case_images: PMC10852098_01
case_images: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
case_images: cureus-0016-00000051946-i01.jpg
case_images: PMC10852098_01_cureus-0016-00000051946-i01.jpg
case_images: FIG1
case_images: Implant planning was done after the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination as shown in Figure 1.
case_images: Radiograph showing six implants each in maxilla and mandibular arch
case_images: cureus-0016-00000051946-i02.jpg
case_images: PMC10852098_01_cureus-0016-00000051946-i02.jpg
case_images: FIG2
case_images: The radiograph is shown in Figure 2.
case_images: Open tray impression of (A) maxillary and (B) mandibular arches
case_images: cureus-0016-00000051946-i03.jpg
case_images: PMC10852098_01_cureus-0016-00000051946-i03.jpg
case_images: FIG3
case_images: The open tray impression was made using elastomeric material, excess material above the impression coping was removed, and unscrewing of the impression coping was done once the impression material was set (Figure 3).
case_images: (A) Maxillary and (B) mandibular cast
case_images: cureus-0016-00000051946-i04.jpg
case_images: PMC10852098_01_cureus-0016-00000051946-i04.jpg
case_images: FIG4
case_images: Metal trial performed intraorally
case_images: cureus-0016-00000051946-i05.jpg
case_images: PMC10852098_01_cureus-0016-00000051946-i05.jpg
case_images: FIG5
case_images: The metal trial was performed intraorally (Figure 5).
case_images: (A) Maxillary and (B) mandibular metal try-in with one anterior and two posterior bridge prosthesis
case_images: cureus-0016-00000051946-i06.jpg
case_images: PMC10852098_01_cureus-0016-00000051946-i06.jpg
case_images: FIG6
case_images: The maxillary prosthesis was cement-retained and the mandibular prosthesis was screw retained for even distribution of the forces (Figure 6).
case_images: Final prosthesis insertion
case_images: cureus-0016-00000051946-i07.jpg
case_images: PMC10852098_01_cureus-0016-00000051946-i07.jpg
case_images: FIG7
case_images: The patient was scheduled for regular recall (Figure 7).