Lt. Col. Vindman should be court-martialed based on his behavior. By his own admission before Congress today, Vindman isn’t the Whistleblower and therefore he isn’t protected by any whistleblower laws. However Vindman is an active duty military officer who’s “testimony” is his own opinion and can be construed as contemptuous words against his Commander in Chief President Trump. According to the UCMJ article 88, “ Contempt Toward Officials” carries with it punishment by court-martial. In order to be prosecuted under Article 88, the prosecution must prove: the accused was a commissioned officer of the U.S. armed forces; the accused used certain words against an official or legislature named in the article; that by an act of the accused these words came to the knowledge of a person other than the accused; and that the words used were contemptuous, either in themselves or BY VIRTUE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH THEY WERE USED. https://mymilitarylawyers.com/practice-areas/ucmj-articles/ucmj-article-88-contempt-toward-officials/