Now, Amazon (Netflix, Hollywood) Are Trying to Rewrite History, By Inserting Their Globalist Politics, Weaponized Social Psychology into Historical Fiction. It's Gaslighting. It's Gross Amazon's Gaslighting vis-a-vis Phyllis Schaffly / Eagle Forum First of all, I have no love for Phyllis Schaffly, ultraconservative woman politician that the right--to this day--deeply reveres as a thought leader, whose memory and politics are continued through her Eagle Forum. I am not really a conservative, or if I am, I'm a Trumppublican (because the left / dem party has left me, a lifelong dem until hillary, behind).  I support our fearless jefe, President Trump, and no he's committed no crime and I'm deeply angered, shocked and ashamed they've impeached him based on THEIR crimes (to avoid punishment for THEIR crimes). Anyway, Amazon has released a tv show that takes place in the 60s called 'the Marvelous Mrs Maisel', and Newsbusters just published an article dissecting it's incredibly divisive, toxic, deepstate propaganda,... "Not So Marvelous: 'Mrs. Maisel' Calls Conservative Icon Phyllis Schlafly 'Satan,' 'Monster' ...essentially outing it as mind-kontrol mkultra programming, but to be fair, not in those exact words. The script is entirely coded language meant to make Schlafly sound like a rampant racist. One of the phrases with which they are most disgusted is "well-financed minorities," a phrase Schlafly never used. It's a bizarre side story in a show that is usually just light and funny, even when dealing with serious things.  You know that old adage that writers should "show, not tell" what they want to say? The writers of Marvelous Mrs. Maisel might need to be reminded of that. At they very least, they can get their facts straight. Analysis My issue with this is that Hollywood feels it has to go backward, forward and pack every single nanosecond of screentime with their polluted, infected, and infectious worldview, which many of us--myself included--have already pointed out to be false (as in counterfactual), politically toxic,  promotional of maladaptive human behavior, and historically dishonest.  They are deeply hurting their younger audience, which has not lived long enough to see any other way than the illusions that are created by the Netflixes and Amazons of the world.   I consider it a type of rape--mindrape, psychological dysgenics.  It seeks to hurt people's understanding of the truth Some may say, 'just don't watch it'.   That would be good advice, if I myself were significantly affected by it, which I am not--beyond stressing, annoying or sometimes--rarely--infuriatiating me.  Like this one Why am I defending Phyllis Schaffly?  The nuke joke in the video I included is probably how she really felt.  A war hawk. JUST LIKE HILLARY.   And Brian Williams, admiring those "beautiful rockets" and "stunning weapons of war".   Gross These people are sick.  Not only because they are warhawks (chickenhawks really, like lindsey graham), but they are also (not so) secretly arms dealers (mccain, lindsey), and they are also hypocrites and gaslighters.   Demons.  The lot of 'em Phyllis Schaffly's Golden Bird Club is Now Hillarys It's a little known fact that Hillary Clinton and Phyliis Schaffly were secretly friends, and that HRC looked up to her as a 'strong woman' political leader even if on opposite sides of the fence, representing differential sets of values.  She was, in a manner of speaking, a type of remote / secret mentor for Hillary. We know this from statements HRC has made, from their associations, and from the fact that the following people seem to be signalling membership in at least 2 of Hillary's secret clubs, which we know to exist, INC, INCII (international neighbors club), the 'secret hillary club' which I refer to as 'the phoenix club', or belizean grove (female bohemian grove).    The signalling refers to a very specialized, limited edition broach, "the liberty eagle" made in DC by Georgetown jeweler Ann Hand for ultrarich female politicians, that the following people have worn publicly and proudly.  It's an eagle clutching a globe--and it represents a females-only subsection / faction of Schaffly's Eagle Club, whose torch is apparently carried by the one and only Hillary Clinton. The golden bird, perched defiantly atop a pearlescent sphere, was crafted by Georgetown jeweler Ann Hand, wife of former Johnson administration protocol chief Lloyd Hand. Former Clinton White House communications director Ann Lewis was quoted in a February 1998 article in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel explaining that during the 1996 presidential campaign, the pin “became a symbol for women who were supporting the president.” Local sellers say most purchasers now consider it a solidarity statement supporting first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. Here are the ladies we know have worn this broach Notice how it's bipartisan?  Palin, Schaffly, Mccain are R's the others are D's.  This is more proof that, behind the scenes, politics is all political theater and that the Deepstate is a "full wing" operation--at least as far as the female political elite phoenix sorority is concerned.    Why mention the lady illuminati above? Ok so why do I mention the above?  Because I want to stress to you that--in the words of the late, great George Carlin, "it's a big F club...and YOU'RE NOT IN IT" And secondly, they shit all these false narratives and tropes, to intensify political infighting.  They try their level best to divide us...across all possible spectra, but none so vicious in 2019 than the political domain At the end of the day, they are all bought and paid-for live actor cia plants for wall street, the central bank, and the military-industrial-complex.  And they let you know it, if you have the eyes to see it. Study your symbols folks.  Brush up on your conspiracy theories...turns out, the biggest ones are being vindicated more and more by the day.