Important Ways Their Hypocrisy and Weaponized Omissions Proves Global Warming / Climate Change Is Partly A False Narrative 1. Easy.  Nuclear Weapons Still Exist You cannot lecture me about climate change or any global ecological concern while nuclear weaponry still exists.  One nuclear weapon going off could destroy the planet now, according to their narrative--if the Earth really is in a vulnerable state, then even ONE large nuclear event would create so much dust cover it would destroy the planet.  Therefore either this is NOT true and global warming is false, or we have MADMEN in many countries around the world, stewing in their own sociopathy, malice and terroristic threat of complete global destruction of everything on the planet.   Which is it?  Are we all one button press from total ruin?  If so, then governments ARE terrorists 2. Obama's sprayed corexit on deepwater horizon instead of cleaning it up properly;  This toxified the oceans, which they've been screeching at us were already depleted from over harvesting of fish populations and other injuries to the coral reefs.  This makes Obama the biggest ecoterrorist in history--one that is GLOBAL, a global ecoterrorist because his decision was a business one to spare 'british petroleum' profits--that's how you know who HE really works for.   This  decision stalled the gulf loop current for several years, which disturbed the oceanic currents around the world, which then deranged major air currents around the world as it is a reciprocally influential feedback system.  You want to know why weather patterns are deranged?  It's because of Obama.  It is.  This is proven with science, not conjecture, though the mainstream press has not connected the dots 3. HAARP Type Technologies exist.  Weather weapons exist.   We have them on record talking about weather weapons we have, and weather manipulation microwave arrays they've been using for decades.  The Hum In a somewhat related statement, I went to NYC yrs ago to receive medical ketamine treatment.  This actually saved and changed my life for the better in many ways, though it was a very fringe therapy and I didn't tell anyone so they couldn't talk me out of it.  It was a VERY weird experience bringing up things for me that I've yet to explain.  One of those things is the fact that after the 6th day / infusion, I was in such an altered post-state that my severe hearing loss in my right ear specifically wasn't just gone, I had temporary super hearing, and I could hear a VERY low frequency that was constant and everywhere.  I thought it was psychological at first, like tinnitus, so I went into a court building with huge heavy masonry, and to my surprise, the noise tapered off as I went deeper into the building.  But even inside the building I could hear it, though it was fainter.  Was I hearing electricity?  Was I hearing the collective sound of the city?   No, it had a direction.  North.  It was a hum that sounded like an enormous diesel engine idling somewhere very far in the distance.....TO THE NORTH.   I tried to find the source of this, and traveled quite a distance, until I realized it was a sound rainbow.  No matter where you go, it was there, at a low level, and no one else could hear it but me, and it sounded northerly.  It never got louder as you traveled north, nor did it get softer as you traveled south.   I drove back to my home in NC, and stopped along the way, at a garden center in Bethesda, MD, to enjoy the incredible, renewed vibrance of colors I've never seen before in various coleus.  I heard the hum there too.  Same volume, also north.  No one there could hear.  Funny looks when I asked them, which is reasonable in retrospect. (this condition is called the ketamine afterglow btw) I got home, and there it was again.  That hum, north.  Not in my head.  Everywhere but not in my head.  What was this?  I believe I was hearing Infrasound, extremely low frequency sound waves from the ionosphere.  Maybe they were a natural phenomenon, but I doubt it--I just--I can't prove that.  It could be shumann resonance frequency but that seems TOO low for me to hear. I mention this because I started researching it and that's how I came to the fact that the NAVY was using HAARP for nuclear sub communications; but they could also be using this for nuclear early warning detection, a kind of sonic skyshield; it could be part of any number of RADAR systems We are absolutely SATURATING the airwaves with electrical signals.  And they want to lecture us about Climate Change.  This is something satanists do--they ruin stuff and then blame others for it---to quote James Alefantis, a hero of our times /s, "You did this to YOU, it's your culture" 4. High Altitude Aerosolized Particulate Spraying aka Chemtrails Exist This is a big subject, and I'm not going to spend any time proving it as I already have and so have others.  It's been disclosed and anyone who rolls their eyes at it, you should disregard them as fake news in reader form--THEY are the problem here because THEY haven't done ANY research into the subject.  Not only have those in the Airforce disclosed it, John Brennan has (CIA), Naval intelligence has, and many officials already have disclosed chemtrails. We've been doing it since the 1970s.  By we I mean the US Air force.  Why? Some are military, some are defense experiments, scientific experiments, but the sheer volume means their reasons are much beyond any military / defense experiments.   They've been using the excuse of geoengineering for a long time.  Is that all it is?  We don't know.  There has been much speculation on this but needless to say that disclosing that they have been doing this for decades would completely undermine this idea that WE THE CITIZENS are responsible for climate change through our collective actions. One would have to say, HEY, if my hairspray is doing it, then why the F are you still spraying chemtrails dozens of times every day for decades?  My hairspray versus your tens of thousands of chemtrails accounting for millions of metric tons of volume of unknown liquids being sprayed from your jets...Don't you think THAT would affect the climate?? 5. Damage Done by Nuclear Testing in the 1950s-60s in US/Russia and Elsewhere; Peaceful Nukes underground, etc We don't know WHAT kind of damage we've done to outer layers of our atmosphere by blowing up nukes in space in the 1950s-60s but I imagine it's a lot, and much more significant than ANYTHING humans have done below.  That hasn't stopped them though, from BLAMING US for that damage We know that the nukes in space 'created exotic particles' that were captured by the van allen belts and have a half life, some short some long.  There could still be exotic high energy particles caught up in that system, and that would necessarily repel the sun's energy around the earth by charge repulsion.  Effectively blowing up nukes in space turned our force field of the van allens into a better, stronger forcefield.  Was that a good thing?  See global dimming below 6. Global DIMMING and Media Narratives they Ignore Global Dimming is a phenomenon observed in a BBC documentary in the 2000s which apparently society has completely forgotten.  Why is the world dimming?  They put light sensors around the world and measured the light over time, and found, YES, the world is getting dimmer Is it grand solar minimum?? Or is is CHEMTRAIL COVER?? (or both (wink)) Conclusion I have NO doubt that the weather patterns on Earth are totally deranged, but the media plays a role in helping us forget that in winter time it gets cold and in summer time it's hot.  I know that sounds dumb, but when the media is making an enormous spectacle about snowstorms like it's the first time on planet earth, people tend to think "oh my gosh it's a disaster" This disaster journalism is really making things worse.  Butterflies that are threatened by us building a wall, as if we are to believe they cannot fly 20' high over it--give me a break--or through it.  There is a lot of nonsense out there We should worry a lot about dead bees and other pollinators, but blaming climate change is a red herring, especially when we've PROVEN that neonicotinoids and glyphosate are the real culprits So until the damn press starts getting things right, and until people start paying attention to "uncomfortable facts that don't fit the narrative", I think we shouldn't run around like our hair is on fire about climate change.  It makes no sense to whine about it, in light of the fact that we are saturating the world with electronic signals, we're chemtrailing, we're using haarp technologies, we're spraying detergent on the 'poor vulnerable ocean' and of course, what damage did US and Russia do in the 1950s to the ionosphere and van allen belts from blowing up nukes in space, or all the nukes tested in nevada?     Why don't we FOIA for it?   Hah.  That's a laugh