case_images: PMC10314815_01
case_images: Patient's intraoral maxilla scans before the orthodontic treatment.
case_images: CRID2023-1831125.001.jpg
case_images: PMC10314815_01_CRID2023-1831125.001.jpg
case_images: fig1
case_images: Recessions categorized as I class by Miller were noted in the area of teeth 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5, which were the part of patient's complaint regarding esthetic profile compromise (Figures 1 and 2).
case_images: Patient's intraoral bite scans before the orthodontic treatment.
case_images: CRID2023-1831125.002.jpg
case_images: PMC10314815_01_CRID2023-1831125.002.jpg
case_images: fig2
case_images: Recessions categorized as I class by Miller were noted in the area of teeth 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5, which were the part of patient's complaint regarding esthetic profile compromise (Figures 1 and 2).
case_images: Patient's intraoral maxilla scans by the end of orthodontic treatment.
case_images: CRID2023-1831125.003.jpg
case_images: PMC10314815_01_CRID2023-1831125.003.jpg
case_images: fig3
case_images: Both clinical examination and provided digital analysis of obtained intraoral scans revealed improvement of gingival margins at the area of teeth 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 (Figures 3 and 4).
case_images: Patient's intraoral bite scans by the end of orthodontic treatment.
case_images: CRID2023-1831125.004.jpg
case_images: PMC10314815_01_CRID2023-1831125.004.jpg
case_images: fig4
case_images: Both clinical examination and provided digital analysis of obtained intraoral scans revealed improvement of gingival margins at the area of teeth 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 (Figures 3 and 4).