Could the latest Q drops Re: Hatch Act be intended to explain the lack of drops? ... I know the most prevalent interpretation was that <<others>> were violating the Hatch Act.  Not sure that was the intent. I didn't understand the logic in Q's prolonged absence during the run up to these critical elections.  Especially with it being RED OCTOBER, etc.  Like most I thought we would have seen some indictments, arrests etc to make sure the midterms were safe. It's possible that the Q team had to lay low due to the hatch act, as they would presumably be subject to it.  That was my interpretation of those drops (2383 - 2383).