Nuance Monday - contrarian post re Kavanaugh's commitment to the Constitution Its easy for us all to spin our wheels into ruts of unquestioned commitment to certain issues and developments as regards to draining the swamp and rescuing Western Civilization from the encroaching tyranny of Globalist crony cap/marxism , so this post is in the interests of allowing us to hit the refresh button on our critical thinking capabilities In regards to Kavanaugh & sexual misconduct allegations, i'm firmly convinced that the Democrats have eviscerated the standards of Jurisprudence both in Congress and the general public to a degree that warrants some kind of punitive remedy at law And I am satisfied of Kavanaugh's dedication and comprehensive knowledge of the Constitution in general. And if Q champions his appointment as part of the fight against the traitors, I'm down with that.  But that's not to say we shouldn't keep one wary eye out for potential chinks in the armor, so to speak So there is, however, an alleged cloud over Kav's commitment to the full scope of the constitution. Now, this may well be true of any and every Candidate Trump had in consideration - candidate A may be weak on amendment Y and candidate B may be weak on amendment Z, etc Anyway, this article https://thefreethoughtproject.com/msm-using-kavanaugh-sex-scandal-to-distract-you-from-real-reason-he-shouldnt-be-appointed/ posed an interesting read in regards to constructing an argument that Kav is weak on the 4th amendment, especially as regards to interpreting privacy rights in the digital age. Warrantless activities appear to be no biggie to the man  the great irony , of course, is Trump appointing a man likely to turn a blind eye to laissez-faire FISA authorisations!