No hard proof. Follow null hypothesis theory. The NULL HYPOTHESIS is that there is NO RELATIONSHIP between Q predictions and actors both good and bad within President Trump's sphere of influence.  Q's predictions, to various extents, have materialized.    Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected if the observed data are significantly unlikely to have occurred if the null hypothesis were true. In other words, we can't prove that there is zero (null) relation between Q and Trump's sphere. Therefore, there must be an alternative hypothesis. Alternative hypothesis could include anything from Q is Trump, Q is Military Intelligence defending the sovereign, Q is a deep state honeypot distraction, to Q is a LARP that Trump's regime perpetuates.  Obviously the sky is the limit on alternative hypothesis. But the null hypothesis (that Trump and Q are unrelated) is rejected. Follow the same logic with FBIAnon's inside leaks about the Clinton Foundation. Again, the null hypothesis is rejected. FBIAnon cannot be ruled out as NOT having inside information on the Clinton Foundation. This is more ominous than QAnon. If one were to "assume" everything FBIAnon said about illegal weapons trafficking, sex traffic, child rape, human sacrifice and the cults interweaved throughout government and business elites were true then the deepstate's current behavior is expected.  v/FBIAnon contemplated suicide. If your worst Illuminati/NWO/Luciferian/Satanic fears could materialize, and you were helpless to stop it, would you contemplate suicide?  (((Columbus's))) genocide of the Arawak/Taino Indians comes to mind. There are no real Haitians because the endogenous women jumped off cliffs with infants in arms to avoid jew slavery and torture. What fear drives a 15 year old mother to jump off a cliff with her 6 month old baby?