content: 100 tigers killed worldwide for their skin every year. 100+ babies die every year, JUST IN US, from circumcisions. Why do people protest the former, but make facial creams and jokes about the latter? Stats: http://www.treehugger.com/natural-sciences/1000-tigers-killed-in-last-10-years-for-skins-parts.html Ask tree hugger why they are concerned with the illegal slaughter of 100 tigers a year worldwide, but not 100 babies being slaughtered every year in the US. 100 boys die every year in the US: http://www.icgi.org/2010/04/infant-circumcision-causes-100-deaths-each-year-in-us/ http://www.circinfo.org/USA_deaths.html http://www.examiner.com/article/new-study-estimates-neonatal-circumcision-death-rate-higher-than-suffocation-and-auto-accidents Much of the time this is just done because the hospital wants to harvest the material, sell it, and charge the parents for the operation. We get upset at a dentist pulling out all a persons teeth and billing medicaid, but how much are hospitals billing to CUT INTO NEW BORN BABIES and kill 100+ of them a year? Someone photoshop up a twitter-sharable poster, something like: ** 100 tigers being killed a year for their skins - unethical? mad? What about 100+ baby boys dying per year just in the US for their foreskins - a industry more profitable than tiger skins.** Also a hashtag or some shit These fucking cunts laughing about getting facials would be the first to cry foul if someone had an animal skin product like tiger. They probably "eat locally grown food" and shit but are paying money to an industry that coerces parents to normalize circumcision and I bet death rates are rising.