THE MOST IMPORTANT topic we will ever encounter - CHILDREN - their future is our future. Greetings We all know that the ruling elites have been making our lives as miserable as they possibly could by poisoning our food, water, forcing us to vaccinate with mercury and brush our teeth with fluoride which is good for You. There is however something much, much worse than that - they made us believe that lying on your back and using anesthetics is the best way for women to give birth to their children - this is a lie. Hospitals are the true gates of Hell through which our children have to crawl before entering this plane of existence. The way it is done disadvantages babies for the rest of their lives in almost every single instance (!) and sometimes leads to the death of the mother. Women from tribes who are in contact with nature give birth while crouching/squating and don't use drugs. It makes the whole procedure last couple minutes (!) not hours, they do it alone without any help whatsoever and literally 20 mins later go back to work. Here's long but REALLY worth reading excerpt from a book titled  "Magical child: rediscovering nature's plan for our children" by Joseph Chilton Pearce. These infants were born in the home, generally delivered by the mother herself. The child was never separated from the mother, who massaged, caressed, sang to, and fondled her infant continually. The mother carried her unswaddled infant in a sling, next to her bare breasts, continually. She slept with her infant. The infant fed continuously, according to its awn schedule. These infants were awake a surprising amount of the time—alert, watchful, happy, calm. They virtually never cried.  Their mothers were bonded to them (an issue I shall discuss more thoroughly in Chapter 7) and sensed their every need before that need had to be expressed by crying. The mother responded to the infant's every gesture and assisted the child in any and every move that was undertaken, so that every move initiated by the child ended in immediate success. At two days of age (forty-eight hours) these infants sat bolt upright, held only by the forearms, with a beautifully straight back and perfect head balance, their finely focused eyes staring intently, intelligently at their mothers. And they smiled and smiled.  New European-type hospitals were being erected in Uganda at the time of Geber's studies (she was granted an additional year to make long-term studies to which I shall return in Chapter 7). Only the upper-class Ugandan families could afford such luxury, of course, and the women of this class naturally followed the fashion of having their children in hospitals. These hospital-delivered infants, it turned out, followed the same civilized schedule American and European infants do. Geber found that they did not smile until some two and a half months after birth. Nor were they precocious in any sense.  They showed no signs of sensorimotor learning, displayed no uncanny intelligence for some two and half months, at which point some signs of intelligence were apparent. Blood analyses showed that high levels of adrenal steroids connected with birth stress were still prevalent at two and a half months. These infants slept massively, cried when awake, were irritable and colicky, frail and helpless. So the issue was not in same racial predisposition toward early intellectual growth. The issue lay solely with what happens to the newborn infant in hospitals.  (...) A number of years ago, a doctor by the name of William F. Windle became concerned over childbirth practices. He made a careful analysis of hospital deliveries throughout the United States and noted, with some alarm, two questionable procedures: the widespread, automatic use of premedication and anesthetics and the usual practice of cutting the umbilical cord as soon as the baby's body was clear.  There has never been a textbook on obstetrics that did not stress leaving the umbilical cord strictly alone so long as any activity is detectable in it. How and why this strict injunction got so completely lost in medical practice is too involved to discuss here. Suffice it to say that Windle's observations proved to be too tragically accurate; the umbilical cord is cut almost immediately in the majority of cases.' Windle then made the simplest of tests. He took pregnant monkeys and treated them to all the benefits of our modern medical practices. At the time of labor and delivery, he administered anesthetics in a body-weight ratio equivalent of that given the average laboring human mother in the hospital. At the birth of the infant, he cut the umbilical cord at the average time he had found practiced in hospitals. In every case, Windle's newborn monkeys could not get their breath and had to be resuscitated; that is, artificial means had to be used to help them get their breath going. (Our hospitals now have various machines to aid in this process.)  In the natural world, of course, this never takes place. Unless an animal infant is stillborn, it breathes the instant that its head clears the cervix. Little monkeys have enormous capability soon after birth. Almost immediately, they can cling to their mother, who resumes her ordinary life quickly, toting her infant with her, giving him a bit of assistance in those first few hours as he clings to her. In a short time, the infant is physically autonomous, on his feet, jumping about, leaping away from his mother and back to her. Windle's infant monkeys, whose nature had been outwitted by clever human devices, showed no such agility or ability. Indeed, they were totally helpless. Not only could they not cling to the mother, they could not get their limbs under them at all. The mothers, dazed by the drugs and the greatly lengthened labor (which anesthetics automatically cause), could do little to assist. Windle had to step in to keep the little creatures alive. And how long was it before these medically delivered infants achieved some normality, got their limbs under them, and began some preliminary sen-sorimotor learning? Some two to three weeks.  Windle performed autopsies on some of these helpless infants and found in every case that their brains harbored severe lesions of a type resulting from oxygen deprivation. He was able to keep some of the monkeys alive (and it took outside help; it was beyond the monkeys' abilities) until they had matured and achieved apparent normality. When Windle autopsied some of these apparently recovered monkeys, he found that their brains still harbored exactly the same lesions found at birth. The damage done at the beginning proved irreparable. Windle next studied human infants who had died following known birth histories of anesthetics, low Apgar scoring, premature cutting of the umbilical cord, and so on. Autopsies showed that these infant brains harbored exactly the same lesions he had found in his oxygen-deprived monkeys. Cases of children who had similar birth histories but who died at age three or four were then studied, and where possible, autopsies were made. Again, the brains were found with the same lesions.  Windle pointed out the obvious. In those first critical moments when the lungs must make the transition to producing all the oxygen for that young body, the system expects to call on the reserve supply held in the placenta. A drugged mother immediately means a drugged infant, and a drugged infant cannot get his/her breath. Artificial means must be used. Breathing is then clumsy, slow, inefficient. The cutting of the umbilical cord at this time denies the infant the reserves of oxygen at the most critical point in his/her life. A vicious double bind is imposed. Windle found that the majority of hospital deliveries required resuscitation. Now, what is the most familiar birth scene that comes to your mind? What do we think of as a universal, natural part of childbirth? Spanking the baby. Holding the newborn up by the heels and vigorously belting him/her on the backside in the hope that air will get going in that tired, drugged system. This is resuscitation. These infants failed to breathe (or in many cases, the impatient doctor could not wait or could not stand to stand around waiting), and artificial means had to be used. Nowhere else in nature is failure to breathe noted except in stillboms. And nowhere else do we find this deadly syndrome except in technological, medical, hospital deliveries.  Newell Kephart, director of the Achievement Center for Children at Purdue University, finds learning and behavior problems resulting from minor undetected brain injury in 15 to 20 percent of all children examined. Goldberg and Schiffman estimate that 20 to 40 percent of our school population is handicapped by learning problems that may be related to "neurological impairments at birth."' Windle closed his report, published in Scientific American in 1969, with this comment:  Our experiments have taught as that birth asphyxia lasting long enough to make resuscitation necessary always damages the brain.... A great many human infants have to be resuscitated at birth. We assume that their brains, too, have been damaged. There is reason to believe that the number of human beings in the U.S. with minimal brain damage due to asphyxia at birth is much larger than has been thought. Perhaps it is time to reexamine current practices of childbirth with a view to avoiding conditions that give rise to asphyxia.  You can download that book from thepiratebay by typing "chilton pearce" or buy it on the web. There's nothing more important than informing parents they have a choice to make here. It will affect children's entire lives. Polish Patriot