case_images: PMC3600263_01
case_images: Preoperative intraoral view.
case_images: CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.001.jpg
case_images: PMC3600263_01_CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: His clinical examination revealed a severe defect in the right posterior maxilla, starting from the canine region (Figure 1).
case_images: 3D view of defect.
case_images: CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.002.jpg
case_images: PMC3600263_01_CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: To be able to make an implant-supported fixed prosthesis, a zygoma implant was planned for the posterior maxilla, due to the huge bone defect in that area, and one dental implant was planned (Figures 2 and 3).
case_images: Preoperative simulation of implant planning.
case_images: CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.003.jpg
case_images: PMC3600263_01_CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: To be able to make an implant-supported fixed prosthesis, a zygoma implant was planned for the posterior maxilla, due to the huge bone defect in that area, and one dental implant was planned (Figures 2 and 3).
case_images: Intraoperative view of zygoma after flap elevation.
case_images: CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.004.jpg
case_images: PMC3600263_01_CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: A crestal incision was made and a mucoperiosteal flap was elevated up to the zygomatic buttress (Figure 4).
case_images: Implant placement of zygomatic implant.
case_images: CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.005.jpg
case_images: PMC3600263_01_CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: The zygoma implant was drilled and placed to the posterior; one dental implant was placed in the premolar region (Figure 5).
case_images: Intraoral view during osteointegration period.
case_images: CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.006.jpg
case_images: PMC3600263_01_CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.006.jpg
case_images: fig6
case_images: Permanent prosthetic rehabilitation was initiated 5 months after implant placement (Figure 6).
case_images: Intraoral view after implant abutments.
case_images: CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.007.jpg
case_images: PMC3600263_01_CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.007.jpg
case_images: fig7
case_images: Metal-supported porcelain restorations were constructed using conventional methods (Figures 7 and 8).
case_images: Fabricated Metal base of bridge.
case_images: CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.008.jpg
case_images: PMC3600263_01_CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.008.jpg
case_images: fig8
case_images: Metal-supported porcelain restorations were constructed using conventional methods (Figures 7 and 8).
case_images: Metal supported porcelain bridge.
case_images: CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.009.jpg
case_images: PMC3600263_01_CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.009.jpg
case_images: fig9
case_images: The last clinical and radiographic assessments were uneventful, and the patient's satisfaction with the esthetic result was excellent (Figures 9 and 10).
case_images: Radiographic view after 1 year follow-up.
case_images: CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.010.jpg
case_images: PMC3600263_01_CRIM.DENTISTRY2013-930345.010.jpg
case_images: fig10
case_images: The last clinical and radiographic assessments were uneventful, and the patient's satisfaction with the esthetic result was excellent (Figures 9 and 10).