The 25th Amendment is code and it's right in our faces. Thanks to the leaks regarding RR, the NYT appears to be playing right into white hat hands. Now, Rosenstein, DJT wiretaps, and 25th Amendment invocation by the Deep State are mainstream and social media discussion points, for one. And, it may be that we have DJT and RR themselves to thank for the Kabuki theater that has been playing out as of late.  In regard to alleged conversations between RR and "other Justice Department and FBI officials" regarding invoking the 25th Amendment behind closed doors, make no mistake what is being said here, this is not just a simple matter of the Deep State trying to set up the President for impeachment. To be sure, the NYT article wasn't even alleging that the DS was trying to frame the President on impeachable offenses. In fact, the allegation was that the discussion was around invoking Section 4 of the amendment, in hopes of somehow removing Trump for being 'unfit for duty'.  All in all, the NYT brings up the alleged Section 4 conversations to infer a notion that the DOJ/FBI could have been scheming to pen a declaration that they thought that the President was crazy and get his Cabinet to sign off on it. That, itself, is crazy and is not how this works. It would be easier to simply try to impeach the President on other grounds than to say "You're crazy! Who thinks he's crazy? Let's vote on it!". To understand the true subtext of the alleged NYT leak, it's important to first understand what the 25th amendment is and why it was written: it deals with presidential succession and disability. Section 4 of the amendment specifically deals with a sitting President who is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office", as quoted by the Cabal News Network's article on the matter. To be sure, the 25th amendment isn't designed be used to remove a sitting president, it is rather the result of something else that invokes it, be it a resignation, or otherwise. Section 1 covers "In the case of the removal of the President...", and Section 2 covers VP vacancies. Section 3 covers when a President, himself, declares a handover of powers, be it as a result of his resignation or from him no longer being able to perform the duties for whatever reason.  Section 4 is where it gets tricky. Section 4 is where the VP, cabinet, and/or Congress may declare that a sitting President is unfit for duty if the President fails to invoke Section 3 himself. In fact, and here's where the truth may lie, Section 4 is historically considered under a specific circumstance altogether, and it may be under this guise from which any alleged conversations could have taken place - that circumstance being...a sitting President dying in office (or being mentally incapacitated, by, say, an assassination attempt). As this Politico article states, the 25th amendment was primarily "designed to protect the government from random occurrences like sudden illness or a failed assassination attempt.". This notion is further exemplified by the mere fact that it was the JFK assassination that brought the need for the creation of such an amendment to light.  Here's the punch line: if such 25th amendment conversations (as alleged by the NYT to have had happened) did in fact transpire between the DOJ and FBI, and RR was present for some of it, RR himself may be the keystone that reveals the ultimate move in the DS playbook - the JFK'ing of DJT. Enjoy the show.