We must be really careful - David Booth- from what does it mean is actively following and pushing Q It's become super, super hard to separate fact from fiction these day's.  I didn't start following Q because he opened my eyes. I've been awake since 9/11. What Q did was confirm what we already knew. And added much depth, and unprecedented Intel.  Now the site "What Does It Mean" which has long published real solid Intel, mixed with a lot of dis-info, has been all over the Q bus lately. People that have actual, real Intel, HAVE TO MIX IN DIS-INFO. It's the only way they are allowed to operate. These people have families. They would die for their country if it meant exposing everything for the world to see. But to ask them to sacrifice their loved ones too, is too big a price to pay. So, they release Intel mixed with bullshit, and it's up to us to separate the wheat from the chaff.  Which brings us back to what Q said "Dis-info is necessary" What is extremely bothersome is that this David Booth dude used to- and may still be - CIA.  This battle is clearly, CLEARLY!, Good guys in MI and NSA vs CIA/MOSS So if an ex-CIA guy is backing Q, it makes me  fckn nervous. Just thinking out loud. Thoughts/ comments welcome. Here is his latest post: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index3063.htm