case_images: PMC3293914_01
case_images: Concept maps illustrating participants' perceptions of risk to livelihoods.. Focus group participants (n = 33; men = 16; women = 17) generated a list of risks to their livelihoods and described them. Responses are displayed in a gender-segregated concept map presenting the "overarching risk themes," "theme attributes," and "attribute descriptions." Fig. 1A displays responses anchored in the "people dimension," Fig. 1B displays responses anchored in the "wildlife dimension," and Fig. 1C displays responses anchored in the "habitat dimension." Boldfaced type illustrates concepts common across men and women. Italicized type illustrates concepts participants related to human-wildlife conflict (HWC). Men and women viewed some risks to local livelihoods differently. For example, within the "people" dimension, women offered breadth of detail about "overarching risk themes" and "theme attributes" and men offered depth of detail when describing "overarching risk themes" and "theme attributes." Even when men and women similarly identified the "overarching risk themes" of flooding, deforestation, and agriculture within the "habitat" dimension, the "theme attributes" and "attribute descriptions" were different.
case_images: pone.0032901.g001.jpg
case_images: PMC3293914_01_pone.0032901.g001.jpg
case_images: pone-0032901-g001
case_images: In contrast, men offered depth of detail when describing "overarching risk themes" and "theme attributes" within the "people" dimension (e.g., lack of funds for infrastructure, which specifically included roads, buildings, schools, and clinics) (Fig. 1a). Only men identified competition between wildlife and livestock (Fig. 1b). One man stated that competition between livestock and wildlife results because "livestock use the same source of resources (e.g., water) [as wildlife][sic](Participant # 42)." Men and women similarly identified the "overarching risk themes" of flooding, deforestation, and agriculture within the "habitat" dimension. Women noted the connection between flooding and poverty whereby men noted the connection between flooding and infrastructure (e.g., roads, buildings, villages) agriculture, life and livestock (Fig. 1c).
case_images: Concept maps illustrating participants' perceptions of risk to wildlife.. Focus group participants (n = 32; men = 15; women = 17) generated a list of risks to local wildlife and described them. Responses are displayed in a gender-segregated concept map presenting "overarching risk themes," "theme attributes." and "attribute descriptions." Fig. 2A displays responses anchored in the "people dimension," Fig. 2B displays responses anchored in the "wildlife dimension," and Fig. 2C displays responses anchored in the "habitat dimension." Boldfaced type illustrates concepts common across men and women. Italicized type illustrates concepts participants related to human-wildlife conflict (HWC). Men and women identified diverse "overarching risk themes," theme attributes" and "theme descriptions." For example, although men and women identified pollution, including noise, as a threat to wildlife, the attribute noise was "described" differently. Men and women identified "overarching risk themes" of human activities such as hunting; only men distinguished legal from illegal hunting and noted how lack of work created risks.
case_images: pone.0032901.g002.jpg
case_images: PMC3293914_01_pone.0032901.g002.jpg
case_images: pone-0032901-g002
case_images: Men and women identified "overarching risk themes" of human activities such as hunting; however only men distinguished legal and illegal hunting and also noted how lack of work and patrols created risks (Fig. 2a). Men and women similarly conceptualized the "overarching risk themes" of wildlife mobility and predation (Fig. 2b). Men and women similarly described many "overarching risk themes" within the "habitat" dimension, for example agriculture, deforestation, the human-wildlife interface, and fire (Fig. 2c).
case_images: Percentage of respondents rating categories of human-wildlife conflict as highly dreadful to livelihoods and wildlife.. Interview respondents (n = 76; men = 38; women = 38) rated various categories of human-wildlife conflict as being a "no," "low," "medium," or "high" level of dreadfulness to them personally. Response categories were recoded into dichotomous responses of "low" and "high" (highly) dreadfulness. Fig. 3A illustrates responses when the human-wildlife conflict (HWC) risk target (i.e., the recipient of negative consequences of the risk) was local livelihoods. Fig. 3B illustrates responses when the HWC risk target was local wildlife. There was a high level of agreement among men and women when the risk target was local livelihoods, with the exception of "human-human conflict" that results from HWC, and less agreement among men and women when the risk target was local wildlife.
case_images: pone.0032901.g003.jpg
case_images: PMC3293914_01_pone.0032901.g003.jpg
case_images: pone-0032901-g003
case_images: There was little difference in the proportion of men and women who rated various categories of HWC-related risks to livelihoods as being highly dreadful (Fig. 3a). There was less agreement among groups regarding categories of HWC-related risks to wildlife as being highly dreadful (Fig. 3b).