case_images: PMC6579837_01
case_images: Custom designed prosthesis.
case_images: fvets-06-00182-g0001.jpg
case_images: PMC6579837_01_fvets-06-00182-g0001.jpg
case_images: F1
case_images: The prostheses elements are pictured in Figure 1.
case_images: Intraoperative radiograph to assess implant position and alignment.
case_images: fvets-06-00182-g0002.jpg
case_images: PMC6579837_01_fvets-06-00182-g0002.jpg
case_images: F2
case_images: ITAP implant was inserted and pushed into position with a slap-hammer and secured by one 3.5 mm and two 2.7 mm locking screws both at the dorsal and medial plate. Intraoperative radiographs were taken to assess the implant position and its alignment before the final tightening of locking screws (Figure 2).
case_images: Radiogram at 8 weeks after implantation.
case_images: fvets-06-00182-g0003.jpg
case_images: PMC6579837_01_fvets-06-00182-g0003.jpg
case_images: F3
case_images: A radiographic examination at 8 weeks revealed thickening and bone remodeling around the distal end of the bone (Figure 3).
case_images: Skin-implant junction infested with larvae of the screwworm fly.
case_images: fvets-06-00182-g0004.jpg
case_images: PMC6579837_01_fvets-06-00182-g0004.jpg
case_images: F4
case_images: It was observed that the subsequent infection with sanguine-purulent discharge affected the skin and subcutaneous tissue around the prosthesis (Figure 4).