content: I'm hesitant because I know there's going to be misuse, but as far as I can tell at the moment as long as we establish proper electronic due process I don't really see the downside here. I know it's a complicated subject, but at least in terms of situations like this where a device's location can inform a trial with facts, how is that your device working against you   1000  (presuming you aren't trying to lie about your whereabouts)? Obviously you can't base an entire argument around where your device was, and there are certainly ways to spoof that information, but for the average person that's not a criminal mastermind I think being able to have an alibi corroborated by your data (willingly gathered, i.e. you're aware that the device is tracking that information) would help you preserve your freedom against incorrect accusations.