content: Well - considering most of the people 'criticizing' this manifesto are braindead lefties - I would say it was lost before they even tried to read it. https://medium.com/@yonatanzunger/so-about-this-googlers-manifesto-1e3773ed1788 Take this dumbfuck for example.  So it seems that someone has seen fit to publish an internal manifesto about gender and our “ideological echo chamber.” I think it’s important that we make a couple of points clear.  Okay, shoot.  (1) Despite speaking very authoritatively, the author does not appear to understand gender.  You mean despite providing credible and reputable sources for his claims?  (2) Perhaps more interestingly, the author does not appear to understand engin  3fea  eering.  Which has exactly how much to do with identity politics?  (3) And most seriously, the author does not appear to understand the consequences of what he wrote, either for others or himself.  Oh - hurt feelings, the most dreaded result of someone reading something they disagree with.  1.I’m not going to spend any length of time on (1); if anyone wishes to provide details as to how nearly every statement about gender in that entire document is actively incorrect,¹ and flies directly in the face of all research done in the field for decades, they should go for it. But I am neither a biologist, a psychologist, nor a sociologist, so I’ll leave that to someone else.  ANNNND THERE IT IS