Published December 9, 2003 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Thomasomys aureus

Authors/Creators

Description

Thomasomys aureus (Tomes)

Figures 11–13

SPECIMENS COLLECTED: 6.2 km (by road) W Papallacta, 11,700 ft (AMNH 248281, 248498; UMMZ 127114, 155621–155624, 155626, 155707); Río Papallacta valley [3– 5 km by trail NNW Papallacta], 11,100 ft (UMMZ 155625).

OTHER MATERIAL: None.

TAXONOMY: The holotype of Thomasomys aureus (BMNH 7.1.1.104) consists of the skin only of a specimen collected by Louis Fraser, allegedly at Pallatanga (1°59'S, 78°57'W; 1500 m above sea level) in the Ecuadorean province of Chimborazo (Allen, 1914; Ellerman, 1941; Cabrera, 1961), or at Gualaquiza (3°24'S, 78°33'W; 971 m above sea level) in the Ecuadorean province of Morona­Santiago (Thomas, 1920). Neither locality, however, is within the usual altitudinal range of this species (ca. 3000–4000 m), and the exact provenance of Fraser’s Ecuadorean material is uncertain due to inadequate labelling and the lack of detailed field records (Gardner, 1983). Despite the absence of cranial material and a definite geographic datum, however, the type serves to establish that aureus is a distinctively large, shaggy rat with grizzled yellowish­brown dorsal fur; yellow­washed, gray­based ventral fur; long, blackish mystacial vibrissae; dark, broad hind feet with semiopposable fifth digits; and a tail that is much longer than the combined length of head­and­body. Other Ecuadorean specimens with these external characters exhibit the qualitative craniodental characters listed in table 2 and approximate the range of morphometric variation summarized in table 3.

Among the several nominal taxa currently synonymized with Thomasomys aureus by Musser and Carleton (1993), the same qualitative and morphometric traits are shared by princeps Thomas (1895a) from the eastern Andes of Colombia and by altorum Allen (1914) from the western Andes of Ecuador. Other putatively synonymous taxa, however, differ conspicuously from aureus in side­byside morphological comparisons: popayanus Allen (1912) from the western Andes of Colombia and nicefori Thomas (1921) from the Colombian central Andes have substantially shorter (33–34 mm) hind feet and smaller (6.0 –6.6 mm) molar toothrows, whereas praetor Thomas (1900) from northern Peru has grayish dorsal fur, pale­silvery ventral fur, pale hind feet, shorter tail, narrower interorbit, and a broad, distinctively flattened braincase. These three taxa were first treated as conspecific with T. aureus by Cabrera (1961), who (as usual) offered no explanation for his nomenclatural changes. In view of such trenchant character differences, at least four species appear to be represented in this complex: T. aureus (including altorum and princeps), T. praetor, and T. popayanus (possibly including nicefori).

FIELD OBSERVATIONS: The 10 specimens of Thomasomys aureus that I collected near Papallacta in 1978 and 1980 were all taken in Subalpine Rain Forest at elevations ranging from 3380 to 3570 m. Six were trapped in well­worn paths through mats of moss and liverworts on horizontal tree limbs, and four were trapped on the ground. Of the latter, two were trapped at the edge of a stream, one was trapped among tall grass in a clearing, and one was trapped in a runway through dense mats of moss.

Notes

Published as part of VOSS, ROBERT S., 2003, A New Species of Thomasomys (Rodentia: Muridae) from Eastern Ecuador, with Remarks on Mammalian Diversity and Biogeography in the Cordillera Oriental, pp. 1-48 in American Museum Novitates 3421 on pages 24-28, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2003)421<0001:ANSOTR>2.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/4734917

Files

Files (3.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f9ced5f663194decf09cdd75780f3319
3.7 kB Download

System files (31.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:12d1a9b8880ba333390dec069282e4e8
31.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
FIELD, OBSERVATIONS
Scientific name authorship
Tomes
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Chordata
Order
Rodentia
Family
Muridae
Genus
Thomasomys
Species
aureus
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Thomasomys aureus (Tomes, 1860) sec. VOSS, 2003

References

  • Allen, J. A. 1914. Two new mammals from Ecuador. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 33: 199 - 200.
  • Ellerman, J. R. 1941. The families and genera of living rodents, vol. 2, Muridae. London: British Museum (Natural History).
  • Cabrera, A. 1961. Catalogo de los mamiferos de America del Sur. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales '' Bernardino Rivadavia' ' (Ciencias Zoologicas) 4 (2): 309 - 732.
  • Thomas, O. 1920. Report on the Mammalia collected by Mr. Edmund Heller during the Peruvian expedition of 1915 under the auspices of Yale University and the National Geographic Society. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 58: 217 - 249, pls. 14, 15.
  • Gardner, A. L. 1983. Proechimys semispinosus (Rodentia: Echimyidae): distribution, type locality, and taxonomic history. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 96: 134 - 144.
  • Musser, G. G., and M. D. Carleton. 1993. Family Muridae. In D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder (editors), Mammal species of the world, 2 nd ed.: 501 - 755. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  • Thomas, O. 1895 a. On small mammals from Nicaragua and Bogota. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 6 (16): 55 - 60.
  • Allen, J. A. 1912. Mammals from western Colombia. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 31: 71 - 95.
  • Thomas, O. 1921. New Cryptotis, Thomasomys, and Oryzomys from Colombia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 9 (8): 354 - 357.
  • Thomas, O. 1900. Description of two new murines from Peru and a new hare from Venezuela. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 7 (5): 354 - 357.