The LOGIC of democrats opposing the Wall is clear. https://www.breitbart.com/border/2019/02/12/group-of-330-migrants-apprehended-in-new-mexico-says-cbp/ Capturing 300+ 'invaders' on OUR side of the non-existent 'border' results in the following: Border Patrol, Local LEOs and now even Military personnel are rushed to the scene to round up as many as they can.  $$$$ Salaries, surveillance equipment, trucks, cars, guns, etc.  ALL at Taxpayer expense! SSSS Captured 'invaders' are housed in USA-based 'detention centers'.  $$$$  Building and maintaining such centers, staffing them with administrators, guards, cooks, maintenance people, PR hacks, surveillance equipment, insurance, food, sewers, electricity, and on and on. $$$$ "The prisoner has rights!". $$$$ Medical staff and equipment, transfers for more serious cases, LAWYERS for the detained AND for the Government, Judges, Bailiffs, Clerks, transcriptionists, computers, paralegals, transportation and housing for all these people, etc. $$$$ Some end up fully incarcerated for various crimes they may have ALREADY committed in the USA on PREVIOUS ILLEGAL visits. ** $$$$** more $$$$ The return trip.  We don't just toss them back across the border.  We load them on buses and planes back to their origins.  ** $$$$** more $$$$ THIS does not include the $$$$ involved when many of the 'invaders' are DELIVERED INTO THE INTERIOR of our Nation. $$$$ for welfare, legal services, deaths, rapes, trafficking, drugs, etc.  which come from SOME of those that get through. So ... we can surmise that the LOGICAL reason that the dems will want to keep things as they are?  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$  As it sloshes around, billions fall into the hands of criminal politicians and their criminal corporate and union buddies. But what if there was a WALL? OBVIOUSLY, in the presence of a wall, the 300+ invaders (of the story) would be standing there in Mexico saying "Ay, caramba' and creating ABSOLUTELY NO ancillary expenses to the US Taxpayer while also depriving the 'poor working criminals' of the deep state with the dirty revenue. And EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, the 300+ migrants actually wouldn't travel to the Wall at all, since there is a effing WALL there and they CANNOT easily get across.  And MORE IMPORTANT than THAT, the 300+  'invaders' would be forced to look inward in their own communities and countries and be encouraged to MAKE THEM BETTER. So the choice is really simple:  If we wish as a nation to PAY $$$$ and PAY $$$$ and PAY $$$$ and PAY $$$$ Some more and more and more.  DON'T BUILD THE WALL. If we wish to 'Set and Forget' the main function of keeping 'invaders' out and making WISE investment in the mechanisms of LEGAL IMMIGRATION ... BUILD THE WALL.