Post a citation that "he wasn't a kkk member" because there's a lot of evidence that he was, from credible sources.  I'm not just saying "you're wrong". I'm saying i'd be VERY interested to see a counterpoint because I'm keeping an open mind and want to see all teh evidence YOu're very wrong about the diversity thing.  He was a slaver.  He owned slaves  Also, interestingly enough, he infiltrated the masons. He actually wasn't a mason, he formed the scottish rite that took over the masons, and a lot of people saw him as a fraud.  No no no.  Wrong.  He was part of the Supreme Council.  He wrote one of the masons' formative books Morals and Dogma which they still use and revere Frauds don't get highly protected DC Statues