Journal article Open Access

Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types

Haspelmath, Martin


Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Haspelmath, Martin</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2005-07-18</dc:date>
  <dc:description>This paper discusses indirective, secundative and neutral alignment in ditransitive constructions, both with respect to argument flagging (adpositional or case marking) and argument indexing ("agreement"), based on a sample of 100 languages. The parallels with monotransitive alignment and accusative and ergative patterns are also explored.</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/831387</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.280</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>oai:zenodo.org:831387</dc:identifier>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Linguistic Discovery 3(1) 1-21</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>argument alignment, ditransitivity, case marking</dc:subject>
  <dc:title>Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types</dc:title>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:type>publication-article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
288
139
views
downloads
Views 288
Downloads 139
Data volume 108.0 MB
Unique views 274
Unique downloads 126

Share

Cite as