content: But I have enough software experience that what they say does not mean that it is implemented like that. What the developers implemented and what the managers think the developers implemented are 2 different things. And in a lot of cases the managers know that they messed up the privacy but continue it anyway because they will fix it in the future. Also even if they implement it correctly, in a lot of cases one silly bit difference could mean the difference of wide open exposed to everybody or secure. Sometimes it is enough for one corrupt database bit to expose everything.  The claim that Wi-Fi sense is secure must be tested and verified by independent security experts. And what must also be do is to capture the network traffic and and analyze what is exactly being transmitted. I am not going to blindly trust a tech site blogger that gets paid by Microsoft.