"Diversity is Strength" is False. It's actually easy to see that it's false, so people falling for it are actually dumb people you should avoid. "Diversity is Strength".   No it's not.  Diversity is a "divide and rule" strategy to keep people from organizing into a sufficiently powerful force to have leverage / cloud over the governments of the world.  "Diversity is Strength" is top-down propaganda to bring about tribalism and disunity that denies the underclass from sharing power with the governments. What is Diversity? Different Languages means that people cannot organize or coordinate because they cannot talk to each other.  Mistakes between not understanding the other lead to further mistakes, alienation, violence.  It's easy to see that differnt languages do not make people 'stronger' unless everyone can speak all the languages.  Everyone knows the paranoia of two people looking over at you and switching to a different language they know you don't know.  This is how they can have a 'private' converation in public, and it's fucking rude.,  When in rome, speak latin....or get the F out Different languages divides people unless there is an official multilanguage situation where everyone knows the languages Different customs / cultures means people will be irked by other people's customs.  They may feign 'PCness' of tolerance, learning about others, etc; but as we know by three years of virtue signalling fakeness, if the left disagrees with someone, then all that tolerance and learning is out the door.  If they valued diversity, they'd value the incumbent culture, but instead we see a hatred against 'patriots' and people who actually succeed in their own way in the incumbent culture.  Therefore, any idea of 'different customs' making people stronger is false Different customs creates tribalism, and tribalism is necessarily a division, not a unity.  Divisions sap power from the people, it keeps them small and controlled.  Being small and controlled is NOT STRENGTH Different Ideas and Ideologies, as an extension of culture, subculture, means that people won't agree on political will, national interest, governance style, and political / social priorities.  They will bicker and never organize to a force that can agree on anything. That is not strength.  Nothing ever gets done, except for the status quo....which is actually the REAL goal of the government (unchange).  They don't want change because this political infighting is a great smokescreen for them to commit actual real, sometimes terrifying, global scale crimes against all humanity, while selling their own customers illusory garbage and stealing from them. Different Sexual and Gender Dispositions -- Identity politics serves the same purpose of pushing tribalism as the above.   "Have them fighting each other, so they aren't spending their time scrutinizing us" Different Races -- very few people are actually really racist--many more are 'culturalist' but the cultural engineers love to racebait and make it about race, because then they can demonize those that disagree with the shitty inequality policies that the cultural engineers created in the first place.  The word racism is used as a vicious political smear against those who have disputes with people over the above concerns, and usually the racism comes directly from those cultural engineer's government policies that creates these asymmetric benefits and entitlements (one side over the other; creating winners and losers) that are the cause of infighting.  In the case of america, it's been the anti-white and anti-asian policy of affirmative action that is essentially a "handicap" (like golf) that has unironically created a "handicap" (as in wheelchair) for the people it allegedly intended to help---blacks are worse, not better, because of affirmative action and we know this now.  They did this to us.  It was their fault.  And now they want to blame all of us for the "racism" (really classism) it created, because you see stupid people like Don Lemon and Al Green in places they have no right being, because they are actually very stupid, unqualified and possibly amoral people. Different Religions -- see different cultures Conclusion What we're up against are vicious social psychologists who have weaponized culture and politics to induce a very dark version of tribalism called identity politics.  Tribalism does NOT equal strength, it's antistrength There IS a way for diversity to be strength, but it requires a free market, including a free market of IDEAS, and for governments and corporations to get the fuck out of our lives forever; or for them to deeply acknowledge that they are here to serve The latter would require such a high level of vetting that less than 1/1000th of 1% would qualify.  We'd actually need highly intelligent, ETHICAL/MORAL people who have a track record of deep thinking and success, and they'd need to work together in a meaningful way to maximize the minimal requirements for human freedom, equality and comfort.  If peoplel are still unhappy--that is their fault and they will have to look for meaning in the stars or in God or within themselves.  But one cannot say it would be the govenrments' fault for their unhappienss if they have adequate clean water, food, shelter and medicine, and opportunities for education and employment if they are willing to work in order to get these things.