Durham: The Debate--An Investigation or a Report? This question is driving me mad. Okay, I exaggerate. Tonight, Dave on X22 referred to it as when the Durham Report comes out. I hit pause and asked the spouse, report? Last week Fitton said there were no grand juries that he had heard of, and no investigation.  Clearly, I don't want another report. I tire of reports. Studies. Recommendations. I'm not even one of those calling for mass arrests; I am a pragmatist. But, as a pragmatist, I also believe in equal justice under the law. I believe we have to hold our government officials to a higher standard because they are running the country. And finally, I believe that in order to restore law and peoples' faith in the law, and to heal as a country after decades of countless and seemingly infinite abuses, we need justice. Point in fact, It is difficult to know what Durham is doing.  According to this article, https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/doj-reveals-what-john-durham-will-be-doing-in-his-investigation-into-origins-of-russia-probe/  Durham's mandate is to "Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd told the House Judiciary Committee that “The Review” would be “broad in scope and multifaceted.” He also said that the purpose of it was to “illuminate open questions regarding the activities of U.S. and foreign intelligence services as well as non-governmental organizations and individuals.” “The purpose of the Review is to more fully understand the efficacy and propriety of those steps and to answers, to the satisfaction of the Attorney General, those open questions,” Boyd continued." An American Spectator piece from about a year ago indicates why it appears to be an investigation: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/05/what_are_the_odds_that_the_durham_investigation_is_for_real_and_will_bring_the_bad_actors_to_justice.html noting that: "Eric Felten noticed something already on the public record last October: that Durham already was investigating leaks to the media from the FBI.  This means that at least seven months before his role was revealed, and months before William Barr took office, Durham was on the case.  The revelation came not from a leak, but from testimony by James A. Baker, the FBI's general counsel under James Comey." But the fact is, no one knows for sure. As recently as December, Sidney Powell offered a prediction that Durham was launching an investigation. https://nationalfile.com/sidney-powell-predicts-durham-will-indict-not-just-write-report/ Mostly just looking for answers to my own questions, and posting in case anyone is interested. If anyone has sources that shed more light, please leave a link!