I think it's a little more grey than that. Here's what's shown:  Political ideologues have control over journalism  Side one goes:  Political ideologues need to be stopped!  Side two goes:  No one ideology should be able to have this control over all journalism!  And both sides get to work fighting against the factor they think will fell the tree. But when they look at the other side, it looks like they're hacking at leaves.  Why are you attacking SJWs? It's giving them ammunition to say we're "antifeminist" and make us look like the bad guys to neutrals!     Why are not going after SJWs? They're the ones who are behind this corruption!  Both sides have their points, and both sides are going about it to fix what they think is the core of the matter. Which side (if either) is in the right remains to be seen. Personally, I'm of the mind that enforcing ethical practice would keep ideologues out of the industry, and making people conscious of the dangers a narrative spinner can present will mean more aware readers, and weaken the ability the SJWs could wield. Having been part of Tumblrinaction for a long time, I've seen what happens when people fight the SJW biofilm directly. Jack.