content: This made me have a brain fart: If the court upholds that clause, I wonder if the decision could be used to limit the scope of copyright & patent infringement to Califonia as well, excluding its coverage to anyone who wanted to launch a clone of FB outside of Califonia. Anyone who disagrees with the ToS because of that clause cannot use FB, right? Free competition law says "if you don't like their rules go use a different product"...But the patents & copyrights prevent clones of FB from launching, thus people are forced to have it FB's way or not at all. These clones could be improvements made on the base product: they could have a better / more inclusive ToS that people would be more agreeable with.