Sure. I kind of see their point in that an organisation censoring some forms of speech isn't necessarily automatically troubling, like KiA banning spam or off topic shitposts for example, but when it comes to a site setting itself up as "the front page of the internet" then they really do have a duty not to try to use it as their personal soapbox. Also, I think the distinction between private and public censorship is a little immature, any organisation powerful enough to veto expression of an idea needs to be watched.