The Resistance Against Military Withdrawal - The Real Reasons The Hidden Mission If you truly want to understand the resistance by political “leaders” against troop withdrawals anywhere, it can be explained in two words: Human trafficking (second only to legal/illegal drugs in profitability) Having spent the better part of my life in the military (including combat) and with the eye opening experience of QAnon, I feel I can provide some insight on why there is resistance by political “leaders” to keep the military engaged wherever possible (beyond the direct military industrial complex profitability). Where can you find the most extreme amount of chaos on the planet? In a war zone or area of conflict. Who is always caught in the middle of a war zone or conflict? Civilians (women and children). Where is the easiest place to disappear anybody? In a war zone or area of conflict. What is always ongoing in these areas alongside conflict are described as “humanitarian” operations to relocate civilians away from the danger. They are taken to a “safe zone” by the troops as they are directed – then the troops head back to the battle field. Some sort of “relief” organization then steps in (think Red Cross or other type of org/group) and takes charge of the civilian refugees of war to make room for more as the war/conflict continues. It's a pipeline. Given the level of “dot connecting” that occurs here, it’s fairly easy to see how this works in the realm of human trafficking.  Base commanders need only get direction from high command on how civilian refugees are to be processed (put into a pipeline of “safety”) and what “authorized relief” orgs or groups will be involved in relocating refugees without knowing the true intent of what is really happening. In other words, troops and commanders on the ground don’t need to know anything for this to play out day after day. This same condition applies to any conflict in the world, whether the US is involved or not. The Political “Leaders” If you go back to Q post 15 (https://qmap.pub/read/15), you will see that most political leaders are “owned”. Here’s the formula: Good Guy Control + Bad Guy Control = Total Control Many of our political leaders (R’s, D’s or I’s) are owned by controlling 4 main aspects of their lives: Power, privilege, prestige and livelihood (high income to prison) This is either continually provided/supported or painfully removed using any number of tactics: Blackmail including but not limited to: -Covert filming of deviant sexual behavior (pedo, homosexual relations) -Covert filming of occult/satanist involvement -Covert filming of being in attendance of crimes or other unacceptable/illegal behavior -DNA acquisition for use in a crime that can be fabricated in the future (how long does DNA last?) Extreme embarrassment/ridicule Sudden onset of legal or financial issues Family member abduction/murder And on and on. Remember, the mockingbird media is on call 24/7 to reveal/exacerbate any of this at a moments notice. So if you really want to know why 12 Senators spoke out against withdrawal from Syria (or anywhere else), now you know – they are “owned” and their focus is on self-preservation and little more.  Eyes Wide Open.  WWG1WGA Edit -- Related Article: Mattis Resignation Most Helpful — Reaction of Congress Reveals Degree to Which ALL Members are Bribed and Blackmailed by Zionist Israel and US Military-Industrial Complex