case_images: PMC6699002_01
case_images: EGD showed a large posterior antral wall ulcer with heaped up edges and
  surrounding infiltrated-appearing mucosa.
case_images: 10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig1.jpg
case_images: PMC6699002_01_10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig1.jpg
case_images: fig1-2050313X19869473
case_images: EGD with biopsy showed multiple antral ulcerations and a large posterior antral wall ulcer with heaped up edges with surrounding infiltrated-appearing mucosa (Figure 1).
case_images: H&E staining of the ulcerated region revealed a marked lymphoid
  infiltrate of monotonous, bland-appearing, small lymphoid cells with clear
  cytoplasm forming occasional lymphoepithelial lesions.
case_images: 10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig2.jpg
case_images: PMC6699002_01_10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig2.jpg
case_images: fig2-2050313X19869473
case_images: A hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain of the ulcerated tissue revealed a markedly dense lymphoid infiltrate, which was suspicious for lymphoma (Figure 2).
case_images: Immunohistochemical staining confirmed a B-cell predominance (CD20 positive
  stain) without co-expression of CD5 or CD10.
case_images: 10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig3.jpg
case_images: PMC6699002_01_10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig3.jpg
case_images: fig3-2050313X19869473
case_images: Immunohistochemical staining confirmed a B-cell predominance (Figure 3).
case_images: Flow cytometry revealed a prominent B-cell population with lambda light chain
  restriction without co-expression of CD5 or CD10, consistent with marginal
  zone lymphoma (MALT lymphoma).
case_images: 10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig4.jpg
case_images: PMC6699002_01_10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig4.jpg
case_images: fig4-2050313X19869473
case_images: Flow cytometry confirmed the clonal nature of this process consistent with a marginal zone lymphoma immunophenotype (Figure 4).
case_images: FISH for BIRC3-MALT1 (11;18) fusion was negative. BIRC3 is represented in
  green and MALT1 is represented in orange.
case_images: 10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig5.jpg
case_images: PMC6699002_01_10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig5.jpg
case_images: fig5-2050313X19869473
case_images: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was negative for t(11;18)(q21;q21) (Figure 5).
case_images: PET-CT in the (a) axial and (b) sagittal views showed a hypermetabolic focus
  in the antrum of the stomach with no other hypermetabolic foci or enlarged
  lymph nodes.
case_images: 10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig6.jpg
case_images: PMC6699002_01_10.1177_2050313X19869473-fig6.jpg
case_images: fig6-2050313X19869473
case_images: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) demonstrated a hypermetabolic focus in the antrum of the stomach with no other hypermetabolic foci or enlarged lymph nodes (Figure 6).