content: Top comment from the first link: Seems that the premise of this opinion at this website ( metro.us ) is that the questioning of the police stop is ignored due to Mr. Soto's past. And since Mr. Soto said "department" instead of "company" this means Mr. Soto is an imposter. No discussion to the fact that the police officers left the scene. No opinion as to the manner in which the police officer demanded Mr. Soto to step out of his vehicle ( which is a violation of his rights as he mentions in the video ).