Some Q Statements I'm Having Trouble With..... On the one hand:  "It won't be safe for them to walk the streets" On the other hand: "The choice to know will be yours" "The full picture would hospitalize 99%" For it to be "unsafe for them to walk the streets" would require a big reveal of some sort to materialize.  The information would have to be damning and provable enough that an overwhelming majority of Americans would accept it as truth and demand justice.  So then what is this other bit of information that presumably won't be officially revealed, but that those willing to do so could piece together? To be clear, I'm not saying the statements are contradictory so much as I'm wondering where the "line" is between what will be revealed officially VS what won't be. For example, might this mean that the pedo networks will be officially revealed whereas the UFO agenda won't be?  I just use that as an example, not necessarily saying that I believe that to be the so-called "line". Larger point is that we can deduce that there certainly is a "dividing line"..  I just wonder where it is..