content: I fully expect this to be a lot of spin and lies, but there's almost certainly a dose of truth to it. Amongst the lies are pretty obviously the feedback tool: if the it were mostly unused like he said, why have it at all? I also know he's straight-up lying about most of it being positive because next to nobody would use a feedback tool that way; my own company has a feedback tool and it's always used to tell people when they screwed up(though unlike the Amazon tool mentioned, it sends the commentary directly to the person in question - the fact that Amazon's doesn't makes it pretty clear its main purpose is to foment an informant mentality). I can see most of the corrections on the personnel being true, though notice how he doesn't actually deny the story of being berated for not working hard enough before getting the promotion(what good is a balanced written review when your boss is yelling at you?).