# attributes

name: Settings
apid:
General {25 8 9 24} {Habitat types} 7 Geography {6 12 19 13 27} GIS {15 16 17} Monitoring {10 20 21 22 23 11}


# attributesParameters

parameter: Country
type: list
bg: #99cf00
avid:
66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313


# attributesValues

information: struct::tree hierarchy of COM DEC
value:
root {} {n {MSFD criteria/indicators}} node1 0 {n {D1 - biological diversity}} node2 0 {n {D2 - Non-indigenous species}} node3 0 {n {D4 - Food webs}} node4 0 {n {D6 - Seafloor integrity}} node5 3 {n {1.1 Species distribution}} node6 3 {n {1.2 Population size}} node7 3 {n {1.3 Population condition}} node8 3 {n {1.4 Habitat distribution}} node9 3 {n {1.5 Habitat extent}} node10 3 {n {1.6 Habitat condition}} node11 3 {n {1.7 Ecosystem structure}} node12 3 {n {1.8 Ecosystem processes & functions}} node49 6 {n {2.1 Abundance and state characterisation of non-indigenous species, in particular invasive species}} node54 6 {n {2.2 Environmental impact of invasive non-indigenous species}} node60 9 {n {4.1 Productivity (production per unit biomass) of key species or trophic groups}} node64 9 {n {4.2 Proportion of selected species at the top of food webs}} node67 9 {n {4.3 Abundance/distribution of key trophic groups/species}} node75 9 {n {4.4 Other (please specify)}} node76 12 {n {6.1 Substrate characteristics – physical damage}} node82 12 {n {6.2 Condition of benthic community}} node13 15 {n {1.1.1 Distributional range}} node14 15 {n {1.1.2 Distributional pattern within range}} node15 15 {n {1.1.3 Area covered by the species (for sessile/benthic species)}} node16 18 {n {1.2.1 Abundance and/or biomass}} node19 21 {n {1.3.1 Population demographic characteristics}} node26 21 {n {1.3.2 Population genetic structure}} node27 24 {n {1.4.1 Distributional range}} node28 24 {n {1.4.2 Distributional pattern}} node29 27 {n {1.5.1 Area}} node30 27 {n {1.5.2 Volume}} node31 30 {n {1.6.1 Condition of the typical species and communities}} node34 30 {n {1.6.2 Relative abundance and/or biomass}} node37 30 {n {1.6.3 Physical, hydrological and chemical conditions}} node41 33 {n {1.7.1 Composition of ecosystem components (habitats and species)}} node44 33 {n {1.7.2 Relative proportions of ecosystem components (habitats and species)}} node47 36 {n {1.8.1 Interactions between structural components}} node48 36 {n {1.8.2 Services provided}} node50 39 {n {2.1.1 Trends in abundance, temporal occurrence, spatial distribution}} node55 42 {n {2.2.1 Ratio between invasive non-indigenous species and native species}} node56 42 {n {2.2.2 Impacts of non-indigenous invasive species at the level of species, habitats and ecosystem}} node61 45 {n {4.1.1 Productivity of key predator species or other trophic groups}} node65 48 {n {4.2.1 Large fish (by weight)}} node66 48 {n {4.2.2 (Other species)}} node68 51 {n {4.3.1 Abundance trends of functionally important selected groups/species}} node77 57 {n {6.1.1 Biogenic substrate}} node81 57 {n {6.1.2 Extent of seabed significantly affected by human activities for the different substrate types}} node83 60 {n {6.2.1 Presence of particularly sensitive and/or tolerant species}} node84 60 {n {6.2.2 Multi-metric indexes assessing benthic community condition and functionality}} node88 60 {n {6.2.3 Proportion of biomass or number of individuals in the macrobenthos above some specified length/size}} node91 60 {n {6.2.4 Parameters describing the characteristics (shape, slope and intercept) of the size spectrum of the benthic community}} node17 72 {n {1.2.1.1 Abundance}} node18 72 {n {1.2.1.2 Biomass}} node20 75 {n {1.3.1.1 Body size}} node21 75 {n {1.3.1.2 Age class structure}} node22 75 {n {1.3.1.3 Sex ratio}} node23 75 {n {1.3.1.4 Fecundity rates}} node24 75 {n {1.3.1.5 Survival/mortality rates}} node25 75 {n {1.3.1.6 Other}} node32 93 {n {1.6.1.1 Species}} node33 93 {n {1.6.1.2 Communities}} node35 96 {n {1.6.2.1 Abundance}} node36 96 {n {1.6.2.2 Biomass}} node38 99 {n {1.6.3.1 Physical conditions}} node39 99 {n {1.6.3.2 Hydrological conditions}} node40 99 {n {1.6.3.3 Chemical conditions}} node42 102 {n {1.7.1.1 Habitats}} node43 102 {n {1.7.1.2 Species}} node45 105 {n {1.7.2.1 Habitats}} node46 105 {n {1.7.2.2 Species}} node51 114 {n {2.1.1.1 Abundance}} node52 114 {n {2.1.1.2 Temporal occurrence}} node53 114 {n {2.1.1.3 Spatial distribution}} node57 120 {n {2.2.2.1 Species}} node58 120 {n {2.2.2.2 Habitats}} node59 120 {n {2.2.2.3 Ecosystem}} node62 123 {n {4.1.1.1 Key predator species}} node63 123 {n {4.1.1.2 Other trophic groups}} node69 132 {n {4.3.1.1 Groups with fast turnover rates}} node70 132 {n {4.3.1.2 Groups/species that are targeted by human activities or that are indirectly affected by them}} node71 132 {n {4.3.1.3 Habitat-defining groups/species}} node72 132 {n {4.3.1.4 Groups/species at the top of the food web}} node73 132 {n {4.3.1.5 Long-distance anadromous and catadromous migrating species}} node74 132 {n {4.3.1.6 Groups/species that are tightly linked to specific groups/species at another trophic level}} node78 135 {n {6.1.1.1 Type of relevant biogenic substrate}} node79 135 {n {6.1.1.2 Abundance of relevant biogenic substrate}} node80 135 {n {6.1.1.3 Biomass of relevant biogenic substrate}} node92 135 {n {6.1.1.4 Areal extent of relevant biogenic substrate}} node85 144 {n {6.2.2.1 Species diversity}} node86 144 {n {6.2.2.2 Richness}} node87 144 {n {6.2.2.3 Proportion of opportunisitc to sensitive species}} node89 147 {n {6.2.3.1 Biomass}} node90 147 {n {6.2.3.2 Number of individuals}}


value:
root {} {n {Biodiversity components}} node1 0 {n Microbes} node2 0 {n Phytoplankton} node3 0 {n Zooplankton} node4 0 {n Angiosperms} node5 0 {n Macroalgae} node6 0 {n {Benthic invertebrates}} node41 0 {n {Pelagic invertebrates}} node7 0 {n Fish} node8 0 {n Cephalopods} node9 0 {n {Marine mammals}} node10 0 {n Reptiles} node11 0 {n Birds} node12 24 {n {1 Diadromous fish}} node13 24 {n {2 Coastal fish}} node14 24 {n {3 Pelagic fish}} node15 24 {n {4 Pelagic elasmobranchs}} node16 24 {n {5 Demersal fish}} node17 24 {n {6 Demersal elasmobranchs}} node18 24 {n {7 Deep-sea fish}} node19 24 {n {8 Deep-sea elasmobranchs}} node20 24 {n {9 Ice-associated fish}} node40 24 {n {10 Other}} node21 27 {n {1 Coastal/shelf pelagic}} node22 27 {n {2 Deep-sea pelagic}} node23 27 {n {3 Other}} node24 30 {n {1 Toothed whales}} node25 30 {n {2 Baleen whales}} node26 30 {n {3 Seals}} node27 30 {n {4 Ice-associated mammals}} node28 30 {n {5 Other}} node29 33 {n {1 Sea-turtles}} node30 33 {n {2 Other}} node31 36 {n {1 Intertidal benthic-feeding}} node32 36 {n {2 Inshore surface-feeding}} node33 36 {n {3 Inshore pelagic-feeding}} node34 36 {n {4 Inshore benthic-feeding}} node35 36 {n {5 Inshore herbivorous-feeding}} node36 36 {n {6 Offshore surface-feeding}} node37 36 {n {7 Offshore pelagic-feeding}} node38 36 {n {8 Ice-associated birds}} node39 36 {n {9 Other}}


value:
root {} {n {Marine areas}} node1 0 {n {1 Baltic Sea}} node2 0 {n {2 North-East Atlantic Ocean}} node3 0 {n {3 Mediterranean Sea}} node4 0 {n {4 Black Sea}} node5 0 {n {5 Non-EU regional sea}} node6 3 {n {1.1 Baltic Sea}} node7 6 {n {2.1 Greater North Sea, including Kattegat, and the English Channel}} node8 6 {n {2.2 Celtic Seas}} node9 6 {n {2.3 Bay of Biscay and the Iberian Coast}} node10 6 {n {2.4 Macaronesian beogeographic region (Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands)}} node11 9 {n {3.1 Western Mediterranean Sea}} node12 9 {n {3.2 Adriatic Sea}} node13 9 {n {3.3 Ionian Sea and the Central Mediterranean Sea}} node14 9 {n {3.4 Aegean-Levantine Sea}} node31 12 {n {4.1 Black Sea}} node15 18 {n {Bothnian Bay (A 1.1.1)}} node16 18 {n {The Quark (B 1.1.2)}} node17 18 {n {Bothnian Sea (C 1.1.3)}} node18 18 {n {Åland Sea (D 1.1.4)}} node19 18 {n {Archipelago Sea (E 1.1.5)}} node20 18 {n {Gulf of Finland (F 1.2)}} node64 18 {n {Gulf of Riga (G 1.3)}} node21 18 {n {Northern Baltic Proper (H 1.4.1)}} node22 18 {n {Western Gotland Basin (I 1.4.2.1)}} node23 18 {n {Eastern Gotland Basin (J 1.4.2.2)}} node24 18 {n {Southern Baltic Proper (K 1.4.3)}} node25 18 {n {Gulf of Gdansk (L 1.4.3.1)}} node26 18 {n {Bay of Mecklenburg (M 2.1)}} node27 18 {n {Kiel Bay (N 2.2)}} node28 18 {n {Little Belt (O 2.3)}} node29 18 {n {Great Belt (P 2.4)}} node30 18 {n {The Sound (Q 3)}} node65 21 {n {Western Englsh Channel (partly) (VIIe)}} node66 21 {n {Eastern English Channel (VIId)}} node67 21 {n {Southern North Sea (IVc)}} node68 21 {n {Central North Sea (IVb)}} node69 21 {n {Northern North Sea (partly) (IVa)}} node97 21 {n {Area outside the FU zones in sub-area IV (IVnotFU)}} node98 21 {n {North Sea, Dogger Bank, SAS (IVSA2)}} node99 21 {n {Southeast North Sea, SA2 (IVSA3)}} node100 21 {n {Centraleast North Sea, SA3 (IVSA3)}} node101 21 {n {Centralwest North Sea, SA4 (IVSA4)}} node102 21 {n {North Sea, Viking and Bergen Bank, SA5 (IVSA5)}} node103 21 {n {North Sea, Shetland Area, SA7 (IVSA7)}} node70 21 {n {Kattegat and Skagerrak (IIIa)}} node71 21 {n {Kattegat, SA6 (IIISA6)}} node92 21 {n {Barents Sea Non-NEAFC Regulatory Area (Ib)}} node93 21 {n {Norwegian Sea (IIa)}} node94 21 {n {Spitzbergen and Bear Island (IIb)}} node95 21 {n {Norwegian Deeps (FU 32) (IV32)}} node96 21 {n {Botney Gut Silver Pit FU5 (IV5)}} node104 21 {n {Iceland Grounds (Va)}} node105 21 {n {Faroes Grounds (Vb)}} node72 24 {n {Northern North Sea (partly) (IVa)}} node73 24 {n {NW coast of Scotland & N. Ireland (VIa)}} node74 24 {n {Rockall Non-NEAFC area (VIb2)}} node75 24 {n {Porcupine Bank Non-NEAFC Regulatory Area (VIIc2)}} node106 24 {n {South and South West Ireland (FU 19) (VII19)}} node108 24 {n {West of Ireland (VIIb)}} node76 24 {n {Southwest of Ireland - West - Part of the Non-NEAFC Area I (VIIk2)}} node77 24 {n {Southwest of Ireland - East Non-NEAFC Regulatory Area (VIIj2)}} node107 24 {n {Celtic Sea (FU 20-21) (VII2021)}} node78 24 {n {Celtic Sea North (VIIg)}} node79 24 {n {Bristol Channel (VIIf)}} node80 24 {n {Irish Sea (VIIa)}} node81 24 {n {Celtic Sea South (VIIh)}} node82 24 {n {Western English Channel (partly) (VIIe)}} node109 24 {n {Eastern English Channel (VIId)}} node83 27 {n {Bay of Biscay – North (VIIIa)}} node84 27 {n {Bay of Biscay – Central (VIIIb)}} node85 27 {n {Bay of Biscay – South (VIIIc)}} node86 27 {n {Bay of Biscay - Offshore Non-NEAFC Regulatory Area (VIIId2)}} node110 27 {n {Bay of Biscay (FU 23-24) (VIII2324)}} node87 27 {n {West of Bay of Biscay Non-NEAFC Regulatory Area (VIIIe2)}} node88 27 {n {Portuguese Waters - East (IXa)}} node89 27 {n {Portuguese Waters - West Non-NEAFC Regulatory Area (IXb2)}} node90 30 {n {Azores Grounds - Parts of the NEAFC Regulatory Area (Xa1)}} node91 30 {n {Azores Grounds Non-NEAFC Regulatory Area (Xa2)}} node111 30 {n {Northeast Atlantic South (Xb)}} node34 33 {n {Northern Alboran Sea (1)}} node35 33 {n {Alboran Island (2)}} node36 33 {n {Southern Alboran Sea (3)}} node37 33 {n {Algeria (4)}} node38 33 {n {Balearic Island (5)}} node39 33 {n {Northern Spain (6)}} node40 33 {n {Gulf of Lions (7)}} node41 33 {n {Corsica Island (8)}} node42 33 {n {Ligurian and North Tyrrhenian Sea (9)}} node43 33 {n {South Tyrrhenian Sea (10)}} node44 33 {n {Sardinia (West) (11.1)}} node45 33 {n {Sardinia (East) (11.2)}} node46 33 {n {South of Italy (partly) (16)}} node47 36 {n {Northern Adriatic Sea (17)}} node48 36 {n {Southern Adriatic Sea (18)}} node49 39 {n {Northern Tunesia (partly) (12)}} node50 39 {n {Gulf of Hammamet (13)}} node51 39 {n {Gulf of Gabes (14)}} node52 39 {n {Malta Island (15)}} node53 39 {n {South of Sicily (16)}} node54 39 {n {Western Ionian Sea (19)}} node55 39 {n {Eastern Ionian Sea (20)}} node56 39 {n {Southern Ionian Sea (21)}} node57 42 {n {Southern Ionian Sea (partly) (21)}} node58 42 {n {Aegean Sea (22)}} node59 42 {n {Crete Island (23)}} node60 42 {n {North Levant (24)}} node61 42 {n {Cyprus Island (25)}} node62 42 {n {South Levant (26)}} node63 42 {n {Levant (27)}} node112 42 {n {Marmara Sea (28)}} node32 45 {n {Black Sea (29)}} node33 45 {n {Azov Sea (30)}}


value:
root {} {n {Habitat types}} node1 0 {n Seabed} node2 0 {n {Water column}} node3 0 {n {Ice habitats}} node4 3 {n {1 Littoral rock and biogenic reef}} node5 3 {n {2 Littoral sediment}} node6 3 {n {3 Shallow sublittoral rock and biogenic reef}} node7 3 {n {4 Shallow sublittoral coarse sediment}} node8 3 {n {5 Shallow sublittoral sand}} node9 3 {n {6 Shallow sublittoral mud}} node10 3 {n {7 Shallow sublittoral mixed sediment}} node11 3 {n {8 Shelf sublittoral rock and biogenic reef}} node12 3 {n {9 Shelf sublittoral coarse sediment}} node13 3 {n {10 Shelf sublittoral sand}} node14 3 {n {11 Shelf sublittoral mud}} node15 3 {n {12 Shelf sublittoral mixed sediment}} node16 3 {n {13 Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef}} node17 3 {n {14 Upper bathyal sediment}} node18 3 {n {15 Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef}} node19 3 {n {16 Lower bathyal sediment}} node20 3 {n {17 Abyssal rock and biogenic reef}} node21 3 {n {18 Abyssal sediment}} node22 6 {n {1 Reduced salinity water}} node23 6 {n {2 Variable salinity (estuarine) water}} node24 6 {n {3 Marine water: coastal}} node25 6 {n {4 Marine water: shelf}} node26 6 {n {5 Marine water: oceanic}} node27 9 {n {1 Ice-associated habitats}}


# sources

name: Finnish National Indicator
_0: Finnish National Indicator
_1: 2012
_4: http://www.ym.fi/download/noname/%7B7D23C52C-5EAA-43C3-90A3-FD8797490508%7D/34441
_2:
Meriympäristön nykytilan arvio, hyvän tilan määrittäminen sekä ympäristötavoitteiden ja indikaattoreiden asettaminen


name: Swedish National Indicator
_0: Swedish National Indicator
_1: 2012
_2:
God havsmiljö 2020 
Marin strategi för Nordsjön och Östersjön
Del 2: God miljöstatus och miljökvalitetsnormer

_4:
https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.2a9b232013c3e8ee03e3c17/1362737191221/God-Havsmiljo-2020-Del-2.pdf


name: HELCOM 2012
_0: HELCOM
_1: 2012
_3: Balt. Sea Environ. Proc. No. 129 B
_4: http://helcom.fi/Lists/Publications/BSEP129b.pdf
_2:
Development of a set of core indicators: Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project PART B: Descriptions of the indicators


name: Statzner et al. 1994
_0: Statzner B, Resh VH, Roux LA
_1: 1994
_3: Freshw Biol 31, 253–263
_4: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01739.x/abstract
_2:
The synthesis of long-term ecological research in the context of concurrently developed ecological theory: design of a research strategy for the Upper Rhone River and it’s floodplain


name: Bremner et al. 2006
_0: Bremner J, Rogers SI, Frid CLJ.
_1: 2006
_3: Ecol Indic 6, 609–622
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X05000956
_2:
Methods for describing ecological functioning of marine benthic assemblages using biological traits analysis (BTA)


name: ICG-COBAM 2013
_1: 2013
_2: Development of a OSPAR common set biodiversity indicators
_4: www.ospar.org
_0:
OSPAR Intersessional Correspondence Group on the Coordination of Biodiversity Assessment and Monitoring for the OSPAR Biodiversity Committee


name: ICES 2012a
_0: ICES WGECO
_1: 2012
_2: Report of the Working Group on THE Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO)
_3: Report, 11–18 April 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2012/ACOM:26. 192pp
_4:
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Expert%20Group%20Report/acom/2012/WGECO/wgeco_2012.pdf


name: Pauly 1996
_0: Pauly D
_1: 1996
_2: One hundred million tonnes of fish, and fisheries research
_3: Fisheries research 25 (1), 25–38
_4:
http://www.seaaroundus.org/researcher/dpauly/pdf/1996/journalarticles/onehundredmilliontonnesfish.pdf


name: Rossberg 2012
_0: Rossberg AG
_1: 2012
_3: Advances in Ecological Research 46, 429–522
_4: http://axel.rossberg.net/paper/Rossberg2012AdvEcolRes_AnalyticSizeSpectrumTheory.pdf
_2:
A complete analytic theory for structure and dynamics of populations and communities spanning wide ranges in body size


name: Greenstreet et al. 2012
_1: 2012
_3: ICES Journal of Marine Science 69, 1789–1801
_0:
Greenstreet SPR, Rossberg AG, Fox CJ, Le Quesne WJF, Blasdale T, Boulcott P, Mitchell I, Millar C, Moffat CF

_2:
Demersal fish biodiversity: species-level indicators and trends-based targets for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive


name: Fürhaupter & Meyer 2009
_0: Fürhaupter K, Meyer T
_1: 2009
_3: unveröffentlicht
_2:
Handlungsanweisung zum Monitoring in den äußeren Küstengewässern der Ostsee nach den Vorgaben der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Qualitätskomponente Makrophyten (BALCOSIS-Verfahren)


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012m
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D1 - Canarias Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_4: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D1_Canarias_tcm7-206792.pdf
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA CANARIA PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 1: BIODIVERSIDAD EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012n
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D1 - Levantino Balear Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA LEVANTINO-BALEAR PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 1: BIODIVERSIDAD EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL

_4:
http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D1_Levantino-Balear_r_tcm7-207252.pdf


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012a
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D1 - Noratlantica Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_4: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D1_Noratlantica_tcm7-207268.pdf
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA NORATLÁNTICA PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 1: BIODIVERSIDAD EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL


name: Bellas et al. 2012
_0: Bellas J, Santos Vázquez B, de Stephanis R (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_2: ESTRATEGIAS MARINAS GRUPO MAMIFEROS MARINOS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL
_3: AZTI-JGR - 0 Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_4:
http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/0_Documento_grupo_mamiferos_marinos_def_tcm7-229902.pdf


name: Danish Ministry of the environment - MSRL
_0: Danish Ministry of the environment
_2: Danmarks Havstrategi
_4:
http://www.naturstyrelsen.dk/NR/rdonlyres/63E67B97-EDE5-4E96-86CC-A812008BDF3A/0/Havstrategi_miljoemaalsrapport.pdf


name: DMU 2004
_0: Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser
_1: 2004
_2: Teknisk anvisning for marin overvågning
_3:
Sampling method: Technical guidelines for marine vegetation surveys
Danish Ministry of the environment

_4:
http://www2.dmu.dk/1_om_dmu/2_tvaer-funk/3_fdc_mar/programgrundlag/TekAnv2004_2009/Del3/TA04_3_1_Bundvegetation.pdf


name: Krause-Jensen & Rasmussen 2009
_0: Krause-Jensen D, Rasmussen MB
_1: 2009
_2: Historisk udbredelse af alegraes i danske kystomrader
_3:
Technical report from NERI no 755, 38 pp
Danmarks Miljoundersogelser, Arhus Universitet
Danish Ministry of the environment


name: Daskalov et al. 2012
_0: Daskalov G, Osio C, Charef A
_1: 2012
_3: JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. European Commission. ISBN:978-92-79-27208-0
_2:
Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF). Assessment of Black Sea Stocks (STECF-12-15) 

_4:
http://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/409649/2012-11_STECF+12-15+-+Black+Sea+Assessments_JRC76532.pdf


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012b
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D1 - Sudatlantica Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_4: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D1_Sudatlantica_tcm7-207284.pdf
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA SUDATLÁNTICA PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 1: BIODIVERSIDAD EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL


name: de Armas et al. 2012
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D1 - Estrecho_y_Alboran Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA DEL ESTRECHO Y ALBORÁN PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 1: BIODIVERSIDAD EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL

_4:
http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D1_Estrecho_y_Alboran_tcm7-207239.pdf


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012c
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D4 - Noratlantica Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_4: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D4_Noratlantica_tcm7-207273.pdf
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA NORATLÁNTICA PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 4: REDES TRÓFICAS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012d
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D4 - Sudatlantica Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_4: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D4_Sudatlantica_tcm7-207289.pdf
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA SUDATLÁNTICA PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 4: REDES TRÓFICAS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012e
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D4 - Estrecho_y_Alboran Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA ESTRECHO Y ALBORÁN PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 4: REDES TRÓFICAS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL

_4:
http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D4_Estrecho_y_Alboran_tcm7-207242.pdf


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012f
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D4 - Levantino Balear Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA LEVANTINO ‐ BALEAR PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 4: REDES TRÓFICAS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL

_4:
http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D4_Levantino_Balear_tcm7-207257.pdf


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012g
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D4 - Canarias Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_4: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D4_Canarias_tcm7-207177.pdf
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA CANARIA PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 4: REDES TRÓFICAS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012h
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D6 - Noratlantica Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_4: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D6_Noratlantica_tcm7-207275.pdf
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA NORATLÁNTICA PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 6: FONDOS MARINOS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012i
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D6 - Sudatlantica Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_4: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D6_Sudatlantica_tcm7-207291.pdf
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA SUDATLÁNTICA PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 6: FONDOS MARINOS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012j
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D6 - Estrecho_y_Alboran Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA DEL ESTRECHO Y ALBORÁN PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 6: FONDOS MARINOS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL

_4:
http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D6_Estrecho_y_Alboran_tcm7-207244.pdf


name: Dahl & Carstensen 2008
_0: Dahl K, Carstensen J
_1: 2008
_2: Tools to access conservation status on open water reefs in Nature-2000 areas
_4: http://www.dmu.dk/Pub/FR663.pdf
_3:
NERI Technical Report No. 663
National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, 25 pp
Danish Ministry of the environment


name: HM Government 2012a
_0: HM Government
_1: 2012
_2: Marine Strategy Part 1: UK initial assessment of Good Environmental Status
_3: HM Government 2015
_4:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69632/pb13860-marine-strategy-part1-20121220.pdf


name: Rice et al. 2012
_1: 2012
_2: Indicators for Sea-floor Integrity under the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive
_3: Ecological Indicators 12, 1, 174–184
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11000744
_0:
Rice J, Arvanitidis C, Borja A, Frid C, Hiddink JG, Krause J, Lorance P, Ragnarsson SÁ, Sköld M, Trabucco B, Enserink L, Norkko A


name: OSPAR 2008
_0: OSPAR
_1: 2008
_3: Publication number 356/2008
_4: http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00356_bd%20ecoqo%20fish%20communities.pdf
_2:
OSPAR Background Document on the EcoQO on changes in the proportion of large fish and evaluation of the sizebased indicators


name: Rombouts et al. 2013
_1: 2013
_2: Food web indicators under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: From complexity to simplicity?
_3: Ecological Indicators 29, 246-254
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X12004402
_0:
Rombouts I, Beaugrand G, Fizzala X, Gaill F, Greenstreet SPR, Lamare S, Le Loc’h F, McQuatters-Gollop A, Mialet B, Niquil N, Percelay J, Renaud F, Rossberg AG, Féral JP


name: Rice et al. 2010
_1: 2010
_2: Marine Strategy Framework Directive – Task Group 6 Report Seafloor integrity
_0:
Rice J, Arvanitidis C, Borja A, Frid C, Hiddink J, Krause J, Lorance P, Ragnarsson SA, Skold M, Trabucco B

_3:
EUR 24334 EN – Joint Research Centre, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 73pp


name: UK & RoI MPTT
_1: 2009
_4: http://www.wfduk.org/resources%20/transitional-and-coastal-angiosperms
_0:
UK & RoI MPTT via Environment Agency, Scottish and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research (SEPA, EANI), CEFAS

_2:
UKTAG Transition an coastal water assessment methods angiosperms Seagrass (Zostera) bed assessment (Draft)


name: Foden & Jong 2007
_0: Foden J, de Jong DJ
_1: 2007
_3: Hydrobiologia 579, 187-197
_2:
Assessment metrics for littoral seagrass under the European Water Framework Directive; outcomes of the Auk intercalibration with the Netherlands


name: Arens & Adolph
_3: http://www.blmp-online.de/Monitoringhandbuch/Kennblaetter/Kennblatt_Makrophyten.html
_0:
Sabine Arens and Winny Adolph via Lower Saxony Water Management, Coastal Defense and Nature Conservation Agency (NLWKN) 


name: Reise et al.
_0:
Karsten Reise, Kerstin Kolbe, Sandra Jaklin, Winny Adolph via Lower Saxony Water Management, Coastal Defense and Nature Conservation Agency (NLWKN) and State Agency for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas (LLUR - Schleswig-Holstein) 


name: Romero et al. 2007
_0: Romero J, Martinez-Crego B, Alcoverro T, Perez M
_1: 2007
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 196-204
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X06003225
_2:
A multivariate index based on the seagrass Posidonia oceanica (POMI) to assess ecological status of coastal waters under the Water Framework Directive (WFD)


name: Orfanidis et al. 2010
_0: Orfanidis S, Papathanasiou V, Gounaris S, Theodosiou T
_1: 2010
_2: Size distribution approaches for monitoring and conservation of coastal Cymodocea habitats.
_4: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.1069/abstract
_3:
Orfanidis S, Papathanasiou V, Gounaris S, Theodosiou T(2010) Size distribution approaches for monitoring and conservation of coastal Cymodocea habitats. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 20(2): 177–188. DOI:10.1002/aqc.1069


name: Fernandez et al. 2008
_0: Fernandez-Torquemada Y, Diaz-Valdes M, Colilla F, Luna B, Sanchez-Lizaso JL, Ramos-Espla AA
_1: 2008
_3: ICES Journal of Marine Science 65, 1492-1497
_4: http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/content/65/8/1492.full
_2:
Descriptors from the Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile meadows in coastal waters of Valencia, Spain, in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive


name: Martin 2006
_0: Martin G
_1: 2006
_3: Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu TÜ Eesti Mereinstituut Tallinn Report
_2:
Veekvaliteedi klasside hindamise tüübispetsiifilise klassifikatsioonisüsteemi väljatöötamine Eesti rannikuvee kohta


name:
Department of Environmental Protection, National Institute for Environmental Protection Research and Development


name: de Jong 2004
_0: de Jong DJ
_1: 2004
_3: document RIKZ/OS/2004.832.x
_2:
Water Framework Directive: determination of the reference condition and Potential-REF/Potential-GES and formulation of indices for plants in the coastal waters CW-NEA3 (K1), CW-NEA4 (K2), CW-NEA1 (K3), transitional water, TW-NEA11 (O2), and large saline lakes, NEA26 (M32), in the Netherlands


name: Borja et al. 2007
_0: Borja A, Josefson AB, Miles A, Muxika I, Olsgaard F, Phillips G, Rodríguez JG, Rygg B
_1: 2007
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 42-52
_2:
An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive


name: Josefson et al. 2009
_0: Josefson AB, Blomkvist M, Hansen JLS, Rosenberg R, Rygg B
_1: 2009
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 58, 1263- 1277
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X09002124
_2:
Assessment of marine benthic quality change in gradients of disturbance: Comparison of different Scandinavian multi-metric indices.


name: Borja et al. 2008
_0: Borja A, Mader J, Muxika I, Rodriguez JG, Bald J
_1: 2008
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 56, 1377-1379
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X06002220
_2:
Using M-AMBI in assessing benthic quality within the Water Framework Directive: Some remarks and recommendations


name: Borja et al. 2009
_0: Borja A, Muxika I, Rodriguez JG
_1: 2009
_3: Marine Ecology 30, 214-227
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X06002220
_2:
Paradigmatic responses of marine benthic communities to different anthropogenic pressures, using M-AMBI, within the European Water Framework Directive


name: Muxika et al. 2007
_0: Muxika I, Borja A, Bald J
_1: 2007
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 16-29
_4: http://www.basqueresearch.com/upload/txostenak/2769_5AMBI.pdf
_2:
Using historical data, expert judgement and multivariate analysis in assessing reference conditions and benthic ecological status, according to the European Water Framework Directive


name: Van Hoey et al. 2007
_0: Van Hoey G, Drent J, Ysebaert T, Herman P
_1: 2007
_3: Part of: NIOO Rapporten, 2007-02. NIOO. 244 pp
_4: http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?module=ref&refid=119203
_2:
The Benthic Ecosystem Quality Index (BEQI), intercalibration and assessment of Dutch coastal and transitional waters for the Water Framework Directive: Final report


name: Perus et al. 2007
_0: Perus J, Bonsdorff E, Bäck S, Lax HG, Villnäs A, Westberg V
_1: 2007
_3: Ambio 36, 250-256
_4: http://dx.doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[250:ZAIOES]2.0.CO;2
_2:
Zoobenthos as Indicators of Ecological Status in Coastal Brackish Waters: A Comparative Study from the Baltic Sea 


name: Leonardsson et al. 2009
_0: Leonardsson K, Blomqvist M, Rosenberg R
_1: 2009
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 58, 1286-1296
_4: ftp://ftp.azti.es/neagig/Papers/Leonardssonetal2009.pdf
_2:
Theoretical and practical aspects on benthic quality assessment according to the EU-Water Framework Directive - examples from Swedish waters


name: Daunys et al. 2007
_0: Daunys D, Olenin S, Paškauskas R, Zemlys P, Olenina I, Bučas M
_1: 2007
_2:
Typology and Classification of Ecological Status of Lithuanian Coastal and Transitional Waters: an Update of Existing System

_3:
Technical Report for Transition Facility project No. 2004/016-925-04-06: Procurement of services for the Institutional building for the Nemunas River Basin management, 66 pp


name: Simboura & Zenetos 2002
_0: Simboura N, Zenetos A
_1: 2002
_3: Mediterranean Marine Science 3 (2), 77-111
_4: http://www.medit-mar-sc.net/index.php/marine/article/view/249
_2:
Benthic indicators to use in ecological quality classification of Mediterranean soft bottom marine ecosystems, including a new Biotic index


name: Dauvin & Ruellet 2007
_0: Dauvin JC, Ruellet T
_1: 2007
_2: Polychaete/amphipod ratio revisited
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X06003250
_3:
Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in European marine waters
Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 215-224


name: Teixeira et al. 2009
_0: Teixeira H, Neto JM, Patricio J, Verissimo H, Pinto R, Salas F, Marques JC
_1: 2009
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 58, 1477-1486
_2:
Quality assessment of benthic macroinvertebrates under the scope of WFD using BAT, the Benthic Assessment Tool

_4:
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CE0QFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F26679548_Quality_assessment_of_benthic_macroinvertebrates_under_the_scope_of_WFD_using_BAT_the_Benthic_Assessment_Tool%2Ffile%2F9fcfd50aa3fb047ad6.pdf&ei=q46pUqm-IsiWtQb6v4G4Dw&usg=AFQjCNGjEbCXy-tfzBVvGGhj89Z93TtR_w&sig2=6GnL5aGww1t8gP1vDZm1TQ&bvm=bv.57967247,d.Yms&cad=rja


name: Word 1978
_0: Word JQ
_1: 1978
_2: The infaunal trophic index
_4: http://www.sccwrp.org/Documents/AnnualReports/BrowseAllAnnualReports/1978AnnualReport.aspx
_3:
SCCWRP1978 Annual Report, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, El Segundo, CA, pp19–39


name: Shannon & Weaver 1963
_0: Shannon, Claude Elwood & Weaver, Warren
_1: 1963
_2: The Mathematical Theory of Communication.
_3:
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Univ. of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-72548-4.

_4:
http://monoskop.org/images/b/be/Shannon_Claude_E_Weaver_Warren_The_Mathematical_Theory_of_Communication_1963.pdf


name: Wells et al. 2007
_0: Wells E, Wilkinson M, Wood P, Scanlan C
_1: 2007
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 55 (1-6), 151-161
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X06003201
_2:
The use of macroalgal species richness and composition on intertidal rocky seashores in the assessment of ecological quality under the WFD


name: WFD-UKTAG 2009
_0: Water Framework Directive - United Kingdom Technical Advisory Group (WFD-UKTAG)
_1: 2009
_2: UKTAG COASTAL WATER ASSESSMENT METHODS MACROALGAE MACROALGAE - ROCKY SHORE REDUCED SPECIES LIST
_3: ISBN: 978-1-906934-17-0
_4:
http://www.wfduk.org/sites/default/files/Media/Characterisation%20of%20the%20water%20environment/Biological%20Method%20Statements/Coastal%20macroalgae%20reduced%20species%20list.pdf


name: Wilkinson et al. 2007
_0: Wilkinson M, Wood P, Wells E, Scanlan C
_1: 2007
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 136-150
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X06003730
_2:
Using attached macroalgae to assess ecological status of British estuaries for the European Water Framework Directive


name: Ballesteros et al. 2007
_0: Ballesteros E, Torras X, Pinedo S, Garcia M, Mangialajo L, de Torres M
_1: 2007
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 172-180
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X06003080
_2:
A new methodology based on littoral community cartography dominated by macroalgae for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive


name: Mangialajo et al. 2007
_0: Mangialajo L, Ruggieri N, Asnaghi V, Chiantore M, Povero P, Cattaneo-Vietti R
_1: 2007
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin, Volume 55, Issues 1–6, 30-41
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X06003158
_2:
Ecological status in the Ligurian Sea: The effect of coastline urbanisation and the importance of proper reference sites


name: Juanes et al. 2008
_0: Juanes JA, Guinda X, Puente A, Revilla JA
_1: 2008
_3: Ecological Indicators 8 (4), 351-359
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X07000465
_2:
Macroalgae, a suitable indicator of the ecological status of coastal rocky communities in the NE Atlantic


name: Bermejo 2012
_0: Bermejo R, Vergara JJ, Hernández I
_1: 2012
_3: Ecological Indicators, 12(1), 46-57
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11000896
_2:
Application and reassessment of the reduced species list index for macroalgae to assess the ecological status under the Water Framework Directive in the Atlantic coast of Southern Spain 


name: Neto et al. 2012
_0: Neto JM, Gaspar R, Pereira L, Marques JC
_1: 2012
_3: Ecological Indicators 19, 39-47
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11002780
_2:
Marine Macroalgae Assessment Tool (MarMAT) for intertidal rocky shores. Quality assessment under the scope of the European Water Framework Directive


name: Dahl et al.
_0:
Karsten Dahl, Jacob Carstensen, Dorte Krause-Jensen, Anne Lise Middelboe; Danish Environmental Authorities, National Environmental Research Institute (NERI), Ministery of the Environment

_3:
www2.dmu.dk/1_om_dmu/2_tvaer-funk/3_fdc_mar/programgrundlag/TekAnv2004_2009/Del3/TA04_3_1_Bundvegetation.pdf


name: Pinedo et al. 2007
_0: Pinedo S, García M, Satta MP, Torres MD, Ballesteros E
_1: 2007
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55, 126-135
_2:
Rocky-shore communities as indicators of water quality: a case study in the Northwestern Mediterranean 

_4:
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CEIQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F6745758_Rocky-shore_communities_as_indicators_of_water_quality_a_case_study_in_the_Northwestern_Mediterranean%2Ffile%2F60b7d524a8d16bce24.pdf&ei=w36pUsvYN4qLswbTroHABg&usg=AFQjCNGV_4T8-Nz2ku0darRNVeSrUUGyeA&sig2=uXDs_UU7aDppM_Ho9zqmwA&bvm=bv.57967247,d.Yms&cad=rja


name: Derrien-Courtel & le Gal 2009
_0: Derrien-Courtel S, le Gal A
_1: 2009
_2: Mise au point du protocole de suivi des macroalgues subtidales pour la façade manche-atlantique
_3: Contrat IFREMER-MNHN, July 2009, 30p
_4:
http://wwz.ifremer.fr/dce/content/download/16113/239866/file/DCE%202010%20Derrien%20et%20Le%20Gal.pdf


name: Bremner et al. 2005
_0: Bremner J, Frid CLJ, Rogers SI
_1: 2005
_2: Biological traits of the North Sea benthos – does fishing affect benthic ecosystem function?
_3:
In: Barnes P, Thomas J.(Eds.), Benthic Habitats and the Effects of Fishing. American Fisheries Society. Symposium, Bethesda, MD, 477–489


name: Tillin et al. 2006
_0: Tillin HM, Hiddink JG, Jennings S, Kaiser MJ
_1: 2006
_3: Mar Ecol Prog Ser 318, 31–45
_4: http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps2006/318/m318p031.pdf
_2:
Chronic bottom trawling alters the functional composition of benthic invertebrate communities on a sea-basin scale


name: Rachello-Dolmen & Clearly 2007
_0: Rachello-Dolmen PG, Cleary DFR
_1: 2007
_3: Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 73 816–826
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771407000893
_2:
Relating coral species traits to environmental conditions in the Jakarta Bay/Pulau Seribu reef system, Indonesia


name: Bonada et al. 2007
_0: Bonada N, Dolédec S, Statzner B.
_1: 2007
_3: Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1658–1671
_4: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01375.x/abstract
_2:
Taxonomic and biological trait differences of stream macroinvertebrate communities between Mediterranean and  temperate regions: implications for future climatic scenarios


name: Frederiksen et al. 2004
_0: Fredersiksen M, Wanless S, Harris MP, Rothery P, Wilson LJ
_1: 2004
_3: Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 1129-1139
_2:
The role of industrial fisheries and oceanographic change in the decline of North Sea black-legged kittiwakes


name: Furness & Tasker 2000
_0: Furness RW, Tasker ML
_1: 2000
_3: Marine Ecology Progress Series 202, 253-264
_4: http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/202/m202p253.pdf
_2:
Seabird-fishery interactions: quantifying the sensitivity of seabirds to reductions in sandeel abundance, and identification of key areas for sensitive seabirds in the North Sea


name: ICES 2008
_0: ICES WGSE
_1: 2008
_2: Report of the Working Group on Seabird Ecology WGSE
_3: Report, 10‐14 March 2008, Lisbon, Portugal. ICES CM 2008/LRC:05. 99pp
_4:
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Expert%20Group%20Report/lrc/2008/WGSE/WGSE2008.pdf


name: Bremner et al. 2004
_0: Bremner J, Frid CLJ, Rogers SI
_1: 2004
_3: In: Barnes P, Thomas J, (Eds.) Symposium 41. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD
_2:
Biological traits of North Sea benthos - does fishing affect benthic ecosystem function? Benthic habitats and the effects of fishing


name: PERSGA/GEF 2003
_1: 2003
_2: Coral Reefs in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. Surveys 1990 to 2000 Summary and Recommendations
_3: PERSGA Technical Series No. 7. PERSGA, Jeddah
_4: http://www.persga.org/Documents/CoralReef_Survey.pdf
_0:
PERSGA - The Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea
and Gulf of Aden


name: Borja et al. 2011
_1: 2011
_3: Marine pollution bulletin 62.3, 499-513
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X10005321
_0:
Borja A, Barbone E, Basset A, Borgersen G, Brkljacic M, Elliott M, Garmendia JM, Marques JC, Mazik K, Muxika I, Magalhães Neto J, Norling K, Rodríguez JG, Rosati I, Rygg B, Teixeira H, Trayanova A

_2:
Response of single benthic metrics and multi-metric methods to anthropogenic pressure gradients, in five distinct European coastal and transitional ecosystems


name: Simboura et al. 2007
_0: Simboura N, Papathanassiou E, Sakellariou D
_1: 2007
_3: Ecological Indicators 7 (1), 164-180
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X05001214
_2:
The use of a biotic index (Bentix) in assessing long term effects of dumping coarse metalliferous waste on soft bottom benthic communities


name: Subida et al. 2012
_0: Subida MD, Drake P, Jordana E, Mavrič B, Pinedo S, Simboura N, Torres J, Salas F
_1: 2012
_3: Ecological Indicators 19, 106–117
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X1100238X
_2:
Response of different biotic indices to gradients of organic enrichment in Mediterranean coastal waters: Implications of non-monotonic responses of diversity measures


name: Finenko et al. 2003
_0: Finenko GA, Romanova ZA, Abolmasova GI, Anninsky BE, Svetlichny LS, Hubareva ES, Bat L, Kideys AE
_1: 2003
_3: Journ. Plankt. Res. 25 (5), 539–549
_4: http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/5/539.full
_2:
Population Dynamics, Ingestion, Growth, and Reproduction Rates of the Invader Beroe ovata and Its Impact on Plankton Community in Sevastopol Bay, the Black Sea


name: Finenko et al. 2006
_0: Finenko GA, Romanova ZA, Abolmasova GI, Anninsky BE, Pavlovskaya TV, Bat L, Kideys A
_1: 2006
_3: Oceanology 46, 472–482
_2:
Ctenophores-invaders and their role in the trophic dynamics of the planktonic community in the coastal regions off the Crimean coasts of the Black Sea (Sevastopol Bay)


name: Orfanidis et al. 2011
_0: Orfanidis S, Panayotidis P, Ugland K
_1: 2011
_3: Mediterranean Marine Science 12, 1, 199-231
_2:
Ecological Evaluation Index continuous formula (EEI-c) application: a step forward for functional groups, the formula and reference condition values

_4:
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CEIQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.medit-mar-sc.net%2Findex.php%2Fmarine%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F60%2F61.pdf&ei=CXqpUvafMYrFswa7-IHICQ&usg=AFQjCNG4oJ5Cb_RpWW7dr0V7dZ0ATR1ddg&sig2=eJgxzp81XCZiRPKnVKEi4w&bvm=bv.57967247,d.Yms&cad=rja


name: Trayanova et al. 2007
_0: Trayanova A, Todorova V, Konsulova T
_1: 2007
_2:
Final report benthic invertebrate fauna. Identification of reference (high status) and bad status values. Development of classification tool for the selected metrics. Initial assessment of the ecological status of the coastal waters

_3:
Evaluation of the impact from land-based activities on the marine and coastal environment, ecosystems and biodiversity in Bulgaria, Volckaert A. (Ed.). Project 03/07746/AL: 192


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012k
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D6 - Levantino Balear Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA LEVANTINO-BALEAR PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 6: FONDOS MARINOS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL

_4:
http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D6_Levantino-Balear_tcm7-207259.pdf


name: de Armas & Bellas 2012l
_0: de Armas D, Bellas J (Coordinators)
_1: 2012
_3: AZTI-JGR - D6 - Canarias Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment
_4: http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/costas/temas/estrategias-marinas/IV_D6_Canarias_tcm7-207179.pdf
_2:
ESTRATEGIA MARINA DEMARCACIÓN MARINA CANARIA PARTE IV. DESCRIPTORES DEL BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL DESCRIPTOR 6: FONDOS MARINOS EVALUACIÓN INICIAL Y BUEN ESTADO AMBIENTAL


name: Humphreys et al. 2012
_0: Humphreys EM, Risely K, Austin GE, Johnston A, Burton NHK
_1: 2012
_3: BTO Research Report No. 626
_2:
Development of MSFD indicators, baselines and targets for population size and distribution of marine birds in the UK


name: Dadam et al. 2012
_0: Dadam D, Cook ASCP, Robinson RA
_1: 2012
_3: The British Trust for Ornithology UK, BTO Research Report No.616.
_2:
Development of MSFD indicators, baselines and targets for the annual breeding success of kittiwakes in the UK.


name: Koffijberg et al. 2011
_0: Koffijberg K, Schrader S, Hennig V
_1: 2011
_3: Joint Monitoring Group for Breeding Birds, Common Wadden Sea Secretariat April 2011, Germany
_2:
Monitoring breeding success of coastal breeding birds in the Wadden Sea - methodological guidelines and field manual


name: Ratcliffe et al. 2009
_0: Ratcliffe N, Mitchell I, Varnham K, Verboven N, Higson P
_1: 2009
_3: Ibis 151: 699-708
_4: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00949.x/abstract
_2:
How to prioritize rat management for the benefit of petrels: a case study of the UK, Channels Islands, and Isle of Man


name: OSPAR 2011
_0: OSPAR
_1: 2011
_2: Advice document on GES 1,2,4 and 6 - Biodiversity (ICG-MSFD(4) 11/2/3-E)
_3:
Meeting of the Intersessional Correspondence Group for the Implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (ICG-MSFD)Madrid 13-14 December 2011


name: Tillin et al. 2010
_0: Tillin HM, Hull SC, Tyler-Walters H
_1: 2010
_2: Development of a sensitivity matrix (pressures-MCZ/MPA features)
_4: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=MB0102_9721_TRP.pdf
_3:
Report to the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs from ABPMer, Southampton and the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the UK. Defra Contract No. MB0102 Task 3A, Report no 22


name: Lindenbaum et al. 2008
_0: Lindenbaum C, Bennell JD, Rees EIS, McClean D, Cook W, Wheeler AJ, Sanderson WG
_1: 2008
_3: Journal of the Marine Biological association of the UK 88, 133-141
_2:
Small-scale variation within a Modiolus modiolus (Mollusca: Bivalvia) reef in the Irish Sea: I. Seabed mapping and reef morphology


name: Hiddink et al. 2006
_0: Hiddink JG, Jennings S, Kaiser MJ,
_1: 2006
_2: Indicators of the ecological impact of bottom-trawl disturbance on seabed communities
_3: Ecosystems 9, 1190-1199
_4:
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDYQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fishsource.com%2Fsystem%2Fresource%2Fdata_path%2F8564%2FHiddink_et_al._Ecosystems.pdf&ei=aWmoUsqUBMGdtAa6qoHIBw&usg=AFQjCNGFMrCQYUVu3N2FeklnpfpC9SJ4aA&sig2=89i0cymtTuTz5hfqbxQIcg&bvm=bv.57799294,d.Yms&cad=rja


name: Chiaradia et al. 2010
_0: Chiaradia A, Forero MG, Hobson KA, Cullen JM
_1: 2010
_3: ICES Journal of Marine Science 67, 1710-1720
_2:
Changes in diet and trophic position of a top predator 10 years after a mass mortality of a key prey


name: Rogers et al. 2010
_1: 2010
_2: Marine Strategy framework Directive Task Group 4, Food Webs
_3: In. European Commission Joint Research Centre, ICES
_0:
Rogers S, Casini M, Cury P, Heath M, Irigoien X, Kuosa H, Scheidat M, Skov Hm Stergiou K, Trenkel V, Wikner J, Yunev O, Piha H


name: Carafa et al. 2007
_0: Carafa R, Dueri S, Zaldivar JM
_1: 2007
_3: In: EUR 22914 EN, Joint Research Centre
_2:
Linking terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems: complexity,persistence and biodiversity in European food webs


name: Rossberg et al. 2011
_0: Rossberg AG, Farnsworth KD, Satoh K, Pinnegar JK
_1: 2011
_3: Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 1617-1625
_4: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21068048
_2:
Universal power-law diet partitioning by marine fish and squid with surprising stability-diversity implications


name: ICES 2012b
_0: ICES WGMME
_1: 2012
_2: Report of the Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME)
_3: Report, 5–8 March 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2012/ACOM:27. 146pp
_4:
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Expert%20Group%20Report/acom/2012/WGMME/wgmme_2012.pdf


name: Garmendia et al. 2012
_0: Garmendia M, Borja A, Franco J, Revilla M
_1: 2012
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 66, 1-2, 7-16
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X1200495X
_2:
Phytoplankton composition indicators for the assessment of eutrophication in marine waters: present state and challenges within the European directives


name: Spatharis & Tsirtsis 2010
_0: Spatharis S, Tsirtsis G
_1: 2010
_3: Ecological Indicators 10 840-847
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X10000063
_2:
Ecological quality scales based on phytoplankton for the implementation of water framework directive in the Eastern Mediterranean


name: Minicheva 2012
_0: Minicheva G
_1: 2012
_3: Phycology Conference Ukraine 2012 Kiev
_2:
Estimation of Ecological Status of Marine Ecosystem on the Basis of Algaecommunity of Morphofunctional Indexes


name: Minicheva et al. 2003
_0: Minicheva G, Zotov A, Kosenko M
_1: 2003
_3: GEF project for recovery of the ecosystem of the Black Sea, Odessa:32
_2:
Methodical recommendations on the determination of a number of morphofunctional indexes of unicellular and multicellular forms of aquatic vegetation


name: Vinogradov et al. 2005
_1: 2005
_3: Oceanology 45, 3, 356–367
_4: http://www.maikonline.com/maik/showArticle.do?pii=S0001437005030082
_0:
Vinogradov M, Lebedeva L, Vinogradov G, Musaeva EI, Lukasheva TA, Zas'ko DN, Anokhina LL, Sivkovich AE

_2:
Monitoring of the Pelagic Communities of the Northeastern Part of the Black Sea in 2004: Macro- and Mesoplankton


name: European Communities Environmental Objectives (Surface Waters) Regulations 2009
_1: 2009
_2: European Communities Environmental Objectives (Surface Waters) Regulations 2009
_3:
Surface Water Regulations S.I. No. 272, 2009 http://www.environ.ie/en/Legislation/Environment/Water/FileDownLoad,20824,en.pdf


name: Cusack & O'Biern 2008
_0: Cusack C, O'Biern F
_1: 2008
_2: Marine Ecological Tools for Reference, Intercalibration and Classification
_4: http://erc.epa.ie/safer/resource?id=c67ae163-8911-102b-aa08-55a7497570d3
_3:
Associated datasets and digitial information objects connected to this resource are available at: Secure Archive For Environmental Research Data (SAFER) managed by Environmental Protection Agency Ireland


name: Borja et al. 2000
_0: Borja A, Franco J, Pérez V
_1: 2000
_3: Marine Pollution Bulletin 40, 1100–1114
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X00000618
_2:
A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments


name: Diaz-Almela et al. 2006
_0: Diaz-Almela E, Marbà N, Duarte CM
_1: 2006
_2: Consequences of Mediterranean warming events in seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) flowering records
_3: Global Change Biology 13, 224–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01260.x
_4:
https://www.com.univ-mrs.fr/~boudouresque/Publications_FLUC_2006_2007/Diaz_Almela_et_al_2007_Global_Change_Biology.pdf


name: Oliva et al. 2012
_0: Silvia Oliva, Oriol Mascaró, Izaskun Llagostera, Marta Pérez, Javier Romero
_1: 2012
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771411003684
_2:
Selection of metrics based on the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and development of a biotic index (CYMOX) for assessing ecological status of coastal and transitional waters.

_3:
Oliva, S., Mascaró, O., Llagostera, I., Pérez, M., & Romero, J. (2012). Selection of metrics based on the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and development of a biotic index (CYMOX) for assessing ecological status of coastal and transitional waters. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 114, 7-17.


name: Mastrandrea et al. 2011
_1: 2011
_3: Climatic Change, 108(4), 675–691 DOI:10.1007/s10584-011-0178-6
_4: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0178-6
_0:
Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Plattner, G.K., Edenhofer, O., Stocker, T.F., Field, C.B., Ebi, K.L. & Matschoss, P.R.

_2:
The IPCC AR5 guidance note on consistent treatment of uncertainties: a common approach across the working groups.


name: Gowen et al. 2011
_1: 2011
_2: The Development of UK Pelagic (Plankton) Indicators and Targets for the MSFD.
_3: Advice to Defra. Belfast, UK, 41 pp.
_0:
Gowen, R.J. McQuatters‐Gollop, A. Tett, P. Best, M. Bresnan, E. Castellani, C. Cook, K. Forster, R. Scherer, C. Mckinney, A.


name: ICES 2014
_0: ICES WGECO
_1: 2014
_3: ICES Document CM 2014/ACOM:26, 174pp.
_4: http://tinyurl.com/p8vwu7d
_2:
Report of the Working Group on the Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO), 8–15 April 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark.


name: Cook et al. 2012
_0: Cook A.S.C.P., Ross‐Smith V.H. & Robinson R.A. 2012.
_1: 2012
_3: BTO Research Report No. 615. The British Trust for Ornithology, UK.
_2:
Development of MSFD Indicators, Baselines and Target for Seabird Breeding Failure Occurrence in the UK. 


name: Härkönen et al. 2013
_1: 2013
_0:
Tero Härkönen, Anders Galatius, Stefan Bräeger, Olle Karlsson & Markus Ahola (in collaboration with HELCOM SEAL expert group and ASTARNIA group).

_2:
HELCOM Biodiversity Core Indicator: Population growth rate, abundance and distribution of marine mammals 

_4:
http://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/biodiversity/indicators/population-growth-rate-abundance-and-distribution-of-marine-mammals/


name: Bäcklin et al. 2013
_0: Bäcklin B., Moraeus C., Kauhala K., Isomursu M., (of Ad hoc HELCOM SEAL Expert Group).
_1: 2013
_2: Pregnancy rates of the marine mammals - Particular emphasis on Baltic grey and ringed seals.
_4: http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/HELCOM-CoreIndicator-Pregnancy_rates_of_marine_mammals.pdf
_3:
Bäcklin B., Moraeus C., Kauhala K., Isomursu  M., (of Ad hoc HELCOM SEAL Expert Group), 2013. Pregnancy rates of the marine mammals - Particular emphasis on Baltic grey and ringed seals. HELCOM Core Indicator Report. Online. 
19/11/2015, http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/HELCOM-CoreIndicator-Pregnancy_rates_of_marine_mammals.pdf.


name: Uusitalo et al. 2013
_0: Uusitalo, L., Fleming-Lehtinen, V., Hällfors, H., Jaanus, A., Hällfors, S., & London, L.
_1: 2013
_2: A novel approach for estimating phytoplankton biodiversity
_4: http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/content/70/2/408
_3:
Uusitalo, L., Fleming-Lehtinen, V., Hällfors, H., Jaanus, A., Hällfors, S., & London, L. (2013). A novel approach for estimating phytoplankton biodiversity. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 70(2), 408-417.


name: Shannon 1948
_0: Shannon, C. E.
_1: 1948
_2: A mathematical theory of communication.
_4: http://www.mast.queensu.ca/~math474/shannon1948.pdf
_3:
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(July 1928), 379–423. doi:10.1145/584091.584093


name: Pielou 1966
_0: Pielou, E.C.
_1: 1966
_2: The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections.
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022519366900130
_3:
Pielou, E.C. (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131-144. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0


name: Lampadariou et al. 2008
_0: Nikolaos Lampadariou, Ioanna Akoumianaki, Ioannis Karakassis
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X08000046
_2:
Use of the size fractionation of the macrobenthic biomass for the rapid assessment of benthic organic enrichment.

_3:
Lampadariou, N., Akoumianaki, I., Karakassis, I., 2008. Use of the size fractionation of the macrobenthic biomass for the rapid assessment of benthic organic enrichment. Ecological Indicators, 8(5): 729-742. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.01.003


name: Torn & Martin 2012
_0: Torn, Kaire & Martin, Georg
_1: 2012
_4: http://www.kirj.ee/public/Ecology/2012/issue_2/ecol-2012-2-106-118.pdf
_2:
Response of submerged aquatic vegetation to eutrophication-related environment descriptors in coastal waters of the NE Baltic Sea.

_3:
Torn & Martin (2012) Response of submerged aquatic vegetation to eutrophication-related environment descriptors in coastal waters of the NE Baltic Sea. Estonian Journal of Ecology, 61(2): 106-118. doi: 10.3176/eco.2012.2.03


name: Hoglander et al. 2013
_0: Höglander, H., Karlson B., Johansen, M., Walve, J., Andersson, A.
_1: 2013
_2: Overview of coastal phytoplankton indicators and their potential use in Swedish waters.
_4: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/37081
_3:
Höglander, H., Karlson B., Johansen, M., Walve, J., Andersson, A. Overview of coastal phytoplankton indicators and their potential use in Swedish waters. Deliverable 3.3-1, WATERS Report no. 2013: 5. Havsmiljöinstitutet, Sweden


name: Olenin et al. 2007
_0: Olenin, S., Minchin, D., and Daunys, D.
_1: 2007
_2: Assessment of biopollution in aquatic ecosystems.
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X07000148
_3:
Olenin, S., Minchin, D., and Daunys, D. 2007. Assessment of biopollution in aquatic ecosystems. Mar Pol Bull 55:379–394. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.01.010


name: Zaiko et al. 2011
_0: Zaiko A, Lehtiniemi M, Narščius A, Olenin S
_1: 2011
_2: Assessment of bioinvasion impacts on a regional scale: a comparative approach.
_4: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10530-010-9928-z
_3:
Zaiko A, Lehtiniemi M, Narščius A, Olenin S (2011) Assessment of bioinvasion impacts on a regional scale: a comparative approach. Biological Invasions 13: 1739-1765. doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9928-z


name: Gobert et al. 2009
_0: Gobert, S., Sartoretto, S., Rico-Raimondino, V., Andral, B., Chery, A., Lejeune, P., & Boissery, P.
_1: 2009
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X09002574
_2:
Assessment of the ecological status of Mediterranean French coastal waters as required by the Water Framework Directive using the< i> Posidonia oceanica</i> Rapid Easy Index: PREI.

_3:
Gobert, S., Sartoretto, S., Rico-Raimondino, V., Andral, B., Chery, A., Lejeune, P., & Boissery, P. (2009). Assessment of the ecological status of Mediterranean French coastal waters as required by the Water Framework Directive using the< i> Posidonia oceanica</i> Rapid Easy Index: PREI. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58(11), 1727-1733. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.06.012


name: Minicheva 2013
_0: Minicheva, G. G.
_1: 2013
_4: http://emblasproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Minicheva_WFD.pdf
_2:
Use of the macrophytes’ morphofunctional parameters to assess Ecological Status Class in accordance with the EU WFD.

_3:
Minicheva, G. G. (2013). Use of the macrophytes’ morphofunctional parameters to assess Ecological Status Class in accordance with the EU WFD.


name: Pinedo et al. 2015
_0: Susana Pinedo, Esther Jordana & Enric Ballesteros
_1: 2015
_4: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maec.12126/abstract
_2:
A critical analysis on the response of macroinvertebrate communities along disturbance gradients: description of MEDOCC (MEDiterranean OCCidental) index.

_3:
Pinedo, S., Jordana, E. & Ballesteros, E. (2014). A critical analysis on the response of macroinvertebrate communities along disturbance gradients: description of MEDOCC (MEDiterranean OCCidental) index. Marine Ecology 36(2):141-154. DOI:10.1111/maec.12126


name: WFD GIG 2013
_0: GIG (Geographical Intercalibration Group)
_1: 2013
_4: https://circabc.europa.eu/faces/
_2:
Technical report coastal waters, Mediterranean GIG Benthic Invertebrate fauna, JRC and the benthic macroinvertebrates subgroup.

_3:
GIG (Geographical Intercalibration Group), 2013. Technical report coastal waters, Mediterranean GIG Benthic Invertebrate fauna, JRC and the benthic macroinvertebrates subgroup. https://circabc.europa.eu/faces/


name: Simboura et al. 2012
_0: Simboura, N., Zenetos, A., Pancucci-Papadopoulou, M.A., Reizopoulou, S., Streftaris, N.
_1: 2012
_4: http://www.medit-mar-sc.net/index.php/marine/article/view/31
_2:
Hellenic Seas indicators for Sea-floor integrity under the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive: setting the thresholds 799 and standards for Good Environmental Status.

_3:
Simboura, N., Zenetos, A., Pancucci-Papadopoulou, M.A., Reizopoulou, S., Streftaris, N., 2012. Hellenic Seas indicators for Sea-floor integrity under the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive: setting the thresholds 799 and standards for Good Environmental Status, Mediterranean Marine Science, 13(1): 140–152. DOI:10.12681/mms.31


name: Simboura et al. 2015
_1: 2015
_4: http://www.medit-mar-sc.net/index.php/marine/article/view/960
_0:
Simboura, N., M. Tsapakis, A. Pavlidou, G. Assimakopoulou, K. Pagou, H. Kontoyiannis, Ch. Zeri, E. Krasakopoulou, E. Rousselaki, N. Katsiaras, S. Diliberto, M. Naletaki, K. Tsiamis, V. Gerakaris, P. Drakopoulou, P. Panayotidis

_2:
Assessment of the environmental status in Hellenic coastal waters (Eastern Mediterranean):  from the Water Framework Directive to the Marine Strategy Water Framework Directive.

_3:
Simboura, N., M. Tsapakis, A. Pavlidou, G. Assimakopoulou, K. Pagou, H. Kontoyiannis, Ch. Zeri, E. Krasakopoulou, E. Rousselaki, N. Katsiaras, S. Diliberto, M. Naletaki, K. Tsiamis, V. Gerakaris, P. Drakopoulou, P. Panayotidis. 2015. Assessment of the environmental status in Hellenic coastal waters (Eastern Mediterranean):  from the Water Framework Directive to the Marine Strategy Water Framework Directive. Mediterranean Marine Science, 16/1: 46-64. DOI: 10.12681/mms.960


name: Simboura et al. 2014
_0: Simboura, N., S. Reizopoulou, M.A. Pancucci-Papadopoulou, K. Sigala, N. Streftaris
_1: 2014
_2:
Schemes of integrating the indicators of the benthic community condition (sea floor integrity-MSFD): an application in Saronikos Gulf. 

_3:
Simboura, N., S. Reizopoulou, M.A. Pancucci-Papadopoulou, K. Sigala, N. Streftaris. 2014. Schemes of integrating the indicators of the benthic community condition (sea floor integrity-MSFD): an application in Saronikos Gulf. Perseus Scientific Workshop oral presentation, 29-30 Jan. 2014. Book of Abstracts p.24.

_4:
http://www.perseus-net.eu/assets/media/PDF/Scientific%20Workshop,%20January%202014/Session%204/4102.pdf


name: EU COM DEC 2013/480/EU
_0: European Commission
_1: 2013
_4: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32013D0480
_2:
COMMISSION DECISION of 20 September 2013 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC.

_3:
COMMISSION DECISION of 20 September 2013 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC.


name: Henriques et al. 2008
_0: Sofia Henriques, Miguel Pessanha Pais, Maria José Costa, Henrique Cabral
_1: 2008
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X08003809
_2:
Development of a fish-based multimetric index to assess the ecological quality of marine habitats: the Marine Fish Community Index.

_3:
Henriques, S., Pais, M. P., Costa, M. J., & Cabral, H. (2008). Development of a fish-based multimetric index to assess the ecological quality of marine habitats: the Marine Fish Community Index. Marine pollution bulletin, 56(11), 1913-1934. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.07.009


name: Miller & Christodoulou, 2014
_0: Peter I. Miller, Stelios Christodoulou
_1: 2014
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X13002066
_2:
Frequent locations of oceanic fronts as an indicator of pelagic diversity: Application to marine protected areas and renewables.

_3:
Peter I. Miller, Stelios Christodoulou, Frequent locations of oceanic fronts as an indicator of pelagic diversity: Application to marine protected areas and renewables, Marine Policy, Volume 45, March 2014, Pages 318-329, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.09.009.


name: Morato et al. 2015
_0: Morato, Telmo, Miller, Peter I, Dunn, Daniel C, Nicol, Simon J, Bowcott, James, Halpin, Patrick N
_1: 2015
_4: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12126/full
_2:
A perspective on the importance of oceanic fronts in promoting aggregation of visitors to seamounts.

_3:
Morato, T., Miller, P. I., Dunn, D. C., Nicol, S. J., Bowcott, J., & Halpin, P. N. (2015). A perspective on the importance of oceanic fronts in promoting aggregation of visitors to seamounts. Fish and Fisheries. doi: 10.1111/faf.12126


name: Scales et al. 2015
_0: Scales, K. L., Miller, P. I., Hawkes, L. A., Ingram, S. N., Sims, D. W., & Votier, S. C.
_1: 2014
_4: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12330/pdf
_2:
On the Front Line: frontal zones as priority at‐sea conservation areas for mobile marine vertebrates.

_3:
Scales, K. L., Miller, P. I., Hawkes, L. A., Ingram, S. N., Sims, D. W., & Votier, S. C. (2014). On the Front Line: frontal zones as priority at‐sea conservation areas for mobile marine vertebrates. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(6), 1575-1583. doi: 10.111/1365-2664.12330


name: Romero et al. 2013
_0: I. Romero, M. Pachés, R. Martínez-Guijarro, J. Ferrer
_1: 2013
_4: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X13004153
_2:
Glophymed: An index to establish the ecological status for the Water Framework Directive based on phytoplankton in coastal waters.

_3:
I. Romero, M. Pachés, R. Martínez-Guijarro, J. Ferrer (2013) Glophymed: An index to establish the ecological status for the Water Framework Directive based on phytoplankton in coastal waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin 75 (2013) 218–223. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.028


name: Shannon et al. 2014
_1: 2014
_2: Trophic level-based indicators to track fishing impacts across marine ecosystems.
_4: http://www.int-res.com/articles/theme/m512p115.pdf
_0:
Lynne Shannon, Marta Coll, Alida Bundy, Didier Gascuel, Johanna J. Heymans, Kristin Kleisner, Christopher P. Lynam, Chiara Piroddi, Jorge Tam, Morgane Travers-Trolet, Yunne Shin

_3:
Shannon L, Coll M, Bundy A, Gascuel D, Heymans JJ, Kleisner K, Lynam CP, Piroddi C, Tam J, Travers-Trolet M, Shin Y(2014) Trophic level-based indicators to track fishing impacts across marine ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 512:115-140. doi: 10.3354/meps10821


name: Cecchi et al. 2014
_0: Enrico Cecchi, Paola Gennaro, Luigi Piazzi, Elena Ricevuto, Fabrizio Serena
_1: 2014
_4: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09670262.2014.918657?journalCode=tejp20&
_2:
Development of a new biotic index for ecological status assessment of Italian coastal waters based on coralligenous macroalgal assemblages.

_3:
Enrico Cecchi, Paola Gennaro, Luigi Piazzi, Elena Ricevuto, Fabrizio Serena (2014) Development of a new biotic index for ecological status assessment of Italian coastal waters based on coralligenous macroalgal assemblages. European Journal of Phycology, 49(3):2014 298-312. doi:10.1080/09670262.2014.918657


name: Piazzi et al. 2015
_0: PIAZZI, L., GENNARO, P., CECCHI, E., & SERENA, F.
_1: 2015
_4: http://www.medit-mar-sc.net/index.php/marine/article/viewFile/1029/660
_2:
Improvement of the esca index for the evaluation of ecological quality of coralligenous habitat under the european framework directives.

_3:
PIAZZI, L., GENNARO, P., CECCHI, E., & SERENA, F. (2015). Improvement of the esca index for the evaluation of ecological quality of coralligenous habitat under the european framework directives. Mediterranean Marine Science, 16(2):419-426. DOI: 10.12681/mms.1029 


name: Gatti et al. 2015
_0: Gatti Giulia, Bianchi C.N., Morri C., Montefalcone M., Sartoretto Stephane
_1: 2015
_4: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.026
_2:
Coralligenous reefs state along anthropized coasts: Application and validation of the COARSE index, based on a rapid visual assessment (RVA) approach.

_3:
Gatti Giulia, Bianchi C.N., Morri C., Montefalcone M., Sartoretto S. (2015) Coralligenous reefs state along anthropized coasts: Application and validation of the COARSE index, based on a rapid visual assessment (RVA) approach. Ecological Indicators 52:567-576. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.026


name: Gatti et al. 2012
_0: Gatti G., Montefalcone M., Rovere A., Parravicini V., Morri C., Albertelli G., Bianchi C.N.
_1: 2012
_4: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475721.2012.671190
_2:
Sea-floor integrity down the harbor waterfront: the coralligenous shoals off Vado Ligure (NW Mediterranean).

_3:
Gatti, G., Montefalcone, M., Rovere, A., Parravicini, V., Morri, C., Albertelli, G., Bianchi, C.N., 2012. Sea-floor integrity down the harbor waterfront: the coralligenous shoals off Vado Ligure (NW Mediterranean). Adv. Oceanol. Limnol. 3(1), 51–67. doi:10.1080/19475721.2012.671190


name: Deter et al. 2012
_0: Deter J., Descamp P., Ballesta L., Boissery P., Holon F.
_1: 2012
_4: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.001
_2:
A preliminary study toward an index based on coralligenous assemblages for the ecological status assessment of Mediterranean French coastal waters.

_3:
Deter, J., Descamp, P., Ballesta, L., Boissery, P., Holon, F., 2012. A preliminary study toward an index based on coralligenous assemblages for the ecological status assessment of Mediterranean French coastal waters. Ecol. Indic. 20, 345–352. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.001


name: OSPAR 2017
_0: OSPAR
_1: 2017
_2: Intermediate Assessment 2017 - Assessment of Proportion of Large Fish (Large Fish Index)
_3: online resource
_4:
https://oap.ospar.org/en/ospar-assessments/intermediate-assessment-2017/biodiversity-status/fish-and-foodwebs/proportion-large-fish-large-fish-index/


# oas

value:
Uusitalo Laura: I actually disagree with this classification (as well as some of the ithers here); the indicator seems to have more to do with population size than fecundity… This is, however, the classification used in HELCOM Roof Report table, which I've used here throughtout.


value:
Biological disturbance, Ecosystem changes, Fishing, Climate Change (as listed by HELCOM CCORESET report)


value:
Lower limit of the 95 confidence interval of geometric mean. ≥ 26 (for males and females ages 1-3); ≥ 36 for males aged 5-20; ≥ 37 for females aged 5-20


value:
To be discussed; suggestion is to use the lower limit of the 95 confidence interval of geometric mean:  ≥35.6 mm for young and sub-adult individuals; 51.4 mm for adults.


value:
Uusitalo Laura: Samuli Korpinen has labelled this as 4.3 indicator; personally, I'm not sure which would be more suitable, 4.1 or 4.3


value:
SC: this indicator is known to be related with ecosystem function, namely reproduction and recruitment


value:
Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)


value:
The annual bycatch rate is reduced to below levels expected to allow conservation objectives to be met


value:
For each colony; annual breeding success is not significantly different, statistically, from the level expected in the prevailing climatic conditions in five years out of six.


value:
The annual percentage of colonies experiencing breeding failure does not exceed the mean percentage of colonies failing over the preceeding 15 years, or 5% whichever is the greater value, in more than 3 out of 6 years.


value:
sn01: marine bird species which at some point in their life cycle are reliant upon coastal and off shore areas under jurisdiction of MSFD


value:
Estimated mortality as a result of fishing bycatch and aquaculture entanglement does not exceed levels that would prevent targets for 1.2 population size being achieved.


value:
sn01: Indicator confined to those speices of marine birds that aggregate in inshore areas, onshore breeding or roosting sites for which distributional pattern can be accurately measured and is likely to provide indication of anthropogenic impacts


value:
 Survey specific targets need to be developed that relate to reference conditions and should incorporate natural variability


value:
Suggested target is to reach a high degree of naturalness in population structure represented by a natural length frequency distribution of all sensitive or indicator species, defined separately per species per region. Natural variability must be considered.


value:
The number of species-specific metrics meeting their individual metric level targets should represent a statistically significant departure from the binomial distribution


value:
Best value of density (nr shoots/m2), rhizome production (mg/year), rhizome elongation (mm/year), leaf production (nr leaves/year) of the meadow at 0-10; 11-20; 21-30; 31-40 meters depth


value:
HT: at a certain extent, productivity can be  considered a proxy for intercations between structural components. But check review on this at Dolbeth et al 2012, because it is not a monotonic relationship and therefore interpretation of this must be careful. Here, at the ecosystem level,  they relate Primary Production with Benthic Biomass, and set a ratio of consumption of about 5-25%  by grazers near the equilibrium. A deviation from this could indicate unbalance. IProduction/Productivity is a measure of the functioning of the ecosystem.


value:
At Good status: 24-30 species from the reduced species list, 52-56% rhodophyta, 41-50 % ESG I, 21-30% chlorophyta


value:
Univ. Cadiz / CEIMAR, Bermejo et al., 2012 - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11000896


value:
Good ecological status ≥ 0.6;  at Good status: Most disturbance-sensitive macroalgae associated with undisturbed conditions are present. The level of macroalgal cover shows slight signs of disturbance. There is a slight deviation from the reference conditions. There is a slightly less diverse community of red, green and brown seaweeds with a corresponding decrease in species richness. Cover variable depending on local physical conditions. Greatest reduction in red species and greater proportion of short-lived species present.


value:
Where an individual taxa bloom is greater than 250,000 cells/L between 20%-39% of the sampling occasions during a 6 year cycle.


value:
A representative and functional habitat network covering 10% of its territory. A further target is for nature to be able to run its course undisturbed by man on 2% of the German territory by 2020.


value:
Maintain depth of kelp communities within a regional context (max depth below chart datum at which kelp occurs and at which a specific density of kelp occurs) .


value:
Target to be aligned with WFD to ensure Good ecological status of macroalgae. No deterioration between classes High,good,moderate,poor,bad


value:
BHQ within range given in Rosenberg et al 2009 ( Temporal and spatial changes in marine benthic habitats in relation to the EU Water Framework Directive: The use of sediment profile imagery. Mar Pollut Bull. 58(4): 565-573


value:
can Shannon equitability be considered this? But then is related more to the community level and not to particular species


value:
HT:what does it refer to here: condition of habitat forming species, or of species within a certain habitat?


value:
HT: not clear if this is also related to typical species and communites  in that habitat, as in the Comm Dec. exemplifies for D1C6I1, or only to habitat (if considering forming habitat species)


value:
Species specific targets need to be developed that relate to reference conditions and should incorporate natural variability


value:
No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions


value:
For each Assessment Unit, maintain the cetacean population size at or above baseline levels, with no decrease of ≥30% over a three generation period.


value:
Changes in abundance of marine birds should be within individual target levels in 75% of species monitored. Annual abundance should not be greater than 130% of the baseline.


value:
Proposal by various expert groups but still to be decided. Set % criteria may not be applicable to all habitat types or geographical scales.


value:
Krause-Jensen, Dorte:diver: off shore pelagic common scooter: in/off-shore benthic long-tailed duck: in/off shore benthic


value:
Area stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline (favourable reference area for HD habitats)


value:
scuba diving; salinity changes, promoted by discharges of desalination plants, maritime transport, Shipping and navigation; aquarium trade, Desalination; maritime transport; collection of corals


value:
<1 no bleaching; 1-10 low or mild bleaching; 10-50 moderate bleaching; 50-90 high bleaching; >90 extreme bleaching


value:
An improvement in the conservation status of all habitats and species classified as ‘unfavourable’ by at least one category (corresponding to an index value of 80%)


value:
Reference community: CymoSkew < 1.5; Good status community: Dense seagrass meadow of (ca. 1099 shoots m-2) CymoSkew >1.5-2.5


value:
Good ecological status ≥ 0.59; reference community: rocky shores places exposed to high irradiance levels and characterized by dense communities of several Cystoseira species: C. mediterranea/amentacea var. stricta, C. crinita, C. brachyparpa var. balearica, C. foeniculacea/barbata/spinosa var. tenuior/compressa var. pustulata. Alternatively, in shadow zones (steep vertical cliffs, high hydrodynamic conditions) Lithophyllum byssoides develops, forming important organogenic structures (trottoir) / at good status: (in hydrodynamic environments and non-polluted waters) highly structured and productive Cystoseira mediterranea/stricta/crinita communites are well developed


value:
Univ. Cadiz / CEIMAR, Bermejo et al., 2013 - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X13001938


value:
Reference conditions: 1) maximum depth distribution vegetation: 5-15 m depth depending on water type; 2) in hard bottom communities Fucus vesiculosus occurs 4-7 m depth depending on water type; 3) proportion of perennial species > 70-90 % from dry biomass depending on water type. Good status condition: 50-80 % deviation of reference conditions - the depth distribution of vegetation is at least 4-12 m, depth distribution of Fucus vesiculosus is at least 3.2-5.6 m, proportion of perennial species is at least 48-72 % from dry biomass depending on water type.


value:
Reference value: 100 % species of the reference list occur, threshold for good ecological status: 80% of referencen list occur


value:
Good ecological status ≥ 0.6; At Good status: there is limited cover (<15%) of opportunistic macroalgae, low biomass (<500g/m2) and no growth of algae in the underlying sediment, i.e. no entrainment of algae.


value:
Good ecological status ≥ 0.6; Reference community: opportunistic macroalgal blooms of anthropogenic origin should be absent or if present should cover less than 5% of the available intertidal habitat. Total area coverage of opportunist macroalgae should be no greater than 100 hectares. Generally directed at intertidal sedimentary shores in both transitional and coastal waters/ at Good status: most disturbance-sensitive macroalgae associated with undisturbed conditions are present. The level of macroalgal cover shows slight signs of disturbance. There is a slight deviation from the reference conditions. There may be minimal presence of opportunist macroalgae growth but still shows no persistence.


value:
Good ecological status ≥ 0.638; reference community: Intertidal macroalgal communities present high number of species, and are not dominated by opportunistic ones (e.g. Ulvales); Rhodophyta species are more representative than Chlorophyta species, being Heterokonthophyta (Phaeophyceae) species presenting values in between. Late successional or perennial taxa (ESG I) dominate the communities in detriment to annual species (ESGII). Proportion and coverage of oppotunistic species should have a low representation.


value:
Methodology for assessment of ecological status of coastal waters using benthic invertebrates: Multivariate AZTI Marine Biotic Index (M-AMBI)


value:
General target is to reach a ratio of typical and/or character species similar to baseline conditions. 


value:
Bottom-up mode is not excited, resulting in a power-law distribution of biomass over the body-mass axis.


value:
Top-down cascade is not excited, resulting in a power-law distribution of biomass over the body-mass axis.


value:
Bottom-up cascade is not excited, resulting in a power-law distribution of biomass over the body-mass axis.


value:
Traget value: 100% of the population size, initially determined by experts as a multiple of the population figures known at the time for 2002.  The threshold value is 80 % of target value.


value:
Haematopus ostralegus, Somateria mollissima, Sterna hirundo, Circus cyaneus, Sterna paradisaea, Mergus serrator, Tringa totanus, Charadrius hiaticula, Uria aalge, Sternula albifrons


value:
None provided; only a qualitative analysis is provided as follow: healthy condition of the reef can be expressed either by a high Shannon index or low value of other indices (Margalef, Berger-Parker dominance, Simpson diversity, Mackintosh diversity, Mackintosh evenness


value:
good ecological status / Good ecological status: median of a  metric set (3 normalized metrics) ≥ 0,6 EQR


value:
Target to be aligned with WFD to ensure Good ecological status of angiosperms. No deterioration between classes High,good,moderate,poor,bad


value:
HT:  for the sampled area this indicator could indicate this, but it is not clearly stated if it is then extrapolated to the overall regional area of application. So would it be addressing this MSFD indicator somehow? 


value:
Reference community - presence/absence of brown algae and angiosperms considered as indicators: 1. Macroalgal communities of high diversity should be dominated quantitatively by brown algae (Cystoseira barbata, Cystoseira crinita) and red algae (Phyllophora sp.) 2. A high number of brown and red algae. Good status community - a high number of sensitive taxa (brown algae - Cystoseira sp., red algae - Phyllophora sp., angiosperms - Zostera nana); a high specific diversity


value:
Ref. community description for NEA4: The tidal and salt marsh areas in the reference situation are quantified on the basis of reconstructions of the Dutch coastal development (starting around 1000 AD). There should not be any dominance of one or a number of species, vegetation types or vegetation zones. Seagrass fields occurred in 5-10% of the water body area.


value:
At Good status: Relatively high density of structuring species (kelp, Cystoseira spp., Halidrys siliquosa ...), Large algal belt with important depth extension, Presence of numerous characteristic species and low density of opportunistic species, Presence of "good ecological status species", quite high diversity, Laminaria hyperborea stipes are quite long and support lots of epibionts


value:
Good ecological status ≥ 0.568; at good status: good coverage of characteristic macroalgae populations with a reduced presence of opportunistic macroalgae


value:
Good Status: 90th percentile chlorophyll range is between 10.0-20.0 µg/L and the median chlorophyll range is 5.0-10.0 µg/L


value:
Gadus morhua, Solea solea, Clupea harengus harengus, Pleuronectes platessa, Melanogrammus aeglefinus, Pollachius virens


value:
Level of exposure to pressure should not result in more than 'moderate impact/vulnerability' of the habitat (depending on the sensitivity of the habitat to this pressure.


value:
Level of exposure should not result in more than 'moderate impact/vulnerability' of the habitat (dependent on the sensitivity of the habitat to this pressure)


value:
Targets to be aligned with WFD to ensure good ecological status for benthic invertebrates. No deterioration between classes High/goog/moderate/poor/bad


value:
no loss of taxa (max 1/4 to 1/3 loss); < 30% loss of bed extent; < 30% loss of % cover (shoot density)


value:
no loss of taxa (max 1/4 to 1/3 loss); < 30% loss of bed extent; < 15% loss of % cover (shoot density)


value:
At least 75% of species should stay within the target range (<30% deviation from baseline; 20% for species laying only 1 egg)


value:
Uusitalo Laura: Jens, which species groups apply here? JO: That was a tuff one:) I guess it would mostly be the diving birds but also swans and coots, i.e 3, 4, 5, 6,  7, 8


value:
At the good status as is indicated by the EEI, the ESG I group may range from 30 to 60% while the ESG II from 0 to 30% of the macroalgae coverage, or the combination may thus that ESG I accounts for over 60% and ESG II between 30 and 60% of the total macroalgae coverage.


value:
The target is an “acceptable” deviation from the baseline and should be determined for each ecosystem individually.


value:
This indicator is closely linked to the area of habitat loss. Therefore the GES boundary for habitat damage could take into account the proportion of area already lost for a particular habitat by decreasing the targets of allowed damage.


value:
A baseline assessment of the extant NIS would provide a reference point against which the success of future actions could be measured.


value:
Any disturbance resulting from man-made structures (coastal defences, ports and, indirectly, land claim).


value:
Coastal segments are “artificialised” when all or part of the 100 meter area on both sides (i.e. land and sea) are subject to transformation by Man, modifying their original physical state.


value:
COARSE index seems to respond firstly to physical pressures (sedimentation, temperature, mechanical damages).


# history

action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
newValue:
The index is a standardized, quantitative method for mapping cumulative impacts of invasive alien species on marine ecosystems. It is based on a conservative additive model, according to which cumulative impact scores are estimated on the basis of the distributions of invasive species and ecosystems, the reported magnitude of ecological impacts and the strength of such evidence.

A rise in the CIMPAL index score (Ic) indicates that IAS impacts on biodiversity are increasing, while impact scores approaching zero point to a decrease in the negative effects of IAS in biodiversity.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
The index is a standardized, quantitative method for mapping cumulative impacts of invasive alien species on marine ecosystems. It is based on a conservative additive model, according to which cumulative impact scores are estimated on the basis of the distributions of invasive species and ecosystems, the reported magnitude of ecological impacts and the strength of such evidence.

A rise in the CIMPAL index score (Ic) indicates that IAS impacts on biodiversity are increasing, while impact scores approaching zero point to a decrease in the negative effects of IAS in biodiversity.

newValue:
The index is a standardized, quantitative method for mapping cumulative impacts of invasive alien species on marine ecosystems. It is based on a conservative additive model, according to which cumulative impact scores are estimated on the basis of the distributions of invasive species and ecosystems, the reported magnitude of ecological impacts and the strength of such evidence.

The criteria to which alien species to include in the calculation depend on the user objectives.

A rise in the CIMPAL index score (Ic) indicates that IAS impacts on biodiversity are increasing, while impact scores approaching zero point to a decrease in the negative effects of IAS in biodiversity.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
newValue:
- georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence)
- georeferenced habitat distribution data
- for each alien species, the magnitude of all its ecological impacts in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat)


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
The index is a standardized, quantitative method for mapping cumulative impacts of invasive alien species on marine ecosystems. It is based on a conservative additive model, according to which cumulative impact scores are estimated on the basis of the distributions of invasive species and ecosystems, the reported magnitude of ecological impacts and the strength of such evidence.

The criteria to which alien species to include in the calculation depend on the user objectives.

A rise in the CIMPAL index score (Ic) indicates that IAS impacts on biodiversity are increasing, while impact scores approaching zero point to a decrease in the negative effects of IAS in biodiversity.

newValue:
The index is a standardized, quantitative method for mapping cumulative impacts of invasive alien species on marine ecosystems. It is based on a conservative additive model, according to which cumulative impact scores are estimated on the basis of the distributions of invasive species and ecosystems, the reported magnitude of ecological impacts and the strength of such evidence.

Criteria for which/how many alien species to include in the calculation depend on the user objectives.

A rise in the CIMPAL index score (Ic) indicates that IAS impacts on biodiversity are increasing, while impact scores approaching zero point to a decrease in the negative effects of IAS in biodiversity.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
The index is a standardized, quantitative method for mapping cumulative impacts of invasive alien species on marine ecosystems. It is based on a conservative additive model, according to which cumulative impact scores are estimated on the basis of the distributions of invasive species and ecosystems, the reported magnitude of ecological impacts and the strength of such evidence.

Criteria for which/how many alien species to include in the calculation depend on the user objectives.

A rise in the CIMPAL index score (Ic) indicates that IAS impacts on biodiversity are increasing, while impact scores approaching zero point to a decrease in the negative effects of IAS in biodiversity.

newValue:
The index is a standardized, quantitative method for mapping cumulative impacts of invasive alien species on marine ecosystems. It is based on a conservative additive model, according to which cumulative impact scores are estimated on the basis of the distributions of invasive species and ecosystems, the reported magnitude of ecological impacts and the strength of such evidence.
Criteria for which/how many alien species to include in the calculation depend on the user objectives.
A rise in the CIMPAL index score (Ic) indicates that IAS impacts on biodiversity are increasing, while impact scores approaching zero point to a decrease in the negative effects of IAS in biodiversity.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _8
newValue:
Not assessed.
The index can rely on global and regional datasets already in place (e.g. EMODNET habitat maps or European Alien Species Information Network - EASIN), therefore its use would not require further monitoring efforts.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _4
newValue:
Previous to index calculation the ecological impacts of each alien species considered in th calculation need to be identified (and the species-impact link needs to be associated to one of the habitat categories considered) and their magnitude assessed (quantitative or qualitatively)


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _8
oldValue:
Not assessed.
The index can rely on global and regional datasets already in place (e.g. EMODNET habitat maps or European Alien Species Information Network - EASIN), therefore its use would not require further monitoring efforts.

newValue:
Not assessed.
However, the index can rely on global and regional datasets available and sampling already in place (e.g. EMODNET habitat maps or European Alien Species Information Network - EASIN), therefore its use would not require further monitoring efforts.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _9
newValue:
Five main sources of uncertaitny have been identified and associated to each of the index parameters. 
For details see Katsanevakis et al., in review (to be updated soon).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
newValue:
The index is presented in Katsanevakis et al. (in review) and has been applied to the Whole Mediterranean Sea.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
- georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence)
- georeferenced habitat distribution data
- for each alien species, the magnitude of all its ecological impacts in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat)

newValue:
. georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence)
. georeferenced habitat distribution data
. for each alien species, the magnitude of all its ecological impacts in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat)


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21380 oid 877 aid 7 apid 11 avid 14 value {European Alien Species Information Network - EASIN}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _9
oldValue:
Five main sources of uncertaitny have been identified and associated to each of the index parameters. 
For details see Katsanevakis et al., in review (to be updated soon).

newValue:
Five main sources of uncertainty have been identified for the CIMPAL index, which were associated to each of the parameters (n, m, Ai, Hj, wi,j) in the index algorithm. Uncertainty is presented as suggested by Mastrandrea et al. (2011). For details see Katsanevakis et al., (in review; to be updated soon).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
The index is presented in Katsanevakis et al. (in review) and has been applied to the Whole Mediterranean Sea.

newValue:
The index is presented in Katsanevakis et al. (in review) and has been applied at the scale of the whole Mediterranean Sea.


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 337 name {Mastrandrea et al. 2011} _0 {Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Plattner, G.K., Edenhofer, O., Stocker, T.F., Field, C.B., Ebi, K.L. & Matschoss, P.R.
} _1 2011 _2 {The IPCC AR5 guidance note on consistent treatment of uncertainties: a common approach across the working groups.} _3 {Climatic Change, 108(4), 675–691
DOI:10.1007/s10584-011-0178-6} _4 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0178-6


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
newValue:
Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence)
Georeferenced habitat distribution data
For each alien species, the magnitude of all its ecological impacts in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat)


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence)
Georeferenced habitat distribution data
For each alien species, the magnitude of all its ecological impacts in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat)

newValue:
Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
Georeferenced habitat distribution data;
For each alien species, the magnitude of all its ecological impacts in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
Georeferenced habitat distribution data;
For each alien species, the magnitude of all its ecological impacts in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).

newValue:
Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
Georeferenced habitat distribution data;
Magnitude of all ecological impacts of a species in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
Georeferenced habitat distribution data;
Magnitude of all ecological impacts of a species in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).

newValue:
1. Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
2. Georeferenced habitat distribution data;
3. Magnitude of all ecological impacts of a species in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
1. Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
2. Georeferenced habitat distribution data;
3. Magnitude of all ecological impacts of a species in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).

newValue:
1. Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
2. Georeferenced habitat distribution data;
3. Magnitude of all ecological impacts of a species in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
The index is a standardized, quantitative method for mapping cumulative impacts of invasive alien species on marine ecosystems. It is based on a conservative additive model, according to which cumulative impact scores are estimated on the basis of the distributions of invasive species and ecosystems, the reported magnitude of ecological impacts and the strength of such evidence.
Criteria for which/how many alien species to include in the calculation depend on the user objectives.
A rise in the CIMPAL index score (Ic) indicates that IAS impacts on biodiversity are increasing, while impact scores approaching zero point to a decrease in the negative effects of IAS in biodiversity.

newValue:
The index is a standardized, quantitative method for mapping cumulative impacts of invasive alien species on marine ecosystems. It is based on a conservative additive model, according to which cumulative impact scores are estimated on the basis of the distributions of invasive species and ecosystems, the reported magnitude of ecological impacts and the strength of such evidence.
Criteria for which/how many alien species to include in the calculation depend on the user objectives.
A rise in the CIMPAL index score (Ic) indicates that IAS impacts on biodiversity are increasing, while impact scores approaching zero point to a decrease in the negative effects of IAS in biodiversity.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
1. Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
2. Georeferenced habitat distribution data;
3. Magnitude of all ecological impacts of a species in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).

newValue:
1. Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
2. Georeferenced habitat distribution data;
3. Magnitude of all ecological impacts of a species in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _8
oldValue:
Not assessed.
However, the index can rely on global and regional datasets available and sampling already in place (e.g. EMODNET habitat maps or European Alien Species Information Network - EASIN), therefore its use would not require further monitoring efforts.

newValue:
Not assessed.
However, the index can rely on global and regional datasets available and sampling already in place (e.g. EMODNET habitat maps or European Alien Species Information Network - EASIN), therefore its use would not require further monitoring efforts.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
1. Georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
2. Georeferenced habitat distribution data;
3. Magnitude of all ecological impacts of a species in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).

newValue:
-georeferenced species distribution data (abundance or presence-absence);
-georeferenced habitat distribution data;
-magnitude of all ecological impacts of a species in the ecosystem (be it on species, populations, community or habitat).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _8
oldValue:
Not assessed.
However, the index can rely on global and regional datasets available and sampling already in place (e.g. EMODNET habitat maps or European Alien Species Information Network - EASIN), therefore its use would not require further monitoring efforts.

newValue:
Not assessed.

However, the index can rely on global and regional datasets available and sampling already in place (e.g. EMODNET habitat maps or European Alien Species Information Network - EASIN), therefore its use would not require further monitoring efforts.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
The index is presented in Katsanevakis et al. (in review) and has been applied at the scale of the whole Mediterranean Sea.

newValue:
The index is presented in Katsanevakis et al. (in review) and has been applied at to the whole Mediterranean Sea.


action: d
dbtable: sources
oldValue:
sid 139 name {Rice 2012/2019} _0 {Rice et al.} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11000751


action: d
dbtable: sources
oldValue:
sid 141 name {Rice 2013} _0 {Rice et al.} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11000745


action: d
dbtable: sources
oldValue:
sid 142 name {Rice 2014} _0 {Rice et al.} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11000746


action: d
dbtable: sources
oldValue:
sid 143 name {Rice 2015} _0 {Rice et al.} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11000747


action: d
dbtable: sources
oldValue:
sid 144 name {Rice 2016} _0 {Rice et al.} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11000748


action: d
dbtable: sources
oldValue:
sid 145 name {Rice 2017} _0 {Rice et al.} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11000749


action: d
dbtable: sources
oldValue:
sid 146 name {Rice 2018} _0 {Rice et al.} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X11000750


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _4
oldValue:
Counts of birds or pairs at breeding sites, counts of shorebirds in intertidal areas. Aerial and ship-based surveys for off-shore species

newValue:
Counts of birds or pairs at breeding sites, counts of shorebirds in intertidal areas. Aerial and ship-based surveys for off-shore species.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _8
oldValue:
Relatively low as seal colonies inshore; monitoring combined with M1 (distributional range) and M5 (pup production)

newValue:
Relatively low as seal colonies inshore; monitoring combined with distributional range and M5 (pup production)


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
newValue:
* This indicator is the result of a merger of two common indicators: M1: seal distribution and M3: seal abundance.


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21383 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21384 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21385 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21386 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21387 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21388 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21389 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21390 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21391 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 2022 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21393 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21394 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21395 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21396 oid 121 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 119 name {Distributional range and pattern of grey and harbour seal haul-outs and breeding colonies} parent 0 _0 {Cefas-SN 108} _5 {Range and counts from haul out sites} _8 {Coastal so relatively low; can be combined with M3 (abundance) and M5 (pup production)} _1 1387398326 _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {M1 Distributional range and pattern of grey and harbour seal haul-outs and breeding colonies} _15 State _16 {Population Ecology} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 1902 oid 119 aid 6 apid 24 avid 14 value {Climate change suggested to have potential consequences}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 1903 oid 119 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 1917 oid 119 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 1931 oid 119 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
newValue:
This indicator is the result of a merger of two common indicators: M-2 cetacean distribution range and pattern and M-4 cetacean abundance.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
This indicator is the result of a merger of two common indicators: M-2 cetacean distribution range and pattern and M-4 cetacean abundance.

newValue:
*This indicator is the result of a merger of two common indicators: M-2 cetacean distribution range and pattern and M-4 cetacean abundance.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue: An indicator metric is defined for abundance.
newValue:
“Abundance of the population of the cetacean species”: abundance needs to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale. The same monitoring used to assess changes in abundance will be used to assess changes in distribution within range and range.
“Occupancy by the species of an area”: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. Changes in occupancy and distribution within range are particularly pertinent for those species that may respond to climate change and for coastal bottlenose dolphins. There might be problems in using occupancy as the only metric, due to the way different species behave. For example, as a population increases, the density might increase, rather than the range extending. Alternatively, changes in occupancy may reflect nothing more than natural movement patterns, so the entire range needs coverage or it will be impossible to say at what point the change noted is significant. Also, changes in distribution within range can be assessed, but it might be difficult to set targets against which those changes should be evaluated. (see Sources for details)


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
“Abundance of the population of the cetacean species”: abundance needs to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale. The same monitoring used to assess changes in abundance will be used to assess changes in distribution within range and range.
“Occupancy by the species of an area”: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. Changes in occupancy and distribution within range are particularly pertinent for those species that may respond to climate change and for coastal bottlenose dolphins. There might be problems in using occupancy as the only metric, due to the way different species behave. For example, as a population increases, the density might increase, rather than the range extending. Alternatively, changes in occupancy may reflect nothing more than natural movement patterns, so the entire range needs coverage or it will be impossible to say at what point the change noted is significant. Also, changes in distribution within range can be assessed, but it might be difficult to set targets against which those changes should be evaluated. (see Sources for details)

newValue:
“Abundance of the population of the cetacean species”: abundance to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale.
“Occupancy by the species of an area”: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. The entire range needs coverage to evaluate at what point the change noted is significant. Changes in distribution within range can be assessed, although difficult to set targets against which changes should be evaluated. (see Sources for details)


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
“Abundance of the population of the cetacean species”: abundance to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale.
“Occupancy by the species of an area”: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. The entire range needs coverage to evaluate at what point the change noted is significant. Changes in distribution within range can be assessed, although difficult to set targets against which changes should be evaluated. (see Sources for details)

newValue:
Abundance of the population of the cetacean species: abundance to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale.
Occupancy by the species of an area: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. The entire range needs coverage to evaluate at what point the change noted is significant. Changes in distribution within range can be assessed, although difficult to set targets against which changes should be evaluated. (see Sources for details)


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Abundance of the population of the cetacean species: abundance to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale.
Occupancy by the species of an area: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. The entire range needs coverage to evaluate at what point the change noted is significant. Changes in distribution within range can be assessed, although difficult to set targets against which changes should be evaluated. (see Sources for details)

newValue:
Abundance of the population of the cetacean species:
abundance to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale.
Occupancy by the species of an area: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. The entire range needs coverage to evaluate at what point the change noted is significant. Changes in distribution within range can be assessed, although difficult to set targets against which changes should be evaluated. (see Sources for details)


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
newValue:
Abundance of the population of the cetacean species: abundance to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale.
Occupancy by the species of an area: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. The entire range needs coverage to evaluate at what point the change noted is significant. Changes in distribution within range can be assessed, although difficult to set targets against which changes should be evaluated.
(see Sources for details)


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Abundance of the population of the cetacean species: abundance to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale.
Occupancy by the species of an area: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. The entire range needs coverage to evaluate at what point the change noted is significant. Changes in distribution within range can be assessed, although difficult to set targets against which changes should be evaluated.
(see Sources for details)

newValue:
Abundance of the population of the cetacean species: abundance to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale.
Occupancy by the species of an area: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. The entire range needs coverage to evaluate at what point the change noted is significant. Changes in distribution within range can be assessed, although difficult to set targets against which changes should be evaluated.
(see Sources for details) 


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Abundance of the population of the cetacean species: abundance to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale.
Occupancy by the species of an area: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. The entire range needs coverage to evaluate at what point the change noted is significant. Changes in distribution within range can be assessed, although difficult to set targets against which changes should be evaluated.
(see Sources for details) 

newValue:
Abundance of the population of the cetacean species: abundance to be assessed at the relevant spatial and temporal scale.
Occupancy by the species of an area: occupancy of an area over the range of the species (eg. number of cells occupied) could be easier to assess than to estimate abundance with precision. The entire range needs coverage to evaluate at what point the change noted is significant. Changes in distribution within range can be assessed, although difficult to set targets against which changes should be evaluated.
See Sources for details. 


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21403 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21404 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21405 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21406 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21407 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21408 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21409 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21410 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21411 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21412 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21413 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21414 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21415 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21416 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21417 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21418 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21419 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21420 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21421 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21422 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21423 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21424 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21425 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21426 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21427 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21428 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21429 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21430 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21431 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21432 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21433 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21434 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21435 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21436 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21437 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21438 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21439 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21440 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21441 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21442 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21443 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21444 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21445 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21446 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21447 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21448 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21449 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21450 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21451 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21452 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21453 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21454 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21455 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21456 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21457 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21458 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21459 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21460 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21461 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21462 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21463 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21464 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21465 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21466 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21467 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21468 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21469 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21470 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21471 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21472 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21473 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21474 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21475 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21476 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21477 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21478 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21479 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21480 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21481 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21482 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21483 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21484 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21485 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21486 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21487 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21488 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21489 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21490 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21491 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21492 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21493 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21494 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21495 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21496 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 2095 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 2107 oid 122 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 120 name {Distributional range and pattern of cetacean species regularly present} parent 0 _0 {Cefas-SN 109} _4 {Biological and pathological investigations; visual surveys from vessels or planes; towed hydrophone arrays; static acoustic monitoring; mark-recapture techniques using photo identification.} _5 {Strandings data, distribution, relative abundance and population trends} _8 {Various techniques for different species vary from quite cheap to very expensive.} _1 1387398285 _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {M2 Distributional range and pattern of cetacean species regularly present} _15 State _16 {Population Ecology} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 1943 oid 120 aid 6 apid 24 avid 14 value {Climate change suggested to have potential consequences}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 1944 oid 120 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 1957 oid 120 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 1970 oid 120 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 1983 oid 120 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 1996 oid 120 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 2009 oid 120 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No decrease with regard to the baseline beyond natural variability, and where possible restoration towards favourable reference conditions}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21497 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21498 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21499 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21500 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21501 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21502 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21503 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21504 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21505 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21506 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21507 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21508 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 2133 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 2120 oid 123 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No statistically significant long‐term average decline of ≥10% at each Assessment Unit.}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
OSPAR common indicator FC2 and FW-3.
Proportion of large fish by weight in assemblage.
The  LFI  is  an  indicator  of  fish  community  size composition. Has been specifically developed to support the  OSPAR EcoQO ecosystem approach to marine management (Greenstreet et al., 2011; Shephard et al., 2012). The LFI describes the proportion of fish biomass contributed by large individuals in the demersal fish community and is defined as  the ratio between the biomass of demersal fish above a length threshold over the  total fish biomass (Roumbouts et al., 2013)
The proportion of large fish in a community follows the structure of the fish community and particularly the proportion of large predatory fish, which are significant balancing features in a food web but at the same time target 
of commercial fishery. The ‘large fish indicator’ (LFI) is used as a proxy for anthropogenic influence on the ecosystem; while it shall not or only little be influenced by natural variability or processes, like recruitment. Fishing has a direct effect on the structure of fish communities, because it can lead to an increase in the relative abundance of small fish (Jennings et al., 1999) 
and reduces the mean body size within a population (Beverton and Holt, 1957). Based on this concept, the LFI maps the fishing pressure (Greenstreet et al., 2011). Several studies to understand and improve the LFI for different marine 
areas and surveys techniques are being prepared at the moment (Oesterwind et al., in prep.; Psuty et al., 2012a; Psuty et al., 2012b)

newValue:
OSPAR common indicator FC2.
Proportion of large fish by weight in assemblage.
The  LFI  is  an  indicator  of  fish  community  size composition. Has been specifically developed to support the  OSPAR EcoQO ecosystem approach to marine management (Greenstreet et al., 2011; Shephard et al., 2012). The LFI describes the proportion of fish biomass contributed by large individuals in the demersal fish community and is defined as  the ratio between the biomass of demersal fish above a length threshold over the  total fish biomass (Roumbouts et al., 2013)
The proportion of large fish in a community follows the structure of the fish community and particularly the proportion of large predatory fish, which are significant balancing features in a food web but at the same time target 
of commercial fishery. The ‘large fish indicator’ (LFI) is used as a proxy for anthropogenic influence on the ecosystem; while it shall not or only little be influenced by natural variability or processes, like recruitment. Fishing has a direct effect on the structure of fish communities, because it can lead to an increase in the relative abundance of small fish (Jennings et al., 1999) 
and reduces the mean body size within a population (Beverton and Holt, 1957). Based on this concept, the LFI maps the fishing pressure (Greenstreet et al., 2011). Several studies to understand and improve the LFI for different marine 
areas and surveys techniques are being prepared at the moment (Oesterwind et al., in prep.; Psuty et al., 2012a; Psuty et al., 2012b)


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _14
oldValue:
Large fish individuals from fishery-based data sources
FC2 OSPAR EcoQO for proportion of large fish (LFI)
FW-3 Size composition of fish communities (Large Fish Indicator)
Large fish indicator (LF)
Large Fish indicator (LFI)
Proportion of large fish in the community

newValue:
Large fish individuals from fishery-based data sources; FC2 OSPAR EcoQO for proportion of large fish (LFI); Large fish indicator (LF); Large Fish indicator (LFI); Proportion of large fish in the community


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 878 name {Fish distributional pattern (FC8)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _1 1447345120 _11 {not available yet} _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {FC8 Fish distributional pattern} _15 State


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 879 name {MMI - Multi‐metric index (BH2)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _1 1447346742 _11 {not available yet} _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {BH2 Multi‐metric index (MMI)} _15 State


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
newValue:
Indicator based on life-form pairs. Ratios of plankton can provide information on ecosystem structure and flow. Combination of life form pairs will depend on the habitat and the objective of the indicator (regional adaptation will be needed).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue: Abundance or biomass of lifeform pairs
newValue:
Plankton abundance or biomass (per taxa)/life-form pairs.
Proposed plankton life-form pairs differ per MSFD descriptor (see source for details).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Plankton abundance or biomass (per taxa)/life-form pairs.
Proposed plankton life-form pairs differ per MSFD descriptor (see source for details).

newValue:
Plankton abundance or biomass (per taxa)/life-form pairs.
Proposed plankton life-form pairs differ per MSFD Descriptor and Pressure (see source for details).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Indicator based on life-form pairs. Ratios of plankton can provide information on ecosystem structure and flow. Combination of life form pairs will depend on the habitat and the objective of the indicator (regional adaptation will be needed).

newValue:
Indicator based on the ratio of functional groups (in terms of life-form pairs). Ratios of plankton can provide information on ecosystem structure and flow. Combination of life-form pairs will depend on the habitat and the objective of the indicator (regional adaptation will be needed).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Plankton abundance or biomass (per taxa)/life-form pairs.
Proposed plankton life-form pairs differ per MSFD Descriptor and Pressure (see source for details).

newValue:
Plankton abundance or biomass (per taxa).
Proposed plankton life-form pairs differ per MSFD Descriptor and Pressure (see Sources for details):
D1 - Diatoms/Dinoflagellates; Large copepods/Small copepods; Copepod grazers/Non‐copepod Grazers
D1.7 - All lifeform pair combinations
D4 - Gelatinous zooplankton/Fish larvae; Copepods/Phytoplankton; Holoplankton/Meroplankton
D5 - Diatoms (Si users)/ Dinoflagellates (non‐Si users); Ciliates/Microflagellates; Psuedo‐nitzschia spp./Potentially toxin Producing dinoflagellates
D6 - Holoplankton/Meroplankton


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Plankton abundance or biomass (per taxa).
Proposed plankton life-form pairs differ per MSFD Descriptor and Pressure (see Sources for details):
D1 - Diatoms/Dinoflagellates; Large copepods/Small copepods; Copepod grazers/Non‐copepod Grazers
D1.7 - All lifeform pair combinations
D4 - Gelatinous zooplankton/Fish larvae; Copepods/Phytoplankton; Holoplankton/Meroplankton
D5 - Diatoms (Si users)/ Dinoflagellates (non‐Si users); Ciliates/Microflagellates; Psuedo‐nitzschia spp./Potentially toxin Producing dinoflagellates
D6 - Holoplankton/Meroplankton

newValue:
Plankton abundance or biomass (per taxa).
Proposed plankton life-form pairs differ per MSFD Descriptor and Pressure (see Sources for details):
D1: Diatoms/Dinoflagellates; Large copepods/Small copepods; Copepod grazers/Non‐copepod Grazers
D1.7: All lifeform pair combinations
D4: Gelatinous zooplankton/Fish larvae; Copepods/Phytoplankton; Holoplankton/Meroplankton
D5: Diatoms (Si users)/ Dinoflagellates (non‐Si users); Ciliates/Microflagellates; Psuedo‐nitzschia spp./Potentially toxin Producing dinoflagellates
D6: Holoplankton/Meroplankton


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 338 name {Gowen et al. 2011} _0 {Gowen, R.J. McQuatters‐Gollop, A. Tett, P. Best, M. Bresnan, E. Castellani, C. Cook, K. Forster, R. Scherer, C. Mckinney, A.} _1 2011 _2 {The Development of UK Pelagic (Plankton) Indicators and Targets for the MSFD.} _3 {Advice to Defra. Belfast, UK, 41 pp.}


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 769 name {Biomass ratio of functional groups (in terms of life form) of plankton} parent 0 _0 {Cefas - SN 129} _4 {Continuous plankton recorder survey} _5 {Abundance or biomass of lifeform pairs} _6 % _8 Low _10 {Can be calculated from various samplers and a range of techniques} _1 1387402854 _11 {OSPAR common indicator PH1} _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {PH1 Changes of plankton functional types (life form) index ratio} _15 State _16 Foodweb _18 {Simple statistics}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18459 oid 769 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18461 oid 769 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18462 oid 769 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18463 oid 769 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _4
oldValue:
Can be calculated from various samplers and a range of techniques:
microscopy, flow cytometry or Continuous plankton recorder survey

newValue:
Can be calculated from various samplers and a range of techniques:
microscopy, flow cytometry or Continuous Plankton Recorder survey.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator Cefas-CL 137 to abundance and biomass to be consistant with other indicators.

newValue:
Plankton biomass and plankton abundance are measured in different ways both within and between member states; however relative changes (trends) in each time‐series can be compared between datasets.


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 787 name {Biomass of phyto- and zooplankton} parent 0 _0 {Cefas - CL 130b} _4 {microscopy, flow cytometry or Continuous plankton recorder survey} _5 {Phytoplankton and zooplankton abundance} _6 abundance _8 Low _10 {Can be calculated from various samplers and a range of techniques} _1 1387117201 _11 {OSPAR commin indicator PH2} _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {PH2 Plankton biomass and/or abundance} _15 State _16 Production _18 {Simple statistics}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18610 oid 787 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18612 oid 787 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18613 oid 787 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18614 oid 787 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18615 oid 787 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18616 oid 787 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18617 oid 787 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Plankton community not significantly influenced by anthropogenic drivers}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 880 name {Common Size composition in fish communities (FW3)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _5 {number of fish in a sample(N)
body mass of each fish in a sample(M)
length of each fish in a sample(L)
} _6 cm _1 1447429415 _11 {Typical Length (TyL) is defined as the geometric mean length of fish, weighted 
by body mass.
Typical Length is an alternative indicator for fish community size structure, which does not contain a free parameter in its definition, as does e.g. the LFI OSPAR common indicator FC2, therefore the TyL facilites comparison and aggregation at larger-assessment scales.} _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {FW3 Common Size composition in fish communities (TyL)} _15 State _16 Foodweb _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 339 name {ICES 2014} _0 {ICES WGECO} _1 2014 _2 {Report of the Working Group on the Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Activities (WGECO), 8–15 April 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark.} _3 {ICES Document CM 2014/ACOM:26, 174pp.} _4 http://tinyurl.com/p8vwu7d


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
newValue: Typical Length (TyL) is defined as the geometric mean length of fish, weighted by body mass.
oldValue:
Typical Length (TyL) is defined as the geometric mean length of fish, weighted 
by body mass.
Typical Length is an alternative indicator for fish community size structure, which does not contain a free parameter in its definition, as does e.g. the LFI OSPAR common indicator FC2, therefore the TyL facilites comparison and aggregation at larger-assessment scales.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
number of fish in a sample(N)
body mass of each fish in a sample(M)
length of each fish in a sample(L)

newValue:
number of fish in a sample (N)
body mass of each fish in a sample (M)
length of each fish in a sample (L)


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 881 name {Changes in average trophic level of marine predators (FW4)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _4 {Biomass: fisheries catches and scientific survey data

TL: dietary analyses (estimated from local gut contents and isotopes analyses). Otherwise, estimates from trophic models such as Ecopath or estimates from online data portals, such as FishBase, can be used.
} _5 {species mean trophic level (TL)
species biomass (only high trophic level species > 3.25)} _6 none _1 1447433793 _11 {Marine Trophic Index (MTI) is calculated using both estimates of species biomass, usually derived from scientific surveys, and their mean trophic level. The trophic level (TL) expresses the position of an organism in a food web, and is estimated using data from dietary analyses. Only predators whose TL is higher than 3.25 are considered.
A decrease in Marine Trophic Index represents a decline in the abundance and diversity of fish species high in the food chain.} _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {FW4 Changes in average trophic level of marine predators (Marine Trophic Index)} _15 State _16 Foodweb _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21527 oid 881 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {The target is an “acceptable” deviation from the baseline and should be determined for each ecosystem individually.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21527 oid 881 aid 7 apid 24 avid 14 value {See Sources for baseline and reference level determination.}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 340 name {Kleisner et al. 2015} _0 {K. Kleisner, H. Mansour, D. Pauly} _1 2015 _2 {The MTI and RMTI as tools for unmasking the fishing down phenomenon.} _3 {Methods-MTI-FiB-RMTI www.seaaroundus.org} _4 http://www.seaaroundus.org/mti-fib-rmti/


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue: Typical Length (TyL) is defined as the geometric mean length of fish, weighted by body mass.
newValue:
Typical Length (TyL) is defined as the geometric mean length of fish, weighted 
by body mass.
The distribution of biomass over body sizes (size spectra; Kerr and Dickie 2001) is an emergent property of food webs, thus size-based metrics that are sensitive and specific to pressures can be used as indicators of food web structure.


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21530 oid 126 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {For each colony; annual breeding success is not significantly different, statistically, from the level expected in the prevailing climatic conditions in five years out of six.}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 882 name {Conservation status of elasmobranch and demersal bony-fish species (IUCN) (FC5)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _10 {FC5 is an OSPAR Candidate Indicator.} _1 1447679262 _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {FC5 Conservation status of elasmobranch and demersal bony-fish species (IUCN)} _15 State _16 {Target Groups}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 883 name {Proportion of mature fish (FC6)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _10 {FC6 is an OSPAR Candidate Indicator.} _1 1447679805 _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {FC6 Proportion of mature fish} _15 State _16 {Population Ecology}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 884 name {Distributional range (FC7)} parent 0 _10 {FC7 is an OSPAR Candidate Indicator.} _1 1447680084 _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {FC7 Distributional range} _15 State


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21544 oid 136 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {General target is to reach a ratio of typical and/or character species similar to baseline conditions. }


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Distribution and sensitivity of habitats and distribution and intensity of human activities (EIAs and VMS data, Data Collection Framework)

newValue:
Distribution and sensitivity of habitats components;
distribution and intensity of human activities and pressures causing physical damage(EIAs and VMS data, Data Collection Framework).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue: Indicator particularly useful to target larger sea areas with relatively low effort.
newValue:
The MSFD requires an analysis of the state of habitats and the distribution and intensity of anthropogenic pressures impacting upon them.
Particularly useful to target larger sea areas with relatively low effort.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue: BH3 is one of the prioritised OSPAR Candidate Indicators, proposed for promotion.
newValue:
BH3 is one of the prioritised OSPAR Candidate Indicators, proposed for promotion.

Avoid overlap with pressures addressed by BH2 - MMI.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
The MSFD requires an analysis of the state of habitats and the distribution and intensity of anthropogenic pressures impacting upon them.
Particularly useful to target larger sea areas with relatively low effort.

newValue:
The MSFD requires an analysis of the state of habitats and the distribution and intensity of anthropogenic pressures impacting upon them. This BH3 indicator is particularly useful to target larger sea areas with relatively low effort.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Distribution and sensitivity of habitats components;
distribution and intensity of human activities and pressures causing physical damage(EIAs and VMS data, Data Collection Framework).

newValue:
Distribution and sensitivity of habitats components (selection based on pre-defined criteria);
Distribution and intensity of human activities and pressures causing physical damage(EIAs and VMS data, Data Collection Framework).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Distribution and sensitivity of habitats components (selection based on pre-defined criteria);
Distribution and intensity of human activities and pressures causing physical damage(EIAs and VMS data, Data Collection Framework).

newValue:
Distribution and sensitivity of habitats components (selection based on pre-defined criteria);
Distribution and intensity of human activities and pressures causing physical damage (EIAs and VMS data, Data Collection Framework).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
BH3 is one of the prioritised OSPAR Candidate Indicators, proposed for promotion.

Avoid overlap with pressures addressed by BH2 - MMI.

newValue:
BH3 is one of the prioritised OSPAR Candidate Indicators, proposed for promotion.

This indicator should not overlap with assessments and outputs already addressed by BH2 - MMI.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
The MSFD requires an analysis of the state of habitats and the distribution and intensity of anthropogenic pressures impacting upon them. This BH3 indicator is particularly useful to target larger sea areas with relatively low effort.

newValue:
BH3 is measuring the surface area of damaged habitat, by analysing the state of habitats and the distribution and intensity of anthropogenic pressures impacting upon them. 
BH3 indicator is particularly useful to target larger sea areas with relatively low effort.


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 2868 oid 138 aid 7 apid 24 avid 14 value {This indicator is closely linked to the area of habitat loss indicator. Therefore the GES boundary for habitat damage could take into account the proportion of area already lost for a particular habitat by decreasing the targets of allowed damage.}


action: u
dbtable: oas
column: value
oldValue:
This indicator is closely linked to the area of habitat loss indicator. Therefore the GES boundary for habitat damage could take into account the proportion of area already lost for a particular habitat by decreasing the targets of allowed damage.

newValue:
This indicator is closely linked to the area of habitat loss. Therefore the GES boundary for habitat damage could take into account the proportion of area already lost for a particular habitat by decreasing the targets of allowed damage.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
newValue:
The indicator incorporates three parameters: species, inventory and dispersal.
While all provide information for the understanding of NIS introductions, spread and management, only the Species-parameter will be used to assess targets at this stage in the indicator development: number of new NIS introduced into the assessment area during the assessment period.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
newValue:
NIS-2 is one of the prioritised OSPAR Candidate Indicators, proposed for promotion.

See Sources for Inventory‐Parameter and Dispersal‐Parameter.


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 16564 oid 712 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {The target for this indicator is to demonstrate a reduction in the rate of introduction of NIS.}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue: Annual mean breeding success of marine bird species at colonies
newValue:
Annual mean breeding success of marine bird species at colonies (no. chicks fledged per pair). 
Depending in species and area, the parameter may be derived from data hatching success (i.e. number of eggs hatched per pair).

Hatching and fledging success is monitored for a selection of species sensitive to changes in pressures, breeding on soft coasts and islands.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Annual mean breeding success of marine bird species at colonies (no. chicks fledged per pair). 
Depending in species and area, the parameter may be derived from data hatching success (i.e. number of eggs hatched per pair).

Hatching and fledging success is monitored for a selection of species sensitive to changes in pressures, breeding on soft coasts and islands.

newValue:
Annual mean breeding success of marine bird species at colonies (no. chicks fledged per pair). 
Depending in species and area, the parameter may be derived from data hatching success (i.e. number of eggs hatched per pair).
Hatching and fledging success is monitored for a selection of species sensitive to changes in pressures.


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 341 name {Cook et al. 2012} _0 {Cook A.S.C.P., Ross‐Smith V.H. & Robinson R.A. 2012. } _1 2012 _2 {Development of MSFD Indicators, Baselines and Target for Seabird Breeding Failure Occurrence in the UK. } _3 {BTO Research Report No. 615. The British Trust for Ornithology, UK.}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
newValue:
In a food web context, primary production is likely to be the most appropriate measure since it is a flux indicator of the potential for higher trophic levels to produce biomass. Moreover, considering primary production at different size ranges could provide information on the trophic efficiency between different parts of the food web.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
In a food web context, primary production is likely to be the most appropriate measure since it is a flux indicator of the potential for higher trophic levels to produce biomass. Moreover, considering primary production at different size ranges could provide information on the trophic efficiency between different parts of the food web.

newValue:
In a food web context, primary production is likely to be the most appropriate measure since it is a flux indicator of the potential for higher trophic levels to produce biomass. Moreover, considering primary production at different size ranges could provide information on the trophic efficiency between different parts of the food web.
Parameters to be measured are phytoplankton production and the P:B ratio (P:B ratio gives an indication of the functioning of the foodweb).


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 864 name {COPY OF: Production of phytoplankton} parent 0 _0 {Cefas - CL 133} _4 {HPLC, flouresence, or remote sensing} _5 {Phytoplankton Biomass (carbon from biovolume, particulate organic cardon, or chlorophyll concentration)} _6 {C m-2 yr-1} _8 Low _10 {Can be calculated from various samplers and a range of techniques} _1 1387363642 _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _13 {check with similar entries

Field 'Country' was "Ospar Contracting Parties". This has been removed since it is no country. Please update Data->Settings accordingly.} _14 {FW-2 Production of phytoplankton} _15 State _16 Production _18 {Simple statistics}


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 767 name {Distributional range of zooplankton} parent 0 _0 {Cefas - CL 136c} _5 {to be agreed} _1 1387399280 _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {FW-6 Biomass, species composition and spatial distribution of zooplankton} _15 State _16 {Target Groups}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _14
newValue: Zooplankton species population size
oldValue:
FW-6 Biomass, species composition and spatial distribution of zooplankton
Zooplankton species population size


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue: Catchable proportion of fish populations by survey
newValue:
Abundances of fishes and benthic invertebrates by functional group. Fish (and benthic species) abundance and biomass are expected to decrease in exploited populations.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
OSPAR common indicator FW-8
Catchable proportion of fish+invertebrate populations by survey (weight or numbers)

newValue:
Biomass Trophic Spectrum (BTS) is an ecosystem-based indicator that allows a more holistic view of the food web structure than species/population indicators.
Abundances per species or group (usually expressed in tons/km2) are distributed on a range of trophic levels around the mean trophic level of the species or group, and according to the variability between individuals. The trophic level(TL) expresses the position of an organism in a food web, and is estimated using diet data. Mean TLs can be derived either (and preferably) from local gut contents and isotopes analyses, or from trophic models such as Ecopath, or by using estimates from online data portals, such as FishBase. BTS are usually built using an empirical smooth function distributing each population or group across TLs according to a lognormal distribution whose standard error increases with TLs. The BTS is the sum of the distributions for all species or groups.


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 885 name {Ecological Network Analysis indicator (FW9)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _5 {The model will need information on the biomass of different trophic groups (e.g. production for phytoplankton) and dietary data that can be obtained from, e.g. stable isotopes, stomach contents, etc.} _8 {High, data intensive.} _10 {FW9 is an OSPAR Candidate Indicator.} _1 1447696435 _11 {Two Ecological Network Analysis (ENA) indicators are proposed: flow diversity and trophic efficiency, for being holistic (represent the whole community) and functional (based on ecosystem functionning). 
Flow diversity, defined as Development Capacity/Total System Throughput, encompasses both the numbers of interactions and the evenness of flows in the food web. A high value of flow diversity reflects a diverse and relatively stable food web, and can also be used as a link between food web characteristics and habitat diversity.
Trophic efficiency is the mean ratio of production of one trophic level to the production of the lower trophic level. A high value of Trophic Efficiency is supposed to be characteristic of a mature ecosystem.} _12 {{OSPAR common indicator}} _14 {FW9 Ecological Network Analysis indicator} _15 State _16 Foodweb _18 Modelling


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Two Ecological Network Analysis (ENA) indicators are proposed: flow diversity and trophic efficiency, for being holistic (represent the whole community) and functional (based on ecosystem functionning). 
Flow diversity, defined as Development Capacity/Total System Throughput, encompasses both the numbers of interactions and the evenness of flows in the food web. A high value of flow diversity reflects a diverse and relatively stable food web, and can also be used as a link between food web characteristics and habitat diversity.
Trophic efficiency is the mean ratio of production of one trophic level to the production of the lower trophic level. A high value of Trophic Efficiency is supposed to be characteristic of a mature ecosystem.

newValue:
Two Ecological Network Analysis (ENA) indicators are proposed: flow diversity and trophic efficiency, for being holistic (represent the whole community) and functional (based on ecosystem functionning). 
Flow diversity is defined as Development Capacity/Total System Throughput; encompasses both the numbers of interactions and the evenness of flows in the food web. A high value of flow diversity reflects a diverse and relatively stable food web, and can also be used as a link between food web characteristics and habitat diversity.
Trophic efficiency is the mean ratio of production of one trophic level to the production of the lower trophic level. A high value of Trophic Efficiency is supposed to be characteristic of a mature ecosystem.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
The model will need information on the biomass of different trophic groups (e.g. production for phytoplankton) and dietary data that can be obtained from, e.g. stable isotopes, stomach contents, etc.

newValue:
The model will need information on the biomass of different trophic groups (e.g. production for phytoplankton) and dietary data that can be obtained from, e.g. stable isotopes, stomach contents, etc.
Minimum requirements are biomass of dominant compartments and the local primary production. Other variables for more precision: respiration, diets.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Biomass of pelagic planktivores, pelagic piscivores, demersal benthivores, demersal planktivores and omnivores
Catchable proportion of fish populations by survey (weight or numbers)

newValue:
Biomass of pelagic planktivores, pelagic piscivores, demersal benthivores, demersal planktivores and omnivores.


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 342 name {Härkönen et al. 2013} _0 {Tero Härkönen, Anders Galatius, Stefan Bräeger, Olle Karlsson & Markus Ahola (in collaboration with HELCOM SEAL expert group and ASTARNIA group).} _1 2013 _2 {HELCOM Biodiversity Core Indicator: Population growth rate, abundance and distribution of marine mammals } _4 http://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/biodiversity/indicators/population-growth-rate-abundance-and-distribution-of-marine-mammals/


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _14
oldValue:
Ratio between invasive and indigenous speceis in selected well-known groups (fish, shrimps and mussels)

newValue:
Ratio between invasive and indigenous species in selected well-known groups (fish, shrimps and mussels)


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 343 name {Bäcklin et al. 2013} _0 {Bäcklin B., Moraeus C., Kauhala K., Isomursu  M., (of Ad  hoc HELCOM  SEAL Expert Group).} _1 2013 _2 {Pregnancy rates of the marine mammals - Particular emphasis on Baltic grey and ringed seals.} _3 {Bäcklin B., Moraeus C., Kauhala K., Isomursu  M., (of Ad hoc HELCOM SEAL Expert Group), 2013. Pregnancy rates of the marine mammals - Particular emphasis on Baltic grey and ringed seals. HELCOM Core Indicator Report. Online. 
19/11/2015, http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/HELCOM-CoreIndicator-Pregnancy_rates_of_marine_mammals.pdf.} _4 http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/HELCOM-CoreIndicator-Pregnancy_rates_of_marine_mammals.pdf


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
newValue: For supporting documentation see Sources.
oldValue:
Documentation: http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/HELCOM-CoreIndicator-Pregnancy_rates_of_marine_mammals.pdf


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Pregnancy rate of grey seals aged 4-20
Pregnancy rate of harbour porposes, all mature females
Pregnancy rate of harbour seals aged 4-20
Pregnancy rate of ringed seals aged 4-20

newValue:
Pregnancy rate of grey seals aged 4-20
Pregnancy rate of harbour porposes, all mature females
Pregnancy rate of harbour seals aged 4-20
Pregnancy rate of ringed seals aged 4-20

Pregnancy rate is measured as the presence or absence of an embryo or foetus during the pregnancy period in mature females  (presence  of  an  ovarian Corpus  luteum,  CL). Pregnancy rate can also be  determined  on  the  basis of  Corpus  albicantia  (CA)  in  the  spring  sample  (between  ovulation  and implantation). 


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 344 name {Uusitalo et al. 2013} _0 {Uusitalo, L., Fleming-Lehtinen, V., Hällfors, H., Jaanus, A., Hällfors, S., & London, L. } _1 2013 _2 {A novel approach for estimating phytoplankton biodiversity} _3 {Uusitalo, L., Fleming-Lehtinen, V., Hällfors, H., Jaanus, A., Hällfors, S., & London, L. (2013). A novel approach for estimating phytoplankton biodiversity. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 70(2), 408-417.} _4 http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/content/70/2/408


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: name
newValue: Assessment of macrovegetation in coastal and transitional waters
oldValue:
WFD Swedish Assessment of Biological Quality Elements in coastal and transitional waters - macrovegetation


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Multimetric index  (4 metrics) assessing EQR values for BQE Macroalgae based on depth limit of sensitive species, species cover of Fucus spp and Ulva and species composition (reduced species list)

newValue:
Multimetric index  (4 metrics) assessing EQR values for BQE Macroalgae based on depth limit of sensitive species, species cover of Fucus spp and Ulva and species composition (reduced species list).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _14
newValue: Area occupied by Posidonia oceanica meadows; Mapping of the Posidonia oceanica meadows
oldValue:
area occupied by Posidonia oceanica meadows
Mapping of the Posidonia oceanica meadows, Mapping of the Maerl-type biogenic sediments.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _14
oldValue:
Index of Sannon-Weaver
Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H')
BENTIX index, H' index (Shannon Index), S index (Species abundance)
Zoobenthos-diversity indices

newValue:
Index of Sannon-Weaver, Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H'), H' index (Shannon Index), Zoobenthos-diversity indices


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _0
oldValue:
MHI-OK 123a
IO-BAS 6
IO-BAS 40
IO-BAS 48
IO-BAS 51
IO-BAS 57
IO-BAS 61
IO-BAS 64
IO-BAS 68
JRC-HT 42
HCMR-NP 7b
HCMR- NP 109d

newValue:
MHI-OK 123a, IO-BAS 6, IO-BAS 40, IO-BAS 48, IO-BAS 51, IO-BAS 57, IO-BAS 61, IO-BAS 64, IO-BAS 68, JRC-HT 42, HCMR-NP 7b, HCMR-NP 109d


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 345 name {Shannon 1948} _0 {Shannon, C. E. } _1 1948 _2 {A mathematical theory of communication. } _3 {Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(July 1928), 379–423. doi:10.1145/584091.584093} _4 http://www.mast.queensu.ca/~math474/shannon1948.pdf


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Multimetric indicator using different parameters like species richness, diversity, percentage of opportunistic species, percentage of sensitive species

CYMOX index is a biotix index that is applied only on habitat with the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa (this biotic index includes several metrics: N15, S34, % N, % P content of rhizomes; shoot size; root weight ratio; epiphytes load; and Cd, Cu and Zn content of rhizomes).

newValue:
The CYMOX index is a multimetric index, constituted by 10 metrics encompassing the physiological (δ15N, δ34S, % N, % P content of rhizomes), individual (shoot size), population (root weight ratio), and community (epiphytes load) organization levels, and some metallic pollution descriptors (Cd, Cu and Zn content of rhizomes). These metrics are integrated into a single index (CYMOX) using the scores of the sites on the first axis of a PCA. These scores are reduced to a 0–1 (Ecological Quality Ratio) scale by referring the values to the optimal (reference) and worst (most degraded) conditions.
CYMOX index is a biotic index that is applied only to habitats  with the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa.


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 886 name {COPY OF: Abundance of selected benthic invertebrate species} parent 0 _0 {AZTI-JGR 266a} _10 {MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 266 in its three parameters to be consistant with other indicators.} _1 1447953083 _11 {Pinna nobilis density} _14 {[Pinna nobilis] density, age-frequency distribution and population demographics} _15 State _16 {Indicator Species} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21561 oid 886 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 266 in its three parameters to be consistant with other indicators.

newValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 266 in its three parameters to be consistant with other indicators.
JRC: and also split Pinna nobilis entries (266 a,b,c) from Seagrasses entries (266 d,e,f).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 266 in its three parameters to be consistant with other indicators.
JRC: and also split Pinna nobilis entries (266 a,b,c) from Seagrasses entries (266 d,e,f).

newValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 266 in its three parameters to be consistant with other indicators.
JRC: and now also separated entries for Pinna nobilis (266 a,b,c) and Seagrasses entries (266 d,e,f).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 266 in its three parameters to be consistant with other indicators.
JRC: and now also separated entries for Pinna nobilis (266 a,b,c) and Seagrasses entries (266 d,e,f).

newValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 266 in its three parameters to be consistant with other indicators.
JRC: and now also separated entries for Pinna nobilis (266 a,b,c) and Seagrasses entries (266 d).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 266 in its three parameters to be consistant with other indicators.
JRC: and now also separated entries for Pinna nobilis (266 a,b,c) and Seagrasses entries (266 d).

newValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 266 in its three parameters to be consistant with other indicators.
JRC: and now also separated entries for Pinna nobilis (266 a,b) and Seagrasses entries (266 d).


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 886 name {Abundance of seagrasses} parent 0 _0 {AZTI-JGR 266d, JRC-HT} _10 {MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 266 in its three parameters to be consistant with other indicators.
JRC: and now also separated entries for Pinna nobilis (266 a,b) and Seagrasses entries (266 d).} _1 1448128807 _11 {seagrasses density} _14 {[Seagrasses] density, age-frequency distribution and population demographics} _15 State _16 {Indicator Species} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21560 oid 313 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21561 oid 313 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 sid 63 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18843 oid 313 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 sid 63 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21562 oid 313 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 sid 63 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21563 oid 313 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 sid 78 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 8857 oid 309 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 8881 oid 309 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 8887 oid 309 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 309 name {Abundance of functional groups} parent 0 _0 {AZTI-JGR 277} _5 {Species composition and abundance data, species-specific functional group definition} _1 1388662951 _13 {MariLim: AZTI-JGR the indicator description is to unprecise. Please specify to which biological components this applies and how the indicator is calculated (per habitat or per biological component, ...)} _14 {abundance of functional groups} _15 State _16 {Life Traits}


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 433 name {Age class structure of commercial fish } parent 0 _0 {MHI-OK 135} _4 {to be checked } _5 {length/weigt of individuals} _8 {Not available } _10 {Merge with MHI-OK 134} _1 1386926709 _13 {add species/taxa in new field} _14 {Commercial fish age class structure}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21566 oid 434 aid 5 apid 26 avid 14 value {Tursiops truncatus, Phocoena phocoena, Delphinus delphis}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21567 oid 434 aid 5 apid 26 avid 14 value {Tursiops truncatus, Phocoena phocoena, Delphinus delphis}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
The three (3) above mentioned indexes have been applied by Cyprus (Good Environmental Status Report) in order to tackle Criterion 1.1 (Species Distribution) for Descriptor 1. The variation of different macroalgal diversity indices (species number, Pielou’s Evenness-“J‟, Shannon-Weaver- “H‟) was studied on a hierarchy of spatial and temporal scales in Cyprus rocky coasts monitored during WFD program.

newValue:
The three (3) above mentioned indexes have been applied by Cyprus (Good Environmental Status Report) in order to tackle Criterion 1.1 (Species Distribution) for Descriptor 1. The variation of different macroalgal diversity indices (species number, Pielou’s Evenness “J‟, Shannon “H‟) was studied on a hierarchy of spatial and temporal scales in Cyprus rocky coasts monitored during WFD program.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
The three (3) above mentioned indexes have been applied by Cyprus (Good Environmental Status Report) in order to tackle Criterion 1.1 (Species Distribution) for Descriptor 1. The spatial variation of different benthic invertebrate diversity indices (species number, Pielou’s Evenness-“J‟, Shannon-Weaver-“H‟) was studied across an anthropogenic gradient in eight Cyprus sedimentary sites within the WFD monitoring program.

newValue:
The three (3) above mentioned indexes have been applied by Cyprus (Good Environmental Status Report) in order to tackle Criterion 1.1 (Species Distribution) for Descriptor 1. The spatial variation of different benthic invertebrate diversity indices (species number, Pielou’s Evenness “J‟, Shannon diversity “H‟) was studied across an anthropogenic gradient in eight Cyprus sedimentary sites within the WFD monitoring program.


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 346 name {Pielou 1966} _0 {Pielou, E.C. } _1 1966 _2 {The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections.} _3 {Pielou, E.C. (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131-144. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022519366900130


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
newValue:
BFI - biomass fractionation index (Lampadariou et al. 2008) is estimated as follows, biomass having passed through 1.0mm and retained on 0.5mm sieve only/total biomass (biomass retained on 1.0mm+0.5mm sieve).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
BFI - biomass fractionation index (Lampadariou et al. 2008) is estimated as follows, biomass having passed through 1.0mm and retained on 0.5mm sieve only/total biomass (biomass retained on 1.0mm+0.5mm sieve).

newValue:
BFI - biomass fractionation index (Lampadariou et al. 2008) is estimated as follows: biomass having passed through 1.0mm and retained on 0.5mm sieve only/total biomass (biomass retained on 1.0mm+0.5mm sieve).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
This is actually the definition of the MSFD indicator 6.2.3 of criterion 6.2 (Condition of benthic community) of Descriptor 6.  For this indicator Cyprus has done nothing due to lack of data, while Greece has suggested the use of BFI Index (biomass fractionation Index) by Lampadariou et al, (2008). 

newValue:
The original indicator entry name is actually the definition of the MSFD indicator 6.2.3 of criterion 6.2 (Condition of benthic community) of Descriptor 6.  For this indicator Cyprus has done nothing due to lack of data, while Greece has suggested the use of BFI Index (biomass fractionation Index) by Lampadariou et al, (2008). 


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 347 name {Lampadariou et al. 2008} _0 {Nikolaos Lampadariou, Ioanna Akoumianaki, Ioannis Karakassis} _2 {Use of the size fractionation of the macrobenthic biomass for the rapid assessment of benthic organic enrichment.} _3 {Lampadariou, N., Akoumianaki, I., Karakassis, I., 2008. Use of the size fractionation of the macrobenthic biomass for the rapid assessment of benthic organic enrichment. Ecological Indicators, 8(5): 729-742. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.01.003
} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X08000046


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator HCMR-NP 123 in abundance and biomass to be consistent with other indicators.

This is actually the definition of the MSFD indicator 6.2.3 of criterion 6.2 (Condition of benthic community) of Descriptor 6.  For this indicator Cyprus has done nothing due to lack of data, while Greece has suggested the use of BFI Index (biomass fractionation Index) by Lampadariou et al, (2008). 

newValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator HCMR-NP 123 in abundance (HCMR-NP 123a) and biomass (HCMR-NP 123b) to be consistent with other indicators.

This is actually the definition of the MSFD indicator 6.2.3 of criterion 6.2 (Condition of benthic community) of Descriptor 6.  For this indicator Cyprus has done nothing due to lack of data, while Greece has suggested the use of BFI Index (biomass fractionation Index) by Lampadariou et al, (2008). 


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 797 name {Abundance ratio of benthic invertebrates above specified length} parent 0 _0 {HCMR- NP 123a} _10 {MariLim: We had to split indicator HCMR-NP 123 in abundance (HCMR-NP 123a) and biomass (HCMR-NP 123b) to be consistent with other indicators.

This is actually the definition of the MSFD indicator 6.2.3 of criterion 6.2 (Condition of benthic community) of Descriptor 6.  For this indicator Cyprus has done nothing due to lack of data, while Greece has suggested the use of BFI Index (biomass fractionation Index) by Lampadariou et al, (2008). 

} _1 1448200085 _14 {Proportion of biomass or number of individuals in the macrobenthos above some specified length/size} _15 State _16 {Community Structure} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21574 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21575 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21576 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21577 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21578 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21579 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21580 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21581 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21582 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21583 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21584 oid 503 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Maintain current density of biogenic species at known locations with biogenic structures}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21585 oid 502 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21586 oid 502 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21587 oid 502 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21588 oid 502 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21589 oid 502 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21590 oid 502 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21591 oid 502 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue: Multimetric index for phytoplankton using three parameters: taxonomic structure, abundance, biomass
newValue:
Multimetric index for phytoplankton using three parameters: taxonomic structure, abundance, biomass. The combination rule applied to the Integrated Biological Index (IBI-Ph) metrics assumes equal weight (1) (average metric scores) proposed by Spatharis S., G. Tsirtsis (2010), i.e., = arithmetic average of EQRs for the single metrics, after normalization of the EQRs boundaries.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
newValue:
POSWARE index (ISPRA, 2009) is formulated on the base of the following set of descriptors: density of prairies (no. of bundles per sq m), primary production (assessed in terms of annual weight increase of rhizome), annual rhizome elongation and leaf production (no. of leaves produced per year).


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 348 name {ISPRA 2009} _0 {ISPRA AMBIENTE} _1 2009 _2 {Anuario ISPRA Ambiente 2009, Chapter 4 Water quality} _4 http://annuario.isprambiente.it/sites/default/files/pdf/2009/en/Water_quality.pdf


action: u
dbtable: sources
column: _3
oldValue:
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems Volume 20, Issue 2, 177–188
National Agricultural Research Foundation (NAGREF)-Fisheries Research Institute (FRI)

newValue:
Orfanidis S, Papathanasiou V, Gounaris S, Theodosiou T(2010) Size distribution approaches for monitoring and conservation of coastal Cymodocea habitats. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 20(2): 177–188. DOI:10.1002/aqc.1069


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Proposed multimetric index assessing EQR values for BQE Angiosperms based on  seagrass demograpghic parameters and epiphyte biomass

newValue:
Proposed multimetric index assessing EQR values for BQE Angiosperms based on  seagrass demograpghic parameters and epiphyte biomass.
Metrics combination through PCA.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Multimetric index for macrophytes using three parameters: depth limit of total attached phytobenthos, depth limit of Fucus vesiculosus and biomass ratio of perennial species

newValue:
Multimetric index for macrophytes using three parameters: depth limit of total attached phytobenthos, depth limit of Fucus vesiculosus and biomass ratio of perennial species. For the calculation of the Estonian Phytobenthos Index (EPI) the average of standardized EQRs of the three above-mentioned metrics is used (Torn & Martin 2012).


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 349 name {Torn & Martin 2012} _0 {Torn, Kaire & Martin, Georg} _1 2012 _2 {Response of submerged aquatic vegetation to eutrophication-related environment descriptors in coastal waters of the NE Baltic Sea.} _3 {Torn & Martin (2012) Response of submerged aquatic vegetation to eutrophication-related environment descriptors in coastal waters of the NE Baltic Sea. Estonian Journal of Ecology, 61(2): 106-118. doi: 10.3176/eco.2012.2.03} _4 http://www.kirj.ee/public/Ecology/2012/issue_2/ecol-2012-2-106-118.pdf


action: u
dbtable: sources
column: _2
oldValue:
Assessment of marine benthic quality change in gradients of disturbance: comparison of multi-metric indices

newValue:
Assessment of marine benthic quality change in gradients of disturbance: Comparison of different Scandinavian multi-metric indices.


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 350 name {Hoglander et al. 2013} _0 {Höglander, H., Karlson B., Johansen, M., Walve, J., Andersson, A. } _1 2013 _2 {Overview of coastal phytoplankton indicators and their potential use in Swedish waters.} _3 {Höglander, H., Karlson B., Johansen, M., Walve, J., Andersson, A. Overview of coastal phytoplankton indicators and their potential use in Swedish waters. Deliverable 3.3-1, WATERS Report no. 2013: 5. Havsmiljöinstitutet, Sweden} _4 http://hdl.handle.net/2077/37081


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
newValue:
"Biopollution level index" (BPL), to classify the level of bioinvasion impacts. The index measures level of biopollution i.e. adverse environmental effects of NIS. Is it measuring the pressure level to the ecosystem. 


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 351 name {Olenin et al. 2007} _0 {Olenin, S., Minchin, D., and Daunys, D.} _1 2007 _2 {Assessment of biopollution in aquatic ecosystems.} _3 {Olenin, S., Minchin, D., and Daunys, D. 2007. Assessment of biopollution in aquatic ecosystems. Mar Pol Bull 55:379–394. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.01.010} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X07000148


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 352 name {Zaiko et al. 2011} _0 {Zaiko A, Lehtiniemi M, Narščius A, Olenin S} _1 2011 _2 {Assessment of bioinvasion impacts on a regional scale: a comparative approach.} _3 {Zaiko A, Lehtiniemi M, Narščius A, Olenin S (2011) Assessment of bioinvasion impacts on a regional scale: a comparative approach. Biological Invasions 13: 1739-1765. doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9928-z} _4 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10530-010-9928-z


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
newValue:
More details on HELCOM website: http://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/environment-fact-sheets/biodiversity/biopollution-level-index


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21592 oid 762 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
statistical descriptors (box-plot) of the biomass and abundance of functional groups (global, segmented by season, segmented by space).

newValue:
statistical descriptors (box-plot) of the biomass of functional groups (global, segmented by season, segmented by space).


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 760 name {Biomass of zooplankton} parent 0 _0 {AZTI-JGR 155b} _1 1448275128 _14 {[Zooplankton] population abundance and/or biomass}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18371 oid 760 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
PREI (Posidonia oceanica Rapid Easy Index), is a method used to assess the Ecological Status along Mediterranean coasts according to the WFD recommendations (Gobert et al. 2009). PREI was implemented in three differently impacted sites across the sedimentary coasts of Cyprus within the WFD monitoring program

newValue:
The Posidonia oceanica Rapid Easy Index (PREI) is based on five metrics: shoot density, shoot leaf surface area, E/L ratio (epiphytic biomass/leaf biomass), depth of lower limit, and type of this lower limit. 
Index algorithm:  EQR defined as an index integrating the averaging of the chosen individual metrics: EQR’= (N density + N leaf surface area + N (E/L) + N lower limit)/3.5


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
The index has been applied by Cyprus (Good Environmental Status Report) in order to tackle Indicator 1.7.1 (Composition and relative proportions of ecosystem components (habitats and species)) of Criterion 1.7 (Ecosystem structure) for Descriptor 1

newValue:
The method is used to assess the Ecological Status along Mediterranean coasts according to the WFD recommendations (Gobert et al. 2009). 

PREI was implemented in three differently impacted sites across the sedimentary coasts of Cyprus within the WFD monitoring program. 

The index has been applied by Cyprus (Good Environmental Status Report) in order to tackle Indicator 1.7.1 (Composition and relative proportions of ecosystem components (habitats and species)) of Criterion 1.7 (Ecosystem structure) for Descriptor 1


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 353 name {Gobert et al. 2009} _0 {Gobert, S., Sartoretto, S., Rico-Raimondino, V., Andral, B., Chery, A., Lejeune, P., & Boissery, P.} _1 2009 _2 {Assessment of the ecological status of Mediterranean French coastal waters as required by the Water Framework Directive using the< i> Posidonia oceanica</i> Rapid Easy Index: PREI.} _3 {Gobert, S., Sartoretto, S., Rico-Raimondino, V., Andral, B., Chery, A., Lejeune, P., & Boissery, P. (2009). Assessment of the ecological status of Mediterranean French coastal waters as required by the Water Framework Directive using the< i> Posidonia oceanica</i> Rapid Easy Index: PREI. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58(11), 1727-1733. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.06.012} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X09002574


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Multimetric index assessing EQR values for BQE Angiosperms combining areal extent, width of vegetation zones and species composition

newValue:
Multimetric index assessing EQR values for BQE Angiosperms combining areal extent, width of vegetation zones and species composition.
Combination rule for multi-metrics: Weighted average metric scores.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Multimetric index assessing EQR values for BQE Phytoplankton using Chl a concentrations, biovolume, Cyanophyceae and  Chlorophyceae concentrations  (between may and sep)

newValue:
Multimetric index assessing EQR values for BQE Phytoplankton using Chl a concentrations, biovolume, Cyanophyceae and  Chlorophyceae concentrations  (between may and sep).
Combination rule for multi-metrics: Weighted average metric scores.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
A multimetric index using several parameters like cover of selected macroalgae species, ratio of opportunistic species (%) and species richness

newValue:
A multimetric index using several parameters like cover of selected macroalgae species, ratio of opportunistic species (%) and species richness.


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 354 name {CFR Index website} _2 {CFR Index website} _3 {CFR Index website: assessed 23/11/2015} _4 http://cfr.ihcantabria.com/cfr-index/


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 355 name {IUCN red list} _0 IUCN _2 {IUCN red list} _3 {IUCN red list: assessed 23/11/2015} _4 http://www.iucnredlist.org/


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 356 name {Minicheva 2013} _0 {Minicheva, G. G.} _1 2013 _2 {Use of the macrophytes’ morphofunctional parameters to assess Ecological Status Class in accordance with the EU WFD.} _3 {Minicheva, G. G. (2013). Use of the macrophytes’ morphofunctional parameters to assess Ecological Status Class in accordance with the EU WFD.} _4 http://emblasproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Minicheva_WFD.pdf


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 357 name {Pinedo et al. 2015} _0 {Susana Pinedo, Esther Jordana & Enric Ballesteros} _1 2015 _2 {A critical analysis on the response of macroinvertebrate communities along disturbance gradients: description of MEDOCC (MEDiterranean OCCidental) index.} _3 {Pinedo, S., Jordana, E. & Ballesteros, E. (2014). A critical analysis on the response of macroinvertebrate communities along disturbance gradients: description of MEDOCC (MEDiterranean OCCidental) index. Marine Ecology 36(2):141-154. DOI:10.1111/maec.12126} _4 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maec.12126/abstract


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _9
oldValue:
U-DKJ/JHA: see examples in tables of link (column p)
We analysed the sensitivity of the algal variables through evaluation of the stochastic variation of the variables and through power analyses. Power analyses were conducted on the basis of the three components of stochastic variation associated with each algal variable, i.e. variation due to divers, variation between sites and residual variation/variation between replicates.

newValue:
U-DKJ/JHA: see examples in tables of Source (column p)
We analysed the sensitivity of the algal variables through evaluation of the stochastic variation of the variables and through power analyses. Power analyses were conducted on the basis of the three components of stochastic variation associated with each algal variable, i.e. variation due to divers, variation between sites and residual variation/variation between replicates.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _14
oldValue:
Ecological evaluation index (EEI)
Ecological evaluation index (EEIc)
Ecological Evaluation Index (EEI), PREI index (Posidonia), BENTIX index

newValue:
Ecological evaluation index (EEI), Ecological evaluation index (EEIc), Ecological Evaluation Index (EEI)


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 358 name {EEI website} _2 {Ecological Evaluation Index site} _3 {Ecological Evaluation Index site: assessed 23/11/2015} _4 http://www.eei.gr/


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
macroalgae community taxonomic structure
1)	Ecological Evaluation Index (EEI): The EEI, inspired by the “alternative stable stages” theory, is based on the well-known pattern where anthropogenic stress, for example eutrophication and heavy metal pollution, shifts the ecosystem from being pristine, where late-successional species are dominant, to a degraded state, where opportunistic, nitrophilous species are dominant (Orfanidis et al. 2011). EEI was implemented in three differently impacted sites of the rocky Cyprus coasts monitored within WFD program.

newValue:
macroalgae community taxonomic structure
The Ecological Evaluation Index (EEI) was inspired by the “alternative stable stages” theory. It is based on the well-known pattern where anthropogenic stress, for example eutrophication and heavy metal pollution, shifts the ecosystem from being pristine, where late-successional species are dominant, to a degraded state, where opportunistic, nitrophilous species are dominant (Orfanidis et al. 2011). EEI was implemented in three differently impacted sites of the rocky Cyprus coasts monitored within WFD program.
See EEI website for more details (link in Sources).


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
Although angiosperms are also covered by this method for soft bottom in coastal lagoons, they were not considered here, because coastal lagoons are out of the scope of the MSFD
MariLim: We had to split inticator HCMR-NP 114 and 115 into its paramters to be consistent with other indicators.

newValue:
Note that EEI and EEIc two versions of the index differ in algorithm and ecological status groups.

Although angiosperms are also covered by this method for soft bottom in coastal lagoons, they were not considered here, because coastal lagoons are out of the scope of the MSFD.

MariLim: We had to split inticator HCMR-NP 114 and 115 into its paramters to be consistent with other indicators.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _14
newValue: BENTIX index, BENTIX, BENTIX index
oldValue:
BENTIX index, H' index (Shannon Index), S index (Species abundance)
BENTIX
Ecological Evaluation Index (EEI), PREI index (Posidonia), BENTIX index


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 359 name {BENTIX website} _0 {Simboura M. (HCMR)} _2 {Bentix index website} _3 {Bentix index website: assessed 23/11/2015} _4 http://www.hcmr.gr/gr/listview3.php?id=1195


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
The BENTIX index was designed to fit the Mediterranean benthic ecosystem and to render a five step numerical scheme for the classification of benthic communities. It is a biotic index based on the concept of indicator groups and uses the relative contribution of tolerant and sensitive taxa in general, weighting them accordingly to the ratio of their occurrence in the benthic fauna by definition. BENTIX was implemented in six differently impacted sites across the sedimentary coasts of Cyprus within the WFD monitoring program.

newValue:
The BENTIX index was designed to fit the Mediterranean benthic ecosystem and to render a five step numerical scheme for the classification of benthic communities. It is a biotic index based on the concept of indicator groups and uses the relative contribution of tolerant and sensitive taxa in general, weighting them accordingly to the ratio of their occurrence in the benthic fauna by definition. BENTIX was implemented in six differently impacted sites across the sedimentary coasts of Cyprus within the WFD monitoring program.
See BENTIX website for more details (link in Source).


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 21158 oid 873 aid 5 apid 24 avid 14 value {sn01: fish species larger than agreed size for specific surveys}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 360 name {WFD GIG 2013} _0 {GIG (Geographical Intercalibration Group)} _1 2013 _2 {Technical report coastal waters, Mediterranean GIG Benthic Invertebrate fauna, JRC and the benthic macroinvertebrates subgroup.} _3 {GIG (Geographical Intercalibration Group), 2013. Technical report coastal waters, Mediterranean GIG Benthic Invertebrate fauna, JRC and the benthic macroinvertebrates subgroup. https://circabc.europa.eu/faces/} _4 https://circabc.europa.eu/faces/


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 361 name {Simboura et al. 2012} _0 {Simboura, N., Zenetos, A., Pancucci-Papadopoulou, M.A., Reizopoulou, S., Streftaris, N.} _1 2012 _2 {Hellenic Seas indicators for Sea-floor integrity under the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive: setting the thresholds 799 and standards for Good Environmental Status.} _3 {Simboura, N., Zenetos, A., Pancucci-Papadopoulou, M.A., Reizopoulou, S., Streftaris, N., 2012. Hellenic Seas indicators for Sea-floor integrity under the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive: setting the thresholds 799 and standards for Good Environmental Status, Mediterranean Marine Science, 13(1): 140–152. DOI:10.12681/mms.31} _4 http://www.medit-mar-sc.net/index.php/marine/article/view/31


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 362 name {Simboura et al. 2015} _0 {Simboura, N., M. Tsapakis, A. Pavlidou, G. Assimakopoulou, K. Pagou, H. Kontoyiannis, Ch. Zeri, E. Krasakopoulou, E. Rousselaki, N. Katsiaras, S. Diliberto, M. Naletaki, K. Tsiamis, V. Gerakaris, P. Drakopoulou, P. Panayotidis} _1 2015 _2 {Assessment of the environmental status in Hellenic coastal waters (Eastern Mediterranean):  from the Water Framework Directive to the Marine Strategy Water Framework Directive.} _3 {Simboura, N., M. Tsapakis, A. Pavlidou, G. Assimakopoulou, K. Pagou, H. Kontoyiannis, Ch. Zeri, E. Krasakopoulou, E. Rousselaki, N. Katsiaras, S. Diliberto, M. Naletaki, K. Tsiamis, V. Gerakaris, P. Drakopoulou, P. Panayotidis. 2015. Assessment of the environmental status in Hellenic coastal waters (Eastern Mediterranean):  from the Water Framework Directive to the Marine Strategy Water Framework Directive. Mediterranean Marine Science, 16/1: 46-64. DOI: 10.12681/mms.960} _4 http://www.medit-mar-sc.net/index.php/marine/article/view/960


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 363 name {Simboura et al. 2014} _0 {Simboura, N., S. Reizopoulou, M.A. Pancucci-Papadopoulou, K. Sigala, N. Streftaris} _1 2014 _2 {Schemes of integrating the indicators of the benthic community condition (sea floor integrity-MSFD): an application in Saronikos Gulf. } _3 {Simboura, N., S. Reizopoulou, M.A. Pancucci-Papadopoulou, K. Sigala, N. Streftaris. 2014. Schemes of integrating the indicators of the benthic community condition (sea floor integrity-MSFD): an application in Saronikos Gulf. Perseus Scientific Workshop oral presentation, 29-30 Jan. 2014. Book of Abstracts p.24.} _4 http://www.perseus-net.eu/assets/media/PDF/Scientific%20Workshop,%20January%202014/Session%204/4102.pdf


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 886 name {Multimetric BENTIX} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _5 {BENTIX index; Shannon diversity index; Species richness.
(Search also respective catalogue entries for further details on BENTIX and Shannon diversity indices).} _6 {0-1 ES} _1 1448280800 _11 {Multimetric Bentix was developed in order to integrate all indicators of benthic community conditions sensu the MSFD under the Sea-floor Integrity descriptor such as diversity, species richness, biotic indices (and provisionally size spectra indices) in a controlled way. This was decided after the realization that in the Mediterranean diversity indices did not show monotonic patterns of response to pressure gradients as the biotic indices did (GIG, 2013). The method is an adaptation of a similar method applied across the MSFD descriptors in the Basque country (Borja et al., 2011) and assigns an increased weight to the biotic component. The scheme developed is a modular formula assigning weighting scores to each one of the components of a formula: one ‘biotic’ component and two ‘diversity’ components (and provisionally one ‘size’ component redistributing scores as 0.1 and 0.1 for Species richness and size component). Within the method, reference values for Diversity indices were set for calculating the EQRs.
The derived formula is as follows: 
Bentix EQR X 0.6 + Shannon EQR X 0.2 + Species richness EQR X 0.2 =ES
} _14 {Multimetric BENTIX} _15 State _16 {Community Structure} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Multimetric Bentix was developed in order to integrate all indicators of benthic community conditions sensu the MSFD under the Sea-floor Integrity descriptor such as diversity, species richness, biotic indices (and provisionally size spectra indices) in a controlled way. This was decided after the realization that in the Mediterranean diversity indices did not show monotonic patterns of response to pressure gradients as the biotic indices did (GIG, 2013). The method is an adaptation of a similar method applied across the MSFD descriptors in the Basque country (Borja et al., 2011) and assigns an increased weight to the biotic component. The scheme developed is a modular formula assigning weighting scores to each one of the components of a formula: one ‘biotic’ component and two ‘diversity’ components (and provisionally one ‘size’ component redistributing scores as 0.1 and 0.1 for Species richness and size component). Within the method, reference values for Diversity indices were set for calculating the EQRs.
The derived formula is as follows: 
Bentix EQR X 0.6 + Shannon EQR X 0.2 + Species richness EQR X 0.2 =ES

newValue:
Multimetric Bentix was developed in order to integrate all indicators of benthic community conditions sensu the MSFD under the Sea-floor Integrity descriptor such as diversity, species richness, biotic indices (and provisionally size spectra indices) in a controlled way. This was decided after the realization that in the Mediterranean diversity indices did not show monotonic patterns of response to pressure gradients as the biotic indices did (WFD GIG, 2013). The method is an adaptation of a similar method applied across the MSFD descriptors in the Basque country (Borja et al., 2011) and assigns an increased weight to the biotic component. The scheme developed is a modular formula assigning weighting scores to each one of the components of a formula: one ‘biotic’ component and two ‘diversity’ components (and provisionally one ‘size’ component redistributing scores as 0.1 and 0.1 for Species richness and size component). Within the method, reference values for Diversity indices were set for calculating the EQRs.
The derived formula is as follows: 
Bentix EQR X 0.6 + Shannon EQR X 0.2 + Species richness EQR X 0.2 =ES


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 887 name {Accumulated cover of perennial macroalgae} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 drop-video _5 {Macroalgae coverage, %} _6 % _1 1448362882 _11 {This indicator reflects quantity of the perennial macroalgae community measured as accumulated cover, thus indicating biodiversity quantity as the amount of a diverse community of algae and species living on and among the algae. It indicates biodiversity quantity on shallow hard bottoms and may be used simultaneously with a vascular plant indicator for shallow soft bottoms. The measured unit is accumulated % cover and the assessment unit is the total aggregated accumulated cover within a predefined monitoring area.} _14 { Accumulated cover of perennial macroalgae} _15 State _16 {Target Groups} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 888 name {Accumulated cover of submerged vascular plants} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 drop-video _5 {submerged vascular plant cover} _6 % _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L10.pdf _1 1448363768 _11 {This indicator reflects quantity of the submerged vascular plant community measured as accumulated cover, thus indicating biodiversity quantity as the amount of the vascular plant community and associated species. It indicates biodiversity quantity on shallow soft bottoms in more sheltered areas and can be used simultaneously with the macroalgae indicator for shallow hard bottoms.} _14 {Accumulated cover of submerged vascular plants} _15 State _16 {Target Groups} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 889 name {Beach wrack Macrovegetation Index (BMI)} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {Manual sampling on shore} _5 {Sampled transects parallel to shore line} _6 {unitless value between 0 and 1, 0 being high and 1 low} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L11.pdf _1 1448364202 _11 {Indicator is based on the structure of macrovegetation of beach wrack. Representativeness of beach wrack data reflecting the biodiversity of macrovegetation in coastal area was tested during the study. Differences between submerged macrovegetation in coastal area and beach wrack samples were the smallest in July (table 1, Suursaar et al., 2014).} _14 {Beach wrack Macrovegetation Index (BMI)} _15 State _16 {Target Groups} _18 {Complex statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 890 name { Indicator of macroalgal community structure (MCS)} parent 0 _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1448364808


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 891 name {Habitat diversity index} parent 0 _5 {Habitat data on GIS format} _6 unitless _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L13.pdf _1 1448365048 _11 {Diversity of benthic habitats is one of the many aspects of marine biodiversity. High diversity of benthic habitats is important in order to maintain species diversity and ecosystem processes. Habitat diversity index indicates the level of diversity of marine benthic habitats by counting the number of different habitats in a predefined grid.} _14 {Habitat diversity index} _15 State _16 {Biotope Features} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 892 name {Seafloor exploitation index} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _5 {Georeferenced data on direct anthropogenic disturbances on seabed} _6 % _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L14.pdf _1 1448365334 _11 {Seafloor exploitation index measures the extent (area) of seabed that is impacted by direct physical anthropogenic disturbances.} _14 {Seafloor exploitation index} _15 Pressure _16 {Anthropogenic Activities} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 893 name {Spectral variability index} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {Remote sensing} _5 {Georeferenced remotely sensed imagery of a sea area} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L15.pdf _1 1448365696 _11 {Spectral variability index is based on the spectral variation hypothesis that predicts a positive correlation between spectral heterogeneity of a remotely sensed image and biodiversity. } _14 {Spectral variability index} _15 State _16 {Community Structure}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 894 name {Condition of soft sediment habitats – the aRPD approach} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {The measure of RPD depth can be retrieved by several methods. Sediment profile imagery (SPI) has been widely used to assess the RPD depth} _5 {RPD depth data} _6 cm _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L16.pdf _1 1448366569 _11 {A soft bottom habitat in good condition can support a zoobenthic community able to sustain a favourable living environment e.g. through bioturbation processes and recirculation of organic material. The condition of the habitats is ultimately determined by oxygen conditions, which are as well pivotal in structuring the benthic communities (Cicchetti et al. 2006).
} _14 {Condition of soft sediment habitats – the aRPD approach} _15 State _16 {Biotope Features} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 895 name {Population structure of Macoma balthica} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {Sampling of M. balthica} _5 {size distribution of M. balthica} _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1448367315 _11 {Deviation from the natural size distribution within the population of a species can be used as an indicator of disturbance in reproduction and/or survival, thus indicating the state of the population.} _14 {Population structure of Macoma balthica} _15 State _16 {Community Structure} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 896 name {Cladophora glomerata growth rate} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 sampling _5 {Growth rate of C. glomarata} _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1448367785 _11 {The indicator describes the abundance of Cladophora glomerata in an assessment unit. The abundance of the C. glomerata vegetation is expressed as growth rate, derived from information on frond length and the length of the growth period.} _14 {Cladophora glomerata growth rate} _15 State _16 {Indicator Species} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 897 name {Community heterogeneity (CH)} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _5 {Heterogeneity of communities} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L20.pdf _1 1448368935 _11 {The index analyses heterogeneity of communities at the landscape scale. } _14 {Community heterogeneity (CH)} _15 State _16 {Target Groups} _18 {Complex statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 898 name {Number of functional traits (NFT)} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _5 {number of functions (biological traits) in the system} _6 {number of traits} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L21.pdf _1 1448369568 _11 {The development of this diversity index is based on the evidence that the presence of various functional groups in a community hints the functional diversity and ecosystem services performed by the community.} _14 {Number of functional traits (NFT)} _15 State _16 {Life Traits} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 899 name {Areal extent of reed belts} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {Remote sensing} _5 {Extent of reed belts} _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1448370895 _11 {The indicator expresses the extent of coastal reed belts, using information from remote sensing and exposition-depth data.} _14 {Reed belt extent – the NDVI approach via high resolution satellite images} _15 State _16 {Indicator Species} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
newValue:
" Abundance index of wintering waterbird species": http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L34.pdf


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
" Abundance index of wintering waterbird species": http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L34.pdf

newValue:
" Abundance index of wintering waterbird species": http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L34.pdf

"Wintering waterbird index": http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L35.pdf


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
OSPAR EcoQO. Several functional groups of birds.
Documentation: http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/HELCOM-CoreIndicator-Abundance_of_waterbirds_in_the_breeding_season.pdf

newValue:
OSPAR EcoQO. Several functional groups of birds.
Documentation: http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/HELCOM-CoreIndicator-Abundance_of_waterbirds_in_the_breeding_season.pdf

"Abundance index of breeding waterbird species": http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L37.pdf


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue: B6 is an OSPAR Candidate Indicator.
newValue:
B6 is an OSPAR Candidate Indicator.

"Distribution of wintering waterbird species": http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L39.pdf


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 900 name { Age/sex ratio of waterbird species (ARI/SRI)} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L44.pdf _1 1448372291 _11 {This indicator consists of two single species indicators reflecting population condition of particular species. Separate indices are calculated for age ratios and sex ratios. Indices are calculated for all species holding considerable populations in the Baltic Sea in any of the seasons where they have sex and/or age specific differences in plumage that are distinguishable using the selected data collection method.} _14 { Age/sex ratio of waterbird species (ARI/SRI)} _15 State _16 {Target Groups}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 901 name {Proportion of oiled waterbirds} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1448372544 _11 {This indicator reflects impact and specific pressure of oil pollution to waterbirds in marine environment. } _14 {Proportion of oiled waterbirds} _15 Pressure _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 902 name {Abundance index of beached birds} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L46.pdf _1 1448372945 _11 {This indicator reflects mortality of birds due to different reasons } _14 {Abundance index of beached birds} _15 Pressure _16 {Target Groups} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 903 name { Indicator on condition of waterbirds} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {sampling of by-caught birds} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L48.pdf _1 1448373236 _11 {A body condition index based on condition of the pectoral flight muscles and the presence and quantity of subcutaneous and intestinal fat depots.} _14 { Indicator on condition of waterbirds} _15 Pressure _16 {Physiological Condition} _18 Categorical/Labelled


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 904 name {Feeding pressure on waterbird food sources} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {Field data collection: using any of the standard methods.} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L49.pdf _1 1448373482 _11 {This indicator reflects impact and specific pressure of feeding marine birds on their food resources/other organisms in their food-chain/structure and conditions of their habitat and its forming species.
} _14 {Feeding pressure on waterbird food sources} _15 Pressure


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 905 name {Abundance and distribution of juvenile flounder} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {beach seine} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L1.pdf _1 1448373668 _11 {the abundance and distribution of juvenile flounders in shallow sandy habitats can be used as an indicator linked to fish reproduction and environmental status of coastal waters.} _14 {Abundance and distribution of juvenile flounder} _15 State _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 906 name {Long term abundance and distribution of demersal fish in relation to benthic communities (fourhorn sculpin Myoxocephalus quadricornis and  eelpout Zoarces viviparous example)} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {benthic trawl, benthic invertebrate monitoring} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L2.pdf _1 1448374079 _11 {The indicator demonstrates trophic relationships between demersal fish and benthic fauna. Biomass of fourhorn sculpin (Myoxocephalus quadricornis) and eelpout (Zoarces viviparous) plotted against biomass of benthic invertebrates.} _14 {Long term abundance and distribution of demersal fish in relation to benthic communities (fourhorn sculpin Myoxocephalus quadricornis and  eelpout Zoarces viviparous example)} _15 State _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 907 name { Abundance and impact of non-native fish species (round goby example)} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {Experimental fishing by coastal net series survey nets.} _6 {mean biomass per one sampling station)} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L3.pdf _1 1448451659 _11 {Indicator reflects primary and secondary invasions of non-native species and is related to various pressures like shipping, ballast water discharge, climate change depending on introduction route of particular non-native species. The indicator describes relative abundance of particular non-native species within an area of concern and its impact on the biodiversity and food web at habitat/ecosystem level.} _14 { Abundance and impact of non-native fish species (round goby example)} _15 State


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
inclusion of pelagic species required for a food web indicator.

Documentation: http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/HELCOM-CoreIndicator-Proportion_of_large_fish_in_the_community.pdf

newValue:
inclusion of pelagic species required for a food web indicator.

Documentation: http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/HELCOM-CoreIndicator-Proportion_of_large_fish_in_the_community.pdf

http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L4.pdf


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 908 name { The length at sexual maturation of female pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in monitoring catches} parent 0 _4 {experimental fishing, trawl or fyke-net} _6 cm _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L5.pdf _1 1448452025 _11 {The indicator describes the average size (TL) at which female pikeperch of monitored populations reach maturity. This indicator should be considered as index of the population’s size and age distribution and should be associated to fishing pressure (both commercial and recreational) on local fish communities. Decrease in the values of this indicator may be symptom of strong fishing pressure which may have lead to life-history shift in local pikeperch populations. The latter can further lead to decrease in the mean trophic level of the community, which in turn may lead to decline in local biodiversity.} _14 { The length at sexual maturation of female pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in monitoring catches.} _15 State


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 909 name {Trophic diversity index of juvenile fish } parent 0 _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L7.pdf _1 1448452355 _11 {This indicator reflects the diversity of juvenile fish weighted by the mean community trophic level of adults. A high value of the indicator should reflect an overall high diversity in terms of juvenile fish and favorable nursery habitats for key predatory fish species such as pike (Esox lucius), perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pikeperch (Sander lucioperca), which are important for the maintenance of food web integrity (Eriksson et al. 2009).} _14 {Trophic diversity index of juvenile fish } _15 State _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 910 name {Habitat-related functional diversity of juvenile fish} parent 0 _4 {underwater detonations} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L8.pdf _1 1448452517 _11 {
This indicator reflects the functional biodiversity of 0-group (juvenile) fish species in terms of habitat preference and is based on the diversity of species that have a preference for high temperatures and a strong affinity for vegetation. The classification of preference follows Sandström et al. (2005, Table 1). A high value of the indicator should reflect a high diversity of species within the defined functional group as well as warm and vegetated areas functioning as nursery areas for both pike (Esox lucius), perch (Perca fluviatilis) and many cyprinids.} _14 {Habitat-related functional diversity of juvenile fish} _15 State _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 911 name {Phytoplankton species assemblage clusters based on environmental factors} parent 0 _5 {phytoplankton biomass} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L24.pdf _1 1448452820 _11 {Indicator based on 7 summer phytoplankton species clusters obtained with a cluster analysis. Most clusters appeared at all stations at each sampling occasion, if a cluster was absent, it was assigned a biomass of 0. Relationships with environmental factors were tested with GAM models.} _14 {Phytoplankton species assemblage clusters based on environmental factors} _15 State _18 {Complex statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 912 name {Cyanobacterial surface accumulations - the CSA-index} parent 0 _4 {remote sensing} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L26.pdf _1 1448453090 _11 {The indicator compares the recent (current) cyanobacterial surface accumulation
characteristics with past observations. It is based on information on the yearly intensity, duration and temporal volume of cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea. Information from these indicative variables is normalized and combined to produce a Cyanobacterial Surface Accumulation index (CSA-index). The CSA-index time series is used to provide the indicator target condition (2003-2010) and the current status (years 2011-2013). The principal data source for the indicator is satellite remote sensing, but the indicator can be complemented with observations obtained using other monitoring methods.} _14 {Cyanobacterial surface accumulations - the CSA-index} _15 State _16 {Target Groups}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _10
oldValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 265 and Cefas-CL 131 as parameters mentioned  are used separately and not combined.

newValue:
MariLim: We had to split indicator AZTI-JGR 265 and Cefas-CL 131 as parameters mentioned  are used separately and not combined.

http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L27.pdf


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 913 name {Phytoplankton trait- and dendrogram based functional diversity index (FD)} parent 0 _5 {microscopy results of phytoplankton} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L28.pdf _1 1448453467 _11 {The indicator aims to describe the trait-based functional diversity of phytoplankton with a functional diversity index (FD), which is calculated based on the dendrogram method
.} _14 {Phytoplankton trait- and dendrogram based functional diversity index (FD)} _15 State _16 {Target Groups}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 914 name {Spring bloom intensity index} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _4 {FerryBox, remote sensing} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L29.pdf _1 1448453650 _11 {The indicator estimates the annual total biomass of the phytoplankton spring bloom. Spring is a period of extensive and rapid phytoplankton growth, during which the main part of the annual phytoplankton production occurs} _14 {Spring bloom intensity index } _15 State _16 {Target Groups}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 915 name {Copepod biomass} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _6 {mg m3-1} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L30.pdf _1 1448453777 _11 {The indicator is based on the idea that zooplankton with a high mean size, i.e. copepods, would indicate good feeding conditions for zooplanktivorous fish as well as a high potential grazing on phytoplankton.} _14 {Copepod biomass} _15 State _16 {Target Groups}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 916 name {Zooplankton diversity} parent 0 _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L31.pdf _1 1448454057 _11 {The indicator aims to describe the species diversity of zooplankton in the Baltic Sea by applying Shannon’s diversity index} _14 {Zooplankton diversity} _15 State _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 917 name {Biomass of microphagous mesozooplankton} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _6 {mg m-3} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L32.pdf _1 1448454203 _11 {The indicator is based on the idea that small-sized herbivorous zooplankton indicate a limitation in the ability of the zooplankton community to transfer energy from primary producers to higher trophic levels} _14 {Microphagous mesozooplankton biomass} _15 State _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 918 name {COPY OF: Biomass of microphagous mesozooplankton} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _6 {mg m-3} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L32.pdf _1 1448454203 _11 {The indicator is based on the idea that small-sized herbivorous zooplankton indicate a limitation in the ability of the zooplankton community to transfer energy from primary producers to higher trophic levels} _14 {Microphagous mesozooplankton biomass} _15 State _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 919 name {COPY OF: COPY OF: Biomass of microphagous mesozooplankton} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _6 {mg m-3} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L32.pdf _1 1448454203 _11 {The indicator is based on the idea that small-sized herbivorous zooplankton indicate a limitation in the ability of the zooplankton community to transfer energy from primary producers to higher trophic levels} _14 {Microphagous mesozooplankton biomass} _15 State _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 920 name {Habitat distributional range (ComInd1)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _1 1448471406 _11 {Habitat distributional range, to also consider habitat extent as a relevant attribute.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Habitat distributional range (Common Indicator 1)} _15 State _16 {Biotope Features} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 921 name {Condition of the habitat’s typical species and communities (ComInd2)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _1 1448472791 _11 {Condition of the habitat’s typical species and communities.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Condition of the habitat’s typical species and communities (Common Indicator 2)} _15 State _16 {Community Structure}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 922 name {Species distributional range (ComInd3)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _1 1448475646 _11 {Species distributional range (related to marine mammals, seabirds, marine reptiles).} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Species distributional range (related to marine mammals, seabirds, marine reptiles) (Common Indicator 3)} _15 State _16 {Target Groups} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 923 name {Population abundance of selected species (ComInd4)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _1 1448476437 _11 {Population abundance of selected species (related to marine mammals, seabirds, marine reptiles).} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Population abundance of selected species (related to marine mammals, seabirds, marine reptiles) (Common Indicator 4)} _15 State _16 {Population Ecology}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 924 name {COPY OF: Population abundance of selected species (ComInd4)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _1 1448476437 _11 {Population abundance of selected species (related to marine mammals, seabirds, marine reptiles).} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Population abundance of selected species (related to marine mammals, seabirds, marine reptiles) (Common Indicator 4)} _15 State _16 {Population Ecology}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 925 name {Trends in abundance, temporal occurrence, and spatial distribution of non-indigenous species, particularly invasive, non-indigenous species, notably in risk areas (ComInd6)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _1 1448477108 _11 {Trends in abundance, temporal occurrence, and spatial distribution of non-indigenous species, particularly invasive, non-indigenous species, notably in risk areas (in relation to the main vectors and pathways of spreading of such species).} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Trends in abundance, temporal occurrence, and spatial distribution of non-indigenous species, particularly invasive, non-indigenous species, notably in risk areas (Common Indicator 6)} _15 Pressure _16 {Target Groups}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21954 oid 925 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {A baseline assessment of the extant NIS would provide a reference point against which the success of future actions could be measured.}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: name
oldValue:
Trends in abundance, temporal occurrence, and spatial distribution of non-indigenous species, particularly invasive, non-indigenous species, notably in risk areas (ComInd6)

newValue:
Trends in abundance, temporal occurrence, and spatial distribution of NIS, particularly IAS, notably in risk areas (ComInd6)


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 926 name {Bycatch of vulnerable and non-target species (ComInd12)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _1 1448529442 _11 {Bycatch of vulnerable and non-target species.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Bycatch of vulnerable and non-target species (Common Indicator 12)} _15 Pressure _16 {Target Groups} _18 Categorical/Labelled


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 927 name {Location and extent of the habitats impacted directly by hydrographic alterations (ComInd15)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _10 {The Barcelona Convention Common Indicator 15 addresses EO7(i.e. D7) but also feeds the assessment of EO1 (i.e. D1) on habitat extent.} _1 1448529966 _11 {Location and extent of the habitats impacted directly by hydrographic alterations.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Location and extent of the habitats impacted directly by hydrographic alterations (Common Indicator 15)} _15 State _16 {Biotope Features} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 928 name {Length of coastline subject to physical disturbance due to the influence of man-made structures (ComInd16)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _10 {The Barcelona Convention Common Indicator 16 addressing EO8 (on Coastal Ecosystems and Landscape, with no equivalente descriptor in the MSFD) is also feeding the assessment of EO1 (i.e. D1) on habitat extent.} _1 1448530366 _11 {Length of coastline subject to physical disturbance due to the influence of man-made structures.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Length of coastline subject to physical disturbance due to the influence of man-made structures (Common Indicator 16)} _15 State _16 {Biotope Features} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21970 oid 928 aid 6 apid 24 avid 14 value {Any disturbance resulting from man-made structures.}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 929 name {Spawning stock Biomass (ComInd7)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1448531352 _11 {Spawning stock Biomass.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Spawning stock Biomass (Common Indicator 7)}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 930 name {COPY OF: Spawning stock Biomass (ComInd7)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _10 {In the Barcelona Convention, the EO3 (equivalent to MSFD descriptor 3) related common indicators will be further developed and assessed by GFCM.} _1 1448531510 _11 {Spawning stock Biomass.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Spawning stock Biomass (Common Indicator 7)} _15 State _16 Production


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 931 name {COPY OF: Total landings (ComInd8)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _10 {In the Barcelona Convention, the EO3 (equivalent to MSFD descriptor 3) related common indicators will be further developed and assessed by GFCM.} _1 1448532885 _11 {Total landings.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Total landings (Common Indicator 8)} _15 State _16 Production


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 932 name {COPY OF: Fishing Mortality (ComInd9)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _10 {In the Barcelona Convention, the EO3 (equivalent to MSFD descriptor 3) related common indicators will be further developed and assessed by GFCM.} _1 1448533054 _11 {Fishing mortality.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Fishing Mortality (Common Indicator 9)} _15 State _16 {Population Ecology}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 933 name {COPY OF: Fishing Effort (ComInd10)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _10 {In the Barcelona Convention, the EO3 (equivalent to MSFD descriptor 3) related common indicators will be further developed and assessed by GFCM.} _1 1448533168 _11 {Fishing effort.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Fishing Effort (Common Indicator 10)} _15 Pressure _16 {Anthropogenic Activities}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 934 name {Concentration of key nutrients in water column (ComInd13)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1448533461 _11 {Concentration of key nutrients in water column.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Concentration of key nutrients in water column (Common Indicator 13)} _15 State _16 {Biotope Features}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 935 name {COPY OF: Concentration of key nutrients in water column (ComInd13)} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1448533461 _11 {Concentration of key nutrients in water column.} _12 -Barcelona- _14 {Concentration of key nutrients in water column (Common Indicator 13)} _15 State _16 {Biotope Features}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 364 name {EU COM DEC 2013/480/EU} _0 {European Commission} _1 2013 _2 {COMMISSION DECISION of 20 September 2013 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC.} _3 {COMMISSION DECISION of 20 September 2013 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC.} _4 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32013D0480


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21993 oid 935 aid 7 apid 24 avid 14 sid 364 value {Ckeck indicative thresholds' values in Source: EUCOMDEC 2013/480/EU}


action: u
dbtable: oas
column: value
oldValue: Any disturbance resulting from man-made structures.
newValue:
Any disturbance resulting from man-made structures (coastal defences, ports, and, indirectly, land claim).


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21969 oid 928 aid 6 apid 24 avid 14 value {Any disturbance resulting from man-made structures (coastal defences, ports, and, indirectly, land claim).}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21968 oid 928 aid 6 apid 24 avid 14 value {Any disturbance resulting from man-made structures (coastal defences, ports, and, indirectly, land claim).}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21967 oid 928 aid 6 apid 24 avid 14 value {Any disturbance resulting from man-made structures (coastal defences, ports, and, indirectly, land claim).}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21971 oid 928 aid 7 apid 24 avid 14 value {Coastal segments are “artificialised” when all or part of the 100 meter area on both sides (i.e. land and sea) are subject to transformation by Man, modifying their original physical state.}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21996 oid 482 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline (favourable reference area for HD habitats)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21997 oid 482 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline (favourable reference area for HD habitats)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21998 oid 482 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline (favourable reference area for HD habitats)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 21999 oid 482 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline (favourable reference area for HD habitats)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22000 oid 482 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline (favourable reference area for HD habitats)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22001 oid 482 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline (favourable reference area for HD habitats)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22002 oid 482 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline (favourable reference area for HD habitats)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22003 oid 488 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Sponge morphological diversity and richness is maintained within regional seas}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 18068 oid 488 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Sponge morphological diversity and richness is maintained within regional seas}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22004 oid 488 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Sponge morphological diversity and richness is maintained within regional seas}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 19604 oid 488 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Sponge morphological diversity and richness is maintained within regional seas}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22005 oid 488 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Sponge morphological diversity and richness is maintained within regional seas}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 19605 oid 488 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Sponge morphological diversity and richness is maintained within regional seas}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22006 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22007 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22008 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22009 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22010 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22011 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22012 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22013 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22014 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22015 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22016 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22017 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22018 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22019 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22020 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22021 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22022 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22023 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22024 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22025 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22026 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22027 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22028 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22029 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22030 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22031 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22032 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22033 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22034 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22035 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22064 oid 512 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {BHQ within range given in Rosenberg et al 2009 ( Temporal and spatial changes in marine benthic habitats in relation to the EU Water Framework Directive: The use of sediment profile imagery. Mar Pollut Bull. 58(4): 565-573}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22065 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22066 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22067 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22068 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22069 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22070 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22071 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22072 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22073 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22074 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22075 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22076 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22077 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22078 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22079 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22080 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22081 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22082 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22083 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22084 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22085 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22086 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22087 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22088 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22089 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22090 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22091 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22092 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22093 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22094 oid 522 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22095 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22096 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22097 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22098 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22099 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22100 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22101 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22102 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22103 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22104 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22105 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22106 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22107 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22108 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22109 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22110 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22111 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22112 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22113 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22114 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22115 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22116 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22117 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22118 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22119 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22120 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22121 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22122 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22123 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22124 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22125 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22149 oid 529 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Accounted for by multimetric indices (AMBI, UK IQI)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22150 oid 529 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Accounted for by multimetric indices (AMBI, UK IQI)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22151 oid 529 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Accounted for by multimetric indices (AMBI, UK IQI)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22152 oid 529 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Accounted for by multimetric indices (AMBI, UK IQI)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22153 oid 529 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Accounted for by multimetric indices (AMBI, UK IQI)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22154 oid 529 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Accounted for by multimetric indices (AMBI, UK IQI)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22155 oid 529 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Accounted for by multimetric indices (AMBI, UK IQI)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22156 oid 529 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Accounted for by multimetric indices (AMBI, UK IQI)}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22157 oid 490 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Proportion of erect fauna are maintained in circalittoral habitats}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22158 oid 490 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Proportion of erect fauna are maintained in circalittoral habitats}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 10053 oid 482 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Area stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline (favourable reference area for HD habitats)}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 10367 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 20698 oid 504 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {Range is stable or increasing and not smaller than the baseline value}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 10588 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22159 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22160 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22161 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22162 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22163 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22164 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22165 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22166 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22167 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22168 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22169 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22170 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22171 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22172 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22173 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22174 oid 524 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: d
dbtable: oas
oldValue:
oasid 10549 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22175 oid 521 aid 7 apid 9 avid 14 value {No change/deterioration against established baseline}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 936 name {MFCI - Marine Fish Community Index} parent 0 _0 JRC-HR _5 {Total number of species;
Number of rare or uncommon species/total number of species;
Pelagic/demersal ratio (in number of species) - (for intermediate and deep soft-bottoms);
Total Abundance (ln(n + 1)) (or simply Total Abundance for rocky subtidal);
Number of species that make up 90% of abundance excluding gregarious species (or simply Number of species that make up 90% of abundance for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of resident species (only for rocky subtidal);
Commercial/non-commercial ratio (in proportion of species) only for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of low and very-low resilience species (except for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of benthic-associated species (only for shallow soft-bottoms);
Proportion of individuals over the maturity size (except for rocky subtidal);
ABC curves (except for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of spawning species;
Proportion of cryptic, Symphodus sp. and Labrus sp. species (only for rocky subtidal);
Number of species with juveniles present (or Proportion of juveniles);
Proportion of invertivore species;
Proportion of piscivore and macrocarnivore species;
Proportion of zooplanktivore species (only for shallow and intermediate soft-bottoms);
Proportion of omnivore species (only for rocky subtidal);
} _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _10 {It can be useful in the context of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive as well as in other contexts of conservation and sustainable management of the
marine environment.} _1 1448644861 _11 {The MFCI is a multimetric index that incorporates both functional and structural community information.
The metrics composing the index vary in function of the habitat assessed (based on typical community): rocky subtidal; shallow, intermediate and deep soft-bottoms.
The several metrics composing the index encompass general attributes such as diversity and composition, abundance, nursery function and trophic integrity.
The ecological assessment given by the MFCI is based on a scoring system (with five possible score values per metric), whose reference conditions are habitat adjusted. See Source for further details.} _14 {Marine Fish Community Index (MFCI)} _15 State _16 {Community Structure} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 365 name {Henriques et al. 2008} _0 {Sofia Henriques, Miguel Pessanha Pais, Maria José Costa, Henrique Cabral} _1 2008 _2 {Development of a fish-based multimetric index to assess the ecological quality of marine habitats: the Marine Fish Community Index.} _3 {Henriques, S., Pais, M. P., Costa, M. J., & Cabral, H. (2008). Development of a fish-based multimetric index to assess the ecological quality of marine habitats: the Marine Fish Community Index. Marine pollution bulletin, 56(11), 1913-1934. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.07.009} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X08003809


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
The MFCI is a multimetric index that incorporates both functional and structural community information.
The metrics composing the index vary in function of the habitat assessed (based on typical community): rocky subtidal; shallow, intermediate and deep soft-bottoms.
The several metrics composing the index encompass general attributes such as diversity and composition, abundance, nursery function and trophic integrity.
The ecological assessment given by the MFCI is based on a scoring system (with five possible score values per metric), whose reference conditions are habitat adjusted. See Source for further details.

newValue:
The MFCI is a multimetric index that incorporates both functional and structural community information. The metrics composing the index vary in function of the habitat assessed (based on typical community): rocky subtidal; shallow, intermediate and deep soft-bottoms. The several metrics composing the index encompass general attributes such as diversity and composition, abundance, nursery function and trophic integrity. The ecological assessment given by the MFCI is based on a scoring system (with five possible score values per metric), whose reference conditions are habitat adjusted. See Source for further details.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
Total number of species;
Number of rare or uncommon species/total number of species;
Pelagic/demersal ratio (in number of species) - (for intermediate and deep soft-bottoms);
Total Abundance (ln(n + 1)) (or simply Total Abundance for rocky subtidal);
Number of species that make up 90% of abundance excluding gregarious species (or simply Number of species that make up 90% of abundance for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of resident species (only for rocky subtidal);
Commercial/non-commercial ratio (in proportion of species) only for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of low and very-low resilience species (except for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of benthic-associated species (only for shallow soft-bottoms);
Proportion of individuals over the maturity size (except for rocky subtidal);
ABC curves (except for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of spawning species;
Proportion of cryptic, Symphodus sp. and Labrus sp. species (only for rocky subtidal);
Number of species with juveniles present (or Proportion of juveniles);
Proportion of invertivore species;
Proportion of piscivore and macrocarnivore species;
Proportion of zooplanktivore species (only for shallow and intermediate soft-bottoms);
Proportion of omnivore species (only for rocky subtidal);

newValue:
Total number of species;
Number of rare or uncommon species/total number of species;
Pelagic/demersal ratio (in number of species) (for intermediate and deep soft-bottoms);
Total Abundance (ln(n + 1)) (or simply Total Abundance for rocky subtidal);
Number of species that make up 90% of abundance excluding gregarious species (or simply Number of species that make up 90% of abundance for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of resident species (only for rocky subtidal);
Commercial/non-commercial ratio (in proportion of species) only for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of low and very-low resilience species (except for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of benthic-associated species (only for shallow soft-bottoms);
Proportion of individuals over the maturity size (except for rocky subtidal);
ABC curves (except for rocky subtidal);
Proportion of spawning species;
Proportion of cryptic, Symphodus sp. and Labrus sp. species (only for rocky subtidal);
Number of species with juveniles present (or Proportion of juveniles);
Proportion of invertivore species;
Proportion of piscivore and macrocarnivore species;
Proportion of zooplanktivore species (only for shallow and intermediate soft-bottoms);
Proportion of omnivore species (only for rocky subtidal);


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 937 name {Oceanic fronts} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _4 {Earth Observation (EO) data or modelling data. } _5 {Use of thermal and colour fronts using Earth Observation (EO) data to develop frequent front maps. Front locations are  composited to calculate the mean frontal gradient (Fmean), the probability of detecting a front (Pfront), and the evidence for a feature in proximity (Fprox). These weighting factors a recombined as the composite front map (Fcomp)to provide optimal visualisation of all oceanic features observed during a given period. The threshold used to indicate a ‘strong’ front was Fcomp >= 0.015.These quantities are then used to generate seasonal maps of frequent fronts.} _1 1452179662 _11 {Many pelagic biodiversity hotspots are related to fronts. Remote sensing can provide valuable inforamtion in regions with insufficient species distribution data, since Oceanic Fronts may be used as a proxy for pelagic biodiversity. It can for example assist site selection for offshore engineering minimising impacts on marine animals (e.g.facilitating the deployment of offshore renewable energy devices), or can be used for supporting in the designation of Marine Protected Areas(MPAs).} _14 {Oceanic fronts} _15 State _16 {Biotope Features} _18 Modelling


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 366 name {Miller & Christodoulou, 2014} _0 {Peter I. Miller, Stelios Christodoulou} _1 2014 _2 {Frequent locations of oceanic fronts as an indicator of pelagic diversity: Application to marine protected areas and renewables.} _3 {Peter I. Miller, Stelios Christodoulou, Frequent locations of oceanic fronts as an indicator of pelagic diversity: Application to marine protected areas and renewables, Marine Policy, Volume 45, March 2014, Pages 318-329, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.09.009.} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X13002066


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22194 oid 937 aid 5 apid 24 avid 14 value {promotes pelagic biodiversity in general, affecting several biodiversity components}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22195 oid 937 aid 7 apid 11 avid 14 sid 366 value {AVHRR archive from Dundee Satellite Receiving Station - since 1981}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22196 oid 937 aid 7 apid 11 avid 14 sid 366 value {AVHRR archive from Dundee Satellite Receiving Station - since 1981}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 367 name {Morato et al. 2015} _0 {Morato, Telmo, Miller, Peter I, Dunn, Daniel C, Nicol, Simon J, Bowcott, James, Halpin, Patrick N} _1 2015 _2 {A perspective on the importance of oceanic fronts in promoting aggregation of visitors to seamounts.} _3 {Morato, T., Miller, P. I., Dunn, D. C., Nicol, S. J., Bowcott, J., & Halpin, P. N. (2015). A perspective on the importance of oceanic fronts in promoting aggregation of visitors to seamounts. Fish and Fisheries. doi: 10.1111/faf.12126} _4 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12126/full


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _11
oldValue:
Many pelagic biodiversity hotspots are related to fronts. Remote sensing can provide valuable inforamtion in regions with insufficient species distribution data, since Oceanic Fronts may be used as a proxy for pelagic biodiversity. It can for example assist site selection for offshore engineering minimising impacts on marine animals (e.g.facilitating the deployment of offshore renewable energy devices), or can be used for supporting in the designation of Marine Protected Areas(MPAs).

newValue:
Many pelagic biodiversity hotspots are related to fronts. Remote sensing can provide valuable inforamtion in regions with insufficient species distribution data, since Oceanic Fronts may be used as a proxy for pelagic biodiversity. It can for example assist site selection for offshore engineering minimising impacts on marine animals (e.g.facilitating the deployment of offshore renewable energy devices), or can be used for supporting in the designation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 368 name {Scales et al. 2015} _0 {Scales, K. L., Miller, P. I., Hawkes, L. A., Ingram, S. N., Sims, D. W., & Votier, S. C.} _1 2014 _2 {On the Front Line: frontal zones as priority at‐sea conservation areas for mobile marine vertebrates.} _3 {Scales, K. L., Miller, P. I., Hawkes, L. A., Ingram, S. N., Sims, D. W., & Votier, S. C. (2014). On the Front Line: frontal zones as priority at‐sea conservation areas for mobile marine vertebrates. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(6), 1575-1583. doi: 10.111/1365-2664.12330} _4 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12330/pdf


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 938 name {Glophymed - Global phytoplankton Mediterranean} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _5 {The Biomass metric requires data on 90th percentile of Chl a (for a five-year period), both in the water body and in a reference site.
The Composition metric requires data on: Total Eukariotic cells, Cyanobacteria, Picocyanobacteria,Prymnesiophyceae, Diatom, Cryptophyceae.
The bloom metric requires cell-density data to calculate bloom intensity and bloom frequency parameters.} _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1452193972 _11 {The Glophymed - Global phytoplankton Mediterranean index includes the metrics: biomass, composition, and intensity and frequency of blooms. See Source for index calculation.} _14 {Glophymed - Global phytoplankton Mediterranean} _15 State _16 {Target Groups} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 369 name {Romero et al. 2013} _0 {I. Romero, M. Pachés, R. Martínez-Guijarro, J. Ferrer} _1 2013 _2 {Glophymed: An index to establish the ecological status for the Water Framework Directive based on phytoplankton in coastal waters.} _3 {I. Romero, M. Pachés, R. Martínez-Guijarro, J. Ferrer (2013) Glophymed: An index to establish the ecological status for the Water Framework Directive based on phytoplankton in coastal waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin 75 (2013) 218–223. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.028} _4 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X13004153


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
oldValue:
The Biomass metric requires data on 90th percentile of Chl a (for a five-year period), both in the water body and in a reference site.
The Composition metric requires data on: Total Eukariotic cells, Cyanobacteria, Picocyanobacteria,Prymnesiophyceae, Diatom, Cryptophyceae.
The bloom metric requires cell-density data to calculate bloom intensity and bloom frequency parameters.

newValue:
The Biomass metric requires data on 90th percentile of Chl a (for a five-year period), both in the water body and in a reference site.
The Composition metric requires data on: Total Eukariotic cells, Cyanobacteria, Picocyanobacteria,Prymnesiophyceae, Diatom, Cryptophyceae.
The Bloom metric requires cell-density data to calculate bloom intensity and bloom frequency parameters.


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22206 oid 938 aid 5 apid 26 avid 14 sid 369 value {otal Eukariotic cells, Cyanobacteria, Picocyanobacteria,Prymnesiophyceae, Diatom, Cryptophyceae}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22207 oid 938 aid 5 apid 26 avid 14 sid 369 value {otal Eukariotic cells, Cyanobacteria, Picocyanobacteria,Prymnesiophyceae, Diatom, Cryptophyceae}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22208 oid 938 aid 5 apid 26 avid 14 sid 369 value {otal Eukariotic cells, Cyanobacteria, Picocyanobacteria,Prymnesiophyceae, Diatom, Cryptophyceae}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22209 oid 938 aid 5 apid 26 avid 14 sid 369 value {otal Eukariotic cells, Cyanobacteria, Picocyanobacteria,Prymnesiophyceae, Diatom, Cryptophyceae}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22210 oid 938 aid 5 apid 26 avid 14 sid 369 value {otal Eukariotic cells, Cyanobacteria, Picocyanobacteria,Prymnesiophyceae, Diatom, Cryptophyceae}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22211 oid 938 aid 5 apid 26 avid 14 sid 369 value {otal Eukariotic cells, Cyanobacteria, Picocyanobacteria,Prymnesiophyceae, Diatom, Cryptophyceae}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 939 name {TL - Trophic Level-based indicators} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _4 {Landings data, surveys data or modelling data can be used depending on the objectives, each with advantages and constraints. See Source for details.} _5 {-TL (trophic level) of species i; 
-Total landings (for TL of the landings) or Total biomass (for TL of surveyed or modelled ecosystems);
-Landings or Biomass of species i. } _1 1452197361 _11 {TL-based indicators (TLIND) are calculated as the mean trophic position of all species, weighted by the relative biomass of each species in the landings, in
the surveys or in the modelled community.
TL-based indicators often used to quantify fishing effects on the trophic
structure of food webs.} _14 {TL - Trophic Level-based indicators} _16 Foodweb


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 370 name {Shannon et al. 2014} _0 {Lynne Shannon, Marta Coll, Alida Bundy, Didier Gascuel, Johanna J. Heymans, Kristin Kleisner, Christopher P. Lynam, Chiara Piroddi, Jorge Tam, Morgane Travers-Trolet, Yunne Shin} _1 2014 _2 {Trophic level-based indicators to track fishing impacts across marine ecosystems.} _3 {Shannon L, Coll M, Bundy A, Gascuel D, Heymans JJ, Kleisner K, Lynam CP, Piroddi C, Tam J, Travers-Trolet M, Shin Y(2014) Trophic level-based indicators to track fishing impacts across marine ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 512:115-140. doi: 10.3354/meps10821} _4 http://www.int-res.com/articles/theme/m512p115.pdf


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22216 oid 939 aid 5 apid 24 avid 14 sid 370 value {applies to several biodiversity components, dependent on data source}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 940 name {ESCA - Ecological Status of Coralligenous Assemblages} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _5 {presence/absence and abundance of sensitive taxa/groups
assemblage taxonomic composition} _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1452199759 _11 {Assemblage descriptors selected as metrics of the ESCA index were: (a) presence/absence and abundance of sensitive taxa/groups (expressed as sensitivity level of assemblages, SL), (b) diversity of assemblages (expressed as α-diversity) and (c) heterogeneity of assemblages (expressed as β-diversity). The three metrics were combined to give a final value for the multimetric ecological index, Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR), calculated as the ratio between the measured values and the value obtained in the reference condition. } _14 {ESCA - Ecological Status of Coralligenous Assemblages} _15 State _16 {Community Structure} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 371 name {Cecchi et al. 2014} _0 {Enrico Cecchi, Paola Gennaro, Luigi Piazzi, Elena Ricevuto, Fabrizio Serena
} _1 2014 _2 {Development of a new biotic index for ecological status assessment of Italian coastal waters based on coralligenous macroalgal assemblages.} _3 {Enrico Cecchi, Paola Gennaro, Luigi Piazzi, Elena Ricevuto, Fabrizio Serena (2014) Development of a new biotic index for ecological status assessment of Italian coastal waters based on coralligenous macroalgal assemblages. European Journal of Phycology, 49(3):2014 298-312. doi:10.1080/09670262.2014.918657} _4 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09670262.2014.918657?journalCode=tejp20&


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 372 name {Piazzi et al. 2015} _0 {PIAZZI, L., GENNARO, P., CECCHI, E., & SERENA, F.} _1 2015 _2 {Improvement of the esca index for the evaluation of ecological quality of coralligenous habitat under the european framework directives.} _3 {PIAZZI, L., GENNARO, P., CECCHI, E., & SERENA, F. (2015). Improvement of the esca index for the evaluation of ecological quality of coralligenous habitat under the european framework directives. Mediterranean Marine Science, 16(2):419-426. DOI: 10.12681/mms.1029 } _4 http://www.medit-mar-sc.net/index.php/marine/article/viewFile/1029/660


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 941 name {COARSE (COralligenous Assessment by ReefScape Estimate) index} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1454069614 _11 {This index provides an indication of sea-floor integrity.} _14 {COARSE (COralligenous Assessment by ReefScape Estimate) index} _15 State _16 {Biotope Features}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 373 name {Gatti et al. 2015} _0 {Gatti Giulia, Bianchi C.N., Morri C., Montefalcone M., Sartoretto Stephane} _1 2015 _2 {Coralligenous reefs state along anthropized coasts: Application and validation of the COARSE index, based on a rapid visual assessment (RVA) approach.} _3 {Gatti Giulia, Bianchi C.N., Morri C., Montefalcone M., Sartoretto S. (2015) Coralligenous reefs state along anthropized coasts: Application and validation of the COARSE index, based on a rapid visual assessment (RVA) approach. Ecological Indicators 52:567-576. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.026} _4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.026


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
newValue:
Biotic cover (%), conspicuous species richness, three-dimensional structure of coralligenous reefs (e.g. maximum height), the percentage of necrosis.


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _4
newValue:
Uses direct visual method - SCUBA diving observations and measurements, to gather data useful to evaluate the state of coralligenous reefs as an indicator of sea-floor integrity following the Rapid Visual Assessment (RVA) approach proposed by Gatti et al. (2012).


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 374 name {Gatti et al. 2012} _0 {Gatti G., Montefalcone M., Rovere A., Parravicini V., Morri C., Albertelli G., Bianchi C.N.} _1 2012 _2 {Sea-floor integrity down the harbor waterfront: the coralligenous shoals off Vado Ligure (NW Mediterranean).} _3 {Gatti, G., Montefalcone, M., Rovere, A., Parravicini, V., Morri, C., Albertelli, G., Bianchi, C.N., 2012. Sea-floor integrity down the harbor waterfront: the coralligenous shoals off Vado Ligure (NW Mediterranean). Adv. Oceanol. Limnol. 3(1), 51–67. doi:10.1080/19475721.2012.671190} _4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475721.2012.671190


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22244 oid 941 aid 6 apid 24 avid 14 sid 373 value {COARSE index seems to respond firstly to physical pressures (sedimentation, temperature, mechanical damages).}


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 942 name {CAI - Coralligenous Assemblage Index} parent 0 _0 JRC-HT _6 {EQR - unitless value between 0 and 1} _1 1454074479 _14 {Coralligenous Assemblage Index (CAI)}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 375 name {Deter et al. 2012} _0 {Deter J., Descamp P., Ballesta L., Boissery P., Holon F.} _1 2012 _2 {A preliminary study toward an index based on coralligenous assemblages for the ecological status assessment of Mediterranean French coastal waters.} _3 {Deter, J., Descamp, P., Ballesta, L., Boissery, P., Holon, F., 2012. A preliminary study toward an index based on coralligenous assemblages for the ecological status assessment of Mediterranean French coastal waters. Ecol. Indic. 20, 345–352. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.001} _4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.001


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _5
newValue:
Bryozoa percent cover, sludge percent cover, builder species percent cover.
gorgonian demography, depth


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _4
newValue:
Photographic and visual quadrats along a transect, by CCUBA (Closed Circuit Underwater
Breathing Apparatus) divers.


action: i
dbtable: objects
newValue:
oid 943 name {COPY OF: Abundance and composition of riparian vegetation} parent 0 _0 {AZTI-JGR 263} _1 1387117460 _11 {Abundance and composition of riparian vegetation in lagoons} _13 {MariLim: Please specify the difference to Indicators Abundance ... or Species diversity ... - What is exactly calculated? To which biological component this is connected (we choose angiosperms). Is it connected to seabed or land vegetation. If it is land vegetation please delete this indicator} _14 {[Lagoons] composition and abundance of riparian vegetation} _15 State _16 {Biotope Features} _18 {Simple statistics}


action: i
dbtable: oas
newValue:
oasid 22266 oid 943 aid 7 apid 23 avid 14 value {Data from different research programs or research projects (mainly Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment)}


action: d
dbtable: objects
oldValue:
oid 919 name {Biomass of microphagous mesozooplankton} parent 0 _0 LU-SYKE _6 {mg m-3} _10 http://www.sea.ee/marmoni/marmoni_pulk/docs/L32.pdf _1 1448454504 _11 {The indicator is based on the idea that small-sized herbivorous zooplankton indicate a limitation in the ability of the zooplankton community to transfer energy from primary producers to higher trophic levels} _14 {Microphagous mesozooplankton biomass} _15 State _18 {Simple statistics}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _19
newValue:
{Biological control - checks and balances - Resilience} {Leisure and recreation} {Aesthetic experience}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _19
newValue:
{Biological control - checks and balances - Pest control} {Biological control - checks and balances - Resilience}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _19
newValue:
{Climate regulation} {Disturbance prevention or moderation} {Bioremediation of waste} {Biological control - checks and balances - Resilience}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _19
newValue:
{Bioremediation of waste} {Biological control - checks and balances - Pest control} {Biological control - checks and balances - Resilience}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _19
newValue:
{Disturbance prevention or moderation} {Biological control - checks and balances - Resilience} {Leisure and recreation} {Aesthetic experience}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _19
newValue:
{Climate regulation} {Biological control - checks and balances - Resilience} {Leisure and recreation} {Aesthetic experience}


action: u
dbtable: objects
column: _19
oldValue: {Climate regulation} {Biological control - checks and balances - Resilience}
newValue:
{Climate regulation} {Biological control - checks and balances - Pest control} {Biological control - checks and balances - Resilience}


action: i
dbtable: sources
newValue:
sid 376 name {OSPAR 2017} _0 OSPAR _1 2017 _2 {Intermediate Assessment 2017 - Assessment of Proportion of Large Fish (Large Fish Index)} _3 {online resource} _4 https://oap.ospar.org/en/ospar-assessments/intermediate-assessment-2017/biodiversity-status/fish-and-foodwebs/proportion-large-fish-large-fish-index/


