Exactly.  And what did you glean for the company Worker - company CEO  comment.  Sounds to me like he was hinting that any company officer that had knowledge of an employees terrorist activities and did noting could have asset frozen. The law governing terrorist activity would I'm sure not get restricted under a legal doctri  2cfd  ne sometimes referred to as "respondeat superior" (Latin for "Let the superior answer"), which only assigns liability if the employee is acting within the course and scope of employment.  It is likely anyway that an Antifa member would probably have engaged in some type  Antifa communications, or planning  on company time..