Published August 29, 2013 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Cuticular hydrocarbon divergence in the jewel wasp Nasonia: evolutionary shifts in chemical communication channels?

  • 1. University of Freiburg
  • 2. Arizona State University
  • 3. University of Groningen
  • 4. University of Rochester

Description

The evolution and maintenance of intraspecific communication channels constitutes a key feature of chemical signaling and sexual communication. However, how divergent chemical communication channels evolve while maintaining their integrity for both sender and receiver is poorly understood. In the present study, we compare male and female cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles in the jewel wasp genus Nasonia, analyze their chemical divergence, and investigate their role as species-specific sexual signaling cues. Males and females of all four Nasonia species showed unique, non-overlapping CHC profiles unambiguously separating them. Surprisingly, male and female phylogenies based on the chemical distances between their CHC profiles differed dramatically, where only male CHC divergence parallels the molecular phylogeny of Nasonia. In particular, N. giraulti female CHC profiles were the most divergent from all other species and very different from its most closely related sibling species N. oneida. Furthermore, although our behavioural assays indicate that female CHC can generally be perceived as sexual cues attracting males in Nasonia, this function has apparently been lost in the highly divergent female N. giraulti CHC profiles. Curiously, N. giraulti males are still attracted to heterospecific, but not to conspecific female CHC profiles. We suggest that this striking discrepancy has been caused by an extensive evolutionary shift in female N. giraulti CHC profiles, which are no longer used as conspecific recognition cues. Our study constitutes the first report of an apparent abandonment of a sexual recognition cue that the receiver did not adapt to.

Notes

Files

Nasonia GC-MS raw data.zip

Files (812.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5fa8df5a823619ab6965960e0e68a3a8
47.5 kB Download
md5:0431565ab47cc4940881391454361b17
42.3 kB Download
md5:01465ab0e519b1deb3bd0e36de421bc5
76.1 kB Download
md5:ac79fe2ef4c15a2ef407530ee9026e17
331.1 kB Preview Download
md5:9cfd3d6152268fe798a160edff798389
165.1 kB Download
md5:6ac0d159cd88464ed61e7506fe6894ee
35.3 kB Download
md5:652a17ccc77d2d78da3e1e713171029e
21.5 kB Download
md5:ed2dc12965c27c01ce5f3a13d30d052e
93.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1111/jeb.12242 (DOI)