One of the things that pseudoskeptics always do is they don't address the content of the video, instead they attack the messenger, who always is imperfect, especially if they were a security contractor.    But you see, it's not possible for the pseudoskeptic to understand how someone with a history in the us military could get a military contractor job that paid well and you thought, well if they get contracts from the US military then they aren't doing anything wrong; and then realize later that what they were doing WAS wrong; and then came forward (ie: a whistleblower) No, under a shitbrained pseudoskeptic mentality (most of which ARE pre-redpilled military contractors themselves, or working for foreign int contractors such as Israel), like to throw shade on people, ESPECIALLY CALLING THEM JEWS or implicating them in some other grand jew conspiracy and then attacking the poster for posting it as being a shill and/or a shitbrain and/or an irresponsible theorist making us look bad (trust me, some of you pseudo fucks don't need my help with your grand jew conspiracies which is totally debunked...over and over again...yuou'd be closer if you said it was a "grand jesuit' conspiracy but even that would be imperfect....it's a grand globalist conspiracy...the film NETWORK got it right in 1970s) Anyway, there are other ways to see "pseudoskeptics" and it's the GISH GALLOP and the AD HOMINEM all of this never talks honestly about the content of the film or the OP's post