Arguably the penetration of Building Information Modeling software in the building industry is enabled by well-structured ontologies such as the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) or green building XML. Acknowledging this, the UDIGISH WG aims to explore and assess possible specifications and data schemas which would facilitate interdisciplinary research for the study and reuse of built heritage in our cities, analysing and representing scales larger than the one of the building it self, like those of the building block, the street, or even of the neighbourhood. We argue, this multiscale data-driven study will facilitate a more holistic, integrated application of digital methods, such as BIM, modelling & simulation to cities, and will better contextualise cross-disciplinary enquiries. This we envision to bring us a step closer to big data for historic cities. Towards this goal, this presentation attempts to introduce some of the complexities of moving from the scale of the building data and its attributes, including heritage linked data, to the scale of the historic neighbourhood or cluster of buildings.
\n\n", "languages": [ { "id": "eng", "title": { "en": "English" } } ], "publication_date": "2020-12-02", "publisher": "Zenodo", "resource_type": { "id": "publication-conferencepaper", "title": { "de": "Konferenzbeitrag", "en": "Conference paper" } }, "rights": [ { "description": { "en": "The Creative Commons Attribution license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the condition that the creator is appropriately credited." }, "icon": "cc-by-icon", "id": "cc-by-4.0", "props": { "scheme": "spdx", "url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode" }, "title": { "en": "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" } } ], "title": "Schemas for BIM interoperability: a case for linked urban data" }, "parent": { "access": { "owned_by": { "user": "165764" } }, "communities": { "entries": [ { "access": { "member_policy": "open", "members_visibility": "public", "record_submission_policy": "open", "review_policy": "open", "visibility": "public" }, "children": { "allow": false }, "created": "2019-06-29T19:25:29.612215+00:00", "custom_fields": {}, "deletion_status": { "is_deleted": false, "status": "P" }, "id": "89ba37af-21e6-4d74-883a-eb6b515b6e6a", "links": {}, "metadata": { "curation_policy": "
The collection brings together and accepts outputs (partially or entirely) of collaborations within and across the DARIAH neworks (such as the DARIAH Working Groups, Theme funding calls or National Consortia), or contributions that are related to DARIAH’s activities in any other way.
\n\n", "organizations": [ { "id": "05n09v162" } ], "page": "
The Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities (DARIAH) aims to enhance and support digitally-enabled research and teaching across the arts and humanities. It develops, maintains and operates an infrastructure in support of ICT-based research practices and sustains researchers in using them to build, analyse and interpret digital resources. DARIAH was established as a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) in August 2014. Currently, DARIAH has 22 Members and several cooperating partners in eleven non-member countries.
\nHere you will find a growing collection of DARIAH-affiliated research outputs and other documents. The DARIAH Zenodo Community aims to complement the DARIAH collection on HAL repository.
", "title": "Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities (DARIAH)", "website": "https://www.dariah.eu/" }, "revision_id": 4, "slug": "dariah", "updated": "2024-11-15T09:19:10.750903+00:00" }, { "access": { "member_policy": "open", "members_visibility": "public", "record_submission_policy": "open", "review_policy": "open", "visibility": "public" }, "children": { "allow": false }, "created": "2020-04-23T05:37:26.082804+00:00", "custom_fields": {}, "deletion_status": { "is_deleted": false, "status": "P" }, "id": "b6ff726b-f8bc-49fa-b676-87e9f9d759ac", "links": {}, "metadata": { "curation_policy": "", "page": "In this community we present abstracts and outcomes of the DARIAH Annual Event 2020 which will take place virtually in the fall.
\r\n\r\nScholarly Primitives
\r\n\r\nIt has been twenty years since John Unsworth first formulated scholarly primitives as a set of recursive and interrelated functions that form the foundations of research activities across disciplines, theoretical frameworks or eras. Ever since, these basic scholarly functions -- discovering, annotating, comparing, referring, sampling, illustrating and representing -- have proved to be useful not only for categorizing the fundamentals of knowledge production in the humanities, but also as a framework for conceptualizing Digital Humanities tools which support these processes.
\r\n\r\nThe time is ripe to revisit and freshly interrogate both the notion and the scope of scholarly primitives. To what extent does this particular set of scholarly primitives still correspond to our understanding of what humanities scholars do on a day-to-day basis? Has our understanding of research workflows changed over time significantly enough to require a new classification? Can we -- and should we -- put our conceptualization of scholarly primitives into a historical perspective as an expression of a particular stage in the development of Digital Humanities? Have scholarly primitives been conceptually robust enough to keep up with the field, which now includes big data, visual analytics, machine learning and artificial intelligence? Finally, are scholarly primitives -- and the way we speak of research as we build tools to support it -- free of ideology and bias?
\r\n\r\nThese theoretical questions frame and encapsulate the challenges of building a digital research infrastructure and developing state-of-the art tools that aid humanities scholars in their work. They make us think about whether research infrastructures are capable of supporting each stage of the research process and how we can best assess their scope and effectiveness. They also bring into focus the question of whether the development of new tools and methods is simply changing the practicalities of conducting research, or whether it is also expanding the horizons of knowledge production in the humanities in more fundamental ways. What are the gaps and discontinuities in our understanding of scholarly primitives and, more generally, DH tools and methods that we should address in order to build comprehensive, flexible, dynamic, open and sustainable research infrastructures?
\r\n\r\nDARIAH is happy to announce John Unsworth as keynote speaker at the Annual Event 2020.
\r\n\r\nIn this community we present abstracts and outcomes of the DARIAH Annual Event 2020 which will take place in November 10-13, 2020 in Zagreb, Croatia.
\r\n\r\nScholarly Primitives
\r\n\r\nIt has been twenty years since John Unsworth first formulated scholarly primitives as a set of recursive and interrelated functions that form the foundations of research activities across disciplines, theoretical frameworks or eras. Ever since, these basic scholarly functions -- discovering, annotating, comparing, referring, sampling, illustrating and representing -- have proved to be useful not only for categorizing the fundamentals of knowledge production in the humanities, but also as a framework for conceptualizing Digital Humanities tools which support these processes.
\r\n\r\nThe time is ripe to revisit and freshly interrogate both the notion and the scope of scholarly primitives. To what extent does this particular set of scholarly primitives still correspond to our understanding of what humanities scholars do on a day-to-day basis? Has our understanding of research workflows changed over time significantly enough to require a new classification? Can we -- and should we -- put our conceptualization of scholarly primitives into a historical perspective as an expression of a particular stage in the development of Digital Humanities? Have scholarly primitives been conceptually robust enough to keep up with the field, which now includes big data, visual analytics, machine learning and artificial intelligence? Finally, are scholarly primitives -- and the way we speak of research as we build tools to support it -- free of ideology and bias?
\r\n\r\nThese theoretical questions frame and encapsulate the challenges of building a digital research infrastructure and developing state-of-the art tools that aid humanities scholars in their work. They make us think about whether research infrastructures are capable of supporting each stage of the research process and how we can best assess their scope and effectiveness. They also bring into focus the question of whether the development of new tools and methods is simply changing the practicalities of conducting research, or whether it is also expanding the horizons of knowledge production in the humanities in more fundamental ways. What are the gaps and discontinuities in our understanding of scholarly primitives and, more generally, DH tools and methods that we should address in order to build comprehensive, flexible, dynamic, open and sustainable research infrastructures?
\r\n\r\nDARIAH is happy to announce John Unsworth and Kristin Veel as keynote speakers at the Annual Event 2020.
", "title": "Scholarly Primitives - DARIAH Annual Event 2020" }, "revision_id": 0, "slug": "dariahannualevent2020", "updated": "2022-05-12T13:42:44.429430+00:00" } ], "ids": [ "89ba37af-21e6-4d74-883a-eb6b515b6e6a", "b6ff726b-f8bc-49fa-b676-87e9f9d759ac" ] }, "id": "4302145", "pids": { "doi": { "client": "datacite", "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.4302145", "provider": "datacite" } } }, "pids": { "doi": { "client": "datacite", "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.4302146", "provider": "datacite" }, "oai": { "identifier": "oai:zenodo.org:4302146", "provider": "oai" } }, "revision_id": 7, "stats": { "all_versions": { "data_volume": 8327271323.0, "downloads": 203, "unique_downloads": 177, "unique_views": 214, "views": 223 }, "this_version": { "data_volume": 8327271323.0, "downloads": 203, "unique_downloads": 177, "unique_views": 214, "views": 223 } }, "status": "published", "swh": {}, "updated": "2024-07-19T12:55:06.548346+00:00", "versions": { "index": 1, "is_latest": true } }