case_images: PMC3169362_01
case_images: Panoramic radiograph did not reveal bone defects in the mandible.
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-792145.001.jpg
case_images: PMC3169362_01_DENTISTRY2011-792145.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: The panoramic radiograph revealed no important alterations in the mandible (Figure 1).
case_images: Sagittal computed tomography slices and bone window (a) and 3D reconstruction (b), showing SBD, anterior variant, left side.
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-792145.002.jpg
case_images: PMC3169362_01_DENTISTRY2011-792145.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: The tomographic images clearly showed multiple cavitary defects, two in the anterior region (anterior variant) and one in the posterior region (posterior variant) (Figures 2, 3, and 4).
case_images: Sagittal computed tomography slices and bone window (a) and 3D reconstruction (b), showing SBD, anterior variant, right side, with small depth.
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-792145.003.jpg
case_images: PMC3169362_01_DENTISTRY2011-792145.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: The tomographic images clearly showed multiple cavitary defects, two in the anterior region (anterior variant) and one in the posterior region (posterior variant) (Figures 2, 3, and 4).
case_images: Volume-rendering 3D reconstruction showing a shallow SBD, posterior variant, on the right side.
case_images: DENTISTRY2011-792145.004.jpg
case_images: PMC3169362_01_DENTISTRY2011-792145.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: The tomographic images clearly showed multiple cavitary defects, two in the anterior region (anterior variant) and one in the posterior region (posterior variant) (Figures 2, 3, and 4).