Well, let's think about it from a variety of angles.  I've heard the idea that a trial in the Senate would allow maximum exposure of the fraudulent nature of the DNC Cabal and the ukraine corruption. So from a Q perspective, it would be desirable. I mean, that's the supposition.    On the other hand, as Q has intimated, tying up the Senate from more important work, such as hearings under Graham, etc., that would expose all the FISA corruption and the players, etc., is an objective of the DNC impeachment attack.  Moreover, building and keeping the narrative alive, that 45 is somehow guilty, mafiosa, corrupt etc, is definitely one aspect of the impeachment gambit.  So, well, there are other mechanisms for exposing the truth besides an impeachment trial in the Senate. (Do you think that MSM would play ball? I doubt it.) Having the impeachment shut-down will free up the Senate to now go on the attack, via hearings etc, and dig out and expose stuff the IG report and other 'reports' are ill equipped to do.  As for the narrative that 45 is corrupt, having the impeachment dismissed for lack of prosecution could definitely send a strong message about how ill-founded and groundless it is. Yes, impeachment trial could possibly be utilized by the patriots for increased exposure of the DNC & DS, but its still a gambit and bears certain risks. Conclusion: doesn't sound like a DS move to me. Impeachment is essentially an extension of the Collusion/Mueller roadblock. The faster the roadblocks are cleared, the quicker the patriots can get about the business of PROSECUTION. IMO.