content: There's an underlying principal of free speech and press. I understand that there's a legitimate draw back, that can drag down an individual's past misbehavior can be held against them, but that's the whole point. What if monsanto's use of agent orange, or HSBC's ties to terrorist organizations, or Trump's abuse of eminent domain were blocked from the internet?  I'd rather have something foolish I said floating around on the web than demand the government cover up my bad behavior.