content: The letter reinforces fundamental nondiscrimination principles:    Commitment to transparency;   The free flow of information over the internet;   No blocking of lawful websites;   No unreasonable discrimination of lawful network traffic; and   No paid prioritization<   yep, it is right there. No blocking of (((lawful))) websites. This I have to say is a very clever trick, framing the argument around protecting the average user from big bad corporate man while sneaking in innocuous language about 'lawful' websites. That is a difficult position to come out against. Even if you concede the reasonable parts picking that particular thing to take issue with is so simple to put down with simple character assassination claims. e.g. You just want CP websites to ruin the internet!