rate among editors of journals using this model, as journal editors are likely to be more deliberate in selecting this model over the traditional discrete-issue publishing model. Workflow and production practices were identified as key chareristics for selecting a publishing model regardless of the model selected, and therefore this is another area in need of further investigation. © 2014 Hayman.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['socscie'],"['librarian', 'researcher', 'publisher']",['USA'],Hayman R.,Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Alberta,1715720X,0,2014.0,9,3,83.0,85,10.18438/b8v89p,WOS:000447007300004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1082,WOS,Some LIS Faculty Indicate Reservations about Open Access,,"Objective - To examine the awareness of, attitudes toward, and engagement with open access (OA) publishing, based on rank and tenure status among library and information science (LIS) faculty in North America. Design - Web-based survey distributed via email. Setting - Accredited library and information science (LIS) programs in North America. Subjects - 276 professors and professors emeriti. Methods - Researchers collected email addresses for 1,017 tenure-track, tenured, and emeriti professors from the public websites of the LIS programs. Researchers sent an email invitation to participate in the survey by accessing a URL, with the survey itself delivered using Qualtrics software. The survey included 51 total questions, some with additional sub-questions, and most items used Likert-type rating scale. The researchers analysed the data using SPSS software, and indicated using chi-square tests to measure significance, with a stated intent to get beyond the descriptive statistics commonly seen in other publications. Main Results - This study's results draw on 276 completed responses, for a response rate of 27%. Researchers reported that 53% of respondents had some experience with publishing in a peer-reviewed OA format. When asked whether they agreed that scholarly articles should be free to access for everyone, pre-tenure assistant professors were most likely to agree (74%), followed by tenured associate professors (62%), full professors (59%) and then emeriti professors (8%). However, they found less likelihood that associate professors would have actually published in an OA format, highlighting a disconnect between beliefs about accessibility of research and actual practice with open access (p. 646). Researchers also discovered a connection between faculty awareness of institutional and disciplinary repositories and faculty publishing in OA journals, though a relatively low number (35%) had deposited their output in a repository within the previous year. That increases to 50% of respondents when timeframe is ignored. Faculty who had never published in OA journals ranked several barriers to doing so, barriers common across disciplinary boundaries. These include objections to paying OA fees; perceptions of slow time to publish, low research impact, and venue prestige when compared to traditional subscription journals; an inability to identify an appropriate OA journal; and an inability to pay OA fees. However, the researchers note that a majority of these respondents who had never published in an OA format would do so if these barriers were removed. Those participants who had some previous experience with OA were more likely to have positive perceptions of OA journal quality and impact, as well as the overall publishing experience, as compared to publishing in traditional journals. As in other disciplines, LIS faculty are conscious of the connection between OA and tenure and promotion processes. For example, this study reveals that non-tenured faculty are more likely to agree that publishing in OA venues may affect their career progress. Researchers report uncertainty about OA even among tenured LIS faculty. Of all respondents, only 34% agreed that a tenure or promotion committee might consider an OA publication on par with a traditional publication, while 44% of respondents were of the opinion that an OA publication would be treated less favourably than a traditional journal. A mere 1% of respondents believed that an OA publication would be treated more favourably within the tenure and promotion process. Despite this unfavourable perception of OA, the researchers report that 38% of respondents planned to publish in an OA journal regardless of whether their tenure and promotion committees might treat that OA publication unfavourably. Conclusion - The researchers report a connection between publishing in an OA journal and academic rank, with full professors more likely to publish OA or to have previous experience in publishing in an OA journal as compared to assistant professor colleagues, who perceive publishing in OA as a potential impediment to career progress. The researchers note that there is significant opportunity for LIS faculty involved in tenure and promotion committees to consider and clarify how OA publications are treated, and the impact of OA publishing with regard to career progress. Moreover, given the levels of uncertainty and equivocacy among faculty respondents as a whole regarding certain aspects of OA, the perceptions around quality and rigour, there is room for further research into LIS professors' perceptions and attitudes toward open access, and how these change over time.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],"['USA', 'CAN']","Hayman, Richard",EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE,English,Article,,,,"[Hayman, Richard] Mt Royal Univ, Calgary, AB, Canada",2.0,0.0,UNIV ALBERTA,1715-720X,,2016.0,11,3,96.0,98,10.18438/B8890B,WOS:000447007300007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1083,WOS,"LIS Practitioner-focused Research Trends Toward Open Access Journals, Academic-focused Research Toward Traditional Journals",,"Objective To examine the occupational characteristics and publication habits of library and information science (LIS) authors regarding traditional journals and open access journals. Design Content analysis. Setting English language research articles published in open access (OA) journals and non-open access (non-OA) journals from 2008 to 2013 that are indexed in LIS databases. Subjects The authorship characteristics for 3,472 peer-reviewed articles. Methods This researcher identified 33 total journals meeting the inclusion criteria by using the LIS categories within 2012 Journal Citation Reports (JCR) to find 13 appropriate non-OA journals, and within the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) to identify 20 appropriate OA journals. They found 1,665 articles by 3,186 authors published in the non OA journals, and another 1,807 articles by 3,446 authors within the OA journals. The researcher used author affiliation to determine article authors' occupations using information included in the articles themselves or by looking for information on the Internet, and excluded articles when occupational information could not be located. Authors were categorized into four occupational categories: Librarians (practitioners), Academics (faculty and researchers), Students (graduate or undergraduate), and Others. Using these categories, the author identified 10 different types of collaborations for coauthored articles. Main Results This research involves three primary research questions. The first examined the occupational differences between authors publishing in OA journals versus non-OA journals. Academics (faculty and researchers) more commonly published in non-OA journals (58.1%) compared to OA journals (35.6%). The inverse was true for librarian practitioners, who were more likely to publish in OA journals (53.9%) compared to non-OA journals (25.5%). Student authors, a combined category that included both graduate and undergraduate students, published more in non-OA journals (10.1%) versus in OA journals (5.0%). The final category of other saw only a slight difference between non-OA (6.3%) and OA (5.5%) publication venues. This second research question explored the difference in the proportion of LIS authors who published in OA and non-OA journals. Overall, authors were more likely to publish in OA journals (72.4%) vs. non-OA (64.3%). Librarians tended to be primary authors in OA journals, while LIS academics tend to be primary authors for articles in non-OA publications. Academics from outside the LIS discipline but contributing to the disciplinary literature were more likely to publish in non OA journals. Regarding trends over time, this research showed a decrease in the percentage of librarian practitioners and other authors publishing in OA journals, while academics and students increased their OA contributions rates during the same period. Finally, the research explored whether authors formed different types of collaborations when publishing in OA journals as compared to non OA journals. When examining co-authorship of articles, just over half of all articles published in OA journals (54.4%) and non-OA journals (53.2%) were co-authored. Overall the researcher identified 10 types of collaborative relationships and examined the rates for publishing in OA versus non-OA journals for these relationships. OA journals saw three main relationships, with high levels of collaborations between practitioner librarians (38.6% of collaborations), between librarians and academics (20.5%), and between academics only (18.0%). Non-OA journals saw four main relationships, with collaborations between academics appearing most often (34.1%), along with academic-student collaborations (21.5%), practitioner librarian collaborations (15.5%), and librarian-academic collaborations (13.2%). Conclusion LIS practitioner-focused research tends to appear more often in open access journals, while academic-focused researcher tends to appear more often in non-OA journals. These trends also appear in research collaborations, with co-authored works involving librarians appearing more often in OA journals, and collaborations that include academics more likely to appear in non-OA journals.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],"['researcher', 'publisher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Hayman, Richard",EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE,English,Article,,,,"[Hayman, Richard] Mt Royal Univ, Calgary, AB, Canada",1.0,0.0,UNIV ALBERTA,1715-720X,,2018.0,13,1,24.0,26,10.18438/eblip29377,WOS:000447517500008,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1085,WOS,Altruism or Self-Interest? Exploring the Motivations of Open Access Authors,,"More than 250 authors at Utah State University published an Open Access (OA) article in 2016. Analysis of survey results and publication data from Scopus suggests that the following factors led authors to choose OA venues: ability to pay publishing charges, disciplinary colleagues' positive attitudes toward OA, and personal feelings such as altruism and desire to reach a wide audience. Tenure status was not an apparent factor. This article adds to the body of literature on author motivations and can inform library outreach and marketing efforts, the creation of new publishing models, and the conversation about the larger scholarly publishing landscape.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'biblio']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'publisher']",['USA'],"Heaton, Robert; Burns, Dylan; Thorns, Becky",COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES,English,Article,,,,"[Heaton, Robert; Burns, Dylan] Utah State Univ Lib, Logan, UT 84322 USA; [Thorns, Becky] Utah State Univ Lib, Digital Initiat, Logan, UT 84322 USA",27.0,4.0,ASSOC COLL RESEARCH LIBRARIES,0010-0870,,2019.0,80,4,485.0,507,10.5860/crl.80.4.485,WOS:000448356800004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1086,WOS,Open science practices in higher education: Discussion of survey results from research and teaching staff in Germany,Open educational resources; open science; open education; survey,"Aspects of open science and scholarly practices are often discussed with a focus on research and research dissemination processes. There is currently less discussion on open science and its influence on learning and teaching in higher education, and reversely. This paper discusses open science in relation to educational practices and resources and reports on a study to investigate current educational practices from the perspective of open science. We argue that offering students opportunities via open educational practices raises their awareness of future open science goals and teaches them the skills needed to reach those goals. We present online survey results from 210 participants with teaching responsibility at higher education institutions in Germany. While some of them try to establish more open learning and teaching settings, most respondents apply rather traditional ways of learning and teaching. 60% do not use open educational resources - many have not even heard of them - nor do they make their courses open for an online audience. Participants' priority lies in resource accuracy and quality and we still see a gap between the benefit of open practices and their practicability and applicability. The paper contributes to the general discussion of open practices in higher education by looking at open science practices and their adaptation to the learning and teaching environment. It formulates recommendations for improvements of open practice support and infrastructure.","['openeducation', 'openmethod', 'opentools', 'opendata']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['DEU'],"Heck, Tamara; Peters, Isabella; Mazarakis, Athanasios; Scherp, Ansgar; Bluemel, Ina",EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION,English,Article,,,,"[Heck, Tamara] Leibniz Inst Res & Informat Educ, DIPF, Informat Ctr Educ, Frankfurt, Germany; [Peters, Isabella; Mazarakis, Athanasios] Univ Kiel, Kiel, Germany; [Peters, Isabella; Mazarakis, Athanasios] Leibniz Informat Ctr Econ, ZBW, Kiel, Germany; [Scherp, Ansgar] Univ Stirling, Comp Sci & Math, Stirling, Scotland; [Bluemel, Ina] Hannover Univ Appl Sci & Arts, German Natl Lib Sci & Technol, Hannover, Germany",55.0,0.0,IOS PRESS,0167-8329,,2020.0,36,3,301.0,323,10.3233/EFI-190272,WOS:000448357300007,,2021-01-27,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1087,WOS,Researcher's attitudes towards open access and institutional repositories: A methodological study for developing a survey form directed to researchers in business schools,End-user attitudes; Methodological study; Web survey,"The aim of this study was to address the need of further studies on researchers' expectancies and attitudes towards open access publishing. In particular we wanted to focus on acceptance and user behavior regarding institutional archives. The approach is domain specific and was based on a framework of theories on intellectual and social organization of the sciences and communication practices in the digital era. In the study we apply a theoretical model of user acceptance and user behavior (UTAUT) developed by Venkatesh et al. in 2003 as an explanatory model for developing a survey form for a quantitative empirical research on user attitudes and preferences. Thus our research approach is new and crossdisciplinary in the way we combine earlier research results from the fields of organizational theory, information science and information systems science. This is in our view a fruitful approach broadening the theoretical base of the study and bringing in a deeper understanding of the research problems. As a result of the study we will present a model framework and a web survey form for how to carry out the empirical study.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['FIN'],Hedlund T.,"Open Scholarship: Authority, Community, and Sustainability in the Age of Web 2.0 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2008",English,Conference Paper,"12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2008",25 June 2008 through 27 June 2008,"Toronto, ON",,,2.0,0,0,9780772763150,2008.0,0,0,15.0,22,,WOS:000448358700008,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1088,WOS,Open access publishing in Finland: Discipline-specific publishing patterns in biomedicine and economics,Economics; Medicine; Open access; Publishing patterns,"Open access publishing strategies have traditionally been directed towards what has been regarded as a homogenous scientific community of universities, researchers and libraries. However, discipline specific practices in communication and publishing strategies are prevailing in different scientific areas. In this study we, argue that discipline specific publishing patterns may affect the ways that open access strategies can be adopted in different scientific areas. We characterise and identify incentives for publishing open access into factors depending mostly on the social environment and factors mostly depending on personal factors of the researcher. In the case study comparing the field of biomedicine and economics and business administration we were able to find out figures on the proportion, type and channel of open access publishing of scientific articles by Finnish researchers in economics and medicine.",['openaccess'],['interview'],"['med', 'socscie']",['researcher'],['FIN'],"Hedlund T., Roos A.","Digital Spectrum: Integrating Technology and Culture - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2006",English,Conference Paper,"10th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2006",14 June 2006 through 16 June 2006,Bansko,,,1.0,0,0,9789541600405,2006.0,0,0,145.0,153,,WOS:000448360500011,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1089,WOS,The open access scientific journal an empirical study,,"The open access (OA) model for journals is compared to the open source principle for computer software. Since the early 1990s nearly 1,000 OA scientific journals have emerged - mostly as voluntary community efforts, although recently some professionally operating publishers have used author charges or institutional membership. This study of CIA journals without author charges shows that their impact is still relatively small, but awareness of it is increasing. The average number of research articles per year is lower than for major scientific journals but the publication times are shorter.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Hedlund, T; Gustafsson, T; Bjork, BC",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"Swedish Sch Econ & Business Adm, Helsinki, Finland",20.0,22.0,WILEY,0953-1513,,2004.0,17,3,199.0,209,10.1087/095315104323159621,WOS:000448361400007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1091,WOS,The Dutch Approach to Achieving Open Access,Open access publishing; the Netherlands; negotiations; big deals; lessons learned,"In this paper, the authors - both of whom are library directors and involved in the contract negotiations with the bigger scientific publishers - present the conditions that formed the Dutch approach in these negotiations. A combination of clear political support, a powerful delegation, a unique bargaining model and fidelity to their principles geared the Dutch to their success in achieving open access. The authors put these joint license and open access negotiations in the perspective of open science and show that they are part of the transition towards open access.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']","['othermeth', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher']",['NLD'],"Heijne, Maria A. M.; van Wezenbeek, Wilma J. S. M.",BIBLIOTHEK FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS,German,Article,,,,"[Heijne, Maria A. M.] Univ Amsterdam, Hgsch Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Appl Sci, Lib, Singel 425, NL-1012 WP Amsterdam, Netherlands; [van Wezenbeek, Wilma J. S. M.] Delft Univ Technol, Lib, Mekelweg 2, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands",14.0,1.0,WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH,0341-4183,,2018.0,42,1,36.0,41,10.1515/bfp-2018-0010,WOS:000448399900003,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1094,WOS,From Open Access to Open Science: The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication,communication studies; communication; social sciences; academics; education; science communication; human communication; new media; communication technologies; mass communication; cultural communication; media and society; information technology; information science; libraries; science; knowledge; technology; sociology,"Although opening up of research is considered an appropriate and trend-setting model for future scientific communication, it can still be difficult to put open science into practice. How open and transparent can a scientific work be? This article investigates the potential to make all information and the whole work process of a qualification project such as a doctoral thesis comprehensively and freely accessible on the internet with an open free license both in the final form and completely traceable in development. The answer to the initial question, the self-experiment and the associated demand for openness, posed several challenges for a doctoral student, the institution, and the examination regulations, which are still based on the publication of an individually written and completed work that cannot be viewed by the public during the creation process. In the case of data and other documents, publication is usually not planned even after completion. This state of affairs in the use of open science in the humanities will be compared with open science best practices in the physical sciences. The reasons and influencing factors for open developments in science and research are presented, empirically and experimentally tested in the development of the first completely open humanities-based PhD thesis. The results of this two-part study show that it is possible to publish everything related to the doctoral study, qualification, and research process as soon as possible, as comprehensively as possible, and under an open license.","['openaccess', 'openmethod']",['survey'],"['socscie', 'hum']","['librarian', 'researcher']","['DEU', 'AUT', 'CHE']","Heise, Christian; Pearce, Joshua M.",SAGE OPEN,English,Article,,,,"[Heise, Christian] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Luneburg, Germany; [Pearce, Joshua M.] Michigan Technol Univ, Houghton, MI 49931 USA; [Pearce, Joshua M.] Aalto Univ, Espoo, Finland",130.0,0.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,2158-2440,,2020.0,10,2,,,10.1177/2158244020915900,WOS:000449592900007,,2021-01-27,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1097,WOS,Open-Access and Institutional Repositories in Fire Literature,Citation analysis;  Fire literature;  Grey literature;  Institutional repositories;  Open-access,"With the emergence of advanced Internet technologies, access to scientific literature is evolving at an unprecedented pace. While the number of peer-reviewed publications is growing exponentially, unpublished technical reports, dissertations and other forms of grey literature are becoming increasingly accessible for researchers across the world. Research organizations and universities are capitalizing on this opportunity, actively making their research available on the Internet. At the National Research Council, the Institute for Research in Construction ensures that all fire-related literature produced is stored in an Institutional Repository and posted on the Web in a freely available manner. In doing so, this system has provided fire researchers with a vehicle to improve visibility of their research, having pronounced advantages. For the fire community, the material is an excellent source of scholarly articles, reports, technical data and conference papers. A close examination of the Institute's fire-related literature in Google Scholar reveals citation patterns which illustrate the value of open-access, free literature to fire researchers.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Henderson, Ian",FIRE TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"CNR, Inst Res Construct, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada",13.0,2.0,SPRINGER,0015-2684,,2013.0,49,1,155.0,161,10.1007/s10694-010-0198-1,WOS:000449869100027,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1098,WOS,The troubles of high-profile open access megajournals,Editorial policies; Journal publishing; Megajournals; Open-access publishing; Peer-review process,"The rise in open access journals was followed by the proliferation of open access megajournals, which were once expected to become a major publication platform of the future. We analyzed the bibliometric parameters of 11 megajournals sensu stricto according to the definition by Bjork and compared them with three control groups of gold open-access journals that do not satisfy the criteria for megajournals and that do not apply the concept of sound science, namely the journals published under the PLoS, BMC and Hindawi brands. We show that nonselective megajournals have started to decline in all bibliometric parameters. These journals in particular have lost connection with the most advanced science as revealed by the decreasing citations to and from the top-tier journals. While some megajournals have underperformed on bibliometric parameters from the beginning of their existence, others experienced a short honeymoon period before declining. In contrast, major discipline-specific open-access journals remain competitive, and those published by less prominent publishers have even increased their performance. However, the discipline-specific open-access journals also display decreasing citations to and from the top-tier journals. Concluded, we provided the first evidence that the change in the perception of megajournals is associated with the deterioration of their bibliometric characteristics. The future of megajournals as a major publishing platform is now threatened.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],"['natscie', 'med']",['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Heneberg, Petr",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Heneberg, Petr] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 3, Ruska 87, Prague 10000, Czech Republic",31.0,7.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2019.0,120,2,733.0,746,10.1007/s11192-019-03144-6,WOS:000449869100256,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1112,WOS,"Challenges of open access of scientific journals in urbanism, architecture, design and art in Chile [Desafíos del acceso abierto de las revistas científicas de urbanismo, arquitectura, diseño y arte en Chile]",Access to information; Chile; Copyright; Electronic journals; Licenses; Open access,"This research analyzes the challenges of open access of scientific journals of urbanism, architecture, design and art in Chile. Based on an analysis of the content of the web pages of the journals and the application of a survey to their editors, the access and publication formats, use of journal management systems, Creative Commons licenses, copyright policies, use of plagiarism detection software and financing models are examined in detail. The results show that all academic journals in the field of urbanism, architecture, design and art in Chile are published by nonprofit universities, and declare themselves as “open access”, with their articles being available free of charge through their web pages, institutional repositories and/or SciELO, Latindex and RedALyC. Likewise, most of the journals use Creative Commons licenses and recently the Open Journal System. However, more than half of the journals still use restrictive copyrights or do not have explicit editorial policies in this regard, which limits the open access of their manuscripts. Other problems for the open access are the lack of “sustainable financing models” and the preference of Latin American authors for publishing in high impact international journals in English, usually edited by commercial publishers without open access. These problems are important challenges that require new editorial strategies, in order to ensure that high-quality Latin American research is available in an open access format to the entire academic community. © 2018, Centro Nacional de Informacion de Ciencias Medicas. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'documentreview', 'othermeth']","['engtech', 'socscie', 'hum']","['publisher', 'researcher']",['CHL'],"Herrmann-Lunecke M.G., Inzulza-Contardo J.",Revista Cubana de Informacion en Ciencias de la Salud,Spanish,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Centro Nacional de Informacion de Ciencias Medicas,23072113,0,2018.0,29,2,0.0,0,,WOS:000451766000003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1119,WOS,Genomics for All: International Open Science Genomics Projects and Capacity Building in the Developing World,open science; genomics; research and development; capacity building; database; international scientific community; developing countries; genomic medicine,"Genomic medicine applications have the potential to considerably improve health care in developing countries in the coming years. However, if developing countries do not improve their capacity for research and development (R&D) in the field, they might be left out of the genomics revolution. Large-scale and widely accessible databases for storing and analyzing genomic data are crucial tools for the advancement of genomic medicine. Building developing countries' capacity in genomics is accordingly closely linked to their involvement in international human genomics research initiatives. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a pilot study on the impact of international open science genomics projects on capacity building in R&D in developing countries. Using indicators we developed in previous work to measure the performance of international open science genomics projects, we analyse the policies and practices of four key projects in the field: the International HapMap Project, the Human Heredity and Health in Africa Initiative, the Malaria Genomic Epidemiology Network and the Structural Genomics Consortium. The results show that these projects play an important role in genomics capacity building in developing countries, but play a more limited role with regard to the potential redistribution of the benefits of research to the populations of these countries. We further suggest concrete initiatives that could facilitate the involvement of researchers from developing countries in the international genomics research community and accelerate capacity building in the developing world.","['openmethod', 'opendata', 'openevaluation']","['documentreview', 'othermeth']","['natscie', 'med']",['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Hetu, Martin; Koutouki, Konstantia; Joly, Yann",FRONTIERS IN GENETICS,English,Article,,,,"[Hetu, Martin; Joly, Yann] McGill Univ, Ctr Genom & Policy, Fac Med, Dept Human Genet, Montreal, PQ, Canada; [Koutouki, Konstantia] Univ Montreal, Fac Law, Montreal, PQ, Canada",48.0,2.0,FRONTIERS MEDIA SA,,,2019.0,10,,,,10.3389/fgene.2019.00095,WOS:000452288900013,30828348.0,2021-01-27,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1122,WOS,A field study on linked and open data at Datahub.io,0,"We describe and conduct a study on datahub.io to explore to what, in practice, Linked and Open Data refers to. We focus on the use of formats, licenses, ages and popularity of the data. An in-depth analysis reveals information about availability, quantity, structure and vocabulary usage of the real-world RDF-based datasets contained. Results show that the most common formats are Microsoft Excel, CSV and RDF. High proportions of structured data is of tabular nature, independent from the format. The heuristics and evaluation methods developed here are released as open source and can be applied to other CKAN-based repositories and RDF-based datasets, too.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['engtech'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Heuss T., Fengel J., Humm B., Harriehausen-Mühlbauer B., Atkinson S.","Proceedings of the 11th International Network Conference, INC 2016",English,Conference Paper,"11th International Network Conference, INC 2016",19 July 2016 through 21 July 2016,0,,,0.0,University of Plymouth,0,9781841024103,2016.0,0,0,79.0,84,,WOS:000452434900001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1136,WOS,Conceptualizing citizen participation in open data use at the city level,Citizen participation; Electronic government; Open date; Smart cities,"Purpose: Open data initiatives represent a critical pillar of smart cities’ strategies but remain insufficiently and poorly understood. This paper aims to advance a conceptualization of citizen participation and investigates its effect on open data use at the municipal level. Design/methodology/approach: Based on 14 semi-structured interviews with citizens involved in open data projects within the city of Montréal (Canada), the paper develops a research model linking the multidimensional construct of citizen participation with initial use of open data in municipalities. Findings: The study shows that citizen participation is a key contributor to the use of open data through four distinct categories of participation, namely, hands-on activities, greater responsibility, better communication and improved relations between citizens and the open data portal development team. While electronic government research often views open data implementation as a top-down project, the current study demonstrates that citizens are central to the success of open data initiatives and shows how their role can be effectively leveraged across various dimensions of participation. Originality/value: This paper proposes a conceptualization of citizen participation on open data use at the municipal level. Citizen participation is a found to be a key contributor to the use of open data through four distinct categories of participation, namely, hands-on activities, greater responsibility, better communication and improved relations between citizens and the open data portal development team. This paper demonstrates the critical role of citizen participation in open government. © 2017, © Emerald Publishing Limited.",['opendata'],['interview'],['socscie'],"['practitioner', 'othergroup', 'policy']",['CAN'],"Hivon J., Titah R.","Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy",English,Article,0,0,0,,,16.0,Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.,17506166,0,2017.0,11,1,99.0,118,10.1108/TG-12-2015-0053,WOS:000453615700024,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1142,WOS,Participatory design for ontologies: A case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas,Ontology engineering; Participatory design; Digital humanities; Semantic web; Open science; Qualitative research; Coding schemas,"Purpose The open science movement calls for transparent and retraceable research processes. While infrastructures to support these practices in qualitative research are lacking, the design needs to consider different approaches and workflows. The paper bases on the definition of ontologies as shared conceptualizations of knowledge (Borst, 1999). The authors argue that participatory design is a good way to create these shared conceptualizations by giving domain experts and future users a voice in the design process via interviews, workshops and observations. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a novel approach for creating ontologies in the field of open science using participatory design. As a case study the creation of an ontology for qualitative coding schemas is presented. Coding schemas are an important result of qualitative research, and reuse can yield great potential for open science making qualitative research more transparent, enhance sharing of coding schemas and teaching of qualitative methods. The participatory design process consisted of three parts: a requirement analysis using interviews and an observation, a design phase accompanied by interviews and an evaluation phase based on user tests as well as interviews. Findings The research showed several positive outcomes due to participatory design: higher commitment of users, mutual learning, high quality feedback and better quality of the ontology. However, there are two obstacles in this approach: First, contradictive answers by the interviewees, which needs to be balanced; second, this approach takes more time due to interview planning and analysis. Practical implications The implication of the paper is in the long run to decentralize the design of open science infrastructures and to involve parties affected on several levels. Originality/value In ontology design, several methods exist by using user-centered design or participatory design doing workshops. In this paper, the authors outline the potentials for participatory design using mainly interviews in creating an ontology for open science. The authors focus on close contact to researchers in order to build the ontology upon the expert's knowledge.",['openmethod'],"['interview', 'othermeth']","['engtech', 'hum', 'socscie']","['researcher', 'practitioner']",['DEU'],"Hocker, Julian; Schindler, Christoph; Rittberger, Marc",ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Hocker, Julian; Schindler, Christoph; Rittberger, Marc] DIPF Leibniz Inst Res & Informat Educ, Frankfurt, Germany; [Hocker, Julian] Univ Hildesheim, Dept Informat Sci & Nat Language Proc, Hildesheim, Germany; [Rittberger, Marc] Darmstadt Univ Appl Sci, Darmstadt, Germany",37.0,0.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2050-3806,,2020.0,72,4,671.0,685,10.1108/AJIM-11-2019-0320,WOS:000454147800001,,2021-01-27,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1143,WOS,"Malaysian researchers on open data: The first national survey on awareness, practices and attitudes",Open data; Open Science; Research data sharing; Readiness studies; Scholarly communication,"The study investigates the awareness, practices and attitudes of researchers in regard to open data - i.e. the sharing and reuse of research data - which is part of a larger study that concentrated on the scholarly communication readiness of Malaysian researchers in Open Science. The data were gathered by means of a survey which obtained 135 responses from researchers based in five research universities in Malaysia. The main conclusions are: (a) the researchers are aware of open data, yet, they are not practising it as shown in the mean scores, as well as in their responses towards the statements asked; (b) unclear information on data privacy policy, misuse of data, and the fear of losing publication opportunity are part of disincentives for data sharing. The requisite for open data understanding, practices and attitudinal change is needed for these may impact research practices, government policies and scientific knowledge, leading to research transparency and accountability, social benefit and economic growth. This paper concludes with a discussion that policies incentivizing the sharing and reuse of open data, as well as tools and guidance to support data sharing, and a strong incentives and rewards to implement open data among researchers, should be encouraged. Future studies should look into the importance of rewards for data sharing among researchers' institutions. Studies bridging the gap between policy and practices of open data should be examined, if true openness in research is to be established in Malaysia.",['opendata'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['MYS'],"Hodonu-Wusu, James Oluwaseyi; Noorhidawati, A.; Abrizah, A.",MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Hodonu-Wusu, James Oluwaseyi; Noorhidawati, A.; Abrizah, A.] Univ Malaya, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; [Hodonu-Wusu, James Oluwaseyi] Univ Ibadan, Fac Educ, Dept Lib Archival & Informat Studies, Ibadan, Nigeria",50.0,0.0,"UNIV MALAYA, FAC COMPUTER SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECH",1394-6234,,2020.0,25,2,1.0,20,10.22452/mjlis.vol25no2.1,WOS:000454157000001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1149,WOS,Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universities,Open access; Altmetrics; Journals; Open access advantage; Gold OA,"Scientific articles available in Open Access (OA) have been found to attract more citations and online attention to the extent that it has become common to speak about OA Altmetrics Advantage. This research investigates how the OA Altmetrics Advantage holds for a specific case of research articles, namely the research outputs from universities in Finland. Furthermore, this research examines disciplinary and platform specific differences in that (dis)advantage. The new methodological approaches developed in this research focus on relative visibility, i.e. how often articles in OA journals receive at least one mention on the investigated online platforms, and relative receptivity, i.e. how frequently articles in OA journals gain mentions in comparison to articles in subscription-based journals. The results show significant disciplinary and platform specific differences in the OA advantage, with articles in OA journals within for instance veterinary sciences, social and economic geography and psychology receiving more citations and attention on social media platforms, while the opposite was found for articles in OA journals within medicine and health sciences. The results strongly support field- and platform-specific considerations when assessing the influence of journal OA status on altmetrics. The new methodological approaches used in this research will serve future comparative research into OA advantage of scientific articles over time and between countries.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Holmberg, Kim; Hedman, Juha; Bowman, Timothy D.; Didegah, Fereshteh; Laakso, Mikael",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Holmberg, Kim; Hedman, Juha] Univ Turku, Res Unit Sociol Educ, Turku, Finland; [Bowman, Timothy D.] Wayne State Univ, Sch Informat Sci, Detroit, MI USA; [Didegah, Fereshteh] Simon Fraser Univ, Vancouver, BC, Canada; [Laakso, Mikael] Hanken Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland",29.0,8.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,122,1,645.0,659,10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x,WOS:000454524300005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1157,WOS,The influence of open access on journal cancellations in university libraries in South Africa,Institutional repositories; Open access; University libraries; South Africa,"Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to present the influence open access initiatives (OAIs) have on journal cancellations in university libraries in South Africa. Design/methodology/approach - The paper is based on part of a doctoral research project which examined the crisis in scholarly communication and its effect on university libraries in South Africa that was carried out at the University of KwaZulu-Natal from 2005 to 2009. Part of the investigation focused on open access (OA) and how it influenced journal cancellations. The survey methodology was adopted and the study used a quantitative approach to collect data on the influence of OA. Findings - The findings revealed that OAIs had a very limited influence on journal cancellations in South African university libraries. Practical implications The study presents data that can be used by university libraries to develop, support and facilitate access to local research. Originality/value - The study provides data on which future developments in OA as a solution to university library journal cancellations could be based.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['ZAR'],"Hoskins, Ruth Geraldine",ELECTRONIC LIBRARY,English,Article,,,,"Univ KwaZulu Natal, Informat Studies Programme, Sch Social Sci, Scottsville, South Africa",35.0,3.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-0473,,2013.0,31,5,574.0,592,10.1108/EL-10-2011-0142,WOS:000454975000034,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1169,WOS,Open access journals in China: The current situation and development strategies,China; Current situation; Development strategies; Open access; Open access journals; Scientific journal,"We have identified and examined the 685 online journals that offer some form of open access (OA) among the 8,814 scholarly journals indexed by the Chinese National Knowledge Information (CNKI) database in China. Data concerning each journal's organizer, discipline, region and/or province, publishing cycle, and first date that content was offered free of charge were analyzed, together with the journals' Web site construction, the way full text was accessed, and the delay between the print and online publication of the journal. On the basis of the survey results, we identified key problems associated with OA journals in China and outlined strategies to address these issues, including radically reforming the current publication system and mechanism for scholarly journals, actively promoting the transition of scholarly journals from print to OA, speeding up network construction and promoting full-text availability, and building a national open access journal platform. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['CHN'],"Hu D., Huang B., Zhou W.",Serials Review,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,0,987913,0,2012.0,38,2,86.0,92,10.1080/00987913.2012.10765434,WOS:000456356300016,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1172,WOS,The availability of open access journals in the humanities and social sciences in China,current status; humanities and social sciences; open access; open access journals; scholarly journals,"We identified and analysed the 147 journals offering open access (OA) among the 2960 scholarly journals indexed by the Chinese National Knowledge Information (CNKI) database in the humanities and social sciences. Data were analysed concerning each journal's organizer, discipline, publishing cycle, areas, regions or provinces covered, and first date that content was offered free of charge, together with the journal's website construction, the way full text was accessed, and the time delay in publication. On the basis of the survey results, we identify key challenges and problems associated with OA journals in the humanities and social sciences in China, and we outline development strategies to address these issues, including actively promoting the transition of scholarly journals from print form to OA, speeding up network construction of OA journals, and enhancing the functionality of the OA journals' websites.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['socscie', 'hum']",['othergroup'],['CHN'],"Hu, Dehau",JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"Cent S Univ, Dept Med Informat, Xiang Ya Med Sch, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China",4.0,6.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0165-5515,,2012.0,38,1,64.0,75,10.1177/0165551511428919,WOS:000456662400001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1173,WOS,Open Access Journals in China: The Current Situation and Development Strategies,Open access journals; Open access; Scientific journal; Current situation; Development strategies; China,"We have identified and examined the 685 online journals that offer some form of open access (OA) among the 8,814 scholarly journals indexed by the Chinese National Knowledge Information (CNKI) database in China. Data concerning each journal's organizer, discipline, region and/or province, publishing cycle, and first date that content was offered free of charge were analyzed, together with the journals' Web site construction, the way full text was accessed, and the delay between the print and online publication of the journal. On the basis of the survey results, we identified key problems associated with OA journals in China and outlined strategies to address these issues, including radically reforming the current publication system and mechanism for scholarly journals, actively promoting the transition of scholarly journals from print to OA, speeding up network construction and promoting full-text availability, and building a national open access journal platform. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['CHN'],"Hu, Dehua; Huang, Biyun; Zhou, Wenqi",SERIALS REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Hu, Dehua; Huang, Biyun; Zhou, Wenqi] Cent S Univ, Xiang Ya Med Sch, Dept Med Informat, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Peoples R China",22.0,9.0,ELSEVIER INC,0098-7913,,2012.0,38,2,86.0,92,10.1016/j.serrev.2012.03.001,WOS:000456679200002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1175,WOS,Open access and document delivery services: a case study in Capital Normal University Library,Open access; China; Document delivery,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a case study in China to show whether open access (OA) affects document delivery services. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conduct a statistical analysis and carry out an investigation through a questionnaire. Findings - Compared with the rapid development of OA around the world, China has published a small number of OA journals. At present, the effect of OA on document delivery service in Capital Normal University Library (CNUL) is positive in that librarians can use OA as an extra resource to perform document delivery services. CNUL users know little about document delivery service or OA, but they frequently look for free Internet resources. CNUL should do more promotion of its document delivery services. Considering users' behavior and the development of OA in future, the volume of document delivery service may be affected. CNUL should redesign its document delivery service. Originality/value - The paper will be relevant to librarians interested in OA and document delivery services in China.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['CHN'],"Hu, Fang; Jiang, Hangsheng",INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY,English,Article,,,,"[Hu, Fang; Jiang, Hangsheng] Capital Normal Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China",7.0,3.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,0264-1615,,2014.0,42,2-3,79.0,82,10.1108/ILDS-01-2014-0003,WOS:000456818800011,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1176,WOS,Open access to journal articles in oncology: current situation and citation impact,open access; oncology; information storage and retrieval; bibliometrics; periodicals as a topic; publishing,"Background: Recent years have seen numerous efforts and resources devoted to the development of open access (OA), but the current OA situation of the oncology literature remains unknown. We conducted this cross-sectional study to determine the current share and provision methods of OA in the field of oncology, identify predictors of OA status (OA versus non-OA), and study the association between OA and citation counts. Materials and methods: PubMed was searched for oncology-related, peer-reviewed journal articles published in December 2014. Google, Google Scholar, PubMed, ResearchGate, OpenDOAR and OAIster were manually checked to assess the OA status of each included article. Citation data were extracted from Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the OA proportion (primary outcome) and OA provision methods. Multivariable logistic regression and multilevel generalized linear model analyses were performed to study predictors of OA status and the association between OA and citation counts, respectively. Results: In a random sample of 1000 articles, 912 were deemed eligible and therefore included. Of these, the full-texts of 530 articles (58.1%; 95% CI: 54.9-61.3) were freely available online: 314 (34.4%) were available from publishers ('Gold road' to OA), 424 (46.5%) were available via self-archiving ('Green road' to OA). According to multivariable regression analyses, impact factor, publisher type, language, research type, number of authors, continent of origin, and country income were significant predictors of articles' OA status; OA articles received a citation rate 1.24 times the incidence rate for non-OA articles (95% CI: 1.05-1.47; P = 0.012). Conclusions: Based on our sample, in the field of oncology, 42% of recent journal articles are behind the pay-wall (non-OA) 1 year after publication; the 'Green road' of providing OA is more common than the 'Gold road'; OA is associated with higher citation counts.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Hua, F.; Sun, H.; Walsh, T.; Glenny, A. -M.; Worthington, H.",ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Hua, F.; Walsh, T.; Glenny, A. -M.; Worthington, H.] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Cochrane Oral Hlth, Div Dent,Sch Med Sci,Fac Biol Med & Hlth, JR Moore Bldg,Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England; [Sun, H.] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Mol & Clin Canc Sci, Sch Med Sci,Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England",35.0,12.0,OXFORD UNIV PRESS,0923-7534,,2017.0,28,10,2612.0,2617,10.1093/annonc/mdx398,WOS:000456829000002,28961842.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1185,WOS,The effect of open access on journal impact factors: A causal analysis of medical journals,Open access; Journal impact factor; Causal analysis; Medical journals; Panel data analysis,"The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) has a significant influence on authors of research paper submissions. Whether open access (OA) is beneficial to JIFs and the dissemination of academic research results remains an under-examined issue. Using panel data analysis to address this question, the present study analyzed medical journals extracted from databases such as Web of Science and Ulrich's Periodicals Directory. The results indicate a causal relationship between JIFs and OA, and specifically that: (1) OA enhances JIFs; (2) countries that are less developed in science and technology are more likely to choose OA for publishing papers; (3) authors' publication language and number of published papers, as well as publication release cycles all have significant effects on JIFs. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Huang, Cui; Yue, Xiaoxu; Chen, Jing; Xu, Weixiao; Li, Jiang",PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Huang, Cui; Xu, Weixiao] Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China; [Yue, Xiaoxu; Chen, Jing] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China; [Li, Jiang] Nanjing Univ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China",39.0,0.0,ELSEVIER,0378-4371,,2019.0,533,,,,10.1016/j.physa.2019.122043,WOS:000457731200014,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1193,WOS,"Opinions of Korean science editors on open access policies, editorial difficulties, and government's support for publishing",Journal publishing; Editor; Manuscript editor; Open access; Publishing cost,"The Korean government has supported scholarly scientific journal publishing since 1971 through the Korean Federation of Science and Technologies (hereafter the Federation). To ensure that this funding is used as efficiently as possible, the views of science editors should be considered. This study measured the opinions of Korean science editors on open access policies, difficulties during editing, and the government's support for publishing. From November 28 to December 10 of 2013, web survey invitations were emailed to 368 journal editors listed by the Federation. The web survey tool Surveymonkey was used to create a questionnaire that consisted of ten items, including the research category for each journal. Out of the 368 editors, 82 responded to the survey (22.3%). Sixty-nine editors (84.1%) had already accepted the open access or free access policy. Of the 13 editors of journals without open/free access policies, seven hoped to adopt a policy within three years. The most difficult tasks in journal publishing were adding a journal to international databases, operating with an inadequate budget, and recruiting professional manuscript editors. Editors want the Federation to increase budgets to cover full-text extensible markup language production costs, to provide guidelines for adding journals to international databases, and to provide programs for training professional manuscript editors and a plagiarism detection system. Most science editors in Korea have already adopted an open/ free access policy. Training professional manuscript editors, using plagiarism detection system, and producing full-text extensible markup language should be considered as important items for journal publishing support from the Federation.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['KOR'],"Huh, Sun; Cho, Hye-Min; Kim, Hyungsun",SCIENCE EDITING,English,Article,,,,"[Huh, Sun] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Dept Parasitol, Chunchon, South Korea; [Huh, Sun] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Inst Med Educ, Chunchon, South Korea; [Cho, Hye-Min] Inha Univ, Infolumi Seongnam, Incheon, South Korea; [Kim, Hyungsun] Inha Univ, Sch Mat Engn, Incheon, South Korea",2.0,1.0,KOREAN COUNCIL SCIENCE EDITORS,2288-7474,,2015.0,2,2,55.0,58,10.6087/kcse.44,WOS:000458830400002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1222,WOS,Do open access working papers attract more citations compared to printed journal articles from the same research unit?,0,"This paper presents the results of an empirical case study of the characteristics of citations received by 10 open access non-peer reviewed working papers published by a prestigious multidisciplinary, but basically social science research institute, compared to 10 printed peer reviewed journal articles published in the same year (2004) by the same institute and predominantly by the same authors. The study analyzes the total amount of citations and citation impact observed in Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar (GS) received during the five-year period 2004-09 (February) by the two publication types, the citation distributions over the individual sample publications and observed years as well as over external, institutional and personal self-citations. The institute concerned is the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen. The results demonstrate that the open access working papers publicly accessible through the DIIS e-archive became far less cited than the corresponding sample of DIIS journal articles published in printed form. However, highly cited working papers have higher impact than the average of the lower half of cited articles. Citation time series show identical distinct patterns for the articles in WoS and GS and working papers in GS, more than doubling the amount of citations received through the latter source. Copyright © ISSI 2011.All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Ingwersen P., Elleby A.",Proceedings of ISSI 2011 - 13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics,English,Conference Paper,"13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2011",4 July 2011 through 7 July 2011,0,,,4.0,"ISSI, Leiden University and University of Zululand",0,9789081752701,2011.0,1,0,327.0,332,,WOS:000465158500011,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1226,WOS,Familiarity and utilization of open access resources A study of library users of Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT) and Pondicherry University (PU),Electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs); Use; Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT); Open access (OA); Open access journals; Pondicherry University (PU),"Purpose - The purpose of the study is to assess the familiarity and utilization of open access resources among library users of Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT), Kochi, and Pondicherry University (PU), Puducherry. Design/methodology/approach - Data for the study were collected via a well-structured questionnaire. For this study, 250 questionnaires were administered among library users of each CUSAT and PU through incidental sampling. From CUSAT and PU, 180 and 160 questionnaires, respectively, were considered for data analysis. Findings - The study reveals that majority of the respondents, i.e. 77.78 and 80 per cent of CUSAT and PU, respectively, believe that they are familiar with the concept of open access (OA). 70.56 per cent respondents from CUSAT and 71.88 per cent users from PU are aware that their library has an OA repository. However, majority of the respondents, i.e. 65 and 70.63 per cent users from CUSAT and PU, respectively, use OA resources. Among OA resources, electronic theses and dissertations are the most preferred ones consulted by 56.67 and 62.50 per cent respondents, respectively, from CUSAT and PU. 60.56 per cent respondents from CUSAT followed by PU (52.50 per cent) cited screen reading as a main barrier in accessing OA resources. Originality/value - Both the universities under study have created and maintained the OA institutional repository for disseminating their institutional intellectual output. This study explores awareness and use of OA resources among library users of CUSAT and PU. The study concludes with some suggestions for utmost utilization of OA resources among library users.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['IND'],"Iqbal, Jafar; Ali, Naushad P. M.",INFORMATION AND LEARNING SCIENCES,English,Article,,,,"[Iqbal, Jafar] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Maulana Azad Lib, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India; [Ali, Naushad P. M.] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India",20.0,0.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2398-5348,,2017.0,118,3-4,141.0,151,10.1108/ILS-12-2016-0080,WOS:000465561400212,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1231,WOS,Open access and the Caribbean academic: An exploratory investigation of the adoption of this medium for publishing among science faculty of The University of the West Indies,Caribbean; institutional repositories; open access; science faculty; scholarly communication; The University of the West Indies,"The potential which open access offers to Caribbean scholarly communication in general, and science and technology specifically, is an opportunity to shift the focus from one which has been publisher driven to one which is research driven. However, for this to become a reality, both the university and faculty will need to break free of the practices surrounding traditional publishing, tenure and promotion. In an attempt to assess readiness among science faculty at The University of the West Indies to make this transition, this exploratory study analyses their perceptions, knowledge and use of open access. The results revealed significant gaps in knowledge about, and minimal engagement with open access as a publication modality among this cohort.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['JAM'],"Iton, Ingrid; Iton, Ardon",IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Iton, Ingrid] Univ West Indies, Sidney Martin Lib, Cave Hill Campus,POB 1334, Bridgetown, Barbados; [Iton, Ardon] Univ West Indies St Augustine, Dept Agr Econ & Extens, St Augustine Campus, St Augustine, Trinidad Tobago",34.0,3.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,0340-0352,,2016.0,42,1,25.0,35,10.1177/0340035215616977,WOS:000466944400006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1233,WOS,The Open-Access System of Journals and Its Use by Russian Scientists According to the Statistics of Web of Science (2008-2017),SCI-E; WoS; open-access journals; research areas; publications; international cooperation,"The review of the research of the Open-Access system of journals and its advantages and disadvantages are presented. The bibliometric analysis was carried out for the array of Russian papers published in the journals of the Gold Open Access system and reflected in the SCI-E database for 2008-2017. The results of the analysis of the publication activity showed that, despite the high payments for papers, there was a steady increase in the share of Russian publications in such journals compared to the overall publication activity of Russia: from 7.8% in 2008 to 13.7% in 2017. This is largely due to active international cooperation of Russian organizations with funding agencies from the United States (31%), Germany (29%), and other industrialized countries. Analysis of the array of Gold OA publications in large research areas made it possible to establish a significant difference in its structure compared to the general array of publications in Russia. As an example, the most important scientific field in the world, Research Area Scientific Technologies, was ranked the third in comparison with the ninth rank in the general array.russian scientists widely use high-quality foreign journals of the Gold OA system, which includes one Russian journal, Solid State Physics.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['RUS'],"Ivanov, V. V.; Markusova, V. A.; Mindeli, L. E.; Zolotova, A. V.",SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING,English,Article,,,,"[Ivanov, V. V.] Russian Acad Sci, Moscow 119991, Russia; [Markusova, V. A.; Zolotova, A. V.] Russian Acad Sci, All Russian Inst Sci & Tech Informat, Moscow 125190, Russia; [Mindeli, L. E.] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Study Sci, Moscow 117335, Russia",15.0,1.0,ALLERTON PRESS INC,0147-6882,,2018.0,45,3,182.0,191,10.3103/S0147688218030097,WOS:000467297800014,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1242,WOS,A study of institutional spending on open access publication fees in Germany,Open access; Open access journal; Article processing charges; Science policy; Scholarly; publishing; Publication fees,"Publication fees as a revenue source for open access publishing hold a prominent place on the agendas of researchers, policy makers, and academic publishers. This study contributes to the evolving empirical basis for funding these charges and examines how much German universities and research organisations spent on open access publication fees. Using self-reported cost data from the Open APC initiative, the analysis focused on the amount that was being spent on publication fees, and compared these expenditure with data from related Austrian (FWF) and UK (Wellcome Trust, Jisc) initiatives, in terms of both size and the proportion of articles being published in fully and hybrid open access journals. We also investigated how thoroughly self-reported articles were indexed in Crossref, a DOI minting agency for scholarly literature, and analysed how the institutional spending was distributed across publishers and journal titles. According to self-reported data from 30 German universities and research organisations between 2005 and 2015, expenditures on open access publication fees increased over the years in Germany and amounted to 9,627,537 for 7,417 open access journal articles. The average payment was 1,298, and the median was is an element of 1,231. A total of 94% of the total article volume included in the study was supported in accordance with the price cap of 2,000, a limit imposed by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) as part of its funding activities for open access funding at German universities. Expenditures varied considerably at the institutional level. There were also differences in how much the institutions spent per journal and publisher. These differences reflect, at least in part, the varying pricing schemes in place including discounted publication fees. With journals articles indexing coverage of 99%, Crossref thoroughly indexed the open access articles included in the study. A comparison with the related openly available cost data from Austria and the UK revealed that German universities and research organisations primarily funded articles in fully open access journals. By contrast, articles in hybrid journal accounted for the largest share of spending according to the Austrian and UK data. Fees paid for hybrid journals were on average more expensive than those paid for fully open access journals.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['DEU'],"Jahn, Najko; Tullney, Marco",PEERJ,English,Article,,,,"[Jahn, Najko] Univ Bielefeld, Bielefeld Univ Lib, Bielefeld, Germany; [Tullney, Marco] German Natl Lib Sci & Technol TIB, Hannover, Germany",41.0,13.0,PEERJ INC,2167-8359,,2016.0,4,,,,10.7717/peerj.2323,WOS:000468340400001,27602289.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1244,WOS,Design and evaluation of a data anonymization pipeline to promote Open Science on COVID-19,,"The Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients (LEOSS) is a European registry for studying the epidemiology and clinical course of COVID-19. To support evidence-generation at the rapid pace required in a pandemic, LEOSS follows an Open Science approach, making data available to the public in real-time. To protect patient privacy, quantitative anonymization procedures are used to protect the continuously published data stream consisting of 16 variables on the course and therapy of COVID-19 from singling out, inference and linkage attacks. We investigated the bias introduced by this process and found that it has very little impact on the quality of output data. Current laws do not specify requirements for the application of formal anonymization methods, there is a lack of guidelines with clear recommendations and few real-world applications of quantitative anonymization procedures have been described in the literature. We therefore believe that our work can help others with developing urgently needed anonymization pipelines for their projects.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['med'],['researcher'],['EU'],"Jakob, Carolin E. M.; Kohlmayer, Florian; Meurers, Thierry; Vehreschild, Jorg Janne; Prasser, Fabian",SCIENTIFIC DATA,English,Article; Data Paper,,,,"[Blesa, Angel] Codeoscop SA, Madrid, Spain; [Iniguez, David; Moreno, Ruben; Ruiz, Gonzalo] Univ Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; [Iniguez, David] Fdn ARAID, Zaragoza, Spain",27.0,0.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,1470-7853,,2020.0,62,1,58.0,78,10.1177/1470785319862734,WOS:000314102000001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1245,WOS,Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields,Google Scholar; Open access; Full text version; Citation version; Citation number; Scopus subject categories,"Google Scholar, a widely used academic search engine, plays a major role in finding free full-text versions of articles. But little is known about the sources of full-text files in Google Scholar. The aim of the study was to find out about the sources of full-text items and to look at subject differences in terms of number of versions, times cited, rate of open access availability and sources of full-text files. Three queries were created for each of 277 minor subject categories of Scopus. The queries were searched in Google Scholar and the first ten hits for each query were analyzed. Citations and patents were excluded from the results and the time frame was limited to 2004-2014. Results showed that 61.1 % of articles were accessible in full-text in Google Scholar; 80.8 % of full-text articles were publisher versions and 69.2 % of full-text articles were PDF. There was a significant difference between the means of times cited of full text items and non-full-text items. The highest rate of full text availability for articles belonged to life science (66.9 %). Publishers' websites were the main source of bibliographic information for non-full-text articles. For full-text articles, educational (edu, ac.xx etc.) and org domains were top two sources of full text files. ResearchGate was the top single website providing full-text files (10.5 % of full-text articles).",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Jamali, Hamid R.; Nabavi, Majid",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Jamali, Hamid R.] Kharazmi Univ, Fac Psychol & Educ, Dept Lib & Informat Studies, Tehran, Iran; [Nabavi, Majid] Iranian Res Inst Informat Sci & Technol, Tehran, Iran",38.0,43.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2015.0,105,3,1635.0,1651,10.1007/s11192-015-1642-2,WOS:000468744600006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1257,WOS,Monitoring open access at a national level: French case study,Open access; Open science; Publishing; Scholarly communication,"After the launch of multiple plans for Open Science, there is now a need for an accurate method or tool to monitor the Open Science trends and in particular Open Access (OA) trends. We address this requirement with a methodology that we developed and tested for France, but that could be extended to other countries. Only open data and information available on the Web are used, leveraging as much as we can large-scale systems such as Unpaywall, HAL (the main open repository in France, part of the CNRS), ORCID and IDRef (referential for French Higher Education and Research). We used rule-based and machine learning techniques to enrich the metadata of the publications. We estimate that the overall OA rate for French affiliated publications ranges from 39% to 42% between 2013 and 2017. The trend is slightly up, except for the last year, but we gather evidence that shows this is a consequence of the moving nature of the OA status. Therefore these figures should be seen as a snapshot rather than definitive. For the last observed year (2017), we show that the OA rate varies according to the publication type, the publisher and the discipline (more than 60% in Mathematics while it is about 30% in Medical research which represents the largest share in the number of publications). We describe the main challenges of our method (detection of the publications with a French affiliation, metadata enrichment with machine learning, open access status) and evaluate the errors of each step. Most of the method is not country-specific and could be applied for another perimeter. Our implementation is open sourced on the repository https://github.com/dataesr/publications. © ELPUB 2019.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['FRA'],Jeangirard E.,ELPUB 2019 - Academic Publishing and Digital Bibliodiversity: The 23d International Conference on Electronic Publishing,English,Conference Paper,"23rd International Conference on Electronic Publishing: Academic Publishing and Digital Bibliodiversity, ELPUB 2018",3 June 2019 through 4 June 2019,0,,,1.0,OpenEdition Press,0,0,2019.0,0,0,0.0,0,10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2019.20,WOS:000470069400003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1260,WOS,Increase in frequency of citation by SCIE journals of non-Medline journals after listing in an open access full-text database,Impact factor; Korea; Medical database; Open access journal; PubMed Central,"We hypothesized that it is not open access status but rather exposure in the PubMed platform that affects citation frequency in medical journals. In November 2008, medical journals from Korea began to be added to PubMed Central (PMC). Therefore, it would be interesting to know whether or not their impact factor based on Web of Science has increased since the journals were listed in PMC/PubMed. To answer this question, a citation analysis of seven journals that have been indexed in PMC since 2008 or 2009 was done. Only non-Medline journals were selected and the impact factors of five Medline journals were compared. The impact factor was calculated via Web of Science. Journal Citation Reports (JCR) data were used if the data of the target journals were provided in JCR. Trends for the impact factors of different years were analyzed using dBSTAT ver. 5.0. There has been an increasing rates of the impact factor for the seven non-Medline journals, 1.92 in 2011 over 2010; 3.27 in 2010 over 2009; 1.12 in 2012 over 2011. As for the five Medline journals, the increasing rate in 2010 over 2009 was 1.18; however, those of 2011 over 2010 and 2012 over 2011 were 1.01 and 1.04 respectively. The Science Citation Index Expanded impact factor of medical journals published in Korea can be increased if those journals are published in English and listed in PMC. This is an effect of the platform in which the journals are listed and not just an effect of free access. © Korean Council of Science Editors.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Jeong G.-H., Huh S.",Science Editing,English,Article,0,0,0,,,25.0,Korean Council of Science Editors,22888063,0,2014.0,1,1,24.0,26,10.6087/kcse.2014.1.24,WOS:000470145800005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1264,WOS,Contribution to open access repository by the central universities of India: A case study of Shodhganga,Central Universities; Electronic Theses and Dissertations; ETD; India; Institutional Repositories; Open Access; Shodhganga,Present paper attempts to provides the overview of the contributions made by the central universities of India to the open access repository namely Shodhganga. There are in total 46 central universities in India as listed in UGC website out of which only 25 are sharing their research outputs to Shodhganga or are the ones which have signed MoU with Shodhganga. Open ETD plays an important role in the academic community as it helps in preventing duplication of research work already been done. This paper is an intensive case study of the contribution of theses faculty wise and year wise from different central universities in India.,['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['IND'],"Jhamb G., Samim A.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2017.0,2017,0,0.0,0,,WOS:000470970400001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1274,WOS,Cultural ideological and practical barriers to open access adoption within the UK Academy: an ethnographically framed examination,Open access; ethnography; scholarly communication; empirical; qualitative interview,"This article presents the results of part of an ethnographic study which examined the perceptions, development and conceptions of open access (OA) practice across the UK higher education environment. It details a qualitative semi-structured interview data capture approach with many institutionally based OA practitioners, which provided a narrative picture of academic and institutional responses to emerging OA dissemination paradigms. Through an analytical process incorporating qualitative content analysis and ideological critique, it focuses on practitioner perceptions of the types and configuration of barriers between scholars and a greater cultural adoption of OA practices. While the greatest problems perceived relate to academic intellectual disengagement or indifference to publishing praxis change, no singular cause of resistance was identified. The study reveals practitioners' perceptions of a multiplicity of operational, technological and ideological barriers blocking progress, and consequently a picture of academic engagement remaining disappointingly patchy. Moreover, moves to increase scholarly compliance through allying it to modalities of fiscal income and metrics, while potentially enhancing practical compliance, appear to risk distorting any revolutionary configuration of OA practices.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['practitioner'],['GBR'],"Johnson, Gareth J.",INSIGHTS-THE UKSG JOURNAL,English,Article,,,,"[Johnson, Gareth J.] Univ Warwick, Inst Adv Study, Coventry, W Midlands, England",26.0,3.0,UBIQUITY PRESS LTD,2048-7754,,2018.0,31,,,,10.1629/uksg.400,WOS:000472587500010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1276,WOS,International Open Access Week at Small to Medium US Academic Libraries: The First Five Years,International Open Access Week; Open access; Scholarly communication; Library programming; Library outreach,"This research seeks to expand the body of knowledge surrounding International Open Access Week (OA Week) practices among small to medium-sized U.S. institutions, examining the rationales guiding these, and creating a baseline activity inventory which may be elaborated upon as open access continues to evolve and as OA Week matures beyond its fifth (2013) anniversary. An electronic survey with closed- and open-ended questions was used to collect data, which were analyzed for recurring themes. Of respondents whose campuses did observe OA Week, the most reported reason for doing so was related to supporting the library's educational outreach program; fewer respondents cited the library's philosophical commitment to open access. Lack of time was the most frequently given reason for OA Week non-participation, however around one quarter of non-participating respondents reported that they were unaware of OA Week, and another quarter reported that it did not figure in their strategic plan. The conditions that were found to best support celebrating OA Week included a grasp of the principles guiding OA on the part of at least one librarian, reinforced by: the educational mission of the library; adequate personnel; and sufficient time for planning. This exploratory study yields points for library- and self-assessment. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['USA'],"Johnson, Paula C.",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"New Mexico State Univ Lib, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA",21.0,1.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2014.0,40,6,626.0,631,10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.011,WOS:000472763900001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1279,WOS,Business process costs of implementing gold and green open access in institutional and national contexts,scholarly communication; costs; open access publications,"As open access (OA) publication of research outputs becomes increasingly common and is mandated by institutions and research funders, it is important to understand different aspects of the costs involved. This paper provides an early review of administrative costs incurred by universities in making research outputs OA, either via publication in journals (Gold OA), involving payment of article-processing charges (APCs), or via deposit in repositories (Green OA). Using data from 29 UK institutions, it finds that the administrative time, as well as the cost incurred by universities, to make an article OA using the Gold route is over 2.5 times higher than Green. Costs are then modeled at a national level using recent UK policy initiatives from Research Councils UK and the Higher Education Funding Councils' Research Excellence Framework as case studies. The study also demonstrates that the costs of complying with research funders' OA policies are considerably higher than where an OA publication is left entirely to authors' discretion. Key target areas for future efficiencies in the business processes are identified and potential cost savings calculated. The analysis is designed to inform ongoing policy development at the institutional and national levels.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['GBR'],"Johnson, Robert; Pinfield, Stephen; Fosci, Mattia",JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Johnson, Robert; Fosci, Mattia] Res Consulting Ltd, Nottingham CleanTech Ctr, 63-67 St Peters St, Nottingham NG7 3EN, England; [Pinfield, Stephen] Univ Sheffield, Informat Sch, Regent Court, 211 Portobello, Sheffield S1 4DP, S Yorkshire, England",39.0,4.0,WILEY,2330-1635,,2016.0,67,9,2283.0,2295,10.1002/asi.23545,WOS:000472977000009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1280,WOS,A study on the use of selected Open Access resources among faculty members of Christian colleges in Kerala,Christian Colleges; E-resources; Faculty; Open access resources,"This study examines the use of Open Access resources by faculty members of Christian colleges in Kerala. Structured questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of seven hundred faculty members from Kottayam District Kerala. The analysis declared that faculty members are not using open access resources. Open access directories, institutional repositories, Courseware and Databases are not familiar with faculty members. Majority of the faculty members are not aware of open access resources. Lack of awareness and lack of guidance and support are the main impediment in the access and the benefit of open access resources. Majority of the faculty members are willing to access open resources however actual subscription towards this stream is unsatisfactory. © 2019, Library Philosophy and Practice.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['IND'],"Joicy A.J., Ally Sornam S.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2019.0,2019,0,0.0,0,,WOS:000472988200002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1282,WOS,Scientific potential of European fully open access journals,Open access journals; Bibliometric analysis; H-index; SJR; Quartiles; EU countries,"The scientific potential of European countries measured by their participation in publication of all peer-review journals as well as open access journals (OAJs) is significant. In this paper we focus on European fully open access journals (OAJs) as a potentially optimal channel of communication in science. We explore fully OAJs (n=1201) indexed by Scopus with several bibliometric indicators: quartile rankings, SJR (SCImago Journal Ranking) and h-index. As countries in our focus have entered EU at different times and have diverse backgrounds, we divide them into three groups: A (members before 1995), B (became members in 2004-2013 period) and C (EU candidate countries). Analysis across country groups is complemented with analysis across major subject fields. Quartile rankings indicate that journals in Q1 dominate in group A, followed by journals in Q2. In the remaining two country groups, journals belonging to Q3 have more than 50% of the share. Analysis by different scientific fields stresses that life and health sciences have the highest shares of OAJs in Q1. In physical sciences the highest share of OAJs is in Q3 while combined shares of Q2 and Q3 are above 50%. Only 10% of all European OAJs in social sciences is in Q1. Furthermore, we find the least difference between journals in group A and groups B and C in social sciences, both in respect to coverage and quality indicators. In all scientific fields median SJR indicators is, in the case of groups B and C, higher for OAJs than non-OAJs as opposed to group A.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['EU'],"Jokic, Maja; Mervar, Andrea; Mateljan, Stjepan",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Jokic, Maja; Mateljan, Stjepan] Inst Social Res Zagreb, Amruseva 8, Zagreb 10000, Croatia; [Mervar, Andrea] Inst Econ Zagreb, Trg JF Kennedyja 7, Zagreb 10000, Croatia",61.0,5.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2018.0,114,3,1373.0,1394,10.1007/s11192-017-2629-y,WOS:000473106000010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1284,WOS,"Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking",,"Context Biobanks are important resources which enable large-scale genomic research with human samples and data, raising significant ethical concerns about how participants' information is managed and shared. Three previous studies of the Canadian public's opinion about these topics have been conducted. Building on those results, an online survey representing the first study of public perceptions about biobanking spanning all Canadian provinces was conducted. Specifically, this study examined qualitative views about biobank objectives, governance structure, control and ownership of samples and data, benefit sharing, consent practices and data sharing norms, as well as additional questions and ethical concerns expressed by the public. Results Over half the respondents preferred to give a one-time general consent for the future sharing of their samples among researchers. Most expressed willingness for their data to be shared with the international scientific community rather than used by one or more Canadian institutions. Whereas more respondents indicated a preference for one-time general consent than any other model of consent, they constituted less than half of the total responses, revealing a lack of consensus among survey respondents regarding this question. Respondents identified biobank objectives, governance structure and accountability as the most important information to provide participants. Respondents' concerns about biobanking generally centred around the control and ownership of biological samples and data, especially with respect to potential misuse by insurers, the government and other third parties. Although almost half the respondents suggested that these should be managed by the researchers' institutions, results indicate that the public is interested in being well-informed about these projects and suggest the importance of increased involvement from participants. In conclusion, the study discusses the viability of several proposed models for informed consent, including e-governance, independent trustees and the use of exclusion clauses, in the context of these new findings about the views of the Canadian public.",['openscience'],"['interview', 'survey']",['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['CAN'],"Joly, Yann; Dalpe, Gratien; So, Derek; Birko, Stanislav",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,"[Joly, Yann; Dalpe, Gratien; So, Derek; Birko, Stanislav] McGill Univ, Ctr Genom & Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada; [Birko, Stanislav] Univ Montreal, Sch Publ Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada",43.0,16.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1932-6203,,2015.0,10,7,,,10.1371/journal.pone.0129893,WOS:000473314700007,26154134.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1289,WOS,Medical and health sciences academics' behaviours and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals: a perspective from South Korea,open access publishing; scholarly communication; medicine; health sciences; Korea,"This article seeks to extend the knowledge of the behaviour and attitudes towards open access publishing through a survey that focusses on the attitudes and behaviours of academic researchers in Korea working in medicine and healthcare. Issues covered include: use of and intentions regarding OAP, and perceptions regarding advantages and disadvantages of OAP, journal article publication services, peer review, and re-use. A significant proportion of the articles (mean 58%) published by this group are published gold open access, consistent with the push in Korea towards international impact for their research. Researchers were more positive about the benefits of OAP than they were negative about its disadvantages. Analysis of responses on the basis of gender, and experience in publishing, showed some significant differences in attitudes to some statements.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['med'],['researcher'],['KOR'],"Joung, Kyoung Hee; Rowley, Jennifer; Sbaffi, Laura",INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Joung, Kyoung Hee] Hansung Univ, Div Knowledge & Informat, Fac Hall, Seoul 02876, South Korea; [Rowley, Jennifer] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Dept Informat & Commun, Geoffrey Manton Bldg, Manchester M15 6LL, Lancs, England; [Sbaffi, Laura] Univ Sheffield, Informat Sch, 211 Portobello St, Sheffield S1 4DP, S Yorkshire, England",42.0,1.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0266-6669,,2019.0,35,2,191.0,202,10.1177/0266666917736360,WOS:000475287900001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1295,WOS,Open access in the countries of the visegrad group instructor and student experiences,Higher education; Open access; Repository; Scientific visibility; The visegrad group,"In recent decades, publication of results of scientific research has earned its rightful place not only on traditional forums but in digital space as well. Collecting studies into databases and providing open access to them serves a double purpose. Not only does it accelerate, but it also liberalizes communication. Our paper presents the results of research conducted in the countries of the Visegrad Group (Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary) among higher education faculty and students, with an intention to inquire into how they relate to Open Access as well as into their habits of using repositories. With the help of a questionnaire survey, we sought to answer to the following questions: 1. What are the differences and similarities between the approach to Open Access in the countries of the region? What lies behind these? 2. Have respondents ever had access to Open Access? How do they feel about its advantages or disadvantages? Do they utilize its hidden potentials, or are they still skeptical about it? 3. Have academics seen an increase in the scientific visibility of their work due to open access? Our research results indicate significant differences between the countries of the region, especially as regards student responses. We aimed to find reasons for these differences so as to be able to offer suggestions for further research topics in the field. © 2015 International Institute of Informatics and Systemics IIIS. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']","['POL', 'CZE', 'HUN', 'SVK']","Juhász A., Dani E.","ICSIT 2018 - 9th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, Proceedings",English,Conference Paper,"9th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, ICSIT 2018",13 March 2018 through 16 March 2018,0,,,0.0,"International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, IIIS",0,9781941763780,2015.0,0,0,44.0,49,,WOS:000475499300002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1301,WOS,"Open access awareness, use, and perception: a case study of AAU faculty members",Awareness; United Arab Emirates; Perception; Faculty; Open access; Use,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of a survey undertaken at Al Ain University of Science and Technology (AAU) to investigate and understand faculty awareness, use and perception of Open Access (OA) resources. Design/methodology/approach - Using a Web-based survey questionnaire, data were collected from full-time faculty members teaching at AAU, United Arab Emirates (UAE). Findings - The study found that faculty members possess a good knowledge and a positive perception of OA resources. They frequently use OA resources for teaching, learning and research activities. However, the findings indicate that female faculty members are more likely to use OA resources than male faculty members. Faculty members with a high level of awareness or use are found to have a highly positive perception of OA resources. Presenting research reports at conferences and seminars or publishing research papers is weakly associated with the level of awareness and use of OA resources. The study revealed no association between the faculty member and their use of OA resources. Research limitations/implications - It is essential for scientific communities to understand the importance of OA resources and how to use them effectively in teaching, learning and research activities. Originality/value - This kind of research is new to the Gulf Cooperation Council countries in general and the UAE in particular. The findings of the study may help to improve the awareness and the use of OA resources among scientific communities not only in the Arab countries but also around the world.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['ARE'],"Kaba, Abdoulaye; Said, Raed",NEW LIBRARY WORLD,English,Article,,,,,54.0,8.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1750-6166,,2017.0,11,1,,,10.1108/TG-12-2015-0050,WOS:000549954200001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1303,WOS,"Open Access from the Publishers' Point of View Results of a survey among scholarly publishers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland",Open Access; scholarly publisher; survey; business model; scholarly communication,"Funders, universities, and libraries have been pushing for Open Access to scholarly publications for years. While Open Access agreements have been negotiated with a growing number of big publishers, smaller publishers hardly figured in the debates on the Open Access transformation so far. We therefore interviewed representatives of 82 small and medium-sized scholarly publishers about their experiences, attitudes and offers on Open Access. Our survey shows that Open Access is becoming more important for these publishers and their authors, although there are clear differences in attitudes and knowledge regarding Open Access, depending on their size, subject areas, and literature types. For publishers, key requirements to convert to Open Access are sufficient funding, more standardization, and better communication with other stakeholders.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],"['DEU', 'AUT', 'CHE']","Kaier, Christian; Lackner, Karin",BIBLIOTHEK FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS,German,Article,,,,"[Kaier, Christian; Lackner, Karin] Univ Bibliothek Graz, Open Access Off, Publikat Serv, Univ Pl 3a, A-8010 Graz, Austria",11.0,0.0,WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH,0341-4183,,2019.0,43,1,194.0,205,10.1515/bfp-2019-2008,WOS:000477323900001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1305,WOS,Open access institutional repositories in universities in East Africa,Open access; Kenya; East Africa; Universities; Tanzania; Uganda; Institutional repositories,"Purpose - Given that repositories were proposed as one of the routes to open access (OA), this study sought to establish the achievements universities in East Africa had attained in initiating institutional repositories (IRs), the challenges in providing OA and strategies for the way forward. Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected through literature searches, using the internet, journal databases and university websites in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda for information about OA and IRs in East Africa. Some of the findings were based on the author's PhD The management and accessibility of OA IRs in selected universities in East Africa, which used face-to-face interviews with six librarians and self-administered questionnaires responded to by 183 researchers at Kenyatta University, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences and Makerere University. Findings - Universities in East Africa were still in the intermediate stages of embracing OA, and only 40 libraries out of 145 universities had implemented IRs. However, most of the repositories had less than 1,000 items, with this challenge attributed to the absence of institutional and government/funder mandates that affected the collection/provision of OA, in addition to the lack of awareness of IRs among researchers. Originality/value - The value in this research was establishing the extent of IR initiatives in universities in East Africa and their contribution to OA, which is regarded as more visible and accessible to scholars and government personnel who could leverage the information for further development in the region.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'survey']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']","['KEN', 'TZA', 'UGA']","Kakai, Miriam; Musoke, Maria G. N.; Okello-Obura, Constant",INFORMATION AND LEARNING SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Kakai, Miriam] Makerere Univ, Kampala, Uganda; [Okello-Obura, Constant] Makerere Univ, Informat Sci, Kampala, Uganda; [Okello-Obura, Constant] Makerere Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci CoCIS, Kampala, Uganda; [Okello-Obura, Constant] Makerere Univ, ULIA, Kampala, Uganda; [Okello-Obura, Constant] Makerere Univ, EASLIS, Kampala, Uganda; [Musoke, Maria G. N.] Kyambogo Univ, Acad Affairs, Kampala, Uganda",53.0,3.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2398-5348,,2018.0,119,11,667.0,681,10.1108/ILS-07-2018-0066,WOS:000477800800029,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0
1342,WOS,Open Access Publishing in Otorhinolaryngology: An Emerging Trend among Turkish Scientists?,Subscription based; open access; otorhinolaryngology,"BACKGROUND/AIMS Scientific medical publishing has undergone significant changes in the last few decades, enabled by advances in technology. Together with these technological innovations, the development of alternative methods has become inevitable. Most authors have had difficulty in making decision between open access and the traditional subscription-based journals. In this study we aimed to compare the changes in citation numbers of open access vs. subscription-based journals in Otorhinolaryngology publishing among Turkish authors and institutions. MATERIAL and METHODS In this study we reviewed 28 Otorhinolaryngology (ORL) journals which have matched SCImago journal rank (SJR) values and included a total of 2,000 scientific papers published by Turkish authors between 2010 and 2015. All data extracted from SJR website and Google Scholar system. RESULTS There was statistically significant difference found between the subscription based (SB) and Open access (OA) according to the types of articles (p=0.000). The difference between the mean total cite number per article of SB and OA journals is not statistically significant but close to level of significance (p=0.061) CONCLUSION When choosing between open access and subscription based journals to publish, it is important to consider the journal's visibility, the cost of publication. Open access publishing trend is on the rise among Turkish researchers, though they still mostly prefer the subscription based journals in otorhinolaryngology category.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['TUR'],"Kazikdas, Kadir Cagdas; Yalcinozan, Eda Tuna; Tinazli, Remzi; Safakogullari, Hasan; Sancar, Nuriye",CYPRUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,English,Article,,,,"[Kazikdas, Kadir Cagdas; Yalcinozan, Eda Tuna; Tinazli, Remzi; Safakogullari, Hasan] Near East Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Sch Med, Nicosia, Cyprus; [Sancar, Nuriye] Near East Univ, Dept Math, Sch Art & Sci, Nicosia, Cyprus",6.0,0.0,AVES,2149-7893,,2018.0,3,3,164.0,167,10.5152/cjms.2018.634,WOS:000485943600003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1343,WOS,Librarian Viewpoints on Teaching Open Access Publishing Principles to College Students,college students; electronic resource management; Open Access; Open Access advocacy and promotion,"Efforts by individual librarians and advocacy groups over the last ten years have resulted in greater awareness about Open Access. In recent years, some academic libraries have begun to raise awareness among both graduate and undergraduate populations. Through an online survey distributed to scholarly communications and e-resources listservs, this article documents some of the ongoing efforts now underway, and gauges how widespread the support is for similar initiatives. Both the literature review and survey responses underscore the importance of e-resource management tools to librarians involved in Open Access initiatives. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['nonspecificgeo'],Keane E.P.,Serials Librarian,English,Article,0,0,0,,,6.0,0,0361526X,0,2012.0,63,44289,333.0,349,10.1080/0361526X.2012.724377,WOS:000485950500018,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1347,WOS,Library support for open access journal publishing: A needs analysis,0,"The aim of this study was to establish the role of academic libraries in the context of open access (OA) journal publishing, based on the perceived needs of the journals and/or their editors. As a study sample, 14 OA journals affiliated to the University of Zürich, Switzerland, were taken. They were very different in nature, ranging from well-established society journals to newly founded titles launched by dedicated individuals. The study comprised two approaches: a comprehensive journal assessment and subsequent editor interviews. The journal assessments evaluated the functionalities, ease of use, sustainability and visibility of the journal. The interviews were used to get additional background information about the journals and explore editors' needs, experiences and viewpoints. The results show that journals affiliated to publishing houses or libraries are technically well provided for. Unaffiliated journals offer fewer functionalities and display some unconventional features, often described as innovations by the editors. More resources-financial or human-is seen by nearly all editors as the most pressing need and as a limitation to growth. In comparison, IT/technical needs are mentioned much less often. The article also describes the launch of an Editors' Forum, an idea suggested by the editors and implemented by the library. This Forum offered further valuable insight into the potential role of libraries, but also specifically addressed several of the editors' needs as expressed in the interviews. © 2015 Alice Keller.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['CHE'],Keller A.,Insights: the UKSG Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,,,3.0,United Kingdom Serials Group,20487754,0,2015.0,28,3,19.0,31,10.1629/uksg.256,WOS:000486139800004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1351,WOS,Learning to share: Mandates and open access,Australia; Open access; Research work; University libraries,"Purpose: Online open access (OA) to research publications comes to scholarship as a vision that makes sense and is congruent with the aims of science and scholarship. It is argued that research, often funded out of the public purse, should be a public good. Given its visionary characteristics and its congruence with the aims of scholarship, the purpose of this paper is to examine why OA is not practiced by all researchers, all the time, or more encouraged by library managers. Design/methodology/approach: The findings reported in the paper are built upon analyses of the literature, the current discussion occurring in e-lists and other public forums, and upon qualitative research using observation, document analysis, interview techniques and thematic analysis conducted as part of a PhD study in two Australian universities. Findings: One of the universities had a long-standing institutional mandate to encourage OA and the other did not. In terms of findings, of the universities studied, the institution with the mandate not only had a far greater proportion of its research output in its OA institutional repository but also the researchers and authors interviewed there had a deep understanding of, and engagement with, issues surrounding not just scholarly publishing but also OA and other publishing options. Further, OA and the mandate policy were reported by university executives as providing benefits both to individual researchers and to the institution as a whole. Originality/value: In analyzing the relationships and entanglements that exist between authors, universities, publishers and other actors we see how these reinforce the current publishing paradigm. While proposals for mandates are not new, this paper illustrates how one is acting in practice. It proposes that despite reservations among academic library managers a mandate can work in practice. Sometimes, a new actor, such as a mandate or deposit policy is required, to assist library and repository managers, to encourage authors to look beyond their existing frames and embrace OA. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['unisupportstaff'],['AUS'],Kennan M.A.,Library Management,English,Article,0,0,0,,,13.0,0,1435124,0,2011.0,32,4,302.0,318,10.1108/01435121111132301,WOS:000486490600004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1352,WOS,"Reassembling Scholarly Publishing: Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and The Process of Change",Actor-network theory; Institutional repositories; Open access; Scholarly publishing,"The domain of scholarly publishing is undergoing rapid change. Change has been instigated and produced by the Internet and open access systems - such as disciplinary and institutional repositories and open access journals. However traditional scholarly publishing is strengthening its hold over prestigious journals thus resisting change. How then does the change come about? An attempt at answering this question led us to examine an institutional repository initiative in a University. As we identified and followed the actors (researchers, research papers, reward systems, institutional repository technology, library staff, RQF, etc.) we saw the emergence of new publishing practices and the forces preserving the old ones. By adopting Actor Network Theory (ANT) we came to understand the materiality, relationality and ambiguity of processes of reassembling scholarly publishing. This paper presents preliminary results and thereby informs a wider debate and shaping of open access and scholarly publishing. © 2007 Mary Anne Kennan & Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian', 'unisupportstaff', 'policy']",['AUS'],"Kennan M.A., Cecez-Kecmanovic D.",ACIS 2007 Proceedings - 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems,English,Conference Paper,"18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, ACIS 2007",5 December 2007 through 7 December 2007,"Toowoomba, QLD",,,5.0,0,0,0,2007.0,0,0,436.0,446,,WOS:000486611500011,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1353,WOS,"Academic authors, scholarly publishing, and open access in Australia",,"This paper briefly describes the rapidly changing research evaluation and funding landscape in Australian universities, specifically in relation to open access and institutional repositories. Recent announcements indicate that funding and evaluation bodies are becoming increasingly concerned that publicly funded research be made publicly available. The paper then reports a survey of all levels of academic staff plus research students at one Australian university, conducted in May 2006, prior to the introduction of an institutional repository. The survey, in line with previously reported surveys, found that while there was a high level of engagement with scholarly publishing, there was a low level of awareness of, or concern with, either open access (green' or 'gold') or the roles repositories can play in increasing accessibility of research. Practically, this indicates that much work needs to be done within this university to increase knowledge of, and change behaviours with regard to, open access and repositories if the university and its academics are to make the most of new funding requirements and research evaluation processes.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['AUS'],"Kennan, Mary Anne",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"Univ New S Wales, Sch Informat Syst Technol & Management, Fac Business, AGSM, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia",18.0,12.0,WILEY,0953-1513,,2007.0,20,2,138.0,146,10.1087/174148507X185117,WOS:000486982300007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1358,WOS,Promoting open access in Germany as illustrated by a recent project at the Library of the University of Konstanz,Germany; Open systems; Publishing; University libraries,"Purpose - With the illustration of a best practice example for an implementation of open access in a scientific institution, the paper will be useful in fostering future open access projects. Design/methodology/approach - The paper starts with a brief overview of the existing situation of open access in Germany. The following report describes the results of a best practice example, added by the analysis of a survey on the position about open access by the scientists at the University of Konstanz. Findings - The dissemination of the advantages of open access publishing is fundamental for the success of implementing open access in a scientific institution. For the University of Konstanz, it is shown that elementary factors of success are an intensive cooperation with the head of the university and a vigorous approach to inform scholars about open access. Also, some more conditions are essential to present a persuasive service: The Library of the University of Konstanz offers an institutional repository as an open access publication platformand hosts open journal systems for open access journals. High-level support and consultation for open access publishing at all administrative levels is provided. The integration of the local activities into national and international initiatives and projects is pursued for example by the joint operation of the information platform open-access.net. Originality/value - The paper offers insights in one of the most innovative open access projects in Germany. The University of Konstanz belongs to the pioneers of the open access movement in Germany and is currently running a successful open access project. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['DEU'],"Kersting A., Pappenberger K.",OCLC Systems and Services,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,0,1065075X,0,2009.0,25,2,105.0,113,10.1108/10650750910961901,WOS:000487769400008,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1363,WOS,Familiarity and Experience with Open Access among Iranian Medical Researchers,,"This study presents partial results from an ongoing doctoral research project. It explores the current status of familiarity and experience with Open Access (OA) among medical researchers in Iran. As a developing country, Iran has been involved in the OA movement via publishing several OA journals, but there are few research studies that indicate the perspectives of Iranian medical researchers with regards to OA. Data has been collected by using questionnaires, and the respondents are 367 clinical and basic science academic staff of medical schools at public medical universities. The results of this survey indicate that in nearly all 13 categories of terms, initiatives, and services of OA, more than half of the respondents are unfamiliar. Only half of the researchers have publishing experience with OA journals. The respondents familiar with OA have more publishing practice than those who are unfamiliar with it. This research is among the earliest studies investigating OA in Iran.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['researcher'],['IRN'],"Khalili, Leila",LIBRI,English,Article,,,,"Univ Malaya, Fac Comp & Informat Technol, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia",35.0,1.0,WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH,0024-2667,,2011.0,61,4,338.0,350,10.1515/libr.2011.028,WOS:000487987700010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1364,WOS,Factors Influencing Acceptance of Open Access Publishing among Medical Researchers in Iran,,"This paper reports the findings from a research project which focused on determining the factors influencing acceptance of open access journals (OAJs) among Iranian medical researchers. Low use of OAJs as a publishing media, especially in developing countries, could be a sign of low acceptance of it. However, it is still not clear what factors influence researchers to publish their scholarly outputs through this channel. This study used a survey design and a questionnaire as the data collection instrument. The sample comprised 367 clinical/basic science academic staff of medical schools at public medical universities in Iran. Results of hierarchical multiple regression indicate that out of the 14 predictors of intention to publish in OAJs, only experience, attitude, facilitating conditions and type of university were significant. Also, results of hierarchical multiple regression show that out of 14 predictors of self-reported publishing in OAJs, intention, social influence, attitude, academic rank, facilitating conditions, type of university and familiarity were significant key predictors. This study is significant in that it provided a description of the current status of OA among Iranian medical researchers. It also investigated the acceptance of OAJs among researchers based on a theoretical framework derived from the UTAUT model, as well as the inclusion of attitude and anxiety as dimensions influencing acceptance.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['researcher'],['IRN'],"Khalili, Leila; Singh, Diljit",LIBRI,English,Article,,,,"[Khalili, Leila; Singh, Diljit] Univ Malaya, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia",61.0,5.0,WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH,0024-2667,,2012.0,62,4,336.0,354,10.1515/libri-2012-0026,WOS:000488110700001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1366,WOS,Mapping of E-books in Science & Technology: An Analytical Study of Directory of Open Access Books,E-books; open access (OA); science and technology (S&T); directory of open access books (DOAB); internet technology,"A detailed study of e-books in Science and Technology indexed in Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB) till May 15, 2016 is presented. Open access publishers, licenses and language-wise distribution of e-books indexed in DOAB is examined. The data collected only on the subjects listed in DDC-23 under Science and Technology domain. The results depicts that there are 1052 e-books indexed in Science and Technology in DOAB. The collection includes e-books that are both made-digital and born digital. Maximum books are on health sciences and published in English only. Mostly e-books have creative commons license. Moreover, Frontier Media SA is the most active open access e-book publisher. The study shall be helpful to library and information professionals as well as open access publishers.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['natscie', 'engtech']",['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Khanchandani, Vanita; Kumar, Moveen",DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Khanchandani, Vanita] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Cent Lib, New Delhi 110016, India; [Kumar, Moveen] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, Cent Lib, New Delhi 110067, India",7.0,0.0,DEFENCE SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION DOCUMENTATION CENTRE,0974-0643,,2017.0,37,3,172.0,179,10.14429/djlit.37.3.10692,WOS:000488236700010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1370,WOS,Authors from the periphery countries choose open access more often,,"This article analyses attitudes of academic authors toward open access (OA) and the frequency of choosing OA publication venues. The research looks particularly at differences between authors based in countries with a gross domestic product per capita less or greater than US$18,000 (called periphery and core countries, respectively). The data were obtained with an online survey sent to 107,296 scholars listed on the mailing lists belonging to De Gruyter Open from December 2015 to January 2016. A total of 1,012 responses were received. Authors from the periphery countries publish their articles in gold OA more often and they also pay OA publication fees equally often as those based in the core countries. The reasons for that are complex, involving both their preference to publish in OA and the composition of the publishing market in the periphery.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Kienc, Witold",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Kienc, Witold] De Gruyter Open, Warsaw, Poland",15.0,5.0,WILEY,0953-1513,,2017.0,30,2,125.0,131,10.1002/leap.1093,WOS:000489052000001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1377,WOS,"Status of digital standards, licensing types, and archiving policies in Asian open access journals registered in Directory of Open Access Journals",Digital standards; Directory of Open Access Journals; Open access journal; Open access publishing; Publication technology,"Purpose: This study aims to analyze the digital standards of Asian journals registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) which has been recognized as an index of quality for open access journals. Methods: Data including 54 fields of each journal listed in DOAJ were provided by the DOAJ team in June 5, 2018. We focused on 11 fields including digital standards, content licensing types and digital archiving policy. Results: Based on raw data from DOAJ from June 5, 2018, there are 11,534 journals registered in the directory. Among all journals in the directory, Asian journals comprise 1,972 journals from 18 countries. Indonesian journals rank at the top for Asian journals, with 1,322 journals originating from that country. Other major Asian countries' registration status includes India (238), South Korea (82), China (80), Malaysia (45), Pakistan (39), Taiwan (30), Thailand (27), Japan (20), and Hong Kong (20). Eighty percent of journals (1,584) are using PDF-only as their full-text format, and DOI is adopted in 852 journals (43%). Almost 98% of journals (1,936) are having a Creative Commons license; however, 85% of journals (1,689) do not have a digital archiving policy. Conclusion: Generally, digital standards are well implemented in South Korea, and digital archiving/deposit policy is well accepted in Indian journals. Many Asian open access journal editors can refer to this study result when they digitalize their journals in order to meet global standards.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['AS'],"Kim, Soon; Choi, Hyungwook",SCIENCE EDITING,English,Article,,,,"[Kim, Soon] Ewha Womans Univ, Res Inst Social Sci, Seoul, South Korea; [Choi, Hyungwook] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Seoul, South Korea",8.0,1.0,KOREAN COUNCIL SCIENCE EDITORS,2288-7474,,2019.0,6,1,41.0,46,10.6087/kcse.154,WOS:000491201000010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0
1389,WOS,Business models for open data ecosystem: Challenges and motivations for entrepreneurship and innovation,Business ecosystem; Business model; Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Open data,"Open data provide many opportunities for businesses, such as the development of new products and services. A significant challenge for businesses and governments is the collaboration among actors who provide data, actors who consume data and actors who create new services and applications around the data. These actors synthesize a collaborative environment-called ecosystem. Open data ecosystems face many obstacles and researchers have focused their interest in establishing and validating them. The existing knowledge about the open data ecosystem from the business perspective is limited. The purpose of this study is to examine the actors of open data ecosystem and their relationships, their motivations in order to increase entrepreneurial activities as well as the business model elements which are required in open data based business. 6 interviews were carried out with actors from open data ecosystem so as to receive up-to-date information directly from actors and estimated how the current ecosystem enables new business opportunities for actors providing data and for actors utilizing data. The analysis of findings is based on the Business Model Canvas and results are presented according to the perspective of each actor of the ecosystem. Findings show that although actors are highly interested in using open data, there is a need for a new kind of business ecosystem that makes a win-win condition possible for all the actors in the open data ecosystem. The interviews disclosed many motives and benefits of the open data ecosystem. Nevertheless, there are also barriers that should be carefully examined and resolved. © 2017 IEEE.",['opendata'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['business', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Kitsios F., Papachristos N., Kamariotou M.","Proceedings - 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics, CBI 2017",English,Conference Paper,"19th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, CBI 2017",24 July 2017 through 27 July 2017,0,,,16.0,Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.,0,9781538630341,2017.0,1,0,398.0,407,10.1109/CBI.2017.51,WOS:000495708700002,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1390,WOS,Beyond Open Data Hackathons: Exploring Digital Innovation Success,open data; hackathon event; innovation; contests; digitalization,"Previous researchers have examined the motivations of developers to participate in hackathons events and the challenges of open data hackathons, but limited studies have focused on the preparation and evaluation of these contests. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to examine factors that lead to the effective implementation and success of open data hackathons and innovation contests. Six case studies of open data hackathons and innovation contests held between 2014 and 2018 in Thessaloniki were studied in order to identify the factors leading to the success of hackathon contests using criteria from the existing literature. The results show that the most significant factors were clear problem definition, mentors' participation to the contest, level of support to participants by mentors in order to launch their applications to the market, jury members' knowledge and experience, the entry requirements of the competition, and the participation of companies, data providers, and academics. Furthermore, organizers should take team members' competences and skills, as well as the support of post-launch activities for applications, into consideration. This paper can be of interest to organizers of hackathon events because they could be knowledgeable about the factors that should take into consideration for the successful implementation of these events.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['GRC'],"Kitsios, Fotis; Kamariotou, Maria",INFORMATION,English,Article,,,,"[Kitsios, Fotis; Kamariotou, Maria] Univ Macedonia, Dept Appl Informat, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece",42.0,1.0,MDPI,2078-2489,,2019.0,10,7,,,10.3390/info10070235,WOS:000495805100057,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1391,WOS,Current practices and infrastructure for open data based research on occupant-centric design and operation of buildings,Open data; Data publishing; Data use; Occupant behavior; FAIR Data; Ontology; Anonymi; z; ation; Metadata schema,"Many new tools for improving the design and operation of buildings try to realize the potential of big data. In particular, data is an important element for occupant-centric design and operation as occupants' presence and actions are affected by a high degree of uncertainty and, hence, are hard to model in general. For such research, data handling is an important challenge, and following an open science paradigm based on open data can increase efficiency and transparency of scientific work. This article reviews current practices and infrastructure for open data-driven research on occupant-centric design and operation of buildings. In particular, it covers related work on open data in general and for the built environment in particular, presents survey results for existing scientific practices, reviews technical solutions for handling data and metadata, discusses ethics and privacy protection and analyses principles for the sharing of open data. In summary, this study establishes the status quo and presents an outlook on future work for methods and infrastructures to support the open data community within the built environment.",['opendata'],['survey'],['engtech'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Kjaergaard, Mikkel B.; Ardakanian, Omid; Carlucci, Salvatore; Dong, Bing; Firth, Steven K.; Gao, Nan; Huebner, Gesche Margarethe; Mahdavi, Ardeshir; Rahaman, Mohammad Saiedur; Salim, Flora D.; Sangogboye, Fisayo Caleb; Schwee, Jens Hjort; Wolosiuk, Dawid; Zhu, Yimin",BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Kjaergaard, Mikkel B.; Sangogboye, Fisayo Caleb; Schwee, Jens Hjort] Univ Southern Denmark, SDU Software Engn, Odense, Denmark; [Ardakanian, Omid] Univ Alberta, Dept Comp Sci, Edmonton, AB, Canada; [Carlucci, Salvatore] Cyprus Inst, Energy Environm & Water Res Ctr, Nicosia, Cyprus; [Carlucci, Salvatore] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Trondheim, Norway; [Dong, Bing] Syracuse Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA; [Firth, Steven K.] Loughborough Univ, Sch Architecture Bldg & Civil Engn, Loughborough, Leics, England; [Gao, Nan; Rahaman, Mohammad Saiedur; Salim, Flora D.] RMIT Univ, Comp Sci & Informat Technol Sch Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; [Huebner, Gesche Margarethe] UCL, Energy Inst, Bartlett Sch Environm Energy & Resources, London, England; [Mahdavi, Ardeshir; Wolosiuk, Dawid] Vienna Univ Technol, Dept Bldg Phys & Bldg Ecol, Vienna, Austria; [Zhu, Yimin] Louisiana State Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Construct Management, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA",69.0,1.0,PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD,0360-1323,,2020.0,177,,,,10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106848,WOS:000496364000001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1392,WOS,Open access barriers: An action research,Action research; Open access; Scholarly publication,"ICT has provided the infrastructure to enable easy access to scientific information. Despite this, libraries are suffering from the rising of journal subscriptions. Additionally, the structure of scholarly publications is creating a wasteful situation where publicly funded research is being paid for several times over. University libraries are struggling to deal with these new realities at the same time as they provide a level of service with acceptable access to publications. The work of librarians is being heavily affected by the influence of copyright and licensing which together are creating barriers to open access. The work in this chapter draws from an action research in progress undertaken by Lund's University in order to explore the barriers to open access to scientific research output in Sweden. © 2008 International Federation for Information Processing.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['SWE'],Klang M.,IFIP International Federation for Information Processing,English,Conference Paper,0,0,0,,,1.0,0,15715736,9780387848211,2008.0,282,0,335.0,348,10.1007/978-0-387-84822-8_23,WOS:000496810000007,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1395,WOS,Open data in the motor test research field. Analysing the relevance and acceptance of the eResearch-infrastructure MO vertical bar RE data for motor research data,Open access; Data pooling; Motor competence; Survey; Repository,"Open access policy means free and unrestricted access to scientific knowledge. It facilitates efficient, transparent and sustainable scientific work. Research data as the basis of this knowledge is becoming more and more significant in this policy. The enormous amount of data being generated requires professional research data management. Data-sharing makes data reusable and reproducible, collaborated work between scientists increases across disciplinary boundaries. The eResearch infrastructure MO vertical bar RE data aims to provide free access to citable motor performance research data for a limited application area with high standardization possibilities. It enables an innovative use of digital object identifiers (DOI) as well as the data-pooling procedures. The present survey aims to examine the needs and relevance of MO vertical bar RE data. First this will be assessed by systematic investigation in repository databases, second by asking members of scientific institutions and members of practical fields (schools, preschools, sport clubs) who collect motor performance data using an online survey. The online survey participants were asked about their interest in using MO vertical bar RE data by themselves as well as their own disposition to access data in a free and open way in MO vertical bar RE data. Currently there is no database like MO vertical bar RE data providing access to motor research data. A total of 143 participants took part in the online survey and both groups, members of scientific institutions and members of practical fields, stated a high interest in using MO vertical bar RE data. Owners of data showed a higher interest than those participants who do not have their own data. The willingness to provide access to their own data in MO vertical bar RE data is very high (more than 70%). In summary, open data enjoys high acceptance and approval in the field of motor performance testing for the entire sample.",['opendata'],"['documentreview', 'survey']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Kloe, M.; Niessner, C.; Woll, A.; Boes, K.",GERMAN JOURNAL OF EXERCISE AND SPORT RESEARCH,German,Article,,,,"[Kloe, M.] Karlsruher Inst Technol, Inst Sport & Sportwissensch, Engler Bunte Ring 15, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany",47.0,1.0,SPRINGER,2509-3142,,2019.0,49,4,503.0,513,10.1007/s12662-019-00620-2,WOS:000497517900007,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1398,WOS,Mining the open science: Themes and trends 10 years of open science,Big data; Open science; Open science trends; Scopus; Text mining,"Background/Objectives: Topics of Open Science and the recent trend will be examined in this research based on the articles that were published in Scopus, the representative foreign academic journal on the subject. Methods/Statistical analysis: This research was carried out in order to search Scopus Web DB, on the basis of which to grasp research trend on Open Science by utilizing text mining techniques, Big Data, Keyword network and Visualization tools for analysis. In this research, a total of 1,809 data were collected and analyzed, and the following conclusions were derived. Findings: As a result of analysis on Open Science research, it was possible to find out quite a few research have been carried out steadily from 2000 to the present actively. And a result of analysis of 10 major keywords on Open Science, such keywords as data, open, research, system, science, paper, and source turned out to be important in descending order. Result of keyword network analysis, service development that takes data and open into consideration seems to be necessary for activation of Open Science research. Improvements/Applications: Open Science is still in its early stage, efforts were made to grasp research trend related to Open Science from Web DB Scopus, derive 10 keywords in the process, and carry out a network analysis on them. © 2018, Institute of Advanced Scientific Research, Inc. All rights reserved.",['openscience'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Ko M.-H., Park E.-M., Park S.-T.",Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,"Institute of Advanced Scientific Research, Inc.",1943023X,0,2018.0,10,1,263.0,270,,WOS:000497813600001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1401,WOS,Use of the paid open access option in hybrid open access journals in agriculture: A mixed-methods study,0,"We explore the use and usefulness of the hybrid open access publishing model in agricultural sciences using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. To ascertain the level of usage of the paid open access option in hybrid open access journals in agriculture, we studied the agriculture-related journals published by six commercial publishers. These publishers offer authors the option of paying a fee, often close to $3,000 per article, to make their article immediately freely available, usually with a Creative Commons license. We defined agriculture broadly but also assigned each journal to a subspecialty (e.g., animal science) in order to see if there were differences based on these subdivisions. For each journal we gathered data for 2014-2015 and noted the total number of research articles and the number of those that were made freely available by authors paying the open access fee. To give context to our results we also surveyed local faculty in agricultural sciences, asking their reasons for considering the paid open access options and the sources of the funds to pay for it. Survey respondents were asked about their academic position and rank to see if there were differences to be noted. We also investigated the findability of the open access articles, noting if each individual publisher offered a way to easily locate all the freely available articles in a particular journal and if there are other avenues to easily locate these articles. © 2016, Association of College and Research Libraries. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'survey']",['agric'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Kocher M., Kelly J.",Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,Association of College and Research Libraries,10921206,0,2016.0,2016,85,0.0,0,10.5062/F47P8WDB,WOS:000498808600002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1402,WOS,"""I've Never Heard of It Before"": Awareness of Open Access at a Small Liberal Arts University",definitions of open access; faculty open access needs; institutional repositories; open access; open access awareness; scholarly communication,"Small colleges and universities, often late adopters of institutional repositories and open access initiatives, face challenges that have not fully been explored in the professional literature. In an effort to gauge the level of awareness of open access and institutional repositories at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire (UWEC), the authors of this article surveyed fellow faculty members at this small liberal arts university before the 2011 Open Access Week. The survey results reveal that faculty members at UWEC do not share the same level of awareness concerning open access and institutional repositories that was found in the existing scholarly literature. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Kocken G.J., Wical S.H.",Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian,English,Article,0,0,0,,,12.0,0,1639269,0,2013.0,32,3,140.0,154,10.1080/01639269.2013.817876,WOS:000500387400009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1403,WOS,Strategies for the use of open access institutional repositories at universities in Ghana,Academic libraries; Ghana; Institutional repositories; Open access; Strategies; Technology acceptance model; University libraries,"Purpose This article suggests strategies for the usage of open access institutional repositories (OAIR) at university libraries in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach Pragmatism paradigm, mixed methods research approach and convergent parallel mixed method design was adopted. Simple random sampling, stratified random sampling, purposive sampling techniques and the sample size converter were the sampling procedures and methods employed. The questionnaire and interview guide were used as research instruments to gather relevant data for the study. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used as statistical tools to analyze quantitative and thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. Findings Factors such as software, staffing, advocacy, marketing and policies are crucial in the development of OAIR strategy at the University of Ghana. Research limitations/implications Information from the National Accreditations Board (NAB) of Ghana (2018) indicates that Ghana has 92 Higher Educational Institutions (HEI). These are categorized into nine national public universities, eight technical universities, ten professional institutions and 65 private universities and university colleges. This article focuses only on five university libraries with the understanding that they were the only universities on the Directory of Open Access Repositories, authoritative international registries of repositories that provide data on the number of registered Institutional Repositories throughout the world. Practical implications It is envisaged that the findings will benefit policymakers, academic staff, university library management and librarians. Academic staff will recognize the need to use OAIR. OAIR managers and administrators will be able to determine the factors affecting the usage of OAIR in university libraries and will be able to design strategies on how OAIR can be sustained and managed. Originality/value The article suggests strategies for the usage of OAIR that are instrumental for university libraries in Ghana. The strategies consist of an Institutional Guideline that requires adequate marketing, policies, software and staffing. The research also provided an understanding of OAIR through the lenses of technology acceptance model (TAM) an extension of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) to explain the usage of OAIR in university libraries in Ghana.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher', 'policy']",['GHA'],"Kodua-Ntim, Kwame; Fombad, Madeleine",LIBRARY MANAGEMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Kodua-Ntim, Kwame; Fombad, Madeleine] Univ South Africa, Dept Informat Sci, Pretoria, South Africa; [Kodua-Ntim, Kwame] Univ Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana",39.0,0.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0143-5124,,2020.0,41,6-7,515.0,530,10.1108/LM-02-2020-0023,WOS:000500931000002,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1409,WOS,Malaysian scholarly open access journals during 2005-2012: A survey,Electronic journals; Electronic publishing; Malaysia; Open access journals,"The main idea of this survey was to gather the data related to Malaysian Open Access Journals (OAJs) with respect to their subject, host organization, indexing, full text availability and language during 2005-2012. Malaysian journals were selected for this survey because Malaysia is currently one of the successful countries in science and technology among other Islamic countries. Data gathering was performed through using various sources of information such as literature, search engines, and directories. Altogether 216 Malaysian scientific OAJs were identified and analyzed. Most of these journals are published by universities in comparison with research institutes. The number of OAJs in ""Social Sciences"" and ""Engineering and Technology"" is higher than other subject fields. The main language of Malaysian OAJs is English.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['MYS'],"Koleini S., Parto P., Arastoopoor S., Siamak M.",International Journal of Information Science and Management,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,0,20088302,0,2013.0,11,2,91.0,103,,WOS:000501596000005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1410,WOS,Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering,Scholarly publications; Civil engineering; Open access; Citation,"The development of science is accompanied by growth of scholarly publications, primarily in the form of articles in peer-reviewed journals. Scientific work is often evaluated through the number of scientific publications in international journals and their citations. This article discusses the impact of open access (OA) on the number of citations for an institution from the field of civil engineering. We analyzed articles, published in 2007 in 14 international journals with impact factor, which are included in the Journal Citation Reports subject category Civil Engineering. The influence of open access on the number of citations was analyzed. The aim of our research was to determine if open access articles from the field of civil engineering receive more citations than non-open access articles. Based on the value of impact factor and ranking in quartiles, we also looked at the influence of the rank of journals on the number of citations, separately for OA and Non OA articles, in databases Web of Science (WOS), Scopus and Google Scholar. For 2,026 studied articles we found out that 22 % of them were published as OA articles. They received 29 % of all citations in the observed period. We can conclude by the significance level 5 % or less that in the databases WOS and Scopus the articles from top ranked journals (first quartile) achieved more citations than Non OA articles. This argument can be confirmed for some other journals from second quartile as well, while for the journals ranked into the third quartile it can't be confirmed. This could be confirmed only partly for journals from the second quartile, and would not be confirmed for journals ranked into the third quartile. This shows that open access is not a sufficient condition for citation, but increases the number of citations for articles published in journals with high impact.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['engtech'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Koler-Povh, Teja; Juznic, Primoz; Turk, Goran",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Koler-Povh, Teja; Turk, Goran] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Civil & Geodet Engn, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia; [Juznic, Primoz] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Arts, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia",39.0,33.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2014.0,98,2,1033.0,1045,10.1007/s11192-013-1101-x,WOS:000501596000006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1444,WOS,"With open science gaining traction, do we need an Australasia PubMed Central (PMC)? A qualitative investigation",,"Open biomedical repositories, such as PubMed Central (PMC), are a means to make research discoverable and permanently accessible. Assessing the potential interest of key stakeholders in an Australasia PubMed Central was the objective of this research. The investigation is novel, assisting in the development of open science infrastructure through its systematic analysis of the potential interest in, and viability of a biomedical repository for managing openly accessible research outputs for the Australasia region. The research adopted a qualitative approach based on semi-structured interviews and a focus group. Forty-four stakeholders located throughout Australia and New Zealand participated in the research. Participants expanded upon their experience of PubMed, MEDLINE, PMC and their use of information resources for research and clinical practice. The Evidence Based Healthcare (EBHC) pyramid was the theoretical model adopted to explain open biomedical repository processes. A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis identified support for exploring membership of an international PMC system, in particular Europe PMC. Lessons learnt from PMC US, Europe PMC and PMC Canada (collectively known as PubMed Central International) informed the investigation. A major strength identified was that PubMed Central International has been able to achieve high levels of compliance way beyond that of most institutional repositories. A great threat faced is overcoming the difficulties of working together with other major world bodies and financially sustaining an Australasia PMC. Improving Australasian biomedical knowledge management processes may be possible from adopting a PMC for retrieving and transferring research, linked to the data underlying the research. This in turn could help put regional research under a brighter spotlight, potentially leading to improvements in research quality. There is an opportunity for a potential Australasia PMC to harvest biomedical research from the National Library of Australia's aggregator database, Trove and work closely with Europe PMC to avoid duplication of effort. Overall, establishment of an Australasia permanent biomedical digital open repository is perceived as important, with significant potential flow-on benefits to healthcare, industry and society.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'othermeth']",['med'],['othergroup'],"['AUS', 'NZL']","Kruesi, Lisa M.; Burstein, Frada V.; Tanner, Kerry J.",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,"[Kruesi, Lisa M.; Burstein, Frada V.; Tanner, Kerry J.] Monash Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia",24.0,2.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1932-6203,,2019.0,14,2,,,10.1371/journal.pone.0212843,WOS:000506612800002,30794701.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0
1446,WOS,On incentives for open access publishing: A survey at IMIA's annual general assembly during HEC2016,Motivation; Open access publishing; Surveys and questionnaires,"Open access provides an alternative opportunity of publishing research articles besides the traditional subscription-based publication model. Facilitating higher visibility, accessibility, and dissemination, among others, open access addresses modern needs of our information and communication society. Though these factors are vital, there also do exist initial problems to become prevalent. Especially, costs like article publication charges seem to have an impact on the author's decision not to publish open access. In order to gain a deeper insight on incentives for open access publishing (as well as on barriers for not publishing open access), we developed a specific survey within the scope of our Trans-O-MIM project. Conducted at HEC2016, we primarily involved participants of the Annual General Assembly of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA). As main incentives and motivation for open access publishing had been identified: article indexing, impact factor, accessibility/availability, dissemination, and visibility. © 2017 International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) and IOS Press.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Kuballa S., Schulze M., Mielke C., Gefeller O., Haux R.",Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,English,Conference Paper,"16th World Congress of Medical and Health Informatics: Precision Healthcare through Informatics, MedInfo 2017",21 August 2017 through 25 August 2017,0,,,2.0,IOS Press,9269630,9781614998297,2017.0,245,0,901.0,904,10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-901,WOS:000506678200112,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1447,WOS,Open Access Publishing in the Field of Medical Informatics,Open access; Medical informatics; Publishing; Charges; Licensing,"The open access paradigm has become an important approach in today's information and communication society. Funders and governments in different countries stipulate open access publications of funded research results. Medical informatics as part of the science, technology and medicine disciplines benefits from many research funds, such as National Institutes of Health in the US, Wellcome Trust in UK, German Research Foundation in Germany and many more. In this study an overview of the current open access programs and conditions of major journals in the field of medical informatics is presented. It was investigated whether there are suitable options and how they are shaped. Therefore all journals in Thomson Reuters Web of Science that were listed in the subject category Medical Informatics in 2014 were examined. An Internet research was conducted by investigating the journals' websites. It was reviewed whether journals offer an open access option with a subsequent check of conditions as for example the type of open access, the fees and the licensing. As a result all journals in the field of medical informatics that had an impact factor in 2014 offer an open access option. A predominantly consistent pricing range was determined with an average fee of 2.248(sic) and a median fee of 2.207(sic). The height of a journals' open access fee did not correlate with the height of its Impact Factor. Hence, medical informatics journals have recognized the trend of open access publishing, though the vast majority of them are working with the hybrid method. Hybrid open access may however lead to problems in questions of double dipping and the often stipulated gold open access.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Kuballa, Stefanie",JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS,English,Article,,,,"[Kuballa, Stefanie] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Technol, Peter L Reichertz Inst Med Informat, Muehlenpfordtstr 23, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany; [Kuballa, Stefanie] Hannover Med Sch, Muehlenpfordtstr 23, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany",27.0,6.0,SPRINGER,0148-5598,,2017.0,41,5,,,10.1007/s10916-017-0729-0,WOS:000506867500008,28365898.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1455,WOS,Enhancing open access in the biomedical field,Gold Road';  'Green Road';  Open access;  Public access policy;  Scholarly communication,"This study was designed to document the state of open access (OA) in the biomedical field in 2009. PubMed was used to collect bibliographic data on target articles published in 2009. Google and PubMed were then used to establish the availability of free full-text online versions for these articles. Articles were analyzed according to the type of OA to provide insight into the characteristics of OA. The main finding was that almost half of the articles were accessible as OA articles, indicating that OA has progressed rapidly since our previous surveys reported for 2005 and 2007. More than half of the OA articles in the biomedical field are provided by Open Access Journals, the so-called 'Gold Road'. PubMed Central is used for journal publishers to archive their contents freely. The percentage of OA articles accessible via institutional repositories (IR) and authors' websites, or the 'Green Road', has consistently remained low.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Kurata K., Matsubayashi M., Mine S., Yokoi K., Morioka T.",Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting,English,Conference Paper,0,0,0,,,1.0,0,15508390,0,2010.0,47,0,0.0,0,10.1002/meet.14504701383,WOS:000508570700004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1457,WOS,Remarkable Growth of Open Access in the Biomedical Field: Analysis of PubMed Articles from 2006 to 2010,,"Introduction: This study clarifies the trends observed in open access (OA) in the biomedical field between 2006 and 2010, and explores the possible explanations for the differences in OA rates revealed in recent surveys. Methods: The study consists of a main survey and two supplementary surveys. In the main survey, a manual Google search was performed to investigate whether full-text versions of articles from PubMed were freely available. Target samples were articles published in 2005, 2007, and 2009;  the searches were performed a year after publication in 2006, 2008, and 2010, respectively. Using the search results, we classified the OA provision methods into seven categories. The supplementary surveys calculated the OA rate using two search functions on PubMed: LinkOut'' and Limits.'' Results: The main survey concluded that the OA rate increased significantly between 2006 and 2010: the OA rate in 2010 (50.2%) was twice that in 2006 (26.3%). Furthermore, majority of OA articles were available from OA journal (OAJ) websites, indicating that OAJs have consistently been a significant contributor to OA throughout the period. OA availability through the PubMed Central (PMC) repository also increased significantly. OA rates obtained from two supplementary surveys were lower than those found in the main survey. LinkOut'' could find only 40% of OA articles in the main survey. Discussion: OA articles in the biomedical field have more than a 50% share. OA has been achieved through OAJs. The reason why the OA rates in our surveys are different from those in recent surveys seems to be the difference in sampling methods and verification procedures.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Kurata, Keiko;  Morioka, Tomoko;  Yokoi, Keiko;  Matsubayashi, Mamiko",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,"[Kurata, Keiko] Keio Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Tokyo, Japan;  [Morioka, Tomoko] Kunitachi Coll Music Lib, Tokyo, Japan;  [Yokoi, Keiko] Tokyo Inst Technol Lib, Tokyo, Japan;  [Matsubayashi, Mamiko] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Lib Informat & Media Studies, Ibaraki, Japan",13.0,39.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1932-6203,,2013.0,8,5,,,10.1371/journal.pone.0060925,WOS:000509405300056,23658683.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1458,WOS,OPEN ACCESS CULTURE AND ACCEPTANCE OF OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES IN CROATIAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES,open access; open educational resources; open access culture; OER acceptance,"The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the understanding of the open access culture and its impact on the use of Open Educational Resources (OER). There are many examples of using the term open access culture, but without giving an explicit description of it. The aim of this research is to offer conceptualization of the open access culture, identify its main components, and determine the impact of this variable on the intention to use and the actual use of Open Educational Resources by the members of public higher education institutions in Croatia. The sample consisted of 427 respondents. Keeping in mind that culture has a significant impact on the behaviour of an individual, but it also manifests itself through this behaviour, the research model will be proposed. The variable open access culture will be observed on a personal, professional and organizational level and it will include attitudes, perception, norms and politics towards open access to scientific and educational content and knowledge sharing. For the purpose of this study a questionnaire was prepared. Each part of the variable open access culture, as well as the intention to use and the actual use of OER, has been tested using a set of statements with answers on a 5-degree Likert type scale. The respondents have expressed a moderate open access culture. The actual use of OER, as well as the intention to use OER, is also in the middle of measurement scale. In order to achieve the aim of this research, three main hypotheses have been proposed. The results of multiple regression analysis show that the proposed model with predictor variable open access culture has a significant prognostic value on the intention to use and the actual use of OER, with a stronger influence on the intention to use OER. Considering the individual influence of the components of the predictor variable, the open access culture at professional level has the strongest influence on the intention to use and the actual use of OER.","['openaccess', 'openeducation']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['HRV'],"Kurelovic, Elena Krelja",ZBORNIK VELEUCILISTA U RIJECI-JOURNAL OF THE POLYTECHNICS OF RIJEKA,English,Article,,,,"[Kurelovic, Elena Krelja] Polytech Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, Rijeka 51000, Croatia",16.0,1.0,POLYTECHNIC RIJEKA,1848-1299,,2018.0,6,1,39.0,50,,WOS:000509630200007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1461,WOS,The open access landscape in Zimbabwe: the case of university libraries in ZULC,Open access; Zimbabwe; Institutional repositories; Open access policies; Mandate,"Purpose - The paper aims to focus on the current state of open access (OA) initiatives in Zimbabwean universities. The paper specifically reports the initiatives at Zimbabwean universities regarding institutional repositories that promote OA and other digital OA collections. Design/methodology/approach - A qualitative research methodology was adopted. Questionnaires were used as the primary data collection method for this research. The research sought to address the following specific areas: the state of institutional repositories and open access in Zimbabwe, the discoverability of content, open access policies and mandates, the benefits of open access in Zimbabwe, and future plans for institutional OA. A total of eight out of 12 universities responded to the questionnaire. The data provided by the universities involved in the research were summarised to give a general picture of the open access landscape in Zimbabwe. Findings - The current initiatives in the universities involved in this survey indicate that most universities in Zimbabwe are going to have institutional repositories that promote open access to information. Most institutions in Zimbabwe are already working on putting open access policies in place in a bid to promote open access. Originality/value - The research will shed more light on the status quo of open access initiatives in Zimbabwe, particularly with regards to institutional repositories, open access policies and open access mandates.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['ZWE'],"Kusekwa, Lovemore; Mushowani, Aston",LIBRARY HI TECH,English,Article,,,,"[Kusekwa, Lovemore; Mushowani, Aston] Univ Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe",13.0,3.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,0737-8831,,2014.0,32,1,69.0,82,10.1108/LHT-07-2013-0083,WOS:000509959000001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1462,WOS,Promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology: results of the Synergy Expert Meeting of the European health psychology society,Open science; integrity; health psychology; open access; replication,"The article describes a position statement and recommendations for actions that need to be taken to develop best practices for promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology endorsed at a Synergy Expert Group Meeting. Sixteen Synergy Meeting participants developed a set of recommendations for researchers, gatekeepers, and research end-users. The group process followed a nominal group technique and voting system to elicit and decide on the most relevant and topical issues. Seventeen priority areas were listed and voted on, 15 of them were recommended by the group. Specifically, the following priority actions for health psychology were endorsed: (1) for researchers: advancing when and how to make data open and accessible at various research stages and understanding researchers' beliefs and attitudes regarding open data; (2) for educators: integrating open science in research curricula, e.g., through online open science training modules, promoting preregistration, transparent reporting, open data and applying open science as a learning tool; (3) for journal editors: providing an open science statement, and open data policies, including a minimal requirements submission checklist. Health psychology societies and journal editors should collaborate in order to develop a coordinated plan for research integrity and open science promotion across behavioural disciplines.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['othermeth'],['med'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['EU'],"Kwasnicka, Dominika; ten Hoor, Gill A.; van Dongen, Anne; Gruszczynska, Ewa; Hagger, Martin S.; Hamilton, Kyra; Hankonen, Nelli; Heino, Matti Toivo Juhani; Kotzur, Marie; Noone, Chris; Rothman, Alexander J.; Toomey, Elaine; Warner, Lisa Marie; Kok, Gerjo; Peters, Gjalt-Jorn; Luszczynska, Aleksandra",HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Kwasnicka, Dominika; Luszczynska, Aleksandra] SWPS Univ Social Sci & Humanities, Wroclaw Fac Psychol, Wroclaw, Poland; [Kwasnicka, Dominika] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, NHMRC CRE Digital Technol Transform Chron Dis Out, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; [ten Hoor, Gill A.; Kok, Gerjo] Maastricht Univ, Dept Work & Social Psychol, Maastricht, Netherlands; [ten Hoor, Gill A.] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX USA; [van Dongen, Anne] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York, N Yorkshire, England; [Gruszczynska, Ewa] SWPS Univ Social Sci & Humanities, Fac Psychol, Warsaw, Poland; [Hagger, Martin S.] Univ Calif, Psychol Sci, Merced, CA USA; [Hagger, Martin S.] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Sport & Hlth Sci, Jyvaskyla, Finland; [Hamilton, Kyra] Griffith Univ, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; [Hamilton, Kyra] Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; [Hankonen, Nelli; Heino, Matti Toivo Juhani] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; [Kotzur, Marie] Univ Glasgow, Mental Hlth & Wellbeing, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland; [Noone, Chris; Toomey, Elaine] Natl Univ Ireland, Sch Psychol, Galway, Ireland; [Rothman, Alexander J.] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN USA; [Warner, Lisa Marie] MSB Med Sch Berlin, Berlin, Germany; [Peters, Gjalt-Jorn] Open Univ Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands",65.0,0.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",1743-7199,,2020.0,,,,,10.1080/17437199.2020.1844037,WOS:000510243000008,33198583.0,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1464,WOS,"Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed",Open access;  Self-archiving;  Scientific publishing;  Science policy,"The degree to which scholarly journal articles published in subscription-based journals could be provided open access (OA) through publisher-permitted uploading to freely accessible web locations, so called green OA, is an underexplored area of research. This study combines article volume data originating from the Scopus bibliographic database with manually coded publisher policies of the 100 largest journal publishers measured by article output volume for the year 2010. Of the 1.1 million articles included in the analysis, 80.4 % could be uploaded either as an accepted manuscript or publisher version to an institutional or subject repository after one year of publication. Publishers were found to be substantially more permissive with allowing accepted manuscripts on personal webpages (78.1 % of articles) or in institutional repositories (79.9 %) compared to subject repositories (32.8 %). With previous studies suggesting realized green OA to be around 12 % of total annual articles the results highlight the substantial unused potential for green OA.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Laakso, Mikael",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"Hanken Sch Econ, Dept Management & Org, Helsinki 00101, Finland",28.0,49.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2014.0,99,2,475.0,494,10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3,WOS:000510245500008,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1465,WOS,Delayed open access: An overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature,publishing;  open access publications;  journals,"Delayed open access (OA) refers to scholarly articles in subscription journals made available openly on the web directly through the publisher at the expiry of a set embargo period. Although a substantial number of journals have practiced delayed OA since they started publishing e-versions, empirical studies concerning OA have often overlooked this body of literature. This study provides comprehensive quantitative measurements by identifying delayed OA journals and collecting data concerning their publication volumes, embargo lengths, and citation rates. Altogether, 492 journals were identified, publishing a combined total of 111,312 articles in 2011;  77.8% of these articles were made OA within 12 months from publication, with 85.4% becoming available within 24 months. A journal impact factor analysis revealed that delayed OA journals have citation rates on average twice as high as those of closed subscription journals and three times as high as immediate OA journals. Overall, the results demonstrate that delayed OA journals constitute an important segment of the openly available scholarly journal literature, both by their sheer article volume and by including a substantial proportion of highimpact journals.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Laakso, Mikael;  Bjork, Bo-Christer",JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Laakso, Mikael;  Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Helsinki 00101, Finland",18.0,40.0,WILEY-BLACKWELL,1532-2882,,2013.0,64,7,1323.0,1329,10.1002/asi.22856,WOS:000511107200006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1466,WOS,Hybrid open access-A longitudinal study,Open access;  Scientific publishing;  Business models;  Science policy,"This study estimates the development of hybrid open access (OA), i.e. articles published openly on the web within subscription-access journals. Included in the study are the five largest publishers of scholarly journals;  Elsevier, Springer, Wiley-Blackwell, Taylor & Francis, and Sage. Since no central indexing or standardized metadata exists for identifying hybrid OA an explorative bottom-up methodological approach was developed. The individual search and filtering features of each publisher website and a-priori availability of data were leveraged to the extent possible. The results indicate a strong sustained growth in the volume of articles published as hybrid OA during 2007 (666 articles) to 2013 (13994 articles). The share of hybrid articles was at 3.8% of total published articles for the period of 2011-2013 for journals with at least one identified hybrid OA article. Journals within the Scopus discipline categorization of Health and Life Sciences, in particular the field of Medicine, were found to be among the most frequent publishers of hybrid OA content. The study surfaces the many methodological challenges involved in obtaining metrics regarding hybrid OA, a growing business for journal publishers as science policy pressures for reduced access barriers to research publications. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Laakso, Mikael;  Bjork, Bo-Christer",JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Laakso, Mikael;  Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Dept Management & Org, Informat Syst Sci, POB 479 Arkadiankatu 22, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland",28.0,28.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV,1751-1577,,2016.0,10,4,919.0,932,10.1016/j.joi.2016.08.002,WOS:000511370900006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1467,WOS,Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure,Open access;  scientific publishing,"Background: Open access (OA) is a revolutionary way of providing access to the scholarly journal literature made possible by the Internet. The primary aim of this study was to measure the volume of scientific articles published in full immediate OA journals from 2000 to 2011, while observing longitudinal internal shifts in the structure of OA publishing concerning revenue models, publisher types and relative distribution among scientific disciplines. The secondary aim was to measure the share of OA articles of all journal articles, including articles made OA by publishers with a delay and individual author-paid OA articles in subscription journals (hybrid OA), as these subsets of OA publishing have mostly been ignored in previous studies. Methods: Stratified random sampling of journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (n = 787) was performed. The annual publication volumes spanning 2000 to 2011 were retrieved from major publication indexes and through manual data collection. Results: An estimated 340,000 articles were published by 6,713 full immediate OA journals during 2011. OA journals requiring article-processing charges have become increasingly common, publishing 166,700 articles in 2011 (49% of all OA articles). This growth is related to the growth of commercial publishers, who, despite only a marginal presence a decade ago, have grown to become key actors on the OA scene, responsible for 120,000 of the articles published in 2011. Publication volume has grown within all major scientific disciplines, however, biomedicine has seen a particularly rapid 16-fold growth between 2000 (7,400 articles) and 2011 (120,900 articles). Over the past decade, OA journal publishing has steadily increased its relative share of all scholarly journal articles by about 1% annually. Approximately 17% of the 1.66 million articles published during 2011 and indexed in the most comprehensive article-level index of scholarly articles (Scopus) are available OA through journal publishers, most articles immediately (12%) but some within 12 months of publication (5%). Conclusions: OA journal publishing is disrupting the dominant subscription-based model of scientific publishing, having rapidly grown in relative annual share of published journal articles during the last decade.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Laakso, Mikael;  Bjork, Bo-Christer",BMC MEDICINE,English,Article,,,,"[Laakso, Mikael;  Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland",21.0,158.0,BMC,1741-7015,,2012.0,10,,,,10.1186/1741-7015-10-124,WOS:000512095100001,23088823.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1468,WOS,Journal copyright restrictions and actual open access availability: a study of articles published in eight top information systems journals (2010-2014),Open access;  Copyright;  Information systems;  Academic social networks,"Most scholarly journals have explicit copyright restrictions for authors outlining how published articles, or earlier manuscript versions of such articles, may be distributed on the open web. Empirical research on the development of open access (OA) is still scarce and methodologically fragmented, and research on the relationship between journal copyright restrictions and actual free online availability is non-existent. In this study the free availability of articles published in eight top journals within the field of Information Systems (IS) is analyzed by observing the availability of all articles published in the journals during 2010-2014 (1515 articles in total) through the use of Google and Google Scholar. The web locations and document versions of retrieved articles for up to three OA copies per published article were categorized manually. The web findings were contrasted to journal copyright information and augmented with citation data for each article. Around 60 % of all published articles were found to have an OA copy available. The findings suggest that copyright restrictions weakly regulate actual author-side dissemination practice. The use of academic social networks (ASNs) for enabling online availability of research publications has grown increasingly popular, an avenue of research dissemination that most of the studied journal copyright agreements failed to explicitly accommodate.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Laakso, Mikael;  Lindman, Juho",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Laakso, Mikael] Hanken Sch Econ, Dept Management & Org, Informat Syst Sci, Helsinki, Finland;  [Lindman, Juho] Univ Gothenburg Chalmers, Appl Informat Technol, Gothenburg, Sweden",30.0,10.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2016.0,109,2,1167.0,1189,10.1007/s11192-016-2078-z,WOS:000512255200001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1469,WOS,Open access in ethics research: an analysis of open access availability and author self-archiving behaviour in light of journal copyright restrictions,Open access; Scholarly publishing; Copyright; Sharing; Academic social networks; Philosophy; Ethics,"The current state of open access to journal publications within research areas belonging to the humanities has received relatively little research attention. This study provides a detailed mapping of the bibliometric state of open access to journal publications among ethicists, taking into account not only open access publishing in journals directly, but also where and in what form ethicists make their journal articles available elsewhere on the web. As part of the study 297 ethicists affiliated with top-ranking philosophy departments were identified and their journal publication information for the years 2010-2015 were recorded (1682 unique articles). The journal articles were then queried for through Google Scholar in order to establish open access status (web locations, document versions) of each publication record. Publication records belonging to the 20 most frequently used journal outlets (subset of 597 unique articles) were put under closer inspection with regards to alignment with publisher copyright restrictions as well as measuring unused potential to share articles. The results show that slightly over half of recent journal publications are available to read for free. PhilPapers and academic social networks (Academia.edu and ResearchGate) were found to be key platforms for research dissemination in ethics research. The representation of institutional repositories as providers of access was found to be weak, receiving the second lowest frequency rating among the eight discrete web location categories. Further, the study reveals that ethicists are at the same time prone to copyright infringement and undersharing their scholarly work.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['biblio'],['hum'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Laakso, Mikael; Polonioli, Andrea",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Laakso, Mikael] Hanken Sch Econ, Dept Management & Org, Informat Syst Sci, Arkadiankatu 22, Helsinki 00100, Finland; [Polonioli, Andrea] Univ Birmingham, Dept Philosophy, 3 Elms Rd, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England",44.0,8.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2018.0,116,1,291.0,317,10.1007/s11192-018-2751-5,WOS:000512688000005,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1470,WOS,The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009,,"Open Access (OA) is a model for publishing scholarly peer reviewed journals, made possible by the Internet. The full text of OA journals and articles can be freely read, as the publishing is funded through means other than subscriptions. Empirical research concerning the quantitative development of OA publishing has so far consisted of scattered individual studies providing brief snapshots, using varying methods and data sources. This study adopts a systematic method for studying the development of OA journals from their beginnings in the early 1990s until 2009. Because no comprehensive index of OA articles exists, systematic manual data collection from journal web sites was conducted based on journal-level data extracted from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). Due to the high number of journals registered in the DOAJ, almost 5000 at the time of the study, stratified random sampling was used. A separate sample of verified early pioneer OA journals was also studied. The results show a very rapid growth of OA publishing during the period 1993-2009. During the last year an estimated 191 000 articles were published in 4769 journals. Since the year 2000, the average annual growth rate has been 18% for the number of journals and 30% for the number of articles. This can be contrasted to the reported 3,5% yearly volume increase in journal publishing in general. In 2009 the share of articles in OA journals, of all peer reviewed journal articles, reached 7,7%. Overall, the results document a rapid growth in OA journal publishing over the last fifteen years. Based on the sampling results and qualitative data a division into three distinct periods is suggested: The Pioneering years (1993-1999), the Innovation years (2000-2004), and the Consolidation years (2005-2009).",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Laakso, Mikael;  Welling, Patrik;  Bukvova, Helena;  Nyman, Linus;  Bjork, Bo-Christer;  Hedlund, Turid",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,"[Laakso, Mikael;  Welling, Patrik;  Nyman, Linus;  Bjork, Bo-Christer;  Hedlund, Turid] HANKEN Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland;  [Bukvova, Helena] Tech Univ Dresden, Dresden, Germany",26.0,264.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1932-6203,,2011.0,6,6,,,10.1371/journal.pone.0020961,WOS:000512885000006,21695139.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1472,WOS,Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers,Open access; openness; open science; responsible innovation; transparency,"Recent arguments for responsible innovation to progress beyond the narrow focus on open access and toward open science present the opportunity for a deliberate global transition to a culture of transparent and open scientific conduct that will deliver greater societal benefit. This paper presents results from a survey of 171 Australian scientists, researchers and other professionals on their expectations and perspectives of transparency and openness in current scientific research practice. The results suggest that for this cultural transition to occur, the responsibility for strengthening transparency and openness must be undertaken not only by scientists and researchers, but also research funding and delivery agencies, and even those beyond the research and innovation sector. These findings are a first step towards defining and understanding what open science means in an Australian context, and what shifts are needed from researchers, research institutions and policy makers to move toward open science for responsible innovation.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['AUS'],"Lacey, Justine; Coates, Rebecca; Herington, Matthew",JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION,English,Article,,,,"[Lacey, Justine; Coates, Rebecca; Herington, Matthew] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org, Brisbane, Qld, Australia",62.0,1.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",2329-9460,,2020.0,7,3,427.0,449,10.1080/23299460.2020.1800969,WOS:000513137800006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1475,WOS,Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science,Case study; Open data; Open science; Research ethics; Research integrity; Social science,"The risk of scooping is often used as a counter argument for open science, especially open data. In this case study I have examined openness strategies, practices and attitudes in two open collaboration research projects created by Finnish researchers, in order to understand what made them resistant to the fear of scooping. The radically open approach of the projects includes open by default funding proposals, co-authorship and community membership. Primary sources used are interviews of the projects’ founding members. The analysis indicates that openness requires trust in close peers, but not necessarily in research community or society at large. Based on the case study evidence, focusing on intrinsic goals, like new knowledge and bringing about ethical reform, instead of external goals such as publications, supports openness. Understanding fundaments of science, philosophy of science and research ethics, can also have a beneficial effect on willingness to share. Whether there are aspects in open sharing that makes it seem riskier from the point of view of certain demographical groups within research community, such as women, could be worth closer inspection. © 2017 The Author(s).",['opendata'],"['othermeth', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['FIN'],Laine H.,Data Science Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,,,6.0,Ubiquity Press Ltd,16831470,0,2017.0,16,0,0.0,0,10.5334/dsj-2017-029,WOS:000513801000010,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1482,WOS,Open Access E-books in Social Science: A Case Study of Directory of Open Access Books,DOAB; Open access; E-books; Open access e-books; Social science; Case study,"The present study examines the current trends of the open access e-books in the field of social sciences available through Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB). The data was collected online regarding the social science e-books in August 2016 from DOAB web site for analysis. In the study the e-books are divided author wise, license wise, language wise, year wise, and pagination wise for better understanding of the results. The results revealed that there is a significant growth of e-books on DOAB on social sciences over the years.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Lamani, M. B.; Patil, R. R.; Kumbar, B. D.",DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Lamani, M. B.; Patil, R. R.; Kumbar, B. D.] Karnataka Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Dharwad, Karnataka, India",11.0,0.0,DEFENCE SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION DOCUMENTATION CENTRE,0974-0643,,2018.0,38,2,141.0,144,10.14429/djlit.38.2.10890,WOS:000514854300004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1492,WOS,Disparate Environmental Monitoring as a Barrier to the Availability and Accessibility of Open Access Data on the Tidal Thames,citizen science; data quality; estuary; monitoring; open data; Thames,"Open Access data plays an increasingly important role in discussions of environmental issues. Limited availability or poor quality data can impede citizen participation in environmental dialogue, leading to their voices being undermined. This study assesses the quality of Open Access environmental data and barriers to its accessibility in the Thames Estuary. Data quality is assessed by its ability to track long-term trends in temperature, salinity, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen. The inconsistencies found in the data required analyses and careful interpretation beyond what would be expected of a citizen. The lack of clear documentation and centralized database acted as a major barrier to usability. A set of recommendations are produced for estuarine monitoring, including defining minimum standards for metadata, creating a centralized database for better quality control and accessibility, and developing flexible monitoring protocols that can incorporate new hypotheses and partnerships. The goal of the recommendations is to create monitoring which can encourage better science and wider participation in the natural environment.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['policy'],['GBR'],"Lanoue, Julia",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Lanoue, Julia] UCL, Off Vice Provost Res, Thames Estuary Partnership, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, England",66.0,0.0,MDPI,,,2020.0,8,1,,,10.3390/publications8010006,WOS:000516813800001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1494,WOS,The library's role in the management and funding of open access publishing,,"This survey presents information on library management of open access resources, institutional involvement in open access funding, and the role librarians see themselves playing in this model in the future. 149 responses from 30 different countries were included. 94% of respondents were librarians, and the remaining 6% consisted of faculty, students, and other library staff Results showed that most libraries are cataloging open access journals, though they usually represent only 1-5% of total listings. The responsibility for funding open access is more likely to fall on the author or a granting organization than the library or institution. 23% of libraries in this survey help finance open access, and one-third of these had established criteria for funding. While librarians disagreed on the appropriate level of their involvement in the publishing process and financing of article charges, the majority viewed the library as an important advocate for open access publishing in their institution. (C) Kate Lara 2015",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Lara, Kate",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,,6.0,8.0,ASSOC LEARNED PROFESSIONAL SOC PUBL,0953-1513,,2015.0,28,1,4.0,8,10.1087/20150102,WOS:000517004700001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1499,WOS,Shaping Local Open Data Initiatives: Politics and Implications,Public sector information; Open government; Open data; Social construction of technology; Interpretative flexibility,"This article explores different perspectives attributed to the open data initiatives and how these perspectives shape the opening-up process. A socio-technical lens, the social construction of technology, was used to analyse a qualitative cross-case study of two Swedish municipalities. Findings revealed two ways of interpreting open data initiatives: 1) as a platform for techno-economic growth and 2) as a platform for co-created societal growth. These two approaches addressed the municipalities respective contextual challenges and interests alongside national recommendations in their aims to realize the open data initiative. In doing so, they diverged into the evolvement toward two different ends: the realization of open data and the realization of open government. To excel the understanding of actions taken to meet these ends, an additional set of differences between these municipalities is provided within a sociotechnical framework that allows us to discuss diverging evolvements of open data initiatives based on agreed and non-agreed interpretations of what is believed to be constructed.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['SWE'],"Lassinantti, Josefin; Bergvall-Kareborn, Birgitta; Stahlbrost, Anna",JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"[Lassinantti, Josefin; Bergvall-Kareborn, Birgitta; Stahlbrost, Anna] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Informat Syst, Lulea, Sweden",74.0,16.0,"UNIV TALCA, FAC INGENIERIA",0718-1876,,2014.0,9,2,17.0,33,10.4067/S0718-18762014000200003,WOS:000518027900002,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1501,WOS,"Open science strategies in research policies: A comparative exploration of Canada, the US and the UK",Open science; research policy; open data; open access; research councils; funding agencies,"Several movements have emerged related to the general idea of promoting openness' in science. Research councils are key institutions in bringing about changes proposed by these movements, as sponsors and facilitators of research. In this paper we identify the approaches used in Canada, the US and the UK to advance open science, as a step towards understanding how policy in this area is evolving. The findings highlight three broad patterns across the countries, showing that open science is supported not only be the activities of individual research councils, but also through government mandates and inter-council cooperation. These patterns involve efforts to create a digital infrastructure for open science, to foster open access, and to support open data initiatives.","['openpolicies', 'openscience']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['funder'],"['GBR', 'CAN', 'USA']","Lasthiotakis, Helen; Kretz, Andrew; Sa, Creso",POLICY FUTURES IN EDUCATION,English,Article,,,,"[Vazquez, Merce; Oliver, Antoni] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Fac Arts & Humanities, Avinguda Tibidabo 39-43, Barcelona, Spain; [Casademont, Elisabeth] TERMCAT, Barcelona, Spain",40.0,0.0,JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING CO,0929-9971,,2019.0,25,2,175.0,197,10.1075/term.00035.vaz,,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1506,WOS,Fee Waivers for Open Access Journals,article processing charges;  fee waivers;  open access publishing,Open access journals which charge article processing charges (APCs) sometimes offer fee waivers to authors who cannot afford to pay them. This article measures the extent of this practice among the largest toll access and open access publishers by gathering stated fee waiver policies from publishers' websites. A majority (68.8%) were found to offer fee waivers and sometimes they are only available to authors from low- and middle-income countries. This has implications for the ability of authors without funding to publish in journals from these publishers.,['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Lawson, Stuart",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"Univ London, Dept English & Humanities, Malet St, London WC1E 7HX, England",26.0,11.0,MDPI AG,2304-6775,,2015.0,3,3,155.0,167,10.3390/publications3030155,WOS:000521335100001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1507,WOS,Communicating the Open Access Message: A Case Study from Ireland,institutional repository; marketing; open access publishing; scholarly communication; university libraries,"Since 2009, Open Access (OA) Week has been celebrated worldwide in October each year. It is an opportunity for librarians to engage with the research community and demonstrate the value that they bring to their organisations in the area of disseminating scholarly output. Although thousands of events have been held since the inception of OA Week, a minimal amount of research has been carried out regarding the impact of these events. This article presents a review of the literature on OA Week and evaluates the effectiveness of three events held during OA Week 2015 in Ireland through the use of statistics and a survey. The three events held during OA Week 2015 in Ireland that were evaluated include: a seminar run by Repository Network Ireland (RNI), a D.E.A.R. (Drop Everything And Read) campaign using OA materials organized by Dr. Steevens' Library, and a collaborative OA seminar between Dr. Steevens' Library and Dublin Institute of Technology (DIT) libraries. The author concludes that a collaborative approach to planning and managing OA week between librarians from academic and other sectors can have tangible benefits both in terms of promoting OA and also promoting the role of the Librarian in the OA movement. © 2016 HSE.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['IRL'],Lawton A.,New Review of Academic Librarianship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,Routledge,13614533,0,2016.0,22,1,60.0,77,10.1080/13614533.2015.1127832,WOS:000522019000003,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1508,WOS,Availability and accessibility in an open access institutional repository: A case study,0,"Introduction. This study explores the extent to which an institutional repository makes papers available and accessible on the open Web by using 170 journal articles housed in DigiNole Commons, the institutional repository at Florida State University. Method. To analyse the repository’s impact on availability and accessibility, we conducted independent known-item title searches on both Google and Google Scholar (GS) to search for faculty publications housed in DigiNole Commons. Analysis. The extent to which the repository makes articles available and accessible was measured quantitatively and the findings that cannot be summarized with numbers were analysed qualitatively. Results. Google and Google Scholar searches provided links to DigiNole metadata for a total of 145 (85.3%) of 170 items, and to full texts for 96 (96%) of 100 items. With one exception, access to either metadata or full text required no more than three clicks. Conclusions. Overall, the results confirm the contribution of the institutional repository in making papers available and accessible. The results also reveal some impediments to the success of open access, including impediments linked to contractual arrangements between authors and publishers, impediments linked to policies, practices and technologies governing the repository itself, and the low level of faculty participation in the repository. © the author, 2015.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['USA'],"Lee J., Burnett G., Vandegrift M., Baeg J.H., Morris R.",Information Research,English,Article,0,0,0,,,9.0,University of Sheffield,13681613,0,2015.0,20,1,0.0,0,,WOS:000522019000005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1511,WOS,Availability and visibility of open access digital repositories in ASEAN countries,open access repositories; web presence; web visibility; webometrics; ASEAN countries,"This study reports on the 2011 survey of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) digital repositories, employing web analysis to highlight the current state of the repositories and describing their characteristics in terms of types, contents, subject coverage and language. It also identifies the web performance of these repositories as reflected through global visibility. Data obtained from the Open Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR), Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR) and the Ranking Web of World Repositories (RWWR) were used to analyse the availability and global visibility. Findings indicate that the total number of digital repositories in ASEAN is 51 with Indonesia as the biggest contributor (20, 39 percent), followed by Malaysia (17, 33 percent) and Thailand (7, 13 percent). Out of the 51 ASEAN digital repositories identified from OpenDOAR and ROAR, only 23 (45 percent) are listed in RWWR. RWWR's data indicates that only about 3 percent (33 out of 1,184 repositories worldwide) in ASEAN are visible. There are another 10 digital repositories identified in RWWR which are not listed under OpenDOAR or registered under ROAR. As such this study has identified a total of 61 ASEAN repositories participating in Open Access publishing through the Green Road. Findings suggest that ASEAN repositories which wish to be listed in RWWR need to have some degree of visibility and incorporate good practices in their web publication to fulfill the requirement of RWWR quantitative webometrics indicators, namely visibility, size, rich files and `scholar'.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['AS'],"Lee-Hwa, Tan; Abrizah, A.; Noorhidawati, A.",INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Lee-Hwa, Tan] KBU Int Coll, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; [Abrizah, A.; Noorhidawati, A.] Univ Malaya, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia",15.0,5.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0266-6669,,2013.0,29,3,274.0,285,10.1177/0266666912466754,WOS:000522449700060,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0
1523,WOS,How Does One Open Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research,academic disciplines and traditions; archiving and collecting practices; politics; power; governance; methodologies; methods,"Open Science policies encourage researchers to disclose a wide range of outputs from their work, thus codifying openness as a specific set of research practices and guidelines that can be interpreted and applied consistently across disciplines and geographical settings. In this paper, we argue that this one-size-fits-all view of openness sidesteps key questions about the forms, implications, and goals of openness for research practice. We propose instead to interpret openness as a dynamic and highly situated mode of valuing the research process and its outputs, which encompasses economic as well as scientific, cultural, political, ethical, and social considerations. This interpretation creates a critical space for moving beyond the economic definitions of value embedded in the contemporary biosciences landscape and Open Science policies, and examining the diversity of interests and commitments that affect research practices in the life sciences. To illustrate these claims, we use three case studies that highlight the challenges surrounding decisions about how-and how best-to make things open. These cases, drawn from ethnographic engagement with Open Science debates and semistructured interviews carried out with UK-based biologists and bioinformaticians between 2013 and 2014, show how the enactment of openness reveals judgments about what constitutes a legitimate intellectual contribution, for whom, and with what implications.",['openpolicies'],"['othermeth', 'interview']",['natscie'],['researcher'],['GBR'],"Levin, Nadine; Leonelli, Sabina",SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES,English,Article,,,,"[Levin, Nadine] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Soc & Genet, Los Angeles, CA USA; [Leonelli, Sabina] Univ Exeter, Exeter Ctr Study Life Sci Egenis, Byrne House,St Germans Rd, Exeter EX4 4PJ, Devon, England; [Leonelli, Sabina] Univ Exeter, Dept Sociol Philosophy & Anthropol, Byrne House,St Germans Rd, Exeter EX4 4PJ, Devon, England",83.0,19.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,0162-2439,,2017.0,42,2,280.0,305,10.1177/0162243916672071,WOS:000524746000015,28232768.0,2021-01-27,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1524,WOS,"Open Data, Collaborative Working Platforms, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Building an Early Career Scientist Community of Practice to Leverage Ocean Observatories Initiative Data to Address Critical Questions in Marine Science",big data; ocean observing; ocean response; data mining; COVID-19 pandemic; remote collaboration; middle Atlantic bight; early career researchers,"Ocean observing systems are well-recognized as platforms for long-term monitoring of near-shore and remote locations in the global ocean. High-quality observatory data is freely available and accessible to all members of the global oceanographic community-a democratization of data that is particularly useful for early career scientists (ECS), enabling ECS to conduct research independent of traditional funding models or access to laboratory and field equipment. The concurrent collection of distinct data types with relevance for oceanographic disciplines including physics, chemistry, biology, and geology yields a unique incubator for cutting-edge, timely, interdisciplinary research. These data are both an opportunity and an incentive for ECS to develop the computational skills and collaborative relationships necessary to interpret large data sets. Here, we use observatory data to demonstrate the potential for these interdisciplinary approaches by presenting a case study on the water-column response to anomalous atmospheric events (i.e., major storms) on the shelf of the Mid-Atlantic Bight southwest of Cape Cod, United States. Using data from the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) Pioneer Array, we applied a simple data mining method to identify anomalous atmospheric events over a four-year period. Two closely occurring storm events in late 2018 were then selected to explore the dynamics of water-column response using mooring data from across the array. The comprehensive ECS knowledge base and computational skill sets allowed identification of data issues in the OOI data streams and technologically sound characterization of data from multiple sensor packages to broadly characterize ocean-atmosphere interactions. An ECS-driven approach that emphasizes collaborative and interdisciplinary working practices adds significant value to existing datasets and programs such as OOI and has the potential to produce meaningful scientific advances. Future success in utilizing ocean observatory data requires continued investment in ECS education, collaboration, and research; in turn, the ECS community provides feedback, develops knowledge, and builds new tools to enhance the value of ocean observing systems. These findings present an argument for building a community of practice to augment ECS ocean scientist skills and foster collaborations to extend the context, reach, and societal utility of ocean science.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Levine, Robert M.; Fogaren, Kristen E.; Rudzin, Johna E.; Russoniello, Christopher J.; Soule, Dax C.; Whitaker, Justine M.",FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Levine, Robert M.] Univ Washington, Sch Oceanog, Seattle, WA 98195 USA; [Fogaren, Kristen E.] Oregon State Univ, Coll Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA; [Rudzin, Johna E.] US Naval Res Lab, Natl Res Council, Monterey, CA USA; [Russoniello, Christopher J.] West Virginia Univ, Dept Geol & Geog, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA; [Soule, Dax C.] CUNY Queens Coll, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Flushing, NY 11367 USA; [Whitaker, Justine M.] Nicholls State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Thibodaux, LA 70310 USA; [Fogaren, Kristen E.] Boston Coll, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA",60.0,0.0,FRONTIERS MEDIA SA,,,2020.0,7,,,,10.3389/fmars.2020.593512,WOS:000524972200009,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1525,WOS,Comparison of self-citation by peer reviewers in a journal with single-blind peer review versus a journal with open peer review,Peer review;  Self-citation;  Journalology;  Publishing ethics;  Open peer review;  Blind peer review,"Objective: Some peer reviewers may inappropriately, or coercively request that authors include references to the reviewers' own work. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether, compared to reviews for a journal with single-blind peer review, reviews for a journal with open peer review included (1) fewer self-citations;  (2) a lower proportion of self-citations without a rationale;  and (3) a lower ratio of proportions of citations without a rationale in self-citations versus citations to others' work. Methods: Peer reviews for published manuscripts submitted in 2012 to a single-blind peer review journal, the Journal of Psychosomatic Research, were previously evaluated (Thombs et al., 2015). These were compared to publically available peer reviews of manuscripts published in 2012 in an open review journal, BMC Psychiatry. Two investigators independently extracted data for both journals. Results: There were no significant differences between journals in the proportion of all reviewer citations that were self-citations (journal of Psychosomatic Research: 71/225, 32%;  BMC Psychiatry: 90/315,29%;  p = .50), or in the proportion of self-citations without a rationale (journal of Psychosomatic Research: 15/71, 21%;  BMC Psychiatry: 12/90, 13%;  p = .21). There was no significant difference between journals in the proportion of self-citations versus citations to others' work without a rationale (p = 31). Conclusion: Blind and open peer review methodologies have distinct advantages and disadvantages. The present study found that, in reasonably similar journals that use single-blind and open review, there were no substantive differences in the pattern of peer reviewer self-citations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openevaluation'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Levis, Alexander W.;  Leentjens, Albert F. G.;  Levenson, James L.;  Lumley, Mark A.;  Thombs, Brett D.",JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"[Levis, Alexander W.;  Thombs, Brett D.] Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Inst Med Res, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E4, Canada;  [Leentjens, Albert F. G.] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands;  [Levenson, James L.] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Richmond, VA USA;  [Lumley, Mark A.] Wayne State Univ, Dept Psychol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA;  [Thombs, Brett D.] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Thombs, Brett D.] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Thombs, Brett D.] McGill Univ, Dept Biostat, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Thombs, Brett D.] McGill Univ, Dept Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Thombs, Brett D.] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Thombs, Brett D.] McGill Univ, Dept Educ & Counselling Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Thombs, Brett D.] McGill Univ, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Thombs, Brett D.] McGill Univ, Sch Nursing, Montreal, PQ, Canada",17.0,2.0,PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD,0022-3999,,2015.0,79,6,561.0,565,10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.08.004,WOS:000524979800006,26337110.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1527,WOS,A survey on the exchange of linguistic resources Publishing linguistic linked open data on the Web,Linguistics;  Resources;  Internet;  Open access;  Linguistic resources;  Language resources;  Linked data;  Survey;  Semantic interoperability;  Linguistic formats,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature review of the principal formats and frameworks that have been used in the last 20 years to exchange linguistic resources It aims to give special attention to the most recent approaches to publishing linguistic linked open data on the Web. Design/methodology/approach - Research papers published since 1990 on the use of various formats, standards, frameworks and methods to exchange linguistic information were divided into two main categories: those proposing specific schemas and syntaxes to suit the requirements of a given type of linguistic data (these are referred to as offline approaches), and those adopting the linked data (LD) initiative and the semantic web technologies to support the interoperability of heterogeneous linguistic resources. For each paper, the type of linguistic resource exchanged, the framework/format used, the interoperability approach taken and the related projects were identified. Findings - The information gathered in the survey reflects an increase in recent years in approaches adopting the LD initiative. This is due to the fact that the structural and syntactic issues which arise when addressing the interoperability of linguistic resources can be solved by applying semantic web technologies. What remains an open issue in the field of computational linguistics is the development of knowledge artefacts and mechanisms to support the alignment of the different aspects of linguistic resources in order to guarantee semantic and conceptual interoperability in the linked open data (LOD) cloud. Ontologies have proved to be of great use in achieving this goal. Research limitations/implications - The research presented here is by no means a comprehensive or all-inclusive survey of all existing approaches to the exchange of linguistic resources. Rather, the aim was to highlight, analyze and categorize the most significant advances in the field. Practical implications - This survey has practical implications for computational linguists and for every application requiring new developments in natural language processing. In addition, multilingual issues can be better addressed when semantic interoperability of heterogeneous linguistic resources is achieved. Originality/value - The paper provides a survey of past and present research and developments addressing the interoperability of linguistic resources, including those where the linked data initiative has been adopted.",['opendata'],['biblio'],['hum'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Lezcano, Leonardo;  Sanchez-Alonso, Salvador;  Roa-Valverde, Antonio J.",PROGRAM-ELECTRONIC LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS,English,Article,,,,"[Lezcano, Leonardo;  Sanchez-Alonso, Salvador] Univ Alcala De Henares, Dept Comp Sci, Madrid, Spain;  [Roa-Valverde, Antonio J.] Univ Innsbruck, Semant Technol Inst, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria",45.0,4.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0033-0337,,2013.0,47,3,263.0,281,10.1108/PROG-06-2012-0030,WOS:000526747900067,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1530,WOS,"Use of open access electronic journals by Chinese scholars, and an initiative to facilitate access to Chinese journals",Chinese journals; Open access; Overseas Chinese scholars,"Surveys were carried out with two groups of Chinese scholars - one group working in China, and a second group working in the UK. The objective was to investigate usage of Chinese-language scholarly journals and the potential for them to use an Open Access business model. The results were compared with those published by the CIBER group at university College London, whose sample of scholars was international in scope. The overseas Chinese group made very little use of journals published in China, and one of the reasons for this was the difficulty of accessing the electronic versions of these journals from the West. We therefore proposed the construction of an English-language website to provide access in the first instance to the full texts of journals published by the members of the Society of China University Journals in the Natural Sciences (SCUJNS), and we created a pilot version of this website.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],"['CHN', 'GBR']","Li R., Rowland F., Xiong Z., Zhao J.","Openness in Digital Publishing: Awareness, Discovery and Access - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2007",English,Conference Paper,"11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2007",13 June 2007 through 15 June 2007,Vienna,,,0.0,0,0,9783854372929,2007.0,0,0,221.0,227,,WOS:000528194400014,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1538,WOS,Will open access increase journal CiteScores? An empirical investigation over multiple disciplines,,"This paper empirically studies the effect of Open Access on journal CiteScores. We have found that the general effect is positive but not uniform across different types of journals. In particular, we investigate two types of heterogeneous treatment effect: (1) the differential treatment effect among journals grouped by academic field, publisher, and tier;  and (2) differential treatment effects of Open Access as a function of propensity to be treated. The results are robust to a number of sensitivity checks and falsification tests. Our findings shed new light on Open Access effect on journals and can help stakeholders of journals in the decision of adopting the Open Access policy.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Li, Yang;  Wu, Chaojiang;  Yang, Erjia;  Li, Kai",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,"[Li, Yang;  Wu, Chaojiang] Drexel Univ, LeBow Coll Business, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA;  [Yang, Erjia;  Li, Kai] Drexel Univ, Coll Comp & Informat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA",60.0,7.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1932-6203,,2018.0,13,8,,,10.1371/journal.pone.0201885,WOS:000531811800002,30161156.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1542,WOS,The persistence of open access electronic journals,Accessibility; Electronic journals; Open access journals; Persistence; Serials; Link decay; Online access,"Purpose - Open access (OA) electronic journals have been identified as potentially at risk of loss without more coordinated preservation efforts. The purpose of this paper is to test the current availability of OA electronic journals indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). Design/methodology/approach - Using publicly available journal metadata downloaded from DOAJ, individual journal URLs were tested for validity and accessibility using a Microsoft Excel Visual Basic for Applications macro. Findings - Initial results showed 69.51 per cent of the URLs tested returned a successful HTTP status code. The remainder of the URLs returned codes that indicated redirection or errors. Originality/value - Unlike past studies of link decay, this is not limited to cited references or a specific discipline. This study uses the full DOAJ metadata to analyze the persistence of OA electronic journals.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Lightfoot, Elizabeth A.",NEW LIBRARY WORLD,English,Article,,,,"[Lightfoot, Elizabeth A.] Florida Int Univ, Univ Lib, Miami, FL 33199 USA",31.0,2.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0307-4803,,2016.0,117,11-12,746.0,755,10.1108/NLW-08-2016-0056,WOS:000533474600010,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1543,WOS,"For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases",DOAJ;  Directory of Open Access Journals;  Databases;  Literature;  Open access;  Biomedicine,"Background. Open access (OA) journals allows access to research papers free of charge to the reader. Traditionally, biomedical researchers use databases like MEDLINE and EMBASE to discover new advances. However, biomedical OA journals might not fulfill such databases' criteria, hindering dissemination. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) is a database exclusively listing OA journals. The aim of this study was to investigate DOAJ's coverage of biomedical OA journals compared with the conventional biomedical databases. Methods. Information on all journals listed in four conventional biomedical databases (MEDLINE, PubMed Central, EMBASE and SCOPUS) and DOAJ were gathered. Journals were included if they were (1) actively publishing, (2) full OA, (3) prospectively indexed in one or more database, and (4) of biomedical subject. Impact factor and journal language were also collected. DOAJ was compared with conventional databases regarding the proportion of journals covered, along with their impact factor and publishing language. The proportion of journals with articles indexed by DOAJ was determined. Results. In total, 3,236 biomedical OA journals were included in the study. Of the included journals, 86.7% were listed in DOAJ. Combined, the conventional biomedical databases listed 75.0% of the journals;  18.7% in MEDLINE;  36.5% in PubMed Central;  51.5% in SCOPUS and 50.6% in EMBASE. Of the journals in DOAJ, 88.7% published in English and 20.6% had received impact factor for 2012 compared with 93.5% and 26.0%, respectively, for journals in the conventional biomedical databases. A subset of 51.1% and 48.5% of the journals in DOAJ had articles indexed from 2012 and 2013, respectively. Of journals exclusively listed in DOAJ, one journal had received an impact factor for 2012, and 59.6% of the journals had no content from 2013 indexed in DOAJ. Conclusions. DOAJ is the most complete registry of biomedical OA journals compared with five conventional biomedical databases. However, DOAJ only indexes articles for half of the biomedical journals listed, making it an incomplete source for biomedical research papers in general.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Liljekvist, Mads Svane;  Andresen, Kristoffer;  Pommergaard, Hans-Christian;  Rosenberg, Jacob",PEERJ,English,Article,,,,"[Liljekvist, Mads Svane;  Andresen, Kristoffer;  Pommergaard, Hans-Christian;  Rosenberg, Jacob] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Surg, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark",26.0,7.0,PEERJ INC,2167-8359,,2015.0,3,,,,10.7717/peerj.972,WOS:000533477400003,26038727.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1548,WOS,An Exploratory Survey of the Suspicious Open Access Journals,Open Access Journals; Predatory Publishing; Scholarly Communication,"This paper describes the results of a survey of possibly predatory open access journals. Based on Jeffrey Beall's compilations of predatory publishers and standalone journals, the study identified 891 publishers and 7,726 journals with content at the end of January 2015, of which 1,989 journals were published by twelve mega publishers that had published over one hundred journal titles. The distributions of all journals versus journals from the mega publishers by paper quantity, journal debut year/journal age, and subject were systematically examined and compared. It was found that, at the time of this study, nearly half of the publishers had only one non-empty journal. Nearly 2/3 of the 7,726 non-empty journals had published only 50 or less papers, and half of them were debuted within two years. As high as 90% of the journals targeted science, technology, and medicine (STM), and the three domains had roughly equal shares of the journals. A sample of 11,419 articles was further drawn from the journals with more than 100 papers and those with 10 or less papers. The analysis of the first authors showed that India, United States and Nigeria were the top three contributors to suspicious journals; they together constituted approximately 50% of the sample.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Lin, Chi-Shiou",JOURNAL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION STUDIES,English,Article,,,,"[Lin, Chi-Shiou] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Taipei, Taiwan",26.0,0.0,"NATL TAIWAN UNIV, DEPT LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE",1606-7509,,2017.0,15,2,45.0,66,10.6182/jlis.2017.15(2).045,WOS:000534851200005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1551,WOS,Researchers and open data - Attitudes and culture at blekinge institute of technology,Attitude; Data Management Plan; DMP; Open Access; Open Research Data; RDM; Research Data Management; Survey,"During March 2015, the Blekinge Institute of Technology library carried out an interview survey comprising around 36 senior researchers and postdocs mainly in engineering sciences, with the objective to get a picture of how research data is managed at BTH and to find out what the researcher attitudes are to sharing data. The survey showed that most researchers in the study were positive to sharing research data but lacked any experience of making data management plans and had little or no knowledge of data preservation or of sharing open data. Uncertainties about data ownership are also an issue. © 2015 The authors and IOS Press.",['opendata'],['interview'],['engtech'],['researcher'],['SWE'],"Linde P., Norling E., Pettersson A., Petersson L., Pettersson K., Stockmann A., Swartz S.","New Avenues for Electronic Publishing in the Age of Infinite Collections and Citizen Science: Scale, Openness and Trust - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Elpub 2015",English,Conference Paper,"19th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Elpub 2015",1 September 2015 through 3 September 2015,0,,,0.0,Vereinigung Osterreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare,10222588,0,2015.0,68,1,66.0,78,10.31263/voebm.v68i1.998,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1559,WOS,How open access policies affect access to grey literature in university digital repositories: A case study of iSchools,Best practice; Grey literature; Information access; Information policy; Information science; Library science; Open access; Scholarly communication; University repository,"An issue of interest to library and information science (LIS) scholars and practitioners is how open-access policies can affect the access and use of grey literature in university repositories. Open access (OA) refers to research placed online free from all price barriers and from most permission barriers (Suber, 2015), allowing unfettered access to scholarship and promoting open scholarly communication (Banach, 2011; Eysenbach, 2006). OA may apply research published traditionally, such as books (Schwartz, 2012) and academic articles (Suber, 2015), and non-traditionally published grey literature, such as electronic theses and dissertations (Schöpfel & Prost, 2013; Schöpfel & Lipinski, 2012). The treatment of grey literature in university repositories is of particular import due to “the ephemeral and changing nature of grey publication types, editions, and formats” (Rucinski, 2015, p. 548; see Farace & Schöpfel, 2010). The access and use of grey literature in these repositories is often executed through an OA policy. There is a gap in the literature, however, regarding best practices for drafting and implementing OA policies that promote unfettered access to grey literature. This paper analyzes OA policies from a sample of U.S. iSchools, created by cross-referencing the Directory of North American iSchools (iSchools, 2017) with the top twenty-five best LIS programs as ranked by U.S. News and World Reports (U.S. News, 2017). Initial analysis shows that of the twenty-two iSchools in the sample, all schools have repositories, ten have OA policies in place, and three have proposed OA policies. This project maps five OA policies against variables drawn from the benchmark of open scholarly communication, the Harvard Open Access Project’s “Good Practices for University Open-Access Policies” (Shieber & Suber, 2017). The goal of this paper is to understand how OA policies at university repositories affect access to grey literature in an ever-changing information landscape. Based on the analysis of the sampled iSchool OA policies and the Harvard variables, it recommends best practices for drafting and implementing OA policies that provide unfettered access to grey literature in repositories. © 2018 TextRelease.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['natscie'],['othergroup'],['USA'],"Lipinski T.A., Kritikos K.C.",Grey Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,GreyNet,15741796,0,2018.0,14,1,6.0,20,,WOS:000539134600001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1560,WOS,"Open data for open science: Aspirations, realities, challenges and opportunities",Digital science; E-science; Open access to knowledge; Open data; Open research; Open science; Research data management; The european organisation for nuclear research,"This chapter examines the emergent approaches to online sharing of the data underpinning scientifi c publications. Such data is referred to as open scientifi c data. Four key drivers are identifi ed: (i) Changing societal approaches and increasing expectations that the outcomes of publicly-funded research be freely available, (ii) the emergence of data journals; (iii) changing policies of research funders and publishers; and (iv) the requirements for research organisations and individual researchers to comply with these policies and introduce research data management plans. In this chapter, the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) is used as a case study to show how open scientifi c data can be successfully managed and used, in innovative ways, to deliver open education in particle physics. Finally, this chapter identifi es three challenges that require attention of research funders and scientifi c organisations. First, the challenge to devise a minimum standard for open scientifi c data. Second, the challenge to develop incentives for researchers and librarians, and third, the challenge to reconceptualise the ownership of open scientifi c data. This chapter argues that addressing these challenges can advance the preservation and sharing of open scientifi c data for the global public good. © 2016 by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['natscie'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['CHE'],Lipton V.,Open Innovation: A Multifaceted Perspective,English,Book Chapter,0,0,0,,,0.0,World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.,0,9789814719186; 9789814719179,2016.0,1,0,33.0,65,,WOS:000539138500003,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1568,WOS,Open access religious journals - an analytical study of the DOAJ,Electronic journals; Online journals; Open access journals; Religious journals,"The main purpose of the paper is to study the publishing trends of the open access religious journals available in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The data were collected online from the Directory of Open Access Journals and quantitative method was applied for data analysis. The data were collected in December 2017 and later presented in tabular forms to reveal the findings. The findings show that 119 religious journals are registered in the DOAJ, published from the 27 countries by 114 publishing agencies in 14 languages. The maximum number of journals (21, 17.65%) is published from Indonesia in the English language (79, 66.39%) during the 2nd decade (2010-2017) of the 21st century. The results also reveal that the majority of the religious journals (88%) doesn't charge publication fee and is peer-reviewed by the experts. © 2018 University of Idaho Library.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['hum'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Loan F.A., Quraishi J.I., Refhat-un-Nisa, Hussain W.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2018.0,2018,0,0.0,0,,WOS:000542351700001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1569,WOS,Open Access E-books in Science and Technology: A Case Study of Directory of Open Access Books,Open access; e-books; electronic books; open access e-books; monographs; directory of open access books; science and technology,"The Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB) is a discovery service for open access e-books. It provides a searchable index to peer-reviewed e-books published under an open access business model, with links to the full text of the publications at the Open Access Publishing in European Networks (OAPEN) Library, publisher's website or repositories. The present study aims to assess the current trends of the open access e-books in the field of science and technology available through DOAB. The data was collected online regarding the science and technology e-books in March 2014 for analysis. The results reveal that 307 e-books are available on science and technology through DOAB falling in three categories-monographs (209, 68.08 %), book series (93, 30.29 %) and conference proceedings (5,1.63 %). These e-books deal with eight major subject areas of Science and Technology having 36 sub-fields. The maximum number of e-books is available on General Science (95), Technology & Engineering (54), Earth & Environmental Sciences (50) & Health & Medical Sciences (47). In sub-fields most of the e-books cover Computer Sciences (24), Information Theory (24), General Medicine (20), Mathematics (17), Biology (13) & Geography (11). The authorship trends show that the maximum contribution is by single author (51.14 %) followed by two authors (74, 24.10 %) and three authors (36, 11.73 %). The linguistic assessment shows that 57.98 % (178) of these e-books have been published in English followed in German (88, 28.66%) and Italian (18, 5.86 %) respectively. The publishing trends reveal that 59.93 % (184) e-books have contributed by university presses whereas 40.07 % (123) by other publishing houses around the world. The maximum number of e-books (245, 79.80 %) is available through the Creative Commons (CC) license, whereas 20.20 % (62) e-books are available through comparable institutional licenses.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['natscie', 'med']",['othergroup'],['EU'],"Loan, Fayaz Ahmad; Refhat-un-nisa",DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Loan, Fayaz Ahmad] Univ Kashmir, Ctr Cent Asian Studies, Srinagar 190006, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Refhat-un-nisa] Delhi Publ Sch, Srinagar 190004, Jammu & Kashmir, India",15.0,3.0,DEFENCE SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION DOCUMENTATION CENTRE,0974-0643,,2015.0,35,4,304.0,309,10.14429/djlit.35.4.8494,WOS:000542475400007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1570,WOS,Analytical study of open access health and medical repositories,Open access; Health and medicine; Digital archives; Digital repositories; Medical information systems,"Purpose - This study aims to assess open access (OA) repositories in the field of the health and medicine (H&M) available in the Directory of the Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR) by analysing their various facets like geographical distribution, language diversity, collection size, content types, operational status, interoperability, updating policy and software used for content management. Design/methodology/approach - To achieve the objectives of the study, the OpenDOAR was selected as a source for identifying the H&M repositories. The required data were manually collected from 1 to 30 April 2014 and analysed using various quantitative techniques to reveal the findings. Findings -The results reveal that the OpenDOAR lists 254 repositories in the field of the H&M contributed by the 62 countries of the world, topped by the USA (15.4 per cent), followed by Japan (7.9 per cent) and the UK (7.5 per cent). The majority of the repositories are institutional (187, 73.6 per cent) in nature, having less than 5,000 items (161, 63.4 per cent) in the collection and mostly consisting of articles (76.0 per cent), theses (49.6 per cent), unpublished documents (33.1 per cent) and books (31.9 per cent). The linguistic assessment shows that the majority of the H&M repositories accept content written in English language (71.3 per cent), followed by Spanish (16.1 per cent) and Japanese (7.5 per cent). The updating policy of these repositories is not up to the mark, as only 67.0 per cent of the H&M repositories have been updated from 2008-2012, but the majority are still operational (91.7 per cent) and are compatible (67.3 per cent) with the Open Archive Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). About 30 software brands, both commercial and open source, have been used by administrators for creating these repositories and managing their content. DSpace is the most popular software used by 88 (34.7 per cent) repositories, followed by EPrints (43, 16.9 per cent) and Digital Commons (18, 7.1 per cent). Research limitations/implications - The scope of this study is limited to the health and medical repositories listed in OpenDOAR, and hence the generalisation is to be cautioned. Practical implications - This study is useful for library and information professionals and health and medical professionals across the globe. Originality/value - This study is the first attempt to analyse the health and medical repositories in OA sites.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Loan, Fayaz Ahmad; Sheikh, Shueb",ELECTRONIC LIBRARY,English,Article,,,,"[Loan, Fayaz Ahmad] Univ Kashmir, Ctr Cent Asian Studies, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India; [Sheikh, Shueb] Cent Univ Kashmir, Cent Lib, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India",31.0,10.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-0473,,2016.0,34,3,419.0,434,10.1108/EL-01-2015-0012,WOS:000542969800012,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1571,WOS,Proposal for the development of a national open access database in Vietnam and comparison with other Asian countries' national literature databases,Open access; National database; Vietnam,"In the context of the need to ensure appropriate signalling of the publication of high-quality, international-calibre publications in Vietnam, as well as new policies to improve the quality and effectiveness of scientific research in Vietnam, it is practical to investigate the possibility of developing a national open access database (NOAD). This study aims to answer the question of whether it is necessary to establish a NOAD in Vietnam. We used document analysis to evaluate issues related to NOADs. The results of this study show the complexity, lack of consistency, and difficulty in obtaining practical statistics and assessing research and scientific records in Vietnam today. Furthermore, the findings of this study imply that it is necessary to establish a NOAD of scientific research in Vietnam. The information in this report can be used to develop a NOAD for Vietnam in particular, and for any country that lacks one in general.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['policy'],['VNM'],Loc My Thi Nguyen; Tien-Trung Nguyen; Thanh Thi Nghiem; Hien Thu Thi Le; Thao Phuong Thi Trinh; Thuan Van Pham; Thanh Chi Nguyen; Linh Khanh Hoang; Trung Tran,SCIENCE EDITING,English,Article,,,,"[Loc My Thi Nguyen; Thanh Thi Nghiem; Hien Thu Thi Le; Thuan Van Pham; Thanh Chi Nguyen] Vietnam Natl Univ, VNU Univ Educ, Hanoi, Vietnam; [Tien-Trung Nguyen; Linh Khanh Hoang] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Theoret & Appl Res, Hanoi, Vietnam; [Tien-Trung Nguyen] Vietnam Journal Educ, Hanoi, Vietnam; [Thao Phuong Thi Trinh] Thai Nguyen Univ, Thai Nguyen Univ Educ, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam; [Trung Tran] Vietnam Acad Ethn Minor, Hanoi, Vietnam",7.0,0.0,KOREAN COUNCIL SCIENCE EDITORS,2288-7474,,2020.0,7,1,55.0,60,10.6087/kcse.190,WOS:000542996300029,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1579,WOS,Current trends in bibliographic description in Spanish open access journals,Open Access Journals; OAI; Bibliographic Description; Standardization; Bibliographic Styles; Bibliographic References,"The use of international standards for bibliographic description and writing styles has imbued scientific journals with a considerable rigor and uniformity for the management and exchange of bibliographical data between diverse systems, enhancing dissemination and scientific production itself. At the current juncture of open access publishing, the study of these behavioral patterns exhibited in open access journals published in Spain seems particularly important. The analysis offered reveals the print media legacy evident in open access journals, embodied in APA standard citation conventions used in most journals examined in this study. Overall results, however, are not entirely satisfactory, because of the scarce use of such international standards in the Spanish open access journals.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['ESP'],"Lopez Carreno, Rosana; Martinez Mendez, Francisco Javier",INVESTIGACION BIBLIOTECOLOGICA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Lopez Carreno, Rosana; Martinez Mendez, Francisco Javier] Univ Murcia, E-30001 Murcia, Spain",32.0,0.0,UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO,0187-358X,,2015.0,29,65,15.0,38,10.1016/j.ibbai.2016.02.013,WOS:000546181400007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1581,WOS,Plan S and ecosystem of Spanish journals of social sciences towards open access: threats and opportunities,Plan S; Scholarly journals; Social sciences; Academic publication; Scholarly communication; Open access; Open science; Copyright; Spain,"Plan S promotes that all articles from research funded by public financing agencies that subscribe it, have to be publicly available immediately, either in open access journals or in repositories that meet certain conditions, as of January 2021. Plan S has been promoted by Science Europe, a group of public research funding agencies through the cOAlition S, and has published two versions that have generated intense academic debate worldwide. Even though no public or private research agency of Spain has been committed at the moment to support Plan S, it is interesting to assess how this Plan can affect the ecosystem of Spanish scientific journals. We present the results of the analysis of the Spanish journals of SCImago Journal Rank in Social Sciences and the compliance that they have with the requirements that cOAlition S has described for the journals to be considered of Open Access of quality. These requirements are related to the opening of the content, the payment model, technical aspects and copyright. It is concluded that although most journals meet the requirements related to open content, they are left with challenges related to the technical aspects of maximum interoperability and reuse. Journals are recommended to take the Plan S as an opportunity and take advantage to carry out a full digital transformation.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['policy'],['ESP'],"Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre; Olle-Castella, Candela; Garcia-Grimau, Francesc; Abadal, Ernest",PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre; Olle-Castella, Candela] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Estudis Ciencies Informacio & Comunicacio, Av Tibidabo 39-43, Barcelona 08035, Spain; [Garcia-Grimau, Francesc] Univ Barcelona, Fac Informacio & Mitjans Audiovisuals, Melcior de Palau 140, Barcelona 08014, Spain; [Abadal, Ernest] Univ Barcelona, Fac Informacio & Mitjans Audiovisuals, Ctr Recerca Informacio Comunicacio & Cultura, Melcior de Palau 140, Barcelona 08014, Spain",33.0,0.0, EDICIONES PROFESIONALES INFORMACION SL-EPI,1386-6710,,2020.0,29,2,,,10.3145/epi.2020.mar.14,WOS:000547804200012,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1582,WOS,Academic journals of open access communication in Mexico. Challenges and vicissitudes,academic/scientific journals; communication journals; electronic journals; Mexico; Conacyt,"Introduction. This research presents the case of communication academic journals in Mexico. It briefly presents some of its background, current state, challenges and difficulties. It also provides the number of undergraduate and graduate communication programs in the country in order to reflect on their current state. Methodology: The work is descriptive and it is based on the review of open access academic publications that treat communication topics and sub-topics. It identifies the characteristics that give them the description of academic, examines their visibility through database indexing, access formats, use of Open Journal Systems (OJS), inclusion of the digital object identifier (DOI), use of anti-plagiarism programs, adhesion to the Committee on Publication Ethics (Cope), use of Creative Commons licenses and registration of quotes in Google Scholar, diversity in access formats, among others. Results and discussion: The current state of open access communication publications in Mexico is specified. The fact that the number of existing publications is insufficient and that they coexist with their print versions but electronic versions are lagging behind technological advancement and international standardization processes is what leaves them outside of the interest of national authors for publication. It also recognizes the existence of journals endorsed by educational institutions that are not precisely interested in being indexed to national and international databases, since its endogamous/institutional role allows them to be a learning platform for the training of academics who experiment the art of publishing for the first time.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['socscie'],['othergroup'],['MEX'],"Lopez-Ornelas, Maricela; Osuna Lever, Cecilia; Diaz Lopez, Karla Maria",REVISTA LATINA DE COMUNICACION SOCIAL,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Lopez-Ornelas, Maricela] Univ Autonoma Baja California, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico; [Osuna Lever, Cecilia; Diaz Lopez, Karla Maria] Sistema CETYS Univ, Mexico City, DF, Mexico",32.0,5.0,LABORATORIO TECNOLOGIAS INFORMACION & NUEVOS ANALISIS COMUNICACION SOCIAL,1138-5820,,2017.0,72,5,475.0,499,10.4185/RLCS-2017-1175,WOS:000548294000001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1583,WOS,Incentives to Open Access: Perspectives of Health Science Researchers,determinants of publication; health sciences; open access; scientific publication,"Technological development has transformed academic publication over the past two decades and new publication models, especially Open Access, have captured an important part of the publishing market, traditionally dominated by the Subscription publication model. Although Health Sciences have been one of the leading fields promoting Open Access, the perspectives of Health Science researchers on the benefits and possibilities of Open Access remain an open question. The present study sought to unveil the perspective of researchers on scientific publication decisions, in terms of the Subscription and Open Access publication model, Gold Road. With this aim, we surveyed Spanish researchers in Health Sciences. Our findings show that the value of publishing in Open Access journals increases as the experience of the researcher increases and the less she/he values the impact factor. Moreover, visibility and dissemination of the results are the main determinants of publication when choosing an Open Access journal as the first option. According to the response of the researchers, the reduction of fees and the increase in financing are important economic incentive measures to promote the Open Access publication model. It is widely accepted that the volume of Open Access publications will increase in the future.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['researcher'],['ESP'],"Lopez-Vergara, Carmen; Flores Asenjo, Pilar; Rosa-Garcia, Alfonso",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Lopez-Vergara, Carmen; Flores Asenjo, Pilar] Univ Catolica San Antonio Murcia, Dept Ciencias Sociales Jurid & Empresa, Av Jeranimos 135, Murcia 30107, Spain; [Rosa-Garcia, Alfonso] Univ Murcia, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ, Campus Espinardo,Edificio 2, Murcia 30100, Spain",31.0,0.0,MDPI,,,2020.0,8,2,,,10.3390/publications8020029,WOS:000548465700001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1598,WOS,Towards an institutional repository of the Italian national research council: A survey on open access experiences,0,"The paper presents the results of a survey aiming at identifying documentation, organization as well as technological resources that could be the basis for a future development of a CNR IR. The survey makes use of a semi-structured questionnaire submitted to all CNR research units. Results show that, despite a limited number of OAI complaint repository developed under the autonomous initiative of some CNR research units, there is a mature environment for the development of an IR.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['ITA'],"Luzi D., Di Cesare R., Ruggieri R., Cerbara L.",Grey Journal,English,Conference Paper,0,0,0,,,5.0,0,15741796,0,2009.0,5,1,35.0,47,,WOS:000552020100059,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1599,WOS,Faculty adoption and usage behaviour of open access scholarly communication in health science universities,Africa; Faculty; Open access; Social exchange theory; Tanzania; Technology acceptance model,"Purpose: The study seeks to investigate factors that affect the adoption and use of open access in Tanzanian health sciences universities. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, 415 faculty members were selected through a stratified random sampling from a population of 679 in all eight health sciences universities in Tanzania. The response rate was 71.1 per cent. Findings: Based on the social exchange theory (SET), and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the study developed a model suitable for assessing open access adoption and usage in academic institutions. The study found that facilitating conditions, extrinsic benefits (professional recognition), behavioural intention and individual characteristics (professional rank, technical skills and number of publications) predicted actual usage of open access. Other factors related to contextual factors (attitude, and open access culture), and extrinsic benefits (academic reward, accessibility and preservation) determined behavioural intention to use open access. Fear to violate publisher's copyright policies and effort expectancy however de-motivated faculty to adopt open access, while copyright concerns inhibited faculty's actual usage of open access. Originality/value: This is the first comprehensive study focusing on the health sciences faculty's open access adoption and usage behaviour in Africa, and Tanzania in particular, and reveals findings that are useful for planning and implementing open access initiatives in other institutions with similar conditions. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['researcher'],['TZA'],"Lwoga E.T., Questier F.",New Library World,English,Article,0,0,0,,,15.0,Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.,3074803,0,2014.0,115,3,116.0,139,10.1108/NLW-01-2014-0006,WOS:000552020100067,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1600,WOS,Open access behaviours and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals,Africa; East; health professionals; health sciences; Librarianship; academic; libraries; open access,"ObjectiveThis study sought to investigate the faculty's awareness, attitudes and use of open access, and the role of information professionals in supporting open access (OA) scholarly communication in Tanzanian health sciences universities. MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 librarians, while questionnaires were physically distributed to 415 faculty members in all eight Tanzanian health sciences universities, with a response rate of 71.1%. ResultsThe study found that most faculty members were aware about OA issues. However, the high level of OA awareness among faculty members did not translate into actual dissemination of faculty's research outputs through OA web avenues. A small proportion of faculty's research materials was made available as OA. Faculty were more engaged with OA journal publishing than with self-archiving practices. Senior faculty with proficient technical skills were more likely to use open access than junior faculty. Major barriers to OA usage were related to ICT infrastructure, awareness, skills, author-pay model, and copyright and plagiarism concerns. Interviews with librarians revealed that there was a strong support for promoting OA issues on campus; however, this positive support with various open access-related tasks did not translate into actual action. It is thus important for librarians and OA administrators to consider all these factors for effective implementation of OA projects in research and academic institutions. ConclusionThis is the first comprehensive and detailed study focusing on the health sciences faculty's and librarians' behaviours and perceptions of open access initiatives in Tanzania and reveals findings that are useful for planning and implementing open access initiatives in other institutions with similar conditions.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'interview']",['med'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['TZA'],"Lwoga, Edda T.; Questier, Frederik",HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL,English,Article,,,,"[Lwoga, Edda T.] Muhimbili Univ Hlth & Allied Hlth Sci, Directorate Lib Serv, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania; [Questier, Frederik] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Biostat & Med Informat Publ Hlth, Dept Educ Sci, Dept Teacher Educ, Brussels, Belgium",34.0,8.0,WILEY,1471-1834,,2015.0,32,1,37.0,49,10.1111/hir.12094,WOS:000552751000001,25603838.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1602,WOS,Developing the tasks-toward-transparency (T3) model for research transparency in open science using the lifecycle as a grounding framework,,"An increasingly data-intensive research environment has highlighted the need for greater research transparency to facilitate integrity and trust in open science and in the conduct of research more widely. The initial findings of faculty researchers' behaviors and practices toward research transparency, using the research data lifecycle as a grounding framework are reported. Four focus group sessions were conducted with faculty researchers in different disciplines, including natural sciences, social sciences, engineering, and different transparency practices were captured using the researchers' own language. Four generic transparency components were identified: action verb, object, task, and stage in the research lifecycle. The inter-relationships between specific transparency components were visualized using network visualizations. The network visualizations suggest that the lifecycle stages of Process/Visualize/Analyze and Publish/Preserve/Archive are key points for transparency, where 'data' play a critical role demonstrated by the multiple node-edge relationships. Based on the findings, a conceptual model, termed the Tasks-Toward-Transparency (T3) Model, was developed. This model may inform researcher practices and support research stakeholders whose role is to articulate and deliver transparency advocacy, policy, training programs, and services.","['opendata', 'openaccess']",['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],"['USA', 'GBR']","Lyon, Liz; Jeng, Wei; Mattern, Eleanor",LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"[Lyon, Liz; Mattern, Eleanor] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Comp & Informat, 135 N Bellefield Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA; [Jeng, Wei] Natl Taiwan Univ, Ctr Res Econometr Theory & Applicat, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, 1 Sect,4 Roosevelt Rd, Taipei 10617, Taiwan",27.0,0.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0740-8188,,2020.0,42,1,,,10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100999,WOS:000553913700001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1607,WOS,Open access journals: a bibliometric study in SSCI,Open access; Document supply; Bibliometric study; Open access journals; SSCI; Social sciences citation index,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe a bibliometric study of journal articles in Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) related to open access journals. Publication trends from 1993 to 2016, core journals, prolific authors and article citation frequencies were examined to provide librarians and scholars with a basic reference of relevant resources. Design/methodology/approach - Among articles published in journals which have been listed in SSCI during 1993- 2016, titles were searched for the term open access journal. The data were evaluated in response to five research questions concerning topics including publication trends from 1993 to 2016, core journals, prolific authors and article citation frequencies. Findings - In total, 115 articles on open access journals were authored by 215 individuals from 1993 to 2016. The 115 articles analyzed were cited 842 times in 57 journals. Originality/value - This paper describes a bibliometric study on open access journal publication, which has rarely been performed within the specific context of document supply issues. It provides a foundation for further research on titles as well as resources for librarians and scholars.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Ma, Tsu-Jui; Lee, Gwo-Guang",INFORMATION DISCOVERY AND DELIVERY,English,Article,,,,"[Ma, Tsu-Jui] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Management, Taipei, Taiwan; [Lee, Gwo-Guang] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Informat Management, Taipei, Taiwan",33.0,3.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2398-6247,,2017.0,45,2,79.0,86,10.1108/IDD-01-2017-0004,WOS:000556255200001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1608,WOS,David among Goliaths: Open access publishing in scientific (semi-)periphery,open access; scientific publishing; Croatia,"This case study analyses data on papers of Croatian authors published in 2017 from four Web of Science Core Collection citation indexes (SCI-EXP, SSCI, AHCI, and ESCI). The primary dataset (5,176 articles and reviews) was divided into two subsets, the open access (OA) subset (2,964 papers) and non-OA subset (2,212 papers). We also used the primary dataset to create a subset of papers published in Croatian journals (1,588) as opposed to foreign ones. All were screened for full-text OA status, journal JCR quartile ranking, journal dominant discipline, and language of publication. OA papers prevailed with 74.4%. Most were available at publisher websites. The percentage of OA papers in Croatian journals was 99.8%. The share of OA papers was the highest in the humanities and social sciences, which also saw the highest share of papers in the Croatian language.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['HRV'],"Macan, Bojan; Skoric, Lea; Petrak, Jelka",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Macan, Bojan] Rudjer Boskovic Inst, Ctr Sci Informat, Bijenicka Cesta 54, Zagreb 10000, Croatia; [Skoric, Lea; Petrak, Jelka] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Cent Med Lib, Salata 3, Zagreb 10000, Croatia",32.0,1.0,WILEY,0953-1513,,2020.0,33,4,410.0,417,10.1002/leap.1320,WOS:000557512800001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1613,WOS,Towards open data in digital education platforms,Data management; Data sharing; Education; Learning analytics; Open data; Open research; Privacy,"Despite the traction gained by the open data movement and the rise of big data and learning analytics in education, there is limited support for researchers in education to generate, access, and share experimental data using openly-available digital education platforms. To explore how this gap could be addressed and elicit requirements, we conducted a survey with 40 researchers in the field of technology-enhanced learning, examining their experience and needs handling research data. Drawing on the results of our survey, we devised a set of features that educational platforms should provide to address the identified requirements, enabling researchers in education to run studies within typical learning environments, adhere to legal and ethical frameworks concerning privacy, and share their data confidently with a wider audience. We then categorized these features into five stages that represent the user flow, namely (1) Bootstrapping Research Studies, (2) Ensuring Consent, (3) Gathering Data, (4) Managing Data Sets, and (5) Supporting Open Research and Collaboration. Our aim is to guide forthcoming research and developments to relieve researchers of the burdens of conducting data-sensitive experiments, support the adoption of best practices, and pave the way for open data policies in digital education. © 2019 IEEE.",['opendata'],['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['EU'],"MacHado J.S., Farah J.C., Gillet D., Rodriguez-Triana M.J.","Proceedings - IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2019",English,Conference Paper,"19th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2019",15 July 2019 through 18 July 2019,0,,,0.0,Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.,0,9781728134857,2019.0,0,0,209.0,211,10.1109/ICALT.2019.00048,WOS:000558316400001,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1622,WOS,Measuring open access publications: a novel normalized open access indicator,Open access;  Normalization;  Institutions;  Disciplinary differences;  Bibliometric indicators;  00Axx,"The issue of open access (OA) to scientific publications is attracting growing interest within the scientific community and among policy makers. Open access indicators are being calculated. In its 2019 ranking, the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) provides the number and the share of OA publications per institution. This gives an idea of the degree of openness of institutions. However, not taking into account the disciplinary specificities and the specialization of institutions makes comparisons based on the shares of OA publications biased. We show that OA publishing practices vary considerably according to discipline. As a result, we propose two methods to normalize OA share;  by WoS subject categories and by disciplines. Normalized Open Access Indicator (NOAI) corrects for disciplinary composition and allows a better comparability of institutions or countries.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],"['FRA', 'nonspecificgeo']","Maddi, Abdelghani",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Maddi, Abdelghani] Observ Sci & Tech, 2 Rue Albert Einstein, F-75013 Paris, France",35.0,1.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,124,1,379.0,398,10.1007/s11192-020-03470-0,WOS:000563809200004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1623,WOS,Use made of open access journals by Indian researchers to publish their findings,Impact factor;  open access;  science citation index;  Web of Science,"Most of the papers published in the more than 360 Indian open access journals are by Indian researchers. But how many papers do they publish in high impact international open access journals? We have looked at India's contribution to all seven Public Library of Science (PLoS) journals, 10 BioMed Central (BMC) journals and Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports. Indian crystallographers have published more than 2,000 structure reports in Acta Crystallographica, second only to China in number of papers, but have a much better citations per paper average than USA, Britain, Germany and France, China and South Korea. India's contribution to BMC and PLoS journals, on the other hand, is modest at best. We suggest that the better option for India is institutional self-archiving.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['natscie', 'med']",['researcher'],['IND'],"Madhan, Muthu;  Arunachalam, Subbiah",CURRENT SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Arunachalam, Subbiah] Ctr Internet & Soc, Bangalore 560071, Karnataka, India;  [Madhan, Muthu] Int Crops Res Inst Semi Arid Trop, Patancheru 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India",14.0,1.0,INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES,0011-3891,,2011.0,100,9,1297.0,1306,,WOS:000563809200005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1627,WOS,The Dawn of Open Access to Phylogenetic Data,,"The scientific enterprise depends critically on the preservation of and open access to published data. This basic tenet applies acutely to phylogenies (estimates of evolutionary relationships among species). Increasingly, phylogenies are estimated from increasingly large, genome-scale datasets using increasingly complex statistical methods that require increasing levels of expertise and computational investment. Moreover, the resulting phylogenetic data provide an explicit historical perspective that critically informs research in a vast and growing number of scientific disciplines. One such use is the study of changes in rates of lineage diversification (speciation - extinction) through time. As part of a meta-analysis in this area, we sought to collect phylogenetic data (comprising nucleotide sequence alignment and tree files) from 217 studies published in 46 journals over a 13-year period. We document our attempts to procure those data (from online archives and by direct request to corresponding authors), and report results of analyses (using Bayesian logistic regression) to assess the impact of various factors on the success of our efforts. Overall, complete phylogenetic data for similar to 60% of these studies are effectively lost to science. Our study indicates that phylogenetic data are more likely to be deposited in online archives and/or shared upon request when: (1) the publishing journal has a strong data-sharing policy; (2) the publishing journal has a higher impact factor, and; (3) the data are requested from faculty rather than students. Importantly, our survey spans recent policy initiatives and infrastructural changes; our analyses indicate that the positive impact of these community initiatives has been both dramatic and immediate. Although the results of our study indicate that the situation is dire, our findings also reveal tremendous recent progress in the sharing and preservation of phylogenetic data.",['opendata'],['interview'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Magee, Andrew F.; May, Michael R.; Moore, Brian R.",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,"[Magee, Andrew F.; May, Michael R.; Moore, Brian R.] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Davis, CA 95616 USA",52.0,25.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1932-6203,,2014.0,9,10,,,10.1371/journal.pone.0110268,WOS:000565063600001,25343725.0,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1639,WOS,"PubMed and ArXiv vs. Gold open access: Citation, mendeley, and twitter uptake of academic articles of Iran",0,"Despite contradicting evidence that open access (OA) articles might have greater citation advantage, there is less case studies in developing countries showing whether their global publication availability pattern advantages scientific impact metrics. Also, by addition of altmetrics to the world scientific evaluation system it is less known how different research access channels such as OA publishers, PubMed database and arXiv repository help altmetric indicators. Therefore, this paper investigates the case of WoS publications of Iran (2001-2012) for impact of mentioned publication availability models on citation, Mendeley readership, and tweet counts across four broader disciplines. Findings on 98,453 articles show that gold OA papers (5%) do not benefit significantly more metric counts, except in tweets linking to OA medical publications. Articles in PubMed Central (3%) significantly advantage the three investigated metrics, whereas arXiv preprints (2%) had higher readership advantage only. Different from PubMed publications, tweets to OA medical research were not significantly correlated with citations, suggesting their social impact rather than scientific. Additionally, OA publications are not significantly read by Mendeley users in developing countries, but developed ones, only in life science and biomedicine. Therefore, repository availability appears to be highly impactful in terms of citation and readership, whereas OA publications tend to receive rather high social impact through tweets.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['IRN'],Maleki A.,Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference,English,Conference Paper,"15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, ISSI 2015",29 June 2015 through 4 July 2015,0,,,1.0,Bogazici Universitesi,0,9789755183817,2015.0,0,0,46.0,58,,WOS:000570769200007,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1640,WOS,The Impact of Open Access Status on Journal Indexes of Radiology Journals,bibliometry; journals; open access; radiology; Scopus,"OBJECTIVE. The impact of open access (OA) journals is still understudied in the field of radiology. In this study, we compared the measures of impact (e.g., CiteScore, citation count, SCImago Journal Rank) between OA and subscription radiology journals. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We collected data on journals included in the Scopus Source List on November 1, 2018. We filtered the list for radiology journals for the years from 2011 to 2017. OA journals covered by Scopus (Elsevier) are indicated as OA if the journal is listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals, the Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources, or both. We also compared citation metrics between OA and subscription radiology journals. RESULTS. The 2017 Scopus report included 265 radiology journals. The percentage of OA journals increased from 14.7% in 2011 to 21.9% in 2017 (49% increase). The median scholarly output and the citation count were both significantly lower in OA radiology journals compared with subscription journals (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). The proportion of documents that received at least one citation was higher in OA (50.2%) compared with subscription journals (44.4%), but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION. This study found that the trend toward OA publishing in the fields of radiology and nuclear medicine has slowed in recent years, although the percent cited (i.e., the proportion of documents that receive at least one citation) is higher for OA journals. We believe the radiology field should be more supportive of OA publishing.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['natscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Malkawi, Lna; Al-Ryalat, Nosaiba; Al Hadidi, Enass; Serrieh, Dina; AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen",AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Malkawi, Lna; Al-Ryalat, Nosaiba; Al Hadidi, Enass] Univ Jordan, Jordan Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Amman, Jordan; [Serrieh, Dina] Univ Jordan, Jordan Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol & Venereol, Amman, Jordan; [AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen] Univ Jordan, Jordan Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Queen Rania St, Amman 11942, Jordan",20.0,1.0,AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC,0361-803X,,2019.0,213,4,736.0,739,10.2214/AJR.19.21215,WOS:000571115700001,31180738.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1643,WOS,Academics' use and attitude towards open access in selected higher learning institutions of Ethiopia,e-information resources; access models; open access; e-journals; institutional repositories; serials crisis; university libraries; Ethiopia,"Libraries in higher learning institutions (HLIs) of Ethiopia have been providing electronic information (e-information) resources to users such as academics through different access models, including open access. Nonetheless, little is known about the academics' attitudes toward open access journals. The study triangulated qualitative and quantitative data collection methods. Data were obtained through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Out of 768 academics from seven selected universities in Ethiopia who were surveyed, 566 (78 percent) responded. The data were analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively by means of content analysis and basic descriptive statistics respectively. The results of the study revealed that 78 percent of the academics were aware of open access journals. On the whole, they have a perceived positive attitude towards open access journals and would like to use them in the future. Moreover, they have been using open access journals as an alternative access model to the conventional journals subscription model; and yet to optimize the benefits of open access among academics, they expect university librarians to promote and enhance the accessibility of open access journals in their respective university libraries and in Ethiopia in general. Further studies using a similarly rigorous approach are required to determine the generality of this finding.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['ETH'],"Mammo, Yared; Ngulube, Patrick",INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Mammo, Yared] Haramaya Univ, Lib Serv, Haramaya, Ethiopia; [Mammo, Yared] Haramaya Univ, Informat Serv, Haramaya, Ethiopia; [Ngulube, Patrick] Univ S Africa, Sch Interdisciplinary Res & Grad Studies, ZA-0003 Unisa, South Africa",53.0,4.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0266-6669,,2015.0,31,1,13.0,26,10.1177/0266666913500977,WOS:000571579500008,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1644,WOS,Open access repositories in the Asia-Oceania region: Experiences and guidelines from three academic institutions,Open access; institutional repository; Asia; Oceania; Australia; Hong Kong; Malaysia,"In recent years open access models have transcended traditional modes of publishing, thus enabling freer access to research. This paper takes a trans-regional approach to open access publishing in the Asia and Oceania region focussing on individual institutions in three countries - Charles Darwin University (Australia), University of Hong Kong and the University of Malaya, reflecting on how each one is rising, in its own individual way, to meet the range of challenges that its research communities are facing. Specifically, it focuses on open access and institutional repository development, and traces their development at each of the aforementioned institutions. This paper is based on interviews conducted with staff involved with the development of the repository, and the open access collection in particular, at each of the three institutions. It synthesises open access developments and reviews the role the library has played in each institution in the development of open access across the academic and research community; and the success that has been achieved to date. It highlights any common factors between the approaches taken by each institution, as well as any significant differences of note. The findings reveal that each of the three institutions is at a different stage of development with the University of Hong Kong repository ranked at the top within Asia. Each has used a slightly different approach toward open access, and used different software to develop their repository. The authors have collated the overall experiences of each institution in open access publishing and repository development. They have highlighted the successes and failures that each has experienced and formulated a set of guidelines that may help those embarking on establishing an open access repository.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],"['AUS', 'HKG', 'MYS']","Mamtora, Jayshree; Yang, Tina; Singh, Diljit",IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Mamtora, Jayshree] Charles Darwin Univ, POB 41246, Casuarina, NT 0811, Australia; [Yang, Tina] Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China; [Singh, Diljit] Univ Malaya, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia",44.0,5.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,0340-0352,,2015.0,41,2,162.0,176,10.1177/0340035215582219,WOS:000571691800006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1646,WOS,THE SURGE OF PREDATORY OPEN-ACCESS IN NEUROSCIENCES AND NEUROLOGY,scientific publishing; open access; predatory journals; ethics in publication,"Predatory open access is a controversial publishing business model that exploits the open-access system by charging publication fees in the absence of transparent editorial services. The credibility of academic publishing is now seriously threatened by predatory journals, whose articles are accorded real citations and thus contaminate the genuine scientific records of legitimate journals. This is of particular concern for public health since clinical practice relies on the findings generated by scholarly articles. Aim of this study was to compile a list of predatory journals targeting the neurosciences and neurology disciplines and to analyze the magnitude and geographical distribution of the phenomenon in these fields. Eighty-seven predatory journals operate in neurosciences and 101 in neurology, for a total of 2404 and 3134 articles issued, respectively. Publication fees range 521-637 USD, much less than those charged by genuine open-access journals. The country of origin of 26.0-37.0% of the publishers was impossible to determine due to poor websites or provision of vague or non-credible locations. Of the rest 35.3-42.0% reported their headquarters in the USA, 19.0-39.2% in India, 3.0-9.8% in other countries. Although calling themselves open-access, none of the journals retrieved was listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals. However, 14.9-24.7% of them were found to be indexed in PubMed and PubMed Central, which raises concerns on the criteria for inclusion of journals and publishers imposed by these popular databases. Scholars in the neurosciences are advised to use all the available tools to recognize predatory practices and avoid the downsides of predatory journals. (C) 2017 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['natscie', 'med']",['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Manca, Andrea; Martinez, Gianluca; Cugusi, Lucia; Dragone, Daniele; Dvir, Zeevi; Deriu, Franca",NEUROSCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Manca, Andrea; Martinez, Gianluca; Dragone, Daniele; Deriu, Franca] Univ Sassari, Dept Biomed Sci, Viale San Pietro 43-B, I-07100 Sassari, Italy; [Cugusi, Lucia] Univ Cagliari, Dept Med Sci & Publ Hlth, I-09100 Cagliari, Italy; [Dvir, Zeevi] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Dept Phys Therapy, IL-52100 Tel Aviv, Israel",15.0,38.0,PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD,0306-4522,,2017.0,353,,166.0,173,10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.014,WOS:000572508900002,28433651.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1647,WOS,Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation,Open access publishing; Rehabilitation,"Increasingly scholars and researchers are being solicited by predatory open access journals seeking manuscript submissions and abusing the author-pays model by charging authors with publishing fees without any or proper peer review. Such questionable editorial practices are threatening the reputation and credibility of scholarly publishing. To date, no investigation has been conducted on this phenomenon in the field of rehabilitation. This study attempts to identify specific predatory journals operating in this field to quantify the phenomenon and its geographic distribution. Beall's List has been used to this end which, although not perfect, is a comprehensive and up-to-date report of predatory publfshers. Of the 1113 publishers on the list, 59 journals were identified, for a total of 5610 published articles. The median number of articles published by each journal was 21, and the median amount of article processing charges was $499. Only 1 out of 59 journals was included in the Directory of Open Access Journals, whereas 7 (12%) were indexed by PubMed. Most of the publishers were based in India (36%) followed by the United States (25%) and Pakistan (5%), and 25% were without a verifiable address. The data indicate that the threat of predatory publishing in rehabilitation is real. Physiatrists, physiotherapists, researchers, and academics operating in this field are advised to use the tools available to recognize predatory practices before considering publishing in open access journals. (C) 2017 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Manca, Andrea; Martinez, Gianluca; Cugusi, Lucia; Dragone, Daniele; Mercuro, Giuseppe; Deriu, Franca",ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION,English,Article,,,,"[Manca, Andrea; Martinez, Gianluca; Dragone, Daniele; Deriu, Franca] Univ Sassari, Dept Biomed Sci, Viale San Pietro 43-B, I-07100 Sassari, Italy; [Cugusi, Lucia; Mercuro, Giuseppe] Univ Cagliari, Dept Med Sci & Publ Hlth, Cagliari, Italy",17.0,31.0,W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC,0003-9993,,2017.0,98,5,1051.0,1056,10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.002,WOS:000572508900005,28115073.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1664,WOS,Monitoring agreements with open access elements: why article-level metadata are important,Open access;  metadata;  monitoring open access;  licensing agreements;  funders' open access policies;  Plan S,"Agreements with open access (OA) elements (e.g. agreements with APC discounts, offsetting agreements, read and publish agreements) have been increasing in number in the last few years. With more agreements including some form of OA, consortia and academic institutions need to monitor the number of OA publications, the costs and the value of these agreements. Publishers are therefore required to account for the articles published OA to consortia, academic institutions and research funders. One way publishers can do so is by providing regular reports with article-level metadata. This article uses the Knowledge Exchange (KE) and the Efficiency and Standards for Article Charges (ESAC) initiative recommendations as a check-list to assess what article-level metadata consortia request from publishers and what metadata publishers deliver to consortia. KE countries' agreements with major publishers were analysed to assess how far consortia and publishers are from requesting and providing article-level metadata. The results from this research can be used as a benchmark to determine how major publishers were performing until early 2019 and prior to Plan S coming into effect in 2021. A recommendation is made that publishers use the article-level metadata check-list as a template to provide the metadata recommended by KE and ESAC.",['openpolicies'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['funder'],"['DNK', 'FIN', 'FRA', 'DEU', 'NLD', 'GRL']","Marques, Mafalda;  Woutersen-Windhouwer, Saskia;  Tuuliniemi, Arja",INSIGHTS-THE UKSG JOURNAL,English,Article,,,,"[Marques, Mafalda] Jisc, Bristol, Avon, England;  [Woutersen-Windhouwer, Saskia] Leiden Univ Lib, Ctr Digital Scholarship, Leiden, Netherlands;  [Tuuliniemi, Arja] Licensing Natl Lib Finland FinELib, Helsinki, Finland",8.0,0.0,UBIQUITY PRESS LTD,2048-7754,,2019.0,32,,,,10.1629/uksg.489,WOS:000576378600007,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1665,WOS,"The recent Italian regulations about the open-access availability of publicly funded research publications, and the documentation landscape in astrophysics",0,"In October 2013 Italy enacted Law n.112/2013, containing the first national regulations about the open-access availability of publicly-funded research results (publications). The impact of these new regulations with the specific situation of that open-access pioneering discipline which is astrophysics, has been considered. Under a strictly technical point of view, in the light of the new dispositions the open nature of a part of the astrophysical scholarly literature which has been made available online free to the reader during the last twenty years, might be questionable. In astrophysics, most of the journal articles are published by a very small number of scientific societies and organizations. The copyright policies of these major publishing bodies have been collected and analyzed, with regard to the main requirements of the Italian law about open access. Most of these policies are sufficiently liberal for an entirely compliant open access to be provided and scientists would benefit from knowing these details more extensively. Some possible ways to make astrophysicists' scholarly dissemination entirely compliant with the Italian law requirements are considered.",['openpolicies'],['documentreview'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['ITA'],Marra M.,GL-Conference Series: Conference Proceedings,English,Conference Paper,"16th International Conference on Grey Literature - Grey Literature Lobby: Engines and Requesters for Change, GL 2014",8 December 2014 through 9 December 2014,0,,,0.0,TextRelease,13862316,9789077484234,2015.0,0,0,116.0,119,,WOS:000576664200027,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1667,WOS,"An open access E-journal: How to find out readers' preferences? The case of the ""sciences Eaux & Territoires"" journal",Environmental science;  Open access;  Public policies support;  Readers' preferences;  Transfer of knowledge,"How may we best evaluate an open access e-journal that is not intended to be cited in rank ""A"" scientific journals? In this study, we took the example of a journal that connects research and professionals workers in the environmental sciences. We compared information from downloads with readership surveys. The main finding was that readers remember the best articles from a given issue and classify the issues based on this memory. A clear dichotomy can be observed: some readers are particularly interested in the management of biodiversity and pollution and others reject all that links to it. © 2015 The authors and IOS Press.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['FRA'],"Martin C., Pagneux V., Henaut A.","New Avenues for Electronic Publishing in the Age of Infinite Collections and Citizen Science: Scale, Openness and Trust - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Elpub 2015",English,Conference Paper,"19th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Elpub 2015",1 September 2015 through 3 September 2015,0,,,0.0,IOS Press BV,0,9781614995616,2015.0,0,0,19.0,30,10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-19,WOS:000577441800015,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1673,WOS,Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study,Reporting guidelines; Randomized controlled trial; CONSORT for Abstracts; Open access publishing; Subscription journals,"Background: Open access (OA) journals are becoming a publication standard for health research, but it is not clear how they differ from traditional subscription journals in the quality of research reporting. We assessed the completeness of results reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in these journals. Methods: We used the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Checklist for Abstracts (CONSORT-A) to assess the completeness of reporting in abstracts of parallel-design RCTs published in subscription journals (n = 149; New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Lancet) and OA journals (n = 119; BioMedCentral series, PLoS journals) in 2016 and 2017. Results: Abstracts in subscription journals completely reported 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77-81%) of 16 CONSORT-A items, compared with 65% (95% CI, 63-67%) of these items in abstracts from OA journals (P < 0.001, chi-square test). The median number of completely reported CONSORT-A items was 13 (95% CI, 12-13) in subscription journal articles and 11 (95% CI, 10-11) in OA journal articles. Subscription journal articles had significantly more complete reporting than OA journal articles for nine CONSORT-A items and did not differ in reporting for items trial design, outcome, randomization, blinding (masking), recruitment, and conclusions. OA journals were better than subscription journals in reporting randomized study design in the title. Conclusion: Abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in subscription medical journals have greater completeness of reporting than abstracts published in OA journals. OA journals should take appropriate measures to ensure that published articles contain adequate detail to facilitate understanding and quality appraisal of research reports about RCTs.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Martinic-Cezar, Iva Jercic; Marusic, Ana",TRIALS,English,Article,,,,"[Martinic-Cezar, Iva Jercic] Univ Hosp Ctr Split, Ctr Transfus Med, Split, Croatia; [Marusic, Ana] Univ Split, Dept Res Biomed & Hlth, Sch Med, Soltanska 2, Split 21000, Croatia",30.0,0.0,BMC,,,2019.0,20,1,,,10.1186/s13063-019-3781-x,WOS:000579442800004,31791393.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1674,WOS,Evidence of open access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: A large-scale analysis,Academic publishers; Academic search engines; Academic social networks; Creative commons; CrossRef; Google Scholar; Institutional repositories; Open access; Open research metadata; ResearchGate; Self-Archiving,"This article uses Google Scholar (GS) as a source of data to analyse Open Access (OA) levels across all countries and fields of research. All articles and reviews with a DOI and published in 2009 or 2014 and covered by the three main citation indexes in the Web of Science (2,269,022 documents) were selected for study. The links to freely available versions of these documents displayed in GS were collected. To differentiate between more reliable ( sustainable and legal) forms of access and less reliable ones, the data extracted from GS was combined with information available in DOAJ, CrossRef, OpenDOAR, and ROAR. This allowed us to distinguish the percentage of documents in our sample that are made OA by the publisher (23.1%, including Gold, Hybrid, Delayed, and Bronze OA) from those available as Green OA (17.6%), and those available from other sources (40.6%, mainly due to Research Gate). The data shows an overall free availability of 54.6%, with important differences at the country and subject category levels. The data extracted from GS yielded very similar results to those found by other studies that analysed similar samples of documents, but employed different methods to find evidence of OA, thus suggesting a relative consistency among methods. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Martin-Martin, Alberto; Costas, Rodrigo; van Leeuwen, Thed; Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Emilio",JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Martin-Martin, Alberto; Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Emilio] Univ Granada, Fac Comunicac & Documentat, Granada, Spain; [Costas, Rodrigo; van Leeuwen, Thed] Leiden Univ, CWTS, Leiden, Netherlands; [Costas, Rodrigo] Stellenbosch Univ, DST NRF Ctr Excellence Scientometr & Sci, Technol & Innovat Policy, Stellenbosch, South Africa",71.0,32.0,ELSEVIER,1751-1577,,2018.0,12,3,819.0,841,10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.012,WOS:000580296200001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1681,WOS,Open access initiatives and institutional repositories: Sri Lankan scenario,Institutional repositories;  Open access;  Scholarly communication;  Sri Lanka,"The paper investigates the open access initiatives in terms of open access publishing and institutional repositories for scholarly communication in Sri Lanka. Relevant data from Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Open DOAR and Sri Lanka Journals Online (SLJOL) were analyzed to study the status of open access in Sri Lanka. Further, websites of all established institutional repositories (IR) of Sri Lanka were explored to gather the relevant data. Semi-structured interviews with Librarian of National Science Foundation and the staff involved in the development of many IRs and digitization projects were also carried out. Findings show that many libraries in Sri Lanka have established institutional repositories. The recently created national open access policy is under review. Different universities and special libraries such as science and technology libraries were granted financial and technical support by the NSF for digitizing their rare contents. However, all digitized contents have not been uploaded yet. There are 60 locally published journals available online through SLJOL, but only 10 journals have been listed in DOAJ. Though there are 23 institutional repositories in Sri Lanka, only seven repositories are registered in Open DOAR. © 2016, National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources (NISCAIR). All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['LKA'],"Mashroofa M.M., Seneviratne W.",Annals of Library and Information Studies,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources (NISCAIR),9725423,0,2016.0,63,3,182.0,193,,WOS:000582519900029,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1684,WOS,"Influence of attitude, subjective norms and personal innovativeness on intention to use open access journals: A case of Agricultural Research Institutes",Attitude; Intention to use; Open access journals; Personal innovativeness; Research institutes; Subjective norm; Tanzania,"This study assessed the influence of attitude and subjective norm (injunctive and descriptive) on the intention to use open access journals (OAJ); and how personal innovativeness in information technology affects intention to use open access journals among researchers in Tanzanian Agricultural Research Institutes. This study employed the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) by Fishbein and Ajzen (1975), and the data was collected from 121 researchers through a cross-section survey questionnaire. The findings from the study revealed that subjective norm is the strongest predictor of the intention to use OAJ, followed by personal innovativeness. Nonetheless, further analysis showed that attitude has no significant influence on the intention to use open access journals. This research contributes to knowledge on the factors that influence the intention to use OAJ by providing and empirical evidence of the drivers of the intention to use OAJ; and how personal innovativeness influences usage intention. This knowledge is essential in creating an impetus for systematic research on intention to use OAJ in order to address the dearth of empirical studies on open access journal in Tanzania. © 2019 Library Philosophy and Practice.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['TZA'],"Massoro Z.Z., Adewale N.T.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2019.0,2019,0,0.0,0,,WOS:000582770700001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1685,WOS,Antecedents for actual usage intentions of open access journals in agricultural research institutions in Tanzania,Agricultural research institutes; Gold open access; Open access journals; Tanzania; Theory of reasoned action,"The purpose of this paper is to examine antecedents that predict researchers' usage intention of Open Access Journals (OAJs) in Tanzania, with a specific focus on the Agricultural Research Institutes (ARIs). Specifically, the study investigates major predictors of usage intentions of OAJs. Data were collected from pilot study. A total of 60 (85.71%) usable questionnaires out of 70 were returned. The study utilized the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA). The results show that attitude, content respectability and predatory publishers have insignificant effect on usage intention, while subjective norms and intention shows statistically significant effect on OAJs usage behavior. The study findings are useful to OAJs publishers and ARIs management staff to identify important factors and safeguard policies on Open Access publishing and strategies to encourage long-term usage of OAJs for future studies and lifelong learning. By using TRA in the context of actual usage intentions and the integration of an additional construct ""content respectability and predatory publisher"", the extended TRA model fits very well in the OAJs in Tanzania, in particular where such studies are scant. The findings can be used in other institutions with similar conditions in investigating OAJs usage intentions.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['TZA'],"Massoro Z.Z., Othman R.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,3.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2017.0,2017,1,0.0,0,,WOS:000583067400001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1691,WOS,The Two-Way Street of Open Access Journal Publishing: Flip It and Reverse It,scholarly publishing; scholarly journals; open access; bibliometrics,"As Open access (OA) is often perceived as the end goal of scholarly publishing, much research has focused on flipping subscription journals to an OA model. Focusing on what can happen after the presumed finish line, this study identifies journals that have converted from OA to a subscription model, and places these reverse flips within the greater context of scholarly publishing. In particular, we examine specific journal descriptors, such as access mode, publisher, subject area, society affiliation, article volume, and citation metrics, to deepen our understanding of reverse flips. Our results show that at least 152 actively publishing journals have reverse-flipped since 2005, suggesting that this phenomenon does not constitute merely a few marginal outliers, but instead a common pattern within scholarly publishing. Notably, we found that 62% of reverse flips (N = 95) had not been born-OA journals, but had been founded as subscription journals, and hence have experienced a three-stage transformation from closed to open to closed. We argue that reverse flips present a unique perspective on OA, and that further research would greatly benefit from enhanced data and tools for identifying such cases.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Matthias, Lisa; Jahn, Najko; Laakso, Mikael",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Matthias, Lisa] Free Univ Berlin, John F Kennedy Inst, D-14195 Berlin, Germany; [Jahn, Najko] Univ Gottingen, Gottingen State & Univ Lib, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany; [Laakso, Mikael] Hanken Sch Econ, Informat Syst Sci, Helsinki 00100, Finland",78.0,7.0,MDPI,2304-6775,,2019.0,7,2,,,10.3390/publications7020023,WOS:000587727100001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1699,WOS,Gamification of an open access quiz with badges and progress bars: An experimental study with scientists,Badge;  Gamification;  Motivation;  Open Access;  Progress Bar;  Scientists,"Gamification is the use of game-design elements in non-game contexts. Gamification has been used in many different contexts to motivate different audiences, but the effect on scientists has not yet been sufficiently investigated. In a field study with 28 scientists the effects of the game design elements badge and progress bar are examined for their potential to raise motivation for scientists to answer questions in the context of an open access quiz. Previous findings show that engaging with the topic open access can be perceived by scientists as “boring”. By gamifying a quiz about open access with badges or a progress bar we aim to create incentives for scientists to engage with the topic. In our study both game design elements provide a statistically significant increase in the number of questions answered compared to a control group. Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['DEU'],"Mazarakis A., Bräuer P.",CEUR Workshop Proceedings,English,Conference Paper,"4th International GamiFIN Conference, GamiFIN 2020",1 April 2020 through 3 April 2020,0,,,0.0,CEUR-WS,16130073,0,2020.0,2637,0,62.0,71,,WOS:000590201000005,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1712,WOS,Does It Make a Sound: Are Open Access Monographs Discoverable in Library Catalogs?,,"This article describes an exploratory study examining the common perception among library-based publishers that open access academic publications (especially monographs) are not readily discoverable in library catalogs. Using titles from the Michigan Publishing imprint, digitalculturebooks, the study provides an empirical basis for evaluating these suspicions. The analysis indicates that only a small percentage of college and university library catalogs in the United States and Canada consistently enable discovery and access for the test sample. However, investigation into the varied discovery configurations of the libraries that do enable discovery and access suggests room for optimism about the future solubility of the problem.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['USA'],"McCollough, Aaron",PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY,English,Article,,,,"[McCollough, Aaron] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820 USA; [McCollough, Aaron] Univ Illinois, Scholarly Commun & Publishing, Librarys Off Res, Chicago, IL 60680 USA",42.0,1.0,JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV PRESS,1531-2542,,2017.0,17,1,179.0,194,10.1353/pla.2017.0010,WOS:000595957700001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1721,WOS,The relationship between usage and citations in an open access mega-journal,Article metrics; Citation metrics; Usage metrics; Citations; Usage; Downloads; HTML views; Correlation; Interdisciplinary; Mega-journal; Scientific Reports; Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Open access; Scholarly articles,"How do the level of usage of an article, the timeframe of its usage and its subject area relate to the number of citations it accrues? This paper aims to answer this question through an observational study of usage and citation data collected about the multidisciplinary, open access mega-journal Scientific Reports. This observational study answers these questions using the following methods: an overlap analysis of most read and top-cited articles; Spearman correlation tests between total citation counts over two years and usage over various timeframes; a comparison of first months of citation for most read and all articles; a Wilcoxon test on the distribution of total citations of early cited articles and the distribution of total citations of all other articles. All analyses were performed in using the programming language R. As Scientific Reports is a multidisciplinary journal covering all natural and clinical sciences, we also looked at the differences across subjects. We found a moderate correlation between usage in the first year and citations in the first two years since publication (Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.49, alpha = 0.05), and that articles with high usage in the first six months are more likely to have their first citation earlier (Wilcoxon = 1,811,500, p < 0.0001), which is also related to higher citations in the first two years (Wilcoxon = 8,071,200, p < 0.0001). As this final assertion is inferred based on the results of the other elements of this paper, it would require further analysis.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"McGillivray, Barbara; Astell, Mathias",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[McGillivray, Barbara] Alan Turing Inst, London, England; [McGillivray, Barbara] Univ Cambridge, Fac Modern & Medieval Languages, Theoret & Appl Linguist, Cambridge, England; [Astell, Mathias] Hindawi Ltd, London, England",36.0,3.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2019.0,121,2,817.0,838,10.1007/s11192-019-03228-3,WOS:000598172500009,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1723,WOS,Open-access writing: An investigation into the online drafting and revision of a research article in pure mathematics,Blogs; Disciplinary discourse; Pure mathematics; Writing for publication,"ESP research has provided an account of research articles (RAs) across disciplines using both text-analytical methods and ethnographically-oriented approaches. This study explores what additional insights are gained into the genre from the study of a collaboratively produced RA in pure mathematics, negotiated via an open-access research blog. The data consists of 659 thread comments posted by blog participants as they engage with the research and writing up process. Facets of research-based writing that preoccupy the blog participants are revealed, as well as how decisions pertaining to genre and dissemination outlets are made. In addition, blog posts point to how the RA is adjusted to cater for the more diverse readership that open-access knowledge dissemination may entail. The findings provide support for results of existing genre analyses of RAs in pure mathematics, and offer new insights into writing for publication practices in the discipline. Potential pedagogical applications of the findings are proposed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",['openmethod'],['interview'],['natscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"McGrath, Lisa",ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES,English,Article,,,,"[McGrath, Lisa] Sheffield Hallam Univ, TESOL Ctr, Sheffield Inst Educ, City Campus, Sheffield S1 1WB, S Yorkshire, England",58.0,8.0,PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD,0889-4906,,2016.0,43,,25.0,36,10.1016/j.esp.2016.02.003,WOS:000598172500011,,2021-01-27,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1725,WOS,AUPress: A Comparison of an Open Access University Press with Traditional Presses,Open access;  University presses;  Printed books;  Readership,"This study is a comparison of AUPress with three other traditional (non-open access) Canadian university presses. The analysis is based on the rankings that are correlated with book sales on Amazon.com and Amazon.ca. Statistical methods include the sampling of the sales ranking of randomly selected books from each press. The results of one-way ANOVA analyses show that there is no significant difference in the ranking of printed books sold by AUPress in comparison with traditional university presses. However, AUPress, can demonstrate a significantly larger readership for its books as evidenced by the number of downloads of the open electronic versions.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['CAN'],"McGreal, Rory;  Chen, Nian-Shing",EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY,English,Article,,,,"[McGreal, Rory] Athabasca Univ, Technol Enhanced Knowledge Res Inst, Athabasca, AB, Canada;  [Chen, Nian-Shing] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Informat Management, Kaohsiung, Taiwan",20.0,3.0,"NATL YUNLIN UNIV SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, TAIWAN",1176-3647,,2011.0,14,3,231.0,239,,WOS:000598221400001,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1740,SCOPUS,The situation of open access institutional repositories in spain: 2009 report,0,"Introduction. The DRIVER I project drew up a detailed report of European repositories based on data gathered in a survey in which Spain's participation was very low. This created a highly distorted image of the implementation of repositories in Spain. This study aims to analyse the current state of Spanish open-access institutional repositories and to describe their characteristics. Method. The data were gathered through a Web survey. The questionnaire was based on that used by DRIVER I: coverage; technical infrastructure and technical issues; institutional policies; services created; and stimulators and inhibitors for establishing, filling and maintaining their digital institutional repositories. Analysis. Data were tabulated and analysed systematically according responses obtained from the questionnaire and grouped by coverage. Results. Responses were obtained from 38 of the 104 institutions contacted, which had 29 institutional repositories. This represents 78.3% of the Spanish repositories according to the BuscaRepositorios directory. Spanish repositories contained mainly full-text materials (journal articles and doctoral theses) together with metadata. The software most used was DSpace, followed by EPrints. The metadata standard most used was Dublin Core. Spanish repositories offered more usage statistics and fewer author-oriented services than the European average. The priorities for the future development of the repositories are the need for clear policies on access to scientific production based on public funding and the need for quality control indicators. Conclusions.This is the first detailed study of Spanish institutional repositories. The key stimulants for establishing, filling and maintaining were, in order of importance, the increase of visibility and citation, the interest of decision-makers, simplicity of use and search services. On the other hand the main inhibitors identified were the absence of policies, the lack of integration with other national and international systems and the lack of awareness efforts among academia. © the authors, 2009.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['ESP'],"Melero R., Abadal E., Abad F., Rodríguez-Gairín J.M.",Information Research,English,Article,0,0,0,,,18.0,0,13681613,0,2009.0,14,4,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1741,SCOPUS,Referees' attitudes toward open peer review and electronic transmission of papers,peer review; referees; attitudes; electronic transmission,"A survey was mailed to 293 referees from the review board of Food Science and Technology International with the following personal characteristics: ages: 35-45 (35%), 45-55 (37%), and 55-65 (27%); 93% PhD graduates; 69% male, 98% researchers, 82% teachers too, 85% review for other journals as well to assess reviewers' attitudes or preferences in favor of or against masking their identity, and toward the electronic transmission of papers for review. The reviewers were mainly from Europe, North America, and South America. The questionnaire was anonymous and asked if respondents were in favor of an open review or masking of the reviewers, and if they agreed with the electronic transmission of the papers for their review (both from the point of view of author and reviewer). The response rate was 35% (103 respondents). The consistency between the answers as being authors or reviewers when asked by the peer review process was significant (P < 0.001) without significant differences in terms of gender or age. Seventy-five percent were in favor of masking reviewers, and 17% completely favored unblinded review. The consistency between the answers for paper transmission was significant (P < 0.001) without significant differences in terms of gender or age. Seventy-five percent were in favor of electronic transmission, 25% were against it. There was a significant association between the answers in favor of or against e-transmission and the age either as reviewers (P = 0.009) or as authors (P = 0.031). The other associations between the system of review and gender or age were not significant. There was a preference among the participants for masking the reviewers, and a tendency to use the Web as the transmission medium because it is considered faster, easier, simpler, and more economic.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Melero, R; Lopez-Santovena, F",FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,English,Article,,,,"Food Sci & Technol Int, Valencia 46100, Spain; CSIC, Inst Agroquim & Tecnol Alimentos, Comp & Stat Unit, Valencia 46100, Spain",15.0,10.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,1082-0132,,2001.0,7,6,521.0,527,10.1106/0MXD-YM6F-3LM6-G9EB,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1743,SCOPUS,Monitoring compliance with governmental and institutional open access policies across Spanish universities,Open access;  Compliance;  Mandates;  Monitoring open access policies;  Potential open access;  Spain;  Universities;  Science law,"Universities and research centers in Spain are subject to a national open access (OA) mandate and to their own OA institutional policies, if any, but compliance with these requirements has not been fully monitored yet. We studied the degree of OA archiving of publications of 28 universities within the period 2012-2014. Of these, 12 have an institutional OA mandate, 9 do not require but request or encourage OA of scholarly outputs, and 7 do not have a formal OA statement but are well known for their support of the OA movement. The potential OA rate was calculated according to the publisher open access policies indicated in Sherpa/Romeo directory. The universities showed an asymmetric distribution of 1% to 63% of articles archived in repositories that matched those indexed by the Web of Science in the same period, of which 1% to 35% were OA and the rest were closed access. For articles on work carried out with public funding and subject to the Spanish Science law, the percentage was similar or slightly higher. However, the analysis of potential OA showed that the figure could have reached 80% in some cases. This means that the real proportion of articles in OA is far below what it could potentially be.",['openpolicies'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['ESP'],"Melero, Remedios;  Melero-Fuentes, David;  Rodriguez-Gairin, Josep-Manuel",PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,English,Article,,,,"[Melero, Remedios] CSIC, IATA, Catedrat Agustin Escardino 7, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain;  [Melero-Fuentes, David] Univ Catolica Valencia San Vicente Martir UCV, Inst Documentac & Tecnol Informac Indotei, Quevedo 2, Valencia 46001, Spain;  [Rodriguez-Gairin, Josep-Manuel] Univ Barcelona, Fac Bibliotecon & Documentacio, Melcior de Palau 140, Barcelona 08014, Spain",43.0,1.0,EPI,1386-6710,,2018.0,27,4,858.0,878,10.3145/epi.2018.jul.15,,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1758,SCOPUS,Measuring the value of open access ETDS in algerian digital repositories: An evaluative study,Digital repositories;  ETDs;  Evaluation of ETDs;  Grey literature;  Open access;  University of Constantine 2;  Usage statistics,"Over the past years, grey literature in general and electronic digital theses (EDTs) in particular have been becoming more and more digital. Algeria is ranked first among Arab countries with fifteen (15) digital repositories. EDTs represent a large percentage of the repositories’ content. Fourteen (14) of these repositories have policies for the collection of theses and dissertations, as well as other types of documents such as articles and reports. The usage of ETDs by undergraduates has been increasing exponentially. This study aims to highlight and evaluate the tools used to measure the usage of ETDs in the digital repositories, their availability and the evaluation methodology. © 2020, GreyNet. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['DZA'],"Mettai K., Boumarafi B.",Grey Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,GreyNet,15741796,0,2020.0,16,Special Issue Winter,34.0,41,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1770,SCOPUS,"Open access, social norms and publication choice",Open Access; Scholarly publication; Social norms; Academics' behavior; Economics of science,"The aim of this paper is to shed light on scholarly communication and its current trajectories by examining academics' perception of Open Access, while also providing a reference case for studying social norm change. In this respect, the issue of publication choice and the role of Open Access journals casts light on the changes affecting the scientific community and its institutional arrangements for validating and circulating new research. The empirical investigation conducted also offers a useful vantage point for gauging the importance of localised social norms in guiding and constraining behaviour.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['ITA'],"Migheli, Matteo; Ramello, Giovanni B.",EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS,English,Article,,,,"[Migheli, Matteo] Univ Turin, Dept Econ & Stat Cognetti de Martiis, Turin, Italy; [Ramello, Giovanni B.] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Inst Publ Policy & Publ Choice, POLIS, Alessandria, Italy",35.0,10.0,SPRINGER,0929-1261,,2013.0,35,2,149.0,167,10.1007/s10657-013-9388-x,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1771,SCOPUS,OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS AND ACADEMICS' BEHAVIOR,,"The rising star of scholarly publishing is Open Access (OA). Even some traditional journals now offer this option on author payment, and many full freely accessible journals are now available to scholars, providing relief to research institutions increasingly unable to afford the escalating subscription rates of serials. However, proper recognition of full OA journals by the community remains a major obstacle to overcome if they are to become a viable alternative for scholarly communication. Through a survey, this work investigates economics scholars' attitudes to OA, and attempts to outline the state of practices and norms governing individuals' publication choices.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Migheli, Matteo; Ramello, Giovanni B.",ECONOMIC INQUIRY,English,Article,,,,"[Migheli, Matteo] Univ Turin, Dipartimento Econ & Stat Cognetti de Martiis, I-10153 Turin, Italy; [Migheli, Matteo] Univ Turin, CeRP Collegio Carlo Alberto, I-10153 Turin, Italy; [Ramello, Giovanni B.] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dipartimento Giurisprudenza Sci Polit Econ & Soci, I-15121 Alessandria, Italy; [Ramello, Giovanni B.] Univ Piemonte Orientale, BRICK Collegio Carlo Alberto, I-15121 Alessandria, Italy",30.0,14.0,WILEY,0095-2583,,2014.0,52,4,1250.0,1266,10.1111/ecin.12131,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1772,SCOPUS,Actual and potential open access to scientific output in a specific country. A case study in Argentina,Open access; Scientific production; Publication patterns; Journals; Access models; Argentina,"This paper presents a methodology to estimate the actual and potential access to scientific research outputs in a specific country based on an analysis of the access model of journals used by researchers to publish their articles. It includes a study of scientific production in Argentina from 2008 to 2010 in the following areas: Medicine, Physics and Astronomy, Agriculture and Biological sciences, and Social sciences and Humanities. The sample was taken from the Scopus database and the journal access models selected through searches performed using DOAJ, e-revist@s, SciELO, RedALyC, PubMed, Romeo-Sherpa, and Dulcinea. The conclusion of this study is that Argentina offers suitable conditions to provide open access to a high percentage of the scientific literature produced at the national level, using repositories. In addition, the methodology used by the authors could be potentially used by other countries and topic areas. The results provide useful knowledge for repository managers at academic and research institutions to promote repository services development and to justify their maintenance.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['ARG'],"Miguel, Sandra; Gomez, Nancy-Diana; Bongiovani, Paola",PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Miguel, Sandra] Univ Nacl La Plata, Fac Humanidades & Ciencias Educ, Inst Invest Humanidades & Ciencias Sociales, UNLP Conicet, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; [Gomez, Nancy-Diana] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dpto Bibliotecon & Documentac, E-28903 Getafe, Madrid, Spain; [Bongiovani, Paola] Univ Nacl Rosario, RA-2000 Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina",21.0,12.0,EPI,1386-6710,,2012.0,21,2,146.0,153,10.3145/epi.2012.mar.04,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1773,SCOPUS,Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context,open access; scientific production on open access; bibliometric analysis,"This research aims to diachronically analyze the worldwide scientific production on open access, in the academic and scientific context, in order to contribute to knowledge and visualization of its main actors. As a method, bibliographical, descriptive and analytical research was used, with the contribution of bibliometric studies, especially the production indicators, scientific collaboration and indicators of thematic co-occurrence. The Scopus database was used as a source to retrieve the articles on the subject, with a resulting corpus of 1179 articles. Using Bibexcel software, frequency tables were constructed for the variables, and Pajek software was used to visualize the collaboration network and VoSViewer for the construction of the keywords' network. As for the results, the most productive researchers come from countries such as the United States, Canada, France and Spain. Journals with higher impact in the academic community have disseminated the new constructed knowledge. A collaborative network with a few subnets where co-authors are from different countries has been observed. As conclusions, this study allows identifying the themes of debates that mark the development of open access at the international level, and it is possible to state that open access is one of the new emerging and frontier fields of library and information science.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Miguel, Sandra; Tannuri de Oliveira, Ely Francina; Cabrini Gracio, Maria Claudia",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Miguel, Sandra] Univ Nacl La Plata, IdIHCS UNLP CONICET, Calle 51 E-124 & 125, RA-1925 Ensenada, Baja California, Argentina; [Tannuri de Oliveira, Ely Francina; Cabrini Gracio, Maria Claudia] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, 737 Hygino Muzzi Filho Ave, BR-17525900 Marilia, Brazil",29.0,14.0,MDPI,,,2016.0,4,1,,,10.3390/publications4010001,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1777,SCOPUS,Open access availability of anatomy papers presented at meetings of the American and British Associations of Clinical Anatomists,anatomy; citation rates; open access; publication,"Introduction:Dissemination of research depends on published work being accessible. In many disciplines open access (OA) research is more frequently cited, although this has never before been demonstrated amongst anatomy publications. The objective of this study was to assess a selection of published anatomy papers to determine the effect of gold and bronze OA availability on citation rates. Materials and Methods:Taken together, 625 peer-reviewed publications were identified from 2927 abstracts presented at meetings of AACA (2003-2010) and BACA (2000-2015). Results:In total 18.75% (69 of 368) of papers presented at BACA and 21.79% (56 of 257) of those presented at AACA reached OA publication. Citation rates are significantly higher amongst OA papers as compared to non-OA papers presented at these two anatomy conferences (OA 18.95, Non-OA 15.14 p = 0.047). OA papers were most commonly themed around education and pure anatomy. Conclusions:The average OA publication rate of 20.0% in anatomical research arising from these conferences is significantly lower than the average rate for scientific research. Citation rates are significantly higher amongst OA anatomy papers presented at these two conferences.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],"['USA', 'GBR']","Miller, George W.; Stoner, Rebecca; Boissaud-Cooke, Matthew A.; Lim, Joseph; Furness, Hugh; Putt, Oliver; Lewis, Thomas L.",CLINICAL ANATOMY,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Miller, George W.] Guys & St ThomasNHS Fdn Trust, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, London, England; [Stoner, Rebecca] Countess Chester Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, Chester, Cheshire, England; [Boissaud-Cooke, Matthew A.] Univ Hosp Plymouth NHS Trust, Dept Neurosurg, Plymouth, Devon, England; [Lim, Joseph] Epsom & St Helier Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Gen Med, London, England; [Furness, Hugh] St Georges Univ London, London, England; [Putt, Oliver] Leicester Royal Infirm, Leicester, Leics, England; [Lewis, Thomas L.] Queen Elizabeth Woolwich, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, London, England",28.0,0.0,WILEY,0897-3806,,,,,,,10.1002/ca.23580,,32065677.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1778,SCOPUS,Graduate Students Reference Open Access Content in Literature Review Assignments,,"Objective - This study seeks to understand to what degree education graduate students cite open access, peer-reviewed journals in their coursework and whether patterns of open access referencing change over time. Design - Longitudinal reference list analysis. Setting - Public university in the United States of America. Subjects - Reference lists collected from final literature review papers in a graduate-level education class (n = 382). Methods - The authors collected reference lists from final literature review papers in a graduate-level education class for a nine-year time frame from the 2005 to 2013 academic years. The authors analyzed 2,594 reference entries from the 382 reference lists in the sample. The authors organized reference entries into spreadsheets for analysis, creating one spreadsheet per class section and sorting references by type (e.g., book, journal article, website, etc.) and source. The authors also created a cumulative list of journal titles that they analyzed for open access status and how often the journals appeared in the sample. Other information collected about each journal included ISSNs, national origin, journal sponsorship, frequency and years of student usage, presence of empirical research, [and] peer review status (p. 249). Finally, the authors organized open access journals into the following four categories based on their access method:. Category A OA Platform and Publisher. Category B Publisher Only. Category C Delay or Hybrid from Host or Publisher. Category D Subscription Based, but Self Archived (p. 249) Main Results - A total of 594 unique journals appeared in reference lists over the study period, and 11.5% (n= 68) of the total were open access journals. Of the open access journals, 96% (n= 65) included original research articles, and the majority (n= 51) fell into Category A OA Platform and Publisher. Nine, six, and two journal titles fell into categories B, C, and D, respectively. The authors found no pattern or change in the use of open access titles during the nine-year study period. Open access journals appeared in reference lists an average of 14 times per year with the highest usage observed in 2009. Conclusion - The results show that graduate students in the sample used a range of open access journals. The presence of open access resources in reference lists signals that students may use both library subscription databases and open web search tools to complete their literature review assignments. The authors suggest potential reasons why open access use did not grow during the study period, including a possible mismatch between student research interests and the topics present in open access titles, the lack of discussion about open access publishing during library instruction, or student satisfaction with the resources provided through library-sponsored subscriptions. Librarians are encouraged to include high-quality open access resources within their catalogues or other electronic resources to increase open access discoverability and to include popular open web search tools as a means to retrieve open access materials during information literacy instruction.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['socscie'],['othergroup'],['USA'],"Miller, Kimberly",EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE,English,Article,,,,"[Miller, Kimberly] Towson Univ, Albert S Cook Lib, Towson, MD 21252 USA",5.0,0.0,UNIV ALBERTA,1715-720X,,2015.0,10,3,102.0,104,10.18438/B87S4C,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1780,SCOPUS,Mapping the development of Open Access in Latin America and Caribbean countries. An analysis of Web of Science Core Collection and SciELO Citation Index (2005-2017),Open Access;  LA&C countries;  Scientific publications;  Bibliometric analysis,"Open Access (OA) initiatives and knowledge infrastructure represent vital elements for both producing significant changes in scholarly communication and reducing limitations of access to the circulation of scientific knowledge in developing countries. The spreading of the OA movement in Latin America and Caribbean (LA&C) countries, exemplified by the growth of regional and national initiatives, such as the creation of OA digital journal libraries and the establishment of supportive governmental policies, provides evidence of the significant role OA is playing in improving the participation of LA&C countries in the so-called global knowledge commons. In this paper, we map OA publications in LA&C countries through a bibliometric analysis of OA publications indexed by the Web of Science Core Collection and SciELO Citation Index during the period 2005-2017. Searches were done in the fields Country, Publication Year, Language, and Research Area using WoS analytical tools, in order to map the evolution, distribution, and characteristics of OA publications in the LA&C region. The analysis is conducted on both the sub-regional and national levels. On the sub-regional level, trends in the four LA&C sub-regions (Southern Cone, Central America and Mexico, Andes, and the Caribbean) are identified and compared. On the national level, the analysis identifies as most representative and focuses on nine countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru. By doing so, it enriches the existing literature on the subject, where the prominent role played by some of these countries in supporting OA has been already underlined.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['SA'],"Minniti, Sergio;  Santoro, Valeria;  Belli, Simone",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Minniti, Sergio;  Santoro, Valeria;  Belli, Simone] Yachay Tech Univ, Sch Math Sci & Informat Technol, Hacienda San Jose S-N, San Miguel De Urcuqui, Ecuador",37.0,9.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2018.0,117,3,1905.0,1930,10.1007/s11192-018-2950-0,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1784,SCOPUS,A study of Open Access research data repositories developed by BRICS countries,Open access; BRICS; Open data; Research data; Open access research data repositories; re3data,"Purpose In the present era, research data is a concern for researchers, as they are trying to find new ways to communicate their research findings and conclusions to other researchers in order to increase visibility and credibility. BRICS nations are fast emerging economies and contribute significantly in research output. This study makes an effort to analyze and explore the role of BRICS nations towards open access research data repository registered with Registry of Research Data Repositories. Design/methodology/approach The data were gathered from re3data repository, and the search was limited to BRICS nations. The data were further analyzed and tabulated as per set parameters, namely, country-wise distribution, types of contents, subject coverage and language diversity. Findings The findings depict that in terms of strength, India has the highest number of data repositories, thereby achieved the first rank among BRICS nations, and South Africa has the least number of data repositories, whereas in terms of content type and subject coverage, India again is leading among BRICS nations. The English language is used by repositories as the main language of the interface. Practical implications The study helps to understand the development of research data repositories by BRICS nations. The study is further beneficial to researchers, as Registry of Research Data Repository provides a single platform to access repositories from various disciplines. Readily available data saves time, money and efforts of researchers and helps the researcher in completing their research activity in a very short span of time. Originality/value The paper has investigated open access data repositories of BRICS nation that has not been attempted earlier. This gives readers comprehensive overview of research data repositories developed in fast emerging economies of the global. The paper can be very helpful for information managers, OA promoters and education and research policy makers to devise plans and policy bearing in mind the evolving research channels in emerging economies.",['opendata'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],"['BRA', 'RUS', 'IND', 'CHN', 'ZAR']","Misgar, Safat Mushtaq; Bhat, Ajra; Wani, Zahid Ashraf",DIGITAL LIBRARY PERSPECTIVES,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Misgar, Safat Mushtaq; Bhat, Ajra; Wani, Zahid Ashraf] Univ Kashmir, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Srinagar, India",28.0,0.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2059-5816,,,,,,,10.1108/DLP-02-2020-0012,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1799,SCOPUS,Understanding researchers' intention to publish in open access journals,Theory of planned behaviour (TPB); Open access; Intention; Personal innovativeness; Psychology; Extended model; Scholarly publishing,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to understand how attitudes, norms (injunctive and descriptive) and perceived behavioral control (PBC) (capacity and autonomy) influence the intention to publish open access (OA), and how personal innovativeness in information technology affects attitude and PBC. Design/methodology/approach - This study employs an integrated and extended theory of planned behavior (TPB) framework within a cross-sectional survey design. The sample consists of researchers at a Norwegian university, and data are collected digitally via e-mail invitation and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Findings - This study determines that attitude is the strongest predictor of the intention to publish OA, followed by injunctive and descriptive social norms, and PBC capacity and autonomy. All factors positively influence intention apart from PBC autonomy, which has a negative effect. Research limitations/implications - Potential limitations include: a relatively small sample size, self-reported data and employing intention, not behavior, as the ultimate dependent variable. Practical implications - This research contributes with a deeper understanding of what drives the intention to publish OA research articles, and how innovativeness affects attitudes and PBC autonomy. Support is found for an extended TPB model with decomposed normative and PBC components. This knowledge is essential in creating an impetus for systematic research on OA publishing behavior. Originality/value - Theory-driven research into understanding OA publishing behavior is rare. Decomposing the normative and PBC constructs is uncommon in TPB research, and a novel approach in OA research. Personal innovativeness has not been explored previously in relation to OA publishing.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['NOR'],"Moksness, Lars; Olsen, Svein Ottar",JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION,English,Article,,,,"[Moksness, Lars] UiT Norges Arktiske Univ, Univ Lib, Tromso, Norway; [Moksness, Lars; Olsen, Svein Ottar] UiT Norges Arktiske Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Tromso, Norway",63.0,7.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0022-0418,,2017.0,73,6,1149.0,1166,10.1108/JD-02-2017-0019,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1801,SCOPUS,From closed to open access: A case study of flipped journals,0,"In recent years, increased stakeholder pressure to transition research to Open Access has led to many journals ‘flipping’ from a toll access to an open access publishing model. Changing the publishing model can influence the decision of authors to submit their papers to a journal, and increased article accessibility may influence citation behaviour. The aim of this paper is to show changes in the number of published articles and citations after the flipping of a journal. We analysed a set of 171 journals in the Web of Science (WoS) which flipped to open access. In addition to comparing the number of articles, average relative citation (ARC) and normalized impact factor (IF) are applied, respectively, as bibliometric indicators at the article and journal level, to trace the transformation of flipped journals covered. Our results show that flipping mostly has had positive effects on journal's IF. But it has had no obvious citation advantage for the articles. We also see a decline in the number of published articles after flipping. We can conclude that flipping to open access can improve the performance of journals, despite decreasing the tendency of authors to submit their articles and no better citation advantages for articles.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Momeni F., Mayr P., Fraser N., Peters I.","17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019 - Proceedings",English,Conference Paper,"17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019",2 September 2019 through 5 September 2019,0,,,0.0,International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics,0,9788833811185,2019.0,1,0,1270.0,1275,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1802,SCOPUS,Getting the best out of data for open access monograph presses: A case study of UCL Press,,"This study of UCL Press sought to identify the extent to which data available to open access (OA) monograph presses can be combined with low-cost analysis tools to provide insight into development and strategy. An additional goal was identifying practical steps that monograph publishers can take to ensure that they make the most of the data they have access to. The project team carried out an analysis of downloaded figures from platforms providing access to UCL Press monograph titles, social media activity, and sales patterns. Patterns of engagement with the books were cross-referenced against key marketing and dissemination events in order to identify relationships between marketing approaches and awareness or use of a title. This study shows that it is possible to gain valuable insights into the uses of OA books by collating and analysing usage and social media data. It also identifies a series of relatively straightforward steps that can be taken by presses to maximize the richness of the data captured. These include proactively gathering and storing data;  providing best practice advice to those engaging in promotion, particularly when promotion is via social media;  and making it easier to track specific efforts to publicize books by using tagged links.",['opendata'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['GBR'],"Montgomery, Lucy;  Neylon, Cameron;  Ozaygen, Alkim;  Leaver, Tama",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Montgomery, Lucy;  Neylon, Cameron;  Ozaygen, Alkim;  Leaver, Tama] Curtin Univ, Ctr Culture & Technol, Kent St, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia",15.0,0.0,WILEY,0953-1513,,2018.0,31,4,335.0,344,10.1002/leap.1168,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1803,SCOPUS,In an Age of Open Access to Research Policies: Physician and Public Health NGO Staff Research Use and Policy Awareness,,"Introduction Through funding agency and publisher policies, an increasing proportion of the health sciences literature is being made open access. Such an increase in access raises questions about the awareness and potential utilization of this literature by those working in health fields. Methods A sample of physicians (N=336) and public health non-governmental organization (NGO) staff (N=92) were provided with relatively complete access to the research literature indexed in PubMed, as well as access to the point-of-care service UpToDate, for up to one year, with their usage monitored through the tracking of web-log data. The physicians also participated in a one-month trial of relatively complete or limited access. Results The study found that participants' research interests were not satisfied by article abstracts alone nor, in the case of the physicians, by a clinical summary service such as UpToDate. On average, a third of the physicians viewed research a little more frequently than once a week, while two-thirds of the public health NGO staff viewed more than three articles a week. Those articles were published since the 2008 adoption of the NIH Public Access Policy, as well as prior to 2008 and during the maximum 12-month embargo period. A portion of the articles in each period was already open access, but complete access encouraged a viewing of more research articles. Conclusion Those working in health fields will utilize more research in the course of their work as a result of (a) increasing open access to research, (b) improving awareness of and preparation for this access, and (c) adjusting public and open access policies to maximize the extent of potential access, through reduction in embargo periods and access to pre-policy literature.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['othergroup'],['USA'],"Moorhead, Laura L.; Holzmeyer, Cheryl; Maggio, Lauren A.; Steinberg, Ryan M.; Willinsky, John",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,"[Moorhead, Laura L.; Holzmeyer, Cheryl; Willinsky, John] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA; [Maggio, Lauren A.; Steinberg, Ryan M.] Stanford Univ, Lane Med Lib, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA",26.0,10.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1932-6203,,2015.0,10,7,,,10.1371/journal.pone.0129708,,26200794.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1805,SCOPUS,Visibility and impact of the Peruvian journals of Social Sciences in open access,Visibility; Impact; Social Sciences; Journals; Open access; Latindex; Peru,"In this article the scientific production and leading indicators of international visibility of 24 Peruvian social science journals indexed in the Catalog Latindex between 2005-2014, available in Open Access is analyzed. The results indicate a greater number of magazines in the field of psychology, Ade-Economics and Law, with respect to other areas of knowledge. a significant volume of published articles and a predominance of articles written by local authors on foreigners is observed. a clear dominance of private universities, from public task in the publishing of scientific journals is found. incentive measures and initiatives are proposed to improve the impact, quality, number of citations and presence in international search engines.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['socscie'],['publisher'],['PER'],"Morales Morante, Luis Fernando",BIBLIOS-REVISTA DE BIBLIOTECOLOGIA Y CIENCIAS DE LA INFORMACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Morales Morante, Luis Fernando] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Comunicac Audiovisual & Publicidad, Barcelona, Spain",19.0,5.0,"UNIV PITTSBURGH, UNIV LIBRARY SYSTEM",1562-4730,,2016.0,,65,29.0,51,10.5195/biblios.2016.320,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1807,SCOPUS,"Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact",Open access; Funding acknowledgements; Collaboration; Impact; Research fields; WoS,"Open access (OA) to every research result supported by funding bodies is a medium to long-term goal. This work aims to find out whether OA publication is useful for all research fields, regardless of their specific features. As a sample, articles from the WoS databases from two disparate disciplines (one from SSCI and another from SCIE) are selected, and several hypotheses related to the presence of funding acknowledgements, cooperation and citations are tested. A first look at the general distribution of publications shows that collaborative and funded research obtains a higher proportion of cited articles, and that this proportion increases in the case of OA publications. Moreover, the logistic regression reveals that the probability of finding an OA publication is significantly increased in the SCIE discipline, and by the presence of EU funding, international collaboration and citations. This probability rises with some interactions (e.g. presence of international funding and international collaboration, or international funding and citations). Regarding OA types, Green OA publications are the most related to fund recognition, although Gold OA/Bronze OA articles in international collaboration are also significantly related to financing. Concerning impact, the most likely cited OA type is the Hybrid OA. However, if papers include funding acknowledgements, the Bronze OA and Green OA publications increase their citation likelihood. Similarly, when Gold OA articles include international collaboration, there is a greater chance of citation. With these findings, it is possible to venture that OA publishing will be useful for all research fields, although their specific features should be considered. Consequently, funders should be aware of these particularities to stimulate OA without compromising the quality of the research.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['socscie', 'med']",['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Morillo, Fernanda",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Morillo, Fernanda] CSIC, IFS, Albasanz 26-28, Madrid 28037, Spain",29.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,125,1,689.0,716,10.1007/s11192-020-03652-w,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1812,SCOPUS,Small scholar-led scholarly journals: Can they survive and thrive in an open access future?,,"This article presents early results of a research project designed to further our understanding of how to ensure that small scholar-led journals can survive and thrive in a global open access knowledge commons. This phase of the research focuses on generation of ideas through interviews and focus groups with 15 participants involved in producing small scholar-led journals that either are or would like to become open access. Although a couple of journals reported that they could survive in an open access future based on existing resources, most were concerned about survival and none expressed confidence that they could thrive in an open access future. These journals are far more diverse than one might imagine. Comparing the costs of article production from one journal with another might not make sense. A number of avenues for further research are discussed.",['openaccess'],['interview'],"['socscie', 'hum', 'med', 'natscie']",['publisher'],"['CAN', 'ITA', 'USA', 'GBR']","Morrison, Heather",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Morrison, Heather] Univ Ottawa, Sch Informat Studies, Ottawa, ON, Canada",16.0,6.0,WILEY-BLACKWELL,0953-1513,,2016.0,29,2,83.0,88,10.1002/leap.1015,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1814,SCOPUS,Open Access Article Processing Charges: DOAJ Survey May 2014,open access; article processing charges; publication fees; Directory of Open Access Journals; economics of scholarly publishing,"As of May 2014, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) listed close to ten thousand fully open access, peer reviewed, scholarly journals. Most of these journals do not charge article processing charges (APCs). This article reports the results of a survey of the 2567 journals, or 26% of journals listed in DOAJ, that do have APCs based on a sample of 1432 of these journals. Results indicate a volatile sector that would make future APCs difficult to predict for budgeting purposes. DOAJ and publisher title lists often did not closely match. A number of journals were found on examination not to have APCs. A wide range of publication costs was found for every publisher type. The average (mean) APC of $964 contrasts with a mode of $0. At least 61% of publishers using APCs are commercial in nature, while many publishers are of unknown types. The vast majority of journals charging APCs (80%) were found to offer one or more variations on pricing, such as discounts for authors from mid to low income countries, differential pricing based on article type, institutional or society membership, and/or optional charges for extras such as English language editing services or fast track of articles. The complexity and volatility of this publishing landscape is discussed.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Morrison, Heather; Salhab, Jihane; Calve-Genest, Alexis; Horava, Tony",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Morrison, Heather; Salhab, Jihane; Calve-Genest, Alexis; Horava, Tony] Univ Ottawa, Sch Informat Studies, 111-02 55 Laurier E, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada",18.0,40.0,MDPI AG,2304-6775,,2015.0,3,1,1.0,16,10.3390/publications3010001,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1815,SCOPUS,Open-access clinical trial registries: the Italian scenario,Clinical trials registry;  Citizen;  Information,"Background: Citizens, patients and their representatives are increasingly insisting on working with health professionals to organize and discuss research protocols. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors recommended setting up a public clinical trial registry where anyone can find key information about a trial. Around the world, governments have, in fact, now begun to legislate mandatory disclosure of all clinical trials. The aims of the present survey were to assess the availability of clinical trial registries for Italian citizens and to examine the transparency of the data items reported. Methods: The availability of open-access clinical trial registries was surveyed on a sample of 182 websites, including research institutes and centers of excellence (IRCCS-teaching hospitals), hospitals and associations. For each registry we downloaded a sample of two trials to assess the correspondence of the data items reported. Results from the Italian and international registries were compared. Results: Fifteen percent of the sample had an open-access registry of clinical trials. Comparison of the data items available, in terms of completeness and transparency, from institutional and international registries indicated wide variability. Conclusions: Italian citizens, patients and their associations have scant access to local registries of clinical trials, and international registries are generally more informative. On the European level, advocacy and lobby actions are needed among citizens and patients to boost the diffusion of open-access clinical trial registries without language barriers, thereby facilitating participation, access to information, and the coordination of clinical research.",['opendata'],['interview'],['med'],['university'],['ITA'],"Mosconi, Paola;  Roberto, Anna",TRIALS,English,Article,,,,"[Mosconi, Paola;  Roberto, Anna] Mario Negri Inst Pharmacol Res, Lab Med Res & Consumer Involvement, I-20156 Milan, Italy",27.0,2.0,BIOMED CENTRAL LTD,1745-6215,,2012.0,13,,,,10.1186/1745-6215-13-194,,23075149.0,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1816,SCOPUS,Open access to scientific knowledge and feudalism knowledge: Is there a connection?,Feudalism knowledge; Google patents; Google scholar; Open access; Transnational corporations; Universities,"The role of universities and transnational corporations in the circulation of scientific knowledge is considered. If institutions generate, mostly scientific knowledge, trying to facilitate its free circulation, then transnational companies, contrarily, try to remove most significant and cutting-edge scientific knowledge from free circulation and its commercialization and reintroduction into an open, but now commercial, circulation in the TRIPS. However, paradoxical, the open access movement to scientific knowledge, eventually, facilitates feudalism of knowledge. We call this phenomenon the 'open access - paradox'. Based on the experiments done with Google Scholar and Google Patents, it is shown that universities generates, mostly scientific knowledge (scientific articles), and transnational companies generates, mostly technological knowledge (patents). © 2011, Vladimir M. Moskovkin.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],"['natscie', 'engtech']","['researcher', 'business']",['nonspecificgeo'],Moskovkin V.M.,Webology,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,0,1735188X,0,2011.0,8,1,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1817,SCOPUS,Students' adoption of an open access online education service An exploratory study in an emerging higher education (HE) market,Open systems; Internet; Education; Higher education; Perception; Innovation,"Purpose - This paper seeks to investigate students' adoption of an open access online education service in higher education and their perceptions of its attributes as an innovation in an emerging market. Design/methodology/approach - Given the exploratory nature of the research a two-phase qualitative approach was adopted. The first phase comprised 11 in-depth interviews to examine the universities' internal and external attributes that directly enhance the rate of adoption of the open access online education service. The second phase involved three focus groups examining students' perceptions of the innovation attributes as well as the likelihood that they would adopt the innovation. Findings - The results indicate that, besides the perceived attributes of the innovation being the main determinant of the students' adoption of it, a number of internal factors within the university and external factors within the educational market in Egypt directly influence the adoption process. Originality/value - The originality of the paper is in its empirical work as it adapted a well-known theory, the perceived attributes of innovation model, and empirically tested it in a specific context: the higher education market in a developing country.",['openeducation'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['EGY'],"Mourad, Maha",ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"Amer Univ Cairo, Sch Business, Dept Management, New Cairo, Egypt",37.0,4.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1468-4527,,2010.0,34,4,604.0,617,10.1108/14684521011073007,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1822,SCOPUS,UiT-Researchers' Attitudes and Practices Towards Open Access Publication: Lessons Learnt for Improving Self-Archiving in Institutional Repository,,"Objective. Using The Munin Repository at UiT The Arctic University of Norway as a case study, a survey was conducted among the UiT researchers to examine their attitudes and practices towards the repository and towards open access (OA) publications. Methods. The survey questionnaire was sent to all employees at UiT between August and October 2016, but only academic staff in research positions, including PhD students, were selected for the analysis. 200 researchers responded to the survey. Results. The study found that researchers are supportive of the principle of OA but are less keen on contributing to their institutional repositories for a range of reasons. These include the process being quite a hassle, academics' uncertainty over certain legal, copyright and peer review issues, prestige issues, and uncertainty over the appropriate version to deposit or self-archive. Contribution. The statistical results can be used by readers as benchmarks to compare with their own institution's figures. Conclusively, the study found that more than 90% of the researchers agreed with the OA principles, but still 54% of UiT researchers did not archive their research documents in The Munin Repository.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['NOR'],"Msomphora, Mbachi Ruth",LIBRES-LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH ELECTRONIC JOURNAL,English,Article,,,,"[Msomphora, Mbachi Ruth] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Tromso, Norway",40.0,0.0,NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIV LIBRARY,1058-6768,,2019.0,29,1,14.0,36,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1825,SCOPUS,"HOW MANY MORE CITES IS A $3,000 OPEN ACCESS FEE BUYING YOU? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM A NATURAL EXPERIMENT",,"We analyze the effect of open access (OA) status of journal articles on citations. Using cross-sectional and panel data from mathematics and economics, we perform negative binomial, Poisson, and generalized method of moments/instrumental variable methods regressions. We benefit from a natural experiment via hybrid OA pilot agreements. Citations to pre-prints allow us to identify the intrinsic quality of articles prior to journal publication. Overall, our analysis suggests that there is no hybrid OA citation benefit. However, for the subpopulation of articles without OA pre- or post-prints, we find positive hybrid OA effects for the full sample and each discipline separately. (JEL L17, O33, A11)",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['natscie', 'socscie']",['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Mueller-Langer, Frank; Watt, Richard",ECONOMIC INQUIRY,English,Article,,,,"[Mueller-Langer, Frank] Max Planck Inst Innovat & Competit, Munich, Germany; [Watt, Richard] Univ Canterbury, Dept Econ & Finance, Christchurch, New Zealand",40.0,5.0,WILEY,0095-2583,,2018.0,56,2,931.0,954,10.1111/ecin.12545,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1833,SCOPUS,Correlation Between Cost of Publication and Journal Impact. Comprehensive Cross-sectional Study of Exclusively Open-Access Surgical Journals,surgical research; open access; h-index; SCImago journal rank indicator; eigenfactor; journal impact,"OBJECTIVES: As open-access journals have become increasingly common, it has provided more options for researchers to publish their work and improved access of information to the public. However, some open access journals charge the authors processing fee on submission. In certain cases, this can be rather expensive. This study is the first study to specifically assess the cost of publishing in exclusively open-access, peer reviewed surgical journals, and their correlation with journal impact, in the form of 6 bibliometrics. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a cross-sectional study. A list of journals is compiled using the SCImago Journal & Country Rank and Directory of Open Access Journals. 6 indices are measured - impact factor, SCOPUS h-index, SCImago journal rank indicator (SJR), Eigenfactor, Article Influence Score and Google h5 index. The cost of publication (in USD$) of a research article (maximum of 6 pages) is used as a baseline. RESULTS: 89 research journals are included. The median cost of publication is USD$100 (range [0-2580]). 47% are free of charge. 13% can cost more than USD$2000 per article. SJR and Google h5 index appear to be the only indices that correlate linearly with the cost (p = 0.015 and 0.041, respectively), although the correlations are weak. 3 indices, namely impact factor, SJR and Article Influence Score appear to have very strong correlations with each other (Pearson coefficient > 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: From this study, the cost of publishing in open-access journals bears little correlation to their impact; this poses a dilemma for researchers without significant funding. Therefore, authors and funders must consider cautiously when submitting to these journals. (Crown Copyright 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association of Program Directors in Surgery. All rights reserved.)",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['med'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Muquit, Jason Yuen Samiul; Whitfield, Peter C.",JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION,English,Article,,,,"[Muquit, Jason Yuen Samiul; Whitfield, Peter C.] Derriford Hosp, South West Neurosurg Ctr, Plymouth PL6 8DH, Devon, England",40.0,7.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,1931-7204,,2019.0,76,1,107.0,119,10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.029,,30100322.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1835,SCOPUS,"Open science, communal culture, and women's participation in the movement to improve science",open science; reproducibility; replicability; women; culture,"Science is undergoing rapid change with the movement to improve science focused largely on reproducibility/replicability and open science practices. This moment of change-in which science turns inward to examine its methods and practices-provides an opportunity to address its historic lack of diversity and noninclusive culture. Through network modeling and semantic analysis, we provide an initial exploration of the structure, cultural frames, and women's participation in the open science and reproducibility literatures (n = 2,926 articles and conference proceedings). Network analyses suggest that the open science and reproducibility literatures are emerging relatively independently of each other, sharing few common papers or authors. We next examine whether the literatures differentially incorporate collaborative, prosocial ideals that are known to engage members of underrepresented groups more than independent, winner-takes-all approaches. We find that open science has a more connected, collaborative structure than does reproducibility. Semantic analyses of paper abstracts reveal that these literatures have adopted different cultural frames: open science includes more explicitly communal and prosocial language than does reproducibility. Finally, consistent with literature suggesting the diversity benefits of communal and prosocial purposes, we find that women publish more frequently in high-status author positions (first or last) within open science (vs. reproducibility). Furthermore, this finding is further patterned by team size and time. Women are more represented in larger teams within reproducibility, and women's participation is increasing in open science over time and decreasing in reproducibility. We conclude with actionable suggestions for cultivating a more prosocial and diverse culture of science.","['openaccess', 'openmethod']","['biblio', 'othermeth']",['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Murphy, Mary C.; Mejia, Amanda F.; Mejia, Jorge; Yan, Xiaoran; Cheryan, Sapna; Dasgupta, Nilanjana; Destin, Mesmin; Fryberg, Stephanie A.; Garcia, Julie A.; Haines, Elizabeth L.; Harackiewicz, Judith M.; Ledgerwood, Alison; Moss-Racusin, Corinne A.; Park, Lora E.; Perry, Sylvia P.; Ratliff, Kate A.; Rattan, Aneeta; Sanchez, Diana T.; Savani, Krishna; Sekaquaptewa, Denise; Smith, Jessi L.; Taylor, Valerie Jones; Thoman, Dustin B.; Wout, Daryl A.; Mabry, Patricia L.; Ressl, Susanne; Diekman, Amanda B.; Pestilli, Franco",PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,English,Article,,,,"[Murphy, Mary C.; Diekman, Amanda B.; Pestilli, Franco] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA; [Mejia, Amanda F.] Indiana Univ, Dept Stat, Bloomington, IN 47408 USA; [Mejia, Jorge] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA; [Yan, Xiaoran] Indiana Univ, Network Sci Inst, Bloomington, IN 47408 USA; [Cheryan, Sapna] Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA; [Dasgupta, Nilanjana] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA; [Destin, Mesmin; Perry, Sylvia P.] Northwestern Univ, Dept Psychol, Evanston, IL 60208 USA; [Destin, Mesmin; Perry, Sylvia P.] Northwestern Univ, Inst Policy Res, Evanston, IL 60208 USA; [Destin, Mesmin] Northwestern Univ, Sch Educ & Social Policy, Evanston, IL 60208 USA; [Fryberg, Stephanie A.; Sekaquaptewa, Denise] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA; [Garcia, Julie A.] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Dept Psychol & Child Dev, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA; [Haines, Elizabeth L.] William Paterson Univ, Dept Psychol, Wayne, NJ 07470 USA; [Harackiewicz, Judith M.] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, 1202 W Johnson St, Madison, WI 53706 USA; [Ledgerwood, Alison] Univ Calif Davis CA, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA; [Moss-Racusin, Corinne A.] Skidmore Coll, Dept Psychol, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 USA; [Park, Lora E.] Univ Buffalo State Univ New York, Dept Psychol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA; [Perry, Sylvia P.] Northeastern Univ, Dept Med Social Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA; [Ratliff, Kate A.] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA; [Rattan, Aneeta] London Business Sch, Org Behav, London NW1 4SA, England; [Sanchez, Diana T.] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Psychol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA; [Savani, Krishna] Nanyang Technol Univ, Leadership Management & Org, Singapore 639798, Singapore; [Smith, Jessi L.] Univ Colorado, Off Res, Colorado Springs, CO 80918 USA; [Smith, Jessi L.] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol, Colorado Springs, CO 80918 USA; [Taylor, Valerie Jones] Lehigh Univ, Dept Psychol, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA; [Taylor, Valerie Jones] Lehigh Univ, Africana Studies, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA; [Thoman, Dustin B.] San Diego State Univ, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA; [Wout, Daryl A.] CUNY John Jay Coll Criminal Justice, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10019 USA; [Mabry, Patricia L.] HealthPartners Inst, Res Div, Bloomington, MN 55425 USA; [Ressl, Susanne] Indiana Univ, Dept Mol & Cellular Biochem, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA; [Ressl, Susanne] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Neurosci, Austin, TX 78712 USA; [Pestilli, Franco] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA",112.0,0.0,NATL ACAD SCIENCES,0027-8424,,2020.0,117,39,24154.0,24164,10.1073/pnas.1921320117,,32929006.0,2021-01-27,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1837,SCOPUS,Agriculture Journals Covered by Directory of Open Access Journals: An Analytical Study,Open access journals-agriculture; Agriculture; DOAJ; Open access journals-impact factor; Open access licenses; Plagiarism,"With the advent of open access movement, open access journals (OAJs) being the prodigious source of academic and research information have been gaining significant magnitude. The electronic age has made it easier and more convenient than ever to break barriers to research information. The present study aims to study and analyse the status of 497 OAJs in Agriculture indexed in Directory of Open Access Journals. Specified traits such as Geographic and language wise distribution, coverage of Indexing/Abstracting databases, ranking of journals according to Impact Factor (IF), OA licensing model adopted, policy of plagiarism, visibility on social media and related issues of the OAJs in Agriculture are evaluated in the paper. Results indicated the dominance of De Gruyter Open as a publisher with highest number of OAJs, English as a content language, Indonesia with highest number of OAJs, Google scholar with highest journals indexed. The study observes the increasing migration of journals from commercial practice to OA. Frontiers in Plant Science found with highest Impact Factor among OAJs in Agriculture.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['agric'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],Muruli,DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Muruli] Natl Power Training Inst, Power Syst Training Inst, Bengaluru 560070, Karnataka, India",9.0,0.0,DEFENCE SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION DOCUMENTATION CENTRE,0974-0643,,2018.0,38,5,354.0,360,10.14429/djlit.38.5.13114,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1838,SCOPUS,Open access health and medicine journals - An informative study,Health Science; Medicine; Open access; Open access journals,"The main purpose of the study was to analyse various aspects of open access journals in the field of health and medicine registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The data were collected from the DOAJ and websites (homepages) of the health and medicine journals, in the month of December 2017. The quantitative method was applied for data analysis to reveal the findings. The results reveal that open access journals in the field of health and medicine are increasing at an exponential rate and currently, 636 health and medicine journals are registered in the DOAJ. These journals are published from the seventy five (75) countries by more than two hundred (200) publishers in the twenty six (26) languages of the world. The maximum number of journals is published from the United Kingdom (81, 12.74%), by the BioMed Central (44, 6.92%), and in the English language (565, 88.83%). The results also reveal that the majority of the health and medicine journals (396, 62.26%) does not charge publication fee and adopt the peer-review system (99.84%) to evaluate the articles before publication in the journal. The figures may not represent the actual number of the open access health and medicine journals available online as the scope of the study is restricted to the Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ) only. © 2017, Rabiya Mushtaq, Fayaz Ahmad Loan, and Mufazil Ali.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Mushtaq R., Loan F.A., Ali M.",Webology,English,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,University of Tehran,1735188X,0,2017.0,14,2,90.0,100,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1843,SCOPUS,Impact of open access resources on library and information science students in India,E-Resources;  Internet;  Library Science;  Open access resources;  Students;  User Study,"A study was conducted to investigate the accessibility and use of open access resources used in the library and Information Science PG students in Alagappa University DDE. In this paper, an attempt has been made to study the awareness of open access resources. The methodology adopted for the study surveyed in which questionnaires, interviews, and observations were used in a collection of the data. A total of 39 respondents participated in the study. It was concluded that most of the open access resources were not aware of most of the resources available hence they could not access and use them effectively. This study shows that majority of the student's impact of the open access resources in that 16 (41%) of the frequency are male while 23(59%) are female in the use of open access resources in distance education students in Alagappa University.Show that 39(100%) respondents are Awareness of open access resources available from the library. Show that the maximum learning of open access resources 16(41%) respondents information access in the home, followed by library 11(28.2%), that the maximum Level of satisfaction of open access resources 25(64.10%) respondents information access in Satisfied,that the17 (43.58%) use for the open access resources in 1 to 3 years. © 2018 Library Philosophy and Practice.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['socscie'],['othergroup'],['IND'],"Muthuvennila S., Thanuskodi S.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2018.0,2018,0,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1844,SCOPUS,User perception on open access resources among college students in India: A survey,Database and subject gateway; Institutional repository; Open access resources; Students; User study,"A study was conducted to investigate the accessibility and use of perception on open access resources used in the library and Information Science students in Idhaya College for Women. In this paper, an attempt has been made to study the awareness of open access resources. The methodology adopted for the study surveyed in which questionnaires, interviews, and observations were used in a collection of the data. A total of 131 respondents participated in the study. 80(61.07%) of the frequency are UG Students while 51(38.93%) are PG Students in the use of open access resources in Idhaya College for Women. show that the Using of open access resources 32(24.43%) respondents information access for Research purpose only. Show that the frequency-wise respondents used in open access resources in daily used in 25(19.08%). Show the Time Spend for the open access resources respondents used in Less than 2 hours used in 29(22.14%).Show that the used in open access resources in a maximum of respondents daily used in home 32(24.43%).: Show that the Problems of used in open access resources in a maximum of respondents Privacy problem faced in 27(20.61%),UG students access the problems of 20(20.62%) PG students access the problems of 7(20.59%).Show that the Storage of open access resources in the maximum of respondents PPT in 42(32.06%), followed by Word Document 28(21.37%).Show that the Impact of using open access resources of respondents Provides free online access to the necessary literature for my research strongly Agree for the 32 (24.43%) Agree for 46(35.11%). © 2019 Library Philosophy and Practice.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['socscie'],['othergroup'],['IND'],"Muthuvennila S., Thanuskodi S.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2019.0,2019,0,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1852,SCOPUS,Open Access Journal Policies: A Systematic Analysis of Radiology Journals,Open access; copyright; journal policies; archiving,"Objective: The open access movement has pushed for greater access to scientific knowledge by expanding access to scientific journal articles. There is limited information about the extent to which open access policies have been adopted by radiology journals. We performed a systematic analysis to ascertain the proportion of radiology journals with open access options. Materials and Methods: A search was performed with the assistance of a clinical informationist. Full and mixed English-language diagnostic and interventional radiology Web of Science journals (impact factors > 1.0) were included. Nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, physics, and solicitation-only journals were excluded. Primary outcome was open access option (yes or no) with additional outcomes including presence or absence of embargo, complete or partial copyright transfer, publication fees, and self-archiving policies. Secondary outcomes included journal citations, journal impact factors, immediacy, Eigenfactor, and article influence scores. Independent double readings were performed with differences resolved by consensus, supplemented by contacting editorial staff at each journal. Results: In all, 125 journals were identified; review yielded 49 journals (39%, mean impact factor of 2.61). Thirty-six of the journals had open access options (73.4%), and four journals were exclusively open access (8.2%). Twelve-month embargoes were most commonly cited (90.6%) with 28.6% of journals stating that they did not require a complete transfer of copyright. Prices for open access options ranged from $750 to $4,000 (median $3,000). No statistically significant differences were found in journal impact measures comparing journals with open access options to journals without open access options. Conclusions: Diagnostic and interventional radiology journals have widely adopted open access options with a few radiology journals being exclusively open access.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Narayan, Anand; Lobner, Katie; Fritz, Jan",JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Narayan, Anand] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA; [Lobner, Katie] Johns Hopkins Univ, Welch Med Lib, Baltimore, MD USA; [Fritz, Jan] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD USA",12.0,2.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,1546-1440,,2018.0,15,2,237.0,242,10.1016/j.jacr.2017.10.012,,29242023.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1853,SCOPUS,Issues and challenges in researchers' adoption of open access and institutional repositories: a contextual study of a university repository,,"Introduction. This paper presents the issues and challenges faced by a university library in encouraging academics and researchers to adopt open access, specifically with respect to depositing publications in the institutional repository Method. Interviews were conducted with academics and researchers about their awareness of open access and their use of the university repository. An action research approach was used to address issues on a continual basis, and redesign the repository based on the findings. Analysis. The interview data were analysed using thematic content analysis, and the repository data were analysed using heuristic evaluation Results. Results show that researchers lack awareness of open access and its value, and that there is also confusion about publishers' copyright policies and researcher reputation. The lack of visibility and usability of the library-managed institutional repository was found to be an issue, as well as the need for subject repositories. The results informed a redesign of the repository and informed the library's strategies to promote scholarly communication literacy. Conclusion. Whilst librarians have been advocates of open access, researchers' understanding of it is still limited;  they have other pressures in regard to their publishing outputs, which also limits their adoption of open access practices.",['openaccess'],['interview'],"['hum', 'socscie']",['researcher'],['NZL'],"Narayan, Bhuva;  Luca, Edward",INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL,English,Article;  Proceedings Paper,"Conference on Research Applications, Information and Library Studies (RAILS)","DEC 06-08, 2016","Wellington, NEW ZEALAND","[Narayan, Bhuva] UTS, Sch Commun, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia;  [Luca, Edward] Univ Sydney Lib, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia",51.0,2.0,UNIV SHEFFIELD DEPT INFORMATION STUDIES,1368-1613,,2017.0,22,4,,,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0
1855,SCOPUS,PubMed Central Canada: Beyond an Open Access Repository?,PubMed Central Canada; CIHR policy; PMC; UKPMC; Open access,"PubMed Central Canada (PMC Canada) represents a partnership between the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the National Research Council's Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (NRC-CISTI), and the National Library of Medicine of the US. The present study was done to gauge faculty awareness about the CIHR Policy on Access to Research and about their familiarity with PubMed Central Canada, the federal open access repository. Researchers were asked to rank search and browse features that would be helpful while using PMC Canada. The study recommends academic librarians to play an active role in promoting open access repositories and informing faculty members about policies on access to research as stipulated by grant funding agencies.",['openpolicies'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['CAN'],"Nariani, Rajiv",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"York Univ, Steacie Sci & Engn Lib, York Univ Lib, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada",6.0,1.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2013.0,39,1,76.0,83,10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.005,,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1859,SCOPUS,Open Access of Publications by Veterinary Faculty in the United States and Canada,communication; research; open access; publishing economics,"The free availability of full-text veterinary publications in MEDLINE-indexed journals by US and Canadian veterinary faculty from 2006-7 was determined. Additionally, publishing databases were searched to obtain general statistics on veterinary publishing. A survey of institutional initiatives to promote open-access journals and institutional repositories was also performed. Veterinary faculty published a total of 4,872 articles indexed by MEDLINE in 679 different journals. Of these articles, 1,334 (27%) were available as free full text and were published in 245 different journals. Although 51 veterinary-specific journals offering immediate and free full-text access were identified, few articles in this study appeared in these titles. Rather, most free scholarly articles by veterinary faculty appeared in journals with an embargo period. Academic veterinary institutions may want to recommend acceptance of alternate forms of information dissemination (such as open-access journals and journals published only digitally) to encourage greater global dissemination of their research findings. The promotion and use of digital institutional repositories is also an area for future investment and warrants additional research.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'survey']",['med'],['publisher'],"['CAN', 'USA']","Nault, Andre J.",JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION,English,Article,,,,"Univ Minnesota, Vet Med Lib, St Paul, MN 55108 USA",26.0,5.0,UNIV TORONTO PRESS INC,0748-321X,,2011.0,38,1,33.0,41,10.3138/jvme.38.1.33,,21805933.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1861,SCOPUS,Open Access to Scholarly Communication in India : Current Status,Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ);  India;  Journal;  Open Access;  Open Access;  OpenDOAR;  Web of Science,"This study aims to examine the growth and development of Open Access (OA) initiatives in India. The study is based on a brief survey of literature and data collected from Web of Science ™-Core Collection, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR). This study also looks at India's position in the global Open Access in terms of its ranking with regards to the total OA Journals, total research output, OA gold papers. Study reveals that inspite of its relatively lower position in OA gold papers, India's position in terms of share of gold OA publications is relatively higher than other leading countries of the world. Some Government departments like University Grants Commission (UGC) and governing bodies of the major research councils, such as Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), have mandated OA and self-archiving for their journals. Despite the large amount of scholarly research literature produced in India, its position in terms of quality research is missing from the global stage, largely because most of the research literature is published in local journals, as well as the quality of research output is often below the global standard. A radical reform is, therefore, needed in OA scholarly publishing system to address these issues. © 2018 IEEE.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['IND'],"Nazim M., Ahmadi A.","IEEE 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services, ETTLIS 2018",English,Conference Paper,"5th IEEE International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services, ETTLIS 2018",21 February 2018 through 23 February 2018,0,,,2.0,Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.,0,9781538608289,2018.0,0,0,202.0,208,10.1109/ETTLIS.2018.8485196,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1862,SCOPUS,Acceptance and adoption of open access publishing by researchers in India,India;  Scholarly communication;  Open access journals;  Open access;  Self-archiving;  Indian Institutes of Technology,"Purpose This paper aims to examine the level of open access (OA) adoption by researchers in Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), identify predictors of OA status (OA vs non-OA) and explore the availability of OA versions of the articles and venues used by the researches for hosting of their articles. Design/methodology/approach Articles contributed by the researchers in IITs were searched using an advance search option in the Web of Science Core collection database. The search was restricted to journal articles published in English language in the year 2015. Of the 10,049 articles retrieved, 1,023 (10 per cent of the total) were chosen randomly. Articles selected after randomizations were exported to MS Excel for further analyses. Title of each article was searched in Google Scholar to assess its OA availability and venues used by the author for self-archiving. Details of ten articles could not be traced in Google Scholar, and they were excluded from the analysis. Based on the analysis of URLs, all OA articles were classified into three categories: gold OA, green OA and both gold and green OA. The OA articles available through green route were further classified into six categories based on the analysis of the websites and the self-archiving venues used by the authors: institutional repository, subject repository, researcher or scholar's website, organizational website, ResearchGate and other websites. Findings Of 1,013 articles examined, OA versions were found for 68.70 per cent of articles. Of the total OA articles, 10.26 per cent articles were available through gold OA and 58.44 per cent were available through green OA, while remaining 6.21 per cent were available via both gold and green OA routes. Although researchers use different venues for self-archiving their articles, ResearchGate and institutional repositories are the most preferred choices by the researchers in IITs. Researchers in IITs are seemed to be unaware of the self-archiving policies of publishers, as more than 85 per cent self-archived articles were found as final PDF versions that are normally not allowed by the publishers. Research limitations/implications - This study is limited to IITs, but it offers theoretical implications for extending its scope to different subjects and institutes. The findings of the study may be useful for the publishers and institutions for formulating OA policies. The findings of the study might be used for raising awareness of OA among researchers and encouraging them to contribute their research outcome in OA outlets. Originality/value - This is the first study in India focusing on the availability of OA research.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['engtech'],['researcher'],['IND'],"Nazim, Mohammad;  Zia, Sana",GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE MEMORY AND COMMUNICATION,English,Article,,,,"[Nazim, Mohammad;  Zia, Sana] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India",56.0,2.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2514-9342,,2019.0,68,1-2,148.0,158,10.1108/GKMC-09-2018-0077,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1863,SCOPUS,Use of Open Access Publishing by Researchers: An Analysis of Open Access Availability of Research Literature in the field of Digital Library,Open access scholarly communication; Digital library; Self-archiving; Gold OA; Green OA,"This paper aims to examine the availability of Open Access (OA) research literature in the field of digital library. In order to analyse the availability of OA research literature in the field of digital library, a search was conducted on Web of Science's Core collection database on June 11, 2019. In response to a topic search TS = Digital Library using the advanced search option, 849 articles were retrieved. Of the 849 articles examined, the details of 26 articles were not found in the Google Scholar. Therefore, 823 articles were selected for further analyses. After examining the Websites of OA articles, they were classified into three categories: gold OA, green OA, and both gold and green OA. Furthermore, all the green OA articles were systematically organised into six groups for the examination of the self-archiving venues used by the researchers for self-archiving. Out of 823 articles analysed, OA versions were found for 64.76 per cent of articles. This study found that 26.68 per cent of OA articles were available through gold OA and 60.39 per cent articles were available through green OA, while 36.53 per cent articles were accessible via both OA journals and self-archiving (gold & green OA). Although researchers used various OA platforms for self-archiving of their research work, publishers' Websites were found as the most preferred choice for self-archiving of research work by the authors in the field of digital library. Computer Science discipline has the highest share of OA copies available through self-archiving. However, it is important to point out that more than 78 per cent of self-archived articles were found as the final publisher's PDF versions of the article which publishers never allow for self-archiving.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['hum'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Nazim, Mohammad; Zia, Sana",DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Nazim, Mohammad; Zia, Sana] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Aligarh 202001, Uttar Pradesh, India",36.0,0.0,DEFENCE SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION DOCUMENTATION CENTRE,0974-0643,,2020.0,40,1,366.0,373,10.14429/djlit.40.1.15045,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1877,SCOPUS,Balancing ideology and feasibility: A case study on adopting and evaluating open access publishing models for a society journal within philosophy,0,"Introduction. Open access, the notion that research output, such as journal articles, should be freely accessible to readers on the Web, is arguably in the best interest of science. In this article, we (1) describe in-depth how a society-owned philosophy journal, Nordic Wittgenstein Review, evaluated various publishing models and made an informed decision on how best to adopt open access publishing for the journal, and (2) develop and implement measures to evaluate the chosen model. Method. This case study uses reports from editorial board members (mainly the editor-in-chief), Web access metrics as well as a Web survey to the journal community as well as the wider philosophy research community. Analysis. After two years as a delayed open access journal with commercial publishers, the journal made a decision to become an independent scholar-run journal without fees to readers or authors, and which would rely mainly on volunteer effort with university faculty support. This decision was made after evaluating various publishing scenarios and negotiating with potential publishers. This study breaks down what is involved in terms of input and effort compared to having handed over the publishing of the journal to an external publisher. Conclusions. For an open access journal choosing between publishing models, elements of ideology and feasibility need to be balanced. This article provides an overview of relevant elements and some means to judge feasibility in journal publishing endeavours. © the authors, 2017.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['hum'],['publisher'],"['NOR', 'SWE', 'DNK', 'FIN']","Neuman Y., Laakso M.",Information Research,English,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,University of Sheffield,13681613,0,2017.0,22,4,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1881,SCOPUS,Open access journal publishing: the views of some of the world's senior authors,journals; journal publishers; free publications; information media,"Purpose - The main aims of the survey were to determine: the volume of open access (OA) publishing; what the attitudes of authors to publishing in OA journals were; and what authors felt were the implications of OA publishing. Design/methodology/approach - The questionnaire survey was administered on behalf of Ciber by NOP and the sample derived from mailing lists supplied by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI (R)). Nearly, 4,000 authors responded. Findings - The detailed results of a major survey of the views and experiences of nearly 4,000 senior authors in regard to OA publishing. A number of statistical analyses were employed to drill down into the data to obtain an understanding of the figures. Views were divided sharply along subject and geographical lines, demonstrating the need to survey large and robust samples of authors. Research limitations/implications - A snapshot study which while providing robust data requires a follow-up study to monitor opinion shifts in this fast-changing area. Practical implications - Highlights the knowledge gap that exists between authors and publishers. Originality/value - One of the biggest, if not the biggest, author survey conducted into scholarly publishing and OA publishing.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Nicholas, D; Huntington, P; Rowlands, I",JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION,English,Article,,,,"UCL, Sch Lib Archive & Informat Studies, Ctr Informat Behav & Evaluat Res, London, England",15.0,33.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0022-0418,,2005.0,61,4,497.0,519,10.1108/00220410510607499,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1882,SCOPUS,Open access in context: a user study,Electronic publishing; Electronic journals; Transactional analysis,"Purpose - The purpose of this research is to examine the impact on usage of the journal Nucleic Acids Research (NAR) moving to an open access model. A major objective was to examine the impact of open access in the context of other initiatives that have improved accessibility to scholarly journals. The study also aims to demonstrate the potential of deep log analysis for monitoring change in usage over time. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered from the logs for the period 2003-June 2005 and analysed using deep log methods. The data were analysed to provide the following information on use: type of item viewed; usage over time; usage for individual journal issues; usage per type of article; age of article. Usage analyses were further examined with regard to the following user characteristics: subscriber/non-subscriber; referrer link employed, organisational affiliation; geographical location. Findings - The analysis showed that the rise in use of NAR over the survey period (140 per cent) could largely be attributed to the opening up of the site to search engines and that the move to OA had a relatively small influence on driving usage up further (less than 10 per cent). Originality/value - The study for the first time thoroughly analyses the usage data of a significant experimental open access journal and reveals the huge impact of search engines on driving up usage.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Nicholas, David; Huntington, Paul; Jainali, Hamid R.",JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION,English,Article,,,,"[Nicholas, David; Huntington, Paul; Jainali, Hamid R.] UCL, Sch Lib Arch & Informat Studies, London, England",18.0,11.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0022-0418,,2007.0,63,6,853.0,878,10.1108/00220410710836394,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1894,SCOPUS,Open access journals: A pathway to scientific information in Iran,Iran;  Open access;  Persian-language;  Scientific journals,"This paper reviews the movement of open access (OA) journals in Iran, investigates and compares the influence of Iranian journals in terms of citation ranking, using the Citation Indexes of Thomson-ISI. There has been growth in the number of open access journals in Iran. The advantages of open access for Iranian researchers are: (i) provides access to other research done in their research fields;  (ii) speeds up scholarly communication and scientific dialog between researchers;  (iii) provides greater visibility and possibly greater impact, although only if open access to the full text is provided. Authors' experiences and motivations have a vital and key role to play in open access. This study indicates that for linguistic reasons, Iranian (Persian-language) journals may not receive and attract the attention that they deserve from the international scientific community. Since there has been little or no discussion in the literature on the impact that the increasing use of OA journals has on scientific production and academic institutions in developing countries, this case study of Iranian experience should be useful for developing countries.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['IRN'],Noruzi A.,"Openness in Digital Publishing: Awareness, Discovery and Access - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2007",English,Conference Paper,"11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2007",13 June 2007 through 15 June 2007,Vienna,,,2.0,0,0,9783854372929,2007.0,0,0,341.0,347,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1897,SCOPUS,A model for open access institutional repositories usage for university libraries in Ghana,open access; institutional repositories (IRs); usage; university libraries; Technology Acceptance Model; Ghana,"The aim of this article was to develop a model for the usage of Open Access Institutional Repositories (OAIR) in university libraries in Ghana. The article adopted the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which was then modified to fit the study. The variables were adapted to improve the fit between data and the theoretical model, keeping the characteristics of TAM. Accessibility, availability and visibility were proposed in addition to the conventional variables of TAM. Positivist paradigm, quantitative methods research and survey design were used for the study. Simple random sampling and stratified random sampling were the sampling procedures and methods employed. A total of 998 respondents completed the questionnaires distributed. The questionnaire was used as a research instrument to gather relevant data for the study. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multinomial logistic regression and Confirmatory Factor Analysis [CFA], using structural equation modelling [SEM]) were used as statistical tools to analyse the data. The study developed an OAIR Usage Model, which would be instrumental in the usage of OAIR in university libraries in Ghana. The model will enhance both user satisfaction and intention to reuse the OAIR, and make OAIR research outputs available, accessible and visible. This article adds to the body of literature on OAIR, as it is used in university libraries.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['GHA'],"Ntim, Kwame Kodua; Fombad, Madeleine",INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Ntim, Kwame Kodua] Univ South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa; [Fombad, Madeleine] Univ South Africa, Dept Informat Sci, Pretoria, South Africa",62.0,0.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0266-6669,,,,,,,10.1177/0266666920937343,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1900,SCOPUS,Open Science Practices in Clinical Psychology Journals: An Audit Study,open science; reproducibility; transparency; audit; journal,"We conducted an audit of 60 clinical psychology journals, covering the first 2 quartiles by impact factor on Web of Science. We evaluated editorial policies in 5 domains crucial to reproducibility and transparency (prospective registration, data sharing, preprints, endorsement of reporting guidelines and conflict of interest [COI] disclosure). We examined implementation in a randomly selected cross-sectional sample of 201 articles published in 2017 in the best practice journals, defined as having explicit supportive policies in 4 out of 5 domains. Our findings showed that 15 journals cited prospective registration. 40 data sharing, 15 explicitly permitted preprints, 28 endorsed reporting guidelines, and 52 had mandatory policies for COI disclosure. Except for COI disclosure, few policies were mandatory: registration in 15 journals, data sharing in 1, and reporting guidelines for randomized trials in 18 and for meta-analyses in 15. Seventeen journals were identified as best practice. An analysis of recent articles showed extremely low compliance for prospective registration (3% articles) and data sharing (2%). One preprint could be identified. Reporting guidelines were endorsed in 19% of the articles, though for most articles this domain was rated as nonapplicable. Only half of the articles included a COI disclosure. Desired open science policies should become clear and mandatory. and their enforcement streamlined by reducing the multiplicity of guidelines and templates.",['openpolicies'],['interview'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Nutu, Daria; Gentili, Claudio; Naudet, Florian; Cristea, Ioana A.",JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Nutu, Daria] Babes Bolyai Univ, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Cluj Napoca, Romania; [Gentili, Claudio] Univ Padua, Dept Gen Psychol, Padua, Italy; [Naudet, Florian] Univ Rennes, Adult Psychiat Dept, Rennes, France; [Naudet, Florian] Univ Hosp Ctr Rennes, Clin Invest Ctr, Rennes, France; [Cristea, Ioana A.] Babes Bolyai Univ, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Republicii 37 St, Cluj Napoca 400015, Romania; [Cristea, Ioana A.] Stanford Univ, Meta Res Innovat Ctr Stanford METRICS, Stanford, CA 94305 USA",21.0,3.0,AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC,0021-843X,,2019.0,128,6,510.0,516,10.1037/abn0000414,,31368730.0,2021-01-27,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1905,SCOPUS,Publishing habits and perceptions of open access publishing and public access amongst clinical and research fellows,0,"Introduction: Open access (OA) publishing rates have risen dramatically in the biomedical sciences in the past decade. However, few studies have focused on the publishing activities and attitudes of early career researchers. The aim of this study was to examine current publishing activities of clinical and research fellows and their perceptions of OA publishing and public access. Methods: This study employed a mixed methods approach. Data on publications authored by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center fellows between 2013 and 2018 were collected via an in-house author profile system and citation indexes. Journals were categorized according to SHERPA/RoMEO classifications. In-person and telephone interviews were conducted with fifteen fellows to discern their perceptions of OA publishing. Results: The total percentage of fellows’ publications that were freely available OA was 28.6%, with a relatively flat rate between 2013 and 2018. Publications with fellows as first authors were significantly more likely to be OA. Fellows cited high article processing charges (APCs) and perceived lack of journal quality or prestige as barriers to OA publishing. Fellows generally expressed support for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access policy. Conclusions: While the fellows in this study acknowledged the potential of OA to aid in research dissemination, they also expressed hesitation to publish OA related to confusion surrounding legitimate OA and predatory publications and frustration with APCs. Fellows supported the NIH public access policy and accepted it as part of their research process. Health sciences information professionals could potentially leverage this acceptance of public access to advocate for OA publishing. © 2020, Medical Library Association. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'biblio']",['med'],['researcher'],['USA'],"O’hanlon R., McSweeney J., Stabler S.",Journal of the Medical Library Association,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,Medical Library Association,15365050,0,2020.0,108,1,47.0,58,10.5195/jmla.2020.751,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1908,SCOPUS,Attitude towards the use of open access scholarly publications: The position of LIS lecturers in Southern Nigeria,Attitude; Frequency; Infrastructure; LIS; Open access publications; Regression analysis,"The study examined Library and Information Science lecturers' attitude towards open access scholarly publications in Southern Nigeria. Consequently, three objectives were set out for the study. The descriptive survey design was employed and the questionnaire entitled Attitude towards Open Access to Scholarly Publications Questionnaire (AOASPQ) was administered on the entire population of 141 LIS lecturers from which 114 responses were successfully collected. The data collected were analyzed using frequency counts, percentages, mean and regression analysis. The study revealed that though the level of usage of open access publications by both senior and junior LIS lecturers is high, usage by junior lecturers are a bit higher. That notwithstanding, both cadre of lecturers exhibit similar positive attitude towards open access publications and this situation was found to account for 20.20% of their tendency to use open access publications. The study recommends that management should equip schools with the enabling infrastructure and that academic reward systems should be designed to encourage open access publications. Tenure and promotion review committee members should have a change of attitude in evaluating publications in open access. © Medwell Journals, 2013.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['NGA'],Obuh A.O.,Social Sciences (Pakistan),English,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,0,18185800,0,2013.0,8,2,153.0,159,10.3923/sscience.2013.106.159,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1913,SCOPUS,Study of Predatory Open Access Nursing Journals,Editorial standards; ethical issues; nursing journals; predatory journals; publishing,"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify predatory journals in nursing, describe their characteristics and editorial standards, and document experiences of authors, peer reviewers, and editors affiliated with these journals. Design: Using two sources that list predatory journals, the research team created a list of nursing journals. In Phase One, the team collected data on characteristics of predatory nursing journals such as types of articles published, article processing charge, and peer review process. In Phase Two, the team surveyed a sample of authors, reviewers, and editors to learn more about their experiences with their affiliated journals. Methods: Data from the review of predatory nursing journals were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Written comments were summarized and categorized. Findings: There were 140 predatory nursing journals from 75 publishers. Most journals were new, having been inaugurated in the past 1 to 2 years. One important finding was that many journals only published one or two volumes and then either ceased publishing or published fewer issues and articles after the first volume. Journal content varied widely, and some journals published content from dentistry and medicine, as well as nursing. Qualitative findings from the surveys confirmed previously published anecdotal evidence, including authors selecting journals based on spam emails and inability to halt publication of a manuscript, despite authors’ requests to do so. Conclusions: Predatory journals exist in nursing and bring with them many of the “red flags” that have been noted in the literature, including lack of transparency about editorial processes and misleading information promoted on websites. The number of journals is high enough to warrant concern in the discipline about erosion of our scholarly literature. Clinical Relevance: Nurses rely on the published literature to provide evidence for high-quality, safe care that promotes optimal patient outcomes. Research published in journals that do not adhere to the highest standards of publishing excellence have the potential to compromise nursing scholarship and is an area of concern. © 2016 Sigma Theta Tau International",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'biblio']",['med'],"['researcher', 'publisher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Oermann M.H., Conklin J.L., Nicoll L.H., Chinn P.L., Ashton K.S., Edie A.H., Amarasekara S., Budinger S.C.",Journal of Nursing Scholarship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,48.0,Blackwell Publishing Ltd,15276546,0,2016.0,48,6,624.0,632,10.1111/jnu.12248,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1914,SCOPUS,The roles of academic libraries in propagating open science: A qualitative literature review,academic libraries; open access; open science; open source; scientific data; scientific research,"This study investigates the roles of academic libraries in propagating Open Science. The study is a qualitative survey based on literature review. Various definitions of open science from different scholars and schools of thought were examined. Research articles on the effects of open science on research and the place of academic libraries in scientific research were reviewed. Open science enhances collaborations and sharing of resources among researchers. Metadata related activities are more prevalent due to open science. Open science has increased the relevance of science to our environment and world issues like privacy and the rightful author of scientific data are still some of the challenges facing open science. Academic libraries continue to take steps to be involved as key players in the propagation of open science through advocacy, building of institutional data repositories and serving as hubs for scientific collaboration among others. Academic libraries have to do more in the area of advocacy and provision of data repositories. © 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.","['openaccess', 'opendata', 'openmethod', 'openevaluation', 'openpolicies', 'opensoftware', 'opentools', 'openeducation']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Ogungbeni J.I., Obiamalu A.R., Ssemambo S., Bazibu C.M.",Information Development,English,Article,0,0,0,,,7.0,SAGE Publications Ltd,2666669,0,2018.0,34,2,113.0,121,10.1177/0266666916678444,,,2021-01-27,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1920,SCOPUS,Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?—a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology,Citation; Impact Factor; Open Access; Predatory; Pseudojournal; Publishing,"Introduction: The advent of open access publishing has allowed for unrestricted and rapid knowledge dissemination and can generate higher citation levels. However, the establishment of predatory journals exploits this model and may lead to publication of non-peer reviewed work. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics and trends of indexed publications in paediatric urology. The primary outcomes were to compare open access vs non-open access publishing. The secondary outcome was to assess whether any open access publications in this cohort could be classified as predatory based on journal data basing and external peer review policies. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase reviews were carried out for any publication using the terms ‘p(a)ediatric urology’ over a 5-year period (October 2012–2017). These publications were individually accessed, assessed for relevance and cross-checked using the ISI Web of Knowledge Journal Citation Report. Bibliometric data, journal type and access model were all individually assessed, ranked and compared using descriptive and non-parametric statistical methods. Results: From an initial total of 4075 indexed publications, 2244 journal publications across 51 countries were included based on relevance, of which 611 were open access. Open access journals were significantly more likely to publish basic science/laboratory versus clinical publications (10.9% vs 3.3%). They were more likely have higher average citations/publication (17 vs. 8), but there was no difference between open and closed journal impact factors (3.1 vs. 2.7). The overall rate of open access, indexed publications that were not peer reviewed and/or included in open access databases was 6.5% Discussion: The overall numbers of paediatric urological articles appearing on PubMed between 2012 and 2017 have increased by approximately 75%, while the number of open access articles has remained relatively static (25%). Researchers may prefer to publish in specific journals to disseminate results to a particular audience or fear in the current climate that an open access journal may not be considered legitimate, and possibly even predatory, thus having a negative impact on the data and the author's reputation. The impact factor status and route/method of publication may be less important. Conclusions: Open access, peer reviewed publishing allows rapid international knowledge dissemination. The exact objective definition of what constitutes a predatory journal remains controversial. We have identified a time-stable prevalence of 6.5% open access publications that could meet proposed criteria for a ‘borderline/predatory journal’; however, this should not influence the decision to publish in open access journals. © 2019 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"O'Kelly F., Fernandez N., Koyle M.A.",Journal of Pediatric Urology,English,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,Elsevier Ltd,14775131,0,2019.0,15,2,1590.0,159.e7,10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.019,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1921,SCOPUS,Academic social networks and Open Access: French researchers at the crossroads,Academic social networks; Exploratory survey; France; Open access; Open science; Perception; Researchers,"Researchers benefit from an increasing array of tools to enhance direct communication and the dissemination of their research findings. These include Open Access repositories, Open Access journals, or hybrid publishing. For some years, researchers have been using new ways to communicate and share their work by using academic social networks. In an attempt to foster the development of Open Access in France, the French consortium COUPERIN (Unified Consortium of Higher Education and Research Organizations for Access to Numerical Publications) proposed that academic social networks could be used to convince researchers of becoming more involved in Open Access. To test this hypothesis, a nationwide survey was launched in 2014 to explore whether and how these academic social networks are used to share content, but also how they compare to other Open Access classic tools. Within a month (20 May to 20 June), 1,898 researchers answered this 28-question survey. It was fully completed by 1,698 of them. This provides COUPERIN with considerable data for analysis. The respondents roughly reflect the composition of the French academic community in terms of gender and research fields, with a slight overrepresentation of young researchers/PhD candidates. This survey does not, however, cover the in-depth opinions of researchers on Open Access and academic social networks. It therefore only presents general tendencies. Nonetheless, the survey gives many indications as to how researchers apply Open Access. In addition, it shows how they feel about the usefulness of these networks compared to repositories when efficiently disseminating their work. This survey also takes the differences between disciplines into account and characterizes behaviour and opinions according to the different disciplinary communities and their research practices. Finally, this survey allows us to define the main characteristics of a tool which could meet French researchers’ needs for scientific communication. The components of such an ideal tool dedicated to Open Science could include efficient repositories to easily disseminate work and improve visibility, a sharing network and the scientific stamp of peer-review. © the Author(s).",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['FRA'],Okret-Manville C.,LIBER Quarterly,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,"Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services",14355205,0,2016.0,25,3,118.0,135,10.18352/lq.10131,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1922,SCOPUS,Whose infrastructure? Towards inclusive and collaborative knowledge infrastructures in open science,Collaboration; Inclusive knowledge infrastructures; Intersectionality; Open science; Participatory design; Research tools,"The current discourse around Open Science has tended to focus on the creation of new technological platforms and tools to facilitate sharing and reuse of a wide range of research outputs. There is an assumption that once these new tools are in place, researchers-and at times, members of the general public-will be able to participate in the creation of scientific knowledge in more accessible and efficient ways. While many of these new tools have indeed assisted in the ease of collaboration through online spaces and mechanisms, the narrowness of how infrastructure is imagined by open science practitioners tends to put the use of technology ahead of the issues that people are actually trying to solve and fails to acknowledge the systemic constraints that exist within and between some communities. Drawing on an analytical framework grounded in Black feminist intersectionality (Noble 2016), this paper highlights the need for more inclusive knowledge infrastructures, particularly in the context of sustainable development. Three case studies from the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network (OCSDNet), are outlined in order to illustrate the importance of moving beyond a definition of infrastructure as merely a technical or physical entity. These cases, arising from research conducted in South Africa, Brazil, and the Caribbean, demonstrate how more sustainable and nuanced forms of collaboration and participation may be enabled through broader understandings of knowledge infrastructures. This paper further argues that leveraging the feminist concept of intersectionality when conceptualizing the development of knowledge infrastructures could be one way to move from narrow assumptions about standardized knowledge “users” towards more inclusive reimaginings of how knowledges can be produced and shared via networked technologies. © 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing - Connecting the Knowledge Commons: From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure, ELPUB 2018. All rights reserved.",['opentools'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['unisupportstaff'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Okune A., Hillyer R., Albornoz D., Posada A., Chan L.","22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing - Connecting the Knowledge Commons: From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure, ELPUB 2018",English,Conference Paper,"22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing - Connecting the Knowledge Commons: From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure, ELPUB 2018",22 June 2018 through 24 June 2018,0,,,0.0,OpenEdition Press,0,9791036538025,2020.0,0,0,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1923,SCOPUS,The possibilities of Open Science for knowledge transfer in the science-policy interface,Scholarly communication; Science and policy-making,"This paper explores the possible role of Open Science in the knowledge transfer between research and policy, focusing on its potential use by scientific councillors at Estonian ministries. Qualitative interviews with scientific councillors show that they perceive their role as intermediaries between research and policy and focus their work on improving the quality of research commissioned by their ministry. This process, for them, involves using existing academic articles and datasets to which, however, they lack official access. We show that Open Science can contribute to knowledge transfer if there are knowledge brokers in public sector organizations. © The Author(s).","['openaccess', 'opendata']",['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['policy'],['EST'],"Olesk A., Kaal E., Toom K.",Journal of Science Communication,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati,18242049,0,2019.0,18,3,0.0,0,10.22323/2.18030203,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1927,SCOPUS,Encouraging Citizen Motivation of Crowd Science: A Case Study of Kyoto Open Science Activities,Citizen science; Crowd science; Crowdfunding; Crowdsourcing; Open science,"Information and communication technology (ICT) has been changing infrastructures of scientific information, discussion, and collaboration style. In this new trend so-called open science, we focus on collaborative work between citizens and scientists. In the present article, we call this collaboration crowd science. We hypothesized that an ideal collaborative relation can be developed from three elements: selections of appropriate topics of scientific projects, appropriate locations and opportunities for citizen-scientist interactions, and well-organized methodologies of the collaborations. To practice and develop this style of the crowd science, we have been organizing two annual workshops, the KYOTO Open Science Workshop in 2016 and 2017. The workshops were held at MTRL KYOTO outside universities, and were designed both for researchers and citizens. In the second workshop in 2017, we employed so-called ideathon technique to develop a survey project of alien slugs as an example. In the ideathon, participants proposed feasible plans to enhance the project, and researchers would not come up with such plans. Questionnaire results showed that 73% of participants had been motivated to the crowd science. We found that the above three fundamental elements induced citizens collaborative motivation to crowd science. We will continue this attempt to build a collaborative relationship between academic experts and citizens who participate in science. © 2017 IEEE.","['openparticipation', 'openmethod']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'practitioner']",['JPN'],"Ono E., Ikkatai Y., Enoto T.","Proceedings - 2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, IIAI-AAI 2017",English,Conference Paper,"6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, IIAI-AAI 2017",9 July 2017 through 3 July 2017,0,,,0.0,Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.,0,9781538606216,2017.0,0,0,116.0,119,10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2017.175,,,2021-01-27,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1928,SCOPUS,Open Research Data in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Bibliometric Study Using the Data Citation Index,Research Data; Research Data Management; Open Access; Scholarly publishing; Sub-Saharan Africa; Electronic publishing,"The purpose of the study was to explore the status of research data sharing among researchers in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and internationally. Relevant data was extracted from the Data Citation Index (DCI) using an advanced search strategy, which was limited to the publication years between 2009 and 2014. Data was analysed to obtain the number of data records by country, institution, subject category, year of publication, and document type as well as the number of citations. A Spearman's correlation analysis was conducted to gauge the relationship between the data records and research articles. Findings indicate that only 20 (out of 50) countries in sub-Saharan Africa produced at least one data record in the DCI, with South Africa leading the pack with 539 (61.39 %) records followed by Kenya, Cameroon and Ghana. SSA contributes a mere 0.03 % of the world's research data as compared to 1.4 % of the world's research articles. Research institutions and universities are the major contributors of research data, which largely focuses on Genetics and Heredity (61.3 %), Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (61.3 %), Agriculture (29.2 %) and Forestry (27.3 %). Citation-wise, the research data has attracted fewer average citations than the articles. A correlational analysis of the data reveals that there is a significant correlation between the publication of data and research articles.",['opendata'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'othergroup']",['AF'],"Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire",PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY,English,Article,,,,"[Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire] Univ South Africa, Dept Informat Sci, Unisa, POB 392, ZA-0003 Pretoria, South Africa",45.0,8.0,SPRINGER,1053-8801,,2016.0,32,3,227.0,246,10.1007/s12109-016-9463-6,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1930,SCOPUS,The dark side of open access in Google and Google Scholar: the case of Latin-American repositories,Open access;  Repositories;  Google;  Google Scholar;  Webometrics;  Web indicators;  Web visibility;  Indexing;  Latin America,"Since repositories are a key tool in making scholarly knowledge open access (OA), determining their web presence and visibility on the Web (both are proxies of web impact) is essential, particularly in Google (search engine par excellence) and Google Scholar (a tool increasingly used by researchers to search for academic information). The few studies conducted so far have been limited to very specific geographic areas (USA), which makes it necessary to find out what is happening in other regions that are not part of mainstream academia, and where repositories play a decisive role in the visibility of scholarly production. The main objective of this study is to ascertain the web presence and visibility of Latin American repositories in Google and Google Scholar through the application of page count and web mention indicators respectively. For a sample of 137 repositories, the results indicate that the indexing ratio is low in Google, and virtually nonexistent in Google Scholar;  they also indicate a complete lack of correspondence between the repository records and the data produced by these two search tools. These results are mainly attributable to limitations arising from the use of description schemas that are incompatible with Google Scholar (repository design) and the reliability of web mention indicators (search engines). We conclude that neither Google nor Google Scholar accurately represent the actual size of OA content published by Latin American repositories;  this may indicate a non-indexed, hidden side to OA, which could be limiting the dissemination and consumption of OA scholarly literature.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],"['NA', 'SA']","Orduna-Malea, Enrique;  Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Emilio",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Orduna-Malea, Enrique] Univ Politecn Valencia, Res Grp EC3, Valencia 46022, Spain;  [Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Emilio] Univ Granada, Res Grp EC3, E-18071 Granada, Spain",44.0,12.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2015.0,102,1,829.0,846,10.1007/s11192-014-1369-5,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1931,SCOPUS,Variation in Spanish authors' names in university Open Access repositories with respect to different fields of knowledge,standardization; authorship control; open access repositories; recommended signature style; recercat; e-prints complutense,"Spanish authors who sign with their official Spanish name (which includes two surnames and sometimes two first names) or who change Their signing name over time will find it. more difficult to collect together their scientific output. Making use of experience with, IraLIS (International Registry for Authors: Library and Information Science = Link, to Identify Scientists; http://www.iralis.org), this study examines how authorities are registered in two Spanish, OAI-PMH-compliant projects: Recercat and E-Prints Complutense. The authorities database of the two repositories analysed were downloaded. The style of signing - the recommended one should contain only two elements - was recorded by field of knowledge, using the topic classification systems of The Intute project and The ANEP agency. The most commonly used signing style involved two surnames (76% in Recercat and 94% in E-Prints Complutense). The social sciences showed the greatest adoption of the recommended signing style (20% of all records in this area). The adoption rate of the recommended signing style in both, repositories was low, especially in E-Prints Complutense. The index of the use of The recommended signing style by knowledge field reveals a true picture of these Open Access repositories. This information could allow awareness campaigns to be designed for different fields of knowledge. it might be thought that the most internationalised sciences and the authors of its literature would take signing style into account, but this does not seem to be the case. Indeed, The social sciences were those which most frequently followed the recommended system. The areas of technology, health and lift sciences, the arts and humanities should be the subjects of awareness campaigns, Further work should study the possible differences in the use of signing style depending on who inputs information into databases.","['openaccess', 'opentools']",['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['ESP'],"Orduna-Malea, Enrique; Peset, Fernanda; Ferrer-Sapena, Antonia",REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Orduna-Malea, Enrique; Peset, Fernanda; Ferrer-Sapena, Antonia] Univ Politecn Valencia, Fac Informat, Valencia, Spain",29.0,1.0,CONSEJO SUPERIOR INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS-CSIC,0210-0614,,2009.0,32,4,9.0,33,10.3989/redc.2009.4.693,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1939,SCOPUS,Continuing professional education in open access – a French-German survey,Academic librarians; Continuing professional education; France; Germany; Open access; Research libraries,"While open access (OA) has become a significant part of scientific communication and academic publishing, qualification issues have been out of focus in the OA community until recent years. Based on findings about the qualification for OA within university-based programs in France and Germany the authors surveyed continuing professional education activities regarding OA in both countries in the years 2012-2015. The results indicate that there are different types of events qualifying for OA and reveal a lack of coherent concepts for different target groups. Until now traditional presentation formats have been dominant. Formats for distance learning, like MOOCs or webinars, might serve different needs and interests. © 2016 Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],"['DEU', 'FRA']","Osswald A., Schoepfel J., Jacquemin B.",LIBER Quarterly,English,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,"Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services",14355205,0,2016.0,26,2,43.0,66,10.18352/lq.10158,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1947,SCOPUS,An agent-based information foraging model of scientific knowledge creation and spillover in open science communities,Agent based modeling; Expectancy theory; Information foraging; Knowledge spillover; Science of science,"Motivation and problem-domain preferences of scientists can affect aggregate level emergence and growth of problem domains in science. In this study, we introduce an agent-based model that is based on information foraging and expectancy theory to examine the impact of rationality and openness on the growth and evolution of scientific domains. We simulate a virtual socio-technical system, in which scientists with different preferences search for problem domains to contribute knowledge, while considering their motivational gains. Problem domains become mature and knowledge spills occur over time to facilitate creation of new problem domains. We conduct experiments to examine emergence and growth of clusters of domains based on local interactions and preferences of scientists and present preliminary qualitative observations.","['openaccess', 'opendata', 'openmethod', 'openevaluation', 'openpolicies', 'opensoftware', 'opentools', 'openeducation']",['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Özmen Ö., Yilmaz L.",Simulation Series,English,Conference Paper,"Agent-Directed Simulation Symposium 2012, ADS 2012, Part of the 2012 Spring Simulation Multiconference, SpringSim 2012",26 March 2012 through 30 March 2012,"Orlando, FL",,,0.0,0,7359276,9781618397836,2012.0,44,1 BOOK,24.0,30,,,,2021-01-27,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1954,SCOPUS,Where There's a Will There's a Way?: Survey of Academic Librarian Attitudes about Open Access,,"Academic libraries are becoming increasingly involved in scholarly communication through work with institutional repositories and other open access models. While academic librarians are being encouraged to promote these new models, their opinions about open access have not been documented. This article reports on the results of a national survey conducted in the summer of 2006 of academic librarians' attitudes toward open access principles and related behaviors. While attitude responses were largely positive, there were differences in levels of support related to respondents' job descriptions and funding of open access activities. Surveyed librarians appear to be more comfortable with tasks that translate traditionally held responsibilities, such as educating others, to the open access environment. Most significant is the discrepancy between stated support of library involvement in open access initiatives and significantly lacking action toward this end. The results offer insight into how open access proponents may better focus their advocacy efforts.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['USA'],"Palmer, Kristi L.; Dill, Emily; Christie, Charlene",COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES,English,Article,,,,"[Palmer, Kristi L.] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA; [Christie, Charlene] SUNY Coll Oneonta, Oneonta, NY USA",32.0,37.0,ASSOC COLL RESEARCH LIBRARIES,0010-0870,,2009.0,70,4,315.0,335,10.5860/crl.70.4.315,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1964,SCOPUS,Knowledge and Perceptions of Open Science among Researchers-A Case Study for Colombia,open science; survey; perceptions; researchers; Colombia,"Open science can provide researchers diverse opportunities to collaborate, disseminate their research results, generate important impacts in the scientific community, and engage in effective and efficient science for the benefit of society. This study seeks to analyse and evaluate researchers' knowledge of open science in Colombia using a survey to determine adequate instruments with which to improve research in the framework of open science. The aim of the study is to determine researchers' current awareness of open science by considering demographic characteristics to analyse their attitudes, values, and information habits as well as the levels of institutionalism and social appropriation of open science. A representative sample of Colombian researchers was selected from the National Research System. An anonymous online survey consisting of 34 questions was sent to all professors and researchers at Colombian universities and research institutes. Sampling was random and stratified, which allowed for a representative sample of different categories of researchers, and principal component analysis (PCA) was used for the sample design. A total of 1042 responses were received, with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 3%. The majority of respondents knew about open science, especially in relation to open science tools (software, repositories, and networks) and open data. Researchers consider open science to be positively impacted by factors such as the rise of digital technologies, the search for new forms of collaboration, the greater availability of open data and information, and public demand for better and more effective science. In contrast, a lack of resources to develop research activities within the open science approach and the limited integration between traditional and open science are identified as the most important barriers to its use in research. These results are important for building adequate open science policy in Colombia.","['openaccess', 'opendata', 'openmethod', 'openevaluation', 'openpolicies', 'opensoftware', 'opentools', 'openeducation']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['COL'],"Pardo Martinez, Clara Ines; Cotte Poveda, Alexander",INFORMATION,English,Article,,,,"[Pardo Martinez, Clara Ines] Univ Rosario, Colombian Observ Sci & Technol, Bogota 11011, Colombia; [Cotte Poveda, Alexander] Univ Santo Tomas, Colombian Observ Sci & Technol, Bogota 11011, Colombia",39.0,1.0,MDPI,2078-2489,,2018.0,9,11,,,10.3390/info9110292,,,2021-01-27,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1966,SCOPUS,Exploring the willingness of scholars to accept open access: A grounded theory approach,0,"This article aims to explore what factors increase or decrease scholars’ willingness to publish and use articles in open-access journals and discusses how these factors are related to one another. Research-oriented publications on the topic of open-access journals have been few, and there is widespread concern about whether scholars will adopt this new form of scholarly communication. The growing number of open-access journals leads scholars to encounter decision-making situations in which they must choose one journal among multiple alternatives, including open access and non-open access. We conducted open-ended and semi-structured in-depth interviews with eight faculty members and six doctoral students at Syracuse University. Based on the interview transcripts, willingness factors and their relationships were identified and refined using the iterative steps of grounded theory approach proposed by Strauss and Corbin in the 1998 edition of their Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. The findings show seven factors (perceived journal reputation, perceived topical relevance, perceived availability, perceived career benefit, perceived cost, perceived content quality, and perceived ease of use) and eight relationships. There were six positive and two negative relationships. The factors and relationships were then compared to the relevant literature to increase internal validity and generalizability of the study. Both theoretical and practical implications of the research are discussed. Theoretically, this study broadens the scope of relevance criteria studies, first identifies the relationship between two important scholarly communication activities, conceptually contributes to the concept of open access, and applies literature comparison methodology in a pure qualitative study to 182increase internal validity and generalizability. Practically, the findings of this study may be helpful for promoting open-access publishing by encouraging facilitators and discouraging hinderers. The research may also provide an ongoing working framework for evaluating open-access journal systems. © 2009 by Taylor & Francis. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Park J.-H., Qin J.",The State of Scholarly Publishing: Challenges and Opportunities,English,Book Chapter,0,0,0,,,1.0,Taylor and Francis,0,9781351473385; 9781412810586,2017.0,0,0,181.0,206,10.4324/9781315135175-10,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1974,SCOPUS,Open data in scientific settings: From policy to practice,Computational infrastructure; Data practice; Human infrastructure; Open data; Science policy,"Open access to data is commonly required by funding agencies, journals, and public policy, despite the lack of agreement on the concept of ""open data."" We present findings from two longitudinal case studies of major scientific collaborations, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey in astronomy and the Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations in deep subseafloor biosphere studies. These sites offer comparisons in rationales and policy interpretations of open data, which are shaped by their differing scientific objectives. While policy rationales and implementations shape infrastructures for scientific data, these rationales also are shaped by pre-existing infrastructure. Meanings of the term ""open data"" are contingent on project objectives and on the infrastructures to which they have access.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['natscie'],"['researcher', 'funder']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Pasquetto I.V., Sands A.E., Darch P.T., Borgman C.L.",Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings,English,Conference Paper,"34th Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2016",7 May 2016 through 12 May 2016,0,,,7.0,Association for Computing Machinery,0,9781450333627,2016.0,0,0,1585.0,1596,10.1145/2858036.2858543,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1976,SCOPUS,Open Access Publishing and Subsequent Citations Among Articles in Major Cardiovascular Journals,Cardiology; Citations; Journal; Open access; Publishing,"BACKGROUND: While open access publishing among cardiovascular journals has increased in scope over the last decade, the relationship between open access and article citation volume remains unclear. METHODS: We evaluated the association between open access publishing and citation number in 2017 among 4 major cardiovascular journals. Articles indexed to PubMed with >= 5 citations were identified among the following journals: Circulation, European Heart Journal, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, and JAMA Cardiology. Multivariable Poisson regression models were adjusted for journal and article type. RESULTS: Of the 16 articles published in 2017, original investigations accounted for most articles (66.7%), followed by reviews (14.5%), guideline/scientific statements (8.4%), research letters (3.7%), viewpoints (3.7%), and editorials (2.9%). Among all articles, 43% (n = 391) were open access. Citation number was higher among open access articles compared with those with subscription access (14 [25th 75th percentile: 9-23] vs 11 [25th-75th percentile: 7-17]; P < .001). Open access status was significantly associated with higher number of citations after multivariable adjustment (beta coefficient: +0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.45, P < .001). Open access articles had consistently higher citations compared with subscription access articles across the 3 most frequent article types. CONCLUSION: Among contemporary articles published in major cardiovascular journals, open access publishing accounted for over 40% of articles and was significantly associated with increased short-term citations. Further research is required to assess the variation in long-term citation rates based on open access publishing status. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Patel, Ravi B.; Vaduganathan, Muthiah; Mosarla, Ramya C.; Venkateswaran, Ramkumar V.; Bhatt, Deepak L.; Bonow, Robert O.",AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE,English,Article,,,,"[Patel, Ravi B.; Bonow, Robert O.] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, 676 N St Clair St,Suite 600, Chicago, IL 60611 USA; [Vaduganathan, Muthiah; Venkateswaran, Ramkumar V.; Bhatt, Deepak L.] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Heart & Vasc Ctr, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA; [Vaduganathan, Muthiah; Venkateswaran, Ramkumar V.; Bhatt, Deepak L.] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA; [Mosarla, Ramya C.] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA",4.0,3.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0002-9343,,2019.0,132,9,1103.0,1105,10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.02.009,,30851265.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1983,SCOPUS,Article processing charge (APC) for publishing open access articles: the Brazilian scenario,Article processing charge; Open access; Public funding; Scientific journal; 00A99; Z00,"The article processing charge (APC) provides economic sustainability for scientific journals that publish in open access (OA). In this work, documents published in OA between 2012 and 2016 by authors with Brazilian affiliation are identified, the profile of these publications is analyzed and the cost of APC is estimated. In order to do so, data from 930 journals and 63,847 documents were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection. It was found that 59% of these documents were published in journals that charge APC. The total expenditures for the 5-year period were estimated at approximately USD 36million, the weighted average cost per document at USD 957.75 and the average cost per journal at USD 1492.27. The profile of these publications shows that journals indexed by SciELO represent 67% of the 63,847 documents. The use of mega-journals increased over the period, which implies an increase in expenditure in publications, since the average APC per journal was USD 2059.77. It was observed that the OA Brazilian scientific production is characterized by an endogenic profile and has a preference for the Gold road with APC. These results suggest that policies for funding charges are required to stimulate a more international attitude.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['BRA'],"Pavan, Cleusa; Barbosa, Marcia C.",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Pavan, Cleusa] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Med, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, BR-2400 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; [Pavan, Cleusa; Barbosa, Marcia C.] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Programa Posgrad Educ Ciencias Quim Vida & Saude, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, BR-2600 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; [Barbosa, Marcia C.] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Inst Fis, Ave Bento Goncalves, BR-7500 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil",34.0,5.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2018.0,117,2,805.0,823,10.1007/s11192-018-2896-2,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1992,SCOPUS,"Revisiting perceptions of, and experience with, open-access publishing among faculty in library and information studies schools with [Réévaluation des perceptions et de l’expérience de l’édition en libre accès parmi les professeurs des écoles de bibliothéconomie et sciences de l’information]",LIS faculty; Open access; Open-access publishing; Scholarly communication,"Open-access scholarly publishing has grown steadily in academia for the past few decades as both a practical alternative to subscription-based journal publishing and a topic of study in its own right. This article presents the results from a survey of faculty in North American library and information studies schools about their attitudes towards, and experience with, open-access publishing. As a follow-up to a similar survey conducted in 2013, the article also outlines the differences in beliefs about, and engagement with, open access that has occurred. © 2020 The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['USA'],Peekhaus W.,Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Toronto Press Inc.,1195096X,0,2019.0,43,1,23.0,47,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1993,SCOPUS,Open Access among Canadian Library and Information Science Faculty,library and information science faculty; open access; open-access journals; open-access publishing; scholarly communication,"This article responds to a gap in the literature about Canadian LIS faculty attitudes toward, and experience with, open access. Drawing on data obtained from an electronic survey sent to North American LIS faculty, this article reports the findings from a descriptive analysis of the results for all Canadian LIS faculty respondents. A majority of Canadian LIS faculty believes that scholarly research is a public good that should not be monetized and that LIS scholars should lead efforts to expand open access to research. Nonetheless, engagement with open access by Canadian LIS faculty appears to be somewhat constrained.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['CAN'],"Peekhaus, Wilhelm",CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE,English,Article,,,,"[Peekhaus, Wilhelm] Univ Wisconsin Milwaukee, Sch Informat Studies, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA",35.0,2.0,CANADIAN ASSOC INFORMATION SCIENCE,1195-096X,,2017.0,41,1-2,105.0,146,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
1994,SCOPUS,A cohort study of how faculty in LIS schools perceive and engage with open-access publishing,Faculty authors; journals; library and information science faculty; open access; open-access publishing; scholarly communication,"This article presents results from a survey of faculty in North American Library and Information Studies (LIS) schools about their attitudes towards and experience with open-access publishing. As a follow-up to a similar survey conducted in 2013, the article also outlines the differences in beliefs about and engagement with open access that have occurred between 2013 and 2018. Although faculty in LIS schools are proponents of free access to research, journal publication choices remain informed by traditional considerations such as prestige and impact factor. Engagement with open access has increased significantly, while perceptions of open access have remained relatively stable between 2013 and 2018. Nonetheless, those faculty who have published in an open-access journal or are more knowledgeable about open access tend to be more convinced about the quality of open-access publications and less apprehensive about open-access publishing than those who have no publishing experience with open-access journals or who are less knowledgeable about various open-access modalities. Willingness to comply with gold open-access mandates has increased significantly since 2013.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['USA'],"Peekhaus, Wilhelm",JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Peekhaus, Wilhelm] Univ Wisconsin Milwaukee, Sch Informat Studies, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA",25.0,0.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0165-5515,,2021.0,47,1,16.0,28,10.1177/0165551519865481,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1995,SCOPUS,An examination of North American Library and Information Studies faculty perceptions of and experience with open-access scholarly publishing,,"Open-access (OA) scholarly publishing has grown steadily in academia for the past few decades as an alternative to traditional, subscription-based journal publishing. This research presents the descriptive analysis of a systematic survey of North American library and information science (LIS) faculty about their attitudes toward and experience with OA publishing. The study reveals that LIS faculty tend to be more experienced with and knowledgeable about open access than their colleagues in other disciplines. A majority of LIS faculty is very critical of what is perceived to be detrimental control exercised by publishers over the scholarly communication system and agrees that major changes need to be made to this system. Although a majority of LIS faculty considers OA journals to be comparable to traditional journals, a sizable minority remains unconvinced of the purported benefits of open-access journals. The perceived constraints of the tenure and promotion system within the academy tend to limit LIS faculty engagement with open-access publishing in ways similar to other academic disciplines. There thus exists a disconnect between proclaimed support for and actual engagement with open access. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['USA'],"Peekhaus, Wilhelm; Proferes, Nicholas",LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"[Peekhaus, Wilhelm; Proferes, Nicholas] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, 2025 E Newport, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA",30.0,8.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0740-8188,,2016.0,38,1,18.0,29,10.1016/j.lisr.2016.01.003,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
1996,SCOPUS,How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access,Faculty authors; journals; library and information science faculty; open access; open-access publishing; scholarly communication,"This paper presents the inferential analysis of a systematic survey of North American library and information science (LIS) faculty awareness of, attitudes towards and experience with open-access scholarly publishing. The study reveals that engagement with open access is related to faculty rank and perceptions about tenure and promotion committee assessments of open-access publications. The perceived constraints of the tenure and promotion system within the academy impact LIS faculty engagement with open-access publishing in ways found in other academic disciplines. However, those who themselves engage with open access tend to assess publications in such venues more favourably than those without such publishing experience and are similarly more predisposed to believe that tenure and promotion committees would evaluate such publications favourably. Nonetheless, while in general it is clear that experience with open access reduces some of the concerns about the effects of this type of scholarly publishing on career opportunities, there remains a substantial amount of equivocacy among LIS faculty about open access.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['USA'],"Peekhaus, Wilhelm; Proferes, Nicholas",JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Peekhaus, Wilhelm; Proferes, Nicholas] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA",22.0,23.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0165-5515,,2015.0,41,5,640.0,661,10.1177/0165551515587855,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2013,SCOPUS,Effects of journal choice on the visibility of scientific publications: a comparison between subscription-based and full Open Access models,Open access; Scientific performance; Citation analysis,"This study analyses the performance of journals and publications based on their type of archiving policies. The main objective is the assessment of the feasibility of the journal typologies with a special emphasis on the comparison of both the subscription-based and the Open Access models. The analysis is backed by the combination of data contained in four of the main bibliographic databases to offer comprehensive, new and updated data on OA (Sherpa-RoMEO, DOAJ, Web of Science and Scopus). A total of 18.3 million articles and reviews were analysed between 2005 and 2015. In the comparison of Web of Science and Scopus, we found that the proportion of OA publications is 5% inferior in WoS. The growth of the total number of documents published in Gold OA journals is noteworthy in the period analysed. However, the study of the proportion of publications and citations in both databases revealed that Gold OA journals only increased their proportion of publications but not the proportion of citations. Trends in the proportion of highly cited publications (top 1%) depicted that OA journals were unable to exceed of this expected 1% in the 11 years under analysis.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio; Olmeda-Gomez, Carlos",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio; Olmeda-Gomez, Carlos] Univ Carlos III, Dept Biblioteconomia & Documentac, C Madrid 128, Getafe 28903, Spain",55.0,4.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2019.0,121,3,1737.0,1752,10.1007/s11192-019-03265-y,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2014,SCOPUS,Open access journals in educational technology: Results of a survey of experienced users,0,"open access journals (OAJs). In educational technology alone, with an estimated 270 associated journals, nearly one-third are designated as open. Though OAJs are lauded for what their availability can contribute to social justice issues (reduction of subscription requirement barriers), some remain suspicious of the content found in them and question the legitimacy of publishing in them. In this study, we sought to discover the opinions of educational technology scholars about OAJs in their own field. We were able to learn which OAJs were deemed to be most valuable, as well as the characteristics of OAJs thought to be particularly important. © 2016.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Perkins R.A., Lowentha P.R.",Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,English,Article,0,0,0,,,6.0,ASCILITE,14495554,0,2016.0,32,3,18.0,37,10.14742/ajet.2578,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2036,SCOPUS,Medical research charities and open access,,"This paper provides an analysis of the attitudes and activities of UK medical research charities in relation to open access (OA). Both quantitative and qualitative data are presented derived from a recent survey of charities covering areas such as policy development, funding arrangements, and business process design for OA. Positions on key issues including green and gold OA, funding article-processing charges (APCs), and publication licences are assessed. Modelling of potential APCs as a percentage of overall annual research spend is undertaken to show possible costs of a charged for gold system. Medical research charities clearly regard OA as important and some see it as an opportunity to further their mission. However, many expressed significant concerns particularly about the costs and expertise required to support OA. Further co-ordination of policy development and action across the sector and with other stakeholders is recommended in order to help ensure optimal implementation of OA. (C) Stephen Pinfield 2013",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['funder'],['GBR'],"Pinfield, Stephen",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"Univ Sheffield, Informat Sch, Sheffield S4 1DP, S Yorkshire, England",20.0,4.0,WILEY,0953-1513,,2013.0,26,4,285.0,+,10.1087/20130409,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2037,SCOPUS,Making Open Access work The state-of-the-art in providing Open Access to scholarly literature,Scholarly communication; Open Access; Scholarly journals; Open Access repositories; Research publishing,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of one of the most important and controversial areas of scholarly communication: Open Access publishing and dissemination of research outputs. It identifies and discusses recent trends and future challenges for various stakeholders in delivering Open Access (OA) to the scholarly literature. Design/methodology/approach - The study is based on a number of interrelated strands of evidence which make up the current discourse on OA, comprising the peer-reviewed literature, grey literature and other forms of communication (including blogs and e-mail discussion lists). It uses a large-scale textual analysis of the peer-reviewed literature since 2010 (carried out using the VOSviewer tool) as a basis for discussion of issues raised in the OA discourse. Findings - A number of key themes are identified, including the relationship between Green OA (deposit in repositories) and Gold OA (OA journal publication), the developing evidence base associated with OA, researcher attitudes and behaviours, policy directions, management of repositories, development of journals, institutional responses and issues around impact and scholarly communication futures. It suggests that current challenges now focus on how OA can be made to work in practice, having moved on from the discussion of whether it should happen at all. Originality/value - The paper provides a structured evidence-based review of major issues in the OA field, and suggests key areas for future research and policy development.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Pinfield, Stephen",ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Pinfield, Stephen] Univ Sheffield, Informat Sch, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England",214.0,24.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1468-4527,,2015.0,39,5,604.0,636,10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0167,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2039,SCOPUS,Researchers' Adoption of an Institutional Central Fund for Open-Access Article-Processing Charges: A Case Study Using Innovation Diffusion Theory,open access; article-processing charges; Gold OA; Innovation Diffusion Theory,"This article analyzes researchers' adoption of an institutional central fund (or faculty publication fund) for open-access (OA) article-processing charges (APCs) to contribute to a wider understanding of take-up of OA journal publishing (Gold OA). Quantitative data, recording central fund usage at the University of Nottingham from 2006 to 2014, are analyzed alongside qualitative data from institutional documentation. The importance of the settings of U.K. national policy developments and international OA adoption trends are considered. Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) is used as an explanatory framework. It is shown that use of the central fund grew during the period from covering less than 1% of the University's outputs to more than 12%. Health and Life Sciences disciplines made greatest use of the fund. Although highly variable, average APC prices rose during the period, with fully OA publishers setting lower average APCs. APCs were paid largely from internal funds, but external funding became increasingly important. Key factors in adoption are identified to be increasing awareness and changing perceptions of OA, communication, disciplinary differences, and adoption mandates. The study provides a detailed longitudinal analysis of one of the earliest central funds to be established globally with a theoretically informed explanatory model to inform future work on managing central funds and developing institutional and national OA policies.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['unisupportstaff'],['GBR'],"Pinfield, Stephen; Middleton, Christine",SAGE OPEN,English,Article,,,,"[Pinfield, Stephen] Univ Sheffield, Informat Sch, 211 Portobello, Sheffield S1 4DP, S Yorkshire, England; [Middleton, Christine] Univ Nottingham, Dept Libraries & Res & Learning Resources, Nottingham, England",59.0,3.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,2158-2440,,2016.0,6,1,,,10.1177/2158244015625447,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2040,SCOPUS,The total cost of publication in a hybrid open-access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions,open-access publications; scholarly publishing; subscriptions,"As open-access (OA) publishing funded by article-processing charges (APCs) becomes more widely accepted, academic institutions need to be aware of the total cost of publication (TCP), comprising subscription costs plus APCs and additional administration costs. This study analyzes data from 23 UK institutions covering the period 2007-2014 modeling the TCP. It shows a clear rise in centrally managed APC payments from 2012 onward, with payments projected to increase further. As well as evidencing the growing availability and acceptance of OA publishing, these trends reflect particular UK policy developments and funding arrangements intended to accelerate the move toward OA publishing (Gold OA). Although the mean value of APCs has been relatively stable, there was considerable variation in APC prices paid by institutions since 2007. In particular, hybrid subscription/OA journals were consistently more expensive than fully OA journals. Most APCs were paid to large traditional commercial publishers who also received considerable subscription income. New administrative costs reported by institutions varied considerably. The total cost of publication modeling shows that APCs are now a significant part of the TCP for academic institutions, in 2013 already constituting an average of 10% of the TCP (excluding administrative costs).",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['GBR'],"Pinfield, Stephen; Salter, Jennifer; Bath, Peter A.",JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Pinfield, Stephen; Salter, Jennifer; Bath, Peter A.] Univ Sheffield, Informat Sch, Regent Court, 211 Portobello, Sheffield S1 4DP, S Yorkshire, England",48.0,59.0,WILEY,2330-1635,,2016.0,67,7,1751.0,1766,10.1002/asi.23446,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2044,SCOPUS,Open access levels and patterns in scholarly articles from India,Open access; paywall; scholarly articles; scientific publishing,"Open access (OA) has emerged as an important movement worldwide during the last decade. There are several calls now that not only persuade researchers to publish in OA journals, to archive their pre- or post-print versions of papers in repositories, but also institutions and funding agencies to promote OA of research publications. This article examines OA levels and patterns in research output by computationally analysing research publication data obtained from the Web of Science for India during the last five years (2014-2018). Results obtained show that about 24% of research output from India, during the last five years, is available in OA compared to world average of about 30%. More articles are available in gold OA compared to green and bronze OA. Furthermore, OA levels vary in different disciplines, with medical science, physics and biology having higher percentage of their articles available as OA as compared to those like arts and humanities, social science and (surprisingly) information science.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['IND'],"Piryani, Rajesh; Dua, Jyoti; Singh, Vivek Kumar",CURRENT SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Piryani, Rajesh] South Asian Univ, Dept Comp Sci, New Delhi 110021, India; [Dua, Jyoti; Singh, Vivek Kumar] Banaras Hindu Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India",15.0,3.0,INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES,0011-3891,,2019.0,117,9,1435.0,1440,10.18520/cs/v117/i9/1435-1440,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2049,SCOPUS,Data reuse and the open data citation advantage,Data reuse; Data repositories; Gene expression microarray; Incentives; Data archiving; Open data; Bibliometrics; Information science,"Background. Attribution to the original contributor upon reuse of published data is important both as a reward for data creators and to document the provenance of research findings. Previous studies have found that papers with publicly available datasets receive a higher number of citations than similar studies without available data. However, few previous analyses have had the statistical power to control for the many variables known to predict citation rate, which has led to uncertain estimates of the citation benefit. Furthermore, little is known about patterns in data reuse over time and across datasets. Method and Results. Here, we look at citation rates while controlling for many known citation predictors and investigate the variability of data reuse. In a multivariate regression on 10,555 studies that created gene expression microarray data, we found that studies that made data available in a public repository received 9% (95% confidence interval: 5% to 13%) more citations than similar studies for which the data was not made available. Date of publication, journal impact factor, open access status, number of authors, first and last author publication history, corresponding author country, institution citation history, and study topic were included as covariates. The citation benefit varied with date of dataset deposition: a citation benefit was most clear for papers published in 2004 and 2005, at about 30%. Authors published most papers using their own datasets within two years of their first publication on the dataset, whereas data reuse papers published by third-party investigators continued to accumulate for at least six years. To study patterns of data reuse directly, we compiled 9,724 instances of third party data reuse via mention of GEO or ArrayExpress accession numbers in the full text of papers. The level of third-party data use was high: for 100 datasets deposited in year 0, we estimated that 40 papers in PubMed reused a dataset by year 2, 100 by year 4, and more than 150 data reuse papers had been published by year 5. Data reuse was distributed across a broad base of datasets: a very conservative estimate found that 20% of the datasets deposited between 2003 and 2007 had been reused at least once by third parties. Conclusion. After accounting for other factors affecting citation rate, we find a robust citation benefit from open data, although a smaller one than previously reported. We conclude there is a direct effect of third-party data reuse that persists for years beyond the time when researchers have published most of the papers reusing their own data. Other factors that may also contribute to the citation benefit are considered. We further conclude that, at least for gene expression microarray data, a substantial fraction of archived datasets are reused, and that the intensity of dataset reuse has been steadily increasing since 2003.",['opendata'],['biblio'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Piwowar, Heather A.; Vision, Todd J.",PEERJ,English,Article,,,,"[Piwowar, Heather A.; Vision, Todd J.] Natl Evolutionary Synth Ctr, Durham, NC 27705 USA; [Piwowar, Heather A.; Vision, Todd J.] Duke Univ, Dept Biol, Durham, NC USA; [Vision, Todd J.] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biol, Chapel Hill, NC USA",33.0,177.0,PEERJ INC,2167-8359,,2013.0,1,,,,10.7717/peerj.175,,24109559.0,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2050,SCOPUS,The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles,Open access; Open science; Scientometrics; Publishing; Libraries; Scholarly communication; Bibliometrics; Science policy,"Despite growing interest in Open Access (OA) to scholarly literature, there is an unmet need for large-scale, up-to-date, and reproducible studies assessing the prevalence and characteristics of OA. We address this need using oaDOI, an open online service that determines OA status for 67 million articles. We use three samples, each of 100,000 articles, to investigate OA in three populations: (1) all journal articles assigned a Crossref DOI, (2) recent journal articles indexed in Web of Science, and (3) articles viewed by users of Unpaywall, an open-source browser extension that lets users find OA articles using oaDOI. We estimate that at least 28% of the scholarly literature is OA (19M in total) and that this proportion is growing, driven particularly by growth in Gold and Hybrid. The most recent year analyzed (2015) also has the highest percentage of OA (45%). Because of this growth, and the fact that readers disproportionately access newer articles, we find that Unpaywall users encounter OA quite frequently: 47% of articles they view are OA. Notably, the most common mechanism for OA is not Gold, Green, or Hybrid OA, but rather an under-discussed category we dub Bronze: articles made free-to-read on the publisher website, without an explicit Open license. We also examine the citation impact of OA articles, corroborating the so-called open-access citation advantage: accounting for age and discipline, OA articles receive 18% more citations than average, an effect driven primarily by Green and Hybrid OA. We encourage further research using the free oaDOI service, as a way to inform OA policy and practice.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Piwowar, Heather; Priem, Jason; Lariviere, Vincent; Alperin, Juan Pablo; Matthias, Lisa; Norlander, Bree; Farley, Ashley; West, Jevin; Haustein, Stefanie",PEERJ,English,Article,,,,"[Piwowar, Heather; Priem, Jason] Impactstory, Sanford, MD 20894 USA; [Lariviere, Vincent] Univ Montreal, Ecole Bibliothecon & Sci Informat, Montreal, PQ, Canada; [Lariviere, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie] Univ Qubec Montral, CIRST, OST, Montreal, PQ, Canada; [Alperin, Juan Pablo] Simon Fraser Univ, Canadian Inst Studies Publishing, Vancouver, BC, Canada; [Alperin, Juan Pablo] Publ Knowledge Project, Vancouver, BC, Canada; [Matthias, Lisa] Simon Fraser Univ, Scholarly Commun Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada; [Norlander, Bree; Farley, Ashley; West, Jevin] Univ Washington, Informat Sch, Seattle, WA 98195 USA; [Norlander, Bree; Farley, Ashley] FlourishOA, Seattle, WA USA; [Haustein, Stefanie] Univ Ottawa, Sch Informat Studies, Ottawa, ON, Canada",52.0,200.0,PEERJ INC,2167-8359,,2018.0,6,,,,10.7717/peerj.4375,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2056,SCOPUS,Comparison of the impact factors of subscription access and open access orthopedics and sports medicine journals in the SCImago database,Impact factor; open access; SCImago Journal Rank; subscription access,"Objectives: This study aims to compare the annual impact factors (IFs) for the period 1999-2017 and the tri-annual IFs in 2011, 2014 and 2017 of the subscription access (SA) and open access (OA) journals published in the field of orthopedics, traumatology and sports medicine according to the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR). Material and methods: All data for this study were obtained from the SCImago Journal & Country Rank database. We compared the change in the mean annual IFs of 197 SA journals with 52 OA journals in the field of orthopedics and sports medicine for the period between 1999 and 2017. In addition, we determined and compared the changes in the mean tri-annual IFs of these journals in 2011, 2014 and 2017. The mean publication fee values of the OA journals as well as the correlation between the three-year IFs of the year 2017 and the publication fee values were evaluated. Results: From 1999 to 2017, the mean IF of SA journals increased 0.47-fold to 0.69, while the mean IF of the OA journals increased 0.85-fold to 0.63. Significant positive correlation was observed between the tri-annual IF and publication fee of OA journals in 2017 (r=0.458, p=0.001). Conclusion: We can predict that the mean IFs of OA journals in the field of orthopedics and sports medicine will reach the mean IFs of SA journals after several years. Choosing OA journals becomes advantageous when the desire for a higher number of citations is the most important factor.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Polat, Baris; Ozmanevra, Ramadan; Ozmanevra, Pinar Tuncbilek; Kazikdas, Kadir Cagdas",EKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY,English,Article,,,,"[Polat, Baris; Ozmanevra, Ramadan] Univ Kyrenia, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Kyrenia, Cyprus; [Ozmanevra, Pinar Tuncbilek] Univ Kyrenia, Fac Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Kyrenia, Cyprus; [Kazikdas, Kadir Cagdas] Near East Univ, Fac Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nicosia, Cyprus",16.0,0.0,TURKISH JOINT DISEASES FOUNDATION,1305-8282,,2019.0,30,2,163.0,167,10.5606/ehc.2019.64729,,31291866.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2058,SCOPUS,Open access publishing trend analysis: Statistics beyond the perception,0,"Introduction. The purpose of this analysis was twofold: to track the number of open access journals acquiring impact factor, and to investigate the distribution of subject categories pertaining to these journals. As a case study, journals in which the researchers of the National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità) in Italy have published were surveyed. Method. Data were collected by searching open access journals listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals) then compared with those having an impact factor as tracked by the Journal Citation Reports for the years 2010-2012. Journal Citation Reports subject categories were matched with Medical Subject Headings to provide a larger content classification. Analysis. A survey was performed to determine the Directory journals matching the Journal Citation Reports list, and their inclusion in a given subject area. Results. In the years 2010-2012, an increase in the number of journals was observed for Journal Citation Reports (+ 4.93%) and for the Directory (+18.51%). The discipline showing the highest increment was medicine (315 occurrences, 26%). Conclusions. From 2010 to 2012, the number of open access journals with impact factor has gradually risen, with a prevalence for journals relating to medicine and biological science disciplines, suggesting that authors prefer to publish more than before in open access journals. © 2016, Information Research. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['ITA'],"Poltronieri E., Bravo E., Curti M., Ferri M., Mancini C.",Information Research,English,Article,0,0,0,,,3.0,University of Sheffield,13681613,0,2016.0,21,2,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2059,SCOPUS,Where on earth to publish? A sample survey comparing traditional and open access publishing in the oncological field,Open access publishing; Scientific publications; Oncology; Surveys; Italy,"Background: The paper intends to help scientific authors to make the best choice of journals in which to publish, by describing and comparing journal features in the area of oncology. For this purpose, the authors identified impact factor (IF) ranking, cost options and copyright conditions offered to authors wishing to publish in full open access (OA), subscription-based or hybrid journals. Methods: Data referring to articles published in 2010 by three Italian research institutions (National Institute of Health - Rome (ISS), Regina Elena National Cancer Institute - Rome (IRE), National Cancer Institute - Milan (INT) in journals (78) managed according to different business models, all listed in the Journal Citation Reports, subject category Oncology, were collected and analysed. The journals surveyed were ranked according to IF, position in quartiles, publication charges, usage rights in published articles, self-archiving conditions in OAI-compliant repositories digital archives. Results: Almost half (34) the journals surveyed were included in the first quartile, thus revealing authors' preference for journals with a high IF. The prevalent journal business model was the hybrid formula (based on subscriptions but also offering a paid OA option) with 51 journals, followed by subscription-based only journals accounting for 22, while just 5 full OA journals were identified. In general, no relationship was found between IF and article publication charges, in terms of correspondence between more expensive fees and higher IF. Conclusions: The issue of OA journals as compared with traditional subscription-based journals is highly debated among stakeholders: library administrators facing financial restrictions, authors seeking to locate the best outlet for their research, publishers wishing to increase their revenues by offering journals with wider appeal. Against this background, factors such as the quest for alternatives to high-cost business models, investments in setting up institutional repositories hosting the published versions of articles and efforts to overcome copyright barriers and gain free access to scientific literature are all crucial.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['ITA'],"Poltronieri, Elisabetta; Bravo, Elena; Camerini, Tiziana; Ferri, Maurizio; Rizzo, Roberto; Solimini, Renata; Cognetti, Gaetana",JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"[Poltronieri, Elisabetta] Ist Super Sanita, Publishing Unit, I-00161 Rome, Italy; [Bravo, Elena] Ist Super Sanita, Dept Cell Biol & Neurosci, I-00161 Rome, Italy; [Camerini, Tiziana] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Milan, Italy; [Ferri, Maurizio] Ist Super Sanita, Data Management Unit, I-00161 Rome, Italy; [Rizzo, Roberto; Cognetti, Gaetana] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Sci & Patient Lib, Rome, Italy; [Solimini, Renata] Ist Super Sanita, Dept Therapeut Res & Med Evaluat, I-00161 Rome, Italy",23.0,7.0,BMC,1756-9966,,2013.0,32,,,,10.1186/1756-9966-32-4,,23339627.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2060,SCOPUS,"Science, institutional archives and open access: an overview and a pilot survey on the Italian cancer research institutions",,"Background: The Open Archive Initiative (OAI) refers to a movement started around the '90s to guarantee free access to scientific information by removing the barriers to research results, especially those related to the ever increasing journal subscription prices. This new paradigm has reshaped the scholarly communication system and is closely connected to the build up of institutional repositories (IRs) conceived to the benefit of scientists and research bodies as a means to keep possession of their own literary production. The IRs are high-value tools which permit authors to gain visibility by enabling rapid access to scientific material (not only publications) thus increasing impact (citation rate) and permitting a multidimensional assessment of research findings. Methods: A survey was conducted in March 2010 to mainly explore the managing system in use for archiving the research finding adopted by the Italian Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care (IRCCS) of the oncology area within the Italian National Health Service (Servizio Sanitario Nazionale, SSN). They were asked to respond to a questionnaire intended to collect data about institutional archives, metadata formats and posting of full-text documents. The enquiry concerned also the perceived role of the institutional repository DSpace ISS, built up by the Istituto Superiore di Sanita (ISS) and based on a XML scheme for encoding metadata. Such a repository aims at acting as a unique reference point for the biomedical information produced by the Italian research institutions. An in-depth analysis has also been performed on the collection of information material addressed to patients produced by the institutions surveyed. Results: The survey respondents were 6 out of 9. The results reveal the use of different practices and standard among the institutions concerning: the type of documentation collected, the software adopted, the use and format of metadata and the conditions of accessibility to the IRs. Conclusions: The Italian research institutions in the field of oncology are moving the first steps towards the philosophy of OA. The main effort should be the implementation of common procedures also in order to connect scientific publications to researchers curricula. In this framework, an important effort is represented by the project of ISS aimed to set a common interface able to allow migration of data from partner institutions to the OA compliant repository DSpace ISS.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['librarian'],['ITA'],"Poltronieri, Elisabetta; Truccolo, Ivana; Di Benedetto, Corrado; Castelli, Mauro; Mazzocut, Mauro; Cognetti, Gaetana",JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"[Cognetti, Gaetana] Ist Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst, Sci & Patient Lib, Rome, Italy; [Poltronieri, Elisabetta] Ist Super Sanita, Publishing Unit, I-00161 Rome, Italy; [Truccolo, Ivana; Mazzocut, Mauro] IRCCS, Ctr Riferimento Oncol, Sci & Patient Lib, Aviano, Italy; [Di Benedetto, Corrado] Ist Super Sanita, Informat Technol Unit, I-00161 Rome, Italy; [Castelli, Mauro] Ist Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst, JECCR, Rome, Italy",21.0,2.0,BMC,1756-9966,,2010.0,29,,,,10.1186/1756-9966-29-168,,21172002.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2065,SCOPUS,Altmetric and Bibliometric Scores: Does Open Access Matter?,altmetrics; bibliometrics; citation advantage; Open Access; social networking sites,"Since new publishing models and new communication channels are being developed, traditional ways of measuring journal and article impact are not sufficient besides bibliometrics, altmetrics arises as a new method based on quantitative analysis of mentions on blogs, in the news, shares on social networking sites etc. The main purpose of the study is to analyze the altmetric indicators for Altmetric top 100 articles in 2014, and to compare them with traditional bibliometric data for the same articles. Also, altmetric scores for Open Access (OA) articles are compared to the scores for non-OA articles. The research confirms low correlation between the number of citations (in the first year after publication) and the altmetric score. Nevertheless, the altmetric score has a potential role in promoting articles and getting post-publication evaluation and feedback.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Poplasen, Lovela Machala; Grgic, Ivana Hebrang",QUALITATIVE & QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN LIBRARIES,English,Article,,,,"[Poplasen, Lovela Machala] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Sch Publ Hlth Andrija Stampar, Zagreb 41000, Croatia; [Grgic, Ivana Hebrang] Univ Zagreb, Dept Informat & Commun Sci, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Zagreb 41000, Croatia",19.0,1.0,INT SOC ART SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-ISAST,2241-1925,,2016.0,,,451.0,460,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2072,SCOPUS,Open Access publishing practice in geochemistry: overview of current state and look to the future,Open access; Article processing charge; Green route; Repository; Environmental geochemistry; Earth sciences; Geochemistry; Fossil geochemistry; Biogeochemistry; Catchment geochemistry; Isotope geochemistry; Petroleum geochemistry; Trace element geochemistry; Hydrochemistry; Information science; Biogeoscience,"Open Access (OA) describes the free, unrestricted access to and re-use of research articles. Recently, a new wave of interest, debate, and practice surrounding OA publishing has emerged. In this paper, we provide a simple overview of the trends in OA practice in the broad field of geochemistry. Characteristics of the approach such as whether or not an article processing charge (APC) exists, what embargo periods or restrictions on self-archiving' policies are in place, and whether or not the sharing of preprints is permitted are described. The majority of journals have self-archiving policies that allow authors to share their peer reviewed work via green OA without charge. There is no clear relationship between journal impact and APC. The journals with the highest APC are typically those of the major commercial publishers, rather than the geochemistry community themselves. The rise in OA publishing has potential impacts on the profiles of researchers and tends to devolve costs from organizations to individuals. Until the geochemistry community makes the decision to move away from journal-based evaluation criteria, it is likely that such high costs will continue to impose financial inequities upon research community. However, geochemists could more widely choose legal self-archiving as an equitable and sustainable way to disseminate their research.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Pourret, Olivier; Hursthouse, Andrew; Irawan, Dasapta Erwin; Johannesson, Karen; Liu, Haiyan; Poujol, Marc; Tartese, Romain; van Hullebusch, Eric D.; Wiche, Oliver",HELIYON,English,Article,,,,"[Pourret, Olivier] UniLaSalle, AGHYLE, Beauvais, France; [Hursthouse, Andrew] Univ West Scotland, Sch Comp Engn & Phys Sci, Paisley PA1 2BE, Renfrew, Scotland; [Irawan, Dasapta Erwin] Inst Teknol Bandung, Fac Earth Sci & Technol, Bandung, Indonesia; [Johannesson, Karen] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Environm, Boston, MA 02125 USA; [Liu, Haiyan] East China Univ Technol, Sch Water Resources & Environm Engn, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China; [Poujol, Marc] Univ Rennes, Geosci Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6118, F-35000 Rennes, France; [Tartese, Romain] Univ Manchester, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England; [van Hullebusch, Eric D.] Univ Paris, Inst Phys Globe Paris, CNRS, Paris, France; [Wiche, Oliver] TU Bergakad Freiberg, Biol Ecol Unit, Inst Biosci, Freiberg, Germany",18.0,1.0,ELSEVIER SCI LTD,2405-8440,,2020.0,6,3,,,10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03551,,32181407.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2081,SCOPUS,"POWER, EMERGENCE, AND THE MEANINGS OF RESISTANCE: OPEN ACCESS SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING IN CANADA",Open access publishing; radical interactionism; power; emergence; resistance,"Open access publishing is an increasingly popular trend in the dissemination of academic work, allowing journals to print articles electronically and without the burden of subscription paywalls, enabling much wider access for audiences. Yet subscription-based journals remain the most dominant in the social sciences and humanities, and it is often a struggle for newer open access publications to compete, in terms of economic, cultural, and symbolic capital (Bourdieu, 2004). Our study explores the meanings of resistance held by the editors of open access journals in the social sciences and humanities in Canada, as well as the views of university librarians. To make sense of these meanings, we draw on Lonnie Athens' (2015) radical interactionist account of power, and expand on this by incorporating George Herbert Mead's (1932, 1938) theory of emergence, arguing that open access is characteristic of an extended rationality (Chang, 2004) for those involved. Drawing on our open-ended interview data, we find that open access is experienced as a form of resistance in at least four ways. These include resistance to (1) profit motives in academic publishing; (2) access barriers for audiences; (3) access barriers for contributors; and (4) traditional publishing conventions.",['openaccess'],['interview'],"['socscie', 'hum']","['librarian', 'publisher']",['CAN'],"Price, Taylor; Puddephatt, Antony","OPPRESSION AND RESISTANCE: STRUCTURE, AGENCY, TRANSFORMATION",English,Article; Book Chapter,,,,"[Price, Taylor] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; [Puddephatt, Antony] Lakehead Univ, Sociol, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada",47.0,1.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0163-2396,978-1-78743-167-6,2017.0,48,,95.0,115,10.1108/S0163-239620180000048008,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2095,SCOPUS,Do researchers use open research data? Exploring the relationships between usage trends and metadata quality across scientific disciplines from the Figshare case,Metadata quality; open research data usage; research repositories,"Open research data (ORD) have been considered a driver of scientific transparency. However, data friction, as the phenomenon of data underutilisation for several causes, has also been pointed out. A factor often called into question for ORD low usage is the quality of the ORD and associated metadata. This work aims to illustrate the use of ORD, published by the Figshare scientific repository, concerning their scientific discipline, their type and compared with the quality of their metadata. Considering all the Figshare resources and carrying out a programmatic quality assessment of their metadata, our analysis highlighted two aspects. First, irrespective of the scientific domain considered, most ORD are under-used, but with exceptional cases which concentrate most researchers' attention. Second, there was no evidence that the use of ORD is associated with good metadata publishing practices. These two findings opened to a reflection about the potential causes of such data friction.",['opendata'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Quarati, Alfonso; Raffaghelli, Juliana E.",JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Quarati, Alfonso] CNR, Inst Appl Math & Informat Technol, Via De Marini 6, I-16149 Genoa, Italy; [Raffaghelli, Juliana E.] Open Univ Catalonia, Fac Psychol & Educ, Barcelona, Spain",75.0,0.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0165-5515,,,,,,,10.1177/0165551520961048,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2103,SCOPUS,Is There a Social Life in Open Data? The Case of Open Data Practices in Educational Technology Research,Open Data; Open Science; Open Data repositories; social media; ResearchGate; Educational Technology research,"In the landscape of Open Science, Open Data (OD) plays a crucial role as data are one of the most basic components of research, despite their diverse formats across scientific disciplines. Opening up data is a recent concern for policy makers and researchers, as the basis for good Open Science practices. The common factor underlying these new practices-the relevance of promoting Open Data circulation and reuse-is mostly a social form of knowledge sharing and construction. However, while data sharing is being strongly promoted by policy making and is becoming a frequent practice in some disciplinary fields, Open Data sharing is much less developed in Social Sciences and in educational research. In this study, practices of OD publication and sharing in the field of Educational Technology are explored. The aim is to investigate Open Data sharing in a selection of Open Data repositories, as well as in the academic social network site ResearchGate. The 23 Open Datasets selected across five OD platforms were analysed in terms of (a) the metrics offered by the platforms and the affordances for social activity; (b) the type of OD published; (c) the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) data principles compliance; and (d) the extent of presence and related social activity on ResearchGate. The results show a very low social activity in the platforms and very few correspondences in ResearchGate that highlight a limited social life surrounding Open Datasets. Future research perspectives as well as limitations of the study are interpreted in the discussion.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['socscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Raffaghelli, Juliana E.; Manca, Stefania",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Raffaghelli, Juliana E.] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Fac Educ & Psychol, Barcelona 08018, Spain; [Manca, Stefania] Natl Res Council Italy, Inst Educ Technol, I-16149 Genoa, Italy",62.0,4.0,MDPI,,,2019.0,7,1,,,10.3390/publications7010009,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2106,SCOPUS,Empowering open science with reflexive and spatialised indicators,Geography of science; bibliometrics; open science; networks; epistemology,"Bibliometrics have become commonplace and widely used by authors and journals to monitor, to evaluate and to identify their readership in an ever-increasingly publishing scientific world. This contribution introduces a multi-method corpus analysis tool, specifically conceived for scientific corpuses with spatialised content. We propose a dedicated interactive application that integrates three strategies for building semantic networks, using keywords (self-declared themes), citations (areas of research using the papers) and full-texts (themes derived from the words used in writing). The networks can be studied with respect to their temporal evolution as well as to their spatial expressions, by considering the countries studied in the papers under inquiry. The tool is applied as a proof-of-concept on the papers published in the online open access geography journal Cybergeo since its creation in 1996. Finally, we compare the three methods and conclude that their complementarity can help go beyond simple statistics to better understand the epistemological evolution of a scientific community and the readership target of the journal. Our tool can be applied by any journal on its own corpus, fostering thus open science and reflexivity.",['openevaluation'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Raimbault, Juste; Chasset, Pierre-Olivier; Cottineau, Clementine; Commenges, Hadrien; Pumain, Denise; Kosmopoulos, Christine; Banos, Arnaud",ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Raimbault, Juste] UPS CNRS 36 11 ISC PIF, Paris, France; [Raimbault, Juste] UCL, CASA, London, England; [Raimbault, Juste; Chasset, Pierre-Olivier; Cottineau, Clementine; Commenges, Hadrien; Pumain, Denise; Kosmopoulos, Christine] UMR CNRS 8504 Geographie Cites, Paris, France; [Chasset, Pierre-Olivier] LISER, Luxembourg, Luxembourg; [Cottineau, Clementine] UMR CNRS 8097 Ctr Maurice Halbwachs, Paris, France; [Banos, Arnaud] UMR IDEES 6266, Paris, France",39.0,1.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,2399-8083,,,,,,,10.1177/2399808319870816,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2110,SCOPUS,Researchers adapting to open access journal publishing: the case of the University of Cape Town,Open access; open access publishing; article processing charges; social justice; scholarly communication; University of Cape Town,"This paper reports on the contribution of the openness movement to the changing mode of distributing scholarly literature. It is argued that the University of Cape Town (UCT), a leading research university on the African continent with relatively high research output, has a social justice obligation to distribute freely its scholarly research to the widest audience possible. Contributing to this social justice obligation through the sharing of research output via open access (OA) platforms are the university's progressive OA policy and activities to ensure roll-out of the policy as well as its commitments to support article processing charges (APCs) and follow the global trend with regard to OA publishing. The authors, using a case study design, report that these factors have contributed to UCT's researchers adapting to publishing their journal articles on OA platforms. The investigation concludes that, in an era of fiscal constraints, the visibility of research is important to source funding and to meet the institution's social justice obligation; and therefore adapting to new publishing trends is an imperative for UCT researchers.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['ZAF'],"Raju, Reggie; Claassen, Jill; Moll, Elizabeth",SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Raju, Reggie] Univ Cape Town, UCT Libraries, Res & Learning Serv, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa; [Claassen, Jill] Univ Cape Town, UCT Libraries, Res & Learning Serv, Scholarly Commun & Res, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa; [Moll, Elizabeth] Univ Cape Town, UCT Libraries, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa",27.0,0.0,FORUM PRESS,0256-8861,,2016.0,82,2,34.0,45,10.7553/82-2-1628,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2112,SCOPUS,Diffusion of knowledge in the social area digital editorial initiative of open access,Knowledge dissemination; Electronic Journal of Open Access; Social Sciences,"This research focuses on analyzing the reflexive view on the dissemination of knowledge in the social area through the open access of the electronic journal Dissertare which is attached to the Social Sciences Unit of Research that belongs to the Basic and Social Studies Department (BSSD) located in the Science and Technology Deanery (STD) of the Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado (UCLA). Universities require a kind of management that facilitates leadership, participation, and the use of the staffing capacities to achieve voluntary commitment in order to get a consistent performance of teachers that promote the achievement of common objectives. The STD, specifically the BSSD, found itself in the need to engage with its teachers to get the impulse of carrying out ascientific journal, which was materialized in the third edition of a scientific event called Experiences Researches in Action, held in octuber, 2015, which incorporated social and humanistic orientation research works in order to open up possibilities of research and establish wideranging research links among regional, national and international members of the scientific community; attending to their need of disseminate knowledge through publications. This article is inserted in the qualitative approach with a descriptive field design, using the inductive method. To carry out the analysis, it was necessary to examine different publications of open access. This activity was performed by a multidisciplinary team through the meetings with experts, as well as editors of recognized scientific solvency; in order to carry out the project of creation, which is currently in its designing and editing phase for its launching in the first trimester of the 2016.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'documentreview']","['socscie', 'hum']","['publisher', 'othergroup']",['VEN'],"Ramirez Chirinos, Luis Alfredo; Araujo Viloria, Alisbeth",ETIC NET-REVISTA CIENTIFICA ELECTRONICA DE EDUCACION Y COMUNICACION EN LA SOCIEDAD DEL CONOCIMIENTO,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Ramirez Chirinos, Luis Alfredo; Araujo Viloria, Alisbeth] Univ Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado, Barquisimeto, Lara, Venezuela",12.0,0.0,UNIV GRANADA,1695-324X,,2017.0,17,1,148.0,167,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2114,SCOPUS,Do Open Access Electronic Theses and Dissertations Diminish Publishing Opportunities in the Social Sciences and Humanities? Findings from a 2011 Survey of Academic Publishers,,"An increasing number of higher education institutions worldwide are requiring submission of electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) by graduate students and are subsequently providing open access to these works in online repositories. Faculty advisors and graduate students are concerned that such unfettered access to their work could diminish future publishing opportunities. This study investigated social sciences, arts, and humanities journal editors' and university press directors' attitudes toward ETDs. The findings indicate that manuscripts that are revisions of openly accessible ETDs are always welcome for submission or considered on a case-by-case basis by 82.8 percent of journal editors and 53.7 percent of university press directors polled.",['openaccess'],['survey'],"['socscie', 'hum']",['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Ramirez, Marisa L.; Dalton, Joan T.; McMillan, Gail; Read, Max; Seamans, Nancy H.",COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES,English,Article,,,,"[Ramirez, Marisa L.] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA USA; [Dalton, Joan T.] Univ Windsor, Leddy Lib, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada; [McMillan, Gail] Virginia Tech, Newman Lib, Digital Lib & Arch, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA; [Read, Max] Univ British Columbia, Fac Grad Studies, Student Acad Serv, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; [Seamans, Nancy H.] Georgia State Univ, Univ Lib, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA",9.0,8.0,ASSOC COLL RESEARCH LIBRARIES,0010-0870,,2013.0,74,4,368.0,380,10.5860/crl-356,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2118,SCOPUS,Open access journal publishing in Sri Lanka: Characteristics and future potential,Developing countries; Open access; Open access journals; Scholarly journals; Scholarly publishing; Sri Lanka,"The purpose of this study was to identify the problems faced by the scholarly journal publishing industry in Sri Lanka and to explore the opportunities provided by online open access publishing to overcome those problems. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used in this study. A literature review was used to identify the problems faced by developing countries, including Sri Lanka, in scholarly journal publishing. Open access journals published in Sri Lanka were identified through secondary sources such as open access journal directories and indexing services. Data were manually collected by accessing eighty-four (84) journal homepages systematically through the links provided by above directories and indexing services. The study has found that Sri Lanka faces problems similar to the other developing countries in the scholarly journal publishing. At the same time, the study has recognized open access as an opportunity for Sri Lankan scholarly journals to overcome those issues. Suggestions were made to improve the open access journal publishing in Sri Lanka and measures were suggested to overcome possible future drawbacks. Despite several studies related to open access initiatives, there have been no substantial studies on open access journal publishing in Sri Lanka. Hence, the present study intended to fill that gap by reviewing related literature and analyzing open access journals published in Sri Lanka. © 2020 Tamkang University.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['LKA'],"Ranasinghe W.M.T.D., Chung J.M.",Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Tamkang University,1013090X,0,2019.0,56,2,245.0,266,10.6120/JoEMLS.201907_56(2).0001.OR.BE,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2122,SCOPUS,Determining the informativeness of comments: a natural language study of F1000Research open peer review reports,Comments; Open peer review; F1000Research; Retrieval; NLP; Social information retrieval,"Purpose Social comments are rich in information and useful in evaluating, ranking or retrieving different kinds of materials. However, their merits in representing or providing added values to scientific articles have not yet been studied. Therefore, the present study investigates the informativeness of open review reports as a kind of social comments in a scholarly setting. Design/methodology/approach A test collection was built consisting of 100 randomly selected queries, 1,962 reviewed documents and their reviewers' open reports from F1000Research. They were analyzed using natural language techniques. The comments' salient words were compared to the documents' and also to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) salient words. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to test the accuracy of the comments in representing their related articles. Findings The papers' contents and comments have a considerable number of salient words in common. The comments' salient words are also largely found in the MeSH, signifying their consistency with the knowledge tree and their potential to add some complementary features to their related items. The ROC curves confirm the accuracy of the comments in retrieving their related papers. Originality/value This research is the first to reveal the merits of open review reports on scientific papers, in terms of their relatedness to their mother articles, in specific, and to the knowledge tree, in general. They are found informative in not only representing the reviewed papers but also in adding values to the contents of the papers.",['openevaluation'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Rashidi, Kianoosh; Sotudeh, Hajar; Mirzabeigi, Mahdieh; Nikseresht, Alireza",ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Rashidi, Kianoosh; Sotudeh, Hajar; Mirzabeigi, Mahdieh; Nikseresht, Alireza] Shiraz Univ, Knowledge & Informat Sci, Shiraz, Iran",81.0,0.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1468-4527,,2020.0,44,7,1327.0,1345,10.1108/OIR-02-2020-0073,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2123,SCOPUS,Open Peer Review in the Era of Open Science: A Pilot Study of Researchers' Perceptions,Open Peer Review; Open Science; OPR; Scientific publishing.,"The quality of Open Access journals is an important issue in developing digital library collections. Traditional criteria, such as peer review, may not be able to identify the quality of peer- reviewed publications. Open peer review (OPR) has emerged as an innovation of open science. OPR is still at an early development stage with various models, from revealing identities of the author and the reviewer to publishing the entire peer review history of the accepted paper. This pilot study utilizes qualitative interviews to investigate researchers' perceptions and attitudes towards the emerging publishing model. Through semi-structured interviews with seven researchers, this pilot study reports on the thoughts and opinions of the interviewees towards OPR and proposes further studies on the potential of OPR in scientific publishing. © 2017 IEEE.",['openevaluation'],['interview'],['natscie'],['researcher'],[],"Rath M., Wang P.",Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries,English,Conference Paper,"17th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2017",19 June 2017 through 23 June 2017,0,,,3.0,Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.,15525996,9781538638613,2017.0,0,0,0.0,0,10.1109/JCDL.2017.7991608,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2124,SCOPUS,Study of Open Access Publishing in Social Sciences and its Implications for Libraries,Social sciences; open access publishing; open access movement,"The Open Access Movement (OAM), which started as a gradual realisation by authors mainly in biomedical sciences to make available results of public-funded research projects to the public without much barrier pertaining to cost, permission, copyright obligations, etc., gradually gained momentum across the world and India was no exception to it. Though the movement was confined mainly to science, technology and medical fields in India, since last few years, a number of open access repositories and open access journals in Social Science subjects have started appearing. The present study which is confined to the open access Social Science journals published from India as mentioned in the Directory of Open Access Journals, identified 60 open access Social Sciences journals in India. The study also analysed the journals on the basis of certain parameters as to trend of open access journals in Social Sciences, and was found that most of open access journals in Social Sciences appeared between 2009 and 2014 and about half of the journals charge authors for publishing their papers in the journals and only a few are published under Creative Commons Attribution. Lastly, the paper discusses about implications of open access publishing on Social Science research libraries made few suggestions towards encouraging open access publishing in Social Science subjects in India.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],['publisher'],['IND'],"Rath, Prabhash Narayana",DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Rath, Prabhash Narayana] Gokhale Inst Polit & Econ, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India",10.0,0.0,DEFENCE SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION DOCUMENTATION CENTRE,0974-0643,,2015.0,35,3,177.0,183,10.14429/djlit.35.3.8720,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2132,SCOPUS,Open Access Research Via Collaborative Educational Blogging: A Case Study from Library & Information Science,blogging; distance learning; higher education; open access; social media,"This article charts the development of activities for online graduate students in library and information science. Project goals include helping students develop competencies in understanding open access publishing, synthesizing research in the field, and engaging in scholarly communication via collaborative educational blogging. Using a design experiment approach as a research strategy, focus is placed on the design of the collaborative blogging activity, open access research as a knowledge domain, and analyses of four iterations of the project. Findings from this iterative learning design suggest several benefits of implementing collaborative educational blogging activities in distance contexts.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['natscie'],['othergroup'],['USA'],"Rebmann, Kristen Radsliff; Clark, Camden Bernard",OPEN PRAXIS,English,Article,,,,"[Rebmann, Kristen Radsliff] San Jose State Univ, Sch Informat, San Jose, CA 95192 USA; [Clark, Camden Bernard] Univ Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843 USA",23.0,2.0,INT COUNCIL OPEN & DISTANCE EDUCATION,2304-070X,,2017.0,9,3,345.0,357,10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.665,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2137,SCOPUS,Observations and Perceptions of Academic Administrator Influence on Open Access Initiatives,Academic administrators; Open access; Scholarly communication,"Existing literature frequently covers the topic of open access from the perspectives of authors, librarians, or publishers. Investigations into the role of academic administrators, however, remain limited. Because librarians are uniquely positioned in the center of the scholarly communication ecosystem a survey of library directors was conducted to investigate the nature of any relationship between the actions of academic administrators and an institution's commitment to open access, as observed by librarians. Results indicate that, according to the perspective of librarians, as academic administrator attention to open access increases, open access activities of faculty and librarians also increase. Open access advocates should reflect upon the role of academic administrators and consider increasing efforts to gain the support of these individuals. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['USA'],"Reinsfelder, Thomas L.; Anderson, John A.",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"[Reinsfelder, Thomas L.] Penn State Mt Alto, Mt Alto, PA 17237 USA; [Anderson, John A.] Indiana Univ Penn, Indiana, PA 15705 USA",29.0,4.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2013.0,39,6,481.0,487,10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.014,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2139,SCOPUS,The quandary between communication and certification Individual academics' views on Open Access and open scholarship,Attitudes; Altmetrics; Scholarship; Open Access; Peer review; Academic publishing,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to understand individual academics' perception, attitudes and participation in Open Access Publishing and open scholarship and revisit some principles and designs of openness in academic publishing from the perspective of creative end-users, which helps to increase the sustainability and efficiency of open models. Design/methodology/approach - This paper draws on a case study of China and empirical data collected through semi-structured interviews with a wide range of academics and stakeholders. Findings - A separation between the communication and certification functions of publishing is identified: open initiatives are valued for efficient and interactive communication while traditional publishing still dominates the legitimacy of research publications, which leads to the quandary of individual academics operating within the transitional landscape of scholarly communication. Practical implications - Practical recommendations for sustainable and efficient openness are derived from discussions on the difficulties associated open/social certification and the shifting maxims that govern academics from publish or perish to be visible or vanish. Originality/value - Openness is defined in broad sense integrating Open Access and open scholarship to comprehensively reflect individual academics' views in the transitional landscape of academic publishing. The research findings suggest that new open approaches are needed to address the evolving tension and conflicts between communication and certification.",['openaccess'],['interview'],"['natscie', 'socscie', 'hum']",['researcher'],['CHN'],"Ren, Xiang",ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Ren, Xiang] Univ So Queensland, Australian Digital Futures Inst, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia",43.0,5.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1468-4527,,2015.0,39,5,682.0,697,10.1108/OIR-04-2015-0129,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2144,SCOPUS,OPEN ACCESS TO THE PAPERS IN WEB OF SCIENCE AND SCOPUS PUBLISHED AND CITED BY PHYSICAL EDUCATION UNIVERSITY LECTURERS: THE CASE OF SPAIN,Faculty; Electronic journals; Open access; Journal article,"Open publication of papers and articles in open-access archives or sites contributes to moving science forward. This paper aims to identify this practice in journals published and cited by Spanish university lecturers. Besides, this study compares databases extracted from Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus and analyses the number of papers of author as well as the number of authors for each paper. The study reveals that the journals indexed in Scopus receive more citations than those indexed in WoS. Over 75% of lecturers do not publish papers in journals indexed in the databases under analysis. The average of authors per paper is between 5.4 for WoS vs. 6.4 for Scopus. While the number of papers for each lecturer ranges between 7.7 for WoS vs 9.7 for Scopus. Most journals do not grant open access to their contents and very few of them have information about archives. As regards the total number of citations and papers in WoS and Scopus, the study has found highly positive correlations. Finally, this paper concludes that there is a need to open up scientific information to the international community as a whole, and that such a practice would contribute to increasing the papers' circulation and impact on the scientific community.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['socscie'],"['researcher', 'publisher']",['ESP'],"Reverter-Masia, Joaquin; Hernandez-Gonzalez, Vicenc; Sans-Rosell, Nuria; Mayolas-Pi, Carme",MOVIMENTO,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Reverter-Masia, Joaquin; Hernandez-Gonzalez, Vicenc; Sans-Rosell, Nuria] Univ Lleida, Lleida, Spain; [Mayolas-Pi, Carme] Univ Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain",38.0,2.0,"UNIV FED RIO GRANDE DO SUL, ESCOLA EDUC FISICA",0104-754X,,2015.0,21,2,419.0,433,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2148,SCOPUS,"Data repositories for e-Science: Open data, linked data and its technologies [Repositórios de dados para E-Science: Open Data, Linked Data e suas tecnologias] [Repositorios de datos para la e-Ciencia: Open Data, Linked Data y sus tecnologías]",E-Science; Linked data; Open data; RDF; Semantic web,"A new paradigm of scientific activity has been characterized from the constant investments in large-scale computing and large-scale data repositories: e-Science. Data repositories that context make use of Semantic Web technologies, and are conceptually different from traditional products intended for dissemination of outputs of traditional scientific activity. This work briefly presents the technological principles that define such data repositories while proposing a debate in the context of the Information Science to promote a reflection about the research potential and the participation of researchers in this area. The article is realized from a literature survey on the issues involved and presents the end considerations and issues identified in the relevant literature to promote the continuity of the discussion. © 2013 Brazilian Institute for Information in Science and Technology. All rights reserved.","['opendata', 'opentools']",['documentreview'],['natscie'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],Ribeiro Junior D.I.,Ciencia da Informacao,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,Brazilian Institute for Information in Science and Technology,1001965,0,2013.0,42,2,274.0,284,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2151,SCOPUS,Awareness of predatory journals and open access among medical oncologists: results of an online survey,predatory journals; survey; oncology; oncologist; knowledge; influence,"Introduction Predatory journals harm the integrity of science as principles of 'good scientific practice' are bypassed by omitting a proper peer-review process. Therefore, we aimed to explore the awareness of predatory journals among oncologists. Methods An online survey among oncologists working in Germany or Austria of various professional surroundings was conducted between October 2018 and April 2019. Results One hundred and eighty-eight participants (55 women (29.2%), 128 men (68.1%)) completed the questionnaire. 41 (21.8%) participants indicated to work in a hospital, 24 (12.8%) in private practice and 112 (59.6%) in a university hospital. 98.9% of participants indicated to actively read scientific articles and consider them in clinical decision-making (96.3%). 90.4% of participants indicated to have scientific experience by publishing papers in journals with peer-review system. The open-access system was known by 170 (90.4%), predatory journals by 131 (69.7%) and Beall's list by 52 participants (27.7%). Predatory journals were more likely to be known by participants with a higher number of publications (p<0.001), with more high-impact publications (p=0.005) and with recent publications (p<0.001). Awareness of predatory journals did not correlate with gender (p=0.515) or translation of scientific literature into clinical practice (p=0.543). Conclusions The problematic topic of 'predatory journals' is still unknown by a considerable amount of oncologist, although the survey was taken in a cohort of oncologists with scientific experience. Dedicated educational initiatives are needed to raise awareness of this problem and to aid in the identification of predatory journals for the scientific oncology community.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['practitioner'],"['DEU', 'AUT']","Richtig, Georg; Richtig, Erika; Boehm, Alexandra; Oing, Christoph; Bozorgmehr, Farastuk; Kruger, Stephan; Kiesewetter, Barbara; Zielinski, Christoph; Berghoff, Anna S.",ESMO OPEN,English,Article,,,,"[Richtig, Georg] Med Univ Graz, Otto Loewi Res Ctr, Pharmacol Sect, Graz, Austria; [Richtig, Georg] Med Univ Graz, Div Oncol, Graz, Austria; [Richtig, Erika] Med Univ Graz, Dept Dermatol, Graz, Austria; [Boehm, Alexandra] Hanusch Hosp, Med Dept 3, Div Hematol & Oncol, Vienna, Austria; [Oing, Christoph] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Oncol Hematol & Bone Marrow Transplantat, Div Pneumol, Hamburg, Germany; [Oing, Christoph] Univ Manchester, Sch Med Sci, Manchester Canc Res Ctr, Div Canc Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England; [Bozorgmehr, Farastuk] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, TLRC H, Thoraxklin, Dept Thorac Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany; [Bozorgmehr, Farastuk] German Ctr Lung Res DZL, Heidelberg, Germany; [Kruger, Stephan] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Med 3, Munich, Germany; [Kiesewetter, Barbara; Berghoff, Anna S.] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Clin Div Oncol, Vienna, Austria; [Zielinski, Christoph] Cent European Cooperat Oncol Grp, Vienna Canc Ctr, Vienna, Austria",14.0,2.0,BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP,,,2019.0,4,6,,,10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000580,,31803502.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2155,SCOPUS,Does open access publishing increase the impact of scientific articles? An empirical study in the field of intensive care medicine,Open access; Citation analysis; Intensive car; Medicine; Hirsch index,"Objective: Some studies suggest that open access articles are more often cited than non-open access articles. However, the relationship between open access and citations count in a discipline such as intensive care medicine has not been studied to date. The present article analyzes the effect of open access publishing of scientific articles in intensive care medicine journals in terms of citations count. Methods: We evaluated a total of 161 articles (76% being non-open access articles) published in Intensive Care Medicine in the year 2008. Citation data were compared between the two groups up until April 30, 2011. Potentially confounding variables for citatiorj,counts were adjusted for in a linear multiple regression model. Results: The median number (interquartile range) of citations of non-open access articles was 8 (4-12) versus 9 (6-18) in the case of open access articles (p = 0.084). In the highest citation range (>8), the citation count was beta (10-16) and 18 (eta-21) (p = 0.008), respectively. The mean follow-up was 37.5 3 months in both groups. In the 30-35 months after publication, the average number (mean standard deviation) of citations per article per month of non-open access articles was 0.28 0.6 versus 0.38 0.7 in the case of open access articles (p = 0.043). Independent factors for citation advantage were the Hirsch index of the first signing author (beta=0.207; p = 0.015) and open access status (beta=3.618; p = 0.006). Conclusions: Open access publishing and the Hirsch index of the first signing author increase the impact of scientific articles. The open access advantage is greater for the more highly cited articles, and appears in the 30-35 months after publication. (C) 2012 Elsevier Espana, S.L. and SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Riera, M.; Aibar, E.",MEDICINA INTENSIVA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Riera, M.] Hosp Univ Son Espases, Serv Med Intens, Palma De Mallorca, Spain; [Aibar, E.] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain",29.0,9.0,ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU,0210-5691,,2013.0,37,4,232.0,240,10.1016/j.medin.2012.04.002,,22683044.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2161,SCOPUS,The Perception of the University Professor regarding the use and value of Open Data,Open data; empowerment; digital literacy; teachers; higher education,"The advance of democratic awareness along with the increase in population is provoking the need to offer the society data that our own governments are legally obliged to provide and that citizens need more and more. Much of this data is offered in open mode; the so-called open data (OD), which is current, future, openness, transparency, knowledge, efficiency, time saving, depth of research, development in education, precision analysis and therefore in the pathologies and diagnoses of any area of our life that is of interest to study. However, it is of little or no use to know all about it if we do not know what to do with it or have the capacity to exploit it. In this context, and faced with the scarce initiatives in the educational field, this study is presented with the objective of studying open data within the scope of the Spanish Faculties of Education, aiming to learn whether they can be used in higher education as a teaching resource. The main objective is to know what type of perception university professors have regarding the use and value of open data for the teaching-learning process. The sample was of 192 teachers, with a maximum margin of error applicable to non-segmented global data with a confidence level of 95.5%, which in the worst case (p = q = 50%) is +/- 7.2%. A non-experimental research design has been developed, of an exploratory type, using the instrument of the questionnaire for the collection of information. The results demonstrated that use in higher education requires an improvement of educational policy that promotes digital literacy thus promoting educational empowerment.",['opendata'],['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['ESP'],"Rivas-Rebaque, Begona; Gertrudix-Barrio, Felipe; Cesar de Cisneros de Britto, Julio",EDUCACION XX1,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Rivas-Rebaque, Begona] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Ctr Innovac Educ Digital URJC Online, C Tulipan S-N, Mostoles 28933, Madrid, Spain; [Gertrudix-Barrio, Felipe; Cesar de Cisneros de Britto, Julio] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Educ Toledo, Avda Carlos III S-N, Toledo 45071, Spain",67.0,6.0,UNIV NACIONAL EDUCACION DISTANCIA,1139-613X,,2019.0,22,2,141.0,163,10.5944/educXX1.21317,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2167,SCOPUS,Infrastructures of accessibility: Designing open science projects to incorporate multiple audiences,Accessibility; Infrastructure; Open access; Open science,"Infrastructure is a crucial consideration for creating code that can be reused and repurposed. Infrastructures of data are highly rhetorical, because they structure how others interact with information and reflect hierarchies of information, people, and things. Those creating open source and open science projects, in particular, must consider how they structure their data according to principles of accessibility, reusability, and replicability. Failure to consider the design of publicly available code and insufficient user documentation lead to issues with transparency, learnability, and usability within open source science projects. This paper explores the decision-making processes of two open science researchers as they design their data according to the principles of open science. Using interviews and document analysis, I analyze the rhetorical coding choices of researchers and how these choices encourage or discourage accessibility for different audiences. Ultimately, I examine what accessibility means for these researchers working under the umbrella of open science. © 2020 ACM.",['opendata'],"['interview', 'documentreview']",['natscie'],['researcher'],['USA'],Roberts L.,SIGDOC 2020 - Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication,English,Conference Paper,"38th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, SIGDOC 2020",5 October 2020 through 9 October 2020,0,,,0.0,"Association for Computing Machinery, Inc",0,9781450375252,2020.0,0,0,0.0,0,10.1145/3380851.3416786,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2169,SCOPUS,Open Access uptake by universities worldwide,Open access; Universities; Research assessment; Research policy; Open science; Unpaywall; Scientometrics; Science of science,"The implementation of policies promoting the adoption of an open science (OS) culture must be accompanied by indicators that allow monitoring the uptake of such policies and their potential effects on research publishing and sharing practices. This study presents indicators of open access (OA) at the institutional level for universities worldwide. By combining data from Web of Science, Unpaywall and the Leiden Ranking disambiguation of institutions, we track OA coverage of universities' output for 963 institutions. This paper presents the methodological challenges, conceptual discrepancies and limitations and discusses further steps needed to move forward the discussion on fostering OA and OS practices and policies.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas; Costas, Rodrigo; van Leeuwen, Thed N.",PEERJ,English,Article,,,,"[Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas] Delft Univ Technol, Delft Inst Appl Math, Delft, Netherlands; [Costas, Rodrigo; van Leeuwen, Thed N.] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, Leiden, Netherlands; [Costas, Rodrigo] Univ Stellenbosch, Ctr Res Evaluat Sci & Technol, Stellenbosch, South Africa",28.0,2.0,PEERJ INC,2167-8359,,2020.0,8,,,,10.7717/peerj.9410,,32714658.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2178,SCOPUS,Directory of Open Access Journals in Keywords. Distribution and Themes of Articles,Open access; DOAJ; Research on open access; Scientific Communication; Scholarly journals,"Researchers depend on consultation with previous work in their field, most of which is published in scientific journals. The open access movement has affected journals and articles, providing new alternatives for accessing scientific content, and the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) is the most specialized and multidisciplinary database of open access journals. The main goal of this study is to analyze publications that include DOAJ in their keywords, to determine how researchers in the areas of Library and Information Science and Social Science are studying it. The specific objectives are: a) to describe the characteristics of journals indexed in the Web of Science, DOAJ, or SCOPUS that have published articles with DOAJ as a keyword; b) to identify the institutional affiliations of the authors of those articles; and c) to classify the articles according to subject area. We identified 39 articles from 29 journals. The countries with the largest numbers of journals are the United States and the United Kingdom (six journals each). Most of the journals were open access, of which universities were the biggest publishers. The countries with the largest numbers of authors were India (12), and Italy and Russia (11 each), and the journal that published the most articles was the University of Nebraska's Library Philosophy and Practice (four articles). Most articles analyze the quality (65.5%), followed by the growth (25.6%), of the Open Access Movement. An analysis of the subject areas covered revealed significant gaps, as the economic, legal and technological aspects of DOAJ were not represented.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],"['natscie', 'socscie']",['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Rodrigues, Rosangela Schwarz; Hermes de Araujo, Breno Kricheldorf; Sabino dos Santos, Laura Lavinia; Campos Brizola, Ana Lidia",JLIS.IT,English,Article,,,,"[Rodrigues, Rosangela Schwarz; Hermes de Araujo, Breno Kricheldorf; Sabino dos Santos, Laura Lavinia; Campos Brizola, Ana Lidia] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil",22.0,0.0,"UNIV STUDI FIRENZE, DIPT STUDI MEDIOEVO & RINASCIMENTO",2038-5366,,2020.0,11,3,110.0,121,10.4403/jlis.it-12630,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2179,SCOPUS,Research Articles about Open Access Indexed by Scopus: A Content Analysis,open access; scientific production about open access; research articles about open access; content analysis,"This study analyzes research articles about open access (OA) indexed by the Scopus database, published from 2001 to 2015, in order to: (a) propose a categorization scheme about OA; (b) categorize the scientific production about OA; and (c) identify research trends on OA through disciplines at international level over time. The authors used descriptive statistical methods and deductive content analysis using an unconstrained matrix in 347 selected research articles. The most explored themes were found to be overview, current state, and growth of OA counting for 98 articles (28.2%), and awareness, perceptions, and attitudes toward OA for 75 articles (21.6%). As a conclusion, this study reveals a continuous and growing research interest by the OA community in studies focused on case studies regarding the development or evolution of OA in relation to certain groups, institutions, regions, periods, and how different actors perceive and address the OA movement.",['openaccess'],"['biblio', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Rodrigues, Rosangela Schwarz; Taga, Vitor; dos Passos, Mariana Faustino",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Rodrigues, Rosangela Schwarz; Taga, Vitor] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Grad Program Lib & Informat Sci, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil; [dos Passos, Mariana Faustino] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Lib Studies, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil",43.0,9.0,MDPI AG,2304-6775,,2016.0,4,4,,,10.3390/publications4040031,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2182,SCOPUS,An evaluation of emergency medicine investigators' views on open access to medical literature,0,"Background: Scientists and governmental agencies have called for free universal access to research publications via the internet - open access. Objectives: To examine the current medical literature reading practices of emergency medicine investigators (EMIs) and their views towards open access. Methods: Surveys were mailed to the 212 corresponding authors of all original research articles published in years 2002 and 2003 in the Annals of Emergency Medicine, Academic Emergency Medicine and The Journal of Emergency Medicine. Results: The most commonly read forms of medical literature reported by the 129 (61%) EMI respondents were hard-copy medical journals and online literature review services. 59% of EMIs were in favour of open access; 58% stated they would read a wider variety of medical literature; 21% believed open access would improve the quality of publications and 39% thought it would decrease the quality. When asked how a US$1500 fee for open access would affect their ability to publish research, 69% said it would greatly impede and 19% said it would slightly impede their research. Conclusions: Despite concerns that open access may impede their ability to publish research and decrease the quality of publications, most EMIs surveyed favoured open access. They believed open access would increase and broaden their medical literature reading.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Rodriguez R.M., Wong J., Hardy J., Frankel E.",Emergency Medicine Journal,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,0,14720205,0,2006.0,23,12,895.0,898,10.1136/emj.2006.037192,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2183,SCOPUS,Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences,Scholarly communication; Open access; Perceptions; Demographics; Age,"This study explores PhD faculty members' current awareness of open access (OA) and perceptions of OA publishing, focusing on demographic characteristics to understand whether these variables correspond to specific perceptions and behaviors. The majority of respondents taught in Art, Humanities and Social Sciences disciplines. Results point to a growing trend in self reported knowledge of OA across all age groups but OA publishing activity is relatively limited. The younger age brackets reported higher percentages of publishing history than older age brackets, but these younger groups tended to also be tenured. Credibility of OA journals was the top concern of respondents. Results suggest that faculty authors cannot be prejudged by their age, seniority or rank as to their perception of, or experience with OA, because these indicators no longer appear to be strong predictors. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Rodriguez, Julia E.",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"Oakland Univ, Kresge Lib 238, Rochester, MI 48309 USA",26.0,28.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2014.0,40,6,604.0,610,10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2187,SCOPUS,Advancing the open science movement through sustainable business model development,Open innovation; open science; research data transfer; sustainable business models; university-industry collaboration,"The open science literature has focused on ways to increase the openness of research data at universities, while links with industry in the context of open innovation have received less attention. The aim of this article is to increase understanding of how open science can lead to open innovation. The key research questions are the following: How can researchers be motivated to make open their research data and how can industry take advantage of the data? The authors explore this topic through a case study of a Finnish foundation and its closed database. In 14 semi-structured interviews with the database owners, potential users and open science experts, they identified opportunities, barriers and possible solutions to opening the database. The authors propose a generic process framework for developing sustainable business models to facilitate research data transfer from university to industry. The study contributes to the open science literature by shedding light on how the gap between open science and open innovation can be bridged through the development of sustainable business models.",['opendata'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'unisupportstaff']",['FIN'],"Roman, Mona; Liu, Jingwei; Nyberg, Timo",INDUSTRY AND HIGHER EDUCATION,English,Article,,,,"[Roman, Mona; Liu, Jingwei; Nyberg, Timo] Aalto Univ, Aalto, Finland",28.0,4.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0950-4222,,2018.0,32,4,226.0,234,10.1177/0950422218777913,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2194,SCOPUS,Opportunities for open access: Insights from the Wiley Practitioner Survey,0,"There is less awareness of open-access publishing amongst practitioners than amongst their academic colleagues. The requirement for certification is a significant driver of professional society membership, particularly for those in clinical and veterinary medicine. Flipping a society journal from a subscription model to fully open access may drive down satisfaction. Professional society members state a desire for increased collaboration with academics and feel that societies have a role to play in this. Satisfaction levels with society membership are generally low amongst early career members (ECMs), but there are some clear opportunities for targeted services to improve this. Awareness of open access is reasonably high, and there are calls for greater transparency and improved data sharing, particularly from ECMs and engineers. © 2020 The Authors. Learned Publishing © 2020 ALPSP",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['USA'],Roscoe J.,Learned Publishing,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Wiley-Blackwell,9531513,0,2020.0,0,0,0.0,0,10.1002/leap.1357,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2197,SCOPUS,"Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers",,"Open peer review (OPR) is a cornerstone of the emergent Open Science agenda. Yet to date no large-scale survey of attitudes towards OPR amongst academic editors, authors, reviewers and publishers has been undertaken. This paper presents the findings of an online survey, conducted for the OpenAIRE2020 project during September and October 2016, that sought to bridge this information gap in order to aid the development of appropriate OPR approaches by providing evidence about attitudes towards and levels of experience with OPR. The results of this cross-disciplinary survey, which received 3,062 full responses, show the majority (60.3%) of respondents to be believe that OPR as a general concept should be mainstream scholarly practice (although attitudes to individual traits varied, and open identities peer review was not generally favoured). Respondents were also in favour of other areas of Open Science, like Open Access (88.2%) and Open Data (80.3%). Among respondents we observed high levels of experience with OPR, with three out of four (76.2%) reporting having taken part in an OPR process as author, reviewer or editor. There were also high levels of support for most of the traits of OPR, particularly open interaction, open reports and final-version commenting. Respondents were against opening reviewer identities to authors, however, with more than half believing it would make peer review worse. Overall satisfaction with the peer review system used by scholarly journals seems to strongly vary across disciplines. Taken together, these findings are very encouraging for OPR's prospects for moving mainstream but indicate that due care must be taken to avoid a one-size fits all solution and to tailor such systems to differing (especially disciplinary) contexts. OPR is an evolving phenomenon and hence future studies are to be encouraged, especially to further explore differences between disciplines and monitor the evolution of attitudes.",['openevaluation'],['survey'],"['natscie', 'engtech', 'med', 'socscie', 'hum']","['researcher', 'publisher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Ross-Hellauer, Tony; Deppe, Arvid; Schmidt, Birgit",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,"[Ross-Hellauer, Tony] Know Ctr GmbH, Graz, Austria; [Deppe, Arvid] Univ Kassel, Kassel Univ Lib, Kassel, Germany; [Schmidt, Birgit] Univ Goettingen, State & Univ Lib Goettingen, Gottingen, Germany",33.0,36.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1932-6203,,2017.0,12,12,,,10.1371/journal.pone.0189311,,29236721.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2198,SCOPUS,Are Funder Open Access Platforms a Good Idea?,open access; scholarly communications; research funders; publishing platforms,"As open access (OA) to publications continues to gather momentum, we should continuously question whether it is moving in the right direction. A novel intervention in this space is the creation of OA publishing platforms commissioned by funding organizations. Examples include those of the Wellcome Trust and the Gates Foundation, as well as recently announced initiatives from public funders like the European Commission and the Irish Health Research Board. As the number of such platforms increases, it becomes urgently necessary to assess in which ways, for better or worse, this emergent phenomenon complements or disrupts the scholarly communications landscape. This article examines ethical, organizational, and economic strengths and weaknesses of such platforms, as well as usage and uptake to date, to scope the opportunities and threats presented by funder OA platforms in the ongoing transition to OA. The article is broadly supportive of the aims and current implementations of such platforms, finding them a novel intervention which stands to help increase OA uptake, control costs of OA, lower administrative burden on researchers, and demonstrate funders' commitment to fostering open practices. However, the article identifies key areas of concern about the potential for unintended consequences, including the appearance of conflicts of interest, difficulties of scale, potential lock-in, and issues of the branding of research. The article ends with key recommendations for future consideration which include a focus on open scholarly infrastructure.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['med'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Ross-Hellauer, Tony; Schmidt, Birgit; Kramer, Bianca",SAGE OPEN,English,Article,,,,"[Ross-Hellauer, Tony] Know Ctr, Graz, Austria; [Ross-Hellauer, Tony] Graz Univ Technol, Graz, Austria; [Schmidt, Birgit] Univ Goettingen, Gottingen, Germany; [Kramer, Bianca] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands",69.0,3.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,2158-2440,,2018.0,8,4,,,10.1177/2158244018816717,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2205,SCOPUS,"Open access availability of Catalonia research output: Case analysis of the CERCA institution, 2011-2015",0,"The open access availability of publications by Catalonia's CERCA research centres was analysed to determine the extent to which authors use open access journals, repositories, social networks and other websites to disseminate their research results. A sample of 3,730 journal articles published by authors from CERCA research centres between 2011 and 2015 and available on Web of Science (out of a total output of 44,423) was analysed to identify how many were available in open access, full-text format. The results revealed that 75,8% of the total (2,828 articles) had at least one version available in open access, but just 52% (1,940 articles) had at least one version available in either journals (whether pure or hybrid open access journals or those with embargo periods) or repositories, a finding that highlights the powerful role played by academic social networks in the sharp increase in open access availability. Of the 2,828 articles for which at least one open access version was found, a total of 9,868 copies were located. With respect to versions, the publisher's final version, i.e. the type formatted for publication by journal publishers, was found in 75,3% of cases. The number of articles published in open access journals (567) was very close to the number of articles published in hybrid journals or journals with embargo periods (624). Only 40,4% of the articles in the sample were located in repositories, being the subject repositories the heaviest used. Fifty percent of the articles (1,881 publications) were posted on academic social networks, the most popular of which were ResearchGate and Academia. According to thematic areas, all six areas (science, life sciences, medical and health sciences, engineering and architecture and humanities) exceeded 70% of articles in open access. Copyright: © 2019 Rovira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'funder']",['ESP'],"Rovira A., Urbano C., Abadal E.",PLoS ONE,English,Article,0,0,0,,,4.0,Public Library of Science,19326203,0,2019.0,14,5,0.0,0,10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0216597,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2206,SCOPUS,Metadata of open access journals in the field of information science.,metadata; digital journals; open access journals; information science,This article presents the results obtained from a metadata study of 61 open access information science journals. The analysis shows that 34% do not use metadata and only 20% have specific metadata on the web page of each article.,['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Rovira, C; Marcos, MC",PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"Univ Pompeu Fabra, Grupo DigiDoc, Barcelona, Spain",1.0,3.0,EPI,1386-6710,,2006.0,15,2,136.0,+,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2207,SCOPUS,"Digital repositories of open access publications in Europe: analysis and assessment of accessibility, web positioning and source code quality",digital repositories; open access; accessibility; web positioning; web standards,"This work presents the results of a studio of web sites of 230 OA digital repositories in 16 European countries. The analysis addresses the extent to which these repositories fulfil display characteristics of quality sites, over and above the quality, of their content. The objective of this study is to verify whether web sites specifically committed to free access to information satisfy the quality criteria of accessibility, web positioning and quality of the source code. The results obtained find that accessibility must be improved upon, source code quality is merely acceptable, and web positioning is good. In short, bad practices were observed that should not occur in sites whose objective is to facilitate the free access to information.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'university']","['DEU', 'AUT', 'BEL', 'DNK', 'SVN', 'ESP', 'SVN', 'FRA', 'GRC', 'NLD', 'HUN', 'IRL', 'ITA', 'PRT', 'SWE', 'GBR']","Rovira, Cristofol; Marcos, Mari-Carmen; Codina, Lluis",PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept Periodismo & Comunicac Audiovisual, Barcelona, Spain",5.0,8.0,EPI,1386-6710,,2007.0,16,1,24.0,+,10.3145/epi.2007.jan.03,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0
2208,SCOPUS,Academics' Behaviors and Attitudes Towards Open Access Publishing in Scholarly Journals,,"While there is significant progress with policy and a lively debate regarding the potential impact of open access publishing, few studies have examined academics' behavior and attitudes to open access publishing (OAP) in scholarly journals. This article seeks to address this gap through an international and interdisciplinary survey of academics. Issues covered include: use of and intentions regarding OAP, and perceptions regarding advantages and disadvantages of OAP, journal article publication services, peer review, and reuse. Despite reporting engagement in OAP, academics were unsure about their future intentions regarding OAP. Broadly, academics identified the potential for wider circulation as the key advantage of OAP, and were more positive about its benefits than they were negative about its disadvantages. As regards services, rigorous peer review, followed by rapid publication were most valued. Academics reported strong views on reuse of their work; they were relatively happy with noncommercial reuse, but not in favor of commercial reuse, adaptations, and inclusion in anthologies. Comparing science, technology, and medicine with arts, humanities, and social sciences showed a significant difference in attitude on a number of questions, but, in general, the effect size was small, suggesting that attitudes are relatively consistent across the academic community.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Rowley, Jennifer; Johnson, Frances; Sbaffi, Laura; Frass, Will; Devine, Elaine",JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Rowley, Jennifer; Johnson, Frances; Sbaffi, Laura] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Dept Languages Informat & Commun, Geoffrey Manton Bldg, Manchester M15 6LL, Lancs, England; [Frass, Will; Devine, Elaine] Taylor & Francis Grp, 4 Pk Sq, Abingdon OX14 4RN, Oxon, England",41.0,25.0,WILEY,2330-1635,,2017.0,68,5,1201.0,1211,10.1002/asi.23710,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2209,SCOPUS,Towards an open access policy framework: A case study of COAR,COAR Repositories; Open Access Interoperability; Open Access Policies; Open Access Policy Framework; Open Access Repository,"This paper examines Open Access (OA) self archiving policies of different Open Access Repositories (OARs) affiliated to COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories) as partner institutes. The process of scrutiny includes three major activities – selection of databases to consult; comparison and evaluation of Open Access policies of repositories listed in the selected databases and attached to COAR group; and critical examination of available self archiving policies of these OA repositories against a set of selected criteria. The above steps lead to reporting the following results: key findings have been identified and highlighted; common practices have been analyzed in relation to the focus of this paper; and a best practice benchmark has been suggested for popularizing and strengthening OARs as national research systems. This paper may help administrators, funding agencies, policy makers and professional librarians in devising institute-specific self archiving policies for their own organizations. © 2018, Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services. All rights reserved.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'university']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Roy B.K., Biswas S.C., Mukhopadhyay P.",LIBER Quarterly,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,"Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services",14355205,0,2018.0,28,1,0.0,0,10.18352/lq.10227,,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2210,SCOPUS,Status of open access institutional digital repositories in agricultural sciences: A case study of Asia,Agriculture; Disciplinary repositories; Institutional repositories; Metadata harvesting; Open access; Self archiving policy,"Paper highlights the current state of open access repositories (OARs) movement in Agricultural field of Asian countries. It describes their characteristics in terms of types, contents, disciplines, languages covered, technical and operational issues, and policy matters. Compares and evaluates repositories against selected parameters and makes some recommendations for the growth of agricultural repositories Worldwide. Also presents a unified interface that can harvest metadata from different OAI-PMH compliant agricultural repositories Worldwide.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['agric'],"['librarian', 'university']","['IND', 'IDN', 'CHN', 'JPN', 'MYS', 'PHL', 'TWN', 'PRK', 'ARM', 'THA', 'TUR', 'KOR', 'PAK']","Roy B.K., Biswas S.C., Mukhopadhyay P.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,5.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2016.0,2016,1,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1
2219,SCOPUS,"SPANISH RESEARCHERS' OPINIONS, ATTITUDES, AND PRACTICES TOWARDS OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING",Open access; Publishing practices; Researchers; Authors; Scholarly publishing; Journals; Survey; Spain,"The open access (OA) movement has exploded in the last few years. In 2016 we invited 1,896 researchers based in Spanish institutions to fill in a survey on their opinion, attitudes and practices towards OA. We analysed the 554 responses received from researchers in all fields of knowledge (29% response ratio). Most researchers are aware of OA outlets in their fields (86%) and believe OA is beneficial (76%). There isn't a clear position on the quality of OA journals among Spain-based researchers and there are differences between disciplines. Almost 70% of researchers have published at least one OA article in the last 5 years. Half of them had to pay article processing charges (APCs) that were covered with research funds.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['ESP'],"Ruiz-Perez, Sergio; Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, Emilio",PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,English,Article,,,,"[Ruiz-Perez, Sergio] European Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Pk, Reading RG2 9AX, Berks, England; [Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, Emilio] Univ Granada, Fac Comunicac & Documentac, Colegio Maximo de Cartuja, Campus Cartuja S-N, E-18071 Granada, Spain",57.0,8.0,EPI,1386-6710,,2017.0,26,4,722.0,734,10.3145/epi.2017.jul.16,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2224,SCOPUS,Paved with gold: An institutional case study on supporting open access publishing,0,"The debate over scholarly communications and the future of publishing continues to simmer. Open access (OA) is seen to be a Good Thing in principle, but how does it work, how much does it cost and who pays for it? A pilot study in supporting 'gold' and 'green' open access at the University of Birmingham is examining the costs to the institution and the requirements of the funders, researchers, research administrators and the Library. Information from the pilot will be used to recommend a practical way forward that meets the needs of different research disciplines and cultures, in the context of the University's research strategy.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['GBR'],"Russell J., Kent T.",Serials,English,Article,0,0,0,,,4.0,0,9530460,0,2010.0,23,2,97.0,102,10.1629/2397,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2226,SCOPUS,Perceptions of the university professor on the open access scientific communication,open access; institutional repositories; scientific magazines; scientific communication; open access policies; universities,"The Internet have generated changes in scientific communication, creating a new model of free and quick access to research results to which educational institutions are gradually adapting in different contexts. This article analyzes the perception of open access policies and practices by teachers of the Uniguajira - Colombia (Uniguajira) and the Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon - Mexico (UANL). Methodologically, a comparative, non-experimental investigation was assumed. A random sample design with (n: 245) participants was used. The results show a favorable attitude of teachers towards open scientific communication, with higher ratings in the general average scale of 3.3 / 4 for UANL compared to 2.97 / 4 in Uniguajira. It is concluded that there is a willingness on part of teachers to share scientific content in free access; nonetheless, at the institutional level, open access policies and practices need to be strengthened.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],"['COL', 'MEX']","Ruth Pinto-Santos, Alba; Villanueva-Valadez, Carlos; Cortes-Pena, Omar",REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Ruth Pinto-Santos, Alba] Univ Guajira, Fac Ciencias Educ, Guajira, Colombia; [Villanueva-Valadez, Carlos] Univ Autonoma Nuevo Leon, Fac Ciencias Comunicac, San Nicolas De Los Garza, Mexico; [Cortes-Pena, Omar] Univ Sergio Arboleda, Fac Psicol, Bogota, Colombia",32.0,1.0,CONSEJO SUPERIOR INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS-CSIC,0210-0614,,2019.0,42,2,,,10.3989/redc.2019.2.1588,,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2228,SCOPUS,Implementing open science policies into library processes – case study of the university of eastern finland library,Academic libraries; Academics; Open access; Open science; Open science services,"This is a case study about the creation of open science services in the University of Eastern Finland. The library has overseen the open science services that have been actively implemented from 2010 onwards due to the development of the digitalisation of science and open science policies. A survey was conducted to determine how the UEF’s academic faculty use the services provided as well as their attitudes towards opening their own research findings in this manner. The researchers seem to be most interested in issues that influence their daily work, i.e. data management plans and opening their publications. It seems that the culture of openness is still at the development stage within UEF. The innovators, i.e. active research groups and researchers, are already practicing and encouraging openness, but the majority of the academic staff seems to be either unaware of open science or unwilling to implement it, due to the fact that incentives and career advancements still support the traditional way of conducting research. © 2020, Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services. All rights reserved.","['openaccess', 'opendata', 'openeducation']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['FIN'],"Saarti J., Rosti T., Silvennoinen-Kuikka H.",LIBER Quarterly,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,"Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services",14355205,0,2020.0,30,1,1.0,20,10.18352/LQ.10336,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2229,SCOPUS,Accessibility and decay of web citations in five open access ISI journals,Internet research;  Open access publishing;  Web citation;  Uniform resource locators;  Accessibility;  Decay;  Online access;  Electronic resources;  Journals;  Open access;  Inter-computer links,"Purpose - The aim of this paper is to scrutinize the accessibility and decay of web references (URLs) cited in five open access social sciences journals indexed by ISI. Design/methodology/approach - After acquiring all the papers published by these journals during 2002-2007, their web citations were extracted and analyzed from an accessibility point of view. Moreover, for initially missed citations complementary pathways such as using Internet Explorer and the Google search engine were employed. Findings - The study revealed that at first check 73 per cent of URLs are accessible, while 27 per cent have disappeared. It is notable that the rate of accessibility increased to 89 per cent and the rate of decay decreased to 11 per cent after using complementary pathways. The .net domain, with an availability of 96 per cent (a decay of 4 per cent) has the greatest stability and persistence among all domains, while the most stable file format is PDF, with an availability of 93 per cent (a decay of 7 per cent). Originality/value - Given the inevitable, destructive and progressing decay phenomenon in web citations, after estimating the extent of this decay for five journals using innovative and standard methods, this paper suggests recommendations for preventing it. The paper carries research value for web content providers, publishers, editors, authors and researchers.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['socscie'],"['researcher', 'publisher']",['USA'],"Saberi, M. K.;  Abedi, H.",INTERNET RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"[Saberi, M. K.] Islamic Azad Univ, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran;  [Saberi, M. K.;  Abedi, H.] Iran Publ Lib Fdn, Res & Educ Off, Tehran, Iran",38.0,14.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1066-2243,,2012.0,22,2,234.0,247,10.1108/10662241211214584,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2230,SCOPUS,Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research,Open access journals; Scientific research,"Background Open access (OA) publications have changed the paradigm of dissemination of scientific research. Their benefits to low-income countries underline their value; however, critics question exorbitant publication fees as well as their effect on the peer review process and research quality. purpose This study reports on the prevalence of OA publishing in orthopaedic research and compares benchmark citation indices as well as evidence quality derived from OA journals with conventional subscription based orthopaedic journals. Methods All 63 orthopaedic journals listed in ISI's Web of Knowledge Journal Citation Report (JCR) were examined. Bibliometric data attributed to each journal for the year 2012 was acquired from the JCR. Studies that fulfilled the criteria of level I evidence were identified for each journal within PubMed. Individual journal websites were reviewed to identify their open access policy. A total of 38 (60.3 %) journals did not offer any form of OA publishing; however, 20 (31.7 %) hybrid journals were identified which offered authors the choice to publish their work as OA if a publication fee was paid. Only five (8 %) journals published all their articles as OA. There was variability amongst the different publication fees for OA articles. Journals that published OA articles did not differ from subscription based journals on the basis of 2012 impact factor, citation number, self citation proportion or the volume of level I evidence published (p > 0.05). Conclusions OA journals are present in orthopaedic research, though in small numbers. Over a third of orthopaedic journals catalogued in the ISI Web of Knowledge JCRA (R) are hybrid journals that provide authors with the opportunity to publish their articles as OA after a publication fee is paid. This study suggests equivalent importance and quality of articles between OA and subscription based orthopaedic journals based on bibliometric data and the volume of level I evidence produced. Orthopaedic researchers must recognize the potential benefits of OA publishing and its emerging presence within the field. Further examination and consensus is required in orthopaedic research to generate an OA system that is robustly regulated and maintains research quality.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Sabharwal, Sanjeeve; Patel, Nirav; Johal, Karanjeev",INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS,English,Article,,,,"[Sabharwal, Sanjeeve] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg & Canc, London W2 1NY, England; [Patel, Nirav] Hillingdon Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Surg, London, England; [Johal, Karanjeev] North West London NHS Trust, London, England",23.0,11.0,SPRINGER,0341-2695,,2014.0,38,6,1297.0,1302,10.1007/s00264-013-2250-5,,24384939.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2237,SCOPUS,Open access practices in India,India; Institutional repository; Journals; Open access; Open access initiatives; Open access journals; Self-archive,"Purpose: The open access movement has become the center of discussion during the last decade. Open access publishing facilitates researchers' and scientists' access to research literature through the internet free of cost. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the awareness of open access publishing among researchers and faculty members of Indian institutions, and to evaluate the development of open access initiatives in India. Design/methodology/approach: This study is based on both primary and secondary sources of data. For studying awareness of open access publishing, a survey was conducted among the researchers of IITs and IIMs in July-August 2012 by using a closed ended questionnaire. The growth of open access initiatives in India is analyzed through data collected from secondary sources, i.e. the websites of Ulrich's, DOAJ, ROAR, and OpenDOAR. Findings: The results showed that India's contribution has increased in the last few years. It was found that the awareness about such open access information sources and initiatives among the research community is increasing. Originality/value: This study will assist in understanding the practices of open access publishing in India. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'othermeth']",['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['IND'],"Sahu S.K., Arya S.K.",Library Hi Tech News,English,Article,0,0,0,,,15.0,0,7419058,0,2013.0,30,4,6.0,12,10.1108/LHTN-03-2013-0011,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2243,SCOPUS,Faculty Members Who Teach Online: A Phenomenographic Typology of Open Access Experiences,Open access; Phenomenography; Online faculty members; Academic libraries,"The open access (OA) movement today incorporates a number of different threads reflecting disagreement among information professionals, publishers, institutions and advocates about how OA is defined and facilitated. It is unclear in this environment how faculty members involved in teaching and research construct understanding about open access and what range of understandings among this constituency may currently exist. This paper reports the results of a study using phenomenography to understand the open access experiences and perceptions of faculty members who teach online; a growing subgroup of faculty whose professional context positions themselves and their students differently in relation to subscription-based digital and print-based library collections and support than in a brick-and-mortar educational environment. Faculty members in this group experienced open access in five qualitatively distinctive ways: as resources for teaching as a publication channel; as a social justice movement, as open source, and as 'free for me'. These findings have implications for outreach and communication efforts for university libraries and higher education administrators, and offer in-sights into the concerns and challenges faced by faculty members while engaging with open access materials.","['openaccess', 'openeducation']",['interview'],"['socscie', 'hum', 'natscie']",['researcher'],"['IND', 'USA', 'GBR', 'AUS']","Salaz, A. M.; Johnston, Nicole; Pickles, Clare",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"[Salaz, A. M.] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Univ Lib, 5032 Forbes Ave SMC,1070, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA; [Johnston, Nicole] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Sci, Bldg 34,270 Joondalup Dr, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia; [Pickles, Clare] Laureate Online Educ, 126 Mt Pleasant, Liverpool L69 3GR, Merseyside, England",23.0,0.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2018.0,44,1,125.0,132,10.1016/j.acalib.2017.09.006,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2250,SCOPUS,The Open Access Initiative (OAI) in the scientific literature,OAI;  Open Access Initiative;  Scientific Literature;  Repository;  Electronic Papers,"According to the declaration of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (OAI) is defined as a editorial model in which access to scientific journal literature and his use are free. Free flow of information allowed by Internet has been the basis of this initiative. The Bethesda and the Berlin declarations, supported by some international agencies, proposes to require researchers to deposit copies of all articles published in a self-archive or an Open Access repository, and encourage researchers to publish their research papers in journals Open Access. This paper reviews the keys of the OAI, with their strengths and controversial aspects;  and it discusses the position of databases, search engines and repositories of biomedical information, as well as the attitude of the scientists, publishers and journals. So far the journal Actas Urologicas Espanolas (Act Urol Esp) offer their contents on Open Access as On Line in Spanish and English.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['med'],"['researcher', 'publisher']",['ESP'],"Sanchez-Martin, Francisco M.;  Millan Rodriguez, Felix;  Villavicencio Mavrich, Humberto",ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Sanchez-Martin, Francisco M.;  Millan Rodriguez, Felix;  Villavicencio Mavrich, Humberto] Fundacio Puigvert, Serv Urol, Barcelona 08025, Spain",10.0,2.0,ENE EDICIONES SL,0210-4806,,2009.0,33,7,732.0,740,10.1016/S0210-4806(09)74224-X,,19757657.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2251,SCOPUS,Scientific journals in Latin America on their way towards open access: A diagnosis on policies and editorial strategies,Open access; Latin America; Copyright; Editorial policies; Scientific journals,"This paper presents the main results of a study carried out in order to assess the current state of policies and strategies used by editorial boards of Latin American scientific journals, to promote use and reuse of open access scientific production, as well as to identify publishers and authors' perceptions and attitudes regarding these policies and strategies. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was carried out on data obtained from 516 journals and questionnaires applied to 400 publishers and 101 authors. Although most of the journals are free and considered as open access by their publishers, actually, in many cases they have established restrictive copyright policies or lack explicit information on terms and conditions of use and publishing of their articles. Institutional and editorial strategies to promote open access are scarce and have little visibility among authors. Sustainable funding and lack of familiarity with open access model are among the most important barriers for Latin America push these initiatives forward. Latin America needs a better and larger alignment and coherence of institutional and editorial policies with principles and strategies that promote open access, as well as further training for editors and authors.",['openaccess'],['survey'],"['socscie', 'natscie']",['researcher'],['SA'],"Sanchez-Tarrago, Nancy; Caballero-Rivero, Alejandro; Trzesniak, Piotr; Deroy Dominguez, Dania; Macedo dos Santos, Raimundo Nonato; Fernandez-Molina, Juan-Carlos",TRANSINFORMACAO,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Sanchez-Tarrago, Nancy] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Artes & Comunicacao, Dept Ciencia Informacao, Av Prof Moraes Rego,1235,Cidade Univ, BR-50740550 Recife, PE, Brazil; [Caballero-Rivero, Alejandro] Acad Ciencias Cuba, Habana Vieja, Cuba; [Trzesniak, Piotr; Macedo dos Santos, Raimundo Nonato] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Artes & Comunicacao, Programa Posgrad Ciencias Informacao, Recife, PE, Brazil; [Deroy Dominguez, Dania] Fac Latinoamer Ciencias Sociales, Biblioteca Marina Majoli, Havana, Cuba; [Fernandez-Molina, Juan-Carlos] Univ Granada, Fac Comunicac & Documentac, Colegio Maximo Cartuja, Granada, Spain",36.0,14.0,PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDADE CATOLICA CAMPINAS,0103-3786,,2016.0,28,2,159.0,172,10.1590/2318-08892016000200003,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2252,SCOPUS,The open access movement and Cuban health research work: an author survey,,"Objective: To assess the level of knowledge about and the attitudes of the Cuban health researchers towards the open access movement. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted from March to June 2007 through a printed questionnaire administered to a group of Cuban researchers from several national health institutes, who were selected by means of a stratified random sampling (160 researchers from 11 institutions). Summary statistics and bivariate correlations were obtained using the spss statistical program, version 10.0 for Windows. Results: The best known initiatives for researchers were those related to biomedical sciences, i.e. PubMed Central, HINARI and BioMed Central. The rate of publication in open access journals and deposit in open access repositories was low. Most of researchers (85%) agree to upload a copy of their papers onto an open access repository if their institution requests so. Conclusions: Our findings indicate a need for the promotion of the beneficial aspects of the open access movement, as well as training and encouragement for researchers so that they can take full advantage of the potential of this movement.",['openaccess'],"['documentreview', 'interview']",['med'],['researcher'],['CUB'],"Sanchez-Tarrago, Nancy;  Carlos Fernandez-Molina, J.",HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL,English,Article,,,,"[Sanchez-Tarrago, Nancy] Minist Publ Hlth Cuba, Havana, Cuba;  [Carlos Fernandez-Molina, J.] Univ Granada, Fac Commun & Informat Studies, Granada, Spain",18.0,9.0,WILEY,1471-1834,,2010.0,27,1,66.0,74,10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00852.x,,20402806.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2253,SCOPUS,An Open Access Policy for the Scientific Output of Cuba's National Health System,,"The open access movement seeks to recover the original principles behind scholarly communication - disseminating the results of research as broadly as possible, so that they can be analyzed, discussed, evaluated and confirmed by the scientific community, while eliminating legal, economic or technological barriers for the access to such documents. Open access policies can be considered catalysts of favourable attitudes and behaviours in this sense. In the particular case of Cuba, widespread and equal access to knowledge and information has been a core issue of social development policies since 1959. Nonetheless, there are weaknesses in the register of scientific production, and the accessibility and visibility of some types of documents in the health sector. This paper presents an outline for developing an open access policy to disseminate the scientific output of Cuba's National Health System. The four-stage analytical process involved questionnaires, interviews, focal groups, content analysis, and a Delphi policy study. The findings underline the benefits of obligatory register and deposit of Cuban scientific articles, Master's and PhD theses, and books on medicine and the health sciences, and thus, that their availability through open access be achieved as soon as possible.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'documentreview']",['med'],['policy'],['CUB'],"Sanchez-Tarrago, Nancy;  Carlos Fernandez-Molina, J.;  Caballero Rivero, Alejandro",LIBRI,English,Article,,,,"[Sanchez-Tarrago, Nancy] Minist Salud Publ Cuba, Direcc Nacl Epidemiol, Havana, Cuba;  [Carlos Fernandez-Molina, J.] Univ Granada, Dept Informac & Comunicac, Granada, Spain;  [Caballero Rivero, Alejandro] Acad Ciencias Cuba, Havana, Cuba",31.0,2.0,WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH,0024-2667,,2012.0,62,3,211.0,221,10.1515/libri-2012-0017,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2260,SCOPUS,Tools for copyright management in Open Access repositories [Instrumentos para la gestión del derecho de autor en repositorios de Acceso Abierto],Addendas;  Copyright;  Institutional repositories;  Laws;  Open Access. Open Access mandates;  Science communication,"The objective of this work is to introduce, to describe and to assess the legal, normative and political instruments adopted by research and academic institutions, funding agencies, national states and regional government agencies in promoting institutional repositories and managing copyright in the Open Access environment. The features of the main Open Access statements and mandates are described, as well as authorizations for the deposit in repositories, addendas to copyright transfer agreements with publishers, other regulations tools and national legislations related to Open Access, inasmuch as they represent instruments with diverse institutional and jurisdictional scope. Documents and data analyzed were drawn from the survey of websites in Latin America, United States and Europe running institutional repositories, of funding agencies and of national legislation in Spain, Brazil, Argentina and the United States. ROARMAP (Registry of Open Access Repository Material Archiving Policies) and Sherpa (Securing a Hybrid Environment for Research Preservation and Access)/Juliet on Open Access policies form funding institutions were also consulted. The conclusions summarise the way in which the analyzed instruments rule the relations among the different stakeholders in scientific communication in the Open Access model, also acknowledging their roles and rights. Finally, some reflections on the scope and impact of these instruments are presented. © 2011 Escuela Interamericana de Bibliotecologia. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['policy'],"['SA', 'USA', 'EU']","Sanllorenti A.M., Pelaya L., Williman M.",Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia,Spanish,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,Escuela Interamericana de Bibliotecologia,1200976,0,2011.0,34,3,313.0,328,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2266,SCOPUS,Tear down the walls: Disseminating open access research for a global impact,Global impact;  International Journal of Health Sciences;  Open Access Journals;  scientometric methods,"Objective: Publications are the cornerstone of the dissemination of scientific innovation and scholarly work, but published works are mostly behind paywalls. Therefore, many researchers and institutions are searching for alternative models for disseminating scholarly work that bypasses the current structure of paywalls. This study aimed to determine whether a self-published open access (OA) journal, the International Journal of Health Sciences (UHS), has been able to reach a global audience in terms of authorship, readership, and impact using the OA model. Methods: All IJHS articles were retrieved and analyzed using scientometric methods. Using the keywords from abstracts and titles, unsupervised clustering was performed to map research trends. Network analysis was used to chart the network of collaboration. The analysis of articles' metadata and the visualizations was performed using R programming language. Results: Using Google Scholar as a source, the general statistics of IJHS from inception to 2019 showed that the average citation per article was 11.29, and the impact factor of the journal was 2.28. The results demonstrate the obvious local and global impact of a locally published journal that allows unrestricted OA and uses an open source publishing platform. The journal's success at attracting diverse topics, authors, and readers is a testament to the power of the OA model. Conclusions: Open source is feasible and rewarding and enables a global reach for research from under-represented regions. Local journals can help the Global South disseminate their scholarly work, which is frequently ignored by commercial and established publications.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],"['researcher', 'funder', 'publisher']",['SAU'],"Saqr, Mohammed;  Al-Mohaimeed, Abdulrahman;  Rasheed, Zafar",INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES-IJHS,English,Article,,,,"[Saqr, Mohammed] Univ Eastern Finland, Sch Comp, Joensuu Campus,Yliopistokatu 2,POB 111, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland;  [Al-Mohaimeed, Abdulrahman] Qassim Univ, Coll Med, Dept Family Med, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia;  [Rasheed, Zafar] Qassim Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Biochem, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia",29.0,0.0,"QASSIM UNIV, COLL MEDICINE",1658-3639,,2020.0,14,5,43.0,49,,,32952504.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2267,SCOPUS,Expanding the actions of Open Government in higher education sector: From web transparency to Open Science,0,"Universities have been pressured by governments to change their way of acting and to be more responsible with the requirements of social development to face the challenges of globalization. To this end, universities must use the principles of Open Science, to allow them to be more transparent regarding the dissemination of scientific results. The purpose of this paper is firstly, to determine the progress made in Open Access policies made by the best-ranked universities regarding ARWU. Secondly, to examine influencing factors that enhance the level of openness in researching, in particular, “transparency”, “reputation”, “participation”, “funding”, “foundation” and “size”. The main results show that those private and older universities, best-ranked in terms of excellence researching and those that have been gradually adopting Open Government policies concerning the dissemination of information through institutional web pages and social participation, are the most interested with complying the recommendations established by the authorities of the Open Science projects. Copyright: © 2020 Saraite Sariene et al.","['openaccess', 'openscience']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['policy', 'university']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Sariene L.S., Pérez C.C., López Hernández A.M.",PLoS ONE,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,Public Library of Science,19326203,0,2020.0,15,44448,0.0,0,10.1371/journal.pone.0238801,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2281,SCOPUS,Exploring the determinants of publication of scientific data in open data initiative,Attribution; Challenges of data sharing; Data management; Open access initiative,"This research provides a preliminary analysis of determinants of the likelihood of researchers to publish their research datasets online. The data is derived from a preliminary survey conducted as part of the DataONE project;  an international federated data repository of ecological data. The survey of 1,329 researchers was conducted by the Usability and Assessment Working Group of DataONE from October 2009 to July 2010. The analysis of the data is threefold, namely: visualization of a 2-mode network, descriptive statistics, and ordered logistic regression. The visualization of the affiliated network shows a disconnected access pattern. With the majority of researchers accessing one database and only a few connecting or accessing more than one database. The results of the survey using descriptive and inferential statistics pointed at two key determinants of publishing research datasets online, namely: data management and attribution to the datasets owner. The importance of data management manifests on two ways, the significant of data management skills and organizational support for data management. Copyright 2011 ACM.","['openaccess', 'opendata']",['survey'],['natscie'],"['researcher', 'university']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Sayogo D.S., Pardo T.A.",ACM International Conference Proceeding Series,English,Conference Paper,"5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV 2011",26 September 2011 through 28 September 2011,Tallinn,,,1.0,0,0,9781450307468,2011.0,0,0,97.0,106,10.1145/2072069.2072087,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2285,SCOPUS,The use of material transfer agreements in academia: A threat to open science or a cooperation tool?,Material transfer agreement;  MTA;  Open science;  Scientific material sharing;  Repository;  Academic competition,"The transfer of scientific material and data, which are scientific inputs, is fundamental to knowledge creation dynamics. This transfer is being controlled, more and more, by the use of Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs). Therefore, the effect of MTAs on the dynamic of knowledge creation is an important concern. The aim of this research is to characterise the restrictions imposed by MTAs, and their determinants. We consider MTA diversity based on a comprehensive analysis of the clauses included in 171 MTAs signed by two French universities. We show that the clauses included in MTAs depend on several factors such as kind of material involved, research field, patenting and collection of material. We find that the presence of an industry actor is not associated to more restrictions on publication and intellectual property. We propose a typology of MTAs corresponding to different transfer situations. We discuss the role of MTAs as collaborative tools and the influence of the legal, scientific, political and organisational context.","['openaccess', 'openscience']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['policy', 'university']",['FRA'],"Schaeffer, Veronique",RESEARCH POLICY,English,Article,,,,"[Schaeffer, Veronique] Univ Strasbourg, BETA, CNRS, 61 Ave Foret Noire, F-67085 Strasbourg, France",105.0,5.0,ELSEVIER,0048-7333,,2019.0,48,9,,,10.1016/j.respol.2019.103824,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2295,SCOPUS,Open data in global environmental research: Findings from the community,Global environmental change;  Open data;  SharingE-infrastructures,"This paper presents selected findings of the Belmont Forum's survey on open data which targeted the global environmental research and data infrastructure community. It highlights users' perceptions of the term ""open data"", expectations of infrastructure functionalities, and barriers and enablers for the sharing of data. Respondents also pointed out a wide range of good practice examples and a desire for enhancement and consolidation. © 2015 The authors and IOS Press.",['opendata'],['survey'],['natscie'],"['policy', 'university', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Schmidt B., Gemeinholzer B., Treloar A.","New Avenues for Electronic Publishing in the Age of Infinite Collections and Citizen Science: Scale, Openness and Trust - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Elpub 2015",English,Conference Paper,"19th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Elpub 2015",1 September 2015 through 3 September 2015,0,,,0.0,IOS Press BV,0,9781614995616,2015.0,0,0,140.0,144,10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-140,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2298,SCOPUS,Open Data in Global Environmental Research: The Belmont Forum's Open Data Survey,,"This paper presents the findings of the Belmont Forum's survey on Open Data which targeted the global environmental research and data infrastructure community. It highlights users' perceptions of the term open data, expectations of infrastructure functionalities, and barriers and enablers for the sharing of data. A wide range of good practice examples was pointed out by the respondents which demonstrates a substantial uptake of data sharing through e-infrastructures and a further need for enhancement and consolidation. Among all policy responses, funder policies seem to be the most important motivator. This supports the conclusion that stronger mandates will strengthen the case for data sharing.",['opendata'],['survey'],['natscie'],"['policy', 'university', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Schmidt, Birgit;  Gemeinholzer, Birgit;  Treloar, Andrew",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,"[Schmidt, Birgit] Univ Gottingen, State & Univ Lib, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany;  [Gemeinholzer, Birgit] Univ Giessen, Systemat Bot, D-35390 Giessen, Germany;  [Treloar, Andrew] Australian Natl Data Serv, Melbourne, Vic, Australia",56.0,28.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1932-6203,,2016.0,11,1,,,10.1371/journal.pone.0146695,,26771577.0,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2301,SCOPUS,Document supply of grey literature and open access: ten years later,Document supply; British library; Grey literature; CISTI; INIST,"Purpose - The paper aims to investigate the impact of the open access movement on the document supply of grey literature. Design/methodology/approach - The paper is based on a comparative survey of five major scientific and technical information centres: The British Library (UK), KM (Canada), INIST- CNRS (France), KISTI (South Korea) and TIB Hannover (Germany). Findings - The five institutions supplied less than 1.8 million supplied items in 2014, i. e. half of the activity in 2004 (- 55 per cent). There were 85,000 grey documents, mainly conference proceedings and reports, i. e. 5 per cent of the overall activity, a historically low level compared to 2004 (- 72 per cent). At the same time, they continue to expand their open access strategies. Just as in 2004 and 2008, these strategies are specific, and they reflect institutional and national choices rather than global approaches, with two or three common or comparable projects (PubMed Central, national repositories, attribution of DOIs to datasets, dissertations and other objects). In spite of all differences, their development reveals some common features, like budget cuts, legal barriers (copyright), focus on domestic needs and open access policies to foster dissemination and impact of research results. Document supply for corporate customers tends to become a business-to-business service, while the delivery for the public sector relies more, than before, on resource sharing and networking with academic and public libraries. Except perhaps for the TIB Hannover, the declining importance of grey literature points towards their changing role - less intermediation, less acquisition and collection development and more high-value services, more dissemination and preservation capacities designed for the scientific community needs (research excellence, open access, data management, etc.). Originality/value - The paper is a follow-up study of two surveys published in 2006 and 2009.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher']","['GBR', 'CAN', 'FRA', 'DEU', 'KOR']","Schoepfel, Joachim",INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY,English,Article,,,,"Univ Lille 3, Informat & Documentat Sci, Villeneuve Dascq, France",31.0,3.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,0264-1615,,2015.0,43,2,84.0,93,10.1108/ILDS-02-2015-0004,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2302,SCOPUS,Open access and document supply,Open repositories;  Document supply;  Service development;  Open access,"Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overview and update of what one actually knows about the impact of open access on inter-lending and document supply. Design/methodology/approach - A review of recent papers, published after the Berlin Declaration on Open Access in 2003. Findings - Everything seems to oppose document supply and open access. Open access has contributed to the recent decline of interlibrary loan (ILL) and document supply requests but is not the only reason and probably not the most important. Open repositories and open-access journals have the potential to substitute ILL and document supply;  yet for different reasons, including legal compliance, this substitution remains of limited interest. ILL and document supply institutions have started to integrate open access into their workflow and service provision in different ways, and the paper provides a conceptual framework with some perspectives for further service development. Originality/value - Paradoxically, relatively few papers make the link between open access and document supply, with empirical and/or conceptual elements. This paper proposes a synthesis and opens perspectives for future development and research.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Schoepfel, Joachim",INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY,English,Article,,,,"Univ Lille 3, Dept Informat & Documentat Sci, Villeneuve Dascq, France",35.0,9.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-1615,,2014.0,42,4,187.0,195,10.1108/ILDS-10-2014-0049,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2303,SCOPUS,Document supply of grey literature and open access: an update,Grey literature; Document delivery; Sciences,"Purpose - This paper seeks to investigate the impact of the open archive initiative on the document supply of grey literature. Design/methodology/approach - The article is based on a comparative survey of five major scientific and technical information centres: The British Library (UK), CISTI (Canada), INIST-CNRS (France), KISTI (South Korea), and TIB Hannover (Germany). Findings - All major document suppliers are quite deeply involved in the open archive movement, and this involvement has an obvious impact on the policy of acquisition, archiving and supply of grey literature (dissertations, reports, conferences etc.). Originality/value - The paper is a follow-up study of the survey published in 2006.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher']","['GBR', 'CAN', 'FRA', 'DEU', 'KOR']","Schoepfel, Joachin; Prost, Helene",INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY,English,Article,,,,"[Schoepfel, Joachin] Univ Lille 3, Dept Informat & Commun Sci, Lille, France; [Prost, Helene] CNRS, French Inst Sci & Tech Informat, Nancy, France",28.0,9.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,0264-1615,,2009.0,37,4,181.0,191,10.1108/02641610911006274,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2306,SCOPUS,"Open access, privacy, and human rights: A case study on ethics in library and information sciences education",Education; Ethics; Human rights; IFLA Code of Ethics; Library and information sciences,"Purpose - How do students comment on ethical principles, which principles are important for their awareness of librarianship, how do they understand the relevance of human rights for their future work? Methodology/approach - The case study presents the results of a lecture on information rights and ethics with 50 Master students in library and information sciences (LIS) at the University of Lille (France) in 2014-2015. Students were asked to comment on the core principles of the International Federation of Library Association (IFLA) Code of Ethics. Findings - The students see the library as a privileged space of access to information, where the librarian takes on the function of a guardian of this specific individual freedom - a highly political role and task. This opinion is part of a general commitment to open access and free flowing resources on Internet. They emphasize the social responsibility toward the society as a whole but most of all toward the individual patron as a real person, member of a cultural community, a social class or an ethnic group. With regard to Human Rights, the students interpret the IFLA Code mainly as a code of civil, political, and critical responsibility to endorse the universal right of freedom of expression. They see a major conflict between ethics and policy. The findings are followed by some recommendations for further development of LIS education, including internship, transversality, focus on conflicts and the students' cognitive dissonance and teaching of social skills, in terms of work-based solidarity and collective choices. Originality/value - The chapter is qualitative research based on empirical data from a French LIS Master program. © 2016 by Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['socscie'],"['librarian', 'university']",['FRA'],Schöpfel J.,Advances in Librarianship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.,652830,0,2016.0,41,0,349.0,371,10.1108/S0065-283020160000041015,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2309,SCOPUS,"Research Ethics, Open Science and CRIS",current research information systems (CRIS);  research information management;  research management;  research ethics;  open science,"The purpose of this paper is to analyze how current research information systems (CRIS) take into account ethical issues, especially in the environment of open science. The analysis is based on a review of the literature on research information management, CRIS, open science and research ethics. The paper provides a framework for the assessment of CRIS on two levels: are CRIS (= their data model, format, functionalities, etc.) compliant with ethical requirements from the research community, funding bodies, government, etc., i.e., can they appropriately process data on research ethics (protocols, misconduct, etc.), and which are the ethical issues of the development, implementation and usage of CRIS? What is the impact of new ethical requirements from the open science movement, such as integrity or transparency? Can CRIS be considered as ethical infrastructures or infraethics? Concluding this analysis, the paper proposes an empirical approach for further investigation of this topic. The originality of the paper is that there are very few studies so far that assess the implications of research ethics and open science on the CRIS.",['openscience'],['documentreview'],['socscie'],"['librarian', 'university']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Schopfel, Joachim;  Azeroual, Otmane;  Jungbauer-Gans, Monika",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Schopfel, Joachim] Univ Lille, GERiiCO Lab, Dept SID, F-59653 Villeneuve Dascq, France;  [Azeroual, Otmane;  Jungbauer-Gans, Monika] German Ctr Higher Educ Res & Sci Studies DZHW, Dept Infrastruct & Methods, D-30159 Hannover, Germany",50.0,0.0,MDPI,,,2020.0,8,4,,,10.3390/publications8040051,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2311,SCOPUS,Ready for the future? A survey on open access with scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS),Open access; Open repositories; OA publishing; Open science; Research management; Self-archiving,"Purpose - This paper aims to present empirical evidence on the opinion and behaviour of French scientists (senior management level) regarding open access (OA) to scientific and technical information. Design/methodology/approach - The results are part of a nationwide survey on scientific information and documentation with 432 directors of French public research laboratories conducted by the French National Research Center (CNRS) in 2014. Findings - The CNRS senior research managers (laboratory directors) globally share the positive opinion towards OA revealed by other studies with researchers from the UK, Germany, the USA and other countries. However, they are more supportive of open repositories (green road) than of OA journal publishing (gold). The response patterns reveal a gap between generally positive opinions about OA and less supportive behaviours, principally publishing articles with article processing charges (APCs). A small group of senior research managers does not seem to be interested in green or gold OA and reluctant to self-archiving and OA publishing. Similar to other studies, the French survey confirms disciplinary differences, i.e. a stronger support for self-archiving of records and documents in HAL by scientists from Mathematics, Physics and Informatics than from Biology, Earth Sciences and Chemistry; and more experience and positive feelings with OA publishing and payment of APCs in Biology than in Mathematics or in Social Sciences and Humanities. Disciplinary differences and specific French factors are discussed, in particular in the context of the new European policy in favour of Open Science. Originality/value - For the first time, a nationwide survey was conducted with the senior research management level from all scientific disciplines. The response rate was high (> 30 per cent), and the results provide good insight into the real awareness, support and uptake of OA by senior research managers who provide both models (examples for good practice) and opinion leadership.",['openaccess'],['survey'],"['natscie', 'engtech', 'med', 'socscie', 'hum']",['researcher'],['FRA'],"Schopfel, Joachim; Ferrant, Coline; Andre, Francis; Fabre, Renaud",INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY,English,Article,,,,"[Schopfel, Joachim] Univ Lille 3, Villeneuve Dascq, France; [Ferrant, Coline] Sci Po, Paris, France; [Ferrant, Coline] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL USA; [Ferrant, Coline] INRA, Ivry, France; [Andre, Francis; Fabre, Renaud] CNRS, Sci & Tech Informat Dept, Paris, France",14.0,10.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-1615,,2016.0,44,4,141.0,149,10.1108/ILDS-06-2016-0023,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2313,SCOPUS,Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions,,"Objectives: We aimed to assess journal authors' current knowledge and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing. Design: An electronic survey. Setting: Authors of research papers submitted to BMJ, Archives of Disease in Childhood, and Journal of Medical Genetics in 2004. Main outcome measures: Familiarity with and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing. Results: 468/1113 (42%) responded. Prior to definitions being provided, 47% (222/468) and 38% (176/468) reported they were familiar with the terms 'open access' and 'author-pays' publishing, respectively. Some who did not at first recognize the terms, did claim to recognize them when they were defined. Only 10% (49/468) had submitted to an author-pays journal. Compared with non-open access subscription-based journals, 35% agreed that open access author-pays journals have a greater capacity to publish more content making it easier to get published, 27% thought they had lower impact factors, 31% thought they had taster and more timely publicaitons, and 46% agreed that people will think anyone can pay to get published. 55% (256/468) thought they would not continue to submit to their respective journal if it became open access and charged, largely because of the reputaiton of the journals. Half (54%, 255/468) said open access has 'no impact' or was 'low priority' in their submission decisions. Two-thirds (66%, 308/468) said they would prefer to submit to a non-open access subscription-based journal than an open access author-pays journal. Over half thought they would have to make a contribution or pay the full cost of an author charge (56%, 262/468). Conclusions: The survey yielded useful information about respondents' knowledge and perceptions of these publishing models. Authors have limited familiarity with the concept of open-access publishing and surrounding issues. Currently, open access policies have little impact on authors' decision of where to submit papers.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Schroter, S;  Tite, L",JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE,English,Article,,,,"BMJ Publishing Grp, BMJ Editorial Off, London WC1H 9JR, England",8.0,52.0,ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD,0141-0768,,2006.0,99,3,141.0,148,10.1258/jrsm.99.3.141,,16508053.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2314,SCOPUS,Identification of influencing factors regarding the decision for or against an open access publication of scientists of medical informatics: Description and first results of group discussions and interviews,Focus Groups;  Motivation;  Open Access Publishing,"Open Access provides researchers another opportunity of publishing, besides the traditional publication in subscription-based journals. Providing higher dissemination and therefore visibility as well as better accessibility, among others, Open Access helps to fulfil changed needs of authors and readers in our information and communication society of today. Though this publication model provides a lot of advantages both for readers and authors, there are also some obstacles. In order to identify the incentives that can lead scientists of medical informatics to an Open-Access-publication, we conducted a study consisting of group discussions, interviews, and surveys. This tripartite evaluation starts in its first part with group discussions and interviews. First results of them show that, among others, the higher visibility, indexing, Impact Factor and better accessibility are factors for an Open-Access-publication. © 2019 International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) and IOS Press. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).",['openaccess'],['interview'],"['natscie', 'med']",['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Schulze M., Mielke C., Taddicken M., Haux R., Kuballa S.",Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,English,Conference Paper,"17th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics, MEDINFO 2019",25 August 2019 through 30 August 2019,0,,,0.0,IOS Press,9269630,9781643680026,2019.0,264,0,1248.0,1252,10.3233/SHTI190426,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2317,SCOPUS,Archiving in the networked world: open access journals,Computer networks;  Journals;  Open access,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate how extensively LOCKSS/CLOCKSS, Portico, and e-Depot provide long-term digital archiving for the journals listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). Design/methodology/approach - The paper uses publicly available online data, which are processed in a set of PERL programs to measure the number of DOAJ articles in the three archiving systems. Findings - The findings show that only 8 per cent of the DOAJ titles are in LOCKSS/CLOCKSS and only 5 per cent in Portico. The findings also suggest that it could take eight years to archive all full text DOAJ articles in e-Depot based on current plans. Practical implications - The most important implication is that most open access titles listed in DOAJ currently have no effective long-term digital archiving. Originality/value - The paper investigates how extensively LOCKSS/CLOCKSS, Portico, and e-Depot provide long-term digital archiving for the journals listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).","['openaccess', 'opensoftware']",['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Seadle, Michael",LIBRARY HI TECH,English,Article,,,,"Berlin Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Berlin, Germany",3.0,5.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,0737-8831,,2011.0,29,2,394.0,404,10.1108/07378831111138251,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2320,SCOPUS,"Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer Review, and Altmetrics among Contributors to Spanish Scholarly Journals",altmetrics; open access; open peer review; scholarly communications; social media,"This paper aims for a better understanding of the perspectives of contributors to Spanish academic journals regarding open access, open peer review, and altmetrics. Specifically, it explores how age, gender, years of professional experience, and perception and use of social media influence authors' opinions of these developments in scholarly publishing. A sample of 295 contributors to Spanish academic journals participated in a survey about the aforementioned topics. They were found to hold a favourable opinion of open access but were more cautious about open peer review and altmetrics. The responses of younger and female scholars indicated more reluctance to accept open peer review practices. A positive attitude toward social networks did not necessarily translate into enthusiasm for emerging trends in scholarly publishing. Despite this, ResearchGate users were more aware of altmetrics.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'publisher']",['ESP'],"Segado-Boj, Francisco; Martin-Quevedo, Juan; Prieto-Gutierrez, Juan Jose",JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Segado-Boj, Francisco] Univ Int La Rioja, Logrono, La Rioja, Spain; [Martin-Quevedo, Juan] Univ Int La Rioja, Fac Law Social Sci & Humanities, Logrono, La Rioja, Spain; [Prieto-Gutierrez, Juan Jose] Univ Int La Rioja, Fac Educ, Logrono, La Rioja, Spain",36.0,9.0,UNIV TORONTO PRESS INC,1198-9742,,2018.0,50,1,48.0,70,10.3138/jsp.50.1.08,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2321,SCOPUS,"Spanish scientific journals perceptions towards open Access, open peer review and altmetrics",Scientific journals; Open access; Search engines; Altmetrics; Open review; Spain,"This paper aims at analysing the perception and attitudes of editors of Spanish scientific journals about some of the most important advances in scholarly communication linked with ICTs and the Internet: the advantages and disadvantages attributed to open access, open peer review and alt-metrics. Fifteen in-depth interviews have been conducted with the people in charge of Spanish journals indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus, attending to a fair representation of all areas of knowledge. Findings show a wide negative perception of all these tools, due to the fear of a loss of reputation for the journal which may use these innovations. Only open access is positively perceived.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation', 'opentools']",['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['ESP'],"Segado-Boj, Francisco; Martin-Quevedo, Juan; Prieto-Gutierrez, Juan-Jose",IBERSID-REVISTA DE SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION Y DOCUMENTACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Segado-Boj, Francisco; Martin-Quevedo, Juan; Prieto-Gutierrez, Juan-Jose] Univ Int La Rioja, Av Paz 137, Logrono 26004, La Rioja, Spain",32.0,0.0,IBERSID NETWORK,1888-0967,,2018.0,12,1,27.0,32,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2324,SCOPUS,Perceptions and attitudes of Arab information technology researchers toward open access publishing,Arabic Content; Attitudes; Open Access Publishing; Perceptions,The freely accessible scientific research and scholarly material is very important to enrich the web content and disseminate the knowledge to the public. Open access (OA) journal publishing can play a major role in providing research results and scholarly material to the public freely. This paper examines the perceptions and attitudes of Arab researchers and scholars toward publishing their research in open-access journals. The paper also explores the factors that may encourage or discourage the publication of Arabic scholarly content in the open-access journals. The study is based on survey questionnaire administered to a sample of Arab academics in the fields of computing and information technology. Results revealed poor contributions of Arab researchers and scholars in enriching the Arabic web content via OA publishing initiatives. These findings may help to alert people concerned with the Arabic content to encourage and foster such participation in the future. © 2012 IEEE.,['openaccess'],['survey'],['natscie'],"['researcher', 'university']",['SA'],"Seliaman M.E., Salim E., Eldow M.E.Y.","CHUSER 2012 - 2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research",English,Conference Paper,"2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research, CHUSER 2012",3 December 2012 through 4 December 2012,"Kota Kinabalu, Sabah",,,0.0,0,0,9781467346153,2012.0,0,0,168.0,171,10.1109/CHUSER.2012.6504304,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2330,SCOPUS,Usage Trends of Open Access and Local Journals: A Korean Case Study,,"Articles from open access and local journals are important resources for research in Korea and the usage trends of these articles are important indicators for the assessment of the current research practice. We analyzed an institutional collection of published papers from 1998 to 2014 authored by researchers from Seoul National University, and their references from papers published between 1998 and 2011. The published papers were collected from Web of Science or Scopus and were analyzed according to the proportion of articles from open access journals. Their cited references from published papers in Web of Science were analyzed according to the proportion of local (South Korean) or open access journals. The proportion of open access papers was relatively stable until 2006 (2.5 similar to 5.2% in Web of Science and 2.7 similar to 4.2% in Scopus), but then increased to 15.9%(Web of Science) or 18.5% (Scopus) in 2014. We analyzed 2,750,485 cited references from 52,295 published papers. We found that the overall proportion of cited articles from local journals was 1.8% and that for open access journals was 3.0%. Citations of open access articles have increased since 2006 to 4.1% in 2011, although the increase in open access article citations was less than for open access publications. The proportion of citations from local journals was even lower. We think that the publishing / citing mismatch is a term to describe this difference, which is an issue at Seoul National University, where the number of published papers at open access or local journals is increasing but the number of citations is not. The cause of this discrepancy is multi-factorial but the governmental / institutional policies, social / cultural issues and authors' citing behaviors will explain the mismatch. However, additional measures are also necessary, such as the development of an institutional citation database and improved search capabilities with respect to local and open access documents.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher', 'university']",['KOR'],"Seo, Jeong-Wook;  Chung, Hosik;  Yun, Jungmin;  Park, Jin Young;  Park, Eunsun;  Ahn, Yuri",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,"[Seo, Jeong-Wook] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Seoul 151, South Korea;  [Chung, Hosik] Naver Corp, Contents Platform Lab, Songnam, Kyunggi Do, South Korea;  [Yun, Jungmin] Korea Inst Ind Technol, Korea Natl Ind Convergence Ctr, Ansan, Kyunggi Do, South Korea;  [Park, Jin Young;  Park, Eunsun;  Ahn, Yuri] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Lib, Seoul, South Korea",40.0,2.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1932-6203,,2016.0,11,5,,,10.1371/journal.pone.0155843,,27195948.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2333,SCOPUS,Open Access Awareness and Perceptions in an Institutional Landscape,Institutional repository; Open access journals; Open access; Services on top of repositories; Open access institutional policy,"The aim of this study was to determine the awareness of open access among the academic staff of a research oriented Spanish university, their use of the institutional repository and their satisfaction with its services. An anonymous survey of 37 questions was sent to all professors, researchers and doctoral students of the University of Navarra. A total of 352 responses (17%) were received. The responses showed statistically significant differences in opinions concerning open access journals and services created on top of the repository. Although there was general agreement on the need for open access, half the respondents adopted open access practices (which included the use of the institutional repository, and other pages and academic platforms). This percentage increased with the older respondents, who were also senior members of staff with tenure and positions of authority at the university. The decision to make publications accessible in open access depends on academic reward and on professional recognition. The services offered by the repository were generally perceived positively, with differences according to the age and subject area of the respondents. The awareness of those differences might help the university library to provide faculty with training and products that suit to their needs and habits. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'university']",['ESP'],"Serrano-Vicente, R.; Melero, R.; Abadal, E.",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"[Serrano-Vicente, R.] Univ Navarra, Serv Bibliotecas, Campus Univ, Pamplona 31009, Spain; [Melero, R.] CSIC, Inst Agroquim & Tecnol Alimentos, Prof Escardino 7, Valencia 46980, Spain; [Abadal, E.] Univ Barcelona, Fac Bibliotecon & Documentacio, Melcior de Palau 140, Barcelona 08014, Spain",18.0,9.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2016.0,42,5,595.0,603,10.1016/j.acalib.2016.07.002,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2335,SCOPUS,Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: An evidence-based review,Communication Technologies; Meta-Synthesis; Open Access; Open Science; Publishing; Scholarly Communication; Science Policy; Scientometrics,"Background: Many of the discussions surrounding Open Access (OA) revolve around how it affects publishing practices across different academic disciplines. It was a long-held view that it would be only a matter of time before all disciplines fully and relatively homogeneously implemented OA. Recent large-scale bibliometric studies show, however, that the uptake of OA differs substantially across disciplines. We aimed to answer two questions: First, how do different disciplines adopt and shape OA publishing practices? Second, what discipline-specific barriers to and potentials for OA can be identified? Methods: In a first step, we identified and synthesized relevant bibliometric studies that assessed OA prevalence and publishing patterns across disciplines. In a second step, and adopting a social shaping of technology perspective, we studied evidence on the socio-technical forces that shape OA publishing practices. We examined a variety of data sources, including, but not limited to, publisher policies and guidelines, OA mandates and policies and author surveys. Results: Over the last three decades, scholarly publishing has experienced a shift from; access to OA as the proportion of scholarly literature that is openly accessible has increased continuously. Estimated OA levels for publication years after 2010 varied between 29.4% and 66%. The shift towards OA is uneven across disciplines in two respects: first, the growth of OA has been uneven across disciplines, which manifests itself in varying OA prevalence levels. Second, disciplines use different OA publishing channels to make research outputs OA. Conclusions: We conclude that historically rooted publishing practices differ in terms of their compatibility with OA, which is the reason why OA can be assumed to be a natural continuation of publishing cultures in some disciplines, whereas in other disciplines, the implementation of OA faces major barriers and would require a change of research culture. © 2020 Severin A et al.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'university', 'policy', 'publisher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Severin A., Egger M., Eve M.P., Hürlimann D.",F1000Research,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,F1000 Research Ltd,20461402,0,2020.0,7,0,0.0,0,10.12688/f1000research.17328.2,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2336,SCOPUS,Web 2.0 interactivity in open access repositories,Social networking;  Twitter;  Facebook;  ATOM;  Open access repositories;  RSS;  Social bookmarking;  Web 2.0 tools;  Podcast;  YouTube;  Flickr;  Blog,"Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to provide an overview of open access (OA) repositories that have embraced Web 2.0 technologies. The main focus of the paper is to explore the occurrence of Web 2.0 tools used in the open repositories. Design/methodology/approach - Repositories having English as one of the interface/content languages and indexed in Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR) were selected and analyzed under different parameters. Findings - A total of 1,499 open access repositories having English as one of the interface/content languages (75.82 percent of total OA repositories) are developed from 81 nations and only 61 countries have most of their repositories Web 2.0 enabled. About 57 percent (804) repositories make use of Web 2.0 tool/s, 43 percent (608) have yet to avail benefits of Web 2.0 tools while 5.8 percent remain inaccessible (87) during the study period. Though the USA leads in terms of OA repositories, the percentage of Web 2.0 enabled repositories is higher for the UK (7527 percent) as compared to the USA (51.08 percent). Really Simple Syndication (RSS), a syndication tool, is found in the majority of repositories (736, 91.54 percent) followed respectively by Social Bookmarking and ATOM (syndication tool) in 228 and 160 repositories Research limitations/implications - Repositories have to develop a more productive Web 2.0 outlook in order to converge with an interactive learning model. A follow-up study can explore the use of Web 2.0 tools in open access repositories. The impact of Web 2.0 tools on the associated activities of the users as well as repository administrators can also be carried on. How Web 2.0 tools have helped to improve the services of the repositories and how they have influenced the information seeking behavior of users in the open access repositories can also be researched. Originality/value - The research is the first of its kind and can act as an opener to the issues related to use of Web 2.0 in open repositories.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Shafi, S. M.;  Gul, Sumeer;  Shah, Tariq Ahmad",ELECTRONIC LIBRARY,English,Article,,,,"[Shafi, S. M.;  Gul, Sumeer;  Shah, Tariq Ahmad] Univ Kashmir, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Srinagar 190006, Jammu & Kashmir, India",60.0,7.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-0473,,2013.0,31,6,703.0,712,10.1108/EL-08-2011-0121,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2341,SCOPUS,Perceptions of Open Access Publishing among Academic Journal Editors in China,0,"Open access publishing is examined from the perspective of academic journal editors in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In addition to providing background information on academic publishing in China, the author incorporates interviews with two editors from open access and four from traditional subscription-based journals in the region. The editors share their general views on Chinese academic publishing and reflect on how open access has or could affect their publications. The editors comment on such issues as the economic viability of open access publishing in China and the potential benefits and challenges faced by Chinese academic journal editors who pursue open access. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['CHN'],Shao X.,Serials Review,English,Article,0,0,0,,,11.0,0,987913,0,2007.0,33,2,114.0,121,10.1016/j.serrev.2007.02.002,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2342,SCOPUS,Perceptions of open access publishing among academic journal editors in china,0,"Open access publishing is examined from the perspective of academic journal editors in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In addition to providing background information on academic publishing in China, the author incorporates interviews with two editors from open access and four from traditional subscription-based journals in the region. The editors share their general views on Chinese academic publishing and reflect on how open access has or could affect their publications. The editors comment on such issues as the economic viability of open access publishing in China and the potential benefits and challenges faced by Chinese academic journal editors who pursue open access. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['CHN'],"Shao X., Scherlen A.",Serials Review,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,0,987913,0,2007.0,33,2,114.0,121,10.1080/00987913.2007.10765105,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2343,SCOPUS,The Current State of Open Access in Journals Sponsored by the China Association for Science and Technology,open access;  journal;  China Association for Science and Technology;  online system model;  regional distribution;  discipline distribution;  category distribution;  time since adopting OA policy,"The open-access (OA) journals among the 1003 journals sponsored by the China Association for Science and Technology (CAST) were identified. Information about the following aspects of the journals were collected and analysed: when each journal was established, its publication cycle, its system model, its region, its discipline, the time between an issue's publication and the posting of the online version, the number of issues that have been made OA, and length of time that it has had an OA policy. On the basis of these results, problems associated with OA journals sponsored by CAST were found and relevant approaches that can promote OA publication in China were recommended.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['CHN'],"Shao, Ju-fang;  Shen, Hui-yun;  Zhang, Si-long;  He, Xiao-jun;  Zheng, Xin-tian",JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Shao, Ju-fang;  Shen, Hui-yun;  Zhang, Si-long;  He, Xiao-jun;  Zheng, Xin-tian] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Ed Office J Emergency Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China",8.0,3.0,UNIV TORONTO PRESS INC,1198-9742,,2013.0,44,4,373.0,383,10.3138/jsp.44-4-005,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2344,SCOPUS,Open science cyber-infrastructure framework for next generation disaster analytics,Disaster analytics;  Next generation repository system;  Open data;  Open science,"The open science movement is gaining popularity due to the stability of data storage and network technologies besides the availability of open data portal in many countries. However, a case study that focuses on the requirement and design of the cyber-infrastructure for open science is limited. This paper reports the assessment of existing infrastructure for disaster information management as an open science activity based on the Sendai Framework. A framework that combines the open data quality and the next generation repository system requirements based on a case study on the flood and forest fire management in Malaysia and Indonesia is proposed. This paper fills the gap between the focus on open data framework and the next generation repository system based on the requirements from a recent international collaboration on climate research studies. © BEIESP.","['openscience', 'opendata']",['documentreview'],['agric'],"['policy', 'university']","['MYS', 'IDN']","Sharef N.M., Jacob D.W., Hayashi M.",International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication,22783075,0,2019.0,8,8,149.0,160,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2349,SCOPUS,"Faculty awareness, use and attitudes towards scholarly open access: A Pakistani perspective",Attitudes; faculty members; open access models; open access movement; Pakistan; scholarly communication,"Open access is a new scholarly publishing model that aims to provide free access to scholarly information to all members of society. This study analyzes the awareness, use and attitudes of Pakistani faculty members towards scholarly open access. A structured questionnaire was designed to collect data from the respondents by using an online survey tool, Google Forms. The population of the study was the faculty members of 21 universities and higher education institutions located in Islamabad. A sample of 3000 faculty members were invited, through email, to participate in the study; of which 616 completed the survey, with a response ratio of 20.53%. Descriptive statistics and (SPSS) version 21.0 were used for data analysis. The findings of the study reveal that, although majority of the Pakistani faculty members (71.5%) were aware of the scholarly open access before this survey, their awareness level about open access-related resources and initiatives was very low. The Pakistani faculty members used open access venues more frequently to access scholarly contents rather than to publish their own research works. A lack of awareness to publish in open access venues, and publication fees of open access journals were the key challenges faced by the Pakistani faculty members. The attitudes of faculty members towards open access were very positive in all contexts. Large readership, impact factor, free access to readers and no publication fee were the key motivational factors for the faculty members to publish in open access journals.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['PAK'],"Sheikh, Arslan",JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Sheikh, Arslan] Sarhad Univ Sci & Informat Technol, Peshawar, Pakistan; [Sheikh, Arslan] COMSATS Inst Informat Technol, Pk Rd, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan",56.0,3.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0961-0006,,2019.0,51,3,612.0,628,10.1177/0961000617742455,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2352,SCOPUS,Open Access Scholarly Journal Publishing in Chinese,scholarly publishing;  open access;  Chinese-language journals,"The research literature on open access (OA) publishing has mainly dealt with journals publishing in English, and studies focusing on OA journals in other languages are less common. This article addresses this gap via a case study focusing on Chinese-language OA journals. It starts with the identification of the major characteristics of this market, followed by eight semi-structured interviews to explore the key motivations behind Chinese-language OA publishing and perceived barriers. The majority of Chinese OA journals are published in Chinese, and most of them are published by universities and scholarly societies. Nearly 80% of journals were launched before the digital age and were converted to OA later. The subject distribution is highly skewed towards the science, technology, engineering and medicine (STEM) fields. Publishers are motivated to convert journals to OA by an expected increase in academic impact, which would also attract more submissions. The lack of a sufficient number of high-quality submissions is perceived as the largest barrier to the successful publishing of journals. The financial instability of journals is identified as the main obstacle hindering internationalisation. The central conclusions of the study are that Chinese-language OA journals need to increase their visibility in journal indexes such as the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and that an OA publishing platform (similar to the Latin American SciELO) should be established for Chinese-language OA journals.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['CHN'],"Shen, Cenyu",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Shen, Cenyu] Hanken Sch Econ, Informat Syst Sci, Helsinki 00100, Finland",55.0,5.0,MDPI,2304-6775,,2017.0,5,4,,,10.3390/publications5040022,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2353,SCOPUS,'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics,Open access;  Scientific publishing,"Background: A negative consequence of the rapid growth of scholarly open access publishing funded by article processing charges is the emergence of publishers and journals with highly questionable marketing and peer review practices. These so-called predatory publishers are causing unfounded negative publicity for open access publishing in general. Reports about this branch of e-business have so far mainly concentrated on exposing lacking peer review and scandals involving publishers and journals. There is a lack of comprehensive studies about several aspects of this phenomenon, including extent and regional distribution. Methods: After an initial scan of all predatory publishers and journals included in the so-called Beall's list, a sample of 613 journals was constructed using a stratified sampling method from the total of over 11,000 journals identified. Information about the subject field, country of publisher, article processing charge and article volumes published between 2010 and 2014 were manually collected from the journal websites. For a subset of journals, individual articles were sampled in order to study the country affiliation of authors and the publication delays. Results: Over the studied period, predatory journals have rapidly increased their publication volumes from 53,000 in 2010 to an estimated 420,000 articles in 2014, published by around 8,000 active journals. Early on, publishers with more than 100 journals dominated the market, but since 2012 publishers in the 10-99 journal size category have captured the largest market share. The regional distribution of both the publisher's country and authorship is highly skewed, in particular Asia and Africa contributed three quarters of authors. Authors paid an average article processing charge of 178 USD per article for articles typically published within 2 to 3 months of submission. Conclusions: Despite a total number of journals and publishing volumes comparable to respectable (indexed by the Directory of Open Access Journals) open access journals, the problem of predatory open access seems highly contained to just a few countries, where the academic evaluation practices strongly favor international publication, but without further quality checks.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Shen, Cenyu;  Bjork, Bo-Christer",BMC MEDICINE,English,Article,,,,"[Shen, Cenyu;  Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Informat Syst Sci, POB 479Arkadiankatu 22, Helsinki 00101, Finland",34.0,288.0,BMC,1741-7015,,2015.0,13,,,,10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2,,26423063.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2354,SCOPUS,The Majority of High-Impact Science Journals Would Accept Manuscripts Derived from Open Access Electronic Theses and Dissertations,,"Objective - To assess science journal publishers' attitudes and policies regarding open access electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs). Design - Survey questionnaire. Setting - Science journal publications. Subjects - Editorial team members from 290 high-impact science journals. Methods - The 16,455 science journals listed in the 2005-09 Thompson Reuter's Journal Performance Indicators (JPI) were identified as the base population for this study. The top five journals, as ranked by relative impact factor, from each of the 171 JPI-defined science disciplines were selected for the sampling frame. After the removal of duplicates, defunct titles, and pretest participants, the 715 resulting journals were grouped into 14 broader subject groups defined by the researchers. Randomized systematic sample was then employed to select a final sample size of 300 journals. Ten additional titles were later removed due to publication scope. Email invitations to participate in the survey were sent to the selected journals on August 9, 2012. After two email reminders, the web survey closed on August 27. Six phone follow-ups were made to a random sample of 100 out of the 246 non-responders between September 7 and 14 to increase the response rate. Main Results - The final response rate for the survey was 24.8% (72 out of 290), and the findings had an 11.5% margin of error with 95% confidence interval. Only 12.5% of the journals surveyed indicated they would never accept manuscripts derived from open access ETDs, while 51.4% indicated revised EDTs are always welcome. The rest of the respondents had some acceptance restrictions, including case-by-case review (19.4%), accept only if the content differs significantly from the original (8.3%), accept or only if access to the original ETD was limited (1.4%). Five of the 72 respondents (6.9%) did not have a policy for accepting ETDs. Of the 17 researcher-created discipline categories, Engineering titles had the highest (85.7%, or 12 out of 14) and Medical journals had the lowest (25%, or 3 out of 14) proportion of respondents who would always welcome manuscripts derived from open access ETDs. At least 50% of the journals from every type of publishing entity indicated they would  always welcome revised ETDs. However, there are differences between the entities: University Presses were most likely to  always welcome revised ETDs (87.5%), Commercial Publishers were more likely to have some acceptance restrictions (41.7%), and Academic Societies were the most likely entity to  never welcome revised ETDs (12.7%). Lastly, in a comparison of the results of this study with the results from a similar 2013 study conducted on social science, arts and humanities (SS&H) journals, the authors found statistically significant differences (p=0.025, a=0.05) between the editorial policies regarding revised ETDs of science and SS&H journals. Conclusion - The study results suggest that, contrary to common perceptions, the majority of high-impact science journals would actually welcome revised open access ETDs submissions. Therefore, science scholars would not greatly reduce their chances for publishing manuscripts derived from EDTs by making the original ETDs accessible online.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Shen, Lisa",EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE,English,Article,,,,"[Shen, Lisa] Sam Houston State Univ, Newton Gresham Lib, Reference & Instruct Serv, Huntsville, TX 77340 USA",1.0,1.0,UNIV ALBERTA,1715-720X,,2015.0,10,3,111.0,113,10.18438/B8VK58,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2359,SCOPUS,"Conflict between entrepreneurship and open science, and the transition of scientific norms",Entrepreneurship; Academic capitalism; Commercialism; Open science; Scientific norm,"In the trend of academic entrepreneurship, practical and direct contribution of university research to the society has been emphasized, in which university scientists have increasingly engaged in commercial activities, university-industry relationships, and technology transfers. However, this trend has aroused concern about a potentially negative impact on the tradition of open science. Drawing on a survey data of 698 Japanese natural scientists, this study analyzes the behaviors and norms of university scientists under the influence of university interventions for entrepreneurship, whereby examining the compatibility between entrepreneurship and open science. The results indicate that entrepreneurial interventions have facilitated scientists' norm for practical contribution, and consequently, their involvement in commercial activities and ties with industry. Then, some, but not all, of these entrepreneurial activities have deterred cooperative or open relationships between scientists. However, the results suggest that the entrepreneurial interventions have not deteriorated the traditional norm for open science. Further analyses indicate that the two norms for practical contribution and for open science are determined independently, implying that academic entrepreneurship can be promoted without deteriorating open science.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['JPN'],"Shibayama, Sotaro",JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER,English,Article,,,,"[Shibayama, Sotaro] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA; [Shibayama, Sotaro] Univ Tokyo, Res Ctr Adv Sci & Technol, Meguro Ku, Tokyo 1538904, Japan; [Shibayama, Sotaro] Natl Inst Sci & Technol Policy NISTEP, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1000013, Japan",59.0,17.0,SPRINGER,0892-9912,,2012.0,37,4,508.0,531,10.1007/s10961-010-9202-7,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2360,SCOPUS,Open Access Digital Repository: Sharing Student Research with the World,0,"University libraries use open access digital repositories to preserve and distribute the intellectual scholarly communications of their institution. How can global accessibility of quality student work be harnessed to benefit researchers, practitioners, and educators? To address this question, we study the impact of content factors and search engine optimization factors on download rates of capstone papers. We examined all 290 MPA capstone papers at Texas State University which have been made available through an online digital repository for public consumption. Results show strong support for the impact of search engine factors on download rates. The implications of high download rates of MPA capstone papers on public administration research, practice, and education are discussed in this paper. © 2012, Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher']",['USA'],"Shields P., Rangarajan N., Stewart L.",Journal of Public Affairs Education,English,Article,0,0,0,,,5.0,Taylor and Francis Ltd.,15236803,0,2012.0,18,1,157.0,181,10.1080/15236803.2012.12001676,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2362,SCOPUS,Scholarly Journal Publishing and Open Access in South Korea,Open access;  Society;  South Korea;  NRF;  KISTI;  Society Village,"This study examines the publishing for 1,437 Korean journals classified by publisher types and disciplines. The aim of the analysis is to understand the status of the journal publishing and the level of open access in Korea. The results show that society publishers are the majority in Korea, commercial publishers predominating in most advanced countries. More than half of the Korean journals for science, technology and medicine (STM) are open access. The study explains why open access is widespread particularly in Korea and suggests the STM journals be published in English for international recognition and impact. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['KOR'],"Shin, Eun-Ja",SERIALS REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"Sejong Univ, Dept Commun Art, Seoul 143747, South Korea",24.0,8.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",0098-7913,,2012.0,38,2,99.0,104,10.1016/j.serrev.2012.05.001,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2363,SCOPUS,The challenges of open access for Korea's national repositories,Open access;  Digital libraries;  South Korea,"Purpose - Korea has been at the forefront of the open access movement since 2003, with four nation-wide repositories built to date. This study seeks to review their current status and to make proposals for further progress. Design/methodology/approach - The study reviews the current status of the four nation-wide repositories in Korea and identifies their drawbacks and solutions. Findings - Korea's repositories were all built and are operated by government agencies. Their software is superb in contrast with the small volume of contents accumulated. If those repositories are to be invigorated, coordinated efforts are required to publicise the objectives of the repositories, and to try to have all research outputs contributed to the repositories with the cooperation of the operating agencies and researchers. Originality/value - The study suggests several strategies for invigorating Korea's nation-wide repositories. If the strategies are implemented in a calm and orderly way, Korea's nation-wide repositories are expected to be more successful.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'policy']",['KOR'],"Shin, Eun-Ja",INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY,English,Article,,,,"Sejong Univ, Dept Commun Art, Seoul, South Korea",5.0,4.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,0264-1615,,2010.0,38,4,231.0,236,10.1108/02641611011094374,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2369,SCOPUS,Grey literature archiving pattern in open access (OA) repositories with special emphasis on Indian OA repositories,India;  Digital archives;  Grey literature;  Institutional repositories;  Open access repositories;  Archiving patterns;  Technical literature,"Purpose This paper aims to examine the grey literature archiving pattern at open-access repositories with special reference to Indian open-access repositories. Design/methodology/approach The Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) was used to collect data from different document types archived by open-access repositories across the world. Data were collected by advanced search and browse features available at the BASE on document types, the number of repositories by country wise and Indian academic and research repositories. Data were tabulated using MS Excel for further analysis. Findings Findings indicated that open-access repositories across the world are primarily archiving reviewed literature. Grey literature is archived more at European and North American repositories compared to rest of the world. Reports, theses, dissertations and data sets are the major grey document types archived. In India, a significant contributor to the BASE index with 146 open-access sources, reviewed literature is the largest archived document types, and grey literature is above world average due to the presence of theses and dissertations at repositories of academic institutions. Originality/value Grey literature is considered as valuable sources of information for research and development. The study enables to get insights about the amount of grey content archived at open-access repositories. These findings can further be used to investigate the reasons/technology limitations for the lesser volume of grey content in repositories. Furthermore, this study helps to better understand the grey literature archiving pattern and need for corrective measures based on the success stories of repositories of Europe and North America.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher']",['IND'],"Shivaram, B. S.;  Biradar, B. S.",ELECTRONIC LIBRARY,English,Article,,,,"[Shivaram, B. S.] Natl Aerosp Labs, CSIR, Bangalore, Karnataka, India;  [Biradar, B. S.] Kuvempu Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Shimoga, India",31.0,3.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-0473,,2019.0,37,1,95.0,107,10.1108/EL-05-2018-0100,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2372,SCOPUS,Faculty members' perceptions and use of open access journals: Bangladesh perspective,Perceptions of open access journals; motivational factors for open access journals; developing countries; predatory journals; choosing an open access journal for publication; libraries as centres for open access publishing,"Open access is a humanitarian movement to ensure equal access to knowledge for each and every member of our society. It aims to reduce the access and knowledge divide and allow researchers from around the world to contribute to enriching human knowledge. Using online surveys, this study attempts to understand Bangladeshi faculty members' awareness, perceptions, and use of open access journals. It also explores the motivational factors that influence the faculty members to choose open access journals for publication. The study briefly discusses some issues of predatory open access journals in the context of the open access movement. Finally, the paper suggests that libraries work as centres for open access publications and help faculty members and researchers choose the right journals for their research.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['BGD'],"Shuva, Nafiz Zaman; Taisir, Radia",IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Shuva, Nafiz Zaman] Univ Dhaka, Dept Informat Sci & Lib Management, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh; [Shuva, Nafiz Zaman] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat & Media Studies, London, ON, Canada; [Taisir, Radia] Univ Dhaka, Dept Stat Biostat & Informat, Dhaka, Bangladesh",54.0,9.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,0340-0352,,2016.0,42,1,36.0,48,10.1177/0340035216628879,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2377,SCOPUS,Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research,Open access;  Publishing economics;  Libraries;  Global health;  Stratification;  Article processing charges;  Universities,"Using a database of recent articles published in the field of Global Health research, we examine institutional sources of stratification in publishing access outcomes. Traditionally, the focus on inequality in scientific publishing has focused on prestige hierarchies in established print journals. This project examines stratification in contemporary publishing with a particular focus on subscription vs. various Open Access (OA) publishing options. Findings show that authors working at lower-ranked universities are more likely to publish in closed/paywalled outlets, and less likely to choose outlets that involve some sort of Article Processing Charge (APCs;  gold or hybrid OA). We also analyze institutional differences and stratification in the APC costs paid in various journals. Authors affiliated with higher-ranked institutions, as well as hospitals and non-profit organizations pay relatively higher APCs for gold and hybrid OA publications. Results suggest that authors affiliated with high-ranked universities and well-funded institutions tend to have more resources to choose pay options with publishing. Our research suggests new professional hierarchies developing in contemporary publishing, where various OA publishing options are becoming increasingly prominent. Just as there is stratification in institutional representation between different types of publishing access, there is also inequality within access types.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['med'],"['publisher', 'researcher', 'university']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Siler, Kyle;  Haustein, Stefanie;  Smith, Elise;  Lariviere, Vincent;  Alperin, Juan Pablo",PEERJ,English,Article,,,,"[Siler, Kyle] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Innovat Studies Grp, Utrecht, Netherlands;  [Haustein, Stefanie] Univ Ottawa, Sch Informat Studies, Ottawa, ON, Canada;  [Haustein, Stefanie] Univ Quebec, CIRST, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Smith, Elise;  Lariviere, Vincent] Univ Montreal, Ecole Bibliothecon & Sci Informat, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Alperin, Juan Pablo] Simon Fraser Univ, Canadian Inst Studies Publishing, Vancouver, BC, Canada",68.0,14.0,PEERJ INC,2167-8359,,2018.0,6,,,,10.7717/peerj.4269,,29479492.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2384,SCOPUS,Open access and institutional repositories in Bulgaria,Bulgaria;  Institutional Repositories;  Open Access;  Publishing,"The paper presents the current situation regarding open access, institutional repositories (IRs) and journals in Bulgaria. It focuses on e-publications and related research content available in digital format on the web. It includes development of IRs in Bulgaria and discusses their content, software and various access restrictions that apply to content. A survey is used to identify current state of open access for IR and e-journals not just those that are using OAI-PMH. © 2017 Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['university', 'librarian', 'policy']",['BGR'],"Simeonov G., Stanchev P.",Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage,English,Conference Paper,"1st International Conference on Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, DiPP 2011",11 September 2011 through 14 September 2011,0,,,0.0,"Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics",13144006,0,2017.0,1,0,165.0,170,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2385,SCOPUS,What makes companies pursue an Open Science strategy?,R&D;  Industrial science;  Knowledge disclosure;  University-industry collaboration;  Open Innovation;  Reciprocity,"Whereas recent scholarly research has provided many insights about universities engaging in commercial activities, there is still little empirical evidence regarding the opposite phenomenon of companies disseminating scientific knowledge. Our paper aims to fill this gap and explores the motivations of firms that disclose research outcomes in a scientific format. Besides considering a dimension internal to the firm, we focus particularly on knowledge sourcing from academic institutions and the appropriability regime. We conduct an econometric analysis with firm-level data from the fourth edition of the French innovation survey (CIS) and matched scientific publications for a sample of 2512 R&D performing firms from all manufacturing sectors. This analysis provides evidence that firms are more likely to adopt academic principles if they need to access scientific knowledge that is considered important for their innovation development, whereas the mere existence of collaborative links with academic institutions is not a strong determinant. Furthermore, the results suggest that the inclination of firms to publish is sensitive to the level of knowledge spillovers in a sector and the effectiveness of legal appropriation instruments. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",['openscience'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['policy', 'business']",['FRA'],"Simeth, Markus;  Raffo, Julio D.",RESEARCH POLICY,English,Article,,,,"[Simeth, Markus] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Coll Management, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland;  [Raffo, Julio D.] Univ Paris 13, Ctr Econ Univ Paris Nord CEPN, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France",82.0,27.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV,0048-7333,,2013.0,42,9,1531.0,1543,10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.007,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2389,SCOPUS,What inhibits authors to self-archive in Open Access repositories? A Malaysian case,Open Access; self-archiving; institutional repositories; academic authors; universities; Malaysia,"This paper reports on a survey carried out on academics in five Malaysian research-intensive universities, investigating their readiness to self archive in Open Access institutional repositories. The study revolves around the following issues: (a) academics' awareness of self archiving in an institutional repository within their institution; (b) their perceptions about self archiving scientific information into institutional repositories; (c) their perceptions regarding obligations to self archive in institutional repositories; and (d) the possible reasons that inhibit them in contributing to institutional repositories. The answers were identified from 72 academics through a web-based survey. The study reveals that the majority of academics in this study have no or little knowledge of, or experience with, institutional repositories and are unfamiliar with self-archiving opportunities. However most of them endorse the principle of Open Access and are willing to contribute content to an institutional repository if an opportunity arises or if mandated by their funding institutions. Those who agree to self archiving see it to be beneficial in the author's life as it enhances visibility and recognition of the author's work, but the main problem encountered is the fact that researchers feel it is time consuming. The major barrier to self archiving is fear of plagiarism. In light of these results, there is a need to create more awareness and to educate authors on the importance of self archiving. Ensuring free electronic access to public-funded research lies with the funding institutions, especially universities, which should set up appropriate repository infrastructures, advocate the public good and ethical implications of open access and even mandate self-archiving of research they fund.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['MYS'],"Singeh, Feria Wirba; Abrizah, A.; Karim, Noor Harun Abdul",INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Singeh, Feria Wirba] Univ Malaya, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia; [Abrizah, A.; Karim, Noor Harun Abdul] Univ Malaya, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia",42.0,11.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0266-6669,,2013.0,29,1,24.0,35,10.1177/0266666912450450,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2390,SCOPUS,Open access LIS periodicals and digital archives An evaluation with reference to Asian countries,Electronic journals; Open access LIS periodicals; LIS e-journals; Mapping open access LIS periodicals; Open access - Asia,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report results of a study which investigated the growth of open access (OA) journals across the world with reference to the Asian region. Details of 117 OA journals were collected from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) to determine the geographic distribution, language of publication and growth of periodical year-wise. The study makes detail analysis of four OA periodical published from India, Iran, Pakistan and Taiwan. Pattern of authorship and contribution according to nature of professional work were analyzed. The study reveals that most contributions were made by teaching professionals in comparison to working library and information officers. Single-authored contributions dominated (44 per cent) in all periodicals of the Asian region, indicating low amount of teamwork/collaborative contributions to library and information science (LIS) research by the authors of this region. To know the subject distribution of articles, the study was limited to 27 subfields within the broad spectrum of LIS. Annals of Library and Information Sciences (ALIS) published in India carried the highest number of articles (165) followed by Journal of Library and Information Sciences (JLIS) from Taiwan. The findings of the study also indicate that there is varied distribution of topics within the Asian LIS literature published in OA journals. Most popular areas of writing among authors in OA journals have been found to be bibliometics, webometrics, research productivity or research methods besides information seeking pattern, information need of users and digital libraries. Design/methodology/approach - To gather data for the present investigation, survey of OA e-journals was made across the Web. The collection of data from OA journals and content was accompanied by searching the DOAJ. After selecting the OA journals, these were analyzed using the descriptions on their content page and key words chosen from each contribution. Selection of additional key words, i.e. words not in the title, was also made. Analysis of this data is discussed in this paper. Findings - OA removes restrictions that exist on access to scholarly information and knowledge, it empowers the readers to read, download, distribute and make use of relevant literature, besides giving authors and their work fairly good visibility, readership and impact. The OA movement is gaining importance and the scholarly community is now realizing that tolled or subscribed access is creating a barrier and preventing their work from wider accessibility and readership. A number of journals across the world are now being published in OA mode. The present study attempts to map the growth of LIS literature in OA journals with special reference to periodicals published from Asian countries. The finding of this sample study suggests that many counties are promoting OA journals. While USA ranks first in publication of OA journals in the world. Taiwan publishes the highest number of articles in Asia. Majority of OA journals are published in English, and English appears to be most popular language for communicating research information. Of the four OA LIS journals analyzed in detail, it is observed that single-authored contributions are most popular. Collaborative contributions to LIS research were not so evident among authors of the Asian community. The teaching professionals or LIS teachers contributed the greatest number of articles, except for the Indian journal ALIS, demonstrating that working professional are more actively involved in writing and they outnumber the teaching community. Contributions from research students in all OA journals have been fairly significant. Research students may be encouraged to publish their master's and doctoral research work in OA periodicals for better visibility, readership and impact. The study further reveals that ALIS from India and JLIS from Taiwan carried the highest number of articles. While areas like bibliometrics, webometrics and e-resources and OA are most popular areas of writing among Indian authors, information-seeking pattern, information need, digital and virtual libraries have been popular among authors from Taiwan. Webology from Iran has predominant articles on Web study or evaluation and social networking. Universities and LIS need to come forward to take a need-based approach to LIS research, suggesting ways for improving existing LIS services in their respective countries. To get the correct picture of growth of OA journals in the Asian region, more exhaustive and extensive study may be required. Researchers interested to carry further investigation will have to adopt appropriate measures to overcome the limitations mentioned in the study, for example, the source of data DOAJ may not be very extensive to give correct picture of OA journals. It is likely that some journals may not have been included in this directory. Researchers interested to carry further investigations will have to adopt appropriate measures to overcome these constraints. Research limitations/implications - Scope and limitation access to data and timely completion are the two vital factors for the success and accomplishment of the objectives of any investigation. Hence, considering the vast range of literature from every geographical region and limited time to complete research, the present study adhered to the following limitations. The study covers in its scope literature published in the period of five years (accessed from March 28 to May 25, 2011, only). The study includes only those publications/journals contributed by authors in English. The study includes four OA journals having full-text articles in English, abstracts not included. It considers those publications primarily inclined and relevant to library and information services. The study includes only those OA LIS journals listed or included in DOAJ. Originality/value - The present study has been taken with view to analyze the growth of OA journals in LIS with special reference to Asian countries. While several studies have been conducted on growth and publishing of traditional LIS journals, the present study is perhaps an interesting attempt to make a comprehensive review of the phenomena. The finding of the recent study will be of interest to many LIS professionals, researchers and academicians as it demonstrate the growth of OA journals.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],"['IRN', 'TWN', 'PAK', 'IND']","Singh, Neena; Chikate, Anil",ELECTRONIC LIBRARY,English,Article,,,,"[Singh, Neena] GB Pant Univ Agr & Technol, Coll Forestry & Hill Agr, Tehri, India; [Chikate, Anil] North Maharastra Univ Jalgaon, Mahrastra, India",18.0,5.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-0473,,2014.0,32,5,710.0,725,10.1108/EL-09-2012-0120,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2391,SCOPUS,Open access repositories in India: Characteristics and future potential,gold route;  green route;  open access;  Dspace;  RWWR;  OAI-PMH,The present study examines the development of open access repositories in India. Institutional repositories development in India dates back to the development of Eprints @ IISc by TB Rajasekhar in 2002. Since then considerable development of institutional repositories has occurred. The data for the study were collected from OpenDOAR (Directory of Open Access Repositories) in January 2015. OpenDOAR provides a quality-assured listing of open access repositories around the world. The findings of the study show that the Indian repositories are also represented in the Ranking of Web Repositories. It also indicates that the trends towards the development of open access repositories are increasing among higher education and research institutions. It serves as a means for the dissemination of the intellectual output of the institutions that may be a research organization or university to communities and to the public at large. It is the prime responsibility of public funded organizations to reveal the results of the research to the public.,['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'university']",['IND'],"Singh, Prerna",IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Singh, Prerna] Cent Univ Jammu, Temporary Acad Block,Sect E Extens, Jammu 180011, India",16.0,10.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,0340-0352,,2016.0,42,1,16.0,24,10.1177/0340035215610131,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2392,SCOPUS,The case of significant variations in gold-green and black open access: evidence from Indian research output,Gold open access;  Green open access;  Open access;  Paywall;  Scholarly articles;  Sci-Hub,"Open Access has emerged as an important movement worldwide during the last decade. There are several initiatives now that persuade researchers to publish in open access journals and to archive their pre- or post-print versions of papers in repositories. Institutions and funding agencies are also promoting ways to make research outputs available as open access. This paper looks at open access levels and patterns in research output from India by computationally analyzing research publication data obtained from Web of Science for India for the last 5 years (2014-2018). The corresponding data from other connected platforms-Unpaywall and Sci-Hub-are also obtained and analyzed. The results obtained show that about 24% of research output from India, during last 5 years, is available in legal forms of open access as compared to world average of about 30%. More articles are available in gold open access as compared to green and bronze. On the contrary, more than 90% of the research output from India is available for free download in Sci-Hub. We also found disciplinary differentiation in open access, but surprisingly these patterns are different for gold-green and black open access forms. Sci-Hub appears to be complementing the legal gold-green open access for less covered disciplines in them. The central institutional repositories in India are found to have low volume of research papers deposited.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'university']",['IND'],"Singh, Vivek Kumar;  Piryani, Rajesh;  Srichandan, Satya Swarup",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Singh, Vivek Kumar;  Srichandan, Satya Swarup] Banaras Hindu Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India;  [Piryani, Rajesh] South Asian Univ, Dept Comp Sci, New Delhi 110021, India",43.0,2.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,124,1,515.0,531,10.1007/s11192-020-03472-y,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2393,SCOPUS,Perceptions of Open Access Publishing by Faculty at Pondicherry University: A Survey,open access journal; Pondicherry University; scholarly communication; survey,[No abstract available],['openaccess'],['survey'],"['natscie', 'engtech', 'socscie', 'hum']",['researcher'],['IND'],"Singson M., Gnanaselvi Joy M., Thiyagarajan S., Dkhar V.",International Information and Library Review,English,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,Taylor and Francis Ltd.,10572317,0,2015.0,47,44228,1.0,10,10.1080/10572317.2015.1021625,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2396,SCOPUS,"Open access, promotion and digital dissemination of R+D projects: the case of the Complutense University of Madrid",R+D projects;  Open access;  Research dissemination;  Research promotion;  Scholarly communication;  Complutense University of Madrid,"The strategies and plans for digital dissemination of the research projects of the 2013 call for proposals of the State Plan for Scientific and Technical Research granted to the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM) are analysed in relation to open access. The scientific production of the 55 selected projects was recovered from the Web of Science, Scopus, Institutional Repository of the UCM (E-prints Complutense) and Google Scholar. Of the 429 documents retrieved, open access production, the degree of compliance with national and institutional policies on open access and production by discipline were analysed. In relation to the dissemination of information on the projects, the existence of specific web pages was analysed. Among the main results the lack of strategies or plans for the dissemination and promotion of research, as well as the lack of compliance with the institutional policy on open access should be outlined.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'policy']",['ESP'],"Siso-Calvo, Brenda;  Arquero-Aviles, Rosario",IBERSID-REVISTA DE SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION Y DOCUMENTACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Siso-Calvo, Brenda;  Arquero-Aviles, Rosario] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Bibliotecon & Documentac, Grp Invest, IDEA LAB, C Santisima Trinidad 37, Madrid 28010, Spain",21.0,2.0,IBERSID NETWORK,1888-0967,,2018.0,12,2,25.0,34,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2398,SCOPUS,Contribution to open access repository by the Tamil Nadu State Universities in India: A case study of Shodhganga,Electronic thesis and dissertations;  India;  INFLIBNET;  Institutional repositories;  Open access;  Shodhganga;  Tamilnadu Universities,"This articles attempts to provide the overview of the contributes made by the Tamil Nadu State Universities of India to the Open Access repository namely Shodhganga INFLIBNET. In TamilNadu there are 41 Universities in listed by the UGC as on 13.09.2017. Out of these Universities 33 Universities were MoU by Shodhganga INFLIBNET. Open Electronic Thesis and Dissertations plays Vitol role in the academic students as it help is presenting duplication of research work already been done. This article is an intensive case study of the contribution of these Departments wise from different Tamil Nadu State Universities in India . © 2018, Library Philosophy and Practice.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['IND'],Sivasubramanian S.,Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2018.0,2018,0,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2399,SCOPUS,The Emergency Medicine Facing the Challenge of Open Science,open access;  data sharing;  data reuse;  sustainable development goals;  emergency medicine;  Supplementary material;  raw data,"(1) Background: The availability of research datasets can strengthen and facilitate research processes. This is specifically relevant in the emergency medicine field due to the importance of providing immediate care in critical situations as the very current Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic is showing to the scientific community. This work aims to show which Emergency Medicine journals indexed in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) currently meet data sharing criteria. (2) Methods: This study analyzes the editorial policies regarding the data deposit of the journals in the emergency medicine category of the JCR and evaluates the Supplementary material of the articles published in these journals that have been deposited in the PubMed Central repository. (3) Results: It has been observed that 19 out of the 24 journals contained in the emergency medicine category of Journal Citation Reports are also located in PubMed Central (PMC), yielding a total of 5983 articles. Out of these, only 9.4% of the articles contain supplemental material. Although second quartile journals of JCR emergency medicine category have quantitatively more articles in PMC, the main journals involved in the deposit of supplemental material belong to the first quartile, of which the most used format in the articles is pdf, followed by text documents. (4) Conclusion: This study reveals that data sharing remains an incipient practice in the emergency medicine field, as there are still barriers between researchers to participate in data sharing. Therefore, it is necessary to promote dynamics to improve this practice both qualitatively (the quality and format of datasets) and quantitatively (the quantity of datasets in absolute terms) in research.","['openaccess', 'opendata']",['documentreview'],['med'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Sixto-Costoya, Andrea;  Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael;  Lucas-Dominguez, Rut;  Vidal-Infer, Antonio",DATA,English,Article,,,,"[Sixto-Costoya, Andrea;  Lucas-Dominguez, Rut;  Vidal-Infer, Antonio] Univ Valencia, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Hist Sci & Informat Sci, Valencia 46010, Spain;  [Sixto-Costoya, Andrea;  Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael;  Lucas-Dominguez, Rut;  Vidal-Infer, Antonio] UISYS, Joint Res Unit CSIC Univ Valencia, Valencia 46003, Spain;  [Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael] Ingenio CSIC Politech Univ Valencia, Valencia 46022, Spain",24.0,2.0,MDPI,,,2020.0,5,2,,,10.3390/data5020028,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2400,SCOPUS,Academic libraries in four Sub-Saharan Africa countries and their role in propagating open science,Academic libraries; open access; open science; Sub-Saharan Africa countries,"The study aims at examining libraries in four Sub-Saharan Africa countries and their role in propagating open science. It also seeks to explore existing open science practices, ascertain the level of participation of academic libraries in open science activities, identify the strategies used in marketing open science platforms and enumerate the challenges hindering the success of open science in the selected countries. The study was guided by the qualitative school of thought where the researcher builds a complex, holistic picture, analyses words, and reports detailed views of informants, and conducts the study in a natural setting. The study employed the multiple case study research design approach to assess how academic libraries in Ghana, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda promote open science. The findings show that there are few scholarly journals which exist in open access for most African academies in Ghana, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda. Though not massively adopted, open access institutional repositories have been used to preserve and publicize the digital contents in some academic institutions in Africa such as theses, dissertations, administrative and heritage materials, conference proceedings as well as pre-prints and post-print of journal articles. The study recommends the intensification of open science advocacy in academic libraries in Sub-Saharan Africa; institutions should ensure that there is a stable electricity supply as well as reliable internet connectivity, introducing regular training on emerging media technologies to the community members and strengthening the libraries consortium in Sub-Saharan Africa as an enabling platform to share intellectual productivity of their member countries.",['openscience'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'university']","['GHA', 'NGA', 'TZA', 'UGA']","Siyao, Peter Onauphoo; Whong, Fidelia M.; Martin-Yeboah, Ebenezer; Namamonde, Annet",IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS,English,Article,,,,"[Siyao, Peter Onauphoo] Mzumbe Univ, POB 4, Mzumbe, Tanzania; [Whong, Fidelia M.] Ahmadu Bello Univ, Kashim Ibrahimu Lib, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria; [Martin-Yeboah, Ebenezer] Univ Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana; [Namamonde, Annet] Uganda Christian Univ, Mukono Town, Uganda",50.0,2.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC,0340-0352,,2017.0,43,3,242.0,255,10.1177/0340035217712263,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0
2402,SCOPUS,Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science,open science;  funding;  replication;  reproducibility;  cultural evolution,"Assessing scientists using exploitable metrics can lead to the degradation of research methods even without any strategic behaviour on the part of individuals, via 'the natural selection of bad science.' Institutional incentives to maximize metrics like publication quantity and impact drive this dynamic. Removing these incentives is necessary, but institutional change is slow. However, recent developments suggest possible solutions with more rapid onsets. These include what we call open science improvements, which can reduce publication bias and improve the efficacy of peer review. In addition, there have been increasing calls for funders to move away from prestige- or innovation-based approaches in favour of lotteries. We investigated whether such changes are likely to improve the reproducibility of science even in the presence of persistent incentives for publication quantity through computational modelling. We found that modified lotteries, which allocate funding randomly among proposals that pass a threshold for methodological rigour, effectively reduce the rate of false discoveries, particularly when paired with open science improvements that increase the publication of negative results and improve the quality of peer review. In the absence of funding that targets rigour, open science improvements can still reduce false discoveries in the published literature but are less likely to improve the overall culture of research practices that underlie those publications.",['openscience'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['university', 'policy', 'funder']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Smaldino, Paul E.;  Turner, Matthew A.;  Kallens, Pablo A. Contreras",ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Smaldino, Paul E.;  Turner, Matthew A.] Univ Calif Merced, Dept Cognit & Informat Sci, Merced, CA 95343 USA;  [Kallens, Pablo A. Contreras] Cornell Univ, Dept Psychol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA",77.0,0.0,ROYAL SOC,2054-5703,,2019.0,6,8,,,10.1098/rsos.190194,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2405,SCOPUS,"Where IR you? Using ""open access"" to extend the reach and richness of faculty research within a university",Academic libraries;  Academic staff;  Digital libraries;  Digital storage;  User studies,"Purpose - This paper aims to clarify the relationship between researcher, digital librarian, and cataloger supporting collection building in institutional repository (IR). It also aims to propose modeling the collaborative process and outline why and how cooperative partnership is important throughout the IR content building process. The study seeks to contribute to the body of knowledge of IR collection building by including a faculty-centered approach and level of data curation aspects than is normally found in IR content building literature. Design/methodology/approach - The paper opted for an experimental approach of IR collection building, including several interviews and one expert group discussion with faculty representing the department of anthropology. The data were complemented by digital collection description and accessibility in IR, online public access catalog (OPAC) and OCLC WorldCat. Findings - The paper provides empirical insights about how faculty contribution is brought about during IR content building. It suggests that digital librarians act as ""integrating forces"" on two levels: integrating the elements of level of data curation for digital objects representation and discoverability, and mediating between digital objects description and the researcher. Research limitations/implications - Because of the chosen research approach, the research results may lack general application. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test proposed propositions further. Practical implications - The paper includes implications for the development of a mature and fully realized IR, the development of ""data curators"" and for managing the balance between participation and content. Originality/value - This paper fulfills an identified need to study how levels of data curation can be enabled.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'documentreview']",['socscie'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['USA'],Smith II P.L.,OCLC Systems and Services,English,Article,0,0,0,,,5.0,0,1065075X,0,2008.0,24,3,174.0,184,10.1108/10650750810898219,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2406,SCOPUS,"Knowledge sharing in global health research - the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature",Open access;  Global health research;  Knowledge translation;  Publication ethics;  Research impact;  Research capacity;  Publication policy,"Background: In 1982, the Annals of Virology published a paper showing how Liberia has a highly endemic potential of Ebola warning health authorities of the risk for potential outbreaks;  this journal is only available by subscription. Limiting the accessibility of such knowledge may have reduced information propagation toward public health actors who were indeed surprised by and unprepared for the 2014 epidemic. Open access (OA) publication can allow for increased access to global health research (GHR). Our study aims to assess the use, cost and impact of OA diffusion in the context of GHR. Method: A total of 3366 research articles indexed under the Medical Heading Subject Heading Global Health published between 2010 and 2014 were retrieved using PubMed to (1) quantify the uptake of various types of OA, (2) estimate the article processing charges (APCs) of OA, and (3) analyse the relationship between different types of OA, their scholarly impact and gross national income per capita of citing countries. Results: Most GHR publications are not available directly on the journal's website (69%). Further, 60.8% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free and in keeping with journal policy. The total amount paid for APCs was estimated at US$1.7 million for 627 papers, with authors paying on average US$2732 per publication;  94% of APCs were paid to journals owned by the ten most prominent publication houses from high-income countries. Researchers from low-and middle-income countries are generally citing less expensive types of OA, while researchers in high-income countries are citing the most expensive OA. Conclusions: Although OA may help in building global research capacity in GHR, the majority of publications remain subscription only. It is logical and cost-efficient for institutions and researchers to promote OA by self-archiving publications of restricted access, as it not only allows research to be cited by a broader audience, it also augments citation rates. Although OA does not ensure full knowledge transfer from research to practice, limiting public access can negatively impact implementation and outcomes of health policy and reduce public understanding of health issues.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['med'],"['researcher', 'university']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Smith, Elise;  Haustein, Stefanie;  Mongeon, Philippe;  Shu, Fei;  Ridde, Valery;  Lariviere, Vincent",HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS,English,Article,,,,"[Smith, Elise;  Haustein, Stefanie;  Mongeon, Philippe;  Lariviere, Vincent] Univ Montreal, Ecole Bibliothecon & Sci lInformat, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Smith, Elise] Med Sociale & Prevent, Sci Humaines Appl Opt Bioth, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Shu, Fei] McGill Univ, Sch Informat Studies, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Ridde, Valery] Univ Montreal, Dept Med Sociale & Prevent, Ecole Sante Publ, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Lariviere, Vincent] Univ Qubec Montreal, Observ Sci & Technol OST CIRST, Montreal, PQ, Canada;  [Ridde, Valery] Univ Montreal, Publ Hlth Res Inst, Inst Rech Sante Publ IRSPUM, Montreal, PQ, Canada",53.0,19.0,BMC,1478-4505,,2017.0,15,,,,10.1186/s12961-017-0235-3,,28851401.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2407,SCOPUS,Revisiting an open access monograph experiment: measuring citations and tweets 5 years later,Open access; Monographs; Citations; Altmetrics; Tweets,"An experiment run in 2009 could not assess whether making monographs available in open access enhanced scholarly impact. This paper revisits the experiment, drawing on additional citation data and tweets. It attempts to answer the following research question: does open access have a positive influence on the number of citations and tweets a monograph receives, taking into account the influence of scholarly field and language? The correlation between monograph citations and tweets is also investigated. The number of citations and tweets measured in 2014 reveal a slight open access advantage, but the influence of language or subject should also be taken into account. However, Twitter usage and citation behaviour hardly overlap.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']","['biblio', 'othermeth']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Snijder, Ronald",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Snijder, Ronald] OAPEN Fdn, The Hague, Netherlands; [Snijder, Ronald] Leiden Univ, Leiden, Netherlands",38.0,7.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2016.0,109,3,1855.0,1875,10.1007/s11192-016-2160-6,,27942082.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2408,SCOPUS,The profits of free books: an experiment to measure the impact of open access publishing,,"This article describes an experiment to measure the impact of open access (OA) publishing of academic books. During a period of nine months, three sets of 100 books were disseminated through an institutional repository, the Google Book Search program, or both channels. A fourth set of 100 books was used as control group. OA publishing enhances discovery and online consultation. Within the context of the experiment, no relation could be found between OA publishing and citation rates. Contrary to expectations, OA publishing does not stimulate or diminish sales figures. The Google Book Search program is superior to the repository. (C) Ronald Snijder 2010",['openaccess'],"['othermeth', 'biblio']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Snijder, Ronald",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"Amsterdam Univ Press, Project Supervisor Digital Publicat, NL-1016 BG Amsterdam, Netherlands",6.0,8.0,ASSOC LEARNED PROFESSIONAL SOC PUBL,0953-1513,,2010.0,23,4,293.0,301,10.1087/20100403,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2414,SCOPUS,Impact Assessment of Non-Indexed Open Access Journals: A Case Study,,"This case study assesses the impact of a small, open-access social sciences journal not included in citation tracking indexes by exploring measures of the journal's influence beyond the established impact factor formula. An analysis of Google Scholar data revealed the journal's global reach and value to researchers. This study enabled the journal's editors to measure the success of their publication according to its professed scope and mission, and to quantify its impact for prospective contributors. The impact assessment strategies outlined here can be leveraged effectively by academic librarians to provide high-value consultancy for scholar-editors of open access research journals.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['socscie'],"['librarian', 'publisher']",['USA'],"Solomon, Daniela; Eddy, Mark",PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY,English,Article,,,,"[Solomon, Daniela; Eddy, Mark] Case Western Reserve Univ, Kelvin Smith Lib, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA",75.0,1.0,JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV PRESS,1531-2542,,2019.0,19,2,329.0,352,10.1353/pla.2019.0019,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2416,SCOPUS,Publication Fees in Open Access Publishing: Sources of Funding and Factors Influencing Choice of Journal,,"Open access (OA) journals distribute their content at no charge and use other means of funding the publication process. Publication fees or article-processing charges (APC)s have become the predominant means for funding professional OA publishing. We surveyed 1,038 authors who recently published articles in 74 OA journals that charge APCs stratified into seven discipline categories. Authors were asked about the source of funding for the APC, factors influencing their choice of a journal and past history publishing in OA and subscription journals. Additional information about the journal and the authors' country were obtained from the journal website. A total of 429 (41%) authors from 69 journals completed the survey. There were large differences in the source of funding among disciplines. Journals with impact factors charged higher APCs as did journals from disciplines where grant funding is plentiful. Fit, quality, and speed of publication were the most important factors in the authors' choice of a journal. OA was less important but a significant factor for many authors in their choice of a journal to publish. These findings are consistent with other research on OA publishing and suggest that OA publishing funded through APCs is likely to continue to grow.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']","['survey', 'documentreview']","['med', 'engtech', 'natscie', 'socscie', 'hum']","['researcher', 'publisher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Solomon, David J.; Bjork, Bo-Christer",JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Solomon, David J.] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA; [Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland",16.0,96.0,WILEY-BLACKWELL,1532-2882,,2012.0,63,1,98.0,107,10.1002/asi.21660,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2417,SCOPUS,A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals,Open access; Citation rate; Scopus; Article Processing Charge,"The study documents the growth in the number of journals and articles along with the increase in normalized citation rates of open access (OA) journals listed in the Scopus bibliographic database between 1999 and 2010. Longitudinal statistics on growth in journals/articles and citation rates are broken down by funding model, discipline, and whether the journal was launched or had converted to OA. The data were retrieved from the websites of SCIMago Journal and Country Rank (journal/article counts), JournalM3trics (SNIP2 values), Scopus (journal discipline) and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) (OA and funding status). OA journals/articles have grown much faster than subscription journals but still make up less that 12% of the journals in Scopus. Two-year citation averages for journals funded by Article Processing Charges (APCs) have reached the same level as subscription journals. Citation averages of OA journals funded by other means continue to lag well behind OA journals funded by APCs and subscription journals. We hypothesize this is less an issue of quality than due to the fact that such journals are commonly published in languages other than English and tend to be located outside the four major publishing countries. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']","['biblio', 'documentreview']","['med', 'nonspecificdisc']",['publisher'],"['nonspecificgeo', 'DEU', 'USA', 'GBR', 'NLD']","Solomon, David J.; Laakso, Mikael; Bjork, Bo-Christer",JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Solomon, David J.] Michigan State Univ, Dept Med, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA; [Solomon, David J.] Michigan State Univ, OMERAD, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA; [Laakso, Mikael; Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Helsinki 00101, Finland",25.0,49.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV,1751-1577,,2013.0,7,3,642.0,650,10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.008,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2418,SCOPUS,Article processing charges for open access publication-the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada,APC charges; APC charges open access,"Background. Open access (OA) publishing via article processing charges (APCs) is growing as an alternative to subscription publishing. The Pay It Forward (PIF) Project is exploring the feasibility of transitioning from paying subscriptions to funding APCs for faculty at research intensive universities. Estimating of the cost of APCs for the journals authors at research intensive universities tend to publish is essential for the PIF project and similar initiatives. This paper presents our research into this question. Methods. We identified APC prices for publications by authors at the 4 research intensive United States (US) and Canadian universities involved in the study. We also obtained APC payment records from several Western European universities and funding agencies. Both data sets were merged with Web of Science (WoS) metadata. We calculated the average APCs for articles and proceedings in 13 discipline categories published by researchers at research intensive universities. We also identified 41 journals published by traditionally subscription publishers which have recently converted to APC funded OA and recorded the APCs they charge. Results. We identified 7,629 payment records from the 4 European APC payment databases and 14,356 OA articles authored by PIF partner university faculty for which we had listed APC prices. APCs for full OA journals published by PIF authors averaged 1,775 USD; full OA journal APCs paid by Western European funders averaged 1,865 USD; hybrid APCs paid by Western European funders averaged 2,887 USD. The APC for converted journals published by major subscription publishers averaged 1,825 USD. APC funded OA is concentrated in the life and basic sciences. APCs funded articles in the social sciences and humanities are often multidisciplinary and published in journals such as PLOS ONE that largely publish in the life sciences. Conclusions. Full OA journal APCs average a little under 2,000 USD while hybrid articles average about 3,000 USD for publications by researchers at research intensive universities. There is a lack of information on discipline differences in APCs due to the concentration of APC funded publications in a few fields and the multidisciplinary nature of research.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['documentreview'],"['med', 'nonspecificdisc']","['publisher', 'university']","['USA', 'CAN']","Solomon, David; Bjork, Bo-Christer",PEERJ,English,Article,,,,"[Solomon, David] Michigan State Univ, Off Med Educ Res & Dev, Internal Med, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA; [Bjork, Bo-Christer] Hanken Sch Econ, Informat Syst Sci, Helsinki, Finland",21.0,24.0,PEERJ INC,2167-8359,,2016.0,4,,,,10.7717/peerj.2264,,27547569.0,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2423,SCOPUS,Does open access citation advantage depend on paper topics?,APC; citation advantage; Green; open access; similarity; subject,"Research topics vary in their citation potential. In a metric-wise scientific milieu, it would be probable that authors tend to select citation-attractive topics especially when choosing open access (OA) outlets that are more likely to attract citations. Applying a matched-pairs study design, this research aims to examine the role of research topics in the citation advantage of OA papers. Using a comparative citation analysis method, it investigates a sample of papers published in 47 Elsevier article processing charges (APC)-funded journals in different access models including non-open access (NOA), APC, Green and mixed Green-APC. The contents of the papers are analysed using natural language processing techniques at the title and abstract level and served as a basis to match the NOA papers to their peers in the OA models. The publication years and journals are controlled for in order to avoid their impacts on the citation numbers. According to the results, the OA citation advantage that is observed in the whole sample still holds even for the highly similar OA and NOA papers. This implies that the OA citation surplus is not an artefact of the OA and NOA papers' differences in their topics and, therefore, in their citation potential. This leads to the conclusion that OA authors' self-selectivity, if it exists at all, is not responsible for the OA citation advantage, at least as far as selection of topics with probably higher citation potentials is concerned.",['openaccess'],"['othermeth', 'documentreview', 'biblio']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Sotudeh, Hajar",JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Sotudeh, Hajar] Shiraz Univ, Fac Educ & Psychol, Dept Knowledge & Informat Sci, Shiraz, Iran",86.0,2.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0165-5515,,2020.0,46,5,696.0,709,10.1177/0165551519865489,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2424,SCOPUS,Sustainability of open access citation advantage: the case of Elsevier's author-pays hybrid open access journals,APC; Article processing charges; Author-pays model; Sustainability; Hybrid open access journals; Open access citation advantage,"The present study tended to investigate the sustainability of citation advantage of author-pays hybrid open access journals. Applying a comparative citation analysis method, it explored a sample consisted of 160,168 articles in 47 Elsevier APC-funded hybrid open access journals published in the periods 2007-2011 and 2012-2015. Two citation windows were selected in the study: one ranging from the journals' publication years until 2013 (obtained from Sotudeh et al. in Scientometrics 104(2):581-608, 2015), and another ranging from the journals' publication years until 2016 (data collection date in the present study). The comparative citation analysis of the older articles (published in 2007-2011) in the two mentioned citation windows indicated that they sustained their citation advantage in comparison with the toll-access ones. The citation advantage was also confirmed for more recent APC-funded OA articles (published in 2012-2015). Therefore, the passage of time did not seem to affect the citation gap between APC-funded OA and toll-access articles, and the citation advantage of the APC-funded OA articles was apparently a sustainable phenomenon. Moreover, the number of the APC-funded OA articles increased in comparison with that of the toll-gated articles. In addition, the APC-funded OA articles exhibited citation advantages in almost all fields.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Sotudeh, Hajar; Estakhr, Zohreh",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Sotudeh, Hajar; Estakhr, Zohreh] Shiraz Univ, Fac Educ & Psychol, Dept Knowledge & Informat Sci, Eram Campus, Shiraz, Iran",74.0,5.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2018.0,115,1,563.0,576,10.1007/s11192-018-2663-4,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2430,SCOPUS,“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals,Economics; Electronic journals; Electronic publishing; Free publications; Journal publishers; Publishing,"Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to better understand the theory and practice of peer review in open-access mega-journals (OAMJs). OAMJs typically operate a “soundness-only” review policy aiming to evaluate only the rigour of an article, not the novelty or significance of the research or its relevance to a particular community, with these elements being left for “the community to decide” post-publication. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reports the results of interviews with 31 senior publishers and editors representing 16 different organisations, including 10 that publish an OAMJ. Thematic analysis was carried out on the data and an analytical model developed to explicate their significance. Findings: Findings suggest that in reality criteria beyond technical or scientific soundness can and do influence editorial decisions. Deviations from the original OAMJ model are both publisher supported (in the form of requirements for an article to be “worthy” of publication) and practice driven (in the form of some reviewers and editors applying traditional peer review criteria to OAMJ submissions). Also publishers believe post-publication evaluation of novelty, significance and relevance remains problematic. Originality/value: The study is based on unprecedented access to senior publishers and editors, allowing insight into their strategic and operational priorities. The paper is the first to report in-depth qualitative data relating specifically to soundness-only peer review for OAMJs, shedding new light on the OAMJ phenomenon and helping inform discussion on its future role in scholarly communication. The paper proposes a new model for understanding the OAMJ approach to quality assurance, and how it is different from traditional peer review. © 2018, © Valerie Spezi, Simon Wakeling, Stephen Pinfield, Jenny Fry, Claire Creaser and Peter Willett.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Spezi V., Wakeling S., Pinfield S., Fry J., Creaser C., Willett P.",Journal of Documentation,English,Article,0,0,0,,,19.0,Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.,220418,0,2018.0,74,1,137.0,161,10.1108/JD-06-2017-0092,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2431,SCOPUS,Researchers' green open access practice: a cross-disciplinary analysis,Open access; Repositories; Self-archiving; Behaviour; Attitudes; PEER project; Disciplinary differences; Research work,"Purpose - This paper aims to report on the findings of the second phase of the Behavioural strand of the EC-funded PEER project (http://www.peerproject.eu/). The paper seeks to explore authors' and readers' behaviours in relation to authors' peer-reviewed accepted manuscripts in open access repositories. Design/methodology/approach - The research was undertaken using a mixed-method approach, involving the distribution of a survey by the 12 participating publishers to their authors in selected journal titles and a participatory workshop with European researchers from selected disciplinary areas. Findings - Researchers' attitudes towards versions of published journal articles made open access via open access repositories may vary depending on whether researchers report behaviours from the perspective of an author or a reader. The research found that disciplinary cultures, norms and traditions shape authors' self-archiving behaviour and readers' use of those versions of journal articles held in repositories. Research limitations/implications - One of the limitations of the research is that it was impossible for the research team to gauge the representativeness of the survey compared to the actual disciplinary distribution of the population of EU researchers, as such population information is not available in an aggregated and consistent format. Originality/value - The PEER Observatory is an unprecedented large-scale collaboration between publishers, researchers and repositories to investigate the effects of self-archiving at European level. The paper provides a disciplinary reading of the findings and augments the understanding of how disciplinary culture and norms shape authors' and readers' behaviours in relation to self-archiving.",['openaccess'],"['survey', 'interview']","['natscie', 'socscie', 'med', 'hum']","['researcher', 'publisher']",['EU'],"Spezi, Valerie; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire; Probets, Steve; White, Sonya",JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION,English,Article,,,,"[Spezi, Valerie; Creaser, Claire; White, Sonya] Univ Loughborough, LISU, Loughborough, Leics, England; [Fry, Jenny; Probets, Steve] Univ Loughborough, Dept Informat Sci, Loughborough, Leics, England",30.0,18.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,0022-0418,,2013.0,69,3,334.0,359,10.1108/JD-01-2012-0008,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2438,SCOPUS,The Status and Patterns of Open Access in Research Output of Most Productive Indian Institutions,Open Access; Sci-Hub; Unpaywall; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access; Black Open Access; Institutional Repository,"Open Access is emerging as an important movement worldwide since last few years, triggered mainly by the high subscription cost of pay walled journals that create barriers in universal dissemination of knowledge reported in those journals. The paywall barriers to access of knowledge has become so problematic that even institutions in the developed countries are not only cancelling subscriptions but also mandating it for their researchers to either publish in open access journals or at least deposit their research papers in Institutional Repositories. The high subscription cost of journals is a more serious issue for developing countries, as it takes away institutional resources that can be used for other productive purposes. India has taken several steps in promoting open access, including release of an open access policy by Ministry of Science and Technology, however, it is not very clear that how effective these initiatives have been. This paper intends to address this issue. It examines published output, indexed in Web of Science, from 100 most productive institutions in India and analyze how much research output coming from them are available in Open Access (OA). The paper further analyzes availability of research papers from these institutions in the popular pirate site Sci-Hub. It is interesting to observe that legal OA percentages are significantly lesser than the Sci-Hub availability for all the institutions, an indication that the existing systems for promoting open access in India are not working efficiently. At the end, the paper also presents statistics about number of papers deposited in three central institutional repositories in India. These statistics provides an indication of the extent to which these repositories have been able to promote open access in India. The paper concludes by pointing to some factors that impede Open Access in India.","['openaccess', 'opentools']","['biblio', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'policy']",['IND'],"Srichandan, Satya Swarup; Piryani, Rajesh; Singh, Vivek Kumar; Bhattacharya, Sujit",JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRIC RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"[Srichandan, Satya Swarup; Singh, Vivek Kumar] Banaras Hindu Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India; [Piryani, Rajesh] South Asian Univ, Dept Comp Sci, New Delhi, India; [Bhattacharya, Sujit] CSIR NISTADS & AcSIR NISTADS Campus, New Delhi, India",24.0,0.0,PHCOG NET,2321-6654,,2020.0,9,2,96.0,110,10.5530/jscires.9.2.13,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2442,SCOPUS,Facilitating Open Access to Information: A Community Approach to Open Education and Open Textbooks,Higher Education Access; Information Access; Open Educational Resources; Open Textbooks; Theory of Educational Change,"Access to information as a necessary precondition for human flourishing is recognized explicitly in the UNESCO Strategic Development Goals, and mirrored by the work of universities globally to reduce barriers to information, especially research outputs. Growing international attention has turned to learning and teaching resources, particularly textbooks as a key barrier to fully engaging with, and participating in, higher education. The affordances of open texts provide an alternative to commercially published and often exclusionary access practices; and empower educators and students in co-creation and open sharing of information and knowledge. This paper examines the design of an ongoing institutional grants program predicated on a facilitated community learning approach for academic staff seeking to adopt, or adapt open textbooks into the curriculum as one mechanism to increase access to information. The participants' experiences and personal learning were captured through a series of semi-structured interviews that inform the iterative design of the ongoing grants program that could be transferred to other institutions seeking to support educational change. Author(s) retain copyright, but ASIS&T receives an exclusive publication license","['openaccess', 'openeducation']",['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['university', 'researcher']",['AUS'],"Stagg A., Partridge H.",Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,John Wiley and Sons Inc,23739231,0,2019.0,56,1,477.0,480,10.1002/pra2.76,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2443,SCOPUS,"A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine",0,"Background: Head & Face Medicine (HFM) was launched in August 2005 to provide multidisciplinar/ science in the field of head and face disorders with an open access and open peer review publication platform. The objective of this study is to evaluate the characteristics of submissions, the effectiveness of open peer reviewing, and factors biasing the acceptance or rejection of submitted manuscripts. Methods: A I-year period of submissions and all concomitant journal operations were retrospectively analyzed. The analysis included submission rate, reviewer rate, acceptance rate, article type, and differences in duration for peer reviewing, final decision, publishing, and PubMed inclusion. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, regression analysis, and binary logistic regression. Results: HFM received 126 articles (10.5 articles/month) for consideration in the first year. Submissions have been increasing, but not significantly over time. Peer reviewing was completed for 82 articles and resulted in an acceptance rate of 48.8%. In total, 431 peer reviewers were invited (5.3/manuscript), of which 40.4% agreed to review. The mean peer review time was 37.8 days. The mean time between submission and acceptance (including time for revision) was 95.9 days. Accepted papers were published on average 99.3 days after submission. The mean time between manuscript submission and PubMed inclusion was 101.3 days. The main article types submitted to HFM were original research, reviews, and case reports. The article type had no influence on rejection or acceptance. The variable 'number of invited reviewers' was the only significant (p < 0.05) predictor for rejection of manuscripts. Conclusion: The positive trend in submissions confirms the need for publication platforms for multidisciplinary science. HFM's peer review time comes in shorter than the 6-weeks turnaround time the Editors set themselves as the maximum. Rejection of manuscripts was associated with the number of invited reviewers. None of the other parameters tested had any effect on the final decision. Thus, HFM's ethical policy, which is based on Open Access, Open Peer, and transparency of journal operations, is free of 'editorial bias' in accepting manuscripts. Original data: Provided as a downloadable tab-delimited text file (URL and variable code available under section 'additional files').",['openevaluation'],['documentreview'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Stamm T., Meyer U., Wiesmann H.-P., Kleinheinz J., Cehreli M., Cehreli Z.C.",Head and Face Medicine,English,Article,0,0,0,,,9.0,0,1746160X,0,2007.0,3,1,0.0,0,10.1186/1746-160X-3-27,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2447,SCOPUS,Open access theses in institutional repositories: an exploratory study of the perceptions of doctoral students,,"Introduction. We examine doctoral students' awareness of and attitudes to open access forms of publication. Levels of awareness of open access and the concept of institutional repositories, publishing behaviour and perceptions of benefits and risks of open access publishing were explored. Method. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through interviews with eight doctoral students enrolled in a range of disciplines in a New Zealand university and a self-completion Web survey of 251 students. Analysis. Interview data were analysed thematically, then evaluated against a theoretical framework. The interview data were then used to inform the design of the survey tool. Survey responses were analysed as a single set, then by disciple using SurveyMonkey's online toolkit and Excel. Results. While awareness of open access and repository archiving is still low, the majority of interview and survey respondents were found to be supportive of the concept of open access. The perceived benefits of enhanced exposure and potential for sharing outweigh the perceived risks. The majority of respondents were supportive of an existing mandatory thesis submission policy. Conclusions. Low levels of awareness of the university repository remains an issue, and could be addressed by further investigating the effectiveness of different communication channels for promotion.","['openaccess', 'opentools']","['interview', 'survey']",['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['NZL'],"Stanton, Kate Valentine; Liew, Chern Li",INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL,English,Article,,,,"[Stanton, Kate Valentine] Massey Univ Lib, Palmerston North, New Zealand; [Liew, Chern Li] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Informat Management, Wellington, New Zealand",35.0,5.0,UNIV SHEFFIELD DEPT INFORMATION STUDIES,1368-1613,,2012.0,17,1,,,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0
2450,SCOPUS,Responsibility for research data quality in open access: A Slovenian case,culture; data quality; open data; stakeholders attitudes,"In the framework of a project aiming to realize a strategy of open research data access in Slovenia in accordance with OECD principles, we conducted a series of interviews with different target audiences in order to assess the initial conditions in the area of data handling. The data creators and data services expressed a high level of awareness about data quality issues, especially in relation to good publication potential. Barriers to ensuring the greater accessibility of data in the future include the little recognition and reputation for doing the related extra work involved in preparing data and documentation, the need for financial rewards for such additional work, and the undeveloped culture of data exchange in general. The motivation to provide open access to such data will involve a combination of requirements prescribed for data delivery, and the provision of support services and financial rewards, in particular changing the views held by the professional scientific community about the benefits of open data for research activities. © 2012 Author.",['opendata'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['SVN'],Štebe J.,Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries,English,Conference Paper,"12th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL '12",10 June 2012 through 14 June 2012,"Washington, DC",,,0.0,0,15525996,9781450311540,2012.0,0,0,401.0,402,10.1145/2232817.2232911,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2451,SCOPUS,Open science and the research information literacy framework,Ecological framework; Information behavior of researchers; Open science; Research information interactions; Research information literacy,"The paper explores a possible framework for integration of concepts of open science and research information literacy. The factors of open science are identified, including relations with broader public and transparent information policies, practices, methods, data and publications. Models of digital scholarship are considered. The second part of the paper reports on results of a qualitative study of information behavior of 19 researchers in Slovakia. Semi-structured interviews and conceptual modeling were applied. Findings point to common methodological analytical procedures and differences in problem statements, data management and publishing strategies. Less awareness of open access, digital sources and publicity of research results was noted. Disciplinary differences are manifested mainly in publishing, procedures and evaluation of results. In conclusion, a resulting ecological framework of research information interactions and research information literacy based on understanding and sense making are proposed. Implications for researchers’ information spaces as part of knowledge infrastructure are considered. © Springer International Publishing AG 2016.","['openscience', 'openaccess']","['othermeth', 'interview']","['hum', 'socscie', 'natscie']",['researcher'],['SVK'],Steinerová J.,Communications in Computer and Information Science,English,Conference Paper,"4th European Conference on Information Literacy, ECIL 2016",10 October 2016 through 13 October 2016,0,,,5.0,Springer Verlag,18650929,9783319521619,2016.0,676,0,277.0,285,10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_27,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2456,SCOPUS,When are researchers willing to share their data? – Impacts of values and uncertainty on open data in academia,0,"Background E-science technologies have significantly increased the availability of data. Research grant providers such as the European Union increasingly require open access publishing of research results and data. However, despite its significance to research, the adoption rate of open data technology remains low across all disciplines, especially in Europe where research has primarily focused on technical solutions (such as Zenodo or the Open Science Framework) or considered only parts of the issue. Methods and findings In this study, we emphasized the non-technical factors perceived value and uncertainty factors in the context of academia, which impact researchers’ acceptance of open data–the idea that researchers should not only publish their findings in the form of articles or reports, but also share the corresponding raw data sets. We present the results of a broad quantitative analysis including N = 995 researchers from 13 large to medium-sized universities in Germany. In order to test 11 hypotheses regarding researchers’ intentions to share their data, as well as detect any hierarchical or disciplinary differences, we employed a structured equation model (SEM) following the partial least squares (PLS) modeling approach. Conclusions Grounded in the value-based theory, this article proclaims that most individuals in academia embrace open data when the perceived advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Furthermore, uncertainty factors impact the perceived value (consisting of the perceived advantages and disadvantages) of sharing research data. We found that researchers’ assumptions about effort required during the data preparation process were diminished by awareness of e-science technologies (such as Zenodo or the Open Science Framework), which also increased their tendency to perceive personal benefits via data exchange. Uncertainty factors seem to influence the intention to share data. Effects differ between disciplines and hierarchical levels. © 2020 Stieglitz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.",['opendata'],['survey'],"['natscie', 'med', 'hum', 'engtech']","['researcher', 'othergroup']",['DEU'],"Stieglitz S., Wilms K., Mirbabaie M., Hofeditz L., Brenger B., López A., Rehwald S.",PLoS ONE,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Public Library of Science,19326203,0,2020.0,15,7 July,0.0,0,10.1371/journal.pone.0234172,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2460,SCOPUS,Do Croatian open access journals support ethical research? Content analysis of instructions to authors,instructions to authors; publication ethics; publication standards; open access; OA; research integrity,"Introduction: The aim of our study was to investigate the extent to which Instructions to authors of the Croatian open access (OA) journals are addressing ethical issues. Do biomedical journals differ from the journals from other disciplines in that respect? Our hypothesis was that biomedical journals maintain much higher publication ethics standards. Materials and methods: This study looked at 197 Croatian OA journals Instructions to authors to address the following groups of ethical issues: general terms; guidelines and recommendations; research approval and registration; funding and conflict of interest; peer review; redundant publications, misconduct and retraction; copyright; timeliness; authorship; and data accessibility. We further compared a subset of 159 non-biomedical journals with a subset of 38 biomedical journals. Content analysis was used to discern the ethical issues representation in the instructions to authors. Results: The groups of biomedical and non-biomedical journals were similar in terms of originality (chi(2) = 2.183, P = 0.140), peer review process (chi(2) = 0.296, P = 0.586), patent/grant statement (chi(2) = 2.184, P = 0.141), and timeliness of publication (chi(2) = 0.369, P = 0.544). We identified significant differences among categories including ethical issues typical for the field of biomedicine, like patients (chi(2) = 47.111, P < 0.001), and use of experimental animals (chi(2) = 42.543, P < 0.001). Biomedical journals also rely on international editorial guidelines formulated by relevant professional organizations heavily, compared with non-biomedical journals (chi(2) = 42.666, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Low representation or absence of some key ethical issues in author guidelines calls for more attention to the structure and the content of Instructions to authors in Croatian OA journals.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['documentreview'],"['med', 'nonspecificdisc']",['publisher'],['HRV'],"Stojanovski, Jadranka",BIOCHEMIA MEDICA,English,Article,,,,"[Stojanovski, Jadranka] Univ Zadar, Zadar, Croatia; [Stojanovski, Jadranka] Rudjer Boskovic Inst, Zagreb, Croatia",31.0,7.0,CROATIAN SOC MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY & LABORATORY MEDICINE,1330-0962,,2015.0,25,1,12.0,21,10.11613/BM.2015.002,,25672463.0,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2461,SCOPUS,Does small equal predatory? Analysis of publication charges and transparency of editorial policies in Croatian open access journals,predatory journals; open access; small scientific communities,"Introduction: We approach the problem of predatory journals and publishers from the perspective of small scientific communities and small journals that may sometimes be perceived as predatory. Among other characteristics of predatory journals two most relevant are their business model and the quality of the editorial work. Materials and methods: We analysed 444 Croatian open access (OA) journals in the Hrtak (portal of Croatian scientific journals) digital journal repository for the presence of article processing charges as a business model and the transparency of editorial policies. Results: The majority of journals do not charge authors or require submission or article processing charges, which clearly distinguishes them from predatory journals. Almost all Hrtak OA journals have publicly available information on editorial boards, including full names and affiliations, and detailed contact information for the editorial office at the Hrtak website. The journal names are unique and cannot be easily confused with another journal or intend to mislead about the journal's origin. While most journals provide information on peer review process, many do not provide guidelines for reviewers or other editorial and publication ethics standards. Conclusion: In order to clearly differentiate themselves from predatory journals, it is not enough for journals from small research communities to operate on non-commercial bases, but also to have transparent editorial policies.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['HRV'],"Stojanovski, Jadranka; Marusic, Ana",BIOCHEMIA MEDICA,English,Article,,,,"[Stojanovski, Jadranka] Univ Zadar, Dept Informat Sci, Zadar, Croatia; [Stojanovski, Jadranka] Rudjer Boskovic Inst, Ctr Sci Informat, Zagreb, Croatia; [Marusic, Ana] Univ Split, Sch Med, Dept Res Biomed & Hlth, Split, Croatia",27.0,8.0,CROATIAN SOC MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY & LABORATORY MEDICINE,1330-0962,,2017.0,27,2,292.0,299,10.11613/BM.2017.032,,28694721.0,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2465,SCOPUS,Estimated effects of implementing an open access policy for grantees at a private foundation,Open access; Policy; Philanthropy,"Background. The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF) was interested in understanding the potential effects of requiring that grantees publish their peer -reviewed research in open access journals. Methods. We collected data on more than 2,000 publications in over 500 journals that were generated by GBMF grantees since 2001. We then examined the journal policies to establish how two possible open access policies might have affected grantee publishing habits. Results. We found that 99.3% of the articles published by grantees would have complied with a policy that requires open access within 12 months of publication. We also estimated the maximum annual costs to GBMF for covering fees associated with gold open access to be between $400,000 and $2,600,000 annually. Discussion. Based in part on this study, GBMF has implemented a new open access policy that requires grantees make peer -reviewed publications fully available within 12 months.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']","['documentreview', 'biblio']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['funder', 'publisher', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Strasser, Carly; Khare, Eesha",PEERJ,English,Article,,,,"[Strasser, Carly] Gordon & Betty Moore Fdn, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA; [Khare, Eesha] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA",20.0,0.0,PEERJ INC,2167-8359,,2017.0,5,,,,10.7717/peerj.3853,,28966895.0,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2469,SCOPUS,"Early-Career Researchers' Perceptions of the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Potential Causes, and Open Science",early-career researcher; research practices; open science,"Young researchers of today will shape the field in the future. In light of current debates about social psychology's research culture, this exploratory survey assessed early-career researchers' beliefs (N = 88) about the prevalence of questionable research practices (QRPs), potential causes, and open science as a possible solution. While there was relative consensus that outright fraud is an exception, a majority of participants believed that some QRPs are moderately to highly prevalent what they attributed primarily to academic incentive structures. A majority of participants felt that open science is necessary to improve research practice. They indicated to consider some open science recommendations in the future, but they also indicated some reluctance. Limitation and implications of these findings are discussed.",['openscience'],['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['DEU'],"Stuermer, Stefan; Oeberst, Aileen; Troetschel, Roman; Decker, Oliver",SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Stuermer, Stefan] Fernuniv, Dept Psychol, Univ Str 33, D-58098 Hagen, Germany; [Oeberst, Aileen] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Mainz, Germany; [Oeberst, Aileen] Leibniz Inst Wissensmedien, Mainz, Germany; [Troetschel, Roman] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Luneburg, Germany; [Decker, Oliver] Univ Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany",32.0,5.0,HOGREFE & HUBER PUBLISHERS,1864-9335,,2017.0,48,6,365.0,371,10.1027/1864-9335/a000324,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2486,SCOPUS,Formation and Open Access of Institutional Electronic Research Corners for Promotion of Communication Facilities and Quality Research,Open Access; E-Research Corner; Communication Facility; Quality Research; Inflibnet,"Indian higher education institutions (HEIs) are struggling hard to get a berth among top-rated HEIs in the world. One of the important parameters that restrict our HEIs from the list of top-notch global HEIs is 'contribution to research'. It does not mean that Indian HEIs don't have quality researchers to produce world class research output. Had that been the case, Indian researchers doing research abroad would not have done miracles with their unique research output in varied domains. The hindrance for researchers in India could be owing to improper communication facility that fails to exchange ideas and outcomes of research among peers. Thus, the urge for formation of sound institutional electronic repositories, i.e., electronic research corners (e-research corners) has crop up. Mere formation of e-research corners won't suffice to address the issue. Besides formation, e-research corners need to be open accessed. University Grants Commission (UGC) of India has established an Inter-University Center called Information and Library Network Center (Inflibnet), which is the best example of open access institutional repositories. While some HEIs of India do have their research corners that are accessed by only the internal stakeholders, some other HEIs don't have any such repositories as such. On the backdrop of the necessity of formation and open access of institutional electronic repositories, this paper focuses on unfolding how open access to sound e-research corners promote quality education. Besides, it has also designed a framework that will assist the HEIs to build sound e-research centers. For the purpose, in-depth interviews are conducted with 50 researchers working in reputed HEIs in Bhubaneswar to ascertain how open access e-research centers facilitate quality research. Focus Group Discussion are also conducted among experts in the field like research heads of selected HEIs, Chief Librarians of established Libraries and reputed educationists of the State for designing the framework to form e-research centers. The findings of this research will help in communicating ideas and findings of researchers to all the corners that matter for quality research.","['opentools', 'openaccess']",['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['librarian', 'researcher']",['IND'],"Swain, Sukanta Chandra",INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING,English,Article,,,,"[Swain, Sukanta Chandra] KIIT Deemed Be Univ, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Bhubaneswar 751024, Odisha, India",6.0,0.0,KASSEL UNIV PRESS GMBH,1863-0383,,2020.0,15,6,192.0,199,10.3991/ijet.v15i06.12003,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2487,SCOPUS,Faculty knowledge and attitudes regarding predatory open access journals: a needs assessment study,,"Objective: The purpose of predatory open access (OA) journals is primarily to make a profit rather than to disseminate quality, peer-reviewed research. Publishing in these journals could negatively impact faculty reputation, promotion, and tenure, yet many still choose to do so. Therefore, the authors investigated faculty knowledge and attitudes regarding predatory OA journals. Methods: A twenty-item questionnaire containing both quantitative and qualitative items was developed and piloted. All university and medical school faculty were invited to participate. The survey included knowledge questions that assessed respondents' ability to identify predatory OA journals and attitudinal questions about such journals. Chi-square tests were used to detect differences between university and medical faculty. Results: A total of 183 faculty completed the survey: 63% were university and 37% were medical faculty. Nearly one-quarter (23%) had not previously heard of the term predatory OA journal. Most (87%) reported feeling very confident or confident in their ability to assess journal quality, but only 60% correctly identified a journal as predatory, when given a journal in their field to assess. Chi-square tests revealed that university faculty were more likely to correctly identify a predatory OA journal (p=0.0006) and have higher self-reported confidence in assessing journal quality, compared with medical faculty (p=0.0391). Conclusions: Survey results show that faculty recognize predatory OA journals as a problem. These attitudes plus the knowledge gaps identified in this study will be used to develop targeted educational interventions for faculty in all disciplines at our university.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Swanberg, Stephanie M.; Thielen, Joanna; Bulgarelli, Nancy",JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION,English,Article,,,,"[Swanberg, Stephanie M.; Bulgarelli, Nancy] Oakland Univ, William Beaumont Sch Med, Med Lib, Rochester, MI 48063 USA; [Thielen, Joanna] Univ Michigan, Art Architecture & Engn Lib, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA; [Thielen, Joanna] Oakland Univ Lib, Rochester, MI USA",28.0,0.0,MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOC,1536-5050,,2020.0,108,2,208.0,218,10.5195/jmla.2020.849,,32256232.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2489,SCOPUS,The Inclusion of open access journals in academic libraries: A case study of Bioline international,Bioline international; Developing countries; Digital library; Journal collection; Open access,"Specialized open access digital collections contain a wealth of valuable resources. However, major academic and research libraries do not always provide access to them, and thus do not benefit from these unique resources. This case study of one such digital collection, Bioline International, surveys 76 academic libraries in Canada and the United States to determine how often libraries are linking to the collection. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to librarians at the surveyed institutions to determine their opinions about the use of open access journals. The findings suggest issues of poor adoption rates of open access journals, as well as some reasons why such journals may not be actively adopted.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian']","['USA', 'CAN']","Sweezie J., Caidi N., Chanl L.","Openness in Digital Publishing: Awareness, Discovery and Access - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2007",English,Conference Paper,"11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2007",13 June 2007 through 15 June 2007,Vienna,,,0.0,0,0,9783854372929,2007.0,0,0,469.0,470,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2494,SCOPUS,Open-access student-centered learning the open web as a collaborative space for higher education in public,Open access; Open web; Student-centered learning,"This study examines two open-access websites that host online public-facing courses at the university level. Online learning environments are replacing or enhancing many physical classrooms within higher education, but these learning environments are not necessarily free, open-access, or publicly available on the open web. Considering two organizations that host free and open websites available to use by any member of the public, this study demonstrates how open-access and public-facing pedagogy on the web is in-line with student-centered practices. Network analysis, website structure, content analysis, and surveys suggest that students can be equally and potentially more empowered as practitioners in their own education by sharing their knowledge-building with a wider audience on the open web. Open web communities can enable student-centered pedagogy practices to freely evolve outside of a hierarchical and institutional structure, and can work to further studentcentered goals through producing knowledge for anyone to access and contribute to on the open web. © Springer International Publishing AG 2017.","['openaccess', 'openeducation']","['othermeth', 'documentreview', 'survey']",['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],Tagliaferri L.,Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing,English,Conference Paper,"19th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL 2016",21 September 2016 through 23 September 2016,0,,,0.0,Springer Verlag,21945357,9783319503394,2017.0,545,0,605.0,619,10.1007/978-3-319-50340-0_54,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2495,SCOPUS,Open Access Publishing: A Study of Current Practice in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Research,Open access; Oral and maxillofacial surgery research; Education and research,"Open access (OA) publication has become an increasingly common route for dissemination of scientific research findings. However, it remains a contentious issue with continued debate as to its impact on the peer-review process and a potential change in the quality of subsequent evidence published. There is little research that looks into OA in oral and maxillofacial surgery. We investigated the OA policy in the 30 relevant journals listed in the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge journal citation report, comparing bibliometric data and quality of evidence produced in journals offering OA and those with subscription-only policies. 3474 articles were graded for evidence level and the results correlated to journal OA status. 76.7 % of journals offered authors OA services. There was no difference between impact factor, self-citation rate, total citations or quality of evidence between OA and subscription journals. These findings should send clear messages to both clinicians and researchers and should re- assure readers that scientific findings that are disseminated in open access form do not differ in quality to those in subscription-only format. It should reinforce that open access formats are a credible way to display research findings in oral and maxillofacial surgery.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Tahim, Arpan; Bansal, Hitesh; Goodson, Alexander M. C.; Payne, Karl F. B.; Sabharwal, Sanjeeve",JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY,English,Article,,,,"[Tahim, Arpan] Royal London Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Whitechapel Rd, London E1 1BB, England; [Bansal, Hitesh; Sabharwal, Sanjeeve] Imperial Coll London, London, England; [Goodson, Alexander M. C.] Morriston Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Swansea, W Glam, Wales; [Payne, Karl F. B.] Worcestershire Royal Hosital, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Worcester, MA USA",12.0,6.0,SPRINGER INDIA,0972-8279,,2016.0,15,4,517.0,520,10.1007/s12663-016-0898-2,,27833346.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2501,SCOPUS,Open access increases citations of papers in ecology,citation advantage; citation pattern; gross national income; hybrid journals; open access,"Open access (OA) can effectively increase the accessibility and visibility of scientific articles and thus potentially confer them with citation advantages. Such an impact may be more pronounced in developing countries where the cost for journal subscription is comparably expensive and usually unaffordable. By comparing one OA article with one non-OA article published in the same issue, we tested the impact of OA on citation advantages of articles published in 46 ecology journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). We compared OA to non-OA articles published in the same issue of these journals, thereby controlling for potentially confounding effects of publication requirement and period. OA articles received significantly more citations than non-OA articles, and this citation advantage of approximately one citation per year was sustained across publication years from 2009 to 2013. The OA citation advantage did not depend upon income of the country of origin of the citing scientists, and the OA citation advantage was found for citing scientists from North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Oceania, but not for Latin America. A total of 10 countries contributed more than 1000 citations each, and the OA citation advantage was found in all the 10 countries except Canada. Therefore, in ecology journals OA confers articles with citation advantages and such an impact accumulates with years and independent of the economic status of the countries. This information may guide decisions of scientific societies, journals, and individual authors as they weigh the relative costs and benefits of open electronic accessibility of scientific research.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['natscie'],"['publisher', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Tang, Min; Bever, James D.; Yu, Fei-Hai",ECOSPHERE,English,Article,,,,"[Tang, Min; Yu, Fei-Hai] Taizhou Univ, Zhejiang Prov Key Lab Plant Evolutionary Ecol & C, Taizhou 318000, Peoples R China; [Tang, Min; Bever, James D.] Univ Kansas, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA; [Tang, Min; Bever, James D.] Univ Kansas, Kansas Biol Survey, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA",41.0,10.0,WILEY,2150-8925,,2017.0,8,7,,,10.1002/ecs2.1887,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2502,SCOPUS,Open science disrupting the status quo in academic libraries: A perspective of Zimbabwe,Institutional repositories; Academic libraries; librarian's role; Developing countries; Disruptive technologies,"The ever-increasing journal subscriptions have seen many universities and research institutions failing to provide access to the much-needed scholarship for propagation of research and development due to dwindling budget allocations. Hence, the adoption of open access (OA) institutional repositories (IR) by the institutions to increase access, availability and visibility of their research output to a wider readership. Institutional repository (IR) technologies have transformed the traditional academic library practice, thus upsetting the work culture of librarians. Though studies there have been studies on the impact of IRs on academic librarians elsewhere in the world, none have been done on the Zimbabwean context. This study draws from a wider study which explored utilisation of institutional repositories in Zimbabwe's public universities. The study sought to answer the question: What is the role of the academic librarian in promoting the institutional repository? The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of technology (UTAUT) informed the study, while a mixed methods approach was employed using document analysis, questionnaires and interviews to collect data from librarians in eight public universities. Findings revealed that in some instances IR responsibilities were added to existing duties for incumbent staff while in others, staff were reassigned to IR roles resulting in diverse staff categories maintaining the IRs across the universities. Recommendations for effective and efficient management of the repositories by the universities are made. The study is relevant to other academic libraries in developing countries and Africa particularly countries whose economies are crumbling.","['opentools', 'openaccess']","['othermeth', 'survey', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['ZWE'],"Tapfuma, Mass Masona; Hoskins, Ruth Geraldine",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"[Tapfuma, Mass Masona; Hoskins, Ruth Geraldine] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Social Sci, Coll Humanities, Informat Studies, Pte Bag X01, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa",45.0,0.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2019.0,45,4,406.0,412,10.1016/j.acalib.2019.05.005,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2505,SCOPUS,Open access journals: Knowledge and attitudes among Cuban health researchers [Conocimientos y actitudes de los investigadores cubanos de la salud hacia las revistas de acceso abierto],Cuba; Open access journals; Open Access Movement; Research institutes,"A descriptive, cross-sectional study is presented whose objective was to determine the level of knowledge about and the attitudes toward open access journals among Cuban health researchers. To this end, a printed questionnaire was distributed between March and June 2007 to a group of researchers from Cuban national health institutes, who were chosen through stratified randomized sampling (160 researchers from 11 institutes). Variables included level of information about Open Access Movement terms and initiatives; papers published in open access journals; and reasons to publish or not papers in such journals. Descriptive statistics, bivariate correlations, and correspondence analysis were done using the SPSS statistical software, version 10.0 for Windows. Little knowledge of open access journals and other Open Access Movement terms and initiatives, and little use of open access journals as a publication means, were observed. © ECIMED.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],['researcher'],['CUB'],"Tarragó N.S., Carlos Fernández Molina J.",ACIMED,Spanish,Article,0,0,0,,,2.0,Centro Nacional de Informacion de Ciencias Medicas,10249435,0,2008.0,17,3,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2506,SCOPUS,Green Open Access in Astronomy and Mathematics: The Complementarity of Routines Among Authors and Readers,Open access; Digital publishing; Open science; Disciplinary cultures; Digital infrastructure; E-research,"Open access (OA) to publications has become a major topic in science policy. However, electronic publication providing free access to research via the internet is more than a decade older, was invented in the 1990s and driven by parts of the scientific community. This paper focuses on two disciplines (astronomy and mathematics) in which green OA is well established. It asks how authors and readers use the central disciplinary repository and how they are thereby included in the communication system of their disciplines. Drawing on an interview study with 20 scientists from both disciplines, we analyze the main characteristics of an inclusion, possible problems that result from it and how they are being solved. The empirical results show that there is a complementarity between the routines of authors and readers that co-stabilize each other. This finding suggests that the emergence of complementary routines could be a necessary condition for the green OA model to succeed.","['openaccess', 'opentools']",['interview'],['natscie'],['researcher'],"['DEU', 'ZAF']","Taubert, Niels",MINERVA,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Taubert, Niels] Bielefeld Univ, Inst Interdisciplinary Studies Sci I2SoS, POB 10 01 31, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany",65.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0026-4695,,,,,,,10.1007/s11024-020-09424-3,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2507,SCOPUS,Citation and attribution in open science: A case study,Bibliometrics; Large-scale collaboration; Open science; Scholarly communication; Scientific publishing,"Technology is changing the way in which scientists and mathematicians communicate. New platforms for scholarly communication enhance informal communication and imbue it with some of the functionalities of formal communication. A citation analysis was conducted to examine how content from one of these platforms, MathOverflow, has been cited and referenced within the mathematics literature. Citation patterns suggested that some authors were treating Math- Overflow content as a legitimate source of scholarly knowledge. Some problems with references and attribution occurred, which can be addressed by changes in the design of these technologies. Developing better systems for scholarly communication can help advance open science. © 2016 ACM.","['opentools', 'openscience']",['biblio'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],Tausczik Y.R.,"Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW",English,Conference Paper,"19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW 2016",27 February 2016 through 2 March 2016,0,,,1.0,Association for Computing Machinery,0,9781450335928,2016.0,27,0,1524.0,1534,10.1145/2818048.2820070,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2512,SCOPUS,An altmetric attention advantage for open access books in the humanities and social sciences,Open access; Altmetrics; Scientometrics; Monographs; Scholarly books; Social impact,"The last decade has seen two significant phenomena emerge in research communication: the rise of open access (OA) publishing, and the easy availability of evidence of online sharing in the form of altmetrics. There has been limited examination of the effect of OA on online sharing for journal articles, and little for books. This paper examines the altmetrics of a set of 32,222 books (of which 5% are OA) and a set of 220,527 chapters (of which 7% are OA) indexed by the scholarly database Dimensions in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Both OA books and chapters have significantly higher use on social networks, higher coverage in the mass media and blogs, and evidence of higher rates of social impact in policy documents. OA chapters have higher rates of coverage on Wikipedia than their non-OA equivalents, and are more likely to be shared on Mendeley. Even within the Humanities and Social Sciences, disciplinary differences in altmetric activity are evident. The effect is confirmed for chapters, although sampling issues prevent the strong conclusion that OA facilitates extra attention at the whole book level, the apparent OA altmetrics advantage suggests that the move towards OA is increasing social sharing and broader impact.",['openaccess'],"['othermeth', 'biblio']","['socscie', 'hum']","['researcher', 'publisher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Taylor, Michael",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Taylor, Michael] Univ Wolverhampton, Digital Sci, Wolverhampton, England",66.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,125,3,2523.0,2543,10.1007/s11192-020-03735-8,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2514,SCOPUS,Charting the landscape of open access journals in library and information science,Journals; Library and information science; Open access; Publishing; Scholarly communication,"Open access journals (OAJs) represent a significant portion of the literature in library and information science (LIS). This study contributes to current efforts to raise awareness of the LIS OA literature by focusing on the characteristics of journals publishing under an open access gold model. To understand the characteristics of LIS OAJs, 65 English language LIS journals were analyzed via descriptive statistical analysis and summative qualitative content analysis. Along these lines, the study updates and extends previous efforts to describe these journals and their practices. Findings suggest there are several key publication characteristics and commonly represented subject areas in the landscape of active LIS OAJs. Implications for practice include the recognition of the growing diversity of subjects and target audiences, the central role of double-blind peer review in LIS OA, and the acknowledgement that consistency and interoperability among OAJs remains a challenge that may undermine goals for dissemination. © 2017, Emmanuel Edward Te, Frances Owens, Megan Lohnash, Janice Christen-Whitney and Kristen Radsliff Rebmann.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Te E.E., Owens F., Lohnash M., Christen-Whitney J., Rebmann K.R.",Webology,English,Article,0,0,0,,,4.0,University of Tehran,1735188X,0,2017.0,14,1,8.0,20,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2515,SCOPUS,"Open Access Mega-Journals: Quality, Economics and Post-publication Peer Review Infrastructure",Article processing charge; Economics; Journal cascades; Marketing; OAMJ; Open access; Spam; Transparency,"As the publishing industry evolves towards the predominant open access (OA) model, publishers are establishing OA journal power-houses, the OA mega-journals (OAMJs), which are wide in scope, with larger-than-usual editor boards, and that pump out large numbers of papers. OAMJs are thus able to accommodate a surge in submissions, or transfers from other journals within the same publisher’s fleet. OAMJs represent a simple but effective publishing model that can also be an effective business model. We question whether the peer review system is robust enough to accommodate for effective post-publication peer review in OAMJs. As examples, we examine Scientific Reports, PLOS One, Heliyon, F1000Research, PeerJ, and BMJ Open, as well as a possible developing OAMJ, eLife, for clues to the dynamics of OAMJs and the possible links to quality control via peer review or post-publication peer review. We also take a closer look at the economics of OA publishing that might be driving the expansion of the OAMJ market. © 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Teixeira da Silva J.A., Tsigaris P., Al-Khatib A.",Publishing Research Quarterly,English,Article,0,0,0,,,3.0,Springer New York LLC,10538801,0,2019.0,35,3,418.0,435,10.1007/s12109-019-09654-8,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2524,SCOPUS,An overview of Open Access publishing in palaeontology,Open Access; Scholarly Publishing; Plan S; palaeontology; Open Science; Journal Policies,"Open Access (OA) describes the free, unrestricted access to and re-use of published research articles. Recently, the announcement of 'Plan S' has catalysed a new wave of interest, debate, and practice surrounding OA. Here, we provide a simple overview of the 'OA status' of palaeontology journals within this rapidly shifting landscape. In particular, we focus on aspects such as whether or not there are author-facing charges for Open Access, what embargo periods or restrictions on 'self-archiving' policies are in place, and whether or not the sharing of preprints is permitted. The majority of journals have self-archiving policies that allow authors to share their peer reviewed work via 'green OA' without charge. There is a clear relationship between 'journal impact' and higher charges levied for OA. The most expensive journals are typically published by the large, commercial, publishing houses, rather than the palaeontology community themselves. However, there are a number of article processing charge (APC)-free (diamond) OA journals that can also be considered to be of moderate impact. Until the palaeontology community makes the decision to move away from journal-based evaluation criteria (e.g., the impact factor), it is likely that such high costs will continue to impose financial inequities upon the research community. However, until such culture change occurs, palaeontologists could more widely embrace legal self-archiving as an equitable and sustainable way to progress communication of their research.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Tennant, Jonathan R.; Lomax, Dean R.",PALAEONTOLOGIA ELECTRONICA,English,Article,,,,"[Tennant, Jonathan R.] Univ Paris, CRI, Rue Charles V, F-75004 Paris, France; [Lomax, Dean R.] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England",29.0,0.0,COQUINA PRESS,1935-3952,,2019.0,22,2,,,10.26879/968,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2525,SCOPUS,"Imagining a Gold Open Access Future: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Funding Scenarios among Authors of Academic Scholarship",,"The viability of gold open access publishing models into the future will depend, in part, on the attitudes of authors toward open access (OA). In a survey of academics at four major research universities in North America, we examine academic authors' opinions and behaviors toward gold OA. The study allows us to see what academics know and perceive about open access models, their current behavior in regard to publishing in OA, and possible future behavior. In particular, we gauge current attitudes to examine the perceived likelihood of various outcomes in an all-open access publishing scenario. We also survey how much authors at these types of universities would be willing to pay for article processing charges (APCs) from different sources. Although the loudest voices may often be heard, in reality there is a wide range of attitudes and behaviors toward publishing. Understanding the range of perceptions, opinions, and behaviors among academics toward gold OA is important for academic librarians who must examine how OA serves their research communities, to prepare for an OA future, and to understand how OA impacts the library's role.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['NA'],"Tenopir, Carol; Dalton, Elizabeth D.; Christian, Lisa; Jones, Misty K.; McCabe, Mark; Smith, MacKenzie; Fish, Allison",COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES,English,Article,,,,"[Tenopir, Carol] Univ Tennessee, Sch Informat Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA; [Dalton, Elizabeth D.] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Murfreesboro, TN 37130 USA; [Christian, Lisa; Jones, Misty K.] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA; [McCabe, Mark] SKEMA Business Sch, Digital Business Program, Lille, France; [Smith, MacKenzie] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA; [Fish, Allison] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA",40.0,22.0,ASSOC COLL RESEARCH LIBRARIES,0010-0870,,2017.0,78,6,824.0,843,10.5860/crl.78.6.824,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2526,SCOPUS,"Pedagogical underpinnings of open science, citizen science and open innovation activities: A state-of-the-art analysis",Citizen Science; Learning design; Open Innovation; Open knowledge; Open Science; Pedagogy,"Higher Educational Institutes (HEIs) and academic libraries increasingly organise Open Science (OS), Citizen Science (CS) and Open Innovation (OI) activities. This paper presents a state-of-the-art analysis of the implications of openness on learning activities, in view of improving the design of future open activities containing learning objectives. The following questions were addressed: 1) how can openness be incorporated into learning activities, and 2) what are the learning benefits and challenges of openness in learning activities? This paper is a useful resource for organisers of OS, CS and OI learning activities. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.","['openscience', 'openparticipation']","['documentreview', 'othermeth']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['university', 'othergroup', 'policy']","['nonspecificgeo', 'NOR']","Teo E.A., Triantafyllou E.",Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics),English,Conference Paper,"15th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2020",14 September 2020 through 18 September 2020,0,,,0.0,Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH,3029743,9783030577162,2020.0,12315 LNCS,0,358.0,362,10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_27,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2527,SCOPUS,Evaluating the Impact of Open Access at Berkeley: Results from the 2015 Survey of Berkeley Research Impact Initiative (BRII) Funding Recipients,,"The Berkeley Research Impact Initiative (BRII) was one of the first campus-based open access (OA) funds to be established in North America and one of the most active, distributing more than $244,000 to support University of California (UC) Berkeley authors. In April 2015, we conducted a qualitative study of 138 individuals who had received BRII funding to survey their opinions about the benefits and funding of open access. Most respondents believe their articles had a greater impact as open access, expect to tap multiple sources to fund open access fees, and support the UC Open Access Policy and its goal of making research public and accessible. Results of the survey and a discussion of their impact on the BRII program follow.",['openaccess'],['survey'],"['natscie', 'med', 'socscie']","['researcher', 'university']",['USA'],"Teplitzky, Samantha; Phillips, Margaret",COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES,English,Article,,,,"[Teplitzky, Samantha] Univ Calif Berkeley, Phys Astron Lib, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA; [Teplitzky, Samantha] Univ Calif Berkeley, Educ Psychol Lib, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA",10.0,9.0,ASSOC COLL RESEARCH LIBRARIES,0010-0870,,2016.0,77,5,568.0,581,10.5860/crl.77.5.568,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2531,SCOPUS,Administrator interest is perceived to encourage faculty and librarian involvement in open access activities,0,"Objective: To better understand the roles and influence of senior-level academic administrators, such as provosts, on open access (OA) activities at the institutional level, including whether librarians perform these activities regardless of administrative interest. Design: Web-based survey questionnaire combined with multiple regression analysis. Settings: The research was conducted online using surveys emailed to potential participants at not-for-profit public and private academic institutions in the United States with a FTE of greater than 1000. Subjects: Academic library directors at selected colleges and universities. Methods: Using directory information from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) and filtering institutions according to not-for-profit status, size, and special focus, a survey sample of 1135 colleges and universities was obtained. Library websites were used to acquire contact information for library directors. In summer 2012 the 43-item survey questionnaire was distributed to respondents online using Qualtrics. The four primary variables were each comprised of multiple questionnaire items and validated using factor analysis, and the data was explored using multiple regression. Main Results: The survey received 298 respondents for a 26% response rate, though the number of incomplete responses is not stated. Among four stakeholder groups (faculty, publishers, librarians, and senior academic administrators), library directors perceived librarians as having the greatest influence in regards to the adoption of open access (mean = .7056), followed by faculty (.3792), administrators (.1881), and publishers as having a negative impact (-.3684). A positive correlative relationship was determined between Administrator Attention to Open Access-a key variable operationalized by combining eight questionnaire items-and the variables Librarian Commitment to Open Access, Faculty Commitment to Open Access, and Faculty Proclivity Toward Open Access, with the latter especially the case at lower levels of administrator support. Regarding institution size, library directors perceived a higher likelihood of faculty adherence and librarian commitment to OA at large institutions (over 20,000). A given institution's public or private status and geographic region were not significant predictors of faculty or librarian commitment or adherence to open access. Conclusions: The study finds that academic library directors perceive librarians to have the strongest influence upon adoption of open access, and senior academic administrator attention to open access is positively linked to the OA activities of faculty and librarians. Larger institutions are considered to have greater commitment to OA, potentially due to differing missions according to institution type. The authors recommend that open access advocates consider administrator roles and target administrator support when seeking to increase participation in OA. © 2014 Tewell.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['USA'],Tewell E.C.,Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Alberta,1715720X,0,2014.0,9,3,80.0,82,10.18438/b8003w,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2543,SCOPUS,Free Open Access Medical Education resource knowledge and utilisation amongst Emergency Medicine trainees: A survey in four countries,,"Introduction Free Open Access Medical Education encompasses a broad array of free online resources and discussion fora. The aim of this paper was to describe whether Emergency Medicine trainees in different contexts know about Free Open Access Medical Education, whether or not they know about its different platforms, which ones they use, and what the major barriers to regular usage are. Methods A convenience sample was surveyed on awareness and use of Free Open Access Medical Education blogs, podcasts, websites and Twitter at three institutions (in Australia, Botswana and Papua New Guinea) and one deanery (United Kingdom) between June 2013 and June 2014 using an online survey tool or via hand-distributed survey. Results 44 trainees responded: four from Botswana, seven from Papua New Guinea, ten from the United Kingdom and 23 from Australia. 82% were aware of blogs, 80% of websites, 75% of podcasts and 61% of Twitter as resources in Emergency Medicine. Awareness and use of specific resources were lower in Botswana and Papua New Guinea. For blogs, podcasts and websites, trainees who had looked at a resource at least once were neutral or agreed that it was relevant. For Twitter, some trainees found it difficult to navigate or not relevant. Lack of awareness of resources rather than lack of internet access was the main barrier to use. Conclusion The Emergency Medicine trainees in both developed and low resource settings studied were aware that Free Open Access Medical Education resources exist, but trainees in lower income settings were generally less aware of specific resources. Lack of internet and device access was not a barrier to use in this group.",['openeducation'],"['documentreview', 'survey']",['med'],['othergroup'],"['GBR', 'BWA', 'PNG', 'AUS']","Thurtle, Natalie; Banks, Colin; Cox, Megan; Pain, Tilley; Furyk, Jeremy",AFRICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE,English,Article,,,,"[Thurtle, Natalie] Guys & St Thomas NHS Hosp Trust, Emergency Dept, London, England; [Thurtle, Natalie] Guys & St Thomas NHS Hosp Trust, Dept Clin Toxicol, London, England; [Banks, Colin; Furyk, Jeremy] Townsville Hosp, Emergency Dept, Townsville, Qld, Australia; [Banks, Colin] Emergency Med Training Programme, Port Moresby, Papua N Guinea; [Cox, Megan] Univ Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; [Cox, Megan] Princess Marina Hosp, Emergency Dept, Gaborone, Botswana; [Banks, Colin; Pain, Tilley; Furyk, Jeremy] James Cook Univ, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia",24.0,14.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV,2211-419X,,2016.0,6,1,12.0,17,10.1016/j.afjem.2015.10.005,,30456058.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2544,SCOPUS,Adopting open access in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from a developing nation,Social science; Information science; Open access; Scientific publishing; Social sciences and humanities; Vietnam,"Open Access (OA) publishing, with ambitious movements such as Plan S, is engendering radical changes among academic publishers. Emerging countries need to keep publishing as well as adopt open access to catch up with the changes. Using exclusive data from the Social Sciences & Humanities Peer Awards (SSHPA) database, the study employed both descriptive statistics and a Bayesian linear regression model to examine the journals and publishers in which Vietnamese social scientists published during the period 2008-2019, and the potential of pursuing the OA movement in Vietnam. We found an increasing diversification in the publishing sources of Vietnamese social science researchers with growth rates of 9.8% and 14.1% per annum in the number of publishers and journals, respectively. Given that the proportion of Gold OA articles had a fourfold increase over the examined period, it seems that the Vietnamese academic community is adopting OA. Furthermore, Bayesian analysis results hint at positive associations of internal and external collaborative power (number of domestic and foreign authors, respectively) with the decision to publish in OA (beta(b_TotalVN_OpenAccess) = 0.22; beta(b_TotalForeign_OpenAccess) = 0.15). The results and its implications suggest that Vietnamese policymakers and university director boards should facilitate as well as control the quality of the scientific publishing and the OA movement.",['openaccess'],"['documentreview', 'othermeth']","['socscie', 'hum']",['researcher'],['VNM'],"Thu-Trang Vuong; Manh-Toan Ho; Minh-Hoang Nguyen; Nguyen, Thanh-Huyen T.; Thanh-Dung Nguyen; Thi-Linh Nguyen; Anh-Phuong Luong; Quan-Hoang Vuong",HELIYON,English,Article,,,,"[Thu-Trang Vuong] Sci Po Paris, F-75337 Paris, France; [Manh-Toan Ho; Minh-Hoang Nguyen; Quan-Hoang Vuong] Phenikaa Univ, Ctr Interdisciplinary Social Res, Hanoi 100803, Vietnam; [Manh-Toan Ho; Minh-Hoang Nguyen; Nguyen, Thanh-Huyen T.; Thanh-Dung Nguyen; Thi-Linh Nguyen; Anh-Phuong Luong] Vuong & Associates, AI Social Data Lab, 3-161 Thinh Quang, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam; [Nguyen, Thanh-Huyen T.; Thanh-Dung Nguyen; Thi-Linh Nguyen; Anh-Phuong Luong] Foreign Trade Univ, 91 Chua Lang St, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam",63.0,0.0,ELSEVIER SCI LTD,2405-8440,,2020.0,6,7,,,10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04522,,32743103.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2553,SCOPUS,Attitudes towards open access: A meta-synthesis of the empirical literature,attitudes; authors; meta-synthesis; Open access; scholars,"The aim of the present study is to report the results of a meta-synthesis of the empirical literature on scholars' attitudes towards Open Access (OA) journals. A total of 16 articles published in scholarly journals since 2002 (when the Budapest Open Access Initiative was released) were included in the study and five major themes emerged from their examination and analysis. The literature indicates that attitudes and perceptions of OA are varied across countries and across disciplines. Free access, which is perceived to facilitate wider dissemination of research outputs, is a strong incentive for publishing in OA. However, quality and reputation are the most important factors in selecting a journal and take priority over the availability of free access. Although OA is perceived to have many advantages over the traditional publication model, it raises some concerns too, especially in regard to the author-pays model, the quality of peer-review and the impact of the journals. © 2014 The authors and IOS Press.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Togia A., Korobili S.","Let's Put Data to Use: Digital Scholarship for the Next Generation -  Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2014",English,Conference Paper,"18th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2014",19 June 2014 through 20 June 2014,Thessaloniki,,,0.0,IOS Press,0,9781614994084,2014.0,0,0,13.0,22,10.3233/978-1-61499-409-1-13,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2555,SCOPUS,"Open access and OER in latin america: A survey of the policy landscape in chile, colombia and uruguay",0,"This chapter presents an overview of the mechanisms (funding, policy, legislative and procedural) adopted by Latin American governments with respect to Open Access and Open Educational Resources (OER) initiatives in the higher education sector. It addresses three questions: How do the higher education systems of Chile, Colombia and Uruguay operate and fund their activities in general? How do existing policies and processes incorporating Open Access and/or OER influence student access to learning and research materials in these countries? What policy, advocacy and community-building interventions might be useful for promoting Open Education activities in these contexts? This study employed a descriptive, case study approach to examine whether and how Open Access and OER policies have been applied at national and institutional levels. It first engaged in an Open Education policy country-mapping exercise, then conducted a comparative analysis, and concluded the research process with a workshop conducted with 10 regional education experts and activists to validate findings. Findings indicate that while each country has its own approach to funding higher education, there are few or no specific national and/or institutional policies aimed at promoting Open Education in the higher education sectors. Low OER awareness and a commercialised model of higher education appear to account for the lack of any OER policies in Chile, while in Colombia various national and institutional strategies reveal a country at a nascent stage of Open Education policy development. By contrast, the nature of OER management and extent of policy implementation in Uruguay suggests that it is an enabling environment for current and future open policy development. ⊓ 121 Adoption and Impact of OER in the Global South 122 All of these countries are making investments in science, technology and innovation programmes and projects, making this the most fruitful field for potential Open Education advocacy. Based on the outcomes of this study, a number of recommendations are proposed, including: fostering and strengthening networks among Latin American civil society organisations promoting Open Education; engaging with higher education stakeholders on how to develop open policies; promoting open policies and mandates for publicly funded research; developing bottom-up and top-down strategies for greater engagement with OER; and providing greater visibility to existing Open Education projects in the region. Acronyms and abbreviations BVS-LILACS • Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (Virtual Library on Health) BVSDE-REPIDISCA • Biblioteca Virtual Desarrollo Sostenible y Salud Ambiental – Red Panamericana de Información en Salud Ambiental (Virtual Library of Sustainable Development and Environmental Health – Pan American Network for Environmental Health) CLACSO • El Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (Network of Virtual Libraries of Latin American Council of Social Sciences) Colciencias Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation CONICYT • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research) CRUCH • Consejo de Rectores de las Universidades Chilenas (Principals Council of Chilean Universities) EIC • educational innovation centre FOSS Free and Open Source Software GDP gross domestic product HEI • higher education institution ICT • information and communication technologies MECESUP 2 • El Programa de Mejoramiento de la Calidad y Equidad de la Educación (Programme for Improvement of Quality and Equity in Higher Education) MoECo • Ministerio de Educación (Ministry of Education) OER • Open Educational Resources PISA • Programme for International Student Assessment REDA • Recursos Educativos Digitales Abiertos (National Strategy for Digital Open Educational Resources) Redalyc • Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal (Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal) 123 Open Access and OER in Latin America: A survey of the policy landscape in Chile, Colombia and Uruguay REMAR • Red Mercosur para la Accesibilidad y la Generación Colaborativa de Recursos Educativos Abiertos (Mercosur Network for Accessibility and Collaborative Creation of Open Educational Resources) SIDALC • Alianza de Servicios de Información Agropecuaria (Alliance of Agricultural Information Services) SciELO • Scientific Electronic Library Online STI • science, technology and innovation UdelaR • Universidad de la República Uruguay (University of the Republic of Uruguay) UTEC • Universidad Tecnológica (Technological University) Introduction It is undeniable that the provision of equitable access to quality education is one of the greatest challenges facing Latin America. Within this context, increased investment in and focus upon higher education is a key element in the pursuit of more equitable societies. Latin American countries are currently spending billions of dollars on education every year. In many of these countries, public… © Contributors 2017. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.","['openaccess', 'openeducation', 'openpolicies']","['documentreview', 'interview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['policy', 'university']","['COL', 'URY', 'CHL']",Toledo A.,Adoption and Impact of OER in the Global South,English,Book Chapter,0,0,0,,,2.0,African Books Collective,0,9781552505991; 9781928331483,2017.0,0,0,121.0,141,10.5281/zenodo.1005330,,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2569,SCOPUS,Daily growth rate of scientific production on Covid-19. Analysis in databases and open access repositories,Scholarly communication; Scientific communication; Bibliometric analysis; Scientific output; Exponential growth; Open access; Scientific databases; Repositories; Covid-19; 2019-nCoV; SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus; Health information; Pandemics,"The scientific community is facing one of its greatest challenges in solving a global health problem: the Covid-19 pandemic. This situation has generated an unprecedented volume of publications. What is the volume of scientific publications on Covid-19? The general objective of this research work is to obtain a global vision of the daily growth of scientific production on Covid-19 in various databases (Dimensions, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, PubMed, and eight repositories). In relation to the results obtained, Dimensions indexes a total of 9,435 publications (69% with peer review and 2,677 preprints) well above Scopus (1,568) and WoS (718). This is a classic bibliometric phenomenon of exponential growth (R-2 = 0.92). The daily global growth rate is 500 publications and the production doubles every 15 days. In the case of PubMed the weekly growth is around 1,000 publications. Of the eight repositories studied, PubMed Central, medRxiv and SSRN are the leaders, but despite their contribution, journals continue to be the core of scientific communication. Finally, it has been established that three of every four publications on the Covid-19 are available in open access. The information explosion which places us, information professionals, at the centre of the information pandemic demands a serious and coordinated response.","['opentools', 'openaccess']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Torres-Salinas, Daniel",PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Torres-Salinas, Daniel] Univ Granada, Dept Informac & Comunicacidn Medialab UGR, Unidad Excelencia Lberlab, Campus Cartuja S-N, Granada 18071, Spain; [Torres-Salinas, Daniel] Ec3metr Spin Off, Campus Cartuja S-N, Granada 18071, Spain",4.0,16.0, EDICIONES PROFESIONALES INFORMACION SL-EPI,1386-6710,,2020.0,29,2,,,10.3145/epi.2020.mar.15,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2570,SCOPUS,BIBLIOMETRIC AND BENCHMARK ANALYSIS OF GOLD OPEN ACCESS IN SPAIN: BIG OUTPUT AND LITTLE IMPACT,Open Access; Gold road; Web of Science; Analisis bibliometrico; Research impact; International collaboration; Spain; Europe,"This bibliometric study analyzes the research output produced by Spain during the 2005-2014 time period in Open Access (OA) journals indexed in Web of Science. The aim of the paper is to determine if papers published in Open Access journals contribute to the improvement of citation impact and collaboration indicators in Spanish research. The results are shown by scientific areas and compared with 17 European countries. Spain is the second highest ranking European country with gold OA publication output and the fourth highest in Open Access output (9%). In Spain OA output is especially high in the fields of Arts and Humanities (28%). Spain's normalized citation impact in Open access (0.72) is lower than the world average and that of the main European countries. Finally, we discuss how these results differ from the so-called Open Access citation advantage.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['ESP'],"Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas; Aguillo, Isidro F.",PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,English,Article,,,,"[Torres-Salinas, Daniel] Univ Navarra, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain; [Torres-Salinas, Daniel] Univ Granada, EC3metr & Medialab UGR, CTTGran Via 48, Granada 18010, Spain; [Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas] Univ Politecn Valencia, Ingenio CSIC UPV, Camino Vera S-N, E-46022 Valencia, Spain; [Aguillo, Isidro F.] CSIC, Inst Polit & Bienes Publ, Lab Cibermetria, Albasanz 26-28, Madrid 28037, Spain",24.0,11.0,EPI,1386-6710,,2016.0,25,1,17.0,24,10.3145/epi.2016.ene.03,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2578,SCOPUS,Methodological issues of open research data: analysis of the datasets from SciELO included in Figshare,research data; open data; research methods; data description; datasets; data usage; data repositories,"Open research data represent an opportunity to share scientific knowledge and to provide new perspectives for validation and dissemination of scientific results. Effective re-use of these data implies to know both the research methods applied to obtain them and the measures of usage and citation that are sistematically gathered. Based on the whole catalogue of open research data (348 datasets) from SciELO journals available in Figshare, this study aims to explore their research methods and the types of data according to data collection techniques and subject categories. It also analyses usage and bibliometric indicators, file formats and dataset licensing. Results show that quantitative data are more frequent than qualitative data. The most usual data were those obtained by observation techniques, followed by experimental and derived data. This figures varied according to the different scientific areas, but usage indicators came out not to be significant for the whole set of data files.",['opendata'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'othergroup']",['BRA'],"Travieso Rodriguez, Crispulo; Ferreira Araujo, Ronaldo",REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Travieso Rodriguez, Crispulo] Univ Salamanca, Dpto Bibliotecon & Documentac, Salamanca, Spain; [Ferreira Araujo, Ronaldo] Univ Fed Alagoas, ICHCA, Maceio, Brazil",46.0,0.0,CONSEJO SUPERIOR INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS-CSIC,0210-0614,,2019.0,42,3,,,10.3989/redc.2019.3.1597,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2586,SCOPUS,"Open Access Driven Transformation of the Scientific Communication System: Current Status, Prerequisites for Change, Effects, and Prospects",open access; open science; scientific communication; new media; open access journals,"This article presents interviews with leaders and staff members of 17 Russian and foreign organizations that represent the publishing community, libraries, community projects, and associations related to the science information system. The interviews were conducted as part of a study of the impact of open access on the scientific communication system. During the interviews we attempted to predict the future transformations of the scientific information market.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'librarian']",['RUS'],"Trishchenko, N. D.",SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING,English,Article,,,,"[Trishchenko, N. D.] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Fac Journalism, Dept New Media & Commun Theory, Moscow 125009, Russia",16.0,0.0,ALLERTON PRESS INC,0147-6882,,2019.0,46,2,73.0,83,10.3103/S0147688219020059,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2597,SCOPUS,Comprehensiveness and uniqueness of commercial databases and open access systems,Citation index database; Open access system; Comprehensiveness of database coverage; Scholarly communication; Academic assessment,"In this study, scholarly communication systems provided by commercial services and open access systems are examined on the basis of the comprehensiveness and uniqueness of their coverage. Commercial databases (Web of Science and Scopus) are compared with search engine (Google Scholar), aggregate institutional repositories (OAIster and OpenDOAR), and the open access system for physics research (arXiv). Retrievals were conducted from the six databases or systems, and the output at each location was compared with that at the others. Journal articles published by Nobel laureates in physics from 2001 to 2013 were selected as samples in this study. The study reveals that search engine tend to provide more resources than do commercial databases but also that commercial databases have better coverage than institutional repositories. Institutional repositories showed a zero percentage of uniqueness when compared with Google Scholar. The results of the present study may provide suggestions to researchers, thereby enabling them to select better information and reference sources for scholarly assessment of individual research productivity and influence; consequently, their international visibility and diffusion may be enhanced.",['opentools'],['documentreview'],['natscie'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Tsay, Ming-yueh; Tseng, Yu-wei; Wu, Tai-luan",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Tsay, Ming-yueh; Tseng, Yu-wei; Wu, Tai-luan] Natl Chengchi Univ, Grad Inst Lib Informat & Archival Studies, 64 Sec 2 ZhiNan Rd, Taipei 11605, Taiwan",15.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2019.0,121,3,1323.0,1338,10.1007/s11192-019-03252-3,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2598,SCOPUS,Measuring academic research impact based on open data: A case of engineering faculties,Open data; Recommendation system; Research information system; Research open data; Visualization,"Professors of Higher Educational Institutions focus their efforts primarily on teaching and on conducting research. While teaching encapsulates all the activities that transfer knowledge, research incorporates the participation in research projects, as well as the authoring of research publications. By measuring the efficiency in the various research activities, the overall academic research impact can be determined. Especially nowadays, that the open data related to research have been amplified in terms of volume, quality and diversity, it is imperative to create and support systems that host and present this kind of information. A variety of information can be derived by research open data, which have many different uses. The advertisement of the institutions' research outputs and the recommendation of research publications based on the already existing publications of the faculty are only some of the possible uses of this information. In this paper, we propose an information system that utilizes open data in order to bring to the fore the research influence of academia and guide the research policy makers. Furthermore, we present a case study with open data derived from engineering faculties to showcase the research impact of the selected faculties and the capabilities of the developed research information system, the e-Research system. The e-Research system consists of an interface for the presentation of the information related to research, which also incorporates a recommendation system to propose relevant research to academics that are registered in the system and search queries for retrieving significant information about the research impact. © 2017 IEEE.",['opendata'],['othermeth'],['engtech'],"['researcher', 'university']",['GRC'],"Tsolakidis A., Triperina E., Sgouropoulou C., Christidis N.","IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON",English,Conference Paper,"8th IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2017",25 April 2017 through 28 April 2017,0,,,3.0,IEEE Computer Society,21659559,9781509054671,2017.0,0,0,1611.0,1618,10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7943064,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2601,SCOPUS,Do open access biomedical journals benefit smaller countries? The Slovenian experience,electronic journals; Europe; impact factor; open access,"Scientists from smaller countries have problems gaining visibility for their research. Does open access publishing provide a solution? Slovenia is a small country with around 5000 medical doctors, 1300 dentists and 1000 pharmacists. A search of Slovenia's Bibliographic database was carried out to identity all biomedical journals and those which are open access. Slovenia has 18 medical open access journals, but none has an impact factor and only 10 are indexed by Slovenian and international bibliographic databases. The visibility and quality of medical papers is poor. The solution might be to reduce the number of journals and encourage Slovenian scientists to publish their best articles in them. JM.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['othergroup'],['SVN'],"Turk, Nana",HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL,English,Article,,,,,,1.0,Association for Computing Machinery,0,9781450372046,2019.0,0,0,287.0,296,10.1145/3325112.3325257,WOS:000368903800004,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2607,SCOPUS,"Publish or Perish, and Pay-The New Paradigm of Open-Access Journals",impact; open-access; peer-review; surgical publication,"OBJECTIVES: The new open-access journal business model is changing the publication landscape and residents and junior faculty should be aware of these changes. DESIGN: A national survey of surgery program directors and residents was performed. RESULTS: Open-access journals have been growing over the past decade, and many traditional printed journals are also sponsoring open-access options (the hybrid model) for accepted articles. Authors need to be aware of the new publishing paradigm and potential costs involved in publishing their work. (C) 2014 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['med'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['USA'],"Tzarnas, Stephanie; Tzarnas, Chris D.",JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION,English,Article,,,,"[Tzarnas, Stephanie; Tzarnas, Chris D.] Mercy Catholic Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA",6.0,15.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,1931-7204,,2015.0,72,2,283.0,285,10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.09.006,,25439180.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2608,SCOPUS,Access and Use of Open Access Resources by Undergraduate Students in Federal Universities in South East Nigeria,Access services; Free resources; Freely available; Freely available challenges; Freely available opportunities; Nigeria; Undergraduate students,"This study surveyed the challenges and opportunities of access and use of open access resources by undergraduate students in selected federal universities in south-east, Nigeria. The study employed descriptive survey method and quantitative research technique, using questionnaire as instrument for data collection. A total of 369 students selected from four federal universities in South East, Nigeria was used as the population of the study. The study found that the students’ respondents are aware of open access resources and use them daily because these resources saves time and provides literature for their research work. Despite the associated benefits students derive from open access resources, there are challenges in accessing and using them such as inadequate training, unsuitable infrastructures and the resources not containing information in their field of study. Though there are challenges in accessing these resources, availability of information resources makes research writing easy and keeps the students informed of current trends. The Call for open access to information resources have been the declaration of Library associations and most governments. This study therefore concluded that libraries/librarians should facilitate student’s access to open access resources to enhance/improve library services and for information provision. © 2020, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). All Rights Reserved",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['NGA'],"Ukwoma S., Onyebinama C.O.",Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2020.0,2020,0,1.0,12,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2613,SCOPUS,Open access initiatives adoption by Nigerian academics,Academic staff; Information services; Nigeria; Serials,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine Nigerian academics' adoption of open access initiatives as authors and readers of scholarly resources. The study was necessitated by the growing need to have the number of Nigerian scholarly publications increased on the internet and accessible to scholars around the world through the use of open access initiatives. Design/methodology/approach - Academics of two first generation Nigerian universities selected using convenient sampling technique were surveyed using the questionnaire to find out the extent of their awareness and use of open access initiatives as authors and readers of scholarly works. Two hundred and fifty questionnaire copies were distributed in the two universities out of which 189 copies were returned, while 180 copies were found to be useable for the study. Findings - It was revealed that the respondents were aware of the pre-print and open access journal initiatives than the post-print initiative. In terms of the use of open access initiatives, although the study revealed insignificant use among the academics, academics in sciences showed more promise of adopting open access initiative as authors and readers of scholarly resources than their counterparts in the humanities. Research limitations/implications - Unlike studies that assessed specific subject based and institutional repositories that allowed for the search and extraction of depositors' names and characteristics, this particular study relied on respondents' responses as a source of their actual use of open access repositories. Originality/value - This paper reveals that academics' perception and publishing culture, and not awareness, determines the extent of their use of open access initiatives in Nigeria. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['NGA'],"Utulu S.C.A., Bolarinwa O.",Library Review,English,Article,0,0,0,,,15.0,0,242535,0,2009.0,58,9,660.0,669,10.1108/00242530910997946,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2617,SCOPUS,Online social networks as a communication channel for open access journals,online social networks; open access journals; scientific production; digital methods; journals rankings; scraping,"Introduction: scientific knowledge is essential for development; open access journals and online social networks are potential enablers for its access. The objective of this research was to analyze to what extend open access journal are using social media tools as communication channels. Method: from a quantitative approach, 3,448 open access journals indexed on Scopus. Results and conclusions: A) 14.4% of journals has at least one online social network profile linked with its official Website; B) there is a significant difference between the proportion of first quartile journals (Q1) using online social networks and the rest of journals (Q2, Q3 and Q4). First quartile journals also report a larger number of social followers. These results allow us to identify an important opportunity area around using online social networks and open access journals as scientific knowledge disseminator tools.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Valerio-Urena, Gabriel; Jose Herrera-Murillo, Dagoberto",REVISTA LATINA DE COMUNICACION SOCIAL,Spanish,Article,,,,"[Valerio-Urena, Gabriel] Tecnol Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico; [Jose Herrera-Murillo, Dagoberto] Univ Libre Bruselas, Brussels, Belgium",31.0,1.0,LABORATORIO TECNOLOGIAS INFORMACION & NUEVOS ANALISIS COMUNICACION SOCIAL,1138-5820,,2017.0,72,13,1341.0,1350,10.4185/RLCS-2017-1222,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2682,SCOPUS,Social dimension activates the usage and academic impact of Open Access publications in Andean countries: a structural modeling-based approach,Altmetric indicators; Andean countries; Open Access publications; PLS-SEM,"Most of the altmetric research in developing countries is descriptive and has not tested models exploring relationships among article-level factors. Therefore, there is a knowledge gap on this issue. The research question for this study was the following: Social dimension is the factor that activates the usage and citation of Open Access publications in Andean countries. DOIs of Andean countries publications in PLoS journals were downloaded using (n = 3,186) using rplos, an Application Programming Interface (API) developed for R: Bolivia (n = 121), Chile (n = 1,180), Colombia (n = 826), Ecuador (n = 266), Peru (n = 622), and Venezuela (n = 171). Data modeling was carried out with Partial Least Squares - Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The hypothesized structural model accounted for at least 41% of the explained variance of citations (R2 = 0.406). Among the two associated factors, the usage made the highest contribution (at least 0.639), while the social media showed a negative contribution. The application of PLS-SEM for modeling the information-seeking behavior, at the document level, highlights the positive evidence for the path social -> usage -> citation, but a negative and nonsignificant association between the social dimension and citation.",['openaccess'],"['documentreview', 'othermeth']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],"['COL', 'VEN', 'BOL']","Vilchez-Roman, Carlos; Huaman-Delgado, Farita; Alhuay-Quispe, Joel",INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT,English,Article; Early Access,,,,"[Vilchez-Roman, Carlos] PUCP, CCGBS, Lima, Peru; [Huaman-Delgado, Farita] UNMSM, Lima, Peru; [Alhuay-Quispe, Joel] USIL, Lima, Peru",43.0,1.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0266-6669,,,,,,,10.1177/0266666920901849,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0
2684,SCOPUS,Estimating open access mandate effectiveness: The MELIBEA score,information access; World Wide Web; open access publications,"MELIBEA is a directory of institutional open-access policies for research output that uses a composite formula with eight weighted conditions to estimate the strength of open access (OA) mandates (registered in ROARMAP). We analyzed total Web of Science-(WoS)-indexed publication output in years 2011-2013 for 67 institutions in which OA was mandated to estimate the mandates' effectiveness: How well did the MELIBEA score and its individual conditions predict what percentage of the WoS-indexed articles is actually deposited in each institution's OA repository, and when? We found a small but significant positive correlation (0.18) between the MELIBEA strength score and deposit percentage. For three of the eight MELIBEA conditions (deposit timing, internal use, and opt-outs), one value of each was strongly associated with deposit percentage or latency ([a] immediate deposit required; [b] deposit required for performance evaluation; [c] unconditional opt-out allowed for the OA requirement but no opt-out for deposit requirement). When we updated the initial values and weights of the MELIBEA formula to reflect the empirical association we had found, the score's predictive power for mandate effectiveness doubled (0.36). There are not yet enough OA mandates to test further mandate conditions that might contribute to mandate effectiveness, but the present findings already suggest that it would be productive for existing and future mandates to adopt the three identified conditions so as to maximize their effectiveness, and thereby the growth of OA.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['publisher', 'university', 'policy']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Vincent-Lamarre, Philippe; Boivin, Jade; Gargouri, Yassine; Lariviere, Vincent; Harnad, Stevan",JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Vincent-Lamarre, Philippe; Boivin, Jade; Gargouri, Yassine] Univ Quebec, Succursale Ctr Ville, CP 8888, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada; [Vincent-Lamarre, Philippe] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; [Lariviere, Vincent] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada; [Harnad, Stevan] Univ Quebec, Dept Psychol, Succursale Ctr Ville, CP 8888, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada; [Harnad, Stevan] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England",36.0,12.0,WILEY,2330-1635,,2016.0,67,11,2815.0,2828,10.1002/asi.23601,,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2696,SCOPUS,Status quo of open access activities at austrian universities: Results of a survey commissioned by the council of austrian university libraries (UBIFO) [open access bestandsaufnahme an österreichischen universitäten: Ergebnisse einer umfrage im auftrag des forums universitätsbibliotheken österreichs (UBIFO)],Austria; Open access; Survey; University,"This report outlines the status quo concerning the Open Access activities of the 21 Austrian public universities. The findings are based on a survey conducted with affiliated university libraries in February and March 2012. The survey was published as a report in May 2013 and paints a mixed overall picture that is at least characterised by a few remarkably successful activities on the local level. Nonetheless, the developments outlined in this study have gained momentum in the last months. Particularly the recent launch of OANA can be perceived as a turning point. Thus further support and implementation of Open Access at Austrian public universities have become more achievable than ever before.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['librarian'],['AUT'],"von Bruno Bauer, Gumpenberger C., Haas I., Katzmayr M., Ramminger E., Reinitzer D.",VOEB-Mitteilungen,English; German,Article,0,0,0,,,3.0,0,10222588,0,2013.0,66,44289,535.0,558,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2700,SCOPUS,"Open access -totally, partially or not at all: How open is the access to the german-language journals in the area of library and information science? [Open Access – Ganz, teilweise oder gar nicht: Wie offen ist der Zugang zu den deutschsprachigen Zeitschriften für Bibliothek und Information?]",Austria; Categorization; German-speaking area; Germany; Library and information science; Open access; Overview; Professional journals; Switzerland,"The article examines the extent to which the journals in the area of library and information science in German-speaking countries are openly accessible. The journals in question are identified and discussed. The author differentiates the relevant publications by categories such as online-only journals with full open access, hybrid journals with full open access, journals with time-delayed open access, as well as magazines with partial open access. The number of library and information science journals without at least partial or delayed free access is fortunately very low in the German-speaking area. © 2015, Vereinigung Osterreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['natscie'],['publisher'],"['CHE', 'DEU', 'AUT']",von Oberhauser V.,VOEB-Mitteilungen,German,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Vereinigung Osterreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare,10222588,0,2015.0,68,2,238.0,253,10.31263/voebm.v68i2.1153,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2701,SCOPUS,Open access and the hybrid journal publishing model – an analysis regarding transparency of selected publishers [Open access und das hybride zeitschriftenmodell – eine analyse zur transparenz bei ausgewählten verlagen],Adjustment of subscription prices; Double dipping; Hybrid journals; Open access; Publishers,"The hybrid model gives authors the opportunity to purchase their articles in a subscription journal in order to make it freely available for others. The hybrid journals of seven publishers are the main focus of this work. Interviews with the publishers and the adjustment lists of subscription journals on their websites form the basis of the analysis presented here. The aim of this contribution is to uncover opacity and to give recommendations as to how a higher degree of transparency could be achieved. This study evaluates the publishers‘ websites. In addition, the interviews conducted with the publishers provide answers to the most urgent questions, e.g. will they continue the hybrid model. In conclusion, this article offers some suggestions as to which parameters would be needed in order to achieve greater transparency for the lists of price adjustments published. © 2015 Vereinigung Osterreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. All rights reserved.",['openaccess'],"['documentreview', 'survey']",['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],Von Stigler S.,VOEB-Mitteilungen,German,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH,3029743,9783030624651,2020.0,12507 LNCS,0,311.0,327,10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_20,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2705,SCOPUS,Open access initiative and its impact on use of digital information resources for research and teaching in higher education institutions in Croatia,0,"Digital information resources have become popular in academic community around the world as their quantity available on the internet increases. This is particularly evident in the case of open access information resources. The idea of open access to scientific information resources promotes use of mostly free of charge scientific information resources thus substituting use of fee based access to scientific information resources. Open access has both advantages and disadvantages. Main advantages would be greater visibility of published research, greater accessibility of scientific content in general, higher rates of citations etc. and disadvantages would be questionable quality of peer review, absence of peer review in some cases, charging authors for publishing their articles, lack of long term preservation policy etc. This paper also presents results of a study of use of digital information resources by students enrolled in two university courses at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Zagreb over period of three years. The results showed that students prefer digital over printed information resources in researched two courses and that they are oriented more towards use of different types of free information resources for writing their term papers instead use of fee based information resources. © 2014 MIPRO.","['openaccess', 'openeducation']",['documentreview'],"['socscie', 'hum']",['othergroup'],['HRV'],Vrana R.,"2014 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics, MIPRO 2014 - Proceedings",English,Conference Paper,"2014 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics, MIPRO 2014",26 May 2014 through 30 May 2014,Opatija,,,1.0,IEEE Computer Society,0,9789532330816,2014.0,0,0,633.0,638,10.1109/MIPRO.2014.6859644,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2710,SCOPUS,The use of theory in research relating to open access: Practitioner perspectives,Open access; practitioner attitudes; theory and practice,"The relationship between theory and practice has long been considered problematic for many applied academic disciplines. In this short paper we report preliminary findings from a two-year research project investigating the ways and the extent that theory and practice have interacted in the development of open-access (OA) approaches to the publishing and dissemination of research outputs. Based on interviews with practitioners and researchers working on OA related issues, we explore the ways in which theory is (and isn't) of value to practice. We find that while practitioners acknowledge that theory has the potential to improve understanding, bestow credibility on work, and codify existing knowledge about OA, they also perceive it as “mood music” to the practical work of OA, lacking explicit links to action. Author(s) retain copyright, but ASIS&T receives an exclusive publication license",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'policy', 'librarian', 'publisher']","['GBR', 'AUS']","Wakeling S., Pinfield S., Bawden D., Robinson L.",Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,John Wiley and Sons Inc,23739231,0,2019.0,56,1,788.0,789,10.1002/pra2.177,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2711,SCOPUS,Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (part 2: Operational realities),0,"This paper is the second of two Learned Publishing articles in which we report the results of a series of interviews, with senior publishers and editors exploring open access megajournals (OAMJs). Megajournals (of which PLoS One is the best known example) represent a relatively new approach to scholarly communication and can be characterized as large, broad-scope, open access journals, which take an innovative approach to peer review, basing acceptance decisions solely on the technical or scientific soundness of the article. Based on interviews with 31 publishers and editors, this paper reports the perceived cultural, operational, and technical challenges associated with launching, growing, and maintaining a megajournal. We find that overcoming these challenges while delivering the societal benefits associated with OAMJs is seen to require significant investment in people and systems, as well as an ongoing commitment to the model. © 2017 The Author(s).",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wakeling S., Spezi V., Creaser C., Fry J., Pinfield S., Willett P.",Learned Publishing,English,Article,0,0,0,,,15.0,Association of Learned and Professional Society Publ.,9531513,0,2017.0,30,4,313.0,322,10.1002/leap.1118,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2712,SCOPUS,Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (part 1: Motivations),0,"This paper is the first of two Learned Publishing articles in which we report the results of a series of interviews with senior publishers and editors exploring open access megajournals (OAMJs). Megajournals (of which PLoS One is the best known example) represent a relatively new approach to scholarly communication and can be characterized as large, broad-scope, open access journals that take an innovative approach to peer review, basing acceptance decisions solely on the technical or scientific soundness of the article. This model is often said to support the broader goals of the open science movement. Based on in-depth interviews with 31 publishers and editors representing 16 different organizations (10 of which publish a megajournal), this paper reports how the term ‘megajour-nal’ is understood and publishers’ rationale and motivations for launching (or not launching) an OAMJ. We find that while there is general agreement on the common characteristics of megajournals, there is not yet a consensus on their relative importance. We also find seven motivating factors that were said to drive the launch of an OAMJ and link each of these factors to potential societal and business benefits. These results suggest that the often polarized debate surrounding OAMJs is a consequence of the extent to which observers perceive publishers to be motivated by these societal or business benefits. © 2017 The Author(s).",['openaccess'],['interview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wakeling S., Spezi V., Fry J., Creaser C., Pinfield S., Willett P.",Learned Publishing,English,Article,0,0,0,,,11.0,Association of Learned and Professional Society Publ.,9531513,0,2017.0,30,4,301.0,311,10.1002/leap.1117,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2713,SCOPUS,"Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open-access mega-journal authors: Results of a large-scale survey",,"Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) are characterized by their large scale, wide scope, open-access (OA) business model, and soundness-only peer review. The last of these controversially discounts the novelty, significance, and relevance of submitted articles and assesses only their soundness. This article reports the results of an international survey of authors (n = 11,883), comparing the responses of OAMJ authors with those of other OA and subscription journals, and drawing comparisons between different OAMJs. Strikingly, OAMJ authors showed a low understanding of soundness-only peer review: two-thirds believed OAMJs took into account novelty, significance, and relevance, although there were marked geographical variations. Author satisfaction with OAMJs, however, was high, with more than 80% of OAMJ authors saying they would publish again in the same journal, although there were variations by title, and levels were slightly lower than subscription journals (over 90%). Their reasons for choosing to publish in OAMJs included a wide variety of factors, not significantly different from reasons given by authors of other journals, with the most important including the quality of the journal and quality of peer review. About half of OAMJ articles had been submitted elsewhere before submission to the OAMJ with some evidence of a cascade of articles between journals from the same publisher.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wakeling, Simon; Creaser, Claire; Pinfield, Stephen; Fry, Jenny; Spezi, Valerie; Willett, Peter; Paramita, Monica",JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Willett, Peter; Paramita, Monica] Univ Sheffield, Informat Sch, Regent Court, 211 Portobello, Sheffield S1 4DP, S Yorkshire, England; [Creaser, Claire; Spezi, Valerie] Loughborough Univ, LISU, Ctr Informat Management, Sch Business & Econ, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England; [Fry, Jenny] Loughborough Univ, Sch Arts English & Drama, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England",26.0,3.0,WILEY,2330-1635,,2019.0,70,7,754.0,768,10.1002/asi.24154,,31763360.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2716,SCOPUS,PEER: green open access - insight and evidence,,"In support of investigating the effects of systematic archiving of authors' final peer-reviewed, accepted manuscripts (green open access), PEER has developed a robust observatory infrastructure which has already successfully processed over 44,000 manuscripts. Technical challenges successfully overcome by the project include non-uniformity of manuscript files and metadata formats, embargo management, and author authentication for repository deposit. Three areas of research investigating (i) author and reader attitudes and behaviours, (ii) article-level usage at repositories and publisher platforms, and (iii) the economics of large-scale archiving have been commissioned and are producing results. The baseline behavioural survey identified an increasing general awareness of open access, but a lower awareness of institutional and subject repositories. Perceptions were also found to vary depending on whether individuals were responding from an author or reader perspective. PEER itself has seen low uptake from authors when invited to self-deposit into the project. Further results from all three research areas are due before the project ends in May 2012. (C) Julia M. Wallace 2011","['openaccess', 'opentools']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['EU'],"Wallace, Julia M.",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"PEER, Int Assoc Sci Tech & Med Publishers STM, Oxford OX2 7HT, England",12.0,3.0,ASSOC LEARNED PROFESSIONAL SOC PUBL,0953-1513,,2011.0,24,4,267.0,277,10.1087/20110404,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2717,SCOPUS,"Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017",,"Currently, there is a growing interest in ensuring the transparency and reproducibility of the published scientific literature. According to a previous evaluation of 441 biomedical journals articles published in 2000-2014, the biomedical literature largely lacked transparency in important dimensions. Here, we surveyed a random sample of 149 biomedical articles published between 2015 and 2017 and determined the proportion reporting sources of public and/or private funding and conflicts of interests, sharing protocols and raw data, and undergoing rigorous independent replication and reproducibility checks. We also investigated what can be learned about reproducibility and transparency indicators from open access data provided on PubMed. The majority of the 149 studies disclosed some information regarding funding (103, 69.1% [95% confidence interval, 61.0% to 76.3%]) or conflicts of interest (97, 65.1% [56.8% to 72.6%]). Among the 104 articles with empirical data in which protocols or data sharing would be pertinent, 19 (18.3% [11.6% to 27.3%]) discussed publicly available data; only one (1.0% [0.1% to 6.0%]) included a link to a full study protocol. Among the 97 articles in which replication in studies with different data would be pertinent, there were five replication efforts (5.2% [1.9% to 12.2%]). Although clinical trial identification numbers and funding details were often provided on PubMed, only two of the articles without a full text article in PubMed Central that discussed publicly available data at the full text level also contained information related to data sharing on PubMed; none had a conflicts of interest statement on PubMed. Our evaluation suggests that although there have been improvements over the last few years in certain key indicators of reproducibility and transparency, opportunities exist to improve reproducible research practices across the biomedical literature and to make features related to reproducibility more readily visible in PubMed.","['openaccess', 'opendata', 'openmethod']",['documentreview'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wallach, Oshua D.; Boyack, Kevin W.; Ioannidis, John P. A.",PLOS BIOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"[Wallach, Oshua D.] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, New Haven, CT USA; [Wallach, Oshua D.] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Med, Collaborat Res Integr & Transparency, New Haven, CT USA; [Boyack, Kevin W.] SciTech Strategies Inc, Albuquerque, NM USA; [Ioannidis, John P. A.] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford Prevent Res Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA; [Ioannidis, John P. A.] Stanford Univ, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA; [Ioannidis, John P. A.] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA; [Ioannidis, John P. A.] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA; [Ioannidis, John P. A.] Stanford Univ, Metares Innovat Ctr Stanford, Stanford, CA 94305 USA",41.0,46.0,PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE,1544-9173,,2018.0,16,11,,,10.1371/journal.pbio.2006930,,30457984.0,2021-01-27,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2728,SCOPUS,Investigation of the degree to which articles supported by research grants are published in open access health and life sciences journals,Open access; Article processing charge; Grants; Authors; Scientific publications; Bibliometric investigation,"In the scientific publication world, there are an increasing number of open access (OA) journals. Many OA journals are financed by the article processing charges (APCs) that they charge authors. There is considerable interest in the funding source of such APCs. In 255 health and life sciences OA journals that charge APCs (APC OA journals) and 183 health and life sciences OA journals that do not charge APCs (free OA journals) that are indexed in the Thomson Reuters Web of Science, this study uses a bibliometric method to examine the relationship between two journal characteristics during 2009-2013: APCs and the percentage of published articles based on work that is supported by grants (grant-funded articles). According to the data collected, the percentage of grant-funded articles increases as the associated APCs increase. Average APCs of APC OA journals are higher in Europe and North America than elsewhere. The study also investigated the top ten countries in the number of scientific publications in the OA journals investigated. All ten countries had lower percentages of grant-funded articles in free OA journals than in APC OA and subscription journals. Of the ten countries, six in Europe and North America have higher percentages of grant-funded articles in APC OA journals than in subscription journals. The other four countries that have lower percentages of grant-funded articles in APC OA journals than in subscription journals are in Asia and South America, which are places where APC OA journals have low average APCs.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wang, Ling Ling; Liu, Xuan Zhen; Fang, Hui",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Wang, Ling Ling; Liu, Xuan Zhen] Nanjing Med Univ, Lib, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China; [Fang, Hui] Nanjing Univ, Sch Elect Sci & Engn, State Key Lab Analyt Chem Life Sci, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China",14.0,12.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2015.0,104,2,511.0,528,10.1007/s11192-015-1624-4,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2729,SCOPUS,Examining the influence of open access on journals' citation obsolescence by modeling the actual citation process,Open access; Obsolescence; Citation distribution model; Impact factor,"This paper aims to quantify and analyze the impact of open access (OA) on the obsolescence characteristics of journals. A total of 15 journals that changed their status from closed to open access in 2012 and 2013 were selected for a longitudinal obsolescence investigation. Based on the cumulative citation rate distribution model, two ageing time parameters were identified from the actual citation process to quantify the obsolescence of cited journals. The experimental results show that the journal presents three different obsolete phenomena: Sustainable growth, Oscillatory decline and Flash in the pan. OA does have an impact on the obsolescence characteristics of the journal, which is expressed as an increase in the value of the ageing time parameter for any category of journals during or after their conversion year. But this impact does not necessarily persist over time, especially for the latter two types of journals. And OA does affect readers' concern about the old articles in journals, but this concern may also be short-lived. For journals of Oscillatory decline and Flash in the pan, their recently published articles will be more concerned than old ones, which has directly led to the growth of journal impact factors. For most of the Sustainable growth journals, it has shown a polarization tendency of citation distribution: towards citing more newly and more old publications, which also helps to improve the impact factor of journals. However, there are still a few Sustainable growth journals with their older articles are more likely to receive attention than newly published ones. In addition to extending the ageing trend for these journals, it does not help to improve journal impact factors. Therefore, OA does not necessarily improve the impact factor of journals.",['openaccess'],"['othermeth', 'biblio']","['med', 'natscie']",['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wang, Mingyang; Zhang, Jiaqi; Chen, Guangsheng; Chai, Kah-Hin",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Wang, Mingyang; Zhang, Jiaqi; Chen, Guangsheng] Northeast Forestry Univ, Coll Informat & Comp Engn, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China; [Chai, Kah-Hin] Natl Univ Singapore, Ind & Syst Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore",65.0,1.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2019.0,119,3,1621.0,1641,10.1007/s11192-019-03085-0,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2731,SCOPUS,Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals,Retracted publications; Open access journals; Plagiarism; Duplicate publication,"The number of articles published in open access journals (OAJs) has increased dramatically in recent years. Simultaneously, the quality of publications in these journals has been called into question. Few studies have explored the retraction rate from OAJs. The purpose of the current study was to determine the reasons for retractions of articles from OAJs in biomedical research. The Medline database was searched through PubMed to identify retracted publications in OAJs. The journals were identified by the Directory of Open Access Journals. Data were extracted from each retracted article, including the time from publication to retraction, causes, journal impact factor, and country of origin. Trends in the characteristics related to retraction were determined. Data from 621 retracted studies were included in the analysis. The number and rate of retractions have increased since 2010. The most common reasons for retraction are errors (148), plagiarism (142), duplicate publication (101), fraud/suspected fraud (98) and invalid peer review (93). The number of retracted articles from OAJs has been steadily increasing. Misconduct was the primary reason for retraction. The majority of retracted articles were from journals with low impact factors and authored by researchers from China, India, Iran, and the USA.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['med'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wang, Tao; Xing, Qin-Rui; Wang, Hui; Chen, Wei",SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS,English,Article,,,,"[Wang, Tao; Xing, Qin-Rui; Wang, Hui; Chen, Wei] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Hainan Branch, Dept Emergency, Sanya 572013, Hainan, Peoples R China; [Wang, Tao; Xing, Qin-Rui; Wang, Hui; Chen, Wei] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Hainan Branch, Intens Care Unit, Sanya 572013, Hainan, Peoples R China",39.0,19.0,SPRINGER,1353-3452,,2019.0,25,3,855.0,868,10.1007/s11948-018-0040-6,,29516389.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2734,SCOPUS,The state and evolution of Gold open access: a country and discipline level analysis,Open access; Web of science; Country comparison; Discipline analysis; Gold OA; Toll access,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the evolution of Gold open access (OA) rates in different countries and disciplines, as well as explore the influencing factors. Design/methodology/approach - In this study, employing the OA filter option of Web of Science (WoS), the authors perform a large-scale evaluation of the OA state of countries and disciplines from 1990 to 2016. Particularly, the authors consider not only the absolute number of Gold OA literature but also the ratio of them among all literature. Findings - Currently, one-quarter of the WoS articles is Gold OA articles. Brazil is the most active country in OA publishing, while Russia, India and China have the lowest OA ratios. The OA percentage of Brazil has been decreasing dramatically in recent years, while the OA percentages of China, UK and the Netherlands have been increasing. There also exist huge differences of OA percentages across different subject categories. The percentages of OA articles in biology, life, and health-related areas are high, while those in physics and chemistry-related subject categories are very low. Originality/value - With the availability of large-scale data from WoS, this study conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the Gold OA state of major countries for the first time. The variation of OA percentages is considered in light of the research profiles. OA policies in different countries and funding organizations also have an influence on the OA development.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],"['USA', 'GBR', 'JPN', 'CHN', 'DEU', 'FRA', 'CAN', 'ITA', 'BRA', 'AUS', 'NLD', 'ESP', 'KOR', 'IND', 'RUS']","Wang, Xianwen; Cui, Yunxue; Xu, Shenmeng; Hu, Zhigang",ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Wang, Xianwen; Cui, Yunxue; Hu, Zhigang] Dalian Univ Technol, WISE Lab, Inst Sci Sci & S&T Management, Dalian, Peoples R China; [Xu, Shenmeng] Univ N Carolina, Sch Informat & Lib Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA",25.0,10.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2050-3806,,2018.0,70,5,573.0,584,10.1108/AJIM-02-2018-0023,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2735,SCOPUS,"The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention",Article-level metrics; Usage metrics; Altmetrics; Open access; Social media attention; Open access advantage,"In this study, we compare the difference in the impact between open access (OA) and non-open access (non-OA) articles. 1761 Nature Communications articles published from 1 January 2012 to 31 August 2013 are selected as our research objects, including 587 OA articles and 1174 non-OA articles. Citation data and daily updated article-level metrics data are harvested directly from the platform of nature.com. Data is analyzed from the static versus temporal-dynamic perspectives. The OA citation advantage is confirmed, and the OA advantage is also applicable when extending the comparing from citation to article views and social media attention. More important, we find that OA papers not only have the great advantage of total downloads, but also have the feature of keeping sustained and steady downloads for a long time. For article downloads, non-OA papers only have a short period of attention, when the advantage of OA papers exists for a much longer time.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wang, Xianwen; Liu, Chen; Mao, Wenli; Fang, Zhichao",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Wang, Xianwen; Liu, Chen; Mao, Wenli; Fang, Zhichao] Dalian Univ Technol, WISE Lab, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dalian 116085, Peoples R China",25.0,92.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2015.0,103,2,555.0,564,10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2739,SCOPUS,Open access electronic thesis and dissertation repositories: An assessment,Electronic Thesis and Dissertation; ETDs; OAETD; Open Access; Repositories,"Purpose- This study evaluates the Open Access Electronic Thesis and Dissertation (OAETD) repositories available at oatd.org, on the basis of various parameters like structure, content support, technical and operational feasibility. It highlights positive and negative aspects of select OAETD repositories and forward suggestions for the better improvement. Design/methodology/approach- Survey method coupled with online visits is employed to obtain data from OAETD repositories besides schedule is drafted to understand various technical features. Findings- The findings of present work further strengthen the belief that adaptation of open access procedures in different settings especially in modern day research is showing an increasing trend. Moreover there is scope for further improvement in technical and operational feasibility of OAETD repositories. Research limitations/implications- Findings of the study will surely benefit the concerned repository hosting and managing authorities globally to take appropriate measures in improving the standards and technical aspects of OAETD repositories. © 2019, Library Philosophy and Practice.",['opensoftware'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],Wani J.A.,Library Philosophy and Practice,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,University of Idaho Library,15220222,0,2019.0,2019,0,0.0,0,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2740,SCOPUS,Open Access Repositories A Case Study of BRICS Nations,BRICS and Global Ranking; Open Access Repositories; OpenDOAR; Repos,"This paper explores different facets of open access repositories developed and hosted by the BRICS nations. The data for the study was taken from OpenDOAR and Alexa to assess the trends, developments, nature of repositories and global ranking. The findings reveal that Brazil has the highest number of repositories in BRICS and bags first five rankings evaluated by Alexa as far as web traffic is concerned and their repositories show maximum positive upward growth among the BRICS repositories. China though has a less number of repositories; it has the highest number of items hosted in its repositories. Indian repositories show maximum negative growth in global web traffic that signifies a dipping position of Indian repositories within BRICS. Further India achieved 9th rank in global ranking by Alexa which is a matter of concern and needs to be addressed whereas Russia didn't find its place in the top ten ranking and contributes very less number of repositories. South Africa being the recent addition to group, needs to work hard to make a mark in the competitive world where information is the key to development by hosting more and more repositories with diverse subjects and wide variety of contents. © 2018 IEEE.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],"['ZAF', 'BRA', 'CHN', 'IND', 'RUS']","Wani Z.A., Ayoub A., Kashtwari D.M.","IEEE 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services, ETTLIS 2018",English,Conference Paper,"5th IEEE International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services, ETTLIS 2018",21 February 2018 through 23 February 2018,0,"[da Costa, Michelli Pereira; Lima Leite, Fernando Cesar] Univ Brasilia UnB, Brasilia, DF, Brazil",21.0,1.0,"UNIV PITTSBURGH, UNIV LIBRARY SYSTEM",1562-4730,,2019.0,,74,1.0,14,10.5195/biblios.2019.328,WOS:000376527500006,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2741,SCOPUS,Mapping the use of open access resources by doctoral students in the USA by employing citation analysis,Scientometrics;  Open access;  IPP;  Immediacy-index;  Impact-factor;  USA-open access,"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to measure the fully open access (OA) contents cited by researchers from top three universities in the USA (MIT, CIT and Stanford) in the field of physics. This study aims to identify the core fully OA journals widely used by researchers in the field of physics and evaluate the cited fully OA resources by applying various scientometric parameters to check the credibility of these OA resources. Design/methodology/approach The PhD theses awarded during 2014 in the field of physics and hosted in the institutional repositories of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), California Institute of Technology (CIT) and Stanford University, respectively, were selected and scanned to extract references of sources cited. Later on, Google Scholar was used to identify source journals of the extracted references. Only source journals were selected and analyzed;  rest of other sources were ignored;  accordingly, toll-access and OA journals were segregated, as such the OA-cited journals could be identified. The scientometric performance indicators were used to check the quality of identified core fully OA journal cited by USA researchers in the field of physics. Findings The results of this study show that fully OA resources are sufficiently used by the researchers of top three academic institutions of the world/USA. The study was also successful in identifying the core fully OA journals;  besides it also reveals that these fully OA journals are highly impressive as showed by performance indicators applied. The major finding of the research includes the identification of top ten fully OA journals along with their impact based on different scientometric parameters like number of times cited, impact factor, h-index, immediacy index, impact per publication and Scimago Journal Rank (SJR). Social implications This paper will assist researchers, libraries, information centers and research and development institutions to take a cost-efficient approach in using and disseminating the scholarly literature. Originality/value This paper is one of the first pieces of research conducted on electronic theses and dissertation (ETD's) in top three universities of the USA, to check usage percentage and quality of fully OA journal resources cited by doctoral students in the field of physics.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Wani, Zahid Ashraf;  Wani, Showkat Ahmad",COLLECTION AND CURATION,English,Article,,,,"[Wani, Zahid Ashraf;  Wani, Showkat Ahmad] Univ Kashmir, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India",26.0,0.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,2514-9326,,2019.0,38,4,112.0,118,10.1108/CC-05-2018-0014,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2746,SCOPUS,Factors influencing publication choice: Why faculty choose open access,0,"Background. In an attempt to identify motivating factors involved in decisions to publish in open access and open archives (OA) journals, individual interviews with biomedical faculty members at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-Chapel Hill) and Duke University, two major research universities, were conducted. The interviews focused on faculty identified as early adopters of OA/free full-text publishing. Methods. Searches conducted in PubMed and PubMed Central identified faculty from the two institutions who have published works in OA/free full-text journals. The searches targeted authors with multiple OA citations during a specified 18 month period. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the most prolific OA authors at each university. Individual interviews attempted to determine whether the authors were aware they published in OA journals, why they chose to publish in OA journals, what factors influenced their publishing decisions, and their general attitude towards OA publishing models. Results & Discussion. Fourteen interviews were granted and completed. Respondents included a fairly even mix of Assistant, Associate and Full professors. Results indicate that when targeting biomedical faculty at UNC-Chapel Hill and Duke, speed of publication and copyright retention are unlikely motivating factors or incentives for the promotion of OA publishing. In addition, author fees required by some open access journals are unlikely barriers or disincentives. Conclusion. It appears that publication quality is of utmost importance when choosing publication venues in general, while free access and visibility are specifically noted incentives for selection of OA journals. Therefore, free public availability and increased exposure may not be strong enough incentives for authors to choose open access over more traditional and respected subscription based publications, unless the quality issue is also addressed. © 2007 Warlick and Vaughan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['med'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Warlick S.E., Vaughan K.T.L.",Biomedical Digital Libraries,English,Article,0,0,0,,,71.0,0,17425581,0,2007.0,4,0,0.0,0,10.1186/1742-5581-4-1,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2748,SCOPUS,Uncertain risk: assessing open data signals,Analytics; Risk; Uncertainty; Information asymmetry; Open data,"Purpose Open data resources contain few signals for assessing their suitability for data analytics. The purpose of this paper is to characterize the uncertainty experienced by open data consumers with a framework based on economic theory. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on information asymmetry theory about market exchanges, this paper investigates the practical challenges faced by data consumers seeking to reuse open data. An inductive qualitative analysis of over 2,900 questions asked between 2013 and 2018 on an internet forum identified how a community of 15,000 open data consumers expressed uncertainty about data sources. Findings Open data consumers asked direct questions that expressed uncertainty about the availability, interoperability and interpretation of data resources. Questions focused on future value and some requests were devoted to seeking data that matched known sources. The study proposes a data signal framework that explains uncertainty about open data within the context of control and visibility. Originality/value The proposed framework bridges digital government practice to information signaling theory. The empirical evidence substantiates market aspects of open data portals. This paper provided a needed case study of how data consumers experience uncertainty. The study integrates established theories about risk to improve the reuse of open data.",['opendata'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Washington, Anne L.",TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY,English,Article,,,,"[Washington, Anne L.] NYU, Steinhardt Sch, New York, NY 10003 USA",63.0,0.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1750-6166,,2020.0,14,4,623.0,637,10.1108/TG-09-2019-0086,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2752,SCOPUS,Managing the transition to open access publishing: a psychological perspective,,"To manage the transition to the open access (OA) model of scholarly publishing, we need to understand better what enables, encourages and inhibits the adoption of OA publishing among scientists, and to appreciate individual differences within disciplines. The study adopts a psychological perspective to elucidate motivations, capabilities and opportunities for OA publishing among bioscientists in the UK. To identify differences within the discipline, bioscientists with starkly different past practices for disclosing research data and technologies were interviewed. The sampled bioscientists face similar obstacles and enablers in their physical environment, but that their motivations and experience of their social environments differ. One group is strongly motivated by their moral convictions and beliefs in benefits of OA and feels peer pressure related to OA. The other group expresses fewer pro-OA beliefs, holds beliefs demotivating OA publishing, but feels pressure from research funders to adopt it. The former group makes more frequent use of OA publishing, which suggests that only those with strong motivations will work to overcome the social and physical obstacles. The individual differences within the discipline suggest that bioscientists are unlikely to respond to OA policies in the same way and, thus, the appropriateness of one-size-fits-all OA policies is questioned.",['openaccess'],['interview'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['GBR'],"Weckowska, Dagmara M.; Levin, Nadine; Leonelli, Sabina; Dupre, John; Castle, David",PROMETHEUS,English,Article,,,,"[Weckowska, Dagmara M.] Univ Sussex, Dept Business & Management, Brighton, E Sussex, England; [Weckowska, Dagmara M.] Univ Edinburgh, Innogen Inst, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland; [Levin, Nadine] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Soc & Genet, Los Angeles, CA USA; [Leonelli, Sabina; Dupre, John] Univ Exeter, Exeter Ctr Study Life Sci Egenis, Exeter, Devon, England; [Leonelli, Sabina; Dupre, John] Univ Exeter, Dept Sociol Philosophy & Anthropol, Exeter, Devon, England; [Castle, David] Univ Victoria, Sch Publ Adm, Victoria, BC, Canada",54.0,1.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",0810-9028,,2017.0,35,2,111.0,135,10.1080/08109028.2017.1408289,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2756,SCOPUS,Evaluating the relationship between the academic and social impact of open access books based on citation behaviors and social media attention,Open access books; Evaluation; Academic impact; Social impact; Disciplines impact; Altmetrics,"Open access academic achievements include not only papers and journals, but also books, which have become an important achievement for scholars and can be regarded as scholarly critical products. Until recently, books have had a key role in the distribution of knowledge and the main issue is which category of open or non-open access books is more effective in academic society. Thus, this study compares the difference between open access and non-open access books in terms of knowledge distribution. We collected and analyzed data from Twitter, Mendeley, and Dimensions platform, as well as the dataset of all Springer books. Twitter and Mendeley are considered alternative metric indicators, which reflect impacts with citation indicators. Data were analyzed from static and comparative perspectives. Results showed a relationship between academic impact and social impact based on citation and social media attention for OA books, and indicated that open access books boost knowledge distribution in Twitter and Mendeley for the sample of books drawn from Springer under study. Moreover, the open access books have the added advantage of keeping sustained impact for a long time. It is sensible to assess the impact of OA books through knowledge distribution. However, there is no significant correlation between citation and social media attention regarding OA books and also the social and academic impact of books in some disciplines such as Geography, Medicine, and Public Health, Culture, and Media Studies attract more social media attention. According to the analysis, the correlation with citations for the number of mentions on social media is negligible, which indicates that social media measures bear different impacts from citations. However, social impact is similar to the complementary measures which should be considered within the impact evaluation of OA books. Therefore, only when OA books are accessed through the channels of communication can the knowledge contained in books be absorbed to generate impact, and lowering the access barrier does lead to more attention found for OA research papers. The findings demonstrated that the OA books and OA papers do not have similar impacts on the citation. Also, OA books could not attract more citations than non-OA books in some disciplines, which is why open access books have a significant impact on social media attention.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wei, Mingkun; Noroozi Chakoli, Abdolreza",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Wei, Mingkun] Hebei Univ, Sch Management, Baoding 071002, Hebei, Peoples R China; [Noroozi Chakoli, Abdolreza] Shahed Univ, Dept Informat Sci & Knowledge Studies & Scientome, Fac Humanities Sci, Persian Gulf Highway, Tehran 3319118651, Iran",61.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,125,3,2401.0,2420,10.1007/s11192-020-03678-0,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2759,SCOPUS,Adapting national mapping & cadastral agencies business models to open data supply: The survey results,0,"Since 2009, Open Government Data initiatives have been launched worldwide and the concept of open data is gaining momentum. Open data are often associated with realizing ambitions, such as a more transparent and efficient government, solving societal problems and increased economic value. There has been ample literature describing the (potential) benefits of open data. However, to switch to an open data policy may pose a challenge to the business model of National Mapping & Cadastral Agencies (NMCAs), especially if they are required to generate sufficient revenue to cover a substantial part of their operating costs. This research aims to assess the effects of open data policies on the business models of NMCAs and which adaptations have been made to cope with revenue losses due to open data supply. In March and April 2017, we surveyed European NMCAs to find out which strategies NMCAs employ to be able to (re)finance operational costs and to ensure long-term sustainability of (open) data. This report provides the initial outcomes of the survey and will provide an input for a workshop on Sustainable Open Data Business Models for NMCAs, to be held 18-19 September 2017 in Delft, The Netherlands. This workshop will bring together the NMCAs to present and share their experiences of open data and discuss the research results with representatives of academia. © 2017, European Spatial Data Research (EuroSDR). All Rights Reserved.",['opendata'],['survey'],['natscie'],['practitioner'],['EU'],"Welle Donker F.M., Crompvoets J., van Loenen B.",Official Publication - EuroSDR,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,European Spatial Data Research (EuroSDR),2570505,0,2017.0,2017,67,1.0,35,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2765,SCOPUS,A survey on environmental open data in Austria,Environmental informatics; Linked open data; Open data,"Environmental Open Data has the potential to become a key strategy for the global endeavor of preserving the world's ecosphere. Therefore, this paper aims at researching the status quo of such data in Austria and exploring related advantages and shortcomings. First, the presented survey is motivated and put in perspective to relevant related work. Then, the approach to gaining the datasets is described and important parameters are specified. Subsequently, the results of the conducted survey are presented. Positive as well as negative highlights are pointed out. Many datasets with good features have been identified, however, there are still some drawbacks concerning data quality, diversity and content. Dealing with these issues and ultimately providing Linked Open Data would greatly improve the datasets and, ultimately, would allow for significantly better utilisation thereof. The goal of this work is to bring the concept of Open Data into the environmental domain by evaluating the environmental Open Data landscape in Austria. © 2013 IEEE.",['opendata'],['documentreview'],"['natscie', 'engtech']",['othergroup'],['AUT'],"Wetz P., Anjomshoaa A., Tjoa A.M.","Proceedings - 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2013",English,Conference Paper,"2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2013",13 October 2013 through 16 October 2013,Manchester,,,0.0,0,0,9780769551548,2013.0,0,0,4566.0,4570,10.1109/SMC.2013.777,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2769,SCOPUS,Open Access and Promotion and Tenure Evaluation Plans at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire,open access publishing; scholarly communication; university promotion and tenure evaluation plans,"Department and program evaluation plans at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire were examined to see if these documents provide evidence that could be used to justify supporting the publication of peer-reviewed open access articles toward tenure and promotion. In an earlier study, the authors reveal that faculty members at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire are more unaware of open access publishing than their counterparts at larger universities. These findings dovetail with other studies that show that faculty members are reluctant to publish in open access journals because of concerns about the quality of those journals. The existing body of scholarship suggests that tenure-line faculty fear publishing in open access journals because it could adversely impact their chances of promotion and tenure. The authors of this current study sought to determine if department and program evaluation plans could influence negative perceptions faculty have of open access journals. The implications of this study for librarians, scholarly communication professionals, tenure-line faculty, departments, and programs are addressed.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['USA'],"Wical, Stephanie H.; Kocken, Gregory J.",SERIALS REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Wical, Stephanie H.] Boston Univ, Mugar Mem Lib, 771 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA; [Kocken, Gregory J.] Univ Wisconsin, WD McIntyre Lib, Eau Claire, WI 54701 USA",37.0,0.0,"ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",0098-7913,,2017.0,43,2,111.0,119,10.1080/00987913.2017.1313024,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2770,SCOPUS,Peer review quality and transparency of the peer-review process in open access and subscription journals,0,"Background Recent controversies highlighting substandard peer review in Open Access (OA) and traditional (subscription) journals have increased the need for authors, funders, publishers, and institutions to assure quality of peer-review in academic journals. I propose that transparency of the peer-review process may be seen as an indicator of the quality of peer-review, and develop and validate a tool enabling different stakeholders to assess transparency of the peer-review process. Methods and Findings Based on editorial guidelines and best practices, I developed a 14-item tool to rate transparency of the peer-review process on the basis of journals' websites. In Study 1, a random sample of 231 authors of papers in 92 subscription journals in different fields rated transparency of the journals that published their work. Authors' ratings of the transparency were positively associated with quality of the peer-review process but unrelated to journal's impact factors. In Study 2, 20 experts on OA publishing assessed the transparency of established (non-OA) journals, OA journals categorized as being published by potential predatory publishers, and journals from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). Results show high reliability across items (a = .91) and sufficient reliability across raters. Ratings differentiated the three types of journals well. In Study 3, academic librarians rated a random sample of 140 DOAJ journals and another 54 journals that had received a hoax paper written by Bohannon to test peer-review quality. Journals with higher transparency ratings were less likely to accept the flawed paper and showed higher impact as measured by the h5 index from Google Scholar. Conclusions The tool to assess transparency of the peer-review process at academic journals shows promising reliability and validity. The transparency of the peer-review process can be seen as an indicator of peer-review quality allowing the tool to be used to predict academic quality in new journals. © 2016 Jelte M. Wicherts. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'librarian', 'publisher', 'practitioner']",['nonspecificgeo'],Wicherts J.M.,PLoS ONE,English,Article,0,0,0,,,60.0,Public Library of Science,19326203,0,2016.0,11,1,0.0,0,10.1371/journal.pone.0147913,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2773,SCOPUS,Journal selection criteria in an open access environment: A comparison between the medicine and social sciences,,"The increasing number of journals makes it difficult to decide the right venue for manuscript submission. This becomes more complicated as the selection criteria may vary from one discipline to another. Therefore, appropriate cross-disciplinary studies are required to understand the exact concerns that dominate a particular field. The current study compares 16 factors that influence journal choices between medicine and social sciences using the answers given to a global survey of 235 open access journal authors. The results reveal that authors of both areas consider ''peer reviewed' status as the most important factor while showing the least interest to the number of annual subscribers' of the journal. However, compared to social science authors, those in the discipline of medicine give significantly more consideration to (1) impact factor, (2) the inclusion of the journal in abstracting and indexing services, (3) publisher's prestige, and (4) online submission with tracking facility. The factors that were identified can be categorized for both disciplines as reflecting the reputation of a journal, performance or production issues, and reliability and demand characteristics of their publication choice. The editors and publishers can use these findings to attract the best manuscripts as the study reveals the author's perception of the journal's status. The results can also be used to design recommender systems for journal submission for new authors in a discipline.",['openaccess'],['survey'],"['med', 'socscie']",['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wijewickrema, Manjula; Petras, Vivien",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Wijewickrema, Manjula; Petras, Vivien] Humboldt Univ, Berlin Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Berlin, Germany",79.0,13.0,WILEY,0953-1513,,2017.0,30,4,289.0,300,10.1002/leap.1113,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2779,SCOPUS,Agricultural researchers' attitudes toward open access and data sharing,0,"This study involved a thorough examination of attitudes and opinions of agricultural researchers toward open access publishing and data sharing. Utilizing the results of the Ithaka S+R Agriculture Research Support Services project, we reanalyzed our institutional interview transcripts and synthesized information from the project's publicly available reports. For comparison, we also searched and coded scientific and library literature. Our findings reveal common attitudes related to open access publishing and data sharing and point to potential roles for libraries to help address common impediments, such as lack of trust, time, and money. Overall, this study provides disciplinary context that can inform how librarians approach agricultural researchers about open access publishing and data sharing. © 2019, Association of College and Research Libraries. All rights reserved.","['openaccess', 'opendata']",['interview'],['agric'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Williams S.C., Farrell S.L., Kerby E.E., Kocher M.",Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship,English,Article,0,0,0,,,0.0,Association of College and Research Libraries,10921206,0,2019.0,2019,91,0.0,0,10.29173/istl4,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2781,SCOPUS,Open access on a zero budget: A case study of Postcolonial Text,0,"Introduction. The founding of a new open access journal is described in terms of its use of the open source software Open Journal Systems, its contribution to a new field of inquiry and its ability to operate on a zero budget in terms of regular expenses. Method. A case study method is deployed describing the circumstances of the journal's founding and current manner of publishing. Analysis. The use of online and open source software, as well as a global team of volunteers is presented as the basis of sustaining an open access approach to publishing. Results The journal has been able to operate with a zero dollar operating budget over the course of its first six issues and is in a position to continue in this manner. Conclusions. A strong commitment to the principles of developing a new field of inquiry committed to global issues of access to knowledge, in combination with open source and Internet technologies, has lowered the barriers to the exercise of academic freedom on a modest, but nonetheless global scale.",['opensoftware'],['othermeth'],['hum'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Willinsky J., Mendis R.",Information Research,English,Article,0,0,0,,,11.0,0,13681613,0,2007.0,12,3,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2783,SCOPUS,Modelling a Cooperative Approach to Open Access Scholarly Publishing: A Demonstration in the Canadian Context,Journals; Open access; Financial modelling; Canada,"Background In light of increasing interest in open access publishing, this Research in Brief proposes and presents a financial analysis of a cooperative approach to moving subscription journals to open access. Analysis The article utilizes a 2014 survey of Canadian scholarly journals as well as an earlier 2004 survey to demonstrate the ways in which a cooperative model can mitigate publisher risk and sustain open access. Conclusions and implications The study sets out the financial details of moving the average Canadian subscription journal to open access with the support of its previously subscribing libraries, in ways that need not involve a publisher revenue loss or a library expense increase.",['openaccess'],['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['CAN'],"Willinsky, John",CANADIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION,English,Article,,,,"[Willinsky, John] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA",16.0,0.0,CANADIAN JOURNAL COMMUNICATION,0705-3657,,2017.0,42,5,923.0,934,10.22230/cjc.2017v42n5a3264,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2788,SCOPUS,How society publishers can accelerate their transition to open access and align with Plan S,open access; Plan S; learned society publisher,"Wellcome, UK Research and Innovation, and the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers commissioned Information Power Ltd. to undertake a project to support society publishers to accelerate their transition to open access (OA) in alignment with Plan S and the wider move to accelerate immediate OA. This project is part of a range of activities that cOAlition S partners are taking forward to support the implementation of Plan S principles. The objective of this project was to explore with learned societies a range of potential strategies and business models through which they could adapt and thrive under Plan S. We consulted with society publishers through interviews, surveys, and workshops about the 27 business models and strategies identified during the project. We also surveyed library consortia about their willingness to support society publishers to make the transition to OA. Our key finding is that transformative agreements emerge as the most promising model because they offer a predictable, steady funding stream. We also facilitated pilot transformative agreement negotiations between several society publishers and library consortia. These pilots and a workshop of consortium representatives and society publishers informed the development of an OA transformative agreement toolkit. Our conclusion is that society publishers should consider all the business models this project has developed and should not automatically equate OA with article publication charges.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'survey']",['socscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wise, Alicia; Estelle, Lorraine",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Wise, Alicia; Estelle, Lorraine] Informat Power Ltd, Winchester, Hants, England",9.0,4.0,WILEY,0953-1513,,2020.0,33,1,14.0,27,10.1002/leap.1272,,32089590.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2791,SCOPUS,Jupyter Notebooks as Discovery Mechanisms for Open Science: Citation Practices in the Astronomy Community,Software; Metadata; Object recognition; Astronomy; Hypertext systems; Aggregates; Stability analysis; Astronomy; software; data citation; Jupyter notebooks; credit; attribution; discovery; open science,"Citing data and software is a means to give scholarly credit and to facilitate access to research objects. Citation principles encourage authors to provide full descriptions of objects, with stable links, in their papers. As Jupyter notebooks (JNs) aggregate data, software, and other objects, they may facilitate or hinder citation, credit, and access to data and software. We report on a study of references to JNs in astronomy over a five-year period (2014-2018). References increased rapidly, but fewer than half of the references led to JNs that could be located and opened. JNs appear better suited to supporting the research process than to providing access to research objects. We recommend that authors cite individual data and software objects and that they stabilize any notebooks cited in publications. Publishers should increase the number of citations allowed in papers and employ descriptive metadata-rich citation styles that facilitate credit and discovery.","['openmethod', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['natscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wofford, Morgan F.; Boscoe, Bernadette M.; Borgman, Christine L.; Pasquetto, Irene V.; Golshan, Milena S.",COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING,English,Article,,,,"[Wofford, Morgan F.; Boscoe, Bernadette M.; Borgman, Christine L.] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Informat Studies, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA; [Pasquetto, Irene V.] Kennedy Sch Govt, Harvard Shorenstein Ctr, Cambridge, MA USA; [Golshan, Milena S.] Los Angeles Cty Museum Art, Collect Management, Los Angeles, CA USA",25.0,3.0,IEEE COMPUTER SOC,1521-9615,,2020.0,22,1,5.0,15,10.1109/MCSE.2019.2932067,,,2021-01-27,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2793,SCOPUS,Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science,Open peer review; Scholarly communication; Journal editorial policies; Open access; Peer review transparency; Transparent review models; C80,"Open peer review (OPR), where review reports and reviewers' identities are published alongside the articles, represents one of the last aspects of the open science movement to be widely embraced, although its adoption has been growing since the turn of the century. This study provides the first comprehensive investigation of OPR adoption, its early adopters and the implementation approaches used. Current bibliographic databases do not systematically index OPR journals, nor do the OPR journals clearly state their policies on open identities and open reports. Using various methods, we identified 617 OPR journals that published at least one article with open identities or open reports as of 2019 and analyzed their wide-ranging implementations to derive emerging OPR practices. The findings suggest that: (1) there has been a steady growth in OPR adoption since 2001, when 38 journals initially adopted OPR, with more rapid growth since 2017; (2) OPR adoption is most prevalent in medical and scientific disciplines (79.9%); (3) five publishers are responsible for 81% of the identified OPR journals; (4) early adopter publishers have implemented OPR in different ways, resulting in different levels of transparency. Across the variations in OPR implementations, two important factors define the degree of transparency: open identities and open reports. Open identities may include reviewer names and affiliation as well as credentials; open reports may include timestamped review histories consisting of referee reports and author rebuttals or a letter from the editor integrating reviewers' comments. When and where open reports can be accessed are also important factors indicating the OPR transparency level. Publishers of optional OPR journals should add metric data in their annual status reports.",['openevaluation'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wolfram, Dietmar; Wang, Peiling; Hembree, Adam; Park, Hyoungjoo",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Wolfram, Dietmar; Park, Hyoungjoo] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA; [Wang, Peiling; Hembree, Adam] Univ Tennessee, Sch Informat Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA",50.0,0.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2020.0,125,2,1033.0,1051,10.1007/s11192-020-03488-4,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2803,SCOPUS,No new evidence for a citation benefit for Author-Pay Open Access Publications in the social sciences and humanities,Citations; Open Access Publishing; Author-pay model; Social sciences; Humanities; Citation advantage; Gold Open Access,"I challenge a finding reported recently in a paper by Sotudeh et al. (Scientometrics, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1607-5). The authors argue that there is a citation advantage for those who publish Author-Pay Open Access (Gold Open Access) in journals published by Springer and Elsevier. I argue that the alleged advantage that the authors report for journals in the social sciences and humanities is an artifact of their method. The findings reported about the life sciences, the health sciences, and the natural sciences, on the other hand, are robust. But my finding underscores the fact that epistemic cultures in the social sciences and humanities are different from those in the other fields.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],"['socscie', 'hum']",['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Wray, K. Brad",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Wray, K. Brad] SUNY Coll Oswego, Dept Philosophy, 212 Marano Campus Ctr, Oswego, NY 13126 USA",9.0,16.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2016.0,106,3,1031.0,1035,10.1007/s11192-016-1833-5,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2813,SCOPUS,A Longitudinal Study of Scholars Attitudes and Behaviors Toward Open-Access Journal Publishing,,"This research applies statistical time series analysis to examine the changing pattern of scholars' attitudes toward open-access (OA) journal publishing from the early 1990s. By synthesizing survey results in existing studies, this research focuses on representative aspects of the attitudes and behaviors recorded through the years. It finds that although an increase in the publishing and awareness rates of scholars with regard to OA journals has been observed, scholars have been consistently concerned with the low prestige of such journals and their lack of peer review, which is not the case in practice. It is hoped that the findings will provide useful information for the improvement of OA advocacy.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Xia, Jingfeng",JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,English,Article,,,,"Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA",50.0,67.0,WILEY,1532-2882,,2010.0,61,3,615.0,624,10.1002/asi.21283,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2814,SCOPUS,A Preliminary Study of Alternative Open Access Journal Indexes,Open access journals; Predatory journals; Non-mainstream indexing; Unethical practice; Alternative publishing market,"This paper examines a group of selected open access journal indexes by non-mainstream index providers. It finds that journals seeking such indexing are mainly predatory journals. Most of these so-called alternative indexes have not provided any evidence of employing quality assessment in journal inclusions. They also are not supporting interoperability for online searching across the Web. Comparisons among the alternative indexes yield many overlaps of journals, indicating shared business of these indexes and journals.",['openevaluation'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Xia, Jingfeng",PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY,English,Article,,,,"[Xia, Jingfeng] East Stroudsburg Univ Penn, 160 Smith St, East Stroudsburg, PA 18301 USA",18.0,1.0,SPRINGER,1053-8801,,2019.0,35,2,274.0,284,10.1007/s12109-019-09642-y,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2816,SCOPUS,Diffusionism and open access,Open access expansion; Tempo-spatial distribution; Technology innovation; Cultural adaptation; Open access; Innovation; Culture (Sociology),"Purpose - This article aims to explore the geographic distribution of open access practices in the world from a diffusionist perspective. Design/methodology/approach - The article applies a tempo-spatial analysis to examine the diffusion movement of open access practices from the West to the entire world during the past several decades. Both maps and tables are used to support the analysis. The diffusionist theory is reviewed and applied to the understanding of open access. Findings - The paper discovers that technology is not the only factor determining the diffusion pattern of information systems as discussed in the literature. Cultural dissimilarities across countries have played a significant role in open access development. Open access can only be effectively established after it meets local standards. Practical implications - The findings help understanding of why open access has a disproportionate growth among developing countries, and even among developed countries, where the ICT infrastructure has been in place. Originality/value - Few studies have taken a transnational view to analyze open access geography at the global level, and few have been able to synthesize models to interpret diverse discoveries. Furthermore, a chronological evaluation tracing the history of open access spatial expansion is absent in the literature.",['openaccess'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Xia, Jingfeng",JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION,English,Article,,,,"Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA",80.0,14.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0022-0418,,2012.0,68,1,72.0,99,10.1108/00220411211200338,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2818,SCOPUS,Multiple open access availability and citation impact,multiple open access copies; open access citation advantage; web search engine,"This research examines the relationship between multiple open access (OA) availability of journal articles and the citation advantage by collecting data of OA copies and citation numbers in 20 top library and information science journals. We discover a correlation between the two variables; namely, multiple OA availability of an article has a positive impact on its citation count. The statistical analysis reveals that for every increase in the availability of OA articles, citation numbers increase by 2.348.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['socscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Xia, Jingfeng; Myers, Rebekah Lynette; Wilhoite, Sara Kay",JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Xia, Jingfeng; Myers, Rebekah Lynette] Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA; [Wilhoite, Sara Kay] Ivy Tech Community Coll, Univ Lib Columbus, Columbus, IN 47203 USA",28.0,39.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0165-5515,,2011.0,37,1,19.0,28,10.1177/0165551510389358,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2819,SCOPUS,Self-selection and the citation advantage of open access articles,Open access journal articles; Citations; Self-selection; Anthropological journals; Serials; Open access publishing,"Purpose - This research seeks to examine the relationship between the open access availability of journal articles in anthropology and their citation conditions. Design/methodology/approach - The paper applies a statistical logistic regression model to explore this relationship, and compares two groups of articles, those published in high-ranked journals and those in low-ranked journals based on journal impact factor, to examine the likelihood that open access status is correlated to scholarly impact. Findings - The results reveal that open access articles in general receive more citations. Moreover, this research finds that articles in high-ranked journals do not have a higher open access rate, and articles in lower-ranked journals have a greater increase rate of citations if they are freely accessible. Originality/value - The findings are contrary to the existing theory that a higher citation rate of open access articles is caused by authors posting their best articles online. It is hoped that the research discoveries can help electronic publishers and digital project managers to adjust their strategies in open access advocacy.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['hum'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Xia, Jingfeng; Nakanishi, Katie",ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Xia, Jingfeng] Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA; [Nakanishi, Katie] Calumet Specialty Prod, Indianapolis, IN USA",34.0,19.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED,1468-4527,,2012.0,36,1,40.0,51,10.1108/14684521211206953,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2820,SCOPUS,A librarian-LIS faculty divide in open access practice,Digital scholarly commtmication; Institutional libraries; Open access; Citations,"Purpose - This paper seeks to examine a librarian-faculty divide in authors' OA contributions with regard to article self-archiving and OA consumptions with regard to citation counts. Design/methodology/approach - This paper measures the OA availabilities and citations of scholarly articles from 20 top-ranked US journals published in 2006. A logistic regression analysis is taken to make the comparisons. Findings - It finds that there is no correlation between the numbers of OA articles and the professional status of the authors. However, librarian authors differ from faculty authors in the citation and self-citation rates of their articles. There are also differences between these two groups of authors in co-authorship and the numbers of article pages and references. Originality/value - This study takes a new approach to compare the publications of librarians and faculty in library and information science for their open access availability and citations. The findings may help OA advocates and administrators to make appropriate policy changes.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['socscie'],"['researcher', 'librarian']",['USA'],"Xia, Jingfeng; Wilhoite, Sara Kay; Myers, Rebekah Lynette",JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION,English,Article,,,,"[Xia, Jingfeng; Myers, Rebekah Lynette] Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA; [Wilhoite, Sara Kay] Ivy Tech Community Coll Lib, Columbus, IN USA",40.0,14.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0022-0418,,2011.0,67,5,791.0,805,10.1108/00220411111164673,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2821,SCOPUS,Academic opinions of Wikipedia and Open Access publishing,Wikipedia; Open Access publishing; Academic perspectives; Questionnaire study,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine academics' awareness of and attitudes towards Wikipedia and Open Access journals for academic publishing to better understand the perceived benefits and challenges of these models. Design/methodology/approach - Bases for analysis include comparison of the models, enumeration of their advantages and disadvantages, and investigation of Wikipedia's web structure in terms of potential for academic publishing. A web survey was administered via department-based invitations and listservs. Findings - The survey results show that: Wikipedia has perceived advantages and challenges in comparison to the Open Access model; the academic researchers' increased familiarity is associated with increased comfort with these models; and the academic researchers' attitudes towards these models are associated with their familiarity, academic environment, and professional status. Research limitations/implications - The major limitation of the study is sample size. The result of a power analysis with GPower shows that authors could only detect big effects in this study at statistical power 0.95. The authors call for larger sample studies that look further into this topic. Originality/value - This study contributes to the increasing interest in adjusting methods of creating and disseminating academic knowledge by providing empirical evidence of the academics' experiences and attitudes towards the Open Access and Wikipedia publishing models. This paper provides a resource for researchers interested in scholarly communication and academic publishing, for research librarians, and for the academic community in general.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Xiao, Lu; Askin, Nicole",ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW,English,Article,,,,"[Xiao, Lu; Askin, Nicole] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat & Media Studies, Human Comp Interact Lab, London, ON, Canada",44.0,8.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,1468-4527,,2014.0,38,3,332.0,347,10.1108/OIR-04-2013-0062,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2825,SCOPUS,Are open access journals trusted by Chinese scholars?,Chinese Scholars; Open Access Journal; Trust,"A total of 686 Chinese researchers were surveyed about matters of trust arising from their scholarly use/reading, citing and publishing behavior. The questionnaire survey was proceeded and informed by two focus groups attended by two dozen Chinese researchers. The findings showed that Chinese researchers appeared lukewarm on the topic of OA journals as a whole. The quantitative research showed that some of them liked the principle of OA, but many were suspicious and confused about OA publications. In terms of diversity, younger researchers and biologists/life scientists were more in favor of publishing in OA journals. The biggest misunderstanding about OA journals is that Chinese scholars confused OA with the who-pays-will-get-published model which comes without peer review. The other common confusions included the belief that all OA journals were not properly peer reviewed and none was published by reputable publishers. © 2016, Research and Development Office of Wuhan University. All right reserved.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['CHN'],"Xu J., Dave N., Su J., Zeng Y.",Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,English,Article,0,0,0,,,4.0,Wuhan University,16718860,0,2016.0,41,0,131.0,135,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2826,SCOPUS,Analysis on open access citation advantage: An empirical study based on Oxford open journals,Citation advantage; Impact factor; OACA; Open access,"This study takes 12,354 original research articles which were published in 93 Oxford Open journals in 2009 as a sample, and carries out statistic analyses on the citation frequency that these articles have received by July 2010 to validate 3 hypotheses: (1) there is citation advantage for open access articles(OACA) published in Oxford Open journals over the non-OA ones; (2) OACA varies with disciplines; (3) there is some correlation between the impact factors(IFs) of Oxford Open journals and the OACA of their open access articles. This study discovers that: there exists OACA for open access articles, in this case 138.87% higher over non-OA ones; different subjects have different OACAs, and Humanities journals in Oxford Open have even a negative OACA; Oxford Open journals with lower IFs have stronger OACAs than those with higher IFs. Copyright © 2011 ACM.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Xu L., Liu J., Fang Q.",ACM International Conference Proceeding Series,English,Conference Paper,"6th Annual Conference on 2011 iConference: Inspiration, Integrity, and Intrepidity, iConference 2011",8 February 2011 through 11 February 2011,"Seattle, WA",,,9.0,0,0,9781450301213,2011.0,0,0,426.0,432,10.1145/1940761.1940819,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2828,SCOPUS,Chinese researchers' perceptions and use of open access journals: Results of an online questionnaire survey,questionnaire survey; Chinese researchers; Open Access journals,"This paper reports the results of a survey on Chinese researchers' perceptions and use of open access journals (OAJs). A total of 381 Chinese researchers from different universities and disciplines were investigated through an online questionnaire survey in August and September 2018. The results showed that most Chinese researchers are familiar with and have positive attitude to OAJs. They know OAJs mainly through their peers, colleagues, and friends. PubMed Central, PLoS, and COAJ (China Open Access Journals) are the most well-known OAJ websites among Chinese researchers. As for use, most of the respondents read and cite OAJs frequently and have experience of publishing in OAJs. However, they strongly prefer to use OAJs indexed in reputable databases (e.g. Web of Science, WoS) when making publishing decisions. Significant differences can be seen among disciplines, with researchers in HSS areas using OAJs less frequently than researchers from other disciplines, although they have the same positive attitudes and are equally well informed about them. Younger researchers preferred to rely on prestigious institutions and authors when using OAJs.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['CHN'],"Xu, Jie; He, Chen; Su, Jing; Zeng, Yuanxiang; Wang, Zixian; Fang, Fei; Tang, Wenhui",LEARNED PUBLISHING,English,Article,,,,"[Xu, Jie; He, Chen; Wang, Zixian; Tang, Wenhui] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China; [Su, Jing] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Sch Journalism & Commun, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China; [Zeng, Yuanxiang] Sichuan Univ, Coll Literature & Journalism, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China; [Fang, Fei] Peking Univ, Sch New Media, Beijing, Peoples R China",68.0,2.0,WILEY,0953-1513,,2020.0,33,3,246.0,258,10.1002/leap.1291,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2847,SCOPUS,Difference in the impact of open-access papers published by China and the USA,Open access; Altmetrics; Research evaluation; Country; Citation analysis,"We analyze the impact of open-access (OA) articles published by China and the USA by using Web of Science (WoS) data covering a period of 5 years (2011-2015), five indexes (citation and four altmetric indexes), five disciplines, and three types of articles. With regard to article type, Type I papers are those wherein the authors are all from China or the USA. Type II are those in which the first author is from China or the USA. Type III includes those in which the first author is not from China or the USA. We found that the proportion of OA papers in WoS has been growing in recent years. In terms of citations and altmetric indexes, the mean value of the USA is larger than that of China in general; Type II articles possess the highest value among all papers in the USA, whereas Type III has the highest value in China. Compared with the scenario in citations, social sciences and humanities possess larger altmetric values in China and the USA. The correlation among indicators is similar for the OA papers from China and the USA. Generally, citations cannot effectively represent the altmetric indexes. The gap between China and the USA is the largest in the altmetric attention score and Type I, and the smallest in citations and Type III. Measuring the international impact of OA papers using only citations underestimates the gap between China and the USA.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['publisher'],"['CHN', 'USA']","Yang, Siluo; Xing, Xin; Wolfram, Dietmar",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Yang, Siluo; Xing, Xin] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China; [Wolfram, Dietmar] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, POB 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA; [Yang, Siluo] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Studies Informat Resources, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China",40.0,4.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2018.0,115,2,1017.0,1037,10.1007/s11192-018-2697-7,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2860,SCOPUS,The information science policy for the public open data of the national research institute,public open data; national research institutes; government; information science policy; information system,"In modern society, the importance of information is constantly growing. Human life has been diversely changed due to the volume expansion of information handling and distribution. The rapid growth and informatization of information and communications technology (ICT) could be the driver of the production and distribution of information in the real world. Also, it has greatly influenced the economy, politics, society, culture, etc. As the value of information continues to increase, all governments around the world are becoming more and more interested in the reaction to the provision of information. The people need liberty and equality in the environment for the acquisition or utilization of necessary information. Especially due to the importance of the information sharing system, both the government and people are greatly interested in the information sharing policy of the government. Information sharing policies around the world greatly affect people. They disclose information (from government agencies, local government units, public institutions, etc.) to people. However, in the case of national research institutes, their information sharing policy has been ineffective due to the specialty of their work and data. Also, their data are not at the general information sharing level. In this paper, first, the information science policy for public open data of national research institutes is presented and discussed. First, we will look for an efficient method of information sharing policy-making for national research institutes. Then we will discuss and present research results data of national research institutes. These will comprise the most useful information from national research institutes. Also, the actual availability of the research results data will be discussed through their utilization trend analysis. In this paper, we propose the information science policy direction for public open data of national research institutes through a study of their information sharing system.","['opendata', 'openpolicies']","['documentreview', 'survey']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['KOR'],"Yoon, Donghun",COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Yoon, Donghun] Korea Basic Sci Inst, Seoul Ctr, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea",30.0,1.0,TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS,2331-1975,,2017.0,4,1,,,10.1080/23311975.2017.1406321,,,2021-01-27,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2864,SCOPUS,Open access dissemination challenges: A case study,Generation and dissemination of information; Libraries; Online databases; Open systems,"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore dissemination, broadly considered, of an open access (OA) database as part of a librarian-faculty collaboration currently in progress. Design/methodology/approach - Dissemination of an online database by librarians is broadly considered, including metadata optimization for multiple access points and user notification methods. Findings - Librarians address OA dissemination challenges by investigating search engine optimization and seeking new opportunities for dissemination on the web. Differences in library metadata formats inhibit metadata optimization and need resolution. Research limitations/implications - The collaboration is in progress and many of the ideas and conclusions listed have not been implemented. Practical implications - Libraries should consider their role in scholarly publishing, develop workflows to enable it, and extend their efforts to the web. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the scant literature on dissemination by libraries, and discusses dissemination challenges encountered by a non-peer reviewed, dynamic scholarly resource. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.","['openaccess', 'opensoftware']",['othermeth'],['hum'],['librarian'],['USA'],Young P.,OCLC Systems and Services,English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,0,1065075X,0,2009.0,25,2,93.0,104,10.1108/10650750910961893,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2873,SCOPUS,Scholarly impact measurements of LIS open access journals: based on citations and links,Open access; Scholarly impact measurement; Citation analysis; Web link analysis; Library and information networks,"Purpose - The main purpose of this paper is to measure the scholarly impact of LIS (Library and Information Science) open access journals (OA journals), most of which are not indexed by the Web of Science (WoS). In addition, the paper seeks to discuss measurement methods beyond citation analysis. Design/methodology/approach - The study selected 97 LIS OA journals as a sample and measured their scholarly impact on the basis of citations and links. The citation counts in WoS, coverage in LISA, Web links, WIFs and Page Rank of the journals are retrieved and calculated, and correlations between citation counts, links, pages, WIFs, and Page Rank are also analyzed. Findings - The results indicate that LIS OA journals have become a significant component of the scholarly communication system. The Journal of the Medical Library Association enjoys the highest citation counts in WoS. This journal, together with D-Lib Magazine, Information Research, Ariadne, Cybermetrics, and First Monday are the six most important LIS OA journals. With regard to coverage in LISA, Bulletin des Bibliotheques de France (2151) performs best. As a whole, the Page Rank is relatively high, mostly at 6, 7, or 8. The study finds that correlation between citation-based measurements and link-based measurements tends to be significant. Originality/value - This paper uses the web as a global resource to measure the impact of LIS OA journals by analyzing citation, coverage, web links and Page Rank. The focus of this study is the value of the web as a source of impact indices, rather different from the traditional research methods. It contributes to the scholarly impact measurements of OA journals.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['socscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Yuan, Shunbo; Hua, Weina",ELECTRONIC LIBRARY,English,Article,,,,"[Yuan, Shunbo; Hua, Weina] Nanjing Univ, Dept Informat Management, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China; [Yuan, Shunbo] Jiaxing Univ, Sch Business, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, Peoples R China",41.0,15.0,EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD,0264-0473,,2011.0,29,5,682.0,697,10.1108/02640471111177107,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2894,,Open access policy and funding in Cyprus University of Technology: A case study,Author fund; Author fund policies; Hybrid model; Open access,"Today an increasing number of researchers and scientists follow Open Access. Open Access is a movement that offers researchers and the academic community the opportunity to share and access academic information freely and immediately. The Library and Information Services at the Cyprus University of Technology (CUT) has defined Open Access as one of its main strategies. An author fund has been established since 2013, with the financial support of a pharmaceutical company, in order to promote and support Open Access. Statistics of this Fund have shown that funding covers publications mainly in health sciences. These findings have allowed us to implement a new policy for the financing of Open Access publications from our university's budget, which falls within the framework of its social responsibility. However, considering the ""hybrid model"" and the ""double dipping"" which favors 'big' publishers, we will examine the different possibilities and present our reflections and decision for the new policy. Finally we will describe the policy implemented. © 2017 The authors and IOS Press.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['othermeth'],['med'],"['librarian', 'publisher']",['GRC'],"Zervas M., Artemi P., Giannoulakis S.","Expanding Perspectives on Open Science: Communities, Cultures and Diversity in Concepts and Practices - Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Electronic Publishing",English,Conference Paper,"21st International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2017",6 June 2017 through 8 June 2017,0,,,0.0,IOS Press BV,0,9781614997689,2017.0,0,0,44.0,55,10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-44,,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2897,SCOPUS,Toward Easy Deposit: Lowering the Barriers of Green Open Access with Data Integration and Automation,open access; article deposit; institutional repository,"This article describes the design and development of an interoperable application that supports green open access with long-term sustainability and improved user experience of article deposit. The lack of library resources and the unfriendly repository user interface are two significant barriers that hinder green open access. Tasked to implement the open access mandate, librarians at an American research university developed a comprehensive system called Easy Deposit 2 to automate the support workflow of green open access. Easy Deposit 2 is a web application that is able to harvest new publications, to source manuscripts on behalf of the library, and to facilitate self-archiving to a university's institutional repository. The article deposit rate increased from 7.40% to 25.60% with the launch of Easy Deposit 2. The results show that a computer system can implement routine tasks to support green open access with success. Recent developments in digital repository provide new opportunities for innovation, such as Easy Deposit 2, in supporting open access. Academic librarians are vital in promoting openness in scholarly communication, such as transparency and diversity in the sharing of publication data.","['openaccess', 'opensoftware']",['othermeth'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Zhang, Hui",PUBLICATIONS,English,Article; Proceedings Paper,14th International Conference on Open Repositories - All the User Needs,"JUN 10-13, 2019","Hamburg, GERMANY","[Zhang, Hui] Oregon State Univ, Oregon State Univ Lib, 121 Valley Lib, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA",17.0,1.0,MDPI,,,2020.0,8,2,,,10.3390/publications8020028,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2898,SCOPUS,The prevalence of green and grey open access: Where do physical science researchers archive their publications?,Green open access; ResearchGate; Journal archiving policy; Citation; Institutional repository; Subject repository,"The Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) implemented an open access policy for its grant recipients in 2008. We used bibliographic data from the Web of Science to find out how CIHR-funded researchers in the physical sciences self-archived their publications. We also examined the self-archiving policies of the journals in which the researchers published, and compared the citation rates of two different self-archiving approaches: the green open access route (deposit in an institutional or subject repository) and the grey open access route (deposit in an academic social network or personal/departmental website). Only 14% of the articles were openly accessible through the green open access route, while 37% could be accessed through the grey open access route. We cannot ascribe the low uptake of green open access to publishers' self-archiving policies, as almost all journals allowed self-archiving through the green open access route. Authors deposited 31% of their publications in ResearchGate, the most popular self-archiving option in our study, while they deposited only 2.1% of their publications in institutional repositories, the least popular option. The citation rates of the various self-archiving approaches did not differ significantly. Our results suggest that it may be time to rethink how to achieve open access.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['biblio'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['CAN'],"Zhang, Li; Watson, Erin",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Zhang, Li] Univ Saskatchewan, Sci Lib, 114 Sci Pl, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X2, Canada; [Watson, Erin] Univ Saskatchewan, Leslie & Irene Dube Hlth Sci Lib, Room 1400,Acad Hlth Sci Bldg,104 Clin Pl, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2Z4, Canada",34.0,1.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2018.0,117,3,2021.0,2035,10.1007/s11192-018-2924-2,,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2899,SCOPUS,Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access,Citation; Green open access; Gold open access; Physical science; Canada; CIHR,"Using data from Web of Science, this research investigates how physical science researchers funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research complied with its open access policy, and compares the citation counts of articles published through gold and green models. It was found that, for articles published between 2008 and 2015, 9% were available through gold open access routes and 13% were available through green routes; most were not openly accessible. Citation rates were comparable for green open access and non-open access articles, but citation rates for gold open access articles were lower. After controlling for publication year, citation rates of gold, green, and non -open access articles were comparable. Among gold open access articles, citation rates were highest for open access journals with article processing charges, but after controlling for publication year, articles published in hybrid journals, followed by those in open access journals with article processing charges, achieved the highest citation rates. Articles published in free open access journals had the lowest citation rates. The results suggest that green open access is the most economical approach to comply with open access policies, and that it provides researchers with at least as much research impact as gold open access.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']",['biblio'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['CAN'],"Zhang, Li; Watson, Erin M.",JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP,English,Article,,,,"[Zhang, Li] Univ Saskatchewan, Sci Lib, Room 180,Geol Bldg,114 Sci Pl, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada; [Watson, Erin M.] Univ Saskatchewan, Leslie & Irene Dube Hlth Sci Lib, Room 1400,Acad Hlth Sci Bldg,104 Clin Pl, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2Z4, Canada",30.0,18.0,ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC,0099-1333,,2017.0,43,4,337.0,345,10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.004,,,2021-01-27,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2902,SCOPUS,A Bibliometric Profile of the Remote Sensing Open Access Journal Published by MDPI between 2009 and 2018,bibliometric; citation impact; remote sensing; research theme; scientific journals evaluation,"Remote Sensing Open Access Journal (RS OAJ) is an international leading journal in the field of remote sensing science and technology. It was first published in the year 2009 and is currently celebrating tenth year of publications. In this research, a bibliometric analysis of RS OAJ was conducted based on 5588 articles published during the 10-year (2009-2018) time-period. The bibliometric analysis includes a comprehensive set of indicators such as dynamics and trends of publications, journal impact factor, total cites, eigenfactor score, normalized eigenfactor, CiteScore, h-index, h-classic publications, most productive countries (or territories) and institutions, co-authorship collaboration about countries (territories), research themes, citation impact of co-occurrences keywords, intellectual structure, and knowledge commutation. We found that publications of RS OAJ presented an exponential growth in the past ten years. From 2010 to 2017 (for which complete years data were available), the h-index of RS OAJ is 67. From 2009-2018, RS OAJ includes publications from 129 countries (or territories) and 3826 institutions. The leading nations contributing articles, based on 2009-2018 data, and listed based on ranking were: China, United States, Germany, Italy, France, Spain, Canada, England, Australia, Netherlands, Japan, Switzerland and Austria. The leading institutions, also for the same period and listed based on ranking were: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan University, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing Normal University, The university of Maryland, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, China University of Geosciences, United States Geological Survey, German Aerospace Centre, University of Twente, and California Institute of Technology. For the year 2017, RS OAJ had an impressive journal impact factor of 3.4060, a CiteScore of 4.03, eigenfactor score of 0.0342, and normalized eigenfactor score of 3.99. In addition, based on 2009-2018, data co-word analysis determined that remote sensing, MODIS, Landsat, LiDAR and NDVI are the high-frequency of author keywords co-occurrence in RS OAJ. The main themes of RS OAJ are multi-spectral and hyperspectral remote sensing, LiDAR scanning and forestry remote sensing monitoring, MODIS and LAI data applications, Remote sensing applications and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR). Through author keywords citation impact analysis, we find the most influential keyword is Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), followed, forestry, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), terrestrial laser scanning, airborne laser scanning, forestry inventory, urban heat island, monitoring, agriculture, and laser scanning. By analyzing the intellectual structure of RS OAJ, we identify the main reference publications and find that the themes are about Random Forests, MODIS vegetation indices and image analysis, etc. RS OAJ ranks first in cited journals and third in citing, this indicates that RS OAJ has the internal knowledge flow. Our results will bring more benefits to scholars, researchers and graduate students, who hopes to get a quick overview of the RS OAJ. And this article will also be the starting point for communication between scholars and practitioners. Finally, this paper proposed a nuanced h-index (nh-index) to measure productivity and intellectual contribution of authors by considering h-index based on whether the one is first, second, third, or nth author. This nuanced approach to determining h-index of authors is powerful indicator of an academician's productivity and intellectual contribution.","['openaccess', 'openevaluation']",['biblio'],['socscie'],['publisher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Zhang, YuYing; Thenkabail, Prasad S.; Wang, Peng",REMOTE SENSING,English,Article,,,,"[Zhang, YuYing] Dalian Univ, Fac Educ, Dalian 116622, Peoples R China; [Thenkabail, Prasad S.] USGS, WGSC, 2255 N Gemini Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA; [Wang, Peng] Dalian Univ Technol, Fac Management & Econ, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China",90.0,8.0,MDPI,,,2019.0,11,1,,,10.3390/rs11010091,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2904,SCOPUS,Study on themes and authors' influence of open access in China,Open access; Research themes; Authors' influence; Strategic diagram; Social network analysis (SNA),"Using Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure as the data resource, this paper searched some papers about open access (OA). Some Visual Basic for Applications programs were developed to generate the co-word matrix, compute the E-index value of keywords as well as the density and centrality of thematic clusters. Callon's clustering method was also used to generate keywords clusters. Then, co-word analysis method and strategic diagrams were utilized to detect the main research themes as well as explore the development situation and status of these research themes. Furthermore, author-themes coupling network was mapped with the help of Netdraw in order to detect the relationship between core authors and research themes of OA as well as the core authors' influence on these themes. Based on this, some conclusions were got in the end.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['CHN'],"Zhao, Rongying; Wu, Shengnan",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article; Proceedings Paper,14th International-Society-of-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics Conference (ISSI),"JUL 15-20, 2013","Vienna, AUSTRIA","[Zhao, Rongying; Wu, Shengnan] Wuhan Univ, Res Ctr Sci Evaluat, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China; [Zhao, Rongying; Wu, Shengnan] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Studies Informat Resources, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China; [Zhao, Rongying; Wu, Shengnan] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China",14.0,3.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2014.0,101,2,1165.0,1177,10.1007/s11192-014-1415-3,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2911,SCOPUS,"Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics' OA practice",Open access; Open science; Gold OA; Green OA; Academic publishing; Scholarly communication,"This paper presents the findings from a survey study of UK academics and their publishing behaviour. The aim of this study is to investigate academics' attitudes towards and practice of open access (OA) publishing. The results are based on a survey study of academics at 12 Russell Group universities, and reflect responses from over 1800 researchers. This study found that whilst most academics support the principle of making knowledge freely available to everyone, the use of OA publishing among UK academics was still limited despite relevant established OA policies. The results suggest that there were differences in the extent of OA practice between different universities, academic disciplines, age and seniorities. Academics' use in OA publishing was also related to their awareness of OA policy and OA repositories, their attitudes towards the importance of OA publishing and their belief in OA citation advantage. The implications of these findings are relevant to the development of strategies for the implementation of OA policies.",['openaccess'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['GBR'],"Zhu, Yimei",SCIENTOMETRICS,English,Article,,,,"[Zhu, Yimei] Univ Leicester, Sch Media Commun & Sociol, 132 New Walk, Leicester LE1 7JA, Leics, England",66.0,16.0,SPRINGER,0138-9130,,2017.0,111,2,557.0,579,10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z,,28490821.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2912,SCOPUS,Open-access policy and data-sharing practice in UK academia,Data sharing; open access; open science; scholarly communication; science communication; social media,"Data sharing can be defined as the release of research data that can be used by others. With the recent open-science movement, there has been a call for free access to data, tools and methods in academia. In recent years, subject-based and institutional repositories and data centres have emerged along with online publishing. Many scientific records, including published articles and data, have been made available via new platforms. In the United Kingdom, most major research funders had a data policy and require researchers to include a 'data-sharing plan' when applying for funding. However, there are a number of barriers to the full-scale adoption of data sharing. Those barriers are not only technical, but also psychological and social. A survey was conducted with over 1800 UK-based academics to explore the extent of support of data sharing and the characteristics and factors associated with data-sharing practice. It found that while most academics recognised the importance of sharing research data, most of them had never shared or reused research data. There were differences in the extent of data sharing between different gender, academic disciplines, age and seniority. It also found that the awareness of Research Council UK's (RCUK) Open-Access (OA) policy, experience of Gold and Green OA publishing, attitudes towards the importance of data sharing and experience of using secondary data were associated with the practice of data sharing. A small group of researchers used social media such as Twitter, blogs and Facebook to promote the research data they had shared online. Our findings contribute to the knowledge and understanding of open science and offer recommendations to academic institutions, journals and funding agencies.",['opendata'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['GBR'],"Zhu, Yimei",JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,English,Article,,,,"[Zhu, Yimei] Univ Leicester, Leicester, Leics, England",37.0,2.0,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0165-5515,,2020.0,46,1,41.0,52,10.1177/0165551518823174,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2917,SCOPUS,Exploring the Impact of Social Communication on the Innovation Potential of Open Science Communities,Agent-based model; collective creativity; communication theories; creative artificial ecosystems,"As scientific communities become increasingly complex and interdisciplinary, implementing policies that foster collective creativity for science-based innovation emerges as a critical issue. In this paper, we investigate the impact of socio-communication strategies on innovation capacity based on experiments using a general-purpose model that aims to study dynamic processes of collective creativity in scientific communities. Experimental results indicate that low communication frequency, openness and receptivity lead to higher variety. On the contrary, variety decreases with increasing receptivity under high communication frequency. If more communication channels exist, the connectivity-driven preferential attachment strategy is beneficial in fostering innovation in terms of generated networks with low density and high centrality. Additionally, balance theory suggests higher levels of knowledge diffusion efficiency. © 2013 IEEE.",['openscience'],['othermeth'],"['engtech', 'med']",['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Zou G., Yilmaz L.","IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems",English,Article,0,0,0,,,1.0,Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.,10834427,0,2016.0,46,2,271.0,281,10.1109/TSMC.2015.2455956,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2918,SCOPUS,Open access and civic scientific information literacy,0,"Introduction: We examine how residents and citizens of The Netherlands perceive open access to acquire preliminary insight into the role it might play in cultivating civic scientific literacy. Open access refers to scientific or scholarly research literature available on the Web to scholars and the general public in free online journals and institutional repositories. Method: Four focus group sessions were held at a conference centre near Amsterdam. Participants were between the ages of twenty-one to sixty and grouped on the basis of age and educational background. All were invited to complete a brief digital literacy and information literacy questionnaire, and contribute to a set of ranking and vignette exercises designed to encourage discussion. Results: Participants generally agreed that open access literature could be useful for personal decision making and conveyed an interest in medical treatment research and other research 'that has to do with people.' Some concern was expressed about the cognitive accessibility of scientific research, but participants were confident that they had the online search skills to find this literature. Science journalists were appreciated for their role as interpreters; however, universities and scholars were considered more credible as information sources, though some participants wondered if scientists and scholars were making their work visible enough to the lay public. Conclusions: Current science policy in The Netherlands is focused on motivating young people to raise their interest in science and technology and engage in science-related careers. We recommend the introduction in schools of strategic e-learning programmes designed to help young citizens develop a greater appreciation for scholarly and scientific research and improve their capacity to make decisions as online information consumers. © the author.",['openaccess'],"['interview', 'survey']",['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['NLD'],Zuccala A.,Information Research,English,Article,0,0,0,,,18.0,0,13681613,0,2010.0,15,1,0.0,0,,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2920,SCOPUS,A comparison of open data policies and their implementation in two Dutch ministries,comparative research; open data; open data policies; policies,"Opening up public data is stimulated and guided by open data policies. In Europe policies at the European, national, ministerial and local level exist. Although plans of the Dutch government are in the making, the Netherlands is still lacking a clear and detailed national open data policy. Furthermore, most of the existing international directives for open public data policies are general by nature. Hence, there may be large differences among open data policies. Up to now there is limited systematic and structured research conducted on differences of open data policies. In this policy paper, a comparison is made of the open data policies of the Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations and the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. Interviews and a review of reports showed that there are differences between the open data policies of the two Dutch ministries with regard to guidelines for opening up data, the type and amount of data that were actually opened up and the way this was done. Gaining more insight into the differences of open data policies may be useful to help formulating open data policies. © 2012 ACM.","['opendata', 'openpolicies']","['survey', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['NLD'],"Zuiderwijk A., Janssen M.",ACM International Conference Proceeding Series,English,Conference Paper,"13th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Bridging Research and Practice, dg.o 2012",4 June 2012 through 7 June 2012,"College Park, MD",,,6.0,0,0,9781450314039,2012.0,0,0,84.0,89,10.1145/2307729.2307744,,,2021-01-27,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2929,SCOPUS,Using open research data for public policy making: Opportunities of virtual research environments,Open data; policy making; research infrastructure; Virtual Research Environment; VRE,"Governments and publicly-funded research organisations increasingly make research data available openly. Researchers can use this data in Virtual Research Environments (VREs) to conduct multidisciplinary data-driven research and to obtain new insights potentially for governmental policy-making. However, the requirements for such a VRE are not yet clear. The objective of this study is to elicit and define requirements for a multidisciplinary VRE that integrates Open Government Data (OGD) and open research data for public policy making. Based on a VRE case study, we elicit 13 VRE requirements related to data storage, data accessing, data curation and other aspects, and describe a use case of open data for governmental policy-making. Meeting the requirements results in a VRE that 1) overlays the existing e-Research Infrastructures to provide researchers with integrated open data from different domains, 2) offers OGD in combination with data from publicly-funded research, and 3) stimulates innovation and research collaboration. © 2016 IEEE.",['opendata'],"['interview', 'othermeth']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Zuiderwijk A., Jeffery K., Bailo D., Yin Y.","Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2016",English,Conference Paper,"6th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2016",18 May 2016 through 20 May 2016,0,,,7.0,Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.,0,9781509010431,2016.0,0,0,180.0,187,10.1109/CeDEM.2016.20,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2930,SCOPUS,Analysing Open Data in Virtual Research Environments: New Collaboration Opportunities to Improve Policy Making,Collaboration; OGD; Open Data; Open Government Data; Use; User Support; Virtual Research Environment; VREs,"This article describes how virtual research environments (VREs) offer new opportunities for researchers to analyse open data and to obtain new insights for policy making. Although various VRE-related initiatives are under development, there is a lack of insight into how VREs support collaborative open data analysis by researchers and how this might be improved, ultimately leading to input for policy making to solve societal issues. This article clarifies in which ways VREs support researchers in open data analysis. Seven cases presenting different modes of researcher support for open data analysis were investigated and compared. Four types of support were identified: 1)'Figure it out yourself', 2)'Leading users by the hand', 3)'Training to provide the basics' and 4)'Learning from peers'. The author provides recommendations to improve the support of researchers' open data analysis and to subsequently obtain new insights for policy making to solve societal challenges.",['opentools'],"['interview', 'othermeth']",['nonspecificdisc'],"['othergroup', 'researcher']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Zuiderwijk, Anneke",INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT RESEARCH,English,Article,,,,"[Zuiderwijk, Anneke] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands",46.0,2.0,IGI GLOBAL,1548-3886,,2017.0,13,4,76.0,92,10.4018/IJEGR.2017100105,,,2021-01-27,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2932,SCOPUS,Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology,Acceptance; Adoption; Use; Open data technology; Open public sector data; Open government data; Open data; UTAUT,"Policy-makers expect that open data will be accepted and used more and more, resulting in a range of benefits including transparency, participation and innovation. The ability to use open data partly depends on the availability of open data technologies. However, the actual use of open data technologies has shown mixed results, and there is a paucity of research on the predictors affecting the acceptance and use of open data technologies. A better understanding of these predictors can help policy-makers to determine which policy instruments they can use to increase the acceptance and use of open data technologies. A modified model based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) is used to empirically determine predictors influencing the acceptance and use of open data technologies. The results show that the predictors performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions and voluntariness of use together account for 45% of the variability in people's behavioral intention to use open data technologies. Except for facilitating conditions, all these predictors significantly influence behavioral intention. Our analysis of the predictors that influence the acceptance and use of open data technologies can be used to stimulate the use of open data technologies. The findings suggest that policy-makers should increase the acceptance and use of open data technologies by showing the benefits of open data use, by creating awareness of users that they already use open data, by developing social strategies to encourage people to stimulate each other to use open data, by integrating open data use in daily activities, and by decreasing the effort necessary to use open data technologies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",['opendata'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],"['researcher', 'othergroup']",['nonspecificgeo'],"Zuiderwijk, Anneke; Janssen, Marijn; Dwivedi, Yogesh K.",GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY,English,Article,,,,"[Zuiderwijk, Anneke; Janssen, Marijn] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands; [Dwivedi, Yogesh K.] Swansea Univ, Sch Management, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales",53.0,104.0,ELSEVIER INC,0740-624X,,2015.0,32,4,429.0,440,10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.005,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2933,SCOPUS,Sharing and re-using open data: A case study of motivations in astrophysics,Open data; Open science; Motivation; Astrophysics; Interview analysis; Qualitative research,"Open data sharing and re-use is currently more common in some academic disciplines than others. Although each discipline has unique challenges and characteristics which can influence data sharing and re-use behavior, it may be possible to gain transferable insight from disciplines where these practices are more common. Several studies of the motivations underlying data sharing and re-use have been conducted, however these studies often remain at a high level of abstraction rather than providing in-depth insight about discipline-specific challenges and opportunities. This study sought to provide in-depth insight about the complex interaction of factors influencing motivations for sharing and re-using open research data within a single discipline, namely astrophysics. We focused on this discipline due to its well-developed tradition of free and open access to research data. Eight factors were found to influence researchers' motivations for sharing data openly, including the researcher's background, personal drivers, experience, legislation, regulation and policy, data characteristics, performance expectancy, usability, and collaboration. We identified six factors that influence researchers' motivations to re-use open research data, including the researcher's background, facilitating conditions, expected performance, social and affiliation factors, effort and experience. Finally, we discuss how data sharing and re-use can be encouraged within the context of astrophysics research, and we discuss how these insights may be transferred to disciplines with low rates of data sharing and re-use.",['opendata'],['interview'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['GBR'],"Zuiderwijk, Anneke; Spiers, Helen",INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT,English,Article,,,,"[Zuiderwijk, Anneke] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Bldg 31,Jaffalaan 5, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands; [Spiers, Helen] Univ Oxford, Dept Phys, Denys Wilkinson Bldg,Keble Rd, Oxford OX1 3RH, England",82.0,8.0,ELSEVIER SCI LTD,0268-4012,,2019.0,49,,228.0,241,10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.024,,,2021-01-27,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2936,ZOTERO,Open Science – a loosely coupled discourse? Comparing Open Science and Open Innovation from a bibliometric point of view,,"Open Science is currently high on the agenda of science policy officials, funding agencies and scholarly activities. Yet, it is still unclear, how the concept of open science is integrating scholarly debates and as to whether it has established structures similar to other scientific fields or debates. Against this backdrop, we have attempted to study the scholarly discourse of Open Science by using bibliometric and network analysis tools. Our goal was to determine how the open science discourse has evolved over time, how it is structured and how the different associated terms relate to other. In order to evaluate as to whether Open Science has evolved into an established scientific topic, we have attempted to compare OS with another concept which propagates openness in innovation and research, that is, Open Innovation. We found that Open Science and Open Innovation are rising topics within the scholarly discourse. Yet, we have also found that the Open Science keyword network is only sparsely connected internally and the different realms in the Open Science keyword network, such as Open Access, Open Data or Data Sharing are only scarcely connected to each other. Furthermore, we could show that Open Science has so far not developed strong ties to other scholarly debates. We contend that more qualitative and quantitative research is needed in order to understand the scholarly debate of Open Science.",['openscience'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Blümel, Clemens; Beng, Florian",,English,Article,,,,,,,,,978-90-9031204-0,2018.0,,,,,https://hdl.handle.net/1887/65367,,,2021-04-16,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2937,ZOTERO,Participation in Citizen Science: Insights from the CONECT-e Case Study,,"Citizen science (CS) is growing quickly, given its potential to enhance knowledge coproduction by diverse participants, generating large and global data sets. However, uneven participation in CS is still an important concern. This work aims to understand (1) participation dynamics in CS and (2) how they are shaped by participation barriers and drivers. We do so by examining participation in CONECT-e, a CS project that uses a wiki-like platform to document traditional ecological knowledge. More precisely, we analyze quantitative data on participants’ profile and activity patterns and qualitative data on barriers and drivers of participation. Our findings suggest that overcoming the education, age, and residence participation barriers is challenging even in cocreated CS projects. This is potentially due to issues of perceived self-illegitimacy and low access to information and communication technologies. Our results also point out that participants’ alliance with the project’s objectives and trust relationships with the project team are important drivers of participation in CS projects. Finally, we also highlight the need to think beyond participation as single actions and rather consider participation diversity in CS as functional diversity in ecosystems, with participants performing a diverse set of interconnected tasks or functions.",['openparticipation'],"['documentreview', 'interview']",['natscie'],['othergroup'],['ESP'],"Benyei, Petra; Pardo-de-Santayana,Manuel; Aceituno-Mata, Laura; Calvet-Mir, Laura; Carrascosa-García, María; Rivera-Ferre, Marta; Perdomo-Molina, Antonio; Reyes-García, Victoria","Science, Technology, & Human Values",English,Article,,,,,,,SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD,0162-2439,,2020.0,,,,,https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920948110,,,2021-04-16,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2938,ZOTERO,Open Up: A Survey on Open and Non-anonymized Peer Reviewing,,"We present a discussion and analysis regarding the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review based on literature results and responses to a survey on the reviewing process of alt.chi, a more or less open-review track within the CHI conference, the predominant conference in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI). This track currently is the only implementation of an open-peer-review process in the field of HCI while, with the recent increase in interest in open science practices, open review is now being considered and used in other fields. We collected 30 responses from alt.chi authors and reviewers and found that, while the benefits are quite clear and the system is generally well liked by alt.chi participants, they are reluctant to see it used in other venues. This concurs with a number of recent studies that suggest a divergence between support for a more open review process and its practical implementation. The data and scripts are available on https://osf.io/vuw7h/, and the figures and follow-up work on http://tiny.cc/OpenReviews.",['openevaluation'],['survey'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Besançon, L.; Rönnberg, N.; Löwgren, J.; Tennant, J.; Cooper, M.",,English,Article,,,,,,,,,,2019.0,,,,,10.20944/preprints201905.0098.v2,,,2021-04-16,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2939,ZOTERO,Open Science Practices are on the Rise: The State of Social Science (3S) Survey,,"Has there been meaningful movement toward open sci-ence practices within the social sciences in recent years? Discussions about changes in practices such as posting data and pre-registering analyses have been marked by controversy—including controversy over the extent to which change has taken place. This study, based on the State of Social Science (3S) Survey, provides the first com-prehensive assessment of awareness of, attitudes towards, perceived norms regarding, and adoption of open science practices within a broadly representative sample of scholars from four major social science disciplines: economics, political science, psychology, and so-ciology. We observe a steep increase in adoption: as of 2017, over 80% of scholars had used at least one such practice, rising from one quarter a decade earlier. Attitudes toward research transpar-ency are on average similar between older and younger scholars, but the pace of change di˙ers by field and methodology. According with theories of normal science and scientific change, the timing of increases in adoption coincides with technological innovations and institutional policies. Patterns are consistent with most scholars underestimating the trend toward open science in their discipline.","['opendata', 'openmethod']",['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Christensen, Garret; Wang, Zenan; Levy Paluck, Elizabeth; Swanson, Nicholas; Birke, David; Miguel, Edward; Littman, Rebecca",UC Berkeley: Center for Effective Global Action,English,Article,,,,,,,,,,2020.0,,,,,https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0hx0207r,,,2021-04-16,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2940,ZOTERO,Open Research Practice Questionnaire Report 2020; University of Surrey,,"The inaugural University of Surrey Questionnaire on Open Research Practices ran from February to May 2020. The aim of the questionnaire was to assess knowledge and adoption of open research practices across the University of Surrey at all career levels, personal experiences of their use and their perceived importance for ensuring the efficiency, reliability and reproducibility of research. This report provides an executive summary of the findings, recommended actions, and summary figures and text of responses to all questions in the questionnaire.",['openscience'],['survey'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['GBR'],"Farran, Emily; Jerrom, Lewis; Hamilton,Alice; Daoutis , Christine",PsyArXiv,English,Article,,,,,,,,,,2020.0,,,,,10.31234/osf.io/5nv4s,,,2021-04-16,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2941,ZOTERO,What Drives Academic Data Sharing?,,"Despite widespread support from policy makers, funding agencies, and scientific journals, academic researchers rarely make their research data available to others. At the same time, data sharing in research is attributed a vast potential for scientific progress. It allows the reproducibility of study results and the reuse of old data for new research questions. Based on a systematic review of 98 scholarly papers and an empirical survey among 603 secondary data users, we develop a conceptual framework that explains the process of data sharing from the primary researcher’s point of view. We show that this process can be divided into six descriptive categories: Data donor, research organization, research community, norms, data infrastructure, and data recipients. Drawing from our findings, we discuss theoretical implications regarding knowledge creation and dissemination as well as research policy measures to foster academic collaboration. We conclude that research data cannot be regarded as knowledge commons, but research policies that better incentivise data sharing are needed to improve the quality of research results and foster scientific progress.",['opendata'],"['documentreview', 'survey']",['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['DEU'],"Fecher, B.; Friesike, S.; Hebing, M.",PLOS ONE,English,Article,,,,,,,,,,2015.0,10,2,,,https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118053,,,2021-04-16,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2942,ZOTERO,Information-sharing in academia and the industry: A comparative study,,"This paper investigates how scientists decide whether to share information with their colleagues or not. Detailed data on the decisions of 1694 bio-scientists allow to detect similarities and differences between academia-based and industry-based scientists. Arguments from social capital theory are applied to explain why individuals share information even at (temporary) personal cost. In both realms, the results suggest that the likelihood of sharing decreases with the competitive value of the requested information. Factors related to social capital, i.e., expected reciprocity and the extent to which a scientist's community conforms to the norm of open science, either directly affect information-sharing or moderate competitive interest considerations on information-sharing. The effect depends on the system to which a scientist belongs.","['opendata', 'openmethod']",['survey'],"['natscie', 'engtech']","['researcher', 'practitioner']","['DEU', 'GBR']","Haeussler, Carolin",Research Policy,English,Article,,,,,,,ScienceDirect,,,2011.0,40,1,,,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.00,,,2021-04-16,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2943,ZOTERO,Meta-Research: Evaluating the impact of open access policies on research institutions,,"The proportion of research outputs published in open access journals or made available on other freely-accessible platforms has increased over the past two decades, driven largely by funder mandates, institutional policies, grass-roots advocacy, and changing attitudes in the research community. However, the relative effectiveness of these different interventions has remained largely unexplored. Here we present a robust, transparent and updateable method for analysing how these interventions affect the open access performance of individual institutes. We studied 1,207 institutions from across the world, and found that, in 2017, the top-performing universities published around 80-90% of their research open access. The analysis also showed that publisher-mediated (gold) open access was popular in Latin American and African universities, whereas the growth of open access in Europe and North America has mostly been driven by repositories.","['openaccess', 'openpolicies']","['biblio', 'documentreview']",['nonspecificdisc'],['university'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Huang, Chun-Kai; Neylon, Cameron; Hosking, Richard; Montgomery, Lucy; Wilson, Katie S;  Ozaygen, Alkim; Brookes-Kenworthy, Chloe",eLife,English,Article,,,,,,,eLife,,,2020.0,,,,,doi: 10.7554/eLife.57067,,,2021-04-16,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2944,ZOTERO,"Reputation, trust, and norms as mechanisms leading to academic reciprocity in data sharing: An empirical test of theory of collective action",,"This research investigated how scientists' academic reputation, community trust, and norms regarding data sharing all influence their academic reciprocity in data sharing, which eventually leads to the scientists' data sharing intentions. This research employed Ostrom's (2003) theory of collective action to better understand scientists' data sharing behaviors from the perspective of cooperation in a community. This research empirically evaluated the research model and related hypotheses by using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method on a total of 456 survey responses from biologists in the U.S. The results suggest that biologists' perceived academic reputation significantly increases their perceived community trust, norm of data sharing, and academic reciprocity. Along with perceived academic reputation, both perceived community trust and norms of data sharing also significantly increases biologists' academic reciprocity in data sharing. This research also found that biologists' academic reciprocity and norms of data sharing significantly affect their data sharing intentions. The results of this research show that the theory of collective action provides new insight to scientists' data sharing behaviors. These results suggest how we can facilitate scientists' data sharing behaviors within a research community by increasing academic reciprocity through the mechanisms of reputation, trust, and norm.",['opendata'],['survey'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Kim, Youngseek",Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology,English,Article,,,,,,,Wiley,2373-9231,,2018.0,55,1,,,https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501027,,,2021-04-21,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2945,ZOTERO,"Internet researchers’ data sharing behaviors: An integration of data reuse experience, attitudinal beliefs, social norms, and resource factors",,"The purpose of this paper is to examine how data reuse experience, attitudinal beliefs, social norms, and resource factors influence internet researchers to share data with other researchers outside their teams.",['opendata'],['survey'],['socscie'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Kim, Youngseek; Seungahn, Nah",Online Information Review,English,Article,,,,,,,emerald,1468-4527,,2018.0,42,1,,,https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2016-0313,,,2021-04-21,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2946,ZOTERO,How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice ,,"This article documents how biomedical researchers in the United Kingdom understand and enact the idea of “openness.” This is of particular interest to researchers and science policy worldwide in view of the recent adoption of pioneering policies on Open Science and Open Access by the U.K. government—policies whose impact on and implications for research practice are in need of urgent evaluation, so as to decide on their eventual implementation elsewhere. This study is based on 22 in-depth interviews with U.K. researchers in systems biology, synthetic biology, and bioinformatics, which were conducted between September 2013 and February 2014. Through an analysis of the interview transcripts, we identify seven core themes that characterize researchers’ understanding of openness in science and nine factors that shape the practice of openness in research. Our findings highlight the implications that Open Science policies can have for research processes and outcomes and provide recommendations for enhancing their content, effectiveness, and implementation.",['openscience'],['interview'],['natscie'],['researcher'],['GBR'],"Levin, Nadine; Leonelli, Sabina; DWeckowska, Dagmara; Castle, David; Dupré, John"," Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society ",English,Article,,,,,,,SAGE,,,2016.0,36,2,,,https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467616668760,,,2021-04-21,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2947,ZOTERO,Open Access Issues and Engineering Faculty Attitudes and Practices,,"The two primary means for accomplishing Open Access (OA) goals are the “author pays” or Gold model and the “self-archiving” or Green model, both of which can have variations or hybrids. There is a growing schism between proponents of the Gold and Green models. Scholar uptake on self-archiving has been very limited. At the same time, a great deal of concern has been expressed regarding the Gold model, particularly with regard to cost and the role of peer-review lite journals. With the evolving OA environment as a backdrop, the authors conducted a survey of university engineering faculty in order to better understand their OA practices and attitudes. The scholarly communication needs and activities of engineering faculty are more diverse than other scholars in that they have a broader and more varied literature, which includes journal articles, conference papers, technical reports, standards, handbook information, patents, and grey literature. The survey was comprised of 12 Likert scale questions and 3 open comment questions. The results of the survey of engineering faculty were consistent with other studies that have revealed concerns over the author pays model and a reluctance to self-archive in the university institutional repository (IR). Survey results showed that engineering faculty do not extensively publish in author pays Gold journals and had limited plans to do so in the future. In line with other studies, the survey revealed that there was a lack of familiarity with campus IRs and a very small uptake rate for depositing research output in institutional repositories.","['openaccess', 'opendata']",['survey'],['engtech'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Mischo, William H.; Schlembach , Mary C. ",Journal of Library Administration ,English,Article,,,,,,,Taylor Francis,,,2011.0,51,5-6,,,https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.589349,,,2021-04-21,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2950,ZOTERO,A Case Study of Scholars’ Open and Sharing Practices,,"Although the open scholarship movement has successfully captured the attention and interest of higher education stakeholders, researchers currently lack an understanding of the degree to which open scholarship is enacted in institutions that lack institutional support for openness. I help fill this gap in the literature by presenting a descriptive case study that illustrates the variety of open and sharing practices enacted by faculty members at a North American university. Open and sharing practices enacted at this institution revolve around publishing manuscripts in open ways, participating on social media, creating and using open educational resources, and engaging with open teaching. This examination finds that certain open practices are favored over others. Results also show that even though faculty members often share scholarly materials online for free, they frequently do so without associated open licenses (i.e. without engaging in open practices). These findings suggest that individual motivators may significantly affect the practice of openness, but that environmental factors (e.g., institutional contexts) and technological elements (e.g., YouTube’s default settings) may also shape open practices in unanticipated ways.","['openaccess', 'opendata', 'openeducation']",['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['USA'],"Veletsianos, George",Open Praxis,English,Article,,,,,,,icde,2304-070X,,2015.0,7,3,,,http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.3.206,,,2021-04-21,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
2951,ZOTERO,Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition,,"Open Science is a disruptive phenomenon that is emerging around the world and especially in Europe. Open Science brings about socio-cultural and technological change, based on openness and connectivity, on how research is designed, performed, captured, and assessed. Several studies show that there is a lack of awareness about what Open Science is, mainly due to the fact that there is no formal definition of Open Science. The purpose of this paper is to build a rigorous, integrated, and up-to-date definition of the Open Science phenomenon through a systematic literature review. The resulting definition “Open Science is transparent and accessible knowledge that is shared and developed through collaborative networks” helps the scientific community, the business world, political actors, and citizens to have a common and clear understanding about what Open Science is, and stimulates an open debate about the social, economic, and human added value of this phenomenon.",['openscience'],['documentreview'],['nonspecificdisc'],['researcher'],['nonspecificgeo'],"Vicente-Saez, Ruben; Martinez-Fuentes, Clara",Journal of Business Research,English,Article,,,,,,,Elsevier,,,2018.0,88,,,,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043,,,2021-04-21,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2952,ZOTERO,Exploring factors that influence the practice of Open Science by early career health researchers: a mixed methods study,,"There is a growing global movement towards open science and ensuring that health research is more transparent. It is vital that the researchers are adequately prepared for this research environment from early in their careers. However, the barriers and enablers to practicing open science for early career researchers (ECRs) have been explored to a limited extent. This study aimed to explore the views, experiences and factors influencing open science practices amongst ECRs working in health research.",['openscience'],"['interview', 'survey']",['med'],['researcher'],['IRL'],"Zečević, K.; Houghton, C.; Noone, C.; Lee, H.; Matvienko-Sikar, K.; Toomey, E. ",HRB Open Research,English,Article,,,,,,,,,,2021.0,56,3,,,https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13119.2,,,2021-04-21,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
2953,WOS,Russian Scholarly Papers in Open-Access Megajournals,megajournal; open access; Russian research papers; international coauthorship; citation analysis; productivity of an institution; open-access funding,"The quantity, research topics, and growth rates are assessed for Russian scholarly papers published in open-access megajournals. Russian papers published in PLoS ONE in 2006-2019 are analyzed on the basis of international scientometric indicators. The results are reported of the international coauthorship survey of Russian researchers to define its impact on citation indices. Affiliations are presented for authors with papers in megajournals. Funding of publication charges is discussed for Russian researchers who publish papers in open-access journals.",['openaccess'],['biblio'],['nonspecificdisc'],['othergroup'],['RUS'],"Domnina, T. N.",SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING,English,Article,,,,"[Jakob, Carolin E. M.; Vehreschild, Jorg Janne] Univ Hosp Cologne, Cologne, Germany; [Kohlmayer, Florian] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Med, Munich, Germany; [Meurers, Thierry; Prasser, Fabian] Berlin Inst Hlth BIH, Berlin, Germany; [Meurers, Thierry; Prasser, Fabian] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany; [Meurers, Thierry; Prasser, Fabian] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany; [Meurers, Thierry; Prasser, Fabian] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany; [Meurers, Thierry; Prasser, Fabian] Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany; [Vehreschild, Jorg Janne] German Ctr Infect Res DZIF, Partner Site Bonn Cologne, Cologne, Germany; [Vehreschild, Jorg Janne] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Internal Med Hematol & Oncol, Frankfurt, Germany",30.0,0.0,NATURE RESEARCH,,,2020.0,7,1,,,10.1038/s41597-020-00773-y,WOS:000468531400007,33303746.0,2021-01-27,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0