Sure and that makes sense. But I don't see it as an excuse to attack a user and break the rules stated in the side panel. Just ban them. Having said that, the post in question that I am thinking about anyway hasn't been proven to be disinformation. Sure someone came out with a counter theory, but neither theory is proven, so it's a matter of opinion as to whether it's disinformation or not. And actually to me the person who is being attacked's theory makes more sense than the attackers theory. So who is to decide these things? Shouldn't we allow all points of view unless it can somehow be proven that someone is intentionally spreading disinformation to destroy the group?