Rosemary Collyer Is Not A Shitbag I flamed many of you in a previous post made by an anon which cited an article that basically said that the FISA judge, Rosemary Collyer, had "erased evidence of FISA abuse." Some of the language and my attitude weren't very nice, so I apologize for that. However, I do not apologize for calling out the reactionary positions and comments calling for this judge's head. Many of you asked me to "cite evidence" of my claim that contrary to that bullshit article, she actually was receptive to Rogers' when he blew the whistle on the abuse.   At the time, the best I could tell you was that I was 90% sure that Rogers had testified that the judge did was she was supposed to do when she was notified. So, another anon posted an article which verifies at least part of my claim.  Namely, that she shut the shit down when she found out what was going on. The other claim I made was that she didn't call for the evidence of the crime to be erased, but rather that she ordered the perps to erase the illegally obtained data that they collected on innocent Americans - which is not the same thing, but easily taken out of context by lazy "journalists" and assholes trying to keep you pissed off at the entire government. If someone robbed a bank, and the judge ordered them to return the money - that is NOT the same thing as if the judge were to erase the CCTV footage of the crime in order to cover for it.  Yet, that's pretty much what Collyer is being accused of by some media and a lot of intellectually lazy anons on this board. So, the larger point: let's be careful who we accuse of shit and who we decide is a deepstate asshole.  Because not everyone is, and I believe (as Q has stated repeatedly) that it was really a small cadre of fuckheads who did this shit.  The things that happened are not insignificant, nor are the prescribed penalties for those found guilty.  This is not a scenario in which playing fast and loose with accusations is of no consequence.  And if we want to help foster a culture in government where the rule of law is observed, blaming innocent people for such crimes hardly provides the incentive for whitehats in government to give a shit about doing the right thing.  Think of it.  If you were in such a position, and then you did the right thing and then were blamed as if you were a criminal anyway?   Ok then, enough of my novel, read this article (paragraph 6) and you'll see that Rogers did indeed testify that Collyer did right by us when she figured out that fuckery was afoot: https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2019/12/26/digenova-calls-mike-rogers-cooperation-durham-team-biggest-single-development-heres/