On the trial for public perception front, two senators set up the ball for the spike, talking about how much more credible it is to have a sketchy, fragmented memory from a fragile woman, in her account surrounding the (alleged) sequence of events, and that it was far easier, implying 'less credible', for someone (implying Kavanaugh) to have a coherent, straight forward memory about his own past.    Blumenthal spikes that ball, repeating the false reasoning and adding that the entire thing indicates that Trump is carrying out a 'coverup' by not demanding an FBI investigation. Diane Feinstein better be under investigation imo.  She has already convicted Kavanaugh as no better than a rapist.  Yet she held back the letter to respect Blasey Ford's privacy.  Are we supposed to believe Feinstein, after waiting until the eleventh hour, would have been willing to just let Kavanaugh be voted to SC?  Of course not, so she prevents a timely and private inquiry, which would have protected both Kavanaugh and Blasey Ford, and instead instigates this spectacle and undermines our entire legal and social underpinning of innocent until proven guilty.  Why even have courts then?  An accusation by a Democrat woman IS the verdict and Democrats have proclaimed that the future is female.  If this travesty is a preview of what that looks like then fair minded better think long and hard about what such a future hold if Dems are in power.