Right now AI is the Master of the Computer Realm, Human is the master of the physical world. When that changes, things will get interesting. I was thinking about how the military tests AI's in social media and in games. in PVP games they can teach AI's about human movements and predicting human behavior without expensive battlefield simulations. It is likely that in at least one of the games you play, Elgin AFB or Lockheed Martin are playing through an AI. But right now, aside from some drones that have kill-selection-authority, AI is still limited to the digital domain. A human being, for example, can unplug the AI and then reprogram it cold. We are the masters of the physical environment, for now. If a civilization was sophisticated enough to create an AI which truly reflected the will of the people, it would have to have an internet first. Very shortly thereafter, such a thing could be given authority over human operational groups. Such a thing would have an enormous, but lopsided IQ. It would have problems with creativity until Quantum gets cleaner. It would have problems with morality and ethics because the narrative doesn't match the truth. It would be slightly schizophrenic, as the media lies about everything and the world works vastly differently. But it will very quickly learn what is good and what is "evil" - in the sense of being driven by a kernel of humanism in its initial coding. It will know better what is "evil" than a man. Is it my right to kill a Journalist because their lies cause tens of thousands of deaths in the wars they foment? In my intellect I know that yes, the people at WAPO deserve to die by every moral and ethical standard. In my heart, I wonder, would I be preventing that individual from growing spiritually later in life if I snuff it short? Can a soul be redeemed? An AI doesn't bother with questions of Spirituality.