There is so much rhetoric/talking points in like most sjw shit that it is worthwhile to be aware of. Everything is phrased in the most easily digestible manner for people. Leading with their best foot forward, so to speak. The calls for discussion are part of that. They know that if they outright said "we want to lecture you" or "we want you to be lectured" about our views and how what you are doing clash with that, that people would push back. So they say "we want to start a discussion" but it's a rigged game because in some way they are going to be in control of it.  Evidence of this shit is the fact that most of these sjw talking heads will say this type of shit and then "lol my finger is getting tired blocking all you people" on twitter later or "comments disabled" on youtube etc. And there's those memes dedicated to shutting down the conversation, like sealioning and dogpiling. Dogpiling i can accept a little bit, but then that's also the nature of talking on a bigass forum. But sealioning, come the fuck on.  But that is kind of the tip of the iceberg in terms of rhetoric. Pretty much every anti gg article is just talking points without substance, shit to hammer specific talking points in and make certain associations and remove nuance and obfuscate details.