gonna probably have to prove the election fraud in these states to the SCOTUS too in order to dispel any temptation for them to try to form a ruling that, well, we're not going to overturn an election outcome if there was no appreciable election fraud that actually happened (even if they agree that clearly the defendant states did not adhere to the US constitution) because a lot of times judicial rulings end up revolving around damages done to the aggrieved party in the law suit So probably going to be incumbent on Texas (and Pres. Trump) to prove they were indeed injured by election fraud in these named states where said fraud was facilitated by these states abandoning the strictures of the US constitution