For years PEPFAR had knowledge and funded widespread botched circumcisions (male genital mutilation) in Africa These people are sick. The following quoted from article http://archive.is/QhMIy#selection-745.0-757.326: In a new draft proposal, the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) say they will end their program of infant circumcision in Africa. They have been using an unsafe circumcision device that was sued out of business after causing too many botches – the Mogen Clamp. They now plan to use the ShangRing device: an untested device that will be tested for its botch rate on African adolescents. (The ShangRing is a device manufactured by a Chinese company. In 2015, it was fast-tracked through the WHO for clearance in medical processes. It was cleared for use within the European Union in March 2019.) Dodgy studies PEPFAR has used millions of tax dollars in a campaign to circumcise Africa under the guise of reducing HIV risks, based on some very controversial studies.  The Studies, backed up by the United Nations World Health Organisation (WHO) have been criticised around the world for being incomplete, too small to be of significance and even measuring the wrong thing. The film American Circumcision interviewed the authors of those studies and their critics, opening up the disaster to a wider audience than those in the men’s rights movement who had raised the issue up to then. Yet many ‘charities’, business interests and NGOs have expended many millions of dollars in mutilation of genitals: something which, done to females, has been attracting equally large amounts of money to stop. The global health bodies that have publicly made statements against male genital mutilation include The Canadian Pediatric Society, the Canadian Urological Association, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians and the Royal Dutch Medical Association. In recent years, Germany, Tasmania and Iceland have all been close to a specific legal ban on it. Many countries outlaw it under generic assault laws but, so far, the criminals are only occasionally pursued. The language that PEPFAR continue to use to describe the butchery they promote and pay for is VMMC (voluntary medical male circumcision). They continue to rely on the three flawed studies that say male circumcision is a way to prevent HIV, and ignore dozens of rigorous, large-scale, investigations that prove otherwise. The very use of the term VMMC (voluntary medical male circumcision) in relation to infants is a misnomer and mis-description in itself. There are various UN treaties and international laws that make it very clear that an infant is unable to volunteer for something to which they have not been asked, could not understand even if they were, or does not have the fullest available information available to make an informed decision. Infant genital mutilation, of both boys and girls, is not “voluntary”. An amputation which is not for immediate and clear benefit is not “medical” (this is why routine appendectomies are not longer carried out). Any unnecessary amputation of any part of male or female genitals is not “circumcision” but is genital mutilation.