content: This video can be summarized by the following statement he said and written:  Terry v Ohio removes the phrase "probable cause" from the 4th Amendment. The deepest, darkest national secret is about what is done to the next guy to come along, the guy who the Government think will pencil it back it.  Basically he's saying that with this case, any future court rulings can accept evidences or detainment or arrests that weren't verified or authorized by the standards of probable cause, such as random frisks. Anyone who would try to reverse this precedent could theoretically be targeted by detainment or arrests by the government regardless of probable cause or sufficient evidence in order to prevent revocation of Terry v Ohio ruling and other cases such as Arizona v Arizona case where "legislature has been taken out of election clause". So in his words, the "judiciary review has fallen" and the "people is enslaved".  It is a pretty sloppy presentation compared to something like CPC Grey, but I think he got the point across. It just could have been edited to be more succinct. But I also feel he should have cut out the parts about how people don't listen to him or personally criticize him in rebuttal, and how he gave a link to the US v Hubbell case for "homework" is kind of demeaning when he could have just explained it.