Personally, I think SCOTUS made the correct decision in this case.  However, I DO also think it's being WIDELY MISINTERPRET  60  ED. Free Speech and Donations to candidates in the process of our elections (ostensibly to elect  ffa   OUR representation) are discrete issues.  I do not believe SCOTUS's decision was to allow unlimited donations/contributions by corporate entities to candidates.  Free Speech means expressing an opinion.  Paying money to a candidate does much more than express an opinion. Elections are a voter process.  Corporations do not vote.  Corporations have free speech, limiting their participation in a voter process to attempts to shape voter opinions.  They need to speak to voters, not candidates. But, any money they spend should be directed to voters, those who actually participate in the selection of THEIR representation.  Candidates DO NOT represent corporations.  The people, via their Representative Democracy, decide the rules under which corporations exist and run.    There's really no two ways about it.