Here’s the thing:  1) you must prove that the tweet is encoded 2) you must prove that your decode method is the correct method to decode<  2830  /p> 3) you must establish a way to differentiate between a tweet that is encoded and one that is not 4) you must describe how your decode system works  Currently what Sally does can be applied to any tweet and you’ll get something.  Also, what sally does is very specific. SB2 compares tweets to Q drops, news articles, timestamps, etc., and speculates in an article what it all means and how each reference sited supports his arguments and conclusions.  Sally is only “decoding” what she says is encoded in the tweet and adds a little speculation about the decode. So Sally’s system must be 100% accurate concerning the decode. SB2’s method is subjective from the beginning and is not a decode of a hidden message but rather speculation on what is being “signaled” by Trump/Q/Trump-team, etc.  I’ve pointed these things out to Sally with no real result.  I finally concluded that only the dumbest on GA would follow this pied piper and we’d be better off once she lead them over the cliff’s edge.