content: The real question that needs answering is how did not being able to discriminate result in equality of outcome?  Should it not have resulted in equality of opportunity where an interview is only conducted after an employer has reviewed your resume and determined that you would be suitable for the position and even then only to confirm that you can show up on time, aren't covered in tattoos, etc.?  I know that kind of system has been tried and resulted in a huge number of white males being selected by the computers put in charge of selecting people based on merit alone, but is not going against that actual discrimination and a retarded business practice in general as it purposefully selects someone less suitable anyway? It's a honking mad world we live in.