I agree. However, that's knowing what we know, which most people do not. Given the strong overlap between comics and gamers, I think there's a very good chance DC Comics actually thought that these sort of social justice extremists actually spoke for a decent amount of people. The reason for that is, in my opinion, exactly what you're saying here. We look on and snicker at these clowns without taking the time to call them out since it's obvious that they really don't speak for anybody except their own tiny little clique of people who take pride in becoming offended at ever more inane things. But if nobody takes the time to call them out then it's not necessarily obvious to outsiders that they are so irrelevant. I mean imagine for example that if for their average announcement DC usually receive personal feedback from 10 or 15 users. For this announcement they received their usual 10 or 15 users, and then several hundred brigading social justice extremists on top of them who came out screaming "Help help! I'm being offended!" Well if you just look at the feedback it's going to be about 97% offended by the cover. If we, the people who are not offended, don't actually start taking the time to say as much - how are people who these things are not "obvious" to ever going to come to reasonably well informed conclusions?