case_images: PMC7568144_01
case_images: Extraoral pre-treatment pictures: (a) frontal view at rest, (b) frontal view with a smile, and (c) lateral view at rest.
case_images: CRID2020-8899184.001.jpg
case_images: PMC7568144_01_CRID2020-8899184.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: He presented a symmetric face, a slightly increased lower facial third, and a mesocephalic tendency (Figure 1).
case_images: Intraoral pre-treatment pictures: (a) frontal view, (b) frontal view of the right side, (c) lateral view of the left side, (d) occlusal view of the lower arch, (e) occlusal view of the upper arch, and (f) overjet.
case_images: CRID2020-8899184.002.jpg
case_images: PMC7568144_01_CRID2020-8899184.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: Oral hygiene had to be improved (Figure 2).
case_images: Pre-treatment radiographic records: (a) orthopantomogram and (b) lateral cephalogram.
case_images: CRID2020-8899184.003.jpg
case_images: PMC7568144_01_CRID2020-8899184.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: Lateral cephalogram and orthopantomogram were taken (Figure 3).
case_images: LM-Activator High Short (LM-Instruments Oy, Parainen, Finland): (a) occlusal view and (b) sagittal view.
case_images: CRID2020-8899184.004.jpg
case_images: PMC7568144_01_CRID2020-8899184.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: In particular, an LM-Activator High Short size 35 (LM-Instruments Oy, Parainen, Finland) was chosen (Figure 4).
case_images: Extraoral post-treatment pictures: (a) frontal view at rest, (b) frontal view with smile, and (c) lateral view at rest.
case_images: CRID2020-8899184.005.jpg
case_images: PMC7568144_01_CRID2020-8899184.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: Intraoral post-treatment pictures: (a) frontal view, (b) frontal view of the right side, (c) lateral view of the left side, (d) occlusal view of the lower arch, (e) occlusal view of the upper arch, and (f) overjet.
case_images: CRID2020-8899184.006.jpg
case_images: PMC7568144_01_CRID2020-8899184.006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: The molar mesial step, which could be associated to a class III tendency, was corrected (Figure 6).
case_images: Post-treatment radiographic records: (a) orthopantomogram; and (b) lateral cephalogram.
case_images: CRID2020-8899184.007.jpg
case_images: PMC7568144_01_CRID2020-8899184.007.jpg
case_images: fig7
case_images: The radiographic records were repeated after the treatment ends (Figure 7).
case_images: Superimposition: comparison between pre- (green) and post-treatment (blue) cephalograms.
case_images: CRID2020-8899184.008.jpg
case_images: PMC7568144_01_CRID2020-8899184.008.jpg
case_images: fig8
case_images: Extraoral follow-up pictures: (a) frontal view at rest, (b) frontal view with a smile, and (c) lateral view at rest.
case_images: CRID2020-8899184.009.jpg
case_images: PMC7568144_01_CRID2020-8899184.009.jpg
case_images: fig9
case_images: After 2 years from the end of the treatment, the patient still has a straight nice profile and a good vertical proportion is also maintained (Figure 9).
case_images: Intraoral follow-up pictures: (a) frontal view, (b) frontal view of the right side, (c) lateral view of the left side, (d) occlusal view of the lower arch, (e) occlusal view of the upper arch, and (f) overjet.
case_images: CRID2020-8899184.010.jpg
case_images: PMC7568144_01_CRID2020-8899184.010.jpg
case_images: fig10
case_images: He has a dental class I relationship with a proper overjet and overbite (Figure 10).