Journal article Open Access

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases

Ale Ebrahim, Nader


Citation Style Language JSON Export

{
  "publisher": "Zenodo", 
  "DOI": "10.5281/zenodo.7713", 
  "container_title": "Asian Social Science", 
  "title": "A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases", 
  "issued": {
    "date-parts": [
      [
        2014, 
        6, 
        27
      ]
    ]
  }, 
  "abstract": "<p><br />\nNowadays, the world&rsquo;s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields. In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems that two most extensive databases are Web of Science and Scopus. Besides searching the literature, these two databases used to rank journals in terms of their productivity and the total citations received to indicate the journals impact, prestige or influence. This article attempts to provide a comprehensive comparison of these databases to answer frequent questions which researchers ask, such as: How Web of Science and Scopus are different? In which aspects these two databases are similar? Or, if the researchers are forced to choose one of them, which one should they prefer? For answering these questions, these two databases will be compared based on their qualitative and quantitative characteristics.</p>", 
  "author": [
    {
      "given": "Nader", 
      "family": "Ale Ebrahim"
    }
  ], 
  "page": "18-26", 
  "volume": "9", 
  "note": "Cite as:\nAghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26. doi: 10.5539/ass.v9n5p18", 
  "type": "article-journal", 
  "issue": "5", 
  "id": "7713"
}
57
38
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 5757
Downloads 3838
Data volume 12.5 MB12.5 MB
Unique views 5050
Unique downloads 3838

Share

Cite as