content: Not sure which points you mean, but might read them if you care to link. In the wake of this blatant act of censorship much talk about potentially regulating social media companies, or taking away their "protected status" to hold them responsible for their editorial decisions as publisher.  I don't know a good way, but my inner libertarian rails against any notion of empowering govt.  Also, regulation would just inhibit potential competitors in an already unprofitable market.    The one thing that makes bitchute a possible contender is their considerably lower cost of operations.  I imagine that even if bitchute had the same number of videos and users as yt their costs would still be only a fraction of yt, thanks to their unique application of p2p tech. Any other competitor, like vid.me for example, has massive hosting and distribution costs which only the likes of amazon, apple, or microsoft could possibly hope to cover.