content: wrong.  When Twitter added their addendums to Trumps tweets  IF TWITTER CENSORS POLITICAL SPEECH, THEY IMMEDIATELY LOSE 230c EXEMPTION for "Common Carriers!" Twitter just promised in the OP link to Twitter vowing to add addendums to Trumps tweets, for 3 weeks, and to shoah them from his fans, if they discuss any election content ("great job michigan" would be banned, "good going pennsylvania, thanks for support" WOULD ALSO BE CENSORED!)  230 protections in their comments section.  Dont pilpul, the entire site of twitter, is de facto a literal COMMENT SECTION, and is no excuse from lawsuits that enjoin Twitter, once they violate their 230 exemption status Telecoms cannot be editorial publishers. They have to choose to be publisher (lawsuits every hour for libel), or they can choose to be and act as a "telecommunications service". One or the other. I am not wrong. Social Media Platforms or Publishers? Rethinking Section 230 https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/social-media-platforms-or-publishers-rethinking-section-230/ https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/19/ag-barr-takes-aim-at-section-230-a-key-protection-for-tech-firms.html Trump sends a warning to social media companies who continue to censor him https://thepostmillennial.com/repeal-section-230-trump-sends-a-warning-to-social-media-companies