You're making the wrong rational point- You're insinuating that Their insinuations have merit. I mean,  obviously you shouldn't be allowed in if you have some sketch disease- but By their logic, Everyone Allowed in public spaces, ALREADY HAS BEEN VACCINATED, Meaning they are not susceptible to whatever the "UN-vaccinated" have....  If some kid Has Polio- And he's in a public space- Who the fuck is he going to give the polio too? Answer: Only other people who don't have the polio vaccine.  We are reaching peak absurdity.  Ninja Edit: TO CLARIFY- if Non vaccinacted kids are actually a danger to society... they are only a danger to other non vaccinated kids.... So why the fuck would you ban them from anywhere? Let the sick kill each other off.... The only people "Protected" from this, are others who aren't vaccinated.... But Apparently this is a law to help protect the vaccinated? But if they are vaccinated, Why do they need to be protected from the UN-vaccinated...  I'm stressing this point because as we all know, Their interest does not stem from trying to benefit humanity... So why are you confronting the issue as if they are doing what they think is right?  It's like debating the fact that Jet fuel DOESN'T MELT steel- Who the fuck cares whether or not jet fuel can melt steel? Even if it could melt steel-All of the jet fuel would have been consumed within seconds after impact.... Edit 2.0: I still haven't adequately clarified my original point- but if you're not retarded, you know what I mean...