I pretty much agree. He has some good points but just lashes out at EVERYTHING. Like these two points:  +The ethics-only idiots who pigeonholed themselves because they can’t see the fucking forest for the tree. And of course, those are also the ones swallowed the “it is about ethics in gaming journalism” hook, line and sinker without an ounce of self-awareness +The SJW idiots who pigeonholed themselves because they are also a fucking bunch of blind mouses who think that somehow #gamergate is the key to defeat SJWs and things such as ProteinWorld is somehow the indirect result of #gamergate (can’t fucking figure out the logic for a moment there)  So what? Where's the middle ground you speak of? How much ethics, how much anti-sjw and how much chemical X do I need to make the perfect gamergater according to him? If I care only about ethics, then why do you give a shit? We're on the same fucking side. It's literally the same thing everyone who's ever ragequit always says "Why doesn't GG act like the way I want it to?" Revolutions are messy things, if you expect it to be 100% clean and orderly, then I have bad news for you.