case_images: PMC11828492_01
case_images: Periapical radiograph revealed impacted tooth 11.
case_images: cureus-0017-00000077496-i01.jpg
case_images: PMC11828492_01_cureus-0017-00000077496-i01.jpg
case_images: FIG1
case_images: After two years postoperatively, tooth 11 was noted to be impacted with dilaceration root, which led to an irrational treatment prognosis (Figure 1).
case_images: Following full-thickness flap elevation, a significant interdental bone loss on mesial 12 presented.
case_images: cureus-0017-00000077496-i05.jpg
case_images: PMC11828492_01_cureus-0017-00000077496-i05.jpg
case_images: FIG5
case_images: Following the degranulation of soft tissue, a significant interdental bone loss was presented on the mesial of tooth 12 (Figure 5).
case_images: Placement of bovine-derived xenograft of 0.25 g and acellular dermal matrix membrane.
case_images: cureus-0017-00000077496-i06.jpg
case_images: PMC11828492_01_cureus-0017-00000077496-i06.jpg
case_images: FIG6
case_images: A bovine-derived xenograft of 0.25 g and an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) membrane were placed on the defect (Figure 6).
case_images: Postoperative photograph shows uneventfully healed surgical site (1-week post-op).
case_images: cureus-0017-00000077496-i07.jpg
case_images: PMC11828492_01_cureus-0017-00000077496-i07.jpg
case_images: FIG7
case_images: The patient was reviewed at one week and two weeks (Figures 7-8).
case_images: Postoperative photograph shows clinical presentation (2-week post-op).
case_images: cureus-0017-00000077496-i08.jpg
case_images: PMC11828492_01_cureus-0017-00000077496-i08.jpg
case_images: FIG8
case_images: The patient was reviewed at one week and two weeks (Figures 7-8).
case_images: Postoperative photograph shows clinical presentation (6-month post-op).
case_images: cureus-0017-00000077496-i09.jpg
case_images: PMC11828492_01_cureus-0017-00000077496-i09.jpg
case_images: FIG9
case_images: During the follow-up visits at six months and one year postoperative, increased keratinized tissue was noticed with no gingival recession of tooth 12 (Figures 9-10).
case_images: Postoperative photograph shows clinical presentation (1-year post-op).
case_images: cureus-0017-00000077496-i10.jpg
case_images: PMC11828492_01_cureus-0017-00000077496-i10.jpg
case_images: FIG10
case_images: During the follow-up visits at six months and one year postoperative, increased keratinized tissue was noticed with no gingival recession of tooth 12 (Figures 9-10).
case_images: Periapical radiograph revealed increased radiopacity at the surgical site of 11.
case_images: cureus-0017-00000077496-i11.jpg
case_images: PMC11828492_01_cureus-0017-00000077496-i11.jpg
case_images: FIG11
case_images: The periapical radiograph at one year revealed increased radiopacity at the surgical site (Figure 11).
case_images: The orthodontist has attached an orthodontic bracket to an acrylic tooth in the 11 area as a temporary replacement.
case_images: cureus-0017-00000077496-i12.jpg
case_images: PMC11828492_01_cureus-0017-00000077496-i12.jpg
case_images: FIG12
case_images: The orthodontist has attached an orthodontic bracket to an acrylic tooth in the 11 area as a temporary replacement (Figure 12).