Published December 1, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Technology Business Incubation In A Philippine State University: Lesson Learned From South Australia Based Leading Technology Business Incubator

  • 1. National Coconut Research Center, Visayas State University
  • 2. Carnegie Mellon University Australia
  • 3. Philippine Rootcrops Research & Training Center, Visayas State University

Description

Transforming intellectual property into commercially-valued goods is a universal problem for universities. The Visayas State University (VSU) in Baybay City Leyte, Philippines is no exception. The capacities of VSU through its newly established Agriculture & Food Technology Business Incubator (AFTBI) and its partners are face by constrained such as but not limited to the lack of experience, financial & human resource This paper aimed to provide useful information for sustainability of the VSU-AFTBI by looking at the success of the Southeast Asia’s leading technology business incubator – The New Venture Institute (NVI) of Flinders University. It is argued that the Flinders University model carries important strategy lessons for strengthening VSU’s AFTBI. The study reveals useful strategy that the NVI utilized, specifically the quadruple helix model that links academics, government, industry managers and citizens. The Service Design Model is suggested for VSU-AFTBI in its approach to the quadruple helix mode and the following recommendations are proposed: an immediate assessment needs to be made of the VSU’s resources and capacity such as intellectual property valuation, technological readiness level, human capital resources and institutional capacity; a separate assessment of the business and community needs; participants and alumni need to be deeply engaged; student entrepreneurs need to be involved; and strengthened communication to improve brand and visibility. Although VSU’s AFTBI and NVI have different specializations and locations, the tenets are presented here in general form and can be expected to work in the context of Philippine’s VSU-AFTBI.

Files

Vol-4-Paper-1-2020-pp.-1-19-Cruz-et-al.pdf

Files (869.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d4b8da15d571e0ce0116337f3ae3bdb2
869.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is derived from
Journal article: http://www.reserds.com/vol-4-paper-1/ (URL)

References

  • Allen, D., & McCluskey, R. (1991). Structure, Policy, Services, and Performance in the Business Incubator Industry. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 15(2), 61-77. doi:10.1177/104225879101500207.
  • Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring the Quadruple Helix. Report of Quadruple Helix Research for the CLIQ Project. Tampere, Finland: QLIQ Project.
  • Castillo, J., & Meyer H. (2018). World Ranking Reports 17/18. Stockholm: UBI Global. Retrieved from https://resources.ubiglobal.com/hubfs/Publications/Rankings/UBI%20Global%20%20Rankings%201718.pdf.
  • Dzisah, J., & Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple Helix Circulation: The Heart of Innovation and Development. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 101-115. doi:10.1386/ijtm.7.2.101_1.
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. doi:10.1177/05390184030423002.
  • European Commission. (2010). The Smart Guide to Innovation-Based Incubators (IBI) European Union Regional Policy Report. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/evaluations-guidance-documents/2010/the-smart-guide-to-innovation-based-incubators-ibi.
  • García-Terán, J., & Skoglund, A. (2018). A Processual Approach for the Quadruple Helix Model: The Case of a Regional Project in Uppsala. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(3), 1272-1296. doi: 10.1007/s13132-018-0521-5.
  • Hannon, P., & Chaplin P. (2003). Are Incubators Good for Business? Understanding Incubation Practice- The Challenges for Policy. Environment and Planning, Government & Policy, 21(6), 861-881. doi: 10.1068/c0215
  • Katzan, Jr., H. (2011). Essentials Of Service Design. Journal of Service Science, 4(2), 43-60. doi 10.19030/jss.v4i2.6644.
  • Kirchhoff, B.A., (1994). Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism: the Economics of Business Firm Formation and Growth. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
  • Klofsten, M., Heydebreck, P., and Jones-Evans, D. (2009). Transferring good practice beyond organizational borders: Lessons from transferring an entrepreneurship programme. Regional Studies, 44 (6), 791-799. doi: 10.1080/00343400903095238.
  • Kondaylas, L. (2019). New Ventures Institute Innovation in Regional South Australia. Retrieved from https://www.yorkeandmidnorth.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Laki-Kondylas- Flinders-University.pdf
  • Mcadam, M., & Marlow, S. (2007). Building Futures or Stealing Secrets? International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 25(4), 361-382. doi: 10.1177/0266242607078563.
  • Milan, S., Lamine W., & Fayolle, A. (2016).Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, (50-51), 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.005.
  • Mulyana, S. (2014). Improving the Capability of Innovation, Competitive Advantage and Performance through the Helix Quadruple Approach: Study in the Fashion Sector Creative Industry. Journal of Technology Management, 13(3), 304-321. doi: https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.
  • New Venture Institute. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.nviflinders.com.au/mentoring/Research, Work Research Centre.
  • New Venture Institute named best university incubator in Asia-Pacific – News. (2019). Retrieved from https://news.flinders.edu.au/blog/2018/02/24/new-venture-institute-named-global-leader-startup-success/.
  • New Ventures Institute (2019). Education Hack 4.0 | Flinders New Venture Institute and Cisco. Retrieved from https://www.nviflinders.com.au/eduhack-wrap/.
  • OECD (1997). Technology incubators: Nurturing small firms. OECD No: Issue Paris. Outlining user-oriented innovation models. University of Tampere, Institute for Social.
  • Pena, I. (2004). Business Incubation Centres and New Firm Growth in the Basque Country. Small Business Economics, 22(3/4), 223-236. doi:10.1023/b:sbej.0000022221.03667.82.
  • Phan, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2): 165–182. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.001.
  • Smilor, R., & Gill, M., (1986). The New Business Incubator: Linking Talent, Technology, Capital and Know-how. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, p. 224.
  • UBI Global (2018). Awards: Most Promising & Top Challengers – 2017/2018. Retrieved from https://ubi-global.com/awards-mp-tc-1718/02/.
  • Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial Universities: Socioeconomic Impacts of Academic Entrepreneurship in a European Region. Economic Development Quarterly, 27 (1), 40-55. doi: 10.1177/0891242412471973.
  • Värmland County Administrative Board (2018). A Quadruple Helix guide for innovations. In For Care. European Regional Developent Plan. Retrieved from https://northsearegion.eu/media/5326/quadruple-helix-guide-version-20180612.pdf.
  • Visayas State University (2019). The University | Visayas State University. Retrieved from https://www.vsu.edu.ph/about/overview.
  • Whittington, R., & Pettigrew A. M. (2003). Complementaries Thinking. In A.M. Pettigrew, R.
  • Whitttington, L. Melin, C.J. Sanchez-Rundle, F.A. J.van den Bosch, W. Ruigrok & T. Numagami (Eds.), Innovative forms of Organizing (pp 125-132). London Sage.