He is refering to bomb threat at GDC when Anita Sarkeesian got a "award". What I think of this reporting? It's shit. It's not filled with usual garbage paragraph about "Sarkeesian and Quinn and Wu got threatened!" but the writer downplays the significance of GamerGate, and ends with a passive aggressive paragraph.   The movement, which deliberately has no central leadership, is a backlash to what its supporters perceive as unprofessional or agenda-driven behavior in the gaming specialty press.  It is not a perception to say Sarkeesian is a liar when she claims to be a fan of games but goes on to lie in her videos about Hitman Absolution by asserting, with a authorititive tone, that the game encourages players to violate women in the game. Truth is as many gamers knew or was enlightened about, it's a lie. It wasn't the first lie and I am damn sure it won't be the last. Her behaviour is agenda-driven. That's factual.  So many of GamerGate supporters assertions are valid and not perceptions. But hey it's Polygon, one of the most agenda driven game sites out there.