Q POST 3896 and the OCCAM'S RAZOR, Q teaches me such COOL things. I will have to look into this more. PART OF Q'S POST What is the mathematical probability this occurs [the ‘time bomb’ explodes] at the exact point in time that allows for maximum damage [above] prior to the P_elec? Outside of standard deviation? WHO BENEFITS THE MOST? [Mueller failed] [Impeachment failed] Why was it critically important impeachment be rushed in the House? [MSM[D party]/Hollywood narrative(s) failed] [THE COUP FAILED] [D] party leading nominee established [super T] prior to lock-down [take-over]? [Sanders ELIM_Biden_FRONT] Occam's razor simply states that of any given set of explanations for an event occurring, the simplest one is most likely the correct one. Q Occam's razor Occam's razor (also Ockham's razor or Ocham's razor: Latin: novacula Occami; or law of parsimony: Latin: lex parsimoniae) is the problem-solving principle that states that "Entities should not be multiplied without necessity." The idea is attributed to English Franciscan friar William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347), a scholastic philosopher and theologian who used a preference for simplicity to defend the idea of divine miracles. It is sometimes paraphrased by a statement like "the simplest solution is most likely the right one". Occam's razor says that when presented with competing hypotheses that make the same predictions, one should select the solution with the fewest assumptions, and it is not meant to be a way of choosing between hypotheses that make different predictions. Similarly, in science, Occam's razor is used as an abductive heuristic in the development of theoretical models rather than as a rigorous arbiter between candidate models. In the scientific method, Occam's razor is not considered an irrefutable principle of logic or a scientific result; the preference for simplicity in the scientific method is based on the falsifiability criterion. For each accepted explanation of a phenomenon, there may be an extremely large, perhaps even incomprehensible, number of possible and more complex alternatives. Since one can always burden failing explanations with ad hoc hypotheses to prevent them from being falsified, simpler theories are preferable to more complex ones because they are more testable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor There is a widespread philosophical presumption that simplicity is a theoretical virtue. This presumption that simpler theories are preferable appears in many guises. Often it remains implicit; sometimes it is invoked as a primitive, self-evident proposition; other times it is elevated to the status of a ‘Principle’ and labeled as such (for example, the ‘Principle of Parsimony’). However, it is perhaps best known by the name ‘Occam's (or Ockham's) Razor.’ Simplicity principles have been proposed in various forms by theologians, philosophers, and scientists, from ancient through medieval to modern times. Thus Aristotle writes in his Posterior Analytics, We may assume the superiority ceteris paribus of the demonstration which derives from fewer postulates or hypotheses.[1]  Moving to the medieval period, Aquinas writes: If a thing can be done adequately by means of one, it is superfluous to do it by means of several; for we observe that nature does not employ two instruments where one suffices (Aquinas, [BW], p. 129).  https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/