case_images: PMC10152957_01
case_images: (a) computed tomography image showing glenoid bone loss of 25% and (b) coracoid avulsion fracture (arrow).
case_images: JOCR-13-87-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC10152957_01_JOCR-13-87-g001.jpg
case_images: F1
case_images: Computed tomography was done to assess glenoid bone loss and avulsion fracture of coracoid (Fig. 1).
case_images: (a) T2 sequence shows glenoid fracture in coronal section and (b) T2 sequence shows glenoid fracture in sagittal section.
case_images: JOCR-13-87-g002.jpg
case_images: PMC10152957_01_JOCR-13-87-g002.jpg
case_images: F2
case_images: Coracoid fracture belongs to Ogava et al., type II, magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the same (Fig. 2).
case_images: Coracoid fracture fragment graft with attached conjoint tendon.
case_images: JOCR-13-87-g003.jpg
case_images: PMC10152957_01_JOCR-13-87-g003.jpg
case_images: F3
case_images: Fractured fragment with conjoint tendon attachment separated from underlying structures (Fig. 3).
case_images: Graft in situ with cannulated screw (arrow).
case_images: JOCR-13-87-g004.jpg
case_images: PMC10152957_01_JOCR-13-87-g004.jpg
case_images: F4
case_images: After confirming the offset of graft two cannulated cancellous titanium screws of size 36 mm were inserted (Fig. 4).
case_images: (a) post-operative X-ray plain anteroposterior view and (b) post-operative X-ray plain scapulary-Y-view with satisfactory screw position.
case_images: JOCR-13-87-g005.jpg
case_images: PMC10152957_01_JOCR-13-87-g005.jpg
case_images: F5
case_images: The patient called for follow-up at 6-week, 4-month, and 6 months for assessment of pain, range (Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8).
case_images: (a) 6-week follow-up showing 80  abduction, (b) 4-month follow-up showing 110  abduction, and (c) 6-month follow-up showing 180  abduction.
case_images: JOCR-13-87-g006.jpg
case_images: PMC10152957_01_JOCR-13-87-g006.jpg
case_images: F6
case_images: The patient called for follow-up at 6-week, 4-month, and 6 months for assessment of pain, range (Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8).
case_images: (a) 6-week follow-up showing 100  forward flexion, (b) 4-month follow-up showing 150  forward flexion, (c) 6-month follow-up showing 180  forward flexion.
case_images: JOCR-13-87-g007.jpg
case_images: PMC10152957_01_JOCR-13-87-g007.jpg
case_images: F7
case_images: The patient called for follow-up at 6-week, 4-month, and 6 months for assessment of pain, range (Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8).
case_images: (a) 6-week follow-up showing 30  external rotation, (b) 4-month follow-up showing 50  external, and (c) 6-month follow-up showing 50  external rotation.
case_images: JOCR-13-87-g008.jpg
case_images: PMC10152957_01_JOCR-13-87-g008.jpg
case_images: F8
case_images: The patient called for follow-up at 6-week, 4-month, and 6 months for assessment of pain, range (Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8).
case_images: (a) 3 month follow-up computed tomography scan showing incorporation of graft and (b) 6 month follow-up computed tomography scan showing incorporated graft.
case_images: JOCR-13-87-g009.jpg
case_images: PMC10152957_01_JOCR-13-87-g009.jpg
case_images: F9
case_images: At three and 6 month follow-up, CT scan was performed to assess union of graft and allowed to return to sport activity (Fig. 9).