content: Yeah, and I'm sure the fox news chart was flashed up up 2 seconds just to add a visual for what they are talking about, there is a change.  I don't think they were trying to show proportionality. So also off topic but the top marginal tax rate thing they talk about in there.  What really pisses me off about how that's always discussed in a misleading way is that the top marginal tax rates of the past that were like 91% applied to the 1% of the 1% of the 1%.  The wealthy were wealthier back then.  Carnegie would make Bill Gates look poor.  The Vanderbilt would too.  The bracket that top earners in today's US economy fit into has gone up.  The rich essentially have more income equality among themselves than they did before.  So the top marginal tax rate really would single out maybe 5 people.  The fact that it was a 91% made it more of a income limit intended for wartime.  In fact that was how it was sold.