For Better Or Worse, Scalise Announces Senate Passed USMCA This Morning Opponents of the USMCA say it brings back the worst of the TPP and NAFTA and is a globalist's dream come true.  it limits the US sovereignty by creating an EU type parliament to govern the US, Mexico and Canada.  it gives the power to a 5 person panel to settle disagreements between the parties to the deal, without any vote by either country's own government.  it allows changes to the treaty without any consent of the country's own governments.  That it ties us to the laws/trade deals of other countries. It allows foreigners on this trade deal's board to make laws that require the American citizenry to obey them, which makes the trade deal unconstitutional. It requires the replacement of each country's currency and economy with 1 North American currency and economy under the oversight of the IMF. They call it a treaty not a trade deal.  Treaties decentralize power and ease or even erase borders.  I take hope in the following: Nancy Pelosi held up the USMCA 4 over a year before impeachment hearings started.  If it gives the US to the Globalists, why did she hold it up?   Scalise, Radcliff, Jones, Nunes, Grassley, Kevin McCarthy, Gaetz all supported it.  They can't all be evil, or ignorant to its reported dangers. Some of their tweets about it seem eager, even giddy with excitement. I do not know the individuals who are interpreting this document, and they may be overstating it's power.  Legal docs are easily misunderstood.   Anything that ends the failed Federal Reserve in the US seems to give the US an opportunity to print it's own money, and control it's own economy, if it backs out of this deal after the FED ends or this deal's power over the US Economy is overstated and misunderstood. On the other hand: Globalists and Mockingbirds have been promoting USMCA hard:  big twitter push, Colbert dancing to the YMCA but changing it to USMCA.  Pelosi, Schiff, Waters all voted for it too. Pelosi held the vote for USMCA right away after impeachment when she could have continued to hold it a few days. McConnel, a week ago, said they would do USMCA, after impeachment.  Why the quick vote?  Is he anticipating a longer trial now then a week ago. Or is it because citizen and independent journo resistance from the right to USMCA has been growing, over the past week too.   Grassley a week ago said that he could get the USMCA passed in 3 weeks.  Suddenly the vote has been held very quickly as opposition to the bill increases online.  The 2 things may have absolutely no relation, but the morning after their were posts here and discussion of beginning to organize against the USMCA Voat went down and was down for around 12 hours. Despite fears and resistance to the bill online among patriots, Q has not posted about the USMCA.  Can he not say it's good or misunderstood because it really is bad, and Trump plans on using it to end the FED and then withdraw (shhh don't spread that around).   Ted Cruz tweeted that the USMCA emboldens the internet Tech Giants when they badly need containing. the vote on USMCA was held under the cover of the impeachment hoopla without debate on the Senate floor.