I thought the article and the basic sentiment was silly, but I do agree with the "There are no bad foods" sentiment in the main. I like dessert and I have a little sweet after dinner every day, I just make sure my meals are small and healthy enough that I can afford the calories. I don't think there's "no place for junk food" ever, I think that if you eat healthy overall it's okay to have the occasional handful of tortilla chips or potato chips or something. Every Friday night we have fast food to give me a break from cooking, and I don't worry at all about what one burger & order of fries is doing to my body because we don't really eat anything processed or fried or whatever the rest of the week (and on the rare occasions when I make fried chicken or something, it's all homemade from scratch and fried in proper lard, not over-processed vegetable oils full of acids and junk). That sentiment I agree with. I refuse to not enjoy my meals just as much as I refuse to overindulge and get fat. But I think the tone of the article was more "It's dangerous to care about clean eating and bad to talk about it because you might trigger fats," or something, and that I strongly disagree with. IMO it's far more unhealthy to have bloaties like Reeee Drummond or Simply Saruh encouraging people to add a pound of cream cheese to chili because flavuh, or to have people think it's normal to eat an entire bag of frozen chicken nuggets for dinner, than it is to show people combinations of good, healthy food that they might not have thought of before.