Ok, Please don't do this to we the public again. Ok, so let me get this straight. We witnessed on various televised broadcasts the questioning of these individuals in person by the congress, where the people were not under oath to tell the truth. And now the government turns around and publishes to we the people the private untelivised interviews where the persons were under oath.  And turns out many if not most or all of the persons under oath revised or reversed their answers this time in the private questioning meetings. In the name of God and for the benefit of clarity and truthfulness... why on earth did you (the government processes) slow-walk the hell out of us, we the people, for years with the televised non binding non legal versions of these liars? Just so we could witness them lie? Why on earth did you not right from the start televise and hold the under oath, legal versions of these questionings? Seems really backwards and like the government willfully and knowlingly shafted we the people, public joe and jane here. Probably going to be a lengthy convoluted and riddled with legal jargon and references to US legal code, as to why they had to do it that way. But even after that explanation being all legal and all.  Still looks and feels like we got shafted. Ya know  Ok, now that i've downloaded the pdf's i'm going to take the time and puruse and speed read through these 'legal' versions. Even though I won't understand half or less of what's being said, or am too slow and dumb to be able to hold the intricate cross reference pieces in my mind so I can piece them together like a puzzle to make sense of all of this. That's why we depend on brains that can, like X22 or George Webb, or others that can do those mental chores and come out on top and provide us with the translations and what it means to us where the rubber hits the road. Ok.