content: Communism seeks out a society's biggest losers to form their vanguard. 1920s Russian communism was also agitating ethnic minorities and sexual deviants, but the real losers were the half-starved peasants. So they took the economic inequality issue to the forefront. Today's American peasants are overweight and entertained. The real losers are the criminals, the morons, the mentally ill, the drug addicts, the betacuck soyboys, the ugly women over 30, and of course the sexual deviants. So the agitation process has to be "intersectional" because they don't actually have a common cause, identity, or  goal, except to stop being losers and to gain undeserved power in society. They got the latter... and yet, they're no closer to being Chads and Stacys. Losers have the least to lose from the collapse of society, which is why jews use them. This is why liberals are getting cancelled by leftists: they're not big enough losers to have real loyalty to the new system.  So this is the fight of the 21st century: losers and people who feel like losers versus competent and self-driven winners. Gee, who's gonna win?