USSC Rules on CIVIL ASSET FORFIETURE - Well, sorta Not quite the expected outcome, especially since the Majority Opinion was (allegedly) written by RBG. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/20/us/politics/civil-asset-forfeiture-supreme-court.html They did not limit CAF, just made it possible to claim law was exceeded, and seek judicial return of seized assets. IMO, CAF should be a court-enforced/authorized action ONLY.  If assets are seized, they should only be seized in conjunction with an arrest, followed by an actual charge and upheld by the court.  If one is not arrested, no seizure should be possible.  And, if one is not charged after arrest, any assets seized should be immediately returned when person released. I'm disappointed, but it is at least a step in right direction.  Why they didn't go further, to me, defies gravity.