A Logical Proof That the Democrats are Fakes And Unserious About Impeachment Political Theater It's all a political show to timeloop and rip-vanwinkle the American People until 2020 where they will rig and try to steal the election again.  President Trump is right about this, but he's wrong about not doing anything about it--by not dropping the hammer on them more quickly, he's wasting time for the "Great Again" New Republic that would come about, were he to do so, and quickly. The Democrats cannot impeach Trump.  Not only do they not have the popular support, they don't seem to have Senate support, and may not have House support they think they have.  And if they DO manage to impeach they will not be removing him from office because 2 things happen.   1) there is an immediate civil war and if Trump doesn't arrest all the troublemakers, the citizens will.  Expect 5 Million to descent on DC.  Is Eric Swallwell going to Nuke DC?  That won't go well.  The UN would immediately take over America if that happened and Trump would signally fail to NATO.  He isn't in this for that to happen. 2) Since 1 is a Trump failure, then 2 would happen.  Trump would immediately arrest the entire Deepstate.  This would not look good in terms of optics, like "oh you're trying to fire me, FINE I will just arrest you".  But he should also include media pundits.  This will terrify the 33% of the nation that is under hypnosis, but they will not be mounting a resistance, because the sheriffs, and law, and military are behind Trump.  It would be over before it began, but 1/3 of our country would be so terrified they'd probabaly flee the country or kill themselves. Knowing the above, it would be difficult to believe that the democrats would be so uniformly psychotic as to induce the above. That is why this whole thing is political posturing and they are NOT serious about impeachment. But I have better evidence than news analysis.  I am going to explain why they won't create a federal referendum process to impeach Trump, which is their best bet if they fail in congress, which they certainly will. 1) America is NOT a Democracy, It's Allegedly A Republic Since I can remember, the Democrats have screeched in unison this special word, "Democracy", repeating it in the news ad-nauseum, in the hopes that you will believe that America is a Democracy, because you either forgot or did not attend a civics course or didn't read wikipedia, when the fact of America is that it is not a Democracy.   It's even arguable if America is even a 'democratically-elected republic', since corporatocracy, or technocracy, or plutocracy seems to be a better fit. Some have referred to America as an inverted totalitarian security state---this may be the best description of all: America is a corporate-owned swamp of corruption, run by the worst among us, whose **'virtue-signalling, secrecy-worshipping, one-world technocommunist archons' control the media, and use the media to gaslight--that is confabulate, confuse, confound, agitate, demoralize and destroy--the minds of their contituents in their attempts to wrest and maintain criminal statusquotarianism of process, policy and systems of government and governance, worldwide, not unlike some kind of cancer that slowly consumes the host into oblivion.  It's a Deep State Shadow Government Ultimately, because of CoG (continuity of government), the 7th floor group, the US shadow government and Deepstate, it's very clear that America as a legal fact is just an illusion, because our leaders have broken the constitution with a dual justice system and unmeted law enforcement to corrupted politicians that the Internet has proven beyond a shadow-of-a-doubt, and --through legal documents--are criminal-fugitives-at-large that have damaged this country far more than any domestic mass murder ever could Sorry if I'm being forkin' inclement. I have a VERY low opinion of America now, due mostly to Mr. Bill BARR's (and USMS, Trump's and Coast Guard's) apparent Law-And-Order inaction, right up to but not beyond Trump's dropping of the hammer, which I admit now, may be a moment that may never come unless he acts very soon.  We don't actually want a civil war, be it a cold one (economic depression and national rioting) or hot one (with the bikers and oathkeepers descending on DC) A DIRECT DEMOCRACY could Impeach Trump (but can't) Could, but wouldn't (won't / can't).  Because according to a Quinnipiac poll, 66% of everyone (Ds + Rs + Is) say "NO" to Impeachment If the Democrats really believed that the People of the United States really wanted to  Impeach President Trump, they would put it up for a vote for the people.   Only problem is that we do NOT have a federal initiative / referendum / recall vote process to enable that type of impeachment.  We only have statewise processes for those things. From Wikipedia (link above)  In the United States, a popular vote on a measure is referred to as a referendum only when originating with the legislature. An initiative may be called a "ballot measure", "initiative measure", or "proposition".[citation needed]  The United States has no initiative process at the national level, but the initiative is in use at the level of state government in 24 states and the District of Columbia,[31] and is also in common use at the local government level. Direct Democracy Gives Citizens Too Much Power But the CONGRESS has the power to craft legislation and processes to give citizens power.  But they won't.  Because they fear it would be used on THEM (and it would) Also, Congress doesn't want their corrupt lobbying processes interrupted.  They don't want transparency and that's why Congress doesn't have a FOIA process (only Executive branch has FOIA / FOIPA processes).   And also: Criminals don't share power except either at the busy end of a gun or when it benefits them ('joint powergrab') The Legislation branch could easily create a bill and pass it to CREATE A FEDERAL INITIATIVE / REFERENDUM PROCESS in order to enable DIRECT DEMOCRACY But they have not, and they WILL NOT.  Because it will give people too much power.  It's not clear where Trump would stand on this, but very likely he wouldn't want it either, at least not right now.  Once he dismantles fake news, and feels comfortable either neutralizing or elminating "media susceptibles", would he feel comfortable giving them the power to remove him That's why, IN MY OPINION, if a referendum is ever allowed at the federal level, to qualify one should be required to pass a one-time certification that says you are capable of intelligent contemplation of the ramifications of your political participation, which includes the following requirements: People fight me on the fMRI thing.  I think it's like you get this done after HS, and if you aren't a psychopath or spy, it gives you a "twitter style blue check" and you are never bothered again.  Otherwise, if you have a neuro issue, they give you more attention, scrutiny, and deny you the abililty to participate in US government or politics x forever (unless we can "medically fix psychopathy").   Think of the Ramifications of Direct Populism If Congress enabled federal citizen initiatives, "The People" would IMMEDIATELY vote to decriminalize Cannabis (and mushrooms after that) because 60% of America has already voted many times that they want to see Cannabis decriminalized / legalized federally.   They would also do the following:  If you look at the above, you see that I'm saying people will vote for things that are popular. I'm basing this info on polls in the news that I've read over the years to get the pulse of the nation.  I might be  wrong about some of the above.   I'm not making judgments about the above, or propagandizing them, but I'm pointing out specifically how the congress is lobbied to maintain the status quo of shit being broken all the time ---VS--- people who are largely common sensical and/or steered by fake news