Service Incident: New DOI registrations are working again. Re-registration of failed DOI registrations (~500) are still affected by the service incident at DataCite (our DOI registration agency).
Published March 31, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Kim są polscy humaniści cyfrowi?

  • 1. Institute of Literary Research, Polish Academy of Sciences

Description

Who Are Polish Digital Humanists?
To sketch a profile of Polish digital humanists, Maryl draws on the results of a European
survey on scholarly practices and digital needs in the arts and humanities. This survey
was conducted in 2014 and 2015 by the Digital Methods and Practices Observatory
(DiMPO), a working group of the European consortium DARIAH. The results are analysed
in the context of the concept of waves of digital humanities: the first wave is simple
digitization, the second entails the use of advanced digital methods, the third harnesses
critical reflection on the epistemology of digital instruments. Maryl proposes to classify
digital humanists by placing them on different points on a spectrum, from those using
basic tools to the most advanced users.

Notes

Artykuł napisany w ramach prac Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO), Grupy Roboczej DARIAH-ERIC. Dziękuję Nephelie Chatzidiakou (Digital Curation Unit, IMIS-Athena Research Centre) za wstępne przetworzenie wyników.

Files

Maryl 2017 Kim są polscy humaniści cyfrowi.pdf

Files (628.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:be50cbe13edd2179ca517ec06c5368e5
628.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
0867-0633 (ISSN)
Is supplemented by
10.5281/zenodo.259522 (DOI)
References
10.5281/zenodo.437438 (DOI)

References

  • Werla, M., Maryl, M., oprac. (2014) Humanistyczne projekty cyfrowe w Polsce (raport z ankiety), Poznań-Warszawa. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.437438
  • Maryl, M. (2014) "F5: odświeżanie filologii Teksty Drugie 2 (146): 9-20.
  • Anne Burdick, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todo Presner, Jeffrey Schnapp (2012) Digital_Humanities, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • Todd Presner, Digital Humanities 2.0: A Report on Knowledge. OpenStax CNX. 8 cze 2010 http://cnx.org/contents/2742bb37-7c47-4bee-bb34-0f35bda760f3@6
  • Svensson, Patrik (2010) "The Landscape of Digital Humanities" Digital Humanities Quarterly 4.1 http://digitalhumanities.org:8081/dhq/vol/4/1/000080/000080.html
  • Tara McPherson, "Introduction: Media Studies and the Digital Humanities". Cinema Journal 48:2 (Winter 2009), 119-120.
  • Cathy N. Davidson "Humanities 2.0: Promise, Perils, Predictions". Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (PMLA) 123:3 (2008).
  • David M. Berry, The Computational Turn: Thinking About the Digital Humanities, Culture Machine, vol. 12 (2011), https://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/view/440/470.
  • Richard Rogers, Digital methods. MIT press, 2013.
  • Alan Liu, Where Is Cultural Criticism in the Digital Humanities, W Debates in the Digital Humanities, red. Matthew K. Gold, University of Minnesota Press, 2012.
  • Daniel Allington, Sarah Brouillette, David Golumbia, Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities, Los Angeles Review of Books, May 1 2016 - https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/neoliberal-tools-archives-political-history-digital-humanities/#!
  • Martyna Barczuk i Jerzy Tyszkiewicz "Magik - nowoczesne narzędzie dla badacza literatury", Teksty Drugie, 2007 nr 3 (105), s. 224-228.
  • Costis Dallas, Nephelie Chatzidiakou, Maciej Maryl, Agiatis Bernardou, Claire Clivaz, John Cunningham, Meredith Dabek, i in. "Europejski sondaż praktyk cyfrowych w humanistyce i naukach o sztuce. Najważniejsze wyniki (wersja Polska)", przeł. Maciej Maryl, 30 Października 2016. doi:10.5281/zenodo.259522.