Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Limaye & Sen 1956
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Okoh 1971
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Rocafort & Siopongco 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Sharma 1975
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1969
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: Vilela 1974
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Hidayat & Simpson 1994: Use of Green Moisture Content and Basic Specific Gravity to Group Tropical Woods for Kiln Drying. Forest Products Laboratory Research Note FPL-RN-0263. Values derived from: van Vuuren et al. 1978
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Holiaka D.M., Bilous A.M., Holiaka M.A. (2018). Live biomass of willow bushes in natural phytocenoses Chernihiv Polissia. Kyiv: NULES of Ukraine. ISBN 978-617-7630-47-9
Huerta Crespo, J. and Becerra Martinez, J. 1982. Anatomia Macroscopica y Algunas Caracteristicas Fisicas de Diecisiete Maderas Tropicales Mexicanas. Boletin Divulgativo No. 46, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico. 61 pp.
Huerta Crespo, J. and Becerra Martinez, J. 1982. Anatomia Macroscopica y Algunas Caracteristicas Fisicas de Diecisiete Maderas Tropicales Mexicanas. Boletin Divulgativo No. 46, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico. 61 pp.
Huerta Crespo, J. and Becerra Martinez, J. 1982. Anatomia Macroscopica y Algunas Caracteristicas Fisicas de Diecisiete Maderas Tropicales Mexicanas. Boletin Divulgativo No. 46, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico. 61 pp.
Huerta Crespo, J. and Becerra Martinez, J. 1982. Anatomia Macroscopica y Algunas Caracteristicas Fisicas de Diecisiete Maderas Tropicales Mexicanas. Boletin Divulgativo No. 46, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico. 61 pp.
Huerta Crespo, J. and Becerra Martinez, J. 1982. Anatomia Macroscopica y Algunas Caracteristicas Fisicas de Diecisiete Maderas Tropicales Mexicanas. Boletin Divulgativo No. 46, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico. 61 pp.
Huerta Crespo, J. and Becerra Martinez, J. 1982. Anatomia Macroscopica y Algunas Caracteristicas Fisicas de Diecisiete Maderas Tropicales Mexicanas. Boletin Divulgativo No. 46, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico. 61 pp.
Hultine, K. R., D. F. Koepke, W. T. Pockman, A. Fravolini, J. S. Sperry, and D. G. Williams. 2006. Influence of soil texture on hydraulic properties and water relations of a dominant warm-desert phreatophyte. Tree Physiology 26:313-323.
Hultine, K. R., D. F. Koepke, W. T. Pockman, A. Fravolini, J. S. Sperry, and D. G. Williams. 2006. Influence of soil texture on hydraulic properties and water relations of a dominant warm-desert phreatophyte. Tree Physiology 26:313-323.
Hultine, K. R., D. F. Koepke, W. T. Pockman, A. Fravolini, J. S. Sperry, and D. G. Williams. 2006. Influence of soil texture on hydraulic properties and water relations of a dominant warm-desert phreatophyte. Tree Physiology 26:313-323.
Hultine, K. R., D. F. Koepke, W. T. Pockman, A. Fravolini, J. S. Sperry, and D. G. Williams. 2006. Influence of soil texture on hydraulic properties and water relations of a dominant warm-desert phreatophyte. Tree Physiology 26:313-323.
IBDF. 1981. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Vol 1. Floresta Nacional do Tapajos. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 113 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1981. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Vol 1. Floresta Nacional do Tapajos. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 113 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1981. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Vol 1. Floresta Nacional do Tapajos. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 113 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1981. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Vol 1. Floresta Nacional do Tapajos. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 113 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1981. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Vol 1. Floresta Nacional do Tapajos. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 113 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1981. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Vol 1. Floresta Nacional do Tapajos. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 113 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1981. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Vol 1. Floresta Nacional do Tapajos. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 113 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1981. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Vol 1. Floresta Nacional do Tapajos. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 113 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1983. Potencial madeireira do Grande Carajas, Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
IBDF. 1988. Madeiras de Amazônia, caracteristicas e utilização. Estação experimental de Curua-Una. Vol 2. Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, Brasilia, DF Brasil, 134 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
INPA 1991. Catalogo de madeiras da Amazônia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coodenação de Pesquisas em Produtos Forestais, Manaus, AM Brasil, 163 pp. In Fearnside, P.M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59-87.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial (INTI), Argentina 2003. Densidad de maderas (Kg/m3). Prepared by: Ing. Ftal. María Elena Atencia. https://www.inti.gob.ar/publicaciones/descargac/365, last accessed on 15/07/2019.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
T. Ibanez, J. Chave, L. Barrabé, E. Blanchard, T. Boutreux, S. Trueba, H. Vandrot, P. Birnbaum (2017). Journal of Vegetation Science.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F. J., Kassim, A. R., Kubo, T., Potts, M. D., & Kohyama, T. S. (2012). Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Functional Ecology, 26(1), 274-282.
NA. Unkown source. In: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
NA. Unkown source. In: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
NA. Unkown source. In: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
NA. Unkown source. In: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
NA. Unkown source. In: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
IMANA-ENCINAS, J. et al. 2012. Florística, volume e biomassa lenhosa de um fragmento de Mata Atlántica no municipio de Santa Maria de Jetibá - Espirito Santo. Floresta 42(3): 565 - 576.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Inga, P.R. and Castillo, M.U. 1987. Caracteristicas fisico-quimicas de la madera y carbon de once especies forestales de la Amazonia peruana. Revista forestal del Peru 14:62-73. By T Baker.
Iogna PA, Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Goldstein G (2011) Water relations and  hydraulic  architecture  of  two  Patagonian  steppe  shrubs: effect  of  slope  orientation  and  microclimate.  J  Arid  Environ 75: 763–772.
Iogna PA, Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Goldstein G (2011) Water relations and  hydraulic  architecture  of  two  Patagonian  steppe  shrubs: effect  of  slope  orientation  and  microclimate.  J  Arid  Environ 75: 763–772.
Iogna PA, Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Goldstein G (2011) Water relations and  hydraulic  architecture  of  two  Patagonian  steppe  shrubs: effect  of  slope  orientation  and  microclimate.  J  Arid  Environ 75: 763–772.
Iogna PA, Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Goldstein G (2011) Water relations and  hydraulic  architecture  of  two  Patagonian  steppe  shrubs: effect  of  slope  orientation  and  microclimate.  J  Arid  Environ 75: 763–772.
Iogna PA, Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Goldstein G (2011) Water relations and  hydraulic  architecture  of  two  Patagonian  steppe  shrubs: effect  of  slope  orientation  and  microclimate.  J  Arid  Environ 75: 763–772.
Iogna PA, Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Goldstein G (2011) Water relations and  hydraulic  architecture  of  two  Patagonian  steppe  shrubs: effect  of  slope  orientation  and  microclimate.  J  Arid  Environ 75: 763–772.
Ivanchikov 1971, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Ivanchikov 1971, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Ivanchikov 1971, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Ivanchikov 1971, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Ivanchikov 1971, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Ivanchikov 1971, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Ivanchikov 1971, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Ivanchikov 1971, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Ivanchikov 1971, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
JMPROV, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Jacobsen A.L., Ewers F.W., Pratt R.B., Paddock W.A. III, Davis S.D. 2005. Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiology 139: 546-556.
Jacobsen A.L., Ewers F.W., Pratt R.B., Paddock W.A. III, Davis S.D. 2005. Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiology 139: 546-556.
Jacobsen A.L., Ewers F.W., Pratt R.B., Paddock W.A. III, Davis S.D. 2005. Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiology 139: 546-556.
Jacobsen A.L., Ewers F.W., Pratt R.B., Paddock W.A. III, Davis S.D. 2005. Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiology 139: 546-556.
Jacobsen A.L., Ewers F.W., Pratt R.B., Paddock W.A. III, Davis S.D. 2005. Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiology 139: 546-556.
Jacobsen A.L., Ewers F.W., Pratt R.B., Paddock W.A. III, Davis S.D. 2005. Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiology 139: 546-556.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen A.L., Agenbag L., Esler K.J., Pratt R.B., Ewers F.W., Davis S.D. 2007. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. Journal of Ecology 95: 171-183.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Ewers FW, Davis SD.  2007.  Cavitation resistance among twenty-six chaparral species of southern California.  Ecological Monographs 77: 99-115.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Davis SD, Ewers FW. 2008. Comparative community physiology: non-convergence in water relations among three semi-arid shrub communities.  New Phytologist 180: 100-113.
Jasinska AK, Alber M, Tullus A, Rahi M, Sellin A (2015) Impact of elevated atmospheric humidity on anatomical and hydraulic traits of xylem in hybrid aspen. Funct Plant Biol 42:565–578. doi:10.1071/FP14224
Jasinska AK, Alber M, Tullus A, Rahi M, Sellin A (2015) Impact of elevated atmospheric humidity on anatomical and hydraulic traits of xylem in hybrid aspen. Funct Plant Biol 42:565–578. doi:10.1071/FP14224
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jati et al. 2014. Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira. Acta Amazonica 44 (1), 79-86.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Jenkins, K.L. and Coomes, D.A. unpublished data.
Johnson D.M., Domec J.C., Woodruff D.R., McCulloh K.A., Meinzer F.C. 2013. Contrasting hydraulic strategies in two tropical lianas and their host trees. American Journal of Botany 100: 374-83.
Johnson D.M., Domec J.C., Woodruff D.R., McCulloh K.A., Meinzer F.C. 2013. Contrasting hydraulic strategies in two tropical lianas and their host trees. American Journal of Botany 100: 374-83.
Johnson D.M., Domec J.C., Woodruff D.R., McCulloh K.A., Meinzer F.C. 2013. Contrasting hydraulic strategies in two tropical lianas and their host trees. American Journal of Botany 100: 374-83.
Johnson D.M., Domec J.C., Woodruff D.R., McCulloh K.A., Meinzer F.C. 2013. Contrasting hydraulic strategies in two tropical lianas and their host trees. American Journal of Botany 100: 374-83.
Johnson D.M., Domec J.C., Woodruff D.R., McCulloh K.A., Meinzer F.C. 2013. Contrasting hydraulic strategies in two tropical lianas and their host trees. American Journal of Botany 100: 374-83.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Kanawjia et al. 2013. Specifi c gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar Valley of the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Sci. Pract. 15(1), 85-88.
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Karizumi 1974, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015b, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2015a, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kasatkin et al. 2016, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov and Morozova 1973, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1977, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kazimirov et al. 1978, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keduolhouvonuo and Kumar 2017. Variation in wood specific gravity of selected tree species of Kohima district of Nagaland North Eastern parts of India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6), 70-74.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Keenan, F.J. and Tejada, M. 1984. Tropical Timber for Building Materials in the Andean Group Countries of South America. IDRC-TS 49.
Kimura 1963, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
Kindermann et al. 2021. Dataset on Woody Aboveground Biomass, Disturbance Losses, and Wood Density from an African Savanna Ecosystem. Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/3cs85wd3gb.1. Also preprint: Improving estimation of woody aboveground biomass in drylands by accounting for disturbances and spatial heterogeneity.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
King, D.A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 25-44.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kingston R.S.T. and Risdon C.J.E. 1961. Shrinkage and density of Australian and other South-west Pacific woods. CSIROIn: Ilic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blakemore,  P. 2000. Woody density phase 1. State of knowledge. National carbon accounting system. Technical Report 18 Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia.
Kininmonth, J.A. 1982. Properties and uses of the timbers of West Samoa. Indigenous hardwoods. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 57 pp.
Kininmonth, J.A. 1982. Properties and uses of the timbers of West Samoa. Indigenous hardwoods. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 57 pp.
Kininmonth, J.A. 1982. Properties and uses of the timbers of West Samoa. Indigenous hardwoods. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 57 pp.
Kininmonth, J.A. 1982. Properties and uses of the timbers of West Samoa. Indigenous hardwoods. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 57 pp.
Kininmonth, J.A. 1982. Properties and uses of the timbers of West Samoa. Indigenous hardwoods. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 57 pp.
Kininmonth, J.A. 1982. Properties and uses of the timbers of West Samoa. Indigenous hardwoods. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 57 pp.
Kininmonth, J.A. 1982. Properties and uses of the timbers of West Samoa. Indigenous hardwoods. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 57 pp.
Kininmonth, J.A. 1982. Properties and uses of the timbers of West Samoa. Indigenous hardwoods. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 57 pp.
Kininmonth, J.A. 1982. Properties and uses of the timbers of West Samoa. Indigenous hardwoods. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 57 pp.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kizha, from: Radtke et al. 2016. LegacyTreeData: A national database of detailed tree measurements for volume, weight, and physical properties. In: Stanton SM, Christensen GA, (eds). Proceedings of Forest Inventory and Analysis 2015 Science Symposium, December 8–10, 2015, Portland, OR. GTR-PNW-931, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, GTR-PNW-931, Portland, OR, pp. 25–30.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Kleinschmidt et al. 2020. Successional habitat filtering of rainforest trees is explained by potential growth more than by functional traits. Functional Ecology 34(7), 1438-1447.
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Koltunova et al. 2007, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kostov et al. 1992, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kostov et al. 1992, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kostov et al. 1992, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kostov et al. 1992, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kostov et al. 1992, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kostov et al. 1992, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kostov et al. 1992, Schepaschenko et al. (2017) Sci. Data 4:170070. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.70
Kotowska, M. M., Hertel, D., Rajab, Y. A., Barus, H., & Schuldt, B. (2015). Patterns in hydraulic architecture from roots to branches in six tropical tree species from cacao agroforestry and their relation to wood density and stem growth. Frontiers in plant science, 6.
Kotowska, M. M., Hertel, D., Rajab, Y. A., Barus, H., & Schuldt, B. (2015). Patterns in hydraulic architecture from roots to branches in six tropical tree species from cacao agroforestry and their relation to wood density and stem growth. Frontiers in plant science, 6.
Kotowska, M. M., Hertel, D., Rajab, Y. A., Barus, H., & Schuldt, B. (2015). Patterns in hydraulic architecture from roots to branches in six tropical tree species from cacao agroforestry and their relation to wood density and stem growth. Frontiers in plant science, 6.
Kotowska, M. M., Hertel, D., Rajab, Y. A., Barus, H., & Schuldt, B. (2015). Patterns in hydraulic architecture from roots to branches in six tropical tree species from cacao agroforestry and their relation to wood density and stem growth. Frontiers in plant science, 6.
Kotowska, M. M., Hertel, D., Rajab, Y. A., Barus, H., & Schuldt, B. (2015). Patterns in hydraulic architecture from roots to branches in six tropical tree species from cacao agroforestry and their relation to wood density and stem growth. Frontiers in plant science, 6.
Kotowska, M. M., Hertel, D., Rajab, Y. A., Barus, H., & Schuldt, B. (2015). Patterns in hydraulic architecture from roots to branches in six tropical tree species from cacao agroforestry and their relation to wood density and stem growth. Frontiers in plant science, 6.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kryn & Fobes 1959: The Woods of Liberia.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F. 1970. Properties of imported tropical woods. Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper 125,Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Kukachka, B.F., McClay, T.A. and Beltranena M.E. 1968. Selected Properties of 52 Timber Species from the Department of El Peten, Guatemala. (also Kukachka, McClay, Beltranena. 1968. Propiedades seleccionadas de 52 especies de madera del Departamento del Peten, Guatemala. Boletin Numero 2, Proyecto de Evaluacion Forestal -- FAO-FYDEP -- Guatemala, C.A.; 88 pp.)
Kukachka, B.F., McClay, T.A. and Beltranena M.E. 1968. Selected Properties of 52 Timber Species from the Department of El Peten, Guatemala. (also Kukachka, McClay, Beltranena. 1968. Propiedades seleccionadas de 52 especies de madera del Departamento del Peten, Guatemala. Boletin Numero 2, Proyecto de Evaluacion Forestal -- FAO-FYDEP -- Guatemala, C.A.; 88 pp.)
Kukachka, B.F., McClay, T.A. and Beltranena M.E. 1968. Selected Properties of 52 Timber Species from the Department of El Peten, Guatemala. (also Kukachka, McClay, Beltranena. 1968. Propiedades seleccionadas de 52 especies de madera del Departamento del Peten, Guatemala. Boletin Numero 2, Proyecto de Evaluacion Forestal -- FAO-FYDEP -- Guatemala, C.A.; 88 pp.)
Kukachka, B.F., McClay, T.A. and Beltranena M.E. 1968. Selected Properties of 52 Timber Species from the Department of El Peten, Guatemala. (also Kukachka, McClay, Beltranena. 1968. Propiedades seleccionadas de 52 especies de madera del Departamento del Peten, Guatemala. Boletin Numero 2, Proyecto de Evaluacion Forestal -- FAO-FYDEP -- Guatemala, C.A.; 88 pp.)
Kukachka, B.F., McClay, T.A. and Beltranena M.E. 1968. Selected Properties of 52 Timber Species from the Department of El Peten, Guatemala. (also Kukachka, McClay, Beltranena. 1968. Propiedades seleccionadas de 52 especies de madera del Departamento del Peten, Guatemala. Boletin Numero 2, Proyecto de Evaluacion Forestal -- FAO-FYDEP -- Guatemala, C.A.; 88 pp.)
Kukachka, B.F., McClay, T.A. and Beltranena M.E. 1968. Selected Properties of 52 Timber Species from the Department of El Peten, Guatemala. (also Kukachka, McClay, Beltranena. 1968. Propiedades seleccionadas de 52 especies de madera del Departamento del Peten, Guatemala. Boletin Numero 2, Proyecto de Evaluacion Forestal -- FAO-FYDEP -- Guatemala, C.A.; 88 pp.)
Kukachka, B.F., McClay, T.A. and Beltranena M.E. 1968. Selected Properties of 52 Timber Species from the Department of El Peten, Guatemala. (also Kukachka, McClay, Beltranena. 1968. Propiedades seleccionadas de 52 especies de madera del Departamento del Peten, Guatemala. Boletin Numero 2, Proyecto de Evaluacion Forestal -- FAO-FYDEP -- Guatemala, C.A.; 88 pp.)
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367
Kusumoto et al. 2014. Functional response of plant communities to clearcutting: management impacts differ between forest vegetation zones. J Appl Ecol, 52: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12367