case_images: PMC5656708_01
case_images: Example of diagrammatic case formulation
case_images: 10608_2017_9862_Fig1_HTML.jpg
case_images: PMC5656708_01_10608_2017_9862_Fig1_HTML.jpg
case_images: Fig1
case_images: In session 1, an idiosyncratic case formulation based on the transdiagnostic metacognitive model (Wells) was developed using the case formulation template (see Fig. 1).
case_images: Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Total (left y-axis) and time spent worrying/ruminating over the previous week (right y-axis) across baseline, treatment, and follow-up phases for each patient
case_images: 10608_2017_9862_Fig2_HTML.jpg
case_images: PMC5656708_01_10608_2017_9862_Fig2_HTML.jpg
case_images: Fig2
case_images: The results of these two outcome variables are shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 2. For the secondary outcomes, end of baseline, post-treatment and follow-up scores are presented in Fig. 3.
case_images: Scores on secondary outcomes scales at end-of-baseline, post-treatment and follow-up for each patient. FCRI Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, MCQ-30 Metacognitions Questionnaire-30
case_images: 10608_2017_9862_Fig3_HTML.jpg
case_images: PMC5656708_01_10608_2017_9862_Fig3_HTML.jpg
case_images: Fig3
case_images: Fig. 2. For the secondary outcomes, end of baseline, post-treatment and follow-up scores are presented in Fig. 3.