There is a newer version of this record available.

Preprint Open Access

What is the resource footprint of a computer science department? Place, People and Pedagogy

Mian, I.S; Twisleton, D.; Timm, D.

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="" xmlns="" xsi:schemaLocation="">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.884492</identifier>
      <creatorName>Mian, I.S</creatorName>
      <affiliation>University College London</affiliation>
      <creatorName>Twisleton, D.</creatorName>
      <affiliation>University College London</affiliation>
      <creatorName>Timm, D.</creatorName>
      <affiliation>University College London</affiliation>
    <title>What is the resource footprint of a computer science department? Place, People and Pedagogy</title>
    <date dateType="Issued">2017-09-04</date>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Preprint</resourceType>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url"></alternateIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.884491</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf"></relatedIdentifier>
    <rights rightsURI="">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;Our goal is formulating policies and developing guidelines that create a more resilient and healthier Department of Computer Science at University College London: a living laboratory for teaching and learning about resource constrained computing, computation and communication. Here, we outline a roadmap and propose high-level principles to aid this effort. We focus on how, when and where resources – energy, (raw) materials including water, space and time – are consumed by the building (place), its occupants (people) and their activities (pedagogy). We describe practical difficulties associated with identifying, acquiring and analysing relevant data. Beyond technical challenges, we find a need to rematerialise the information society: to reveal the full costs of Internet and Communication Technology and electrical and electronic equipment by, for example, undertaking life cycle analyses of end-user paraphernalia such as smartphones and demonstrating the corporeal nature of seemingly immaterial entities such as the “cloud.” We outline routes to realising three interlinked aims: cap the power consumed and greenhouse gas emitted per person per year, become a zero waste institution, and rejuvenate and (re)integrate the natural and built environments. We propose two maxims to aid policy making and guideline preparation: resource use needs to be minimised and minimal (reduced in relative as well as absolute terms), and responsible research and innovation encompasses decreasing the Department’s resource footprint and considering non-technological solutions to complex real-world problems. Keywords: resource footprint; energy; water; internet and communication technology; electrical and electronic equipment; e-waste; resource constrained computing, computation and communication; rematerialise the information society. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
All versions This version
Views 208140
Downloads 24999
Data volume 90.4 MB33.4 MB
Unique views 182131
Unique downloads 22690


Cite as