case_images: PMC10413255_01
case_images: Demography of the patients, procedure, and the outcome
case_images: IPRS-12-04-t-001.jpg
case_images: PMC10413255_01_IPRS-12-04-t-001.jpg
case_images: T1
case_images: There were no complaints of abdominal herniation during the follow-up period (Figure 1 (Fig. 1)).
case_images: Exstrophy-epispadias complex reconstruction (case 1)
case_images: IPRS-12-04-g-001.jpg
case_images: PMC10413255_01_IPRS-12-04-g-001.jpg
case_images: F1
case_images: Dehiscence developed at the opposite inset margin, which was managed conservatively (Figure 2 (Fig. 2)).
case_images: Total penectomy with left inguinal node dissection defect reconstruction (case 2)
case_images: IPRS-12-04-g-002.jpg
case_images: PMC10413255_01_IPRS-12-04-g-002.jpg
case_images: F2
case_images: The flap reconstruction site healed satisfactorily without recurrent ulceration (Figure 3 (Fig. 3)).
case_images: PMC10413255_02
case_images: Left trochanteric soft tissue defect reconstruction (case 3)
case_images: IPRS-12-04-g-003.jpg
case_images: PMC10413255_02_IPRS-12-04-g-003.jpg
case_images: F3
case_images: The suprafascial flap was elevated to provide a thin, pliable coverage that mimicked the natural penile shaft (Figure 4 (Fig. 4)).
case_images: PMC10413255_03
case_images: Peno-scrotal defect (post-Fournier's gangrene) reconstruction (case 4)
case_images: IPRS-12-04-g-004.jpg
case_images: PMC10413255_03_IPRS-12-04-g-004.jpg
case_images: F4
case_images: Minor dehiscence developed at the insertion that required resuturing, with an acceptable contour observed at follow-up (Figure 5 (Fig. 5)).