Seems to be a logical speculation.   The hard facts before us are pretty strong. Schiff was head of the intel committee and lied about things to the public;  the video clips are damning.  He also is implicated in the illegal leaks to the press.  The rest, like the pointers at the Hotel Standard or the Blackhawk operation in his backyard,  are icing on the speculation cake.  Nonetheless, they provide  strong circumstantial evidence that there is fire near the smoke.  When opponents are really trashed publicly (like calling him "Adam Schitt", or ""Little Adam Schitt", etc and there are NO repercussions, NO pushback, NO indignant howls from the "victim", it is a signal that there is deeply compromising dirt on him. He doesn't fight back, because he deserves to be trashed and he knows it.  Look at what Trump said about Hillary IN PUBLIC. "She deserves to go to jail. She is a crook. She should be locked up." There are LAWS against defaming and libelling and slandering people. Yet Trump refers to Hillary Clinton as "Crooked Hillary", WITH REGULARITY.  If Trump was not on solid ground he would have been attacked legally and with every justification.   But when you say something about someone THAT IS TRUE, they have no legitimate basis for taking you to court.