My 2 cents about what will happen with the coming election, declassifications, and military tribunals: Trump will end up running on the "Military Tribunal" platform. "Lock her up" was just a test. They needed to do two things with the first election: 1. take the room temperature with the public about the very idea of locking up politicians, and 2. Get the general public used to the idea. I remember when I first started taking Trump seriously, and I noticed that he didn't gradually warm the public up to his brash communication, he just unloaded it from the beginning.  I'm sure you remember all this, but at first people were outraged and shocked.  Even people that supported him were often embarrassed. Then they got used to it, now no one talks about it, or, if they do, most people roll their eyes at them.  Mission accomplished.  If you know you're going to say something people will think is outrageous, say it early and often until they get bored with it. Use that as a template to understand how the declass, trials, and executions (or life terms, I honestly don't have a read on that yet) will occur. "Because you'd be in jail."  and the resulting chants of "Lock her up!"  weren't just rhetorical tools for a political campaign, they were tests designed to see how the entire country would react to the idea of prosecuting (one of) those people.  In fact, don't you remember that it was almost like Trump ran on the promise of locking Hillary up? As if it was, actually, a campaign issue?  The first election, among other things, was a dry run for, what I predict, the 2nd election will literally be:  They're going to make the election about locking them all up.  If the American people want it to happen, they'll elect Trump.  If they don't, then they won't elect him. It would be brilliant in terms of heading off a lot of the resulting civil unrest if you think about it. If Trump wins and they start military tribunals, at least roughly half the country won't be that upset by it, and no one will be surprised. There will still be some civil unrest, of course, but again, at least half (probably more) of the country will be ok with when the troops are sent it. So here's the timeline that makes the most sense to me as of today: 1. The primaries start. 2. The declasses happen, one by one over time (think the wikileaks drops) 3. The shock and horror set in for America 4. Trump starts saying "If the American people want them to be tried and prosecuted, vote for me!  5. The usual useful idiots (read:Antifa) start going full retard, causing some civil unrest 6. Governors start sending in the national guard and they get put down quickly or 7. In states with Marxist governors who don't stop it, the people do/federal troops sent it. 8. The people vote for Trump and tribunals start 9. Any Marxist unrest is swiftly dealt with and the majority of American's are just fine with it. I could be wrong.  I don't think I am.  But really, what better way to justify military tribunals for treason than putting it up to a vote as a campaign issue? Makes a lot of sense to me.