Q Post 2672 - Is Q Telling us The ARRESTS to Begin??? 2672 Q!!mG7VJxZNCI 13 Jan 2019 - 11:08:58 AM https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/02/11/former_cia_director_john_brennan_investigated_for_perjury.html📁 D House focus on POTUS = 'insurance' extension from MUELLER to House. Q mentioned in a post last week that the Mueller Investigation was "insurance" to protect Dems from prosecution.  But Q said (#2643) that that insurance is expiring, which I concluded meant that the Mueller Investigation will be coming to a close soon.   https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2954358 So here, Q is saying that the Dem House is taking over from the Mueller Investigation, because the Dems are still desperately looking for some "insurance" to protect them from imminent prosecution for their crimes.  (Example: trying to impeach or otherwise get rid of  Trump as POTUS, etc.) GJ testimony underway in several states. (GJ = Grand Jury)  However, Grand Jury testimonies are under way in several states, so..... Attempts to BLOCK/PROTECT themselves will FAIL.  .....so any attempts to block or protect themselves from prosecution will FAIL. Far beyond political corruption/sedition. We are talking about crimes way beyond just political corruption and sedition.  (We are talking about Treason and attempts to murder POTUS???) Law governing removal of a sitting Congress(m/w)/Senator? What are the laws regarding removing a sitting Congressman/woman or Senator?  Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution states that a sitting Senator or Congressman/woman CAN be arrested while Congress is in Session.  Its ok, as long as the Senator/Congressman/woman was being charged with Treason or a Felony.  They can be arrested for Treason or a Felony even if they are in the middle of a speech or a vote, but they cannot be arrested for minor charges while Congress is in session (ex: can't be arrested for J-walking while Congress is in session).  More on this LAW further below. Lights on. Q An Anon pointed out that Q used to end with "enjoy the show", which is something one would say before a show will start. Now he is saying "lights on" or LET IT BEGIN.   If so, Q is alerting us to the imminence of the long awaited round up of the Criminal Elite, and nothing they can do now can stop what is coming!! Q: "Attempts to BLOCK/PROTECT themselves will FAIL." .....so attempts to block or protect themselves from prosecution will FAIL, because their crimes are Treason. So I guess we should be on the look out for certain Treasonous members of Congress/Senate to go MIA (Missing in Action), which would mean they have been arrested.  I doubt if Trump Team will arrest them while they are on the floor speaking or voting.  I think like the rest of the arrests made to date, it will be done quietly.  Also, I suppose, be prepared for their MIA being blamed on Cancer or something, like the rest of the creeps arrested to date.  So A LOT of people will suddenly be battling cancer. Considering 2 or more prison barges were sent to GITMO in December, so they should be docked by now, and ready for inmates.   https://i.imgtc.com/K0S8a5f.jpg  Gitmo was expanded these past 2 years, and multiple court rooms installed to hold trials.  December the Military Police were deployed to GITMO.  So everything is ready. Q Post Dec 2: #2523 - GITMO READY FOR NEW INMATES - Everything Ready for ROUND-UPS!!! Trump Can Use Deadly Military Force for Round Ups!!! https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2887835 HERE'S "THE PLAN"!!! We are at Stage 5 of 5!!! https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2899192 Here's the LAW: The Senators and Representatives...shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same.... Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 The clause, does not provide Congress with any immunity from criminal prosecution. Privilege from Arrest The Privilege from Arrest Clause provides a Member of Congress a privilege from civil arrest only, but not from other civil processes. Even the privilege from civil arrest would be valid only while Congress is in session. Civil arrest is the physical detainment of a person, by lawful authority, to answer a civil demand against him. At the time the Constitution was adopted, civil arrests were common. Long v. Ansell (1934). The Framers likely feared this tool could be misused to interfere with the legislative process. Civil arrest is rarely, if ever, practiced, so this clause is virtually obsolete and has little application today. The Supreme Court interpreted the language "in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace" to encompass all crimes. Williamson v. United States (1908). Tracing the origins of the clause to parliamentary privilege, the Court found this identical language was used to qualify Parliament's privilege from arrest so that the members of Parliament were not immune from criminal prosecution. The Court concluded that the Framers' use of the identical phrase, without any explanation, indicated that Congress's privilege was to have the same limitation regarding criminal actions as did the parliamentary privilege from which the language was borrowed. The clause, therefore, does not provide Congress with any immunity from criminal prosecution. The Supreme Court, applying the Framers' intent, later declared that the clause also did not provide any privilege from civil process. Long v. Ansell. Hence, civil litigants can compel Members of Congress to appear in a court of proper jurisdiction to defend against civil actions. Furthermore, the Court has so narrowly interpreted the clause that Members of Congress may even be compelled by subpoena to testify in criminal and civil actions while Congress is in session. Professor of Law  Cleveland-Marshall College of Law  https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/26/privilege-from-arrest