Journal article Open Access

Against markedness (and what to replace it with)

Haspelmath, Martin


JSON-LD (schema.org) Export

{
  "description": "<p>This paper first provides an overview of the various senses in which the terms \"marked\" and \"unmarked\" have been used in 20th-century linguistics. Twelve different senses, related only by family resemblances, are distinguished, grouped into four larger classes: markedness as complexity, as difficulty, as abnormality, and as a multidimensional correlation. In the second part of the paper, it is argued that the term \"markedness\" is superfluous, because some of the concepts that it denotes are not helpful, and others are better expressed by more straightforward, less ambiguous terms. In a great many cases, frequency asymmetries can be shown to lead to a direct explanation of observed structural asymmetries, and in other cases additional concrete, substantive factors such as phonetic difficulty and pragmatic inferences can replace reference to an abstract notion of \"markedness\".</p>", 
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode", 
  "creator": [
    {
      "affiliation": "Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Haspelmath, Martin"
    }
  ], 
  "headline": "Against markedness (and what to replace it with)", 
  "image": "https://zenodo.org/static/img/logos/zenodo-gradient-round.svg", 
  "datePublished": "2006-01-01", 
  "url": "https://zenodo.org/record/815500", 
  "keywords": [
    "markedness, frequency, linguistic complexity"
  ], 
  "@context": "https://schema.org/", 
  "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226705003683", 
  "@id": "https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226705003683", 
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
  "name": "Against markedness (and what to replace it with)"
}
408
315
views
downloads
Views 408
Downloads 315
Data volume 77.5 MB
Unique views 375
Unique downloads 292

Share

Cite as