Part 2, since Voat apparently didn't like me posting the full post:  Quality filter sounds rad, but let’s elaborate on what that means, and allow users to specify a sensitivity level. Here’s where things can get fun. Accounts should be scored on a variety of factors. It’s about quality of interactions. Do they often tweet at accounts that don’t tweet back? Do the majority of accounts they tweet at immediately block them? What’s their follower/following count look like? How old is their account? Did they verify their email address? Do they have a unique phone number? How many tweets have they made? Are they using the default egg profile pic? Getting even more granular, do the accounts that I follow ever interact with this user in a positive way? Do people that I follow also follow this account? Do they block this account?  Sounds like a load of BS that could be easily manipulated to me. If Twitter tried to implement such a thing, you KNOW they'd fudge it to favor the "right" people.   Allow me to see only the tweets that have been filtered.  The reasoning here is actually semi-reasonable, although at the end of the day, I can't help but feel that the people who block en masse would have issues differentiating between "actionable tweets" and disagreement.  Have a better reporting system. I should be able to view a list of all the tweets I’ve reported, along with any actions that were taken. Emails should include a link to the tweet. If you report a large number of abusive tweets, there’s no way to know which tweet is for what email. Twitter likes to ask for more information. I have no fucking clue what to tell them, because they refuse to tell me what tweet that report is even about. Even after I ask.  Again, fair enough.  If I have a protected account, people not following me can’t see my tweets. That’s great. However, they can search for my name and see tweets that other people are directing towards me.  I'm not seeing the huge issue here, honestly. This feels like more echo-chambery stuff.  Fix the API rate limits. Some of these limits?—?such as getting a list of followers for an account?—?are ridiculously low. If a user has a high number of followers and you try to pull down that list, you don’t actually have any guarantee of getting the complete follower list because you have to pause and wait for the rate limit to be refreshed.  Fair complaint.  Create an API call so I can view the users that have favorited/liked a Tweet.  Also fair.  Create an API call so I can view all the users that have RTed a tweet.  And once again, fair.  Allow me to disable Twitter moments.  I'm not familiar with Twitter moments, so no comment.  Allow users to toggle displaying tweets from blocked users in search results.  I'm not sure whether or not blocked users are shown in search results by default. If so, that's silly, and should be changed. If not, then I don't see the problem. If you blocked them, wouldn't it basically be implied that you didn't want to see anything from them in general?  If a protected user tweets at a user that isn’t following them, that user should be able to see this tweet. I shouldn’t have to follow a protected user for them to be able to interact with me.  Fair.  Allow users to only see notifications from people that are following them.  So, echo-chamber.  When I select Mentions instead of Notifications on the notifications page in Twitter web, it should remember this option.  Also fair. tl;dr version: API stuff is reasonable, as is removing IP bans. The privacy stuff ranges from reasonable to obviously serving little more purpose than to enforce Twitter echo-chambers. Very hit and miss, and not as horrible as I would have guessed overall.