content: I'm being a prick, but my point is the major graffiti community doesn't think too fondly of Banksy's work as of lately. One, he is seen in the community of cashing in on the anarchist culture (I'm not that upset about this one, I love capitalism). Two, he has vandilized some of the oldest graffiti art pieces in London, one in particular that was hidden from public eye under a bridge, which in my eyes is blatant disrespect to a culture that takes pride in respecting throw ups and pieces of graffiti (street tags are not graffiti art), Three, his work has become mainstream and kitsch. Banksy has the audacity to create a documentary calling out the public's poor art judgement, when ironically i would argue the same on his work. My opinion, but I argue that the subject of his "graffiti art" holds no emotional depth now that he's being paid to make political statements. But hey, he's a street artist now so I guess that freedom is what he always wanted. Cashing in on vandilism is stupid. If I killed 10 people on my own time and merit, do you think it would be ethical for someone to hire me as a mercinary, or should I go to the electric chair?