content: Different interpretations. If you want to argue that the King James version is as divinely inspired as the original texts and therefore supercededs them, I'll grant you that assumption. If you claim the KJV more accurately portrays the original texts, that's false. It's an English translation of the Vulgate which borrowed from the Geneva but made it more Protestant. When the newest translations of the Bible use texts from the Nag Hammadi Library, which wasn't discovered until 1945, they're more fundamentalist than KJV readers.