content: I mean, if there was reasonably zero correlation between the physics of 5G and the known fact that the nervous systems of birds are EM sensitive, I'd say you have a point. But you are using poor logic here. It's not as if we're saying "The boss fired me, the moon must be made of cheese." Look at the evidence (at least what appears to be the case):   This video doesn't just depict an ordinary number of dead birds. To be quite honest, I'm not sure that I've ever encountered multiple dead birds concentrated to a single spot, except pheasants that were killed very intentionally.   We aren't identifying just any scary thing. Even if we hadn't been able to predict precise outcomes, we understood the nature of the EM radiation emitted by these towers, and so we could have expected some kind of radius of effect in which animate or inanimate things which were energetically sensitive might suffer some adverse consequences.   Birds are animate, energetically sensitive things.   Towers go up, birds begin dying in irregular patterns within proximity of towers.   Do we have enough evidence here to be reasonably sure about this? No, we don't. But we do have sufficient evidence, given pre-existing knowledge, to be very interested in paying more attention to the phenomena. If you don't think so, then you're a moron.