case_images: PMC6885274_01
case_images: Case no. 1 facial photos, intraoral photos, panoramic radiograph, and lateral cephalogram at T0 (pretreatment).
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.002.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_01_CRID2019-9597024.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: Due to decay, 7.4, 7.5, 8.4, and 8.5 were extracted (Figure 2).
case_images: Case no. 1 tracings (pretreatment).
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.003.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_01_CRID2019-9597024.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: Case no. 1 facial photos, intraoral photos, panoramic radiograph, and lateral cephalogram at T1 (after PS3 treatment).
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.004.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_01_CRID2019-9597024.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: A tendency to a Class III molar relationship was still present on the right side due to the lower first molar mesial shift because of the early extraction of deciduous molars (Figure 4).
case_images: Case no. 1 tracings at T1.
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.005.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_01_CRID2019-9597024.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: Case no. 1 fixed appliance phase.
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.006.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_01_CRID2019-9597024.006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: The fixed appliance phase lasted 24 months as a consequence of the delayed time of 3.4 and 3.5 eruption (Figure 6).
case_images: Case no. 1 facial photos, intraoral photos, and lateral cephalogram at T2 (posttreatment).
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.007.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_01_CRID2019-9597024.007.jpg
case_images: fig7
case_images: A straight nice profile with a good vertical proportion was also maintained after the pubertal growth spurt (Figure 7).
case_images: Case no. 1 tracings at T2.
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.008.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_01_CRID2019-9597024.008.jpg
case_images: fig8
case_images: Case no. 1 tracing superimpositions.
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.009.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_01_CRID2019-9597024.009.jpg
case_images: fig9
case_images: PMC6885274_02
case_images: Case no. 2 facial photos, intraoral photos, panoramic radiograph, and lateral cephalogram at T0 (pretreatment).
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.010.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_02_CRID2019-9597024.010.jpg
case_images: fig10
case_images: A bilateral posterior crossbite was also present (Figure 10).
case_images: Case no. 2 tracings (pretreatment).
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.011.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_02_CRID2019-9597024.011.jpg
case_images: fig11
case_images: The mandible morphology confirmed a severe structural hyperdivergency (Figure 11).
case_images: Case no. 2 facial photos, intraoral photos, panoramic radiograph, and lateral cephalogram at T1 (after PS3 treatment).
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.012.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_02_CRID2019-9597024.012.jpg
case_images: fig12
case_images: A full Class II molar relationship was reached on the left side, while an edge-to-edge relationship was present on the right side (Figure 12).
case_images: Case no. 2 tracings at T1.
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.013.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_02_CRID2019-9597024.013.jpg
case_images: fig13
case_images: The mandibular inclination decreased (Sn-GoGn from 43.7 to 39.5 degrees) (Figure 13).
case_images: Case no. 2 facial photos, intraoral photos, and lateral cephalogram at T2 (posttreatment).
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.014.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_02_CRID2019-9597024.014.jpg
case_images: fig14
case_images: Case no. 2 tracings at T2.
case_images: CRID2019-9597024.015.jpg
case_images: PMC6885274_02_CRID2019-9597024.015.jpg
case_images: fig15
case_images: The mandibular inclination increased again to 41.3 degrees (Table 2), but considering the very severe hyperdivergent growth pattern, the final value should be considered as a quite favorable result (Figures 15 and 16).