Journal article Open Access

What Ottoman nationality was and was not

Hanley, Will

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="">
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ottoman international law</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nationality</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Citizenship</subfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120152707.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">803340</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">503219</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:7993c87fdcd9abc6470e5bd4557cc1c1</subfield>
    <subfield code="u"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2016-11-01</subfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="o"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">277-98</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">2</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">Journal of Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">3</subfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Florida State University</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1832-6805</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Hanley, Will</subfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">What Ottoman nationality was and was not</subfield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u"></subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International</subfield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;Will Hanley&amp;rsquo;s analysis of the 1909 revision of the 1869 Ottoman Nationality Law takes up one of the central themes that occupied the Office of Legal Counsel: the slippery relationship between the legal definitions of nationality, subjecthood, and citizenship. As Hanley argues, recent scholarship on the 1869 Ottoman Nationality Law has consistently sought its origins in the Tanzimat edicts of 1839 and 1856. He contends that interest in the question of Ottoman citizenship has led to a misreading of the word tebaa, and that the Tanzimat edicts referred to subjects, not citizens. This &amp;ldquo;citizenship misreading&amp;rdquo; has obscured the 1869 law&amp;rsquo;s original connection to the Capitulations and an 1863 decree designed to restrict the proliferation of foreign prot&amp;eacute;g&amp;eacute;s. This law presented foreign prot&amp;eacute;g&amp;eacute;s with a choice: They could either naturalize as foreign subjects or submit to Ottoman territorial jurisdiction to maintain their status as subjects of the sultan. The unintended consequence was that many of them chose to naturalize with a foreign state, while remaining in residence and continuing to benefit from the rights of Ottomans. Thus, while the number of prot&amp;eacute;g&amp;eacute;s dropped, the number of naturalized foreigners increased precipitously. This development prompted firmer legislation, which took the shape of the 1869 law. Set against this backdrop, Hanley puts forward the provocative conclusion that neither the 1863 prot&amp;eacute;g&amp;eacute; legislation nor the 1869 nationality law were intended to form a citizenry. Rather, he argues that both were primarily aimed at safeguarding the empire&amp;rsquo;s sovereignty over its residents against the threat of European extraterritoriality. Hanley then analyzes a 1909 proposal for the revision of the 1869 law in order to chart the evolution of Ottoman readings of nationality and naturalization from the Tanzimat through the CUP period. While the 1909 proposal was never enacted, Hanley considers what it reveals about ongoing struggles to implement the 1869 law, as well as two specific issues that it failed to fully address: denaturalization and marriage to&lt;br&gt;
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.2979/jottturstuass.3.2.05</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
Views 437
Downloads 344
Data volume 173.1 MB
Unique views 420
Unique downloads 322


Cite as