That being said you have no created an environment where everything should be reported. If 50% of the subverse thinks something is acceptable and the other half does not, how do you weight that decision?  We have established rules and a community that has been around for years. The mod team judges what is and isn't acceptable. Has done so since the start. All we are doing is rewarding people so reports come more often. Nothing changes.  Posts won't be removed just because they get reported. We will continue to tell people no even if it is mass reported.  Obviously a case-by-case basis, but what happens to the reporter? If someone reports 70% acceptable posts are they going to be banned,  No? If the post violates the rule it will be removed. Same as before. I have no issue removing a retarded ass meme from the front page just because the community agrees with it. Same if a fatass got upvoted. Or defense to fatties like to boogie. You don't seem to understand. If rules fall so does the community. /r/fatlogic used to be harder. But guess what happened to it?  especially if the community agrees with the context?   If the community suddenly accepts fat people should we let fat people come around in here? No. We have set rules and those rules are there for a reason.  I expect you will warn/ban people reporting at a high rate, but how do you define that? If someone reports every post that is considered acceptable by 60% is that being too aggressive? The reporting will likely fall to an “obvious pro-fat” reporting scheme, but people report items all the time because it is no effort. Again I do not discredit the mod team skills, but I greatly want to understand that a voluntary reporting system and an economically beneficial reporting system are different ideas. If something is economically viable it can be prone to abuse.  We have had the same system for years. And it is the same system we will continue to use. FPH has been as close to as its roots than ANY other sub in existence. Want to know why that is? Because we follow our rules to a tee.  If 95% of the removed posts are done by one person would you still payout equally?  Yes? No special treatment.  Are you hesitant towards bots or manipulators?   I don't see how either of those would work in this situation since all content reported has to be looked over by a moderator. Any both of those would be told to fuck off by the mod who looks at it.  so your response is to involve money. Do you disagree that financial interest may affect the reporting statistics? I understand you want to reward users, but by stepping into financial benefit you are causing more harm than good.   Fake money. Let us not make this seem like real finances.   What stops bots from tracking accounts or keywords?   I don't see how that would even work.  What stops aggressive over-reporting?   Mods telling users to fuck off and cut it out, the same we have done for years?  The answer is the mod team and this will lead to a drastic increase in reporting. The new reporters were pushed by the financial benefit, even though it would have been reported regardless by people who care.   I care which is why I am implementing this system. I have noticed fairly often small amounts(subtle even) of fat sympathy. This will only lead to a dam burst like every other sub which goes lax on its rules.  So you have made more work for the mod team…and in response you spend money. Why is that beneficial?  Mod work has always been volunteer work. Every mod who joins the team knows the job. We have been doing it for years even when the sub was bigger. And no. We aren't spending money again. Since all of this is in a fake currency monopoly bucks.  On top of this you are controlling the narrative. You are pushing the community to be more aggressive and reject everything that is not obscenely FPH.  We have been doing this for years. We have ALWAYS made it very clear that the sub is for specifically hating fat people. So I don't understand why you are acting like this is a new thing.  here is a drastic different between FPH and understanding the delusion fatties hold and countering them.  Yes. That is what makes us different than FatLogic. We are the harder of the two. Zero tolerance.  You are completely cutting off any room for discussion of nuance.   No I'm not. We have had discussion fine for years. All you are doing is finding a problem when there isn't one.  Last week I had to write a long discussion on how someone was being unnecessary aggressive and delusion by rejecting science (you know, the thing we all agree with) because on quick read of a click-bait title it was pro-fat, but details of the research were within the FPH.   Ok? How is this going to stop you from doing that?   You are limiting FPH discussion to the average majority of belief rather than allowing growth as a community.  Bullshit.  Do you want to be a group of people that are immediately rejected and are pushed aside or do you want to be a community can foster social change to change the narrative?  What. We will continue to be pushed from obesity groups no matter what we do.  If we reject all challenges we push FPH to the realm of hate speech. Are you racist? Are you sexist? Why not? Why promote a narrative that shows us as delusionally exclusionary?   We are hate speech(if it was honestly a real thing.)  And us being "different" will not change that. The people who will say those will continue to say those things. They say the same thing about fatlogic and other lesser fat subs.   We hate fat people because we know they are pathetic and desperate and we can prove it. Why remove the opportunity to allow the community to shine in logic in reason?  Because we don't want fat people in the community? Because all that does is allow flood gates to open.  By pushing reporting you are pushing FPH isolation. FPH isolation is the greatest enemy we face, we cannot fall into that trap. If we hate fat people but 90% of the social sphere thinks we are deluded – we lose. We cannot solely fight on our beliefs – movements are made by convincing others and we do not do this as a community. We ignore and reject when we should listen and challenging. We are better than fatties, so why dip to their level?  Weird. I remember us doing that exact same thing on reddit and continuing to grow exponentially.  No offense but I really dislike reading very long posts like this. It makes it hard to reply.