content: No not yet. He provides a salient commentary of deep ideas, current events, and other matters concerning our times. If there's any criticism I'd have to lay, it's that sheerly by how much stuff he puts out he's not always on his 'A' game. The videos where he interviews random clallers aren't always as direct, or interesting as the more planned/focused ones. It's not all of those types of videos that interest me, but those of very few,  if any, creators do.  He's ultimately still an important voice on many topics. In our times, the bringing of philosophy into the mix when discussing things is desperately needed.  "shekel grabber"  Not as effective a criticism when someone's a proud capitalist, and strongly arguing for the free market. Of all the criticisms by peopl, resenting the fat that right-wing e-celebs are in vouge, and get paid by people who felt they recieved something of value, this is the weakest.  "civic nationalist"  Case of dealing with the cards you're (((dealt with))). He's only a civic nationalist insofar as we're currently embedded in an experiment of civic nationalism, and must contend with how that changes the operational landscape. He pretty frequently talks about where naive civic nationalism goes wrong, and how it's in times where things were more segregated that we did better.