Published June 30, 2024 | Version v2
Dataset Open

The Metadata of "The punishment intensity for research misconduct and its related factors: An exploratory study on hospitals in Mainland China"

Description

This is the metadata of the research article The punishment intensity for research misconduct and its related factors: An exploratory study on hospitals in Mainland China.

 

Abstract (English)

Previous studies (Long et al. 2023) have found that factors such as gender and academic positions do not influence the severity of administrative actions taken by institutions. However, this study provides partly inconsistent evidence. It focuses on incidents of research misconduct in hospitals across Mainland China and explores factors related to punishment using a large cross-sectional dataset (N = 815). Regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between authorship order and the punishment intensity (p < 0.05). Under specific conditions, there was a significant correlation between professional title (senior) and punishment intensity (p = 0.001), and an interaction between professional title and types of research misbehavior. Further analysis of simple effects showed that, in cases of fabrication and falsification, and combinations of multiple research misbehavior, researchers with senior titles received significantly lighter punishments compared to those with junior, intermediate, and associate senior titles (p < 0.05). The study unveils potential accountability patterns (collective accountability and tiered punishment) that may be adopted by hospitals in Mainland China, as well as the challenges faced in ensuring fairness, emphasizing the importance of independent investigative bodies for incidents of research misconduct, and advocating for fairness as a priority in governance of research misconduct.

Files

Files (42.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1b8b2a03d7c85ec44ec17c8c9667d791
42.2 kB Download