Thats the issue with sedition. It also falls under 1st Amendment Rights. It's why there hasn't been a successful case of sedition tried yet. It HAS to go hand in hand with treason. Sedition are the words an  3118  d plans, treason is the act of acting upon seditious views. The views and words themselves are harmless, even in printed form, UNTIL the act of treason itself. Herein lies the problem of charging these people with either. WE may feel these people are guilty, and rightly so, but if you can't clearly point to a written or verbal "agreement" of sorts, a "Cabal" so to speak, then you have no case for either charge.  The Rosenbergs were found guilty of treason because there was a clear cut case that even their lawyers couldn't defend against. Not so with this current crop. There's no "smoking gun." And unfortunately, that's what our courts damn near require nowadays. It's why the MSM always presses for and is insistent upon having a smoking gun.  There may be Oval Office meetings and SCIF meetings, etc, but the official recording devices of both can be turned off by the Pres, VP, House Speaker, and Senate Majority Ldr. And there's been nothing to prove that a written or verbal record of these seditious/treasonous plans exist, so it's all just conjecture and suppostion even on Q's part. Which is why I highly doubt "we have it all." Or even "more than we know." If there was clear cut, hard evidence of [their] treason, it would've been presented by now.  Edit: We have a mountain of circumstantial evidence, but in this day and age of damn near everything being recorded, circumstantial evidence is no longer enough, hence, "the smoking gun" theoretical practice of law now. And that just doesn't exist in this case.  Which is why Q surfaced and asked for help from the digital warriors. [Their] case will be tried more in the "court of public opinion" than in a true court of law.  Ask yourselves this, IF we do infact "have it all,$ why hasn't it been presented yet? One would think it would be been presented shortly after being gathered, like in a "real" court case, correct? What hasn't it? Why keep us waiting all this time? What's stopping them?  It isn't money, fame, power, prestige, and it damned sure isn't Antifa/BLM stopping the DOJ & AG Barr. Something else is missing. And that's the clear cut evidence of [their] duplicity. Even a shitty 1st year lawyer could defeat that case if there's no concrete evidence to be found. The legal definition of that is heresy, and it is forbidden in ALL court systems.