Published June 13, 2025
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
The use of artificial intelligence for analysing the impact of Military Technical Cooperation on political alliance establishment in XX-XXI centuries
Description
The aim of the study is to determine the influence of Military Technical Cooperation (MTC) on establishing of the MPAs through the analysis of historical data and key political, economic, military, and socio-cultural factors, taking into account the geopolitical context and strategic interests of states. The study employed the following methods: identification of key influencing factors, multifactor analysis, retrospective analysis, correlation convergent comparative analysis, artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis. The study confirmed that MTC is not a sufficient condition for establishing of the MPAs, and its influence is determined by a combination of political, economic, military, and socio-cultural factors. AI-based analysis was used to process 20+ datasets covering over 200 years of historical data and 3,500+ states. Correlation convergence comparative analysis showed that establishing of the MPAs more often depends on the strategic interests of states than on the MTC.
Files
articulo 71_iryna.pdf
Files
(2.1 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:1ac811654646a10c81a1c6dad2b54a90
|
2.1 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Adisa, O. O. (2025). The cold war resurgence: A discourse on the rivalry between ECOWAS and AES in west Africa. International Journal of Social Sciences and English Literature, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55220/2576683x.v9.244
- Aryal, S. K., & Bharti, S. S. (2025). India's post-independence strategic culture: A case study of India's cooperation with the United States and Russia in military modernization. Journal of Asian and African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096251313553
- Ashidiqi, M. M., Dwi, R., Sasmita, A. W., & Gunawan, W. (2024). Defense policy: A look at bilateral cooperation. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan): Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Politik Daerah, 9(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.9.2.2024.104-117
- Baranovsky, F., Kamionka, M., & Melnyk, H. (2024). Polish military diplomacy concerning Ukraine in 2022-2024: Between centrism and peripherality of direction. Balkan Social Science Review, 24(24), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.46763/bssr242424281b
- Bolt, P. J. (2025). Strategic stability in a new era. Frontiers in Political Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1504361
- Brown, D., & James, P. (2017). The religious characteristics of States: Classic themes and new evidence for international relations and comparative politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(6), 1340-1376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717729882
- But, S. A. (2024). Peculiarities of international military-technical cooperation. Hileya: Scientific Bulletin/Gileya, https://doi.org/10.31392/Hileya-POLITICAL-2024.7-8(197-198).06
- Davies, S., Engström, G., Pettersson, T., & Öberg, M. (2024). Organized violence 1989–2023, and the prevalence of organized crime groups. Journal of Peace Research, 61(4), 673-693. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433241262912
- Department of War Studies. (2025). Research. King's College London. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/warstudies/research
- Diehl, P. F., Goertz, G., & Gallegos, Y. (2021). Peace data: Concept, measurement, patterns, and research agenda. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894219870288
- Dimitrova, S., & Kikste, K. (2024). Prerequisites for the establishment of the Baltic-Black sea union. Environment. Technologies. Resources. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 1, 111–115. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol1.7962
- Fayet, H., Futter, A., Kühn, U., Kulesa, Ł., van Hooft, P., & Bruusgaard, K. V. (2025). Forum: European nuclear deterrence and Donald Trump. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 67(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2025.2459011
- Gibler, D. M., & Miller, S. V. (2023). The militarized interstate events (MIE) dataset, 1816–2014. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 41(4), 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942231182674
- Hovsepyan, L., & Tonoyan, A. A. (2024). From alliance to 'soft conquest': The anatomy of the Turkish-Azerbaijani military alliance before and after the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 35(4), 622-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2024.2312957
- Ilnytska, U. (2024). Regional Alliance-Lublin Triangle: Geopolitical priorities and dynamics of foreign policy transformation in the context of security challenges and threats. Language, Culture, Politics. International Journal, 1(9), 115-131. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1282394
- Institute for the Study of War. (2025). Research. https://www.understandingwar.org/research
- International Institute for Strategic Studies (via World Bank). (2025). Armed forces personnel. World Development Indicators. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0037712/World-Development-Indicators
- Julius AI. (2025). Main page. https://julius.ai/
- Kelleher, C. (2025). World alliances. Github. https://github.com/curran/world-alliances?tab=readme-ov-file
- Khalid, F. H., & Ahmed, N. (2024). From alliance building to strategic partnerships: A historical analysis of defence diplomacy. JANUS NET E-Journal of International Relations, 15(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.15.1.1
- Kucukdegirmenci, O. (2024). CICA and China's soft balancing act towards the US. The Pacific Review, 38(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2024.2320718
- Kumar, R. (2024). Russia–China strategic alignment: Are they headed towards a military alliance? China Report, 60(2), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455241287292
- Kuo, T. Y. (2025). Establishing military cooperation between Taiwan and Japan: Policy suggestions and problems. In: Karalekas, D., Liu, F.-K., & Matsumura, M. (Eds.), Enhancing East Asian security coordination (pp. 39-56). https://doi.org/10.1142/13987
- Lummack, R. (2025). Defence and military reform in Ukraine 2014-2022 [Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa]. University of Ottawa. https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-30833
- Lyall, J. (2022). Replication data for: Divided armies. Harvard Dataverse, V2. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/DUO7IE
- Military Alliances. UCDP Actor Dataset Version 24.1. (2024). Uppsala conflict data program and peace research institute Oslo. https://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/index.html#armedconflict
- Our World in Data. (2024). Peaceful and hostile relationships between states. Only country-pairs that have a relationship are included. Global change data lab. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/peaceful-and-hostile-relationships-between-states
- Political Regime Classification by Source. (2024). Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/political-regime-classification-by-source
- Political Regime. The V-Dem Dataset. (2024). The Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://v-dem.net/data/the-v-dem-dataset/
- Rasshyvalov, D., Portnov, Y., Sigaieva, T., Alboshchii, O., & Rozumnyi, O. (2024). Navigating geopolitical risks: Implications for global supply chain management. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7, 2024spe017. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe017
- Shchokin, R., Soloviov, O., & Tantsiura, I. (2023). Strengthening cooperation between the civilian and military sectors in the context of state security: Benefits and challenges. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 83, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.83.11
- Stekić, N. (2024). Analysing comprehensive strategic partnership between Сhina and Serbia: Political, economic, and military-technical relations. In: Sahakyan, M. (ed.), Routledge handbook of Chinese and Eurasian international relations (pp. 214–227). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003439110-18
- Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2025). Military spending as a share of GDP. SIPRI: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685
- Swedish Defence University. (2025). War studies. https://www.fhs.se/en/swedish-defence-university/research/our-research/war-studies.html
- The University of Alabama. (2025). States involved in interstate conflicts. International Conflict Data Project. https://internationalconflict.ua.edu/data-download/
- The World Bank Group. (2025a). GDP ranking. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0038130/GDP-ranking
- The World Bank Group. (2025b). World Bank country and lending groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
- UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset version 24.1. (2024). States involved in state-based conflicts. https://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/index.html#armedconflict
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2025). Research & development spending as a share of GDP. Research and Development (R&D) SDG 9.5. https://uis.unesco.org/bdds
- United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Human Development Report. Breaking the gridlock: Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2023-24
- World Values Survey Association. (2022). Cultural traditions and values. World Values Survey (WVS) V3.0 https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp
- Wyczawski, T., & Dudek, M. (2024). NATO's regional security in the context of military-defensive cooperation between Russia and Belarus: A Polish perspective on Eastern European stability. Acta Humanitatis, 2(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.5709/ah-02.02.2024-04
- Yu, L. (2024). China-Russia military partnership. In: The rise of China and the China-Russia strategic partnership (pp. 123–159). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0997-0_4