The clipboard upload is something that I want to include, but its beyond my skills to implement.  I'm a bit wary to outsource it to another developer at this time because I already sunk the donation and some money out of pocket into the album redesign and the site is proving difficult to monetize. I have no problem fronting the hosting fees on my own but developers are kind of expensive.  As for the name, I'm a recent graduate from law school and not overly concerned with any trademark issues. Under the current legal definition of trademark infringement I'm fairly safe. The only action that can arise from a trademark issue is infringement, which comes under a three part test. This test is:   A reputation or goodwill acquired by the plaintiff in its business, name, or mark   A misrepresentation by the defendant causing deception or confusion between the two enterprises   Actual or likely damage to the plaintiff   In a confusion claim there are four factors to consider with regard to the original mark and the infringing mark: a)The inherent distinctiveness of the trademarks b) The length of time the trademarks have been in use c) The nature of the wares, services or business d) The nature of the trade In this case the most relevant factor  to a successful claim becomes c, the nature of the services, both of us being image hosts. The other factors are I would consider neutral or pointing towards non-infringement. Furthermore as established in the Veuve Cliquot case the plaintiff must lead actual evidence of confusion which given the very different visual looks of the two sites makes a successful claim less likely.