content: I completely agree, but there is also no right that one individual's speech can be foisted onto another.  I think that's more the point of the article.  The author is not calling for silence, or even silence in a particular venue.  He is pontificating on the right of one individual to not listen or agree with another's (perhaps more PC) speech.  To have the option of not listening to that speech.  I didn't see anywhere in the post where the author was calling for silence.  He was calling for the ability to walk away.    As for leaving society, I would not say that is not working.  Germany now has the fastest aging population in the world, due to low birth rates (Germany has a very strong women's rights lobby).  Marriage rates in the US are at an all time low, and youngans looking to marry are also at an all time low.  Those in their 20's and 30's have assessed marriage as a business proposition, and men found it non-beneficial, and they are walking away from the table.  Women have decided that the most effective way to get men back to the marriage table is to harass men in media and in political narrative.  That may have worked for a little while, but it's effectiveness is waning. Hence all the "where have the good men gone?" articles.  Those men are still here.  Women just moved the goal post one time to many and the fuckers didn't come back out after halftime.