content: WRONG THIS TIME Wrong... normally you would be 100% correct, but not for Twitter.  The monthly 80 million dollars on average of LIBEL lawsuits they escape from are from Twitter self declaring themselves NOT a Publisher, and instead a "telecommunications service" with 230c (Section 230) exemptions. Twitter chooses to evade nearly a billion dollars cumulative of libel lawsuits, by claiming not to be a publisher, but a exempt telecommunications service. IF TWITTER CENSORS POLITICAL SPEECH, THEY IMMEDIATELY LOSE 230c EXEMPTION for "Common Carriers!" Telecoms cannot be editorial publishers. They have to choose to be publisher (lawsuits every hour for libel), or they can choose to be and act as a "telecommunications service". One or the other. I am not wrong. Social Media Platforms or Publishers? Rethinking Section 230 https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/social-media-platforms-or-publishers-rethinking-section-230/ https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/19/ag-barr-takes-aim-at-section-230-a-key-protection-for-tech-firms.html Trump sends a warning to social media companies who continue to censor him https://thepostmillennial.com/repeal-section-230-trump-sends-a-warning-to-social-media-companies