confirming the evidence  This is desperate and dishonest grasping at straws.  Read that entire chapter, not just those pages.  Do you really think an Inspector General's report is going to ignore a cover up of a sex crime?   But spent 85 pages on when a warrant was asked for?  Like are you in reality?  Because if you're in reality, this is majorly dishonest. Remember the bullshit hoax claim about the NYPD only exists in the fake news world. In the real world, the FBI did not seize the laptop from NYPD.  That's imaginary.  I know people believed it and won't let it go.  But it's imaginary.  It's leprechaun riding a unicorn.  Easy to imagine, but non-existent.   The IG does not live in this bullshit hoax world.  They deal with facts and they spend a lot of time trying to get to the facts. It's a complete bullshit claim that that description applies to clinton.  It applies to Weiner.  A fair and much more plausible reading of those pages is the FBI now recognizes it has two investigations which require two warrants.  A Weiner investigation involving sexting with a child and a Clinton investigation about emails and possible classified info. The chapter deals extensively with this two warrants.  No warrant against clinton for "Crimes against Children" is mentioned because it doesn't exist.