Title: Default for H5P nodes
Course: H5P nodes

Q: Tortoises are reptiles with flippers instead of feet. One can conclude that it is likely they must live mainly in water.

Premise: Tortoises are reptiles with flippers instead of feet.

Conclusion: It is likely they must live mainly in water.

How would an experienced critical thinker rate this argument?
- Good/cogent (We don't agree; the argument is poor due to this reason: Tortoises are reptiles with feet, mainly living on land. Many people confuse tortoises with water-dwelling turtles that have flippers. But an experienced critical thinker would check whether the premises are true before deciding whether the conclusion follows and thus whether the argument is good or poor. Since the premise is not true the argument is poor/uncogent.)
- Poor/uncogent (You got it right. Tortoises are reptiles with feet, mainly living on land. Many people confuse tortoises with water-dwelling turtles that have flippers. But an experienced critical thinker would check whether the premises are true before deciding whether the conclusion follows and thus whether the argument is good or poor. Since the premise is not true the argument is poor/uncogent, and b) is the correct answer.)
A: Poor/uncogent