case_images: PMC2729425_01
case_images: Preoperative crush injury right forearm.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.001.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: Intraoperative external and intramedullary fixations.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.002.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: The orthopaedic timing consisted of a debridement of the wound and reduction of the fractures with external and intramedullary fixation (Figure 2), followed by a further debridement and washout of the wound with a pulsed lavage system, performed by the authors.
case_images: LD flap with anastomosis of the vessels.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.003.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: Postoperative at 2 weeks.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.004.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: The additional use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy allowed a successful healing of this complex severely contaminated wound in two weeks time (Figures 4  and 5). 
case_images: Postoperative at 2 weeks.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.005.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: The additional use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy allowed a successful healing of this complex severely contaminated wound in two weeks time (Figures 4  and 5). 
case_images: X-ray showing a further displacement of the fracture fragment of the radius, with ulnar deviation of the wrist.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.006.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: X-ray showing a reduced fracture with plates and screws.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.007.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.007.jpg
case_images: fig7
case_images: The wrist was fixed in arthrodesis (Figure 7).
case_images: Followup at 1 year with 95% recovery of the flexor tendons.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.008.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.008.jpg
case_images: fig8
case_images: The range of extension motion was probably due to the vicarious action of the inteosseous muscles (Figures 8, 9, 10, and 11).
case_images: Followup at 1 year with 40% recovery of the extensor tendons.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.009.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.009.jpg
case_images: fig9
case_images: The range of extension motion was probably due to the vicarious action of the inteosseous muscles (Figures 8, 9, 10, and 11).
case_images: Patient able to write.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.010.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.010.jpg
case_images: fig10
case_images: The range of extension motion was probably due to the vicarious action of the inteosseous muscles (Figures 8, 9, 10, and 11).
case_images: Patient able to carry a glass.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.011.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.011.jpg
case_images: fig11
case_images: The range of extension motion was probably due to the vicarious action of the inteosseous muscles (Figures 8, 9, 10, and 11).
case_images: Patient showing a good strength.
case_images: CRM2009-568142.012.jpg
case_images: PMC2729425_01_CRM2009-568142.012.jpg
case_images: fig12