Q Post 3647 and Q's mention of Rinse/Repeat. It does look like the Deep State uses the same tactics over and over against us. I like to look up the references Q uses. Especially the ones that make me laugh. I like Q's sense of humor. Q has a way with words that is interesting. I like when Q puts something in a post that is unusual and unexpected. "Lather, rinse, repeat (sometimes wash, rinse, repeat) is an idiom roughly quoting the instructions found on many brands of shampoo. It is also used as a HUMOROUS WAY of pointing out that such instructions, IF TAKEN LITERALLY, would result in an endless loop of repeating the same steps, at least until one runs out of shampoo. It is also a sarcastic metaphor for following instructions or procedures SLAVISHLY without critical thought It is known as the shampoo algorithm, and is a classic example of an algorithm in introductory computer science classes. In Benjamin Cheever's novel The Plagiarist, a fictional advertising executive increases the sales of his client's shampoo by adding the word "REPEAT" to its instructions." RINSE/REPEAT "A phrase borrowed from instructions commonly found on bottles of shampoo and hair conditioner. It is used to indicate that a certain pattern of behaviour will, inevitably, occur again - usually despite furious claims that it won't."  OBAMA and the Paris Agreement The Paris Agreement was a product of the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris, where FORMER PRESIDENT OBAMA met with world leaders to COMMIT THE U.S. to non-binding emission reduction targets. Under the agreement, Obama committed the U.S. to wholly improbable reduction goals of 26 to 28 percent by year 2025. Through a litany of regulations stemming from the agreement, Obama essentially OFFERED UP  the U.S. economy as a SACRIFICIAL LAMB to further his own legacy.  The agreement however would not just have hurt the country’s growth as a whole, but would have trickled down to low-and-middle income Americans. If the U.S.'s participation in the agreement had been allowed to move forward, energy costs would have skyrocketed, in turn raising the cost of utility bills for families and increasing the costs of consumer goods. A recent study by the Heritage Foundation projected that the Paris agreement and resulting policies would have increased electricity costs for a family of four between 13 and 20 percent annually. The study also projected American families would see over $20,000 of lost income by year 2035. Such regressive policy hits the nation’s most vulnerable hardest, who ironically are the same people Obama used to justify the deal.  The Paris debacle was also slated to reduce U.S. GDP by over $2.5 trillion, and result in an average shortfall of nearly 400,000 jobs by 2035. Of the 400,000 jobs lost, an estimated 200,000 would have been in the manufacturing sector. Meaning Americans would also have seen the costs of consumer goods such as electronics, paper products, and apparel increase, inevitably taking more out of household income. With such drastic costs to the U.S., American’s would expect an equally drastic benefit on the other end, yet that is simply not the case. Policies such as those resulting from climate deal would, even with a complete elimination of U.S. carbon emissions, result in less than two-tenths of a degree Celsius redustion in Global temperatures. global temperatures.  It is all to clear the Paris climate deal was all cost and no benefit for the U.S., and unlike the Obama Administration, which was all to comfortable sacrificing low-and-middle income Americans, along with thousands of jobs and GDP, President Trump realized Paris was a "bad deal" for America and it's citizens, and made the right decision to withdraw from this disastrous agreement.    https://www.atr.org/obamas-paris-agreement-all-cost-and-no-benefit-us THIS IS WHAT NANCY PELOSI SAID IN THE ARTICLE Q POSTED. “By coming here we want to say to everyone we are still in, the United States is still in,” Pelosi told reporters on the first day of the two-week United Nations climate talks in Spain. Many governments and environmental groups are aghast at Trump’s move last month to begin formal proceedings to yank the United States, one of the world’s biggest polluters, from the 2015 Paris Agreement to avert catastrophic temperature rises.