case_images: PMC3196981_01
case_images: Rectourinary fistula after LRP. The retrograde cystourethrography shows the filling of the bladder and the contrast in the rectum.
case_images: UROLOGY2011-292517.001.jpg
case_images: PMC3196981_01_UROLOGY2011-292517.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: The digital rectal examination revealed no alterations, and the retrograde cystourethrography showed the contrast passing to the rectum (Figure 1).
case_images: Prone position:Jack-Knife position.
case_images: UROLOGY2011-292517.002.jpg
case_images: PMC3196981_01_UROLOGY2011-292517.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: The patient is placed in prone position:Jack-Knife position:and buttocks kept away with adhesive (Figure 2).
case_images: The surgical incision of York:Mason technique:starting at the right side of the coccyx towards the anal edge by the midline.
case_images: UROLOGY2011-292517.003.jpg
case_images: PMC3196981_01_UROLOGY2011-292517.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: The incision starts at the right edge of the coccyx and extends to the midline to the anal edge (Figure 3).
case_images: Diagram of the York-Mason technique (from Middleton RG: rectourethral fistula repair. In Krane RJ, Siroky MB, Fitzpatrick JM, eds: Operative Urology. Philadelphia, Churchill-Livingstone, 2000:286).
case_images: UROLOGY2011-292517.004.jpg
case_images: PMC3196981_01_UROLOGY2011-292517.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: In this case, we did not do the excision of the fistulous track because of the proximity of the ureteral meatus (Figures 4, 5, and 6).
case_images: Dissection and identification of the fistulous track, respectively.
case_images: UROLOGY2011-292517.005.jpg
case_images: PMC3196981_01_UROLOGY2011-292517.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: In this case, we did not do the excision of the fistulous track because of the proximity of the ureteral meatus (Figures 4, 5, and 6).
case_images: Dissection and identification of the fistulous track, respectively.
case_images: UROLOGY2011-292517.006.jpg
case_images: PMC3196981_01_UROLOGY2011-292517.006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: In this case, we did not do the excision of the fistulous track because of the proximity of the ureteral meatus (Figures 4, 5, and 6).