Q Drops: 2746 + 2747 + 2748 + 2749 + 2750 + 2751 + 2752 + 2753 Feb 17 2019  2753  Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 095247 No.5220101 📁  Feb 17 2019 03:37:17 (EST)  https://mobile.twitter.com/TeaBoots/status/1096744370928275456📁  Q  2752  Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 1176a5 No.5219492 📁  Feb 17 2019 02:55:58 (EST)  Anonymous ID: 736a53 No.5219376  📁  Feb 17 2019 02:48:23 (EST) 5218933 pb Q These phrases below imply that Trump plans on following his constitutional rights no matter what he signed iin the “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019” (the “Act”), which authorizes appropriations to fund the operation of a number of agencies in the Federal Government through September 30, 2019. “My Administration will treat each of these provisions consistent with the President’s constitutional authorities with respect to foreign relations.” And  “my Administration will continue the practice of treating provisions like these as advisory and non-binding.” And “My Administration will make appropriate efforts to notify the relevant committees before taking the specified actions and will accord the recommendations of such committees all appropriate and serious consideration, but it will not treat spending decisions as dependent on the approval of congressional committees.” 5219376 You are the news now.  Q 2751 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 3c93e1 No.5219298 📁 Feb 17 2019 02:42:34 (EST) Anonymous ID: 00b7e9 No.5219261  📁 Feb 17 2019 02:40:37 (EST) 5219223 I trust Potus And I trust the LORD. The Lord is leading Potus, of that I'm certain. 5219261 The Lord is leading us all. Good v Evil Q 2750 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 3c93e1 No.5219265 📁 Feb 17 2019 02:40:47 (EST) Anonymous ID: 003cde No.5219185  📁 Feb 17 2019 02:35:43 (EST) Trumps statement is brilliant Deep State loaded the bill with multiple facets to block it and his white house statement just released systemically points out section by section where they tried to block him and he's countering that by citing presidential and constitutional authority.  Shall we play a game? 5219185 2749 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 3c93e1 No.5219223 📁 Feb 17 2019 02:38:41 (EST) Anonymous ID: 551384 No.5219066  📁 Feb 17 2019 02:28:12 (EST) Screenshot_2019-02-16 Statement by the President The White House.png ⬇ 5218933 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-by-the-president-28/📁 So all restrictions are off? 5219066 Trust your President! Q 2748 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 3c93e1 No.5219050 📁 Feb 17 2019 02:27:09 (EST) Anonymous ID: 10988f No.5218953  📁 Feb 17 2019 02:21:10 (EST) 5218735 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.443  📁 Nov 10 2018 12:44:56 (EST) The 'Scaramucci' Play Temp hire to remove embedded 'untrustworthy' staffers?  Spicer Priebus  Temps can be very dangerous to those who are targeted. Think Whitaker. [NEXT WEEK] 51096BA5-34C3-403C-8269-4D9703D165EF.png ⬇ 5218953 2747 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 3c93e1 No.5218933 📁 Feb 17 2019 02:20:13 (EST) https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-border-security-victory/📁 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-by-the-president-28/📁 Q 2746 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 3c93e1 No.5218735 📁 Feb 17 2019 02:04:57 (EST) 5217756 They were removed. When was Page removed from the investigation? What month?  July 2017? (Early) When was Scaramucci hired? July 2017? (Late) Re: the ‘Scaramucci’ model  5:5? Those who left (majority) did not have a choice. ALL remained pro MAGA and loyal to POTUS? Why are we attacked by pro MAGA? The ‘establishment’ runs deep. Logical thinking.  Q