case_images: PMC9296280_01
case_images: Pretreatment extraoral photographs.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.001.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: III malocclusion with a flat profile, normal facial vertical dimension, and an adequate soft tissue projection with a slight lip strain (Figure 1). In the frontal view, the face had a good symmetry.
case_images: Pretreatment intraoral photographs.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.002.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: The intraoral examination and the orthopantomogram showed spacing in the maxillary arch and severe crowding in the mandibular arch, with crossbite of 1.3 and 2.3 and edge-to-edge relationship of upper and lower premolars, with a discrepancy in upper and lower arch form (Figures 2 and 3).
case_images: Pretreatment orthopantomogram.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.003.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: The intraoral examination and the orthopantomogram showed spacing in the maxillary arch and severe crowding in the mandibular arch, with crossbite of 1.3 and 2.3 and edge-to-edge relationship of upper and lower premolars, with a discrepancy in upper and lower arch form (Figures 2 and 3).
case_images: Pretreatment cephalometric analysis.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.004.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: The teleradiography and the consequent cephalometric analysis highlight the class III skeletal malocclusion in a subject tended to hyperdivergence, with an importance of upper incisor proclination and normal position of lower incisors (Figure 4).
case_images: Posttreatment extraoral photographs.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.005.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: The posttreatment photographs show the substantial improvement in the aesthetics of the patient (Figures 5 and 6).
case_images: Posttreatment intraoral photographs.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.006.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: The posttreatment photographs show the substantial improvement in the aesthetics of the patient (Figures 5 and 6).
case_images: Posttreatment orthopantomogram.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.007.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.007.jpg
case_images: fig7
case_images: The posttreatment orthopantomogram displayed the good root parallelism achieved without root resorption (Figure 7).
case_images: Posttreatment cephalometric analysis.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.008.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.008.jpg
case_images: fig8
case_images: The posttreatment cephalometric analysis and the tracing superimposition illustrate the modifications obtained with the treatment (Figures 8 and 9).
case_images: Pretreatment and posttreatment tracing superimposition.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.009.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.009.jpg
case_images: fig9
case_images: The posttreatment cephalometric analysis and the tracing superimposition illustrate the modifications obtained with the treatment (Figures 8 and 9).
case_images: 12-month follow-up, extraoral photographs.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.010.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.010.jpg
case_images: fig10
case_images: Tooth 1.1, which was dyschromic since the beginning of the treatment, due to a previous endodontic treatment, has been treated with the walking bleach technique (Figures 10 and 11).
case_images: 12-month follow-up, intraoral photographs.
case_images: CRID2022-9200469.011.jpg
case_images: PMC9296280_01_CRID2022-9200469.011.jpg
case_images: fig11
case_images: Tooth 1.1, which was dyschromic since the beginning of the treatment, due to a previous endodontic treatment, has been treated with the walking bleach technique (Figures 10 and 11).