"Vaccine Shedding"--Vaccinated people infecting unvaccinated people--Breaks The Narrative of Herd Immunity. Sorry! Elite. You Dun Goof'd Vaccine SHedding vaccine shedding breaks their narrative.  If you vaccinate someone, and then THEY infect the UNVACCINATED, well there goes your "herd immunity" hypothesis.  RIGHT OUT THE DOOR It would turn out that the MORE people are vaccinated, the greater chance for unvaccinated to become infected because of vaccine shedding, which means that herd immunity is false....since it can only be ONE or the OTHER They dun GOOFD Herd Immunity vs Vaccine Shedding--which is more true? If what I'm saying is true (a scenario outlined below), it would turn out this herd immunity hypothesis is just MASS GASLIGHTING Because if you have a  Then the presumption under HERD IMMUNITY (* a Hypothesis btw) is that Population A would have a higher rate of disease than Population B, because population B has a number of people that are essentially immune to being 'vectors'.   However, because of vaccine shedding, it could be the case (we don't know) that a number of folks between 0 and 50% could become infected, and of the other 50% that were vaccinated, a small number WILL DEVELOP THE INFECTION, as we've seen with the polio vaccine This number, whatever it is could be higher than in population A, the unvaccinated.  Because you are introducing the virus into the population, and we don't know the rate of vaccine shedding We just have to rely on wikipedia saying "RARE EVENT".  We need to know the rates.  We MUST know otherwise we ought not implement any MANDATORY vaccine programs.  And I'll tell you why Vaccination as propaganda Because of vaccine shedding, if the rate is sufficiently higher so that population B has a higher rate of infection than population A, then the vaccination "Herd Immunity" hypothesis is FAKE NEWS SCARE PROPAGANDA, to SCARE populations into vaccinating their kids.  And as we know, these vaccines could be anything. But even if the vaccines were "pure and true" and didn't have other agents that cause problems (in other words, they were simply 'vanilla' vaccines without dangerous adjuvants, cancer agents or tracking nanotech devices), it would STILL be an anticompetitive "protection racket" run by the pharma corporations with promotional,  administrative, and enforcement pressures sponsored  by the government. Truly nasty stuff. We demand answers on "Vaccine Shedding".  We have real questions about this issue, and aren't just shilling for the "Big Homeschooling Industrial Complex" that doesn't exist