case_images: PMC4672862_01
case_images: Clinical examination depicts loss of buccal cortical bone showing implants under thin mucoperiosteum.
case_images: JIOH-7-85-g001.jpg
case_images: PMC4672862_01_JIOH-7-85-g001.jpg
case_images: F1
case_images: Mucoperiosteum covering the dental implant in 41 regions was so thinned that implant outline can be easily appreciable in transmitted light (Figure 1).
case_images: Mucoperiosteal flap raised to depict completely denuded buccal aspect of implant.
case_images: JIOH-7-85-g002.jpg
case_images: PMC4672862_01_JIOH-7-85-g002.jpg
case_images: F2
case_images: After hemostasis, the examination revealed completely denuded buccal aspect of the implant in relation to 41 (Figure 2).
case_images: Graft marked using postage stamp method keeping same distance from implants.
case_images: JIOH-7-85-g003.jpg
case_images: PMC4672862_01_JIOH-7-85-g003.jpg
case_images: F3
case_images: The graft was marked using postage stamp method (Figure 3).
case_images: Symphysis block graft with cancellous bone chips placed and stabilised using single screw apical to implants.
case_images: JIOH-7-85-g004.jpg
case_images: PMC4672862_01_JIOH-7-85-g004.jpg
case_images: F4
case_images: The graft was stabilised over the buccal aspect of implants using titanium screw away from implants (Figure 4).