Interesting post I saw regarding the whistleblower situation. I can only speculate so you guys give me some feedback and let me know what you think. Huber reaches out to a whistleblower in the Clinton foundation meanwhile the FBI raids the home of a Clinton foundation whistleblower. They are not the same guy obviously if you read drop 2514 What I think happened... Bobby boy Mueller is feeling a bit of anxiety because his case against DJT if falling apart in front of his very eyes. He needs Cohen to verify something... anything... from the Steele dossier which we all know to be bullshit. Noteables: WSJ 2007 piece | Steele Dossier He's going to have to write a full report at the conclusion of his investigation, so he needs it to be inconclusive rather than outright saying what we all know to be true. Which is that DJT is innocent. Enter Cohen. If they can get him to say something against Trump they hope that they can get another SC to investigate. How fast do you think they'll name a guy to lead a SC this time? So while all this is going on, and they are setting the stage for stage 2, someone tips them off "hey someone's talking to Huber!" They know this is trouble and I think they didnt have a fucking clue who it was. They end up raiding the home of a known whistleblower for 6 hours, even after he tells them "hey jackass, I already gave everything I had to the Intel committee". That's a clear indication that not only do they not know who the new whistleblower is, but they don't have a clue as to what he/she said to Huber. Why else would they search for 6 hours if not to try to figure it out? Clearly the goal was to figure out what was said so they could either lock it up in the DOJ to never see the light of day, or start prepping a defense. 6 hours?? Folks, they didnt find what they were looking for. I mean really... how big is this guys house? Now we need to speculate on why Mark Meadows really wants Huber to testify on the 5th of Dec? What does he really know, and when did he know it? I see 2 options. He wants to know what the fuck Huber has been doing. (This is not good for us, if so) He's in the know, and is following a plan. (This means they are closing in on Clinton) The fact that the FBI doesn't know who the whistleblower is, is clear indication that option 2 is still on the table. Some interesting questions come to mind right away that you guys might like. Someone leaked that a whistleblower was talking so that the Mueller gang could respond. Did they not know who it was as a result of good guys using OPSEC? Did the good guys know who the leaker might be? Did a whistleblower really talk to Huber on Friday, or was it actually much earlier? How might these unknowns impact Mueller's final report? How might these unknowns impact the timing of Mueller's final report Guys... was this a strategic leak? Think about post 2505 Are good guys controlling the timing of Mueller's report? Think about post 2507 What are the advantages of DECLAS before v after testimonies? What is Q saying in post 2510? What is James Comey really saying in his latest Tweet? Grateful for a fair hearing from judge. Hard to protect my rights without being in contempt, which I don’t believe in. So will sit in the dark, but Republicans agree I’m free to talk when done and transcript released in 24 hours. This is the closest I can get to public testimony. 10:36 AM · Dec 2, 2018 · Twitter for iPhone Dark to light Look guys, I am not SerialBrain... just some dude from NC trying my best to calculate what the hell is going on. But! I do look forward to your comments! Also sorry for syntax errors.