Good thinking, @sheepdoggie, though I sense a premise not totally warranted, yet.  Unless of course, you have seen the studies, in conformity with the Koch Postulates, and ammended by Rivers et all,  that identify, isolate and demonstrate causality to covid-19.  So, do you have a link to those studies?  I am concerned that the 5g induces coronavirus in skincells study is retracted by the editor due to ...." concerns regarding peer review process. (see pub med)    And given the fact there are no studies showing no causality, and the absence of postive sarscov2 identification with covid19 causality, allows for being very suspicious of any claim that a hazmat suit would be all end all protection.  I would even suspect, that only certain people are susceptible to develloping a sarscov-2 "virus" due to interference by vaccin and radiation.  These people would then be the patient zero. Every fucking time, but also allows for different strands of the same "virus" as if the "virus&  2000  quot; is mutating. so, a mutation not as a natural process but a guided mutation based on radiation.  There is a video online of a guy preaching the wonders of genetic science, (2017), and shows how this process is done in bacteria.  There is also a video online on the effect of electro magnetism on rainbow trout. ( natural vs guided mutation)  Meaning, that if I were to introduce a virus with plausible deniability, based on the current technological prowess, this would be the way to go.  I cannot proof it. It is a suspicion, a working hypothesis, based on the datapoints I have observed.