Ford Caught in MORE LIES - EXCELLENT analysis! HOW and WHY Ford was forced to change her story for the senate testimony. EXCELLENT analysis! HOW and WHY Ford was forced to change her story for the senate testimony. https://threader.app/thread/1046408449918218240 It stands to reason that if the assault happened at a "small gathering" of 5 teenagers, most likely the house of the scene was the home of one of the party members.  It wasn't Ford's home, who said she lived 20 away from the Country Club.  She said the party was located near the Country Club where she had spent the day swimming.  The problem is NONE of the people Ford said was at the party LIVED near the Country Club!!! Once that faux pas became evident she had to quickly change her story and say well the scene of the crime was somewhere between the country club and her home, a distance of 20 miles. How many LIES has she told to date? 1) she is not a DOCTOR, she is not listed on CA boards. 2) she lied about who was at this party, everyone denies it.  Her best friend denies she even knows or ever met Kavanaugh. 3) she lied about WHERE the party and attack took place. 4) she lied about WHEN the 2nd front door was put in on her home in Palo Alto (2008, not 2012).  Recall that she testified that an argumeent about putting this 2nd front door in was the REASON for seeing a therapist in 2012.  I think the real reason she went to a therapist in 2012 was because Romney was running for Pres, and Kavanaugh's name came up at that time as a possible Supreme nomination.  So she was instructed to "get something on the record", so dreamed this whole thing up. 5) she lied about fear of flying, when it is clear she is a frequent flier all over the country and the world. 6) she lied about seeing Mark Judge at the safeway a few weeks after the assault.  Citizen Investigative Journalists have found that THERE WAS NO SAFEWAY THERE IN 1982.  It was built several years later. 7).....what else, I know I'm missing some  It's an instruction that tells the jury that if they find a witness has testified falsely about one thing, they can, if they choose, disregard all of that witness' testimony as being unreliable and not credibile.