case_images: PMC4282018_01
case_images: Case 1 - Appearance of previously reconstructed right breast before revision reconstruction with DIEP flap.
case_images: eplasty14e47_fig1.jpg
case_images: PMC4282018_01_eplasty14e47_fig1.jpg
case_images: F1
case_images: Case 1 - Left sided perforator vessel supplying overlying skin and fat (arrow) on CT angiogram.
case_images: eplasty14e47_fig2.jpg
case_images: PMC4282018_01_eplasty14e47_fig2.jpg
case_images: F2
case_images: Pre-operative CT angiography demonstrated normal-looking abdominal and perforator anatomy (Fig. 2).
case_images: Case 1 - Appearance 5 months following DIEP flap breast reconstruction
case_images: eplasty14e47_fig3.jpg
case_images: PMC4282018_01_eplasty14e47_fig3.jpg
case_images: F3
case_images: A 610g DIEP flap was raised on a single, central, medial row perforator vessel, 3.2 mm in diameter, with no fat necrosis or delayed healing (Fig. 3).
case_images: PMC4282018_02
case_images: Case 2 - MR angiogram demonstrating a single large patent perforator below and right of the umbilicus (arrow).
case_images: eplasty14e47_fig4.jpg
case_images: PMC4282018_02_eplasty14e47_fig4.jpg
case_images: F4
case_images: Preoperative MRA of the abdomen (Fig. 4) demonstrated a single large patent perforator below and right of the umbilicus.
case_images: Case 2 - Appearance 1 week following DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
case_images: eplasty14e47_fig5.jpg
case_images: PMC4282018_02_eplasty14e47_fig5.jpg
case_images: F5
case_images: No fat necrosis or wound dehiscence was detected at follow-up clinic appointments (Fig. 5).