content: In the marketplace of ideas i should be able to say the space is aether and it is up to others to disagre  2d42  e and leave it at that because it is still theory or to prove through scientific tests that i'm wrong. Even though i might be a stuborn fuck and ignore their scientific studies, block them, be ignorant and stick to my initial beliefs. Merely allowing verifiable facts will make those who establish facts, which one can also call scientific truths, as all powerful. We've seen the whole 'i reject your alternative facts' already.  At one point, the CDC advised the public that smoking was healthy, because the Tobacco studies said so, which claimed to not be tobacco funded studies to feign impartiality. The same can be said about Monsanto/bayer products and a whole myriad of products. Everything is trolled and controlled and to rely on such authorities is simply wrong. People should have the freedom to say lizard people are walking around us, even if it absolutely preposterous. Youtube has deleted hundreds of thousands perhaps even millions of such fringe thinking videos, (this was often great entertainment and a good laugh before going to bed) even if the poster might clearly have a mental disorder related to paranoid delusions, the fact is they should be allowed to say it. Free speech means the right to say whatever, including absolute degenerate pedo scum professing their love for little kids, and every-time they do they should be vilified and viciously smeared.  Because if i was not in favor of free speech, my innate bias would make CP and even Marxist opinions illegal. Currently Twitter allows pro pedo groups to exist and spread their vitriol while right wingers who object them are silenced if not outright banned. This is why free speech is an absolutist thing. What can be done against them, can be done against us, it largely depends on who currently controls society or in the example of social media who controls the platform. Hence why right wingers are moving to parler. Leftist scum have no want or need for free speech, they need and want speech controls in order to control the narrative and the debates, even allow wild debates within that control but to never allow the public to venture outside those ideas and suppress anyone who thinks outside, violently if need be.