case_images: PMC11058728_01
case_images: Modified 20G needle.
case_images: aott-58-1-77_f001.jpg
case_images: PMC11058728_01_aott-58-1-77_f001.jpg
case_images: f1-aott-58-1-77
case_images: Needle position (A) and the probe position (B) images show the technique used.
case_images: aott-58-1-77_f002.jpg
case_images: PMC11058728_01_aott-58-1-77_f002.jpg
case_images: f2-aott-58-1-77
case_images: The dynamic ultrasound image shows the tendon during (A) and after release (B) of the medical intervention technique.
case_images: aott-58-1-77_f003.jpg
case_images: PMC11058728_01_aott-58-1-77_f003.jpg
case_images: f3-aott-58-1-77
case_images: After the procedure, the flexor tendon was released, and the absence of mechanical compromise was confirmed by dynamic ultrasound (Figure 3B). The patient attended check-ups at 15, 30, and 60 days after the procedure, and a favorable evolution was observed, with a ROM of 0-100  (Figure 3), a VAS of 2/10 (previously 7), and a Quick-DASH of 4% (previously 20%).