bug_id,comment_date,comments 1653407,2017-01-01 07:03:41 UTC,ubuntu default setting.please 1653413,2017-09-25 09:47:57 UTC,For Greeter it was handled here: https://github.com/elementary/greeter/pull/71 1653413,2017-09-25 09:48:42 UTC,For Camera it was handled here https://github.com/elementary/camera/pull/40 1653413,2017-09-25 09:47:19 UTC,For Slinghshot it was handled here: https://github.com/elementary/applications-menu/pull/43 1653413,2017-01-10 16:17:28 UTC,Unmarking Photos since it has a more specific report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pantheon-photos/+bug/1654873 1653413,2017-09-25 09:42:37 UTC,In Wingpanel this was handled in https://github.com/elementary/wingpanel/pull/56 1653413,2017-09-25 06:39:50 UTC,In Scratch this was handled in https://github.com/elementary/scratch/pull/223 1653413,2017-09-25 09:43:23 UTC,In the Parental Controls plug this was handled in https://github.com/elementary/switchboard-plug-parental-controls/pull/29 1653419,2020-11-08 09:06:01 UTC,"The QEMU project is currently considering to move its bug tracking to another system. For this we need to know which bugs are still valid and which could be closed already. Thus we are setting all older bugs to ""Incomplete"" now. If you still think this bug report here is valid, then please switch the state back to ""New"" within the next 60 days, otherwise this report will be marked as ""Expired"". Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience." 1653419,2021-01-08 04:17:18 UTC,[Expired for QEMU because there has been no activity for 60 days.] 1653420,2017-01-01 12:33:21 UTC,"Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source packages so that people interested in the package can find the bugs about it. You can find some hints about determining what package your bug might be about at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage. You might also ask for help in the #ubuntu-bugs irc channel on Freenode." 1653420,2017-01-03 23:01:29 UTC,"Hi Guardfather," 1653420,2017-01-25 12:24:41 UTC,Posted and updated at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777733 1653421,2017-02-11 15:55:07 UTC,"Now after update to OTA-15, I see two Ubuntu entries. Please see screenshot attached." 1653421,2017-01-23 22:24:40 UTC,"I have this issue, too. On my bq tablet and smartphone." 1653421,2017-01-23 22:22:44 UTC,Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. 1653425,2017-01-06 02:31:07 UTC,"Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a ""regular"" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find." 1653425,2018-05-07 11:17:41 UTC,Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. 1653430,2018-03-15 14:51:22 UTC,"@trakatelis yes, this solve the problem of openstack installed over ESXI but not openstack over baremetal directly. I tried host-model and host-passthrough and both options not working" 1653430,2018-03-14 03:53:00 UTC,After setting 1653430,2018-03-13 14:07:00 UTC,"I still have this problem in newton and above fixes doens't work for me. I have RDO Newton deployed on baremetal server (not ESXI) and every time I boot Cirros or cisco images I get ""Failed to boot error""" 1653430,2017-08-15 16:06:02 UTC,This issue seems similar as reported through 1653430,2017-02-01 21:47:43 UTC,Thank you Mohammed! 1653430,2017-02-01 18:44:45 UTC,"Hi Tim," 1653430,2017-08-30 15:23:59 UTC,"If your compute host is centos/rhel 7.3 running as a VM on ESXi, there is a quick fix to have hardware assisted virtualization (virt_type = kvm) work." 1653430,2017-01-11 14:48:19 UTC,I think believe it's the issue with qemu version. causing I am facing the same exact issur. I have launched instance on lab environment where qemu version is previous version qemu. I even install virt-manager on both environment where different qemu version and I could have created a vm on previous version of qemu but not on the ltest version of qemu. 1653430,2017-01-06 15:00:31 UTC,"Hi there," 1653430,2017-01-06 01:18:53 UTC,"All my services are normal, just like yours。" 1653430,2017-01-03 20:50:45 UTC,"I am also facing the same issue on vmware fusion and vmware v-center. I have tested on liberty, mitaka, and newton have the same isuue, but when I have deployed on virtual box it's working fine." 1653430,2017-01-04 19:01:54 UTC,"I have run this command egrep -c '(vmx|svm)' /proc/cpuinfo its returning 0 and I have double checked nova.conf file as well where virt_type=qemu, restart libvirt service but no luck" 1653430,2017-01-04 14:50:34 UTC,"this is the actual output of my nova.conf. I have done this deployment using packstack. Interesting part is, when I have deployed on virtualbox I didn't face any issue. On vmwarefusion and vceneter having an issue." 1653430,2017-01-04 13:42:25 UTC,Unfortunately this isn't a valid or supported method for deploying nova-compute. 1653430,2017-02-01 18:08:03 UTC,"I'm having the same issue. Not sure why QEMU would be an invalid or non-supported manner of starting an instance (as mentioned in #3 as a reason to invalidate the bug), as kvm is an accelerator. Nice feature, but should not be essential. This would also be indicated by this setting being in the /etc/nova/nova.conf file - using qemu would be a valid type of hypervisor. The file actually says this: # Allowed values: kvm, lxc, qemu, uml, xen, parallels" 1653445,2017-01-02 22:25:50 UTC,Hello 1653446,2017-01-01 20:41:17 UTC,"confirmed on Windows 10, using Inkscape 0.92pre5 r15287." 1653448,2019-07-23 05:42:18 UTC,The version of xfce4-settings in the proposed pocket of Cosmic that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion. 1653448,2019-06-28 19:29:19 UTC,"The fix for this bug has been awaiting testing feedback in the -proposed repository for cosmic for more than 90 days. Please test this fix and update the bug appropriately with the results. In the event that the fix for this bug is still not verified 15 days from now, the package will be removed from the -proposed repository." 1653448,2019-03-29 09:47:51 UTC,"Hello Kev, or anyone else affected," 1653448,2019-03-27 01:20:06 UTC,Uploaded package version 4.13.4-1ubuntu1.18.10.1 1653448,2019-03-27 01:17:08 UTC,Attaching cosmic debdiff. 1653448,2019-03-05 21:44:19 UTC,This bug was fixed in the package xfce4-settings - 4.13.4-1ubuntu2 1653448,2018-10-24 18:02:24 UTC,*** Bug 13317 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 1653448,2018-10-23 23:58:14 UTC,Fix applied with the below commit. 1653448,2019-01-20 18:56:42 UTC,*** Bug 14879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 1653448,2018-10-03 20:00:30 UTC,*** Bug 14732 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 1653448,2018-02-25 18:06:43 UTC,"That version is now dead http://news.softpedia.com/news/ubuntu-17-04-zesty-zapus-has-reached-end-of-life-upgrade-to-ubuntu-17-10-now-519360.shtml" 1653448,2018-03-20 15:24:33 UTC,Scrolling works if you click on the mouse wheel and keep scrolling it 1653448,2018-03-17 21:41:24 UTC,"Yes, it affects any scrolled window of plugged gtk3 dialogs. The workaround I found is to click (left or right) and hold on any part of the scrolled window then mouse wheel works. After the mouse button is released, it'll briefly work. I suspect it's not an issue about events passage, but related to focus." 1653448,2018-03-17 14:12:25 UTC,New upstream bug reported for xfce4-settings 1653448,2018-03-17 14:11:33 UTC,Scrolling with mouse fails in some plugins. 1653448,2018-03-01 12:24:02 UTC,"Per the upstream bug, this affects xfce4-settings." 1653448,2018-03-01 12:22:45 UTC,Also affects bionic. 1653448,2018-10-23 14:12:17 UTC,Another workaround: 1653455,2017-02-01 16:09:05 UTC,"Sorry - I need to come back and update this bug. The package built fine in my ppa, and installed OK on my Xenial system. But running vagrant fails with a similar/same error to that listed in the Debian Bug that was closed with this version of vagrant. I need to find some time to report back properly." 1653457,2017-01-01 20:22:43 UTC,"output from ""cat /proc/bus/input/devices""" 1653457,2017-01-01 20:23:54 UTC,"output from ""/usr/bin/evtest /dev/input/event15""" 1653457,2017-01-01 20:28:22 UTC,"output from ""xev | grep -i button"" (recorded at the same time as the evtest output)." 1653457,2017-01-01 20:29:36 UTC,"output from ""xinput -list-props 14""" 1653457,2017-04-20 02:28:22 UTC,Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. 1653459,2017-01-04 12:34:24 UTC,"If I reconect the mouse, lag disappears." 1653476,2019-03-02 13:47:46 UTC,Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. 1653478,2017-01-02 17:16:25 UTC,Just stumbled upon this: 1653478,2017-01-03 04:10:28 UTC,"- which version did you use? > python-swiftclient 3.2.1.dev9 > swift 2.12.0 (cbb99f97b02857dd638b0d61f5e19b584037b25f) " 1653478,2017-01-03 05:45:51 UTC,@Christian 1653478,2017-01-03 09:06:02 UTC,"In your case you are setting the quota first, and then do a request with the same user. However, that user must be an user with reseller rights, otherwise setting the quota would be not allowed. At the same time a user with reseller rights will always bypass the quota check. This is why you can exceed the quota." 1653478,2017-01-03 12:35:17 UTC,Ahh! That was my mistake. I was trying to upload an object with reseller_admin rights. Didn't noticed that quota is bypassed for reseller_admin in the code. 1653478,2017-01-05 16:37:32 UTC,FYI: an older patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312603/ Adds support for object count quotas at a storage account level. 1653478,2017-01-16 12:34:44 UTC,@jrichli: I'll go through the patch. Thanks for the info. 1653478,2017-01-02 15:36:19 UTC,I couldn't verify this using the current master branch - it worked as expected in my quick test. 1653481,2017-01-02 10:16:23 UTC,Repo case. Compile with gcc main.cpp -ldl 1653488,2017-03-29 05:30:40 UTC,"Yes, it is confusing users. I think we're supposed to change the name or the way to describe it. It's really ambiguous." 1653489,2017-01-04 20:35:34 UTC,But ipr.ko is already included. There must be some other missing boot essential module. 1653489,2017-01-02 08:59:16 UTC,"------- Comment From