For the time being, at least, the dead can vote in Wisconsin Two days ago, we hailed the good news that a trial court judge in Wisconsin held the Elections Commission and three of its Democrat members in contempt because they refused to abide by his December order that they remove 200,000 non-viable names from the state’s voting records. One day later, on Tuesday, the state appellate court stepped in to stop the Elections Commission from cleaning out the cemetery vote: The same judges -- Michael Fitzpatrick, JoAnne Kloppenburg and Jennifer Nashold -- had on two previous occasions refused to step in to block the purge. This time, however, they moved so quickly they did not even have time to write an order explaining their reasoning: It should be noted that the decision to remove names was not arbitrary or under the control of a single person or party. Instead, it was the last phase in a formal notice procedure: Commissioner Julie Glancey, a Democrat, complained that it just wasn’t fair to remove people from the rolls because once upon a time, in the past, they had been valid voters: Glancey ignores the fact that, in Wisconsin, it’s incredibly easy to re-register on election day, whether online, at the polling place, or at the county clerk’s office. Glancey’s complaint therefore cannot be about the risk of disenfranchising legitimate voters. Same-day re-registration means that no one can argue that the Republicans are pushing to purge voter rolls in order to suppress voter turnout. That leaves one to conclude that the only reason Democrats want to keep 200,000 names on the rolls, even though the people attached to those names have moved on, is to have a roster of names that people who cannot vote can “borrow” for the day, also known as voter fraud. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/01/for_the_time_being_at_least_the_dead_can_vote_in_wisconsin.html