case_images: PMC10996861_01
case_images: Summary of the results for the CE1, using RF. (A) Detailed performance for the old female subgroup. (B) Detailed performance for the young female subgroup. (C) Detailed performance for the young male subgroup. (D) Detailed performance for the old male subgroup.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g006.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_01_fncom-18-1357607-g006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: The results of CE1 are elaborated in Figures 6-9. However, a stark contrast is observed in the Female Young subgroup (Figures 6B-9B), where the three normative individuals display significantly lower results compared to the SMS group. In the final subgroup, Male Old (Figures 6D-9D), both normative and SMS individuals demonstrate low detection rates.
case_images: Summary of the results for the CE1, using KNN. (A) Detailed performance for the old female subgroup. (B) Detailed performance for the young female subgroup. (C) Detailed performance for the young male subgroup. (D) Detailed performance for the old male subgroup.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g007.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_01_fncom-18-1357607-g007.jpg
case_images: fig7
case_images: The results of CE1 are elaborated in Figures 6-9. However, a stark contrast is observed in the Female Young subgroup (Figures 6B-9B), where the three normative individuals display significantly lower results compared to the SMS group. In the final subgroup, Male Old (Figures 6D-9D), both normative and SMS individuals demonstrate low detection rates.
case_images: Summary of the results for the CE1, using SVM. (A) Detailed performance for the old female subgroup. (B) Detailed performance for the young female subgroup. (C) Detailed performance for the young male subgroup. (D) Detailed performance for the old male subgroup.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g008.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_02_fncom-18-1357607-g008.jpg
case_images: fig8
case_images: The individual 11OADS depicts a considerable increase in SVM detection from 0 to 0.815 (Figures 8D vs. 12D) and an increase from 0 to 0.577 in LDA (Figures 9D vs. 13D).
case_images: Summary of the results for the CE1, using LDA. (A) Detailed performance for the old female subgroup. (B) Detailed performance for the young female subgroup. (C) Detailed performance for the young male subgroup. (D) Detailed performance for the old male subgroup.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g009.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_02_fncom-18-1357607-g009.jpg
case_images: fig9
case_images: The individual 11OADS depicts a considerable increase in SVM detection from 0 to 0.815 (Figures 8D vs. 12D) and an increase from 0 to 0.577 in LDA (Figures 9D vs. 13D).
case_images: PMC10996861_02
case_images: Normotypic vs. nonnormotypic CPP decomposition by sex and group.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g002.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_02_fncom-18-1357607-g002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: Figures 10-13 depict the outputs of CE2.
case_images: Summary of the results for the CE1, using SVM. (A) Detailed performance for the old female subgroup. (B) Detailed performance for the young female subgroup. (C) Detailed performance for the young male subgroup. (D) Detailed performance for the old male subgroup.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g008.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_02_fncom-18-1357607-g008.jpg
case_images: fig8
case_images: The individual 11OADS depicts a considerable increase in SVM detection from 0 to 0.815 (Figures 8D vs. 12D) and an increase from 0 to 0.577 in LDA (Figures 9D vs. 13D).
case_images: Summary of the results for the CE1, using LDA. (A) Detailed performance for the old female subgroup. (B) Detailed performance for the young female subgroup. (C) Detailed performance for the young male subgroup. (D) Detailed performance for the old male subgroup.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g009.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_02_fncom-18-1357607-g009.jpg
case_images: fig9
case_images: The individual 11OADS depicts a considerable increase in SVM detection from 0 to 0.815 (Figures 8D vs. 12D) and an increase from 0 to 0.577 in LDA (Figures 9D vs. 13D).
case_images: Summary of the results for the CE2, using RF. (A) Detailed performance for the old female subgroup. (B) Detailed performance for the young female subgroup. (C) Detailed performance for the young male subgroup. (D) Detailed performance for the old male subgroup.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g010.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_02_fncom-18-1357607-g010.jpg
case_images: fig10
case_images: Figures 10-13 depict the outputs of CE2. In Figures 10A-13A, there is a noticeable enhancement in the detection of 10AGPC compared to the previous case, notwithstanding with a minor decline for SMS11. In the Female Young subgroup (Figures 10B-13B), detection rates for subjects 517A and 637A have increased, but performance for patient SMS06 has decreased. In the Male Old subgroup (Figures 10D-13D), all normative subjects exhibit improvements in their detection rates, despite a minor decrease for subjects SMS07 and SMS08. Lastly, the Male Young subgroup (Figures 10C-13C) mirrors the Male Old, with improved detection for all normative individuals and a slight decrease for SMS.
case_images: Summary of the results for the CE2, using KNN. (A) Detailed performance for the old female subgroup. (B) Detailed performance for the young female subgroup. (C) Detailed performance for the young male subgroup. (D) Detailed performance for the old male subgroup.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g011.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_02_fncom-18-1357607-g011.jpg
case_images: fig11
case_images: Figures 10-13 depict the outputs of CE2. In Figures 10A-13A, there is a noticeable enhancement in the detection of 10AGPC compared to the previous case, notwithstanding with a minor decline for SMS11. In the Female Young subgroup (Figures 10B-13B), detection rates for subjects 517A and 637A have increased, but performance for patient SMS06 has decreased. In the Male Old subgroup (Figures 10D-13D), all normative subjects exhibit improvements in their detection rates, despite a minor decrease for subjects SMS07 and SMS08. Lastly, the Male Young subgroup (Figures 10C-13C) mirrors the Male Old, with improved detection for all normative individuals and a slight decrease for SMS.
case_images: Summary of the results for the CE2, using SVM. (A) Detailed performance for the old female subgroup. (B) Detailed performance for the young female subgroup. (C) Detailed performance for the young male subgroup. (D) Detailed performance for the old male subgroup.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g012.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_02_fncom-18-1357607-g012.jpg
case_images: fig12
case_images: Figures 10-13 depict the outputs of CE2. In Figures 10A-13A, there is a noticeable enhancement in the detection of 10AGPC compared to the previous case, notwithstanding with a minor decline for SMS11. In the Female Young subgroup (Figures 10B-13B), detection rates for subjects 517A and 637A have increased, but performance for patient SMS06 has decreased. In the Male Old subgroup (Figures 10D-13D), all normative subjects exhibit improvements in their detection rates, despite a minor decrease for subjects SMS07 and SMS08. Lastly, the Male Young subgroup (Figures 10C-13C) mirrors the Male Old, with improved detection for all normative individuals and a slight decrease for SMS. For 637A (Female Young), there is a global enhancement in detection across methods, with both SVM and LDA (Figures 12B, 13B) yielding favorable results.
case_images: Summary of the results for the CE2, using LDA. (A) Detailed performance for the old female subgroup. (B) Detailed performance for the young female subgroup. (C) Detailed performance for the young male subgroup. (D) Detailed performance for the old male subgroup.
case_images: fncom-18-1357607-g013.jpg
case_images: PMC10996861_02_fncom-18-1357607-g013.jpg
case_images: fig13
case_images: Figures 10-13 depict the outputs of CE2. In Figures 10A-13A, there is a noticeable enhancement in the detection of 10AGPC compared to the previous case, notwithstanding with a minor decline for SMS11. In the Female Young subgroup (Figures 10B-13B), detection rates for subjects 517A and 637A have increased, but performance for patient SMS06 has decreased. In the Male Old subgroup (Figures 10D-13D), all normative subjects exhibit improvements in their detection rates, despite a minor decrease for subjects SMS07 and SMS08. Lastly, the Male Young subgroup (Figures 10C-13C) mirrors the Male Old, with improved detection for all normative individuals and a slight decrease for SMS. For 637A (Female Young), there is a global enhancement in detection across methods, with both SVM and LDA (Figures 12B, 13B) yielding favorable results.