case_images: PMC7479477_01
case_images: Colposcopy.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.001.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: However, it drew the clinical suspicion of the attending gynecologist as an "atypical lesion" which necessitated further thorough evaluation (Figure 1).
case_images: Transvaginal scan image.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.002.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: Analogously with the speculum inspection, TVS revealed at the site of the "discolored lesion" a hyperechogenic area and the relevant acoustic shadow was depicted (Figure 2).
case_images: Pap smear.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.003.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: According to the cytological report, the cytological sample reflected "infiltration of the cervix by lymphoblastic cells" (Figures 3-7).
case_images: Pap smear.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.004.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: According to the cytological report, the cytological sample reflected "infiltration of the cervix by lymphoblastic cells" (Figures 3-7).
case_images: Pap smear.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.005.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: According to the cytological report, the cytological sample reflected "infiltration of the cervix by lymphoblastic cells" (Figures 3-7).
case_images: Pap smear.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.006.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: According to the cytological report, the cytological sample reflected "infiltration of the cervix by lymphoblastic cells" (Figures 3-7).
case_images: Pap smear.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.007.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.007.jpg
case_images: fig7
case_images: According to the cytological report, the cytological sample reflected "infiltration of the cervix by lymphoblastic cells" (Figures 3-7).
case_images: Histology.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.008.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.008.jpg
case_images: fig8
case_images: The histological result confirmed both the clinical impression and the cytological result leading to the diagnosis of "infiltration of the cervix by leukemic blasts" (Figures 8 and 9).
case_images: Histology.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.009.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.009.jpg
case_images: fig9
case_images: The histological result confirmed both the clinical impression and the cytological result leading to the diagnosis of "infiltration of the cervix by leukemic blasts" (Figures 8 and 9).
case_images: MIB 1/Ki-67: positive 100%.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.010.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.010.jpg
case_images: fig10
case_images: The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).
case_images: CD34: weak positive.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.011.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.011.jpg
case_images: fig11
case_images: The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).
case_images: CD45: positive.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.012.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.012.jpg
case_images: fig12
case_images: The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).
case_images: CD20: weak positive.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.013.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.013.jpg
case_images: fig13
case_images: The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).
case_images: CD79A: positive.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.014.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.014.jpg
case_images: fig14
case_images: The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).
case_images: CD10: positive.
case_images: CRIOG2020-8492036.015.jpg
case_images: PMC7479477_01_CRIOG2020-8492036.015.jpg
case_images: fig15
case_images: The positive Clusters of Differentiation (CD) were CDs 34, 45, 20, 79A, and 10 together with the marker MIB 1/Ki-67 (Figures 10-15).