Published April 4, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

DIVERSITY, DISTRIBUTION AND CURRENT STATUS OF BUTTERFLIES IN MOUNT KORHOGO AREA (NORTHERN COTE D'IVOIRE)

  • 1. Département de Biologie Animale, UFR Sciences Biologiques, Université Peleforo Gon Coulibaly, BP 1328 Korhogo, Côte d'Ivoire

Description

Butterflies are affected both by abiotic and biotic factors so that they are considered very important ecological indicators. The diversity, the distribution and the status of butterflies of Mount Korhogo area were studied from August to December 2018. Butterflies were captured at 5 sites following a 100m transect at each site from 09 am to 11 am and 03 pm to 05 pm (local time) with a sweep net. The frequency of occurrence of the species has been determined. During this study, 24 taxa of butterflies belonging to 12 Genus and 3 Families were harvested. Pieridae and Nymphalidae were the most diverse families. Five taxa were ubiquitous. They were harvested in all the sites. These were the African migrant Catopsilia florella (Fabricius), the common grass yellow Eurema hecabe solifera (Butler), the angled grass yellow Eurema desjardinsii regularis (Butler), the hilara dotted border Mylothris hilara hilara (Karsch) and the dancing acraea Acraea serena serena (Fabricius). Three species were very frequent at all sites. These were Catopsilia florella Eurema hecabe solifera and Acrea serena serena. Based on their abundance, Catopsilia florella was the very common specie. The highest value of Shannon index and Pielou Equitability were obtained in the family Pieridae. On the other hand, family Nymphalidae recorded the highest Margalef Richness and Berger-Parker Dominance Indices. The butterfly settlement of the different sites, therefore, has a high degree of similarity.

Files

7. IJZAB ID No. 489.pdf

Files (679.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8157db3ea6d43df0d3f29c2536031171
679.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Ahsan, M., & Iqbal, J. (1975). contribution to the butterflies of Lahore with the addition of new records. Biologia.143-158.
  • Balasubramanian, P., Mahendramani, P., & Padmapriya, K. (2001). Comparison of plant diversity pattern of various disturbed habitats of Moongilpallam area in the Western Ghats report, Salim Ali Centre for ornithology and natural history: Coimbatore.pp.56-70.
  • Benton, T. (1995). Biodiversity and biogeography of Henderson Island's insects. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 56(1-2), 245-259.
  • Berger, W.H., & Parker, F.L. (1970). Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science, 168(3937), 1345-1347.
  • Dajoz, R. (2000). Précis d'Ecologie. 7èmeédition. Dunod, Paris, 615.
  • Elanchezhyan, K., Samraj, J., & Reuolin, S. (2017). Butterfly diversity at the agricultural college campus, Killikulam, Tami Nadu, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5(5).1389-1400.
  • Henderson, C., Petersen, K., & Redak, R. (1988). Spatial and temporal patterns in the seed bank and vegetation of a desert grassland community. The Journal of Ecology, 717-728.
  • Hopkins, W. A., Rowe, C. L., & Congdon, J. D. (1999). Elevated trace element concentrations and standard metabolic rate in banded water snakes (Nerodia fasciata) exposed to coal combustion wastes. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal, 18(6), 1258-1263.
  • Ivinskis, P. (1998). Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of Lithuania: fauna, distribution and protection. Acta Zoologica Lituanica, 8(3), 9-22.
  • Larsen, T.B. (2005). Butterflies of West Africa: text volume: apollo Books. cx +8990.7+xcxzb
  • Margalef, R. (1958). Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton. Perspectives in Marine Biology, 323-349.
  • Penney, D. (2009). Field guide to butterflies of the Gambia, West Africa: Siri Scientific Press.
  • Pollard, E. (1988). Temperature, Rainfall and butterfly numbers. Journal of Applied Ecology, 819-828.
  • Rajagopal, T., Sekar, M., Manimozhi, A., Baskar, N., & Archunan, G. (2011). Diversity and community structure of butterfly of Arignar Anna Zoological Park, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. Journal of Environmental Biology, 32(2), 201-207.
  • Ramesh, T., Hussain, K.J., Selvanayagam, M., Satpathy, K., & Prasad, M. (2010). Patterns of diversity, abundance and habitat associations of butterfly communities in heterogeneous landscapes of the department of atomic energy (DAE) campus at Kalpakkam, South India. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 2(4), 75-85.
  • Rosin, Z.M., Myczko, Ł., Skórka, P., Lenda, M., Moroń, D., Sparks, T.H., & Tryjanowski, P. (2012). Butterfly responses to environmental factors in fragmented calcareous grasslands. Journal of Insect Conservation, 16(3), 321-329.
  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. Illinois press, Urbana, 1, 11, 117.
  • Tiple, A.D., Deshmukh, V.P., & Dennis, R.L. (2005). Factors influencing nectar plant resource visits by butterflies on a university campus: implications for conservation. Nota Lepidopterologica, 28(3/4), 213.
  • Woodhall, S. (2012). Field guide to butterflies of South Africa: Penguin Random House South Africa.

Subjects

Zoology
10.5281/zenodo.3739710