The Press and Senate Intel Committee (Q2657 & Q2643) and Judicial Watch is Holding Adam Schiff (and others) Accountable APRIL 14, 2017 (Washington, DC)  – Judicial Watch today sent a hand-delivered letter to the chairman and co-chairman of the House Office of Congressional Ethics calling for an investigation into whether Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Jackie Speier (D-CA) “disclosed classified information to the public in violation of House ethics rules.” Citing the ethics complaints filed against House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) charging that he “may have made unauthorized disclosures of classified information, in violation of House Rules, regulations, or other standards of conduct,” Judicial Watch wrote: If the standard for filing a complaint or opening an ethics investigation is that a member has commented publicly on matters that touch on classified information, but the member does not reveal the source of his or her information, then the complaints against Chairman Nunes are incomplete insofar as they target only Nunes.  At least two other members of the House Intelligence Committee have made comments about classified material that raise more directly the very same concerns raised against Chairman Nunes because they appear to confirm classified information contained in leaked intelligence community intercepts. On March 21, 2017, the Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff spoke to an audience at the Brookings Institution in which he commented on an intelligence community intercept of a December 29, 2016 conversation between Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislayak and retired U.S. Army General Michael Flynn, who had been selected by then-President Elect Donald Trump to serve as National Security Advisor.  Both the fact of the conversation and the conversation’s contents were leaked to the news media and reported widely.  In his Brookings Institution speech, Rep. Schiff stated: And then you have leaks that expose malfeasance or illegality.  Now, I put that kind of leak, I put the Flynn leak in that category.  And what was most disturbing to me, frankly, about that was:  here you had a situation where the president is informed that his national security advisor . . . has lied to the vice president, and probably others . . . about a conversation with the Russians over sanctions imposed over hacking in the election to help the president. Q2643 What happens when all 'insiders' know the news is FAKE? What happens when all 'insiders' know [AS] is the leak of false data? What happens when a member of the House Intel Comm purposely leaks FAKE & FALSE data to 'friendly' news sources in order to   maintain & portray a FALSE NARRATIVE to the public?  How do you build a case against a member of the House Intel Comm if they themselves have access to the intelligence?  What critical 'mission' did SESSIONS publicly announce re: leaks?  Why did SESSIONS make this PUBLIC? Optics are important. Control of the NARRATIVE. TRUTH & TRANSPARENCY IS THE ONLY WAY FORWARD> RE: MUELLER deleted 'critical' text messages between PS+LP? Re_read Re: [MUELLER] designed to…. The 'MUELLER' insurance policy has expired. Q Q2657 ... Does the C_A hold blackmail on political leaders? Does the C_A protect those who protect them? Why are ex C_A contractors running for office? How many ex C_A contractors are currently in office? Hello, [AS]. Once an agent, always an agent. Q https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-calls-upon-office-congressional-ethics-investigate-whether-rep-schiff-rep-speier-disclosed-classified-information/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGeiHxbz1G0