setwd("C:/Users/Gallese/Desktop/Mask Survey/")
cond <- readr::read_delim("cond.txt", "\t", escape_double = FALSE)
##
## -- Column specification ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## cols(
## Subj = col_double(),
## stim = col_character(),
## Mask = col_character(),
## ActGen = col_character(),
## Emo = col_character(),
## Act = col_character(),
## genere = col_double(),
## generecat = col_character(),
## eta = col_character(),
## RegQua = col_character(),
## cat = col_character(),
## fis = col_double(),
## soc = col_double(),
## val = col_double(),
## catn = col_double()
## )
print(cond)
## # A tibble: 6,912 x 15
## Subj stim Mask ActGen Emo Act genere generecat eta RegQua cat
## <dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
## 1 1 Mask~ Mask F AN AF18 1 F 25 Sicil~ SU
## 2 1 Mask~ Mask F AN AF20 1 F 25 Sicil~ AN
## 3 1 Mask~ Mask F AN AF35 1 F 25 Sicil~ AN
## 4 1 Mask~ Mask F AN BF23 1 F 25 Sicil~ FE
## 5 1 Mask~ Mask F AN BF26 1 F 25 Sicil~ AN
## 6 1 Mask~ Mask F AN BF28 1 F 25 Sicil~ FE
## 7 1 Mask~ Mask F HA AF18 1 F 25 Sicil~ HA
## 8 1 Mask~ Mask F HA AF20 1 F 25 Sicil~ HA
## 9 1 Mask~ Mask F HA AF23 1 F 25 Sicil~ HA
## 10 1 Mask~ Mask F HA AF26 1 F 25 Sicil~ HA
## # ... with 6,902 more rows, and 4 more variables: fis <dbl>, soc <dbl>,
## # val <dbl>, catn <dbl>
FINALval <- lme4::lmer(val ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + Emo:generecat + ActGen:Emo + (1|Subj) + (1|stim), data = cond)
car::Anova(FINALval)
## Registered S3 methods overwritten by 'car':
## method from
## influence.merMod lme4
## cooks.distance.influence.merMod lme4
## dfbeta.influence.merMod lme4
## dfbetas.influence.merMod lme4
R2
MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(FINALval)
## R2m R2c
## [1,] 0.7155719 0.7584366
Model Parameters CI
confint(FINALval)
## Computing profile confidence intervals ...
## 2.5 % 97.5 %
## .sig01 3.188703 4.4710535
## .sig02 3.529137 5.0847606
## .sigma 13.637646 14.1057899
## (Intercept) -37.512535 -31.5037552
## EmoHA 61.685893 69.0663792
## EmoNE 22.260952 29.6414383
## MaskScar -2.995607 1.1622738
## generecatM 6.057617 9.8484478
## EmoHA:generecatM -16.192929 -12.9883928
## EmoNE:generecatM -3.797466 -0.5929303
## EmoAN:ActGenM -4.283122 2.9185388
## EmoHA:ActGenM -4.634685 2.5669763
## EmoNE:ActGenM -1.245796 5.9558652
AIC
AIC(FINALval)
## [1] 56312.37
Post Hoc
Simple Effects Emotion
(emmvalEmo <- emmeans::emmeans(FINALval, pairwise ~ Emo))
## $emmeans
## Emo emmean SE df asymp.LCL asymp.UCL
## AN -31.33 1.03 Inf -33.34 -29.32
## HA 26.57 1.03 Inf 24.56 28.59
## NE -4.96 1.03 Inf -6.97 -2.95
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Mask, generecat, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## Confidence level used: 0.95
##
## $contrasts
## contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
## AN - HA -57.9 1.35 Inf -43.029 <.0001
## AN - NE -26.4 1.35 Inf -19.597 <.0001
## HA - NE 31.5 1.35 Inf 23.432 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Mask, generecat, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 3 estimates
Simple Effects Gender of Participants
(emmvalGen <- emmeans::emmeans(FINALval, pairwise ~ generecat))
## $emmeans
## generecat emmean SE df asymp.LCL asymp.UCL
## F -4.42 0.798 Inf -5.98 -2.853
## M -2.06 0.789 Inf -3.61 -0.513
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Mask, ActGen, Emo
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## Confidence level used: 0.95
##
## $contrasts
## contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
## F - M -2.36 0.844 Inf -2.794 0.0052
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Mask, ActGen, Emo
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
Interaction Emotion * Gender of Participants
(emmvalGenEmo <- emmeans::emmeans(FINALval, pairwise ~ Emo:generecat))
## $emmeans
## Emo generecat emmean SE df asymp.LCL asymp.UCL
## AN F -35.31 1.14 Inf -37.5 -33.074
## HA F 29.89 1.14 Inf 27.7 32.127
## NE F -7.84 1.14 Inf -10.1 -5.604
## AN M -27.35 1.13 Inf -29.6 -25.137
## HA M 23.26 1.13 Inf 21.0 25.472
## NE M -2.08 1.13 Inf -4.3 0.137
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Mask, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## Confidence level used: 0.95
##
## $contrasts
## contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
## AN F - HA F -65.20 1.409 Inf -46.277 <.0001
## AN F - NE F -27.47 1.409 Inf -19.497 <.0001
## AN F - AN M -7.95 0.967 Inf -8.225 <.0001
## AN F - HA M -58.56 1.606 Inf -36.468 <.0001
## AN F - NE M -33.23 1.606 Inf -20.691 <.0001
## HA F - NE F 37.73 1.409 Inf 26.780 <.0001
## HA F - AN M 57.25 1.606 Inf 35.649 <.0001
## HA F - HA M 6.64 0.967 Inf 6.865 <.0001
## HA F - NE M 31.97 1.606 Inf 19.910 <.0001
## NE F - AN M 19.52 1.606 Inf 12.153 <.0001
## NE F - HA M -31.09 1.606 Inf -19.362 <.0001
## NE F - NE M -5.76 0.967 Inf -5.955 <.0001
## AN M - HA M -50.61 1.404 Inf -36.048 <.0001
## AN M - NE M -25.27 1.404 Inf -18.002 <.0001
## HA M - NE M 25.34 1.404 Inf 18.045 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Mask, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 6 estimates
Hierarchical Model Selection
null <- lm(val ~ 1, data = cond)
emo <- lm(val ~ Emo, data = cond)
emomask <- lm(val ~ Emo + Mask, data = cond)
emomaskgend <- lm(val ~ Emo + Mask + generecat, data = cond)
emomaskgend.emo <- lm(val ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + Emo:generecat, data = cond)
emomaskgend.emoact.emo <- lm(val ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + Emo:generecat + ActGen:Emo, data = cond)
emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj <- lme4::lmer(val ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + Emo:generecat + ActGen:Emo + (1|Subj), data = cond)
emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj_stim <- lme4::lmer(val ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + Emo:generecat + ActGen:Emo + (1|Subj) + (1|stim), data = cond)
Model <- c("null", "emo", "emomask", "emomaskgend", "emomaskgend.emo", "emomaskgend.emoact.emo", "emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj", "emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj_cond")
AIC <- c(AIC(null), AIC(emo), AIC(emomask), AIC(emomaskgend), AIC(emomaskgend.emo), AIC(emomaskgend.emoact.emo), AIC(emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj), AIC(emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj_stim))
BIC <- c(BIC(null), BIC(emo), BIC(emomask), BIC(emomaskgend), BIC(emomaskgend.emo), BIC(emomaskgend.emoact.emo), BIC(emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj), BIC(emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj_stim))
R2m <- c(MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(null)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emo)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomask)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend.emo)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend.emoact.emo)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj_stim)[1])
R2c <- c(MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(null)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emo)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomask)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend.emo)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend.emoact.emo)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj_stim)[2])
(Lrtval <- cbind(Model, lmtest::lrtest(null, emo, emomask, emomaskgend, emomaskgend.emo, emomaskgend.emoact.emo, emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj, emomaskgend.emoact.emo_subj_stim), AIC, BIC, R2m, R2c))
Plot
require(ggplot2)
## Loading required package: ggplot2
FINALfis <- lme4::lmer(fis ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + ActGen + Emo:generecat + Mask:generecat + (1|Subj) + (1|stim), data = cond)
car::Anova(FINALfis)
R2
MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(FINALfis)
## R2m R2c
## [1,] 0.3665619 0.5558988
Model Parameters CI
confint(FINALfis)
## Computing profile confidence intervals ...
## 2.5 % 97.5 %
## .sig01 9.815499509 13.165594
## .sig02 2.305038706 3.667917
## .sigma 17.788515501 18.399144
## (Intercept) 66.566924004 74.196497
## EmoHA -50.127135037 -45.640595
## EmoNE -30.086354895 -25.599815
## MaskScar 0.008212403 3.671457
## generecatM -17.302755751 -7.558006
## ActGenM 1.764579193 4.996995
## EmoHA:generecatM 16.194427949 20.374316
## EmoNE:generecatM 8.446164808 12.626053
## MaskScar:generecatM 0.634569492 4.047439
AIC
AIC(FINALfis)
## [1] 60059.61
Post Hoc
Simple Effects Emotion
(emmFfisEmo <- emmeans::emmeans(FINALfis, pairwise ~ Emo))
## $emmeans
## Emo emmean SE df asymp.LCL asymp.UCL
## AN 67.4 1.37 Inf 64.7 70.1
## HA 28.6 1.37 Inf 25.9 31.3
## NE 44.8 1.37 Inf 42.1 47.5
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Mask, generecat, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## Confidence level used: 0.95
##
## $contrasts
## contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
## AN - HA 38.7 1.03 Inf 37.741 <.0001
## AN - NE 22.6 1.03 Inf 21.992 <.0001
## HA - NE -16.2 1.03 Inf -15.749 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Mask, generecat, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 3 estimates
Simple Effects Condition
(emmFfisMask <- emmeans::emmeans(FINALfis, pairwise ~ Mask))
## $emmeans
## Mask emmean SE df asymp.LCL asymp.UCL
## Mask 45.4 1.31 Inf 42.9 48
## Scar 48.4 1.31 Inf 45.9 51
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Emo, generecat, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## Confidence level used: 0.95
##
## $contrasts
## contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
## Mask - Scar -3.01 0.838 Inf -3.592 0.0003
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Emo, generecat, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
Simple Effects Gender of Stimuli
(emmFfisAct <- emmeans::emmeans(FINALfis, pairwise ~ ActGen))
## $emmeans
## ActGen emmean SE df asymp.LCL asymp.UCL
## F 45.2 1.31 Inf 42.7 47.8
## M 48.6 1.31 Inf 46.1 51.2
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Emo, Mask, generecat
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## Confidence level used: 0.95
##
## $contrasts
## contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
## F - M -3.38 0.838 Inf -4.034 0.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Emo, Mask, generecat
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
Interaction Emotion * Gender of Participants
(emmFfisemo.gen <- emmeans::emmeans(FINALfis, pairwise ~ Emo:generecat))
## $emmeans
## Emo generecat emmean SE df asymp.LCL asymp.UCL
## AN F 73.0 1.86 Inf 69.4 76.6
## HA F 25.1 1.86 Inf 21.5 28.7
## NE F 45.1 1.86 Inf 41.5 48.8
## AN M 61.7 1.82 Inf 58.2 65.3
## HA M 32.1 1.82 Inf 28.6 35.7
## NE M 44.4 1.82 Inf 40.9 48.0
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Mask, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## Confidence level used: 0.95
##
## $contrasts
## contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
## AN F - HA F 47.884 1.16 Inf 41.214 <.0001
## AN F - NE F 27.843 1.16 Inf 23.964 <.0001
## AN F - AN M 11.260 2.45 Inf 4.596 0.0001
## AN F - HA M 40.859 2.60 Inf 15.702 <.0001
## AN F - NE M 28.567 2.60 Inf 10.978 <.0001
## HA F - NE F -20.041 1.16 Inf -17.249 <.0001
## HA F - AN M -36.624 2.60 Inf -14.075 <.0001
## HA F - HA M -7.024 2.45 Inf -2.867 0.0476
## HA F - NE M -19.317 2.60 Inf -7.423 <.0001
## NE F - AN M -16.583 2.60 Inf -6.373 <.0001
## NE F - HA M 13.016 2.60 Inf 5.002 <.0001
## NE F - NE M 0.724 2.45 Inf 0.295 0.9997
## AN M - HA M 29.599 1.15 Inf 25.703 <.0001
## AN M - NE M 17.307 1.15 Inf 15.029 <.0001
## HA M - NE M -12.293 1.15 Inf -10.674 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Mask, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 6 estimates
Interaction Gender of Condition * Gender of Participants
(emmFfismask.gen <- emmeans::emmeans(FINALfis, pairwise ~ Mask:generecat))
## $emmeans
## Mask generecat emmean SE df asymp.LCL asymp.UCL
## Mask F 46.8 1.80 Inf 43.3 50.3
## Scar F 48.7 1.80 Inf 45.2 52.2
## Mask M 44.0 1.76 Inf 40.6 47.5
## Scar M 48.2 1.76 Inf 44.7 51.6
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Emo, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## Confidence level used: 0.95
##
## $contrasts
## contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
## Mask F - Scar F -1.840 0.949 Inf -1.939 0.2116
## Mask F - Mask M 2.824 2.411 Inf 1.171 0.6451
## Mask F - Scar M -1.357 2.515 Inf -0.540 0.9493
## Scar F - Mask M 4.663 2.515 Inf 1.854 0.2481
## Scar F - Scar M 0.483 2.411 Inf 0.200 0.9972
## Mask M - Scar M -4.181 0.940 Inf -4.446 0.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: Emo, ActGen
## Degrees-of-freedom method: asymptotic
## P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 4 estimates
Hierarchical Model Selection
null <- lm(fis ~ 1, data = cond)
emo <- lm(fis ~ Emo, data = cond)
emomask <- lm(fis ~ Emo + Mask, data = cond)
emomaskgend <- lm(fis ~ Emo + Mask + generecat, data = cond)
emomaskgendact <- lm(fis ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + ActGen, data = cond)
emomaskgendactgend.emo <- lm(fis ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + ActGen + Emo:generecat, data = cond)
emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask <- lm(fis ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + ActGen + Emo:generecat + Mask:generecat, data = cond)
emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj <- lme4::lmer(fis ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + ActGen + Emo:generecat + Mask:generecat + (1|Subj), data = cond)
emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj_stim <- lme4::lmer(fis ~ Emo + Mask + generecat + ActGen + Emo:generecat + Mask:generecat + (1|Subj) + (1|stim), data = cond)
Model <- c("null", "emo", "emomask", "emomaskgend", "emomaskgendact", "emomaskgendactgend.emo", "emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask", "emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj", "emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj_stim")
AIC <- c(AIC(null), AIC(emo), AIC(emomask), AIC(emomaskgend), AIC(emomaskgendact), AIC(emomaskgendactgend.emo), AIC(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask), AIC(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj), AIC(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj_stim))
BIC <- c(BIC(null), BIC(emo), BIC(emomask), BIC(emomaskgend), BIC(emomaskgendact), BIC(emomaskgendactgend.emo), BIC(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask), BIC(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj), BIC(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj_stim))
R2m <- c(MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(null)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emo)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomask)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgendact)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgendactgend.emo)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj)[1], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj_stim)[1])
R2c <- c(MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(null)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emo)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomask)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgend)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgendact)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgendactgend.emo)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj)[2], MuMIn::r.squaredGLMM(emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj_stim)[2])
(Lrtfis <- cbind(Model, lmtest::lrtest(null, emo, emomask, emomaskgend, emomaskgendact, emomaskgendactgend.emo, emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask, emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj, emomaskgendactgend.emogend.mask_subj_stim), AIC, BIC, R2m, R2c))
Cross Tabulation & Chi-Square Test
cond$Emogen <- paste(cond$Emo,cond$generecat)
descr::CrossTable(cond$Emogen, cond$cat, digits = 2, sresid= T, asresid = T, expected = T, prop.r = T, prop.c = F, prop.t = F, prop.chisq = T,chisq = T, row.labels = T, format = "SPSS")
## Cell Contents
## |-------------------------|
## | Count |
## | Expected Values |
## | Chi-square contribution |
## | Row Percent |
## | Std Residual |
## | Adj Std Resid |
## |-------------------------|
##
## ========================================================================================
## cond$cat
## cond$Emogen AN DI FE HA NE SA SU Total
## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## AN F 803 160 62 2 0 31 70 1128
## expected 251.81 59.89 44.55 297.34 320.51 81.76 72.13
## chisq 1206.52 167.33 6.83 293.35 320.51 31.51 0.06
## row % 71.19 14.18 5.50 0.18 0.00 2.75 6.21 16.32
## std. res. 34.73 12.94 2.61 -17.13 -17.90 -5.61 -0.25
## adj. std. res. 43.08 14.53 2.92 -21.82 -23.13 -6.37 -0.28
## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## AN M 735 150 115 3 49 41 83 1176
## expected 262.52 62.44 46.45 309.99 334.15 85.24 75.20
## chisq 850.33 122.78 101.18 304.02 243.34 22.96 0.81
## row % 62.50 12.76 9.78 0.26 4.17 3.49 7.06 17.01
## std. res. 29.16 11.08 10.06 -17.44 -15.60 -4.79 0.90
## adj. std. res. 36.32 12.50 11.27 -22.30 -20.24 -5.46 1.02
## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## HA F 0 7 7 925 61 26 102 1128
## expected 251.81 59.89 44.55 297.34 320.51 81.76 72.13
## chisq 251.81 46.71 31.65 1324.94 210.12 38.03 12.37
## row % 0.00 0.62 0.62 82.00 5.41 2.30 9.04 16.32
## std. res. -15.87 -6.83 -5.63 36.40 -14.50 -6.17 3.52
## adj. std. res. -19.68 -7.68 -6.28 46.37 -18.73 -7.00 3.97
## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## HA M 0 5 2 884 176 5 104 1176
## expected 262.52 62.44 46.45 309.99 334.15 85.24 75.20
## chisq 262.52 52.84 42.53 1062.88 74.85 75.53 11.03
## row % 0.00 0.43 0.17 75.17 14.97 0.43 8.84 17.01
## std. res. -16.20 -7.27 -6.52 32.60 -8.65 -8.69 3.32
## adj. std. res. -20.18 -8.20 -7.30 41.70 -11.23 -9.91 3.77
## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## NE F 1 22 52 0 756 253 44 1128
## expected 251.81 59.89 44.55 297.34 320.51 81.76 72.13
## chisq 249.81 23.97 1.25 297.34 591.70 358.65 10.97
## row % 0.09 1.95 4.61 0.00 67.02 22.43 3.90 16.32
## std. res. -15.81 -4.90 1.12 -17.24 24.32 18.94 -3.31
## adj. std. res. -19.60 -5.50 1.24 -21.97 31.43 21.50 -3.74
## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## NE M 4 23 35 8 922 145 39 1176
## expected 262.52 62.44 46.45 309.99 334.15 85.24 75.20
## chisq 254.59 24.91 2.82 294.20 1034.15 41.90 17.43
## row % 0.34 1.96 2.98 0.68 78.40 12.33 3.32 17.01
## std. res. -15.96 -4.99 -1.68 -17.15 32.16 6.47 -4.17
## adj. std. res. -19.87 -5.63 -1.88 -21.94 41.72 7.38 -4.74
## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Total 1543 367 273 1822 1964 501 442 6912
## ========================================================================================
##
## Statistics for All Table Factors
##
## Pearson's Chi-squared test
## ------------------------------------------------------------
## Chi^2 = 10373.04 d.f. = 30 p <2e-16
##
## Minimum expected frequency: 44.55208
Database Import
setwd("C:/Users/Gallese/Desktop/Mask Survey/")
test_scoring <- readxl::read_excel("Scoring_EBLCOVID_last_1giugno2020.xlsx")
print(test_scoring)
## # A tibble: 98 x 10
## Subj Q paura_covid_tot ansia_salute_tot TAS_20_tot TAS_20_SUB1_des~
## <dbl> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 1 S 17 37 65 20
## 2 2 S 8 25 23 6
## 3 3 S 7 25 74 20
## 4 4 S 9 32 35 13
## 5 5 S 14 28 29 5
## 6 6 S 9 29 42 10
## 7 7 S 15 27 29 7
## 8 8 F 15 31 33 12
## 9 9 S 11 34 37 10
## 10 10 F 9 30 50 17
## # ... with 88 more rows, and 4 more variables: TAS_20_SUB2_identify <dbl>,
## # TAS_20_SUB3_thinking <dbl>, IRI_EC <dbl>, IRI_PD <dbl>
Fear of COVID-19 Scale (Bonferroni correction 0.05/3 = 0.025) (Kendal Confidence Interval estimation based on Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2013). Nonparametric statistical methods (Vol. 751). John Wiley & Sons)
cor.test(test_scoring$paura_covid_tot, test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, method = "kendal")
##
## Kendall's rank correlation tau
##
## data: test_scoring$paura_covid_tot and test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot
## z = 4.1798, p-value = 2.918e-05
## alternative hypothesis: true tau is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
## tau
## 0.3010034
NSM3::kendall.ci(test_scoring$paura_covid_tot, test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, type="t", bootstrap=F, B=1000)
## fANCOVA 0.5-1 loaded
##
## 1 - alpha = 0.95 two-sided CI for tau:
## 0.181, 0.421
cor.test(test_scoring$paura_covid_tot, test_scoring$IRI_PD, method = "kendal")
##
## Kendall's rank correlation tau
##
## data: test_scoring$paura_covid_tot and test_scoring$IRI_PD
## z = 3.9022, p-value = 9.533e-05
## alternative hypothesis: true tau is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
## tau
## 0.2837924
NSM3::kendall.ci(test_scoring$paura_covid_tot, test_scoring$IRI_PD, type="t", bootstrap=F, B=1000)
##
## 1 - alpha = 0.95 two-sided CI for tau:
## 0.156, 0.411
cor.test(test_scoring$paura_covid_tot, test_scoring$IRI_EC, method = "kendal") # n.s
##
## Kendall's rank correlation tau
##
## data: test_scoring$paura_covid_tot and test_scoring$IRI_EC
## z = 2.1946, p-value = 0.02819
## alternative hypothesis: true tau is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
## tau
## 0.159501
ScatterPlot Fear of COVID-19 Scale * Health Anxiety Scale
ggstatsplot::ggscatterstats(
data = test_scoring,
x = paura_covid_tot,
y = ansia_salute_tot,
type = "nonparametric",
xlab = "Fear of COVID-19 Scale",
ylab = "Health Anxiety Scale",
point.args = list(size = 5, alpha = 0.4),
results.subtitle = FALSE,
smooth.line.args = list(size = 1.5, color = "black"),
ggstatsplot.layer = FALSE,
marginal.type = "density",
xfill = "grey30",
yfill = "grey70",
centrality.parameter = "median",
centrality.label.args = list(size = 5),
messages = FALSE,
ggtheme = ggplot2::theme_classic(base_size=20))
## Registered S3 method overwritten by 'broom.mixed':
## method from
## tidy.gamlss broom
ScatterPlot Fear of COVID-19 Scale * Health Anxiety Scale
ggstatsplot::ggscatterstats(
data = test_scoring,
x = paura_covid_tot,
y = IRI_PD,
type = "nonparametric",
xlab = "Fear of COVID-19 Scale",
ylab = "IRI Personal Distress Subscale",
point.args = list(size = 5, alpha = 0.4),
results.subtitle = FALSE,
smooth.line.args = list(size = 1.5, color = "black"),
ggstatsplot.layer = FALSE,
marginal.type = "density",
xfill = "grey30",
yfill = "grey70",
centrality.parameter = "median",
centrality.label.args = list(size = 5),
messages = FALSE,
ggtheme = ggplot2::theme_classic(base_size=20))
Health anxiety Scale (Bonferroni correction 0.05/6 = 0.008333333) (Kendal Confidence Interval estimation based on Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2013). Nonparametric statistical methods (Vol. 751). John Wiley & Sons)
cor.test(test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, test_scoring$TAS_20_tot, method = "kendal")
##
## Kendall's rank correlation tau
##
## data: test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot and test_scoring$TAS_20_tot
## z = 3.4637, p-value = 0.0005328
## alternative hypothesis: true tau is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
## tau
## 0.243811
NSM3::kendall.ci(test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, test_scoring$TAS_20_tot, type="t", bootstrap=F, B=1000)
##
## 1 - alpha = 0.95 two-sided CI for tau:
## 0.109, 0.378
cor.test(test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, test_scoring$TAS_20_SUB1_describe, method = "kendal")
##
## Kendall's rank correlation tau
##
## data: test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot and test_scoring$TAS_20_SUB1_describe
## z = 2.7764, p-value = 0.005496
## alternative hypothesis: true tau is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
## tau
## 0.1983113
NSM3::kendall.ci(test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, test_scoring$TAS_20_SUB1_describe, type="t", bootstrap=F, B=1000)
##
## 1 - alpha = 0.95 two-sided CI for tau:
## 0.063, 0.334
cor.test(test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, test_scoring$TAS_20_SUB2_identify, method = "kendal")
##
## Kendall's rank correlation tau
##
## data: test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot and test_scoring$TAS_20_SUB2_identify
## z = 4.7677, p-value = 1.863e-06
## alternative hypothesis: true tau is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
## tau
## 0.3403081
NSM3::kendall.ci(test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, test_scoring$TAS_20_SUB2_identify, type="t", bootstrap=F, B=1000)
##
## 1 - alpha = 0.95 two-sided CI for tau:
## 0.208, 0.473
cor.test(test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, test_scoring$TAS_20_SUB3_thinking, method = "kendal") # n.s
##
## Kendall's rank correlation tau
##
## data: test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot and test_scoring$TAS_20_SUB3_thinking
## z = 0.89989, p-value = 0.3682
## alternative hypothesis: true tau is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
## tau
## 0.0642696
cor.test(test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, test_scoring$IRI_PD, method = "kendal")
##
## Kendall's rank correlation tau
##
## data: test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot and test_scoring$IRI_PD
## z = 3.155, p-value = 0.001605
## alternative hypothesis: true tau is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
## tau
## 0.2259924
NSM3::kendall.ci(test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, test_scoring$IRI_PD, type="t", bootstrap=F, B=1000)
##
## 1 - alpha = 0.95 two-sided CI for tau:
## 0.099, 0.353
cor.test(test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot, test_scoring$IRI_EC, method = "kendal") # n.s
##
## Kendall's rank correlation tau
##
## data: test_scoring$ansia_salute_tot and test_scoring$IRI_EC
## z = 0.99274, p-value = 0.3208
## alternative hypothesis: true tau is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
## tau
## 0.07106205
sessionInfo()
## R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10)
## Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
## Running under: Windows 10 x64 (build 18362)
##
## Matrix products: default
##
## locale:
## [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252
## [2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252
## [3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252
## [4] LC_NUMERIC=C
## [5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252
## system code page: 65001
##
## attached base packages:
## [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
##
## other attached packages:
## [1] ggplot2_3.3.2
##
## loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
## [1] estimability_1.3 SparseM_1.78
## [3] descr_1.1.4 coda_0.19-4
## [5] tidyr_1.1.2 BSDA_1.2.0
## [7] Rfit_0.24.2 knitr_1.30
## [9] multcomp_1.4-14 data.table_1.13.0
## [11] rpart_4.1-15 inline_0.3.16
## [13] generics_0.0.2 waveslim_1.8.2
## [15] callr_3.5.0 cowplot_1.1.0
## [17] TH.data_1.0-10 combinat_0.0-8
## [19] correlation_0.4.0 httpuv_1.5.4
## [21] StanHeaders_2.21.0-6 assertthat_0.2.1
## [23] agricolae_1.3-3 WRS2_1.1-0
## [25] xfun_0.18 hms_0.5.3
## [27] evaluate_0.14 promises_1.1.1
## [29] tidyBF_0.3.0 fansi_0.4.1
## [31] readxl_1.3.1 km.ci_0.5-2
## [33] htmlwidgets_1.5.2 reshape_0.8.8
## [35] kSamples_1.2-9 stats4_4.0.3
## [37] Rmpfr_0.8-1 paletteer_1.2.0
## [39] purrr_0.3.4 ellipsis_0.3.1
## [41] rcompanion_2.3.25 dplyr_1.0.2
## [43] backports_1.1.10 SemiPar_1.0-4.2
## [45] binom_1.1-1 V8_3.2.0
## [47] insight_0.9.6 ggcorrplot_0.1.3
## [49] RcppParallel_5.0.2 libcoin_1.0-6
## [51] vctrs_0.3.4 quantreg_5.73
## [53] abind_1.4-5 withr_2.3.0
## [55] metaBMA_0.6.3 bdsmatrix_1.3-4
## [57] checkmate_2.0.0 emmeans_1.5.1
## [59] prettyunits_1.1.1 fastGHQuad_1.0
## [61] cluster_2.1.0 crayon_1.3.4
## [63] labeling_0.3 pkgconfig_2.0.3
## [65] SuppDists_1.1-9.5 ordinal_2019.12-10
## [67] nlme_3.1-149 statsExpressions_0.5.1
## [69] nnet_7.3-14 rlang_0.4.8
## [71] questionr_0.7.3 lifecycle_0.2.0
## [73] miniUI_0.1.1.1 LaplacesDemon_16.1.4
## [75] MatrixModels_0.4-1 sandwich_3.0-0
## [77] EMT_1.1 cellranger_1.1.0
## [79] matrixStats_0.57.0 broomExtra_4.0.6
## [81] lmtest_0.9-38 np_0.60-10
## [83] Matrix_1.2-18 loo_2.3.1
## [85] mc2d_0.1-18 carData_3.0-4
## [87] boot_1.3-25 zoo_1.8-8
## [89] base64enc_0.1-3 processx_3.4.4
## [91] png_0.1-7 PMCMRplus_1.5.1
## [93] parameters_0.8.6 rootSolve_1.8.2.1
## [95] ggExtra_0.9 stringr_1.4.0
## [97] multcompView_0.1-8 coin_1.3-1
## [99] readr_1.4.0 jpeg_0.1-8.1
## [101] ggsignif_0.6.0 klaR_0.6-15
## [103] scales_1.1.1 memoise_1.1.0
## [105] magrittr_1.5 plyr_1.8.6
## [107] compiler_4.0.3 rstantools_2.1.1
## [109] bbmle_1.0.23.1 RColorBrewer_1.1-2
## [111] ash_1.0-15 lme4_1.1-23
## [113] cli_2.0.2 pbapply_1.4-3
## [115] ps_1.4.0 TMB_1.7.18
## [117] Brobdingnag_1.2-6 htmlTable_2.1.0
## [119] Formula_1.2-3 MASS_7.3-53
## [121] mgcv_1.8-33 tidyselect_1.1.0
## [123] stringi_1.5.3 forcats_0.5.0
## [125] highr_0.8 yaml_2.2.1
## [127] latticeExtra_0.6-29 ggrepel_0.8.2
## [129] bridgesampling_1.0-0 grid_4.0.3
## [131] polynom_1.4-0 tools_4.0.3
## [133] lmom_2.8 parallel_4.0.3
## [135] rio_0.5.16 rstudioapi_0.11
## [137] foreign_0.8-80 gridExtra_2.3
## [139] cubature_2.0.4.1 ipmisc_4.0.0
## [141] gld_2.6.2 pairwiseComparisons_3.0.0
## [143] NSM3_1.15 farver_2.0.3
## [145] digest_0.6.25 shiny_1.5.0
## [147] nortest_1.0-4 quadprog_1.5-8
## [149] BWStest_0.2.2 Rcpp_1.0.5.2
## [151] car_3.0-10 broom_0.7.1
## [153] metafor_2.4-0 ez_4.4-0
## [155] BayesFactor_0.9.12-4.2 performance_0.5.0
## [157] metaplus_0.7-11 later_1.1.0.1
## [159] ucminf_1.1-4 effectsize_0.3.3
## [161] colorspace_1.4-1 splines_4.0.3
## [163] statmod_1.4.34 rematch2_2.1.2
## [165] expm_0.999-5 conquer_1.0.2
## [167] Exact_2.1 MuMIn_1.43.17
## [169] xtable_1.8-4 gmp_0.6-1
## [171] jsonlite_1.7.1 nloptr_1.2.2.2
## [173] AlgDesign_1.2.0 rstan_2.21.2
## [175] zeallot_0.1.0 modeltools_0.2-23
## [177] R6_2.4.1 partitions_1.9-22
## [179] broom.mixed_0.2.6 Hmisc_4.4-1
## [181] pillar_1.4.6 htmltools_0.5.0
## [183] mime_0.9 glue_1.4.2
## [185] fastmap_1.0.1 minqa_1.2.4
## [187] class_7.3-17 codetools_0.2-16
## [189] pkgbuild_1.1.0 mvtnorm_1.1-1
## [191] utf8_1.1.4 lattice_0.20-41
## [193] tibble_3.0.3 numDeriv_2016.8-1.1
## [195] curl_4.3 DescTools_0.99.38
## [197] gtools_3.8.2 logspline_2.1.16
## [199] zip_2.1.1 openxlsx_4.2.2
## [201] survival_3.2-7 rmarkdown_2.4
## [203] munsell_0.5.0 e1071_1.7-3
## [205] fANCOVA_0.5-1 labelled_2.7.0
## [207] ggstatsplot_0.6.1 haven_2.3.1
## [209] reshape2_1.4.4 gtable_0.3.0
## [211] bayestestR_0.7.2
citation("lme4")
##
## To cite lme4 in publications use:
##
## Douglas Bates, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker, Steve Walker (2015).
## Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of
## Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Article{,
## title = {Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using {lme4}},
## author = {Douglas Bates and Martin M{\"a}chler and Ben Bolker and Steve Walker},
## journal = {Journal of Statistical Software},
## year = {2015},
## volume = {67},
## number = {1},
## pages = {1--48},
## doi = {10.18637/jss.v067.i01},
## }
citation("car")
##
## To cite the car package in publications use:
##
## John Fox and Sanford Weisberg (2019). An {R} Companion to Applied
## Regression, Third Edition. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. URL:
## https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Book{,
## title = {An {R} Companion to Applied Regression},
## edition = {Third},
## author = {John Fox and Sanford Weisberg},
## year = {2019},
## publisher = {Sage},
## address = {Thousand Oaks {CA}},
## url = {https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/},
## }
citation("MuMIn")
##
## To cite package 'MuMIn' in publications use:
##
## Kamil Barton (2020). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version
## 1.43.17. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Manual{,
## title = {MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference},
## author = {Kamil Barton},
## year = {2020},
## note = {R package version 1.43.17},
## url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn},
## }
##
## ATTENTION: This citation information has been auto-generated from the
## package DESCRIPTION file and may need manual editing, see
## 'help("citation")'.
citation("emmeans")
##
## To cite package 'emmeans' in publications use:
##
## Russell Lenth (2020). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka
## Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.5.1.
## https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Manual{,
## title = {emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means},
## author = {Russell Lenth},
## year = {2020},
## note = {R package version 1.5.1},
## url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans},
## }
citation("lmtest")
##
## To cite lmtest in publications use:
##
## Achim Zeileis, Torsten Hothorn (2002). Diagnostic Checking in
## Regression Relationships. R News 2(3), 7-10. URL
## https://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Article{,
## title = {Diagnostic Checking in Regression Relationships},
## author = {Achim Zeileis and Torsten Hothorn},
## journal = {R News},
## year = {2002},
## volume = {2},
## number = {3},
## pages = {7--10},
## url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/},
## }
citation("ordinal")
##
## To cite the ordinal-package in publications use:
##
## Christensen, R. H. B. (2019). ordinal - Regression Models for Ordinal
## Data. R package version 2019.12-10.
## https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinal.
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Misc{,
## title = {ordinal---Regression Models for Ordinal Data },
## author = {R. H. B. Christensen},
## year = {2019},
## note = {R package version 2019.12-10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinal},
## }
citation("rcompanion")
##
## To cite package 'rcompanion' in publications use:
##
## Salvatore Mangiafico (2020). rcompanion: Functions to Support
## Extension Education Program Evaluation. R package version 2.3.25.
## https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcompanion
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Manual{,
## title = {rcompanion: Functions to Support Extension Education Program Evaluation},
## author = {Salvatore Mangiafico},
## year = {2020},
## note = {R package version 2.3.25},
## url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcompanion},
## }
citation("descr")
##
## To cite package 'descr' in publications use:
##
## Jakson Aquino. Includes R source code and/or documentation written by
## Dirk Enzmann, Marc Schwartz, Nitin Jain and Stefan Kraft (2018).
## descr: Descriptive Statistics. R package version 1.1.4.
## https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=descr
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Manual{,
## title = {descr: Descriptive Statistics},
## author = {Jakson Aquino. Includes R source code and/or documentation written by Dirk Enzmann and Marc Schwartz and Nitin Jain and Stefan Kraft},
## year = {2018},
## note = {R package version 1.1.4},
## url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=descr},
## }
##
## ATTENTION: This citation information has been auto-generated from the
## package DESCRIPTION file and may need manual editing, see
## 'help("citation")'.
citation("NSM3")
##
## To cite package 'NSM3' in publications use:
##
## Grant Schneider, Eric Chicken and Rachel Becvarik (2020). NSM3:
## Functions and Datasets to Accompany Hollander, Wolfe, and Chicken -
## Nonparametric Statistical Methods, Third Edition. R package version
## 1.15. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NSM3
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Manual{,
## title = {NSM3: Functions and Datasets to Accompany Hollander, Wolfe, and
## Chicken - Nonparametric Statistical Methods, Third Edition},
## author = {Grant Schneider and Eric Chicken and Rachel Becvarik},
## year = {2020},
## note = {R package version 1.15},
## url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NSM3},
## }
##
## ATTENTION: This citation information has been auto-generated from the
## package DESCRIPTION file and may need manual editing, see
## 'help("citation")'.
citation("effects")
##
## To cite effects in publications use:
##
## John Fox and Sanford Weisberg (2019). An R Companion to Applied
## Regression, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA
## <https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/index.html>
##
## For predictor effects or partial residuals also cite:
##
## John Fox, Sanford Weisberg (2018). Visualizing Fit and Lack of Fit in
## Complex Regression Models with Predictor Effect Plots and Partial
## Residuals. Journal of Statistical Software, 87(9), 1-27. URL
## https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v087i09.
##
## For generalized linear models also cite:
##
## John Fox (2003). Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models.
## Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 1-27. URL
## https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v008i15.
##
## For usage in multinomial and proportional-odds logit models also cite:
##
## John Fox, Jangman Hong (2009). Effect Displays in R for Multinomial
## and Proportional-Odds Logit Models: Extensions to the effects
## Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 32(1), 1-24. URL
## https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v032i01.
##
## To see these entries in BibTeX format, use 'print(<citation>,
## bibtex=TRUE)', 'toBibtex(.)', or set
## 'options(citation.bibtex.max=999)'.
citation("Rmisc")
##
## To cite package 'Rmisc' in publications use:
##
## Ryan M. Hope (2013). Rmisc: Rmisc: Ryan Miscellaneous. R package
## version 1.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rmisc
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Manual{,
## title = {Rmisc: Rmisc: Ryan Miscellaneous},
## author = {Ryan M. Hope},
## year = {2013},
## note = {R package version 1.5},
## url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rmisc},
## }
##
## ATTENTION: This citation information has been auto-generated from the
## package DESCRIPTION file and may need manual editing, see
## 'help("citation")'.
citation("ggplot2")
##
## To cite ggplot2 in publications, please use:
##
## H. Wickham. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis.
## Springer-Verlag New York, 2016.
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Book{,
## author = {Hadley Wickham},
## title = {ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis},
## publisher = {Springer-Verlag New York},
## year = {2016},
## isbn = {978-3-319-24277-4},
## url = {https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org},
## }
citation("ggsignif")
##
## To cite package 'ggsignif' in publications use:
##
## Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze (2019). ggsignif: Significance Brackets for
## 'ggplot2'. R package version 0.6.0.
## https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggsignif
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Manual{,
## title = {ggsignif: Significance Brackets for 'ggplot2'},
## author = {Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze},
## year = {2019},
## note = {R package version 0.6.0},
## url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggsignif},
## }
citation("ggstatsplot")
##
## Patil, I. (2018). ggstatsplot: 'ggplot2' Based Plots with Statistical
## Details. CRAN. Retrieved from
## https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggstatsplot/index.html
##
## A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
##
## @Article{,
## title = {{ggstatsplot}: 'ggplot2' Based Plots with Statistical Details},
## author = {Indrajeet Patil},
## year = {2018},
## journal = {CRAN},
## url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggstatsplot},
## doi = {10.5281/zenodo.2074621},
## }
Social Distance
Convergence Test
Deviance Table
Pseudo-R2 (pseudo R-squared measures are relative measures among similar models indicating how well the model explains the data)
Likelihood ratio tests of model terms in scale and nominal formulae (We should be safe requiring that the thresholds are equidistant or equally spaced) Nominal Test (Test evidence of non-proportional odds, Partial proportional odds assumption) Scale Test (Test evidence of scale effects)
Spacing among consecutive equidistant thresholds
Model Parameters CI
Post Hoc
Simple Effects Emotion
Simple Effects Gender of Stimuli
Simple Effects Gender of Participants
Interaction Emotion * Gender of Participants
Interaction Condition * Gender of Participants
Hierarchical Model Selection