content: I see where you're coming from - that if a specific author is actively hostile to you and/or the project, then any code they submit has a higher chance of being malicious and should be treated with more caution than code from a neutral or friendly party. I don't think this applies to the spirit of my statement, however, because in this context we were talking about 'identity' in the sense of the author's race, gender, sexual identity, sexual preference, favourite food, etc. My statement was about accepting someone's code because they're a member of Minority X, even though the code is terrible and makes the software worse.