Medical Niqab ..... -1. The virus itself has not been positively identified and isolated according to Koch postulates.  -2. RT-PCR tests is mumbo jumbo. There is only a partial strain of RNA that is being sought. The source of it, external or internal remains an open question. There is then no direct relation between the not Koch postuales virus strain and the partial strain from your body.  -3. RT-PCR tests are 80% trustworthy? But what do they really tell you? see 2.  -4. Sick people should be quarantined, vulnerable people should be protected, not the healthy and strong. This flies in the face of Germ Theory and, depending on the jurisdiction you live in, actually be discriminatory, and given 1 -3, be unreasonably burdensome without scientific justistification.  -5: the same goes for face masks. Depending on your jurisdiction, there may be laws on the books prohibiting face covering wearables. Since it is not established face mask have any medical advantage in a not scientifically supported virus emergency, forcing the public to wear a mask is unreasonably burdensome. Depending on the jurisdiction you live in, it may be illegal to proscribe what any individual should wear. Prohibiting participation in public events, working, shopping, free movement, access to restrooms and public transport may indeed be discriminatory.  -6. Given 1-4, and the lack of scientific proof that "the virus" it unlikely to be transmitted at 6 feet, at best the distance is arbitrary, and flies in the face of legal powers of .gov to proscribe association rules.  -7. In many jurisdiction the existing medication with improvements in hours and remission in days are not being employed and even prohibited for medical doctors to prescribe. This failure on the part of government is intentionally damaging and burdensome, both in terms of human life, human health and economically. In many jurisdictions this may be considered as a breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, making the .gov liable for all damages.  -8 Since .gov for reasons of not adequately responding to a not scientifically established health risk, it medical malpractice, practicing medicine without a license may also apply.  What is a people to do when a government demonstrably fucks it up big time?  one thing is for sure: since no scientific basis is present for the whole shebang, this reverts the whole issue back to the level of religious dogma. Wearing a mask then becomes a sign of your compliance to being a dhimmie to to medicalism, a new religion introduced to you by sarscov-2.  Happy submission. FAUCI AKBHAR! https://invidio.us/latest_version?id=aGtQvGGY4S4&itag=18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGtQvGGY4S4