I understand where you are coming from in your critique of my piece and I sincerely appreciate any feedback I get.  It seems, however, that my efforts have all come to naught.  I tried to expose the lies and deceptions we have been told over the years from academia, the media and Hollywood by pointing out we have one side that seeks CONTROL of the citizens and one side seeks LIBERTY.  Now, I will grant you perhaps my use of political parties was too simplistic and perhaps a bit jingoistic.  But my point was that from the vantage point of State-ism vs. a Constitutional Republic, there is a CLEAR delineation of where Leftist ideas line up with the 25 points far more than with the Right.  Your selection of ideals is interesting, using the straw-man of Patriotism = Nationalism and strong faith = hatred of Jews or non-Christians and that the goal of strong borders is a Nazi ideal.  Strong borders are the sovereign right of EVERY country that ever existed.  It is written in the Constitution and it protects it's citizens above all foreign entities.  Only looking through the prism of today's world with the EU's open border policy and globalism would one conclude that have a strong immigration policy is somehow comparable to Nazism.  Also, you point out: "who does not smoke/drink".  I'm not sure what you are saying there but no one on the RIGHT has EVER infringed on the rights of smokers or drinkers.  All legislation against smoking or drinking has come from the do-gooder class on the LEFT. May I suggest my own list as a rebuttal:   We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood.  The first duty of every citizen must be to work mentally or physically. No individual shall do any work that offends against the interest of the community to the benefit of all.  Therefore, we demand: That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished. Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits. We demand the nationalization of all trusts. We demand profit-sharing in large industries. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities. We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land. We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed or race. We demand that Roman law (capitalism), which serves a materialist ordering of the world, be replaced by German common law (socialism). In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. . We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State. The State has the duty to help raise the standard of national health by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor, by increasing physical fitness through the introduction of compulsory games and gymnastics, and by the greatest possible encouragement of associations concerned with the physical education of the young. We demand the abolition of the regular army and the creation of a national (folk) army. We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press. In order to make possible the creation of a German press, we demand:  (a) All editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens. (b) Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State. They must not be published in the German language. (c) All financial interests in or in any way affecting German newspapers shall be forbidden to non-Germans by law, and we demand that the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper and the expulsion of the non-Germans from the Reich. Newspapers transgressing against the common welfare shall be suppressed. We demand legal action against those tendencies in art and literature that have a disruptive influence upon the life of our folk, and that any organizations that offend against the foregoing demands shall be dissolved. The party as such is convinced that a lasting recovery of our folk can only come about from within on the principle: COMMON GOOD BEFORE INDIVIDUAL GOOD  In order to carry out this program we demand: the creation of a strong central authority in the State, the unconditional authority by the political central parliament of the whole State and all its organizations.  The formation of professional committees and of committees representing the several estates of the realm, to ensure that the laws promulgated by the central authority shall be carried out by the federal states. This is a DIRECT translation, from the German, of the 25 points. Please, ask yourself in an honest,  academic way:  Do those sound like they would come from the RIGHT where there is a desire for LESS government control, LESS intrusion into people's everyday lives, and MORE individual LIBERTY?  Or do they sound like they come from the LEFT where the government is supreme and government decides what is best for it's citizens and makes laws against how one should behave (such as anti-smoking or anti-drinking)?  You cannot compare asking a countries citizens to "Buy American" or "Protecting American Jobs" to actually making laws to ENFORCE these ideals. Please understand this if nothing else:  at it most basic, the difference between the right and left is that the right believes in the INDIVIDUAL and the left believes in the STATE.That is axiomatic. Again, I thank you for your criticism and appreciate your reading of my piece.