Ohio State Supreme Court To Decide Whether Gun Owners Can Drink In Their Homes . . . and the insanity continues . . .  From CDP: Apparently, gun-banning activists have a new idea in Ohio. They are pushing to make it against the law to defend yourself… in your own home… if you have been drinking. The state’s Supreme Court will now have to decide on the issue. Essentially, the argument involves whether drinking at home makes the use of a firearm illegal. Breaking Arms reported: The Ohio Supreme Court will hear arguments in February to decide whether a law prohibiting gun owners from carrying firearms while intoxicated should be applied inside a gun owner’s home. Lawyers for a Clermont County man arrested in 2018 after he acknowledged having an unloaded shotgun while drunk say the law is unconstitutional when applied to homeowners. They say a person’s sobriety or intoxication level should have nothing to do with possessing a weapon “in the hearth and home.” And, honestly, they’re right. Now, I’m a big believer in the idea that guns and alcohol don’t mix. I don’t recommend a range day with a cooler of beer and, in fact, will rail against it to anyone who cares to listen. It’s just a bad idea any way you slice it. The thing is, though, you don’t forfeit your right to self-defense simply because you’ve had a few drinks. https://conservativedailypost.com/state-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-gun-owners-can-drink-in-their-homes/?utm_source=Push&utm_campaign=OneSignal&utm_term=23_Nov-1