case_images: PMC5095519_01
case_images: (a) Eight years before surgical excision (17 x 12 x 14 mm). (b) Four years before surgical excision (28 x 18 x 30 mm). (c) Preoperative (60 x 20 x 35 mm).
case_images: icrp_a_1247650_f0001_c.jpg
case_images: PMC5095519_01_icrp_a_1247650_f0001_c.jpg
case_images: F0001
case_images: Computed tomography revealed a mass measuring 28 x 18 x 30 mm in the subcutaneous tissue (Figure 1(b)). We found her previous abdominal computed tomography results and confirmed that the mass had already existed 8 years previously, but it had been much smaller (17 x 12 x 14 mm) (Figure 1).
case_images: (a) Preoperative appearance. (b) The excised mass with indurated subcutaneous fat.
case_images: icrp_a_1247650_f0002_c.jpg
case_images: PMC5095519_01_icrp_a_1247650_f0002_c.jpg
case_images: F0002
case_images: We excised the mass with indurated subcutaneous fat (Figure 2).
case_images: (a,b) The subcutaneous tissue was degenerated broadly (Haematoxylin and eosin staining). (c) Extensive amyloid deposition in the subcutaneous tissue (arrow) (Congo red staining). (d) No evidence of vascular involvement (arrow: subcutaneous artery without amyloid deposition) (Congo red staining).
case_images: icrp_a_1247650_f0003_c.jpg
case_images: PMC5095519_01_icrp_a_1247650_f0003_c.jpg
case_images: F0003
case_images: Amyloid-AA, kappa-chain and lambda-chain were not detected immunohistochemically (Figure 3).