Why Isn't Any Attack on Any Monument Seen as An Act of War? In these extraordinary times, under National Emergency, Causing a disturbance which results in vandalism, injury, looting, holding people hostage, etc., should be considered an act of civil war or provocation of civil war. Maybe The Administration could activate the emergency broadcast system warning everyone, that in these extraordinary times, that any attempt to overtake, vandalize, deface, or permanently alter any monument, place of business, residential areas, etc, will be deemed an act of civil war and will be met with deadly force to anyone on the front line of the disturbances? i.e. The Alamo, George Washington, etc,