The exposed Pawn: the deliberations on Trump's options with Julian Assange Hey all I'm not really seeing much critical analysis out there on Trump's options with Assange as the British nose tightens around the Wikileaks founder in the Ecuadorian embassey - which yesterday publicly announced it has ceased providing Assange a harbor there so I wanted to lay out my understanding of the dynamics in play - and going forward- and inviting you guys to add your contributions firstly, respectable Journalist Cassandra Fairbanks just visited Assange in the embassy a few days ago. At the last minute she was denied the interview that was arranged but says she heard Assange's angry voice arguing with the embassy staff in the next room. I vouch for Cassandra's credibility and this post is based on a presumption that Assange remains in the embassey , pending immediate ejection In terms of the salient tactical considerations, there's this interesting article in Zero Hedge today https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-05/dear-mr-president-warning it makes some good points but I dont think it strongly argues its main thesis of the additional jepoardy team Trump would be in if Assange fell into the hands of the Globalists (unless they extract some false confessions out of Julian under duress). But anyway, here's my assessment: Muellers report has concluded, so Trump is free - if he wishes - to exonerate Assange without it being used by the Deep State as 'Obstruction' both Trump and Q have been very tight lipped about Assange, although we know Trump has considerable animus towards similar whislteblowers like Snowden (though the circumstances differ considerably - Assange helped pave the way for Trump's election. Maybe the wikileaks releases didnt sway too many votes, but I'm pretty confident a lot of disgusted Bernie supporters who would have otherwise come out and voted for Hillary stayed home). Trump isnt sentimental enough to cut his own throat to save Julian, but that doesnt mean he sees no utility in keeping Assange safe from capture by the deep state Mueller never subpoenad Assange - and the Barr summary suggests that Mueller is keeping alive the fabrication that the Russians hacked the DNC and / or Podesta. In ths capacity Mueller has not taken off his grey hat , and was likely compelled by Barr to 'sacrifice a rook' by ending the collusion investigation But here's the thing: There's no point in Trump issuing an Exoneration while Assange remains trapped behind enemy lines. Assange may be released from legal jepoardy by the US, but the Wicked British establishment will still seek to punish / use Julian so Trump has to get Assange to America first before exonerating him.  One option is to push for Extradition. But extradition implies a crime being prosecuted What that means is for Assange to co-operate, he has to trust that Trump will indeed exonerate once he is on American soil So Assange has to temporarily give up his Immunity with Ecuador on a promise alone, and Assange may not trust Trump enough to do that (its not like Trump or Q have been publicly singing his praises) so even though the Mueller report / Obstruction no longer hangs over their heads, there remains a certain impasse but now Ecuador is trying to kick him out and revoke its protection, so the Brits are poised to pounce on our exposed pawn what, precisely, can Trump do without violating British sovereignty and causing a diplomatic crisis? Anything?  thoughts ?