Important Events Involving Huber. X22 mentioned some of this today. Don't Panic. We're not DC. So after the Huber rumors mentioned by WaPo yesterday, there was a serious bit of hubbub about the conclusion and downplay of Huber's work. First of all, this is a report by The Washington Post, linked here, if you really want to go there. Dave from X22 mentions the inconsistencies in the article, at 8:05 in today's 2067B episode. It claims Huber's investigation has ended, and there was nothing of consequence in it. Later in the article, there's a disclaimer that says the investigation isn't finished, and nothing has been sent to DOJ or Congress from Huber's office.  So I hopped on QMAP.  This is where it gets interesting.  During my daily perusal of the news I ran into this article on Gateway Pundit, which I'm sure many of you saw this morning: It Was All A Head Fake: Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Say HUBER Lost Their Evidence — Had to Send It 3 Times — Huber Never Even Looked at it – And Now the Probe Is Over With "head fake" swirling in my mind after not enough coffee, that's when I searched Huber on QMAP and found this: 2604 Prosecutor John Huber Will Bring SEVERE PAIN to DC Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 12 Dec 2018 - 4:52:23 PM Anonymous 12 Dec 2018 - 4:36:06 PM 4278922 So HUBER is a HEADFAKE? If so, BRILLIANT Q! 4278980 FALSE. HUBER will bring SEVERE PAIN TO DC. SESSIONS' forced release of name [HUBER] to House created another variable. Use Logic. Why would we tell you the plan if in doing so also alerts those who we are actively engaged in HUNTING? You are witnessing, first-hand, the demise of those in power [OLD GUARD]. Those who push simply have no grasp of reality.  Those who push simply do not understand warfare tactics.  Emotions cloud judgement. Emotions cloud logic. You have more than you know. Securing the SENATE meant EVERYTHING. Securing the SC meant EVERYTHING. [Avoided Z]  We, the PEOPLE. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. TOGETHER WE WIN! Do you think all these attacks on 'Q' (We, the People) is simply for a person on the internet who they label as a conspiracy?  Think for yourself. Trust yourself. Research for yourself. Be in control of yourself. NEVER let someone else DRIVE YOU. Those who try to DRIVE YOU are not your friend.  Q> So, aside from Huber, what's mentioned here is the Supreme Court and the Senate as the good guys, and the MSM as the bad guys. Obvious enough, but what is the context?  The Supreme Court deballed one of the impeachment articles, and the Senate is about to deball both.  The MSM push and drive people, therefore, not a friend. Keeping this in mind, I bring you to the next post that jumped out at me: 2937 This Is a Methodical Plan Moving Ahead Step by Step with Military Precision Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 3 Mar 2019 - 1:27:22 PM Why have there been no arrests? Why have 'specific' dates been mentioned only to see no action? Define 'game theory'. Why must disinformation be provided? Define 'open source'. Define 'public purview'.  Do we let our enemies walk through the front door? Define 'plausible deniability'.  Why was it important to FIRST clean house within the FBI & DOJ (public info)? Why was it important to FIRST clean house within other ABC agencies (non_public info)? What are the duties of the FBI? What are the duties of the DOJ? When does MIL INTEL have jurisdiction?  What vested powers does POTUS have re: MIL INTEL vs. ABC agencies re: matters of NAT SEC (HOMELAND)? Think 'umbrella surv'. What agency does the FBI report to?  What is the role of the AG? Does the AG oversee the firing of FBI & DOJ senior/mid/lower staff? How many FBI & DOJ were FIRED/FORCED? Does 'Russia' recusal prevent/block AG from this responsibility?  What time period did this occur?  Who appointed and tasked HUBER? Who appointed and tasked the OIG? Who was AG? [zero leaks - none] Transfer from AG1 to AG2? Why might that be important?  How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'? Optics are important. When are optics not important? Think Whitaker.  Define 'stage set'.  Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command? What 'stage' experience did this person have? Think Bill Clinton impeachment. Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance?  If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin? How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue? Define 'thesis' statement. What benefit(s) does this provide BARR? "This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government." - POTUS  Logical thinking. Q> Three things to notice here.  Why have there been no arrests? Why have 'specific' dates been mentioned only to see no action?>  Ten months later here we are, but this is an older question. [zero leaks - none]> Ten months ahead of schedule, the WaPo, and probably many other DS sources are already discredited. The WaPo article like many others is simply getting ahead of the story, with fake anonymous sources, before any real information is released. Define 'stage set'.  Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command? What 'stage' experience did this person have? Think Bill Clinton impeachment. Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance?  > Upon reading this, it seems pretty clear that some people know Huber is wrapping things up, and those people know Nancy Pelosi.  IMHO, this is why the articles of impeachment have been delayed, because whatever Huber's figured out is about to be released. In order to disctract or delay it, here we have an impeachment trial that will suck the oxygen out of the room. Remember... [Mueller][impeachment] all meant to 'slowdelayprevent' > Searching Huber on QMAP will bring out WAYYYY more than just what's been highlighted here.  There's a lot of good information.