content: What does it matter? They're not going to use up all the internet or something dumb like that. If there was a (ideally outside party) study demonstrating that it was actually impeding other people's ability to use the network, then I could agree that it's a reasonable move. Until then, it's just another example of greed at the expense of the consumers. The Internet is reliant on instantaneous throughput, not aggregate data transferred over a period of time. It should be irrelevant how much data someone uses. You'd probably have to be in the multi-terabyte range to have a reasonable argument that you're congesting the network, as that would be constant transfer at high speeds.