https://www.serial.rocks/post-117 @TurquoiseLover this is what @Serialbrain2 decode-predicted in regard to Gowdy replacing Sessions as AG, but predicted inaccurately:  ...we learn Gowdy and Ratcliffe are considered to be potential picks for the AG position. In the meantime, the current Acting AG Whitaker is being attacked for having made statements in the past that Dems wrongly consider to justify his recusal from the Mueller probe  link.  Do you see it? Do you now see why Gowdy made statements that made him appear as he was supporting Mueller against Trump causing many excellent Trump supporters to think he was disloyal?  link1 -  link2. These statements were well positioned on the political credit timeline so that, in due course, they would be spent to shut down any criticism from the Dems regarding Gowdy’s ability to be an impartial AG. These last two drops informed us as early as in January 2018 that the plan all along was to get Sessions to progress as far as his recusal allowed him to by stealthily coaching the sealed indictments, Huber and Horowitz while Gowdy (with Goodlatte) was taking the House investigations to the 10 yard line. Then, when it would be time to move from the investigation phase to the justice phase, Sessions would gracefully let Gowdy replace him while all the investigation paperwork would migrate to Grassley’s desk in the Senate. Brilliant. Clearly, @Serialbrain2's provided decode prediction was inaccurate/disinformation.