Published December 1, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Teaching Strategies: The Case of a National Vocational School in Hilongos, Leyte

  • 1. Department of Mathematics and Physics, Visayas State University
  • 2. Department of Statistics, Visayas State University

Description

Evaluation of teaching strategies serves as a guide for diagnosis and improvement for effective teaching. However, studies focusing on the effectiveness of teaching strategies in Region 8, Philippines is a bit limited. Hence, this paper aims to evaluate the teaching strategies of teachers at the Hilongos National Vocational School using a total of 23 randomly selected teachers and 294 students. The data was analyzed using descriptive measures and Spearman rank correlation coefficient was also computed to determine the relationship between student’s perception and student’s performance for each teaching strategy. Results show that 11 academic teachers are using five teaching strategies namely computer assisted lessons, peer tutoring, modeling and teaching demo, oral recitation and reporting, and group work. In addition, there are 12 vocational teachers who are also using the same teaching strategies plus lecture with laboratory. The students rated high or strongly approve all the teaching strategies. In addition to computer assisted lessons and peer tutoring, the following teaching strategies such as modeling, teaching demo, oral recitation and reporting are effective for both academic and vocational teachers. The student’s perception on peer tutoring and academic performance under an academic teacher is positively correlated. Further, no relationship was found between the student’s perception of teaching strategies and academic performance under vocational teachers.

Files

Vol-2-2018-pp.-65-80-Paper-4.pdf

Files (709.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9f499d03e6baa04c400e9a680baf4ce5
709.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is derived from
Journal article: http://www.reserds.com/vol-2-paper-4/ (URL)

References

  • Ahmann, J. S. and Glock, M. D. (1975). Evaluating Pupil Growth. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston.
  • Albert, J. R. G. (2008). Basic Statistics for the Tertiary Level, 1st Edition. Rex Book Store, Inc., Philippines.
  • Conover, W. J. (1980). Practical Nonparametric Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
  • Duffy, G. D. (2002). The case for direct explanation of strategies. In C. C. Block, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Gage, N. (1958). Educational Psychology. Rand McNally Pub., Chicago, USA.
  • Gagne, R. M., Scriven, M. and Tyler, R. (1967). Perspective of Curriculum Evaluation. Rand McNally and Co., Chicago, USA.
  • Hacker, D. and Tenent, A. (2002). Implementing reciprocal teaching in the classroom: Overcoming obstacles and making modifications. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (4), 699-718.
  • Hashey, M. and Conners, D. (2003). Learn from our journey: Reciprocal teaching action research. The Reading Teacher, 57 (3), 224-232.
  • King, C. M., & Johnson, L. M. (1999). Constructing meaning via reciprocal teaching. Reading Research and Instruction, 38(3), 169-186.
  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997). Best Practices In Promoting Reading Comprehension In Students With Learning Disabilities. Remedial& Special Education, 18, 197-216.
  • Millman, J. (1981). Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Sage Pub., Beverly Hills.
  • Pilten, G. (2016). The Evaluation of Effectiveness of Reciprocal Teaching Strategies on Comprehension of Expository Texts. Journal of Education and Training Studies 4 (10), 232-247.
  • Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., and Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221.
  • Salandanan, G. (2000). Teaching Approaches and Strategies. Katha Publishing, Quezon City, Philippines.
  • Tenedero, H. S. (2009). Super Teacher: Excellent in Teaching. Center for Learning and Teaching Styles. Phils., Inc., Philippines.
  • Tyler, R. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Institution. University of Chicago Press., Chicago, USA.
  • Taylor, B., and Frye, B. (1992).Comprehension strategy instruction in the intermediate grades. Reading Research and Instruction, 32 (1), 39-48.
  • Villavicencio, F. T. (2006). General Psychology. El Bulakeno Printing House, Sto. Rosario, City of Malolos, Bulacan, Philippines.
  • Walpole, R. E. (1982). Introduction to Statistics. McMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York.
  • Zulueta, F. (2004). Foundation of Education. Katha Publishing, Mandaluyong City, Philippines.