The thesis covers mostly the former with some mentions actual pederasty was acceptable in some historical eras, which, while true, implies the latter should also be acceptable, though that is merely speculation for the most part. Her tweets, on the other hand, lean in favor of the latter, and alarm bells when off when she made that "child sexual agency" remark (that's a classic pedophile normalization argument), and it further got disturbing when she complained about an actual possessor of child pornography (as in, illegal under US law) having the book thrown at them.