ANTI-TRUMPERS' SILVER BULLET? THINK TRUMP INSTEAD OF KAVANAUGH. THINK NABU INSTEAD OF BLASEY-FORD. Ukraine Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) apparently has regained the country's senior investigative power and will terminate all investigation of Burisma.  That is reported here:  [https://creativedestructionmedia.com/investigations/2019/12/04/ukraine-fires-prosecutor-investigating-burisma-and-hunter-biden-transfers-cases-to-soros-controlled-nabu-for-closure/].  Zelensky's support or acquiescence can be assumed if it is true (as reported) that his major supporter controls Burisma.   Although terminating the Burisma investigation does not help Trump, more important by far is the implicit threat that NABU and its allies can now investigate the activities of Trump's "iregular channels."  That would include Giuliani and the narratives and allegations of quid pro quo, bribery, coverup and whatever else has not yet surfaced.   Now suppose that NABU/Ukraine, late in a Senate impeachment trial, announce official findings that attribute serious wrongdoing to Trump and his representatives.  There could be little or no practical defense in real time because investigators, witnesses and documents would all be largely unknown and inaccessible here.  Leaving truth aside, US media and anti-Trumpers would be galvanized by "findings" and "facts" that previously were laughably absent.  Independent voters could flip sufficiently to tip US opinion in favor of removal.  RINO/Never-Trump senators could find enough cover in that chaos to abstain or vote to remove in numbers that would enable 47 Democrats to muster the necessary "two-thirds of those voting."  It's all my speculation, obviously, but I offer it anyway to provoke thought and encourage preparation.