case_images: PMC9509221_01
case_images: Treatment variation considering the phototherapy and fire needle combination.
case_images: BMRI2022-6984149.002.jpg
case_images: PMC9509221_01_BMRI2022-6984149.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: Combining phototherapy and fire needles, Figure 2 depicts the total treatment procedures involved in the system.
case_images: Risk bias tool for assessing different trials (Min, Med, and Max).
case_images: BMRI2022-6984149.003.jpg
case_images: PMC9509221_01_BMRI2022-6984149.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: The variation of the outcomes is shown in Figure 3.
case_images: Effectiveness rate using NP formula using different trials.
case_images: BMRI2022-6984149.004.jpg
case_images: PMC9509221_01_BMRI2022-6984149.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: The total trials considered (13, 13, 12, 15, 24, 26, 27, 32, 15, 17, and 18) are used by the total patients, whose outcomes are statistically determined using the total effectiveness rate calculated with the NP formula.  Figure 4 depicts risk trials which correspond to the diagram.
case_images: Effectiveness rate using NVSL formula using different trials.
case_images: BMRI2022-6984149.005.jpg
case_images: PMC9509221_01_BMRI2022-6984149.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: Comparison of RCT+fire needles+phototherapy methods vs. other methods.
case_images: BMRI2022-6984149.006.jpg
case_images: PMC9509221_01_BMRI2022-6984149.006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: This is illustrated in Figure 6.
case_images: The outcome predicted for different methods and trials.
case_images: BMRI2022-6984149.007.jpg
case_images: PMC9509221_01_BMRI2022-6984149.007.jpg
case_images: fig7