Has it occurred to KiA and GG that the reason there aren't devs voicing support for them... ...is because they recognize many members of KiA/GG really don't support the right of developers to make the games they want to make? When you have members of KiA/GG openly declaring their hopes that certain developers and publishers go under solely because they make games those members don't like, and when those posts get upvoted, it becomes perfectly clear that KiA/GG don't support the right of video game creators to make games that they don't like. When people whine about how a gay man writing a gay character in a game or how a handful of different LGBT characters in a 100+-hour game with hundreds of characters means that the developers are "pandering to SJWs", they're showing that they really don't believe in the right of developers to tell the stories they want to tell. When KiA/GG launches into a hate circlejerk against a developer for something they've claimed when in reality it was inaccurate or sensational gaming journalism that misled KiA/GG, why would they listen to members when they say they want to protect developers from unethical journalism? And when other publishers and developers are circlejerked incessantly, even when they do the same things as games that are supposedly "pandering to SJWs", it shows that it really boils down to hypocritical fanboy mentality—our side good, their side Satan. So why would publishers and developers voice support for a movement that purports itself to fight for truthful gaming journalism and developer freedom, but has made perfectly clear they'll kick devs to the curbs and happily become as unethical as the journalists themselves as soon as the developer does something the circlejerk crowd within KiA/GG doesn't like?