case_images: PMC3169809_01
case_images: Frontal view (pretreatment).
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-586854.001.jpg
case_images: PMC3169809_01_DENTISTRY2011-586854.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: The enamel layer was very thin and Brown (pigmented), the cuspal structure was completely absent in the occlusal portion of the molars which were most severely affected, and enamel pit defects (pigmented stains deep) were present in the anterior teeth (Figures 1, 2, and 3).
case_images: Occlusal view of the maxillary arch (pretreatment mirror view).
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-586854.002.jpg
case_images: PMC3169809_01_DENTISTRY2011-586854.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: The enamel layer was very thin and Brown (pigmented), the cuspal structure was completely absent in the occlusal portion of the molars which were most severely affected, and enamel pit defects (pigmented stains deep) were present in the anterior teeth (Figures 1, 2, and 3).
case_images: Occlusal view of the mandibular arch (pretreatment mirror view).
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-586854.003.jpg
case_images: PMC3169809_01_DENTISTRY2011-586854.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: The enamel layer was very thin and Brown (pigmented), the cuspal structure was completely absent in the occlusal portion of the molars which were most severely affected, and enamel pit defects (pigmented stains deep) were present in the anterior teeth (Figures 1, 2, and 3).
case_images: Frontal view of the left and right sides (posttreatment).
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-586854.004.jpg
case_images: PMC3169809_01_DENTISTRY2011-586854.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: Paul, MN, US) (Figures 4, 5, and 6). 
case_images: Occlusal view of the maxillary arch (posttreatment mirror view).
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-586854.005.jpg
case_images: PMC3169809_01_DENTISTRY2011-586854.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: Paul, MN, US) (Figures 4, 5, and 6). 
case_images: Occlusal view of the mandibular arch (posttreatment mirror view).
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-586854.006.jpg
case_images: PMC3169809_01_DENTISTRY2011-586854.006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: Paul, MN, US) (Figures 4, 5, and 6). 
case_images: Control view after 24 months.
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-586854.007.jpg
case_images: PMC3169809_01_DENTISTRY2011-586854.007.jpg
case_images: fig7
case_images: The 24-month recall clinical and radiographic examination revealed no pathology associated with the rehabilitation, and the patient's aesthetic and functional expectations were satisfied (Figure 7).