content: He might be trying to emphasize the bad stuff to show that he knows about it and opposes it in hopes that it'll restore some of the respect he lost for that brilliant little move. IIRC he was also talking about "balance" in terms of who has the rights to what.  I don't recall precisely what that was for (DRM, privacy, or whatever), but I think he's a bit naive in that at the very least, considering corporations pretty much want all the rights and to temporarily license a few back to us when they deem it profitable.