id,collection,dc.cibproject[en],dc.contributor.author,dc.coverage.spatial[en],dc.coverage.temporal[en],dc.date.accessioned,dc.date.available,dc.date.created[en],dc.date.issued,dc.description.abstract[en],dc.description.provenance[en],dc.description.statementofresponsibility,dc.dqcompletenessomission.valueattributedata[en],dc.dqcompletenessomission.valuespatialdata[en],dc.dqcompletenessomission.valueunit[en],dc.exgeographicboundingbox.eastboundlongitude[en],dc.exgeographicboundingbox.northboundlattitude[en],dc.exgeographicboundingbox.southboundlattitude[en],dc.exgeographicboundingbox.westboundlongitude[en],dc.exverticalextent.maximumvalue[en],dc.exverticalextent.minimumvalue[en],dc.exverticalextent.unitofmeasure[en],dc.exverticalextent.verticaldatum[en],dc.format.extent,dc.format.mimetype,dc.identifier.uri,dc.language.iso,dc.mdconstraints.uselimitation[en],dc.mdcoveragedescription.contenttype[en],dc.mddataidentification.language[en],dc.mddataidentification.spatialrepresentationtype[en],dc.mddataidentification.spatialresolution[en],dc.mddistributor.distributorcontact[en],dc.mdfeaturecataloguedescription.cataloguedate,dc.mdfeaturecataloguedescription.contenttype[en],dc.mdidentification.deliverypoint[en],dc.mdidentification.electronicmailaddress[en],dc.mdidentification.organizationname[en],dc.mdidentification.phone[en],dc.mdidentification.postalcode[en],dc.mdidentification.purpose[en],dc.mdimagedescription.cameracalibrationinformationavailability[en],dc.mdimagedescription.imagingcondition[en],dc.mdimagedescription.lensdistortioninformationavailability[en],dc.mdimagedescription.radiometriccalibrationdataavailability[en],dc.mdimagedescription.triangulationindicator[en],dc.mdlegalconstraints.accessconstraints[en],dc.mdmaintenanceinformation.maintenanceandupdatefrequency[en],dc.mdusage.usagedatetime,dc.mdusage.userdeterminedlimitations[en],dc.rights[en],dc.title[en]
"be71e265-a4db-4876-9d26-b0a262785158","123456789/137","Large-scale patterns in diversity","Coetzee, Bernard","measure","2009/01/01 to 2012/12/31","2013-08-15T07:30:31Z","2013-08-15T07:30:31Z","2013","2013-08-15T07:30:31Z","The challenge of conserving biodiversity is daunting. Despite some local conservation gains,
most indicators of the condition of global biodiversity show declines since the 1970’s, while
indicators of the threats to biodiversity all show increases. Humanity has in part responded
to the global biodiversity extinction crisis by establishing protected areas (PA) and they are
widely considered cornerstones of conservation.
However, their efficacy in maintaining biodiversity is much debated. Previous studies have
been unable to provide a general answer because of their typically restricted geographic
and/or taxonomic focus, or qualitative approach. Using a global meta-analysis with 861 pairwise
comparisons inside and outside PAs from 86 studies across five major taxon groups, I
tested the hypothesis that PAs achieve significant conservation outcomes measured as
higher biodiversity values compared with alternative land covers. I found that globally, PAs
typically contain higher abundances of individual species, higher assemblage abundances
and higher species richness. Variation in effect sizes among taxa nonetheless underscores
that PA efficacy can be context specific.
To examine factors driving the context specific nature of PA efficacy, an exact distance,
timed point count methodology was used to assess PAs ecological effectiveness in terms of
bird assemblages of the Kruger National Park (KNP), South Africa, in the Phalaborwa section.
Bird assemblages inside the KNP were compared to matched sites in rural and urban land
cover, as well as the connecting habitat matrix outside the KNP. Species richness and
abundance were significantly lower inside the KNP compared to other land covers. However,
the species assemblages are markedly different. The artificial addition of resources in an
otherwise resources poor area, mainly in terms of gardening, provide suitable habitat for a
range of species, consistent with the more individuals hypothesis. Large-bodied and ground
nesting species are virtually absent outside the KNP. Thus species richness and abundance
differences between land cover regions mask insidious changes in species traits.
Nonetheless, not formally protected land can contribute positively to the regional
biodiversity portfolio.
Since an understanding of the mechanisms that structure species assemblages can aid in the
consequences of anthropogenic drivers disentangling them, I describe and analyse the body size frequency distributions (BSFDs) of avian assemblages at several spatial scales in the Afrotropical biogeographic realm. I found that the African avifaunal continental BSFD is
unimodal and right-skewed. African avifaunal BSFDs are quantitatively dissimilar to the
African mammal BSFDs, which are bimodal at all spatial scales. Much of the change in
median body size with spatial scale can be captured by a range-weighted null model,
suggesting that differential turnover between smaller- and larger-bodied species might
explain the shift in the central tendency of the BSFD.
My results for the first time quantitatively demonstrate that PAs are a vital component of a
global biodiversity conservation strategy. However, I also show that PA ecological
effectiveness can be context specific, and understanding which species traits are at risk outside of PAs is critical to predicting their efficacy.","Submitted by Bernard Coetzee (bwtcoetzee@gmail.com) on 2013-08-14T12:47:55Z
No. of bitstreams: 4
Coetzee_PHD.Thesis.2013_FINAL.pdf: 4140910 bytes, checksum: 40f932d71d8e9c9453e8fad83dd27e45 (MD5)
Chap4_BSFD.xls: 1033216 bytes, checksum: 366104c6b47210cce074dfc2432926a7 (MD5)
Chap3_KRUGER.xls: 1616896 bytes, checksum: e2be8964b4a337b07da4531d79519f41 (MD5)
Chap2_MetaAnalysis.xlsx: 363669 bytes, checksum: 3f24e34955044b077b325c73e2126290 (MD5)||Approved for entry into archive by Karla Coombe-Davis(kcd@sun.ac.za) on 2013-08-15T07:30:30Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 4
Coetzee_PHD.Thesis.2013_FINAL.pdf: 4140910 bytes, checksum: 40f932d71d8e9c9453e8fad83dd27e45 (MD5)
Chap4_BSFD.xls: 1033216 bytes, checksum: 366104c6b47210cce074dfc2432926a7 (MD5)
Chap3_KRUGER.xls: 1616896 bytes, checksum: e2be8964b4a337b07da4531d79519f41 (MD5)
Chap2_MetaAnalysis.xlsx: 363669 bytes, checksum: 3f24e34955044b077b325c73e2126290 (MD5)||Made available in DSpace on 2013-08-15T07:30:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4
Coetzee_PHD.Thesis.2013_FINAL.pdf: 4140910 bytes, checksum: 40f932d71d8e9c9453e8fad83dd27e45 (MD5)
Chap4_BSFD.xls: 1033216 bytes, checksum: 366104c6b47210cce074dfc2432926a7 (MD5)
Chap3_KRUGER.xls: 1616896 bytes, checksum: e2be8964b4a337b07da4531d79519f41 (MD5)
Chap2_MetaAnalysis.xlsx: 363669 bytes, checksum: 3f24e34955044b077b325c73e2126290 (MD5)","Coetzee, Bernard","100","100","Percentage","31°20'16.19""E","23°50'27.79""S","24° 1'26.54""S","30°58'6.98""E","450","401","meters","None","4140910 bytes||1033216 bytes||1616896 bytes||363669 bytes","application/pdf||application/vnd.ms-excel||application/vnd.ms-excel||application/vnd.ms-excel","http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1312","en_US","Only with express permission from the author (BWT Coetzee)","thematicClassification","English","spreadsheet","Multiple datasets - 1. Gobal 2. Across continetnal Africa 3. Local (25km2))","Unknown","2013-03-01","Coverage","School of Biological Sciences
Monash University
Victoria 3800
Australia","bwtcoetzee@gmail.com","Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology","0218082832","7602","For PhD degree, to assess aims detailed in Abstract above.","Yes","Blurred","Yes","Yes","No","copyright","When_needed","2013-03-01","Only for Academic purposes","copyright","Species assembly patterns and protected area effectiveness in times of change: a focus on African avifauna"