Polar Vortex Questions for a Somewhat Red-Pilled Climate Expert Who Claims Polar Vortex is Agenda 2030 Gaslighting of the Public Tom Harris is executive director of the Ottawa-based International Climate Science Coalition, which challenges the hypothesis that carbon dioxide emissions from human activities are known to cause climate problems. To: tom.harris@climatescienceinternational.net, tom.harris@sympatico.ca Subject: Question about Article on Polar Vortex Dear Mr. Harris, I just read your interesting, and convincing article on Townhall, entitled, "The Polar Vortex: a Propaganda Creation of Obama’s Science Czar to Make Normal Weather Appear Abnormal" and I had a question about this article.  I noticed that no where in this article is the Ridiculously Resilient Ridge (RRR)  mentioned, and yet I was led to believe that the RRR was the cause of the polar vortex as it was a longstanding, purportedly 'anomalous' bend in the jet stream that forces warm air into the arctic region, thus displacing colder air to follow the jet stream curve towards a southernly direction on the eastern coast of the United States. Please correct me if I'm wrong about this My questions are the following: 1) Do you believe the Ridiculously Resilent Ridge RRR was NOT an anomaly but a typical meterological pattern that has been propagandized by the media as abnormal?  Note that the above mainstream sources cite RRR as anomalous.  Please be detailed about your answer and cite specific sources. Thank you 2) Do you believe the RRR and Polar Vortex Were NOT Correlated as part of the very same Jet Stream pattern? 3) What is the possibility of HAARP and GWEN (atmospheric microwave) installations being used as political weather weapons to convince Americans of Climate Change, by creating local, regional and perhaps even global aberrations to weather?  Note the US military has already admitted to weather manipulation and geoengineering efforts, now they are trying to 'socialize' 'normalize' it in the media Thank you M Chris Neglia e: ******************** a serie certe rectificari verum videre Responses Do you mind if your answer is posted to https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3039072 where the question from Mr. Neglia is posted? Tom On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:40 PM Tim Ball timothyball@shaw.ca wrote: Thanks Tom The RRR Chris Neglia references is biased by the word “ridiculous.” The article does refer to them when it mentions “planetary waves”. What happens is because of the location and orientation of the mountain chains any that extend above 10,000 feet influence the flow of upper air. Like a boulder in a stream creates a down stream turbulent but persistent pattern, so these mountains create such “Resilient Ridges."  There is nothing ridiculous about them. They are called “standing waves." I will only talk about the one that influences North America and that is the Rocky Mountains. First, you have to know they are narrower and higher in the Canadian portion so at different times of the year as the Jet Stream moves north and south with the season the influence is different. However, overall there is a standing wave in the planetary wave system that deflects the Jet Stream over North America south into the US on the eastern side of the Rockies. Tim Ball === I agree, since he posted the initial questions – OK, Chris? Tom === Subject: Re: Question about Article on Polar Vortex I am flattered. I think Chris should do it.  Tim b === from: negutron@protonmail.com Will Do!