Voat Protocol: We Don't Link Directly To Shill Websites Who Are Actively Attempting To Usurp Our Country And Constitution!!!!! Cross-Posted for visibility to GA, Qanon, and Whatever Guys and Gals, Why do you choose to post links for discussion directly from twitter?  facebook?  WSJ? etc etc... These sites (corporations staffed primarily with dems/nu-dems/antifa supporters/lgbt diversity hires) are actively spreading disinfo about you and your kind.  Everyday they are convincing sleeping minds that you are the enemy and that the improvements you would like to see in your society are somehow deplorable, abhorrent, and violent/hateful at the core. And YOU give them the potential for more power/money by driving traffic directly to their sites. These sites are actively trying to usurp the US and our constitution. These sites are stoking tension between the middle class. I know you've heard it before - so this can be brief: USE AN ARCHIVE SERVICE TO POST YOUR LINKS! It takes 1 extra minute, sometimes less to find an archive site and receive an alternate link for the archive version of the site you wish to share/discuss. Instead of giving twatter, fakebook, etc..., free traffic and clicks (that they can turn around and utilize in negotiating new ad revenue) You are literally helping the people you claim are your enemy. Keep voat clean of the crud.  Help voat users who aren't necessarily tech savvy be tagged because they followed links from voat to these cancer sites.