It's all bait. She has managed to establish herself as a symbol for liberal feminism (without any concrete agenda apart from that) and at the same time many people detest her for being an unfunny entitled cunt. So any article about her "exploits" will bring out the two camps in force - people attacking her for her latest display of entitlement and obnoxiousness and people defending her for being their symbol (though they never had a say in picking that particular symbol). Both sides are being played for ad revenue. The way to win, is not to play by their rules - archive that shit and keep the discussion on fph, don't give them clicks.