Though I disagree with you about the dog shit, that’s neither here nor there.  What matters is the content of the specific article cited.  Is it based in reality and supported by and with documented/verifiable facts?  Indeed this one is. John Solomon writes for ‘The Hill’.  Much of what they put out is horse shit, but does that mean I should dismiss John Solomon just because he writes for The Hill?  I think not. I didn’t post the website, I posted the article.