(1) Whether the Respondents in bringing their complaints as to a series of unlawful deductions and underpayments of holiday pay are restricted to a period ending no later than three months prior to the presentation of the complaints to the Tribunal.
                (2) What is meant by a series of unlawful deductions to pay and when such a series ends.
                
                (3) What is the correct approach to calculating unlawful deductions and underpayments of holiday pay, including the approach to annual leave entitlement, overtime and the reference period for calculating normal pay.
                
                (4) Whether the Respondents have been discriminated against contrary to Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol 1.

Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its approach to section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 in finding that the Republic of Mozambique's ("Mozambique") claims were "matters" within the scope of the relevant arbitration agreements.

Which local authority was responsible for the after-care of a service-user who had been detained in hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983 (the "1983 Act")? The case turns on the issue of where the service-user had been "ordinarily resident…immediately before being detained" for the purposes of s.117(3)(a) of the 1983 Act.

Did the Court of Appeal err in finding that when determining the development for which planning permission could reasonably have been expected to be granted in relation land, the decision maker is not entitled to take into account applications or decisions relating to other land arising from the compulsory acquisition of land for the same underlying scheme.

Does a bankrupt have standing under section 303(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986 to challenge transactions entered by their trustee in bankruptcy in situations where the relief sought would have no impact on their position within the bankruptcy?

Are litigation funding agreements ("LFAs") pursuant to which the funder is entitled to recover a percentage of any damages recovered "damages-based agreements" ("DBAs") within the meaning of the legislation which regulates such agreements?