ES-Trader, thank you for the jocularity in your commentary, makes reading enjoyable! I tend to agree that specifics as manifested were not part of "Trust the plan"; however, I am certain some shenanigans were expected. The sex related allegations would be a likely subject in light of all the "M2" and "female 3rd-month" activity (I will not use the tag names and give any credit to militant groups), let alone other "They want you DIVIDED" instigators. So, in that respect, the plan had a counter move planned. Can I say agreeing to an inappropriate FBI Criminal History/Character Background check was the counter move? No, I cannot. So, with that in mind, I concur with "cease the opportunity" theory you lay out. I cannot wait to see what scope is place upon the "investigation" as it would be amazing if, like the Mueller probe, it found all kinds of collateral issues that can be referred to appropriate law enforcement agencies. Here is where "Trust Wray" and "Trust the Plan" come in, IMHO of course. For example, I found very interesting and telling that amidst all of the Kavanaugh shenanigans, Q drops SpyFi with China and bullying Murkowski images , a message to her perhaps? We all know Q+ knows the chan board is watched. Couple that with leaked CBF name accusation by Judiciary Republicans and her overt defensive denial. Me thinketh correlation. Related to SCOUTS seating; provided to me by a fellow anon, see following response received from SCOTUSblog legal beagles.   The Court can order any case re-argued after a new Justice is confirmed, this happened with a couple of cases that were argued after Scalia's death; see Jennings v. Rodriguez. They are most likely to do that in cases that were deadlocked 4-4, but we don't ever know for sure if that's the reason. Generally, though, if they have a clear majority (5-3, 6-2, etc.), they just decide the case.  In our WWG1WGA - MAGA efforts, the big Kahuna is having a Conservative/Constitutionalist majority in SCOTUS to support use of Military Law (review Graham/Kavanaugh exchange during confirmation hearings ). Although DECLAS drop+Huber Report+IG Report release and indictments will trigger tribunals, you can rest assured that charged CABAL members will immediately seek injunction using "Constitutionality" as reason. After a round or two in Federal District Court "judge shopping", it will go to SCOUTS which will take up immediately for obvious reasons. Even thought there have been prior rulings on use of Military Law (again see Graham-Kavanaugh) they will pursue to avoid tribunals. Under these presumptions, the 1 week delay in confirmation has little impact and greater potential benefit. The LSM has been pushing a Roe v Wade narrative as the focus of why they want Kavanaugh off the court. Well, I don't buy it as that is way too obvious and would be true for any nomination coming from a conservative side of the spectrum. IMHO, the exchange between Graham and Kavanaugh sent chills up their spine. The full court press (no pun intended) was on. Again, SpyFi drops?  Could it be that black's move was anticipated and allowed the White Bishop to be positioned for eventual Check Mate?  Certainly the game is afoot and I believe the DS "Kavanaugh move" has been capitalized by white hats; I get impression you feel the same.