I'm OK with you being neutral, but I felt compelled to talk about FemFreq:  When I first watched her videos  First of all, FemFreq is not just Anita, it's a group of people, a non-profit organization. And I used to have the same opinion about them, but not anymore:  However, fact of the matter is she's never said such games shouldn't exist  Bloomerg interview:  “Major publishers need to enforce a zero-tolerance policy of sexism and racism and homophobia,” says Sarkeesian.  Except "sexism", "racism" and "homophobia" are defined by FemFreq with as much stretch as possible. Remember that Hitman part in one of the video, when they completely misrepresent gameplay?  so much as simply noted existing "problems" within gaming and media as a whole  And constantly decrying how those "problems" damage society. Check out The Colbert's Report with her:  Sarkeesian: One of the problems with that is it actually reinforces the culture myth that women are sexual objects and sexual play things for male amusement and we're not. Sarkeesian: ...it's a bigger issue to talk about the industry as a whole and how it perpetuates these ideas of sexism and misogyny as opposed to just Grand Theft Auto for example.  We can't just repeatedly say, for example, that "certain literature damages society" and then act like we are surprised when people start banning it. It's nothing but "I'm not saying that Barry should be arrested, but I'm telling everyone that he is a thief (despite having no proof about it) - how could you say that I want him to be behind the bars?"  I see nothing wrong with her commentary  Their commentary presented by them as truth, not an opinion. Not backed up by any serious science research, because any links between violence, sexism and video games weren't found - but they still are on their "perpetuate"/"reinforce" train, just scream "we never said it caused" - a play of words, nothing more. Their style often is "state truism, then stretch it to the point where it's no longer works but we pretend it does anyway". There are more problems with FemFreq (avoiding criticism is a big one). I have at least two links in my bookmarks: one, two - there are more parts to this one specifically.  Also, if you check FemFreq twitter and the twitter of their writer McIntosh (radicalbytes), all illusions about those people fade away. I especially recommend the McIntosh ones, because there is a long-term suspicion that he has access to their official account. Remember to take sanity potions when you will read the man talking how fiction and reality are entwined. Also, they recently gone Jack-Thompson-but-without-lawsuits anti-violence route (those are not the only twits about DOOM from them): https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHgi2MJWgAALnbj.png:large