Agreed, although I'd definitely like to add a rape exception as well (assuming that we could all agree on what counts as rape anymore. I'm talking about forced, aggravated  penetration against the recipient's will, not just a mere withdrawal of consent as an afterthought or "absence of consent" based on varying states of inebriation). Basically: idiot rapes woman, and as a consequence she gets pregnant. She can't be expected to keep the child of her rapist (she was removed in the decision to bear a child), so as a consequence an abortion is performed. The child is killed, but the murder charge is placed on the rapist, since he is solely responsible for it existing. Now, what about female-on-male rape (forced to penetrate)? I think allowing the man to choose what happens, instead of automatically performing the abortion and charging the rapist with murder, is fair. While he had no control over the situation that caused the child to be conceived, her body is bearing the stresses of the developing child and bringing it to the world. If he chooses for it to be aborted, she should get the murder charge (if it weren't for her, that kid wouldn't exist). If he chooses to allow it to live, he should be free from any & all financial responsibility (wasn't his decision). It 100% becomes the woman's responsibility.  Incest is a bit trickier. Both parties are willing (as disgusting as it can be) and there's no telling how developmentally stunted the child will end up, but killing it because of the handicaps it'll have it simply eugenics under a different name. Once we go down that road, where would it end? Would we stop at simply aborting incest kids? What about cerebral palsy? Downs? Autism? Cleft palates? I mean, if we're going to start killing babies because of developmental issues, where do we draw the line as to what's acceptable and what isn't - and could we justify the spilling of that much innocent blood? Children are innocent lives, but can be created by evil people. Free will and individuality dictates we, as a society, cannot expect a person to accept responsibility for a child forced on to them through sexual assault. The only option that seems viable is to remove the child from the equation and charge the assailant with both its creation and destruction. I pray God grants us mercy for the decisions we must make in these dark days.