case_images: PMC5366199_01
case_images: The upper gastrointestinal contrast study finding (supine position). The proximal duodenum was markedly dilated, which suggested duodenal obstruction.
case_images: CRIPE2017-2074387.001.jpg
case_images: PMC5366199_01_CRIPE2017-2074387.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: An upper gastrointestinal contrast study showed marked dilation of the proximal duodenum which suggested duodenal obstruction (Figure 1).
case_images: The gastroduodenal endoscopy findings. A pin-hole obstruction about 2 mm in diameter was found at the second portion of the duodenum (arrow).
case_images: CRIPE2017-2074387.002.jpg
case_images: PMC5366199_01_CRIPE2017-2074387.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: A gastroduodenal endoscopy revealed a pin-hole obstruction of about 2 mm in diameter at the second portion of the duodenum (Figure 2).
case_images: The surgical findings. The longitudinal incision of the duodenum revealed a thick web stenosis of the duodenum with a very small central hole.
case_images: CRIPE2017-2074387.003.jpg
case_images: PMC5366199_01_CRIPE2017-2074387.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: The longitudinal incision of the duodenum revealed a thick web stenosis of the duodenum with a very small central hole (Figure 3).
case_images: Wound scar at one year after surgery. The cosmetic outcome was good at the one-year follow-up.
case_images: CRIPE2017-2074387.004.jpg
case_images: PMC5366199_01_CRIPE2017-2074387.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: The body weight gain after surgery was favorable, and the cosmetic outcome is good after 1 year of follow-up (Figure 4).