It’s a fair question so we’ll try to explain. No one, not even SB2, is claiming that SB2 has more access to information. In Q’s early posts their was an emphasis on explaining the comms, meaning the coding techniques, that are used in plain sight. This can be on Twitter or other platforms as well, including some conversations or an awards show or “news” broadcast. By explaining this early the idea was that Anons could then apply these decoding techniques. Some do, many do not, SB2 does it very well. Now if SB2 simply wrote a decoded synopsis, which is self-admittedly their own interpretation, then it may seem more likely that it should be dismissed.  However, this is not the case, because SB2 provides detailed information on how the decodes were performed. This allows further teaching to other Anons on how to possibly apply the decoding techniques.  As for the interpretations, they are up to the individual reader or listener to decide if they believe it is correct.