Q flag, it's speeding up Q flag on the "Cornish castle " hotel: https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/john-mappin-camelot-castle-tintagel-donald-trump-qanon-flag-theory-1362499 Also other MSM report it: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jan/11/trum-and-farage-supporter-flies-flag-for-qanon-rar-right-conspiracy Of course, their articles are more of a libel than a decent jurnalism but at least they're making one mistake and it's great: While trying to stick a conspiracy label to the Q movement they spread the Q idea to thousands. Many people won't stop on reading and anchoring "a conspiracy theory". Some people will research, many will end up here. Do you remember Q post 3665 with a link to Jesse Watters talking about Q?: While a biased POV shelters/protects the host, the overall discussion [eyes on] generates awareness. Of course we cannot compare Jesse Watters and The Guardian. I'm not saying The Guardian are using the same tactic. They've done disservice to themselves, it's obvious. In a race to "The Most Disliked Profession Of The World" Award - jurnalists just exceeded the politicians and they're nearly as high as "the oldest profession in the world". I'm not claiming MSM are doing a good job undercover using the bias as a defence. Jesse - yes, MSM - no. They do it because (as Q said) they're stupid, because they have no other choice when more and more connected people are talking about it. The Q team knows that it's a good thing is to spread the awareness (Q recognition), even if the message is biased. People are not that stupid (sheep) as jurnalists think and Q knows it well. Now, see the picture on John Mappin's profile: https://twitter.com/JohnMappin And listen to him and see who has been anchored with "@": https://twitter.com/JohnMappin/status/1215093543439667206 At some point growing awareness will force the [Q]uestion. God Bless!