Tucker has an egoistic streak, just like any television personality, and it shows when the aim is taken at himself. That is not why you get invited on a show. You leave the host alone, unless the host attacks you.  Bregman. Rutger Bregman is what? Just a Dutch guy?  Bregman was too composed, trained and executed his hit with precision. I really did it well.  Bregman is the protagonist for a Universal Basic Income. Why do you think he got invited to Davos in the first place? Because he speaks "truth to power" and they are trembling in their socks and stockings?  Bullshit!  And Tuckers knows that. I imagine the curiosity: Why does a "poor" historian influencer UBI protagonist get invited to Davos, and why are billionaires interested in pushing UBI?  What was Bregman's answer? You are the problem, Tucker. So shut the fuck up, and my buddies at Davos love me.    Yes, niggerfaggots do your homework!  Leaked audio: And why do you think that clip was shared with that lefty news organisation going off on " right wing antisemitic dogwhistles" ? Who shared it? My guess? Bregman shared it.  This was a frontal personal attack. It was meant to discredit Tucker, and Fox. That is all.  Powell Convo: Is Tucker rightly worried about the state of affairs? I dare say he is, and so are you. What did Q say: The Precipice? You think this is the Precipice? Maybe think again.  Not convinced? Listen tot he man himself:  "If we do not get answers to these questions and agree on that, our country will never be unified again".  He sees the expression of the will of the people as a keystone to our system of self-government.  Read it again.  Do you agree?  And being faced with the prospect of being so close to the point of losing it, having watched it being perverted by those with power all these years, and when confronted, these people lie to your face and get away with it, how do you think he feels?  Have you never gone out of bounds? How many of you, by the first signs of a seemingly lost battle, are blaming Q, or calling for Q to do something, or scoffing at trust the plan: All assets deployed?  Of course you did. Because you cannot know what you do not know.  So, what made him go out of bounds apart from his egoistic streak?  In the cause of time up until the election, his ratings went through the roof! And I dare say, he was somewhat smug about it. Probably, because he interpreted the data the wrong way.  On the other hand, how cool, and this is typical, how cool would it be for a opinion/ news host in the tele to break a story with inside info ..... How would that benefit him within Fox? For FOX it would mean the restoration of ratings and thus income from advertisement. For Tucker, well .... he is invested in it too. So, the logical conclusion is egoism and money. And Sidney Powell is not ready to share what she knows and what she has. Note what she did when explaining how she got to where she is:  - Do you own math. the data is out there, is what it came down to.  It is what we talked about on this forum. But this is data on the highest aggregate level. For this to have more teeth, you need to be able to drill down. And you think this particular dataset is not known to Tucker and his staff? Come on guys, use your niggerfaggot logical brains. Twitter exploded with it!  He knows he has no right to the information Powell has, there is no way he can force Powell to release it. So he did the next best thing.  The Next best thing He covered her story unbiased and clearly stated he knows her story to be true.  That is not the hallmark of an idiot, a traitor, a deserter, but what he tries to be: the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity and group think.