Report Open Access
Mats Hansson; Solveig Fenet-Chantereau
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"> <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7266806</identifier> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Mats Hansson</creatorName> <affiliation>Uppsala University</affiliation> </creator> <creator> <creatorName>Solveig Fenet-Chantereau</creatorName> <affiliation>Uppsala University</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title>SIENNA D2.7: Proposal for an ethical framework for the assessment of genomics technologies and for research in genetics and genomics</title> </titles> <publisher>Zenodo</publisher> <publicationYear>2020</publicationYear> <subjects> <subject>Genetics</subject> <subject>genomics</subject> <subject>research</subject> <subject>framework</subject> <subject>ethics self-assessment</subject> <subject>ethics review</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType="Issued">2020-05-01</date> </dates> <language>en</language> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Report"/> <alternateIdentifiers> <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/7266806</alternateIdentifier> </alternateIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.7266805</relatedIdentifier> </relatedIdentifiers> <version>V1.3</version> <rightsList> <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights> <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights> </rightsList> <descriptions> <description descriptionType="Abstract"><p>This SIENNA report 2.7 provides an assessment and integration of key results from SIENNA Reports 2.2, 2,3, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6. A basic learning from these reports is that one has to acknowledge a need to balance different interests against each other, i.e. important human rights for the protection of basic freedoms against human rights related to the potential of benefiting from scientific advances.&nbsp;The report emphasize that ethics&nbsp;must&nbsp;be an integral&nbsp;reflective&nbsp;part of the conduct of science as well as of clinical practice. A principled approach for such a reflective work is suggested to be part of a framework for ethical assessment both of genomic technologies at large and for research in genetics and genomics. The framework proposes a set of nine ethical principles and questions for ethical self- assessment in genetic and genomics research. For emerging technologies in human genetics and genomics where there is yet not sufficient backing in basic science or animal experiments but a possibility for clinical application within a context of compassionate treatment a special governance structure is suggested with an international organization setting up an institute of a&nbsp;Patient Ombudsman.</p> <p>*This report is based partly on the SIENNA results reported in 2.2 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6, thus with due acknowledgement to contributors to these reports</p></description> </descriptions> <fundingReferences> <fundingReference> <funderName>European Commission</funderName> <funderIdentifier funderIdentifierType="Crossref Funder ID">10.13039/100010661</funderIdentifier> <awardNumber awardURI="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/741716/">741716</awardNumber> <awardTitle>Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact</awardTitle> </fundingReference> </fundingReferences> </resource>
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 121 | 121 |
Downloads | 57 | 57 |
Data volume | 60.8 MB | 60.8 MB |
Unique views | 111 | 111 |
Unique downloads | 54 | 54 |