Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published March 28, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Acoustic Signalling In Eurasian Penduline Tits Remiz Pendulinus: Repertoire Size Signals Male Nest Defence

Creators

  • 1. , Van Dijk, R. E. & , Devoogd, T. J. & Department of Ethology, Eötvös University H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/c, Hungary, E-mail: apogany@ludens.elte.hu & , Van Dijk, R. E.
  • 2. , Menyhárt, O. & Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK & , Menyhárt, O. & Behavioural Ecology and Self-Organization, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies University of Groningen, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands & , Menyhárt, O. & Present address: Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom
  • 3. Miklósi, Á. & And T. Székely & Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
  • 4. , Van Dijk, R. E. & , Devoogd, T. J. & Department of Ethology, Eötvös University H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/c, Hungary, E-mail: apogany@ludens.elte.hu
  • 5. , Menyhárt, O. & Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK

Description

Pogány, Á., Dijk, R., Menyhárt, O., Miklósi, Á., Devoogd, T., Székely, T. (2013): Acoustic Signalling In Eurasian Penduline Tits Remiz Pendulinus: Repertoire Size Signals Male Nest Defence. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 59 (1): 81-96, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5736131

Files

source.pdf

Files (600.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fbf55256a98673407e5ab65099452397
600.9 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFF55256FF8673407E5AB6509945FF97

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5736133 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5736137 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5736139 (DOI)

References

  • ANDERSSON, M. (1994) Sexualselection. PrincetonUniversityPress, Princeton, 624 pp. ARNqVIST, G. & ROwE, L. (2005) Sexualconflict. PrincetonUniversityPress, Princeton, 360 pp. BALLENTINE, B., SEARcY, W. A. & NOwIcKI, S. (2008) Reliable aggressive signalling in swamp
  • sparrows. AnimalBehaviour 75: 693-703. BALSbY, T. J. S. & DAbELSTEEN, T. (2001) The meaning of song repertoire size and song length to male whitethroats Sylvia communis. Behavioural Processes 56: 75-84.
  • BEEbEE, M. D. (2004) The functions of multiple singing modes: experimental tests in yellow warblers, Dendroica petechia. Animal Behaviour 67: 1089-1097.
  • BEEcHER, M. D., CAmpbELL, S. E., BuRT, J. M., HILL, C. E. & NORDbY, J. C. (2000) Song- type matching between neighbouring song sparrows. Animal Behaviour 59: 21-27.
  • BERGLuND, A., BISAZZA, A. & PILASTRO, A. (1996) Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58: 385-399.
  • BLEEKER, M., KINGmA, S. A., SZENTIRmAI, I., SZEKELY, T. & KOmDEuR, J. (2005) Body condition and clutch desertion in penduline tit Remiz pendulinus. Behaviour 142: 1465-1478.
  • BOTERO, C. A., MuDGE, A. E., Koltz, A. M., HOcHAcHKA, W. M. & VEHRENcAmp, S. L. (2008) How reliable are the methods for estimating repertoire size? Ethology 114: 1227-1238.
  • BYERS, B. E. & KROODSmA, D. E. (2009) Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires. Animal Behaviour 77: 13-22.
  • CATcHpOLE, C. K. (1989) Responses of male sedge warblers to playback of different reper- toire sizes. Animal Behaviour 37: 1046-1047.
  • CATcHpOLE, C. K., DITTAmI, J. & LEISLER, B. (1984) Differential responses to male song reper- toires in female songbirds implanted with estradiol. Nature 312: 563-564.
  • CATcHpOLE, C. K. & SLATER, P. J. B. (2008) Bird song: Biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 348 pp.
  • CRAmp, S., PERRINS, C. M. & BROOKS, D. J. (1993) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa - Birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 376-396.
  • GARAmSZEGI, L. Z., BALSbY, T. J. S., BELL, B. D., BOROwIEc, M., BYERS, B. E., DRAGANOIu, T., EENS, M., FORSTmEIER, W., GALEOTTI, P., GIL, D., GORISSEN, L., HANSEN, P., LAmpE, H. M., LEITNER, S., LONTKOwSKI, J., NAGLE, L., NEmETH, E., PINxTEN, R., ROSSI, J. M., SAINO, N., TANVEZ, A., TITuS, R., TOROK, J., VAN DuYSE, E. & MOLLER, A. P. (2005) Es- timating the complexity of bird song by using capture- recapture approaches from community ecology. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57: 305-317.
  • GRubbAuER, P. & HOI, H. (1996) Female penduline tits (Remiz pendulinus) choosing high quality nests benefit by decreased incubation effort and increased hatching success. Ecoscience 3: 274-279.
  • HALL, M. L. (2004) A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55: 415-430.
  • HARRAp, S. & QuINN, D. (1996) Tits, nuthatches and treecreepers. Christopher Helm, London, 464 pp.
  • HOI, H., ScHLEIcHER, B. & VALERA, F. (1994) Female mate choice and nest desertion in pen- duline tits, Remiz pendulinus - the importance of nest quality. Animal Behaviour 48: 743-746.
  • KINGmA, S. A., SZENTIRmAI, I., SZEKELY, T., BOKONY, V., BLEEKER, M., LIKER, A. & KOmDEuR, J. (2008) Sexual selection and the function of a melanin- based plumage ornament in polygamous penduline tits Remiz pendulinus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62: 1277-1288.
  • KREbS, J. R., ASHcROfT, R. & VANORSDOL, K. (1981) Song matching in the great tit Parus major L. Animal Behaviour 29: 918-923.
  • KREbS, J. R., ASHcROfT, R. & WEbbER, M. (1978) Song repertoires and territory defence in great tit. Nature 271: 539-542.
  • KROODSmA, D. E. (1982) Songrepertoires: problemsintheirdefinitionanduse. Pp 125-146. In: KROODSmA, D. E. & MILLER, E. H. (eds): Acoustic communication in birds. Academic Press, NewYork.
  • LAmbREcHTS, M. M. (1992) Male quality and playback in the great tit. Pp 135-152. In: Mc- GREGOR, P. K. (ed.): Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum Press, New York.
  • McDONALD, M. V. (1989) FunctionofsonginScott' sseasidesparrow, Ammodramusmariti- muspeninsulae. AnimalBehaviour 38: 468-485.
  • McGREGOR, P. K., KREbS, J. R. & PERRINS, C. M. (1981) Song repertoires and lifetime repro- ductive success in the great tit (Parus major). American Naturalist 118: 149-159.
  • NAGuIb, M., ZubERbUHLER, K., CLAYTON, N. S. & JANIK, V. M. (2009) Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol 40. ElsevierAcademicPressInc, SanDiego.
  • NOwIcKI, S., SEARcY, W. A. & HuGHES, M. (1998) The territory defense function of song in songsparrows: Atestwiththespeakeroccupationdesign. Behaviour 135: 615-628.
  • PERSSON, O. & OHRSTROm, P. (1989) A new avian mating system - Ambisexual polygamy in thependulinetitRemizpendulinus. OrnisScandinavica 20: 105-111.
  • POGANY, A. & SZEKELY, T. (2007) FemalechoiceinthependulinetitRemizpendulinus: the effects of nest size and male mask size. Behaviour 144: 411-427.
  • R DEVELOpmENT CORE TEAm (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R FoundationforStatisticalComputing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
  • RIVERA-GuTIERREZ, H. F., PINxTEN, R. & EENS, M. (2010) Multiple signals for multiple mes- sages: great tit, Parus major, song signals age and survival. Animal Behaviour 80: 451-459.
  • RIVERA-GuTIERREZ, H. F., PINxTEN, R. & EENS, M. (2011) Songs differing in consistency elicit differential aggressive response in territorial birds. Biology Letters 7: 339-342.
  • ScHLEIcHER, B., VALERA, F. & HOI, H. (1993) Theconflictbetweennestguardingandmate guardinginpendulinetits (Remizpendulinus). Ethology 95: 157-165.
  • SEARcY, W. A. (1992) Song repertoire and mate choice in birds. American Zoologist 32: 71-80.
  • SEARcY, W. A. & ANDERSSON, M. (1986) Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 507-533.
  • SEARcY, W. A., ANDERSSON, R. C. & NOwIcKI, S. (2006) Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60: 234-241.
  • SEARcY, W. A. & NOwIcKI, S. (2000) Male-malecompetitionandfemalechoiceintheevolution of vocal signalling. Pp. 301-315. In: ESpmARK, Y., AmuNDSEN, T. & ROSENqVIST, G. (eds): Animal signals: Signalling and signal design in animal communication. Tapir AcademicPress, Trondheim.
  • SEARcY, W. A., NOwIcKI, S. & HOGAN, C. (2000) Song type variants and aggressive context. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 48: 358-363.
  • SZENTIRmAI, I., KOmDEuR, J. & SZEKELY, T. (2005) What makes a nest- building male success- ful? Malebehaviourandfemalecareinpendulinetits. BehavioralEcology 16: 994-1000.
  • SZENTIRmAI, I., KOmDEuR, J. & SZEKELY, T. (2007) Sexualconflictovercare: antagonisticeffect ofclutchdesertiononreproductivesuccessofmaleandfemalependulinetits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1739-1744.
  • VAN DIJK, R. E., SZENTIRmAI, I. & SZEKELY, T. (2007a) Practical field guide for investigating breedingecologyofpendulinetitsRemizpendulinus. Version 1.2. Univ. ofBath http:// www.bath.ac.uk/bio- sci/biodiversity- lab/pdfs/PT_%20Field%20Guide_21_22.pdf.
  • VANDIJK, R. E., SZENTIRmAI, I., KOmDEuR, J. & SZEKELY, T. (2007b) Sexualconflictoverparen- talcareinpendulinetits: theprocessofclutchdesertion. Ibis 149: 530-534.