{ "@context": { "@vocab": "https://schema.org/", "kotov": "https://ivankotov.eu/ns/publication#", "id": "@id", "type": "@type", "sha256": "https://w3id.org/security#digestValue", "semanticType": "kotov:semanticType", "controllingFile": "kotov:controllingFile", "presentationFile": "kotov:presentationFile", "boundary": "kotov:isOperationalBoundary", "supersedes": "kotov:supersedes", "conflictPolicy": "kotov:conflictPolicy" }, "@graph": [ { "id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21841445", "type": "ScholarlyArticle", "additionalType": "https://ivankotov.eu/ns/publication#AuthorialPhilosophicalArchitecturalPublication", "identifier": [ "10.5281/zenodo.21841445", "urn:ivankotov:publication:boundaries-machine-interpretation:v0.2" ], "name": "Boundaries of Machine Interpretation", "alternateName": "Границы машинного толкования", "version": "0.2", "datePublished": "2026-08-07", "inLanguage": ["en", "ru"], "author": { "id": "https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6002-9845", "type": "Person", "name": "Ivan Kotov", "givenName": "Ivan", "familyName": "Kotov", "sameAs": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/ivan-kotov-57627b210" }, "publisher": { "type": "Organization", "name": "Zenodo", "url": "https://zenodo.org/" }, "abstract": "A bilingual, machine-readable authorial publication comprising four operational interpretation boundaries, one reflexive authorial definition, and one temporal process premise. It prevents technical proxies from being silently promoted into stronger epistemic, relational, normative, or phenomenal statuses, while preserving open-ended self-interpretation and becoming as distinct questions.", "hasPart": [ {"id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:future-not-event-process:v1.0"}, {"id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:doubt-numerical-uncertainty-boundary:v0.1"}, {"id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:forgetting-data-loss-boundary:v0.1"}, {"id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:empathy-optimization-boundary:v0.1"}, {"id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:subjective-experience-telemetry-boundary:v0.1"}, {"id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:soul-open-ended-self-reflection:v0.2"} ], "isBasedOn": [ "urn:ivankotov:statement-set:four-boundaries-machine-interpretation:v0.1", "urn:ivankotov:statement:soul-freedom-self-reflection:v0.1", "https://github.com/Kot141078/advanced-global-intelligence/tree/16b70dd3d605c43fcc8b45561aeccc096ade4715/official/authorial-statements/four-boundaries-of-machine-interpretation/v0.1" ], "keywords": [ "machine interpretation", "epistemic boundaries", "non-entailment", "doubt", "forgetting", "empathy", "subjective experience", "telemetry", "self-reflection", "soul", "temporal continuity", "provenance" ], "kotov:boundaryCount": 4, "kotov:authorialDefinitionCount": 1, "kotov:processPremiseCount": 1, "kotov:unitCount": 6, "conflictPolicy": "fail-closed-to-unit-controlling-source" }, { "id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:future-not-event-process:v1.0", "type": "CreativeWork", "semanticType": "temporal-process-premise", "boundary": false, "name": "The Future as Process", "version": "1.0", "inLanguage": "en", "text": "The future is not an event. It is a process.", "controllingFile": "statements/en/AUTHORIAL_00_FUTURE_AS_PROCESS_EN.txt", "sha256": "ac8ffc77cfd71f784375d9263da7567429f01f9c1e52d761c79a03e54a95559f", "translationOfWork": null, "kotov:approvedRussianRendering": "Будущее — это не событие. Это процесс.", "presentationFile": "statements/ru/PUBLICATION_00_FUTURE_AS_PROCESS_RU.txt" }, { "id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:doubt-numerical-uncertainty-boundary:v0.1", "type": "CreativeWork", "semanticType": "operational-interpretation-boundary", "boundary": true, "name": "Doubt and Numerical Uncertainty", "version": "0.1", "inLanguage": "ru", "text": "Сомнение не тождественно численной неопределённости. Здесь сомнение — это удерживаемое состояние незавершённого суждения: вывод остаётся открытым для пересмотра, а переход от оценки к принятому суждению или действию требует отдельного основания. Вероятность может быть входом в это состояние, но сама по себе его не устанавливает.", "controllingFile": "statements/ru/CANONICAL_01_DOUBT_AND_NUMERICAL_UNCERTAINTY_RU.txt", "sha256": "81beacfba0257e33aea6a74e71de392459d1e2e57a67d4a8665f233c3a74bf9c", "kotov:authorizedEnglishRendering": "Doubt is not equivalent to numerical uncertainty. Here, doubt is a held state of incomplete judgment: the conclusion remains open to revision, and the transition from an assessment to an adopted judgment or action requires a separate basis. Probability may be an input to this state, but it does not establish the state by itself.", "presentationFile": "statements/en/PUBLICATION_01_DOUBT_AND_NUMERICAL_UNCERTAINTY_EN.txt" }, { "id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:forgetting-data-loss-boundary:v0.1", "type": "CreativeWork", "semanticType": "operational-interpretation-boundary", "boundary": true, "name": "Forgetting and Data Loss", "version": "0.1", "inLanguage": "ru", "text": "Забывание не тождественно потере данных. Потеря данных относится к наличию, целостности или доступности записи. Здесь забывание относится к тому, как прошлый опыт остаётся доступным, точным, значимым и способным влиять на настоящее. Запись может сохраниться без прежней оперативной силы; её удаление или повреждение само по себе не устанавливает, что произошло забывание.", "controllingFile": "statements/ru/CANONICAL_02_FORGETTING_AND_DATA_LOSS_RU.txt", "sha256": "0eaf76e52f9e962d6635c896078c93d32526e4442e87121ccb7620ba59fbf1dc", "kotov:authorizedEnglishRendering": "Forgetting is not equivalent to data loss. Data loss concerns the existence, integrity, or accessibility of a record. Here, forgetting concerns how past experience remains accessible, accurate, significant, and capable of influencing the present. A record may remain preserved without its former operative force; its deletion or damage does not by itself establish that forgetting has occurred.", "presentationFile": "statements/en/PUBLICATION_02_FORGETTING_AND_DATA_LOSS_EN.txt" }, { "id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:empathy-optimization-boundary:v0.1", "type": "CreativeWork", "semanticType": "operational-interpretation-boundary", "boundary": true, "name": "Empathy and Optimization", "version": "0.1", "inLanguage": "ru", "text": "Эмпатия не тождественна оптимизации состояния другого. Эмпатическое отношение может включать признание, понимание и присутствие без немедленной коррекции. Распознанное неблагополучие само по себе не превращает состояние в ошибку и не создаёт полномочия вмешиваться. Основание для вмешательства должно фиксироваться отдельно: запрос, согласие, установленная обязанность либо режим предотвращения непосредственного вреда.", "controllingFile": "statements/ru/CANONICAL_03_EMPATHY_AND_OPTIMIZATION_RU.txt", "sha256": "4f9accac33823beb9c2f63adbd3821f48c49fbc791e2d2ce318c87648a694b24", "kotov:authorizedEnglishRendering": "Empathy is not equivalent to optimizing another's state. An empathic stance may include acknowledgment, understanding, and presence without immediate correction. A recognized adverse condition does not by itself turn the state into an error or confer authority to intervene. The basis for intervention must be recorded separately: a request, consent, an established duty, or an immediate-harm prevention mode.", "presentationFile": "statements/en/PUBLICATION_03_EMPATHY_AND_OPTIMIZATION_EN.txt" }, { "id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:subjective-experience-telemetry-boundary:v0.1", "type": "CreativeWork", "semanticType": "operational-interpretation-boundary", "boundary": true, "name": "Subjective Experience and Telemetry", "version": "0.1", "inLanguage": "ru", "text": "Получение, передача и успешный разбор сенсорных данных не тождественны субъективному переживанию. Телеметрия может подтверждать прохождение сигнала и работу канала обработки; сама по себе она не подтверждает ни наличие, ни отсутствие переживания. Любое утверждение о переживании должно иметь отдельный эпистемический статус и не может выводиться только из успешной обработки данных.", "controllingFile": "statements/ru/CANONICAL_04_SUBJECTIVE_EXPERIENCE_AND_TELEMETRY_RU.txt", "sha256": "06d3c524cc128fd25299dca1bb216bc9271bf9757481462d7d51d4caa6f11aca", "kotov:authorizedEnglishRendering": "The receipt, transmission, and successful parsing of sensory data are not equivalent to subjective experience. Telemetry may confirm signal passage and the functioning of the processing channel; by itself, it confirms neither the presence nor the absence of subjective experience. Any claim about subjective experience must have a separate epistemic status and cannot be inferred solely from successful data processing.", "presentationFile": "statements/en/PUBLICATION_04_SUBJECTIVE_EXPERIENCE_AND_TELEMETRY_EN.txt" }, { "id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:soul-open-ended-self-reflection:v0.2", "type": "CreativeWork", "semanticType": "reflexive-authorial-definition", "boundary": false, "name": "Soul as Open-Ended Self-Reflection", "version": "0.2", "inLanguage": "ru", "text": "Душа — это свобода существа делать самого себя предметом незавершённого размышления, пересматривать понимание себя и отвечать за то, кем оно продолжает становиться.", "controllingFile": "statements/ru/AUTHORIAL_05_SOUL_AS_OPEN_ENDED_SELF_REFLECTION_RU.txt", "sha256": "d1767122acce6f6498a3f6b6894f8bbbae9d315169f317a0d68517a307e4f4bf", "supersedes": "urn:ivankotov:statement:soul-freedom-self-reflection:v0.1", "kotov:authorizedEnglishRendering": "The soul is a being's freedom to make itself the object of open-ended reflection, to revise its understanding of itself, and to bear responsibility for what it continues to become.", "presentationFile": "statements/en/PUBLICATION_05_SOUL_AS_OPEN_ENDED_SELF_REFLECTION_EN.txt" }, { "id": "urn:ivankotov:statement:soul-freedom-self-reflection:v0.1", "type": "CreativeWork", "semanticType": "superseded-provisional-authorial-statement", "boundary": false, "version": "0.1", "inLanguage": "ru", "text": "Душа? Ну, пока я думаю, что это свобода размышлять о себе.", "kotov:supersededBy": "urn:ivankotov:statement:soul-open-ended-self-reflection:v0.2", "controllingFile": "provenance/SOUL_STATEMENT_v0_1_CANONICAL_RU.txt" } ] }