content: I think it does make some sense because there is a problem. But it's far from being the best solution, and if people do want a one price fits all kind of solution, which is what neutrality means most of the time, then people could have the option to pay for that, and  let other people have different broadband plans. But yes, unless you try get rid of the monopolies and cartels that exist in some places they are going to bend the rules to fit themselves better, including using those laws to wrestle against providers that want to offer more competitive services. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the time those laws are the product of the influence of big telecoms. That's why I think is better to allow for more options, let people decide and make it easier to sue if they don't get what they paid for.