The unemployment lines under Barack Hussein Obama were bigger than this years Women's March. Saturday was the day that the latest protest against President Trump's election took place with the 2020 "Women's March" drawing underwhelming numbers to the streets of Washington D.C. and other cities. The turnout was a far cry from 2017 when hundreds of thousands of protesters donned their pink "pussy" caps, toted vulgar signs of female anatomy and swarmed D.C. on the weekend of Trump's inauguration.  Many of the hordes who swarmed the Beltway likely for the initial march had already made travel plans to be in the nation's capital to celebrate Hillary's historic win and rather than waste their tickets and hotel reservations, chose to rage against Trump and the 63 million Americans who voted for him instead.  It was a harbinger of things to come from an alliance of far-left groups and capitalized on feminist anger over Hillary Clinton's thwarted bid to become the nation's first female president and are still protesting today.  This year's turnout was a sad shadow of the massive temper tantrum of three years ago as outrage fatigue has set in along with lingering questions about the anti-Semitism of the leadership of the "Women's March" that has done much to tarnish the brand.  According to early reports, the D.C. march drew fewer than 10,000 raising questions as to the long-term viability of the event after President Trump's reelection.  https://trendingpolitics.com/this-year-s-anti-trump-women-s-march-could-be-a-bad-omen-for-democrats/