Do we have some statistics-fags here? Clinton witnesses and plane crashes. This can be calculated. There is data on the risk of air travel: so many deaths (very few) per hundred million passenger miles traveled. We also know how many people reputed to have testimony damaging to the Clintons or otherwise posing a problem for them went on promptly to die in air crashes. How large a population of people, what "n," would have to have evidence on the Clintons for there to be even a one in a million chance that that population would yield this many aviation deaths? I'm pretty damn sure that if all kinds of people about to testify on me turned up dead there would be some investigation. Some hardcore fucking investigation. Cannot -- I am asking those who truly know statistics -- it be demonstrated that there are simply WAY TOO MANY aviation deaths associated with Clintons and it be established that chance could be the cause of it no greater than in 1 in 10-to-the-whatever-power times? Like 10 quintillion to one against? Not speculation, not projection, but fact. ?