Journal article Open Access
Haspelmath, Martin
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"> <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">language universals, linguistic typology, Universal Grammar, functional explanation</subfield> </datafield> <controlfield tag="005">20200120162503.0</controlfield> <controlfield tag="001">831412</controlfield> <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "> <subfield code="s">248437</subfield> <subfield code="z">md5:74ea692c15b628dae921218781154196</subfield> <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/831412/files/Haspelmath2004.pdf</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="l">open</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="c">2004-07-18</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O"> <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield> <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:831412</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4"> <subfield code="c">554-579</subfield> <subfield code="n">3</subfield> <subfield code="p">Studies in Language</subfield> <subfield code="v">28</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="u">Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology</subfield> <subfield code="a">Haspelmath, Martin</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description?</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield> <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7"> <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield> <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a"><p>I argue that the following two assumptions are incorrect: (i) The properties of the innate Universal Grammar can be discovered by comparing language systems, and (ii) functional explanation of language structure presupposes a &ldquo;correct&rdquo;, i.e. cognitively realistic, description. Thus, there are two ways in which linguistic explanation does not presuppose linguistic description.</p> <p>The generative program of building cross-linguistic generalizations into the hypothesized Universal Grammar cannot succeed because the actually observed generalizations are typically one-way implications or implicational scales, and because they typically have exceptions. The cross-linguistic generalizations are much more plausibly due to functional factors.</p> <p>I distinguish sharply between &ldquo;phenomenological description&rdquo; (which makes no claims about mental reality) and &ldquo;cognitively realistic descrip- tion&rdquo;, and I show that for functional explanation, phenomenological description is sufficient.</p></subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">10.1075/sl.28.3.06has</subfield> <subfield code="2">doi</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">publication</subfield> <subfield code="b">article</subfield> </datafield> </record>
Views | 318 |
Downloads | 260 |
Data volume | 64.6 MB |
Unique views | 303 |
Unique downloads | 251 |