content: I think you're actually missing most of the points that he's making. You're only refuting a backup example he gave about the guy wanting your TV (he's saying the world isn't as dangerous as you've been led to believe ) and then getting upset because you didn't follow the point of his analogy ( He was saying as a society you have to play by societies rules, and also pointing out that many of arguments for slavery were just as bullshit as the arguments for keeping guns around, he does make a leap in logic saying the same kinda people who would argue for slaves likely would argue to keep guns a  7ffa  round). I'm neutral on gun rights and I agree with most of his points, other than the "gun to a drone fight thing", which is still funny.