Derp. A badly worded title.  Intended to mean: <the content of the post> is 'The reasoning that sought to inspire doubts about Huber and Sessions' Q posts images of the reasoning that Q critiques in previous posts. Exposing again why this reasoning is flawed.  So, yep, the phrasing is ambiguous, and you could read it as 'Reasoning (is) inspiring doubts about Huber, Session', but it was meant to be read '(the) reasoning (that is) inspiring doubts about Huber, Sessions...' Mea Culpa.