case_images: PMC11287043_01
case_images: Clinical and radiographic follow ups of teeth #11 and #21 from 2005 to 2023: A) March, 2005 clinical photograph at the immediate post-trauma appointment; B) March, 2005 digital periapical radiograph at the immediate post-trauma appointment; C) 15 days after immediate procedures; D, E) 2005 digital periapical radiographs of endodontic procedures; F) 2006 follow up digital periapical radiograph; G) 2007 follow up digital periapical radiograph; H) 2008 follow up digital periapical radiograph; I) 2011 follow up digital periapical radiograph; J) 2015 follow up digital periapical radiograph; K) 2019 follow up digital periapical radiograph; L) 2020 follow up digital periapical radiograph; M) 2021 follow up digital periapical radiograph; N, O) 2023 follow up digital periapical radiograph and clinical picture
case_images: IEJ-19-237-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC11287043_01_IEJ-19-237-g001.jpg
case_images: F1
case_images: After seven days, pulp sensibility tests were performed at the dental ambulatory of Pontific Catholic University of Parana and both teeth had a negative response (Figure 1). After 15 days, tooth #21 presented an acute dentoalveolar abscess with intraoral edema (Figure 1); therefore, immediate endodontic treatment was initiated (modeling and intracanal dressing with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) paste). Teeth were evaluated monthly for two years (Figure 1). An apical barrier closed the root of tooth #21, thus, it was conventionally filled three years after the trauma (Figure 1 and Table 1). 