Report Open Access

A Landscape Study on Open Access and Monographs: Policies, Funding and Publishing in Eight European Countries

Ferwerda, Eelco; Pinter, Frances; Stern, Niels

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="" xmlns="" xsi:schemaLocation="">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.815932</identifier>
      <creatorName>Ferwerda, Eelco</creatorName>
      <creatorName>Pinter, Frances</creatorName>
      <creatorName>Stern, Niels</creatorName>
    <title>A Landscape Study on Open Access and Monographs: Policies, Funding and Publishing in Eight European Countries</title>
    <subject>Knowledge Exchange, KE, OA, Open Access, Monographs, Publishing, Policy, Funding</subject>
    <date dateType="Issued">2017-08-01</date>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Report</resourceType>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url"></alternateIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.815931</relatedIdentifier>
    <rights rightsURI="">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;Knowledge Exchange is continuously active in promoting Open Access by bringing together Open Access experts from all six KE partner countries. The study was initiated by Knowledge Exchange and financed by Knowledge Exchange (, FWF (, CRIStin ( and Couperin (, and together with the skilled expertise of Eelco Ferwerda, Frances Pinter and Niels Stern, we can now publish the biggest landscape study on the conditions and potentials for Open Access books yet. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The report builds on i.a. 73 in-depth conversations, conducted across eight different countries (Denmark, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom, France, Norway and Austria) to understand current developments among three stakeholder groups: publishers, funders and libraries. The importance of author attitudes, scholarly reward and incentive systems is also raised throughout the study by numerous interviewees.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The&lt;em&gt; study shows that although the main OA policies do not include monographs, conversations about OA and monographs are surfacing and are expected to be accelerating over the next few years.&lt;/em&gt; The general explanation for monographs not being included in policies is the global focus on journal publishing and the perception that monographs are more complex to deal with than journals. Some also point to a lack of demand yet from authors.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In general, OA book publishers will comply with gold OA policies from funders and institutions. This is not the case for green OA. &lt;/em&gt;It appears that the current self archiving policies from publishers for books are largely restricted to book chapters.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The report also points towards the fact that funding schemes for books are lagging behind schemes for articles and their availability to fund the publishing process is somewhat ad hoc across the countries we’ve surveyed. Nevertheless the authors are ‘cautiously optimistic’ about the prospects for OA and monographs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The report creates an overview of the OA monographs policies, funding streams and publishing models for all eight countries for the first time.&lt;/p&gt;

All versions This version
Views 2,7062,706
Downloads 1,1371,137
Data volume 5.4 GB5.4 GB
Unique views 2,5922,592
Unique downloads 975975


Cite as