I didn't get shitlording in that article. I actually got the opposite.  "But is it fair to call a woman in an ad campaign “normal” just because she doesn’t have the seemingly unattainable body of a Victoria’s Secret angel?" They said she wasn't "normal," but they implied she was, instead, "special, HAES, free hugs," not "disgusting fat cow." It wasn't a 'she's not normal she's bad' article, it was a 'she's not normal, normal is a bad word and everyone is special' article.