A Comparative Review of Fake Review Detection Techniques Using Machine Learning and Transformer Models
Authors/Creators
Description
– Online review systems play a crucial role in shaping consumer decisions in modern e-commerce environments. However, the increasing prevalence of deceptive or fake reviews has raised serious concerns regarding the reliability of such platforms. Over the years, a wide range of techniques have been proposed to address this issue, spanning traditional machine learning methods, deep learning architectures, and transformer-based models. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative review of major approaches used for fake review detection. The analysis covers feature-based classification methods, network-oriented models, neural architectures such as CNN and LSTM, and advanced transformer models including BERT and RoBERTa. Each approach is evaluated in terms of model design, dataset usage, performance metrics, advantages, and limitations. The study highlights a clear shift from manually engineered feature-based systems to context-aware deep learning frameworks. Although recent transformer-based models demonstrate strong performance, challenges such as cross-domain adaptability, computational complexity, interpretability, and evolving spam tactics remain unresolved. This review aims to provide a structured understanding of existing techniques and identify future research directions for building efficient and scalable fake review detection systems.
Files
A Comparative Review of Fake Review Detection Techniques'.pdf
Files
(991.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:7f221abd2588af3219e3e6049a7d8ad3
|
991.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- • B. Jindal and B. Liu, "Opinion spam and analysis," in Proc. Int. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (WSDM), 2008, pp. 219–230. • M. Ott, Y. Choi, C. Cardie, and J. T. Hancock, "Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination," in Proc. 49th Annu. Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (ACL), 2011, pp. 309–319. • Mukherjee, V. Venkataraman, B. Liu, and N. Glance, "Collective opinion spam detection: Bridging review networks and metadata," in Proc. ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining (KDD), 2015, pp. 985–994. • Jain, A. Gupta, and R. Katarya, "Spam review detection using deep learning," in Proc. IEEE Conf., 2019, pp. 1–6. • P. Boobalan, "Fake review detection using BERT transfer learning algorithm," Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 3360–3365, 2024. • R. Mohawesh, H. B. Salameh, and others, "Fake review detection using transformer-based enhanced LSTM and RoBERTa," Int. J. Cogn. Comput. Eng., 2024. • Author et al., "Robust fake review detection using uncertainty-aware LSTM and BERT," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Commun. Netw. (CICN), 2023. • M. Mexwell, "Fake reviews dataset," Kaggle, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mexwell/fake-reviews-dataset • J. Li, M. Ott, C. Cardie, and E. Hovy, "Towards a general rule for identifying deceptive opinion spam," in Proc. ACL, 2014. • S. Feng, R. Banerjee, and Y. Choi, "Syntactic stylometry for deception detection," in Proc. ACL, 2012. • N. Jindal, B. Liu, and E.-P. Lim, "Finding unusual review patterns using unexpected rules," in Proc. CIKM, 2010. • H. Li, Z. Chen, B. Liu, X. Wei, and J. Shao, "Spotting fake reviews via collective positive-unlabeled learning," in Proc. ICDM, 2014. • J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, "BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding," in Proc. NAACL-HLT, 2019. • Y. Liu et al., "RoBERTa: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach," 2019. • T. Joachims, "Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features," in Proc. ECML, 1998.