Miss Kalonga was the tenant of a property in Croydon under a flexible tenancy for a fixed term of five years from 25 May 2015 to 24 May 2020 (the "Tenancy Agreement"). Croydon London Borough Council was her landlord ("Croydon").
On 2 August 2017, Croydon served a notice on Miss Kalonga seeking to terminate the Tenancy Agreement due to rent arrears and anti-social behaviour. On 29 August 2017, Croydon issued a claim in the County Court at Central London seeking possession of the property. No claim was made on the ground of forfeiture.
Miss Kalonga served a Defence and Counterclaim, arguing that the Tenancy Agreement did not include a forfeiture clause, Croydon had failed to serve a valid notice under section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925, and the claim was defective as a claim for possession of a flexible tenancy during the fixed term.
As a preliminary issue, the High Court held that the Tenancy Agreement did not include a forfeiture clause and without one, Croydon did not have any right to end the Tenancy Agreement before the fixed term of five years had expired. Croydon appealed and the Court of Appeal dismissed its appeal. Croydon now appeals to the Supreme Court.

Mr Craig is a UK national who lives in Scotland. In May 2017, a request was made by the US Government for his extradition to the US, where is accused of committing an offence relating to securities fraud.
The process for determining whether a person should be extradited from the UK is governed by the Extradition Act 2003 ("the 2003 Act"). Section 79 of the 2003 Act sets out a series of bars to extradition to "category 2" countries, such as the US. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, that list includes a "forum" bar, which applies if the extradition would not be in the interests of justice, for example because a substantial measure of the alleged criminal activity was performed in the UK. In Scotland, the legislative amendments which inserted the "forum" bar into the 2003 Act ("the Forum Bar Provisions") have not been brought into force. In December 2018, the Court of Session declared that failure to be unlawful.
In July 2019, a judge at the Edinburgh Sherriff Court decided that Mr Craig’s extradition was not barred under section 79 of the 2003 Act, that his extradition would be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights ("ECHR"), and that the case should be sent to the Scottish Ministers for their decision. In September 2019, the Scottish Ministers decided that Mr Craig should be extradited, in accordance with section 93 of the 2003 Act.
Mr Craig appealed against the Scottish Ministers’ decision to the High Court, unsuccessfully, under section 103 of the 2003 Act. He now appeals to the Supreme Court, under paragraph 13 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998. He argues that the failure to bring the Forum Bar Provisions into force in Scotland gives rise to a breach of article 8 of the ECHR, insofar as there is an interference with his right to respect for his private and family life which is not "in accordance with the law".