case_images: PMC3504211_01
case_images: Lateral view and AP view radiographs of the knee taken upon presentation at the Accident and Emergency Department.
case_images: CRIM.ORTHOPEDICS2012-230430.001.jpg
case_images: PMC3504211_01_CRIM.ORTHOPEDICS2012-230430.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: AP view and lateral view radiographs of the knee prior to replacing the mobile bearing.
case_images: CRIM.ORTHOPEDICS2012-230430.002.jpg
case_images: PMC3504211_01_CRIM.ORTHOPEDICS2012-230430.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: Spontaneous relocation was considered (Figure 2), but due to concerns regarding recurrent dislocation and possible damage to the bearing, a mini-open approach to the knee was made, and the bearing was observed to have relocated.
case_images: Lateral view and AP view radiograph of the knee taken following operation.
case_images: CRIM.ORTHOPEDICS2012-230430.003.jpg
case_images: PMC3504211_01_CRIM.ORTHOPEDICS2012-230430.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: However, it had significant wear on its superior articular surface in the form of pitting and a small area of delamination of about five squared millimetres, and it was replaced by a 7 mm polyethylene liner (Figure 3).