content: I just tracerouted both URLs, and none of them seem to share anything in common. Two different server IPs, and two completely different ways to getting to each one. Not sure what that pic is trying to prove. Intel's server appears to accept the host being set to "amdflaws.com" in the request header, but that doesn't really mean anything. Especially since the server returns a 301 http status code, with no other info. Meaning that the server doesn't know what to do with said "host" (amdflaws.com). EDIT: I'm saying this, under the assumption that Intel's server, probably for security reasons, spontaneously creates 301 pages for content that it can't find in its own resources, and shoots you to the correct URL doing its own reverse search. I may be presuming too much, though. For all you know, someone could have manually written said 301 page, thus giving credibility to OP's claims that amdflaws is an Intel black-flag attempt at discrediting AMD.