A more accurate way of gauging public sentiment than rigged polls Some anons and I did some work last night and came up with some interesting ways to get a more accurate perspective of what the political climate actually looks like using Google Trends. I will post the juicy parts below but original thread is here Was mentioned that trends accurately predicted numerous elections "Vote Biden" "Vote Trump" http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1602225434035.png "Protests" "Riots" http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1602227794837.jpg Then going into the presidential and VP debates "Hunter Biden" "Trump taxes" "White supremacy" http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1602228268583.jpg I thought this was especially interesting since it's unmistakable there was a spike of interest in all three topics immediately after the debate, yet none even came close to Trump's hardest push about Hunter Biden. "Harris won" "Pence won" http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1602230775446.png "People of color" "Niggers" http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1602231311373.jpg "Biden won debate" "Trump won debate" http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1602231455965.png "Will Biden win" "Will Trump win" http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1602233691410.jpg I thought this was just great because it really illustrates a few things here. First, nobody really seems concerned about Biden winning. They're only concerned about Trump LOSING. Just reinforces that Biden is a walking husk. Everyone knows it. Anyways. I figure this should help shed some light on the issue, it's nice to have some hard data you can mostly trust. I don't think Google has started manipulating analytics like this quite yet but they certainly will in the future. Cheers