Thank you BeetusChristFUPAStar (and thank you for choosing a hilarious username, it made me laugh, hard), your comment made me smile widely. Yeah, rereading my submission, I see that I kind of veered from rational-ish anger to all out Armageddon. Need to watch that, in case it spills over into the real world. A bit sad that I keep a lid on it IRL but gotta suppress and smile lest I get hate mail or horrified looks from friends who haven't quite turned to the realm of shit-lording yet.    It's nuts just how careful one has to be about saying anything against fatties, SJWs and people who insult the concept and origins of actual feminism. (As for white knights, are they 'chubby chasers'?) I feel for the desperate ones, a lot of them seem to have been tricked or conditioned into thinking that 'condishuns' are normal thanks to years of subtle brainwashing by the online F.A. movement. I don't want to get angry at younger fatties, male and female, who were mislead into leading a very unhealthy and short lifestyle (lifespan). They're the victims of people like Munster/Holliday and her herd who've tricked them into believing they're immune from the dangers these habits cause. (When you read the 'Stone-cold Sanity' post by cynoclast -http://imgur.com/a/nHo7F- it stings to know how niave and oblivious these younger fatties are and how the FA propaganda is slowly ruining their quality of life. As radical as it sounds, I honestly think people encouraging these lifestyles and intentionally omitting the realities should be charged with cruelty. They use their soapbox to destroy impressionable people's lives, weak or vulnerable individuals who are desperate for some form of acceptance, and all that happens is they become more ostracized and are considered ridiculous and subpar.)  It's so difficult oscillating between rage towards the enablers, liars and feeders and sympathy for those they trick. It's like hating a cult and having such sympathy for its members. Where do you draw the line on who's to blame. Is ignorance really an excuse or is that just a way of getting away with these terrible habits etc? My anger I think is most directed at those who have already ruined their own lives and then have decided to go out and ruin other people's lives. Like those 'friends' you have who became single and lonely and suddenly think it's okay to try to encourage their friends in committed relationships to break up with their partners over small things that could be worked out through time and effort and love, just so the lonely person isn't totally alone. Misery loves company, but misery that actively seeks to perpetuate further misery is horrific and abusive. And that's what Munster et al are doing, they've destroyed their own lives, so now they seek to ruin others, so they aren't deemed abnormal, just misunderstood or under-appreciated. It's a weird subject, and not something I imagine many philosophy lecturers would appreciate getting an essay on! (One would probably get kicked out of the class nowadays as such a topic would be deemed 'hate speech', it's PC gone mad.)