MI AG Dana Nessel Response To Hearings - As expected, you know she is in on the fraud as well (https://wearethene.ws/notable/176395) It is obvious from her response that she is in on the fraud. The following issues stand out with her two tweets: 1.) She mentions how America watched in horror as Republicans sponsored an event to hear fraud claims. The only one's in horror were those in on the massive fraud that is becoming more apparent by the day. Furthermore, considering the same things are happening in multiple states all favoring the same candidate, this rises to the level of conspiracy and is obvious these are not "mistakes" or "glitches" since not one of these has favored Trump at all. Furthermore, she is deceptive in that it is the right of electors to hear these claims. This is not political, it is Constitutional.. 2.) Calling the "claims, baseless and debunked". None of these are "claims" - they are sworn eyewitness testimony which, in court, is commonly referred to as EVIDENCE. With 131 of them, nor are they baseless and, considering the nature of the hearing, nor are they debunked - or why would they have the hearing to begin with? As an AG, she should know that one side produces evidence and the other produce counter-evidence - that's how it works. You simply do NOT dismiss presented evidence as "not being evidence". It doesn't work that way. 3.) Calling on the "evidence" to be submitted to the AG's office with "Put Up or Shut Up." Said like a petulant child. These are sworn affidavits that REQUIRE you as AG to actually investigate on. It's her job by law. Furthermore, since she is admitting they haven't done any investigation on these claims how does she know they are "baseless". This is where she caught herself - admitting no investigation by her office yet she KNOWS the claims are baseless. Someone should ask her how she KNOWS this since she hasn't investigated. 4.) Her response to the follow up of "We have seen no credible evidence of fraud, we have heard these cases to date and are unpersuaded by these claims." Again, she is caught red-handed here. Exactly WHAT did you do to show these were simply claims and not evidence. 131 sworn eyewitness testimonies are NOT claims. They are sworn witnesses - in court that is called EVIDENCE. If you robbed a small grocery store and 14 people saw you, could identify you, put in sworn affidavits and testified in court your defense would not be "these are baseless claims". Instead, you would be going to jail. It is obvious in MI, like some of these other states, that Whitmer (Governor), Dana Nessel (AG) and Jocelyn Benson (SoS) - all financed by Soros - are in on the fraud. There was an overwhelming amount of evidence presented at the hearings. The wheels are coming off the bus and Dana is lashing out like a spoiled child who just got caught in something and by screaming and saying mean things it will make people go away. These people have no idea what is coming.