Any Time a Deepstate or Democrat Derp Says "Quid Pro Quo", Ask Them How Sanctions or Extradition Negotiations of Assange AREN'T A "Quid Pro Quo"? These people don't understand the difference between the POTUS's constitutionally and fiduciarily obligated duties and 'personal gain'.  In the case of Joe Biden, they assume he is innocent, when in fact he already confessed, and it was on video, to his crime.  People have used open source materials to conclude his son was engaged in nepotism related graft.  Everything is known, and the crime is actually real and substantiated.  However, when Trump's administration attempts to enforce the law, it's a quid pro quo; when in fact the beneficiary of bringing the criminals to justice is actually the people of the US itself--society itself.  The USGOV seizes assets and they re-fund society, not Trump himself.  HE doesn't take Joe and son's money, the treasury does.   So the dems don't know what a quid pro quo actually is, and you know that their complaints are solely political-targetting and harassment of POTUS because they NEVER EVER complained about US UK negotiations of extradition of Assange as a "quid pro quo"; and they also don't complain about Trump giving and removing sanctions on countries as some kind of quid pro quo.  In fact, it IS a quid pro quo, ('a tit for tat') only it doesn't meet the threshold of any criminality because the beneficiary is the US generally and of course, the simple fact that it's HIS FORKING JOB to do that.