Today's testimony: Jones Catches Schiff Tacitly Admitting He Knows Who the Fake Whistle Blower Is, by ruling he cant ask a question because it would expose the Id of the whistle blower Jordan asked Who the second person Vindman told something to and Vindmans's attorney stopped and said that the rules say questions cant seek to expose the whistle blower. Schiff agrees with Vindman's attorney and then Jordan Ask's How is asking who he told seeking to expose whistle blower? Vindman has testified he does not know the identity of the whistle blower and Mr Schiff has said he doesn't know the identity, though no one believes you. He way have also said no one believes Vindman, not sure but he definately said no one believes Schiff. It's a huge blunder for Shiff. If he doesn't know the ID of the supposed whistle blower how does he confirm Vindman's attorney's assertion that this question would expose the whistle blower? Clearly Vindman's attorney has to know the identity. And how does Shiff confirm if he himself does not know A who Vindman told and B the id of the whistle blower? Jordan is quick and set the trap!  Schiff gave himself away.  Thank You Representative  Jim Jordan.  He knows the play book and exposes the corruption. Nomoss provided a video link to the testimony segment paraphrased: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NEbtBoY-EGE Jump to 3:45 to see the relevant question/answers