The argument for pro-choice above is outdated today.  Unlike when pro-choice became a movement, families are eager to adopt unwanted babies.  And the stigma of being an unwed mother no longer causes a woman to be unable to marry.  Marriage is the the gateway to a financially strong economy personally and for the country.  2 can pull the cart better than 1.  Once a movement has become so well established, and your identity becomes wedded to a party, you accept the argument above without thinking critically enough to catch the flaws. I imagine today the argument is about the empowerment of women to choose their lives or something. Out of touch with how they are selling it today. Perhaps just through the cult of personality that supports it.    Oh, I imagine they would say, just because that's how it is today doesn't mean that's how it will be in 10 years. And of course they will trot out the research that says how deeply wounded children who are adopted are because they were rejected by their birth parents and given up. And indeed that research does exist and as a therapist I have seen first hand that this wound is almost always there for the adopted person.