case_images: PMC6546918_01
case_images: Electrocardiograms of proband and family members at baseline and after ajmaline challenge. Proband's father (II-7), proband (III-3), and proband's youngest sister (III-6) exhibit the BrS type 1 pattern after ajmaline administration, confirming the BrS diagnosis. Proband's second eldest sister (III-2) and brothers (III-4 and III-5) are ajmaline negative.
case_images: fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC6546918_07_fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: Therefore, an ajmaline challenge was performed and confirmed the BrS diagnosis (Figure 1).
case_images: Arrhythmogenic substrate characterization in Proband and Father. Electrocardiogram (left) demonstrates the type 1 BrS pattern after ajmaline administration, confirming the diagnosis. Potential duration map after ajmaline infusion (center) reveals the full extent of the arrhythmogenic substrate. The area of the substrate exhibiting potential durations at least 160 ms in duration is denoted by the "marked area" and is 13.7 cm2 for Proband and 16.6 cm2 for Proband's father. The duration of fragmented potentials (right) were prolonged and measured 272 ms for Proband and 325 ms for Proband's father.
case_images: fphys-10-00666-g002.jpg
case_images: PMC6546918_02_fphys-10-00666-g002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: BrS arrhythmogenic substrate ablation with a technique based on a transcatheterial application of radiofrequency (Figure 2). Both these procedures were successful and without any operative or postoperative complications.
case_images: Identification of the c. 4894C>T (p.Arg1632CyS) missense mutation in the SCN5A gene. NGS paired-end reads loaded in the IGV genome browser. The arrow indicates the position of the single nucleotide variation in SCN5A gene in the proband (A) compared to a wild type control sample (B). SCN5A gene is in the reverse orientation on the chromosome. Sanger sequencing electropherogram confirm the presence of the variants in the proband (C) and the absence in a wild type control (D).
case_images: fphys-10-00666-g003.jpg
case_images: PMC6546918_01_fphys-10-00666-g003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: PMC6546918_02
case_images: Electrocardiograms of proband and family members at baseline and after ajmaline challenge. Proband's father (II-7), proband (III-3), and proband's youngest sister (III-6) exhibit the BrS type 1 pattern after ajmaline administration, confirming the BrS diagnosis. Proband's second eldest sister (III-2) and brothers (III-4 and III-5) are ajmaline negative.
case_images: fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC6546918_07_fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: Therefore, an ajmaline challenge was performed and confirmed the BrS diagnosis (Figure 1).
case_images: Arrhythmogenic substrate characterization in Proband and Father. Electrocardiogram (left) demonstrates the type 1 BrS pattern after ajmaline administration, confirming the diagnosis. Potential duration map after ajmaline infusion (center) reveals the full extent of the arrhythmogenic substrate. The area of the substrate exhibiting potential durations at least 160 ms in duration is denoted by the "marked area" and is 13.7 cm2 for Proband and 16.6 cm2 for Proband's father. The duration of fragmented potentials (right) were prolonged and measured 272 ms for Proband and 325 ms for Proband's father.
case_images: fphys-10-00666-g002.jpg
case_images: PMC6546918_02_fphys-10-00666-g002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: BrS arrhythmogenic substrate ablation with a technique based on a transcatheterial application of radiofrequency (Figure 2). Both these procedures were successful and without any operative or postoperative complications.
case_images: Family pedigree. Proband identified with arrow. Square: male; circle: female; slash: deceased; grayed: clinically affected by Brugada syndrome; star: molecularly confirmed SCN5A variant; star with slash: genetic test for SCN5A variant performed but negative.
case_images: fphys-10-00666-g004.jpg
case_images: PMC6546918_02_fphys-10-00666-g004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: He came to our attention for familial history of BrS (in his son, the proband: see family tree, Figure 4).
case_images: PMC6546918_03
case_images: PMC6546918_04
case_images: Electrocardiograms of proband and family members at baseline and after ajmaline challenge. Proband's father (II-7), proband (III-3), and proband's youngest sister (III-6) exhibit the BrS type 1 pattern after ajmaline administration, confirming the BrS diagnosis. Proband's second eldest sister (III-2) and brothers (III-4 and III-5) are ajmaline negative.
case_images: fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC6546918_07_fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: Therefore, an ajmaline challenge was performed and confirmed the BrS diagnosis (Figure 1).
case_images: PMC6546918_05
case_images: Electrocardiograms of proband and family members at baseline and after ajmaline challenge. Proband's father (II-7), proband (III-3), and proband's youngest sister (III-6) exhibit the BrS type 1 pattern after ajmaline administration, confirming the BrS diagnosis. Proband's second eldest sister (III-2) and brothers (III-4 and III-5) are ajmaline negative.
case_images: fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC6546918_07_fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: Therefore, an ajmaline challenge was performed and confirmed the BrS diagnosis (Figure 1).
case_images: PMC6546918_06
case_images: Electrocardiograms of proband and family members at baseline and after ajmaline challenge. Proband's father (II-7), proband (III-3), and proband's youngest sister (III-6) exhibit the BrS type 1 pattern after ajmaline administration, confirming the BrS diagnosis. Proband's second eldest sister (III-2) and brothers (III-4 and III-5) are ajmaline negative.
case_images: fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC6546918_07_fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: Therefore, an ajmaline challenge was performed and confirmed the BrS diagnosis (Figure 1).
case_images: PMC6546918_07
case_images: Electrocardiograms of proband and family members at baseline and after ajmaline challenge. Proband's father (II-7), proband (III-3), and proband's youngest sister (III-6) exhibit the BrS type 1 pattern after ajmaline administration, confirming the BrS diagnosis. Proband's second eldest sister (III-2) and brothers (III-4 and III-5) are ajmaline negative.
case_images: fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC6546918_07_fphys-10-00666-g001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: Therefore, an ajmaline challenge was performed and confirmed the BrS diagnosis (Figure 1).