Thanks Scab.  I get that. I really do. Traditionally, my approach for the last 30 years has been the spiritual/christian perspective. However, I do not think this is the only angle valid for viewing things. It may be the ultimate view, but not everyone can or is ready to take that approach.  There are many patriots out there who support Q and support the Great Awakening, even though they are not specifically religious or practicing a faith. This is the main reason I included the notion of 'psychology' here; not everyone can relate to scripture. But let me clarify. By psychology, I do not mean 'the practice or industry of psychology'. I mean, the mental framework and structure of those invisible elements that lie at the core of our reality: our mind, our heart, our emotions, intellect and will, all aspects of our spirit given to us by our Creator.  Modern 'psychology' has been infiltrated by the Cabal, materialism, and corruption, just as much as any other area of human life. So I'm not talking about that. I'm saying 'psychological' in this sense: "of, affecting, or arising in the mind; related to the mental and emotional state of a person."  Personally, I believe that any psychological approach is best rooted in recognizing the spirit, the heart, and the spiritual dimension of things as the ultimate reality.  Regarding self-reflection and humility, let's flip it on its side. Are people who are unaware, who do not know themselves and their capacities and limits, make good soldiers? Not sure about that. Do arrogant people make good soldiers? Maybe. But not in a spiritual war or a spiritual battle, which I personally think the Great Awakening is.  In any case, your comments much appreciated. wwg1wga