The vid I linked to does not question the path of the hurricane, nor does it question how common or uncommon that path may or not be.  What it does focus on is data provided by hundreds of bouys just off the coast, none of which seem to support the severity of Michael.  In addition, the wind speeds on and off land, and the duration of the increased wind speeds immediately after landfall also do not support the severity of Michael.  In addition again, the width of the hurricane force winds, during and immediately after landfall, don’t even come close to what would have been the eye, and the distance from the eye that hurricane force winds would extend, and yes, I realize every hurricane eye is different.  So again, I’m not proclaiming that Michael was weaponized.  I’m simply saying some valid questions have been raised that need to be answered.  And you’re free to believe whatever you want, but if you honestly do not think that we have the technology and the know how to at least manipulate the weather, if not flat out control it, I would encourage you to do more research.  https://youtu.be/XbCsPmzxpMQ