Help, Please. Rybicki Interview Transcript, p79-81. Anyone out there read the Rybicki transcript? Why would the stuff in Rybicki Exhibit 3 be redacted? "[Rybicki Exhibit No. 3 Was marked for identification.]   Ms. Sachsman Grooms.  I want to move to a new exhibit in this sequence.  We're marking it exhibit 3.  It is an email from Peter Strzok on May  17th, 2016, at 4:35  p.m.    It's to you.    It cc's Andrew McCabe, Priestap,  and a redacted OGC counsel.    It's Bates stamped FBI 49 through 50.  Do you recall this email?    Mr.  Rybicki.   I can't  --  I don't recall specifically, but I don't dispute that it came to me.  Ms.  Sachsman Grooms.   Uh-huh.  So  the  email  starts:  Jim,  blank, John, and I thought  about and then  spent a few hours  talking about the Director's request.    Some of our overarching observations follow as he narrows down what he wants to  say.    We'll provide comments about specific numbers, fact checking.   Do you know who the redacted person is at the beginning?    Mr.  Rybicki.   I think I could, given the context.    I think I could say, but I'm not certain for sure.  Ms. Sachsman Grooms.  Uh-huh.  Who do you think it is?    Mr. Rybicki.  Lisa Page.  Ms.  Sachsman Grooms.   When you read  through these comments and this email, did you consider them to  be Mr.  Strzok's comments alone or was he consolidating the comments of the group? [12:25 p.m.] Mr. Rybicki.  I would have said, because this happened frequently, the consolidating the group. Ms. Sachsman Grooms.  And who would have been in that group?  Mr.  Rybicki.   So I  guess I would call  it a subset of  the executive briefing group, so  Mr.  Strzok, Mr. Lisa Page,  sort of the investigative team plus some of their counsels. So  Ms.  Sachsman Grooms.   So he separated these comments into three parts.  Under thematic considerations he said, and I'll quote:  " [all the quote was redacted]  When you got these comments from Mr. Strzok on behalf of this group, did you consider  --  did you feel that they showed that he and the team wanted to  aggressively rebut statements that  had been made by Secretary Clinton and her campaign,  that they had evidence that they felt that they could rebut?    Mr. Rybicki.  I don't remember feeling that reaction, no. " This part of the interview is confusing me.  Can anyone help me understand it?