Yeah,  I talked about all this over a year ago, when I looked into this. When the story broke both NYPD and the US attorney opened investigations.  But the US Attorney went further  https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/23/nyregion/anthony-weiner-faces-new-scrutiny-after-report-about-girl-15.html Sept. 22, 2016 Federal authorities in New York have issued a subpoena for records pertaining to allegations that Anthony D. Weiner exchanged sexually explicit messages with a 15-year-old girl, a person with knowledge of the matter said. ... It was not clear which records investigators in the office of the United States attorney, Preet Bharara, would subpoena. The person was not authorized to discuss the matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity. A spokesman for the New York Police Department said it was investigating Mr. Weiner but did not elaborate.  So both the NYPD and the FBI opened investigations, but only one issued a subpoena that day.  New York Times has wrong info, even as late as April 2017?  What information do you think is wrong? ** EDIT.....now, i see the image.**  So the FBI had the laptop  by Sept 28.  ......I think I see where the Oct 3 date comes from.  The warrant says "you are Commanded to execute this on or before Oct 3rd, 2016."  Seems like they might have missed the "or before" part.  From who, Granite Management? Where the devices were housed since Sept 23, 2016?  What's the warrant say?  The warrant would have to say what the evidence to be seized is and where the location to be searched is.  Subject Device 3 is a laptop computer, believed to be a Dell, that was transferred from the Target Subject to the Security Firm on September 22, 2016 and is currently housed at the security firm's office.  So yes, it appears the US attorney's office was aware that the laptop had been transferred to Granite when the Warrant was written up and the laptop was seized from Granite's office. What exactly is the fake news you are talking about?  OK, the dates, I see it now...... Strozk?  He's the guy who wanted to go harder at Clinton and slower on Trump right? OK, so where does this leave us    We have a different timeline for the FBI, however we still do not have the NYPD getting the laptop before the FBI. Facts remain FBI got it from Granite.  Granite got it from Weiner knew by Sept 22 they were going to come for his stuff. So does this change the story in any material way?