content: Yup. The default behavior is to completely remove whatever the DMCA issuer told them was an illegal technology regardless of total lack of proof. The ones filing the take down request can do so with complete impunity since they are not following the original DMCA take down procedure which had a felony charge of perjury which is a maximum of 30 years in prison. Fucking judges in court didn't fight at all when RIAA was there suing people for things the RIAA did not own the copyright for. They merely took those items off the list and kept going with the case for anything else left (read, THE JUDGE DID THE COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP WORK). What fucking tool does someone else's job with what's at stake for copyright abuse? Completely without complaints at the RIAA on top, for decades.