It is quite  likely.  Let's take a step back and consider history. In 1581 Dutch declared independence and became a truthfully free country, causing a scientific, economic boom. All over the world were they with their ships to trade. New Amsterdam on the tip of Manhattan, Caribbean, Brasil, South Africa, India, Dutch Indies, Japan, etc. They were very successful and becoming very very rich, allowing them to forge their own land from the sea, and because of their freedom of conscience, many philosophers, scientist, etc, published their books there ..... ..... Charles II of England did not like it one bit. Louis XIV of France did not like it one bit, The Pope did not like it one bit, The Holy Roman Emperor did not like it one bit, because the Low Lands were once part of the HRE. And rebellion against Gods arrangement will not stand. These natural enemies, converged in 1672 by land, by sea from all directions to break this republic for all time. And they succeeded, though not entirely as they had hoped. Although the republic of the 7 provinces survived, it's resilience and power were gone, co-opted as they became with the powers of old. What they could not break is the idea. And when the time came, the same idea that fueled the Dutch Revolt, fueled the American Revolution in 1776.  And once again, we see how co-opted the American Revolution has become. And again, by unlikely allies, natural enemies even and the same operations: secret meetings, scheming, assassinations, prohibitions, elevated taxes.  So, let's assume it was not one reason, but a heap of reasons. All parties had their own reason for the same outcome.  The banks because he was a threat to their hegemony.  The CIA because he was a threat to their scheming The Maffia, because he was going after them The Vatican, well, threats converge somewhere.... The Mossad, Israel, for having a secret regarding nuclear weapons (sum of all fears) See, Kennedy was not against a global cooperation of nation states. So global government of the Banks ilk, no thank. Of the CIA ilk, no thanks.......  All actors have their own determination, their own objectives, their own means. But why not pool it for once or twice.  Given this hypothesis, look at today: It is not one behemoth, but several actors having their own reasons for Trump gone. Party one does party two a favor. Party two is now beholden to party one, etc. It was so nice and cosy. Almost there, they could taste it. And from out of the left field came Donald Trump with America first, MAGA.  But now these parties are intertwined having added even more parties to their roster: the MSN and entertainment, all kinds of agencies created since the mid sixties, pedo rings, drug cartels, the political scene, other countries, technology companies, Pharma, food chain, etc.    What Potus is doing, is co-opting their infra, giving it a new purpose. And every step along the way, makes his agenda more powerful, and that of the DS weaker.