This file ReadMe was created on 2025-08-14 by: Katerina Kupkova, Researcher (VSB-TUO, IET, CEET katerina.kupkova@vsb.cz). Last update: 2025-09-03 --------------------------- Basic information --------------------------- 1. Dataset name: Effect of copper introduction via wet-impregnation on the performance of Mg-Al mixed metal oxides in selective ammonia oxidation 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16872589 3. Contact information Name: Katerina Pacultova Institution: Institute of Environmental Technology, Centre of Energy and Environmental Technologies, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava E-mail: katerina.pacultova@vsb.cz ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3032-9264 4. Dataset archiving (publication) date: 2025-08-14 5. Place of archiving (publication): Ostrava 6. Dataset description: PNG and csv. data from original research. Precisely, there are twenty-eight csv.files with measured data and thirty final, complex Figures and four Table. Further are there eight csv. files with data from Supplementary and twenty-five PNG Supplementary figures. Data_Figure1A._XRD_series600 Data_Figure1A._XRD_series800 Data_Figure1B._isotherms_series600 Data_Figure1B._isotherms_series800 Data_Figure1C._Pore_width_series600 Data_Figure1C._Pore_width_series800 Data_Figure3A._H2_TPR_profile_of_samples_600_IMP_Cu5_and_600-MgAl Data_Figure3A._H2_TPR_profile_of_samples_600_IMP_Cu10_and_600-MgAl Data_Figure3A._H2_TPR_profile_of_samples_600_IMP_Cu15_and_600-MgAl Data_Figure3B._H2_TPR_profile_of_samples_800_IMP_Cu5_and_800-MgAl Data_Figure3B._H2_TPR_profile_of_samples_800_IMP_Cu10_and_800-MgAl Data_Figure3B._H2_TPR_profile_of_samples_800_IMP_Cu15_and_800-MgAl Data_Figure3C._UV_vis_DRS_absorption_bands_series600 Data_Figure3C._UV_vis_DRS_absorption_bands_series800 Data_Figure5._NH3_TPD_measurement_600_IMP_Cu5 Data_Figure5._NH3_TPD_measurement_600_IMP_Cu15 Data_Figure5._NH3_TPD_measurement_800_IMP_Cu5 Data_Figure5._NH3_TPD_measurement_800_IMP_Cu15 Data_Figure6A._NH3_SCO_catalytic_efficiency_in_temperature_range_250_350_°C_series800 Data_Figure6A._NH3_SCO_catalytic_efficiency_in_temperature_range_250_350_°C_series600 Data_Figure6B._NH3_SCO_yield_of_N2_and_side_products_compared_to_unreacted_NH3_IMP_series600 Data_Figure6B._NH3_SCO_yield_of_N2_and_side_products_compared_to_unreacted_NH3_IMP_series800 Data_Figure7A._NH3_SCO_Stability_test_sample_600_IMP_Cu15 Data_Figure7B._NH3_SCO_Stability_test_sample_800_IMP_Cu15 Data_Figure8A._Catalytic_efficiency_vs_BET_surface_area Data_Figure8B._Catalytic_efficiency_vs_hydrogen_consumption Data_Figure8C._Catalytic_efficiency_vs_Cu_surface_area__m2_gsample Data_Figure8D._Catalytic_efficiency_vs_Cu_surface_area_m2_m2sample Figure1A._XRD_calcined_series600_series800 Figure1B._isotherms_series600_series800 Figure1C._Pore_width_series600_series800 Figure1D._SEM_image_SE+BSE_600_IMP_Cu5 Figure1D._SEM_image_SE+BSE_600_IMP_Cu10 Figure1D._SEM_image_SE+BSE_600_IMP_Cu15 Figure1D._SEM_image_SE+BSE_600_MgAl Figure1D._SEM_image_SE+BSE_800_IMP_Cu5 Figure1D._SEM_image_SE+BSE_800_IMP_Cu10 Figure1D._SEM_image_SE+BSE_800_IMP_Cu15 Figure1D._SEM_image_SE+BSE_800_MgAl Figure2._SEM_micrographs_of_600_IMP_Cu_15_EDS_maps_Cu_Mg_Al Figure2._SEM_micrographs_of_800_IMP_Cu_15_EDS_maps_Cu_Mg_Al Figure3A._H2_TPR_profiles_series600 Figure3B._H2_TPR_profiles_series800 Figure3C._UV_vis_DRS_IMP_SERIES_600_800_absroption_bands Figure4A._XPS_spectra_of_Cu2p_for_all_Cu_containing_samples Figure4B._XPS_spectra_of_O1s_for_all_800_IMP_samples Figure4C._XPS_spectra_of_O1s_for_all_600_IMP_samples Figure5._NH3_TPD_IMP_samples_5_15_600_800 Figure6A._NH3_SCO_efficiency_600_800 Figure6B._NH3_SCO_yield_of_N2_and_side_products_compared_to_unreacted_NH3_IMP_series600_series800 Figure7A._NH3_SCO_Stability_test_sample_600_IMP_Cu15 Figure7B._NH3_SCO_Stability_test_sample_800_IMP_Cu15 Figure8A._Catalytic_efficiency_vs_BET_surface_area Figure8B._Catalytic_efficiency_vs_hydrogen_consumption Figure8C._Catalytic_efficiency_vs_Cu_surface_area__m2_gsample Figure8D._Catalytic_efficiency_vs_Cu_surface_area_m2_m2sample Figure9._SEM_micrograph_of_plate_like_structures_800_IMP_Cu15_1 Figure9._SEM_micrograph_of_plate_like_structures_800_IMP_Cu15_2 Table_1.Chemical_composition_of_catalysts Table_2.Crystallite_size_of_oxide_phases_textural_properties_theoretical_and_measured_hydrogen_consumption Table_3.Surface_composition_of_all_studied_samples_by_XPS Table_4.Results_of_reactive_frontal_chromatography FigureS1._SEM_micrograph_of_600_MgAl_SE_BSE_mode FigureS2._SEM_microstructure_of_600_IMP_Cu5 FigureS3._SEM_microstructure_of_600_IMP_Cu10 FigureS4._SEM_microstructure_of_600_IMP_Cu15 FigureS5._SEM_microstructure_of_800_MgAl FigureS6._SEM_microstructure_of_800_IMP_Cu5 FigureS7._SEM_microstructure_of_800_IMP_Cu10 FigureS8._SEM_microstructure_of_800_IMP_Cu15 FigureS9._SEM_micrographs_of_a_600_IMP_Cu5_and_the_EDS_maps_of_Cu_Mg_and_Al_distribution FigureS9._SEM_micrographs_of_b_800_IMP_Cu5_and_the_EDS_maps_of_Cu_Mg_and_Al_distribution FigureS9._SEM_micrographs_of_c_600_IMP_Cu10_and_the_EDS_maps_of_Cu_Mg_and_Al_distribution FigureS9._SEM_micrographs_of_d_800_IMP_Cu10_and_the_EDS_maps_of_Cu_Mg_and_Al_distribution FigureS9._SEM_micrographs_of_e_600_MgAl_and_the_EDS_maps_of_Mg_and_Al_distribution FigureS9._SEM_micrographs_of_f_800_MgAl_and_the_EDS_maps_of_Mg_and_Al_distribution FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_600_IMP_Cu5 FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_600_IMP_Cu10 FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_600_IMP_Cu15 FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_800_IMP_Cu5 FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_800_IMP_Cu10 FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_800_IMP_Cu15 FigureS11._UV_vis_DRS_absorption_bands_at_550_900_nm_series600_series800 FigureS12A._High_resolution_XPS_spectra_of_Mg_2p_for_series600 FigureS12B._High_resolution_XPS_spectra_of_Mg_2p_for_series800 FigureS13A._High_resolution_XPS_spectra_of_Al_2p_for_series600 FigureS13B._High_resolution_XPS_spectra_of_Al_2p_for_series800 Data_FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_600_IMP_Cu5 Data_FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_600_IMP_Cu10 Data_FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_600_IMP_Cu15 Data_FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_800_IMP_Cu5 Data_FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_800_IMP_Cu10 Data_FigureS10._Deconvolution_of_the_H2_TPR_profiles_of_sample_800_IMP_Cu15 Data_FigureS11._UV_vis_DRS_absorption_bands_at_550_900_series600 Data_FigureS11._UV_vis_DRS_absorption_bands_at_550_900_series800 7. Funding: This work was supported by the following: The work was supported by the OP JAK project "INOVO!!!", No. CZ.02.01.01/00/23_021/0008588 supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports and co-financed by the European Union. Experimental results were accomplished by using Large Research Infrastructure ENREGAT supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under project No. LM2023056. The XPS study was carried out using research infrastructure funded by the European Union in the framework of the Smart Growth Operational Programme, Measure 4.2; Grant No. POIR.04.02.00-00-D001/20, “ATOMIN 2.0 – Center for materials research on ATOMic scale for the INnovative economy”. The financial support of the Strategic Programme Excellence Initiative at Jagiellonian University, used for servicing measurement systems, is also appreciated.