content: Agreed. The problem is what is statistically provable with weak or strong significance. There are so many confounding factors with medicine that the decisions in statistical calculations are wanton, and that is putting it mildly. The best we can do is make pharma responsible for outcomes, but they'll have none of that. If insurance companies got involved, then the rates of incidents would be better recorded as liability would shift, but right now doctors get annual bonuses of up to 100k for total vaccine compliance. This is why some doctors will turn kids away, to keep their numbers up. It's not wrong, just a broken incentive structure.  Mama groups on the Spergbook are all over this with cases (anecdotally) but rarely can it be formalized into a case study.