High-rise building in UAE engulfed in flames, yet doesn't collapse like WTC 7 cause fires don't collapse concrete buildings because steel/concrete high-rises remain standing during fires https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-05-14-high-rise-uae-flames-doesnt-collapse-like-wtc7.html One of the largest skyscrapers in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates (UAE), burst into flames the other day and continued to burn well into the night, resulting in more than a dozen injuries and thankfully no deaths. But unlike the infamous World Trade Center Building 7, this residential tower did not collapse into its own footprint because steel and concrete high-rises remain standing during fires – unless they are detonated, of course. The 48-floor Abbco Tower was captured on film being engulfed in flames, which quickly shot up through the building’s top floors leaving firefighters helpless to stop it. The thing basically had to burn itself out as firefighting drones and at least a dozen firetrucks did what they could to contain the blaze. According to reports, the fire grew so rapidly and out of control, in part due to the fact that it was made using a material called aluminum composite panel cladding. Similar fires have occurred all through Dubai, the capital of UAE, in skyscrapers made from the same questionable material. At least five other buildings in close proximity to the Abbco Tower had to be evacuated because the fire was so extreme, and its embers so hot, that the entire vicinity was at risk. And yet neither the Abbco Tower nor any other nearby tower collapsed in the slightest because fire doesn’t melt steel or concrete. The collapse of Building 7 was a controlled demolition, and that’s a scientific fact A similar building fire occurred several years ago in London, and involved a 24-story public housing structure that lit up like a bonfire. And just like the Abbco Tower, it remained standing after the last embers were put out because, once again, steel and concrete do not burn. So why, then, did Building 7 collapse when it was not even directly affected by the airplanes that supposedly slammed into the two main World Trade Center towers? Remember, it was across the World Trade Center complex and the official story is that it became “compromised” by falling debris, resulting in its sudden and orderly freefall into its own footprint. The answer to this question is that Building 7 was rigged with explosives and sent plummeting into the ground as part of greater 9/11 conspiracy because it housed evidence linking the whole thing to planned terrorism that was coordinated and facilitated by deep state entities within our own government. This is still a hard pill to swallow for many people who remain in denial about the fact that the government could be so evil as to perpetrate such crimes against humanity on American citizens, but it is an undeniable fact when looking at the evidence. Natural physics dictate that no amount of fire or falling debris is enough to collapse a steel and concrete skyscraper, no matter how hot or heavy. It simply is not possible from a scientific standpoint, and neither is the hallmark “crimp” that appeared at the top-center of Building 7 right before it fell into a pile of ruin. That crimp, by the way, is a trademark of controlled demolitions. It can be seen every time a large building or skyscraper is intentionally demolished anywhere in the world because this is how demolition crews protect other nearby buildings from being damaged during the demolition process. And more than 1,500 engineers and architects agree with this, by the way. Though some will still insist that this is some wild “conspiracy theory,” it is actually a conspiracy fact that the official story surrounding Building 7 is nonsensical, unscientific and absolute bunk. “If Lucky Larry insured that building there would be nothing left but rubble,” joked one Zero Hedge commenter, referring to Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the old World Trade Center towers who infamously told crews to “pull it” in reference to Building 7.