A note about Confirmation Bias From time to time I feel the need as moderator to put my neck on the chopping block of the Q movement and say a cautionary note about checking our confirmation bias It's not  unequivocally appropriate for me to pull rank because, what rank do i have, I'm just a shitposting guy who was in a rightish position at an unusual time and yes, I'm no exception to being sucked in by scant evidence in confirmation of wild conjecture that Q may have only tangentially alluded to but which we as a community like to use to affirm our conviction of the breadth and depth of evil and corruption and its understandable with this CHINESE VIRUS (fuck you, enemedia) and it's necessitation of large scale government response that this is a worthy flashpoint for unusual amounts of speculation HOWEVER I'm seeing many threads on social media which are expressions of outright conviction of almost totally baseless conjecture If the hollywood elite put out a little note to each other right now to troll the Q movement the way Trump trolls the libtard press, we'd be absolute suckers for it.  "Hey guys lets all talk about spinach like its something sinister, those Q people will go full retard over it"  & theyd be right. We would I just feel that its currently at levels that are an impediment to the Great Awakening newby: "is there something to this Q movement? Post xyz was pretty weirdly accurate"  skeptic "yea but they also believe whenever a hollywood star says spinach theyve sacrificed a child in their basement" thats where we're at  can I ask you to all consider being a little more circumspect. Who am I to tell you not to speculate wildly ? Im no-one, I'm not telling you what to speculate, I'm just strongly recommending that if you express a speculation on social media, it should be in absentia of the language of absolute conviction  downvoat me if you must, im good for the points as you were.