content: tbh those are all mostly correct points. The right needs to focus more on saving the white race (for real hard mathematical reasons like simply preserving the world's average IQ at a level that's basically compatible with maintaining modern society and not even because of anything explicitly moral necessarily, which we too often forget) first than on judging its conduct, and once it gets to the point of judging its conduct it needs to do so in a more thoughtful manner than "This looks weird to me in one picture I saw online so everybody involved should die." The dragdemonwhateverthing in the OP is a freak (at least in that context), but kids can still figure that out for themselves. They're not going to magically think this guy with 2 foot horns sticking out of his head is normal just because he reads them a book, which is the low IQ implication you see thrown around with this image ("hurr they're teaching our kids to worship tranny satan").  Other than that, I don't see anything particularly wrong with it. Yes, he's freaky, but that's how entertainers have been since the beginning of time. Magicians are freaky. Cirque du Soleil is freaky. And the world is sometimes genuinely freaky and not just for show. It's better to have your kids exposed to a freak like this in a controlled context where they can do no harm, allowing you to digest with them after what they just saw and confirm their natural instincts that it's weird. Otherwise your kid will end up like the cultural equivalent of little Clayghdeign-Prestwick-Smithington-Kennedy who has 52 allergies because his parents never let him be exposed to any of that nasty old bacteria. If Sam Hyde were dressed up like the guy in the picture reading to kids we'd think it's the greatest thing ever. Admittedly, the guy in the picture is probably not doing it satirically as Sam would be, but at the same time the people you're arguing with are right in that I highly doubt he's getting a boner in a long dress reading to kids while dressed up like RuBaphomet. He may very well be an autogynephile in other contexts, but being an autogynephile means wanting to look hot like a woman, not like an insane monster, so the level of drag craziness he has going on in the picture is probably definitely more of an attention whore thing than a sexual thing. Overall I pretty much agree with the other posters: you're acting like a little bitch about this. On the great list of sins to correct, some dude's aesthetic weirdness is far down the line. Just make sure your kid knows that the guy's a freakazoid who is good for entertainment or not at all and move on. The right is falling too often these days into the SJW trap of obsessing over completely minor cultural issues like these, under a hypersensitive "Where there's smoke, there's fire" attitude (while ignoring the real fires blazing around them), because it's nice and easy and gives you a quick dopamine hit of outrage and imagined power over another human being. It's not going to solve anything. Now admittedly, despite me saying that they're narrowly right in this issue, the people you're conversing with are probably buggy as shit and would gladly support censorship in any leftist-approved direction for even minor offenses, but imagine if it weren't that way. Imagine if they resumed applying the same tolerance to un-PC things (as normies once did) as they apply to these freaks. We'd all be better off and it's worth the trade. So we should encourage this kind of thinking to a degree, to give ourselves the space to exist and determine our own lives.