case_images: PMC8191563_01
case_images: Baseline clinical view
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_01_NJMS-12-109-g001.jpg
case_images: F1
case_images: In addition, the contour of the ridge was strangely serpentine in the form with unfavorable frenal attachments [Figure 1].
case_images: Preoperative cone-beam scans scout view and cross sections
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g002.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_01_NJMS-12-109-g002.jpg
case_images: F2
case_images: PMC8191563_02
case_images: PMC8191563_03
case_images: PMC8191563_04
case_images: Diagrammatic illustration of incision
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g003.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_04_NJMS-12-109-g003.jpg
case_images: F3
case_images: The site was exposed through a crestal incision as illustrated in Figure 3; the palatal flaps were sutured together for better retraction and exposure of the field.
case_images: Exposure of operative site
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g004.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_04_NJMS-12-109-g004.jpg
case_images: F4
case_images: Ostectomy with rotary disc
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g005.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_04_NJMS-12-109-g005.jpg
case_images: F5
case_images: Implant placement at preplanned sites
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g006.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_04_NJMS-12-109-g006.jpg
case_images: F6
case_images: Guided bone regeneration
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g007.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_04_NJMS-12-109-g007.jpg
case_images: F7
case_images: In most of the ridge bone graft was placed as a buccal veneer while in some region (#23-25), it was used as a palatal veneer [Figure 7].
case_images: Sutured wound
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g008.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_04_NJMS-12-109-g008.jpg
case_images: F8
case_images: 2-week follow-up
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g009.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_04_NJMS-12-109-g009.jpg
case_images: F9
case_images: PMC8191563_05
case_images: Situation at 3 months
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g010.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_05_NJMS-12-109-g010.jpg
case_images: F10
case_images: There was asymmetry in the amount and location of attached tissue, which required correction before the implants were uncovered [Figure 10].
case_images: Free gingival graft harvest
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g011.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_05_NJMS-12-109-g011.jpg
case_images: F11
case_images: These were about 1.5-2 mm thick and 25-30 mm in length [Figure 11].
case_images: Free gingival graft adapted and secured
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g012.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_05_NJMS-12-109-g012.jpg
case_images: F12
case_images: Grafts were adapted and secured using 5,0 polyglactin sutures (Vicryl, Ethicon) [Figure 12].
case_images: Final view of the arch form with integrated implants
case_images: NJMS-12-109-g013.jpg
case_images: PMC8191563_05_NJMS-12-109-g013.jpg
case_images: F13
case_images: PMC8191563_06