Published February 14, 2026 | Version v1
Preprint Open

PRGDAI-SD 360+ Decision Architecture: Integrating Performance, Risk, Governance, Data, Artificial Intelligence, Sustainability, and Decision Execution

Authors/Creators

  • 1. University of Religions and Denominations

Description

PRGDAI-SD 360+ Decision Architecture is a universal, KPI-governed, evidence-based, and AI-ready meta-architecture for strategic decision-making and governance. It integrates seven decision-quality dimensions: Performance, Risk, Governance, Data, Artificial Intelligence, Sustainability, and Decision Execution. The method is designed to help executives, policymakers, researchers, data leaders, AI strategists, governance boards, and institutional decision-makers convert fragmented KPIs, risk signals, data streams, AI insights, sustainability indicators, and governance inputs into auditable, ethically bounded, and action-oriented decisions. The architecture follows a design science research logic and supports the full decision chain: problem diagnosis → indicator design → data validation → scoring → risk sensing → governance review → decision execution → learning and recalibration. PRGDAI-SD 360+ can be applied across three major application families: 1. Organizational and sectoral governance: airline strategy, airline logistics, MRO, tourism, supply-chain resilience, customer experience, safety, finance, operations, procurement, and sustainability management. 2. Digital and technological governance: data governance, AI governance, cybersecurity, digital resilience, digital transformation, business intelligence, automation, predictive analytics, decision intelligence, and agentic AI-enabled systems. 3. Civilizational and theological governance: civilizational studies, Taqrīb, comparative Kalām, Islamic unity, interreligious dialogue, Christian ecumenism, waqf governance, and sacred-text-to-governance translation. The method consolidates and extends the author’s previous KPI-governed and civilizational frameworks, including IKEF-360+, 7S-360, CAT, TDDM, UCTA, UCTA-PA, GKSF, IHF, ITDF, IDDF, ECKF, TPF-CJ, DDRNIC, and ICRA/MCPI. These prior frameworks function as domain-specific modules, while PRGDAI-SD 360+ provides the universal decision architecture. Its main contribution is not simply performance measurement, but the construction of a 360-degree decision system that links performance intelligence, risk intelligence, governance accountability, data trustworthiness, AI readiness, sustainability impact, and decision execution into one reusable model for evidence-based strategic governance. In sensitive theological and civilizational contexts, the method explicitly treats indicators as decision-support instruments, not as substitutes for theology, ethics, sacred meaning, scholarly judgment, or human dignity.

Files

PRGDAI-SD 360+ Decision Architecture Integrating Performance, Risk, Governance, Data, Artificial Intelligence, Sustainability, and Decision Execution.pdf

Files (485.6 kB)

Additional details

Additional titles

Alternative title (Persian)
PRGDAI-SD 360+: معماری ۳۶۰ درجۀ تصمیم‌گیری برای یکپارچه‌سازی عملکرد، ریسک، حکمرانی، داده، هوش مصنوعی، پایداری و اجرای تصمیم
Subtitle (English)
A Universal KPI-Governed, Evidence-Based, and AI-Ready Meta-Architecture for Strategic Decision-Making and Governance

Identifiers

URL
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/404652667_PRGDAI-SD_360_Decision_Architecture_Integrating_Performance_Risk_Governance_Data_Artificial_Intelligence_Sustainability_and_Decision_Execution
DOI
10.13140/RG.2.2.17495.02729
URL
https://www.academia.edu/166875263/PRGDAI_SD_360_Decision_Architecture_Integrating_Performance_Risk_Governance_Data_Artificial_Intelligence_Sustainability_and_Decision_Execution

References

  • DAMA International. (2017). DAMA-DMBOK: Data management body of knowledge (2nd ed.). Technics Publications.
  • Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI 1: Foundation 2021. Global Reporting Initiative.
  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018: Risk management—Guidelines. ISO.
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO/IEC 27001:2022: Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection—Information security management systems—Requirements. ISO.
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Information technology—Artificial intelligence—Management system. ISO.
  • ISACA. (2018). COBIT 2019 framework: Governance and management objectives. ISACA.
  • Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE.
  • Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (2002). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. New Jersey Institute of Technology.
  • Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025a). 7S-360 Strategic Indicator Architecture: A KPI-Governed Framework for Integrated Governance. University of Religions and Denominations (URD). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15665.24160
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025b). Integrated KPI Excellence Framework (IKEF-360+): A universal model for role-based airline performance management. Tarbiat Modares University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17285.46562
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025c). UCTA‑PA: Unified Civilizational Theological Architecture: A Performance Architecture for Measurable Rapprochement and Civilizational Renewal. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16602.40647
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025d). Unified Civilizational Theological Architecture (UCTA): A KPI-Governed Goal Architecture for Islamic Civilizational Renewal. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35438.27202
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025e). Taqrib Diagnostic–Decision Model (TDDM): A multi-dimensional framework for classifying, designing, and evaluating Islamic intra-faith rapprochement. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27306.68806
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025f). Islamic Ḥiwār Framework (IHF): A KPI-Based Architecture for Intra-Faith Dialogue and Civilizational Unity. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34234.30403
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025g). Islamic Theological Dialogue Framework (ITDF): A KPI-Based Architecture for Intra-Islamic Unity and Interfaith Readiness. University of Religions and Denominations (URD). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19952.11521
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025h). Global Kalam Strategic Framework (GKSF): A fourteen-pillar KPI-based comparative model for Islamic unity and theological convergence. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16774.28489/1
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025i). Twelve-pillar framework for comparative jurisprudence (TPF-CJ). University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26840.61441/1
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025j). Interfaith Doctrinal Dialogue Framework (IDDF): A KPI-Oriented Architecture for Abrahamic Unity. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13026.85443
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2025k). Ecumenical Christian KPI Framework (ECKF): A KPI-Based Strategic Architecture for Christian Unity and Institutional Dialogue. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31969.21609
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2026). Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT): A Design–Science Method for Sacred-Text Ontology Structuring and Theology-to-Governance Translation. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17244.86400
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H., AlizadehMousavi, S. M., HosseinPoor, S. M. M., Bagheri, A., MoghadasNian, S. A. H., & Qasemi, E. (2025a). A KPI-governed Taqrīb architecture: A data-driven roadmap to the New Islamic Civilization (DDRNIC). 10th International & 11th National Conference on New Findings in Management, Psychology and Accounting. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5995838
  • MoghadasNian, S. A. H., Raeisi, Z., Karami, F., MoghadasNian, S. A. H., & MoghadasNian, A. S. (2025b). A KPI-Governed Architecture for Integrated Civilizational Renewal (ICRA): From Theological Convergence to Measurable Unity (MCPI). 10th International & 11th National Conference on New Findings in Management, Psychology and Accounting. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5990594
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). The NIST cybersecurity framework (CSF) 2.0. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.CSWP.29
  • Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  • Tabassi, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
  • United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.