Q Post 3856 and Depopulation, World, U.N. must reduce population growth. Hillary Clinton and her EVERGREEN ideas. In Q Post 3856 Q talked about EVERGREEN and DEPOPULATION. The Deep State thinks that PEOPLE are the problem on this planet and of course Hillary Clinton agrees with this idea. Basically in order to keep our planet evergreen we have to have less people ruining it. Hillary Clinton has given MANY speeches on sustainability of the planet, and reducing population growth. People like this think they are GOD and should be the ones that make decisions on how many people should be allowed to live on earth, The lines are drawn. [Zw7301-&vQ-00-00-03] Define Renegade [Hussein USSS code name]. Standard definition. Define Evergreen [HRC USSS code name] Non-standard defintion. Think depopulation. The Silent War continues… Q "On Sept. 24-25, world leaders will gather at the United Nations in New York to review progress toward the U.N.’s 2030 Agenda and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals. The SDGs, which aim “to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure prosperity for all,” are commendable, and summarize the kind of world many of us wish to see in 2030. But if this vision is to have any chance of materializing, governments must now add an 18th goal: “DAMPEN POPULATION GROWTH.” The challenges that humanity faces today stem mainly from overconsumption and OVERPOPULATION. Yet policymakers often fail to consider the two factors together, and largely neglect population growth in particular. The overall human impact on the global environment is the product of population size and average per capita consumption. The U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has concluded that population growth and economic (consumption) growth are the two main causes of global warming. Per capita resource consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions are highest in developed economies, while rapid population growth in developing countries contributes to the LOSS OF FORESTS and biodiversity. When governments adopted the SDGs in 2015, many experts were surprised by the lack of attention to POPULATION GROWTH. Demographer Joseph Chamie, a former director of the U.N. Population Division, expressed concern that the U.N. was ignoring the issue. University of Cambridge economist Partha Dasgupta and co-authors concurred, arguing that this omission “should be a point of public concern.” More recently, demographer Massimo Livi Bacci of the University of Florence wrote that “population ... has become irrelevant for the sustainability of development, notwithstanding the evidence to the contrary.” Between 1960 and 2000, the world’s population doubled from 3 billion to 6 billion. This growth contributed to greater pollution of land, lakes, rivers and oceans, as well as urban overcrowding and a higher demand for agricultural land and freshwater (in turn encroaching on natural ecosystems). Despite significant technical advances in agriculture, famines killed millions of people over this 40-year period. And in developing countries, rapid population growth left poor people at greater risk of death, injury, and disease resulting from pollution, floods, droughts and other disasters. There are now 7.7 billion people on Earth. The U.N. forecasts that this figure will rise to 11 billion by 2100 (and that assumes steady fertility declines in many countries that have tended to resist this trend). A population increase on this scale would create more pollution, require a doubling of global food production under difficult conditions (including climate disruption) and result in more people suffering during conflicts and famines." https://www.dailystar.com.lb/Opinion/Commentary/2019/Sep-14/491577-world-un-must-reduce-population-growth.ashx