I Want This G D Ice Cream Licking to Stop. That's Why I recommended Bioterrorism (18 U.S. Code §1365.Tampering with consumer products) Sentencing to the Port Arthur TX Chief of Police Tim Duriso Dear Port Arthur Texas Chief of Police Timothy Duriso,  I am reaching out to your contact email from this website (https://www.portarthurtx.gov/394/Police-Department).  I want to thank you for arresting D'Andrien Anderson for the ice cream consumer tampering bioterrorism.  The sentencing reported for D'Adrien Anderson, according to Gateway Pundit (below), was not more than a year. I believe you may not have included the federal law violation when you charged D'Andrien Anderson for his state / local violation of committing food tampering bioterrorism.  I would like to remind you of the applicable federal statute, so that you can apply additional sentencing as you see fit, or refer this man to the Department of Justice for additional sentencing.  I'm not accusing you of not doing your job, sir, quite the opposite.  I'm trying to help make sure this person receives ALL the punishment he is owed, and I send you this because it's a national news story now, and given the dumbfounding cluster of similar stories, this event by Anderson belies a coordinated effort to commit a kind of psychological warfare on the public, and thus I have standing in his and all other similiar cases for that reason. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/gross-texas-man-arrested-after-licking-grocery-store-ice-cream-and-putting-it-back-on-the-shelf/ 18 U.S. Code § 1365.Tampering with consumer products https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1365 *(a) Whoever, with reckless disregard for the risk that another person will be placed in danger of death or bodily injury and under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to such risk, tampers with any consumer product that affects interstate or foreign commerce, or the labeling of, or container for, any such product, or attempts to do so, shall— (1) in the case of an attempt, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; (2) if death of an individual results, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both; (3) if serious bodily injury to any individual results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both; and (4) in any other case, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both* ... (e) Whoever is a party to a conspiracy of two or more persons to commit an offense under subsection (a) of this section, if any of the parties intentionally engages in any conduct in furtherance of such offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. Subsection (e) applies also to whomever FILMED and posted this person (ie: not protected by journalistic protections) doing the act(s) outlined in subsection (a), which is the tampering.  This person may not have been charged, and under this statute, they should have been. Terrorism, because the purpose of posting the video is to psychologically demoralize society and make them feel unsafe eating ice cream from the stores. Bioterrorism, since the tampering involved his bodily fluid, and whomever would be the recipient of said ice cream would also be subjected to any of this persons' oral diseases, bacteria, viruses, if any, and oral-borne pathogens could collect and grow on the ice cream affected by his licking.  Not only is this concept grosss, it's gross because it's dangerous--an unknown person's oral pathology being transferred to an assumed hygienic product, now tainted.  Now even if this person made an excuse he was purchasing it or didn't put it back, it still falls under the federal violation for attempting to tamper in section (a) as well as the subsection (d) the threat of the same (d) Whoever knowingly threatens, under circumstances in which the threat may reasonably be expected to be believed, that conduct that, if it occurred, would violate subsection (a) of this section will occur, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. I want this man proscuted more thoroughly--with respect to the sentencing for the federal statute violation.  And it's not because he's black, or because I don't like how he looks, but because I feel that he has committed a federal crime because I HEARD ABOUT IT through the news, and this becomes federal left wing bioterrorism in my mind, because this is one of a pattern of at least 10 such incidents which are intended to intimidate consumers from buying these products.  It could be considered a form of left-wing terrorism because it harms the grocery store, it harms the ice cream industry, and it harms the brand of ice cream; and it forces the brand of ice cream affected to spend much more money to 'secure the packaging" so stupid fools like this guy cannot play dangerous, sociopathic pranks on the public like this, and incur the additional costs of their ice cream due to the brand having to secure the packaging as a ressult.  It is patently unfair and this person deserves a punishment so severe as to be informative to any other sociopaths that may follow in his footsteps.  You have to make the punishment MORE SEVERE than the gain they get from social media video content virality from their act, otherwise it continues to happen Crime that pays is crime that stays.   This is why you need to upgrade this man's sentence to not only conform to the federal guidelines, but to be educational and instructive punitive meature for the public to understand that this behavior MUST STOP>>> Thank you for your consideration sir.  We appreciate your continued service protecting the public. Best Regards,