case_images: PMC3804808_01
case_images: X-ray show a destructive bone lesion in the left distal femur.
case_images: rt-2013-3-e33-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC3804808_01_rt-2013-3-e33-g001.jpg
case_images: fig001
case_images: The patient was seen by different physicians and finally an orthopedic surgeon did order a plain X-ray that showed a destructive bone lesion in her left distal femur with a permeative pattern (Figure 1).
case_images: Computed tomography scan shows the lesion, located in meta-diaphysial area.
case_images: rt-2013-3-e33-g002.jpg
case_images: PMC3804808_01_rt-2013-3-e33-g002.jpg
case_images: fig002
case_images: Computed tomography (CT) scanning (Figure 2) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Figure 3) showed that the lesion was located in meta-diaphysial area and it had eroded the anterior bone cortex of left femur, but there was no soft tissue extension by the lesion.
case_images: Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the lesion was located in meta-diaphysial area and it had eroded the anterior bone cortex of left femur.
case_images: rt-2013-3-e33-g003.jpg
case_images: PMC3804808_01_rt-2013-3-e33-g003.jpg
case_images: fig003
case_images: Computed tomography (CT) scanning (Figure 2) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Figure 3) showed that the lesion was located in meta-diaphysial area and it had eroded the anterior bone cortex of left femur, but there was no soft tissue extension by the lesion.
case_images: Primary giant cell tumor of bone (Haematoxylin and Eosin).
case_images: rt-2013-3-e33-g004.jpg
case_images: PMC3804808_01_rt-2013-3-e33-g004.jpg
case_images: fig004
case_images: The result was compatible with primary giant cell tumor of bone (Figure 4).