Need to start writing some threads that consolidate and explain Greetings folks, I've been doing a lot of thinking about the role of v/pizzagate, the Q Leaks and our shared mission to wake up the masses to the evil that has corrupted our government agencies, powerful corporations, and charity foundations. I am working on a thread for v/pizzagate explaining how Q is "Pizzagate Related" and it occurred to me one of the biggest problems we have both on Voat and on 8chan is that almost no one is writing posts that bring crumbs and their resulting research together in articles that explain things. Lots of little tidbits and back-and-forth, some videos, lots and lots of cool memes, but not much *reporting. Meanwhile we've got shills and concern trolls writing essays. Writing things out in black and white, a la traditional newspaper reporting citing sources and direct quoting them, is very very important because it is how things are put "on the record" and pass into the documentation of the history of the times. I've always kind of seen v/pizzagate as the "newspaper of record" for the Clinton Cabal exposure, because it's the only organized place the "reporting" has been consolidated and not erased by hostile IT companies. If the Q Leaks are legit, we need to be "reporting" the crumb findings, not just sharing tidbits and following along. I know we've got the skills to do that. I think it is what Q is asking for. Please ping me to any such threads you see here or on 8chan or elsewhere. Consider learning how to make them yourself and post. Include pizzagate relevance for any you submit to v/pizzagate. We just passed 16,000 subscribers and are growing again, so there are a lot of eyeballs there to spread the word. If anyone does not know how to "report" on the latest Q findings, here's a Three Minute Guide to Writing a News Article. To this, I would add: always write the lede and the title LAST -- you won't know what's most important until you've written a draft in the inverted pyramid style, and organized your sources by importance.  When you write the title and lede, write it as a premise or hypothesis that invites people to prove or disprove it. This invigorates research! Naysayers have something to aim at -- which will reveal holes in the theory which will inspire additional research and discovery, or lead to a speedy admission the hypothesis is wrong. It's exactly what we need. Every critical comment shills think erodes your piece actually strengthens it when it is addressed. Welcome them! They make the argument stronger. That's how truth works. Keep up the great work Voat anons. I look forward to seeing some great threads.