case_images: PMC8257371_01
case_images: Patient 1, closed wound on day 1 after application of 5 Regular size DermaClip  devices.
case_images: CRIEM2021-6687961.001.jpg
case_images: PMC8257371_01_CRIEM2021-6687961.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: After cleaning the wound, the wound edges were reapproximated with 5 Regular size DermaClip devices (Figure 1).
case_images: Patient 1, wound site on day 14 (~2 weeks) after injury.
case_images: CRIEM2021-6687961.002.jpg
case_images: PMC8257371_01_CRIEM2021-6687961.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: Follow-up photographs were provided at 2 weeks (Figure 2), 19 weeks (Figure 3), and 41 weeks (Figure 4) after closure.
case_images: Patient 1, healed wound at day 135 (19 weeks) after injury.
case_images: CRIEM2021-6687961.003.jpg
case_images: PMC8257371_01_CRIEM2021-6687961.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: Follow-up photographs were provided at 2 weeks (Figure 2), 19 weeks (Figure 3), and 41 weeks (Figure 4) after closure.
case_images: Patient 1, healed wound at day 289 (41 weeks) after injury.
case_images: CRIEM2021-6687961.004.jpg
case_images: PMC8257371_01_CRIEM2021-6687961.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: Follow-up photographs were provided at 2 weeks (Figure 2), 19 weeks (Figure 3), and 41 weeks (Figure 4) after closure.
case_images: PMC8257371_02
case_images: Patient 2, wound sites at time of injury before application of DermaClip  devices.
case_images: CRIEM2021-6687961.005.jpg
case_images: PMC8257371_02_CRIEM2021-6687961.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: The patient had fallen outside onto the street, and her right arm had suffered traumatic lacerations with wide margins (Figure 5).
case_images: Patient 2, wound sites on day 8 (~1 week) at the time of the removal of devices.
case_images: CRIEM2021-6687961.006.jpg
case_images: PMC8257371_02_CRIEM2021-6687961.006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: The devices were removed on day 8 (Figure 6), and the wound was examined again a week later, day 15 (Figure 7).
case_images: Patient 2, healing wound sites on day 15 (~2 weeks).
case_images: CRIEM2021-6687961.007.jpg
case_images: PMC8257371_02_CRIEM2021-6687961.007.jpg
case_images: fig7
case_images: The devices were removed on day 8 (Figure 6), and the wound was examined again a week later, day 15 (Figure 7).
case_images: Patient 2, healing wound sites on day 50 (~7 weeks).
case_images: CRIEM2021-6687961.008.jpg
case_images: PMC8257371_02_CRIEM2021-6687961.008.jpg
case_images: fig8
case_images: At day 50 (Figure 8), the wound site showed no loss of tissue from either the trauma to or manipulation of skin when closing the wound.
case_images: Patient 2, healing wound sites on day 153 (~22 weeks).
case_images: CRIEM2021-6687961.009.jpg
case_images: PMC8257371_02_CRIEM2021-6687961.009.jpg
case_images: fig9
case_images: A final follow-up photograph was provided at 22 weeks (Figure 9), where the scar was imperceptible.