Only true if the states stay w/in the framework of the Constitution. Changing the rules by executive fiat rather than the legislature?  Unconstitutional. Accepting votes after the election and counting them?  Again. The swing states will likely argue what you're saying, but if unconstitutional implementation of an election in a state leads to bogus award of electors, then the plaintiff states' electors votes have been degraded.  ESPECIALLY if its in conjunction with  FRAUD. In addition, those swing states likely COORDINATED their actions, using Dominion, stopping the election counts at the same time....Those swing states banded together against the interests of the other states long before the plaintiffs sought SCOTUS intervention.