case_images: PMC6900677_01
case_images: (Left) FDG PET showing highly avid lymph nodes. Right suprahilar lymph node with
  standardized uptake value (SUV) maximum of 25.4 and paratracheal lymph node with
  SUV of 18.6. (Right) CT scan of chest showing subcarinal and right hilar
  lymphadenopathy; the right main stem bronchus shown in mediastinal window.
case_images: 10.1177_2324709619892724-fig1.jpg
case_images: PMC6900677_01_10.1177_2324709619892724-fig1.jpg
case_images: fig1-2324709619892724
case_images: Hence, a computed tomography scan of thorax was ordered, which revealed an incidental 2-cm left breast mass, diffuse lymphadenopathy, and a right hilar mass encasing the right main stem bronchus (Figure 1).
case_images: (Top left) Hematoxylin and eosin stain showing noncaseating granulomas at 200x
  magnification from the peribronchial lymph node (station 10R). Arrow points to
  area of granuloma. (Top right) Hematoxylin and eosin stain showing noncaseating
  granulomas from the peribronchial lymph node (station 10R). 400x magnification
  showing epithelioid histiocytes with footprint-shaped nuclei and abundant
  eosinophilic cytoplasm. (Bottom left) Hematoxylin and eosin stain prepared in
  CytoLyt showing noncaseating granulomas at 200x magnification from the
  subcarinal lymph node (station 7). Arrow points to area of granuloma. (Bottom
  right) Hematoxylin and eosin stain that was prepared in CytoLyt showing
  noncaseating granulomas from the subcarinal lymph node (station 10R). 400x
  magnification showing epithelioid histiocytes with footprint-shaped nuclei.
case_images: 10.1177_2324709619892724-fig2.jpg
case_images: PMC6900677_01_10.1177_2324709619892724-fig2.jpg
case_images: fig2-2324709619892724
case_images: Other notable lymphadenopathy was noted in the lower paratracheal area with SUV of 12.3 and right anterior mediastinal adenopathy with SUV of 6.6 (Figure 2). Cytopathology was evaluated at the peribronchial lymph node (station 10R) and subcarinal lymph node (station 7), which were all of samples were consistent with noncaseating granuloma with giant cell reaction (Figure 2).