Book section Open Access

Framework-free grammatical theory

Haspelmath, Martin


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">grammar, theoretical linguistics, linguistic framework, generative grammar</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20170908080318.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">814947</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">372104</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:bde881130508dabd2bdabd34ba550ae8</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/814947/files/Frameworkfree.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2010-01-01</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:814947</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Haspelmath, Martin</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Framework-free grammatical theory</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;Framework-free grammatical description/analysis and explanation is argued here to be superior to framework-bound analysis because all languages have different catgeories, and languages should be described in their own terms. Frameworks represent aprioristic assumptions that are likely to lead to a distorted description of a language. I argue against restrictive theoretical frameworks of the generative type, against frameworks of functional approaches such as Functional Grammar and Role and Reference Grammar, and against Basic Linguistic Theory.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isPartOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.814946</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g">341-365</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, edited by Bernd Heine &amp; Heiko Narrog</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.814947</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">section</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>

Share

Cite as