Question for law fags concerning possible evidence as a result of upcoming searches on Epstein's property In advance sorry for the way I try state my question. I am not a native speaker and US law idiom is too peculiar for me to translate in a correct manor. But I hope I am clear enough for law fags to understand my question. Presumed Epstein isn't dead, but currently in a witness protection program. Because he's dead no one can object further search warrants ("standing to challenge the search warrant"). Now lets presume they find tapes of Bill abusing minors. And Epstein shows up alive and kicking in court again.  In this hypothetical case, could Bill's lawyers successfully object against the tapes as evidence? Because this evidence is gathered under false pretences? For if Epstein was still alive, Bill could have challenged the search warrant and the tapes may not have been found.