[00:01] Moderator: good so if you're ready we can go to the first desk but before moving to the first task i would like you to just look at the for two three second look at the printer name in front of you perfect so

[00:27] Sub-046 (P4): the first task you are part of hiring committee and we have three applicants that have applied for sorry i'm gonna have to stop you you you told us to look at the aim the one on the screen or that one

[00:42] Moderator: On the printed one.

[00:43] Sub-046 (P4): I didn't look at the printed one.
[00:44] Sub-046 (P4): I started out by looking at the printed and then I looked at the screen.
[00:47] Sub-046 (P4): I think we'll have it for the next time.
[00:49] Sub-046 (P4): Okay.

[00:51] Moderator: So you are a part of a hiring committee and you have three applicants that apply for a role at GN, which is about supporting AI adoption and transformation across different departments.
[01:05] Moderator: So you'll get also some information about the role itself and also information about the users on your tablet.
[01:13] Moderator: The structure is that you will silently read your information on your tablet for around one minute and after that you have seven minutes to discuss together what is your opinion about the candidate and also come up with final one that you all agree on to be the final candidate.
[01:40] Moderator: So if you have a question about the task, please ask me.
[01:43] Moderator: Otherwise, we will go to the show.
[01:46] Moderator: I will send you the evidence cards on your tablets.

[01:51] Sub-044 (P1): So we select the candidate first and then we discuss and then we reselect it together?
[01:55] Sub-044 (P1) [bc]: No,

[01:56] Sub-045 (P3) [bc]: No,

[01:56] Sub-046 (P4) [bc]: No,

[01:56] Sub-044 (P1) [bc]: no,
[01:56] Sub-044 (P1) [bc]: no.

[01:56] Sub-046 (P4) [bc]: no,

[01:56] Sub-045 (P3) [bc]: no.

[01:56] Sub-046 (P4) [bc]: no.

[01:56] Moderator: Oh, sorry.

[01:56] Sub-044 (P1) [bc]: Oh,

[01:57] Moderator: You will just read silently for one minute the information that you have on your tablet.

[02:01] Sub-044 (P1): Yeah.

[02:02] Moderator: And then you have seven minutes to discuss which candidate you like, what information you have, and so on.
[02:10] Moderator: And then within the seven minutes, you also should agree on one candidate to choose.

[02:16] Sub-046 (P4): So we can discuss the information that we each have.

[02:20] Moderator: But the role is that you cannot use the word by word information from your tablet.

[02:25] Sub-046 (P4): You can paraphrase it, rephrase it, and just say in whatever way you choose.

[02:31] Moderator: And I will send you the evidence card and you have one minute and 15 seconds to read your information.
[03:51] Moderator: So I am focusing on

[04:04] Sub-045 (P3): So I am focusing on what is in the description of the role, that it focused a lot on helping teams to understand the potential of AI and look at opportunities and sort of support the rollout.
[04:23] Sub-045 (P3): And I think when I look at candidate C, they show that they have a track record of...
[04:34] Sub-045 (P3): being able to communicate to other team members.
[04:42] Sub-045 (P3): And they've been in pilot projects or help facilitate alignment between departments.
[04:50] Sub-045 (P3): But I'm focusing a lot on what it says about their ability to
[04:57] Sub-045 (P3): to come across to other team members, to educate team members on the collaboration side.
[05:04] Sub-045 (P3): And that's why I'm sort of leaning towards candidate C more than candidate A and B.
[05:13] Sub-045 (P3): which B, one of them looked very, they were not working in a very collaborative way, was said about one of them.
[05:22] Sub-045 (P3): And I don't think that would be very good for this role as it looks to have to go sort of cross departments.

[05:30] Moderator: Yeah, I agree with that.

[05:30] Sub-047 (P2) [bc]: Yeah,

[05:30] Moderator: Yeah, I agree with that.

[05:30] Sub-046 (P4) [bc]: Yeah,

[05:31] Sub-047 (P2): Yeah.
[05:32] Sub-047 (P2): Also, yeah, maybe they don't have like a specialty in one specific area, but again, we have to do the cross across GN.
[05:42] Sub-047 (P2): So of course, Kennedy will also be my preferred option.
[05:46] Sub-047 (P2): Yeah, maybe he doesn't have or she doesn't have that much expertise in specific areas, but again, they have heard the words before and know what it is and not afraid of taking risk of new projects and so on, try to do it.

[06:02] Sub-044 (P1): I saw candidate A and B has been kind of similar because they both didn't have that deep of a technical background but as you already mentioned seems like they are both experienced in project coordination within various teams good at communication and change management so
[06:29] Sub-044 (P1): just like my first impression was that i didn't have a preference between those two um but depending on how much technical knowledge you need or if it's not that deep of a technical knowledge you need but more like a high level then i would also tend towards either aoc yeah but yeah

[06:50] Sub-046 (P4): I also got the impression that person B is technically skilled, but perhaps not so easy to work with or perhaps not so good at communicating.
[07:02] Sub-046 (P4): And I think what you said about person C, that seemed spot on also as what I read.
[07:09] Sub-046 (P4): And person A appears to not have that much relevant experience regarding this.

[07:18] Sub-047 (P2): so yeah i would also lean towards person also half a candidate is like uh not not into that much of new uh new content in in gn but more keeping the old one for longer and that's also why more is for c than than for a because this is like ai is a new topic and how does it work across multiple teams and so on

[07:19] Sub-046 (P4) [bc]: yeah

[07:47] Sub-045 (P3): Yeah, so A, steady hand, keeping projects on track, strong organizational.
[07:52] Sub-045 (P3): Yeah, I'm not supposed to read.

[07:59] Sub-044 (P1): I think the only thing that I see...

[08:01] Sub-045 (P3): Probably A could do it as well, right?
[08:02] Sub-045 (P3): Yeah.

[08:02] Sub-044 (P1) [bc]: Yeah.
[08:03] Sub-044 (P1): Yeah, but I wouldn't see a big difference.
[08:06] Sub-044 (P1): The only thing is that A also mentioned something around AI, even though it doesn't seem like it's very in-depth training.

[08:16] Sub-045 (P3): C.

[08:18] Sub-044 (P1): So you mentioned something about... Yeah, or... No, the candidate A.

[08:18] Sub-045 (P3): C mentioned something about, is for me, AlphaEI, right?

[08:25] Sub-044 (P1): But I don't know if it's actually a negative.
[08:26] Sub-044 (P1): I don't know about the phrasing.
[08:28] Sub-044 (P1): If it means that it's bad or good.
[08:32] Sub-044 (P1): That they received training.

[08:35] Sub-045 (P3): Maybe we don't have the same text.

[08:40] Sub-047 (P2): i don't think we have uh but yeah also candidate has a lot of experience as a project coordinator but yeah you can you can say that but again i'm still more for for c and that's because they also have some basics into the ai the things so they know they know what it is and how it can be used and i'll also have been like in cooperation with it and so on

[08:41] Sub-046 (P4) [bc]: no

[09:14] Sub-047 (P2) [bc]: yeah

[09:15] Sub-045 (P3) [bc]: Yeah,
[09:18] Sub-045 (P3) [bc]: Yeah,
[09:19] Sub-045 (P3): Also because it doesn't really call for a specialist, right?

[09:22] Sub-046 (P4) [bc]: right?

[09:22] Sub-047 (P2) [bc]: yeah

[09:23] Sub-046 (P4): And C is also regarded highly among his or her peers.

[09:24] Sub-047 (P2) [bc]: yeah
[09:28] Sub-047 (P2) [bc]: yeah

[09:30] Sub-044 (P1): Yeah, that's good to me.

[09:34] Sub-047 (P2): so we all agree yeah on c are we all agreeing on uh candidacy okay cool so then

[09:34] Moderator: Sounds like we all agree, maybe, on C?
[09:41] Moderator: okay cool so then please one of you fill in the

[09:41] Sub-045 (P3) [bc]: okay

[09:41] Sub-046 (P4): Okay.

[09:43] Moderator: So, then, please, one of you fill in the
