case_images: PMC5932497_01
case_images: Axial, coronal, and sagittal planes of view from the CT data set of the patient, including target and OAR structures.
case_images: CRIM2018-4137943.001.jpg
case_images: PMC5932497_01_CRIM2018-4137943.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: Axial dose distributions obtained by (a) 3D-CRT, (b) IMRT, and (c) RA.
case_images: CRIM2018-4137943.002.jpg
case_images: PMC5932497_01_CRIM2018-4137943.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: AAA and PB algorithms for 3D-CRT plans are not substantial. A picture of the axial dose distributions with the three techniques is shown in Figure 2.
case_images: DVH comparison between IMRT and 3D-CRT for the target and OAR.
case_images: CRIM2018-4137943.003.jpg
case_images: PMC5932497_01_CRIM2018-4137943.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: The comparison between three DVHs obtained by 3D-CRT, IMRT, and RA is shown in Figures 3-5.
case_images: DVH comparison between RA and 3D-CRT for the target and OAR.
case_images: CRIM2018-4137943.004.jpg
case_images: PMC5932497_01_CRIM2018-4137943.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: The comparison between three DVHs obtained by 3D-CRT, IMRT, and RA is shown in Figures 3-5.
case_images: DVH comparison between IMRT and RA for the target and OAR.
case_images: CRIM2018-4137943.005.jpg
case_images: PMC5932497_01_CRIM2018-4137943.005.jpg
case_images: fig5
case_images: The comparison between three DVHs obtained by 3D-CRT, IMRT, and RA is shown in Figures 3-5.