My analysis of "Miss Johnson Sometimes" https://youtu.be/Pl4s1UK7LG4 The above video I made is to analyze SCOTUS audio from:   https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2018/17-9572 At 21:09, the miss Johnson interruption comes and it seems to be used to clear Ruth to talk.. then at 22:15 another "Miss Johnson" that seems could be the same exact audio. This analyzes the audio in both speakers and separate speakers with one panned right and one panned left. Is this the same audio spliced in to make an interruption for RBG pre-recorded audio to be cut in? This was first posted by NR, which of course made it be attacked by a lot of users calling him a Paytriot, but I wanted to see if I could prove or disprove this theory more because it is interesting, and it does seem suspicious to me. It seems like they took this audio, to make a break in point for Ruth to talk. that way an interruption could be made, and explained with an abrupt stop of ms Johnson, since Ruth doesn't properly interrupt, and is too soft to come off as an interjection. So make a three car pile up to explain the strange edit of conversation. Two instances of the same phrase. Best listened to with headphones.