Renowned MIT Scientist Defends Epstein: "Victims Were Entirely Willing" "Richard Stallman has been hailed as one of the most influential computer scientists around today and honored with a slew of awards and honorary doctorates...leaked email excerpts showed him suggesting one of Epstein’s alleged victims was “entirely willing.” He has written dozens of posts on his personal website in favor of legalizing pedophilia and child pornography for more than 15 years. Stallman defended both Epstein and Marvin Minsky, a lauded cognitive scientist and founder of MIT’s Artificial Intelligence Lab who was accused of assaulting Virginia Giuffre. Giuffre has alleged that sex offender and financier Epstein trafficked her to powerful men for sex, including Minsky, who died in 2016." Stallman quotes in the article: “The most plausible scenario” for Giuffre’s accusations was that she was, in actuality, “entirely willing.”  “It is morally absurd to define ‘rape’ in a way that depends on minor details such as which country it was in or whether the victim was 18 years old or 17.”  “I disagree with some of what the article says about Epstein. Epstein is not, apparently, a pedophile, since the people he raped seem to have all been postpuberal.” He preferred to call Epstein a “serial rapist.” "I think that everyone age 14 or above ought to take part in sex, though not indiscriminately. (Some people are ready earlier.)”  "I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing.” The law does not allow for “voluntary” pedophilia. "It wouldn’t be so bad for an adult man...to have sex with a 14 year old...supposing she had voluntarily had sex with him, presuming that they used a condom and suitable contraception, it would have done no harm to either of them.”  "There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.”  "All of these acts (prostitution, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, incest, and pedophilia) should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.” "The term ‘child pornography’ is dishonest. The censorship of it puts young lovers in direct danger of prosecution. Many published works are disgusting, but censorship is more so.”  “Even when it is uncontroversial to call the subject depicted a ‘child,’ that is no excuse for censorship. Having a photo or drawing does not hurt anyone, so and [sic] if you or I think it is disgusting, that is no excuse for censorship.” Read more: https://www.thedailybeast.com/famed-mit-computer-scientist-richard-stallman-defends-epstein-victims-were-entirely-willing  Sick!  There is definitely something deeply disturbing and sinister going on at MIT.