Reverse Q #2117... Did we just get proof? DS turns on Mueller? Q #2117: If [RR] is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, [RR] must also be dirty. I think it's time to ask if the reverse might be true, and if that might be the true meaning of this post.  To wit, If [RR] has been turned, Mueller must also have been turned.  If Mueller has been turned, [RR] must also have been turned. We've gotten some good evidence that [RR] has indeed been turned, and actually was wearing a wire, just not against the President.  Further, Q has hinted that a Special Counsel is an ideal way to bring evidence in for IG use without tipping anybody off that that's what's happening. Who uses the false rape accusation against anyone who stands to seriously harm them?  That's Deep State playbook.  Who has it been used against?  In order, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Julian Assange, Donald Trump, and Brett Kavanaugh. Why is Mueller being accused of rape now?  He's been Special Counsel for nigh on two years.  It's not like he just jumped out into the spotlight.  If a true victim were to be incensed at his notoriety/power, wouldn't they have already come forward long ago?  These things tend to happen in response to large transitions of power and visibility, not after years of steady state. Is this rape accusation our signal that the Deep State just figured out that Mueller has been turned, and is working against them?  And they have exactly one play in their playbook for anyone who becomes a serious threat to them? I don't know the answer to that.  Maybe I'm completely out in left field.  I'll happily accept if that proves to be the case.  All I'm saying is, I think this is a question worth asking.  I think we have to consider it as a possibility.