Trump's walk away from the talks... a reactive move? We have watched how the talks in Vietnam have stalled over the lifting of restrictions... But those following Q also saw the post saying deal agreed long ago... So what are we to think? Was it always the intention to break up talks as we saw and could this be linked to the -21?  In other words are we too expect a big big thing coming is the complete agreement to denuclearise in NK.. Or has this break up of talks been a reactive response by the Q team to counter a play by the DS?  We saw the tension suddenly build up in Pakistan and India yesterday indeed Trump even referred to that situation... and we are all well aware of the links between the DS & democrats and Pakistan... Also we saw the MSM narrative pushing the Cohen testimony and how there is all they need to impeach (admittedly that seems to have fallen on its face!) but they are still digging and pushing that collusion narrative..! Or was the break up a reactive response to something that we are unaware of maybe something behind the scenes and something we’ll never know because by breaking up the talks it has negated that counter move ? Or maybe a move made by DS that we will find out as they’ve initiated the play and this was a reactive response by Trump to avoid the talks being drowned out by the narrative of this DS play? We know the culture of negotiations in Asia is very different to the way the west negotiate and maybe this was a way for Kim to appear strong...? Anyone else have any thoughts on this break down of the talks in Vietnam especially given what Q told us just a few days ago?