This article develops a critical–propositive reading of The Unified Proof Set: Bridging Quantum Mechanics, General Relativity, and Mathematical Harmony through the Equation of Relational Unity, by Eliahi Priest, confronting its proposal of “relational unity”—aimed at harmonizing quantum mechanics, general relativity, and mathematical structure—with the foundational and recent bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity (TO). We argue that the UPS exhibits meaningful convergences with TO by privileging relations over isolated entities and by seeking a unifying structure prior to effective physical models. However, when subjected to the modal discipline of TO’s Seven Axioms, decisive ontological tensions emerge: (i) the absence of an explicit ontology of Nothingness as a primitive and eternal mathematical essence; (ii) the potentially contingent status of the unifying principle/“equation” when it is not deduced from necessary axioms; and (iii) the distinction between an implicit cosmology and a deductive cosmology grounded in a pre-temporal foundation.
\nTO is presented as an ontological discipline, not as a competing research program meant to replace contemporary physics. The paper maintains that any model coherent with a possible universe must rest upon a logically, ontologically, and scientifically necessary basis—a requirement reinforced by independent, AI-assisted assessments, which also proposed operational bridges for testability and predictability concerning TO’s phenomenic elements and cosmological eras. We further stress that TO is not merely philosophical: it claims to demonstrate, through a proprietary mathematical language (graphical and axiomatic), the emergence of the universe from an eternally static perfect logical sphere prior to time, space, and matter, with specific structural properties (64 straight logical parts on its maximal circumference and 2048 logical parts on its total surface), also corroborated by dedicated graphical and logical presentations.
\nOn the propositive level, the article offers a protocol of “reconstruction under discipline,” in which UPS relational unity is reinterpreted as a derived coherence criterion within effective regimes, constrained by boundaries, minimal relational observation, and compositional genealogy. The analysis also integrates TO’s Inductor Effects—the Expansive Inductor Effect (axioms 4 and 5) and the Reductive Inductor Effect (axioms 4, 5, and 6)—as a conceptual grammar for coherence expansion and stabilization through compositional lineage. Finally, we articulate routes toward empirical contact via indirect evidence and observational regimes (Bell/Aspect tests, Planck/CMB cosmological parameters, LIGO–Virgo gravitational waves, and interpretive tensions associated with JWST), and we discuss the working hypothesis that neutrinos may function as phenomenic manifestations of TO’s cosmological plasmas.
\nKeywords: Theory of Objectivity; modal ontology; relational unity; perfect sphere; boundaries; observation; inductor effects; neutrinos; testability; cosmology; ontological discipline.
", "languages": [ { "id": "eng", "title": { "en": "English" } } ], "publication_date": "2026-02-20", "publisher": "Zenodo", "references": [ { "reference": "Abbott, B. P., et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration). 2016. \"Ob- servation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger.\" Physical Review Letters 116 (6): 061102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102." }, { "reference": "Aspect, Alain, Jean Dalibard, and G\u00e9rard Roger. 1982. \"Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers.\" Physical Review Letters 49 (25): 1804\u2013 1807. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804." }, { "reference": "Arrabal Haro, Pablo, Mark Dickinson, Steven L. Finkelstein, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Callum T. Donnan, Denis Burgarella, Adam Carnall, et al. 2023. \"Confirmation and Refutation of Very Luminous Galaxies in the Early Universe.\" Nature 622: 707\u2013712." }, { "reference": "Bohm, David. 1980. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge." }, { "reference": "Cabannas, Vidamor, and Denivaldo Silva. 2016. Teoria da Objetividade: terceira teoria de origem do universo, alternativa \u00e0 Teoria do Big Bang e ao Criacionismo. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17306198." }, { "reference": "Cabannas, Vidamor, and Denivaldo Silva. 2018. THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: Third theory of the origin of the universe, alternative to the Big Bang Theory and Creationism. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17012791." }, { "reference": "Cabannas, Vidamor, and Denivaldo Silva. 2020. A ESFERA PERFEITA (Coment\u00e1rio N\u00famero 9 \u00e0 Teoria da Objetividade). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 17013728." }, { "reference": "Cabannas, Vidamor, and Denivaldo Silva. 2025. Theory of Objectivity: Logical, Onto- logical, and Scientific Foundations for a New Physics and Cosmology (Dialogue with Artificial Intelligences). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17295496." }, { "reference": "Cabannas, Vidamor, and Denivaldo Silva. 2026a. From Modal Axioms to Empirical Con- tact: G\u00f6delian Discipline, the Law of Logical Minimum, and Operational Bridges in the Theory of Objectivity (2.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18154295." }, { "reference": "Cabannas, Vidamor, and Denivaldo Silva. 2026b. Modal Ontology and Testability: Boundaries, Convergence, and the Phenomenic Table of the Theory of Objectivity in Dialogue with Contemporary Physics and AI-Assisted Operational Bridges (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18257429." }, { "reference": "Cabannas, Vidamor, and Denivaldo Silva. 2026c. Gravity as an Emergence of Convergence Zones: A Critical\u2013Propositional Examination of Information Flux Theory in Light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO) (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 18306977." }, { "reference": "Cabannas, Vidamor, and Denivaldo Silva. 2026d. Quantum Field Theory and the Prop- erties of the Vacuum: A Critical\u2013Propositional Reading under the Modal Discipline of the Theory of Objectivity (TO) (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 18370212." }, { "reference": "Einstein, Albert. 1920. Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. London: Methuen & Co." }, { "reference": "Gupta, Rajendra P. 2023. \"JWST early Universe observations and \u039bCDM cosmology.\" Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 524 (3): 3385\u20133395. https://doi. org/10.1093/mnras/stad2032." }, { "reference": "Hawking, Stephen. 1988. A Brief History of Time. New York: Bantam." }, { "reference": "Heisenberg, Werner. 1958. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York: Harper & Row." }, { "reference": "Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press." }, { "reference": "Menci, N., A. A. Sen, and M. Castellano. 2024. \"The excess of JWST bright galaxies: a possible origin in the ground state of dynamical dark energy in the light of DESI 2024 data.\" Manuscript/preprint (November 2024)." }, { "reference": "Penrose, Roger. 2004. The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. London: Jonathan Cape." }, { "reference": "Planck Collaboration (Aghanim, N., et al.). 2020. \"Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmolog- ical parameters.\" Astronomy & Astrophysics 641: A6. https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/201833910." }, { "reference": "Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. 1984. Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. New York: Bantam." }, { "reference": "Priest, Eliahi. 2025. The Unified Proof Set: Bridging Quantum Mechanics, General Relativity, and Mathematical Harmony through the Equation of Relational Unity. Zenodo (v3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14741163." }, { "reference": "Weinberg, Steven. 1993. The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe. New York: Basic Books." } ], "related_identifiers": [ { "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.17295496", "relation_type": { "id": "cites", "title": { "de": "Zitiert", "en": "Cites" } }, "resource_type": { "id": "publication-book", "title": { "de": "Buch", "en": "Book" } }, "scheme": "doi" }, { "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.17012790", "relation_type": { "id": "cites", "title": { "de": "Zitiert", "en": "Cites" } }, "resource_type": { "id": "publication", "title": { "de": "Publikation", "en": "Publication" } }, "scheme": "doi" }, { "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.17306198", "relation_type": { "id": "cites", "title": { "de": "Zitiert", "en": "Cites" } }, "resource_type": { "id": "publication-book", "title": { "de": "Buch", "en": "Book" } }, "scheme": "doi" }, { "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.17013728", "relation_type": { "id": "cites", "title": { "de": "Zitiert", "en": "Cites" } }, "resource_type": { "id": "publication-book", "title": { "de": "Buch", "en": "Book" } }, "scheme": "doi" }, { "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.18257429", "relation_type": { "id": "cites", "title": { "de": "Zitiert", "en": "Cites" } }, "resource_type": { "id": "publication", "title": { "de": "Publikation", "en": "Publication" } }, "scheme": "doi" }, { "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.18154295", "relation_type": { "id": "cites", "title": { "de": "Zitiert", "en": "Cites" } }, "resource_type": { "id": "publication", "title": { "de": "Publikation", "en": "Publication" } }, "scheme": "doi" }, { "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.18306977", "relation_type": { "id": "cites", "title": { "de": "Zitiert", "en": "Cites" } }, "resource_type": { "id": "publication", "title": { "de": "Publikation", "en": "Publication" } }, "scheme": "doi" }, { "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.18370212", "relation_type": { "id": "cites", "title": { "de": "Zitiert", "en": "Cites" } }, "resource_type": { "id": "publication", "title": { "de": "Publikation", "en": "Publication" } }, "scheme": "doi" }, { "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.18209342", "relation_type": { "id": "cites", "title": { "de": "Zitiert", "en": "Cites" } }, "resource_type": { "id": "publication", "title": { "de": "Publikation", "en": "Publication" } }, "scheme": "doi" }, { "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.14741163", "relation_type": { "id": "cites", "title": { "de": "Zitiert", "en": "Cites" } }, "resource_type": { "id": "publication", "title": { "de": "Publikation", "en": "Publication" } }, "scheme": "doi" } ], "resource_type": { "id": "publication", "title": { "de": "Publikation", "en": "Publication" } }, "rights": [ { "description": { "en": "The Creative Commons Attribution license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the condition that the creator is appropriately credited." }, "icon": "cc-by-icon", "id": "cc-by-4.0", "props": { "scheme": "spdx", "url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode" }, "title": { "en": "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" } } ], "subjects": [ { "subject": "Theory of Objectivity" }, { "subject": "modal ontology" }, { "subject": "relational unity" }, { "subject": "perfect sphere" }, { "subject": "boundaries" }, { "subject": "observation" }, { "subject": "inductor effects" }, { "subject": "neutrinos" }, { "subject": "testability" }, { "subject": "cosmology" }, { "subject": "ontological discipline" } ], "title": "The \"Unified Proof Set\" under Ontological Discipline: Relational Unity, Modal Necessity, and Operational Bridges between Quantum Mechanics, General Relativity, and the Theory of Objectivity (TO)", "version": "1.0" }, "parent": { "access": { "owned_by": { "user": "1398261" }, "settings": { "accept_conditions_text": null, "allow_guest_requests": false, "allow_user_requests": false, "secret_link_expiration": 0 } }, "communities": { "default": "43b922bc-4942-4bbf-9270-59428e7062ef", "entries": [ { "access": { "member_policy": "open", "members_visibility": "public", "record_submission_policy": "open", "review_policy": "members", "visibility": "public" }, "children": { "allow": false }, "created": "2025-11-07T14:51:06.997845+00:00", "custom_fields": { "subjects": [ { "id": "euroscivoc:775" }, { "id": "euroscivoc:30060" }, { "id": "mesh:D008128" }, { "id": "euroscivoc:53388279" } ] }, "deletion_status": { "is_deleted": false, "status": "P" }, "id": "43b922bc-4942-4bbf-9270-59428e7062ef", "links": {}, "metadata": { "curation_policy": "The Theory of Objectivity (TO) Zenodo Community serves as an official digital repository for scholarly, philosophical, and scientific materials related to Vidamor Cabannas’s Theory of Objectivity, including publications, datasets, models, translations, and collaborative research documents.
\nIts purpose is to ensure the open, accurate, and permanent preservation of materials that contribute to the study, dissemination, and peer review of TO as a unified logical–ontological framework for understanding the universe.
\nThe mission of this community is to curate, preserve, and disseminate works that explore, develop, or critically engage with the Seven Absolute Truths and their applications to physics, cosmology, ontology, logic, mathematics, and consciousness studies.
\nThe community promotes open science, philosophical rigor, and cross-disciplinary dialogue between philosophy, mathematics, and physics.
All materials are made freely available under open-access licenses to foster transparent scientific collaboration.
The community accepts the following types of contributions:
\nMaterials must align with the general goals of advancing the academic, scientific, or logical understanding of the Theory of Objectivity.
\nTo ensure academic integrity and transparency, submissions must:
\nAll submissions undergo curatorial review by the TO Curatorial Board, consisting of editors and reviewers appointed by the group administrator (Vidamor Cabannas or a designated curator).
\nThe review process ensures that materials:
\nCurators may provide feedback or request minor revisions before acceptance. The review process is non-anonymous and non-adversarial, emphasizing collaboration and accuracy.
\nAll accepted works must be published under open-access licenses, preferably Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) or CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, unless otherwise justified.
All files will remain permanently accessible under Zenodo’s long-term digital preservation infrastructure.
Curators ensure compliance with the FAIR Data Principles:
\nEach record must include:
\nAdditional optional metadata:
\nAll contributions must adhere to:
\nAny detected plagiarism, falsification, or unauthorized content will result in removal of the record.
\nCurators may update records to maintain metadata accuracy, ensure compliance with open-access policies, and preserve version integrity.
\nThe Theory of Objectivity community aims to:
\nFor inquiries, collaborative proposals, or curatorial participation, please contact the community through:
\ud83c\udf10 https://www.teoriadaobjetividade.com.br
\ud83d\udcd8 Zenodo Community: Theory of Objectivity
\ud83d\udce7 Curatorial contact available via Zenodo messaging portal.
This Curatorial Policy is reviewed annually to ensure continued alignment with Zenodo, FAIR, and Open Science standards.
", "description": "We invite scholars, physicists, philosophers of science, mathematicians, and interdisciplinary thinkers to participate in the expansion, critique, and formal development of the Theory of Objectivity.\nIf possible, participate in the Curatorial Board.", "page": "The Theory of Objectivity (TO) is a comprehensive logical–ontological framework developed by Vidamor Cabannas to explain the origin and structure of the universe through a system of seven axioms known as the Seven Absolute Truths.
This community on Zenodo serves as the official open-access repository for all scholarly materials, datasets, and collaborative research related to the Theory of Objectivity.
The purpose of this community is to curate, preserve, and disseminate research that explores or expands upon the Theory of Objectivity — a theory that seeks to unite logic, mathematics, physics, and metaphysics within a single deductive system.
\nThrough open publication and collaboration, the TO Zenodo Group promotes:
\nThis repository includes:
\nAll materials follow open-access principles and are archived under DOI identifiers to ensure long-term preservation and citation integrity.
\nThe Theory of Objectivity proposes that Nothingness is a primitive mathematical essence from which all existence unfolds by logical necessity.
It seeks to provide a deductive model of the universe capable of explaining the emergence of space, time, matter, and consciousness through a coherent set of axioms — redefining the boundary between physics and philosophy.
As Cabannas affirms, “The universe does not arise from energy or matter, but from logic itself — the first cause and the final horizon of all being.”
\nResearchers, physicists, philosophers, and interdisciplinary thinkers are invited to contribute:
\nTogether, we aim to advance an open, reason-based cosmology that unites science and metaphysics in the pursuit of understanding the Whole.
\n\n
", "title": "Theory of Objectivity: Fundamentals Logicians, Ontological and Scientists for a New Physics and Cosmology (Dialogue with to the Intelligences Artificial)", "type": { "id": "project" }, "website": "https://www.teoriadaobjetividade.com.br" }, "revision_id": 8, "slug": "theory_of_objectivity_fundamentals_logicians_ontological_and_scientists", "updated": "2026-02-21T14:34:46.782000+00:00" } ], "ids": [ "43b922bc-4942-4bbf-9270-59428e7062ef" ] }, "id": "18705463", "pids": { "doi": { "client": "datacite", "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.18705463", "provider": "datacite" } } }, "pids": { "doi": { "client": "datacite", "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.18705464", "provider": "datacite" }, "oai": { "identifier": "oai:zenodo.org:18705464", "provider": "oai" } }, "revision_id": 4, "stats": { "all_versions": { "data_volume": 14405760.0, "downloads": 45, "unique_downloads": 44, "unique_views": 42, "views": 42 }, "this_version": { "data_volume": 14405760.0, "downloads": 45, "unique_downloads": 44, "unique_views": 42, "views": 42 } }, "status": "published", "swh": {}, "updated": "2026-02-19T23:50:02.783147+00:00", "versions": { "index": 1, "is_latest": true } }