case_images: PMC8536442_01
case_images: Anteroposterior pelvis radiograph.
case_images: CRIOR2021-6864910.001.jpg
case_images: PMC8536442_01_CRIOR2021-6864910.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: X-ray and CT taken in the previous hospital showed few dislocations of the sacral fracture (Figure 1).
case_images: CT ((a) axial, (b) sagittal, and (c) coronal) showing displaced bilateral sacral alar fractures. L5 was bonny fused with S1.
case_images: CRIOR2021-6864910.002.jpg
case_images: PMC8536442_01_CRIOR2021-6864910.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: CT taken at our hospital showed that the dislocation of the sacral fracture had worsened (Figure 2).
case_images: Postoperative X-ray of anteroposterior, inlet view, outlet view, and lateral view.
case_images: CRIOR2021-6864910.003.jpg
case_images: PMC8536442_01_CRIOR2021-6864910.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: Constructs were made using spinal instruments (Solera, Medtronic Co., Dublin, Ireland) (Figure 3).
case_images: CT examinations (postoperative 6 months) ((a) axial, (b) sagittal, and (c) coronal) showing the fracture united.
case_images: CRIOR2021-6864910.004.jpg
case_images: PMC8536442_01_CRIOR2021-6864910.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: CT examinations (postoperative 6 months) were performed to determine the progress of bone union (Figure 4).