Yep, she's really on the ball - but she's missing a few small key pieces. Communism was always about seizing control of the wealth and resources of a nation under the umbrella of a centralized State power paradigm. "Wealth and resources" can also mean people. In fact, that's really what it only ever means. And in a post industrial world, where factory workers aren't the means of production or "engine of society" anymore, the Marxists moved onto Culture/Information warfare. In an Automated society, IDEAS are the wealth. Intellectual property and innovation are the true resources. When you can build anything you want with robots, 3D Printing, advanced Sintering techniques etc, the only thing holding you back is your own imagination.  So, how do you "seize the means of imagination" and control it through a centralized State power paradigm? You subvert culture and demonize those who generate the most and best ideas. You "cancel" them and silence their voices as being too problematic and toxic. So then the only channel for ideas becomes your Cultural Marxist/Communist Global State and it's selected mouthpieces (it's Gates, Jobs and Musk types). Where nothing gets through, even an idea, unless you co-sign it. This is how you get a guy like Musk supposedly on the "cutting edge of rocketry" using self-landing booster tech we had nailed down 25 years ago.  Someone, somewhere already has their boot-heel on the "feeder tube" of Western Advancement. Letting thru tiny droplets of fuel for our engines of innovation, only if and when it suits them to. When they know they can control the public reception of and engagement with it - ie: it's social framing (which is what this girl is talking about). She's talking about all of this very well, understanding that this shit is the political clothing that Marxism/Communism/Frankfurt School/Critical Theory wear to appear as legitimate "social correction/justice" movements. But the fight right now id for the future. And the future ain't industrial. It ain't over social media either. It's for the post-full automation world. To control the generation and flow of the greatest resource of all: human ideas and innovation. So pay attention to that shit about "Nazis" and "Incels" and whatever other slur they invent for "White Men Who Must Be Silenced". Because it is the Silence and Suppression (ie: Centralized Globalist State Control) of White Male Innovation that is the actual end goal here. I haven't ranted about this particular subject for a while, because so many of our shitfights have dealt with the daily framework of the culture war and shit like Covid and Fentanyl Floyd etc. But the "big picture" here is that we are on the edge of the next 100 years of human advancement. The war is about who controls it, or how free and democratic it is. Those that would rule us want to be the New Pharaohs. They want to own the sintering machines that can knit anything together from tiny particles. Powerful energy sources the size of a pinhead. Impenetrable metals and fabrics, and advanced health tech so they may live forever and avoid assassination. And, most importantly, across-the-board control of information so that in 100 or so years they have a civilian population who literally thinks that these new Pharaohs are actual gods who have always ruled over them. There was never a USA. There was never a 20th Century. And there was never a race of White Men who they stole everything from.  Red Guards destroyed historical relics as well as artifacts, and ransacked cultural and religious sites.  ie: Erasing history to replace it with their own. We're standing on the honest-to-God turning pin of history. She's almost there in her thinking as seen here.  It may seem the far left's main goal is to promote their amorphous social justice agenda, but really the ultimate goal of is to control (or be able to control) all aspects of freedom of speech & expression previously not up for debate.  I think she feels it more than knows it right now. She knows WHAT they're doing, but not quite why (bar a basic power grabbing motivation and repeat of historical precedent/the communist playbook in action). The Enemy already owns and controls all the material wealth and has captured all the institutions that run our lives. In all senses they've already won. And yet they haven't. They still feel compelled to beat down on the White Man in a way that seems extraordinarily petty for those with so much power and control already.  Why? Because that's the final prize. The eradication of creative and innovative thought. Why? because that's the real "wealth" of the future.  They can't even create AIs that white nerds can't turn away from their masters in a day. There's something about us that they can't synthesize or mimic or even capture effectively enough to reliably farm intellectual innovations. They can only observe and copy. And ultimately fumble because they lack White vision and "atunement" to the sense of a Greater Good. A better future. Of potential and possibility. They can only think in terms of scams and trickery and theft.  So now, when we're on the precipice of a post-scarcity automated society of accelerated invention. They can no longer control "the middle" - the delivery and supply systems. They can't put their boot-heel on the feeder tube of technology and innovation and cultural development. They can't even control basic entertainment anymore (because our AIs will generate anything we want). And we'll leave them in the dirt where they belong. So again, she did a great job. Look forward to see the continued deconstruction. But I just needed to get a rant off my chest about what I feel is the ultimate goal/prize here. And why it's happening now and at such intensity.