The Limits of Negotiation in bringing Russo-Ukraine War to an End

Abstract

The urgency of this research stems from the prolonged and unresolved nature of the ongoing Russo-Ukraine conflict, necessitating an investigation into why previous diplomatic efforts have failed. To address this inquiry, an inspection of the limits of negotiation in bringing Russo-Ukraine war to an end was carried out. Drawing on theoretical frameworks such as the Integrative Negotiation Theory, this study employs a qualitative approach and a case study design. Data analysis is conducted through thematic analysis. The findings reveal a myriad of factors impeding negotiation in bringing Russo-Ukraine war to an end. These are; power dynamics, conflicting interests of actors, interest of actors, the contribution of NATO and USA, structural bias, inadequate leverage and polarized mediation format; historical, cultural and political differences.  From these findings and conclusions, the study recommends that actors involved in this conflict should foster open communication, considering cultural and economic factors in other to facilitate negotiation for peace agreement to be signed. The study also recommends that negotiators, and all stakeholders involved in this conflict should ensure impartiality in every diplomatic engagement, and avoid isolation of actors at war in every engagement so as to draw a line in understanding their interest and encourage them reach an agreement for peace to thrive, cherished and sustained in this region.

Keywords: Limits of Negotiation, Diplomacy, Integrative Negotiation Theory, Power, Peace agreement, Russo-Ukraine War.