So Tired Of Muhjoos Shills So sick of the muhjoo attacks here. Some of these attacks are nothing but rants against certain Jewish rabbis who could not accept the Godhead Incarnate manifested in the life of Jesus and wrote about it in a work called the Talmud. The teachings of the Talmud are opinions, not laws.  Hebrew laws are in the Torah.  The Talmud is not the Torah (first five books of the Bible - Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy). The complete Old Testament as we know it is the Hebrew's Tanakh which is an acronym for Torah ('Teaching'), Nevi'im ('Prophets') and Ketuvim ('Writings')—hence TaNaKh. Which Talmud are these shills screaming about? The Talmud (literally "study" or "learning") is a compilation of rabbinical arguments that were written:   1) after the captivity of the Jews by the Assyrians (Northern tribes or Israel) and then the captivity of Judea by the Chaldeans (Babylon) around 500 BC. This is the Babylonian Talmud.   2) after their dispersal under the Romans after the fall of Jerusalem  in 70 AD. This is the Jerusalem Talmud which is the only Talmud that could mention Jesus.   The Babylonian Talmud is the opinions of rabbis also known as the Oral Tradition. Jesus spoke out against these earlier Talmudic teachings as evidenced in the Book of Mark, Chapter 7.  Shills are referring to the Jerusalem Talmud (compiled about 200 AD) in which rabbis tried to explain away why so many thousands and thousands of Jews (including priests) accepted Jesus as Lord and Savior after His death and Resurrection. Keep this in mind, the very first Christians were Jews. Non-Jews only became Christians in great numbers after the ministry of the Apostle Paul. Read the Book of Acts. None of the rabbis who wrote their "teachings" (actually opinions) in the Jerusalem Talmud were contemporaries of Jesus. The historian Flavius Josephus  (a Hebrew born about 37 AD) provides us with the longest 1st Century secular description of the life of Jesus. He describes Jesus in his "Antiquities of the Jews" as follows:   Antiquities 18:63 "At this time there was a wise man called Jesus, and his conduct was good, and he was known to be virtuous. Many people among the Jews and the other nations became his disciples. Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die. But those who had become his disciples did not abandon his discipleship. They reported that he had appeared to them three days after his crucifixion and that he was alive. Accordingly, he was perhaps the Messiah, concerning whom the prophets have reported wonders. And the tribe of the Christians, so named after him, has not disappeared to this day."   Remember,  Josephus was a Jew, he was not a Christian.   Don't be a shill. Research your posts before you blather on about things you may have read and then regurgitate in Voat.