That's what I'm wondering. It's obviously very photoshopped and makes her look very close to human. But it's not one of the Project Harpoon photos. It's as though they put it at the top of the article ironically, and they include her more realistic photos later. I can't tell if they are on the "she's beautiful the way she is" side or the "she's ugly and needs massive photoshopping" side. It can be read both ways.