Looking for info Debunking the FBI says Qanon = Domestic Terrorists NARRATIVE DATA: https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-documents-conspiracy-theories-terrorism-160000507.html?soc_src=hl-viewer&soc_trk=tw https://www.scribd.com/document/420379775/FBI-Conspiracy-Theory-Redacted https://www.thedailybeast.com/michael-flynn-finally-embraces-his-qanon-cult-following Players:  * Kelly R. Grant (Uploaded the Doc to Scribe) * Jana Winter (Wrote the Yahoo story, referenced then by other media, including the Daily Beast, etc) * Daily Beast - Will Sommer (DB writer) This came out about a year ago, via Yahoo News (same as the Russia Hoax leak, right?) 'contributor' Jana Winter, and was quoted and spread via the Leftist Alt Media. At the same time, when Wray was asked about it, I think he said basically we don't go into specific groups. He neither confirmed nor denied the story. Now, in hindsight, it seems that WRAY is Deep State, and Q's 'Trust Wray' comments were disinfo meant to encourage false sense of security by Wray and his masters, so his NOT debunking the "Phoenix Office" Q = Terrorist content makes sense.  I recall now that shortly after this operation emerged, I read some Anon info that debunked/disproved the whole operation, something like the following:  a)  that the FBI doesn't issue such bulletins via it's branch offices  b) the format of the 'bulletin' is inconsistent with actual FBI bulletins/releases on such subjects.  or something like that.  I have seen the bogus "FBI says Q = Terrorist" content referenced several times in the past 2 weeks, in my interactions with others, and of course the Daily Beast article attacking QW and Flynn that came out on July 1.  We KNOW this is how the Cabal works to build their narrative. Layer upon layer upon layer. A lie, added to other lies, added to other lies, so that Normies simply cannot resolve it without actually digging to the base. It's how they corroborate their lies, and build their narrative. If you want to understand this process more, think in terms of embedded presuppositions (NOTE).  Seems to me it would be exceedingly useful at this time to have, on hand, and with easy access, content or article, posts, etc, that pull the FBI Says Q = Terrorist hoax apart. Easy to counter the crap like the DB just published. A meme or two containing the information, ready for anons and patriots to fire when ready.  Can anyone help out with this? I mean, point to where the information is? Or any solid info they have?  Thanks.  NOTE: Embedded Presuppositions An embedded presupposition is essentially an idea that is layered into a sentence or similar linguistic structure in such a way that it avoids direct scrutiny and is 'slipped in' to the mental structure of the listener/reader.  The Cabal propaganda use this all the time:  "It has been shown that Fred is a follower of the baseless Q-anon conspiracy theory" The main premise is that Fred is a follower of Q, which may well be true, and if factually true, lends veracity to the entire sentence. The embedded presupposition is that the Qanon 'conspiracy theory is baseless'. It's not be asserted directly that its baseless, and then argued, It's just embedded in the sentence as if it is a fact that can just be accepted.  For a normie mind reading this, these kinds of embedded presuppositions simply layer in again and again ideas that have never been shown to be true via proof, evidence. Essentially, its a form of slow brainwashing.  Embedded presuppositions need to be identified and exposed for their power to be neutralized.  With regards to narrative building, just as an embedded presupposition is layered into the phrase structure of a sentence, likewise embedded presupposed ideas, concepts can be layered into news reports, media broadcasts, talking points underneath the actual main assertion and focus, thereby 'slipping it in' to the unconscious (subconscious) and building the trance/brainwash.