Vehicle agnostic area coverage maximisation for campaign planning
- 1. SeeByte ltd, Edinburgh
Description
The level of maturity of maritime autonomous vehicles makes the deployment of networks of vehicles costeffective with an increasing number of applications that today require the usage of autonomous robots. To maximise operational effectiveness, one critical decision variable that has a direct impact on both the cost and performance, lies in how to properly place the different robots/sensors in the target environment. The number of assets, the dedicated communication networks, can contribute a significant portion of the overall cost and their placement determines the overall mission time and the associated coverage area. The ability to quickly allocate the available vehicles to one specific area, to monitor the mission performance, and to understand the quality of the data gathered would represent a key capability to speed up the uptake of the technology even more. This paper aims at bridging this gap, and provides a solution to efficiently schedule multi-vehicle, multi-days and large areas campaigns. The output of the campaign planner is a set of goals (e.g. areas to survey, targets to reacquire), which can then be allocated to the vehicles for execution. Finally, to maximise vehicle interoperability this paper also report an automated translator from high-level mission plans to vehicle to vehicle specific commands. Results are reported through simulations.
Files
INEC_2020_Paper_76.pdf
Files
(4.0 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:577a7e0a496674303cfb871411c98ee0
|
4.0 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Caiti, A., Calabr`o, V., Munaf`o, A., Dini, G., Lo Duca, A., 2013. Mobile underwater sensor networks for protection and security: Field experience at the uan11 experiment. Journal of Field Robotics 30, 237–253.
- Caiti, A., Munafo, A., Vettori, G., 2012. A geographical information system (gis)-based simulation tool to assess civilian harbor protection levels. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 37, 85–102.
- Chinneck, J.W., 2015. Practical optimization: a gentle introduction. Available on line at http://www.sce. carleton.ca/faculty/chinneck/po.html.
- Ferri, G., Munaf`o, A., Tesei, A., Braca, P., Meyer, F., Pelekanakis, K., Petroccia, R., Alves, J., Strode, C., LePage, K., 2017. Cooperative robotic networks for underwater surveillance: an overview. IET Radar, Sonar Navigation 11, 1740–1761.
- Kala, R., Warwick, K., 2011. Multi-vehicle planning using RRT-connect. Paladyn 2, 134–144.
- Marques, T., Pinto, J., Dias, P., Tasso de Sousa, J., 2017. Mvplanning: A framework for planning and coordination of multiple autonomous vehicles, in: OCEANS 2017 - Anchorage, pp. 1–6.
- Miguela˜nez, E., Patr´on, P., Brown, K.E., Petillot, Y.R., Lane, D.M., 2011. Semantic knowledge-based framework to improve the situation awareness of autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 23, 759–773.
- Salavasidis, G., Munaf`o, A., Harris, C.A., Prampart, T., Templeton, R., Smart, M., Roper, D.T., Pebody, M., McPhail, S.D., Rogers, E., Phillips, A.B., 2019. Terrain-aided navigation for long-endurance and deep-rated autonomous underwater vehicles. Journal of Field Robotics 36, 447–474.
- SeeByte, 2020. SeeByte Website. www.seebyte.com. Accessed: 2020-05-14.
- Wu, J., Bingham, R.C., Ting, S., Yager, K.,Wood, Z.J., Gambin, T., Clark, C.M., 2019. Multi-auv motion planning for archeological site mapping and photogrammetric reconstruction. Journal of Field Robotics 36, 1250–1269.
- Yordanova, V., Griffiths, H., Hailes, S., 2017. Rendezvous planning for multiple autonomous underwater vehicles using a markov decision process. IET Radar, Sonar Navigation 11, 1762–1769.
- Zhao, J., Cheung, S.c.S., David, H., 2009. Optimal visual sensor network configuration. Multi-Camera Networks Chapter 6.
- Zhao, J., Cheung, S.c.S., David, H., 2013. Approximate techniques in solving optimal camera placement problems. IEEE International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks .