Quinqueloculina auberiana d’Orbigny 1839b, p. 193, pl. 12, figs. 1–3 [Plate 1, Fig. 8]. Cimerman & Langer (1991), p. 36, pl. 32, figs. 8, 9. Milker & Schmiedl (2012), p. 56, figs. 15.1, 2. Hanagata & Nobuhara (2015), p. 21, figs. 8.7–8.8.
Quinqueloculina bosciana d’Orbigny 1839b, p. 191, pl. 11, figs. 22–24 [Plate 1, Figs. 4, 5]. Van Hengstum & Scott (2011), p. 224, fig. 12.16. Milker & Schmidl (2012), p. 56, fig. 15.7–9. Weinmann & Goldstein (2016), fig. 3D. Note: This species is very similar to Quinqueloculina laevigata and may also be mistaken with Quinqueloculina oblonga. Earlier chambers of Quinqueloculina bosciana are oblique to the longitudinal axis of the test. The top of the last chamber forms a low collar around the aperture.
Quinqueloculina disparilis d’Orbigny 1826, p. 302, no. 21 [Plate 1, Fig. 14, 15]. Cimerman & Langer (1991), p. 36, pl. 33, figs. 1–4. Milker & Schmiedl (2012), p. 56, figs. 15.10–12. Non ” Adelosina disparilis ” Sanchez (2010), p. 156, pl. 2, fig. 4.
Quinqueloculina eburnea (d’Orbigny) = Triloculina eburnea d’Orbigny 1839b, p. 180, pl. 10, figs 21–23 [Plate 2, Fig. 9]. Thissen (2015), p. 46, pl. 7, figs. 1–3. ” Pseudolachnalella eburnea ” Chen & Lin (2017), fig. 2.3. ” Affinetrina eburnea ” Poignant (2019), pl. 2, figs. 11–12.
Quinqueloculina laevigata d’Orbigny 1826, p. 143, pl. 3, figs. 31–33 [Plate 1, Figs. 9–12]. Carvalho & Chermont (1952), p. 82, pl. 1, figs. 3a–c. Cimerman & Langer (1991), p. 37, pl. 33, figs. 8–11. Milker & Schmiedl (2012), p. 58, figs. 15.13–15. “ Pseudotriloculina laevigata ” Yokes et al. (2014), figs. 8.8a, b. “? Adelosina laevigata ” Laut et al. (2017), p. 137, pl. 1, fig. M. Note: this species is more slender than Quinqueloculina seminulum and the outline is rounded triangular.
Quinqueloculina lamarckiana d’Orbigny 1839b, p. 189, pl. 11, figs. 14, 15 [Plate 1, Fig. 7]. Bock (1971), p. 19, pl. 6, figs. 7–9. Jones (1994), p. 21, pl. 5, fig. 12. Javaux & Scott (2003), p. 20, figs. 4.12, 4.13.
Quinqueloculina lata Terquem 1876, p. 82, pl. 11, fig. 8a–c [Plate 1, Fig. 16]. Le Campion (1968), p. 247, pl. 22, figs. 3a–c. non Sanchez (2010), p. 157, pl. 2, fig. 6. Milker & Schmiedl (2012), p. 58, fig. 15.16.
Quinqueloculina parvula Schlumberger 1894, p. 255, pl. 3, figs. 8–9 [Plate 1, Figs. 17–18]. Cimerman & Langer (1991), p. 37, pl. 34, figs. 6–8. Milker & Schmidl (2012), p. 59, figs. 15.25–27. Frontalini et al. (2015), fig. 5a, b. Note: the rough surface, inflated chambers, and a rim borderung the aperture are distinctive characters of this species.
Quinqueloculina seminulum (Linné) = Serpula seminula Linné 1758, p. 786 [Plate 1, Fig. 13, Plate 5, Fig. 12]. Jones (1994), p. 21, pl. 5, fig. 6. Reymond et al. (2014), pl. 1, figs. 17, 18. “ Quinqueloculina seminula ” Raposo et al. (2016), p. 11, fig. 3.b. Laut et al. (2017), p. 137, pl. 5, fig. I. Note: this species shows a large morphological variety as noted by Haake (1980: p. 8). The tests are always elongated-ovate in lateral view and subrounded-triangular in peripheral view.
Quinqueloculina stelligera Schlumberger 1893, p. 68, pl. 2, figs. 58, 59 [Plate 1, Fig. 6, Plate 5, Fig. 11]. Cimerman & Langer (1991), p. 38, pl. 34, figs. 13–15. Mendes et al. (2012), p. 38, figs. 2.5a–c. Milker & Schmiedl (2012), p. 59, figs. 16.1–4. Note: the elongated O-shaped outline in lateral view and acute costae on the peripheral chamber margins are diagnostic features of this species.