Bribery - The really bogus charge Something that I haven't seen clarified as yet, which makes the Dems bribery accusation really stupid, yet nobody's brought it up.  The president SHOULD be impeached for ACCEPTING a bribe and thus being influenced to do something he shouldn't. This is what the Constitution refers to.  Crazy Dems are trying to say that Trump, exerting influence to get some action done, for whatever reason, as long as he might benefit politically, is somehow bribery as discussed in the Constitution. Virtually everything Trump does to improve the national condition of the US could then be viewed as bribery of the American voters because if he does well and they do well, he will more likely be reelected.  I think they are twisting this on purpose because actual bribery is what most of the fat-cat politicians ARE THEMSELVES receiving. Witness, Joe Biden, Bill and Hillary, Maxine, Schitt, Schumer, Obama, etc., (and likely a bunch of Republicans, as well). Whether the billion to Ukraine to get Hunter on Brisma's board is a bribe or not, it's the funds funneled through Ukraine, China, etc., that come back to these guys that IS the essence of what bribery is. This should be talked about, me thinkst.