While I personally agree (as I imagine many people who come here do) I don't think that argument would be effective at getting the point across, the idea of censorship with these sorta topics has become used to such an extent that you could perhaps argue that censorship has become a buzzword, while it draws a lot of eyes almost everyone already has their mind made up due to the thousands of times it has been brought up, those who would agree that this is censorship and shouldn't be done at that basis likely recognize that immediately and thus oppose it, while those who disagree dismiss the position outright. Perhaps it's just me, but it comes off to me as if arguing to not walk around in the grass in the morning because you'll get your shoes wet, something that everyone who knows about morning dew is fully aware of the core principle and saying it won't have much of an impact because either they already know and will try to avoid it, or they don't care because their shoes won't get THAT wet. It being corporate censorship SHOULD be enough of an argument, but I'd argue that saying, "This is censorship therefor bad!" results in just preaching to the choir, but that's just my opinion.