Account Deleted By User I wanted to share this here as well to give it as much exposure as possible. Please see my comments for a clearer explanation.  https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2682382, Archived: http://archive.fo/3o0ki I haven't yet checked the other tabs of this page, and they need translated: http://www.albergoacampora.it/same-user-also-posted-content-from-vpizzagate/, Archived: http://archive.is/Dj31s Here, I've removed all obscure references to the clothing company: usa based subreddits and pretend to be from Minnesota and try to influence our 2018 US Senatorial elections to help Republican candidates How can we, the community, trust you to take any kind of substantive action at all, when we been calling for it time and time again and have been ignored? /r/PCMasterRace was banned for apparent brigading, and was only reinstated after strict anti brigading rules were put in place. Meanwhile, people in /r/The_Donald openly called for bridgading /r/Minnesota in order to swing its election. The user who proposed it even got caught brigading the thread calling them out for it. The_Donald remains active, the user account remains active, and their comment is still in place (I just checked). Moderators didn do jack about it when it was reported, meanwhile the users reveled in their “success” for the next eleven hours. /r/Minnesota now has a flood of people who come out of the woodwork only for posts pertaining to elections or national politics, and they seem to be disproportionately in favor of Trump. I once had my account permanently suspended because I posted publicly available WHOIS information that supported my claim that the three day old website was part of a massive Macedonian fake news phenomenon. I very carefully worded my post to make it clear that this wasn an indictment of the user who posted it, because of the possibility this was “indirect propaganda” instance. It took me about a week for my appeal to be heard and my suspension commuted. There a user who pushes vile hate speech about immigrants and Muslims as bad as the kind of stuff that went on in /r/CoonTown, calling them all rapists and pedophiles, yet their account remains active. Same user organized harassment of David Hogg, a seventeen year old kid claiming that if he met him he beat him up. Same user also posted content from /v/Pizzagate, promoting how “real” it is including tons of the same kind of witch hunt y kind of vague mumbo jumbo “evidence” that was used in /r/Pizzagate, which was so toxic it had to be banned. That user is still active today, and don say it because you didn know, because I filed a formal report, and got an acknowledgment from another admin. And don say it because the moderators took action, because when the moderators took action against my WHOIS comment you still felt the need to come after my account days after the fact. And I can say for a fact that the moderators wouldn take action because said user is a moderator in the subreddits where they posting this content. What is your explanation for this? I post publicly available information and get the banhammer, this user spews vile stuff and organizes harassment and witch hunts the likes of which got whole subreddits banned, but they left alone? If you did reach out to them clearly you had little impact because that content is still up on their account, and they still posting stuff just like it now. When states adding up to 270 or more EC votes sign up, it kicks in for all signatories and then the national popular vote winner for the Presidency will receive >=270 EVs from NPV states and therefore the Presidency. So far 11 states with 165 EVs have enacted it; in 12 states with 96 EVs it has passed at least one legislative chamber; and in 2 states with 27 EVs it has passed legislative committee votes unanimously. So if those 14 end up following through all the way that enough. A best popular vote Presidency is quite conceivable. woodbury Minnesota, however, is not among the signups bills have been introduced several times but not gotten far. Contact your legislators (link at top of that page)!If you look at the numbers, the biggest differences are fluctuations in voter turnout for Democratic candidates. The amount of votes Trump got was pretty close to what Romney, McCain, and Dubya got in his second term. However, Obama drew 200k more than Hillary did. https://www.newmoncleroutlet.com What Hillary drew still would have only been enough to narrowly defeat them too. Hillary had the lowest turnout since Al Gore, with Kerry even drawing more than she did 12 years earlier, in a second term election. To me that seems much more like a significant chunk of the Democrat population was unwilling to vote for Hillary. “anyone who supports the Republican party is a traitorous fascist” doesn mean that message is wrong. It just a matter of what the reasonable thing to do about that long festering problem is, and violence/secession (the solutions Russian based efforts tend to promote) have a lot of logical arguments against them at this point if you take the time to settle down and think about it at any length. In American politics, the southern strategy was a Republican Party electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the South by appealing to racism against African Americans. As the Civil Rights Movement and dismantling of Jim Crow laws in the 1950s and 1960s visibly deepened existing racial tensions in much of the Southern United States, Republican politicians such as presidential candidate Richard Nixon and Senator Barry Goldwater developed strategies that successfully contributed to the political realignment of many white, conservative voters in the South that had traditionally supported the Democratic Party to the Republican Party. It also helped push the Republican Party much more to the right. In academia, “southern strategy” refers primarily to “top down” narratives of the political realignment of the South, which suggest that Republican leaders consciously appealed to many white southerners racial resentments in order to gain their support. In 2015, Reddit closed several subreddits foremost among them r/fatpeoplehate and r/CoonTown due to violations of Reddit’s anti harassment policy. However, the effectiveness of banning as a moderation approach remains unclear: banning might diminish hateful behavior, or it may relocate such behavior to different parts of the site. We study the ban of r/fatpeoplehate and r/CoonTown in terms of its effect on both participating users and affected subreddits. Working from over 100M Reddit posts and comments, we generate hate speech lexicons to examine variations in hate speech usage via causal inference methods. We find that the ban worked for Reddit. More accounts than expected discontinued using the site; those that stayed drastically decreased. MY ASSESSMENT: This appears to be them seeing how banning modifies user behavior such as we're seeing now with Twitter "time outs."