To be clear, Q never called this a proof, the Anon’s twat that Q linked claims this as a proof.  The Joe D. Comments do tie this previous article (I remember this when it was first reported) directly to the Q post and to the bad actors we now know were targeting Trump and also, as Joe D. states, the RNC in general.  Thanks for posting the old article. It actually adds more to the validity of what is being said by Joe D. even if this isn’t a Q proof. However, I find Q proofs overrated. Whatever Q is the outcome of what Q does (inform-some and direct attention-more) is what I find important about Q. Insider or Outsider makes no difference to me. Although, I’m not discounting that there are legit proofs...just sharing where I’m at on the importance of them.