content: Left Wing vs. Right Wing Economic Strategies: Short Excerpt From Book I'm Working On One thing I've noticed is that conservatives tend to be big into acquiring assets that generate cash flow, case and point guys like Trump and Kiyasaki, who use debt as money by purchasing profitable properties. An easy way of thinking about it is that it's like dropping $175 on a small candy machine to generate $30 every month. In the long run, the machine generates a profit; and since money is not backed by the gold standard they're able to take out millions of dollars they don't have in order to purchase things that at the very least have the ability to eventually pay back the loan. Left wing economic strategy is more about employership and hierarchies, it's about using stuff like credentialism and ceremonial behavior in order to keep people lower on the economic order from invading their own positions. This is basically all of the corporate nonsense you find on Craigslist and Indeed; paradigm shifters and Affirmative action quotas, pseudo intellectual titles and an obsession with trivial heuristics like what school you went to. This is just an economic strategy where the affluent make their bottom firmer and their top airish. Schmoozing and saying big words to navigate the economy. When you look at guys who have vending machine businesses, they always have more masculine features, and you can often tell just by looking at them they're Republicans.. This is also probably the case with real estate magnates and other businessmen / entrepreneurs who use debt as money. I've also heard that Wall Street tends to trend conservative as well and I suspect entrepreneurship is biased towards conservatives outside of stuff like tech. My personal theory is that conservatives just don't do as good as liberals in the employer / employee scenario, because they tend to be unceremonious, and that the major split between these groups economically is that one group hunts and tries to make something for themselves (even though in many cases you really do need a team to win), whereas the other group completely relies upon a hierarchy system with rigid protections and class structure. The brutal irony in all of this is that the frustrations of Socialists probably have more to do with the model that they themselves subscribe to. The employer / employee class model creates class specifically through socially constructed barriers. What do socialists want? More socially constructed barriers. They want the government to get involved and somehow force their bosses into being nice, when in reality the whole problem is a problem of organizing specialized labor. They're trying to promote a system which continues to just dunk on their ability to specialize or properly utilize their talents. Capitalism unironically is a "better" (more convenient) system not because you can just do whatever you want but because you can utilize the abilities of people more efficiently. This is why we abandoned slavery, because the only thing a chained nigger is good for is picking cotton. If you can get that nigger to write Jesus is King and get it sold to hundreds of millions of people around the world, well you've just created income for lots of people and better utilized a niche talent that would otherwise be tilling carrots and yams. In a shitlib economy, we see the Kanyes of the world being asked for their official papers and shown the door if they don't meet 1000 unnecessary requirements.