Such a ridiculous point of view. Think of the trillions of things that will happen this year. There's only 365 days to get them all done.  This is an interesting point of view. If I follow your logic, if I draw a straight line on the floor and let a stick fall, what would be the probability the stick aligns with the line? We have 2PI radians or 360 degrees. Would be the number of possibilities in radians or degrees or non of the above? As you can see, depending on the measure system, the probability changes. So? It's the wrong approach.  Your way of thinking is a common mistake made in mathematics when you confuse discreet data with continuous data. The classic illustration is the length of a carpet on a straight staircase where the height H equals the base B. If you think about it, you will see the length of the carpet is independent from the number of stairs and equals H+B=2H or 2 when H=1 is normalized. So? When the number of stairs grows, the carpet approaches the straight line allowing you to use the Pythagoras formula but you never end up having Square Root of 2 = 2. Do you see it?