NOT TRUE !! Not unless that threat is uttered or provided directly to the recipient and she did NOT say it to trumps ears. typing in public forum does not count because it is passive and also possibly not conveyed by her across a state line, but rather remotely fetched by others. To be Imminent lawless action it needs a stated time under 365 days in the future according to scotus, and needs a specific target or subset of a class (which she did do (the president) but she did NOT specify a time .. her possible crime is not what you claim at all!    her crime is threatening the president. Famous SCOTUS Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action SCOTUS Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 (1973) [must be less than 12 months] : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hess_v._Indiana "criminal threats" or whatever you are alleging, must be DELIVERED DIRECTLY to the target, not posted. The us has only 22 limits on free speech, and you are not citing the correct limitation for this situation.