@pwdwp Who cares what an opinion columnist for the NY Post says? He's just referencing the Seth Rich case which the DNC knows is fake, the FBI knows is fake and Robert Mueller knows is fake.  It's fake because a month before anyone had heard of Seth Rich, the DNC had a cyber experts on site looking at the malware on their systems as it ran real time.  And they recognized the malware as a long term cyber threat traced back to Russian Military intel.  Theories are that Assange got the emails from a Clinton campaign insider, namely Seth Rich.  Why do you think Assange isn't simply lying about this to throw people off the trail? There's a gigantic problem with this theory that a Clinton Campaign Insider did it.  There's no one who was  A.  An insider to the DCCC which was hacked. AND B.  An insider to the DNC which was hacked AND  C.  Also hacked John Podesta's gmail account.  (would this be an insider to gmail?  Many, many people were spearphised by the same group that stole Podesta's emails.) D.  And hacked the RNC. That's right the RNC.  The CYBER campaign went waaaaaay beyond the DNC.  The RNC was also hacked during this campaign, but their emails were not released.  Are we claiming an there was a person who was an insider to the DNC and the RNC and had hacking skills.  That's another problem with this theory.  Seth Rich wasn't a hacker.  He was not a computer expert. The DNC malware was a very sophisticated tool. Robert Mueller has communications between Wikileaks and the cutout personality the GRU used.  One problem for Assange is the DNC leak was attributed to the GRU before their cutout, Guccifer 2 even existed.  Assange knows this.  He knows Mueller has the goods, because he spelled it out in the indictment. https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download Organization 1 is Wikileaks  On or about June 22, 2016, Organization 1 sent a private message to Guccifer 2.0 to “[s]end any new material [stolen from the DNC] here for us to review and it will have a much higher impact than what you are doing.” On or about July 6, 2016, Organization 1 added, “if you have anything hillary related we want it in the nexttweo [sic] days prefable [sic] because the DNC [Democratic National Convention] is approaching and she will solidify bernie supporters behind her after.” The Conspirators responded, “ok . . . i see.” Organization 1 explained, “we think trump has only a 25% chance of winning against hillary . . . so conflict between bernie is interesting."