Thanks for the docs. Interesting.   For this reason, the Commission highlighted two areas for particular attention. First, personnel security lies at the very heart of our security system, and the trustworthiness of those who deal with sensitive and classified information must be ensured. Second, Information Systems (IS) security requires increased attention. U. S. Government organizations are increasingly dependent on IS in performing their complex missions. The evolution of IS technology is, however, much faster than that of IS security technology. Overcoming this problem will require careful threat assessments, investment strategies, funding, and management attention if we are to protect the integrity, availability, and confidentiality of ourinformation assets. These themes, emphasized by the Commission, continue to be vital in solving the insider problem and are reflected in this advisory.  It reminds me of two thing:  Q 3997:  INFILTRATION INSTEAD OF INVASION.  And the Snowden document Q referenced. There was a section on Snowden's failure to meet the NSA handling standards and he was complaining that after failing for it 3x he might get the shaft. So, how is NSA hiring exactly?  When I enter into an employment that requires me to have a certain level of understanding and a certificate demonstrating that, I usually get a period of 3 months in which I have to meet that threshold. Apparently, back then for Snowden, there was none.  So, how many infiltrators have been let lose on NSA datacollection premises? Has it changed?  Let's see what this week brings in terms of booms. I'd be very interested to know what class 1-99 actually is.