case_images: PMC2801015_01
case_images: CT Scan findings of fibroepithelial polyp of left kidney.
case_images: AU2009-721469.001.jpg
case_images: PMC2801015_01_AU2009-721469.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: A subsequent CT-Scan (pre- and postcontrast) confirmed the presence of a 13 mm mass arising within the left renal pelvis and extending into the upper pole of the kidney (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)).
case_images: Macroscopic view of fibroepithelial polyp of the kidney within the nephroscopic sheath following application of the 25 mm Amplatz GOOSE NECK Snare to the polyps base.
case_images: AU2009-721469.002.jpg
case_images: PMC2801015_01_AU2009-721469.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: A 30 Fr nephroscope was introduced and the fibroepithelial polyp was visualized (Figure 2). A 25 mm Amplatz GOOSE NECK Snare (Figure 3) was deployed across the base of the fibroepithelial polyp and this was subsequently excised in situ (Figure 4).
case_images: A 25 mm Amplatz GOOSE NECK Snare.
case_images: AU2009-721469.003.jpg
case_images: PMC2801015_01_AU2009-721469.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: A 30 Fr nephroscope was introduced and the fibroepithelial polyp was visualized (Figure 2). A 25 mm Amplatz GOOSE NECK Snare (Figure 3) was deployed across the base of the fibroepithelial polyp and this was subsequently excised in situ (Figure 4).
case_images: Macroscopic view of base of the fibroepithelial polyp of the kidney following excision with 25 mm Amplatz GOOSE NECK Snare.
case_images: AU2009-721469.004.jpg
case_images: PMC2801015_01_AU2009-721469.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: A 30 Fr nephroscope was introduced and the fibroepithelial polyp was visualized (Figure 2). A 25 mm Amplatz GOOSE NECK Snare (Figure 3) was deployed across the base of the fibroepithelial polyp and this was subsequently excised in situ (Figure 4).
case_images: Postoperative intravenous urogram findings confirming the absence of any recurrent fibroepithelial polyp of left kidney.
case_images: AU2009-721469.005.jpg
case_images: PMC2801015_01_AU2009-721469.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: Postoperative imaging performed 6 months later showed no filling defect within the left renal pelvis or evidence of any new filling defect (Figure 5).