Focusing on one input, the ocean heat sink in this case, seems to contradict the main point of the article, namely that there are so many more inputs to the climate than the Alarmists are willing to admit (In other words, it is a very vast and complex system that we know next to nothing about and it would be grossly irresponsible to take any action, economic or scientific, based on very limited information). The error margins in their models are greater than the projected warming.  Think about that for a second.  It's the type of thinking that reminds me of Cubs fans predicting a World Series win every year after winning on Opening Day.