Voat became a recourse of others who have extreme opinions from reddit - for better or worse. This site hosts more polarizing opinions, however that will slowly dissipate with a greater user base. Many people see FPH as extreme, although we don't - we are "extreme" as the modern world accepts obesity as a regular state. The entire argument is about beliefs and ideas. That means you as an individual must be willing to promote your ideas regardless of the social damage they cause. You must invest in your beliefs - if you truly believe them. For FPH that means you are an outsider (for now), although the biological perception of obesity is so ingrained that we know we win. So do you trust the the modern social perception or agree with the now-intrinsic concept of obesity due to a genetic identity? Both can be wrong based on a narrative you present. What is your narrative? What do you care for? How should the world proceed? We accept that genes are a companion of personal action and we can criticize ones' overall status. That is obvious to some and critically "ignorant" to others. You must balance the ideas push your narrative of humanity, while accepting any faults you have. We are ignorant, reaction beings - how do we perform best? Are you beliefs beneficial for humanity? Why aren't they toxic? I don't expect true answers, but I want to muddy the waters and force introspective thought.