" At any point did Q suggest or say that the May 17th image in the tweet was pre-emptive? I don't think he did. There is another point being made." No, Q didn't say that.  To me that was implied, and it was also implied to other anons, notably the one who said "walk it back." I'm hoping that the implication wasn't that it was pre-emptive.    But you're right, I'm operating on the assumption that this was the implication, and maybe I'm wrong. It seems lots of twitter anons are operating on the same assumption, too. I hope we're wrong for obvious reasons.