case_images: PMC4357189_01
case_images: PMC4357189_02
case_images: The relationship between mean energy intake and changes in absolute body weight for male athletes (
  n 
  = 9).
case_images: 13728_2015_22_Fig1_HTML.jpg
case_images: PMC4357189_02_13728_2015_22_Fig1_HTML.jpg
case_images: Fig1
case_images: Interestingly, when the data was adjusted for male athletes only (n = 9), there were significant relationships between change in absolute body weight and fat, protein and energy intakes, respectively (Figures 1 and 2).
case_images: The relationship between mean fat intake and changes in absolute weight for male athletes (
  n 
  = 9).
case_images: 13728_2015_22_Fig2_HTML.jpg
case_images: PMC4357189_02_13728_2015_22_Fig2_HTML.jpg
case_images: Fig2
case_images: Interestingly, when the data was adjusted for male athletes only (n = 9), there were significant relationships between change in absolute body weight and fat, protein and energy intakes, respectively (Figures 1 and 2).
case_images: Mean between group differences in urine osmolarity values at the start line, checkpoint and finishing line.
case_images: 13728_2015_22_Fig3_HTML.jpg
case_images: PMC4357189_02_13728_2015_22_Fig3_HTML.jpg
case_images: Fig3
case_images: Osmolarity measures between groups at the start line were significantly different (control: 599 +- 222 mOsmol.L-1; faster finishers: 1,017 +- 56 mOsmol.L-1; and slower finishers: 600 +- 249 mOsmol.L-1) (Figure 3).
case_images: PMC4357189_03
case_images: PMC4357189_04