content: SJ's biggest downfall is that it claims to be anti-racism, anti-sexism, anti-discrimination in general, while SJWs tend to say racist, sexist and discriminatory things.  This is because they've used the 1984 playbook to develop Newspeak, as you allude. Racism used to be "the view that different races have different qualities", evolved into "prejudice based on racial lines", and is now in the final form of "prejudice plus power", which implies you cannot be racist against a privileged group (e.g. White people). Sexism similarly was "different sexes have different qualities", then "prejudice based on sex discrimination", and finally "prejudice plus power", implying you can't be sexist against men. And so forth, and so on. These new definitions are literally being programmed into people by the Cathedral (the emergent feedback cycle of university/media/bureaucracy) and I have heard them parroted at me verbatim as though a new definition simply changes reality. It sure makes it hard to have a rational conversation with someone.