content: This has bothered me too. As soon as someone deems something "illegal" then the privacy structure crumbles. Somehow unconstitutional spying isn't considered "illegal" by secret courts. I still can't and won't agree with that just based on principle alone. Ideally, we would live in a world with complete end-to-end encryption where all traffic in encrypted tunnels gets treated the same, and no SSL MiTM or other vulnerabilities/exploits that allow sniffing. But considering what we have to deal with, was it wise or pragmatic to use the FCC to regulate the ISPs? Perhaps it would have been better to control ISPs through other regulation, or by enforcing monopoly laws or something so we could choose a competing ISP that matches or at least responds to our demands and needs as customers. What do you see as an ideal scenario, and also what do you see as pragmatic or realistic given our current situation?