content: webtorrent  I could be proved wrong, but it sounds like an Imperfect, solution for good goys. I've felt it fits into the Hegelian dialectic of problem reaction solution. Sends all your content unencrypted over the web, letting (((them))) snoop in on it to their hearts content.  I'd rather a protocol where Uploaders/Watchers can be  private, and uncensorable become the new standard. Memes, wrong-think, and dissenters are under enough persecution as is, and we don't need new avenues of persecution.  Just look at what's happening right now in the EU (article 13 & beyond), and what's been attempted to be made law here in the US. Persecution of Wrong-think is moving private domains like YouTube (you'll still have to deal with private ISP traffic snooping), to the public/governmental domain, where the arbiter of your  memes, and thoughts are law. It  I feel, hands random 3rd parties the snooping/persecution reigns, where as before it was mostly constrained by Alphabet INC.. Things would change such that that your government, random witch-hunt gourps, NGOs, and private ISPs, could hunt down private individuals, not to mention pay loads of lobbyists/politicians that would incessantly try and get stuff banned.  If what you're watching is  "interesting", broadcasting it to whoever takes an an interest and decides to 'leech'/'seed' sounds like your asking for it. I worry that they'll adapt quite easily to webtorrent, and that actually pushing back against Orwellian censorship requires one be more forward thinking.