Did Q answer wrong/opposite on the 911 Pentagon question to calibrate interpretation of Q&A answers? It seems that a “plane” hitting the Pentagon on 911 is the most plausible to normies yet obvious misinformation to us that he could answer... Are all his other answers meant to be interpreted conversely as well? => We are alone, space isn’t vast => We never landed on the moon => K confirmation will be due to RR stand down (this is the most obvious confirmation/controvertible of whether this theory holds water) and perhaps explains the timing of the Declas Or am I just projecting? 🧐