content: THIS STORY NEEDS MORE BACKGROUND  By suggesting there is the possiblity for doubt, this statement impements damage control.   YOU ARE ONLY PROMOTING HATRED AND VIOLENCE.  Between-the-lines, this statement blantantly admits that the act caught on film will generate backlash and critisim. Doubling down on the damage control by suggesting the poster has an agenda, the weasel is preforming tu quoque on the behalf of the attacker (posting the video of someone commiting haterd and violence against the victim is promoting hatred and violence against the attacker).  WHAT IS YOUR POINT? YOU SHOULD EXPLAIN YOURSELF. I DO NOT LIKE WHAT I SEE HERE.  The weasel is attempting to ground moral and moderator authority, because the content offers no weak points. The weasel is attempting to fish for words from the poster in an attempt to taint the video with them.   YOU AFE GLORIFYING SOMETHING. IS IT HATE OR VIOLENCE?  Finally, this question is asked to frame a limited argument against a straw man. The weasel can only fight the strawman poster himself (and not the video) on his ground of applogizing nigger behavior on the internet. The weasel has already lost, the poster has to do absolutely nothing.