content: Please excuse my pedantry, but I'm not certain that I can answer your question in terms of "we." That seems to promote a hive-mind mentality; which is something that I had hoped to escape in migrating to Voat. What I can tell you is that Gawker media employs some awful social engineering (and abuse) to promote their content. I often go so far as to add entries into my hosts file to ensure that if I ever obliviously click on a link to one of their articles it will redirect me to 127.0.0.1. There is indeed no place like home where keeping my blood pressure in check. As I recall, Gawker started as a celebrity stalking website in the same vein as TMZ. Over time, it has grown into a loose confederation of bloggers and mostly awful journalists that engage in/employ things like click-bait titles, left-leaning outrage culture, witch hunting, not verifying source information, and so on. Gawker certainly isn't alone in this, but that hardly excuses the behaviour, does it?    They are a symptom of the much larger problem of outrage culture. An organization of oblivious hypocrites indiscriminately screaming into the whirlwind of the internet, regardless of who or what comes to harm as a result.