Oath of Office means nothing anymore If congress takes almost the same oath of office as our military takes in their oath of enlistment, why aren't they being held accountable for violating that oath.  Violating the Oath of Enlistment has legal consequences.  This is just another blatant example of the two sets of laws, theirs and everyone else.  Why can these anti-constitutional and criminal politicians violate the constitution without anyone even batting an eyelash? The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration ... of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.” Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.     The Congressional Oath of Office: Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;   that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation   freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well   and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter:   So help me God.     A good breakdown of what the Oath of Office means:   https://www.news-press.com/story/opinion/contributors/2015/03/15/congressional-oath-office-mean/24813417/