December 28, 2022 Book section Open Access

Dan Savatovsky

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7489109</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Dan Savatovsky</creatorName>
      <affiliation>Université Sorbonne Nouvelle and Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Laboratoire d'histoire des théories linguistiques, F-75013 Paris, France</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Wüster/Carnap:  Vienna School/Vienna Circle. Terminology between Linguistics and Philosophy of Language</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2022</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Wüster (Eugen)</subject>
    <subject>Vienna Circle</subject>
    <subject>Carnap</subject>
    <subject>language of science</subject>
    <subject>principle of parsimony</subject>
    <subject>nominalism</subject>
    <subject>technical object</subject>
    <subject>material culture</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2022-12-28</date>
  </dates>
  <language>en</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="BookChapter"/>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/7489109</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.7489108</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/hel_livres</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;R&amp;eacute;sum&amp;eacute;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Cette contribution vise &amp;agrave; mettre en &amp;eacute;vidence certaines des affinit&amp;eacute;s th&amp;eacute;oriques entre la terminologie w&amp;uuml;st&amp;eacute;rienne et la philosophie du langage du positivisme logique. Apr&amp;egrave;s avoir succinctement indiqu&amp;eacute; les raisons pour lesquelles la plupart des linguistes du vingti&amp;egrave;me si&amp;egrave;cle ont &amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; r&amp;eacute;ticents &amp;agrave; &amp;laquo; recevoir &amp;raquo; la th&amp;eacute;orie de W&amp;uuml;ster en raison de ses pr&amp;eacute;suppos&amp;eacute;s philosophiques, on s&amp;rsquo;efforce d&amp;rsquo;&amp;eacute;tudier quelques-uns de ces pr&amp;eacute;suppos&amp;eacute;s en mettant en regard les conceptions de l&amp;rsquo;&amp;eacute;cole de Vienne de terminologie et celles du Cercle de Vienne (de Carnap, principalement). On examine tour &amp;agrave; tour le recours au principe de parcimonie, la question du nominalisme et le probl&amp;egrave;me de la d&amp;eacute;finition r&amp;eacute;elle. On termine sur les conditions d&amp;rsquo;une culture mat&amp;eacute;rielle, telles qu&amp;rsquo;elles se d&amp;eacute;gagent d&amp;rsquo;une terminologie/ontologie des objets techniques &amp;agrave; la W&amp;uuml;ster.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Mots-cl&amp;eacute;s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
W&amp;uuml;ster (Eugen), Cercle de Vienne, Carnap, langage de la science, principe de parcimonie, nominalisme, objet technique, culture mat&amp;eacute;rielle&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This paper aims at highlighting some of the theoretical affinities between W&amp;uuml;sterian terminology and the philosophy of language of logical positivism. After briefly indicating the reasons why most twentieth-century linguists were reluctant to &amp;lsquo;receive&amp;rsquo; W&amp;uuml;ster&amp;rsquo;s theory because of its philosophical presuppositions, we try to study some of these presuppositions by comparing the conceptions of the Vienna School of terminology with those of the Vienna Circle (Carnap&amp;rsquo;s, mainly). We examine in turn the recourse to the principle of parsimony, the question of nominalism and the problem of real definition. We conclude with the conditions of a material culture, as they emerge from a W&amp;uuml;ster-like terminology/ontology of technical objects.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Keywords&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
W&amp;uuml;ster (Eugen), Vienna Circle, Carnap, language of science, principle of parsimony, nominalism, technical object, material culture&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>