For Discussion: Anons vs. Disinfos vs. MSM With all of the craziness going on re: censorship, new intel, disinfo, who to trust vs. who not to trust... I've learned some things. You may not agree with this. But for me? A litmus test was needed. It is not measurable in any quantitative capacity, it is not objective, it is not based on any hard evidence to-date. It is based on my opinion of the current landscape. Some sources we grew to trust, follow and enjoy. Over time these sources can "get weird", have a sudden change of heart, stop talking about certain details. And the most obvious/relevant/current group that fits this = "Anti-Q" movement. For those who simply state they are "Anti-Q" I will never immediately qualify that person as a shill, as there are a few valid critiques in the wild. But for each of them I have personally come to a conclusion that no critique to-date is capable of disproving/debunking Q. Not even close.  In fact, most of the Q "disproofs" are cherry-picked nuggets with misinterpretation applied.  But, again, just because I believe that Q is 100% legit, does not void someone's opinion that disagrees. But obvious shill and disinformation attempts form a pattern. That pattern, when repeated enough, becomes a trend line. When other sources of information are moving you along the trend line towards another piece of actionable intel (Q, Judicial Watch, Trump, Us, etc.), and these counter-"disinfo" trends are: That is when they jump the shark for me. As they have likely been compromised along the way.  Attacks will intensify [all sides].  ~Q #1438 Stay focused patriots! WWG1WGA!