case_images: PMC3570436_01
case_images: PMC3570436_02
case_images: Diminished radiation dermatitis. Patient 1 demonstrated substantially decreased erythema in the area of the skin beneath the markers.
case_images: 1748-717X-8-19-1.jpg
case_images: PMC3570436_02_1748-717X-8-19-1.jpg
case_images: F1
case_images: He developed typical asymptomatic erythema on his hips bilaterally; however, the erythema was substantially attenuated in the area of skin beneath the markers (Figure 1).
case_images: PMC3570436_03
case_images: Dose response effect. Patient 2 demonstrated more erythema in the skin that was covered for only 3 weeks (Left Image) compared to the skin covered for 6 weeks (Right Image), suggesting a dose response effect.
case_images: 1748-717X-8-19-2.jpg
case_images: PMC3570436_03_1748-717X-8-19-2.jpg
case_images: F2
case_images: Moreover, the area of skin on the side that was covered for only 3 out of the 6 weeks showed a less noticeable decrease in erythema compared to the surrounding uncovered skin than the area that was covered for 6 weeks (Figure 2).
case_images: The double scattered SOBP demonstrated no apparent dose variation with and without the transparent marker in the beam.
case_images: 1748-717X-8-19-3.jpg
case_images: PMC3570436_03_1748-717X-8-19-3.jpg
case_images: F3
case_images: The results of the phantom dosimetric study are shown in Figure 3.