Benghazi may have been a cover to stage an attack and let the server(s) with the SAP program be physically stolen during the attack. Why? The data couldn't be transmitted covertly without the NSA knowing.  This is a rather overly-complicated  theory wouldn't you agree? The last sentence is just flat out incorrect when you look at it.  When you have digital data on server you have transmit to someone, do you bring the server to them?  Of course not.  Even if you had to worry about the NSA, you could easily come up with a dozen ways to do this.  So they transported the server to the Special Mission in Benghazi where it could be overrun and stolen   I mean come on.  How about burn it to a DVD or a thumb drive and FedEx it.  You don't need a production.   The addition of security would have made it impossible to overrun the SM  It was a military style attack, what embassy in the world has enough security to stop RPGs?  Maybe Baghdad?  Even at actual embassies, Marine Embassy Guards are not equipped to go against guys with RPGs. In fact, they are there to secure the information.   The primary mission of the MSG is to provide security, particularly the protection of classified information and equipment vital to the national security of the United States at American diplomatic posts  When an attack occurs they are supposed to destroy info and machined. Once they have done that they can protect people.  The secondary mission of Marine Security Guards is to provide protection for U.S. citizens and U.S. Government property located within designated U.S. Diplomatic and Consular premises during exigent circumstances, which require immediate aid or action.  The Benghazi Outpost was neither an embassy or a consulate.  It was there primarily to provide cover for the CIA annex nearby and explain why Americans were in town.